TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @julie_kelly2

julie_kelly2
Posted - January 25, 2026 at 3:03 PM
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 4:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched Pretti directing SUVs into a street barricade, prompting confrontation with officers. He impeded federal officers, a felony under 18 USC 111, and conspired to impede them with at least one partner. He committed the felony while armed, and he tried to aid a criminal evade law enforcement. He assaulted a woman after pepper spray, carrying a loaded gun. His parents warned him, but this wasn’t a protest—it was a crime.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Pretti is on video directing SUVs to form a barricade on the street, which is what prompted the first confrontation with officers. Which means he was actively impeding/obstructing federal officers, a felony under 18 USC 111 Also a crime to conspire to obstruct/impede federal officers; Pretti was working with at least one other individual at the time. And he was committing that felony while in possession of a firearm. Pretti also by his actions was attempting to aid a criminal illegal evade law enforcement. He then assaulted a woman after being hit by pepper spray—presumably disoriented from the spray. And he had a loaded gun in his waistband. His parents had cautioned him not to get aggressively involved in anti ICE protests. But this was not a protest—it was a crime.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 BREAKING: Commander Greg Bovino FIRES BACK at CNN’s lies “He was in the scene actively impeding and assaulting law enforcement!” BASH: But he wasn't impeding! He was filming, which is a legal thing to do in the United States! https://t.co/wnb5UA4UGQ BOVINO: Dana, let's not free frame adjudicate this. He was IMPEDING an arrest of a criminal illegal! 💯

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that what was described is that he went there to try to stop the law enforcement operation, and that all the video shows him doing is documenting it with his cell phone, which is lawful. The only time he appeared to interact with law enforcement was when they went after him as he was trying to help an individual who law enforcement pushed down. Speaker 0 asks where the evidence is to show that he was trying to impede the operation, noting that he was filming, which he says is legal in the United States of America. Speaker 1 responds that Dana was there in the scene and was actively impeding and assaulting law enforcement to the point, but adds that this is not illegal. Speaker 0 counters that Dana wasn’t impeding it; he was filming, which is legal. Speaker 1 asks not to freeze-frame adjudicate the moment and insists that Dana was there for a reason, and that reason was to impede law enforcement. Speaker 1 further argues that de-escalation techniques were utilized during this action, including physically trying to remove those from the law enforcement scene and the use of pepper spray, which is described as another de-escalation technique. He states that those techniques did not work.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because what you were saying is that he went there to try to stop this, law enforcement operation. All of the video that we have seen shows him documenting it with his cell phone, which is a lawful thing to do. And the only time he seemed to interact with law enforcement is when they went after him when he was trying to help an individual who law enforcement pushed down. So where do you have the evidence to show that he was trying to impede that that law enforcement operation? Speaker 1: Sure. Dana, first, was there in the scene. He was in the scene actively impeding and assaulting law enforcement to the point. But that's not illegal. Speaker 0: Here's a wasn't he wasn't impeding it. He was filming it, which is a legal thing to do in The United States Of America. Speaker 1: Now, Dana, let's let's don't freeze frame adjudicate this now. He was there for a reason and that reason was to impede law enforcement to Speaker 0: the What evidence do you have Speaker 1: of And here and here's a good point, is the fact that de escalation techniques were utilized during this action. Those de escalation techniques whether it was physically trying to remove them from that law enforcement scene, that active law enforcement scene in which law enforcement were going after a violent illegal alien or the use of pepper spray which is another de escalation technique. Those techniques did not work.
julie_kelly2
Posted - August 29, 2025 at 1:23 PM
Saved - August 29, 2025 at 3:28 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

How did Cook afford to take out three mortgages in a matter of a few months? Most lenders would throw a big red flag at this in general—raises more questions:

@pulte - Pulte

3 strikes and you’re out. Today, U.S. Federal Housing sent a 2nd Criminal Referral in the matter of Lisa D. Cook, related to a mortgage on a 3rd property and alleged misrepresentations about her properties to the United States Government during her time as Governor of the Federal Reserve. On April 7, 2021, Cook entered a 15-year mortgage for a condominium in Cambridge, MA, representing it as her “Second Home”. Only eight months later, on December 1, 2021, Cook signed an ethics form with the U.S. Government that this property was an “investment/rental property”. In subsequent filings from 2022 to 2025, Cook consistently listed this property as an investment/rental property, not a second home. Representing the property as a second home may have allowed Cook to secure a lower “Second Home” mortgage down payment and rates, as investment properties typically carry higher down payments and higher rates due to increased risk. Additionally, Cook allegedly misrepresented her Atlanta, GA property from 2022-2025 to the U.S. Government as her residence, despite evidence suggesting it was being rented out to tenants. Similarly, Cook declared in a 2025 government filing that her Ann Arbor, MI property was her personal residence, however, we have reason to believe that as of 2025, the Ann Arbor property is being used as a rental property, not a personal residence. These inconsistencies appear Cook made additional, multiple false representations, including to the U.S. Government, regarding the status of her mortgages and properties.

julie_kelly2
Posted - August 17, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Saved - August 18, 2025 at 10:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Julie Kelly critiques Danny Hodges, a DC police officer known for his media appearances regarding the January 6 events. She argues that Hodges misrepresents his experiences, claiming he was not a victim despite his portrayal. Kelly shares body camera footage showing Hodges and other officers arriving in tactical gear after earlier clashes with Trump supporters. She also highlights Hodges' demeanor and mocks his comments about law enforcement training, suggesting a disconnect in his understanding of police procedures.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

So J6 celeb cop Danny Hodges is back doing media hits blasting Trump adm for trying to keep DC safe. Hodges is still a DC police officer but appears to have done little else over a four year period besides do interviews and show up at J6 court proceedings as a witness and “victim.” Here is how Hodges once again misrepresents his experience on January 6. But he was not a victim…

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Sure would be nice if they backed the police then. Right? That was an actual emergency that they could have activated the National Guard for is sending them to, back us up when we were trying to protect the capital, protect the vice president, protect congress." "But, you know, Trump sat in his little chair and watched us get, you know, beaten on Fox." "I had someone try to gouge out my eyes, had someone beat me in the head with my own baton, but, apparently, that was a national emergency." "It's interesting that spitting is now something we can use to justify, you know, extremely use of force." "I don't I don't understand how these people oscillate between these value systems." "They're supposed to back the blue, and then they they abandon us on the sixth." "But now that it's convenient for them, politically, they're all about it. It's they don't have a consistent ethical framework." "Do you think it's hypocritical? Yeah. Absolutely." "Officer Daniel Hodges, it's great to have you as always, even in your personal capacity. Thank you for joining us tonight."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sure would be nice if they backed the police then. Right? That was an actual emergency that they could have activated the National Guard for is sending them to, back us up when we were trying to protect the capital, protect the vice president, protect congress. But, you know, Trump sat in his little chair and watched us get, you know, beaten on Fox. I had someone try to gouge out my eyes, had someone beat me in the head with my own baton, but, apparently, that was a national emergency. It's interesting that spitting is now something that we can use to justify, you know, extremely use of force. I don't I don't understand how these people oscillate between these value systems. They're supposed to back the blue, and then they they abandon us on the sixth. But now that it's convenient for them, politically, they're all about it. It's they don't have a consistent ethical framework. Do you think it's hypocritical? Yeah. Absolutely. Officer Daniel Hodges, it's great to have you as always, even in your personal capacity. Thank you for joining us tonight. Thanks, Caitlin. Really appreciate you.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Here is Hodges body worn camera footage. He and his fellow DC cops arrived around 2pm dressed like storm troopers ready to crack heads. This was about 50 minutes after cops had been attacking Trump supporters outside. Listen to the reaction… https://t.co/Qwz3wB2qbe

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

More from Hodges—whose checkered shirt nice guy soft spoken routine belies the thuggery he demonstrated on Jan 6… https://t.co/IOUadkBSw4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Make one. Make one. You're wrong. Get out. Your microphone. Hey. What what can we do to help you? Hey. You guys no. That ain't gonna happen. Hey. How can we get you out of here safely? Hello, everyone.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Make one. Make one. You're wrong. Get out. Your microphone. Hey. What what can we do to help you? Hey. You guys no. That ain't gonna happen. Hey. How can we get you out of here safely? Hello, everyone.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Now Hodges is mocking AG Bondi for not understanding how law enforcement works and how carefully police are trained to handle various situations LOL https://t.co/6sOvHcNs9C

Video Transcript AI Summary
Personally, I haven't seen the guard out here, but I did serve in the Virginia National Guard for six years. So I know that soldiers are trained to fight and win wars. So the baseline of soldiers' training is to close with and destroy the enemy. They are not trained in law law enforcement. They're not trained to get to traffic stops. So what they're doing here is pretty unclear to me. With regards to the federal partners, you know, more hands are always great, but they're by and large, they're investigators. They they don't have the saturation of experience in street work that would make them really super useful in fighting crime out here. And the final part of this federalization is just the change of, I guess, leadership to someone in the federal government.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Personally, I haven't seen the guard out here, but I did serve in the Virginia National Guard for six years. So I know that soldiers are trained to fight and win wars. So the baseline of soldiers' training is to close with and destroy the enemy. They are not trained in law law enforcement. They're not trained to get to traffic stops. They're not trained to mediate family disputes. So what they're doing here is pretty unclear to me. I think they're just gonna stand around and be visible so that it looks like they're, you know, doing something. With regards to the federal partners, you know, more hands are always great, but they're by and large, they're investigators. You know, their work is behind a desk. They they don't have the saturation of experience in street work that would make them really super useful in fighting crime out here. And the final part of this federalization is just the change of, I guess, leadership to someone in the federal government. And, I mean, do you really think Pam Bondi has some keen insight into deployment of urban law enforcement resources that our own law enforcement leaders don't have? I just don't see how that's gonna be helpful either.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Also

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Here are photos he posted on FB on 1/7 of his injuries from the previous day. No swollen hand. No large contusion on his head. No evidence of an attempt to gouge out his eye. Hodges—like Fanone, Gonell, and Dunn—lied about his injuries. https://t.co/scHgF9xfzf

julie_kelly2
Posted - August 18, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Saved - August 18, 2025 at 9:45 AM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The Just For Men hair. The droopy upper lip. The whitestick covered eyes to conceal dark circles. The fake sincerity. Patient Zero for the FBI’s trashed reputation.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: Former FBI Director and 'Swiftie' James Comey releases a 5-minute video talking about how Taylor Swift inspires him and how she helps him deal with Trump. "At my second Taylor Swift concert in Hartford, CT, 14 years ago, she sang a song about this topic, asking..." "Why you gotta be so mean?" Comey said while quoting Swift's 2010 song 'Mean' as he discussed how mean people on X are. It's truly mind-blowing that this man served as the FBI director.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Taylor Swift is the inspiration this week. I watched her podcast with the Kelsey brothers; she’s grown up with my family and provided a soundtrack through adversity and celebration—resonating with my kids and me as a parent. She models handling online jerks without letting them change you, urging us to protect our energy: Think of your energy as if it's expensive, as if it's like a luxury item. She also urged Americans not to elect him last year; we’re living with the consequences. The piece notes research that being rude or snarky hurts the rude person and that less polite conduct can make you less happy, more depressed, and angrier. In Hartford, she sang a line about why you gotta be so mean. Thank you, Taylor Swift. Keep the faith.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. Welcome back to my Substack. Last week's cold turns out to have been COVID, quite a flashback, and Donald Trump is still president and still humiliating America on a national stage standing next to Vladimir Putin. It's like a dream, a bad dream you can't wake up from. But I don't wanna talk about that bad dream this week. I wanna talk about a truly inspirational public figure named Taylor Swift. Of course, I watched her podcast interview with the Kelsey brothers. Of course, I watched the whole thing. Although on YouTube, Patrice and I got kicked off for the last fifteen minutes and finished it on her phone, but I watched it. You see, Taylor Swift and I go way back. I went to my first concert of hers fifteen years ago. I've been to a second, and I have helped financially support the attendance of a lot of family members at others. I'm in a family's Swifty group chat. I know all her music, and I listened to it in my headphones when I cut the grass. So, yes, I have a favorite of hers. Although, honestly, for me, it's a tie between All Too Well, ten minute version, and Exile featuring Bon Iver. Taylor Swift has grown up with my family and provided us a soundtrack, really, as we've grown ourselves and learned and adapted and dealt with adversity and celebration. She had songs for all of it. I suspect that's something that millions of Americans have also experienced in their families. I think that's because Taylor Swift produces great art, but also because she models something. At every stage of her career, she's shown a certain way of being that resonated with my kids and also felt right to me as a parent, and she's still doing that as a grown up. Like a lot of you, I struggle with how to stand up to bullies without letting their meanness infect me and change me. You may have seen that the governor of California has been generating a lot of attention lately by posting on social media in a satirical way where he mocks Donald Trump and is all caps megalomania and his absurdity, and I find it very funny, hilarious even sometimes. But I gotta be honest, it also leaves me with a strange feeling at times because I don't want us to become like Trump and his followers. There are far more decent, honest, kind people in America than there are mean jerks. And don't get me wrong. We have our jerks, millions of them. You may have noticed. In particular, there's a stunning coarseness and ugliness in the Republican Party today. It's upsetting, but it's also a minority of America. On the whole, we aren't like that, and we don't like that. I think that's a big part of the reason so few Americans support Donald Trump when they have to see him and that up close, and why Republicans are so worried about what's coming for them next year. And to be clear, I am not an advocate for weakness. Of course, we need to stand up to jerks and defend what matters, but I think we have to try to do that without becoming like them, which is what makes me think about Taylor Swift. She's made clear that she sees Donald Trump for what he is. And last year, she urged Americans not to make the serious mistake of electing him. Of course, we're now living with the consequences of that mistake. But while our elderly makeup covered president is posting about whether Taylor Swift is still hot and declaring that he can't stand her, what's she doing? Living her best life, producing great music and, as she urged all of us to do during the podcast, not giving the jerks power over her mind. She said something about dealing with Internet trolls that stuck with me. Think of your energy as if it's expensive, she said, as if it's like a luxury item. Not everyone can afford it. I really enjoy reading Arthur Brooks who writes columns about happiness in the Atlantic. I don't know if he's a Swifty, but last week, he wrote about research on the way that being rude or snarky actually hurts the rude person. As he wrote, when you become less polite, the alteration in your conduct can make you less happy, more depressed, and angrier about life. I know you get that even without the research. Just watch Fox News or hang around an x, and you'll see what he means. We can't stop people from being jerks. What we can do is stop it from hurting us, from changing us. At my second Taylor Swift concert in Hartford, Connecticut 14 ago this summer, she sang a song about this topic, asking why you gotta be so mean. And she spoke directly to the nasty people. I bet you got pushed around. Somebody made you cold, but the cycle ends right now because you can't lead me down that road. You'll be glad I didn't sing that. That's right. Because down that road is unhappiness. Nobody should have that power over us. Thank you, Taylor Swift. Keep the faith.
julie_kelly2
Posted - August 13, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Saved - August 14, 2025 at 5:40 AM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Well, looky what we have here. The DOJ's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section (CES) refused to cooperate with FBI investigation into Carter Page FISA leak and recommended closing the inquiry in 2020. None other than Jay Bratt was CES chief at the time: https://t.co/7baon3toKy

julie_kelly2
Posted - August 13, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Saved - August 13, 2025 at 8:41 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

FWIW I really want this unredacted

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Well, looky what we have here. The DOJ's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section (CES) refused to cooperate with FBI investigation into Carter Page FISA leak and recommended closing the inquiry in 2020. None other than Jay Bratt was CES chief at the time: https://t.co/7baon3toKy

julie_kelly2
Posted - August 6, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 5:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a list of Trump aides and advisors who have been ordered to testify before a federal grand jury under the Biden administration. The list includes notable names like Mike Pence, Jared Kushner, Rudy Giuliani, and several lawyers.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

A short list of Trump aides and advisors ordered to testify before federal grand jury under the Biden regime: Mike Pence Mark Meadows Jared Kushner Dan Scavino Boris Epshteyn Stephen Miller Kash Patel Hope Hicks Rudy Giuliani John Ratcliffe Chad Wolf Ken Cuccinelli Lawyers: Pat Philbin, Pat Cipolonne, Evan Corcoran among others

@axios - Axios

AG Pam Bondi's decision to order a grand jury investigation into Obama-era intelligence officials is a watershed moment in the history of MAGA retribution after 10 years of demanding the arrests of Trump's political enemies. https://www.axios.com/2025/08/06/russia-investigation-criminal-charges-trump-maga

MAGA expectations soar after DOJ orders Russia grand jury probe The MAGA movement has spent the past 10 years demanding the arrests of Trump's political enemies. axios.com
julie_kelly2
Posted - July 27, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Saved - July 27, 2025 at 11:46 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

More from Comey’s 2018 book tour. This is particularly insidious because Comey suggests he at first didn’t think the “pee tape” with Russian hookers was true but after meeting with Pres Trump he changed his mind. Again these interviews took place when Trump was President: https://t.co/oNd823L3IK

Video Transcript AI Summary
An intelligence official briefed the president-elect alone on salacious allegations from the Steele dossier regarding his engagement with prostitutes in Moscow during the 2013 Miss Universe pageant. The allegations involved prostitutes ordered by Trump to urinate on a bed in a Moscow hotel where the Obamas had stayed. The official stated the intelligence community didn't want to keep secrets from the incoming president, especially if the information was about to become public. The FBI's strategy to defeat blackmail is to inform the potential victim that they are aware of the compromising information. Initially, the official did not believe the allegations, but now thinks it's possible the incident at the Miss Universe pageant is true. The official cannot assign a probability, but believes it is non-zero. This assessment is based on encounters with the president, who constantly brings it up to deny it. The official remembers having an out-of-body experience during the meeting, reflecting on the absurdity of discussing prostitutes with the president-elect.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To stay behind and meet alone with the president-elect, to brief him on a portion of the material from what's now known as the Steele dossier that made salacious allegations about his engagement with prostitutes in Moscow during a visit to the Miss Universe pageant in 02/2013. And the intelligence community thought and and cleared this with Speaker 1: president is the one that the the American press even mislead called pee pee gate. Right? It's it's about the prostitutes being ordered by president Trump to pee piss on the bed in which the Obama's once stayed in a Moscow hotel. Right? Is is that a problem? Speaker 0: Words that have never left my lips. Speaker 1: Not to him. You didn't actually say that to him. Right? Speaker 0: No. And I and the the I don't like to say any of it. But but my assignment was and president Obama was told this is the way we're gonna approach it, that because I was staying and that the CIA leader was leaving, the director of national intelligence was leaving, and the FBI has counterintelligence responsibilities. We couldn't keep this secret from the president-elect. We thought it was about to become public, so we don't want to keep secrets from the new president. And one of the ways, if there's anything to it, and we didn't know there was anything to it, but if there's anything to it, one of the ways the FBI defeats efforts to blackmail is we go to the person who might be blackmailed and said, hey. We want you to know we know about this. Speaker 1: Did you believe any of it? Speaker 0: I didn't believe it. Actually, when I first saw it, I didn't believe it at all. And that my view changed a little bit on that. Speaker 1: How much of it do you believe now? Speaker 0: No. The things I never this I will actually say. I I think it's possible that it's true. All of it's Well, all of it's a hard thing. You mean the the Speaker 1: The salacious stuff then. Speaker 0: Yeah. The the incident at the Miss Universe, I think it's possible it's true. Now I can't assign a a percentage to the probability, but it's it's non zero. And I say that you know, I'm I know it's funny, but I'm not saying it to be funny. It it's, just based on my encounters with the president after he became president that he's he's constantly bringing it up in order to deny it. So Speaker 1: he knew all this. He knew what you were going to tell him. No. Speaker 0: I don't know that. And so the plan was, I will stay behind to meet with the president-elect alone to tell him this as my first meeting with him. And and so that was the part I was I'm not sure how much I was paying attention to the first meeting because I knew the second meeting was gonna be very difficult. And so we did that. I met alone with him, and it was such a stressful thing for me. I actually remember looking down on myself from the ceiling like an out of body experience. I'm talking to the president-elect about prostitutes. How did I end up here?
julie_kelly2
Posted - July 27, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Saved - July 27, 2025 at 9:23 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

In his book and in a few interviews, Comey bragged about his Jan 5, 2017 meeting with Obama at the White House. He told Obama that he and Clapper planned to “brief” Donald Trump the following day on the dossier and nonexistent “pee tape” in particular: https://t.co/ceDTBzVrVe

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker briefed President-elect Trump's team on January 6th regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election. The intelligence community concluded Russia's goals were to damage American democracy, hurt Hillary Clinton, and help Donald Trump. General Clapper informed President Obama of additional material involving alleged sexual activity by Trump in Moscow, potentially compromising him. Obama asked about the briefing plan, assigning it to the speaker due to the FBI's counterintelligence role. During the Trump Tower briefing, attended by figures like Priebus, Flynn, Pence, Pompeo, and Spicer, the team showed less interest in future threats and more in downplaying the report's impact on the election. Clapper confirmed the intelligence community doesn't analyze American elections. The team then began strategizing on how to downplay the information to the media. Following this, the speaker briefed Trump on the compromising material, fearing Trump would perceive it as an attempt to blackmail him, potentially initiating conflict between the FBI and the President. The briefing quickly went awry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We came up January 6 to brief the president-elect and his incoming team. The day before we had been in the Oval Office with president Obama and his senior team, it was our returning on an assignment he gave us right after the election, which is put together everything we know, The United States Intelligence Community, about what the Russians did, what their goals were, what their tools were, everything we know so that I, the president of The United States, can figure out what to do and so I can equip the next president to protect the country. And so that work was done really almost all in December, finished January, and we went to brief him. And general Clapper, the director of national intelligence, briefed president Obama and vice president Biden and laid it all out. They had three goals. Their goals were to overarching goal was to damage the American democracy, dirty up the shining city on the hill. Second, hurt Hillary Clinton, who Putin hated. And third, help Donald Trump. Speaker 1: Mission accomplished. Speaker 0: I'd say their efforts succeeded beyond their wildest imagination. Maybe too well, honestly, but we'll see. And and so we laid all that out for the president, and then general Clapper said, there's some additional material that is of a difficult nature, and we've decided that we have to brief the incoming president about it. It involved sexual allegations of an allegation that he was involved with prostitutes in Moscow, that images of that were captured by the Russians, so they'd in a position of coerce, the new president. And we think that we have to tell the incoming president, and president Obama looked to general Clapper straight ahead and said to him, what's the plan for that briefing? And Clapper looks at me and goes, well, Jim is gonna do it. Speaker 1: So Clapper didn't like you. Speaker 0: Well, and and Clapper explained the logic of it. Clapper said, look. FBI owns counterintelligence. Jim is staying or so we thought. Jim is staying. And and Jim's an effective communicator, and this is gonna be a very difficult communication. And just tell you an aside, I I've been struck by how the two presidents before president Trump that I worked closely with both had an ability to use humor in a really effective way, and the current one does not. President president Obama turned slightly without changing his facial expression to me and raised and lowered both eyebrows like a Groucho Marx thing. And in that moment, I heard in my head, you poor bastard. And what was cool about it was it kinda relaxed me. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Because I had this lump in my stomach as Clapper's describing this. So the next day, fast forward, we're up here, and we're at Trump Tower. Brennan, Clapper, myself, and, Mike Rogers, the head of NSA, And we went up and did a briefing for the full national security team of the president-elect on the Russia, just we had told president Obama. And then I Speaker 1: state Who was that? That was Reince Priebus, Mike Flynn, Pence, and Trump? Speaker 0: Yeah. And more than that Jared Kushner wasn't there, but Mike Pompeo was there. Sean Spicer was there. Tom Bossert was there. These were the in their incoming Speaker 1: So Homeland Security Advisor, the press secretary, and Speaker 0: Yep. And the Pompeo Speaker 1: was a CIA. Speaker 0: CIA designee. And so we briefed Clapper did most of it, briefed it to them, and they had almost no questions like the questions that president Obama had had, which is how do I protect the country from this threat going forward? The questions were all backward looking. You can confirm, though, that it had no impact on the vote. And Clapper said, at least twice, no. We don't do that kind of work. We we the American intelligence community does not do intelligence analysis of American elections. Right. So we don't we don't have anything for you on that. What we can tell you is they're gonna come for us again, all that kind of stuff. And then they began at the table wordsmithing what they would say to the media to downplay this, which had never happened to me before with either president Bush or president Obama, that they had had a a press strategy session with the chiefs of the American intelligence agencies. And and then the meeting came to an end, Clapper said there's a some additional material that Jim needs to brief you about. Speaker 1: How'd that go? Speaker 0: That was a difficult experience. I was nervous on a lot of levels, but mostly because this is just a natural human thing. We all have a tendency to project onto others the way we see the world. Right. And so I said Donald Trump is gonna think I'm pulling a J. Edgar Hoover on him. Yeah. He's gonna think I'm telling him this in order to jam him so he knows that I know about this thing in Moscow, which was not the purpose at all. And and so I was very nervous about it going off the rails and beginning a presidential administration with the the FBI being at war with the president of The United States. And it went off the rails pretty quickly.
julie_kelly2
Posted - July 27, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Saved - July 27, 2025 at 4:27 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Pure evil. They set up the incoming president with false claims of “kompromat” including the nonexistent “pee tape” from Moscow Ritz hotel. And Obama knew the day before they planned to do it.

@DGrayTexas45 - Clyp Keeper

John Brennan is asked about the meeting in Trump tower in January 2017 where Comey, Clapper, Rodgers & Brennan briefed Trump on what the Russian capabilities were. “WE PROVIDED TO HIM THE BRIEFING THAT AS PRESIDENT ELECT HE DESERVED TO GET” - John Brennan

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a meeting at Trump Tower with the president-elect. The meeting, which lasted several hours, involved conveying knowledge and assessments regarding Russian objectives and capabilities. The speaker states they are not going to get into the details of that meeting. The speaker confirms they provided the briefing that the president-elect deserved. The speaker says that Trump should have come away with a very clear understanding of where James Clapper, Jim Comey, Mike Rogers, and John Brennan stood on these issues.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have to talk about the Trump Tower meeting, where you guys go and talk to the president-elect, show him the evidence. Can you take me there, talk about at least what you were trying to KIRK convey and how that went? Speaker 1: We had a meeting with Mr. Trump at Trump Tower, and it was several hours long. We talked to him about what it is that we knew and assessed. We talked about what the Russian objectives were, what the capabilities are, and it was a back and forth. But I'm not going to get into details of that meeting. Speaker 0: MICHAEL Did you give him the full Monty? Was it everything? Was it the hard stuff? Speaker 1: We provided to him the briefing that, as president-elect, he deserved to get. Speaker 0: Yeah. What does that mean? Speaker 1: He should have come away with a very clear understanding of just where James Clapper, Jim Comey, Mike Rogers and John Brennan came out on these issues.
julie_kelly2
Posted - July 11, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Saved - July 11, 2025 at 1:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
For four years, I consistently issued press releases highlighting indictments and convictions related to January 6 cases, which led to significant media coverage and increased hostility towards those involved. After being fired by Pam Bondi last month, I find myself seeking sympathy. Many argue that my actions caused more harm to the lives of January 6 participants than the legal system itself. My dismissal should be just one consequence of my actions. Additionally, I note how Scott MacFarlane boasts about the DOJ's perfect conviction rate, missing the larger issue of a flawed process.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

For four years, Patricia Hartman churned out near-daily press releases to boast about indictments, convictions, and sentencings in Jan 6 cases. Her handiwork created national and local coverage of J6ers, fueling hate against them and endangering their safety. Pam Bondi fired her last month—and now she wants sympathy. Hartman arguably did more damage to the lives of J6ers than did prosecutors and/or judges. Her firing should only be part of the price she pays. (Also note how her fellow J6 propagandist Scott MacFarlane brags about DOJ’s 100% conviction rate in J6 jury trials without realizing the point we are making about a rigged process)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Patty Hartman, a 20-year Justice Department veteran, was abruptly fired, one of four officials terminated since June who were tied to January 6 prosecutions. Hartman, a public relations administrator, managed news releases and a website/database of January 6 cases, which the Trump administration has taken offline. She stated she is not political and serves the American people, expressing confusion over her termination for doing her job. Hartman believes the separation between the White House and the Justice Department has disappeared. Three other recently fired officials were prosecutors who helped secure a 100% conviction rate in January 6 jury trials. Hartman wants to give voice to others who have lost their jobs or feel powerless to speak out, believing many are afraid for their jobs. The Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment. Hartman is planning legal action to get her job back and send a message to the Department of Justice.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tonight's Justice Department veteran is speaking out after being abruptly fired this week. As CBS's Scott McFarlane reports, she is one of several officials terminated since last month, all tied to the January 6 insurrection prosecutions. Speaker 1: Patty Hartman spent nearly twenty years serving the US Justice Department, a civil servant who loved the mission. Speaker 2: I am not political. I do not serve a president or a party. I serve the American people. Speaker 1: The mission was cut short Monday when Hartman was fired by a letter from Attorney General Pam Bondi. Speaker 2: It's hard to understand why or how it's okay to remove people from their job for doing their job. Speaker 1: You posted that we're driving straight toward an abyss. What do you Speaker 2: mean? The rules don't exist anymore. The laws don't seem to exist anymore. Speaker 1: Hartman is the fourth person fired since early June who helped work the largest prosecution in American history. The prosecution of Trump supporters who stormed The US Capitol and beat police officers January 6. But Hartman's case is different. She wasn't a prosecutor or an FBI agent. She was a public relations administrator, sending out her boss's news releases and helping with the content for a website and database of January 6 cases, which the Trump administration has taken offline. Speaker 2: There used to be a line, used to be a very distinct separation between the White House and the Department of Justice because one should not interfere with the work of the other. Speaker 1: You think that line's gone? Speaker 2: That line is very definitely gone. Speaker 1: The other three recently fired officials were prosecutors who helped the agency secure a perfect 100% conviction rate in January 6 jury trials. But I will faithfully execute. Days after president Trump took the oath in acting top prosecutor in DC fired others who'd worked capital riot cases. Speaker 2: One of the reasons I wanna tell my story is because I wanna give voice to the people who also have lost their jobs or who are there and feel powerless to talk about what's going on in the office. Are they fearful? I think a lot of people are afraid for their jobs right now. I think there's there's no doubt about that. Speaker 0: So, Scott, what is the Justice Department saying about all this? Speaker 1: Yeah. We asked for comment on Patty Hartman's firing and the other recent firings and they did not respond to our request for comment. Broadly speaking, Maurice, the president and his allies have argued the January 6 prosecutions were politicization of the weaponization of the Department of Justice that it was political. That being said, Patty Hartman is going to try to fight this, trying to take a legal action to get her job back and hopefully, she says, send a message to the Department of Justice on behalf of her former colleagues.
julie_kelly2
Posted - July 3, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Saved - July 4, 2025 at 4:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to highlight Lisa Monaco's role in the December 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian interference, alongside Obama and Brennan. The assessment was part of a broader setup, linked to Michael Isikoff's article that fueled the Trump-Russia narrative. Monaco's involvement in anti-Trump operations spans years, including Russiagate and the January 6 investigations. There's speculation about her influence on Biden, but it's unclear if any investigations into her actions are currently happening.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Aside from Obama and Brennan, don't forget who else was behind the bogus Dec 2016 ICA on Russian interference in the election: Lisa Monaco. Check out this clip from Dec 9, 2016--the day Obama announced an "intelligence" review into Russia's alleged interference in the 2016 election to "help" Trump win. This was a total set-up between Monaco and Michael Isikoff, whose Sept 2016 Yahoo News article not only helped launch Trump-Russia collusion via Steele dossier but was cited in FISA applications to spy on the campaign. The bogus ICA was completed on Dec 30 and published a week later just as Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Monaco and others were setting up President Trump on Steele dossier claims:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The intelligence community is reviewing Russian interference in the 2016 election. Their determination will be based on not disclosing sources and methods that may impede identifying malicious actors in the future. The president has directed the intelligence community to conduct a full review of what happened during the election process. The goal is to capture lessons learned and report to a range of stakeholders, including Congress. This review aligns with work done over the summer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Black protect our interest as well as impose costs given that the intelligence community publicly said on October 7 that it was confident that the Russians had tried to interfere in the election. How has the US government sought to impose costs on the Russians? And secondly, as you know, there's continued interest in Congress and investigating this more. Seven Democratic senators with the president last week asking for you to declassify more information about what you know about what the Russians were doing. Are you going to be able to share publicly more information about what happened during this election? Speaker 1: So in that piece, that you know, intelligence community is looking at that. That's going to be first and foremost a determination that is made by the intelligence community as it was in terms of the first statement was made in October because you want attentive to not disclosing sources and methods that may impede our ability to identify and attribute malicious actors in the future. What I would also say on this though, the president has directed the intelligence community to conduct a full review of what happened during the twenty sixteen election process. It is and to capture lessons learned from that and to report to a range of stakeholders to include the Congress. This is consistent with the work that we did over the summer

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Monaco’s dirty fingerprints have been on every anti-Trump operation for a decade—from Russiagate to the Jan 6/classified docs investigations and prosecutions. The president now suspects she was Biden’s auotpen. Don’t know if any investigation—either by DOJ or Congress—into her is underway.

julie_kelly2
Posted - June 20, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Saved - June 23, 2025 at 1:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I received the transcript of Judge Breyer's hearing regarding his potential order to halt the president's use of the National Guard in California under the Posse Comitatus Act. Despite the Ninth Circuit ruling that the president had the authority to deploy the guard, Breyer seems determined to find a way to reverse this decision. He expressed uncertainty about jurisdiction and requested briefs from the parties involved. Additionally, I provided an explainer on the background of Newsom's lawsuit and the appellate court's decision.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

I just received the transcript of Judge Breyer's hearing this morning about the possibility of his entering another order to halt the president's use of National Guard in California--this time, under the Posse Comitatus Act which prevents the military from being involved domestic law enforcement. Although the CA appellate court (Ninth Circuit) clearly concluded last night the president was within his authority under a federal statute to deploy the guard, Breyer is now trying to find any angle to institute another order reversing Trump. He is off his rocker. Breyer: "It is not clear to me that the Ninth Circuit's stay of the [temporary restraining order] divests this Court of its usual authority...to grant or modify an injunction as to the Posse Comitatus Act following its refusal to grant one. Of course, this Court recognizes that the Ninth Circuit has the authority to modify, restore, or grant an injunction while the appeal is pending. So that I can be sure that I am operating within my jurisdiction, I would like the parties to submit briefs by noon on Monday, June 23rd, 2025, addressing whether this Court or the Ninth Circuit retains primary jurisdiction to modify or grant an injunction under the Posse Comitatus Act."

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

My explainer here on the background of Newsom's lawsuit and the appellate court decision https://www.declassified.live/p/another-big-l-for-newsom?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

A(nother) Big L for Newsom Newsom's victory lap after a Clinton judge upheld his lawsuit against President Trump last week looks even more buffoonish after a California appellate court just took another stab at his ego. declassified.live
julie_kelly2
Posted - June 17, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 6:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I wrote to FBI Director Kash Patel requesting more documents on China's interference in the 2020 election. New information reveals that the CCP mass-produced fake driver's licenses to secure absentee ballots for Joe Biden. An intel report from August 2020 was destroyed, and Wray's FBI didn't investigate further.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: In a letter today to FBI Director Kash Patel, Sen Grassley asks for more documents related to China's interference in 2020 election. New info disclosed by Patel confirms CCP mass produced fake driver's licenses to obtain absentee ballots to vote for Joe Biden. An August 2020 intel report on the matter reportedly was destroyed and allegations were not further investigated by Wray's FBI.

julie_kelly2
Posted - July 16, 2024 at 4:26 PM
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 6:34 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

A little reminder of Kim Cheatle’s background. And how she defended USSS purge of texts related to J6 with an indignant response about “integrity.” https://t.co/QyJ3gBoUpI

Video Transcript AI Summary
A 28-year veteran who evacuated Vice President Dick Cheney on 9/11 and served on then-Vice President Biden's protective detail was named director in mid-2022. This occurred amid controversy over the agency deleting nearly all text messages from January 6th. The agency claims this was due to a data migration, but some find this explanation suspicious given the timing and volume of messages deleted. One individual stated it's unfortunate that people would assume nefarious intent, emphasizing that the agency's integrity is paramount. It was stated that their integrity has been put to the test.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She would know. The twenty eight year veteran was on the team that evacuated vice president Dick Cheney on 09/11, and she served on then vice president Biden's protective detail. He named her director in mid twenty twenty two. Amid a swirl of controversy over the agency deleting nearly all of its text messages from January 6. The agency says that was due to a data migration system migrations happen, but I think for a lot of Americans, it just doesn't pass the smell given the timing and the volume of messages deleted. Speaker 1: Well, it's unfortunate that that would be the assumption that people would make. Our integrity is everything, and there was nothing nefarious attached to that. Speaker 0: Their integrity has been put to the test.
julie_kelly2
Posted - June 14, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Saved - June 14, 2025 at 3:04 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Tim Walz just confirmed the Hortmans have both been killed. The Hoffmans just emerged from surgery after being shot "multiple times." Beyond tragic and sickening.

@ChenueHer - Chenue Her

BREAKING: MN Democratic Sen. John Hoffman and Democratic House Rep Melissa Hortman & their spouses have been shot overnight by someone impersonating a police officer, sources confirm to @FOX9. A search now ongoing for the suspect in the Brooklyn Park area. https://www.fox9.com/news/brooklyn-park-champlin-shootings-suspect-impersonating-police

Live updates on Minnesota lawmaker shootings: Legislators targeted by suspect impersonating police A shelter-in-place alert was sent out at 5:30 a.m. Saturday morning by the Brooklyn Park Police Department after multiple shootings. A suspect in the shooting may be impersonating law enforcement and should not be approached. fox9.com
julie_kelly2
Posted - June 13, 2025 at 1:02 PM
Saved - June 13, 2025 at 1:40 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Judicial coup update. Another Obama judge.

@kyledcheney - Kyle Cheney

JUST IN: A federal judge has blocked federal election officials from enforcing Trump’s executive order forcing states to apply citizenship requirements, saying it imposes significant burdens and would harm eligible voters. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.282905/gov.uscourts.mad.282905.107.0.pdf

Memorandum & Order – #107 in State of California v. Trump (D. Mass., 1:25-cv-10810) – CourtListener.com Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Court shall grant the motion for preliminary injunction as sought as to §§ 2(a), 3(d), 2(d), 7(b) of the Executive Order and § 7(a) of the Executive Order as to civil or criminal enforcement actions. None of the States shall be required to post an injunction bond or any other security as a condition of obtaining the injunction described in this Memorandum or the accompanying Order.Nothing in this Memorandum or the accompanying Order shall prevent the Executive Branch from taking any lawful action that is not based upon §§ 2(a), 2(d), 3(d), 7(a) or 7(b) of the Executive Order as described herein and in the accompanying Order. An Order of preliminary injunction shall be entered today in accordance with this Memorandum.(LMH) (Entered: 06/13/2025) courtlistener.com
julie_kelly2
Posted - June 9, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Saved - June 9, 2025 at 3:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe federal judges, from Chief Justice John Roberts to Jeb Boasberg, have significantly contributed to the current situation by undermining presidential authority. They express sympathy for illegal immigrants, including those with criminal backgrounds, and accuse the Trump administration of acting illegally. This has empowered individuals here unlawfully to challenge the president and law enforcement. The Trump DOJ is frequently in court defending deportation policies against activist lawyers and judges. While many share the blame for the chaos, I see judges as the most responsible.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Federal judges— from Chief Justice John Roberts down to Jeb Boasberg—absolutely green lighted what’s happening now. By undermining the president’s authority, expressing sympathy for illegals including criminal illegals like Abrego Garcia, accusing the Trump administration of acting “illegally” and pursuing contempt charges, and insisting those here unlawfully are entitled to “due process”—these judges have empowered illegals to act against the president and ALL authority including law enforcement. Hardly a day has gone by since March where Trump DOJ isn’t in some federal court somewhere defending deportation policy as radical activist lawyers and political judges work hand in glove to deny the will of the people: remove individuals who are here illegally. Plenty of people to blame for this current chaos but judges are most responsible.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Judges continue to admit their very limited if not nonexistent role in reviewing the president’s authority in invoking Alien Enemies Act. And yet— https://open.substack.com/pub/juliekelly/p/another-judge-admits-alien-enemies?r=4yy1i&utm_medium=ios

Another Judge Admits Alien Enemies Act is Unreviewable A Trump-appointed judge in California this week made another strong argument that the courts have nearly nonexistent authority to second-guess the president's key deportation policy. declassified.live
julie_kelly2
Posted - June 6, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Saved - June 6, 2025 at 8:56 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

18 USC 111 - assaulting federal officers. Hundreds of J6ers faced that charge for even minimal confrontations with police. Many denied release pending trial—sentences upon conviction plea ranged between 3 years to 14 years in federal prison.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: Radical leftists are ASSAULTlNG ICE AGENTS who are conducting operations in the NYC courthouse ARREST ALL OF THEM ON FEDERAL FELONY CHARGES! https://t.co/bLss4hRpkS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that someone is not allowing them to speak and is seemingly unaware of rise rates in the courtroom. This person keeps asking what's going on and reiterates that the department has broad discretion and is moving to the system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Alright. She's she's not she's not allowing me to speak. It's clear that the is not aware of rise rates in the courtroom. He keeps asking what's going on, and she just reiterates that the department has broad discretion and is moving to the system.
julie_kelly2
Posted - June 3, 2025 at 3:04 PM
Saved - June 3, 2025 at 9:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m questioning Bill Barr's actions during 2019 and 2020, particularly regarding his handling of the DOJ and the investigation into election fraud. Reports indicate that senior DOJ officials, including Scott Brady, were unaware of a portal allowing the FBI to conceal evidence, including Hunter Biden's laptop, which the FBI had since December 2019. This lack of communication raises serious concerns about the integrity of investigations, especially in light of Special Counsel Jack Smith's work and the evidence collected against the president.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

What exactly the f*ck was Bill Barr doing in 2019 and 2020 besides protecting Chris Wray's job, letting cities across the country burn in honor of George Floyd, and refusing to investigate 2020 election fraud? In addition to allowing Robert Mueller to run a "post" special counsel office that continued to conceal evidence related to Crossfire Hurricane--away from federal and Congressional investigators--the latest reporting by @ProfMJCleveland reveals senior DOJ officials and US attorneys were unaware of the "prohibited access" portal in FBI record management system that allowed FBI to hide incriminating documents. This included Scott Brady, the US attorney investigating Biden crime family and Hunter's grifting off Ukraine...

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Brady told Margot that his team was not aware of the existence of Hunter's laptop until NY Post reported on its contents in mid October 2020--and AFTER his investigation ended. The FBI had the laptop in Dec 2019. Barr didn't feel the need to tell Brady---hey make sure you talk to Chris Wray or Tim Thibault or Brian Auten about the LAPTOP? https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/03/u-s-attorney-vetting-evidence-of-biden-corruption-did-not-know-of-fbis-ability-to-hide-documents/

Attorney On Biden Case Didn't Know FBI Was Able To Hide Docs The U.S. attorney screening evidence related to Biden corruption did not know the FBI’s Sentinel had a feature to render files invisible. thefederalist.com

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

As I noted on X and in this piece--this raises huge implications on investigation into Special Counsel Jack Smith, his team, and the whereabouts of evidence collected in both cases against the president https://www.declassified.live/p/new-disclosures-underscore-challenges?r=4yy1i&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

New Disclosures Underscore Challenges at FBI More evidence of Comey-era skullduggery in Crossfire Hurricane operation is a reminder what the new leadership team at the FBI is up against. declassified.live
julie_kelly2
Posted - June 3, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Saved - June 3, 2025 at 12:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m Greg Rosen, and I led the Capitol Siege section at the DC US Attorney's office, where I took pride in prosecuting those involved in the political protest. After being demoted by Ed Martin, I resigned and joined the Rogers, Joseph O'Donnell law firm. Before leaving, I shared my thoughts with the president and the American people. I also wonder about the PR preparation I underwent for my interview with Scott MacFarlane. My new employer highlights my numerous awards and significant contributions at the DOJ.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This is Greg Rosen. Greg Rosen led the so-called "Capitol Siege" section of the DC US Attorneys office and proudly prosecuted Americans involved in a political protest by bastardizing the law and working in the all-Dem bubble of Washington. Rosen, who was demoted by Ed Martin, finally resigned and was hired by Rogers, Joseph O'Donnell law firm in DC. But Rosen had some words for the president and the American people before he left!

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

One has to wonder how much PR prep Rosen did before this interview with the always obsequious Scott MacFarlane. https://t.co/cwKPAiDO5k

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI allegedly maintains a list of over 5,000 employees involved in the January 6 investigation, though US Attorneys are reportedly not included. Some individuals are purportedly being treated poorly for performing their assigned duties related to the investigation. These duties involved investigating facts and applying them to legal standards as guided by prosecutors. This work is described as non-political.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There was and still is at the FBI, this circulating list of the 5,000 plus FBI employees who were part of the January 6 investigation. Granted, the US Attorneys aren't on the list, but you all probably noticed that. What were people saying about this creation of a list of people who did their assigned duties? FBI agents who did their job by following basic facts, investigating those facts, and then taking those facts and applying them to legal standards as guided by prosecutors, that's the job. It was not political. And for any person to be, treated poorly because of that state of employment is shocking.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Rosen has won many major awards at the DOJ and done many important things, his new employer says. https://t.co/iuXrk0yLfN

julie_kelly2
Posted - June 2, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Saved - June 2, 2025 at 9:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm frustrated by the recent revelations from the FBI and Senator Grassley regarding Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team. It seems they continued to hide documents and obstruct the investigation into Nellie Ohr even after Mueller's office was closed down. This obstruction persisted as late as June 2019, despite the findings of no collusion. I can't help but wonder what tactics Jack Smith and his team might be using to conceal evidence in their prosecution of the president. This situation highlights the challenges Kash Patel and Dan Bongino are facing.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

What is perhaps most galling about recent disclosures by FBI and Sen Grassley is that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team hid documents and thwarted Nellie Ohr investigation months AFTER his office was shut down. As late as June 2019--3 months after AG Barr closed him down and 2 months after the release of the report finding no collusion--hangers-on at the "post" special counsel's office were obstructing the Washington FBI field office's perjury probe into Nellie Ohr. Now just imagine what Jack Smith and his slimeballs did to hide evidence related to his prosecution of the president. This is what Kash Patel and Dan Bongino are up against.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

More here: https://www.declassified.live/p/new-disclosures-underscore-challenges?r=4yy1i&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

New Disclosures Underscore Challenges at FBI More evidence of Comey-era skullduggery in Crossfire Hurricane operation is a reminder what the new leadership team at the FBI is up against. declassified.live
julie_kelly2
Posted - June 2, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Saved - June 2, 2025 at 7:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During the Republican control of the House and Senate, Devin Nunes and President Trump were poised to expose the collusion narrative. In March 2017, Trump tweeted about FBI surveillance of his campaign. However, key Republicans, including John McCain, supported the appointment of a special counsel, sidelining Nunes' efforts. Paul Ryan backed a questionable ethics investigation against Nunes, delaying progress. The media amplified the collusion story, and after Mueller's appointment, relevant documents were secured. The base demands accountability to prevent this from happening again.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Republicans had control of House and Senate at the time. Devin Nunes and Pres Trump were on the brink of blowing the collusion hoax wide open. In March 2017, Trump tweeted that the FBI "spied" on this campaign. Nunes' Intel committee was in full swing and taking aim at Comey and others. So what happened? Republicans in Washington,--led by John McCain, who helped circulate the dossier before and after the election--sided with Comey by supporting the appointment of a special counsel. Paul Ryan endorsed a bogus ethics investigation into Nunes, which sidelined his work for at least 8 months. The media published FBI/Steele planted stories including the disclosure of the FISA on Carter Page to help bolster the collusion narrative. And after Mueller was appointed in May 2017, his office, led by the inexecrable Andrew Weissmann, quickly collected all relevant documents and locked them down at the special counsel's office. This is why the base wants quick action on this and other corrupt operations against the president, his allies, and his voters. Everyone involved in CH including both Ohrs got away with it. Cannot let this happen again.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Working on a piece about latest disclosures by Sen Grassley—I’m reminded what those of us who covered SC Bob Mueller’s witch hunt knew at the time: the “investigation” wasn’t just to bolster fake Trump-Russia collusion but to acquire all incriminating records and bury them: https://t.co/nOYvk1Rz1m

julie_kelly2
Posted - December 3, 2024 at 12:23 AM
Saved - June 1, 2025 at 2:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared footage of an FBI SWAT raid on the home of a suspected J6 protester, Jeff Snyder, who was not present during the 6am raid. His wife was handcuffed and interrogated, causing distress in the neighborhood. The FBI's tactics have escalated, with threats involving their daughter, a Marine in Japan. The harassment persists, with agents surveilling their home and interrogating neighbors, including on Thanksgiving. I believe a thorough investigation into the FBI's actions and leadership is essential, as their overreach affects us all.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: Ring camera footage shows FBI SWAT raid at California home of a suspected J6 protester in October 2024. The targeted individual was not home but at least 10-15 heavily armed FBI agents stormed the house using flashbangs, aiming guns at his wife, and holding her in handcuffs while interrogating her and traumatizing the neighborhood:

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The harassment continued. (Note the time of the raid — 6am) The subject, Jeff Snyder, according to his wife had left behind his phone and other items. He is still at large. https://t.co/p2IIMWZ5Pr

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

After an hour of pathetic cajoling over a loudspeaker, the tyrannical FBI agent threatened to involve their daughter — a Marine stationed in Japan. Tell me again how @Kash_Patel is the threat to our country. And this has happened over and over for 4 years https://t.co/yfpoze6h2w

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The harassment continues to this day. We are paying for helicopters and drones and agents to hunt down the subject. One neighbor, according to the subject's wife, was interrogated on Thanksgiving Day. An agent bragged to one neighbor that he was head of domestic terrorism for the FBI San Jose office. (Loser) Another disclosed that the FBI had surveilled their home for weeks and even conducted a practice raid at the Oakland Zoo beforehand. The rot of the FBI extends to every field office and is aided by state and local law enforcement--which is unacceptable in "red" states. Not only are pardons necessary but so is a full blown investigation into every FBI leader and field agent responsible for this.

julie_kelly2
Posted - May 27, 2025 at 1:06 PM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 11:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dozens faced denial of release after armed FBI raids, including those accused of non-violent offenses and individuals with no criminal records. J6ers were transported to a DC facility designed for them, despite all hearings being virtual in 2021. They were kept in solitary confinement under Covid rules, with DC judges routinely denying release motions. Access to attorneys and discovery was obstructed, especially for those refusing vaccines. Excessive sentences were sought by the DOJ, and many J6ers were convicted under misused statutes, highlighting a significant lack of due process.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Dozens were denied release following armed predawn FBI raids including those accused of non violent offenses such as the unlawful 1512c2 count and those without any criminal record. J6ers were then hauled—some cross country stopping at 4-5 other prisons along the way to add to the torment—to a DC gulag created specifically for J6ers. The excuse for bringing J6ers to DC was that the capital was the “scene of the crime” and all court proceedings would take place in DC. Except all hearings in 2021 were virtual—the first trial took place March 2022. Those defendants then were kept in solitary in 2021 under “Covid” rules. DC judges routinely denied motions for release—only a handful were overturned by DC appellate court. Meanwhile, prison officials denied a few members of Congress who were brave enough to take interest (MTG and Gohmert first) access to the facility amid accusations of physical and mental abuse. DOJ and prison guards also prevented J6ers from meeting with their attorneys and accessing their discovery—foundational Constitutional rights. If a J6ers refused a vaccine, that individual could not meet in person with their lawyer. They remained “locked up” as DC judges systematically denied every change of venue motion—which handed DOJ a perfect conviction record before DC juries made up almost exclusively of Democratic voters. DOJ then sought excessive sentences which included terror enhancements and in at least 2 instances illegal prison time (add- ons later reversed by DC appellate court) for nonviolent convictions. At least 100 J6ers were “locked up” on a corporate fraud statute SCOTUS determined 3 years later had been misused (abused) by Biden DOJ and 17 federal judges. This only scratches the surface of the lack of due process afforded to J6ers. And it infuriates me to this day to read an ACLU lawsuit signed by at least a dozen lawyers when not a single one stepped up to represent J6ers. Illegal Venezuelan gang banger? ACLU and federal judges will work round the clock to ensure their “due process rights.” A U.S. veteran accused of bogus crimes related to a political protest on taxpayer funded property? Rot. Sorry to interrupt your popular delusion with facts, Michael.

@michaelpfreeman - Michael Freeman

The answer is zero. None were locked up without due process.

@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy

How many J6’ers were locked up without due process? How many democrats spoke out against that?

julie_kelly2
Posted - May 21, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Saved - May 22, 2025 at 5:04 PM

@undefined - undefined

Oh look who suddenly supports immunity from prosecution for elected officials

@undefined - undefined

Members of Congress have strong official immunity Expect to hear about that defense & many others in the McIver case Trump's DOJ will go down the tubes as they have so many times before https://t.co/l9cjm7t9R2

julie_kelly2
Posted - May 21, 2025 at 11:29 PM
Saved - May 22, 2025 at 3:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In March 2021, I was arrested for allegedly assaulting Brian Sicknick by spraying pepper spray, though I never made contact. After 18 months in custody, I pleaded guilty and received a six-year sentence. At my sentencing, Sicknick's family shared their impact statements, which influenced the judge's decision. Additionally, Sicknick's ex-girlfriend filed a $10 million wrongful death lawsuit against me. Meanwhile, Congresswoman LaMonica McIver is fundraising off her legal challenges and receiving support from Democrats and the media.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

When NJ resident Julian Khater was arrested on an airplane in March 2021 for allegedly assaulting Brian Sicknick, he was immediately taken into custody. Julian was accused of spraying pepper spray in Sicknick’s direction—he made no contact with Sicknick or any other officer. DC Judge Tom Hogan denied his release. Julian spent nearly 18 months in the DC gulag before he was tormented into pleading guilty to the same 2 counts charged against McIver. He was then sentenced to six years in prison.

@AlexisMcAdamsTV - Alexis McAdams

Congresswoman LaMonica McIver appeared in front of a judge virtually today. She did not have to post bail. But, cannot travel outside of the country…for now. McIver is fundraising off the charges, according to Fox digital. Asking for money to fight back against the Trump Administration.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Sicknick’s family gave victim impact statements at Julian’s sentencing to make sure Hogan, a Reagan appointee, threw the book at him which he did. Sicknick’s ex-girlfriend—they broke up 6 months before Jan 6—then sued Julian for $10 million in a wrongful death lawsuit. McIver is raising money and getting broad support from Dems and the media.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Here’s what @RepLaMonica said on Jan 25 after Julian was pardoned: https://t.co/tBQ0lfXcTD

julie_kelly2
Posted - May 7, 2025 at 7:51 PM
Saved - May 7, 2025 at 9:37 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Markwayne Mullin, who just told @bennyjohnson that some senators are still traumatized by Jan 6, comforted Lt. Michael Byrd after he killed Ashli Babbitt.

@cspan - CSPAN

.@RepMullin on police officer who fatally shot woman in Capitol on January 6th: "After it happened, he came over. He was physically and emotionally distraught. I actually gave him a hug and I said, 'sir, you did what you had to do.'" https://t.co/qSwZgilMS7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Markwayne Mullin recounted a conversation with the police officer who fatally shot a woman at the Capitol on January 6th. Mullin stated he doesn't know for a fact, but he guarantees the officer had never used his weapon in that manner before and didn't want to. Mullin said the officer was physically and emotionally distraught after the event, and Mullin told him he did what he had to do. Mullin stated the officer's life has also changed because using lethal force for the first time never leaves you. He added the officer was doing his job because members were still in the balcony, and if someone presents a weapon and gives commands that are ignored, there is no choice but to discharge the weapon in self-defense or risk it being used against you and endangering others.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This Sunday, Seaspan premieres January 6, views from the house. 14 members of congress shared stories of what they saw, heard, and experienced that day, including Oklahoma Republican Markwayne Mullen. He told us about his conversation with a police officer who fatally shot a woman in the Capitol. Speaker 1: I guarantee you, I don't know for a fact, but I guarantee you, he's never had a pull's weapon in a manner like that before. He was the last person in the world that ever wanted to use force like that, And he wasn't wanting to do that. I know for a fact, because after it happened, he came over and he was physically and emotionally distraught and I actually gave him a hug. And I said, sir, you did what you had to do. And I mean that. Unfortunately, the young lady, her family's life has changed and it was an unfortunate situation that she lost her life and some people lost their loved ones. But the lieutenant's life has also changed too because if it's the first time you've ever had to use lethal force, that doesn't ever leave you and it wasn't his choice. He didn't show up to work that day to have to do that. He didn't, he didn't, he was doing his job and he got put in a situation where he had to do his job because there was members still in the balcony and if you're going to present your weapon in a manner and give commands and they still don't listen and they still approach, you don't have a choice because either you have to at that point discharge your weapon in a manner of self defense or that weapon's gonna be taken away from you, it's gonna be used on you, it's gonna put all of our lives in danger too. Speaker 0: This week, you'll also hear from Democrats Jason Crow of Colorado and Tom Malinowski of New Jersey. January sixth, views from the house starts this Sunday at 10PM eastern on Seaspan, seaspan Org or listen on the Seaspan radio app.
julie_kelly2
Posted - May 1, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Saved - May 2, 2025 at 2:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I vividly recall the expression on J6 prosecutor Mike Romano's face when I entered the courtroom for Brady Knowlton's sentencing. Romano seemed surprised to see me as he sought a harsh sentence for Knowlton, a father of a severely autistic daughter, over a minor offense. Recently, Romano testified about his pride in prosecuting January 6 cases, showing a vindictive side. It's amusing that he boasted about imprisoning misdemeanants, which likely contributed to his reassignment within the DOJ. Romano has since departed from the department.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

I will never forget the look on J6 prosecutor Mike Romano's face when I walked into a courtroom last year to cover the sentencing of Brady Knowlton, who was convicted of a misdemeanor. Pretty sure I was the last person Romano expected to see as he was preparing to ask a DC judge to send Knowlton, the father and sole provider for a severely autistic daughter, to federal prison for a year on a petty offense. Romano this week testified before Senate Dems about his feelz related to January 6 and his pride as "deputy chief of the Capitol Siege section" in tormenting hundreds of Americans and sending them to jail even on lowlevel nonviolent charges. He oozes revenge for being locker stuffing as a kid.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker learned about the Capitol riot on January 6th and was disgusted and afraid. They were afraid of what the rioters might do and that they would not face consequences. The speaker is proud to have joined the effort to hold them accountable. The Justice Department charged over 1,500 people with crimes and obtained convictions against almost 1,300. The speaker states that this ensured the rioters would face accountability and created a public record of the crimes committed that day.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On January 6, like many other Americans, I learned about the Capitol riot on the news as it was happening. I turned on my television and saw thousands of people storming the Capitol, apparently bent on forcing Congress to overturn the results of the twenty twenty presidential election. I was disgusted, and more importantly, I was afraid. I was afraid of what these rioters might do, and I was afraid they would never face consequences. I'm proud to have joined the effort to hold them accountable. Thanks to the work of our team, the justice department charged more than 1,500 people with crimes and obtained criminal convictions against almost 1,300 people. We ensured that the rioters would face accountability no matter how short lived. Our work created a public record of the crimes committed that day.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

LOL Romano bragged about locking up J6 misdemeanants. Which must’ve been one reason why Ed Martin reassigned Romano to misdemeanor unit after he took helm of DC U.S. attys office. Romano has since left DOJ https://t.co/4qRpf8sGdz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Prosecution of misdemeanor defendants was critically important because there were no small crimes on January 6th. Misdemeanor defendants were accused of trespassing at the Capitol, knowingly remaining where they shouldn't have, and their presence enabled mob violence. The volume of people who stormed the Capitol contributed to the violence and damage. Many misdemeanor defendants understood what the violent rioters meant to accomplish and knowingly lent their bodies to the effort. The rioters were treated fairly, with skilled attorneys, opportunities to challenge evidence, and jury trials. Their constitutional rights were protected, and they were convicted in overwhelming numbers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Prosecution of misdemeanor defendants was critically important to our mission. It's easy to hear the word misdemeanor and think a crime is minor or even insignificant, but there were no small crimes on January 6. The people charged with misdemeanors were basically accused of trespassing at the capital. They entered and remained knowing they should not have done so. Their presence enabled the mob violence. Without the volume of people who stormed the capital, less violence would have been committed, less damage would have been done. As one judge recognized, every raindrop contributes to a flood. And based on the evidence I've reviewed, many misdemeanor defendants understood exactly what the violent rioters meant to accomplish. They knowingly lent their bodies to the effort even if they committed no violence themselves. Third, the rioters were treated fairly. They had skilled attorneys representing them. They challenged the evidence against them. Many took their cases to trial, testified, and made arguments to juries of their peers. In short, all of their constitutional rights were protected, and they were convicted in overwhelming numbers.
julie_kelly2
Posted - May 1, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 9:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just recalled how certain dates align with the classified documents case involving the president. The FBI was investigating him for keeping classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, and on May 22, they served a subpoena on his team for more files. Interestingly, this was just one day before DC US Attorney Matthew Graves indicated plans to indict Navarro. The arrest date also stands out: June 3, 2022, when Jay Bratt and three FBI agents visited Mar-a-Lago to collect more documents. It all feels interconnected with themes of collusion and conspiracy.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Just remembered how these dates align with key dates in the classified documents case. This is the same time the FBI was investigating the president for keeping classified docs at Mar a Lago. On May 22, FBI served a subpoena on Trump's team demanding more files. That was one day before DC US Attorney Matthew Graves told Wash FBI field office that he planned to indict Navarro several days later. The June date of the arrest also kept sticking in my head: it was the same day, June 3, 2022, that Jay Bratt and 3 FBI agents from Washington FBI field office visited Mar a Lago to collect more docs and snoop around the president's residence. Collusion and conspiracy.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: Emails obtained by Sen Grassley demonstrate the collusion between Biden DOJ, DC US Attorney Matt Graves, and Washington FBI to pursue an indictment and schedule the arrest of Peter Navarro in 2022. "After consultation with main Justice." And I believe 'Molly" is Molly Gaston, who was assigned to Special Counsel Jack Smith's team a few months later to handle the J6 case against Pres Trump. Grassley is now asking AG Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel for all comms "between or among all DOJ and FBI personnel related to the contempt of Congress cases."

julie_kelly2
Posted - May 1, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 6:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come across emails revealing collusion between the Biden DOJ, DC US Attorney Matt Graves, and the FBI regarding the indictment and arrest of Peter Navarro in 2022. Grassley is now requesting all communications related to the contempt of Congress cases. The media is currently focused on Ed Martin, but they were critical of Graves, who indicted Steve Bannon early in his term and later declined to investigate Hunter Biden. Graves sought a quick indictment of Navarro, leading to a dramatic arrest at Reagan National Airport instead of a more discreet approach.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: Emails obtained by Sen Grassley demonstrate the collusion between Biden DOJ, DC US Attorney Matt Graves, and Washington FBI to pursue an indictment and schedule the arrest of Peter Navarro in 2022. "After consultation with main Justice." And I believe 'Molly" is Molly Gaston, who was assigned to Special Counsel Jack Smith's team a few months later to handle the J6 case against Pres Trump. Grassley is now asking AG Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel for all comms "between or among all DOJ and FBI personnel related to the contempt of Congress cases."

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

While the media now fixates on Ed Martin, they were gloves off when it came to his predecessor, Matthew Graves. (He is noted in these emails by "USAO-DC.") In his first act in office, Graves, appointed by Biden, indicted Steve Bannon on contempt for refusing to cooperate with Jan 6 Select Committee. A few months later, Graves refused to work with Special Counsel David Weiss to investigate and possibly charge Hunter Biden for tax crimes in DC in 2014-2015. Then in May 2022, Graves--who I am told had daily communication with the office of Lisa Monaco, the deputy attorney general under Biden--sought a quick indictment of Peter Navarro. This also included the usual suspects at Washington FBI field office including the disgraced Tim Thibault and former head of the office Steven D'Antuono. The FBI arrested Navarro at Reagan National Airport to make a scene rather than allow him to surrender or arrest him at home--Navarro has said he lives a few blocks from FBI HQ.

julie_kelly2
Posted - May 1, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 2:13 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Just a reminder that @SenThomTillis voted to confirm both Merrick Garland and Lisa Monaco to lead Biden's DOJ. Now he wants to sink the confirmation of acting DC US attorney Ed Martin, who is investigating corruption at that office under Garland/Monaco leadership.

julie_kelly2
Posted - April 30, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 1:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it amusing that Sara Levine, a temporary assistant US attorney, didn't show any emotion while prosecuting a single mother charged with misdemeanors related to January 6. Despite her claims of public interest, she pushed for a trial just days before Christmas, ignoring the hardships faced by those involved. Her deceptive use of outdated jury survey data to argue bias in DC further highlights her questionable tactics. Now, after her temporary role ended, she portrays herself as a victim, which I find ironic.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This is funny. I didn’t see temporary asst US attorney Sara Levine cry when I watched her prosecute one of the last J6 trials the week before Christmas 2024. When Biden DOJ forced a single mom charged with 4 misdemeanors who was inside the Capitol for 9 minutes engaged in no violence to stand trial before Jeb Boasberg—who refused to delay the trial despite Trump’s pledge to pardon J6ers exactly like Levine’s target. This is your typical crybully J6 prosecutor—never cared about Americans being destroyed or losing their livelihoods over exercising their 1A rights but sheds tears for herself when tables are turned Btw she—along with several other lawyers—were hired by Biden DOJ as temps to handle the massive J6 caseload. Their service ended after the president was inaugurated. Somehow she thinks she was still entitled to a job. Now she’s the victim lol

Video Transcript AI Summary
After three weeks of training, the speaker saw a litigation hold on their phone with a memo giving Mr. Martin permission to fire probationary employees from the capital c section. The memo referenced people but didn't have a list of names. The speaker headed back to the office and was met by colleagues who shared their confusion. Two hours later, letters terminating them started rolling in. At the end of the night, 15 assistant U. S. Attorneys had been fired. The termination letter stated the decision was based on actions and the prosecution of persons relating to the events that occurred at or near The U. S. Capitol on 01/06/2021. An executive order characterized that work as having involved a grave national injustice. The speaker's hiring hindered the ability of the acting US attorney Martin to staff his office in furtherance of his obligation to faithfully implement the agenda that the American people elected president Trump to SCU. The termination letter made it clear that mister Martin does not understand the role of a prosecutor. Firing 15 qualified attorneys created an immediate deficit in the office to appropriately prosecute cases.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so I thought it was possible I could continue to serve that office. I was wrong. After three weeks of training and getting prepared for the next week, That Friday, I left work. I walked to the metro station. I got on the train and I pulled out my phone and I saw a litigation hold that had been put on it. And attached to that was a memo that gave Mr. Martin permission to fire probationary employees from the capital c section that were moved to other places in the office. The memo referenced people but didn't have a list of names attached. But, the information provided was confusing. I knew I was probably on the list, but I didn't know exactly what was going on. I headed back to the office so I could figure out what was happening. I was met by my colleagues who shared their confusion and a heartbreak over this sudden event. We left the office, and two hours later, the letter started rolling in terminating us. At the end of the night, 15 U. S. Attorneys assistant U. S. Attorneys had been fired. The termination letter I received stated the decision was based on your actions and the prosecution of persons relating to the events that occurred at or near The U. S. Capitol on 01/06/2021. An executive order issued by on 01/20/2025, the president characterized that work as having involved a grave national injustice that has perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years. It went on to say that my hiring has hindered the ability of the acting US attorney Martin to staff his office in furtherance of his obligation to faithfully implement the agenda that the American people elected president Trump to SCU. The termination letter made it clear to me that mister Martin does not understand the role of a prosecutor. US attorneys represent The United States Of America, not the president. Firing 15 qualified attorneys created an immediate deficit in the office to appropriately prop prosecute cases.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Here is crybully Sara Levine's Nov 14, 2024 response on behalf of Biden DOJ opposing J6er request to delay trial. She claimed it was in the "public interest" to put this woman on trial in DC on Dec 16, 2024. https://t.co/XjhthlUSMN

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The J6er (I won't name her) righfully argued she could not get a fair trial in DC after the results of 2024 election in Washington. What stands out to me is Levine's deceptive use of a jury survey conducted by Thomas Webster showing DC bias. (DC courts including appellate court denied his argument.) She failed to note in her DOJ brief was that the survey was from 2022--two and a half years before the 2024 election. A crybully and a fraud. Good riddance:

julie_kelly2
Posted - April 29, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 10:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question the integrity of DC appellate court judge Cornelia Pillard, who should recuse herself from cases involving the Trump administration due to her husband, David Cole's, history with the ACLU, where he handled numerous lawsuits against Trump. Despite his ongoing influence, she remains on panels that could impact these cases. Cole, now writing for the NY Review of Books, continues to criticize the administration and strategize against its policies, including potential deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, which has already led to a lawsuit involving Judge Jeb Boasberg.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

If DC appellate court judge Cornelia Pillard had one ounce of integrity, she would recuse from any case involving lawsuits against the Trump adm. Her husband, David Cole, last summer retired as legal director of the ACLU--which is suing the Trump adm in several jurisdictions related to the president's immigration policies. During his 8-year run at ACLU, Cole handled more than 400 lawsuits against Trump 45 administration. Does anyone doubt he is still advising his former employer about how to proceed with lawsuits against Trump 47? But rather than step aside, Pillard sits on DC appellate panels to consider several appeals by the Trump adm. While none currently involve the ACLU, her ability to remain impartial is highly in doubt.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Cole now writes for the NY Review of Books, where he rages about the Trump adm and gives advice on how to "resist." Here are a few recent headline gems from Judge Cornelia Pillard's husband. She has recently been named to the panel to preside over the high profile case of Biden's climate lottery recipients v Citibank.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

In a Dec 2024 interview with The Nation, David Cole already was prepping how to fight the president's potential use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport illegals. The ACLU was the first to file a lawsuit attempting to ban the use of the AEA, which the president had signed on March 14. The case "randomly" landed on the docket of Judge Jeb Boasberg. Cole and Boasberg both attended Yale Law School (although Boasberg graduated 6 years after Cole.)

julie_kelly2
Posted - April 29, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 1:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it striking that former employees and prosecutors have remained silent about the actions of DC U.S. Attorney Matt Graves, a Biden appointee. He has pursued harsh penalties for low-level misdemeanors and misused a corporate fraud statute to label political protesters as felons. Additionally, he invoked a post-Civil War seditious conspiracy statute against mostly nonviolent individuals based on their political beliefs. The office has also sought severe prison recommendations, withheld evidence, and contributed to the tragic outcomes for some J6ers. The notion of fair justice seems far from reality.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

These same former employees and prosecutors (some left the office 50+ years ago) said nothing when DC U.S. Attorney Matt Graves, a Biden appointee whose wife was close with Biden and Harris, rounded up hundreds of Americans on lowlevel federal misdemeanors and recommend prison time. These hacks had nothing to say when DC U.S. Attys office unlawfully used a corporate fraud statute to turn hundreds of political protesters into felons. They said nothing when Graves dusted off a post Civil War seditious conspiracy statute to prosecute 2 dozen mostly nonviolent J6ers based on their political affiliations. They said nothing when DC U.S. attorneys office added terror enhancements to prison recommendations; sought pretrial detention for nonviolent protesters; withheld evidence from defendants; withheld video from the public; or caused the suicide of at least 4 J6ers. “The full and fair administration of justice and the rule of law?” Seriously GFY.

@CBSNews - CBS News

Nearly 100 former employees and prosecutors for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington, D.C., have signed a memo opposing President Trump's nominee to lead the office. https://cbsn.ws/4iIq7qH

CBS News | Breaking news, top stories & today's latest headlines CBS News offers breaking news coverage of today's top headlines. Stay informed on the biggest new stories with our balanced, trustworthy reporting. cbsnews.com
julie_kelly2
Posted - April 19, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Saved - April 20, 2025 at 3:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it perplexing how the Supreme Court can state that the Alien Enemies Act is not subject to judicial review while simultaneously halting deportations under it. I'm trying to understand the recent AEA case where the ACLU sought a temporary restraining order for anonymous plaintiffs, aiming to expand it to cover everyone at risk of removal. The Texas judge denied this motion, which led to SCOTUS's reversal of a previous decision. It seems the courts recognize their limited authority in foreign policy matters but are still intervening, possibly due to political factors.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

HAHA someone make it make sense. SCOTUS on left: AEA is not subject to judicial review SCOTUS on right: We halt deportations under the AEA until further notice https://t.co/3fJB7Q7SVj

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Trying to get up to speed on AEA case SCOTUS just weighed in on. Just like the case before Jeb Boasberg, ACLU filed a suit seeking temp restraining order for a few anonymous plaintiffs covered by Alien Enemies Act proclamation. ACLU then immediately asked the judge to convert the anonymous plaintiffs into a class wide TRO covering EVERYONE who might be subject to removal under AEA in that jurisdiction (which is one reason why SCOTUS reversed Boasberg--none of the illegals were in DC) The Texas judge in this case denied TRO motion and motion to turn 2 suspected TdA Venezuelans (who both entered US illegally in 2023) into a class--which is why SCOTUS cited "putative" class. Appellate court--scolding ACLU for another rushed timeline--upheld decision by the Texas judge.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

In his order, Hendrix AGAIN noted the judicial branch's lack of authority in reviewing the president's issuance of the Alien Enemies Act. SO WHAT EXACTLY ARE WE DOING HERE? By the way, even Jeb Boasberg in a March order acknowledged the "often-circumscribed extent of judicial power in matters of foreign policy and national security." Basically the courts' arguments are--we don't really have authority under Article III to interfere in the president's exercise of the Alien Enemies Act but we are doing it anyway because Trump.

julie_kelly2
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 9:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it perplexing that Jeb Boasberg seems to show leniency towards violent offenders while being harsh on nonviolent individuals involved in the January 6 events. Recently, he sentenced a man with a troubling criminal history to just 24 months for serious firearms violations, despite the DOJ recommending 34 months. This is particularly striking when compared to the harsher sentence given to a woman with no prior record related to January 6. It's frustrating and leaves me speechless.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

One really has to wonder why Jeb Boasberg coddles violent criminals after throwing the book at nonviolent J6ers. This morning, he sentenced a DC man with a dangerous criminal history to only 24 months in prison on firearms violations. DOJ: "He possessed the gun and ammunition in April 2024 while on supervised release for 2021 convictions for Assault with Intent to Kill (Firearm) and Carrying a Pistol Without a License. Those convictions arose out of the defendant’s participation in a late-night shootout at a gas station, which posed an extraordinary risk to the people involved and the general public. " The DOJ asked for 34 months--Boasberg went 10 months below that. But only 10 months longer than he gave a Pennsylvania woman with no criminal record convicted of no violence on Jan 6.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Just no words https://t.co/CA9Sp6jHRz

julie_kelly2
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 9:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw that the Trump DOJ filed an appeal regarding Boasberg's criminal contempt finding. Honestly, the contempt order seems completely outrageous to me. I've shared my thoughts on Boasberg's ruling in more detail.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: Trump DOJ just filed its appeal of Boasberg criminal contempt finding

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This is SO well said--and really encapsulates how f*cking batshit crazy Boasberg's contempt order is.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

My summary of Boasberg's contempt finding here: https://www.declassified.live/p/jeb-boasbergs-criminal-contempt-finding?r=4yy1i&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

Jeb Boasberg's "Criminal Contempt" Finding Makes Mockery of Separation of Powers After setting the contempt trap, Judge James Boasberg today snapped the trap shut with a wild 46-page opinion accusing Trump officials of "willful disregard" for his now vacated court orders. declassified.live
julie_kelly2
Posted - April 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 9:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it stunning that the ACLU and Jeb Boasberg are moving forward with the Alien Enemies Act lawsuit, seemingly ignoring the Supreme Court's recent ruling. Despite SCOTUS vacating Boasberg's temporary restraining orders, the ACLU filed another motion for a new restraining order, claiming Boasberg still has jurisdiction. They are seeking to notify class members designated as 'alien enemies' and facilitate their communication with attorneys. Additionally, the ACLU plans to expand the class to include illegals not currently in custody, aiming for their eventual release into communities.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Stunning to watch the ACLU and Jeb Boasberg ignore the Supreme Court--who is in contempt now?--and advance the Alien Enemies Act lawsuit despite SCOTUS vacating Boasberg's two temporary restraining orders banning the removal of illegal Venezuelans covered by the president's AEA proclamation. After the SCOTUS decision, Boasberg brazenly asked the ACLU to "file a notice indicating whether they believe that they still have a basis to proceed on their Motion for Preliminary Injunction in this Court." It was due yesterday, the same day Boasberg issued his contempt finding against the Trump adm. The ACLU, despite SCOTUS determining DC was the improper jurisdiction, just filed ANOTHER motion seeking a new temp restraining order on behalf of the illegals. The ACLU argued Boasberg still has jurisdiction in the matter. Here is what the ACLU is seeking--and Boasberg just set a briefing schedule on the latest proposed TRO with a hearing set for Monday. "To provide notice to each class member that they have been designated as an 'alien enemy' under the Alien Enemies Act at least 30 days prior to any attempt to remove that class member from the United States under the AEA. The notice must be in both English and Spanish, and must clearly state that the class member has the right to contact an attorney and to challenge their designation and removal in court. For each class member, this notice must be provided to the class member, class counsel in this case, and the class member’s immigration attorney of record, if they have one and to facilitate each class member’s ability to communicate with family members and counsel, by providing regular access to confidential phone calls, and to in-person meetings if an attorney requests it." (BTW I was assured by some "legal experts" the ACLU would not pursue this course and if they did, Boasberg would not allow it.)

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The second written TRO issued by Boasberg on the evening of March 15 converted the initial five unnamed illegals covered by the AEA into a class wide lawsuit protecting ALL potential AEA subjects in US custody from deportation. Despite what SCOTUS said (on the left), the ACLU--now apparently with Boasberg's consent--claims the Supreme Court did not vacate the part of Boasberg's TRO that addressed the class wide determination. (On right) Regardless, the ACLU argues, Boasberg can reissue classwide status AND include illegals NOT in custody, which would expand the class from his original order.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The ACLU says it may seek class certification for illegal suspected TdA members who are in CRIMINAL custody with active detainers against them. Make no mistake--the ACLU is not doing all of this just to keep the illegals in permanent custody in the US. They want these illegals eventually released into our communities--there is no other explanation.

julie_kelly2
Posted - April 17, 2025 at 2:45 AM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 9:54 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

There was always a reason this “Maryland dad” was on the top of the deportation list. Now we know

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Wow @TheTNStar just broke a huge story. You know the illegal immigrant that Democrats are trying to free from an El Salvador prison? In 2022, he was stopped driving without a license and Tennessee Highway Patrol suspected him of trafficking the 7 people inside. THP then learned he was on a terrorist watch list so they called Biden’s FBI but Biden’s FBI told THP to RELEASE HIM. Kilmar Abrego Garcia was then released due to the Biden FBI order and the THP concerns about trafficking were ignored by the government. This is on top of a court + Maryland Police finding that they believe he was in MS-13 and his wife reporting that he beat her when filing for a protective order. This is who Democrats want in our country. This is who they’re fighting for. Evil! Link to full story: https://tennesseestar.com/justice/bidens-fbi-ordered-tn-highway-patrol-to-release-maryland-man-recently-deported-to-el-salvador-after-he-was-detained-in-2022-traffic-stop-on-suspicion-of-human-trafficking/tpappert/2025/04/16/ Incredible scoop by @realTomPappert and the @thetnstar team @michaelpleahy!

Biden's FBI Ordered TN Highway Patrol to Release 'Maryland Man' Recently Deported to El Salvador After He Was Detained in 2022 Traffic Stop on Suspicion of Human Trafficking - Tennessee Star The Tennessee Star learned on Wednesday that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an alleged member of the South American gang Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) who was deported to El Salvador under President Donald Trump amid legal action claiming the removal was by mistake, was suspected of being engaged in human trafficking by a Tennessee Highway Patrol (THP) officer who detained him in his vehicle on December 6, 2022. tennesseestar.com
julie_kelly2
Posted - April 17, 2025 at 11:39 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 9:54 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

So proud of my courageous friend @BrandonStraka

@BrandonStraka - Brandon Straka #WalkAway

January 6th: The Truth About My Case My short film documentary drops right now. It exposes how the FBI and DOJ built their case on lies, twisted facts, and forced a false confession to destroy my reputation and silence my voice. After 4 years of having the truth silenced by a corrupt plea deal, I can finally share what really happened without fear of reprisal — thanks to my pardon. Includes never-before-seen footage proving my innocence. The FBI agent behind targeting me with lies and false accusations? Jeremy Desor. Still collecting a paycheck from the FBI. Watch it. Share it. Demand answers. @Kash_Patel @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino @dbongino @realDonaldTrump @elonmusk The truth matters.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brandon Straka claims he was wrongfully charged and convicted by the DOJ and FBI for actions on January 6th, despite being innocent. He states FBI agents raided his apartment and arrested him, charging him with felonies: knowingly occupying restricted grounds, impeding law enforcement, and a misdemeanor for disorderly conduct. Straka says the case was based on a video he shot and uploaded to Twitter. He claims he was a scheduled speaker at a permitted event and wanted to document the events at the Capitol. He says he saw no barricades or police preventing people from walking toward the Capitol. He admits to repeating "We're going in," but says he was quoting someone else. He also admits to shouting "Go, go," but says it was to help women exit the crowd, not to encourage entry. Straka says he joined in a "USA" chant, but denies shouting "take the shield." Straka says he plead guilty to a misdemeanor to avoid a trial where he was guaranteed to be found guilty on multiple felonies, even though he maintains his innocence. He says the government's lies have damaged his reputation, career, and organization, Walk Away.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Brandon Strak, and I was wrongfully charged and convicted by the United States DOJ and FBI. I plead guilty, but I was innocent. For four years, I've had my name, my reputation, and my life shattered by the lies told by my government, but I've never been free until now to tell the truth about what actually happened. This is my story. On the morning of 01/25/2021, I woke up at dawn to a team of FBI agents in tactical gear raiding my apartment. Within thirty seconds, I had my hands cuffed behind my back as the lead agent told me that I was facing multiple felony charges for what I had done on January 6. I reflexively replied felonies. I didn't even commit any crimes. The agents began tearing my apartment apart, seizing my computers, phones, iPads, hard drives, thumb drives, cameras, clothing, and more. Then they took me to jail. I sat in jail for two and a half days before I was released. I replayed my memories of January 6 in my head over and over again trying to figure out what crimes I could possibly be charged with. I never entered the capital on January 6. I didn't engage in any violence, vandalism, theft, or destruction, nor did I witness any. I was never present for the riot that had occurred on the west side of the building. So what have I done? My attorney said, you're being charged with two felonies and a misdemeanor, and the government's threatening to add a third felony charge. Felony number one, knowingly occupying restricted grounds. Felony number two, impeding law enforcement. And a misdemeanor, disorderly conduct with an intent to disrupt a hearing before congress. I was shocked as none of these charges made any sense. The entire case against me was based on a video I shot myself and uploaded to Twitter on January 6. To fully understand my confusion, let me explain the context of the situation. On 01/06/2021, I was a scheduled speaker for a permitted event to take place on Capitol Grounds. As I was on my way to the Capitol to speak, I began getting text messages from people saying that they were hearing on the news that there was a disruption at the capital and that people were going inside the building. As somebody who has very little faith in the media, I wanted to see for myself if what the media was reporting was true. And I wanted to capture what was happening myself on video for the benefit of my over 1,500,000 social media followers. I started shooting a video when I was at least a block away from the capital, walking toward the building and the crowd. The first thing that you'll notice in my video is that the people on the outer grounds are very calm and subdued. Nothing seems to indicate that there's any trouble ahead. The second thing you'll notice is that there's no closed barricades preventing people from walking up to the Capitol Building. The barricades are fully open. There are no signs to indicate that it's not okay to advance forward. No police officers or security agents anywhere in sights, and there are at least hundreds of people standing on the other side of the open bike rack. Nobody could possibly know they'd be committing a crime by simply joining the large crowd ahead. Nonetheless, according to the government, this is the moment that I committed my first felony, knowingly occupying restricted grounds. To this day, nobody's ever explained to me how I knew that I was occupying restricted grounds, but that didn't stop the government from definitively saying that I did. I continued to walk forward calmly toward the crowd. I can even be heard saying excuse me to the people in front of me. Excuse me, sir. Oh, yeah. Excuse me. Not exactly the demeanor someone might expect from somebody who's moments away from trying to overthrow the United States government. As I walked up the steps, I passed a number of people. None of them were trying to storm the building or get inside. They were all facing away from the building. Most of them looked bored on their phones and these men had a statue of Jesus and a sign that read Jesus saves. I continued to climb the steps and then I heard a man say, we're going in. They opened the doors. The doors are open. I repeated the words the man said verbatim and then I added, the people are going in. Look at this. We're going in. Stay open the door. We're going in. The people are going in. Look at this. But in the government's account, they omitted that I was repeating the words of the man next to me and removed the context of my statement, instead making it seem like me saying we're going in was my idea. And sure enough, when I got to the top of the stairs, the doors on the East Side of the capital were wide open. Now listen carefully. I said East side. I was on the opposite side of the capital as the West Side where the riot had occurred. None of that was happening where I was. I never saw it. I never knew anything about it. I had absolutely no knowledge at this point that anybody had broken any windows or had any physical altercations with police officers on the other side. And speaking of police officers, where were they? Far I'd walked peacefully onto Capitol Grounds and up to the top of the Capitol Stairs where the two large Columbus doors, which can only be unlocked from the inside by deactivating the magnetic lock, were both wide open. No police officers anywhere in sight. Which is very interesting because in my statement of offense, the government blatantly lied stating, For somebody who is represented by the government and the media as an integral instigator in the insurrection, reality shows that I was actually rather confused. Are people going in? I asked the people around me. Are people going in? Minutes later, standing shoulder to shoulder with hundreds of people, two young women tried to push their way out of the crowd causing the crowd to sway and people to begin losing their footing. I took a step back to create opening for the girls and I hollered, go go. Go. Go. And the young lady immediately responded to me saying, I'm going left. I'm going left. I'm going left. I'm going left. But the government lied once again, again removing the context of my statement and saying that I shouted, go, go, to encourage the crowd to storm the building. They even added a third go that I never said to make it sound more emphatic. Go. But what happened next gave the government exactly the ammunition that they needed to destroy my reputation. Now it's very important to know, I was holding my camera above my head and pointing it down toward the door because the people in front of me were taller than me and holding flags on poles and I could not see what was in front of me. So I zoomed in all the way, went a % on my camera and held my camera up so that it could capture what my eyes could not see. One officer appears in the crowd carrying his plastic shield above his head. A few members had zero awareness of what had happened. At no point at all was I aware of what was going on. I was just trying to keep my balance and keep my camera pointed at the door. However, a few seconds later, the crowd began chanting USA. USA. USA. USA. USA. USA. And as someone who never misses out on an opportunity to join in with the crowd chanting USA, I joined right in. USA. USA. USA. And according to the FBI and DOJ, this is when I committed my second felony, impeding law enforcement. Because you see, they blamed me for shouting about the shield. But it wasn't even that straightforward. When the FBI raided my house and took me to jail, they put out an eight page charging document, a press release stating that I was the voice shouting, take the shield, take the shield, take the shield away from him. I immediately told my attorney this wasn't true. In fact, I had never even watched my own video since I posted it on January 6. I actually had to watch my own video for the first time after being arrested to even see the moment in question, but it's actually easy to hear for yourself. The voices shouting about the shield sound farther away from my voice and come predominantly out of the right speaker. My voice sounds closer and comes predominantly out of the left speaker. USA. USA. USA. My attorney was working on getting the government to drop the felony charges against me, and what happened next was stunning. He told the DOJ that I would not take ownership of shouting take the shield, take the shield, take the shield away from him. The prosecutor responded saying that she agreed that I might not be the voice shouting take the shield, but that she thought that maybe I was the other voice, the voice shouting take it, take it. We were told if I was going to allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, felonies dropped, I would have to take ownership of this act, which I unequivocally did not do. My attorney told me the FBI already put out a release saying that you did this. They're not gonna say that they made a mistake. You're gonna have to give them something. So I have to confess to something I didn't do because the FBI agent ruining my life with false accusations might be embarrassed? Are you fucking kidding me? But in the interest of avoiding a bogus trial in Washington DC where I was guaranteed to be found guilty on multiple felonies, that's exactly what I did. Years after my arrest and conviction, this footage was sent to me. It's never been seen before. It was shot outside the building at the time of the shield incident and for several brief moments, you can see me in the crowd. It's me struggling to keep my balance and struggling to keep my camera up in the air and pointed at the doors which were 35 feet away. There was literally no way for me to know what was going on with the shield. But the government and the media created a public spectacle saying that I was the ringleader of this event. After eight minutes, a man came out of the capital and said the building had been evacuated and everybody needed to move out. I immediately turned around and told the people behind me to move out and to leave because the building had been evacuated. People were still entering the capital, but I left of my own volition and told others to as well. Everyone needs to go this way. They everyone's evacuated. And that's it. That is in totality everything that I did on January 6, including every allegation of criminal activity against me by the FBI and DOJ. There's nothing I've left out. This was the entirety of my involvement in what would be called an attempt to overthrow the US government. This is what justified the most powerful agencies and institutions in the world to destroy almost every aspect of my life and make me the subject of multiple felony criminal charges, a civil lawsuit, years of federal investigations, mass banning and deplatforming, subpoenas and depositions by the January 6 committee, travel bans and restrictions, and placement on multiple government terrorism watch lists. You see, there's no justice in January 6 cases. Even the ones with a basis of truth are lies. This was never a question of how do I win or how do I lose. It was always a question of how do I lose the least. The government's lies about January 6 and my participation in it have permanently damaged my name, my reputation, my career, my finances, my relationships with friends, family, and so much more. Their lies have given the media the fodder they needed to tell stories about me like this. Speaker 1: Stryker was arrested on multiple charges including impeding law enforcement during civil disorder, a felony which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison. Speaker 0: Brandon Straka was also involved in the official planning and programming around the insurrection. Yeah. The take the shield, take the shield, that's him yelling documenting it. But I don't think he did even go into the capitals. His name is Brandon Stracha. He confessed. He confessed to being guilty. He was found to helping attack police. Their lies caused federal law enforcement to raid my home like they were looking for Osama bin Laden and put me in jail and then on house arrest and then on four years of federal supervision. I will never again be the person that I once was. I'll never have the career I might have once had. My organization, Walk Away, will never be what it would have been if none of this had ever happened. But as difficult as all of that is to live with, I don't know that anything has been as bad as having to spend the last four years unable to tell the truth about what actually happened on January 6 and clear my name. But now you do know the truth about my story in January 6. Please share it with as many people as you possibly can and help me make sure that the United States government never again does something like this to one of its own citizens.
julie_kelly2
Posted - April 6, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Saved - April 6, 2025 at 7:42 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

A dozen of our toughest guys at DOJ and FBI cannot possibly in 10 weeks immediately identify and remove every single bad actor in a 100,000+ employee dept with a long history of corruption. Be patient and get a grip. Encourage them instead of giving them sh*t. It’s happening.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

MORE: It appears Trump DOJ is purging establishment DOJ officials who are sabotaging key immigration lawsuits against the Trump administration. This guy also on the Boasberg AEA lawsuit on behalf of DOJ. The rot is deep and wide. https://t.co/wl1u8scizw

julie_kelly2
Posted - April 5, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Saved - April 5, 2025 at 11:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
My Saturday off was short-lived as I received the transcript from Thursday's hearing with Jeb Boasberg. It revealed intriguing details about the timeline of events on March 15. Boasberg's claim that cases are randomly assigned seems dubious, especially since he appeared unprepared for the hearing, suggesting he anticipated it. His frustration with the Trump administration stemmed from their actions under the Alien Enemies Act without his approval, indicating a troubling view of judicial power. Additionally, his questioning of a DOJ attorney about who was listening to the hearing felt inappropriate.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

My plan to take Saturday off lasted about 13 minutes. I have just received the (purchased) transcript from Thursday's hearing before Jeb Boasberg. Lots of good stuff especially as I develop a fuller timeline of what went down behind the scenes on March 15. This really caught my eye. Remember the whole "THESE CASES ARE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED" bit by Boasberg and others? No one really believes this...right? Also--during the start of the 5pm Zoom hearing on March 15, Boasberg apologized for his casual dress saying he had gone "away" for the weekend and did not bring a tie or his robe. He knew this case was coming. He wanted this case. He wanted to stop the deportations and most importantly--he wanted to set a contempt trap for the Trump administration.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

One source of Boasberg's beef with Trump adm is that they dared to prepare and then deport illegals under President Trump's Alien Enemies Act proclamation without HIS approval. He has suggested repeatedly that since HE had scheduled a 5pm hearing to consider turning the ACLU lawsuit into a class action covering ALL illegals under AEA that the Trump adm should have waited until HE acted before proceeding. This is not judicial restraint or a careful balance of powers. This is Boasberg giving away the notion that the executive branch should WAIT FOR APPROVAL from the judicial branch before taking action on matters clearly under the purview of the presidency including foreign policy and diplomacy. Boasberg knew throughout the day that ICE was rounding up the TdA gang bangers covered by the proclamation. So he rushed not only to convert the initial lawsuit into a class, but entered a second temporary restraining order prohibiting their removal and absurdly demanding the return of planes carrying the illegals.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

One set of exchanges during Thursday's hearing I believed was way out of line for Boasberg was his interrogation of DOJ atty Drew Ensign over which Trump officials were listening to the 5pm hearing on March 15. On what basis can he demand those answers? https://t.co/8wrNN766Y0

julie_kelly2
Posted - April 1, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Saved - April 1, 2025 at 8:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall the NY FBI field office chief who left amid bagpipes and emotional staff after resigning for insubordination linked to the internal investigation of the FBI's handling of January 6 cases. James Dennehy was also tied to the Hunter Biden laptop coverup. In 2020, he led the Counterintelligence and Cyber Division.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Remember the NY FBI field office chief who strutted out of the building last month to bagpipers and weeping FBI employees after being asked to resign for insubordination related to internal investigation of FBI’s handling of J6 cases? James Dennehy was involved in the Hunter Biden laptop coverup. In 2020, Dennehy was special agent in charge of NY FBI’s Counterintelligence and Cyber Division.

@C__Herridge - Catherine Herridge

BREAKING: FBI Imposed  “Gag Order” About Hunter Biden Laptop After Employee Accidentally Confirmed Its Authenticity To Twitter   Newly released internal FBI chat messages reveal senior bureau officials actively shutting down discussion of the laptop’s credibility days before the 2020 Presidential election This is a CatherineHerridgeReports @C__Herridge  / Public @Shellenberger Joint Investigation An FBI official admitted to House investigators that an FBI employee had inadvertently confirmed the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop to Twitter on a conference call the morning of October 14, 2020, the day the New York Post published a story about it.  “I recall that when the question came up, an intelligence analyst assigned to the Criminal Investigative Division said something to the effect of, ‘Yes, the laptop is real’,” the then Russia unit chief testified in a closed door transcribed interview. “I believe it was an (Office of General Counsel) attorney assigned to the (Foreign Influence Task Force) stepped in and said, ‘We will not comment further on this topic.’” For the first time, and with a change of administration, the FBI has now turned over to GOP House investigators the internal chat messages that show Bureau leadership actively silenced its employees.   The FBI, which had a special task force to counter foreign election interference, could have set the record straight by confirming the laptop was real and the subject of an ongoing criminal probe. Instead, FBI leadership allowed the false narrative about the laptop to gain momentum. The FBI provided the chat messages to congressional investigators with heavy redactions. Some of the redactions on the chats are marked “OGC AGC,” which appears to mean that they were made by the FBI’s Office of General Counsel and Associate General Counsel.  An individual whose name is blacked out, tells Elvis M. Chan, the San Francisco-based FBI special agent tasked with interacting with social media companies, there was a “gag order” on discussion of Hunter Biden’s laptop. In a separate exchange, Chan is told “official response no commen(t).” In the chat, the FBI officials showed awareness that the laptop may have contained evidence of criminal activity. Asked Chan, “actually what kind of case is the laptop thing? corruption? campaign financing?” Another FBI employee responds, “CLOSE HOLD —” after which the response is redacted.  To which Chan responds, “oh crap” appearing to underscore the serious nature of the probe, which included felony tax charges. Chan adds, “ok. It ends here”. In the same conversation, Chan is asked if “Anyone discussing that NYPost article on the Biden’s?”  Chan responds, “yes we are. c d confirmed an active investigation. No further comment.”  “C D” is likely shorthand for the FBI’s Criminal Division. Said another FBI employee, whose name was redacted by the Bureau, “please do not discuss biden matter.” We asked for a response from the bureau and the FBI employees identified in the chat messages. An FBI spokesman declined to comment. We go in-depth on the chat messages for subscribers!

julie_kelly2
Posted - March 26, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 11:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it interesting that Jeb Boasberg was “randomly” assigned to the Signal chat lawsuit. Nothing in that courthouse happens by chance. This feels like a deliberate move against the administration regarding the Venezuelan illegals lawsuit and their request to reassign the case.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

One thing about Jeb Boasberg being “randomly” assigned to Signal chat lawsuit. Nothing in that courthouse happens on accident. This is an intentional FU to the administration related to the Venezuelan illegals lawsuit , for invoking state secret privilege, and asking circuit court to reassign the case to another judge.

julie_kelly2
Posted - March 23, 2025 at 9:54 PM
Saved - March 24, 2025 at 11:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jeb Boasberg is now insisting that the DOJ provide detailed information about flights carrying illegals linked to foreign terrorist organizations. However, he previously dismissed requests from January 6 defendants for similar transparency. In Ryan Zink's case, Boasberg denied a motion for evidence regarding undercover agents, absurdly expecting Zink to identify them himself. A year later, he mocked Zink for not providing evidence of Antifa's presence, despite police body cam footage and videos showing Antifa-clad individuals near the Capitol.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Jeb Boasberg is now demanding that the DOJ provide granular details about flights carrying illegals suspected of being part of a foreign terrorist organization. But Boasberg--like all of his DC colleagues on the bench--had no such devotion to what he now calls "fact finding" and routinely denied J6ers' requests to get details about Jan 6 from the DOJ. In the case of Ryan Zink, Boasberg denied his pre-trial motion for evidence related to undercovers, informants, and Antifa members. His reasoning here is farcical: Zink was supposed to identify suspected undercovers or instigators on his own?

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

A year later--Boasberg mocked Zink and others for never producing evidence of Antifa presence--even though police are on body cams talking about looking for Antifa and Antifa-clad individuals also are on video outside the Capitol. Boasberg sure likes defending suspected terrorists...

julie_kelly2
Posted - March 23, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Saved - March 24, 2025 at 1:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In September 2023, I was sentenced to 14 months in federal prison by Jeb Boasberg, primarily due to a 1512c2 conviction, with no other felony charges against me. Despite the impending SCOTUS review of the statute, Boasberg proceeded with my sentencing. A week before, my defense team had filed for certiorari after a divided DC appellate court upheld the DOJ's use of the statute. SCOTUS later granted cert in December 2023, and Boasberg released me in February 2024. This experience has been a significant waste of time and resources, deeply affecting my family and me.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Jeb Boasberg in Sept 2023 sentenced 60-year-old Sandra Weyer to 14 months in federal prison. A 1512c2 conviction drove the length of that sentence--she faced no other felony count. Boasberg sent Weyer to prison on the 1512c2 conviction even though everyone by that point knew the statute was headed for SCOTUS review. In April 2023, the DC appellate court had issued a "splintered" decision barely upholding DOJ's use of the post-Enron corporate fraud statute. Defense lawyers filed application for writ of certiorari a week before Boasberg ordered Weyer to prison. SCOTUS granted cert in the Fischer 1512c2 case in Dec 2023--Boasberg granted her motion for release in Feb 2024. A complete waste of time and resources at great personal cost to Weyer and her family.

julie_kelly2
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Saved - March 20, 2025 at 10:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A sworn statement from an attorney representing five Venezuelans suing the Trump administration confirms their removal from a plane to El Salvador. This counters claims that the administration ignored a court order. One participant highlights the ACLU's involvement in blocking deportations of a designated terrorist group, criticizing the legal costs incurred by taxpayers. They also mention major donors to the ACLU, including the Open Society Foundations, Ford Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation, and note the ACLU's partnerships with other organizations on civil rights issues.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This new sworn statement signed by an attorney representing one of the five illegal Venezuelans suing Trump adm over the Alien Enemies appears to confirm the five were removed from a plane headed to El Salvador on Saturday evening. So the morons claiming Trump adm ignored a court order related to the original lawsuit and Boasberg's 1st temporary restraining order can STFU. And boy I can't help but think how lucky these illegals are to have a huge stable of lawyers to go to bat for them...good thing they weren't at the Capitol on January 6, 2021!

@RobinNunya14 - Robin

Folks want to know something interesting? The ACLU sued to block @POTUS from deporting members of a designated terrorist group, and a rogue activist judge sided with them. This is just one of countless lawsuits where they’re not only undermining our Constitution but also sticking taxpayers with millions in legal defense costs. @DOGE, two NGOs are bankrolling the ACLU—cut off their funding now. Did you know that the TOP Donors of ACLU are: 💥 Open Society Foundations (George Soros) – As mentioned, Soros’s foundation is one of the largest donors to the ACLU, particularly in funding campaigns around civil rights and justice reform. 💥 Ford Foundation – The Ford Foundation is another large philanthropic organization that has provided substantial funding to the ACLU, especially in areas related to social justice, racial equality, and human rights. 💥The Rockefeller Foundation – The Rockefeller Foundation has historically supported many initiatives related to human rights and justice, including the ACLU's advocacy. NGO Support: Though the ACLU mostly relies on individual donors and foundations, it partners with organizations, especially civil rights and social justice groups, to bolster its efforts. Ex: 💥The National Immigration Law Center (NILC) – The NILC collaborates with the ACLU on issues related to immigrant rights. 💥 The Brennan Center for Justice – The Brennan Center has worked alongside the ACLU on various legal issues, such as voting rights and criminal justice reform. @DOGE @elonmusk @DOGECommittee @PressSec @POTUS @VP @HouseGOP @SenateGOP

julie_kelly2
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Saved - March 20, 2025 at 8:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A conversation began with a comment about a sworn statement from an attorney representing five Venezuelans suing the Trump administration, indicating they were removed from a plane to El Salvador. The initial speaker criticized claims that the administration ignored a court order, expressing frustration over the legal support available to the plaintiffs. In response, another participant expressed disbelief that a lawyer would represent illegal Venezuelans suing the President, suggesting that individuals who dislike the country are prevalent.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This new sworn statement signed by an attorney representing one of the five illegal Venezuelans suing Trump adm over the Alien Enemies appears to confirm the five were removed from a plane headed to El Salvador on Saturday evening. So the morons claiming Trump adm ignored a court order related to the original lawsuit and Boasberg's 1st temporary restraining order can STFU. And boy I can't help but think how lucky these illegals are to have a huge stable of lawyers to go to bat for them...good thing they weren't at the Capitol on January 6, 2021!

@MiDiamondDave - 🇺🇸MI_DiamondDave🇺🇸

@julie_kelly2 A lawyer representing an illegal Venezuelan that is suing President Trump? I can't even believe I just read this. People that hate this country are embedded everywhere.

julie_kelly2
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Saved - March 20, 2025 at 8:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a sworn statement from an attorney for one of the five Venezuelans suing the Trump administration, confirming they were removed from a plane to El Salvador. This seems to counter claims that the administration ignored a court order. It's striking how these individuals have a strong legal team backing them, especially considering the events of January 6, 2021. Additionally, I'm curious about why Jeb Boasberg is still seeking information about the flights related to these cases.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This new sworn statement signed by an attorney representing one of the five illegal Venezuelans suing Trump adm over the Alien Enemies appears to confirm the five were removed from a plane headed to El Salvador on Saturday evening. So the morons claiming Trump adm ignored a court order related to the original lawsuit and Boasberg's 1st temporary restraining order can STFU. And boy I can't help but think how lucky these illegals are to have a huge stable of lawyers to go to bat for them...good thing they weren't at the Capitol on January 6, 2021!

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

What do we have here? This is one of the anonymous 5 illegals. So why is Jeb Boasberg still demanding details about the flights? https://t.co/ce1dPb6lBU

View Full Interactive Feed