TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @justicecometh
@justicecometh - ⚖️The Justice Cometh⚖️
Are you seeing it yet? https://t.co/x8cTjHm9Nu
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 emphasizes a mission to crush violent crime and defend the nation “twenty four seven, three six five” from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific, extending extraterritorially to the furthest reaches of the planet to deliver the justice voters elected.
Speaker 1 describes the situation as “the largest Rico case in history,” with everything being done by the book, including the law of war manual. They state that corrupt people in the United States are not the only targets and that the Caval’s network is worldwide. They announce they are in the exposure phase, aiming to show everything to the people so patriots can clean house. They caution that progress will not be immediate and that the process must unfold to ensure there are no technicalities, loopholes, or payoffs. They claim Trump has had nine years to identify the patriots and select his team, and that although one may not see background events, actions are ongoing.
Speaker 2 notes that the wheels of justice turn slowly, despite a personal sense of urgency, acknowledging that fraud has occurred and wondering why arrests have not yet happened. They invoke the proverb that “the wheels of justice turn slowly but surely,” and issue a warning: “You can run, but you cannot hide. Justice is coming.”
Speaker 3 discusses moving parts coming together to save the public, praising President Trump and his aides for using executive authority, and asserting that a clear field is needed to proceed this year. They express strong alignment with Freedom Caucus–level conservatives and say everything is moving forward according to plan, claiming that obstacles have been overcome and a “new deal” is rolling out. They promise to keep the public updated and assert that the country is on the verge of “beautiful growth and prosperity,” urging Americans to hang in there. They express dedication to serving the people, stating that people should not fear their governments, but that governments should be afraid of their people.
Speaker 0 closes with a rallying note that the American populace is facing an unconventional warfare scenario, specifically information warfare, underscoring the strategic shift to information-based operations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Told you when I got this job that we would crush violent crime, that we would take the fight to anyone who wishes to do harm to our way of life and to hurt our citizenry. This mission must be twenty four seven, three six five from the Atlantic Ocean to Pacific Ocean. But beyond that, we must go extraterritorial like I've just told you about. We must go down to the furthest reaches of the planet to make sure that we bring you the justice that you have voted for.
Speaker 1: What's happening is the largest Rico case in history. Everything's being done by the book, including the law of war manual. Corrupt people in The United States aren't the only targets. The Caval's network is worldwide. Right now we're in the exposure phase.
Everything has to be shown to the people, and patriots need to clean house. Things aren't going to happen overnight. We have to go through the process. That way when the dominoes start falling, they won't have a way out. No technicalities, no loopholes, and no one to pay off.
Trump has had nine years to figure out who the patriots are, and who he wanted on his team. Those are the people he put into position. Just because you can't see what's happening in the background, doesn't mean nothing is happening.
Speaker 2: The wheels of justice turned slowly. In fact, obviously, I'm a I'm a maniacal sense of urgency. So to me, when I see that terrible fraud has happened, I'm like, haven't we arrested someone already? But as the saying goes, the wheels of justice turned slowly but surely. Let this be a warning.
You can run, but you cannot hide. Justice is coming.
Speaker 3: America, there's a lot of moving parts that are coming together nicely here to save our public. The work that president Trump and his people are doing with executive authority needs a a clear field to run through this year. Some things that I can't even talk about, but let me just reassure you that Freedom Caucus level conservatives like me are in full support of the work that president Trump is doing. All things moving forward according to plan. We've overcome every obstacle.
This is a this is a new deal rolling right now, and the president needs our full support. He's gonna get it. So I'll keep you posted, but we have things well in hand. And our country is on the verge of really beautiful growth and prosperity. Hang in there, America.
We're gonna be okay. God bless you one and all from sea to shining sea. I am just so honored to serve you. People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
The American populace is facing an unconventional warfare scenario. This is information warfare.
@jgt58maga - ⚖️The Justice Cometh⚖️
Wake up people. Take 30 minutes and listen to this message. The great awakening is here and it’s not what you think it was… https://t.co/0E5X7NZkQw
Video Transcript AI Summary
1) Global perspective: “Israel is a tiny country in the Middle East, not critical to our national security, by the way.” “Two THAAD missile batteries in Israel… one quarter of the world’s total supply.” “The United States has spent at minimum $30,000,000,000 defending Israel.” “Over the course of its existence, the United States has put 300,000,000,000 into supporting Israel.” “India and China combined represent more than a third of the entire world’s population.”
2) Self-respect and client state: “get some freaking self respect and stop being ordered around by a client state.” “IDF officers in the Pentagon… barging into meetings, giving orders.” Netanyahu: “I control Donald Trump.”
3) Citizenship and lobbying: “APAC has to register under FAIR, the foreign agent registration act of the nineteen thirties.” “No dual citizenship.” “You are not allowed to serve in a foreign military without losing your American citizenship.” “expel everyone who’s not a citizen from the country.”
4) Theology: “The chosen people in Christianity are those who choose Jesus.” “That is not Christianity. It is heresy.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a lot going on in the world right now, but if you're on social media and, of course, you are because it's really America's only remaining news source, you know there's only one story going on, and it's Israel. Everyone online is arguing about Israel. And, really, they fall into one of two camps, generally speaking. So probably more aggressive side are the deranged Taliban level ethno narcissists who are telling you that any criticism of the secular government of Israel is tantamount to blood libel against the Jewish people. And if you think that maybe it was not a great idea to arm Joseph Stalin, the greatest murderer in history, then you're a holocaust denier.
Shut up. And then on the other side, a group every bit as obsessed with Jews, the people who hate Jews who are telling you that anyone who's Jewish is bad by virtue of being Jewish. It's a blood thing. Two things are interesting. One, there are very few kind of conventional Christian voices saying, wait a second.
This is a secular government, another country, and it has probably nothing to do with my religion or anybody's religion. And we should never judge people on the basis of their immutable qualities because guilt and virtue are not passed down genetically. But almost no one is saying that. So you really have the ethnomorphosis and the antisemites, and they're at war with each other. That's the online picture.
What's even more interesting and maybe even more distressing is that in the US government, the conversation, while much more muted, is a mirror of this in that a lot of the conversation is about Israel. Israel, a tiny country in the Middle East, not critical to our national security, by the way. But the conversation, the bandwidth is consumed by questions of Israel. So wherever you stand on Israel, whether you're on one of the two sides just described or neither one of them, you know in your gut that this is bad. If a country like ours, supposedly the most powerful in the world, is devoting all of its time internally to conversations about Israel, it's probably not going in a good direction.
There's probably a lot being neglected in favor of this very specific boutique conversation about this tiny little country. It's just not good for anybody, including Israel, by the way. So what's the antidote to this? How do you fix it? Here are four things you can do to make the conversation about Israel and the relationship with Israel a lot healthier than it currently is.
Here are the four. The first is get some global perspective on what we're talking about. The United States is a nation of 350,000,000 people. It is some of the deepest natural resources in the world that would include energy and water, agricultural products. The United States, however it's managed, is a powerhouse globally and always will be because its strength is inherent.
It's a huge decisive country in the scope of world history. The United States makes things happen. Israel is not an insult, merely an observation. By contrast, is a tiny and inherently insignificant country, at least geopolitically, in that it has only 9,000,000 people and no natural resources, no meaningful natural resources. So it is insignificant.
It is also physically tiny. It's about the size of New Jersey famously, but it has a much smaller GDP than New Jersey. It is a much smaller economy than the state of New Jersey. It's an economy about the size of the state of Arizona and almost one half the economy of the state of Massachusetts or Illinois. It just doesn't really matter, actually.
If you're looking at a map and thinking through, you know, where does power politics go, Israel's not even on the list. Again, it's tiny. It's got the population of Burundi. It's got a smaller population than Belgium. Like, what is this anyway?
And yet despite its objective insignificance, it is the focus of the conversation, but it's also the focus of the spending. So right now, as we speak tonight, there are two THAAD missile batteries in Israel. That's one quarter of the world's total supply of THAAD missile batteries. The THAAD missile batteries, an American made, very high-tech missile battery that takes incoming missiles out of the sky. And one quarter of the world's entire supply of these is in Israel right now manned by US troops, by Americans in uniform or not.
They are American military personnel, and they are manning these batteries to protect Israel. And that shouldn't surprise you because since 10/07/2023, which is a little less than two years ago, The United States has spent at minimum $30,000,000,000 defending Israel. Huge. And for some perspective, the entire Israeli military budget before October 7 was about 25,000,000,000. So United States has put at least 30,000,000,000 into defending Israel in less than two years.
Over the course of its existence, a little less than eighty years, The United States has put 300,000,000,000, at least those are just the on books numbers, into supporting Israel. 300,000,000,000. Israel is by far, no one comes close, the largest recipient of USAID over time and currently. So anyone who says, oh, it's just a drop in the bucket. It's totally insignificant is lying or doesn't know the numbers.
By the way, number two is Egypt. So why are we spending so much money in Egypt? Well, we're doing it at the request of Israel. So you could probably add that to the tally. It's not an attack.
It's merely perspective. We are spending our time, our money, and we're taking enormous risks on behalf of a country that geopolitically is not significant at all. The interesting thing is most Americans have no idea that this is true. They don't know how disproportionate our attention to Israel and our spending on Israel is relative to the rest of the world. And if you want some sense of how disproportionate, India and China combined, neither which is a strong ally at the moment, combined represent more than a third of the entire world's population, both our rivals economically, both our rivals militarily, at least potentially.
And our relationship with them has gotten worse or at the very least languished because of our relationship with Israel, because of the bandwidth consumed by tending to it, and also because of some of the inevitable conflicts that have arisen because of our support for Israel, which is engaged in an extremely controversial, which is to say hated war in Gaza, which is not even really a war. It's a massive displacement of people and killing on on a on a grand scale of unarmed people, of unarmed combatants, of civilians, of women and children. And the world sees this, and the world rejects it, and the world hates it. And so Israel's really last remaining ally of size other than The UK is The United States. And so there's a huge cost to this.
But, again, most Americans have no perspective on just how disproportionate our commitment is because they marinate in lies about this relationship, mostly from our political class, also from the media. But, really, if you were to lay the blame on one group in The United States, it's our elected leaders who continuously lie to us about the nature of this relationship, its significance, and they do it generationally. They've been doing it for many decades. Here and this is just one example, but the most fun to watch. This is Nikki Haley at the Republican presidential primary debate two thousand twenty three describing The United States' relationship with the state of Israel.
Watch.
Speaker 1: Last thing we need to do is to tell Israel what to do. The only thing we should be doing is supporting them in eliminating Hamas. It is not that Israel needs America. America needs Israel.
Speaker 0: It is not that the not Israel needs The United States. The United States needs Israel. How could that possibly be true? It is in no sense true. In fact, it's one of those lies that's not three degrees off the truth.
It is a complete inversion of the truth. And the truth, which is obvious to anyone who looks at the numbers or is paying any attention at all, is that Israel could not survive without The United States. That's not an argument for pulling all aid to Israel. It's just an acknowledgment of the physical reality. Israel fights its wars with American backing, with the guaranteed, the implied defense guarantee that we have provided for so many years since at least 1973, fifty years.
And its social services are made possible, which are quite generous, made possible by American subsidies. In other words, every dollar that goes to the Israeli military from The United States is a dollar that the nation of Israel can spend on its own people. And so there is no world in which America needs Israel more than Israel needs The United States. And, of course, Nikki was Haley was never asked to explain how exactly that could be true. What are you talking about, governor Haley?
Not one person asked her that question. And no one asked her that question because anyone in whose mind that question appeared would have paused for fear of being attacked as an anti Semite for asking a question about geopolitics. That has been the state of play in The United States for my entire life, over fifty years. Politicians make nonsensical statements. Nobody wants to even ask a follow-up question for fear of being attacked.
It is a state of perpetual intimidation. Everybody's afraid of Israel. Afraid of the topic, afraid in some cases of the state itself. We have not had an honest conversation about this ever. Certainly not in my lifetime.
And that suits the Israelis just fine. And if you're wondering why there's an awful lot of lunatic antisemitic comment about Israel online, you have to wonder how much of that is organic. Some of it, of course, there are always haters. But how much of it is not organic at all? How much of is of that the lunatic, all Jews are evil?
How much of that is being ginned up on purpose to make legitimate questions about the US government's relationship with the government of Israel seem like crackpot stuff, like hate, like David Duke level lunacy? Probably some because it serves their interests. Now that is a criticism of the state of Israel and its incredibly sophisticated propaganda campaign, which, again, the rest of us been marinating in for a long time. But the true villain here, I would argue, is not the state of Israel, the Jews. It's The United States.
It's our leaders who are putting up with this. Israel is a small country with very limited resources, and it is doing its best to serve its own interests. You'd think every country would act that way and most do. But there are some that don't, and ours would top that list. And so the true shame here, the actual villain in this story is the leadership of The United States that is putting up with serial humiliation for decades.
And for what reason? So if there's someone to be mad at, it's our leaders. And that leads to the second thing that we can do to fix this truly unhealthy relationship, this poisonous relationship, which is getting worse, by the way. It's breaking our society into pieces. It's truly hurting the Trump administration.
The second thing we can do after getting global perspective on what we're actually talking about here, a tiny country that is in the deepest sense insignificant to The United States. The second thing we can do is get some freaking self respect and stop being ordered around by a client state. That's not good for us. It's not good for them. It's not good for anybody.
It's like being screamed at by your children. No normal parent would allow that because it's totally destructive. It's not good for you, and it's not good for the child. And that is exactly the relationship that we have with the state of Israel. In fact, not in theory.
In fact, it is a huge country and a tiny country. The huge country supports the tiny country, and that's a pretty nice thing to do. Whether it's wise or not is a whole separate conversation. But if you're gonna have that relationship, a parent to a child, you cannot be yelled at, humiliated, spied upon, bossed around by the child, by the person in the inherently subordinate position. You can't do that.
You can't be shamed into ignoring things that are quite clearly not the behavior of a subordinate ally to a big brother ally. For example, spying on the country that makes your economy and your defense possible, which the Israelis have been doing for generations. That's a fact. One of them very famously was caught, Jonathan Pollard, who's an American citizen, taking real secrets, like actual military secrets, and sending them to Israel, which promptly sent a bunch of them to the Soviet Union, which was our archrival, our foe at the time. And that happened, and he went to prison, and then somehow he got out of prison and went to Israel where he continues to denounce The United States.
And anyone who says anything about it is attacked. Oh, you're an anti Semite. It's nothing to do with anti Semitism. That's insulting. Why would we ever put up with that?
Why we put up with the attack on the USS Liberty that everyone's so afraid to talk about clearly targeted on purpose by a country we're supporting Israel. And it's somehow shameful to say that. Why? Why is it shameful to say that? Who knows why it's shameful to say that, but it shouldn't be.
And until we have some self respect, not anger or hate, but just dignity, it will continue in June. For example, during the twelve day war, such as it was with Iran, The US and Israel versus Iran, bombing on all sides. During that short conflict, IDF officers in the Pentagon, foreign military officers in the Pentagon by the way, they're not the only foreign military officers in the Pentagon, to be clear. There are NATO officers. They're from other country British.
But there are a bunch of Israeli defense force officers in the Pentagon that week. And during that week, ask anyone who works at the Pentagon, they enraged American Pentagon staff by just barging into meetings, giving orders, making demands, and nobody did anything about it. How can a foreign military officer barge into military headquarters, even if invited, barge into a meeting and start demanding, we want this. We want that. You need to get on this.
The more you allow that kind of deeply unhealthy behavior, the more you're going to get. And that's exactly what has happened. Because of the weakness of our leaders, we have incited predators in a foreign country to take advantage of us. Oh, that's such an anti Israel thing to say. It's not anti Israel at all.
It's a demand that the people whose job it is, whose sacred duty it is to defend and represent us, our leaders both at the Pentagon and all throughout the US government, that they do that, that they stand up and defend us against all potential threats, against all foreign countries to the extent they need to, and that they do not prostrate themselves before a foreign nation. That's just basic. Why have a government, especially a strong government if it's taking orders from another weaker government? And that is the state of play. And it has been for a very long time.
And they're not even pretending to such an extent that the prime minister of Israel goes on television to openly participate and meddle in internal American politics, taking sides, attacking people, Americans. You wouldn't think it would be his business. He's not an American leader. He's not even an American citizen. Going on television to attack Americans because they're not fully on board with sending billions more to a country of 9,000,000 people?
And in case you think that's an overstatement, here is the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, commenting on American politics.
Speaker 2: We talked about the woke right, and he said, I call it the woke right. That's a brilliant I don't know why. The woke right because these people, you know, they're not any different from the woke left. I mean, they're they're insane here, But they're actually meeting on some of the things. We have to fight back.
How do we fight back? Our influencers. I think you should also talk to them if you have a chance. To that community, they're very important. And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle, and the most important ones are on social media.
And the most important purchase that is going on right now is class Followers.
Speaker 0: Five followers.
Speaker 2: TikTok. TikTok. Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential.
Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important? Oh, Alex. Mhmm. X.
X. That's Successful. Very good. And, you know, so we have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy.
He's a friend. We should talk to him. Now if we can get those two things, we get locked, and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now. We have to fight the fight.
Speaker 0: It's almost unbelievable that he said that on camera. Imagine. This is a foreign leader bragging about how he's censoring Americans. Again, this guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist. And here he is on camera, and he's a sophisticated guy.
He of course, he knows that he's being filmed saying, anyone who opposes me in The United States who opposes more aid to Israel or opposes getting sucked into war with Iran, which does not serve American interest. That person is not simply mistaken or wrong. I'm not gonna bother to explain why that person is wrong. That person is a Nazi, part of the woke Reich, a Nazi. And the only way to fix it is by preventing Americans in the last country on Earth with guaranteed freedom of speech, prevent Americans from hearing the other side.
And so we push congress to force a TikTok sale, which is true, by the way. And when that happened and various members of congress, no. Really, it's about China. There were people in line who said, no. I think it's really about Israel.
You you you kinda wish it was about China. Here he is just admitting. No. No. No.
We pushed the US congress to censor in The United States to commit censorship in The United States because we think it's bad for us, and we need to talk to Elon. The only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk. By the way, a naturalized American, a foreigner who looked at The United States and said, what's great about that country? People can say what they believe because they're not slaves. They're not subjects of the state.
They're citizens of a nation that they own. Free speech is central to the entire idea of America. In fact, it's really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on Earth. It's not our market economy. It's freedom of speech.
And here's this guy, a foreign head of state who, let me restate, is totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist is saying Americans don't have that right, and he's gonna do some kinda secret pressure campaign on Elon Musk to censor x because it bothers Israel. You know, that's the point at which you just say no. Absolutely not. That is not allowed. But since no one has said that, it has continued.
And that's why when you go on social media, you see person after person taking that guy's line. That guy's line. Repeating foreign government talking points on social media as Americans. Oh, you're you can't say that. It's true.
It's a 100% true. And it's also totally counterproductive, by the way. This is not a sophisticated propaganda campaign. This is a brutal and brutish propaganda campaign where anyone who disagrees with anything is immediately slandered and smeared. Megan Kelly, who's gotta be the single most moderate person on the question of Israel, who said a 100 times and means it, by the way.
I like Israel. I'm not against Israel. You know? But maybe it's not a great idea to get sucked into one of their wars. We've done that.
Let's not do it again. Nazi. Immediately called her an anti Semite and won't stop. Meanwhile, the actual anti Semites, and there certainly are some online, never get criticized by Bebe or anyone else in his orbit. That's kind of interesting, isn't it?
I wonder why that is when you have actual antisemites. You know, doing videos, making fun of Auschwitz, but they get a pass? Maybe things are not quite as they seem. But normal people who harbor no hate toward anyone or try not to are immediately slandered in a way that makes it, in some cases, hard for them to have jobs if they deviate even a little bit. So what's the effect of this?
Not that it's up to me to tell Israel how to run its propaganda campaigns, but the effect, just noticing, is that it turns allies into enemies. You can agree on 98% of things, but if you think maybe it was a bad idea to bomb Doha, Qatar, the site of the largest military base in the Middle East, which exists to protect Israel, if you think it was a bad idea for the Israeli government to bomb Doha, then you're a what? A Nazi? Just in point of fact, by the way, Hamas was originally in Qatar because the Israeli government asked them to accept Hamas. That air base exists to protect Israel, by the way.
That was such a reckless and demented move that Mossad Mossad in Israel opposed it and wouldn't participate in it because they thought it was too reckless. So to say that there is, you know, quite a bit of latitude for debate in Israel is an understatement. Massoud refused to participate in that. But as an American, on social media, if you're like, I think it's a little crazy that our ally is bombing another one of our allies without even telling us and then lying and pretending that they had permission from the president to do this, which they did not. If you say that, you're a Nazi.
You're part of the woke Reich. This can't continue. It's too crazy. It's counterproductive for them, and it's deeply destructive of our political conversation and of our country itself. And the good news is that the humiliation, which is gone I mean, just give you one more example of the humiliation, which is almost beyond belief.
So Israel's our greatest ally. We should never ask anything of them. Of course, you you heard Haley. You hear all of them say exactly the same thing. Protecting Israel is the most important thing.
They're our only real ally. If they're our only real ally, why does Israel have a long history of transferring military technology, including American military technology, to China? To China? Most people have no idea that's true. It is true.
Why is China running the Port Of Haifa, Israel's biggest port? Really, if they're such a close ally. And, of course, the answer is because from Israel's perspective, we're not a close ally. We're a country that has been willing to help them. But when you only have 9,000,000 people in a limited defense budget, you know, you take help where you can get it.
So the loyalty is not requited. It's one way. And I think the good news is that the governor of Israel, in particular, the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has pushed it too far. And he did that in part by running around telling people what he thought was true apparently. I control Donald Trump.
I control the United States Congress. I control The United States. He said that to political allies and opponents in his country. He said it to foreign heads of state. Fact.
I control these people. Don't you worry. And by the way, if you kick me out of office, the next guy probably won't have the level of control that I have. He's made that case openly, verbally. He said it out loud.
And that was too much for our president. And so in one of the great moments, it was just it was a cool shower on a hot day. President Trump pushed back, not directly, but you can watch this clip and see that he's had enough. Here is president Trump the other day asked about Israel's plans to annex the West Bank. Watch.
Speaker 2: Did you promise leaders this week that you would not allow Israel to annex the West Bank? Is that something that you
Speaker 3: I I will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank. Nope. I will not allow it. It's not gonna happen.
Speaker 2: Did you speak with Netanyahu about this
Speaker 3: directly? But I'm not gonna allow it. Whether I spoke to him or not, I did. But I'm not allowing Israel to annex the West Bank.
Speaker 0: Mister
Speaker 3: Obin There's been enough. It's time to stop.
Speaker 0: It's been enough. I will not allow it. He's not just talking about the West Bank there, obviously. These are political people. They understand when your poll numbers fall dramatically, particularly among the young men who help make you president, you have to ask why is that?
And it's about this issue. Because it's too humiliating. And people who don't wanna see their government bossed around by a tiny foreign power are not haters. They don't hate any ethnic group. They just don't wanna be humiliated.
And by the way, why should they be humiliated? That's the core problem right there. That's why Donald Trump has lost support over this Israel question, and he knows that. And he's pushing back, and there's just no question from that clip whatsoever. So the third thing I think that would be very helpful to restore health and balance the relationship between The United States and Israel is restore the concept of citizenship in The United States.
If you're an American citizen, it means something. The first thing it means is equality. You are equal to every other citizen. There's no hierarchy of citizenship. All citizens are equal.
Each gets one vote. Each gets justice before the law. That's the promise of The United States, and each gets to say exactly what he thinks. Period. Restore the value of citizenship.
And the very first thing you were gonna you would do if you cared about that, and you should because the country can't continue without it. After you expelled everyone who's not a citizen from the country, which should happen immediately, they should be deported immediately for our own survival. But after doing that, the first thing you would do is not allow dual citizenship. Why would you allow that? You're a citizen of two countries.
Can you really serve two masters simultaneously? By way, it's not just Israelis who have dual citizenship. They're all. Every nationality has dual citizenship in this country. It's not just Israel, and it shouldn't be allowed for a single moment.
What is that? Whose side do you want? Don't accuse me of dual loyalty. You're a dual citizen. Whether it's Argentina or Mali or Israel, not allowed.
And moreover, you are not allowed to serve in a foreign military without losing your American citizenship. You're fighting for another country? How can that be allowed? How can you retain your citizenship? By the way, why aren't you serving in our military?
Every country has a different perspective on the world, and that grows from a whole bunch of different things, their history, their language, their size, their resources. But each country is different, and each country has a different set of priorities. And if you're fighting in a military for a country, you were not serving America's priorities. You're taking up arms on behalf of foreign power. You're done.
This would seem to be obvious. Many Americans have fought in Israel and Gaza. Many Americans have fought in Ukraine, by the way, and a lot of other countries for foreign militaries. Lose your citizenship immediately. Of course.
Obviously, it's amazing that even exists. And APAC has to register under FAIR, the foreign agent registration act of the nineteen thirties. Of course, it's a foreign lobby. There are a million of them. But it's only APAC that doesn't register.
And it's only APAC that is somehow above criticism. It's a foreign lobby that's acting on behalf of foreign government. It's it's and its interest. Again, it's one of many, but it's the only one that doesn't have to register. And, course, it should register immediately.
You should know who is giving money to your politicians. You should know who is influencing them. There should be a record of that as there is with any other nation, any other lobby of a foreign power, and only APAC is exempt. What is the effect of that? Makes everyone paranoid.
Doesn't make people like Israel more. When a topic cannot be spoken about and when anyone who raises it is called a Nazi, the woke Reich, or dismissed as a Holocaust denier, anti Semite, or whatever slandered in some way like that. It doesn't make the problem go away. It festers, and people go crazy and get angry and become resentful. End all that.
There's no reason to conduct any business like that in secrecy. It doesn't make things better at all. It doesn't make the person doing it stronger. It makes him weaker, actually, in the end. And the last thing that I think we need to do to restore balance between the relationship between The United States and Israel and to restore some sanity to the public conversation on this topic is to get our theology right.
And this is not a message aimed at Israelis or Jews. This is a message aimed at Christians who are the largest group of Israel supporters in The United States. And their view of Israel is colored not just by sentimental attachment, which is fine, or trips to Israel, great, no problem. But by a Christian heresy, the oldest of the Christian heresies, which is that God somehow prefers some people based on their DNA. And of course, the whole point of Christianity is that that is no longer true, that there is no chosen people.
The chosen people are people who choose Jesus. That is the Christian message right there. It's not an anti Semitic message, by the way. It's the Christian message. It's the core Christian message.
And yet there are many, many self described representatives of the Christian faith, the world's largest, who are daily sending a different message. And we should be very clear. Whatever this is, it's not Christianity. It is heresy. And among the many examples we could pick, we're gonna go because we couldn't control ourselves with Lindsey Graham.
Watch.
Speaker 4: To people in my party, I'm tired of this crap. Israel is our friend. They're the most reliable friend we have in the Mideast. They're a democracy surrounded by people who would cut their throats if they could. This is not a hard choice if you're an American.
It's not a hard choice if you're
Speaker 0: a Christian.
Speaker 4: A word of warning. If America pulls the plug on Israel, God will pull the plug on us.
Speaker 0: God will kill you if you don't support Bibi Netanyahu. That's what he's saying. And there are cheers, unfortunately. Cheers when he said that God will kill you. He will pull the plug on you like a quadriplegic in intensive care.
You're gonna flatline unless you support the secular abortion on demand government of Israel. That's the Christian perspective, really. That God loves some people more because of their DNA. That is not the Christian message. That's the opposite of the Christian message.
The Christian message is universal. That's the whole point of it. The chosen people in Christianity are those who choose Jesus. The entire New Testament is that story. And anyone who says otherwise has not read it or is lying.
God does not prefer you because of your DNA or anyone else because of their DNA, period. So the fact that people can stand up in The United States in 2025 and say something like that, and by the way, not even make the case, Just invoke the power of god as a weapon. He will kill you. He'll pull the plug on your country unless you go along with this. We need more war.
Listen to yourself. And it's not just Lindsey Graham. It's the speaker of the house, Mike Johnson. It's a lot of people, some of whom are very nice people. People have dinner with them.
They seem perfectly normal. But this is a heresy, and it's deranged. And you know it's deranged because it's a justification for killing the innocent. And in Christianity, if there's one thing that's crystal clear, it's that Christians cannot abide the killing of the innocent. People who have done nothing wrong cannot be killed.
That's a sin. You are not allowed to do that. Period. And if you find anyone leveraging the message of Jesus to justify the killing of innocents, that person is committing heresy. So those are the four things I think that we probably should do right away to restore some balance and health, reduce the craziness in the relationship and the conversation about Israel.
@jgt58maga - ⚖️The Justice Cometh⚖️
Did y’all watch the Water last night? https://t.co/30EJp5skx6
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript reports that Tulsi Gabbard released a House Intel report alleging a conspiracy by President Obama and U.S. intelligence agencies to undermine the 2016 election and Donald Trump. It claims Obama ordered a new intelligence community assessment on Russia’s interference, handpicking five CIA analysts to draft a rushed, siloed report with only one person in charge. The four elements cited as the basis of the Russia hoax are: Putin wanted Trump to win; Putin took action to help Trump win; the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. It asserts there was no reliable intelligence to support these allegations, senior CIA officials refused to traffic in them, but were overruled by Brennan and Comey, who allegedly cherry-picked, misquoted, and suppressed countervailing intelligence, including anonymous postings. The document alleges Obama continued promoting the hoax, mentions potential criminal implications, and states the Steele dossier was not used by the CIA. It ends with accountability rhetoric.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News alert the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election.
Speaker 1: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't.
Speaker 0: Gabbard got her hands on a house intel report that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born, interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns out that the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move.
John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was nothing routine about this, and it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in. Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies either. Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama.
There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again and form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt. One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump. That was the Steele dossier.
And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of any of this was ever true. There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted that they be pushed even without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherrypicks the intelligence, lied about their sources, misquoted sources, didn't corroborate their claims, suppressed intelligence that ran counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings.
Rank and file CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own tradecraft standards. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump knows, that the Russians helped him win in 2016.
Speaker 2: Putin hated secretary Clinton so much that that the flip side of that coin was he had a clear preference for the person running against the person he hated so much.
Speaker 3: It was Russia in a very systematic way, in trying to interfere in the election and to try to advance the prospects of Donald Trump being elected.
Speaker 0: This was such a malicious disinformation campaign perpetrated on the American people that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House. What this report actually shows is that the Russians just wanted to create chaos and undermine Americans' faith in democracy. Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir Putin didn't care who won. He had no preference. But like most people expected Hillary to win and had a little docket of compromising dirt on her, dirt that he never released.
Now if Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn't Putin drop the dirt?
Speaker 1: There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. Then CIA director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a, quote, unquote, clear preference for Trump.
Speaker 0: Now if Clinton was on tranquilizers like the Russians believed, why didn't they leak it to help Trump win? How credible was the information about Hillary Clinton's health?
Speaker 1: All I have seen is what, the intelligence, committee have reported through their investigation. I think the the the underlying point there is is that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that they had. And the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election, as president Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan, everybody said they were doing in order to support Donald Trump's election, they would have released the most damning of that information. Obama and
Speaker 0: his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did. Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with Trump and that he didn't even direct his people to help Trump win, but they put it out there anyway. In a sense, Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in our country. Barack Obama, the CIA, and the FBI were the ones doing what our enemy wanted.
Speaker 4: Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former president Obama in criminal behavior?
Speaker 1: We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this. For even for the evidence Obama? Correct. The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to president Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.
Speaker 0: Even two years later after the election, Barack Obama was still pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true. And he knew it wasn't true because he helped manufacture it.
Speaker 4: They're undermining our alliances, cozying up to Russia. What happened to the Republican Party? They're cozying up to the former head of the KGB. Actively blocking legislation that that would defend our elections from Russian attack. What happened?
Speaker 0: Now I don't know if it's possible to indict a former president for actions he took while in office. I'm not a lawyer, proudly. But Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe liability. Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact that Brennan committed perjury when he lied to congress.
Speaker 5: Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier?
Speaker 6: I don't. Do you know if
Speaker 5: the bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier as any as part of any court filings, applications?
Speaker 6: I have no awareness.
Speaker 5: Did the CIA rely on it?
Speaker 6: No. Why not? Because we didn't. It wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done.
It was it was not.
Speaker 0: Well, that's a lie. Whatever happens to these guys is not revenge. It's accountability. And it's time for people to pay the price.
reSee.it AI Summary
Today's deltas are crucial, so I’m starting with the most important one. I’ll share more details in a thread to keep you updated on everything happening. Stay tuned for insights and information!
@jgt58maga - ⚖️The Justice Cometh⚖️
Todays deltas Ok start with the most important one first 🤯 A thread 🧵 👇🏻 https://t.co/3Dzr2jdyan
@Jgt58maga - ⚖️The Justice Cometh⚖️
Big accounts are deleting this post I’m not… https://t.co/DcvxnkyR7N
reSee.it AI Summary
While you were watching the Super Bowl, Trump eliminated the Department of Education and stopped new penny production. There's also a report claiming Josh Shapiro allegedly attempted to have Trump killed at Butler. Let the fun begin!
@Jgt58maga - ⚖️The Justice Cometh⚖️
While you have been watching the Super Bowl Trump has : Eliminated the Dept of Ed Eliminated new production of pennies And a report that Josh Shapiro allegedly tried to have Trump killed at Butler… Let the fun begin
