TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @joeroganhq
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast News
Former PM of Somalia: "Ilhan's interests is not the interest of Minnesota, nor is it the interest of the American people. The interest of Ilhan is that of the Somalian people and Somalia." https://t.co/XQ0kXhZXDA
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast News
Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan on Julian Assange. https://t.co/4PCQPN7YHC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discusses Trump’s stance on JFK assassination files, saying Trump claimed that if you knew what I know, you wouldn’t tell people either, and notes that this is his position on UAP as well. He asserts that the CIA had knowledge of the JFK matter and that the conspiracy industry around JFK is an industry with many wackos, but emphasizes that the facts themselves tell an unbelievable story. He mentions that documents are still classified sixty-one years later and argues that both Trump and Joe Biden have kept those documents secret in violation of his reading of federal law. He states there is no living person connected to the Kennedy assassination, only an institution or possibly countries involved, and indicates there may be something worth protecting.
He relays a conversation with someone who had seen the documents two years earlier, from whom he learned that yes, the CIA was involved, and notes James Jesus Angleton, head of the operations directorate, had knowledge of this. He says this was news to him and he discussed it on TV. The next day, while quail hunting, he received a phone call from Mike Pompeo’s lawyer, who, as then-CIA director and later Secretary of State, had plotted the murder of Julian Assange. The lawyer told him that anyone who reveals contents of classified documents has committed a crime, and the speaker recalls driving with his dog and asks if revealing that the U.S. government had a role in the murder of a democratically elected president constitutes the crime, while suggesting Pompeo is protecting the murder. The speaker says Pompeo had no response.
The speaker asserts Pompeo pressed Trump to keep the documents secret and calls Pompeo sinister and criminal, citing that Pompeo was caught—referencing Yahoo News, Mike Issachoff’s piece—where Issachoff’s sources claimed Pompeo was plotting to murder Julian Assange, who had not been charged in the U.S. as CIA director. He states federal employees are not allowed to kill people they don’t like. He contends Pompeo pressured Trump to withhold information the public has a right to know and that Pompeo plotted the murder of someone who committed no crime.
Finally, the speaker questions how Pompeo is treated in Republican Washington, noting he is treated as a respected figure and potential secretary of defense in a Trump administration, despite being described as criminal for keeping information secret and for plotting a murder. He finds it mind-bending that Pompeo is treated as a pillar of Republican Washington.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you hear Trump's take on the JFK assassination, why he didn't release the files? Yeah. I know what Trump's take is. He said that if you knew what I know, you wouldn't tell people either, which is crazy. Well, and What does that mean?
That's his position on the UAP thing as well Yeah. Actually. And that's a lot of people's position on it. I mean, you know, Trump is saying, of course, the CIA had knowledge of it. That is known.
I mean, I mean, the whole it sounds like it's so funny. There's so many levels and there's so much I don't understand. But the whole JFK conspiracy industry, and it really is an industry, more books written on that than almost any historical topic, is is filled with wackos. Right? There are a lot of wackos in there.
But it obscures that fact obscures the larger fact which is the facts themselves tell an unbelievable story. Yeah. And so whatever. I could get into it at great length. But yeah.
Yeah. They're they're still classifying documents sixty one years later. Both Trump and Joe Biden have, in violation of my read of federal law, kept those documents secret. There's no living person connected to the Kennedy assassination. It was a couple generations ago.
There's no one person whose whose secrets are being protected. It's an institution or maybe countries. There may have been countries involved too. I mean, don't know the answer, but there's clearly something worth protecting. And I know that when I I spoke to someone who'd seen the documents, okay, two years ago and I got I got one fact out of him, which is, yes, the CIA was involved.
And by CIA, CIA is a huge organization, but James Jesus Angleton, the head of the operations directorate, had knowledge of this, which I think is well known. But that that's the view of someone who saw the documents. So I thought that was news, so I went on TV and said that. The next day, I'll never forget it, I went quail hunting, and I was driving back and I got a phone call from Mike Pompeo's lawyer. Mike Pompeo was the secretary of state, but before then he was the director of the CIA.
And in that position, he plotted the murder of Julian Assange, so he is a criminal as far as I'm concerned. But his lawyer called me and said, you know, you should know that anyone who tells you the contents of classified documents has committed a crime. He's threatening me. He's in my car. I'll never with my dog sitting next to me.
I'll never forget this. And I said, are you really saying that to reveal that the US government had a role in the murder of a democratically elected president to say that out loud, that's the crime? What about the actual crime which is murdering a president? Like, you're covering up for that, Mike Pompeo. He had no no response at all.
And so Mike Pompeo is the one who pressed Trump to keep those documents secret. And so it's like, what's crazy to me is not just that Pompeo did that. I think Pompeo was a really sinister person and a and a criminal. I think that. I think that because the facts suggest that.
He was caught. Yahoo News, Mike Issachoff wrote a long piece on this several years ago. His employees went to Mike Issachoff and said, hey. Mike Pompeo was plotting to murder Julian Assange who's never even been charged with a crime in The United States as CIA director. That's illegal.
You're not allowed federal employees are not allowed to just kill people they don't like. Okay? Just to set the baseline here. So that's who Mike Pompeo is, but he somehow intimidated Trump into not releasing this. Well, okay.
That's all bad. Right? I think it's criminal behavior. What's crazy is how Mike Pompeo is treated. He's treated as like a republican pooh bah in good standing.
He fully expects to become the secretary of defense in a Trump administration, which is like completely insane. Why would you get criminal and give him nuclear weapons? Okay. That's my view. I think it's a common sense view.
And like he goes to fundraisers and dinners and everyone's like, hey, Mike Pompeo. It's like, no. You're the guy who kept information the public has right to know secret. You're the guy who plotted the murder of someone who committed no crime. You are the outlaw.
You are the bad guy. But no. He's treated as like, you know, like a pillar of republican Washington. I think that's I think it's mind bending to watch that.
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast News
Joe Rogan: "Why do you have to give them hormones to make them a girl?" Guest: "I'm sorry can you expand on the question?" Joe Rogan: "It's a simple question." https://t.co/nSPb0SUgfe
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast News
Hillary Clinton: "If social media doesn’t moderate content, then we lose total control." https://t.co/s586f3qsrk
Video Transcript AI Summary
If social media platforms do not moderate and monitor content, we lose total control. This loss of control results in real harm, beyond just social and psychological effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If the platforms whether it's Facebook or Twitter X or Instagram or TikTok whatever they are, if they don't moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control, and it's not just the social and psychological effects, it's real harm.
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast
Video Transcript AI Summary
Wish Network raised $127 million but only 2.5% went to direct cash aid for kids, while solicitors were paid $109 million. The Cancer Fund of America spent less than 1% on its stated cause.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Wish Network. Look at this. They raised a hundred and 27,000,000. They paid the solicitors a hundred and nine million, and they spent percentage on direct cash aid to the actual kids is 2.5%. Two point five %.
Look at the Cancer Fund of America. Less than 1% went to the actual thing.
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast
Shit got real today. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/ZymYRo2U9g
Video Transcript AI Summary
You're asking about the kind of diplomacy that will end the destruction of my country. With respect, it's disrespectful to come here and try to argue about this in front of the media. You're forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for bringing us into this conflict.
During the war, everybody has problems, even you. You don't know what we're going to feel. You're in no position to dictate that. You're gambling with the lives of millions and with World War Three, and what you're doing is very disrespectful. Have you even said thank you once? You campaigned against us!
You think speaking loudly will help? My country is in big trouble, I know, but we're staying strong. We've been alone and we are thankful. I said that. If you didn't give us military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks, maybe three days.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We signed the exchange of Britain, but he didn't do it. What kind of diplomacy? JD, you're asking me about. What what you have what you what do you mean?
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's gonna end the destruction of your country.
Speaker 0: Yes. But if you
Speaker 1: Mister president, mister president, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president bringing into this conflict.
Speaker 0: Ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?
Speaker 1: I have been to You come once. I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister president. Are do you disagree that you've had problems? What? Bringing people into your military?
Speaker 0: We have problems.
Speaker 1: And do you think that it's respectful I will answer. To come to the Oval Office Of The United States Of America and attack the administration that is trying to trying to prevent the destruction of your country.
Speaker 0: A lot of a lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning. Sure. First of all, during the war, everybody has problems. Even you, but you have nice ocean and don't feel now, but you will feel it in the future.
God bless. You don't know that. God bless. God bless. You will not have war.
Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. I'm not telling you. Because you're in no position to dictate that.
Remember this. I'm not You're in no position to dictate what we're gonna feel. We're gonna feel very good. Feel influence. We're gonna feel very good and very strong.
You will feel influence. You're right now not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to be in a very bad position, and he happens to be right about it. From the very beginning of the war You're not in a good position. I was You don't have the cards right now.
With us, you start having cards. Right now, you don't yeah. You're playing cards. Miss a brother. You're playing serious.
You're gambling with the lives of millions of people. You're with World War three. You're gambling with World War three. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country. I'm with that respect to you.
Far more than a lot of people say Awareness. They should have.
Speaker 1: Have you said thank you once? A lot
Speaker 0: of times. No. Even today. You said thank you. Even today.
Speaker 1: You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for The United States Of America and the president who's trying to save your country.
Speaker 0: Please, you think that if you will speak very loudly about the war. He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble. Can I help you?
No. No. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble. I know.
You're not winning. I know. You're not winning this. I You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because of Mister president, we are staying in our country, staying strong from the very beginning of the war. We've been alone, and we are thankful.
I said thanks You haven't been this cabinet. And not only in this cabinet. We gave you I said that. Stupid president three hundred and fifty billion dollars. You voted for your military equipment.
You voted for your but they had to use our military. One of our best If you didn't have our military equipment You invited me to have our military equipment, This war would have been over in two weeks. In three days. I heard it from Putin. In three days.
This is something you less. In two weeks. Of course. Yes. It's gonna be a very hard thing to do business like this.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be a hill. Thank you.
Speaker 0: I said it all the time.
Speaker 1: To American people. That there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out of the American media when you're wrong.
Speaker 0: We know you're wrong. But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this story so long. You have to be thankful.
You don't have the cards. You're buried there. You're you're people have died. You're running low on soldiers. Don't listen.
You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn good news. Then you can then you tell us, I don't wanna cease fire. I don't wanna cease fire. I wanna go, and I want this.
Look. If you could get a ceasefire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop causing you.
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast
Our neighbors to the north 😂. Should Canada become the 51st state? 🇺🇸 @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/sxZ1Je7cXu
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm making my annual call to the North Pole for Santa's health check. It's been a tough season with many illnesses around. Fortunately, Santa and I are both in great health and have received our vaccinations, including COVID boosters and flu shots. I always remind Santa to stay on top of his health. First, he should keep his vaccinations updated, and second, he should wear a mask in crowded indoor places.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, kids, I'm just doing my yearly call to the North Pole for Santa's holiday health check. It's been a tough season with lots of viruses making people sick.
Speaker 1: Thankfully, Santa and I are feeling as healthy as ever. We are both up to date with our vaccinations, including COVID boosters and flu shots.
Speaker 0: That's so good to hear.
Speaker 1: I always tell Santa to make a list and check it twice. 1, stay up to date on your vaccinations. 2, wear a mask in crowded indoor places.
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast
Since 2020, accountability from leaders was low and mainstream propaganda was high. The garbage is finally being take out. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/misZyx4WFX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The reported coronavirus death rate of 3.4% is considered inaccurate by some, with claims that it is actually under 1%. President Trump has been accused of spreading misinformation by contradicting health experts, including Dr. Fauci, who suggested the death rate could be significantly lower. Critics emphasize that decisions should be based on scientific data rather than personal hunches. A study conducted in April 2020 found the infection fatality rate to be around 0.2%. The spread of false information is deemed dangerous, especially during a pandemic, as it can lead to confusion and undermine public health efforts. The emphasis is on trusting doctors and scientists rather than relying on unverified claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think the 3.4% is really a false number. Based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this, I think the number is way under 1%.
Speaker 1: So to fact check, the World Health Organization says the coronavirus death rate is 3.4%. President Trump lies that the World Health Organization is wrong.
Speaker 2: The number is 3.4%. 3.4% is what it's being reported around the world.
Speaker 3: Making it deadlier so much death.
Speaker 1: The death rate
Speaker 2: the percentage is 3.4%, and no hunch from the president can change that. Trump lied about the most recent World Health Organization estimate that the global death rate of coronavirus is 3.4%.
Speaker 3: The 3.4% death rate was wrong,
Speaker 4: and WHO data later updated it to
Speaker 3: We're a fraction of 1%. Let's go back into history.
Speaker 0: Trump has a hunch history. Trump has
Speaker 3: a hunch that the death rate is lower than 1%. Way under 1%. Way under 1%.
Speaker 2: Will someone put a mozzarella stick in this stupid hole? Trump lied
Speaker 0: to viewers about the mortality rate. It's
Speaker 2: way under 1%. Spreading disinformation. Disinformation is dangerous. Disinformation. If
Speaker 3: you're president of the United States, you have the world's greatest scientist at your disposal. He listened to that. Leading scientists, including doctor Fauci, wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine that the death rate could be considerably less than 1%.
Speaker 0: Way under 1%.
Speaker 2: Why are you going on national television and contradicting experts based on
Speaker 3: a hunch?
Speaker 2: His fake hunch with some fake math.
Speaker 3: The president somehow thinks it could be lower than 1% based on nothing.
Speaker 0: Based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this.
Speaker 3: Outright lies, contradicting health officials on fatality rates.
Speaker 2: It's not a time for Donald Trump to be calling into cable shows. It's a time for the CDC.
Speaker 3: What is CDC's best
Speaker 2: estimate of the fatality rate?
Speaker 3: It's somewhere between half a percent and one percent. Fatality rate? It's somewhere between half a percent and 1%. To a fraction of 1%. The president is spreading false information.
Information discarding what
Speaker 0: the health professionals are saying. Outright bogus information.
Speaker 2: Science is not based on hunches.
Speaker 3: A hunch Yeah.
Speaker 1: About what he thinks is going on.
Speaker 2: Instead of trusting information from doctors and scientists He has a hunch. Hunch. A hunch. It's not a time for Donald Trump's hunches. It's a time for science.
It's a time for doctors.
Speaker 3: Welcome doctor j Bhattacharya. My hypothesis
Speaker 0: My hunch.
Speaker 3: Was it's likely to be less deadly than the World Health Organization was saying. 3.4%. There's no way that was true.
Speaker 0: Really, false number.
Speaker 3: This is why I ran the study in April of 2020.
Speaker 2: And what did you discover?
Speaker 3: The infection fatality rate was 0.2%. Way under 1%.
Speaker 0: A pandemic of misinformation.
Speaker 1: To put out misinformation.
Speaker 2: Redding false information. And the disinformation Falsehood.
Speaker 3: Wrong and misleading information.
Speaker 2: Misleading. Misinformation and misinformation.
Speaker 3: Misinformation. Misinformation. Just unspeakably reckless. It's totally reckless. It's
Speaker 1: dangerous to have conflicting messages out there.
Speaker 3: That is very dangerous.
Speaker 1: How dangerous is it? Really dangerous. What is the danger? I think we're in a very dangerous period. If the president continues to
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast
‼️Austin TX podcast or let her walk. Thoughts? https://t.co/05N9SHVzEv
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast
Third @realDonaldTrump assassination attempt near rally in CA https://t.co/XuEq4kZBRq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Sheriff Chad Bianco reported an incident at a Trump rally in Coachella where an individual was apprehended before Trump's arrival. The individual gained access past the outer perimeter by appearing to be a VIP or press member. At the inner perimeter, deputies noticed irregularities, including a vehicle in disarray, a fake license plate, and multiple IDs with different names. The vehicle was unregistered, and the license plate suggested the individual was a sovereign citizen. A loaded handgun and shotgun were discovered. The individual was arrested and booked into jail but has since been released. The Riverside County Sheriff's Department is working with the Secret Service and FBI in the ongoing investigation. The arrest was based on firearms charges, and any further charges will be determined by the federal government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon. Thank you all for coming here today. I am Chad Bianco. I'm the sheriff of Riverside County, and we are obviously here, to talk about an incident that occurred yesterday at the rally that, former president Trump had in Coachella. Yesterday afternoon, before former president Trump arrived to the rally, we made contact with an to an individual on the inner perimeter of, our operation at the rally.
As you can imagine, this was a a very large event. In regard to previous attempts on the former president's life, This was not something that we were taking lightly. We had a very, detailed plan in place on how we were going to keep not only the former president safe, but all of the, participants or the attendees of the rally safe. In general terms, I will tell you that we had a a larger outside perimeter and then an inside perimeter that was completely controlled by us, by Riverside County Sheriff's Deputies, and, both of them served different purposes. Only people that were allowed with the inside the perimeter, the outside perimeter in a vehicle was if you lived there or if you had documentation that said you were going to this rally.
He approached the outside perimeter, gave all indications that he belonged there, that he was, that he had that he was a participant that was allowed to get into VIP and to, and and a press corps, and so he was allowed through that outer perimeter. As he got to the inside perimeter where deputies were conducting, obviously, a more thorough, evaluation of the vehicles that were coming in, there were many irregularities that popped up. The deputy noticed that the interior of the vehicle was in quite disarray. The vehicle had a, an obviously fake license plate, and that prompted further investigation from our deputy into why the person was where why the person was there and what he was doing. During that investigation, the deputy eventually found multiple ports with multiple names, multiple driver's license with different names.
The vehicle was unregistered, and the license plate was what we in law enforcement would recognize as one that is homemade and indicative of a group of individuals that claim to be sovereign citizens, and, we and assuming the deputy assumes that he would that he was part of of that identifying group. So during the investigation, obviously, those identification documents were found in addition to a loaded handgun and a shotgun. Obviously, this was before the former president arrived. The person was taken into custody. He was eventually booked into jail on those charges, and eventually, he was he was released.
He will he will have to further his court case, is in the in the future. Right now, we are actively, engaged in working with Secret Service and the FBI to ensure that this person is followed up on and all of the information that they can gather. I can tell you that from from my perspective, from from a state law enforcement agency's perspective, the the firearms charges is what we arrested him for and booked him on. Anything further will come from the federal government, and quite frankly, I don't know if we will be a part of that. We will certainly be a part of that investigation and cooperating with them, but those charges, if any, will come from them.
They will not come from us.
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast
How many of you watched this episode?? wow.
@nickdiazofnauts - Nick Diaz Of Nauts
Terrence Howard just Mic Dropped all of science on Joe Rogan! 🤯 Your move conventional scientists, you’ve got a lot of explaining to do… #joerogan #terrencehoward #science #conspiracy #podcasts Ps, my brain hurts… https://t.co/YDxGImsb29
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Earth takes 105,600 years to move one mile, and 9,000,000,820,000,800,000,000 years to reach 93,000,000 miles. Mars would take 15,000,000,00780,000,000,004,180,000,000 years to reach its position. Venus will move into the Goldilocks zone next. Mercury is under high pressure, hindering oxygen release. The pressure on Venus is high, with sulfur and ammonia in the clouds. The speaker believes the asteroid belt was once a planet with humanoids. They suggest that Sirius was a planet with no solid core, similar to Earth. They propose that CERN's particle accelerator caused a planet to become the asteroid belt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mile equals 63,360 inches. So the number of years that it would take for the Earth to move one mile is a 105,600 years. So the in order for the Earth to reach where we are at 93,000,000 miles, it would take 9,000,000,000,820,000,000,800,000,000 years for the Earth to get here. Likewise, Mars, at a 147,000,000 miles away from the sun, it would take 15,000,000,000,00780,000,000,004,180,000,000 years for Mars to get where it was. So at a given point, Mars was here in the Goldilocks zone.
And now Venus is going to inherit the Goldilocks zone next. The sun will give Mercury is under a high oppression because they're still under the miss and miss mistake thinking that there's a void in space. So they forget that Mercury is under the highest pressure possible, so it can expand. It's like hydrogen. It's like those octaves before hydrogen.
So the atmosphere of the iron isn't able to release any oxygen and the oxides. But when you get to 67,000,000 miles away from the sun, the pressure is a little less, but it's still so much higher than the pressure than the pressure, on earth. It's like going deep into the very belly of the earth. That pressure is so very high. And so now the clouds, there there's a great deal of sulfur.
There's a great deal of of of of ammonia and all of those things in it. But once Earth moves to where Mars is, Venus is going to slowly move and will be right here. You know? And maybe 5 or 6,000,000,000,000 years, Venus will be right here, and humanoids will appear again and unwind the same way and that asteroid belt that we have right now Mhmm. Between Mars and Jupiter, that used to be a planet.
And I believe that they had humanoids that developed on there the same way that everything that's the periodic table. They call it the periodic table because these things happen according to periodicity. They happen under regular event. You change the motion and pressure conditions, the the crystallization changes. We call it a different element, but it's the same substance, like my hand is one substance.
But if I do it like this and do it like this and do it like this, it looks like a whole different thing. And they can call it a different element, but it's the same element under different motion and pressure conditions. I believe that Sirius Sirius used to be a planet when it was here and the humanoids on there didn't recognize that we don't have a solid core. Everything expands as a sphere and no sphere in our universe, no bubble has a solid core. We're perceiving it as a solid core, but there is not a solid core there.
There's just a bubble and at CERN, that hadron collider, that particle accelerator, I believe they did the same thing, and they popped their planet. And it became that asteroid belt.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how gravity is not the dominant force in the universe, but rather electricity. They explain how electricity is 137 times stronger than gravity, attracting particles and creating life through electric and magnetic forces. The speaker emphasizes that the planet is alive and constantly evolving, not just a random occurrence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Through space and it's It's an atom. Collects via gravity, and the more mass, the more gravity. It's it's supposed to, but look at the take a balloon, another thing that kills gravity. Gravity is supposed to be the greater the mass is Watch the dust particles jump off the ground. Watch the dust particles jump off the ground, off this big mass called the earth, and jump onto that balloon because, why, Electricity is a 137 times stronger than the pull of gravity or the effects of the so called gravity.
It's the electric force that's the attractive force. It's the electric force that tightens everything together as the masculine, and then the dividing force is the radiative force, the magnetic field. It ablates and pushes everything out, and then they collect together again. But where these things meet at the proper angles of incidence, like the Birkeland currents talked about, those plasma currents talked about, those angles of incidence is at a 120 degrees when it converts it back into electricity and it will keep collecting and coming and making life. The planet isn't a dead thing.
It didn't just happen to come together. That's just the process by which it was given life. It's alive, and it's screaming.