reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @juneslater17

Saved - January 7, 2025 at 4:21 AM

@juneslater17 - June Slater

How can a government decide an 11 year old child has made a lifestyle choice to be gang raped, and urinated on as punishment for not enjoying it? The police were Instructed to drop investigations into child rape gangs! https://t.co/F9VNvaOVvt

Video Transcript AI Summary
I recently watched a 2010 interview of Tommy Robinson by Jeremy Paxman. Paxman, an educated presenter, confronted Robinson, a working-class man who initially fought against the system through the EDL but later distanced himself from it. Despite his past, the media continues to highlight it while ignoring serious issues like child abuse by individuals in powerful positions, such as the BBC's Jimmy Savile. Robinson is currently in jail for contempt of court, a victimless crime, while others with similar offenses receive lighter sentences. The systemic failures that allowed Pakistani grooming gangs to operate unchecked are alarming. Robinson attempted to raise awareness about these issues, and I view him as a political prisoner facing harsh treatment for speaking out against a corrupt system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've just watched a video and shared it on Twitter, Twitter X, of Tommy Robinson on Jeremy Paxman, presumed news map back in 2,010. Were Paxman, an aloof TV presenter at the end of the day with an exceptional education who went on to host university challenge, an academic, I suppose you could call him. He's faced with a a working class lad who fought back against the system the only way he knew how. And later, as he grew up, realized that maybe that wasn't the way to do it, and he left his early beginnings of the EDL. But the media remind you of that every time they talk about him. And yet, we've got people who have been in official jobs, who have been looking at child porn, and it's not porn, is it? It's child abuse. We've got people who have managed to have a career at the BBC and get away with it for decades. Jimmy Saville for 1. When I watched the video of Tommy Robinson explaining what he saw happening in his hometown with the, growing implications of Islamification, I saw a brave young man in the lion's den, really, at the BBC, back in the day, 2010, when the BBC was still basically a trusted voice. They hadn't unearthed Jimmy Savile then. So my thoughts are that Tommy Robinson, who's now sitting in jail because the attorney general decided on putting him there the attorney general is a political appointee. He's a labor peer working for a labor government who's decided that for a a victimless crime, which is what contempt is, there's no victim in this crime. Nobody's off work sick. Nobody's injured. Nobody's distressed. Is to sit in a jail cell for 18 months in solitary confinement, allegedly for his own protection, when other people who have had contempt of court sentences have been given open prisons, fines, ankle tags. I find it very harsh, especially when for decades, Pakistani led rape gangs have got away with it. They've got away with abuse of 100 of thousands of children and merely because these people had also slotted themselves into society in powerful positions on councils and whatever influence they have within the police. How can a police service investigate when they get a directive from a Labour government headed by Gordon Brown at the time that these girls, these 11 12 year old girls, were making a lifestyle choice and not to investigate any further. Even the Pakistani lawyer who handled the grooming gang cases at the time put that information out in 2,017. How can you make a a lifestyle choice at 11 And 12, how can you decide you want to be gang raped? How can you decide you want to be punished by being urinated on because you haven't lived up to your expectations of being gang raped? How can you be raped with a broken bottle because you refuse? In fact, you beg them to stop. How is that making a lifestyle choice? What sort of soulless people have been in charge of our systems to allow Britain to descend in this debaucherous system that's allowed this to happen. So I see Tommy Robinson as a man who tried to speak out and warn people about what's happening, and suddenly, the world and his brother is commentating on it. I see, personally, Tommy Robinson as a political prisoner being dealt with harshly because what he has to say would unravel a den of the equity.
Saved - August 5, 2024 at 4:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that a special law was created just for Kier Starmer, allowing him to save on taxes for his pension after retiring from public prosecutions in 2013. This unique privilege was granted by the Coalition government. Meanwhile, he's cut the Winter Fuel Allowance.

@juneslater17 - June Slater

A special law was passed JUST FOR KIER STARMER to save tax on his pension when he retired from public Prosecutions in 2013. The Coalition government afforded him this unique right. This needs to be known widely. He's just cut The Winter Fuel Allowance... Happy to stand corrected but here's a government document

Saved - April 20, 2024 at 2:35 PM

@juneslater17 - June Slater

A quick clip . The detail is amazing... Save it store it share it https://t.co/hkOkMuneVy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer was criticized for marketing practices, and there are concerns about excess deaths in Australia possibly linked to the vaccine rollout. The vaccines may have systemic harm due to spike protein use. Dr. Tindall warns of potential harm to the immune system and increased cancer risk from disrupting DNA. There are suspicions of hidden cancer-linked DNA in vaccines. A study in Japan suggests a link between vaccines and increased cancer rates. The speaker urges an inquiry into vaccine safety and efficacy and calls for the government to suspend the vaccine rollout.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wrapped Pfizer on the knuckles the 6th time and said their marketing practices had brought the industry into disrepute. They were asked to pay a a paltry £30,000 in administrative expenses with no fine on top. Madam deputy speaker, the person heading the A BPI at the moment is also the head of Pfizer UK. The MHRA have a statutory duty to carry out this this work and has handed the responsibility over to the industry itself. This is an outrageous conflict of interest. So let's turn back to excess deaths. In Australia, the Australian government has launched an inquiry into their excess death problem. Australia is almost unique as a case study for excess deaths. They had the vaccine before they had COVID. Their excess deaths are not so easily to be blamed on the long term side effects of coronavirus, and like us, they saw a rise in deaths that began in May 2021 and has not let up since. The impact was evident on the ambulance service first. South Australia saw a 67% increase in cardiac presentations of 15 to 44 year olds, which peaked in November 2021 before COVID hit. We saw a similar, deeply worrying effect here too. Calls for life threatening emergencies in the UK rose from 2,000 per day to 2,500 per day in May 2021, and it's never returned back to normal. By October 2021, despite it being springtime in Australia, headlines reported on ambulances unable to drop off patients in hospitals that were already at full capacity. Mark McGowan, premier of Western Australia, said he could not explain the overwhelmed hospitals. Our hospitals are under enormous pressure, he said. This has been something no one's ever seen before. Why it is, it's hard to know. And by April 2022, Yvette D'Aathe, Queensland's health minister, said about the most urgent ambulance calls called code ones, and I quote, I don't think anyone can explain why we saw a 40% jump in code ones. We just had a lot of heart attacks, chest pains, and trouble breathing. Respiratory issues, sometimes you can't explain why these things happen, but unfortunately, they do. Madam deputy speaker, I think we can explain why, why this if we look to the link to the vaccine rollout. Omicron did cause some excess deaths in Australia from 2022 onwards. However, there's a huge chunk of excess deaths prior to that which doctors have not been able to blame on on the virus. And again, you know, could this death be caused by the vaccine? Well, very few people even dare to ask that question, madam deputy speaker. And it's important to remember how these vaccines were made. Traditionally, the key to making a vaccine is to ensure that the pathological, the harmful parts of the virus or bacteria are inactivated so the recipient can develop an immune response without the dangers of developing the disease. In stark contrast, these so called COVID vaccines use the most pathological or harmful part of the virus, the spike protein, in its entirety. The harm is systemic because, contrary to what everyone was told, the lipid nanoparticles encapsulating the genetic material spread throughout the whole body after injection, potentially affecting all organs. At the same time, everyone was being reassured that the injection was broken down in the arm and the injection site. Regulators ought to have known these were problems. Furthermore, it's now tentatively evident that the drug results in continued spike protein production for many months, even years in some people. The deaths thus far have been predominantly cardiac, but there may be many more deaths to come, unfortunately, madam deputy speaker, from these novel treatments, and that is from inducing extra cancer deaths. Doctor Robert Tindall is the retired director of clinical medical virology centre in Brisbane and emeritus professor of immunology. This month, Doctor Tindall published a paper highlighting the multiple potential harms from the vaccines, including harm to the immune system, which, as anyone will know who knows anything about biology, anything that disrupts the immune system can potentially increase the risk of cancer. There are many other reasons to be concerned about cancer being induced by these vaccines. Cancer is a genetic disease disorder that arises from errors in the DNA allowing cells to grow uncontrollably. Moderna have multiple patents describing methods for reducing the risk of cancer induction from their mRNA products. This risk comes from the material interrupting the patient's DNA. It turns out that what we were told about the mRNA injection actually has very high quantities of DNA in it. This massively increases the risks of disturbing a patient's own DNA. Worse still, the DNA that was injected contained sequences that were hidden from the regulator. This is the SV 40 or simian virus 40 promoter region, which has been linked to cancer and has been found in the Pfizer vaccines. This was no accident, And an independent study in Japan, published And an independent study in Japan, published last week, has found links between increased cancer rates in Japan and those who took the first and subsequent booster vaccines. Perhaps, madam deputy speaker, that explains why Pfizer acquired a cancer treatment company for a reported $43,000,000,000 earlier this year. In conclusion, madam deputy speaker, it's it's clear. The evidence is clear. These vaccines have caused deaths, and despite this, they've been described as safe and effective. But for a proportion of the people who took them, the vaccines have caused serious harm and death, and they will have raised the risk of cancer to many, many more. They're neither are they effective. The vaccine does not prevent infection or transmission. And when the data is looked at objectively, it does not prevent serious illness or death either. These are very hard truths to face, but we must face them, madam deputy speaker. If we want to learn the lessons of the last few years, at at some point we'll have to face up that all the evidence is is is building. It was it was fairly convincing 18 months when I first spoke out. It is unequivocal now. So I asked the House, it's time to take the politics out of our science and we need to put some actual science back into our politics. I ask the House to support the motion today for, the Baroness Hallett's inquiry to open module 4 on the safety and efficacy of the experimental COVID 19 vaccines. And given the evidence, madam deputy speaker, I call on the government once again to immediately suspend the No. No. No. No.
Saved - February 15, 2024 at 4:05 PM

@juneslater17 - June Slater

This isn't an antivaxxer this is Prof Angus Dalgleish a leading oncologist about the jabs and cancer @jonsopel @thecoastguy https://t.co/qTaqu04i5z

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Angus Doug Leach, an oncology professor, has observed that some of his patients with melanoma experienced relapses after receiving booster vaccines. These relapses were aggressive and required systemic therapy. Additionally, he has noticed an increase in people developing lumps, feeling unwell, and experiencing fatigue after receiving booster shots. Some of these individuals were diagnosed with leukemia, lymphoma, or myeloma. Dr. Leach believes that these occurrences are not coincidental and calls for further investigation to determine if there is a real effect. He suggests halting booster vaccinations if necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Angus Doug Leach. I'm professor of oncology at St. George's, a consult medical oncologist. And I have started to notice that several of my patients have melanoma who've been stable, stage 4 disease, they've had very good immunotherapy or other treatments, and I've been reviewing them some 5 to 20 years, I've noticed that I have now over 6, possibly 7, or even an 8th yesterday, who clearly relapsed following the booster vaccine. At first, we didn't put the 2 together. But when patients said, I felt all falls of the vaccine have just been drained. They describe symptoms of, like, a long COVID. And the next thing we know, 2, 3 weeks, couple of months later, they've got clear evidence of relapse. And these relapses are quite aggressive. They're not a gentle relapse. There are lapses that are requiring systemic therapy as opposed to a little nodule that requires surgical excision. But it's not just this. I'm now very much aware in my own circle of many people who are having, they haven't got melanoma, but they've never had anything before. That they've got lumps and bumps, and they're not feeling well. And 2 people I have interviewed at great length, they all put it down to feeling awful after their stuff. They were fine with the first two vaccines or just had shivers, flu, etcetera. But they've described being very tired, very fatigued, wanted to stay in bed. And this has dragged on to the point where they've gone to a doctor. They've had blood counts and investigations, and I now know 7 of them. 2 of them are leukemias, and the others have, lymphomas. And one of them has a very bad myeloma, which he was absolutely sure was, instigated by the our booster, as he developed the dreadful symptoms. So, really, I want to bring every to everybody's attention that I think this does not look like a coincidence to me. And we nearly, we need to join forces and see if this is a real effect. And if it is, we must stop all the boosters immediately. Thank you.
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 2:29 PM

@juneslater17 - June Slater

👇👇👇 https://t.co/J4qayebPPg

Video Transcript AI Summary
A biopharmaceutical complex has formed, with various organizations and individuals colluding to take advantage of medical emergencies. They meet in Davos, Switzerland and have realized that during a crisis, governments will pour money into the complex. The complex includes the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, Welcome Trust, Rockefeller Foundation, UN, Gavi, UNITATE, CEPI, and regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC. Key figures like Scott Gottlieb and Steven Hahn are involved, with Gottlieb now on Pfizer's board and Hahn supporting Moderna. Even high-ranking officials like Deborah Birx have joined biotech companies. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded massive returns. Overall, it's a money-driven operation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's happened is a biopharmaceutical complex has formed. This is a syndicate. It's a carefully organized syndicate. They've been meeting together in Davos, Switzerland for years on this. And everybody is in on it that what you can see uh-uh in places of wealth and authority in the world. This complex has figured out that in the setting of a medical emergency, in getting the worldwide impetus behind this, that doors of treasuries of governments all over the world will open, and money will pour out into the complex. The complex will invest in itself. The complex will co opt and collude with anybody they need to accomplish this goal, and they will reward those people with future jobs in the complex. The complex is at the top, we believe, the World Health Organization, the Gates Foundation, the Welcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Health Organization, UN, Gavi, UNITATE, CEPI, the Coalition For Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, formed by Gates and World Economic Forum. All the regulatory agencies, and I could just go roll through them from The FDA, the CDC, the NIH, the TGA, the MHRA, Safra in South Africa, they've got them all. And you know the complex is active by just watching the movement. Scott Gottlieb is one of my contemporaries, former FDA commissioner. He's in the complex. He's on the board of Pfizer now. His predecessor, Steven Hahn, who is very active as I was active in the early parts of the pandemic, now works for the venture capital firm, supporting and funding Moderna. Recently, a high ranking, official in the UK in the medical response just joined Moderna itself. Deborah Birx. Remember her? The scarf lady who's in the, yes. She's now CEO of a biotech company. You know, from a being a public health official. You can see what's happening. The complex is operative. Gates Foundation invested just a few million in BioNTech, and they got out 1,000,000,000, 1,000,000 to 1,000,000,000. Those of you in the room who like money, you would like this. It is a money orgy right now.
Saved - November 19, 2023 at 3:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The boss of Care for Calais had a relationship with a supposed Syrian refugee who became her bodyguard. After their breakup, he allegedly attempted to burn their storeroom. However, it turns out he was just a market stall holder from Turkey, already married to another British woman.

@juneslater17 - June Slater

You have to laugh . The boss woman from Care for Calais, had a full on relationship with her alleged Syrian refugee who she made her bodyguard. After the relationship ceased he allegedly tried to burn their storeroom down. Turns out he actually just a marketstall holder from Turkey! Who was already married to another British woman . Read on 👇😆 nippet from the

Saved - November 12, 2023 at 9:06 AM

@juneslater17 - June Slater

'Megalab' set up during Covid..never used £1.1 billion tax payers money it's your money they wasted .. https://mol.im/a/12739165 via @MailOnline

'Megalab' set up during Covid up for sale The Rosalind Franklin Laboratory is up for sale on property website Rightmove, three years after it was opened by then-health secretary Matt Hancook during the Coronavirus pandemic dailymail.co.uk
Saved - October 28, 2023 at 11:54 PM

@juneslater17 - June Slater

There you go ..we did tell ya!

Saved - October 19, 2023 at 4:41 AM

@juneslater17 - June Slater

Just in case you're dumb enough to actually still trust this parliament.. Here's what they really think of us .. https://t.co/r3xZPniK6E

Saved - October 4, 2023 at 6:43 PM

@juneslater17 - June Slater

The Telegraph has deleted this post? Anyone any idea why

View Full Interactive Feed