TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @iamlisalogan
reSee.it AI Summary
Homeschooling in the U.S. is a concern for UNESCO, as it may conflict with UN Sustainable Development Goals. They aim to regulate private education through vouchers and Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) to promote equity. A UNESCO paper emphasizes the need for regulations tied to public funding to align private education with government equity goals. Their ultimate objective is to implement Global Citizenship Education universally. I caution against supporting ESA and voucher bills, as they could undermine parental choice and replicate the public education system many seek to escape.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
Homeschool in the US is a big problem to UNESCO b/c parents might teach their children values & beliefs that don’t align with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It's why they're looking to regulate private education options like this through financing https://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/no-unesco-home-schooling-is-not-a-threat-to-inclusion🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
Education systems outside public provision raise significant concerns. A notable example is homeschooling in the United States, where families withdraw children from traditional schools to teach them at home. This trend often stems from communities seeking to separate themselves and establish distinct belief systems, which can lead to a breakdown in social cohesion and hinder sustainable development. While this is an extreme case, it prompts reflection on the potential consequences if public education systems decline, potentially resulting in fragmented educational contexts that diverge from established norms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Education systems, you know, if if they fall outside public provision, there are, important concerns there. And, I think I would say the, let's say, most extreme example of, non state provision is the homeschooling in The United States. People withdraw, children from schools, and they prefer to teach them in, in, at home. What is the implication of that, and where will that take us? Again, there could be different ways of looking at it, But we do see evidence that in The United States, which has the largest homeschooling provision in the world, it's often driven by communities that want to disassociate themselves from the rest of society and form their own, you know, belief systems that set them apart, something that really leads to a breakdown in social cohesion, and situations that are not really very helpful for sustainable development.
So, I mean, I'm I'm taking an extreme example, but I think I would imagine your thinking also goes down that way. What if, somehow, public education systems lose ground and leads to situations that are outside, you know, the context that we have been used to so far.
No, UNESCO, home schooling is not a threat to 'inclusion' - Washington Examiner
UNESCO reports nearly half of all school-age children worldwide have lost at least two-thirds of their school year because of the COVID-19 pandemic and millions of children are being home-schooled by their parents. But rather than highlight the possibilities that home schooling offers, its 2020 Global Education Report gives short shrift to the millions of
washingtonexaminer.com
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
How? Vouchers & ESA’s, which are listed in UNESCO’s PEER website under the United States profile page as laws that will help bring “equity” to school choice through government regulation. https://education-profiles.org/europe-and-northern-america/united-states-of-america/~non-state-actors-in-education 🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
We launched the peer website alongside the inclusion report, which provides information on laws and policies regarding education inclusion in various countries. The 2020 report focused on how nations approach inclusion in education. We are now expanding this resource to include regulations on private and non-state education provisions globally. This initiative aims to facilitate knowledge sharing among countries and enhance the material we offer beyond what can be included in the report.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also have the the peer, website, which was launched with inclusion report, and that's very relevant also for our discussion today, offering information on laws and policies in all countries with reference to the theme of the report. So we had the laws and policies in 2020 on how countries approach inclusion in education, and we are extending it already with information on how countries regulate, private provision or non state active provision of education around the world to offer a basis for countries to learn from each other and to also enrich the material that we provide that we cannot possibly fit in the, in the pages of the report.
United States of America | NON-STATE ACTORS IN EDUCATION | Education Profiles
education-profiles.org
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
A paper prepared for UNESCO'S GEM report clearly states that the way to ensure private education options are aligned with the “equity” goals of the government is to control them through regulations & accountability measures attached to public funding.https://lisalogan.substack.com/p/the-strings-of-school-choice?sd=pf🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
We publish about five policy papers each year, along with a blog and various other materials. I invite you to visit our website to explore these resources.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Finally, we also have policy papers, that we publish about five a year, our blog, and a range of other materials that I would like to invite you to to join, to to go to the website to, to consult.
The Strings of School Choice
The plot to regulate private schooling options through public accountability tied to public funding.
lisalogan.substack.com
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
UNESCO’s goal is to create a single system so they can enforce the teaching of Global Citizenship Education in EVERY school to EVERY student across the globe. It’s why they launched their GEM report to stakeholders looking to accomplish this in the U.S. https://youtu.be/MlPgu1VDAdg?t=1081🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
The 2021-2022 Global Education Monitoring Report emphasizes the need for policymakers to evaluate their relationships with non-state actors in education, balancing equity and freedom of choice. It advocates for a unified system where all institutions, students, and teachers adhere to common quality standards and monitoring processes. Effective regulation of private education is crucial to prevent inequality and exclusion. The report highlights the importance of fostering initiative and collaboration among various educational providers. While some argue against the role of non-state actors, the report acknowledges their existing and future contributions to education. It calls on governments to establish appropriate frameworks for these interactions and encourages reading the report's recommendations for transformative change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The twenty twenty one, twenty twenty two Global Education Monetary Reports rallying call, who chooses, who loses, invites policy makers to question relationships with non state actors in terms of fundamental choices and their trade offs between equity and freedom of choice, two pillars of the right to education between encouraging initiative and setting standards between groups of varying means and needs, between immediate commitments under SDG four and those to be progressively realized. It calls for governments to see all institutions, students and teachers as part of a single system, to use common quality standards, common monitoring and support processes for all providers. Governance systems can be complex when multiple actors are involved. This makes oversight that much more important. The report warns that inequality and exclusion can also result if private education is not effectively regulated.
The report's PAIR website will help inform our policy dialogue on this issue. It tracks and compares non state provision regulations in 211 countries around the world. This report reads my mind when it calls on governments to create spaces to foster initiative and to set the conditions for a variety of access to interact, coordinate, and cooperate. Some people say that non state actors should not play a role in education. This report shows that in fact, they already do today and will continue to do so tomorrow.
And it is our responsibilities to hashtag right the rules. I encourage you to read the 2021, '20 '20 '2 GEM report recommendations and the vision it has for change.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
Read all about UNESCO’S #RightTheRules Campaign to bring “equity” and regulation to school choice. 🧵
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
"Our role is to make sure that we design our governance & regulations in a way that ensures that all these actors pull in the same direction. This means strong oversight on the core values we committed to as part of the 2030 Agenda." https://world-education-blog.org/2021/12/13/there-is-room-for-all-actors-in-education-as-long-as-we-have-the-same-vision-for-change/
There is room for all actors in education, as long as we have the same vision for change - World Education Blog
By Dr David Moinina Sengeh, Minister of Basic and Senior Secondary Education and Chief Innovation Officer, Sierra Leone, and Chair of the Global Education Monitoring Report Advisory Board I started my education in a non-state pre-primary and primary school before enrolling in a state secondary school in Sierra Leone, continued through on scholarships to world […]
world-education-blog.org
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
Don’t fall for the trap by supporting ESA & voucher bills! They will be the tool UNESCO & others use to take away your choices by making all education options look exactly like the public system exasperated parents are attempting to flee from. https://lisalogan.substack.com/p/unescos-vision-for-school-choice 🧵
UNESCO’s Vision for School Choice
Their Plan to Use Backpack Funding Bills & Government Regulations to Ensure "Equity" in Private Choice Options
lisalogan.substack.com
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h27zzx9odgA
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
Also consider this tweet from the other night and any of my tweets covering the Internet of Education.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
Strange bedfellows, no? And people wonder why many of us who are exposing what is going on in education keep saying that School Choice™️ via ESAs & vouchers is a part of The Great Reset agenda. 👀👇 credit: Alliance to Protect Children https://t.co/X9SWVJOZes
reSee.it AI Summary
The Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience is a conspiracy to transform America into a surveillance state like China. It aims to use the term 'resilience' to manipulate federal resources and implement a racial justice lens. The plan is part of a global effort by the World Health Organization to replace capitalism with a "Well-Being" Economy. The plan involves inserting the WHO's Geneva Charter for Well-Being into U.S. cities and towns. This would lead to constant tracking and measurement of "resilience" instead of GDP, creating a S.M.A.R.T. city that collects data on everyone. The plan also involves using digital wallets to track compliance and reward/punish entities based on government recommendations. The implementation of this monitoring system requires significant funding from COVID recovery bills. A detailed congressional investigation is needed to uncover the groups behind the Federal Plan and its implementation. Contact your representatives to call for an investigation.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵I’ve discovered EXACTLY how the federal government is sneakily going to turn freedom-loving America into a surveillance state like China through the manipulation of the term ‘resilience.’ It’s called The Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Federal Plan for Equitable Long Term Recovery and Resilience aims to use federal funding to make communities more resilient after the pandemic. This plan will bring radical policy changes affecting education, housing, employment, and more. It will measure resilience by collecting data on individuals and entities, resembling a social credit system. Critics argue that it aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, transitioning America to a "well-being economy" with government intervention for equal outcomes. The public is urged to call for a full investigation into the federal plan and its partners.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Federal Plan for Equitable Long Term Recovery and Resilience, also called ELTRR or the federal plan, is supposedly infusing federal funding into communities hit hard by the pandemic to make them more resilient against future disasters. Under this pretext, radical policy changes will be expected in these local economies to foster what they call resilience. Changes, not just in health, but in education, housing, employment, transportation, food, water, justice, climate, etcetera. The recommendations instituted through the federal plan will affect what children will be taught in school because it'll teach them to think like a communist, how communities are planned and budgeted, giving preferential treatment based on skin color, how much water can be used and what kind of food can be purchased, decided by equity and sustainability, and more. Measuring resilience will require collecting invasive amounts of data on children, adults, businesses, and other entities, which will be gathered and evaluated, tracked through indices like these, and then scored and judged based upon whether or not their behavior is contributing to the resilience or health of their communities.
Social credit system ahoy. Essentially, the federal plan and its vital conditions framework are being used as a backdoor way of implementing the totalitarian targets of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals or SDGs. It will transform America's capitalist economy to what's deceptively termed a well-being economy, where growth isn't measured anymore by gross domestic product or GDP, but by very subjective indicators of well-being and health that will need government intervention and constant monitoring to ensure everyone has equal outcomes and resilience. This is communism, folks, and this is where you come in. Please retweet this tweet thread, Tag your representatives in congress that you can find at this link as well as the judiciary committees and call on them to do a full investigation into the federal plan, the interagency work group behind it, and their partners in the private sector.
Read this tweet thread and watch the YouTube video I made on it linked below for the full story.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵The conspiracy for this transformation was hatched by a federal interagency work group & their partners in March of 2020. ‘Resilience’ requires using a critical theory lens (racism) to decide WHO gets federal resources & HOW those resources are spent (“equitably”).
Video Transcript AI Summary
The government aims to measure success by boosting resilience in communities through public-private partnerships. The federal plan aligns resources to enhance resilience, coordinating with civil society's efforts like Thriving Together. It harmonizes with executive orders and focuses on vital conditions for health and well-being to promote equity in resource access and outcomes for communities. This work is embraced by both federal and non-federal partners.
Translation: The government wants to measure success by increasing resilience in communities through partnerships between the public and private sectors. The federal plan aligns resources to improve resilience, working together with civil society initiatives like Thriving Together. It is in line with executive orders and focuses on essential conditions for health and well-being to promote fairness in resource access and outcomes for communities. This effort is supported by both federal and non-federal partners.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if the government uniformly measured its success in terms of elevated resilience in communities across all dimensions that define healthy thriving communities? The work group in deliberating on these questions in 2020, determined that there were a couple of considerations that had to be paramount. One of which was this involved all of us, that it really is a public private partnership to build resilience across this nation. That's what the federal plan intends largely to do, provide a lens through which agents across the federal government can entertain how they best apply their resources towards the same meaningful outcomes that ultimately define an increased resilience. As the case that may be, or was, civil society was already thinking in these terms and had been even pre pandemic, to the point where you see depicted on the left side of this slide, thriving thriving together, which is an initiative across civil society that was intended to better orchestrate, civil actors, nongovernmental actors towards enhanced resilience of in communities.
The federal government's interagency work group working on this effort intended, very deliberately to build out the federal plan over the ensuing months years now, in such a way that it could harmonize with that civil society effort. On the right, there's also a nod to the fact that, it does very much harmonize with a number of, subsequent executive orders and cross governmental efforts that have occurred in the current administration. The framework for the vital conditions for health and well-being looks to define the actions that can be taken to enhance resilience through these different components that you see here. It may resonate, in its familiarity with the social determinants of health framework. But I think this offers a a more inclusive and open relationship to those sectors that traditionally haven't been involved with SDOH necessarily.
I mean, ultimately, what these objectives are set to do is enhance that equity. The equity, as you see on the bottom there, in terms of access to to federal resources, and more importantly and most importantly, equity in terms of outcomes, for communities and individuals. This work is being taken up organically already by federal government and partners outside of federal government.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵To ensure equitable outcomes in the Federal Plan, a new framework created by Well-Being in the Nation (WIN) Network changes how our nation measures health to be through a racial justice lens. Their goal is the destruction of capitalism and shifting how we measure our economy.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We had a meeting focusing on applying a racial justice and intergenerational lens to national well-being measures. Our priorities include advancing racial justice, promoting a shared thriving movement, measuring equitable recovery, building an equitable economy, improving mental health, and addressing COVID disparities. We aim to disrupt, dismantle, and rebuild systems to create a better future. Shifting from trauma to inclusion, we work towards shared stewardship and defining what matters in our measurements. Transitioning from an adversity economy to a well-being economy is crucial for our progress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We had a measurement and learning meeting that begins to apply a racial justice and intergenerational lens to our national measures for well-being and thriving. That truly included a diverse group of people from the grassroots to the grass tops. If you think about the wind strategic priorities, they really reflect, action across this. So advancing racial justice, advancing a shared movement for thriving together, leveraging the springboard that many of you helped to create as a framework, advancing the wind measures for equitable recovery and resilience, advancing an equitable economy, advancing mental health and well-being, and addressing COVID inequities and resilience in the context of COVID. Leaning into that is a stress test that can help us create a better system, a new system.
And as we yes, Michelle, it means disrupting, it means dismantling and redoing. If you if you think about it, that our our priority around addressing racial justice is all about shifting, acknowledging those legacies and shifting to from, to trauma to exclusion. Of course, our advancing that thriving movement together is about coming together in shared stewardship and relationship to chart that path to renewal that we'll focus on and shift toward those vital conditions. Our work on wind advancing wind measurement, that third strategy is about that that third piece, changing what we measure and how we measure it and with whom who gets to define what we measure and how we understand what matters. And as we think about that we need to shift of course the context of our economy from an adversity economy to a well-being economy.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵Capitalism will be replaced with a "Well-Being" Economy. This is a global plan by the World Health Organization to use “health” (“resilience”) as a lever to change all sectors in all communities to force compliance to the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal agenda.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The pandemic made us realize the harm caused by our materialistic world. We need to shift focus from profits to well-being and environmental health. Countries like Bhutan, New Zealand, and the UAE are leading the way with happiness and well-being measures in their policies. We must prioritize health globally and locally to create a better future post-COVID 19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's taken a pandemic. Tap us realize just how sick our world has become. We've been slaves to materials, building our personal empires and countries' economies. We convinced ourselves that life was great. We ignored the cost to ourselves, other people, and our planet.
When COVID 19 arrived, it forced us to stop. We had time to question our way of life. If we had done things differently, could we have been better prepared? We've realized we can't go on as before. How can we say our economies are thriving and the cost to our societies are so high?
There is a way out of this, and we all have a part to play. Countries should be measuring their success by the well-being of their people and the environment they live in, not just by deals and trade, but profits made on products that are threatening our world and our own survival. We need to stop pursuing the same old self destructive priorities and create conditions for people to live better lives. Health should be factored into everything, both globally and locally. Some countries are already getting this right.
Bhutan has a gross national happiness index where indicators such as living standards, community vitality, and psychological well-being drive a more meaningful and sustainable way of life. New Zealand has a well-being budget which uses human health, safety, and flourishing to assess the success of its policies. The UAE's happiness agenda ensures the government prioritizes happiness across all its policies. While Finland and other Nordic countries living and turning it into real action to transform our lives. COVID 19 has cost the world dearly, but it's also given us a chance to change the path that we're on and create the future be white.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵The Federal Plan and the Interagency Work Group behind it are using “health/resilience” as a guise to covertly insert the WHO’s Geneva Charter for Well-Being into U.S. cities & towns. They’re told in this video from the WHO exactly how to do it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent progress has brought challenges like scarce resources and climate change. To achieve sustainable development goals, all sectors must invest in promoting health and well-being. Ways to start include integrating health into policies, having a champion for support, engaging all stakeholders, and creating a supportive governance structure. Collective efforts are crucial to reach the SDG's goals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Recent decades have witnessed great progress in human and technological developments across the globe. We live in an interconnected world with easier access to commodities and services. Life expectancy and living standards are better than ever before. However, this progress has come at a cost and brought new challenges. In a highly competitive world, we are encouraged to produce more and consume more.
The natural resources are becoming scarce and climate change has led to extreme weather conditions. There is a need for a major shift in the current socio ecological and economic models. Promoting health and well-being is at the core of the sustainable development goals and the World Health Organization's 13th general program of work. The WHO has called on decision makers to take bold political actions that would shift the world into a sustainable and resilient path. This cannot be achieved by the health sectors alone.
The benefits are multi sectorial, and investments need to be made by all sectors. Greater political commitments are needed by the highest levels of governance and by all partners across borders to implement the required sustainable change to promote health and well-being. Here are some ways to get started. Identify an entry point to integrate health and well-being into current policies. For example, solidarity, social cohesion, gender equality, equity, or leaving no one behind.
This will integrate approaches and together form a platform for change. Then identify a champion to support the policy orientation. This can be at the highest level of the governance or at the local level such as a city mayor. The process for developing policies and ideas to support it needs to engage all sectors, stakeholders, and people at every level. To implement the policies effectively, a supportive governance structure should be in place to enable strengthened legislation and reduce health risks and promote health and well-being, share knowledge, and build networks to address relevant public health issues.
Transformative and collective efforts will be needed to ensure that we can reach the goals set in the SDG's agenda. Back now for our health and
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵You can see here in this document https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/health-promotion/framework4wellbeing_16dec22.pdf?sfvrsn=32a0e228_5&download=true the WHO’s framework to implement their Geneva Charter in localities across the world. It's exactly what the Federal Plan does, and a link to the Federal Plan is actually listed as a resource at the bottom of the paper.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵In a well-being economy, “resilience” will be constantly measured & tracked instead of GDP, turning everywhere into a S.M.A.R.T. city that collects data on everybody and everything. That data will be interoperable (able to be shared across systems through blockchain).
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the future, smart cities will use sensors and data to personalize your experience, monitor your activities, and even control behavior. While convenient, this raises concerns about privacy and government control. Personal data can be misused, and constant surveillance may limit freedom. The trade-off between benefits and privacy is a key question. Can we trust governments and corporations with our data, and what happens if the system fails or needs to be challenged?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to the city of the future, a smart city that knows everything about you, from how you like your coffee to whether you've broken the law or even if you've grown a beard. While the smart city we're about to tour doesn't exist, yet, all of the parts do. They're all components of real projects happening all over the world. Put them together, and this is what life may well be like in the not too distant future. You go to work.
Your office building knows exactly who's coming and going and what they need, thanks to thousands of inbuilt sensors collecting data. Wherever you sit, the lighting will adjust to suit your preferences. The building will even recall your regular coffee order. On your way home, you pass lampposts laden with sensors and HD cameras that monitor and record the world around them 247. Air quality and traffic flow data tell you the quickest and cleanest route and alert emergency services to accidents.
You also regularly update your doctors using data sent directly from your smartwatch. They analyze it and prescribe personalized drugs and supplements that are people They're busy policing antisocial behavior, identifying people smoking in unauthorized zones, or throwing rubbish from high rise buildings. While much of this might sound pretty idyllic, it is not without issues. Smart cities go hand in hand with gathering and storing huge amounts of personal data and using it to control city life. For governments keen to control certain populations, this is an incredibly the places you visit at night, and who you're with.
This data can be used by people with far more nefarious aims than making you the perfect soya lactate. You could leave your phone at home, but with advanced facial recognition CCTV in the mix, authorities can easily keep tabs on you. In places like Xinjiang in China, where growing a beard can already get reported, this is a frightening prospect. So are the benefits of a smart city worth giving up privacy and freedom for? Can governments and corporations be trusted with such huge datasets on all of us?
What happens if there's a mistake in the system or you want to overthrow the system itself?
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵Your digital wallet/I.D. used to access services in the S.M.A.R.T. city will carry your “health/resilience” data and track compliance. Like in China’s social credit system, every entity could be rewarded/punished based upon if they follow the government’s recommendations.
Video Transcript AI Summary
China uses millions of cameras and algorithms to monitor residents, enforcing rules like mask-wearing and tracking health status through apps. Citizens must scan QR codes and have temperatures checked for entry. A social credit system rewards good behavior like volunteering and penalizes false statements. Obedience is encouraged through rewards and punishments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Surveillance center, no resident goes unwatched. 100 of millions of cameras are installed all over China.
Speaker 1: We have algorithms that automatically recognize certain behaviors. If someone isn't wearing a mask, for example, we immediately detect this wrongdoing.
Speaker 0: No one can escape the camera's gaze even when taking out the trash. In the wake of the COVID 19 pandemic, data collection has ramped up even more in China. Health authorities use apps to try to identify infected individuals potential contacts. Deng must scan a QR code with an app before entering the gallery district. His temperature is also taken.
Speaker 2: The app looks at your health status and can track your journey. After the scan, it shows you if everything is okay.
Speaker 0: If he had been in the same place as someone infected with the coronavirus, he would have been denied entry. Whenever COVID 19 is again detected in the country, the app becomes everyone's ticket to public life to shop at a grocery store, to eat at a restaurant, even to get a taxi.
Speaker 1: We installed a network of sensors in front of apartments. When the door sensor registers people leaving the apartment in violation of the rules, we're alerted. District staff and the health department are then informed and can respond quickly.
Speaker 0: Is signing up for the social credit system. Has to link the data from his personal ID then he'll get his score.
Speaker 3: The better you score, the more advantages you have in your daily life. I think it encourages people to voluntarily follow the rules.
Speaker 0: People are also penalized for making false statements in the country's COVID 19 app. People are rewarded for volunteering, staying fit through exercise, or using low emission transportation. Donating blood also earns points. Other cities also reward organ donors or everyday things like returning books to the library on time. China wants obedient citizens, authorities entice with rewards and threaten with punishment.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵The technological & data infrastructure needed to create this monitoring system in every city will require mass amounts of funding. $ from COVID recovery bills that cities accept from the Economic Development Administration force them to implement Federal Plan recommendations.
Video Transcript AI Summary
EDA received $3 billion from the American Rescue Plan Act to invest in communities, focusing on equity, job creation, skills development, and economic recovery. They aim to build resilience and support industries hit hard by the pandemic. EDA has 6 programs and funding opportunities, with equity as a top priority. They update investment priorities to align with economic development practices and administration goals. Prioritizing underserved communities is crucial for future investments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: EDA has received a historic $3,000,000,000 supplemental appropriation through the American Rescue Plan Act focused on investing in America's communities, with a particular spotlight on advancing equity, creating good paying jobs, and helping workers to develop in demand skills, continuing to build resiliency, and helping to accelerate and expand the economic recovery by focusing on industries of the future, and industries and communities that were hardest hit by the, pandemic. We want to make sure that we're focusing not just on building back, but on building back better and stronger and making sure that we're positioning communities and regions to be more resilient to future economic shocks. We have 6 distinct programs and 6 distinct notices of funding opportunity that we'll be providing. I think it's important to emphasize the lens through which we view our grant making activity and our investment portfolio as a whole. This set of investment priorities are what EDA uses to evaluate grants.
EDA periodically updates our investment priorities to reflect the best practices in economic development programming and also to be a reflection of the administration's latest priorities. EDA, has updated our investment priorities. The last update included in April of this year. Importantly, as the deputy secretary mentioned, equity is now our top priority on this investment priority list. And here, we're looking to emphasize those communities and populations that may have been underserved and unable to avail themselves of past economic prosperity.
And this is a critically important priority, and one through which we'll be viewing all of EDA's investment activity moving forward.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵There needs to be a detailed congressional investigation into The Federal Plan for Equitable Long Term Recovery and Resilience & the conspiracy of the groups behind it. What say you @Jim_Jordan, @HawleyMO, @SenRonJohnson, @BasedMikeLee, @JudiciaryGOP, @SenJudiciaryGOP?
Video Transcript AI Summary
We formed ELTRR to address pre-existing inequities exacerbated by COVID. Recognizing decades of failed systems, we united to create change. Without official appointments, like-minded individuals collaborated to craft an ambitious plan. This movement aims to identify key functions and unite individuals to work together towards a common goal. Recognizing the importance of collaboration, we understand that none of us can do this alone.
Translation: We created ELTRR to address existing inequalities worsened by COVID. Recognizing decades of failed systems, we came together to make a difference. Without official appointments, like-minded individuals collaborated to create a bold plan. This movement aims to identify key functions and bring people together to work towards a common goal. Recognizing the importance of collaboration, we understand that none of us can do this alone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We started the ELTRR, that interagency work group, in a moment when we were reflecting on what we were seeing across the country. In many communities the failed systems were falling apart before a virus arrived. It was not COVID that was causing the inequities that were flooding our communities. It was the recognition that there were decades of failure on the part of government, civil society, and many other leaders across sectors to invest in the kinds of things that we knew would have produced equitable well-being and resilience, the kinds of things that are called for in the vital conditions framework and in the LTRR. So this single notion that was elevated and brought forth in the springboard about as systems collapse people rise explains so much of how this plan came to be and what we need to continue to do.
It also explains why a group of committed career officials weren't out of frustration and not wanting to be a part of returning to the way things were, the way the way those systems had been designed that resulted in so much pain and suffering came together and slowly over time, not through official channels of asking for official formal appointments of political officials but through our networks, through our relationships, we identified like minded individuals who were thinking and understood if only we could do things differently. We could come together and craft an ambitious plan, Didn't know how long it would last or where it would take us but we had to try. This is without a doubt part of a bigger movement. They have very informally mapped what are those functions you would expect to be present and who is taking part of them. I think it's important so you can find each other.
It's also important so you can recognize none of us are doing this alone.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵See the YouTube video I made https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvyvRtmfVaI and the recent article I published on Liberty Sentinel https://libertysentinel.org/the-sneaky-federal-plot-to-turn-your-kids-and-community-towards-communism-in-the-name-of-resilience/ for more details on who’s behind the Federal Plan and how it's being implemented.
The Sneaky Federal Plot to Turn Your Kids and Community Towards Communism in the Name of 'Resilience' - Liberty Sentinel
How do you get freedom-loving cities and towns wanting nothing to do with communism to adopt collectivist policies and turn their community into surveillance states that take away their individual rights? Through deception. ‘Resilience’ Is Being Used as the Pretext for a Global Agenda The Federal Plan for Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience (a.k.a. ELTRR […]
libertysentinel.org
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵Contact your representatives and call for an investigation! For house reps, go to https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative and enter your zip code. For your state senators' contact information, go to https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm and select your state from the drop down menu.
Find Your Representative | house.gov
house.gov
U.S. Senate: Contacting U.S. Senators
senate.gov
reSee.it AI Summary
A new K12 technique called "Compassionate Systems Awareness" combines mindfulness, deprivation, and manipulation to make children activists for leftist causes. The Iceberg Theory is used to indoctrinate students into believing that US systems perpetuate racism and capitalism needs to be torn down. The Compassionate Systems Framework will teach kids to prioritize the collective and planet over their own interests. This manipulates children's compassion to override cognitive dissonance caused by conflicting beliefs.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵🚨NEW K12 BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUE‼️ "Compassionate Systems Awareness" combines social emotional learning mindfulness techniques, physical deprivation and psychological manipulation to get children to become activists for leftist political causes. Is this school or a POW camp? https://t.co/ACUlA7rixx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Compassionate Systems Awareness Framework teaches kids to view world issues with compassion. However, critics argue it manipulates children into leftist activism. An example is a school experiment where students experience hunger to promote empathy for global food distribution issues. The goal is to shift children towards collectivist solutions like government-controlled farming. This approach is seen as brainwashing and creating future social justice activists, disguised as compassion. Critics urge against social emotional learning in schools.
Translation: The Compassionate Systems Awareness Framework aims to teach children to approach global issues with compassion. However, some believe it manipulates kids into leftist activism. An example is a school experiment where students experience hunger to promote empathy for global food distribution issues. The goal is to steer children towards collectivist solutions like government-controlled farming. This approach is viewed as brainwashing and creating future social justice activists, disguised as compassion. Critics advise against social emotional learning in schools.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Compassionate Systems Awareness Framework claims to teach kids to look at the world's problems through a lens of compassion. But this newest form of social emotional learning is just yet another way schools are using psychological manipulation and experimentation to turn children into activists for leftist political causes. Take this example of how the International Baccalaureate Indianapolis School teaches 1st about hunger and food distribution. 1st, they create a situation where children can feel hunger pings by canceling the morning snack and moving lunch by 45 so it's later in the day. Then they gather data on and with the children by asking them how their stomachs feel and sound every hour along with their mood as they get hungrier.
The 6 7 year olds are then told to meditate on the central idea that everyone on Earth has the right to nutritious food and then have what they call a reflection as a class. These reflections were recorded weekly to see how the students' thinking about hunger and food were changed by these forced experiences. It makes me wonder how many weeks they carried on this very disturbing treatment of these kids. Why would they do this? For one reason and one reason only.
To alter the way these children see the world and its problems as a fault of people caring too much about their own individual needs instead of the needs of all. You see, during that reflection, they go through specific activities as a class that get them to think that the way that food is currently produced, processed, and shared around the world is bad because it causes hunger like what they were forced to experience. So the way these things are done needs to be changed. Their own hunger, plus their innate sense of empathy, is manipulated to see collectivist or communist policies like government owning farms instead of private farmers and allowing them to make sure food is distributed equitably as ways to fix the problem of hunger. They're also told their choices about food can help end hunger.
Knowing that the objectives of this lesson are in lockstep with radical ideas about environmental sustainability, one of the choices about food might include something like eating less meat to save the planet. The purveyors of this program call it creating systems awareness. Brazilian Marxist Paulo Freire called this critical consciousness. I call call this abuse and brainwashing and creating future social justice activists. It's all the same thing disguised as compassion.
Say no to social emotional learning in schools.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵Here’s an example of how a systems tool like The Iceberg Theory can be used to indoctrinate students into thinking that the systems/institutions of the US are set up to perpetuate racism, their own white privilege prevents them from seeing it & capitalism needs to be torn down. https://t.co/8c7HzK4h6m
Video Transcript AI Summary
Racism goes beyond what's visible, benefiting white people through white privilege. It shapes identities, creating norms that favor whites and hold back people of color. These beliefs are embedded in institutions, perpetuating inequality. Understanding racism is crucial to making meaningful change together.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People often think that racism is what they can easily see. We can refer to the tip of the iceberg as oppressive power. Racism's obvious ability to hurt people of color. But racism has much more power than the ways that people of color are oppressed. If we look under the surface, we can see that the purpose of racism is to benefit people who are considered white.
This is also referred to as white privilege to make it clear that white power is about the everyday benefits that white people receive, not some sort of organized white supremacy group. Down below, white power is the deepest and most dangerous level of the iceberg, identity power. This is where deep seated beliefs and attitudes are formed, rewarded, and maintained. Here, we see racism's power to shape the way we understand ourselves and others. For people who are considered white, racism forms an identity that asserts that their ways and standards are normative, civilized, and superior, and that all people should believe, behave, talk, and conform to these ways.
Why don't you act more like me? But the power of racism doesn't just affect individual self esteem. The effects of racism are encoded in the policies and practices of our institutions, creating real benefits for white people and holding people of color back. Racism is real and the part that's hardest to see will sink us all. We can work together to create changes in our institutions as long as we know what racism is.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵The Compassionate Systems Framework—WHICH WILL BE THE LENS USED TO TEACH ALL SUBJECTS-- will get kids to view themselves as global citizens who should care more about the needs of the collective + planet more than their rights to think, feel & act in their own best interest. https://t.co/XEJ1tJDOh9
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵Systems awareness is yet another method to try and manipulate children’s innate sense of compassion to override the cognitive dissonance they feel (& subsequent lack of action toward the UN SDGs) when the school’s religion interferes with their own familial & cultural beliefs. https://t.co/vsyhgxuoOm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cognitive dissonance arises when beliefs clash with actions, hindering UN's SDG progress. People struggle with sacrificing freedoms for collective goals or feeling overwhelmed by climate collapse. Resolving dissonance involves changing beliefs, actions, or perception of tasks. UN faces challenges in persuading individuals to support SDGs by rewiring beliefs and actions. For instance, transitioning to sustainable energy may lead to energy scarcity and higher prices, deterring those valuing personal freedom. To overcome this, UN aims to manipulate empathy, mindfulness, and critical thinking to align individuals with collective goals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cognitive dissonance is a mental state of psychological distress that occurs when your internal beliefs conflict with actions you take or are expected to take. The UN knows that the gigantic totalitarian changes they want to accomplish through the SDGs don't always sit well with certain people who value individual rights and freedoms because it can mean that those must be sacrificed to make their collective goals a reality. Then there are other people who experience cognitive dissonance because they want to help achieve the SDGs but are overwhelmed with despair at the thought of what seems like a daunting task in a hopeless situation of climate collapse they've been coaxed into believing is going to inevitably happen. Either way, the cognitive dissonance these individuals are experiencing can only be brought down and resolved in one of 3 ways, changing beliefs or changing action, which are the most difficult to convince someone to do, or that person changing their perception of the action they're being asked to do, which is what happens most often and usually results in that action not being taken at all. Changing the perception of the action could mean that they question the research behind the suggested action, that the cost of the action isn't worth the perceived benefits, and or that the action being asked of them conflicts with their internal beliefs so much that it is undeserving of the effort it would take to change their beliefs and actions.
This is an obvious problem when it comes to the UN getting people to become agents of change so that their sustainable development goals can be accomplished by 2030. In order to get what they want, they will have to figure out a way to rewire subjects' brains, as I said earlier, to change their beliefs and therefore their actions. Let's take their goal to achieve net zero emissions as an example. There's no question that a transition from fossil fuels to more sustainable sources could mean energy scarcity that could lead to death and a massive inflation of energy prices. Those who believe in individuality and personal freedom over the collective good will not choose to support their goals and so they need to be brainwashed through the weaponization of empathy, mindfulness, compassion, and the creation of critical inquiry, or in other words, creating a critical consciousness in people in order to override their existing internal beliefs.
reSee.it AI Summary
The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are well-known, but there's another agenda called Inner Development Goals (IDGs). Governments, businesses, and scientists are collaborating to spread the IDGs, which aim to reeducate individuals. The US government wants to integrate the IDGs into school recommendations. These goals are a rebranding of CASEL's Social Emotional skills, using empathy and critical inquiry to advocate for the UN SDGs. The IDGs are rapidly spreading through various platforms and networks. The question arises: who gets to define the relationship between the self and society? China or the UN? This could jeopardize individual rights. Moreover, the incorporation of IDG and SEL skills into a digital ID may lead to a social credit system. Attend the upcoming IDG Summit to learn more. Register here: summitinnerdevelopmentgoals.org.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵Premiere: https://youtu.be/FreqnLzBiRU You may already know about the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (the UN’s totalitarian agenda for every country)... but did you know there’s also now a re-education agenda for YOU & every person called the Inner Development Goals?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The inner development goals highlight the need for personal growth and shifts in order to achieve sustainability. Making the right decisions is crucial for reaching these goals. Mental health and well-being are supported by spirituality and faith, and education should focus on meaning and purpose rather than just delivering content. It is important to prioritize the world and be excited about it. However, it is also necessary to acknowledge that selfishness and environmental problems persist despite decades of scientific progress. Building a strong foundation for the future is crucial, but it requires training and action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The inner development goals show what inner shifts or human growth needs to happen the
Speaker 1: Is more sustainable, but in order to be able to reach those sustainability goals, we need to also be able to Take the
Speaker 2: right decisions to get there.
Speaker 3: Mental health and well-being is supported by our inner capacities for spirituality and faith. Where education is fundamentally oriented towards meaning and purpose in a changing world rather than, mere content delivery for students.
Speaker 4: I think that's the most important thing to do
Speaker 0: is to make sure that we
Speaker 4: are the most important thing to do is to make sure that we are the most important thing to do is to world. And we are very excited about the world. And
Speaker 5: we are very excited about the
Speaker 3: so,
Speaker 6: we're not I think, I think, I think, I think, I think,
Speaker 0: I think, I think, I think, I think, I think, I think,
Speaker 6: I think, I think, I think, I think, I think, I think, I
Speaker 0: think, I think, I think,
Speaker 5: I think,
Speaker 0: I think, I think, I
Speaker 3: think, I think, I think, I thought that with 30 years of good science, we could address those problems. But I was wrong. The top environmental problems are selfishness,
Speaker 4: also, we have a very strong foundation
Speaker 1: for the future. And we have a very strong foundation
Speaker 4: for the first time
Speaker 0: we're going to be able to make sure that we're going to be able to make sure that we're going to be able to make sure that we're going to be able to make sure that we're going to be able
Speaker 1: to make sure that we're going to be able to make
Speaker 0: sure that we're going to Yes. It's great that you want to help make the world work better, but you have to get into training.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵Progressive governments, universities, businesses (Google, Apple) & scientists are working together (fascism) to spread the Inner Development Goals into all of society. "I could give you lots of examples of this, but then I would have to kill you." --IDG COO Michael Wernstedt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our theory of change is to ensure that everyone, not just top leaders, has the resources and training to do this work. We have partnered with progressive companies like Ikea, Spotify, Ericsson, and Google, who not only sponsor this initiative but also train all their employees. Some companies even aim to spread this in society. We are in talks with Apple to have this in every iPhone, although it may take 1 or 2 years due to internal bureaucracy. To establish credibility, we have collaborated with universities such as Stockholm University, Stockholm School of Economics, Lund University, Harvard, Atmos, Paris University, and Danish Technical University.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our theory of change has been that who has the resources to do this, to really not just train like a top leadership of of leaders who can do this work, but but to see that everybody has to do this work. Our thinking, who has the resources to do this, not just for the top leadership, but for everybody. And we said, of course, it's countries and we want to work with countries and it's organizations. So we have teamed up with some of the most progressive companies in the, in the world, and you recognize many of these countries, sorry, companies, Ikea, Spotify, Ericsson, Google and so on. And they have said that we will we will support this initiative, with, you know, sponsoring it, but we will also train all our employees in this.
And of course, the big company like Ikea, 150,000 employees is a huge impact. And then some companies had also said that we will not just support this and train our employees, but we will also work to to spread this, in in in society. And and, I can give you Lots of examples on this, but then I would have to kill you. And since I was, you know, in an accident last week, I wanna do that. So we're now talking to Apple and said, you know, we would like to have this in every iPhone.
It will take us 1 or 2 years to work the internal bureaucracy, but, you know, we will get there. Our thinking was that if we want to buy in from from countries and companies, that we really need to do this work, then it has to be firmly rooted in science. So we teamed up with a number of universities, first Swedish university, like Stockholm University, Stockholm School of Economics and Lund University, and then also international, Harvard, at Atmos, Paris University and now Danish Technical University.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵25+ countries are interested in embedding the Inner Development Goals into their national policies, including the United States. US gov’t agencies using climate change as a lever for societal change want to integrate the IDG framework into their recommendations for schools.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Costa Rica was the first country to adopt sustainable development in its national policies. Now, many countries like Colombia, Iran, and Bangladesh are following suit. Around 25 countries are in talks about implementing this approach. In the US, major government agencies are considering integrating the IDG framework into recommendations for schools and agencies. This would mark the first time the inner dimension is included in climate change strategies. Regardless of the framework, scientists worldwide are embracing this shift in consciousness. Exciting news about these developments is expected in the next few weeks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Costa Rica was the 1st country, that in December said that we will adopt even developing those in all our national policies. And now, many countries are almost over the fence. And Colombia, Iran, Bangladesh, nowadays, that is the, ones closest to the Jantuan war. But we're talking to about 25 countries. We will also take this number.
Speaker 1: Some of the biggest US government agencies working with climate change are looking at Integrating the IDG framework into the recommendation to all US schools and all US agencies and how to work with. Hopefully, We will be able to tell the good news in just 3 or 4 weeks that this is happening and it's incredible. It's the first time the inner dimension It's part of recommendations of how to work with climate change. And no matter if the IDG framework or not is included, the inner dimension is already there. The scientists are getting it, and it's a global shift in consciousness, if you are so to say.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵The Inner Development Goals are essentially a rebranding of CASEL's 5 Social Emotional skills, which are meant to overcome one’s cognitive dissonance about the individual freedoms we’re expected to give up in favor of the collective well-being advocated for in the UN SDGs.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Politicians, officials, and future leaders will be trained in 23 skills across 5 domains, similar to social emotional learning (SEL) competencies. SEL aims to rewire everyone's brains, not just students, to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, cognitive dissonance arises when individuals' beliefs conflict with the actions required by the SDGs. Resolving this dissonance can be achieved by changing beliefs, changing actions, or altering perceptions of the actions. The UN faces challenges in convincing people to become agents of change for their goals by 2030.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Politicians, senior officials, and other people in positions of power as well as our future leaders will be trained in these 23 skills across 5 domains that are virtually identical to the 5 core competencies of social emotional learning. If you read the definitions of CASEL's competencies carefully, Lee. You'll get that self awareness and self management covers the IDG of being. Social awareness is thinking and relating. Relationship skills is both relating and collaborating and responsible decision making is acting.
Why is it significant that the inner development goals are essentially social emotional learning for adults? It's because the United Nations Educational a Scientific and Cultural Organization or UNESCO, specifically said in this paper that they need social emotional learning, which I've those extensively in my other videos as a cultural and spiritual brainwashing program in K12 education to achieve the UN SDGs. Theater development goals like social emotional learning is meant to rewire everyone's brains, not just students. Cognitive dissonance is a mental state of psychological distress that occurs when your internal beliefs conflict with actions you take or are expected to take. The UN knows that the gigantic totalitarian changes they want to accomplish in the globalization and domination they're implementing through the SDGs don't always sit well with certain people who value individual rights and freedoms because it can mean that those must be sacrificed to make the collective goals a reality.
The cognitive dissonance these individuals are experiencing can only be brought down and resolved in one of 3 ways. Changing beliefs or changing action, which are the most difficult to convince someone to do, or that person changing their perception of the action they're being asked to do, which is what happens most often and usually results in that action not being taken at all. Changing the perception of the action and could mean that they question the research behind the suggested action, that the cost of the action isn't worth the perceived benefits, and or that the action being asked of them conflicts with their internal beliefs so much that it is undeserving of the effort it would take to change their beliefs and actions. This is an obvious problem when it comes to the UN getting people to become agents of change so that their sustainable development goals can be accomplished by 2,030.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵Both the Inner Development Goals & Social Emotional Learning try to overcome that dissonance by weaponizing training in empathy, mindfulness, compassion & critical inquiry to get those who are training in these skills to advocate for the UN SDGs and its progressive ideologies.
Video Transcript AI Summary
To achieve their goals, they aim to rewire people's brains and change their beliefs and actions. This involves interventions like emotional regulation and resilience to navigate behaviors necessary for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They use social-emotional learning (SEL) in education and other sectors to manipulate individuals through initiatives promoting inner development and mental health. For instance, to achieve net zero emissions, they target those who prioritize personal freedom and individuality over collective good. They aim to brainwash them using empathy, mindfulness, compassion, and critical inquiry to override their existing beliefs. They also teach resilience and emotional regulation to motivate scared youth to take action against climate change. All these efforts aim to promote pro-social behavior aligned with the UN SDGs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In order to get what they want, they will have to figure out a way to rewire subjects' brains, as I said earlier, to change their beliefs and therefore their actions. UNESCO's SCL for SDG's paper described these as interventions because, quote, subjects of dissonance require emotional regulatory capabilities or emotional resilience to navigate the behaviors and prerequisite antecedents, meaning the beliefs and mindsets you need ahead of time to attain the SDGs. SEL in the Education Sector and the IDGs in other sectors Are these interventions we're talking about that will utilize the competencies of that creepy EMC two acronym that hearkens back to Einstein's equation of Special Relativity To manipulate all people to take action under the guise of inner development and positive mental health initiatives. Let's take their goal to achieve net zero emissions as an example. There's no question that a transition from fossil fuels to more sustainable sources could mean energy scarcity that could lead to death and a massive inflation of energy prices.
Those who believe in individuality and personal freedom over the collective good will not choose to support their goals and so they need to be brainwashed through the weaponization of empathy, mindfulness, compassion, and the creation of critical inquiry or, in other words, creating a critical consciousness in people in order to override their existing internal beliefs. Similarly, the poor youth that they've scared half to death that the world is going to end because of climate change need to be coaxed through their paralysis that keeps from taking action by teaching them resilience and emotional regulation. All of this training in social emotional skills is so that individuals Exhibit what UNESCO calls pro social behavior. In other words, actions that further the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵The IDGs are spreading rapidly, through their many nodes, networks, hubs, and open source platforms which were mentioned in the June 2022 resolution adopted by the EU as helpful tools to accelerate progress toward the SDGs.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Interdevelopment Goals aim to implement them worldwide, starting with the EU. A recent resolution highlighted the role of the IDGs in supporting the SDGs. It emphasized the significance of SDG 17, Partnerships for the Goals, and recognized the innovative role of open source initiatives like the Interdevelopment Goals Initiative. These initiatives aim to educate, inspire, and empower individuals to drive positive change in society, ultimately accelerating progress towards achieving the SDGs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The long term plan with the Interdevelopment Goals is to implement them across every sector in every country across the globe. Alarmingly, the process for this has already begun in the EU. The role of the IDGs to help with the SDGs was highlighted in this resolution that was recently adopted in June of 2022. Under the budget and financing section In number 50, it says, quote, underlines the importance of SDG 17, Partnerships for the Goals, notes in the framework of global partnerships And capacity building, the innovative role of open source initiatives such as the Interdevelopment Goals Initiative that aim to educate, inspire, and empower people to be a positive force for change in society, thereby accelerating progress toward achieving the SDGs.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵If the IDGs are meant to become “global values," which governmental system gets to define what the relationship should look like between the self & society or the individual & the state? China's? Who gets to decide what our global society needs to experience “well-being”?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the equality movement has succeeded in countries like Sweden, where it is expected for managers and people in power to prioritize equality. They question why the same emphasis is not placed on leadership and personal development. They suggest that if we have global goals for sustainable development, we should also work together to shape our culture and the kind of leaders we want. The interviewer raises the question of how China and India view this relationship between the individual and society, highlighting the importance of considering different cultural perspectives. They also mention the need to determine who gets to define global values and what transformations are required.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Equality movement has, in some ways, succeeded in countries like Sweden, where it's a very strong norm if you're a manager or a person in power, especially Mhmm. That you need to care about this and work with us systemically. And the the least thing you have to do is pay it lip service because you're gonna be thrown out of the board's room or leadership team. Yeah. And how can we make the same thing with leadership development or personal development.
Because today, senior leaders still can say, oh, that's up to you. You you you do mind that with your own psychologist or your own, that this is the thing that we are responsible for doing. Like, this the business of business is business, you know, and that's because, of course, we can just let's say that, no, we should just let evolution handle that and it will all be fine. Why aren't we, if we have sustainable development goals and we realize that we have some external goals. I mean, just like like a company can have goals of markets they want to be and their shares or profit they want to make.
If we have these external goals together globally, why aren't we doing our culture work together. What kind of society and what kind of humans we want to create and what kind of leaders we want for our top positions? What
Speaker 1: do you think China's view of that would be? Or what would India's view of that be in their cultures or in their relationship between the individual and the state, for example. There is already a very different,
Speaker 2: internal, a spiritual understanding of the relationship between the self and the society. That question and points that the interviewer brings up at the end is an important one. If you value your own personal choice and freedom to develop yourself as you desire, you should be asking yourself Whose governmental system gets to define what the relationship looks like between the self and society or the individual and the state when it comes to global values? Who gets to decide what our global society needs to experience health, well-being, thriving, and flourishing? And if that's tied to a political agenda, what transformational shifts does that require?
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵If it’s China or the UN that decides our global values, we’re in trouble, because they believe that you don’t have any rights that they don’t give you and that individual rights must be in submission when they come into conflict with those that benefit societal/collective good.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The IDG focuses on inner development, but not on individual well-being or the planet's health. Their goal is to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the United Nations believes that they grant rights and prioritize actions that benefit the collective good over individual rights. This contradicts American values, which state that rights come from God and that the government's role is to protect and uphold those rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I can tell you right off the bat because the IDG folks say it themselves that when they say inner development, they're mostly not referring to individual health, well-being, or flourishing, plus that of the collectives and of the planet with the resulting goal of that inner development being achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This is a problem because the United Nations believes that you don't have any rights that they don't give you and that actions benefiting the collective good in service of the sustainable development goals are more important than your individual rights. This is in direct conflict with American values which assert that your rights come from God and that the purpose of government and your elected officials is to uphold and protect those rights.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵Since the plan is to measure if IDG intervention changes our behaviors/attitudes towards the SDGs or not, won’t this eventually shift our society into a social credit system when the IDG & SEL skills get incorporated into a digital ID where your compliance is monitored/tracked?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Companies like Panorama have measured students' values and beliefs in social emotional learning. Similarly, those who aim to influence our beliefs and actions towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) need quantitative ways to assess the effectiveness of their interventions. These skills may be tracked throughout our lives, connected to virtual credentials and blockchain technology. The lack or presence of these competencies could lead to rewards or punishments, such as promotions or travel restrictions. The ultimate goal is to shift our economy from capitalism to a well-being or post-growth model, which some view as a form of communism. The concept of inner development goals could serve as a starting point to engage people in more complex frameworks and theories, including those who are typically left behind, such as conservatives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just as companies like Panorama have done the students' values, attitudes, and beliefs in social emotional learning, those who want to influence our inner development need to have ways to measure quantitatively whether or not their trainings and interventions to change our beliefs and actions toward the SDGs are actually working. SEL and IDG skills will eventually be tracked and recorded as data that follows the individual from cradle to grave under the guise of lifelong learning. When incorporated into a virtual credentials wallet as a competency score, like they wanna do with initiatives like the Internet of Education, which will allow employment and education to be connected and share data through blockchain, and then that eventually gets absorbed into a full fledged digital ID, These social emotional or interdevelopment goal competencies or the lack thereof could mean rewards or punishments for you based upon how successful they are. Maybe that means incentives like a promotion at work or like in China, the inability to travel if you do things like participate in a political rally that the government doesn't agree with. That could bring your inner development or social credit score down.
You must understand that the main goal of measuring all of this, social emotional learning, environmental, social, and governance scores, and the inter development goals is to change our economy from a capitalist model into a well-being or post growth model, which is code for communism. We are packaging in The framework in a western package deliberately because it's it's a cure for the western mind, by western mind. But it's not The people in the east with much more complex understanding who are causing the troubles. It's it's this western capitalistic in systems that we have invented. And maybe it's like a trojan horse here again, where we need to start with something that is very paradoxical, I mean inner development goals that people get it instantly and I think the inner development goals is is that step that can can get people interested and get them into more complex frameworks, theories, ways of thinking.
I think we really need to lean to get the people that we usually leave behind like the Conservatives.
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
🧵The Inner Development Goal folks have a Summit coming up next week. It might be worth your time to sign up to attend virtually and see what else they’re saying & where they are planning to go with this. You can find the link to register here: https://summit.innerdevelopmentgoals.org/ END
IDG Summit 2023
summit.innerdevelopmentgoals.org
@iamlisalogan - Lisa Logan
The Inner Development Goal folks have a Summit coming up next week. It might be worth your time to sign up to attend virtually and see what else they’re saying & where they are planning to go with this. You can find the link to register here: https://summit.innerdevelopmentgoals.org END
IDG Summit 2023
summit.innerdevelopmentgoals.org