TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @idropFbombs
@idropFbombs - ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐เฟโฝ
Microchips, RNA and human cloning in a 2002-2003 elementary school yearbook..๐ฑ They have been programming us for a MINIMUM of 20 years! https://t.co/TfHiOfBI6n
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 recalls yearbook content from 2002-2003, including a center section with art, pop culture, and science. The key point shared is an item titled chipping in, describing Verichip as a microchip containing personal identification information injected under the skin, virtually undetectable, and usable for financial and transportation security, building access, as well as military and government security purposes. The segment also notes RNA has its day and mentions a federal bill banning all forms of human cloning, including efforts used for promising stem cell research.
The speaker uses this example to illustrate a view that we have been conditioned for at least twenty years to accept a chip that would enable buying and selling, alongside concerns about human cloning and DNA manipulation. A lighter blurb follows about technology: Instant photo, with a phone camera that can capture up to eight seconds of video, and email images to anyone from just about anywhere, such as showing a photo of the Statue of Liberty to โmom.โ
The speaker argues this technology is addictive and that people have been programmed for a long time. They point to widespread smartphone addiction and the emergence of payment methods like Apple Pay, suggesting that some places already swipe hands for paying or building access, and predicting it will become large-scale. The speaker asserts that it will reach a point where one โwonโt be able to buy or sell without it,โ equating this to the mark of the beast.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, then we have me there with my name in missus Reker's class, fourth, fifth grade. There's the front of my yearbook, 2002, 2003. So I was about nine or 10 depending on when the picture was taken. There's another picture back here with me and my great grandfather. And then we have kind of the main point, which is the center portion of this yearbook, which has all the pretty colorful pictures, the art, pop culture, scientific section of the yearbook.
And the one that we wanted to share with you guys is called chipping in. Verichip, a microchip containing personal identification information, is injected under the skin, virtually undetectable. The chip may be used for financial and transportation security, building access, as well as military and government security purposes. Down here, you also have RNA has its day. And if you're like me, a federal bill banning all forms of human cloning, including efforts used for promising stem cell research, blah blah blah.
So I wanted to share that with you guys because it goes to show that we've been conditioned for a minimum of twenty years into accepting this chip that's coming, which will enable us to buy and sell, as well as, you know, you have the human human cloning and the manipulation of DNA. Another little just fun blurb. Instant photo. Smile into your phone. Cell phone camera combos are here with some phones even allowing up to eight seconds of video.
Wow. That's impressive. Email images to anyone from just about anywhere. Look, mom. I'm now at the Statue Of Liberty.
Can be addictive. So even back then, they knew what they were doing. They've been programming us. They've been manipulating us for a very long time. And then what do you have?
Everyone addicted to their phone. And, you know, people with their Apple Pay phones, it's just a matter of time before people are swiping their hands. I mean, well, I mean, some people in some areas are already swiping their hands for paying or accessing the buildings, but it's going to become large scale, and you're not going to be able to buy or sell without it just like the mark of the beast.
@idropFbombs - ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐เฟโฝ
Jim Carrey doesn't look, sound or behave like Jim Carrey. Actors playing actors. ๐ฏ https://t.co/LoElUgeZc5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether the person receiving the Cesar Award was really Jim Carrey, presenting several points of discrepancy.
- Eye color: Jim Carrey has deep brown eyes, especially during the The Mask and The Truman Show era. The award recipient had blue, nearly transparent eyes under bright stage lights, which contradicts Carreyโs known eye color.
- Public presence and personality: Jim Carrey has gradually distance himself from mainstream Hollywood social events and has publicly expressed detachment from fame and celebrity culture. In contrast, the award recipient was very outgoing on stage, frequently interacting with the media and using exaggerated gestures, which is inconsistent with Carreyโs low-key personality.
- Mannerisms and performance: The recipientโs classic movements and expressions appeared deliberately stiff. While at the ceremony, he occasionally made familiar funny faces and exaggerated gestures, these seemed like intentional imitations of Jim Carrey remembered from memory, lacking natural humor. Both gestures and facial expressions carried a trace of mechanical precision, like a trained stand-in performing Jim Carrey.
The speaker concludes by asking for an opinion: Do you think the person accepting the award at the Cesar Awards was really Jim Carrey?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you notice Jim Carrey's blue eyes? Nobody realized that the person accepting the award at the fifty first Cesar Awards was actually Jim Carrey's body double. First, Jim Carrey's eyes have always been a deep brown, especially during the The Mask and The Truman Show era. Those eyes carried a signature brown glow, lively and full of vitality. However, the person receiving the award had blue eyes, appearing almost unnaturally transparent under the bright stage lights.
Second, anyone familiar with Jim Carrey knows that in recent years, he has gradually distanced himself from mainstream Hollywood social events and has publicly expressed his detachment from fame and celebrity culture. In contrast, the award recipient was very outgoing on stage, interacting frequently with the media and using exaggerated gestures, completely inconsistent with Jim Carrey's low key personality. Finally, his classic movements and expressions seemed deliberately stiff. At the ceremony, he occasionally made familiar funny faces and exaggerated gestures, but these seemed like intentional imitations of Jim Carrey remembered from memory, lacking natural humor. Both the gestures and facial expressions carried a trace of mechanical precision, like a trained stand in performing Jim Carrey.
Do you think the person accepting the award at the Cesar Awards was really Jim Carrey?
@idropFbombs - ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐เฟโฝ
And then they sold us Cabbage Patch dolls for our children to mock us ๐โโ๏ธ https://t.co/3y0u004N9Z
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1903, a disturbing spectacle existed at Coney Island where visitors could pay 25 cents to watch premature babies fighting for their lives in glass incubators, labeled as โCabbage Patch Children.โ The display was positioned between freak shows and roller coasters, part of an array of popular entertainments. Dr. Martin County ran the exhibit for forty years, presenting himself as a hero and a pioneer who claimed he was saving babies that hospitals refused to treat.
Several troubling questions arise from these accounts. Where did all these babies come from, and what happened to them after they survived? There were no hospital records, birth certificates, or documentation tracing the babiesโ origins or fates. Across thousands of babies and decades of exhibits, there was almost no paper trail to verify the claims.
The timing is highlighted by the broader social climate: the height of the eugenics movement in America, a period obsessed with controlling who reproduces and who survives. These exhibits werenโt isolated to Coney Island; they appeared alongside Worldโs Fairs and expositions, frequently situated near human zoo displays and other demonstrations of racial hierarchy and evolutionary ranking. The exhibit claimed an 85 percent survival rate, asserted as better than any hospital, yet there was no verification provided for that statistic.
Key questions persist: who tracked these children, and why were they displayed? Why turn dying babies into paid entertainment, effectively normalizing a process that involved life-and-death outcomes for profit? The presentation frames medical experimentation as spectacle, with the public paying to watch which babies live and which do not.
The narrative emphasizes that this wasnโt charity or benevolence, but Eugenics presented with a ticket price. The implication raised is that if babies in glass boxes were subjected to hospital-like experimentation for profit and control a century ago, then the possibility remains that similar dynamics could have persistedโperhaps larger, more hidden, and more accepted today. The speaker ends with an invitation to consider how deep these ties go and asks viewers to share their thoughts below.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1903, you could pay 25ยข to watch premature babies fight for their lives in glass incubators at Coney Island. They called them Cabbage Patch Children, displayed between the freak shows and the roller coasters. Doctor. Martin County ran the exhibit for forty years. He claimed he was saving babies that hospitals refused to treat.
A hero. A pioneer. But here's what doesn't add up. Where did all these babies come from? No hospital records, no birth certificates, no documentation of where they went after they survived.
Thousands of babies, decades of exhibits, and almost no paper trail. The timing? Right in the middle of the eugenics movement when America was obsessed with controlling who reproduced and who survived. These exhibits weren't just at Coney Island, world's fairs, expositions always positioned near the human zoo exhibits, the racial displays, the evolutionary hierarchies. Cooney claimed a 85 survival rate better than any hospital, but who verified that?
Who tracked these children and why display them? Why turn dying babies into paid entertainment unless you're normalizing something? Medical experimentation is spectacle. Life and death is a carnival attraction. The public paying to watch who lives and who doesn't.
This wasn't charity. It was Eugenics with a ticket price. And if they were experimenting on babies in glass boxes a hundred years ago for profit and control, what makes you think it stopped? Maybe it just got bigger, more hidden, more accepted. Drop your thoughts below.
Follow if you're ready to see how deep this goes.
@idropFbombs - ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐เฟโฝ
They removed our free energy,โก๏ธ and our free transportation and covered it up with vanilla skies in all the old photos. If you think any politician cares about you, it's time to wake up to reality. Credit to: @MYLUNCHBREAK_ Go follow him on YouTube too. https://t.co/FmaTsfVAgf
@idropFbombs - ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐เฟโฝ
He's 100% right. The government isn't going to open back up. It's time to wake up and realize wtf is happening. https://t.co/k8y7UfYcrr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the government will not reopen and that employees are being laid off during this crisis, claiming โItโs over with. They not opening the government back up.โ They describe this as the plan all along and urge listeners to make sense of it, noting visible examples such as โthousands of people at the airportโ in Houston with โno employees there,โ and stating that TSA didnโt show up because โthe government paid them.โ The speaker declares, โThere is no government. Thatโs the big secret,โ and calls it the overarching conclusion of the situation.
They allege a continuous test and manipulation, saying, โThey running a psyops on us every week to see if weโre go for what they putting down,โ and claim that people are still moving forward, โgoing to work,โ still paying taxes, and continuing daily life despite the supposed shutdown. The speaker contrasts this with the claim that billionaires could have already provided fundingโโThey could have been kicked the money in for snaps for snapโโimplying wealthier individuals have not redirected resources as a solution.
The speaker proclaims that โItโs over with,โ and asserts that the current mode of living has ended, describing this moment as the time for collective action and unity. They emphasize inclusivity beyond race or color, stating, โIt donโt matter the color. It donโt matter the race. It none of that matters right now.โ They conclude with a call to engagement, urging listeners to get in the comments and share their thoughts, reinforcing the message that the governmentโs status and the societal order are defined by this crisis as they see it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me let y'all know something, man. They not opening the government back up. To all of them employees, they're being laid off during this crisis. It's over with. They not opening the government back up.
This has been the plan the whole time, y'all. Make it make sense. I'm pretty sure by now y'all done seen them people in Houston at the airport, thousands of people at the airport, no employees there. TSA didn't show up because, you know, the government paid them. Look.
It it it's over with. There is no government. That's the big secret. Y'all haven't caught on yet. Listen, man.
They running a on us every week to see if we're gonna go forward. They running a psyops on us every week to see if we're go for what they putting down, y'all. Make it make sense. And guess and guess what? People are going forward.
They're still going to work. They're still paying taxes. Make it make sense. These billionaires could have been kicked the money in for snaps for snap. They could have been kicked down the money for snap, y'all.
Make it make sense. Yeah. It's over with. The way we was living, it's over with. Y'all don't understand that this is the time that we need to come together.
It don't matter the color. It don't matter the race. It none of that matters right now. It's over with. The government over with.
Get in the comments and let me know what you
@idropFbombs - ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐เฟโฝ
Subliminal messaging is part of the frequency war for your minds. This is why boomers are the hardest to reach. Tell-a-vision ๐บ https://t.co/87iQPhRbce
Video Transcript AI Summary
- Five years ago, I stopped watching TV.
- I felt really brainwashed at that time.
- Now I still have cable TV.
- And whenever I accidentally switch on a TV channel, it's like an instant wave of disgust rolling over me.
- You know, the human eye recognizes 24 pts as a flawless movement.
- That's why most movies are shot in 24 frames.
- And they replaced some of the frames with different pictures, text, information.
- And they found out the human eye doesn't notice it at all, but the human brain recognizes it.
- Nowadays, TVs have a refresh rate of 100, 200, 300 frames per second.
- Can you imagine how much additional information you can put into that without you even noticing?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Put on your tinfoil hats. Five years ago, I stopped watching TV. You know when and why. I felt really brainwashed at that time. Now I still have cable TV.
They somehow forgot to shut it down. And whenever I accidentally switch on a TV channel, it's like an instant wave of disgust rolling over me. Now back in the seventies, eighties, they made funny experiments. You know, the human eye recognizes 24 pts as a flawless movement. That's why most movies are shot in 24 frames.
And scientists said: If we only need 24, but our TVs have a refresh rate of 50 to 60 frames, what can we do with the unnecessary frames? And they replaced some of the frames with different pictures, text, information. And they found out the human eye doesn't notice it at all, but the human brain recognizes it. Now put down your tinfoil hat and think. Nowadays, TVs have a refresh rate of 100, 200, 300 frames per second.
Can you imagine how much additional information you can put into that without you even noticing? And as I said, whenever there's something technically feasible, there's always somebody who does exactly that. Just some food for thought.
@idropFbombs - ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐เฟโฝ
If you needed another reason to never shop at Walmart again, I got you fam ๐ค https://t.co/JNlefOaEOO
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you shop at Walmart, your experience is about to get 10 times worse.
basically, they're switching all their, like, lights, their fluorescents to 10,000 Kelvin.
10,000 is the coolest, like, bluest artificial light that we have.
It's not natural. It's not in the natural light spectrum. It's terrible.
When we're in 10,000 Kelvin light, it makes us anxious.
It, like, literally puts us into fight or flight mode, triggering the amygdala.
And then two, it means you're gonna overspend because you're not gonna be logically making purchases.
So, basically, if you didn't like going to Walmart before, you're really not gonna like it now.
I feel bad for the employees who have to work in the 10,000 lighting all day with their body screaming at them to escape, escape, whatever this is, and they cannot.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you shop at Walmart, your experience is about to get 10 times worse. I'm sorry. Basically, they're switching all their, like, lights, their fluorescents to 10,000 Kelvin. Now you may not know what that means. 10,000 is the coolest, like, bluest artificial light that we have.
It's not natural. It's not in the natural light spectrum. It's terrible. When we're in 10,000 Kelvin light, it makes us anxious. It, like, literally puts us into fight or flight mode, triggering the amygdala.
So when you're in fight or flight mode, you can't make rational decisions because all decisions in your brain are made with the amygdala, which is the fight or flight fear, all that part of brain. This is on purpose and intentional because if you can't make rational decisions, then a, you're gonna be a very fast shopper because you're anxious and your body is, like, screaming at you to get out of whatever unnatural space that is that has the 10,000 Kelvin lights. And then two, it means you're gonna overspend because you're not gonna be logically making purchases. You're just gonna grab things because your heart rate's gonna be increased. You're not making good decisions.
So, basically, if you didn't like going to Walmart before, you're really not gonna like it now. I feel bad for the employees who have to work in the 10,000 lighting all day with their body screaming at them to escape, escape, whatever this is, and they cannot.
@idropFbombs - ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐เฟโฝ
Energy is free!! Why are we paying for the electric power grid?! https://t.co/xJT0d53K2J
@idropFbombs - ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐
Flat earth in 7 minutes and 59 seconds. Can you swing it? https://t.co/vj3gR0FOkC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the heliocentric model, questioning the consistency of day and night on Earth. They mention Warner Von Braun's alleged prediction of a fake alien invasion to initiate a space weapon project. The conversation shifts to connections between NASA, satanism, and science fiction. Warner Von Braun's tombstone inscription referencing the firmament is highlighted as evidence of deception about space. The discussion concludes with skepticism about gravity's ability to hold water on a spinning Earth.
Translation: The speaker talks about doubts regarding the heliocentric model and Warner Von Braun's alleged prediction of a fake alien invasion. They discuss connections between NASA, satanism, and science fiction, pointing out Warner Von Braun's tombstone inscription as evidence of deception about space. The conversation ends with skepticism about gravity's ability to hold water on a spinning Earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The heliocentric model. Right? Let's just say this is the sun. Right? And we have all these planets going around the sun.
Right? Mercury is the the the one closest to the sun, and then Venus is is going this way. And then Earth is the third one, 3rd rock in the sun, and then Mars. Right? It takes a year to go around the sun.
Takes a year. Takes 6 months to get to this side. This is what they're telling us. So our planet is going around the sun. It's daytime on the part of Earth that's facing the sun.
There's no way this side of Earth is nighttime when the sun is on the inside. Nighttime is always on the outside.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: It's always on the
Speaker 1: outside. Right.
Speaker 0: So we're looking, like so if I'm right here Right. Right, we're looking at the out nighttime Yeah. With all the stars over here Right. On this side of the room.
Speaker 1: Right. Right.
Speaker 0: But on the other side of the sun, there's all a bunch of other stars. Right? Right. Right?
Speaker 1: Okay. Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: I could only see this side of the universe. Okay. Right? But when when in 6 months, when I'm on this side, I could only see at night, it's only night when this side is facing out. So I only could see this side of the room.
Alright. Does that make sense? We got all these stars over here that we're seeing at night. Alright. 6 months later, we're seeing all of those stars.
Right? Right. And then 6 months later back, we're seeing all those stars. Right? So there should be at every 3 months or 6 months, there should be a different set of stars.
Constellation. Yeah. I don't know. We shouldn't see the same constellation.
Speaker 1: See the same
Speaker 0: constellation. Why do we why do we see the big dipper every night. Every night. Yes. Warner von Braun was Hitler's right hand man.
He was his rocket scientist. And and after World War 2, the United States took about 1200 Nazi scientists Paperclip. Including Operation Paperclip. They they took all these Nazi scientists, and, they took Warner von Braun. He's the head of NASA.
He directed realize that. He directed all 6 moon missions.
Speaker 1: And
Speaker 0: And when he when he died, he had cancer for about a couple years before he died. And when he got cancer, during the last 4 years of his life, he hired this woman, doctor Carol Roslin, and she was his assistant. His, you know, prepared speeches for him him for 4 years. And you could go on YouTube and hear her talk about this all the time. She said that he told her they're creating enemies.
They need to Warner Von Braun, their prices. They're they need to create an asteroid. They need, according to Warner Von Braun, the
Speaker 1: Like a crisis.
Speaker 0: They're they need a crisis. They need a reason to, start a Star Wars project, like, weaponized space. And he and Warner Von Braun told doctor Carol Roslin, look that shit up. She'll tell you right out of her mouth. She said that he told her over and over again, the final threat is a fake alien invasion, and it's gonna be a lie.
He told her over and over for 4 years. Wouldn't get into detail. She said he would not explain, or go into detail, but he made it really clear on his deathbed. He made it clear till the day he died. They're just
Speaker 1: I mean, some people that were involved in the in the creation of NASA was Jack Parsons.
Speaker 0: And and what is isn't he a satanist?
Speaker 1: A satanist.
Speaker 0: And what about Walt Disney 2. Walt Disney and Warner Von Braun were Not deceased. They were they were boys. They're so not easy. You go to Disneyland and yeah.
It's Space Mountain. And Disneyland was big in pushing space and getting space in
Speaker 1: else had something to do with that. L Ron Hubbard. Nobody talks about that because
Speaker 0: l Ron Hubbard was Science fiction writer.
Speaker 1: Best friends with Jack w Parsons and l Ron Hubbard and banging Jack's wife and it just caused chaos.
Speaker 0: Throw Anton LaVey in there, the founder of the satanic church.
Speaker 1: Elsa Crowley, dog.
Speaker 0: Exactly. Friend of all of us. When you start putting all those characters together in the same fucking room
Speaker 1: I can't wait to hear that.
Speaker 0: Makes sense. It makes sense that they are trying to they they're creating this infinite space. Put up Warner Von Braun's tomb stone.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: Dude, on his dick. He was trying to tell people. Try to
Speaker 1: tell people. On his tombstone. Fucking It
Speaker 0: That's true. Put tombstone. He has a a Bible verse. You're fucking kidding me. He has a Bible verse.
Look at that. Look at that. Look at that. Warner Von Braun. What what does it say?
Psalm, what, 191?
Speaker 1: 191.
Speaker 0: Watch. And then go read what that is. Now put up Psalm
Speaker 1: 19 one. At the bottom. Bam. Bam. Look at that.
Speaker 0: What does it mean? Put that up. Now, now, what does what does it say? What does what does that what does that sound? Okay.
This is coming from the dude who faked 6 moon missions. Look at that.
Speaker 1: The heavens declare the glory of God, and the ferment seweth The firmament. The firmament
Speaker 0: seweth his handiwork. Now the firmament, that's the dome. That's the that's what separates the the heaven the heavens from earth or the waters from above and the waters from below. That's the firmament. That's the dome.
That's when flat earthers believe in a dome. They're actually talking about the firmament.
Speaker 1: Shut up, dude.
Speaker 0: That was on Warner Robron Braun's tombstone. Get the fuck out of here. Right? Look at that.
Speaker 1: Dude, shut up.
Speaker 0: The heavens declare the glory of god and the firmament shoe with his handiwork. That's what Warner von Braun put on his tombstone. Get the fuck out of here. That's a deathbed confessional right there. That's a dead the guy who takes 6 moon missions God, dude.
Put that shit
Speaker 1: on his tombstone. Oh my god. Is the structure above a conceived as a vast solid dome.
Speaker 0: And that's what Werner Von Braun put on his tombstone, dude. Come on.
Speaker 1: Aaron, that looks like the fucking house underworld too. There's an underworld right there.
Speaker 0: They're lying to us about space, man. That's that's that's I'll never What
Speaker 1: is on the other side of the dome? Heaven of the heavens. That's what it says.
Speaker 0: What is that? No one know. You know, people say, well, where's the proof of flat earth? It's like, dude, we're not the ones with with all the NASA $18,000,000,000 budget. You know what I mean?
We don't have to prove shit. You have to prove what you should ram down our throats as as children. Blowing my mind. All we're doing is breaking down what you're saying. We don't have to prove You're breaking.
We don't have any equipment. We can't how are we gonna prove it? You're blowing my mind. You know one thing that we can prove that I know for sure is that most of the earth is water. Right?
Yeah. Yeah. 70, 80%.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And water always finds its level, man. The only thing that the only thing that's holding helium balloon? Helium balloon ain't gonna go down. It goes up, but it defied gravity? No.
Helium is less dense than the air around it, so it rises. You drop a a boulder in the ocean, it goes sinks right to the ground. You drop a beach ball in the ocean, it stays right there at the top. Air in that ball is less dense than the water. Fucking gravity's holding gravity is so strong that it's holding oceans stuck to a ball, but it can't hold a fucking helium balloon.
Water water always finds its level, and water always conforms to the interior of a container, not the exterior of a container. So all that, like, we're on a ball and the oceans are conforming to the outside of the ball, ball, and then there's this mystical, magical, powerful force, gravity holding it together. So wait a minute. We got inertia that's trying to fling the water off the ball as it spins a 1000 miles an hour, but then the gravity is fighting. There's a battle between the inertia and the gravity, but there's no sign of this battle.
@idropFbombs - ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐
So what's going on here? ๐ค https://t.co/pp92Nv89NK
@idropFbombs - ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐
@idropFbombs - ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐
