TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ic911justice

Saved - October 9, 2025 at 8:49 AM

@ic911justice - Intl. Center for 9/11 Justice

Two highly experienced commercial pilots failed to hit the South Tower in a full motion simulator when they attempted to replicate the observed 587mph speed and sudden turn 10 seconds from the tower. And we are supposed to believe an amateur pilot did it on his first attempt. https://t.co/33yy2w1U3F

Video Transcript AI Summary
At about 7,000 feet, the dive begins, with 'the speed alarm you can hear clicking' meaning 'the aircraft's exceeding the being never exceed speed.' The second pilot, 'on silent' to protect identity, shows a similar process: planes dive to lose altitude and make a last-minute turn about a mile from the tower, and the turn starts but the plane 'narrowly misses the tower.' This indicates a 'combination of momentum and controllability problems' as a 500-knot recovery out of a dive must turn through 'three or four degrees' with little time to react. It requires 'a lot of precision, very precise timing and judgment.' The plane must be 'put into the right level of bank' and 'pull back' in order to make that turn. If it's 'a couple of seconds too late' or 'insufficient role is put into the control inputs,' you're going to miss a towel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is about 7,000 feet, and it's and start the dive in. That is the speed alarm you can hear clicking. That means the aircraft's exceeding the being never exceed speed, Speaker 1: and the warnings are going on. Okay. Stop turning now. That's it's slightly unclear. Oops. I need to go back. Sorry about this. Okay. Let's get it right. This is slightly unclear because there were buildings on the graph which we couldn't get removed. So I'm gonna show the three d image, which is a Speaker 0: little bit clearer and Speaker 1: it's Okay. So turn in now. Speaker 0: The plane misses the power. Speaker 1: So the pilot's started to turn. He's trying to get Speaker 0: the plane to turn in. Speaker 1: Oh, wow. Speaker 0: But essentially, it just misses the power. Speaker 1: This is the second pilot. This is on silent because, there's a lot of talk going on and the pilots wanted their identity protected, so it's on silent. But you see a similar process here. Planes put into a dive to try to get to to lose the altitude, and then the attempt coming up to make the last minute turn. It's about a mile away from the tower that that turn started. And so the turn starts in, you can see the plane starting to turn, but it's not enough and narrowly misses the tower. So just to to go through this, what this is indicating is essentially you have a combination of momentum and controllability problems. You have a plane which is going at high speed, 500 knots is coming pulling out of a dive, and then it has to make a turn to pull through three or four degrees in order to get it to line up with the tower, and it just does not react very quickly. It starts to turn slowly, and it's difficult for the pilots to judge that. Essentially, you're looking at is you need a lot of precision, very precise timing and judgment. The plane needs to be put into the right level of bank. It needs to control column needs to be pulled back in order to make that turn, And there's not much room for error because the plane is so close to the tower. If it's a couple of seconds too late, then the angle it has to turn through gets greater and greater and it would become more and more difficult to turn the plane. If insufficient role is put into the control inputs, then the plane is not gonna be start to turn fast enough. So you've got to get it just right or you're gonna miss a towel, is what you just saw with those two first attempts.
Saved - August 7, 2025 at 7:28 AM

@ic911justice - Intl. Center for 9/11 Justice

@jakeshieldsajj 36 news reporters also believed the towers were bombed (before they were told what to think and say) https://t.co/xKitIvEg1k

Video Transcript AI Summary
Eyewitnesses reported multiple explosions at the World Trade Center. The explosions caused the buildings to collapse, sending smoke and debris throughout the area. Some described the scene as being "out of a horror film." Many heard and felt the explosions, with some feeling tremors under their feet. One person reported seeing what appeared to be charges set off on each floor in succession. A New York City officer reportedly said "car bomb" after one of the explosions. A fire department chief of safety believed there were devices planted in the building, causing secondary explosions that killed many rescue workers. One person reported that the first wave of rescue workers were trapped and killed by the second blast. One report stated that a bomb hit the lobby first, followed by the first plane. The "working theory" was that there were two planes and explosives in the building.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But as I was looking up, I saw the entire explosion. It looked exactly like the first two, but we certainly had the most perfect vantage point for that explosion. It was unbelievable. And There Speaker 1: has just been a huge explosion. We can see a billowing smoke rising, and I can't I'll I'll tell you that I can't see that second tower. Speaker 2: The two towers, a huge explosion now waiting for money on all of us. Speaker 3: We're not sure exactly what happened, but it was another explosion on the far side of one of the buildings from where we're standing. The verb the the reverberation and another explosion on the right hand side. Speaker 4: Watch the right side. It's exploding. It's apart. On the Speaker 3: far side of the building, there seemed to be another explosion. And also on the right hand side, there was also another explosion. We're not sure if that was, extra reverberation from what happened at the World Trade Center or if that was an added explosion. Speaker 5: We heard a very loud blast of explosion. We looked up, and the building literally began to collapse before us. Speaker 1: Again, there has been a second explosion here in Manhattan at the at the Trade Center. Are Speaker 5: And believe it or not, there was another major explosion. The build the building itself, literally, the top of it came down sending smoke and debris everywhere. Speaker 6: Do you know if it was an explosion or if it was a building collapse? To me, it Speaker 3: sounded like it to me, Speaker 6: it sounded like an explosion. A huge explosion, a huge rumbling cloud. We're taking photographs and securing this area just prior to that huge explosion that we all heard and felt. Speaker 4: But it literally exploded and came down as though it had been hit. We heard an explosion. The explosion happened was shooting pieces of the plane. There are pieces of the plane on Church Street. Speaker 5: There's another explosion as we speak. Speaker 3: Something either exploded or fell off the side of the one building that was attacked. Speaker 2: Then the entire top of the building just blew up. Speaker 5: And just seconds ago, there was a huge explosion, and it appears right now the Second World Trade Tower has just collapsed. Speaker 7: It was just a a small explosion, and then rocks and debris and everything started pouring down. And we're about two blocks away when the the second explosion hit, and all we heard was just this small explosion, then you saw a a roar of an of an explosion and all kinds of smoke coming, bellowing out, debris falling down. Speaker 4: It's unbelievable because you you hear these explosions. In fact, I just heard another one. I don't know if it was like an after effect or whatnot, just while you were on the phone talking about the school closings. I also I'm hearing another explosion, just so you know. I'm hearing another rumble. It's what you can feel when these tremors come is that it literally comes up under your feet. That's what it feels like. I that's the best way I know to describe it. Speaker 8: I certainly didn't imagine that there would be second or tertiary explosions, so they parked some of their vehicles in those areas. And many of those vehicles people in those vehicles have lost their lives. Speaker 0: Well, we just heard another explosion go off a couple of minutes ago, Chris, and saw a bunch more people sort of running this way. A woman on her bike was was screaming as it went off. And there was a a New York City officer. He's plainclothes walking by with a radio. I tried to stop him to Speaker 4: ask what happened, and all Speaker 0: he said was car bomb, car bomb, and then I I couldn't press him for any more information. He said when that last bomb went or when that last collapse happened and they Speaker 9: When the first tower collapsed, it was a massive explosion. When that explosion occurs, it was, like, the scene out of a horror film. Speaker 2: Another explosion, a rolling blast of fire, a rolling column of fire towards us. Speaker 9: You saw people being wheeled on gurneys away from the site of the explosion. I looked up and that's when I heard the pardon me. That's when I heard the explosion. That's when the second tower came down. Speaker 10: Was It was an explosion. Speaker 11: Two or three minutes ago, there was yet another collapse or explosion. I'm But at a quarter to eleven, there was another collapse or explosion following the 10:30 collapse of the Second Tower. Speaker 0: Explosion and and also the the collapse of the tower. Speaker 3: I'm With subsequent explosions and Speaker 12: And explosions were coming down the building. It looked as if charges had been set on each floor and they were in succession going off. Speaker 13: He received word of the possibility of a secondary device, that is another bomb going off. He tried to get his men out as quickly as he could, but he said that there was another explosion which took place. And then an hour after the first hit here, with the first crash that took place, he said, there was another explosion that took place, in one of the towers here. So, obviously, he according to his theory, he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building. But the bottom line is that according to the chief of safety of the New York City Fire Department, he says that he probably lost a great many men in those secondary explosions. Speaker 5: Would put us about a block and a half away from the site of where the explosion was. So their fear is that there may have been explosive device planted either in the building or in the adjacent area. Speaker 2: Office supplies many, many blocks from the site of the actual explosion where they now Speaker 10: I was actually in the subway heading towards the World Trade Center right around Franklin Street. And after the first explosion, the subway station started to fill with smoke. The subway cars started to fill with smoke, and the subways actually stopped. Speaker 14: And I was walking on Broadway at Fullerton, and suddenly we heard an explosion. It was the first tower coming down. I started to walk out. I walked down Broadway towards Canal, and we heard the second a second explosion. Speaker 15: Covered in the debris and the dust from from the explosion itself. I was because it was rocked with a lot of the explosion from the force of the twin of the, Twin World Trade Centers when they came down. Speaker 16: I was out front as you were when the second explosion occurred because the explosion threw debris on top of a lot of people. That was when the real panic began. Speaker 13: Sequence of crashes, then explosions, and then the collapses. Speaker 5: This must have been ground zero where this thing blew up car after car after car, buses completely obliterated and burned straight down to the steel. Speaker 15: That's the first time we're hearing that. So two planes and explosives that were in the building. Is that correct? Speaker 6: That is the working theory at this point. Speaker 17: The first wave of rescue workers who went in were trapped, many of them killed by the second blast. Speaker 7: And escaped through the lobby where they report they believe there was a bomb in the lobby. Speaker 4: I believe the the bomb hit the lobby first, and a couple of seconds in the first plane hit.
Saved - April 12, 2025 at 6:06 AM

@ic911justice - Intl. Center for 9/11 Justice

Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson openly talking about 9/11 as a false flag event to an audience of millions. We've come a long way. The dam is going to break soon. https://t.co/fen948ZsP2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker researched false flag attacks, citing the Gulf of Tonkin, the USS Liberty incident, and Operation Ajax as examples. They claim to have seen preprogramming in the news about an impending attack by Bin Laden. The speaker claims to have predicted the specifics of 9/11, stating they said the CIA would fly planes into the World Trade Centers and blame it on Bin Laden. They allege that intelligence agencies were tracking the supposed hijackers, who were being trained in US military bases and funded by multiple governments. They add that Bin Laden was a CIA asset used to destabilize areas and act as a boogeyman. They cite the 1990s World Trade Center bombing attempt involving Ahmad Salam, and the structural issues of the World Trade Center as contributing factors. They also mention the Project for the New American Century document, which stated that a new Pearl Harbor event was needed to launch the Pax Americana. The speaker claims the document also mentioned race-specific bioweapons.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd already been researching false flag attacks, not just by our government, but other governments throughout history. The Gulf Of Tonkin to get us into Vietnam in '64 that was later declassified to have been staged. And, of course, The US's liberty, between, Israel and the Lyndon Baines Johnson administration wanted to get us into full war with Egypt, but the ship survived, became the most decorated ship in US history because of the valiance of the crew. And operation Ajax where the CIA, Kermit Roosevelt fifty three overthrew Mohammed Mosaddegh, who was a reformist and really pro west, but he wouldn't give them all the oil. And they use radical Islamist to overthrow him and then put the shah in and then overthrew the shah. Over and over again, there's just hundreds and hundreds of historical real case examples of that being done by our government and other governments. And I saw a lot of preprogramming in the news. Oh, someone Bin Laden's gonna get us when he gets us. We we need to give up all of our rights, and it'll be a new America, and we've gotta set up this police state. So so I saw a lot of preprogramming. And But you Speaker 1: called the specifics you called the specifics of nine eleven. I just can't get past that. And I've asked you in public and private, how did you do that? I've never gotten really a straight answer. I doubt I will now, but the fact remains the incontrovertible fact, the provable fact that you called it, and then they began a campaign against you. And it's not because you're a racist. You've never been a racist or an anti Semite or a crazy person, actually. You've never spewed hate, but you have for, you know, thirty years said the foundations of our system are actually kind of fake and rotten, and it's but it was 09/11. That's when they decide that's when they really decided this guy has to be stopped and and just basically eliminated the first amendment to stop you. Speaker 0: Well well, just to be clear, it's not that I'm dodging how I knew it. That was twenty four years ago, and I I remember what I was covering and what I was doing at the time. And everybody's seen the July 25, where I went into detail, but but but actually my crew using ChatGPT scanning through all my old shows, found shows in April, and even before that in March where I get more specific, and I said the CIA is gonna fly planes into the World Trade Centers and blame it on Bin Laden. Speaker 1: So I just think that's the most amazing fact I've ever heard in my entire life that you called that, and and we again, we can prove it because it's on tape with time stamps. And everyone's like, oh, yeah. Okay. Alex Jones is crazy. I hate her. Okay. Whatever. I don't think that's true, but you called 911, and no investigator ever called you to ask you how you called that? How you knew that? Not one. No. No one from DOJ, Philip Zelikow of the nine eleven Commission No. You? Speaker 0: No. Why? And well, I mean, obviously, because certain segments of our intelligence agencies with other foreign intelligence agencies were tracking the supposed hijackers. They were being trained in US military bases. They were being given government money from our government and other governments. They were being protected. Then two of their magic passports, all that rubble and hundreds of millions pieces of paper were found the next day to then connect them to it. It was all laid out. Then the Bin Laden family was thrown was flown out of the country in the days after, and that was basically shut down in the news. You know, it was covered some locally here in Florida. So I knew that Bin Laden had been CIA going back to really the mujahideen being set up by Zbigniew Brzezinski and Jimmy Carter, then Reagan took that over. And then they kinda build that as blowback, but even recently, you've seen the USAID information and and and other documents come out in the Institute for Peace where they're directly paying massive amounts of money to Taliban, to Al Qaeda, to ISIS even in the last few years. Oh, yeah. And they use them as these proxy armies. So so that was well known in the research circles that that that that Bin Laden was basically a multinational cutout used by Western intelligence agencies to destabilize areas, but also be a boogeyman. Then you see CNN in a mountain cave magically being able to find him, but The US can't kill him and nobody else can. And I knew that CNN is literally the, you know, CIA broadcasting system. For sure. Total mockingbird, thoroughbred. And there were hundreds and hundreds of points that went in, but okay, Bin Laden's work for the CIA, and you got CNN interviewing him, and and and they're all scaring us saying he's about to attack us. And then I remembered how Ahmad Salam, who was an Egyptian intelligence agency operative working for the FBI and CIA, was hired to build a bomb in the early nineties to blow up the World Trade Center. But then when they said build a real bomb, he started recording them because he he sort of figured out it was a setup. And then he had that press conference where he played it. I interviewed him a few times where where the FBI said, no. Just go ahead and let it go forward. And so you start adding all that together. They'd already tried to hit the World Trade Center before. The World Trade Center had a lot of, issues in it with asbestos and also some of the structural issues. So they're already wanting to have a plan to get rid of it. And then you have the CIA and FBI in the Solomon Brothers Building, Building 7, the 47 story skyscraper. You have that right next door. So I looked at all of it and I thought where would the new Pearl Harbor be? And the year before in, the project for American Century headed up by Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, Dick Cheney wrote in there that we need a new Pearl Harbor event to launch the Pax Americana, but it wasn't an American empire of freedom and liberty and justice like Trump's trying to, you know, launch. It was a globalist empire of military enforcement and tyranny. And so there was a lot of other data points that went into it. Cheney also writes in that same document. We need to look at, you know, race specific bioweapons to to have control and bring in our power, and that was actually picked up in the newspapers.
Saved - April 24, 2024 at 11:06 PM

@ic911justice - International Center for 9/11 Justice

@iluminatibot She confirmed via email in 2021 that she did indeed her an explosion. https://t.co/OR9jOGZaZU

Saved - April 24, 2024 at 10:08 PM

@ic911justice - International Center for 9/11 Justice

@iluminatibot Another video that was shadowbanned until 2020 was this report by NY1 reporter Gigi Stone Woods of "an incredibly loud explosion." She is the only known WTC 7 witness recorded using the word "explosion" spontaneously on the day of 9/11, so a very important eyewitness account. https://t.co/XlMu3bzUhT

Video Transcript AI Summary
There was a fire that seemed like it could get worse, then a loud explosion happened. People started screaming and running due to a foul odor and smoke. Some filmed the chaotic scene, while hundreds of police and others fled. Firefighters and police were interviewed about the incident. Translation (if needed): There was a fire that seemed like it could get worse, then a loud explosion happened. People started screaming and running due to a foul odor and smoke. Some filmed the chaotic scene, while hundreds of police and others fled. Firefighters and police were interviewed about the incident.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Possibility that the fire was going to get worse. All of a sudden, a loud incredible loud explosion. And we have the video to show you. Now what happened was if we started screaming, everyone started screaming. It was a very foul odor. We were covered in smoke, and everyone started running. I started running as well. I could talk to her, Bashe Warner, did not run, and he he was there filming all of the clouds, filming the billowing, the billowing smoke. And it was, it was just incredibly frightening scene. Hundreds of policemen running away from the scene and, and slipped anyone that was, in the area. Now we did speak to many firefighters and policemen.
Saved - April 3, 2024 at 3:27 PM

@ic911justice - International Center for 9/11 Justice

It's now 15 years since the publication of the landmark nano-thermite paper by Niels Harrit et al — and still no defender of the official 9/11 story has come forward to refute it in a scientific journal. Their silence speaks volumes. https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

Bentham Open ArchivesTwitterSM-FacebookSM-Youtube benthamopenarchives.com
Saved - October 23, 2023 at 9:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a span of 7 seconds, we discovered 67 distinct flashes in a video, averaging 10 flashes per second. Testimonies from first responders recount witnessing these flashes before the collapse of the World Trade Center. Stephen Gregory, FDNY Assistant Fire Commissioner for Communications, and Karin DeShore, FDNY Captain, both observed the flashes, describing them as orange and red bursts that circled the building. To analyze the video yourself, click the link: https://ic911.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/south-tower-flashes-7-seconds.mp4.

@ic911justice - International Center for 9/11 Justice

We found 67 distinct flashes in a span of 7 seconds in this video. That’s about 10 flashes per second. Some of the first responders’ testimony comes to mind: "I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . . You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. . . . He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did you see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too." — Stephen Gregory, FDNY Assistant Fire Commissioner for Communications "Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center, there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode. The popping sound, and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building. I went inside and I told everybody that the other building or there was an explosion occurring up there and I said I think we have another major explosion." — Karin DeShore, FDNY Captain Download the video and let us know how many flashes you find: https://ic911.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/south-tower-flashes-7-seconds.mp4

Saved - October 16, 2023 at 5:01 PM

@ic911justice - International Center for 9/11 Justice

“Puffs of dust” (Popular Mechanics), “puffs of smoke” (NIST), or “high velocity bursts of debris from point-like sources (Journal of 9/11 Studies)... Which do you think is telling the truth? https://ic911.org/journal/articles/high-velocity-bursts-of-debris-from-point-like-sources-in-the-wtc-towers

High Velocity Bursts of Debris from Point-Like Sources in the WTC Towers - International Center for 9/11 Justice Since September 11th, 2001, there have been two competing hypotheses to explain the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings. The first hypothesis, a fire-induced collapse of all three buildings, has undergone numerous variations over the years, as government scientists have worked to keep it alive while ignoring the second hypothesis. That second hypothesis is the controlled demolition of all three buildings. ic911.org
View Full Interactive Feed