TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @iFightForKids

Saved - May 17, 2025 at 1:37 AM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

On May 15th, we busted a pedophiIe elementary school teacher that admitted to having over 4,000 child p*rn images 😳 Since the media won’t tell you, here’s how it all went down… 🧵 https://t.co/jCwEC7ug1b

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 has a USB drive with 90-95 Gigabytes of data, possibly containing around 4,000 videos of varying quality. The data is organized into "videos" and "photos" folders. There is no passcode on the drive. Speaker 1 states his wife is an idiot with technology and wouldn't know about the drive's contents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Or my I don't have my computer, but I have the USB drive. And I got a do have a Mac? Yep. I have an adapter. Speaker 1: Fuck yes. Cool. Cool. Let's make sure we're off the WiFi and everything. Yep. Speaker 2: How many how many Giga GigaBytes do we Speaker 0: have? 90. I think maybe a little more, 95. You didn't give me the whole collection? That's that's odd. Uh-oh. How many so how many videos do you think that is? It's like 4,000. Fuck. Yeah. Yeah. It's like varying quality. It's a mess. I just put one in, like, videos folder and photos folder. That's it. Got it. Got it. Is there a passcode on there? No. There's not a passcode. But Oh. It'll be like Speaker 1: My wife's an idiot with technology. Speaker 2: She won't even know anyway. Yeah. But, yeah, let me Speaker 0: I'll see who drove.
Saved - April 25, 2025 at 12:43 AM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Nathaniel Bailey of martinsville, Indiana admitted to molesting 6 children and possessing and trading child porn. MORGAN COUNTY INDIANA said they are not doing ANYTHING and to just go give Indiana state police a “tip” STEVEN SONNEGA is the prosecutor here. https://t.co/2DwWYSvlug

Video Transcript AI Summary
After an arrest in Muskegon Heights, Michigan related to child pornography, the speaker traveled to Morgan County, Indiana, where a suspect admitted to possessing child pornography depicting babies and toddlers and to molesting a one-year-old. Neighbors allege the suspect shocked and stared at children, and has molested six kids. Despite this, Morgan County Sheriff's deputies, allegedly on the prosecutor Steven Sinega's instructions, refused to seize the suspect's phone and instead advised filing a tip with the Indiana State Police. The speaker accuses Sinega of dereliction of duty and enabling a "baby raper" to remain free in the community. The speaker urges people to contact Morgan County, Indiana, to express their concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. What's up guys? So despite yesterday of getting this guy's butt buddy arrested for tons of child pornography, we come five hours to Indiana to Morgan County just to be told by the Morgan County Sheriff's deputies that the prosecutor is telling us to make a tip with the Indiana State Police rather than just take his fucking phone when he admitted in front of them that he has child pornography, seeing his babies and toddlers, and he molested a fucking one year old. This guy, as we've heard from the neighbors here, has been this guy shocks kids in the neighborhoods, has babysat those kids, has just stared and stared at kids all the neighborhood. Six six fucking kids molested, and Morgan County fucking sheriffs are letting this guy go because because we just need to submit a tip with the Indiana State Police even though Muskegon Heights, Michigan has messages of this dude too sending child pornography. It it it's it's a dereliction of duty. Who's the prosecutor in fucking Morgan County, Indiana? Just my name. Baby, be a perk. Who is this person? Yes. Yes. She's Steve Steve prosecutor Steven Seneca. So not Steven Sinega. Yes. Steven Sinega is letting is letting this monster walk free tonight. He's the one who made the call himself. You know Morgan County, IN please let them know how y'all feel about this. It's evil. They're just letting you're letting a literal baby raper walk in their community tonight. Sick.
Saved - February 15, 2025 at 11:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just exposed federal employee Ross Yeager, who leads OSHA in five states, for targeting a 13-year-old. Also, I’ll be posting a video early for my X subscribers. If you want to support our work, check out our merch!

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Just busted federal employee, Ross Yeager, going after a 13-year-old. He is the head of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (@OSHA_DOL) in 5 states.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Okay, so there was no penis sighting by Sorgen, no. I understand that whatever happened has already happened, but now it's a police thing. We're just having a conversation, and basically, you're not going to talk to a 13-year-old again, right? This is the last time you're doing it, everything's deactivated and done. You're not sending a penis picture to one again, are you? No. And there will be no mishaps like before. No more mishaps with my niece, right? Sorgen? Okay, they don't live here anymore. You're not going to rub her butt again? She's not going to brush her penis again? No. Okay. That's what's going on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: K. So did did Sorgen see your penis at all? No. No. Okay. So, no, no, no. And I and I understand dude, I I fully understand, but obviously in this case, whatever happened has already happened. Alright? It's about Well, now it's a police foe. Yeah. Did your, your wife. How's it going, sir? We're just having a conversation here with, Ross. He's he's the head of, OSHA over five states for the federal government. Basically, you're not gonna talk to a 13 year old again, are you? No. Last time doing it? Yeah. Everything's deactivated and done. Okay. You're not gonna send a penis picture to one again, are you? No. Okay. And there's gonna be no mishaps that happened like My wife called. There's there's gonna be you're not gonna send a penis picture to one again, are you? Last time doing something like this? Okay. No. Alright. No more mishaps with, your niece, right? With Sorgen? Okay. They don't live here anymore. Okay. You're not gonna rub her butt again? She's not gonna brush her penis again? No. No. Okay. Well, yeah. This is, this is kinda what's going on.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Video will be up early for X subscribers Support our work, grab some merch: http://www.predatorpoachers.com

Predator Poachers Predator Poachers predatorpoachers.com
Saved - December 14, 2024 at 5:00 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Message to BIuesky… https://t.co/t0useDpGgp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Blue Sky, on November 21st, we identified five pedophiles on your platform, including two registered sex offenders. This highlights a serious issue that needs addressing. Despite previous viral posts criticizing you, our goal is to collaborate to reduce the presence of pedophiles online. I urge the CEO or moderators of Blue Sky to contact me at ppoacher3@gmail.com. We request immunity for our decoy accounts to continue our efforts in identifying and reporting these individuals. Please reach out to me as soon as possible. To everyone watching on X, please tag Blue Sky and share this video.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, blue sky. Look. November 21st, we've caught 5 pedos off your platform. 2 of them being sex offenders. There's obviously an issue on your platform blue sky with pedophiles. Now, yes, we've had viral posts, make fun of you, blah blah blah blah blah. But we wanna work with you blue sky. Forget this being like a ex is better than blue sky or vice versa. Let's make sure there's less pedos in the world. And blue sky, you could help with that. The CEO or any moderator for blue sky, get in touch with me. Ppoacher3@gmail.com. P poacher3. What I'm requesting from you Blue Sky is immunity for all of our decoy accounts so we can continue to poach pet to poach pedophiles off your platform and out of the world. Okay? Get in touch with me ASAP. And people watching on x, tag Blue Sky and retweet this video right now.
Saved - December 14, 2024 at 12:30 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Another pedo caught off BIuesky. Admitted to viewing videos of babies, and to trading child p*rn. He works for the immigration law firm Gresk and Singleton in Indianapolis https://t.co/Zi5BoNe2BY

Saved - December 9, 2024 at 12:33 AM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

All the people who said I wouldn't say the n word in person, explain this https://t.co/A4cA87HAQ9

Video Transcript AI Summary
A lot of people comment that I wouldn't say the name of a place in Pennsylvania, but that's not true.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A lot of people, you know, try to put in my comment section, oh, but you would never say the Edward of Allegheny National Forest in Pennsylvania. Well, you're wrong. Nigger.
Saved - November 6, 2024 at 6:13 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Now that’s what I call a meltdown https://t.co/uP0GwliU75

Video Transcript AI Summary
If he wins again, his supporters will celebrate while many others feel threatened and scared for their lives. Pro-life women are suffering because doctors fear repercussions from his presidency. It's terrifying to witness such ignorance and hate in this country. How can anyone claim to have moral values and support someone who promotes hate and wants to pardon those who stormed the Capitol? If you care about women, LGBTQ individuals, or anyone who isn’t white, how did we get here? It feels like either he cheated or this country is deeply rooted in hate. If you voted for him, you are dead to me. Block me if you want; I don’t care.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thing to me is that if this guy does end up winning again, all of the people who voted for him will be, like, happy and he'll just be celebrating. And everyone else, everyone who feels threatened by him is, like, scared. Like, we're scared for our lives. We're scared for our friends. Like, you have pro life women dying because their their doctors are scared to treat them because of the repercussions of his last presidency. How did we get here? How did we get here? To know that there is that much ignorance and that much hate in this country. It's so terrifying. It's so terrifying. Terrifying. How could you do this? How can you claim to be a Christian or anyone of moral values and support someone with every word out of his mouth to hate when he wants to pardon people who took over the capital. Do not do this to people that you love and care about. If you have a woman in your life, if you have an LGBTQ person in your life, if you have anyone in your life who's not white, how did we get here? Someone tell me, please. Someone really tell me, please. Because the only way I see it is that, like, either he cheated and that was his secret, or this country is built on so much hate, and we might never get out of this. If you voted for him, you are dead to me. Go ahead and block me. I don't give a shit. I really don't. I really don't.
Saved - September 18, 2024 at 1:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m outraged that a man who admitted to raping a 3-year-old is free to go home tonight. In Maryland, police can’t use chat logs from civilians, rendering the evidence from the 12-year-old he messaged useless. Our investigation is the only reason this monster is even known. If we were just a couple hours south, he wouldn’t be walking free. This law is absurd, and I urge everyone to share this and tag the governor to push for change instead of allowing pedophiles to be protected.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

This pedophiIe who admitted to r*ping a 3-year-old tonight is free to go home tonight. Let me tell you about Maryland. The police cannot use any chat logs conducted by civilians. So the 12-year-old he was messaging and came to meet is null and void in the eyes of Maryland law. This monster would never even be known after tonight if not for our own investigation. If we were just a couple hours south, he would not be walking away tonight. It makes no sense. If you think this law is absurd, share this and tag the governor who could take steps to change this instead of protecting pedophiIes @GovWesMoore

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Police are here. https://t.co/2TumirgPCq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is talking with Roy about an incident involving a 12-year-old girl, where Roy may have said inappropriate things. Roy claims the speaker's great-niece was "fucking crazy" as a child. Roy alleges that when she was three years old, she bounced on his penis and made him ejaculate. The speaker then asks Roy his name, and Roy responds, "Alex Rosen."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How's it going? Alright. We're just having a talk here with Roy and all this stuff. Man, it was just kind of, here to beat a 12 year old girl. Just kinda maybe said some inappropriate things to her. And but you're telling me that, man, your, your great niece was fucking crazy back in the day. She was she was like She was very crazy. You're telling me this 3 year old girl, like, bounced on your dick and even made you cum? Okay. Okay. Okay. Why don't I talk to you? Guitar. Just so you know my body. Okay. What's your name, man? It's Alex Rosen. A l e x r o s e n.
Saved - July 1, 2024 at 11:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
People are questioning how individuals who are naked in front of children and engage with them are not considered pedophiles. A post references a thread about the San Francisco Pride March, warning of nudity in front of children.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

“So you can just be naked in front of kids, and try to talk to kids?” “Yes, exactly” How are these people not pedophiles? 😭 https://t.co/FsZNAMPV6M

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 defends being naked in front of kids, claiming it's natural and about love winning. Speaker 1 questions the appropriateness, pointing out kids being present. Speaker 0 brushes it off, saying it's fine as long as nothing inappropriate is happening. Speaker 1 highlights the discomfort of nudity around children, but Speaker 0 remains unfazed, insisting it's not a big deal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They just happen to be there. Speaker 1: But it's okay for you to do this in front of kids? You're comfortable with that? You think that's something they should see? Speaker 0: A lot of people are doing it. Speaker 1: So it just makes it okay? Speaker 0: But it's part part. It's it's it's locust. It's sleek. Okay. Honey, it is natural, Speaker 1: honey. I'm asking him a question. Speaker 0: I'm his friend. So look, it is natural to be who you are and what you are. And look, do you see all this? And this love is love always wins. Speaker 1: So always wins. So you can just hang naked in front of kids, try to talk to kids. You don't think that's weird? You don't find anything wrong with that? No. I'm Speaker 0: not talking to kids. They just happen to be there. Speaker 1: They just happen to be on the front row with Your dick out. Speaker 0: It doesn't matter. I've Speaker 1: you got kids right here. Literally run over next to you. Speaker 0: Well, I didn't notice that. Speaker 1: But you've been waving I but when the Boy Scouts of America came by, you're sitting there waving at them. Speaker 0: I'm waving at everybody, not just them. They just happen to be there. Speaker 1: But so you just think it's fine for nudity in in front of kids? Speaker 0: There's there's nothing as long as you're not doing anything, there's nothing wrong with that. Look at your Not section.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

📸: @TaylerUSA

@TaylerUSA - Tayler Hansen

THREAD OF SAN FRANCISCO PRIDE MARCH— WARNING: NUDITY IN FRONT OF CHILDREN: Updated in live time.

Saved - June 23, 2024 at 9:08 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

https://t.co/MrKzCnkqI7

@EdKrassen - Ed Krassenstein

@iFightForKids So are you saying babies and toddlers can’t be in the tub or shower with their mom or dad? How about showing the context of what I was replying to instead of creating a fake narrative. Then again that’s probably not what you really care about though.

Saved - June 23, 2024 at 9:05 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

👀 https://t.co/iKg11j88WM

@EdKrassen - Ed Krassenstein

No you didn’t. Plenty of people have enjoyed pride month and most have no clue who you are. Who are you again?

Saved - June 13, 2024 at 9:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
An elementary school teacher with a "garbage disposal fetish" was confronted and later turned himself in after a conversation with individuals. The police are currently investigating him, and his school is also involved. To watch the full video and support catching individuals like him, consider subscribing on X.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Earlier this week, we confronted an elementary school teacher going after a 13-year-old. He also had a "garbage disposal fetish", which I know sounds absolutely insane typed out like that but it's 100% true... 🤷‍♂️ In the middle of the conversation, he claimed he had to go get his daughter. Since we obviously can't hold him, he left and we were supposed to continue at his house. When we arrived, we were greeted by a rather unhappy wife who refused to let the conversation resume. We called the police, who arrived shortly after. They informed us that apparently he had turned himself in during the time he was "picking up his daughter". Works for me! He is currently under investigation by the police and his school. If you want to see his full video, and support us traveling across the country to catch sick people like him -- consider subscribing right here on X. It's less than the coffee you wasted money on this morning, and keeps us moving. Just click on my profile and click subscribe at the top right. 🫡

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm a teacher. My family teaches music too. I wanted to talk honestly with you. Did you send anything weird to Lily? Just a video. I have a strange fascination with garbage disposals since I was a kid. I find them fun. There was a message about living together with a garbage disposal in our house. That's new to me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're a teacher. Right? Yes. Cool, man. My uncle and my dad are both in education. They also teach music as well. Speaker 1: Oh, wow. Speaker 0: So my dad's a tuba player. My uncle's a clarinet player. I think you play clarinet? Speaker 1: Saxophone. Speaker 0: Saxophone? Okay. Cool, man. Do you know what I'm here to talk to you about? Speaker 1: Yes. Okay. Speaker 0: I do. Alright. Seem like an honest dude. Yep. I think you teach your kids the same. Right? Just be honest? Alright. You wanna be honest with me? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Cool, man. What are we here for? Speaker 1: I just wanted to meet her to say hi. I am not trying to do anything shady. I know it seems that way. Speaker 0: How old is Lily now? Speaker 1: She is 13. I'm aware of that. I Okay. I know that she's gonna be turning 14 soon. Speaker 0: Did you send her anything that could be, like, woah. Why would this be sent? Speaker 1: One time. Speaker 0: What was it? Speaker 1: It was just a video which she I I messed up on that. I did not want to send it, and I shouldn't have. And it was a stupid lapse of judgment. Speaker 0: So there's something mentioned about, like, garbage disposals in the messages. This is me just kinda being, like, the curious person I am about shit. What's the thing with the garbage disposals? Speaker 1: This is a weird thing that I've had since I was a little kid. I don't know Okay. Why my brain made that association but it did. Okay. So that's all. Speaker 0: So you find garbage disposals kind of attractive in a way? Speaker 1: It's it's hard to describe. It's Just try it, Speaker 0: but I'm just curious. Speaker 1: I mean, it really is hard to put into words. It's partially that, but they're just we've always been kind of fun. So Speaker 0: Okay. So there there's a message here, something about eventually we could live together and our house will have a garbage disposal. Yes. Okay. That for garbage disposal, that's a first for me.
Saved - June 2, 2024 at 4:44 AM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Ralphie May on the LGBT community 20 years ago. Still rings true today. https://t.co/NOGtHZr2OU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gay people are sensitive because they suck dick and have parades. The speaker questions why straight people don't have parades. They mention traffic issues, gas prices, and taking the rainbow symbol. The speaker clarifies they are not homophobic, just making jokes. They express wanting the rainbow back and question the need for more colors. The speaker jokes about the rainbow being magically delicious. They end by saying it's all in good fun and that gay people should be able to take a joke.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In this town, you can't talk about gay people. Everybody gets all worked up. Stop it. They're sensitive. Why? Because they suck dick. Stop it. Okay. Because they suck dick, they get to have a parade and fuck up traffic for 3 days. The fuck is that girls? Y'all suck dick. Where's your parade? Right. Where's your parade? And don't get it twisted. I'm not homophobic. Okay? I'm just saying. Okay. I ain't willing to take a 15 mile detour so little bunny pooper can walk up and down the street, go yay for dick or lock it in the butt. Now when gas is $2.23 a gallon, fuck you, bubbles. Don't suck dick in your bedroom. I ain't got no problem there. So get the fuck out of the road. And gay people just take shit that used to be everybody's and make it gay. Remember when you was a kid, you just draw a picture of your house, you put a nice big rainbow in the sky? Yeah. Gay. They done took the rainbow. I want the rainbow back. You can't have the rainbow, goddamn it. We didn't vote on this shit. I didn't get an email. Fuck you greedy bastards. How many colors do you need? Goddamn it. You already got pink. And now you need the whole fucking spectrum. Jesus Christ. And what the fuck does a rainbow hat do with sucking dick anyway? Ain't that just magically delicious home girl? Right? And if you gay and you're all worked up, well, guess what? It's just a fucking joke. Even though personally, I do want the rainbow back, it's just a fucking joke. Look, you can take a dick in the ass. You can damn sure take a joke.
Saved - April 19, 2024 at 11:08 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

https://t.co/Gb92mwriRw

@EdKrassen - Ed Krassenstein

Anyone claiming that I'm engagement farming is participating in a form of engagement farming themselves, and it's even more of a violation of @X and @elonmusk's rules because it's engagement farming of engagement farming. It's engagement farming-squared. Thus if you are doing this, it means that you will be suspended-squared.

Saved - April 19, 2024 at 12:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Kansas City Police released a pedophile on parole for child porn, despite him admitting to having child porn on his phone. The officer refused to identify himself. They only took the phone after a scene was made. Requesting body/dash cam footage. Clarification: @kcpolice, not @KCKPDChief.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Kansas City Police just let a pedophile (WHO IS ON PAROLE FOR CHILD PORN) walk after he admitted TO THEM there was child porn on his phone… The male officer wouldn’t even identify himself. @kcpolice @KCKPDChief This yall you fuckin clowns?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kansas City police are releasing a sex offender who admitted to having child pornography on his phone because they can't seize it. The speaker urges to capture the officer's badge number and film the cop car. They accuse the police of protecting child molesters while other counties prosecute. The speaker repeatedly asks for the officer's badge number. They express disbelief that the police are letting the child molester go and plan to take action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're they're just gonna not take his phone today because they can't they they said they can't seize his phone even though this guy's on parole. Here, get get the officer's badge number. Get the officer's badge number. They're literally letting him go. Get this right now. Get this right now. They're literally letting this guy go. Kansas City police is letting this sex offender go because they said they can't take his phone even though he admitted to having child pornography on it. They're just gonna let him go. Kansas City police, make sure you get the make sure you get the cop car on camera. Get the cop car. Kansas City police is letting this admitted child molester go because we're acting as agents of the state when we have nothing to do with the state. We've he he voluntarily told us this on camera. Kansas City police right here protects child molesters. Even though Saint Louis County prosecute, Pulaski County prosecutes, Kansas City Police let a child molester go. What's your badge number? What's your badge number? What's your badge number? He's playing. What's your badge number? Okay. What's your badge number? I'm doing a call for now. What's your officer, what's your badge number? Okay. They're letting us literally they're letting us child Melissa go. Look at this. They're letting a child Melissa go. We are we're gonna go to

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Here’s one of the officers claiming we’re doing this for likes. Yeah, it’s all about likes. Definitely has nothing to do with you guys doing your fucking job when it’s regarding a literal child molester. https://t.co/cLPH0M3wJN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of doing things for likes. Speaker 1 gets defensive and threatens to report Speaker 0 to their supervisor. Speaker 0 insists on reporting the incident to everyone. Speaker 1 mocks Speaker 0's threat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Useless. Speaker 1: Go and get your likes in, mom. Get the likes. Speaker 0: Okay. She she said it's for likes. She just said it's for likes. Speaker 1: Yeah. Because we get all super passionate. Speaker 0: She she just said it's for likes. Speaker 1: Tried to explain to you what's happening Speaker 0: No. She just said it's for likes. She just said it's for likes. You go with this phone and we're gonna call your fucking supervisor. Oh, Speaker 1: my fucking supervisor. Speaker 0: I fucking will. Right. I'll make sure this gets forwarded to everybody. You better take his fucking phone to your fucking job. Alright.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

At the end they finally got the phone, only because he willingly gave it up. We’re not going to let you forget that you originally weren’t even going to seize the phone. You changed your tune when I started making a scene. Better believe we’re requesting all those body/dash cams too.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is pleased that a child molester's phone was taken after he signed a consent form. They thank the officer and credit themselves for the action. The speaker acknowledges being an "idiot" and "asshole," but is glad the phone was taken. They express relief that the child molester will go back to jail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They get it? Let's see. Let's go. I'm the asshole. Yes. Go. Let's go. He actually gave it up. Let's go. Well, they he somehow signed a consent form for his phone. Thank you so much. And, Casey, be sure to credit us because we're the ones that did this, so thank you. He actually took his phone. Okay. I'm a proud asshole. Thank you so much, officer. Thank you. Thank you. I'm the idiot. I'm the idiot. Good. Good. Now granted, they only took it because he signed the consent form. I'm a proud asshole. I'm glad I'm wrong. Thank you so much. This child molester is gonna go back to jail now. Thank you. Thank god.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

If you were to ever share a post of mine, let it be this one. Share this shit out of this.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

I tagged the wrong account @KCKPDChief in the initial post. I want to clarify this was Kansas City, MO @kcpolice. Not Kansas City in Kansas.

Saved - April 8, 2024 at 9:26 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

https://t.co/zDcARhqZ3r

@EdKrassen - Ed Krassenstein

WOW! Why do so many Conservatives automatically think of sex when the topic of parents caring for their babies, toddlers and preschoolers comes up? Yeah, I’m talking to you @LibsofTikTok @TateTheTalisman @SarahPalinUSA @ImMeme0 @amuse and others. Even @elonmusk commented on the post. It is extremely creepy and scary that some people's minds go to sex when thinking about parents bathing with their 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 year old kids. WATCH THIS VIDEO if you care about the full context. I know most of you won't because you simply care about creating misinformation and false narratives. You don't actually care about the truth and context. DO BETTER People!

Video Transcript AI Summary
I went to Miami for a podcast and came back to chaos. People twisted my comments on showering with kids, claiming I said it's okay. I only shared expert opinions on when it's inappropriate. Critics sexualized it, but I clarified I never condoned it. Different cultures have different norms, and memories can be from a young age. Some supported my stance, while others attacked me. I just presented facts, and if you disagree, engage respectfully.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. What happened? I literally went to Miami to do a podcast over the weekend, and I came back to complete insanity. Yeah. Complete insanity. So, apparently, a bunch of people took a comment I made and then twisted and turned it around to try and create some ridiculously sick and twisted narrative. So what happened? They took a tweet reply made to a reply from somebody else to a video that I made and just they didn't show the entire context of what I was saying and then create this narrative around this single reply comment. I I know you're probably like, oh, yeah. Sure. Yeah. Right. That didn't happen. Let me show you. So on April 4th, I made a video discussing Ashley Biden's diary or her alleged diary or her alleged diary entry. And in that video, I said this. Now some of you might say it is never appropriate for a father to be in the same shower with their with their daughter. If you ask if you ask most pediatricians or child psychologists, they'll probably say somewhere between the age of 35, it is no longer appropriate. As you can see in here, I said, some people may find it inappropriate at any age, a father showering his child, his son or daughter, but most experts say it only becomes inappropriate after the age of 3, 4, or 5. You if you talk to experts, if you do research online, you'll see most articles say that once a child is around 3, maybe 4 or 5, it's probably no longer appropriate for them to be showering with their parent, especially of the opposite gender. I never said it was okay. I never said it was not okay. I didn't give my opinion on the matter whatsoever. I merely said what the experts say. I merely put the facts out there. And I also said how some other people may feel. I don't think it's wrong if you feel one way or the other as long as it's at least in line with what the experts say. We all have our own opinions, and I think we all deserve to have those opinions. You can do your own research. Talk to your own pediatricians, child psychologists. I would definitely highly suggest that. So, someone then replied to this video saying, quote, why would Joe Biden shower with his daughter no matter the age is wrong? Okay. Obviously, this person is not very good at writing, but I think we can all kind of understand what they're saying. To which I replied, remember, this was a reply to my video where I said between age 3 5, it becomes inappropriate, to which I replied with this tweet that is spreading around the Internet like wildfire. What I said is factual. There are a lot of mothers who bathe with their babies, toddlers, preschoolers, just like there's fathers who bathe or shower with their babies, toddlers, and preschoolers. If you wanna say it's wrong, say it's wrong. That's absolutely your right. But what the experts say is that it typically becomes inappropriate between 35. 3, of course, would be considered a toddler. 5 would be a preschooler. So somewhere around that age group. That's all I said. I gave the facts, and you guys attacked me for it and sexualized it for some sick reason. You sexualized parents taking care of their children, of their young children. And by young, I mean 3, 4, maybe 5. You can tell that Libs of TikTok who posted this tweet, has no idea about parenting. You can tell that Tristan Tate, who also attacked me for my reply to this reply to my video, who has actually been charged with rape, human trafficking, and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women probably shouldn't be permitted to come within 10 miles of a child ever again in his entire life. Sarah Palin also shared it, but, well, she's Sarah Palin, so I guess I kind of excuse her for it. But then there are all the disingenuous people who are claiming, I implied that it somehow that it was somehow okay for filers who shower with their 10 year old daughters. Really? No. I never said that. I never implied it. That's wrong. That's disgusting. It shouldn't happen. Why did they say this? They say it because they claim that Ashley had to have been at least 10 years old when she wrote her diary. But if you actually read the alleged passage that she wrote, it was in the past tense looking back looking back into her past when she was a young child. How young? I don't know. Maybe she was 9. I don't know. If so, that was wrong. Maybe she was 2 or 3. People do have memories from back when they were 2a half to 3 years old. I know I do. Look. There's a there are different parenting styles. There's different cultures. There's just different cultural norms. People in one country might say it's okay up until age over 5. People some pediatricians, I'm sure, probably say that as well. But for your minds to automatically think that a parent is a pedophile because his or her babies, toddlers, maybe preschoolers have seen him or her naked in their own house is kind of disturbing. Why is it where your mind goes when parents care for their children? Why does it go there? Does it really go there, or is it are you just being disingenuous in trying to create a narrative to try and discredit me or make me look like some bad guy? Merely for posting facts, I got bombarded with nasty, disgusting DMs here on x, and I mean disgusting. But at the same time, I also received several DMs from child psychologists and pediatricians saying, you're absolutely right. I just put out the facts, people. Community note my post if you disagree with it. Just do better.
Saved - January 30, 2024 at 10:41 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

This you guys? https://t.co/dxHFIT6Ai1

@MEStatePolice - Maine State Police

The Maine State Police is releasing this official statement regarding recent alleged child exploitation evidence being given to our teams. https://t.co/TSyerOZbFJ

Saved - January 29, 2024 at 9:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Maine State Police refused to look at evidence of a child predator confrontation and instead focused on investigating the alleged conduct of the person reporting it. The author sarcastically suggests that the police should admit they don't care about public safety.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

🚨 LOL! Maine State Police sent me a letter basically confirming they won’t even look at our evidence/video regarding a very sick child predator we confronted yesterday. Then at the end of the letter, they claim they’ll be “doing a proper investigation into our alleged conduct to make sure no rights were violated”. @MEStatePolice Hey geniuses, how are you going to investigate the “alleged conduct” if you won’t accept the video of the “alleged conduct” from us…? 🤡 Just say that you don’t care about public safety in your jurisdiction and call it a day.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

🚨 We had a catch today in Maine where the PREDATOR admits to real life victims, child porn, an attraction to infants, and sexual intent with a 13-year-old decoy… All of this was bundled into a 2 hour long confession, and Somerset county cops didn't want to even view the evidence. Instead they let a dangerous predator drive off… 🤦‍♂️ Share this and tag @MEStatePolice

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker contacts the state police computer crimes unit in Maine regarding a case involving child pornography. They mention that the police are aware of the group involved but cannot force the individual to provide information. The speaker also mentions that they have the passcode to the suspect's phone and that the suspect admitted to having child pornography on it. The speaker discusses the possibility of receiving a video but states that they cannot accept anything. The transcript ends with the speaker mentioning that they are following instructions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In Maine. We have a conviction I just contacted the state police computer crimes. Okay. They're they're highly regarded in our state. They are the flagship of our state. The lieutenant is aware, and I just talked to the sergeant in charge of that, unit in which I am an affiliate agent with. And, again, that we will not use any they're not they're aware of your group. Apparently, dealt with your group, I guess, in another capacity Right. On another case. But, again, any information this kid wants to give If he can, if he chooses not to, I can't force him to. Right. I don't know how you have any ability to take his phone and you download or extract. I don't know what you're doing. Did it. We won't basically, we're just telling him that. It's it's supposed to start a charge in our car. It's on airplane mode right now. It's not actually downloading and extracting Okay. But he gave me the passcode to his phone. He admitted there's child pornography on there as young as a. He said he beats off the infants. He said he has a real life victim. He Better name. I mean, this is all stuff that wasn't Okay. I'll see if he wants to give me that information. Well, can we send you the video here? Or I can't take anything from you. I can't take anything from you. I'm sorry. Again, I'm being instructed by
Saved - January 16, 2024 at 12:38 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Honestly some of my finest work https://t.co/roRUz3ACES

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

“If you don’t vote for me then you ain’t black” - Martin Luther King Jr.

Saved - January 10, 2024 at 12:14 AM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

BREAKING: Pedophile that admitted to molesting toddlers he was babysitting through @CARE nanny service HAS BEEN ARRESTED & CHARGED! Best news of the week! https://t.co/o030DNqbKs

@PPoachersLIVE - Predator Poachers

SICK child predator admits to using a babysitting service to molest toddlers… 😳 https://t.co/0lJAUNDavm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 recounts babysitting a 3-year-old boy for a divorced woman. They met through Care.com. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 touched the boy's penis, to which Speaker 1 confirms, explaining that they rubbed it with their finger. Speaker 0 clarifies if saying "jacking him off" would be accurate, and Speaker 1 agrees, but specifies that they only used their finger.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you were babysitting someone and you played with them? Yeah. Okay. And how how long ago is this? Speaker 1: Probably like 3 months ago. Speaker 0: 3 months ago? Speaker 1: Okay. Who were you babysitting? But it wasn't like, it, for this woman. She, she's divorced. She has 4 kids. Okay. Okay. Speaker 0: How old was the kid? 3. 3? Okay. Is it who who is it? Boy or girl? It was a boy. What's his name? Speaker 1: Sorry. Just give me a second. Speaker 0: What's the, what who are you babysitting before? What's her name? What's over that? Speaker 1: Sorry. I've only done it, like, 5 times. So I I don't Yeah. I don't remember her name. No. Speaker 0: No. We're gonna have to get No. Speaker 1: I just just hold a second. Sure. Sure. Speaker 0: Brianna. Brianna? What's her last name? How did, how did you all meet? Care.com. Care.com. And, her so you said a 3 month old or A 3 year old. 3 year old? Okay. What what what I just Speaker 1: touched him. He he was, like, grabbing himself and and stuff like that. And he was, like, kinda, Like, playing with himself and not Speaker 0: Did you put your hand on his penis? Okay. What did you do to it after that? Speaker 1: Just that's it. I just Speaker 0: Did you did you would you do would you if people if there was a camera on you when you did that, would would would saying you jacking them off be accurate? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I was, Yeah. Going like that. So, yeah. I mean, I mean, you can t really I don Speaker 0: t really jaggle, but, yeah, yeah. But you re rubbing it. You you you were, like, doing this motion with this penis. Okay. Yeah. Speaker 1: With my finger, not with my hand. Right.
Saved - January 7, 2024 at 12:18 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Debate with Alex Jones last night regarding illegal aliens voting in elections: “They’re not voting in elections, that’s a conspiracy theory” (𝟑 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫) “ok well maybe they’re voting, but not in federal elections” 🤡 https://t.co/vOGW48uHDX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Alex promotes conspiracy theories about illegal aliens voting, but there is no evidence to support this claim. It is possible that illegal aliens are being counted in the census, which could increase electoral votes. However, there are no indictments or laws allowing illegal aliens to vote in federal elections. While some cities may allow them to vote in local matters, it is not clear how successful these attempts are. It is important to note that illegal aliens should not be voting in any elections. The speaker is not concerned about the conspiracy theory and is anticipating a large number of views.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What Alex does is he pushes these conspiracy theories, these ideas that illegal aliens were voting. There's no evidence of that. I think what the the illegal alien, voting thing is what's happening is they're coming in and then they're being counted in the census, which then adds more electoral votes to Okay. Speaker 1: That gives more congressional measures. Speaker 0: That's that's fair. That might be happening. Thing I haven't recently done, but that's not the truth. They're not the truth. Speaker 1: Indictments of illegals everywhere voting. Got them again. Hit them all. Not. Hit them all. Speaker 0: Voting. Executive like, 2 people Speaker 1: in the 5. Of cities have passed laws where illegal aliens can vote. Speaker 0: No. They haven't. No. Not at not in the not in the federal election. Speaker 1: No. But oh, oh, oh, the illegals are voting in elections, though? Speaker 0: Not in the federal ones. So I know that some cities try to have them voting in, like, local matters. I don't know how many of those are successful. Illegal aliens shouldn't be voting. Okay? But they're not. They're not voting in federal election. Yeah. I don't know why you would they are not doing the conspiracy theory out there. Care Speaker 1: about it. There are gonna be a 100,000,000 views of you guys. Ex is gonna eat you guys alive. Speaker 0: Flat. I can't wait for it. I don't know
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 9:29 AM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

“bUsInEsS iS bOoMinG!!” - Elite shill with 100s of millions of dollars https://t.co/nD28PVoAM8

@StephenKing - Stephen King

Business is booming under Biden. Jobs up, inflation down. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Saved - January 4, 2024 at 1:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I got kicked out of a Hillary Clinton rally for asking about Bill's trips to Epstein island. Thanks to @DBrozeLiveFree for capturing it on film. Secret service tried to question me afterwards, but I laughed in their faces and walked away. #NoFear

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

I was DRAGGED OUT of a Hillary Clinton rally for asking about Bill’s trips to Epstein island! https://t.co/ygqBJAdDR9

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person questions why someone's husband has been in MCI twenty-six times and asks if it is necessary. They continue to ask if it is necessary multiple times. Another person asks if it is necessary and says they are correct. The first person mentions endless government spending and accuses the other group of supporting it. They claim that more money has been given to white people in Ukraine than to them. They also mention endless money for Israel and criticize the group for being the same and committing the same crimes. They compare the situation to Chicago and accuse the group of loving it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then you want somebody who's gonna get up every day. Speaker 1: Hey, Hillary. Why is your husband in the MCI twenty six times? Is this really necessary? Is this really necessary, guys? Is this really necessary? Is this really necessary, sir? Hey. Is this necessary, officer? No. You guys are correct. I'm not a grown man. I was You guys are dragging somebody out in You're not welcome. Private event. You decide to Why Speaker 0: do you guys support, like, just endless government spending? I mean, she's given more money to white people in Ukraine than you freaking idiots in terms of. What's up? What's up? What's up? Endless money to Ukraine. Endless money for Israel. She's not anti establishment. You guys are the same shit over and over again. Same crimes. It's gonna be like just like Chicago. You guys love this shit. Alright.

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Shout out @DBrozeLiveFree for coming with and capturing the magic on film

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

@DBrozeLiveFree Secret service trying to question me afterwards

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

After I was dragged out of Hillary Clinton’s rally, the SECRET SERVICE tried to question me. Take notes. This is how you handle fed bois. Laugh in their dumb fed faces, then walk away. 😂 https://t.co/0X546I7PXw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 informs Speaker 1 that they have accomplished something. Speaker 1 expresses happiness for Speaker 0. Speaker 0 then states their intention to leave and asks for some information. Speaker 1 refuses to provide the information. Speaker 0 clarifies that they are not feeling suicidal, and Speaker 1 confirms the same. Speaker 0 concludes by expressing their love for life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How you doing? Good. Good. I need to see what's going on. Good. I I did it. Speaker 1: Oh, that's great. I mean, I Speaker 0: I'm gonna leave now. Okay. You're gonna leave? Yeah. Can I get some information, please? Speaker 1: Absolutely not. Speaker 0: I'm not suicidal, by the way. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm not suicidal either. Speaker 0: Totally love life,
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 3:27 AM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

.@Deadspin how does it feel knowing you guys are about to pay this kid for slandering him? Ironically, you’re about to pay him reparations 😂 https://t.co/DxSxcIiH91

Saved - October 29, 2023 at 5:55 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

Has @BillClinton ever condemned Jeffrey Epstein at any point? https://t.co/LtEKqvPDA6

Saved - October 29, 2023 at 3:25 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

After I was dragged out of Hillary Clinton’s rally, the SECRET SERVICE tried to question me. Take notes. This is how you handle fed bois. Laugh in their dumb fed faces, then walk away. 😂 https://t.co/0X546I7PXw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is checking in with someone and expresses that they have accomplished something. The other person asks if they are leaving, to which Speaker 0 confirms. Speaker 0 then asks for some information, but the other person refuses. Both speakers clarify that they are not suicidal and enjoy life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How you doing? Good. Good. I need to see what's going on. Good. I I did it. Oh, that's great. I mean, I I'm gonna leave now. Okay. You're gonna leave? Yeah. Can I get some information, please? Absolutely not. I'm not suicidal, by the way. Yeah. I'm not suicidal either. Totally love life.
Saved - October 27, 2023 at 10:18 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

I WILL NEVER BE QUIET https://t.co/ekOE15I13p

Saved - October 27, 2023 at 9:58 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

@CollinRugg I am not suicidal

Saved - October 27, 2023 at 9:55 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

I was DRAGGED OUT of a Hillary Clinton rally for asking about Bill’s trips to Epstein island! https://t.co/ygqBJAdDR9

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the necessity of certain actions and confronts Hillary Clinton about her husband's frequent visits to MCI. They express frustration with government spending and accuse Clinton of giving more money to white people in Ukraine than to their own country. The speaker criticizes the establishment and compares their actions to the ongoing issues in Chicago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then you want somebody who's gonna get up every day. Hey, Hillary. Why is your husband in the MCI twenty six times? Is this really necessary? Is this really necessary, guys? Is this really necessary? Is this really necessary, sir? Hey. Is this necessary, officer? No. You guys are driving my grown man. Officer's You guys are dragging somebody out in You're not welcome. Private event. You decide to Why do you guys support, like, just endless government spending? I mean, she's given more money to white people in Ukraine than you freaking idiots in terms of. What's up? What's up? What's up? Endless money to Ukraine. Endless money for Israel. She's not anti establishment. You guys are the same shit over and over again. Same crimes. It's gonna be like just like Chicago. You guys love this shit. Alright.
Saved - October 27, 2023 at 6:25 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

I am not suicidal. I did not kill myself.

Saved - June 18, 2023 at 4:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Peter Hotez shares an unpleasant encounter with antivaxers outside his home, taunting him to debate RFKJr. He mentions his support for the Houston Texans. @iFightForKids responds with laughter.

@PeterHotez - Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD

Ugh I just was stalked in front of my home by a couple of antivaxers taunting me to debate RFKJr. Of course I was looking my Sunday best in our brutal heat wave. What is it with people? Well at least Houstonian’s now know I support the team…#GoTexans

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

@PeterHotez LOLOLOLOLOL https://t.co/PstEH6tc54

Saved - June 18, 2023 at 4:28 PM

@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen

I confronted @PeterHotez and asked why he is too scared to debate @RobertKennedyJr on the @joerogan podcast! W/ @merissahansen17

Video Transcript AI Summary
Peter Hodges is asked why he won't debate RFK on Joe Rogan's podcast, but he dismisses it as harassment. He is then asked if he has anything to say to people who believe they are vaccine injured, but he avoids giving a direct answer. The question is repeated, asking if he believes vaccine injuries are real, but he still avoids answering. The conversation ends with a sarcastic comment about going on a safari to vaccinate more kids.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Yeah. Oh, are you Peter Hodges? I am. Hi. Nice to meet you. How are you? Hey. So why are you not, like, gonna debate, RFK on Joe Rogan's podcast? Oh, come on. That's harassing. I'm just I'm just curious. What? No. Nothing at all. Just curious. I haven't said anything one way or the other. I mean, are you planning on doing it? You know, I just you just invited me, so we'll see. And I think you should, though. Well, we'll give it some we'll give it some thought. Okay. And what do you have to say to people who think they're a vaccine injured? Anything for them? I don't continue. I have I mean, do you have anything to say to people that think do you have anything to say to people? Yeah. I mean, do you think vaccine injuries are real, Peter? Peter, it's just a question. Settle the science now. On a safari to go vaccinate more kids.
View Full Interactive Feed