TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @jimmy_dore

jimmy_dore
Posted - May 1, 2025 at 9:06 PM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 10:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a post highlighting Jeffrey Sachs' view that Israel influences U.S. foreign policy, claiming it leads to unnecessary wars in places like Yemen, Syria, Libya, and Lebanon. He argues that the U.S. government is serving Israel's interests rather than its own.

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

https://t.co/09JTiOlrUf Of Course! Israel is behind the current push to get US into war w/Iran. Jeffrey Sachs explains: ‘Israel runs the US government, runs the White House. They’re serving Israel and that means the United States is at war in places it shouldn’t be in.’ ‘No, we shouldn’t be at war in Yemen for heaven’s sake. We shouldn’t be at war in Syria, Libya, Lebanon.’ From -@afshinrattansi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel runs the US government and the White House, and they are serving Israel's interests. Because of this, the United States is in wars it shouldn't be in, such as in Yemen, Syria, Libya, and Lebanon. The White House is deciding where to bomb at Israel's behest, not for American interests or security. It's not just "amateur hour" but "Israel hour" nonstop, and it's as if the US has one-person rule.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel runs the US government, runs the White House. They're run by Israel. They're serving Israel. They're doing this for Israel, and that means that The United States is in war in places it shouldn't be in. No. We should not be in war in Yemen, for heaven's sake. We shouldn't be in war in Syria, in Libya, in Lebanon. We're in war in all of these places. We have a a group amateur hour in the White House deciding where to bomb, but they're doing it for Israel's behest, not for American interest or American security. Not only is it amateur hour, not only is it Israel hour nonstop, but it's as if we have essentially one person rule.

@MaxBlumenthal - Max Blumenthal

The @FDD is the main outfit working to undermine Trump’s negotiations with Iran and oust pro-diplomacy officials At 4:52 in this hidden cam investigation, FDD is named by an Israeli military intel official as an Israeli proxy in Washington https://t.co/s4JoycFggt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript details a covert campaign by the Israeli government and pro-Israel lobby groups to gather information on American citizens and demonize the BDS movement. Adam Milstein, a major donor, and his connections to Sheldon Adelson are highlighted. An Israeli official describes a data-gathering operation targeting BDS activists. The Foundation for Defensive Democracies (FDD) is identified as a key partner in this campaign, working to link BDS supporters to Hamas. Jonathan Shanza from FDD presents research alleging that American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), a group he calls the "mothership," is run by former employees of the Holy Land Foundation, a charity shut down for allegedly funding Hamas. Despite claims that there is no evidence of illegal activity by AMP, these allegations are used to discredit the BDS movement and insinuate that activists for Palestinian rights are connected to terrorism. Claims made by Shanza are entered into congressional record, lending them legitimacy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In part one, how anonymous websites smear supporters of the BDS movement. Speaker 1: You used the name of our daughter. They're capable of doing anything. It's psychological warfare. Speaker 2: Drives them crazy. Speaker 1: Not saying it's hardship, but I I think it's not serious. Speaker 0: Yeah. Our undercover reporter, Tony, is having a coffee with Eric, his boss at the Israel project. Tony wanted to find out more about Canary Mission. Speaker 1: There's a guy named Adam Milstein, who you might wanna meet. He's a convicted felon. That's that way to describe it. He's a real estate mogul. When I was working with him, when I saw him back, I was literally emailing back and forth with him while he was in jail. But he's loaded. I mean, he's close to half a million dollars. Speaker 0: Adam Milstein has become a central figure in the lobby. His foundation funds numerous pro Israel organizations. He also sits on the boards of APAX National Council, the Israel on Campus Coalition, and Stand With Us. Our reporter filmed him alongside Jacob Baim from the Israel on Campus Coalition at the Stand With Us conference in Los Angeles. The two men had lengthy lengthy private discussions. Milstein is close to probably the wealthiest donor to the pro Israel lobby, Sheldon Adelson. Adelson's money helped Milstein expand the Israeli American Council into a major new force within the lobby. Adelson arrived at the 2016 conference with Rudy Giuliani, now an adviser to president Trump. An IAC video from the conference shows Milstein and Adelson discussing their partnership. Speaker 3: You said you see the vision, and you tell us go and do it. And we took your orders, and we made it happen. And we took your money. Speaker 4: Is there somebody else around that can give you fifty minutes? Speaker 3: No. There is no Sheldon. Speaker 0: Eric is wary of Adelson's relationship with a US president. Speaker 1: It's really impulsive if he gets a call from, you know, dollars around the dolphins. They get all the prose recommendations to start helping us. He starts pushing their arms and putting pressure on them. Like, I give you a million dollars. You better start putting out TV ads. Know? Like, the That's not our goal. You know? It's not our mission. Speaker 0: Tony attended the Israeli American Council's annual conference. At a party, he spotted the IAC's chairman, Adam Milstein. Speaker 3: It's very important that we're proud Jews. We're not you know, I was born Jews, but I'm actually a proud Jew with. We have strong connection in the land of Israel. So this affect that they are bigger than they are in democracy. Speaker 1: Do you think there's a good role to just naming them as antisemites? Speaker 3: Not just antisemites. It's too simple. We need to present them for what they really are. They are freedom. They are anti Christian. They are anti democracy. That's all we need to do. Yeah. Speaker 0: Numerous groups from the pro Israel lobby were attending the conference. An Israeli official gave them a message to pass on to BDS supporters in America. Speaker 5: Everybody out there who has to do anything with BDS should ask himself twice. Do I wanna be on this side, or do I wanna be on the other side? If I'm submitting to BDS, what would be the effect? We've got the budget. We can bring things to the table that are quite different. Speaker 0: In episode one of the Lobby USA, Tony discovered that the Israeli government has launched a covert campaign to gather information on American citizens. Speaker 5: We have three different sub campaigns. Data gathering, working on activist organization, money trail. Speaker 0: The Israeli official named one organization that was a partner in its covert campaign, the Foundation for Defensive Democracies or FTD. Speaker 5: This is something that only a country with its resources can do the best. We have FTD. We have others working on this. Speaker 6: She names the foundation for the defense of democracy as an agent for this foreign government going after American citizens. I mean, that quote is a smoking gun. Speaker 1: Yeah. Sorry. Are you Jonathan? Hey. I'm Tony. Speaker 3: Hi. Speaker 1: Hi. I met up with a venue Speaker 0: Jonathan Shanza works for the FDD. Produces research on the financing of armed groups. Speaker 1: Yeah. I've I'm very interested in getting involved in, like, BDS activity and stuff like that. Speaker 2: Hopefully, anti BDS. If Speaker 6: you had on tape a senior Russian or Iranian or even Canadian official saying that they were running covert operations to spy on Americans and using an organization like the Foundation for Defensive Democracies as a front group, I think it would be a bombshell. Speaker 0: Shanza was invited to talk at the training workshops that Tony attended. Speaker 2: The think tanks are the folks that used to work in government, have PhDs, and decided not to become professors. Speaker 7: The democracies is a misnomer. It's the foundation for the defense of Israel. When you strip away all the layers of the onion and you look at what you really have, what you have is a foundation that is dedicated to one goal, and that is defending Israel at every turn. Speaker 0: The FDD's mission has been to associate students who support BDS through links to charities and pressure groups, ultimately to Hamas, which governs the besieged territory of Gaza. Speaker 2: We found out that there was a coordinator who was being paid to make sure that the activists from a certain group called SJP, Students for Justice in Palestine, who was working with all the different SJP chapters around this country to make sure that they all have the same message. So we said, wait a minute. Who are these people? We took a little bit of a deeper dive. We found out that there was one organization that was in fact the mothership. Speaker 0: Shanza's mothership is a group called American Muslims for Palestine. Speaker 2: Here's the remarkable thing, is that this organization has employees that used to work for Hamas charities here in The United States. Many locals that used to work for the Holy Land Foundation. Does that name ring a bell to anyone? Speaker 0: The Holy Land Foundation was the largest Islamic charity in The United States. In the aftermath of nine eleven, the government accused it of funding terrorism. Speaker 8: With this action, we go beyond the Al Qaeda network to target groups whose violent actions are designed to destroy the Middle East peace process. Speaker 0: Hamas emerged as a resistance movement, challenging Israel's occupation of Palestinian land. The United States lists it as a foreign terrorist organization. Five members of the Holy Land Foundation were later convicted of sending money to Hamas. Speaker 9: Almost 90% of all those Arab and Muslims that were targeted in The United States post nine eleven were targeted because of their engagement with the Palestine issue. They had nothing to do with being members of Al Qaeda, have no relationship whatsoever to what so called transnational terrorism. Speaker 6: There's been a very strong trend, from Israel and its advocates since the September eleven two thousand and one attacks to portray Israel as part of a civilizational war where Israel is on the Western side and Israel's critics are on the side of the terrorists. Speaker 0: According to reports in Israeli newspapers in 02/2008, prime minister Netanyahu said nine eleven had been good for Israel. The attacks had swung American public opinion in its favor. Speaker 9: Not surprising. One of the largest cases that we had in this country was the shutting down of the Holy Land Foundation. If you look at all those that were targeted were targeted in relations to Palestine Israel conflict and their engagement politically. Speaker 2: Turns out there are three individuals currently working for Old Prophet Mothership that that used to work for the Holy Land Foundation. Speaker 0: Three former volunteers at the Holy Land Foundation are now involved with American Muslims for Palestine. None of individuals has been accused of any wrongdoing in The United States. Speaker 2: So I'm thinking, okay. Terror financiers. I used to do this for a living. Speaker 5: I used to work for Speaker 2: the treasury department tracking terrorist money. I know these guys. What's going on here? Speaker 10: We have no affiliation with any foreign organization. We don't receive money from overseas, and this mothership organization is a very small organization. Speaker 0: But the pro Israel advocacy class heard another message. Speaker 2: It was that the primary driver of the BDS movement in America is all populated by people who are former Hamas charity employees. This is not a grassroots organization. This is not a grassroots movement. It is being coordinated by very bad people, and it needs to be made known. Speaker 0: Think tanks like the FDD play an important role for Israel in the media. Their selective use of evidence is often presented as legitimate academic research. Speaker 7: They try to educate people to understand that Israel is effectively understand that Israel is effectively a western liberal democracy in the sea of terrorist states, which is the Arab world. The other goal is to intimidate and to smear people. Speaker 0: Shanza is invited by pro Israel Congressmen to provide evidence before subcommittees on terrorism in The Middle East. He uses them to insinuate that prominent activists for Palestinian equal rights are linked to armed groups. Speaker 11: The AMPs founder and president, Hatam Bazian, was one of two featured speakers at a two thousand four fundraising dinner in California. Incidentally, the other speaker at this dinner was Mohammed Al Mazayn, who was currently in jail for his role in the Holy Land Foundation and for providing financial support to Hamas. Speaker 9: When you entered into the congressional record, now people are begin begin to think that there's some legitimacy to it. So this dumping of utter nonsense and garbage into the congressional record into a legitimate hearing will have a effect down the line. Speaker 11: There's also Usama Abu Ershayd. He is currently the national coordinator and policy director for AMP. Mister Abu Ershayd also runs a pro Hamas newspaper in Virginia. Speaker 10: They made Palestine as a front on the war on terrorism. It was Al Qaeda that attacked The United States. It wasn't Hamas or any Palestinian organization. It was Al Qaeda. Speaker 11: I should note here that our open research, open source research did not indicate that AMP or any of these individuals are currently involved in illegal activity. Speaker 10: He himself, in his testimony in congress, he says, we have no evidence of any wrongdoing by this organization, but still you have to investigate them. So investigate us for what? Speaker 9: For doing nothing wrong? The fact it's rubbish does not mean that people don't listen to it. Speaker 0: Allegations that American students are somehow connected to armed groups in The Middle East has become part of the lobby's attempt to demonize BDS. Speaker 5: Organizations that have spread throughout the world via a network of carefully constructed proxies. Speaker 4: We should promote the fact that according to Jonathan Shanzer, knows Harrison, he said a group of people who were active in funding Hamas, a now formed a group American Muslims for Palestine. Shanzer testified said they were a leading driver of the BDS thing is sure Speaker 0: they're Speaker 4: thing that being funded and trained Speaker 0: possible that they are Speaker 4: being funded and trained by vicious lovers of Hamas.
jimmy_dore
Posted - March 6, 2025 at 5:05 AM
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 12:20 AM

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

Motherfuckers, yeah, it’s a real “mystery”. Whatever you do, don’t “do your own research”. Whatever you’ll find out will shatter your trust in authority forever:

@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland BMedSci MBChB MRCGP (2014)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14429957/Breast-cancer-UK-deaths-40-cent-doctors-IARC-WHO.html

UK breast cancer deaths set to rocket by over 40 per cent by 2050 Experts from the International Agency for Research on Cancer - part of the WHO - examined data from over 50 different countries, including the UK. dailymail.co.uk
jimmy_dore
Posted - October 3, 2024 at 9:00 PM
Saved - October 3, 2024 at 11:24 PM

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

We are in the end stage of our Republic, & we’re ending the way all empires end— Bankrupting the Treasury on foreign wars while letting our own country rot. When will we rise up? Mayorkas: “FEMA doesn't have funding to last through hurricane season” https://apnews.com/article/hurricane-helene-congress-fema-funding-5be4f18e00ce2b509d6830410cf2c1cb

Mayorkas warns FEMA doesn't have enough funding to last through hurricane season Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas says the agency tasked with helping communities recover from Hurricane Helene and other natural disasters does not have enough money to make it through the hurricane season. apnews.com
jimmy_dore
Posted - September 3, 2024 at 7:47 AM
Saved - September 3, 2024 at 12:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Freedom of speech is a right, not a privilege. Those who support censorship are undermining democracy and are authoritarian enemies of liberty. It's alarming that half the country seems to agree with this stance. As Thomas Jefferson said, “The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.”

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

Freedom of speech is NOT a privilege, it’s a right . People like this are not protecting democracy, they’re squashing it, they’re authoritarians who are enemies of liberty & freedom. What is really scary is somehow 1/2 the country agrees with her & wants censorship. “The price of liberty is eternal vigilance”.- Thomas Jefferson

@ClownWorld_ - Clown World ™ 🤡

Kamala will shut down X if she wins https://t.co/sML999zQlB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Social media sites must be held responsible and understand their power. The speaker claims these sites speak directly to millions of people without oversight or regulation, and that "has to stop." The speaker asserts that the same rules must apply across platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Someone "has lost his privileges" and content "should be taken down."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He has he has lost his privileges and it should be taken down. And and the bottom line is that you can't say that you have one rule for Facebook and you have a different rule for Twitter. The same rule has to apply which is that there has to be a a a a responsibility that is placed on these social media sites to understand their power. They are directly speaking to millions and millions of people without any level of of of oversight or regulation and that has to stop.
jimmy_dore
Posted - July 30, 2024 at 4:02 AM
Saved - July 30, 2024 at 4:12 PM

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

This how propaganda works, you must repeat it over & over & over. It’s really amazing how shallow & stupid it is, it’s almost “weird” in that way:

@tomselliott - Tom Elliott

SUPERCUT! Proof the entire Democrat-Media Complex outsources their brains to DNC talking-point writers #JDVanceIsWeird https://t.co/ceN2qvIPTM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, are described as weird multiple times in the video. Vance's behavior, policies, and style are all labeled as weird. The speakers question Vance's ability to connect with the public due to his perceived weirdness. The use of diet Mountain Dew and Vance's lack of laughter are highlighted as examples of his weird behavior. Overall, the video emphasizes the perception of Trump and Vance as weird individuals. Translation: The video repeatedly calls Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, weird. Vance's actions, policies, and style are all considered strange. The speakers doubt Vance's ability to connect with the public due to his perceived weirdness. Examples like drinking diet Mountain Dew and Vance's lack of laughter are pointed out as strange behaviors. The video focuses on the perception of Trump and Vance as weird individuals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some of what he and his running mate are saying, well, it's just plain weird. Speaker 1: These guys are just weird. That's where they are. Not as weird and creepy, as JD Vance. Super weird idea from JD Vance. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's not. I mean, it's quite weird. Just plain weird. Just plain weird. Just plain weird. Speaker 1: That stuff is weird. They come across weird, and then they start being weird. Yeah. They're weird. Speaker 0: Being a really weird Speaker 1: He's such a weirdo. Speaker 0: Trump and his weirdo running mate are weird, deeply and profoundly weird. They are Speaker 1: weird. These Republicans just being weird? It's just weird. It's really weird. Speaker 0: Republican weirdness goes even deeper. He said a lot of things Speaker 1: that are weird, a weird style that Speaker 0: he brings, weird policies. Let's start with with the weird thing because it is a thing. Just plain weird. What was weird was Speaker 1: just talking about diet Mountain Dew. Who who drinks diet Mountain Dew? Whoever seen the guy laugh, that seems very weird to me that, that an adult can go through 6 and a half years of being in the public eye. If he has laughed, it's at someone, not with someone. That that is weird behavior. Speaker 0: Weird and cultish. Speaker 1: These are weird people on the other side. Speaker 0: He kinda doubled down on his weird ideas. I think weird is probably generous. Simply weird. These guys are just plain weird. Dance as weird? You know, as the campaign said, weird? It really is just plain weird. JD Vance, plain weird. I mean, how the hell is he gonna read it? Weird. It is kinda weird. Speaker 1: We're not afraid of weird people. Speaker 0: The Speaker 1: other side, they're just weird. Why are you being so weird? Vance has done something more extreme, more weird. Speaker 0: No matter what kind of weird stuff they keep saying. Trump and Vance are just weird. In addition, it should've been dangerous to the box. That's the weird part that's the most engaging. Speaker 1: Whom he addressed as my beautiful Christians, which was super weird. Speaker 0: Weird tech bro, JD Vance. He's a weird guy. JD Vance, uneasy and sort of weird. Frankly, for lack of a better word, that he's weird. Sarcastic remarks that aren't even funny, and he kinda shows that he can't really deliver, one liner. So, Sam, weird is the word here, in terms of initial impressions from Vance, to the American public.
jimmy_dore
Posted - July 26, 2024 at 5:56 PM
Saved - July 26, 2024 at 7:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it amazing that Trump pointed out it's not the Palestinians blocking peace, but Netanyahu who is preventing a deal. This seems to confirm suspicions that Netanyahu's true plan has been to eliminate the Palestinians and take control of the West Bank and Gaza.

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

This is AMAZING. Watch as Trumps says it is not the Palestinians blocking peace, but Netanyahu that doesn't want to make a deal & is BLOCKING A PEACE DEAL. This confirms everyone's suspicions that Netanyahu's plan all along was to wipe out the Palestinians, move those that remained off their land & take over the West Bank & Gaza.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I had a great meeting with Abbas, who I felt was very nice. After a brief meeting with Netanyahu, I realized he may not want to make a deal. I used to think Israelis were willing to do anything for peace, but now I see that may not be the case.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Reveal it here. He wanted to make a deal more than Netanyahu. And I will be honest, I had a great meeting with him, Abbas. Right? I had a great meeting with him, and we spent a lot of time together, talked about many things, and it was almost like a father. I mean, he was so nice. Couldn't have been nice And after meeting with BB for 3 minutes, I looked at him and said, you don't wanna make a deal, do you? And he said, well, and the fact is I don't think maybe ever wanted to make a deal. Hawaii I thought the were impossible, and the the Israelis would do anything to make peace in a deal. I found that not to be true.
jimmy_dore
Posted - July 5, 2024 at 10:59 AM
Saved - July 5, 2024 at 1:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The war in Ukraine is driven by the desire to expand NATO and strip Ukraine of its resources, according to posts. The globalist elite, including Blackrock and bankers, are interested in subjugating Ukraine and Russia. The current government in Kiev does not represent the interests of the Ukrainian people. The war could escalate and become regional or even global. The globalists are desperate and fear the rise of BRICS countries and a currency backed by gold. Intervention in western Ukraine could lead to a full-fledged war. Putin has shown restraint but may respond if provoked. The US is ill-prepared for war and cannot recruit enough soldiers.

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

Attention all the dupes with Ukraine flags in your profile, you’ve been had once again by the war machine. After being lied into war TWICE in Iraq, lied into Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, lied to for 20 yrs about Afghanistan,you fell for it AGAIN with Ukraine. Here’s the REAL REASON for the war in Ukraine & what you’re NOT being told by your favorite corporate news outlet:

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

We are in the verge of WW 3 with Russia. Why? Because we want to expand NATO into Ukraine. That’s it. That’s the reasons you and your kids may die. Ukraine didn’t even want to join NATO. They thought it was too inflammatory against their Russian neighbors. That’s why the elected Viktor Yanukovych. He was a president who ran on peace and not joining NATO. Shortly after the United States incited a Coup, and he was replaced….

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the US plan to expand NATO to Ukraine, despite Ukrainian opposition. Viktor Yanukovych's neutrality stance angers the US, leading to a crisis and coup in 2013. US involvement in the insurrection is evident, with senators openly supporting the demonstrators in Kiev. Victoria Nuland's actions, including distributing cookies, further highlight US interference in Ukraine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To understand that is in this long standing Palmerston, Brzezinski Yes. Theory. This isn't just haphazard. Oh, why don't we take Georgia? This is a plan. Okay. The Russians understand every single step of this. So another thing goes awry. What goes awry? The Ukrainians don't want NATO enlargement. The Ukrainians don't want it. They're against it. The public opinion said, no. This is very dangerous. Neutrality, it's safer. We're in between east and west. We don't want this. So they elect Viktor Yanukovych Yes. A president that says, we'll just be neutral. And that's absolutely the US's, oh, what the hell is this? Ukraine, they don't have any choice either. So Yanukovych becomes the enemy of the neocons, obviously. So they start working, of course, the way that the US does. We got to get rid of this guy. Maybe we'll elect his opponent afterwards. Maybe we'll catch him in a crisis and so forth. And indeed, at the end of 2013, the US absolutely stokes a crisis that becomes an insurrection and then becomes a coup. And I know, again, from firsthand experience, the US was profoundly implicated in that, but you can see our senators standing up in the crowd, like, if Chinese officials came to January 6th and said, yes. Yes. Go. You know, can how would we like it if, if if Chinese leaders, came and said, yeah. We we were with you a 100%. American senators standing up in Kiev saying to the demonstrators, we're with you a 100%. Victoria Nuland famously passing around the cookies, but it was much much more than the cookies. I can tell you.

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

https://t.co/vK7jk7QTrw

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

MUST WATCH👏👏👏‼️‼️‼️ Ukraine war cause and the end game explained: War of the globalist elite, Blackrock, and bankers. Colonel Douglas Macgregor: 📑 In Ukraine, which I think happening there. And what, do you know, what is the end game? Well, for the globalists that are running the show, this is a globalist neocon elite, both on the hill as well as in the White House. And these elites in Europe, particularly in Paris, Berlin, London, they're all interested in seeing Blackrock take over Ukraine, number one, so that it can be systematically stripped of its resources and turned into a subjugated state that belongs to the larger globalist elites. But they also want to see that happen to Russia, which is why this war was never about Ukraine. It was always about what can be done to destroy Russia. And of course, since the people in charge didn't perform any strategic analysis, they never thought about purpose, method, or end state. They concluded that Russia today is still the Russia of 1992. It's weak, it's prostrate, its economy is ineffective. Remember the McCain statement, oh, Russia is Spain with a gas station. All of these arrogant displays of american hubris, treating Russia as though it was a third class nation with a fourth class military. Well, we're getting an education right now. We paid no attention to the Russians, who had legitimate concerns about what we were doing in eastern Ukraine. We were building an army to attack them. We put a hostile government into that country in 2014. And we kept telling them that it made no difference to us what they thought or what they cared about. They said, we don't want NATO on our border. No one paid attention. President Trump tried to listen, but he was surrounded by people who subverted him, people who were not loyal to the president, who took an oath of obedience to the orders of the president and then ignored them. So what's the outcome? You've got a very serious war that could become regional, even global, and no one in the White House seems to really grasp that. But we're losing. The globalists are losing. And when the ground dries, and in June, you're going to see a massive russian offensive. And most of what we call this thing called Ukraine is going to be swept away, especially that government in Kiev. But that government doesn't represent the interests of the ukrainian people. They represent the interests of this globalist elite who are interested in resources and stripping them and using them and exploiting them to make money. Yeah, it feels like the biggest threat to America is actually what's happened to the petrodollar. When you have Putin now talking with the Saudis and Putin now talking with Xi, and you get rid of the petrodollar, and all of a sudden all that borrowing that we do where we're living way above our means, that's no longer possible, plausible or worse. I think what you're saying is this war has become financial as well as military. And the globalists understand that they're going to lose this war. And what will come of this is that the BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, are going to be increased by 81 additional members. And all of these people are going to go to a currency that is backed by gold. And once they go to that currency backed by gold, whether it is one currency or a basket of currencies, it doesn't make any difference. Yes, we are in a lot of trouble. The globalists know that, and it is why they are so desperate right now. And the greatest fear that I have is that when the Russians do attack and it becomes abundantly clear that Ukraine is finished, I mean, it's already obvious to anybody who visits the place for any length of time. It's in ruins. But once that occurs, I fear that there will be pressure to commit US forces in Poland and Romania, along with Polish forces and potentially Romanian ones, to western Ukraine. And if that occurs, the gloves will come off, because truthfully, thus far, Putin has exercised tremendous restraint, tremendous patience. He does not want a war with the west. If he wanted that, wed already have it. But if we intervene in western Ukraine, it's over. We'll be in a full fledged war. Expand on that a little bit, because it's sort of interesting. You know, I think we grossly miscalculated. Putin had made several speeches over the last 20 years, repeatedly saying, please do not advance the border to Russia. Do not try to transform Ukraine into a hostile actor, an actor with hostile intentions towards Russia. What happens in Ukraine is of existential strategic interest to us, just as theoretically, what happens in Mexico is of existential strategic interest to us. Although this administration has decided to ignore it. He expected that we would negotiate, that he would demonstrate that this was serious, and that Russia wanted its population in eastern Ukraine, which is really russian, to have equal rights before the law. He wanted to end the oppression of the Russians that lived there, and he wasn't going to surrender Crimea. The reason he went into Crimea is he was afraid it was going to be turned into a US naval base. Biden said. Our goal is regime change. Our goal is to get rid of Putin, and our goal is ultimately to divide Russia into constituent parts, then exploit it. All of his supporters, his staffers, everyone in the globalist camp knows this is the truth. The so called oligarchs Kolomoisky, Soros and others were all part of this. None of this is news. Finally, he said, enough's enough. He stopped. They set up a strategic defense. They ran an economy of force mission, and now they have a force in place that can go as far as it needs to go, which includes to the polish border. They have a plan for 31, 31 month war against us if we insist on fighting it. And we are in no shape to fight a war. We can't even recruit the United States army or the Marines. The Marines are running around trying to recruit illegals and are being encouraged to do so by the administration. Is that what you want in the ground force, to fight for this country? Forget it. It's not going to work.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The globalists aim to have BlackRock take over Ukraine for resources, while also targeting Russia. The war is financial and military, with potential for a global conflict. Putin seeks to protect Russian interests in Ukraine, warning against hostile actions. If the US intervenes in Western Ukraine, a full-fledged war may erupt. Putin has shown restraint but has a plan for a 31-month war if needed. The US military is not prepared for conflict.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Or in Ukraine, which is happening there. What do you you know, what what is the endgame? Speaker 1: Well, for the globalists that are running the show, this is a globalist neo con elite in both on the hill as well as in the White House and these elites in Europe, particularly in Paris, Berlin, London. They're all interested in seeing BlackRock take over Ukraine, number 1, so that it can be systematically stripped of its resources and turned into a subjugated state that belongs to the larger globalist elites. But they also wanna see that happen to Russia, which is why this war was never about Ukraine. It was always about what can be done to destroy Russia. And, of course, since the people in charge didn't perform any strategic analysis, they never thought about purpose, method, or end state. They concluded that Russia today is still the Russia of 1992. It's weak. It's prostrate. Its economy is ineffective. Remember the McCain statement? Oh, Russia is Spain with a gas station. All of these arrogant displays of American hubris, treating Russia as though it was a third class nation with a 4th class military. Well, we're getting an education right now. We paid no attention to the Russians who had legitimate concerns about what we were doing in Eastern Ukraine. We were building an army to attack them. We put a hostile government into that country in 2014, and we kept telling them that it made no difference to us what they thought or what they cared about. They said we don't want NATO on our border. No 1 paid attention. President Trump tried to listen, but he was surrounded by people who subverted him. People who are not loyal to the president, who who took an oath of obedience to the orders of the president and then ignored them. So what's what's the outcome? You've got a very serious war that could become regional, even global, and no 1 in the White House seems to really grasp that. But we're losing. The globalists are losing. And when the ground dries and in June, you're straight you're gonna see a massive Russian offensive, and most of what we call this thing called Ukraine is gonna be swept away, especially that government in Kyiv. But that government doesn't represent the interest of the Ukrainian people. They represent the interest of this globalist elite who are interested in resources and stripping them and using them and exploiting them to make money. Speaker 0: Yeah. It feels like, you know, the biggest threat to America is actually what's happened to the petrodollar. When you have Putin now talking with the Saudis and Putin now talking with Xi, and you get rid of the petrodollar and all of a sudden all that borrowing that we do, where we're living way above our means, that's no longer possible, plausible, or or worse. Speaker 1: I think what you're saying is this war has become financial as well as military, and the globalists understand that they're going to lose this war. And what will come of this is that the BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, are going to be increased by 81 additional members. And all of these people are going to go to a currency that is backed by gold. And once they go to that currency backed by gold, whether it is 1 currency or a basket of currencies, it doesn't make any difference. Yes. We are in a lot of trouble. The globalists know that, and it is why they are so desperate right now. And the greatest fear that I have is that when the Russians do attack and it becomes abundantly clear that Ukraine is finished. I mean, it's already obvious to anybody who visits a place for any length of time. It's in ruins. But once that occurs, I fear that there will be pressure to commit US forces in Poland and Romania along with Polish forces and potentially Romanian ones to Western Ukraine. And if that occurs, the gloves will come off because truthfully, thus far, Putin has exercised tremendous restraint, tremendous patience. He does not want a war with the west. If he wanted that, we'd already have it. But if we intervene in Western Ukraine, it's over. We'll be in a full fledged war. Speaker 0: Expand on that a little bit because it's sort of interesting. You know? Speaker 1: I think we've grossly miscalculated. Putin had made several speeches over the last 20 years repeatedly saying, please do not advance the border to Russia. Do not try to transform Ukraine into a hostile actor, an actor with hostile intentions towards Russia. What happens in Ukraine is of the existential strategic interest to us just as theoretically, what happens in Mexico is of existential strategic interest to us, although this administration has decided to ignore it. He expected that we would negotiate, that he would demonstrate that this was serious and that Russia wanted wanted its population in Eastern Ukraine, which is really Russian, to have equal rights before the law. He wanted to end the oppression of the Russians that lived there, and he wasn't going to surrender Crimea. The reason he went into Crimea is he was afraid he was gonna be turned into a US naval base. Biden said, our goal is regime change. Our goal is to get rid of Putin, and our goal is ultimately to divide Russia into constituent parts then exploit it. All of his supporters, his staffers, everyone in the globalist camp knows this is the truth. The so called oligarchs, Kolomoisky, Soros, and others were all part of this. None of this is news. Finally, he said, enough's enough. He stopped. They set up a strategic defense. They ran an economy of force mission, and now they have a force in place that can go as far as it needs to go, which includes to the Polish border. They have a plan for a 31 31 month war against us if we insist on fighting it, and we are in no shape to fight a war. We can't even recruit the United States Army or the Marines. The Marines are running around trying to recruit illegals and are being encouraged to do so by the administration. Is that is that what you want in the ground force to fight for this country? Forget it. It's not gonna work.
jimmy_dore
Posted - June 26, 2024 at 4:35 PM
Saved - June 26, 2024 at 11:15 PM

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

The CIA has figured out how to infiltrate & control “Community Notes”, of course they have. @elonmusk

@BTnewsroom - BreakThrough News

BREAKING: The first 400 Kenyan police officers have arrived in Haiti to be the backbone of the US-engineered and funded occupation, designed to keep Haiti mired in poverty. https://t.co/eL3dC49apM

jimmy_dore
Posted - June 21, 2024 at 7:18 PM
Saved - June 22, 2024 at 1:48 PM

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

Holy Shit:

@fightwithmemes - Fight With Memes

https://t.co/zBag0Pm6fX

jimmy_dore
Posted - May 8, 2024 at 5:49 PM
Saved - May 9, 2024 at 9:38 PM

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

The JIMMY DORE SHOW Is Live! NOW! Piers Morgan’s WILD DELUSIONS About U.S. Foreign Policy! NY Governor INSULTS Black Kids! Featuring: Whitney Webb @_WhitneyWebb Mike MacRae @MikeMacRaeMike Dr. Meryl Nass @NassMeryl & Stef Zamorano @miserablelib Now streaming on Rumble, YouTube & Rokfin https://rumble.com/v4tz56n-piers-morgans-wild-delusions-about-u.s.-foreign-policy-ny-gov-insults-black.html

Private video rumble.com
jimmy_dore
Posted - March 4, 2024 at 5:29 AM
Saved - March 4, 2024 at 5:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author expresses a belief that there has been widespread deception regarding Covid, including the funding and concealment of its creation. They also claim that the definition of "vaccine" was altered to promote mRNA gene therapy. The author believes that those responsible will not face consequences due to their connection to the establishment. They express distrust in the government, institutions, and media, suggesting they are influenced by the billionaire class. The author encourages questioning and skepticism.

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

We've been lied to on a scale most peoples brains can't comprehend. Everything about Covid was a lie, including the fact that Fauci & the Pentagon FUNDED the creation of the virus & then lied about it to Congress & everyone else. They even had the dictionaries change the definition of "Vaccine" so they could use us as guinea pigs for their new mRNA gene therapy. No one will ever be held accountable cuz the criminals did all this at the behest of the establishment, so there's no-one to hold them accountable. I'll never forget, nor will I ever put any faith in our corrupt government's corrupt institutions or the corrupt bought media that is paid to lie to us and manufacture our consent for every horrible thing the billionaire class wants. Question everything especially those who shame you for questioning.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The idea that bioweapons research caused Covid was debunked, people say. But it wasn't. New documents show scientists sought to insert a furin cleavage site right where it exists on SARS-CoV-2, and they'd been funded in the past by Anthony Fauci, who oversaw bioweapons research. https://t.co/dyDollMB6g

jimmy_dore
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 5:44 PM
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 10:07 AM

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

This Will Definitely Blow Your Mind:

@unhealthytruth - Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌

Our friend, Bobby Kennedy, exposes MK ultra. I don’t care if you vote for him or not but at least listen to the video. https://t.co/VUWPr5cxKE

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the history of the U.S. bioweapons program and its connection to the CIA. They explain how the CIA brought German and Japanese scientists involved in bioweapons programs to the U.S. after World War II. The CIA conducted experiments on the American public, including spraying toxins and conducting aerial dosing. In 1969, President Nixon shut down the U.S. bioweapons program, but the CIA secretly stored the weapons. The speaker also discusses the CIA's involvement in pandemic simulations and the role of Tony Fauci in bioweapons development. They highlight the importance of resisting government overreach and restoring freedoms. The speaker also briefly mentions the issue of child trafficking.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, you know, I look back on, in my new book, I talk about the history of the U. S. Bio weapons program. And from the beginning, the CIA was running the bio weapons program. Why? Because we didn't have a bioweapons program after World War II. And the CIA's first operation was called Operation Paperclip. And it was an operation to get all the bioweapons and nuclear and chemical scientists out of Germany and Japan, where they had extensive bioweapons program. The Japanese had a horrendous program where they were doing they did live visitations on 3,000 people. You know, they killed them all during the operation, removing their infected organs while they were alive with no anesthesia. And these were horrible, horrible scientists. The CIA elevated them, brought them over to Fort Detrick, downloaded them and made made them the heads of hospital systems pharmaceutical companies in Japan and continued to work with them. And they brought all the German scientists over here. And then they did all these experiments unwittingly on the American public. They sprayed toxins in National Airport. They sprayed them in the Pentagon, air conditioning system. They put poison water in NIH. They put light bulbs filled with bacteria that they broke on the grates and contaminated the New York City subway system, some of those microbes still in the subway today, they they did aerial dosing from ships of about, of about 60,000,000 Americans. At a dose, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, Virginia, Norfolk, Virginia, all of the seaside towns were dosed from the air. And a lot of the midwestern cities were also all unwitting. They did 200 outdoor tests on Americans, unwitting. And they developed bioweapons by 1969 had a nuclear equivalent. They could kill people at $29 for death according to a CIA study, which they're bragging about. And then in 'sixty nine, President Nixon shocked the world by going to Fort Detrick and ending the U. S. Bioweapons program. He was worried we were creating bioweapons that could be reproduced for nothing. They were kind of a poor man's nuclear bomb. Anybody could reproduce them once we. And we were publishing how you did it. So they were giving blueprints to the to foreign nations to create these things that could be used against us. And he said, why are we doing this? We have nuclear bombs. We don't need these things. And we have a monopoly on nuclear bombs, 7 nations to have them. We've agreed not to give them to anybody else. Why are we letting these guys get, you know, weapons that are going to be turned against us? So we shut down the whole program. The Pentagon destroyed all of its bio weapons. But the CIA went into Fort Detrick right before the Pentagon went in there and took cultures of all the different weapons and hid them in a warehouse. A lot of it was in New York City and Washington DC. And they continued, we signed the bioweapons treaty, which Nixon, one of the great accomplishments of Nixon, he got all the nations in the world to sign it. We signed the Geneva Convention, finally, after delaying it for 50 years, the CIA was breaking the law the entire time. Then, in 2001, in June, the CIA sponsors the first of its pandemic simulations. It simulates a biological attack on Washington, D. C. By Saddam Hussein. This is in June 2001. That simulation got international press. And a lot of the CIA people like Judith Miller from The New York Times was promoting it, going around doing all the talk shows. It, it triggered 2 Senate hearings, 1 by Joe Biden's committee. And that hearing was in September 2001. What happened in September 2001? The 9/11. So that hearing was going on during 9/11. As soon as 9/11 happened, the neocons, which were working on all this stuff with the CIA, pulled out the Patriot Act, a 3 50 page statue from a shelf where I had been waiting for a while. And in 1 week said we want to pass this in a week. There's only 1 member of Congress who read it, which was Dennis Kucinich. And he went crazy and said, you have no idea this is the end of American democracy if you do this. It allows the CIA to spy on Americans. One of the things the Patriot Act did is it did not get rid of the Geneva Convention or the bioweapons treaty. But it said no federal official can be prosecuted for violating those 2 statutes. So it reopened the bioweapons arms race globally. And when the, a week after, when the Patriot Act was being debated, and it was being held up by 2 senators, there was an anthrax attack on the US capital. It was blamed on Saddam Hussein. And they although the new consul said, the we were right in the pandemic simulations, Saddam Hussein attacked us. And we used that as a justification to go to war against Saddam Hussein. And within 2 days we passed the Patriot Act. Who got the anthrax? 2 Senate offices. Tom Daschle and Patrick Lee, the 2 senators who were blocking the Patriot Act. The FBI did a 1 year investigation. They said this anthrax was unique. It was Ames Anthrax. There's only 1 place in the world that could have come from, Fort Detrick, the CIA lab. So we went to war. We passed the Patriot Act and immediately started giving $2,000,000,000 a year to bioweapons development. The Pentagon didn't want to do it because it was nervous about the legality because it was a death penalty to violate the Geneva Convention. Oh, you would have been committing a, you know, a war crime even if somebody told you it was okay. It wasn't. And so they funneled it through DITRA and DARPA. They funneled all of that money to NIH to NIAID, which became the primary spear tip of bioweapons development. So, Tony Fauci became the bioweapons czar in 2001. His budget went up by $2,200,000,000. He was personally given a 68% raise from the military. That's why he was the highest paid individual in the federal government. Because he was getting about this 68% bonus every year from the military. But it meant that he could not stop. And the thing the military wanted was gain of function studies, where they could take wild viruses and turn them into bioweapons. And bioweapons development always includes vaccine development. Because unlike chemical weapons, with bioweapons there's always blowback. It's called the boomerang effect. If you give your enemy bubonic plague, your guys are going to get it first, too. They're going to get it quickly. So the only way you can deploy a bioweapons is if you have already developed a vaccine. So the race is to develop a vaccine simultaneously and then you can deploy the bioweapons and your enemy will take a couple of years to develop the vaccine. And you can inoculate all of your team. So in 2014, 3 of Tony Fauci's bugs escaped from federal labs. And their escapes were public. And it caused a huge Abruaha, there were senate hearings. And people were immensely upset. And, and 300 scientists wrote letter wrote a petition to President Obama saying you have to shut down Tony Fauci. He's going to cause a global pandemic. And Obama declared a moratorium and told Fauci, ordered Fauci to shut down the 18 studies he was been doing. As I show in my book, he didn't do it. He instead took that science And he moved it offshore to the Wuhan lab and to the Ukraine. And when he did that, he was not the only one who did it. Tony Fauci spent about $29,000,000 on gain of function science in Wuhan. I let the CIA spend over $100,000,000. And the military spent about that much too, about 64,000,000 And they, the CIA funneled the money, most of it through USAID. But they also the CIA, as we now know, was also running this organization called the EcoHealth Alliance, which Fauci was funneling his money through. It was like a laundromat, where they funneled federal money so that it was so that their fingerprints would not be in the would not be visible on those studies. And, So, so that's important to understand now, just to get to the final thing in my book. And Tony Fallachy, if any of you end up reading the book. That last chapter is, talks about the, you know, the all of these, you know, these pandemic simulations. I've been studying the CIA for much of my adult life. Because of my family's relationship, I wrote a book, which I, to me is my best book, American Values. And it is a story of my family's 60 year fist fight with the CIA, which began with my grandfather, Joseph Kennedy, who served on the Hoover Commission in 1955 and recommended the disbanding of the CIA's plans, the vision. It's, you know, it's the vision that was fixing elections and assassinating leaders and all of that. So the CIA never forgave my family for that. And then when my uncle came in, you know, after the Bay of Pigs, he fired the top 3 officials, Bizzle and Goodell and and Alan Dulles, who then made himself the head of the Warren Commission 3 years later. And when my uncle died, he told a reporter, I'm glad the little shit is dead. He thought he was a god. And, So I, you know, I have I know a lot about the CIA. I've gotten their manuals. I paid over a $1,000 get these manuals because, you you know, they're training manuals from MK Ultra. And MK stands for mind control, MK Naomi, MK Dietrich, it all came out of Fort Detrich and NIH. And then 150 colleges around our country where they were funding these studies. And if you look at what they do in these simulations, they're using all of these techniques that they developed in colleges in college laboratories, social scientists and other scientists, medical scientists for years who were studying how do you control individual behavior but also Mass Baby. How do you induce mass psychosis? How do you create Manchurian candidates? You know, how do you do all these? And all these colleges studying these. And how do you, how do you impose centralized foreign control on indigenous populations. By coming into a country by using propaganda, by using fear, by sowing chaos, by destroying relationships, destroying faith in institutions, driving people apart and creating chaos so they will invite in an authority who will give them peace and safety. And all of them, all of these mind control techniques are designed to accelerate that process. And they, you know, they study the Stockholm syndrome, for example. How do you, if you lock people, you know, down, they become grateful to their captors. And they become angry at the people who criticize their captors. And they believe that the only way that they can escape is confinement, is through total obedience and total compliance to, you know, to their to their jailers. And, but, one of the most interesting experiments was called, the, Anyway, I'll think of it. It was, what Milgram Milgram. And it was a scientist, associate scientist at Yale, a sociologist called Stanley Milgram, who was a, who was part of the MK Ultra program. And he conducted this experiment where he recruited subjects from every Walk of American Life, there were students, there were professors, there were business people, there were blacks, whites, everybody from the New Haven area. And he would put the subject in a chair at a table where there was a dial in front of them that they could administer an electric shock to a person who is tied in the chair in the next room, who they told was tied in a chair, but he was actually a confederate of Milgram's. He was an actor. And when they turn this dial up and administer the supposed electric shock, they could hear the man in the other room screaming, shouting, begging, struggling, bleeding with them, crying. And the thought that but and the most of the people who are participating in this experiment begged to stop. A lot of them were crying and telling the doctor. The doctor was standing behind them saying, turn it up, turn it down, turn it higher, turn it down, turn it even higher, turn it down. And 67% of them turned it up to 2 50 volts where it was marked potentially fatal. 67%. You can go on Wikipedia and look the Milgram experiment. So, but 33% of the people got up and walked out. And what Milgram said that if you, for 67% of people, if you have an authority figure that has some imprimatur of legitimacy, like a doctor's title, that 67% of people will take his orders, even it means violating their most sacred values. It'll go against everything they believe in. And to me, it occurred to me many times during that 2020 we were all involved in this huge Milgram experiment. And that Anthony Fauci was, you know, Doctor. Milgram telling us you can violate the constitution. You can censor speech. You can close churches. You can shut businesses. You can ban jury trials. And you can, you know, tell people what they can and can't do. And you can gaslight them and marginalize them and vilify them. And and, you know, no cruelty is too great for somebody who dissipates. And what I would say to you is that 33% of the people walked out. And the people in this room are the 33% who wouldn't be told what to do. And, you know, what our job is now is to fight for the 67% till they wake up until they're able to fight for themselves to restore the freedoms that all of us believe in. And I'll leave you with three thoughts. 1 is that any power that government takes from the people, it will never return voluntarily. Number 2 rule. Every power the government takes, it will ultimately abuse to the ultimate to the maximum extent possible. And number 3, nobody ever complied their way out of totalitarianism. The only thing we could do is resist. Thank you all very much. Speaker 1: I just saw this from Wall Street Silver, and it's got 4,700,000 views. So let's just start there. It says, His days are numbered, referencing me. They will make it look like an accident. He is likely correct. The CIA does this, and it is used for blackmailing their assets in high places to keep them in line. Hollywood actor Jim Caviezel says CIA operates world's biggest pedophile ring. Well, let me explain something to All of you in the world that think that I'm a little girl and I'm afraid of you. I'm not scared in in the least bit. I gave God brought me into Hollywood to become an actor. He asked me to do that. He was my intel officer, the greatest God, the only God, and he loved me enough to give me a purpose in my life because I was the lowest of the low at that time. And I would gladly trade my life to save these little ones because the screaming that I heard was so horrific. I can't sleep at night. At 3 in the morning, for whatever reason, I can hear it. Speaker 2: It is the fastest growing international crime network that the world has ever seen. I'd it has already passed the illegal arms trade, and soon it's gonna pass the truck trade. Think you can sell a bag of coke cake one time to the child I'd 5 to 10 times a day. God's children are not for sale. Speaker 0: How long even knew Speaker 2: this. Paul hears now. How many pedophiles you got? 288. How many kids Speaker 0: I I'd For homeland you know we can't go off rescuing Honduran kids in Colombia. Speaker 2: Janice will disappear Speaker 0: for good. Speaker 2: I'm actually walking into her room right now I Stay in that seat there. What we do. You quit your job, and you go and rescue those kids. So this I She could be a block down the road or she could be in Moscow, Bangkok, LA. She's an agent operator. There, it's all regulatory. No one goes in. On the army, on the police, no threats. When is this with you or daughter? There's no marine unit coming. I It's still tears you to pieces. And that's just not a windshield. I that's again. God tells you what to do.
jimmy_dore
Posted - August 6, 2023 at 1:37 AM
Saved - August 6, 2023 at 3:32 AM

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

This is for my comedian friends who still repeat the Big Pharma lie that “Nobody Ever Said The Vaxx Would Stop The Transmission Of Covid Virus” Here is EVERYONE saying it:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccination is crucial for protecting oneself and others, and for society to return to normal. Vaccinated individuals are less likely to transmit the virus or get sick. Getting vaccinated and receiving booster shots can save lives and prevent the spread of infection. The goal is to become a dead end for the virus, stopping its transmission. Vaccinated people do not get infected and cannot be used as hosts to spread the virus. However, the initial emergency use authorization did not have sufficient data on the vaccine's effectiveness against transmission. The speed of scientific progress necessitated quick action.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. Speaker 1: We can kind of almost see the end. We're vaccinating so very fast. Our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Speaker 0: Getting vaccinated and getting a booster shot when eligible can save your life and protect you When your family and friends from getting seriously ill and spreading infection. What do you think the probability is? 80%? Personally, I think it's a 100%. I think that there's a reduction transmission. Speaker 2: We have all the vaccines we need. We just need our people to take it, a, for their own Protection for the protection of the family, but also to break the chain of transmission. You want to be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person. Speaker 3: Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. Cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this. Speaker 0: But when we look at the emergency use authorization which is right on the screen, if you look what it says under transmission, this is what was known the moment they were making those things. Can I have the next slide please? What was known was that the data are, not there limited to assess the effects of the vaccine against transmission of SARS CoV-two. They had no idea. They had no idea if it would stop the infection, yet they were making those statements on the news. Speaker 4: The Pfizer COVID vaccine tested On stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. If not, please Say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want straight answer, yes or no, and I'm looking forward to it. Thank you very much. Speaker 3: Regarding the question around, did we know about stop and humanization before it entered the market? No. These, we had to really move at the speed of science
jimmy_dore
Posted - May 20, 2023 at 5:11 PM
Saved - June 3, 2023 at 8:01 PM

@jimmy_dore - Jimmy Dore

The craziest thing during Covid was being shamed/censored/ostracized for questioning authority. Sad to watch comedians repeat Big Pharma propaganda while shaming people 4 getting informed about an experimental medical treatment they’re forced to take. https://t.co/zlErlBx6a0

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the COVID pandemic, I noticed something strange. People were discouraged from asking questions and were expected to blindly follow what was said on TV. If you questioned it, you were labeled a white supremacist Trumper, even if you didn't vote for Trump. It was weird because questioning authority is supposed to be valued. Even comedians would shame those who wanted to be informed about experimental medical treatments. They would say, "Don't do your own research." But isn't that just reading? It's like waking up in a Bill Hicks bit. People internalized the propaganda from big pharma to the point where they would shame others for reading. It's hypocritical. You would never shame someone for seeking information on any other subject.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the weird thing that happened around COVID, and I'd never noticed this before in any other time in my life, but you weren't allowed to ask questions and at at any point during this. You just had to you had to do what the man on the TV said. Right? You had to do what the man on the TV said without questions, and then you're a good person. But if you question it, Then you're a white supremacist Trumper. They're like, woah. No. No. No. I didn't vote for Trump. I just have questions. Jimmy, Only dumb people ask questions. No. I'm pretty sure we're supposed to question authority. It's like a value. Is that what they taught you in comedy school? Yeah. That is what they taught me at country school. Isn't that weird? It was the weirdest thing I've ever seen. Even comedians would get on stage, and they would shame people for trying to get informed about a medical treatment that was experimental that they had to take or they would lose their jobs they wouldn't be able to travel. And when people tried to get informed about that, other people shamed them. They would say, please tell me you're not gonna Do your own research. You've heard people say that. Please don't do your own research. You know, before COVID, doing your own research used to be called reading. Now you're shaming me for reading at the behest of big pharma? It's like I woke up in the middle of a Bill Hicks bit. Well, looks like we got ourselves a reader. Tell me, boy. What you reading for? Don't you know everything that needs to be read? It's already been readied by a smart person. That's how much people internalize the propaganda from big pharma was that they would shape they would be anti intellectual enough to shame people for reading while they're wagging their finger at them for doing it. You would never shame people for trying to get informed no matter what other subject it was, no matter how unimportant. Like, if I say, hey. I'm gonna go I'm gonna go buy a car. Don't look into it. Well, how will I know which car to get? Ask the salesman. He's the expert. What are you? Henry Ford?
View Full Interactive Feed