TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @infolibnews
reSee.it AI Summary
David M. Friedman said Epstein was not Jewish. In reply, hippyresident challenged the claim and shared a recording of Epstein and Ehud Barak allegedly discussing stopping Arab and non-European Jews from reproducing to keep Israel’s population pure, labeling it Jewish supremacy.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Trump's fmr US Ambassador to Israel, David M. Friedman, on Jeffrey Epstein: "There was nothing about him that was Jewish ... He's not a Jew." https://t.co/yOMtfrxBnQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Antisemitism is “you know, it’s always kind of lurking underneath, and you need sometimes sometimes events over the years, you know, pull it out.” The speaker recalls Captain Dreyfus being accused of treason in France and Theodor Herzl watching, and suddenly, “kill Dreyfus, kill all the Jews.” The question is, where did “kill all the Jews” come from? The response is that, from one guy, antisemitism can surge.
The speaker notes that today we have our Dreyfus again. We have the war. We have Jeffrey Epstein, who, the speaker says, “hated Israel,” and “had nothing there was nothing about him that was Jewish. Didn’t observe Judaism, didn’t practice Judaism.” The speaker adds as a side thought: “If you don’t mind me jumping in on this,” and then discusses a common claim: people say you can be anti-Zionist without being anti-Semitic, arguing that Judaism is just a religion, not a nationality, so they are not against the religion but against the nation, and it “shouldn’t be considered a nation.”
The speaker then contends that Epstein is not a Jew under that standard because there is nothing about him that identifies with Israel. The only related claim is that “one of his emails says, I hate Israel. Right? There’s nothing about him that is religious at all.” However, when it comes to antisemitism, the speaker asserts, “he’s a Jew.” That is presented as the final point on Epstein’s case.
The speaker mentions Epstein “tried to work with a former prime minister,” calling that his only connection. The former prime minister referred to is David Barak, described as not in politics for many, many years and having no influence in Israel, and “is the, kind of, the main political antagonist of Netanyahu.” The transcript notes that Epstein’s only connection was with David Barak, and that Barak is viewed as Netanyahu’s main political antagonist, despite Barak’s long absence from active politics. The passage ends with that acknowledgment of Epstein’s connection being limited to Barak.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Antisemitism is you know, it's it's always kind of lurking underneath, and you need sometimes sometimes events over the years, you know, pull it out. Like, you know you know, the when when when captain Dreyfus was accused of treason in in France and Theodore Hersl was was watching, all of a sudden, you know, kill Dreyfus, kill all the Jews. Yeah. Where'd kill kill all the Jews come from? Well, all of a sudden, you know, from one guy.
So we have, you know, we, you know, we have our Dreyfus today. You know, we have we have the war. We have Jeffrey Epstein who, by the way, hated Israel, you know, had had was was was had nothing there was nothing about him that was Jewish. Didn't observe Judaism, didn't practice Judaism. By the way, I thought of this the other day.
I just if you don't mind me jumping in on on this. Please. You know, everybody says you know, when people say, you know, you can be anti Zionist without being anti Semitic, they say, look, Judaism is just a religion. It's not an it's not a nationality. So, you know, we're not an we're we're not against the religion.
We're just against the nation. It shouldn't be considered a nation. Okay. That's very interesting. Jeffrey Epstein.
Right? He's not a Jew he's not a Jew under that standard because there's nothing about him that identifies with Israel. I think one of his emails says, I hate Israel. Right? There's nothing about him that is religious at all.
He doesn't in in any way accept the Jewish faith, but when it comes to antisemitism, he's a Jew. Right? Finally, that's it. I mean, he also tried to work with a former prime minister, didn't he? The only real connection in trying to essentially That was his only connection.
David Barak. Israel. Yeah. His only connection was with David Barak, who has not been in politics for many, many years. Has no influence in Israel.
And actually is the, kind of the the main political antagonist of Netanyahu. So, you know, they're they're they're that was the only connection. Anyway, it's
@hippyresident - 𝕻𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖌𝖆𝖙𝖔𝖗
@infolibnews Denying Epstein was jewish is kind of a wild statement @DavidM_Friedman. Here’s a recording of Epstein & Ehud Barak (former PM of Israel) discussing how to stop Arab & Non-European Jews from reproducing to ensure the Israeli population stays pure. This is jewish supremacy! https://t.co/KuoMncoqQM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Future of Israel. I mean, something will happen in Iran. Maybe we'll succeed. Maybe we won't, but and that'll make it worse. But the demography seems terrible. Nobody sane seems to be procreating, and everybody getting sane in their own way seems to have five children. Whether it's Arabs or Orthodox, they have five children. If you're a regular Israeli, you have 1.5 children or two.
Speaker 0: The Haredim are more productive than the Arabs. If we cancel some of the we had exponential support function for productivity. It's something bizarre. Rather to be an esker, we became exponential. And always when I meet a friend with three children, telling another two and you are deep into the social security trap, that's your job, you can sit idle.
Speaker 0: No, I don't the future of Israel is waking up at the right moment before it's too late, putting your wedge on this drift along the slippery slope toward one state nation. First of all, because with one state nation, would be even faster. Yeah. It would be by nation at first, and then within the generation with an Arab majority. In fact, the minority with a sense of being kind of hybrid form, they excel in medicine therapy.
Speaker 0: Then we have, I believe, we have to break the monopoly of the orthodox rabbinate on marriage and the funerals and whatever and the definition which and accept, open in a sophisticated subtle manner, open the gates from massive conversion into Judaism. It's a successful country. Many will apply at the beginning without making it, cannot make it a precondition, but under the social pressure, the need, especially of the second generation, to adapt, will happen. And we can control the quality, much more effective than our ancestors or the founding fathers of Israel could deal with the way that it was a kind of salvation way from Africa and Arabs or from whatever. They took whatever came to save people.
Speaker 0: Now we can be selective. And
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Future of
Speaker 1: Israel. I mean, something will happen in Iran. Maybe we'll succeed. Maybe we won't, but and that'll make it worse. But the demography seems terrible.
Nobody sane seems to be procreating, and everybody getting sane in their own way seems to have five children. Whether it's Arabs or Orthodox, they have five children. If you're a regular Israeli, you have 1.5 children or two
Speaker 0: The Haredim are more productive than the Arabs. If we cancel some of the we had exponential support function for productivity. It's something bizarre. Rather to be an esker, we became exponential. And always when I meet a friend with three children, telling another two and you are deep into the social security trap, that's your job, you can sit idle.
No, I don't the future of Israel is waking up at the right moment before it's too late, putting your wedge on this drift along the slippery slope toward one state nation. First of all, because with one state nation, would be even faster. Yeah. It would be by nation at first, and then within the generation with an Arab majority. In fact, the minority with a sense of being kind of hybrid form, they excel in medicine therapy.
Then we have, I believe, we have to break the monopoly of the orthodox rabbinate on marriage and the funerals and whatever and the definition which and accept, open in a sophisticated subtle manner, open the gates from massive conversion into Judaism. It's a successful country. Many will apply at the beginning without making it, cannot make it a precondition, but under the social pressure, the need, especially of the second generation, to adapt, will happen. And we can control the quality, much more effective than our ancestors or the founding fathers of Israel could deal with the way that it was a kind of salvation way from Africa and Arabs or from whatever. They took whatever came to save people.
Now we can be selective. And
reSee.it AI Summary
A pro-Israel donor says he funds “pro-America” groups with varying amounts, sometimes small, to open doors; listed beneficiaries include Heritage, PragerU, Judicial Watch, CUFI, Philos Project, Leadership Institute, Americans for Limited Government, Capital Research Center, Center for Security Policy, HonestReporting, Henry Jackson Society, UN Watch, and more per his foundation. A responder adds Milstein funds Jewish Policy Center, notes Podhoretz on its Board, cites Liora Rez, and says Marissa Streit was PragerU’s Director of Ops before becoming CEO.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Pro-Israel activist Adam Milstein tells the Israeli-American Council how he's funding "pro-America" organizations that are "willing to collaborate." "Some we fund big amounts, some we fund small amounts—but even a small amount opens the doors." (He funds Heritage, PragerU, Judicial Watch, Christians United for Israel, the Philos Project, the Leadership Institute, Americans for Limited Government, Capital Research Center, the Center for Security Policy, HonestReporting, the Henry Jackson Society, UN Watch, and more, according to the Milstein Family Foundation's website.)
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines a framework for shaping America’s future by emphasizing intelligence to identify enemies and organize effective responses. He states that Jews will not lead this fight and that Americans must think and fight as Americans. The approach centers on two ecosystems, both supported by the Milsson Family Foundation and Gillan: the Pro Israel ecosystem and the Pro American ecosystem.
In the Pro Israel ecosystem, which fights antisemitism, they support close to 100 organizations. In the Pro American ecosystem, organizations that have nothing to do with Jews and aim to fight for America are supported. The selection process focuses on identifying “the good ones”—organizations willing to collaborate with others and open to hearing ideas. They fund some organizations with large amounts and others with smaller grants; even small funding can open doors because donors’ input matters to organizations that would rather listen to donors than “dogs barking outside.”
The foundation’s role includes sharing information, offering ideas, and making connections to strengthen collaboration. Specifically, they connect pro‑Israel/anti‑antisemitism organizations with pro‑American organizations to build broader coalitions. The speaker emphasizes that there is no silver bullet, but the goal is to mobilize and empower many groups to work together for America’s future.
Overall, the message centers on intelligence-led identification of adversaries, strategic funding of organizations in two allied ecosystems, selective support of collaborative and receptive groups, donor influence as a catalyst for engagement, and proactive information sharing and inter‑organizational linking to foster a united effort for the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jews are not going to lead this fight for the future of America. We need to understand our role, and we need to think as American, and we need to fight as American. How do I do all this? As I said, intelligence is priority number one. We need to understand who's the enemy.
We can't do anything if we have no idea who is the enemy and what the enemy is planning. Once we have the intelligence, what Gillan sitting here and I in Milsson Family Foundation, we support two ecosystem. Many organization, not many nonprofit in each one of them. There is the Pro Israel, the one that fights anti Semitism is Jews, we support close to 100 organizations in that ecosystem. And there is the ecosystem of the Pro American, organization that nothing to do with Jews and they wanna fight for America.
What we do, we identify the good ones, the one that are willing to collaborate with other, the ones that are have open ears to hear our ideas, and we fund them. Some of them we fund big amounts, some of them we fund small amount, but even a small amount open the doors. They're listening to donors. They don't want to listen to dogs barking outside. But once you're a donor, they're listening to you.
So we share information. We give some ideas. We make connections how they can fight back together. We connect the pro AIDS organization with the pro American organizations. And as we know, there is no silver bullet, and we are really mobilizing and empower many groups to work together for the future of America.
@posobitch - Jack PosoBitch
@infolibnews Milstein funds Jewish Policy Center too, where Dennis Prager and Elliott Abrams’ Father-in-Law, Norman Podhoretz, are on the Board of Fellows. He funds Liora Rez too. Before Unit 8200 Officer, Marissa Streit, became CEO of PragerU, she was DIRECTOR OF OPS for Milstein & the IAC. https://t.co/vetiuyCnmf
@posobitch - Jack PosoBitch
Yeah, @RubinReport. Let’s talk REAL MEN like DENNIS PRAGER. PRAGER is a COMMUNIST jew who attends Stephen S. Wise synagogue in LA and he’s a FELLOW at JEWISH POLICY CENTER with ELLIOTT ABRAMS’ FATHER-IN-LAW, NORMAN PODHORETZ. The CEO of PRAGERU is an 8200 spy/terrorist from IAC. https://t.co/rr3zZQBK5L
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, speaking before a LA synagogue, says he’s helping people on the right take down Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, naming Ted Cruz and Ben Shapiro, and that he’s doing the same on the left. Post 3 notes Sinai Temple privatized the interview, implying these admissions were not for public view.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, while speaking before an LA synagogue, suggests he's helping people "behind the scenes" to "take down" Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson and Hasan Piker. "I need people on the right to take down Tucker Carlson—so I'm trying to help Ted Cruz," Greenblatt reveals. "I need people on the right to take down Nick Fuentes—so I'm trying to help people like Ben [Shapiro]." He says he's doing the "same thing on the left." @NickJFuentes | @TuckerCarlson | @HasanTheHun
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
✍️ ADL 'Helping' Ted Cruz and Ben Shapiro 'Take Down' Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, CEO Suggests https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=65085
ADL 'Helping' Ted Cruz and Ben Shapiro 'Take Down' Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, CEO Suggests
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt suggested in a now-deleted interview that 'behind the scenes' he is 'helping' Senator Ted Cruz to 'take down' Tucker Carlson and helping Ben Sha.
informationliberation.com
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
This is wild (I've got tons of clips from the interview on my profile). https://t.co/BXgRJS3VPQ
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
🚨 Sinai Temple just privated Rabbi David Wolpe's interview with ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt. I guess the public wasn't supposed to see these shocking admissions.🚨 https://t.co/tJ0izDOKT7
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt says the ADL is "working with OpenAI, with Alphabet, with Anthropic, with Meta, with Microsoft" to "train" their LLMs (ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.). "Heck, we're in conversations with Alibaba to train their LLM." The ADL's also "investing in Wikipedia." https://t.co/HUUtpKctZP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises a question from the audience about whether the ADL has considered hiring people to counter-march, particularly with diverse ethnicities, to ensure marches are unopposed on social media and publicity.
Speaker 1 responds: It’s important to “go where the puck is going” and not just to where it is. Since 10/07, resources have been redistributed toward LLMs and generative AI. He asks how many used ChatGPT in the last week, noting that ChatGPT has over a billion users and is ground truth for vast numbers of people, having existed for about two and a half years. While marching in the streets is one approach, he emphasizes building technology to train LLMs more effectively and working with leading AI companies. He specifies collaborations with OpenAI, Alphabet, Anthropic, Meta, and Microsoft, and says they are in conversations with Alibaba to train their LLM, highlighting that Chinese AI models are profound, potent, cost-effective, and spreading. He reiterates that marching in the streets is only one option, but the focus is on going where the puck is going by investing in Wikipedia, LLMs, and changing the game before it changes us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So someone came up to me after services and said, I really wanna ask him a question, but I can't be there. So I said, okay, give me the question. I'll ask. Here is the question. The question is, it used to be when Nazis were marching, that Jews would show up with clubs and get into fights.
He says, now I know we can't do that anymore. But has the ADL ever considered hiring people to counter march, especially people of different ethnicities, So that because social media and and publicity are so important, people won't see marches unopposed. So, I have now asked.
Speaker 1: So I think it's an interesting question. I think that we have to do, like to quote Wayne Gretzky, is not go where the puck is, but where it's going. And this has been a big lesson really since 10/07 in part. So I can tell you, you know, we have taken resources and redistributed it really toward towards the LLMs, towards generative AI. Folks, I got to tell you, how many of you used chat GPT in the last week?
Raise your hand. Folks, I'm going to come back here in a year and you all need to raise your hand. ChatGPT is ground truth for the vast hundreds of millions of people. It has over a billion users. It's been around for like two and a half years.
So Yeah. Like marching in the streets is one thing we could do. But what I would rather do and where I'm investing is building the technology to train the LLMs more effectively. And working with OpenAI, with Alphabet, with Anthropic, with Meta, with Microsoft. We are working with them now to train the LLMs.
Heck, we're in conversations with Alibaba to train their LLM because the Chinese AI models are profound and potent and they're much more cost effective and they're spreading. So marching in the streets is certainly one thing we could do and I get why that matters. But what I need to do is go where the puck is going. So we are investing in Wikipedia, LLMs, and trying to change the game before it changes us.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Netanyahu: We "transported black Africans from Africa not to enslave them, but to liberate them." https://t.co/ESX5VpgD5r
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that immigrants were admitted from Africa, and among them, Ethiopian Jews were brought into the country. The statement emphasizes that this is the first instance in which black Africans from Africa were transported into the nation with the stated purpose of liberation rather than exploitation or subjugation. In the speaker’s framing, the action involved the importation of Africans who are identified as Ethiopian Jews, highlighting a specific regional and ethnic group within the broader category of African immigrants. The description conveyed is that these individuals were not moved for enslavement, but rather for liberation, marking a distinction between historical patterns of movement and the intention attributed to this particular migration. The claim centers on two principal components: the origin of the immigrants (Africa, with a focus on Ethiopian Jews) and the stated motive or outcome of their transport (liberation, not enslavement). By describing the act as “the first time” such a transport has occurred, the speaker foregrounds novelty and a turning point in the nation’s handling of black African immigrants, contrasting it with other possible historical or hypothetical practices. The language underscores a moral framing of the action as liberatory rather than oppressive, positioning the arrival of Ethiopian Jewish immigrants as a milestone within the speaker’s narrative of immigration policy. Overall, the essential points communicated are: the destination country admitted African immigrants; these included Ethiopian Jews; this migration is presented as a historic first in which black Africans were moved not to enslave them but to liberate them. The speaker’s wording draws a clear dichotomy between liberation and enslavement as the defining characteristic of this specific immigration event, and it casts the event as a notable departure from prior patterns of movement of Africans to the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We let in, mind you, immigrants from Africa, Ethiopian Jews, who come into this country. I think it's the first time that we have actually transported black Africans from Africa, not to enslave them, but in fact to liberate them.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Israel's MFA brought its first tranche of over 1,000 pastors to Jerusalem to train them to spread hasbara. US Amb. Mike Huckabee praised the effort, urging pastors to speak boldly against antisemitism. Friends of Zion founder Mike Evans said they plan a 2026 global program to reach a million pastors and churches.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs brought its first tranche of "over 1,000 pastors" to Jerusalem this week to train them to spread hasbara among their flocks. US Amb. Mike Huckabee praised the Israeli influence operation targeting Americans in an interview with CBN News shared Thursday. "[It's] an extraordinary time for pastors to go to their pulpits and to speak with clarity and with boldness and to push back on the antisemitism, the bigotry that is being pushed toward Jewish people and toward the people of Israel," Huckabee said. "There is a growing cancer within the evangelical movement in America where people are thinking, Israel doesn't matter," Huckabee said. "And there's nothing biblical about our relationship to Israel. This is very dangerous." Friends of Zion founder Mike Evans, who partnered with Israel's MFA on this foreign influence op, told CBN News his group is "launching in 2026 a global program to reach one million pastors and one million churches globally."
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Netanyahu addresses the "1,000 pastors" Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs brought to Jerusalem for hasbara training: "I'm counting on you, and I know you'll do what has to be done." https://t.co/Ndsaph8Biu
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israeli leaders encouraged the pastors to be bold and express gratitude for their support. Stand up and be counted. Tell the truth. Speak to young people. Speak up and be counted. I'm counting on you, and I know you'll do what has to be done. That's what our destiny calls for.
This is not just Israel's fight. This is a fight for civilization. We are facing very much a civilizational struggle like we saw in the thirties between Nazism and the free world. Today, that Nazism is Islamism in coordination with communism, which today's expression is called woke, but it's the same thing.
Behind the scenes, Shira Mills of the Friends of Zion Museum helped make the summit possible. Never been done before. This is something very unique, very difficult, but here we are. From my point of view, it's miraculous.
The vision going forward: recruiting 10,000 more pastors in the next thirty six months. Because there's a lot of misinformation out there, a lot of young people that are not for Israel, and they're just getting the wrong information. So our whole idea here is to reach the youth of America and around the world and just show the truth.
With a thousand pastors gathered at such a critical moment for the nation of Israel, when antisemitism is rising in our nation and globally, this has been such a pivotal turning point. I believe we can turn the tide of antisemitism.
A thousand pastors and leaders that didn't even know each other, and he called and we heard the word of the Lord. And this is a season to see antisemitism defeated and to see God's glory come to his chosen people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israeli leaders encouraged the pastors to be bold and express gratitude for their support.
Speaker 1: Stand up and be counted. Tell the truth. Speak to young people. Speak up and be counted. I'm counting on you, and I know you'll do what has to be done.
That's what our destiny calls for.
Speaker 2: This is not just Israel's fight. This is a fight for civilization. We are facing very much a civilizational struggle like we saw in the thirties between Nazism and the free world. Today, that Nazism is Islamism in coordination with communism, which today's expression is called woke, but it's the same thing.
Speaker 0: Behind the scenes, Shira Mills of the Friends of Zion Museum helped make the summit possible.
Speaker 3: Never been done before. This is something very unique, very difficult, but here we are. From my point of view, it's miraculous.
Speaker 0: The vision going forward, recruiting 10,000 more pastors in the next thirty six months.
Speaker 3: Because there's a lot of misinformation out there, a lot of young people that are not for Israel, and they're they're just getting the wrong information. So our whole idea here is to reach the youth of America and around the world and just show the truth.
Speaker 4: With a thousand pastors gathered at such a critical moment for the nation of Israel, when antisemitism is rising in our nation and globally, this has been such a pivotal turning point. I believe we can turn the tide of antisemitism.
Speaker 5: A thousand pastors and leaders that didn't even know each other, and he called and we heard the word of the Lord. And this is a season to see antisemitism defeated and to see God's glory come to his chosen people.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Israeli billionaire Shlomo Kramer's New Year's resolution is to eliminate America's First Amendment. "I know it's difficult to hear, but it's time to limit the First Amendment in order to protect it." https://t.co/dOmb7DuLb1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Shlomo Kramer argues that AI will revolutionize cyber warfare, affecting critical infrastructure, the fabric of society, and politics, and will undermine democracies by giving an unfair advantage to authoritarian governments. He notes that this is already happening and highlights growing polarization in countries that protect First Amendment rights. He contends it may become necessary to limit the First Amendment to protect it, and calls for government control of social platforms, including stacking-ranked authenticity for everyone who expresses themselves online and shaping discourse based on that ranking. He asserts that the government should take control of platforms, educate people against lies, and develop cyber defense programs that are as sophisticated as cyber attacks; currently, government defense is lacking and enterprises are left to fend for themselves.
Speaker 2 adds that cyber threats are moving faster than political systems can respond. He emphasizes the need to use technology to stabilize political systems and implement adjustments that may be necessary. He points out that in practice it’s already difficult to discern real from fake on platforms like Instagram and TikTok, and once truth-seeking ability is eliminated, society becomes polarized and internally fighting. There is an urgent need for government action, while enterprises are increasingly buying cybersecurity solutions to deliver more efficiently, since they cannot bear the full burden alone.
Kramer notes that this drives the next generation of security companies—such as Wiz, CrowdStrike, and Cato Networks—built on network platforms that can deliver extended security needs to enterprises at affordable costs. He clarifies these tools are for enterprises, not governments, but insists that governments should start building programs and that the same tools can be used by governments as well.
Speaker 2 mentions that China is a leading AI user, already employing AI to control the population, and that the U.S. and other democracies are in a race with China. He warns that China’s approach—having a single narrative to protect internal stability—versus the U.S. approach of multiple narratives creates an unfair long-term advantage for China that could jeopardize national stability, and asserts that changes must be made.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Network, Shlomo Kramer, also one of the founders of Checkpoint, another big cyber company. Shlomo, it's great to have you here. Welcome.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me.
Speaker 0: How is AI cyber warfare shaping geopolitics right now?
Speaker 1: AI is going to revolutionize cyber warfare is revolutionize cyber warfare from critical infrastructure to the fabric of society and politics and undermining it, giving unfair advantage to the creditian governments against democratic countries. First Amendment type of
Speaker 0: That's already happening?
Speaker 1: That's already happening. You're seeing the polarization in countries that allow for the First Amendment and protect it, which is great. And I know it's difficult to hear, but it's time to limit the First Amendment in order to protect it and quickly before it's too late.
Speaker 0: What do you mean?
Speaker 1: I mean that we need to control the platforms, all the social platforms. We need to stack rank the authenticity of every person that expresses themselves online and take control over what they are saying based on that ranking.
Speaker 0: The government.
Speaker 1: The government should control the social media. They should do that. And we need to educate people against lies, and government need to develop cyber defense programs that are as sophisticated as the cyber attack. Today, it's a one to a 100 ratio. And really, are not doing this today at any rate and enterprises are left fending from themselves.
Speaker 2: Is moving much faster than the political system typically can to respond Right.
Speaker 1: You need to use technology, you know, to stabilize the political system and you need to put adjustments that are perhaps not
Speaker 2: I mean, we're at a point though necessary. Right. You I mean, I can go on Instagram or TikTok, and frankly, it already is becoming unclear what is fake and what is real. Exactly. And once you eliminate that ability to discern truth from fiction, then what are you left with?
Speaker 1: You are left with polarization of society and inner fighting, and you have to control it. And you see that already happening across the world. So this is an urgent need by the government to do that. And until then, enterprises are buying by themselves more and more cybersecurity solutions, but they can't afford all these solutions by themselves. So they are looking for ways to deliver more efficient consumption.
Speaker 2: And I assume you have some of those ways, obviously. So
Speaker 1: and that that drives the the next generation of companies such as Wiz, CrowdStrike, Kato Networks on the network that are platforms and are able to deliver this extended need for security in an affordable way for enterprises.
Speaker 0: For enterprises. Right. Not for governments.
Speaker 1: Not for government. But governments need to start building their programs, and the same tools can be used also by governments.
Speaker 2: But the two leaders in AI, one is China which obviously already is using AI to control the population and here we're all out in a race with China and so we're not as interested in regulation right now, certainly not at the state level for example.
Speaker 1: And that's a big mistake because a big if China has a single narrative that protects its inner stability and The US has multiple narrow allows for multiple narratives, it puts them in an unfair advantage that long term is going to cost the stability of the nation. So changes must be made.
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that the seven largest Jewish communities hold biweekly ADL-run Zooms to share tips and craft legislation for other countries, with some meetings off the record and some with world leaders, says ADL VP Susan Heller Pinto. Astonishing admission.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
The "seven largest Jewish communities on earth" hold biweekly Zoom meetings organized by the ADL to "share tips" and "draft legislation that might work in other countries" to advance their people's agenda. "We have meetings that are some off the record, some on the record with world leaders in which we share our community's concerns and call for action," ADL VP of International Policy Susan Heller Pinto says on an ADL call hosted by ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt. Astonishing admission.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that last week, leaders of the world’s seven largest Jewish communities convened in Australia as part of the twenty twenty five J Seven summit. This summit is organized by the ADL as part of the J Seven task force to combat antisemitism, and it brings together a convening of representative bodies of the largest Jewish communities on Earth.
Speaker 1 describes the J Seven as comprising the seven largest diaspora communities. They meet every other week via Zoom to share information and best practices, including what has worked for their communities, what hasn’t worked, and what might work elsewhere. They share tips, draft legislation that might work in other countries, or discuss different litigation. A central element has been this consultation, where they can learn from each other, learn the trends that are coming in, learn the techniques that others have used successfully, and what might be coming their way. The point is that “what happened in Montreal could happen in Melbourne, and what happens in New York or London or Paris, will make its way to Buenos Aires.” That is the first emphasis.
Second, they speak in one voice, in certain aspects on key advocacy. For example, when they left Australia, their call to action was on the Australian government to move forward the special envoy Jillian Siegel’s plan on antisemitism, which had been stalled for a number of months, to accept it and to implement it. It was significant that the leaders of the seven largest diaspora communities went to Australia to show solidarity publicly with the community, with government leaders, and with the media, and also to make this joint call to action.
Finally, they have meetings that are some off the record, some on the record, with world leaders in which they share their community’s concerns and call for action. Thus, the J Seven is described as both a really important body for consultation and learning from each other as well as an effective tool when they can come together and speak in one voice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now just last week, leaders of the world's seven largest Jewish communities convened in Australia as part of the twenty twenty five j seven summit. This is a summit organized by ADL as part of the j seven task force to combat antisemitism, a convening of representative bodies of the largest Jewish communities on Earth.
Speaker 1: So the j seven, as I said as we said, is comprised of the seven largest diaspora communities. We meet every other week via Zoom, to share information, to share best practices. We share what worked for our communities, what hasn't worked, what might work elsewhere. We have shared tips, or draft legislation that might work in other countries or spoken of different litigation. A lot of what has been very important has been this consultation where we can learn from each other, learn the trends that are coming in, learn the techniques that others have used successfully, and what what might be coming our way.
Because what happened in Montreal could happen in Melbourne, and what happens in New York or London or Paris, will make its way to Buenos Aires. That's that's number one. Number two, we do speak in one voice, in, on in certain aspects on key advocacy. So, for example, when we left Australia, our call to action was on the Australian government to move forward the special envoy Jillian Siegel's plan on antisemitism, which has been stalled for a number of months to to accept it and to implement it. It was significant that the leaders of the seven largest diaspora communities went to Australia to show solidarity publicly with the community, with government leaders, and the media, and also make this joint call to action.
Finally, we have meetings that are some off the record, some on the record with world leaders in which we share our community's concerns, and call for action. So it's both a really important body for consultation and learning from each other as well as an effective tool when we can come together, and speak in one voice.
reSee.it AI Summary
More than a dozen Israeli soldiers describe in ITV's Breaking Ranks a Gaza campaign marked by shooting unarmed Palestinians, using teenagers as human shields, and flattening neighborhoods with no evident threat. Anecdotes include labeling a rooftop man a spotter and killing one of two teens with a cart; a unit allegedly killed 112 “terrorists” but only one was armed. They say orders were to ignore international law and avenge all. Netanyahu cites a civilian-to-militant ratio under 1.5:1; a soldier counters: 111:1.
@DropSiteNews - Drop Site
More than a dozen Israeli soldiers spoke to ITV for their new documentary Breaking Ranks: Inside Israel’s War, about how their army’s two-year campaign in Gaza involved shooting unarmed Palestinians en masse, using teenagers as human shields, and flattening entire neighborhoods without pretext of any threat. One soldier recalls a man on a roof hanging his washing. A tank brigade 700 meters away decided to label him a “spotter” with no evidence of threat, and blew up half the residential tower, killing and injuring many civilians. Another remembers two teenage boys quietly pushing a cart, and Israeli soldiers deciding to shoot one in the head, adding: “If they walk too fast, they’re suspicious. If they walk too slow, they’re suspicious. They’re plotting something… If you want to, you can always find a reason to incriminate someone. If I wanted to, I could incriminate the entire Strip.” “Eli,” another soldier, said his commander reported their unit killed 112 “terrorists” at the end of their deployment— before admitting only one was even suspected of being armed. Soldiers said they were ordered to “ignore international law” and told to “take revenge on them all.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion outlines the conditions under which armed force may be employed in armed conflict. It states that combatants may be subjected to armed force, and that military force can sometimes be used against civilians who are directly participating in hostilities. This implies a distinction between ordinary civilians and those who actively take part in combat or military actions; the latter may be targeted with force in the course of conflict.
A central principle highlighted is proportionality. The instruction emphasizes that the harm caused, including deaths or the destruction of civilian infrastructure, must be proportional to the military advantage that is sought by the party employing force. In other words, the proportionality requirement ties the expected or actual use of force to the legitimate military objective, ensuring that the adverse impact on civilian life and property does not exceed what is necessary to achieve that objective.
The speaker also references the existence of attacks that are deemed completely disproportionate. This portion indicates that there are specific actions or campaigns in which the level of harm caused to civilians or civilian infrastructure is far beyond what could reasonably be considered connected to the military advantage obtainable from those actions. Such assessments lead to the labeling of those actions as completely disproportionate.
From these points, the speaker identifies a threshold beyond which conduct in war is deemed unacceptable or illegal. The term “war crimes” is invoked to describe those attacks that are completely disproportionate. This designation implies a formal judgment that certain acts, when they exceed what is proportional to the military objective, violate established laws of armed conflict and carry legal and moral implications.
In summary, the speaker articulates a framework in which the use of armed force is permissible against combatants, and in some cases against civilians who participate directly in hostilities, provided that the harm caused remains proportional to the military advantage sought. When the level of harm is completely disproportionate—well beyond the military advantage—such actions are identified as war crimes. The overall focus is on maintaining a balance between military necessity and protection of civilian life and infrastructure, with severe consequences for actions that fail to meet the proportionality standard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're allowed to use armed force against combatants. Sometimes, you're also allowed to use military force and against civilians who are directly participating in hostilities. But the harm, including death or destruction of civilian infrastructure, must be proportional to the military advantage that is sought. There are certain attacks where we say this was completely disproportionate. This was beyond what the the military advantage that any government or military could seek, and that's where we talk about war crimes.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
@DropSiteNews Netanyahu two weeks ago: Israel's civilian-to-militant kill ratio is "less than 1.5:1." IDF soldier to ITV: Our civilian-to-militant kill ratio was, at best, 111:1. https://t.co/zBay11NHq0
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Charlie Kirk's executive producer Andrew Colvett confirms the texts leaked by Candace Owens are legit. "That was a text grab, a screengrab, that I had shared." https://t.co/B3aX1jhZee
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the segment, the speakers address a private text exchange released by Kent Owens. They confirm the screen grab is authentic but say it was private; it was shared with a few government officials because rapid events followed the incident. They note that authorities identified a suspect within 33 hours and emphasize “no stone unturned” in pursuit of justice for Charlie. One speaker, an eyewitness, says they avoid public comments to not affect a trial. They affirm free speech as a guiding principle and defend Charlie's public stance on Israel as nuanced but consistent. Charlie wrestled with Israel for months; he read about the conflict and warned against anti-Israel sentiment online. He believed Hamas started the war and could end it; Israel represented European civilization, Hamas Middle Eastern barbarism. He loved and cared about Israel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I wanna take the start of this show to address some of the things that have been going around on public, namely about a text a group text chain that has been made known, and released, by Kent Owens. And I just wanna address it head on because, you know, that was a text grab, a screen grab that I had shared, with people. So it it is authentic, and I wanna go into it because I actually am really excited that the the truth is out there. I first wanna say the reason I have I didn't share that screen grab publicly is because it was a private it was a private exchange, and I felt like it didn't necessarily comport with things that were already public. I wanted to not betray my friend's trust in that way.
But I did share it with some people in government because it happened really quick. It was a you know, it took thirty three hours for authorities to get their suspect. And in that first in those first moments, we wanted no stone unturned. We wanted to leave nothing unturned. So I shared it with a few people.
Don't know where it went from there, apparently, but here we are. So one of the reasons, Blake, that I'm glad to have this now public, it was not mine to share publicly, but, you know, one of the criticisms we've been we've received is that we don't care. We're not investigating every lead. We're not looking under every stone, And that somehow we're just, like, you know, sweeping things under the rug. And when I say that we want justice for Charlie more than anybody else, I really mean it, and no stone unturned.
I mean, I I don't know if you wanna chime in on that part alone, but I have more to say.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I so it's it has been so frustrating to have people blow up about this. Yeah. And, you know, we've stated I've certainly stated publicly. The reason I haven't waited on things is I am an eyewitness to events, and they've said, don't comment on things because anything you say can mess that up.
I don't want to mess up any trial for the person who did this.
Speaker 0: That's a thousand percent right. And and I will say I wasn't an eyewitness. I was not there. I flew to Utah immediately, to be with the family and the team, but I was not an eyewitness. So there's that.
But I am aware that in my role as spokesman for Turning Point USA, which is another hat I wear, the things I say I'm cognizant of the fact that things I say could negatively impact an ongoing investigation. Alright? But I will weigh in specifically on this this issue of Israel because I know there's a lot of fascination. And I just wanna say that, you know, we have to let free speech be our north star here. Okay?
Charlie was adamantly free speech, and I am not personally going to impugn anybody's character who is asking questions and looking for answers. Alright? And I will say that that text chain is consistent with public frustrations that he voiced many times. And I know Blake, you were in the trenches on a lot of this stuff because we were workshopping how we were gonna do the tour and what we was we're, you know, he's gonna get asked about Israel. What was he gonna say?
And this is consistent with things that he told his friends, people that are, you know, in the in the water wider movement about his wrestle that he was going. And so I just wanna say, like, what is the truth about the way Charlie felt about Israel? Well, it's complicated, and it's nuanced, and it was a wrestle that was going on for months. And it's probably somewhere between the b b letter and the text
Speaker 1: I don't even think there's a between about it. I think those are entirely consistent with the exact same worldview. Charlie was not hiding things from people. There's going to there's people are going to try to make you fixate on a particular quote or a particular line to make you think that there was something hidden. There was nothing hidden about Charlie's views on Israel.
Like, I worked with Charlie on every major issue that we talked about, you know, immigration, abortion, transgender stuff. And he thought about the Israel issue a ton, all the time. It was in the news all the time. People cared about it a lot. He cared about it a lot.
Just before the shooting happened, I finished reading this is a 700 page book about the history of the Israel Palestine Conflict. I read this book because Charlie said, Blake, get really well versed on this so you can help me whenever it comes up and just know stuff off the top of your head.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So I read it for that reason. If you want to know Charlie's views on the Gaza war, he wanted the war to end. He didn't want America to take Palestinian refugees. He was annoyed when people advocated that. He didn't want American troops on the ground there or with any other war.
And he was upset when he saw stories about churches being damaged or Christians being killed. But at the same time, he recognized Hamas started the war. Hamas could end the war. Israel ultimately represented European civilization. Hamas represented Middle Eastern barbarism.
And Hamas were the chief evildoers, and people who supported them were almost always supporting them for these bad, like, anti civilizational reasons. Yeah. That's what his view was. And he would Well was public about that. And then as it continued, Charlie talked to young people all the time.
He could see what was going on in the Internet. He could see among young conservatives, there was a big shift to be hostile to Israel. There was a shift big time on the left, but it was also visible on the right. He could tell anti Semitism was rising in America, and that upset him. Charlie was public about this.
He loved Israel. He cared about Israel. And he cared about how that
Speaker 0: Well And
Speaker 1: and he wanted to give he wanted to help the pro Israel movement.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared texts from a private group chat where Charlie Kirk expressed regret over losing a significant Jewish donor just days before his death. He mentioned feeling pressured and stated he might have to step away from the pro-Israel cause. Josh Hammer was also involved in the chat.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Candace Owens shares texts from a private group chat purportedly showing Charlie Kirk, two days before his death, lamenting that he lost "another huge Jewish donor" who was giving $2M a year. "Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause," the text reads. Owens claims Josh Hammer (who was giving Kirk hasbara coaching up until the night before his death) was part of the chat.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"This is an actual group chat, which happened two days before Charlie Kirk was assassinated."
"There were nine people in total on this chat, including Charlie and Rob McCoy."
"Rob McCoy was on this text thread."
"just lost another huge Jewish donor. 2,000,000 a year because we won't cancel Tucker. I'm thinking of inviting Candace."
"Charlie writes, Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause."
"please do not invite Candace. That might feel good short term but it's not good long term."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is an actual group chat, which happened two days before Charlie Kirk was assassinated. There were nine people in total on this chat, including Charlie and Rob McCoy. I'm going to protect the names of the other seven for now. To be clear, I might actually release a name every day this week. But I wanna show you this because suffice it to say, Rob McCoy was on this text thread.
And I think it helps contextualize him as a person in my view that he would attack me for telling the truth about the pressure that he was facing. Take a look. So Charlie writes in this group chat, just lost another huge Jewish donor. 2,000,000 a year because we won't cancel Tucker. I'm thinking of inviting Candace.
Somebody writes, Charlie writes, Jewish donors play into all of the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause. And somebody writes, the donor writes, please do not invite Candace. That might feel good short term but it's not good long term.
In my opinion, like all groups, you're going to get a wide variety of opinions that nasty free will thing that God bestowed on us makes life frustrating at times after the dust settles a bit maybe. So, again, this is forty eight hours before Charles was assassinated. He was very clear and he was very explicit, and he did not back down on in that Hamptons meeting which they're all lying about nor in this text thread. I'm not going to reveal the names of the other seven. Actually, you know what?
I disagree with myself four seconds ago. Let's just throw in Josh Hammer for funsies. He's on this chat. Okay?
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
@DropSiteNews - Drop Site
⚡️NEW from Drop Site: Larry Ellison Vetted Marco Rubio for Fealty to Israel, Hacked Emails Reveal The billionaire Oracle founder is on track to take control of the American media. By @RyanGrim and @MazMHussain https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/larry-ellison-vetted-marco-rubio-israel-hacked-emails-ron-prosor
Larry Ellison Vetted Marco Rubio for Fealty to Israel, Hacked Emails Reveal
The billionaire Oracle founder is on track to take control of the American media.
dropsitenews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt announced a shift from defense to offense, highlighting that the organization has filed more lawsuits in the past year than in its entire history, targeting various entities to combat anti-Semitism. There's a perception that this aggressive approach, including collaboration with the GOP and the Trump administration, aims to address perceived anti-Semitic content on platforms like Wikipedia. Some express skepticism about the tactics, suggesting that dissenters may be labeled anti-Semitic. Additionally, I noted that my content inspired a popular show segment.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt: "We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense." "In the past 12 months, ADL's filed more lawsuits than in the prior 112 years—against extremist groups, elite universities, public companies, school districts, and state sponsors of terror." "We've launched innovative products to intercept anti-Semitism before it takes root, whether in the boardroom or in chat rooms, large language models or academic associations, in Wikipedia entries or WhatsApp chats."
Video Transcript AI Summary
We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense. You see this in our focus on the courts. In the past twelve months, ADL has filed more lawsuits than in the prior one hundred and twelve years against extremist groups, elite universities, public companies, school districts, and state sponsors of terror. We've launched innovative products to intercept antisemitism before it takes root, whether in the boardroom or in chat rooms, large language models or academic associations, in Wikipedia entries or WhatsApp chats. This work matters, not just for the Jewish people, but for all of society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense. You see this in our focus on the courts. In the past twelve months, ADL has filed more lawsuits than in the prior one hundred and twelve years against extremist groups, elite universities, public companies, school districts, and state sponsors of terror. We've launched innovative products to intercept antisemitism before it takes root, whether in the boardroom or in chat rooms, large language models or academic associations, in Wikipedia entries or WhatsApp chats. This work matters, not just for the Jewish people, but for all of society.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
See here for how the ADL is working with the GOP to go after Wikipedia and is also working with the Trump admin to implement parts of the Biden admin's "U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism" (which was written by the ADL). 👇
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
A pair of AIPAC-funded Republicans, working on behalf of the ADL, sent an intimidating letter to the Wikimedia Foundation on Wednesday announcing they're under investigation in relation to "antisemitic and anti-Israel" content on Wikipedia. https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=65023
AIPAC-Funded Republicans, On Behalf of ADL, Launch Investigation Into Wikipedia for 'Anti-Semitism'
A pair of AIPAC-funded Republicans, working on behalf of the Anti-Defamation League, sent an intimidating letter to the Wikimedia Foundation on Wednesday announcing they're.
informationliberation.com
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
@OwenShroyer1776 Yeah, there's been a lot of mask-off moments at this conference, most likely because they're in Israel and speaking among Israelis!
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
@goddeketal Yeah, and if you disagree with any part of their agenda they'll label you "anti-Semitic!"
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
@MohaveFreePress Believe it or not, that show was inspired by my clips 😂 I took the Moskowitz one (someone w/ a huge account lifted it, slapped that "Section 230" over my tag and got 1M views on it). I also took the Don Bacon/ADL one (Tucker said he had to check to make sure it was real 🤣)!
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Mark Levin at JNS conference shouts out his rabbi, spreads debunked atrocity propaganda to justify genocide, then declares that "No other country in the world, none, is going to tell Israel what to do." The US funds and fights Israel's wars but mustn't hold any sway. 🤡 https://t.co/YT0B9jCHhz
Video Transcript AI Summary
You don't rape Jewish women, decapitate Jewish babies, and execute Jewish men, and think you're gonna get away for it. You're not gonna get away. As Israel has demonstrated, you're gonna die for it. And that's exactly what you deserve. And that's my view. The way you treat other human beings, these are subhuman monsters. That's what they are. They're called terrorists. It doesn't even seem to matter anymore. Oh, Hamas. Sounds like a food. Oh, man, pass the Hamas. No, I don't think so. No other country in the world, none, is gonna tell Israel what to do, how to defend itself and its people. Period.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My rabbi, my Chabad rabbi, where are you? Stand up. I can't see him. There he is back there. Let me start at the beginning here.
You don't rape Jewish women, decapitate Jewish babies, and execute Jewish men, and think you're gonna get away for it. You're not gonna get away. As Israel has demonstrated, you're gonna die for it. And that's exactly what you deserve. And that's my view.
The way you treat other human beings, these are subhuman monsters. That's what they are. They're called terrorists. It doesn't even seem to matter anymore. Oh, Hamas.
Sounds like a food. Oh, man, pass the Hamas. No, I don't think so. No other country in the world, none, is gonna tell Israel what to do, how to defend itself and its people. Period.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe we need to leverage our technological expertise and resources to invest heavily in the information battlefield. It's crucial to launch a significant counter-information campaign to win back public opinion. The Jewish story is long, but we can and will prevail.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Jewish News Syndicate CEO Alex Traiman, after not-so-tacitly threatening that Israel has nukes to serve as a "deterrent," calls for wealthy Zionists to make a "massive investment into the information battlefield." "This is an arena we can and must win." "We must take all of our technological expertise and all of our available resources to develop methods to launch and win a significant counter-information campaign." "The Jewish story is a long one—we can, and will, win back public opinion."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel has the world's best planes and best precision guided weapons, offensive and defensive. The prime minister refers to the battle of information as the eighth front. It is actually this eighth front where our enemies believe they can actually defeat the Jewish state. We must not let that happen, and we will not let that happen. We must invest heavily in the information battlefield. I'm calling today for the supporters of Israel to make a massive investment into the information battlefield. Like every other battlefront, this is an arena that we can and must win. When this happens, Israel must be well positioned to ultimately win the battle of narratives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel has the world's best planes and best precision guided weapons, offensive and defensive. And Israel may or may not have, ambiguity intended here, the world's most powerful weapons to serve as a deterrent against any force that seeks our annihilation. Israel has fought and continues to fight bravely on seven fronts. The prime minister refers to the battle of information as the eighth front. It is actually this eighth front where our enemies believe they can actually defeat the Jewish state.
Ladies and gentlemen, we must not let that happen, and we will not let that happen. Just as Israel has invested billions and billions of dollars into securing Israel's qualitative military edge on the battlefield, we must now invest heavily in the information battlefield. We are being dramatically outspent by our opponents who control the newsrooms of the mainstream media, who control university Middle Eastern study centers, who and control the world's most powerful social media algorithms and bot farms. I'm calling today for the supporters of Israel to make a massive investment into the information battlefield. Like every other battlefront, this is an arena that we can and must win.
We must take all of our technological expertise and all of our available resources to develop methods to launch and win a significant counter information campaign. Even with massive investment, we may not see an immediate turnaround, but the Jewish story is a long one. We can and will win back public opinion. Ladies and gentlemen, the decisions that are being made by Israel's prime minister and the victories on the kinetic battlefield have the potential to usher in an era of peace and prosperity in Israel and across the greater Middle East. When this happens, Israel must be well positioned to ultimately win the battle of narratives.
reSee.it AI Summary
I worked closely with Charlie Kirk, providing him with hasbara coaching almost daily for six months leading up to his death. I want to clarify that I was not his "Mossad handler." My role was to help him formulate positions he felt comfortable with. Charlie valued the open marketplace of ideas, which sometimes frustrated people by giving a platform to controversial figures like Tucker Carlson. While I believe he sometimes went too far in this pursuit of truth-seeking, his commitment to diverse opinions was genuine.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Israeli agent Rabbi Pesach Wolicki, who gave Charlie Kirk hasbara coaching "basically daily" for six months up to the night before his death, insists he was not Kirk's "Mossad handler." He says he just "worked with Charlie" to "formulate positions" he'd "be comfortable with." "[Kirk] believed in the open marketplace of ideas, which is why he annoyed people like you and me by platforming Tucker Carlson and whoever else," he tells Ari Hoffman. "For Charlie, the idea that you're supposed to silence any opinion was anathema, but that came from a place of truth-seeking. Do I think he went too far with it? Well, yes." (Wolicki has a public contract w/ the Israeli govt to fly MAGA/pro-Trump influencers to Israel for propaganda tours.)
Video Transcript AI Summary
Asked about the last meeting with Charlie, it wasn't 'about, like, this is what you should say,' but 'talking through the issues' with Charlie asking questions and 'then saying, Okay, I think I'm going to approach this issue this way and this is going to be my position on it.' They discussed 'USA to Israel,' and 'I'm opposed to USA to Israel. I want it to be drawn down,' noting Netanyahu's stance. They talked through 'why is Israel actually an American interest?' 'Why is it in America's interest to support Israel?' Charlie was a listener, and 'the open marketplace of ideas' was a core fundamental. He believed in that, which is why he annoyed people by platforming Tucker Carlson and others, because for Charlie, 'the idea that you're supposed to silence any opinion was anathema.' 'Do I think he went too far with it? Well, yes.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So your last meeting with Charlie, where'd you guys leave it? Was it okay? Here's the talking points he's going out with, or was
Speaker 1: it gonna keep talking? Yeah. Yeah. Meaning and so and and it was like and it wasn't about, like, this is what you should say, which is how it's being portrayed by the conspiracy theorists, become some sort of Mossad handler. It was more like talking through the issues and Charlie asking questions and Charlie then saying, Okay, I think I'm going to approach this issue this way and this is going to be my position on it.
And formulating his positions, which weren't necessarily the positions I would want him to take even. Meaning he was, let's say his whether it's his position on on USA to Israel, which I'm opposed to USA to Israel. I want it to be drawn down, and Prime Minister Netanyahu has said he wants it to also. Charlie would probably have that done more quickly than I would. So I'm not saying that he just take my position on everything, but we talked through how to talk about why is Israel actually an American interest?
Why is it in America's interest to support Israel? And I don't think he was convinced by some of the arguments that I was making. I was just sort of sharing different approaches to it. But not just approaches that I think or that Israelis think or that the Israeli government thinks, but more like working with Charlie to formulate a position that he'd be comfortable with. Because I understand where he's coming from politically and I understand the nuances of what's going on in The Middle East and with Israel.
So I could help him formulate a position. It's basically sharing my opinions. Charlie is a listener. Was? Charlie was a listener.
He wanted to hear all opinions. The open marketplace of ideas was like a core, core fundamental, more than belief. And it was kind of like his existential core, was he believed in that. He believed in the open marketplace of ideas, which is why he annoyed people like you and me by platforming Tucker Carlson and whoever else. Because for Charlie, the idea that you're supposed to silence any opinion was anathema.
But that came from a place of truth seeking. Do I think he went too far with it? Well, yes. For all of us, our best traits we often have to a fault.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that Charlie Kirk has stirred annoyance in the Jewish community with his criticisms of Israel, leading some to label him anti-Semitic. However, I pointed out that during his time on college campuses, he's often engaged in hasbara and defending Israel, despite not being fully informed on the issues.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Israeli agent Rabbi Pesach Wolicki: "[Charlie Kirk] annoyed people in the Jewish community with some of the criticisms he had for Israel… People were calling him an anti-Semite…" "Little do they know, half the time he's on college campuses, all he was doing is hasbara and defending Israel, and he doesn't even want to be! He doesn't even know the issues that well, but he's forced to."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says a figure has annoyed the Jewish community over the last few months with criticisms of Israel. He cites a Jerusalem Post piece about backlash after Tucker Carlson spoke at SAS, where people were calling him an anti Semite. "I know Charlie and here he's little do they know half the time he's on college campuses, all he's doing is Hasbara and defending Israel. And he doesn't even wanna be. He doesn't even know the issues that well, but he's forced to." "But he dutifully with a smile on his face, defends Israel left and right." We saw him in England, at the debate, passionately defending Israel. And that's not even what he wants to be doing. Now he's getting criticized as an anti Semite. So I wrote that piece in the Jerusalem Post basically saying, listen, everybody. Stop with the purity tests for every single view that he has to line up with, I don't know, B. B. Cabinet decisions. "Relax. Okay? This is our greatest ally. Yes, he has questions. Yes, he's influenced by the other side as well." "Good. I'm talking to him."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He he annoyed people in the Jewish community over the last few months with some of the it was with some of the criticisms he had for Israel. And I argued I don't know if you saw the piece I wrote in the Jerusalem Post a couple of months ago when he was being attacked after Tucker Carlson spoke at at SAS and people were calling him an anti Semite. I know Charlie and here he's little do they know half the time he's on college campuses, all he's doing is Hasbara and defending Israel. And he doesn't even wanna be. He doesn't even know the issues that well, but he's forced to.
But he dutifully with a smile on his face, defends Israel left and right. We all saw what he did at, you know, in England. You know you know what I'm talking about Yeah. At the debate, and passionately defending Israel. And that's not even what he wants to be doing.
And now he's getting criticized as an anti Semite. So I wrote that piece in the Jerusalem Post basically saying, listen, everybody. Stop with the purity tests for every single view that he has to line up with, I don't know, B. B. Cabinet decisions.
Relax. Okay? This is our greatest ally. Yes, he has questions. Yes, he's influenced by the other side as well.
Good. I'm talking to him.
reSee.it AI Summary
I expressed my hope that the shooter linked to Charlie Kirk isn't from the left, as it would be better for various reasons. I needed some assistance to clarify my comments during the discussion.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Rachel Kleinfeld, who tried to link Nick Fuentes and Groypers to the Charlie Kirk shooter, told The Bulwark that she hopes Kirk's killer is not a leftist: "I sure hope it was not from the left—that would be better." "I hope this wasn't from the left, for all sorts of good reasons," Kleinfeld said. The host had to help her clean up her remarks.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I don't know who did this. And I sure hope that it was not from the left that would be better."
"But it doesn't matter because the first Trump assassination also was not from the left."
"It was just a guy who was going to also had Biden on his target list."
"And it's been made in the ideology of this far right that you're seeing online."
"It's part of a line, Brett Kavanaugh, Trump assassination, how Charlie Kirk,"
"It doesn't matter that it wasn't from the left because that part has been erased in the common litany of grievances."
"Absolutely."
"I mean, it's just it's just about the, momentum of violence. Right?"
"If one side keeps punching, that's bad, that's really bad."
"But it's much worse when one side punches, the other punches back."
"That causes an escalation."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just to I'm not gonna I'm not exactly pushing back, but I guess that presupposes a little bit that the attack on Charlie Kirk is from the left. I mean, I hear you. Okay. No. I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't know who did this. And I sure hope that it was not from the left that would be better. But it doesn't matter because the first Trump assassination also was not from the left. It was just a guy who was going to also had Biden on his target list. And it's been made in the ideology of this far right that you're seeing online.
It's part of a line, Brett Kavanaugh, Trump assassination, how Charlie Kirk, It doesn't matter that it wasn't from the left because that part has been erased in the common litany of grievances. And so, you know, I hope this wasn't from from the left for all sorts of good reasons, but I'm not sure it'll make that much of a difference.
Speaker 0: Can you tell me why you say that? Is it because you say that not as a I think I'm hearing you right that you say that not as a person who is, oh, well, I'm from the left, and I don't want it to be one of my people. You're saying it as it's better to contain it on one side. Like, if it exists on one side, it's easier to contain than if you do actually have now a burgeoning problem on the left where you're getting into a Hatfield versus McCoy.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Absolutely. I mean, it's just it's just about the, momentum of violence. Right? If one side keeps punching, that's bad, that's really bad.
But it's much worse when one side punches, the other punches back. That causes an escalation. And when the government isn't saying, Stop it and go to your corners, but is favoring one side, you can imagine the other side says, Okay, well then I'll get my big brother. The way violence works is if they don't trust a referee, you get people taking it into their own hands. And I think that's where the country is.
And that trend line just tends to accelerate things quite a bit. And it also, by the way, I think I mentioned it accelerates nonpolitical violence too. You just start seeing copycats of various sorts.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Rachel Kleinfeld's attempt to link Nick Fuentes to the Charlie Kirk shooter is astonishing. First, she falsely claims the inscriptions on the bullet casings are linked to Groypers/Nick, then she says the shooter's ideology doesn't matter because "violence will grow from the pointing of fingers." By her own standard, she's encouraging violence against Nick through her finger-pointing!
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
WSJ and NYT are trying to link the Charlie Kirk shooter to Nick Fuentes because the song "Bella Ciao" (1B+ views on YouTube) was on a random Spotify playlist "for Groypers." Gov. Cox told WSJ directly it's "very clear" the shooter was a leftist, but they ran with it anyways.🧵
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Q: "Is Mossad responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk?" Ex-Mossad Chief Yossi Cohen: "Absolutely not. I mean, we have nothing to do with it. Mossad is not doing this kind of stuff. We're not involved in political assassinations. We never were." Is anyone reassured by this? https://t.co/cQBfdKpISt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Is Mossad responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk? We have nothing to do with it. Mossad is not doing this kind of stuff. We're not involved in political assassinations. This is super false and evil. Mossad would be the first one I mean, the prime suspect. Even the tsunami, someone offered that it is a Mossad job. It's not true. We don't do that, and we will never do. Bottom line, Mossad is not part of it. We will never be part of this kind of staff. We don't do that. We let democracy run their own, and we will never be part of any kind of these plots. And more than that, I think that it has to be carefully looked upon what is there that the I mean, mainly young people are digesting as false news or false information day by day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is Mossad responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk? Absolutely not. I mean, we have nothing to do with it. Mossad is not doing this kind of stuff. We're not involved in political assassinations.
We never were. And this is super false and evil. I know that everything that has happened in around the world, I mean, Mossad would be the first one I mean, the the prime suspect. Right? I mean, even the tsunami, someone offered that it is a Mossad job, I mean, to make sure that whatever mean, countries will be disappearing or whatever it is.
I mean, it's not true. Of course not. We don't do that, and we will never do. I mean, this is not nothing that we do. So bottom line, Mossad is not part of it.
We will never be part of this kind of staff. I mean, we don't do that. I mean, we let democracy and run their own, and we will never be part of any kind of these plots. And and more than that, I think that it has to be carefully looked upon what is there that the I mean, mainly young people are digesting as false news or false information that they they're, like, inhaling day by day.
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended a private meeting with House Speaker Mike Johnson, AIPAC, and Jewish leaders where he committed to filtering out "isolationist" GOP candidates to curb their influence in the House. Rep. Tim Walberg shared that he had been in touch with Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt regarding the rise of antisemitic conspiracy theories linked to influencer Charlie Kirk's death. While most attendees kept quiet about the discussions, Rep. David Kustoff shared a photo from the meeting, revealing some participants.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
House Speaker Mike Johnson held a "private meeting" with AIPAC and Jewish leaders on Wednesday on Capitol Hill wherein he reportedly pledged to screen out "isolationist" (see: anti-Israel) GOP candidates "to prevent that wing of the party from growing larger in the House." Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI), who was also part of the meeting, revealed "he’d been texting recently with Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt about the proliferation of antisemitic conspiracy theories about the killing of influencer Charlie Kirk," Jewish Insider reported. Though nearly all the participants remained mum on what went down, Rep. David Kustoff (R-TN) tweeted out an image of the room and you can make out many of the participants, including several Jewish Insider declined to name. 🧵
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt told the Israeli Knesset earlier this year how important it was that they "capture" TikTok. It has now been captured.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must, you must take this deadly seriously. Pushing extremists off Wikipedia might not seem equal to the challenge of pushing Hezbollah north of the Litani River. Capturing TikTok might seem less meaningful than holding on to Mount Hermon. Libelist tweets certainly might seem less deadly than missiles from Yemen. But this is urgent because the next war will be decided based on how Israel and its allies perform online as much as offline.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We must, you must take this deadly seriously. Pushing extremists off Wikipedia might not seem equal to the challenge of pushing Hezbollah north of the Litani River. Capturing TikTok might seem less meaningful than holding on to Mount Hermon. Libelist tweets certainly might seem less deadly than missiles from Yemen. But this is urgent because the next war will be decided based on how Israel and its allies perform online as much as offline.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
TikTok, which the US government moved to ban last year for allowing criticism of Israel to go viral, is reportedly now in final talks to be bought by a small group of Zi*nist billionaires. https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=65036
WSJ: TikTok in Final Talks to be Bought by Oracle, Silver Lake and Andreessen Horowitz
TikTok, which the US government moved to ban last year for allowing criticism of Israel to go viral, is reportedly now in final talks to be bought by a small group of Zioni.
informationliberation.com
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Tucker Carlson: Charlie Kirk was "tormented" by his Israel First donors for platforming me... https://t.co/Fmrn1jIVsx
Video Transcript AI Summary
He was dependent on donors, and a small, intense group tormented Charlie Kirk until the day he died. Two days before his death, he lost a $2,000,000 donation after publicly pledging to bring me to the next Turning Point conference in December. A flyer announced I would speak, and he texted he was taking heat. The American Jewish Committee called in a statement Charlie Kirk an antisemite and, quote, dangerous. Charlie Kirk, an antisemite. Yeah. He was not an antisemite. He was the opposite, and he was not dangerous. He was a great lover of people and a purveyor of peace. He was deeply offended by that and expressed some feelings on Megyn Kelly show and elsewhere. Seth Dillon of Babylon Bee pressured Charlie Kirk to pull me off stage because BB didn't like what I said, shocking that someone whose persona is about free speech.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He was dependent to a great extent on his donors, of course. It's a nonprofit. And they went after him and tormented him. Not all. Of course, many were supportive, but, the ones who were offended by my speech, and there was a a small, very intense group who were, tormented Charlie Kirk until the day he died.
Two days before he died, he lost a $2,000,000 donation because he had publicly pledged to bring me to the next Turning Point conference in December. And he told me over the past couple of months, he was losing a lot of donations over that pledge. They put out a flyer basically saying that I was gonna be at this event giving a speech. And so he would text me and say, man, I'm really taking a lot of heat for this, and people are really mad. The American Jewish Committee called in a statement Charlie Kirk an antisemite and, quote, dangerous.
Charlie Kirk, an antisemite. Yeah. He was not an antisemite. He was the opposite, and he was not dangerous. He was a great lover of people and a purveyor of peace.
He was the opposite, and he was very stung by that. Those of us who've been called names for a long time are a little bit harder to offend. Charlie was deeply offended by that and expressed some of those feelings on Megyn Kelly show and in other places, but that did not let up. The reason I'm telling this story is because he called me and then came to see me at my house about this topic. And I said to him every single time, look.
It's you know, I've I've got my own way to communicate my views. This is actually not the most important issue to me. There are lots of things I can talk about. I don't need to come to Turning Point. I can take a year off.
No problem. I hated seeing how much he was suffering, the hassle he was getting from people, and I was being attacked too. By the way, it was a huge effort. I wasn't fully aware of it actually because I don't go online that much, but there was a huge effort by people, some of whom I know and have helped and like Seth Dillon, the Babylon Bee, for example. Someone who had his own problems with free speech who was famously canceled.
And I I like Seth Dillon. I had him on a couple of times. I had dinner with him to show support. Seth Dillon was out there demanding that Charlie Kirk take me off the roster. Pull me off stage because I had said things that BB didn't like or that he didn't like or whatever.
Shocking that someone whose whole persona is wrapped up in the idea that we all get to speak. And if you don't like it, make a more compelling case that that person and many others like him were advocating for me getting pulled off the stage because they don't like what I'm saying.
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed the recent assassination of Charlie Kirk, emphasizing that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu stated Israel was not involved. However, I noted concerns about Netanyahu's quick response, which seemed to exploit the situation for pro-Israel rhetoric. He linked Kirk's death to a supposed alliance between radical Islamists and ultra-progressives, despite the suspect not being identified yet. This raises questions about the motivations behind his comments and the implications for public perception.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Netanyahu: Israel was not behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Video Transcript AI Summary
the absurdity of it. Some of the Internet rumors that somehow Israel is behind the Charlie Kirk murder.
That's insane. That's insane. Israel also changes the orbit of the moon. Israel pushes the sun.
You can't believe that people are saying this. They just found the perpetrator. They'll get to the bottom of this.
But they they go, you know, they have no limits. When you hate Jews, when you hate the Jewish state, you're willing to say anything and promote all these absurd, absurd rumors.
And by the way, they're willing to to kill us all the time.
Charlie Kirk said to me that he wrote me this detailed letter, you have to fight the slander. These untruths, these vilifications have consequences. And he was right.
He was gonna win. That's why they shot him. I hope they don't silence him. I don't think people will give in to these ridiculous, ridiculous lies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before I let you go, I want you to address one thing and and I've it's just the absurdity of it. Some of the Internet rumors that somehow Israel is behind the Charlie Kirk murder. And, you know, I don't believe it for one second, but I want you to, you know, make a statement. It's so absurd.
Speaker 1: That's insane. That's insane. Israel also changes the orbit of the moon. Israel pushes the sun. I mean, the whole thing is it's not only insane, it's I I think it's so absurd, so stupid, it's so stupid and so ridiculous.
You can't believe that people are saying this. They just found the perpetrator. They'll get to the bottom of this. But they they go, you know, they have no limits. When you hate Jews, when you hate the Jewish state, you're willing to say anything and promote all these absurd, absurd rumors.
And by the way, they're willing to to kill us all the time. I mean, that's what they're doing. And you know, over the centuries when when Jews, especially in the Middle Ages, the horrific Middle Ages, the worst things were said about Jews you couldn't possibly believe. We were poisoning the wells, we were drinking the blood of Christian children, you name it. I mean, these things, that continued actually up to the Holocaust.
The Nazis said the same thing. You know, we're carrying vermin, we're spreading disease, and people believed it. Every And time they believed it, this was a prelude to a greater and greater massacre culminating with the the worst massacre of them all, the Holocaust. Well, since then, we've learned, a, when people spread these lies about us, prepare yourself for the assault. And, you know, they're trying to delegitimize the state of Israel.
Charlie Kirk said to me that he wrote me this detailed letter, you have to fight the slander. These untruths, these vilifications have consequences. And he was right. But I'll tell you one thing, we're fighting on the battlefield against the terrorists and winning, and he was fighting on the battlefield of ideas. And I think he was winning.
He was gonna win. That's why they shot him. I hope they don't silence him. I don't think people will give in to these ridiculous, ridiculous lies.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
✍️ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assured the American public on Thursday that Israel was not behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk. https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=65032
Netanyahu: Israel Was Not Behind Assassination of Charlie Kirk
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assured the American public on Thursday that Israel was not behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
informationliberation.com
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
@hayasaka_aryan 🫥
reSee.it AI Summary
I find Rachel Kleinfeld's attempt to connect Nick Fuentes to the Charlie Kirk shooter astonishing. She inaccurately claims the bullet casings link to Groypers/Nick and then argues that the shooter's ideology is irrelevant, yet her finger-pointing seems to encourage violence against Nick.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Rachel Kleinfeld's attempt to link Nick Fuentes to the Charlie Kirk shooter is astonishing. First, she falsely claims the inscriptions on the bullet casings are linked to Groypers/Nick, then she says the shooter's ideology doesn't matter because "violence will grow from the pointing of fingers." By her own standard, she's encouraging violence against Nick through her finger-pointing!
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
WSJ and NYT are trying to link the Charlie Kirk shooter to Nick Fuentes because the song "Bella Ciao" (1B+ views on YouTube) was on a random Spotify playlist "for Groypers." Gov. Cox told WSJ directly it's "very clear" the shooter was a leftist, but they ran with it anyways.🧵 https://t.co/RhW9mFDwlC
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Hasbara agent Brandon Tatum tells Netanyahu how happy he is that his Christian congregation was only spit on once during their visit to Israel. You just can't make this sh*t up. https://t.co/aW3ccmbvp7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: They say Israel is the only place where we're respected and protected.
Speaker 1: I can attest to that. I went to Israel, spent two weeks there with the church, and we had an incredible time. We had only one incident where a small child spit on one of the pastors and immediately after, there was an adult that came by and said, "That's not a representation of who we are. You know, we love you guys." "You guys are always welcome here." And I have to say, no adults gave us any grief. We had no issues whatsoever in our experience there. It was actually an amazing
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In Israel, if you actually talk to the majority of Christians, talk to them, you'll see what they say. They say Israel is the only place where we're respected and protected.
Speaker 1: And I can attest to that. As a Christian, I went to Israel. I spent two weeks there with the church, and we had an incredible time. We had only one incident where a small child spit on one of the pastors and immediately after, there was an adult that came by and said, That's not a representation of who we are. You know, we love you guys.
You guys are always welcome here. And I have to say, no adults gave us any grief. We had no issues whatsoever in our experience there. It was actually an amazing
reSee.it AI Summary
Beverly Hills has passed a resolution to display Israeli flags in public schools, reflecting the community's Jewish majority. Vice Mayor John Mirisch supported the decision, while some public members protested, questioning the appropriateness of foreign flags in schools. Despite dissent, the resolution passed 3-2, with board member Sigalie Sabag emphasizing the urgency of the situation for Jews. The resolution includes elements like adopting the IHRA definition to curb criticism of Israel and implementing ADL training for staff and students. Other districts may follow suit.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
🇮🇱🇺🇸 Beverly Hills has passed a resolution to display Israeli flags in US public schools. "This should be a no-brainer for a school district that represents one of the only Jewish-majority communities outside of Israel," Beverly Hills Vice Mayor John Mirisch said at a meeting Tuesday, flexing his in-group's ethnic power. "Does any flag of a foreign nation belong on a public school facility here in Beverly Hills? Of course not!" a member of the public protested. All protests were ignored, the resolution passed 3-2. "Jews are being k*lled and slaughtered on the streets—so, enough!" Beverly Hills Unified School District board member Sigalie Sabag barked to shut down debate. What next? Forcing students to pledge allegiance to Israel to get their school lunches, just like Trump tried to force people to pledge allegiance to Israel to get disaster relief funds?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Resolution passes three to two.
"The resolution would, among other things, recognize May as Jewish heritage month, display the Israeli flag at each school and facility, Call for education and awareness around Jewish history and culture and designate 10/07/2023 as an annual day of remembrance."
"I believe this vote is for the Jewish people, for antisemitism, and why there needs to be education and training. This should be a no brainer for a school district that represents one of the only Jewish majority communities outside of Israel."
"But opponents argue that displaying the Israeli flag in a public school setting blurs the line between supporting Jewish people and endorsing the Israeli government, particularly during the war in Gaza, adding that other ethnic and religious groups exist in the school district as well."
"Does any flag of a foreign nation belong on a public school facility here in Beverly Hills? Of course not."
"Moreover, some organizations and local parents warn the resolution is not designed to protect all students. Instead, could alienate certain kids, exclude other persecuted communities, and even fuel more anti Semitism."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Resolution passes three to two. Thank you.
Speaker 1: A stamp of approval by the Beverly Hills Unified School District Board of Education, passing a resolution meant to combat antisemitism in the community and drawing strong reaction from the public and board members.
Speaker 0: This is a time right now that Jews are being killed and slaughtered on the street and threats are being are happening. So enough.
Speaker 1: The resolution would, among other things, recognize May as Jewish heritage month, display the Israeli flag at each school and facility, Call for education and awareness around Jewish history and culture and designate 10/07/2023 as an annual day of remembrance. Supporters say the measure is needed amid rising antisemitism to make Jewish students feel safe and supported.
Speaker 2: I believe this vote is for the Jewish people, for antisemitism, and why there needs to be education and training. This should be a no brainer for a school district that represents one of the only Jewish majority communities outside of Israel.
Speaker 1: But opponents argue that displaying the Israeli flag in a public school setting blurs the line between supporting Jewish people and endorsing the Israeli government, particularly during the war in Gaza, adding that other ethnic and religious groups exist in the school district as well.
Speaker 0: Does any flag of a foreign nation belong on a public school facility here in Beverly Hills? Of course not.
Speaker 1: Moreover, some organizations and local parents warn the resolution is not designed to protect all students. Instead, could alienate certain kids, exclude other persecuted communities, and even fuel more anti Semitism.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
You can see just how crazy Beverly Hills' full resolution is below. - IHRA adoption to silence criticism of Israel - Oct 7th education (i.e. teaching "40 beheaded babies," "mass rapes," "babies cooked in ovens," etc. as fact) - ADL training for staff/kids
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
✍️ Beverly Hills Unified School District on Tuesday passed a resolution to fly Israeli flags on all campuses and district facilities. https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=65022
Beverly Hills to Display Israeli Flags in Public Schools
Beverly Hills Unified School District on Tuesday passed a resolution to fly Israeli flags on all campuses and district facilities.
informationliberation.com
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
@USAttyChattah @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash Why did you delete your personal account? https://t.co/GDZk5Zjwcs
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Attorney General Pam Bondi (and Pres. Trump) said nothing about the stabbing death of Austin Metcalf but they're turning this Jewish student allegedly being shoved by a white college girl into an international incident. Can't get any more obvious who the sovereign is in America. https://t.co/xZZKCIhxoC
@AGPamBondi - Attorney General Pamela Bondi
Thank you @PresMcCullough for your leadership and prompt action. Anti-Semitism will not be tolerated in Florida or anywhere else. @AAGDhillon @CivilRights @LeoTerrellDOJ and my US Attorney Jack Heekin (@NDFLNews) are investigating this.
@FloridaState - Florida State University
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
Fox News is now at the point where they're crying for hate speech laws to silence criticism of Jews/Israel. https://t.co/EBMzgbDb8w
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
WATCH: ADL CEO Greenblatt tells the Israeli govt how important it is to "capture" TikTok. "Capturing TikTok might seem less meaningful than holding on to Mount Hermon...but this is urgent because the next war will be decided based on how Israel and its allies perform online." https://t.co/dGGXqCMezK
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must take the online battle seriously. While pushing extremists off platforms like Wikipedia may seem less critical than military actions, it is urgent. The next conflict will be influenced significantly by how Israel and its allies engage online. This digital landscape is as vital as physical territories, and our performance in this arena will impact future outcomes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We must, you must take this deadly seriously. Pushing extremists off Wikipedia might not seem equal to the challenge of pushing Hezbollah north of the Latany River. Capturing TikTok might seem less meaningful than holding on to Mount Hermon. Libeless tweets certainly might seem less deadly than missiles from Yemen, But this is urgent because the next war will be decided based on how Israel and its allies perform online as much as offline.
@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸
>Zionist activists share "suicide letter of a Nova survivor" to prove girls were raped on October 7th >Media runs with it >Letter turns out to be completely fake https://t.co/xGfeVZZlzi
