TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @israelUSAforeve
@israelUSAforeve - Israel & USA forever🎗️
President Trump instructs all journalists on Air Force One to sit down before landing: "I don't want you to get hurt, I love fake news" 😂😭😂😭😭😭 https://t.co/1GNsHH1M9L
Video Transcript AI Summary
The plane is landing. A person asks if the president plans to take Greenland by force and about the impact of today's inflation report. Someone says they don't want to see anyone get hurt. Another person wishes the president good luck and tells him to be careful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're landing right now.
Speaker 1: Is it Mister president, do you plan to take Greenland by force? Is today's inflation report impact?
Speaker 0: Uh-oh. We're landing right now. Don't I don't wanna see anybody get hurt.
Speaker 1: We don't wanna see you
Speaker 2: get hurt. Have a good time. Thank you, mister Good luck. Thank you. Careful.
@israelUSAforeve - Israel & USA forever
In case you missed it Watch: This is Nancy Pelosi’s daughter caught explaining how the democrats are using lawfare to persecute, not prosecute, their political enemies Release the J6 prisoners now! Thoughts? https://t.co/tWPPGlZpr3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the potential impact of dragging out trials after Democrats lose power. They mention the attention trials receive initially, but predict waning interest over time. The conversation touches on trial locations, sentencing discrepancies, and the use of certain cases to strengthen charges. Overall, they suggest that prolonging trials may lead to increased scrutiny and potentially harsher sentences.
Translation: The speakers talk about the consequences of prolonging trials after Democrats lose power, noting initial interest followed by declining attention. They discuss trial locations, sentencing differences, and using specific cases to bolster charges. They imply that extending trials could result in heightened scrutiny and harsher penalties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think the one thing if you drag it out, after the democrats lose the house Yeah. And then they get rid of the committee Right. People may lose interest. Yeah. The first trials are gonna get a lot of attention.
Yes. It's like anniversaries. At the first one is a big deal. They did a really
Speaker 1: big deal. Then you're saying Alright. Right.
Speaker 0: No one's gonna care after the Democrats out
Speaker 1: of power. Right.
Speaker 0: And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out longer, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is
Speaker 1: a lot of people who work for the government. Right. And it's a lot
Speaker 0: of people who work for the government.
Speaker 1: Right. And it's
Speaker 0: a lot of I don't think I'm sympathetic.
Speaker 1: That's our the jury that's the that's
Speaker 0: the The jury issue is because we we don't
Speaker 1: need this trial to
Speaker 0: be held there.
Speaker 1: Obama City bomber. They agreed to move to Colorado. So that's a stick to it. Even the Boston bomber case, which is now on appeal, the Boston the city of Boston or the federal judge, they were like, what
Speaker 0: do you mean we can't be fair?
Speaker 1: Motion is signed by the judge. Yes. Yes. But then but but there might be more favorable up the line. You know, we go to the I'm not gonna be the decision of appeal to the Supreme Court.
They might say, wait a second. You're do you have politicians every night comparing it to Pearl Harbor, 911 That was just
Speaker 0: deep. Deep. These are under siege.
Speaker 1: Had the natural budget for 7 months. If you live there, you're like, I don't yeah. I do.
Speaker 0: So some days In
Speaker 1: the case of
Speaker 0: I tell him he got great legal sometimes I say, 8 months was a
Speaker 1: was great. It wasn't.
Speaker 0: Considering that the shaman who did not I mean, what did the shaman do? He stood there. What he told you? He stood there. The shaman got how many months?
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: 31.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So they're
Speaker 0: paid. So I bought when I sold out, and I think that the government is gonna go for that they're going to look to get bigger. Like, people are criticizing some of the people that get home conduct. A lot of people getting probation and stuff. So I think they're looking to make people like, I think if Paul went now, he'd get a bigger a longer sentence.
Speaker 1: What what would he do? Okay. What did he do? He went He just walked him with
Speaker 0: the trunk flag in the sand.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's it. That's it.
Speaker 0: That's it. And he got so I don't know if anyone was was good or bad.
Speaker 1: Well, for the charge itself, I'm looking from a charging point. I'm gonna give you a 15, 12.
Speaker 0: Steve, you didn't walk in.
Speaker 1: You didn't walk in. You didn't walk
Speaker 0: in to the
Speaker 1: for that reason. I'm not there to overturn anything. I I I think they might have used him to to shore up their 15 12 charge too because if they have people fleeing to it, they're telling the judge, look, we already have people who pledge this felony. So if you overturn it for one case, you're gonna overturn all the prior conditions. It puts more pressure on these district judges not to overturn it because he, oh, we have Paul.
He's gonna plead guilty with