reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @justredpillme

Posted - August 9, 2023 at 3:22 AM

Saved - August 1, 2024 at 9:21 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In my latest post, I shared a video of Mike Pence's campaign advertisement where he pretended to fill up a truck with gas. He parked at a gas station, got out, and grabbed the fuel pump nozzle. However, he didn't select a fuel grade, leaving the pump beeping, and he also failed to squeeze the trigger to dispense any fuel. The scene seemed more like a staged performance than a genuine moment.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Mike Pence Pretended to Fill Up a Truck With Gas in an Advertisement In an advertisement for his campaign, Mike Pence filmed a scene where he was parked at a gas station in a red pickup truck, got out of the truck, and grabbed the fuel pump nozzle. He took it off of the fuel pump, and then placed it in the gas tank entry port of the vehicle. Without selecting the grade of fuel he wanted (which left the fuel pump beeping), he then failed to squeeze the trigger to the handle of the nozzle, preventing fuel from being dispensed into the vehicle. The entire ad is below.

Video Transcript AI Summary

I'm Mike Pence. Gas prices have gone up since Joe Biden became president due to his energy policies. We have a plan to bring back $2 gas and lower electricity prices. Check out the Pence Energy Plan at mikepence2024.com to help us achieve energy independence and become the top energy producer by 2040. Let's lead America to a prosperous future with energy independence and leadership.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. Mike Pence here. Remember $2 a gallon gas? I do. And then Joe Biden became president of the United States and launched his war on energy. Since that time, gasoline prices are up 60%. Electricity prices are up 25%. Joe Biden's war on energy is causing real hardship for working families, small businesses, and family farms, but we've got a plan to relieve all of that. We just unveiled the Pence Energy Plan that'll not only put our country back on a path to energy independence, but by 2040, we will reclaim America's role as the leading producer of energy in the world. Join us in the fight for American energy leadership by going to mikepence2024.com. We can lead the world once again to a more prosperous and a secure future for America with energy independence and American energy leadership.

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - July 26, 2023 at 9:02 PM

Saved - February 25, 2024 at 2:11 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In a press briefing, Donald Trump clarified his previous comments, stating that he condemned neo-Nazis and white supremacists. Despite media requests for further condemnation, he has already denounced these groups in multiple videos.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Trump Condemns Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists 🧵 On August 15, 2017, Donald Trump answered press questions during a press briefing on infrastructure at Trump Tower in New York. In this question and answer exchange, he was asked about a protest event that featured two different sides of the political spectrum. His comments have been taken out of context repeatedly in the past, specifically the portion which claimed that he said that neo-Nazis and white nationalists were “very fine people”. While he did say that there were “very fine people on both sides”, he was explicitly and specifically referring to not the neo-Nazis, and not the white nationalists, and condemned them totally. His quote regarding this is as follows: “… and I'm not talking about the neo Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally.” Many media companies continue to request that Donald Trump condemn white nationalists and neo-Nazis. Below are two videos where he denounces them. The second one is a compilation of him denouncing both groups of people. Note: Twitter only permits a single video on long form tweets. The additional mentioned videos are below in thread format.

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - November 16, 2023 at 6:40 PM

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 8:42 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Stacey Abrams, who ran for Governor of Georgia in 2018, has been labeled as an election denier due to her statements after her loss. A video compilation and Breitbart's analysis provide evidence supporting this claim. The RedPill rating for this post is true.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Stacey Abrams Is an Election Denier Stacey Abrams (D) ran against Brian Kemp (R) for Governor of Georgia in 2018. Brian Kemp won by more than 50,000 votes. After her loss in running for that position, she has made many statements which establish her as an election denier. Although Breitbart has broken down a very comprehensive list of each instance (linked below), we find that the five minute video compilation of her saying many of these statements is sufficient enough to prove that she is an election denier. The video is embedded below.

Video Transcript AI Summary

I won the election, but I didn't get the job because of cheating. The election was stolen from us. I don't think it's dangerous to use words like "rigged" and "stolen" because we have evidence to back it up. I won't concede because our democracy is being eroded. Thousands of voters in Georgia had their voices stolen and their votes may not be counted in 2020. If an election is rigged, it should not be conceded. The election was stolen from Georgia voters and the process was unfair. I refuse to call it a loss. I can't prove I would have won, but Brian Kemp's actions affected the outcome. He is the legal governor, but not the legitimate one. The election was tainted and thousands of voters were disenfranchised. I still stand by my decision not to concede. The election was not fair, right, or proper. Brian Kemp dismantled our democracy, making free and fair elections impossible.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I do have one very affirmative statement to make. We won But I didn't lose. I got the votes, but we won't know exactly how many because of how they cheated. I did win my election. I just didn't get to have the job. We were robbed of an election. Speaker 1: Using the word rigged, using the word steal. Do you think it's dangerous going into 2020? Speaker 0: I I don't because we can actually back it up. Speaker 1: And so in response to what I believe of Well, it's stolen in the election. I'm not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the door to the door. In fact, Speaker 0: when outside asked if I'm ever gonna concede, the answer is no. This is not a speech of concession. Because concession needs to acknowledge an action is right, true, or prompt. And I will not concede because the erosion of Speaker 1: our democracy is not right. People look bad. Yes, ma'am. Yeah. They're gonna Speaker 0: not a free and fair election. Speaker 2: I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. Speaker 0: I believe it was stolen from the voters. Thousands of Georgians had their voices the stolen because they were not able to cast ballots. And they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 2020 if we don't do this right. Speaker 1: If what happens to you happens nationally and you you see, whoever runs for whoever wins the Democratic nominee, if they say, actually, I can prove that there's a number of votes in every state that that and that and that the same thing that you just described happens in multiple states. Should they concede? Speaker 0: I do not think we should concede an election until we know the results of an election. I still fundamentally believed it could be fair, and that's just not how life works. If it looks like it's cheating, it probably is. If it looks like it's rigged, it probably is. Speaker 1: We've been raised to believe that it is in that effect of to call question. And if you wanna run for office again, you gotta concede the election so that everyone knows you're a good sport. Speaker 0: I said that the election was stolen from Georgia voters. The process that took place during the legislative cycle was one that did not countenance and did not pay attention the deep and real concerns of those who watch this election be stolen in the state of Georgia. It was stolen from the voters of Georgia. As long as we have eligible American citizens who cannot cast a ballot, then the game is rigged. I am complicit if I say that that system is fair. Concession in the political space is an acknowledgment that the process was fair, and I don't believe that to be so. But I refuse to concede because concession means that the process was proper, that the result was true and right, and I cannot say that. I tend to say I didn't lose. I just didn't win. And I don't call it a loss. I just didn't win. Of Speaker 1: Yes. She's lying. Officially. Yes. Officially. Put it this way. Didn't get Speaker 0: to get inaugurated, and that's probably Okay. I was joking with Beth backstage when Cliff said, you know, she lost. And I'm like, no. I just didn't win. Because we don't know what really happened because of the miasma of voter suppression. I can't know for a fact that I would be the governor of Georgia, but for the malfeasance and the mismanagement of Brian Kemp, but I know it's a pretty good guess. So I can't prove that I would have won, but I know we don't know because of how he behaved. Speaker 3: Is he the legitimate governor elect of Georgia? Speaker 0: He is the person who won an adequate number of votes Speaker 3: But that's not Speaker 0: from the governor of Speaker 3: With all with all due respect and I respect where you're coming from and I respect the the issues that raising. You're not answering the question. Do you think it was Speaker 0: Wait a minute. No. I I what I'm not Speaker 3: You're not using the word legitimate. Is he the legitimate governor elect Georgia? Speaker 1: Of her. Speaker 0: He is the legal governor of Georgia. Speaker 1: You see, I'm here to tell you that just because you win, doesn't mean you're won. And you said to me that you did not lose. You just did not win. Yes. So we're gonna talk about that. Speaker 0: Bad news is that we didn't get the victory we secured. Speaker 1: And the thing is Speaker 0: we won't ever know empirically that I got more votes because we will never know which votes did get half. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that. Speaker 1: You refused to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely. Speaker 0: This was not fair. It was not right, and it is deeply improper that someone could ascend to that role having performed so basely and so crassly against the very people he is now supposed to represent. The election was not fair. The process not fair. Speaker 2: You, notably did not concede. I did not. Okay. You acknowledged Yes. That he won, but you did not concede. Seed. Correct. 5 months later, do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression? Speaker 0: Yes. Georgia voters did not have their votes counted. They were not allowed to cast votes. They had their votes discarded, and it was not fair to those who filled up absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to, it either was I've counted or not counted, assuming you received it in time. Brian Kemp oversaw for 8 years the systematic and systemic dismantling of our democracy, and that means there could not be free and fair elections in Georgia. Speaker 1: So you don't feel that you lost fair and square? Speaker 0: I do recognize I am not the governor of Georgia, but I do like to point out something that is true for me and for many in our state, and that is we won.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Links To Evidence: Archived Compilation Video (MP4): https://jrpm.me/b0Vopx Original Breitbart Reporting: https://jrpm.me/4Yfbh1

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

RedPill Rating: True

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Offsite Article Link: https://jrpm.me/m86T70

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - December 2, 2023 at 2:27 AM

Saved - January 4, 2024 at 9:56 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Jimmy Kimmel expressed on his show that those who choose not to get vaccinated should not receive priority in healthcare and that death is a possible consequence. Watch the video below.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Jimmy Kimmel Said That People Who Were Not Vaccinated Did Not Deserve Medical Treatment and Should Die Jimmy Kimmel plainly stated on his nighttime show, Jimmy Kimmel Live, that people who refused to get a COVID 19 vaccine should not be prioritized in healthcare settings and that death is an acceptable outcome for them should they require any kind of emergency medical care. The video of the segment can be viewed below:

Video Transcript AI Summary

New COVID-19 cases have increased by over 300% compared to last year. Hospitals may have to make tough decisions about ICU admissions due to overcrowding. The speaker finds it easy to prioritize treating vaccinated individuals over unvaccinated individuals who have taken horse dewormer instead of getting vaccinated. Many people are turning to Ivermectin as an alternative to the vaccine, despite it being made by a major pharmaceutical company, Merck, which advises against its use for COVID-19. The speaker highlights the lack of scientific evidence and safety data supporting Ivermectin's efficacy. They also mention a TikTok video by a disgraced veterinarian promoting the drug. The speaker comments on the unexpected anger displayed by someone drinking Topo Chico.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The number of new cases is up more than 300% from a year ago. Doctor. Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're gonna have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU. But I don't know. That choice doesn't seem so tough to me. Vaccinated person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who Gobbled horse goo, rest in peace, Wheezy. You're that's I mean, we what the poison control centers have seen is this spike in calls from people taking this livestock medicine to fight the coronavirus, but they won't take the vaccine, which is crazy. It's like if You're a vegan and you're just like, no, I don't want a hamburger. Give me that can of Alpo instead. One of the reasons these Seabiscuits are opting for Ivermectin is because they don't trust big pharma, which is fine, I guess, except for the fact that Ivermectin is made by Merck, which is the 4th largest pharmaceutical company in the world. And even Merck is telling people to cut it out. They released a statement saying Ivermectin has no scientific basis for potential therapeutic effect against COVID. There's no meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID nineteen disease. And there's a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies. Listen, if a pharmaceutical company says, please don't take the drug we're selling, You should probably listen to the or or you could just go with the TikTok posted by a disgraced veterinarian instead. And this is inhalable or these are the tablets, steroids. You wanna suppress me? You wanna kill me? You son of a bitch. You demon. You think I'm easy to kill? Think I'm gonna roll over to your crap? No. I've never seen someone that mad Drink a Topo Chico before. Like, it kinda came out of nowhere.

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - November 3, 2023 at 6:35 PM

Saved - December 18, 2023 at 12:33 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Joe Biden claimed in a debate that he has never taken money from any foreign source. A video of his statement is available. Evidence supporting this claim is provided in the form of archived videos and a RedPill rating of "True."

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Joe Biden Said He Has Not Taken a Penny From Any Foreign Source Ever in His Life In a recorded segment of a debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, Joe Biden said: I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life. The video of his statement can be viewed below.

Video Transcript AI Summary

I have never received any money from any foreign source in my entire life. It has come to our attention that the current president has paid significantly more taxes in China, possesses a hidden bank account in China, conducts business in China, and has made claims about me accepting money. However, I want to clarify that I have never accepted any money from any country at any time.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life. We learned that this president paid 50 times the tax in China, has a secret bank account with China, does business in China, and in fact, is talking about me taking money. I have not taken a single penny from any country whatsoever, ever.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Links To Evidence: Archived Video (MP4): https://jrpm.me/e7w5te Original Sourced @akafacehots X Post: https://jrpm.me/uyuha7

Proton Drive Proton Drive allows you to securely store and share your sensitive documents and access them anywhere. drive.proton.me

aka (@akafacehots) on X "I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life! ... I have not taken a single penny from any country whatsoever — EVER!" — Joe Biden (10/22/20) twitter.com

@justredpillme - justredpillme

RedPill Rating: True

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Offsite Article Link: https://jrpm.me/J5tdRI

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - November 8, 2023 at 3:15 AM

Saved - December 12, 2023 at 1:52 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki admitted to collaborating with private companies like Facebook to combat disinformation. The government has increased research and tracking efforts to flag problematic posts. Evidence, including transcripts and videos, supports this claim. It is important to note that this information has been rated as true. For more details, refer to the provided offsite article.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Jen Psaki Admits the Government Is Colluding With Private Companies to Censor Speech On July 15, 2021, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said: "We’ve increased disinformation research and tracking within the Surgeon General’s office. We’re flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation." The video can be viewed below:

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses the request for tech companies to combat misinformation and the actions the federal government is taking. They mention being in regular contact with social media platforms, increasing disinformation research, flagging problematic posts, and working with medical professionals to share accurate information. They also mention the creation of the COVID Community Corps and investing time in meeting with influencers. Proposed changes for social media platforms include measuring and sharing the impact of misinformation, creating a robust enforcement strategy, taking faster action against harmful posts, and promoting quality information sources in feed algorithms. The speaker emphasizes the importance of accurate information and the need for cooperation from social media platforms.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Thanks, Jen. Can you talk a little bit more about this request for tech companies to be more aggressive in financing misinformation? Has the administration been in touch with any of these companies? And are there any actions that the federal government can take to ensure their cooperation? Because we've seen from the start, there? There's not a lot of action on some of these platforms. Speaker 1: Sure. Well, first we are in regular touch with these social media informed, and those engagements typically happen through members of our senior staff, but also members of our COVID nineteen team. Given as in. Doctor. Murthy conveyed, this is a big issue of misinformation specifically on the pandemic. In terms of actions, Alex, that in? We have taken or we're working to take, I should say, from the federal government. We've increased disinformation research and tracking within the Surgeon General's office. In We're flagging problematic posts for Facebook, that spread disinformation. We're working with doctors and medical professionals to connect, 2 connected medical experts a popular with popular who are popular with their audiences with, with accurate information and boost trusted content. So we're helping get trusted content out there. In We also created the COVID nineteen the COVID community court to get factual information into the hands of local messengers. And we're also investing, as you all have seen in the Presidents, the vice president's, and doctor Fauci's time in meeting with influencers who also have large reaches to a lot of these target audiences who can spread and share Accurate information. You saw an example of that yesterday. I believe that video will be out tomorrow. I think that was your question, Steve, yesterday, the full follow-up there. There also proposed changes that we have made to social media platforms, including Facebook. And those specifically are 4 key steps. In? One, that they measure and publicly share the impact of misinformation on their platform. Facebook should provide in. Publicly and transparently data on the reach of COVID nineteen, COVID vaccine misinformation, not just engagement, but the reach of the misinformation, and the audience that it's reaching. That will help us ensure we're getting accurate information to people. This should be provided not just to researchers, but to the public. So that the public knows and understands what is accurate and inaccurate. Second, that we have recommended, proposed that they create a robust enforcement strategy a that bridges their properties and provides transparency about the rules. So about I think this was a question asked before. There's about 12 people who are producing 65% of anti vaccine misinformation on social media platforms? All of them remain active on Facebook despite some even being banned on other platforms, Including Facebook, ones that Facebook owns. 3rd, it's important to take faster action against harmful posts. As you all know, information travels quite quickly on social media platforms. Sometimes it's not accurate and Facebook needs to move more quickly to remove harmful, in, violative posts. Post that will be within their policies for removal often remain up for days. That's too long. The information spreads too quickly. Finally, we have proposed they promote quality information sources in their feed algorithm. Facebook has repeatedly shown that they have the leverage to promote quality information? We've seen them effectively do this, in their algorithm over low quality information, and they've chosen not to use it in this case in on that certainly an area that would have an impact. So these are, certainly the proposals. We engage with them regularly, and they certainly understand what our asks are.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Links to Evidence: Original White House Transcript: https://jrpm.me/yQchNw Archived Video (MP4): https://jrpm.me/yyVkZN Archived Transcript (PDF): https://jrpm.me/EvMw6G

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

RedPill Rating: True

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Offsite Article Link: https://jrpm.me/l824pz

Jen Psaki Admits the Government Is Colluding With Private Companies to Censor Speech justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

This is another article we have which was proving to be popular so we've now moved it over to X local content. You can now enjoy it without having to click an external link (unless you want!). 👍

@justredpillme - justredpillme

☀️ This fact-check is brought to you by Sunfluencer, a comprehensive Vitamin D solution with D3, K2, Magnesium, Quercetin, and Zinc, for a low monthly cost. Available here: https://jrpm.me/sun

Quality Vitamin D Supplement | Sunfluencer SUN is a comprehensive vitamin D supplement with added quercetin, zinc for optimal immune function and formulated for optimal absorption & effectiveness. sunfluencer.com

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - October 9, 2023 at 6:34 PM

Saved - October 21, 2023 at 7:16 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In an undated video, Ron Paul claims that both Israel and the US played a role in the creation and rise of Hamas. The video, found on C-SPAN and other platforms, has been circulating for years. Evidence includes an archived MP4 file. This claim has been rated as true by RedPill. For more details, check the offsite article.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Ron Paul Says Israel and the US Helped Create Hamas In an older, undated recorded video from C-SPAN, Ron Paul said that both Israel and the United States were responsible for the creation and rise to power of Hamas. Although the video is itself undated, copies of this video have been found online elsewhere, including YouTube which has comments as old as 9 years. Watch the video below.

Video Transcript AI Summary

A congressman from Texas opposes a resolution regarding the situation in Gaza, stating that it harms the United States and Israel. He believes that the US has a moral responsibility for both sides due to providing aid to Arab nations and Israel. However, he also highlights the political liability of intervention and mentions the history of Hamas being indirectly supported by Israel. He criticizes the US for trying to impose its system on the world and mentions the blowback from past actions. The congressman concludes that the resolution is not in the interest of the United States or Israel.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The gentleman from Florida is recognized. Thank you, madam speaker. I'd like to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Texas, doctor Paul. Gentleman is recognized for Speaker 1: 2 minutes. For yielding, and I ask unanimous consent to revise and Speaker 0: extend my remarks. Without objection. Speaker 1: Madam speaker, I rise in opposition to this resolution. Not because, I am taking and and picking who the bad guys are and who the good guys are. But I'm looking at this more from the angle of being a, A, United States citizen and American. And I think resolutions like this, really do us great harm. In many ways, what's happening in the Middle East, and in particular with Gaza right now. We have some moral responsibility for both sides, in in a way because we provide help and funding, for both Arab nations and Israel. And, so we definitely have a moral Responsibility, and especially now today, the weapons being used to, kill so many Palestinians are weapons and, American funds, especially, are being used for this. But there's a political liability, which I think is something that We fail to look at because too often there's so much blowback from our intervention in areas that we shouldn't be involved in. You know, Hamas, if you look at the history, you'll find out that Hamas was encouraged and really started by Israel because they wanted Hamas to counteract Yasser Arafat. That. He said, well, yeah, that was better than and served his purpose, but we didn't want Hamas to do this. So then, we as Americans say, well, We have such a good system. We're gonna impose this on the world. We're gonna invade Iraq and teach people how to be Democrats. We want free elections. We encourage the Palestinians to have a free election. They do, and they elect Hamas. So we first indirectly and directly Through Israel, help establish Hamas. Then we have election. Then Hamas becomes dominant, so we have to kill him. You know, it it just doesn't make sense. During during the eighties, you know, we were allied with Osama bin Laden. And, we Contending with the Soviets. It was at that time our CAA thought it was good if we lies the Muslim world. So we financed in the madrasa schools to radicalize the Muslims in order to compete with the With the Soviets, there's too much blowback. There's a lot of reasons why we should oppose this resolution. It is not in the interest of the United States. Speaker 0: It's not Speaker 1: in the interest of Israel either.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Links To Evidence: Archived Ron Paul Video (MP4): https://jrpm.me/CEq9Av

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

RedPill Rating: True

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Offsite Article Link: https://jrpm.me/PYWPm1

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - August 10, 2023 at 2:20 AM

Saved - October 20, 2023 at 3:34 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In a 2017 interview with CBS Sunday Morning, Hillary Clinton suggested that Donald Trump knew he was an illegitimate president. Democrats have criticized election deniers as extremists. Video evidence supports this claim. (RedPill Rating: True) For more details, refer to the offsite article.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Hillary Clinton Said Trump Was an Illegitimate President In an interview on CBS Sunday Morning, in September of 2017, with reporter Jane Pauley, Hillary Clinton was asked about her election campaign against Donald Trump. In response to that question, she replied: I believe he knows he is an illegitimate president. He knows… he knows... The Democrats have previously said that election deniers are extremists.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0, a former candidate, expresses gratitude for the honor of being a candidate and shares personal happiness. However, they also express concern about the damage being done to the country's future, values, and institutions. Speaker 1 mentions the continued popularity of the phrase "lock her up" in reference to Speaker 0. Speaker 0 believes that the current president knows he is illegitimate and suggests that he is obsessed with them due to a guilty conscience. Speaker 0 supports holding the president accountable and believes there should be an impeachment inquiry. They express confidence that certain events from their own election will not happen again in the future.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Being your candidate has been one of the greatest honors of my life. Speaker 1: No surprise. 3 years after the historic election of 2016, You know how you're doing Speaker 0: on any given day. Personally, I'm doing well. And Having my grandchildren and especially a new 2 month old grandson has been a gift beyond measure. I feel very blessed. I feel good. But I can't deny that a big part of me cares deeply about what's happening in the country and what I fear is the damage that's being done to our future, the damage being done to our values, our institutions, and try to think of ways that I can help those who are on the front lines of the fight. Speaker 1: Your name doesn't come up much on any campaign except for Donald Trump's. Mhmm. Lock her up is still a big Popular Speaker 0: align. I believe he knows he's an illegitimate president. He knows. He knows that There were a bunch of different reasons why the election turned out the way it did. And I take responsibility for those parts of it that I should, but, Jane, it was like Applying for a job and getting 66,000,000 letters of, recommendation and losing to A corrupt human tornado. And so I know that he knows that this wasn't on the level. I don't know that we'll ever know everything that happened, but Clearly, we know a lot and are learning more every day, and history will probably sort it all out. So of course he's obsessed with me. And I believe that it's a guilty conscience in so much as he has a conscience. Speaker 1: Of course, given the events of the past week, now the question is, how will it end? The president must be held accountable. No one is above the law. This is familiar territory for her. Speaker 0: The House Judiciary Committee voted to recommend that the House impeach president Nixon. Speaker 1: 6. In 1974, Hillary Rodham was a young lawyer on the House Judiciary Committee staff looking into the impeachment of Richard Nixon. 6 and, of course, in 1998, as Hillary Rodham Clinton You lived through an impeachment as first lady in the Clinton administration. And Speaker 0: which is such a blatant effort to use his presidential position to advance his personal and political Interests, there should be an impeachment inquiry opened. And I don't care who you're for in the Democratic primary or whether you're a Republican. When the president of the United States, who has taken an oath to protect and defend the constitution, and by that, defend the American people and their interests, Uses his position to, in effect, extort a foreign government for his own political purposes. I think that is very much what the founders worried about in high crimes and misdemeanors. Speaker 1: So What could happen if in in another Another 4 years of the Trump administration. Speaker 0: I I don't accept that. I don't believe that will happen. I believe that there were many funny things that happened in my election that will not happen again, and I'm hoping that both the public and the press understand the way that Trump plays this game.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Links To Evidence: Archived Interview Segment Video (MP4): https://jrpm.me/4r6ojM

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

RedPill Rating: True

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Offsite Article Link: https://jrpm.me/qKFDoB

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - August 25, 2023 at 5:07 PM

Saved - October 17, 2023 at 12:07 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Karine Jean-Pierre, a political figure, faced scrutiny for a tweet claiming the 2016 election was stolen. When questioned about it, she dismissed the comparison to current election denial. A video of the exchange is available. Evidence includes the original tweet, a response from Daily Wire, and an archived copy of the video. The claim is rated as true. For more details, refer to the offsite article linked.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Karine Jean-Pierre Is an Election Denier In a tweet dated Dec 17, 2016, Karine Jean-Pierre said that the 2016 election was stolen. When confronted about this tweet by Peter Doocy, she had this to say: Doocy: “You tweeted in 2016 that Trump stole an election.” KJP: “I was waiting for when you were going to ask that question.” Doocy: “If denying election results is extreme now, why wasn't it then?" KJP: “That comparison that you made is just ridiculous.” X posts prohibit mixed media of images and videos, so the video of this exchange is included below in a connected post.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Video of the exchange:

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 1 addresses the accusation of stolen elections by MAGA Republicans. Speaker 0 mentions a tweet and the claim that Brian Kemp stole an election. Speaker 1 acknowledges the question and dismisses the comparison as ridiculous. They clarify that they were referring to the threat to voting rights at that time.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The new attention on the MAGA Republicans. You tweeted Oh, Speaker 1: I knew that he's coming. Speaker 0: Stole an election. Speaker 1: I was waiting, Peter, when you were gonna ask me that question. Speaker 0: Brian Kemp stole an election. If denying election results is extreme now. Speaker 1: Yep. So let's let's be really clear. That that comparison that you made is just It's ridiculous. I have been, I have been well, you're asking me a question. Let me answer it. Speaker 0: And you said it Speaker 1: was ridiculous. I was talking specifically at that time of what was happening with voting rights and the what was in danger of voting rights. That's what I was speaking to at the time.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Links To Evidence: Original KJP Tweet: https://jrpm.me/BSjojm Original Daily Wire Tweet of Response: https://jrpm.me/HCLyFU Archived Copy of Response Video (MP4): https://jrpm.me/WpHKB1

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

RedPill Rating: True

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Offsite Article Link: https://jrpm.me/Sxt8xP

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - October 11, 2023 at 1:43 PM

Saved - October 11, 2023 at 5:28 PM

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Think the government wouldn't collude with private social media companies to censor voices? Think again. Watch their literal admission here:

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - July 26, 2023 at 2:54 PM

Saved - August 29, 2023 at 4:15 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Hunter Biden's lawyers admit that his personal data was on the laptop in question. They request an investigation into individuals who violated federal laws by accessing and distributing his data without consent. The lawyers' letter confirms that the laptop contained Hunter's data, some of which was distributed without his consent. It is unclear how much data was his. The letter also suggests possible manipulation of the laptop's data. Evidence links and archived documents support these claims.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Hunter Biden's Lawyers Admit His Data Was on the Laptop On February 1, 2023, lawyers who represent Hunter Biden, admitted that data on the laptop in question was Hunter Biden’s personal data. In the letter, the lawyers start off by saying the following: We write on behalf of our client, Robert Hunter Biden, to request an investigation into the following individuals for whom there is considerable reason to believe violated various federal laws in accessing, copying, manipulating, and/or disseminating Mr. Biden’s personal computer data. They go on to emphasize multiple times that Hunter Biden did not provide consent for distribution of his personal data from the laptop: Mr. Biden did not consent to Messrs. Mac Isaac, Giuliani, or Costello providing his computer data to any third parties This letter establishes: ➡️The laptop contained Hunter Biden's data. ➡️Some of that data was distributed without Hunter's consent. (PDF): https://jrpm.me/7HmTka This is the same laptop that more than 50 former senior intelligence officials outlined their belief that the disclosure of the emails from the laptop had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” (PDF): https://jrpm.me/GjWRnG It is important to note that the letter Hunter Biden’s lawyers sent, does not necessarily admit that all of the data on the laptop was his, only that at least some portion of the data on there was his. How much this portion represents is not currently known.

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Links To Evidence: Archived Letter: https://jrpm.me/7HmTka Archived Statement: https://jrpm.me/GjWRnG Original AP News Reporting: https://jrpm.me/4FOziP Original DailyMail Reporting: https://jrpm.me/h8Gc4J Original NYPost Reporting: https://jrpm.me/YrMFug

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

RedPill Rating: True

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Offsite Article Link: https://jrpm.me/KJEQTV

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Note: Since this article was being posted by our bot a lot, we figured we would turn it into a Twitter-local piece of content so users didn't have to click out to go to another website. Enjoy! 👍

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Snice we can't edit the above tweet, and we want to be as accurate as possible, we will add it here: ➡️This letter also establishes the claim that data on the hard drive / laptop may have been manipulated as well.

@justredpillme — justredpillme

Posted - August 1, 2023 at 4:32 AM

Saved - August 1, 2023 at 8:42 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Joe Biden assured in an interview that his family members would not engage in any foreign business, emphasizing that they would not trade on the family name. This statement was confirmed in a video exchange. Evidence supporting this claim can be found in archived videos and sourced tweets. For further details, refer to the provided offsite article.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Joe Biden Said His Family Members Would Not Be Engaged in Any Foreign Business The CEO of Axios, Mike Allen interviewed Joe Biden in a video branded as ‘Axios on HBO’. HBO’s own YouTube channel lists the upload date of portions of this interview as December, Oct 08, 2019. Mike Allen asked Joe Biden: You’re elected, you’re in office, what guardrails would you have to be sure that your son, your brother jimmy, doesn’t do anything to trade on the family name? Joe Biden responded with: They will not be engaged in any foreign business. … No one is going to be engaged in that kind of thing. When asked a second time by the interviewer: So no foreign business for your relatives? Joe Biden responded with: Correct. The video of this exchange can be viewed below.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about his son's involvement in a Ukrainian energy company facing corruption charges. Speaker 1 claims to have no knowledge of his son's activities and trusts him. Speaker 0 questions the lack of accountability, but Speaker 1 deflects by mentioning Trump's family. Speaker 1 denies any wrongdoing and states that there is no evidence against his son. When asked about guardrails if elected, Speaker 1 asserts that his relatives will not engage in foreign business due to the current administration's controversies. No foreign business dealings will occur.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: To serve on the board of a Ukrainian energy company facing serious corruption charges, you were the vice president running point on Ukraine. The average Joe hears that and says, That sounds fishy. What's your understanding of what your son was doing for an extraordinary amount of money? Speaker 1: I don't know what he was doing. I know he was on the board. I found out he was on the board after he was on the board. And that was it. And there's nobody Speaker 0: We have a lot of time. Isn't this something you wanna get to the bottom of? Speaker 1: No, because I trust my son. Speaker 0: But that doesn't pass the smell test. Like, when you're vice president, isn't there a higher standard? Don't you need Speaker 1: to know What's happening with Speaker 0: your family? Don't you need to put down some guardrails? Speaker 1: Unless there was something on its face that was wrong. There's There's nothing on his face that was wrong. Look, if you want to talk about problems, you know, let's talk about Trump's family. I mean, come on. This is so these guys are amazing. Speaker 0: So you think that everything that happened was kosher? Speaker 1: You know there's not 1 single bit of evidence, not one little tiny bit to see if anything done was wrong. You know that. But you keep asking me these questions. It's okay. He you know, you're you know, you're doing what you have to do. But I'm not worried about it. Look, the American public knows me. Speaker 0: Last 1 on this. Say you're elected, you're in office, what guardrails would you have to be sure that Your son, your brother, Jamie, doesn't do anything to trade on the family name. Speaker 1: They will not be engaged in any foreign business because of what's happened in this administration. No one's tradition. No one's going to be seeking patents for things from China. No one's going to be engaged in that kind Speaker 0: of thing. So no foreign business for your relatives in

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Links To Evidence: Archived Video (MP4): https://jrpm.me/zCSCad Sourced Tweet (@bennyjohnson): https://jrpm.me/GY7jzB

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

RedPill Rating: True

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Offsite Article Link: https://jrpm.me/96W6TT

@TedNugent — Ted Nugent

Posted - June 27, 2023 at 12:56 AM

Saved - June 27, 2023 at 12:43 PM

@TedNugent - Ted Nugent

@justredpillme - justredpillme

@TedNugent https://t.co/HOaYgyGO0S