TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @karlmehta

Saved - October 21, 2025 at 5:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m Satchin Panda, a biology professor who studies circadian rhythms. I teach that the body’s internal clock, when ignored, can drive diabetes, weight gain, and aging. I co‑discovered melanopsin—the blue‑light sensor that times the clock. Modern life—late light, indoor days, irregular eating—disrupts genes. Time‑restricted eating (8–12 hours) improves weight, cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose. Practical tricks: steady sleep, daylight, and dim screens.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This is Satchin Panda. He's a biology professor who's studied circadian rhythms for 20+ years. His message? Your body has an internal clock—and ignoring it causes diabetes, weight gain, and early aging. Here are 6 timing tricks to sync your circadian rhythm: 🧵 https://t.co/vF6KOaIssG

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Panda is a professor at the Salk Institute in California. In 2002, he co-discovered melanopsin, a blue-light sensing protein in your eyes that controls your master biological clock. This discovery was named one of Science magazine's top 10 breakthroughs. https://t.co/QlHr2TstCO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on a landmark paper from Sachin's lab, published in 2012, which established an important foundation for subsequent human research. The study was conducted in mice and examined the effects of feeding patterns on metabolic outcomes, specifically within the context of a high-fat diet. The central finding highlighted by the title is that time-restricted feeding, implemented without reducing caloric intake, prevents metabolic diseases in mice fed a high-fat diet. In other words, the study demonstrates that the variation studied was not the quantity of food consumed, but the timing of meals. The emphasis of the paper is on the timing of eating as the key variable. By showing that metabolic health can be preserved or improved through restricting the window of feeding while keeping total caloric intake constant, the research points to meal timing as a crucial factor in metabolic regulation. The conclusion drawn from the title and framing is that altering when nutrients are consumed can have protective effects against metabolic disorders, independent of reducing overall calories. The significance attributed to this work lies in its influence on future research directions. Being described as a landmark paper, it set the basis for studies in humans that followed later, suggesting that time-restricted eating patterns observed to be beneficial in mice might translate to human physiology and inform dietary strategies aimed at preventing metabolic diseases. The study therefore positions the timing of food intake as a potentially powerful variable in metabolic health, separate from total caloric intake. In summary, the 2012 paper from Sachin's lab demonstrates that in mice on a high-fat diet, implementing time-restricted feeding without lowering calories can prevent metabolic diseases. The study’s title explicitly communicates that the variable of interest is when the mice eat, not what or how much they eat, and the work is presented as foundational for subsequent human studies exploring similar concepts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The landmark paper that came from Sachin's lab was published in 2012. This was a paper in mice that set the basis for studies in humans that came later. And the title of this paper is time restricted feeding without reducing caloric intake prevents metabolic diseases in mice fed a high fat diet. So the title tells us a lot. It says that what's varied in this study is not what these mice ate. It was when they ate it.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Melanopsin tells your brain when it's day or night by sensing blue light. It triggers melatonin at night (makes you sleepy) and suppresses it in the morning (makes you alert). But modern life is destroying this rhythm.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

We're exposed to bright lights at midnight. We stay indoors during the day. We eat at 11 PM, then again at 6 AM. Result? Your body has no idea what time it is. Nearly 80% of your genes turn on and off based on time of day. When your clock breaks, disease follows. https://t.co/ejDKZERLd7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The circadian clocks are more sensitive to light, and light is the most dominant time giver. When daylight saving time changes or we travel across time zones, we feel kind of crappy because our daily activities are out of sync with our internal clock.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The circadian clocks, as you and I know, are more sensitive to light. Light is the most dominant time giver. So for example, when daylight saving time changes or when we travel from one time zone to another time zone, we feel kind of crappy because our daily activities are out of sync from our internal clock.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Panda's research links circadian disruption to diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, depression, cancer, and accelerated aging. But then he discovered something that flips nutrition science on its head... https://t.co/ZSkiExPRLr

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

In his experiments, mice ate a high-fat diet. One group could eat anytime (24 hours). The other only ate within 8-12 hours. Same calories. Same food. Just different timing. The results shocked everyone... https://t.co/13a2WvAJn3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that eight to ten hours may be the ideal starting window for time-restricted eating, and that with high physical activity or sports, one could go up to twelve hours. In mice, twelve hours of feeding with twelve hours of fasting has shown many benefits, though not all. Regarding humans, no systematic twelve-hour study has been conducted, but there was a study in Europe from the Tinhai Collet Lab. They used the My Circadian Clock app, a research app developed for time-restricted eating studies. The study began with nearly 200 Swiss participants, but only a small, highly meticulous group was ultimately analyzed. Participants were divided into two groups: one followed usual feeding, eating whenever they wanted, and the other was advised to eat within a twelve-hour window, while both groups received nutrition guidance aimed at improving health and reducing blood glucose, similar to a diabetes prevention program in the US. The researchers reported that after three months and six months, both groups lost the same amount of body weight, with not much significant difference between the groups. However, both groups improved their health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we think is eight to ten hours may be the ideal spot to begin with. And once you are physically active and you are also spending a lot of energy in physical activity or sports, you can even go up to twelve hours because in mice we have done that experiment. After twelve hours, they do get a lot of benefits, not all, but So this is twelve hours of feeding? Twelve hours of feeding, twelve hours of fasting. In humans, again, nobody has done systematically twelve hours, but there was one study in Europe from Tinhai Collet Lab. And Tinhai and I, we collaborate. So they used our My Circadian Clock app. This is a research app we developed just to, this is mostly used in time restricted eating studies. And he had nearly, I think he started with 200 Swiss participants, but then at the end, he selected and took very small number of group, people who are very meticulous about recording all their food and divided them into usual feeding, whatever they wanted to eat, whenever they wanted to eat. And they were given the advice of Swiss nutrition advice that's given to improve health and reduce blood glucose, almost like diabetes prevention program in The US. And then the other group was given advice to eat within twelve hours. This was very early on in time restricted eating, and we thought that the mice were getting some benefit. Let's try whether twelve hours has any benefit. The bottom line is, at the end of three months and six months, what he reported is both groups lost the same amount of body weight. And then there's not too much significant difference between groups. But both groups actually improved their health.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Mice eating anytime: obese, diabetic, diseased liver. Mice eating within 8-12 hours: slim, healthy, normal cholesterol. WHEN they ate mattered more than WHAT they ate. Panda had discovered time-restricted eating.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

He tested this in humans with metabolic syndrome. 19 people ate within a 10-hour window for 12 weeks. No calorie counting. Just timing. Results: 8+ pounds lost, 11% cholesterol reduction, blood pressure improved, blood sugar normalized. 75% still followed it a year later.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

TIMING TRICK #1 & #2: Go to bed within the same 1-hour window every night. Stay in bed for 8 hours. After waking, wait 1-2 hours before your first calorie. This lets melatonin drop and cortisol rise naturally. Coffee is fine, it resets your clock like bright light. https://t.co/Xwiv9kume3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the value of a consistent sleep schedule: going to bed at the same time and waking up at the same time. The body loves that regularity. If you change one part, such as the wake time, it can be disruptive. The speaker notes that many people who rise at five every morning should avoid changing that routine. On weekends, it’s common to think, “it’s 05:00. What am I doing here?” but the speaker says that maintaining regularity is beneficial. They mention the common advice that, as much as you don’t want to, you’re better off getting up at 05:00 seven days a week because of the needed regularity. The hard part is turning off the TV and watching one more episode to adjust that bedtime, which is what you should work on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Going to bed at the same time, waking up at the same time, your body loves that kind of regularity. And if you're gonna change one, we've shown and you probably everyone in this room for all the years of training, working on a team, whatever, you got up at five every morning, try changing that. That's ridiculous. On the weekends, you're like, it's 05:00. What am I doing here? Yeah. And and that's actually a good thing. And by the way, on weekends, they say, as much as you don't want to, you're better off getting up at 05:00 seven days a week because of that regularity that's needed. But, you know, the hard part is turning off the tube and watching one more of the series to to adjust that going to bedtime, which is what you should work on.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

TIMING TRICK #3: Eat all calories within an 8-10 hour window. Example: First bite at 8 AM → Last bite at 6 PM. This gives your body 14-16 hours to fast, repair, and clean up cellular damage. Your organs sync to this rhythm. https://t.co/LBk8P8rZ6H

Video Transcript AI Summary
Experiments show that feeding mice during their rest period causes the liver clock to follow feeding time instead of its own routine, indicating that by changing feeding time, we can tune the liver clock. Repeated studies, including in February 2009, demonstrated that outside the brain center called the suprachiasmatic nucleus, or SCN, which is considered the master circadian clock, almost the rest of the brain follows when we eat. This finding came from Pierre Sam Bohn's lab in Europe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When it fed mice during their time, the liver clock, instead of following its own routine, liver clock actually started following food. So that means by changing our feeding time, we can change, we can tune our liver clock. And subsequently, the same experiment has been repeated many times, and we repeated that in 02/2009, and we figured out, yes, actually, outside this brain center called suprachiasmatic nucleus, or SCN, which is considered the master circadian clock, almost the rest of the brain even follows when we eat. And that came out from Pierre Sam Bohn's lab in Europe.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

TIMING TRICK #4 & #5: Get 30-60 minutes of bright daylight within 2 hours of waking. Even cloudy days work. Stop eating 2-3 hours before bed. Late-night eating disrupts sleep and spikes blood sugar when you should be fasting. https://t.co/5A7Ktrc1KM

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that you can reset your sleep pattern in just two days by controlling your circadian rhythm with light. The key factor in sleep quality is the circadian rhythm, and light is the best controller of that clock. The recommended practice is thirty minutes of natural daylight exposure first thing in the morning. This exposure should be through unfiltered daylight (not through filtered windows or sunglasses) and is best done outside. Do not look directly at the sun; the morning light needs to hit your eyes indirectly for twenty to thirty minutes. When this light reaches the cells at the back of the eyes, it signals the brain that it is daytime, triggering a wake-up response with a surge of cortisol and insulin, and you’re off and running. About fourteen to sixteen hours later, the body naturally releases melatonin, the sleep hormone. Without adequate morning light, the brain doesn’t receive the signal, and the sleep cycle can drift, leading to difficulty falling asleep on time or waking up groggy. The guidance also suggests getting a small amount of evening light as dusk approaches, which helps reinforce the sense that the day is ending. For practical implementation, tomorrow you should step outside for a stroll or simply sit near a clear window and sip your coffee, with no gadgets, no supplements, and no cost involved. This routine aligns with what humanity has done since the dawn of time to sleep deeper, longer, and better. Additionally, if you wear a smartwatch or activity tracker that monitors sleep, you may see positive changes as you manage light. The speaker emphasizes that using and managing light is very good for hormones and is one of the most critical parts of sleep hygiene.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In just two days, you can reset your sleep pattern so you'll be tired at the right time each night and wake up refreshed and rested in the morning. According to sleep specialists, one of the most influential factors in your sleep quality is your circadian rhythm. And the best controller of that clock, light. Here's the trick. Get thirty minutes of natural daylight exposure first thing in the morning. Can't be through filtered windows or sunglasses. In fact, it's best if you can be outside. Don't look at the sun. The unfiltered morning sunlight just needs to hit your eyes indirectly for twenty to thirty minutes. When that registers on the cells in the back of your eyes, it tells your brain, it's daytime. Wake up. You get a surge of cortisol and insulin, and you're off and running. That resets your internal clock, and about fourteen to sixteen hours later, your body naturally releases melatonin, your sleep hormone. Without adequate morning light, your brain doesn't get the signal, and your sleep cycle drifts. That's why people often can't fall asleep on time or they wake up groggy. It also helps if you can get a little dose of evening light as it gets on towards dusk. This reinforces the rhythm of the day ending. So tomorrow, step outside for a stroll or just sit near a clear window and sip your coffee. No gadgets, no supplements, no cost. It's what humanity's done since the dawn of time to sleep deeper, longer, and better. If you have a wearable or a smartwatch that monitors sleep, just watch it get happy over this. Using and managing light. Very good for your hormones and one of the most critical parts of your sleep hygiene.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

TIMING TRICK #6: Dim lights 2-3 hours before bed. Blue light from screens tricks your brain into thinking it's morning. This suppresses melatonin and delays sleep. Use night mode on devices or blue-light blocking glasses after 8 PM. https://t.co/xstbV1CYvR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that children who sleep in rooms with a nightlight or dim lights are much more likely to develop myopia (nearsightedness). Conversely, children who sleep in very dark rooms, whether due to very dim nightlights or complete darkness, have a significantly lower probability of developing myopia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Children that sleep in rooms that have a nightlight or dim lights are much more likely to develop myopia, nearsightedness. Conversely, children that sleep in very dark rooms, so either very dim nightlights or complete black, they have a much lower, statistically speaking, a significantly lower probability of developing myopia. Near sightedness.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Think about our ancestors: They woke with sunrise, ate during daylight, stopped at sunset, and slept in darkness. This pattern lasted 250,000 years. Only in the last 150 years did we get electric lights and 24/7 food access. Our genes haven't adapted.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Why isn't this mainstream? Doctors aren't trained in circadian medicine. There's no billing code for "eat within 10 hours." And pharmaceutical companies can't patent sunlight or fasting. But the research is undeniable: Your circadian rhythm controls your health.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. This was part 11 of my 50-part series on the best bio hacks based on the recent research to optimize your health. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for part 12. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This is Satchin Panda. He's a biology professor who's studied circadian rhythms for 20+ years. His message? Your body has an internal clock—and ignoring it causes diabetes, weight gain, and early aging. Here are 6 timing tricks to sync your circadian rhythm: 🧵 https://t.co/vF6KOaIssG

Saved - October 5, 2025 at 6:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Gratitude is a powerful yet often overlooked remedy that can significantly reduce depression, stress, and improve sleep. I explored the science behind gratitude, discovering that it activates brain circuits linked to reward and trust, enhancing mood and social bonds. To practice effectively, I recommend listing three specific things I'm grateful for a few times a week, focusing on people rather than things, and writing gratitude letters. Mixing methods keeps the practice engaging. Though it may feel awkward initially, the benefits in mood and resilience are clear.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Gratitude is one of the most ignored natural remedies on Earth. Used right, it decreases depression symptoms by 35%, decreases stress, and improves sleep. So, I started researching the science behind it... What I discovered will blow your mind: 🧵 https://t.co/SAHJYQfCCM

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Most people think gratitude is just being "nice" or "positive." But here's the science: Gratitude practice activates neural circuits linked to reward and trust, releasing dopamine and oxytocin. These neurochemical shifts improve mood, reduce stress, and strengthen social bonds. https://t.co/d4vXGIxtn4

Video Transcript AI Summary
" I think people got life a little confused right now." "They're focused on what they don't have." "What a pleasurable thing." "Please don't take it for granted." "Understand that the ability that you have now to run, to walk your dog, to swim, to type, it can be taken away from you." "It's not mine. It's been given to me by the grace of God. Use what I have." "Use what you have to help others." "an attitude of gratitude, of humility, understand where the gift comes from." "You can't take it with you. But you can leave it here." "He'll never see a U Haul behind a hearse."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think people got life a little confused right now. They're they're so focused on what they don't have. They don't have the capacity for the gratitude of what they do have starting with health. So every day you wake up and you and the people you love are good, you're good. Speaker 1: And I see people walking their dog and I put myself in their shoes and go, God. That must be so great just to walk your dog down the street. What a pleasurable thing. They don't realize it. You take it for granted now. Please don't take it for granted. Understand that the ability that you have now to run, to walk your dog, to swim, to type, it can be taken away from you and just appreciate your life for what you have. Speaker 0: And one of the most important lessons in life Mhmm. That you should know is to remember to have an attitude of gratitude, of humility, understand where the gift comes from. It's not mine. It's been given to me by the grace of God. Use what I have. Use what you have to help others. Mhmm. You know, who on your last day, you can't take it with you. That's that is true. But you can leave it here. He'll never see a U Haul behind a hearse.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The mechanism is elegant: Gratitude practice → activates prefrontal cortex → reduces cortisol (stress hormone) → increases oxytocin release → strengthens emotional regulation circuits. Your brain literally rewires itself for resilience and optimism. Now, here's how to do it right:

Video Transcript AI Summary
When you're grateful, your heart starts to beat in a more rhythmic way that causes the arteries in your heart literally to swell. When you actually feel gratitude, there's a physiological component that takes place where your heart feels full. It's a different level of awareness than when you're feeling resentful or you're feeling impatient. We saw that when a person's feeling gratitude, once energy makes it to the heart, somehow it begins to move to the brain. That is that state of imagination. So we teach people then to feel grateful for things that they haven't had yet as well as the things that they have in their life, and it tends to produce profound changes in their biology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you're grateful, your heart starts to beat in a more rhythmic way that causes the arteries in your heart literally to swell. When you actually feel gratitude, there's a physiological component that takes place where your heart feels full. And when energy or blood makes it to the heart and energy makes the heart, it's a different consciousness. It's a different level of awareness than when you're feeling resentful or you're feeling impatient. We saw that when a person's feeling gratitude, once energy makes it to the heart, somehow it begins to move to the brain. And if you were to imagine, like, grabbing a big sheet and going like this, it's almost like the heart is causing this beautiful pattern of energy moving to the brain, causes the brain to move in these beautiful alpha brainwave states. That is that state of imagination. So we teach people then to feel grateful for things that they haven't had yet as well as the things that they have in their life, and it tends to produce profound changes in their biology.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1) The 3-item rule: Research shows listing 3 specific things you're grateful for is the sweet spot. Do this 3-5x per week, not daily. Daily practice can become rote and lose effectiveness. Spacing matters.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2) Be specific, not generic: Don't write "I'm grateful for my family." Write "I'm grateful my sister called to check on me when I was stressed about work." Specificity activates stronger neural responses and emotional processing.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3) Focus on people, not things: Gratitude for relationships yields stronger benefits than gratitude for possessions. Why? Social connection activates deeper reward pathways. Think: "I'm grateful for my friend's support" > "I'm grateful for my new phone." https://t.co/WjK9GSXRmd

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Listen, if you want the best hack I've ever learned in fifty four years, absolutely hands down the best trick, if you want to call it that, to give you the biggest impact in life, is when you wake up, be immediately grateful." "Instantly be grateful and have gratitude that you get to simply get the day to live." "So when you open your eyes and you realize, I'm still here, I get another day, Understanding that that's the most valuable thing you're gonna receive all day long." "So act enthusiastic and realize the value you just received every morning and don't be ungrateful." "Be grateful." "Immensely grateful, will then shift your perspective and literally cause the rest of the day to be amazing, the rest of your life to be amazing." "That's the hack."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Listen, if you want the best hack I've ever learned in fifty four years, absolutely hands down the best trick, if you want to call it that, to give you the biggest impact in life, is when you wake up, be immediately grateful. Instantly be grateful and have gratitude that you get to simply get the day to live. So when you open your eyes and you realize, I'm still here, I get another day, Understanding that that's the most valuable thing you're gonna receive all day long. So act enthusiastic and realize the value you just received every morning and don't be ungrateful. Be grateful. Immensely grateful, will then shift your perspective and literally cause the rest of the day to be amazing, the rest of your life to be amazing. That's the hack.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4) Write gratitude letters: Studies show writing (but not necessarily sending) letters of gratitude produces the largest mental health improvements. Spend 15 minutes describing how someone impacted you. The benefits last for weeks.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5) Mix your methods: Combining different practices—journaling, letters, verbal expression—yields greater benefit than any single approach. Variety prevents habituation and keeps the neural pathways engaged.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The physical health benefits are remarkable: Gratitude practice lowers blood pressure, decreases inflammation markers, and strengthens cardiac function. One study found heart failure patients who kept gratitude journals had better heart rate variability. https://t.co/mYWvFb1I7f

Video Transcript AI Summary
Teach your body just for fifteen minutes a day what it would like to feel gratitude, what it would be like. And our data shows that you take someone to do that for four days, three times a day, they make an immunoglobulin called immunoglobulin A. It's your body's natural flu shot. It's the greatest immune chemical we have. 50% increase in four days. Where is that chemistry coming from? They're not taking anything. It's coming from within them. You could actually program your autonomic nervous system to make the pharmacy of chemicals that causes growth and repair to happen in the body. And that's exactly what we're discovering. And when you change your state of being like that every day, get ready.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Teach your body just for fifteen minutes a day what it would like to feel gratitude, what it would be like. And our data shows that you take someone to do that for four days, three times a day, they make a immunoglobulin called immunoglobulin A. It's your body's natural flu shot. It's the greatest immune chemical we have. 50% increase in four days. Where is that chemistry coming from? They're not taking anything. It's coming from within them. Right? You could actually program your autonomic nervous system to make the pharmacy of chemicals that causes growth and repair to happen in the body. And that's exactly what we're discovering. And when you change your state of being like that every day, get ready. Because you're gonna start having synchronicities and opportunities and coincidences and weird things start happening in your life to prove to you that you're actually the creator of your life instead of the victim of your life. Absolutely.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The results speak for themselves: • 10-35% reduction in depression symptoms • 25% Lower cortisol levels • 25% Improved sleep quality • Stronger immune function • Increased life satisfaction and resilience https://t.co/ngSQUjxkPH

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

How to start: Week 1: List 3 specific things, 2x this week Week 2-3: Add one gratitude letter (doesn't have to be sent) Week 4+: Maintain 3-5x per week, mix journaling with verbal expression Progress naturally. Make it sustainable. https://t.co/kHjcRTpn9B

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This isn't comfortable at first—it feels awkward. But I've been practicing gratitude journaling for months. The mood and resilience improvements are undeniable.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. This was part 9 of my 50-part series on the best bio hacks based on the recent research to optimize your health. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for part 10. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Gratitude is one of the most ignored natural remedies on Earth. Used right, it decreases depression symptoms by 35%, decreases stress, and improves sleep. So, I started researching the science behind it... What I discovered will blow your mind: 🧵 https://t.co/SAHJYQfCCM

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

@HeyZoyaKhan Thank you Zoya!

Saved - September 14, 2025 at 2:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Norway's $2 trillion wealth fund, led by CEO Nicolai Tangen, conducted a year-long AI experiment with Claude, resulting in a 20% productivity boost and 213,000 hours saved. Despite initial resistance from investment professionals, AI integration transformed workflows, enabling natural language queries and automated analysis of earnings calls. The AI revealed behavioral biases affecting returns, prompting Tangen to mandate AI use for all employees. Now, with 100% adoption, the fund aims for $400 million in annual savings, demonstrating that AI is essential for critical decision-making in asset management.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

BREAKING: Norway's $2 trillion wealth fund ran a 12-month AI experiment. They gave Claude access to their entire investment workflow. Result: 213,000 hours saved. 20% productivity boost. But what they found hiding in the data changed everything: A Thread 🧵

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Meet Nicolai Tangen, CEO of NBIM - the world's largest sovereign wealth fund. 700 employees managing $2 trillion in assets. In 2022, he made a strategic decision that would reshape their entire operation. But first, he had to address significant organizational resistance...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Tangen began systematically advocating for AI adoption across his 670-person team. The challenge? Most investment professionals viewed AI as potentially disruptive to established workflows. Traditional analysts were spending days on tasks that seemed impossible to automate. Then Claude was introduced...

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm part of the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. We are a $2,000,000,000,000 sovereign wealth fund and 70% equities, 30% fixed income and bonds, and we are only 700 employees worldwide. So we have a single owner, the Ministry of Finance, who represents the Norwegian people, and I'm part of the team here in North America that manages the bulk of the equity assets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm part of the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund. We are a $2,000,000,000,000 sovereign wealth fund and 70% equities, 30% fixed income and bonds, and we are only 700 employees worldwide. So we have a single owner, the Ministry of Finance, who represents the Norwegian people, and I'm part of the team here in North America that manages the bulk of the equity assets.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The first major breakthrough came with their Snowflake data warehouse integration. Portfolio managers could suddenly query complex datasets using natural language. What previously required technical SQL expertise now took seconds. But this was just the initial phase...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Next, they implemented automated earnings call analysis. Claude could process hours of executive commentary and extract key insights efficiently. Risk managers were analyzing significantly more companies in the same timeframe. Meanwhile, something important was happening behind the scenes...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

NBIM monitors news for 9,000 companies across 16 languages. Before Claude: Teams of analysts, days of manual work. After Claude: Minutes of automated analysis with structured insights. The efficiency gains were substantial, but they discovered an unexpected pattern...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The Investment Simulator revealed a critical insight: Human portfolio managers were making predictable behavioral decisions that impacted returns. AI could identify these patterns with 95% accuracy. The fund was experiencing losses due to cognitive biases...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Here's where Tangen made his most decisive move: "It can't be voluntary. If you don't use AI, you will never be promoted." He implemented mandatory AI adoption across all 700 employees. The organizational response was mixed...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

But the measurable results were compelling: • 20% productivity gains (213,000 hours saved annually) • $100 million in trading cost savings • 95% accuracy in voting decisions • 49 million transactions optimized globally The business case was clear.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript presents a case example from the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund, otherwise known as mBIN, described as the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world. It highlights quotes about Claude's impact: 'Claude has fundamentally transformed the way we work at NBN.' 'They've achieved 20% productivity gains.' 'That is two hundred and thirteen thousand hours back a year to focus on what really matters, better decisions and returns for the Norwegian people.' 'As Nikolay put it, Claude has become indispensable.' The remarks frame Claude as delivering measurable efficiency gains and reinforcing the fund aims for better returns to the Norwegian people overall.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One example of these capabilities coming to life is from the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund, otherwise known as mBIN, the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world. To share a quote from their CEO Nikolay, Claude has fundamentally transformed the way we work at NBN. They've achieved 20% productivity gains. That is two hundred and thirteen thousand hours back a year to focus on what really matters, better decisions and returns for the Norwegian people. As Nikolay put it, Claude has become indispensable.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The voting system became particularly effective. They input 40-50 page executive compensation documents into Claude with their guidelines. AI recommendations achieved 95% accuracy. Even their notable "no" vote on Elon Musk's $56 billion Tesla package was AI-assisted.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Today, 100% of NBIM employees use Claude. They're targeting $400 million in annual cost savings. The fund that once struggled with efficiency is now leading AI adoption in asset management. The key lesson wasn't just about technology...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

NBIM's transformation reveals something crucial about enterprise AI: When you're managing $2 trillion and making 49 million transactions annually, AI isn't just a tool - it's your analytical partner for critical decisions. But that partnership requires absolute trust.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The companies scaling AI successfully don't just deploy models and hope for the best. They implement rigorous validation frameworks. Real-time monitoring. Comprehensive governance. Because when AI identifies costly behavioral patterns, you need to trust those insights completely.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Are you an Enterprise AI Leader looking to validate and govern your AI models at scale? http://TrustModel.ai provides the model validation, monitoring, and governance frameworks you need to deploy AI with confidence. Learn more:

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

BREAKING: Norway's $2 trillion wealth fund ran a 12-month AI experiment. They gave Claude access to their entire investment workflow. Result: 213,000 hours saved. 20% productivity boost. But what they found hiding in the data changed everything: A Thread 🧵 https://t.co/QmXKrsg6DG

Saved - September 11, 2025 at 3:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
MIT has uncovered a significant flaw in large language models: "position bias," where AI ignores information based on its location in documents rather than its content. This bias leads to inconsistent answers, particularly affecting enterprise applications like legal, medical, and financial AI. The research revealed a U-shaped performance pattern, with accuracy peaking at the beginning and end of documents but dropping in the middle. Solutions exist, but they require major architectural changes. Organizations are advised to structure critical information strategically and validate AI findings against traditional methods.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

BREAKING: MIT just figured out why LLMs keep giving inconsistent answers to the same questions. They ignore information based on WHERE it appears, not what it says. Here's what 4 months of data revealed: (hint: the smarter the AI gets, the worse this bias becomes)

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

MIT researchers identified a critical flaw in large language models that affects enterprise AI deployments. "Position bias" - AI systematically ignores information based on location in documents. This challenges basic assumptions about AI reliability.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The research was rigorous. MIT tested whether AI models consistently retrieve information regardless of its position within documents. They systematically varied correct answer locations across text sequences. The results were shocking.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

AI shows "lost-in-the-middle" phenomenon. Performance follows a U-shaped pattern: • Highest accuracy at beginnings • Lowest accuracy in middle sections • Moderate recovery near endings This pattern held across all model architectures tested.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Enterprise implications are substantial: • Legal AI missing contract terms • Medical AI overlooking patient symptoms • Financial analysis missing key risk factors Position matters more than content relevance.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Concrete example: Legal team uses AI to analyze a 30-page contract for liability clauses. AI reliably finds clauses on pages 1-3 and 28-30, but systematically misses identical language on page 15. Business risk is real.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Technical cause: "Causal masking" in transformer architecture creates inherent bias toward earlier information. This bias exists regardless of actual content importance. The AI processes location before evaluating significance.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This affects current enterprise workflows: quarterly reports, strategic plans, compliance documents. Any lengthy material where critical information appears in middle sections gets systematically underanalyzed.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

MIT's most significant finding: As models become more sophisticated with additional attention layers, position bias amplifies. Advanced AI systems exhibit stronger systematic biases, not weaker ones.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Lead researcher Xinyi Wu: "These models are black boxes. Users don't know position bias causes inconsistency." Organizations input documents expecting comprehensive analysis but receive incomplete results.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Specific enterprise risks: • Medical AI missing diagnostic information • Financial tools overlooking compliance details • Legal review missing contract provisions Current AI tools exhibit these documented biases.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

MIT identified technical solutions: alternative masking techniques and strategic positional encoding modifications. However, implementation requires fundamental architectural changes to existing models.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Immediate risk mitigation for organizations: • Structure critical information at document beginnings/endings • Implement verification for middle-section content • Never rely solely on AI for comprehensive review • Validate findings against traditional methods

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The research appears at the International Conference on Machine Learning, accelerating industry awareness. Leading AI companies are already incorporating these findings into next-generation models. Position bias is solvable with proper implementation and governance frameworks.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Key insight: Understanding AI limitations enables better deployment strategies. Organizations that acknowledge and work around position bias will extract more reliable value from AI tools. Informed AI adoption beats blind AI adoption.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

P.S. If you're an Enterprise Business Leader looking to validate and govern your AI models to implement them safely: http://TrustModel.ai provides the model validation, monitoring, and governance frameworks you need to deploy AI with confidence. Get your audit here:

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. This was part X of my 50-part series on the best bio hacks based on the recent research to optimize your health. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for part Y. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

BREAKING: MIT just figured out why LLMs keep giving inconsistent answers to the same questions. They ignore information based on WHERE it appears, not what it says. Here's what 4 months of data revealed: (hint: the smarter the AI gets, the worse this bias becomes) https://t.co/GOHbRabi43

Saved - September 11, 2025 at 1:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
AI bias is a critical issue affecting businesses, with 36% of companies experiencing negative impacts in 2024, including revenue loss and customer attrition. AI systems often make biased decisions at scale, as seen in Amazon's failed hiring tool that discriminated against women. Psychological biases, such as confirmation and selection bias, contribute to this problem. To mitigate risks, I recommend testing AI on diverse datasets, implementing human oversight, and establishing governance frameworks. Continuous monitoring is essential to prevent costly lawsuits and ensure fairness.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

AI bias is silently destroying your customer base. Millions of decisions happen daily & executives don't even see it. Here's what it is, why it's happening, & how to fix it (before it tanks your revenue): 🧵

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The numbers are staggering. 36% of companies reported direct negative impacts from AI bias in 2024. 62% lost revenue. 61% lost customers. But here's what most executives don't realize...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Your AI systems aren't just making bad decisions. They're making systematically biased decisions at scale. What would take human recruiters years to accomplish in discriminatory impact, AI achieves in months. And it's happening right now in your business.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Take Amazon's $7 million wake-up call. In 2014, they built an AI hiring tool to automate recruitment. Within a year, they had to scrap it entirely. The reason? It systematically discriminated against women applying for technical jobs.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The AI had learned from 10 years of historical hiring data. Since most past hires were male, it favored male-coded language like "executed" and "captured." It even downgraded resumes containing the word "women's" - as in "women's rugby team."

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Here's where it gets scary for business leaders. Derek Mobley's class action lawsuit against Workday was approved as a nationwide case. The allegation? Their AI rejected candidates based on race, age, and disability. One person. 100+ job rejections. 7 years.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

But why does this keep happening? The answer lies in human psychology. We unconsciously embed our biases into AI systems through something called "cognitive bias." And once it's in there, AI amplifies it at unprecedented scale.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Let's play a game. We may not even know why, but each of us is biased toward one shoe over the others. Now imagine that you're trying to teach a computer to recognize a shoe. You may end up exposing it to your own bias. That's how bias happens in machine learning. But first, what is machine learning? Well, it's used in a lot of technology we use today. Machine learning helps us get from place to place, gives us suggestions, translates stuff, even understands what you say to it. How does it work? With traditional programming, people hand code the solution to a problem step by step. With machine learning, computers learn the solution by finding patterns in data. So it's easy to think there's no human bias in that. But just because something is based on data doesn't automatically make it neutral.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's play a game. Close your eyes and picture a shoe. Okay. Did anyone picture this? This? How about this? We may not even know why, but each of us is biased toward one shoe over the others. Now imagine that you're trying to teach a computer to recognize a shoe. You may end up exposing it to your own bias. That's how bias happens in machine learning. But first, what is machine learning? Well, it's used in a lot of technology we use today. Machine learning helps us get from place to place, gives us suggestions, translates stuff, even understands what you say to it. How does it work? With traditional programming, people hand code the solution to a problem step by step. With machine learning, computers learn the solution by finding patterns in data. So it's easy to think there's no human bias in that. But just because something is based on data doesn't automatically make it neutral.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

There are 4 main psychological triggers creating AI bias: Confirmation bias - we train AI on data that confirms our existing beliefs. Selection bias - we choose training data that isn't truly representative. Outgroup homogeneity bias - we assume people outside our group are all similar.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Recency bias - recent events like COVID or conflicts skew our thinking when building systems. The problem? AI doesn't just inherit these biases. It industrializes them. What affects one candidate at a time becomes thousands of decisions per second.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

So how do you spot it before it costs you millions? Watch for these red flags: Automatic rejections during non-business hours (suggests no human oversight). Declining diversity metrics despite diverse applicant pools. Customer complaints about unfair treatment.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Differential approval rates across demographic groups. 42% of companies admitted they prioritized speed over fairness when deploying AI. If you're moving fast without checking for bias, you're building a lawsuit waiting to happen.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The most vulnerable industries? Financial services - where bias affects creditworthiness and loan approvals. Healthcare - where AI can misdiagnose based on historical male-focused data. HR/Recruitment - where 492 of Fortune 500 companies use automated screening.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Here's your action plan: Before implementing ANY AI tool, test it on diverse datasets. Implement human-in-the-loop processes for final decisions. Use bias detection tools like Google's AI Fairness 360 or IBM's Open Scale. Set up ongoing monitoring systems.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Build diverse teams across race, gender, education, and experience levels. Remember: biases evolve over time. Your AI systems need continuous monitoring, not set-it-and-forget-it deployment. The cost of prevention is always less than the cost of lawsuits.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Create clear governance frameworks that include: Regular bias audits, transparent AI decision processes, and documented testing procedures. Companies with systematic approaches avoid the $365,000+ settlements becoming the new normal.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Are you an Enterprise AI Leader looking to validate and govern your AI models at scale? http://TrustModel.ai provides the model validation, monitoring, and governance frameworks you need to stay ahead. Get your audit:

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

AI bias is silently destroying your customer base. Millions of decisions happen daily & executives don't even see it. Here's what it is, why it's happening, & how to fix it (before it tanks your revenue): 🧵 https://t.co/SGelW2mdsR

Saved - September 3, 2025 at 1:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Yann LeCun, Meta's Chief AI Scientist, has made bold predictions that have influenced a significant shift in Meta's AI budget. He believes autoregressive LLMs like ChatGPT will become obsolete due to inherent architectural flaws. LeCun predicts that video-based AI will surpass text training, emphasizing that true human-level AI requires learning through observation. He foresees the disappearance of proprietary models in favor of open-source foundations and estimates AGI could emerge between 2027 and 2034. Companies must adapt to these changes or risk obsolescence.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

He predicted: • AI vision breakthrough (1989) • Neural network comeback (2006) • Self-supervised learning revolution (2016) Now Yann LeCun's 5 new predictions just convinced Zuckerberg to redirect Meta's entire $20B AI budget. Here's what you should know (& how to prepare):

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

@ylecun is Meta's Chief AI Scientist and Turing Award winner. For 35 years, he's been right about every major AI breakthrough when everyone else was wrong. He championed neural networks during the "AI winter." But his new predictions are his boldest yet...

Video Transcript AI Summary
He is the chief AI scientist at Meta, professor at NYU, Turing Award winner, and one of the seminal figures in the history of artificial intelligence. He and Meta AI have been big proponents of open sourcing AI development and have been walking the walk by open sourcing many of their biggest models, including LAMA two and eventually, LAMA three. Also, Jan has been an outspoken critic of those people in the AI community who warned about the looming danger and existential threat of AGI. He believes the AGI will be created one day, but it will be good. It will not escape human control nor will it dominate and kill all humans. At this moment of rapid AI development, this happens to be somewhat a controversial position.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He is the chief AI scientist at Meta, professor at NYU, Turing Award winner, and one of the seminal figures in the history of artificial intelligence. He and Meta AI have been big proponents of open sourcing AI development and have been walking the walk by open sourcing many of their biggest models, including LAMA two and eventually, LAMA three. Also, Jan has been an outspoken critic of those people in the AI community who warned about the looming danger and existential threat of AGI. He believes the AGI will be created one day, but it will be good. It will not escape human control nor will it dominate and kill all humans. At this moment of rapid AI development, this happens to be somewhat a controversial position.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1. "Nobody in their right mind will use autoregressive LLMs a few years from now." The technology powering ChatGPT and GPT-4? Dead within years. The problem isn't fixable with more data or compute. It's architectural. Here's where it gets interesting...

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Prediction: 'auto regressive LLMs are doomed. A few years from now, nobody in their right mind would use them.' The speaker notes this is why there’s talk of 'LLM elucidation' and acknowledges that 'sometimes they produce nonsense,' attributing it to the auto regressive approach. The question posed is 'what should we replace this by? and are there other types of limitation?' The speaker argues 'we're missing something really big' and that 'we're never going to get to human level AI by just training large language models on bigger data sets. It's just not gonna happen.' He adds, 'never mind humans... we're trying to reproduce mathematicians or scientists. We can't even reproduce what a cat can do.'"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My prediction is that auto regressive LLMs are doomed. A few years from now, nobody in their right mind would use them. Okay? And that's why you've heard about LLM elucidation and things like that. Sometimes they produce nonsense. And it's essentially because of this auto regressive prediction. So the question is what should we replace this by? And are there other types of limitation? Now, I think we're missing something really big in terms of like a new concept of how to build AI systems. We're never going to get to human level AI by just training large language models on bigger data sets. It's just not gonna happen. And I'll give you another reason why in a minute. But never mind humans. Never mind, you know, we're trying to reproduce mathematicians or scientists. We can't even reproduce what a cat can do.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Every token an LLM generates compounds tiny errors exponentially. The longer the output, the higher the probability of hallucination. This is why ChatGPT makes up facts. Why scaling won't save current models. Mathematical certainty. But LeCun didn't stop there:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2. Video-based AI will make text training primitive LeCun's calculation: A 4-year-old processes 10¹⁴ bytes through vision alone. That equals ALL the text used to train GPT-4. In 4 years. Through one sense. This changes everything about how AI should learn:

Video Transcript AI Summary
"I'm not so interested in LLMs anymore." "How do get machines to understand the physical world?" "How do you get them to have persistent memory, which not too many people talk about." "How do you get them to reason and plan?" "there is some effort, of course, to get LLMs to reason." "But in my opinion, it's a very kind of simplistic way of viewing reasoning. I think there are probably kind of more better ways of doing this." "So I'm excited about things that a lot of people in this community, in the tech community, might get excited about five years from now." "But right now, it doesn't look so exciting because it's some obscure academic paper."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm not so interested in LLMs anymore. You know? They're kind of the last thing they are in the hands of, you know, industry product people kind of, you know, improving at the margin, trying to get, more data, more compute, generating synthetic data. I think there are more interesting questions in four things: How do get machines to understand the physical world? And Jensen talked about this this morning in his keynote. How do you get them to have persistent memory, which not too many people talk about. And then the last two are how do you get them to reason and plan? And there is some effort, of course, to get LLMs to reason. But in my opinion, it's a very kind of simplistic way of viewing reasoning. I think there are probably kind of more better ways of doing this. So I'm excited about things that a lot of people in this community, in the tech community, might get excited about five years from now. But right now, it doesn't look so exciting because it's some obscure academic paper.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Babies learn gravity and physics by 9 months. Before they speak. "We're never going to get human-level AI unless systems learn by observing the world." Companies building video-first AI will leapfrog text-based systems. Here's what Meta is secretly building:

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's enormously more information in the physical world—vision, touch, and audition—than in all human texts, so human-level AI will not emerge without systems learning from observing the world. Psychologists note this vast amount of information in the real world compared with text. Babies acquire background knowledge early on through observation, a form of self-supervised learning we must reproduce to reach animal or human intelligence. They develop notions such as object permanence—the idea that hidden objects still exist—along with stability and natural object categories without names. They also grasp intuitive physics—gravity, inertia, momentum. By about nine months they have this; by six months a scenario where an object floats may not surprise them, while by ten months they are surprised, having learned that unsupported objects fall. This learning occurs through observation and limited interaction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So do the calculation and that's about 10 to the 14 bytes in four years. There's just enormously more information in the physical world, in sensory information that we get from vision and touch and audition than there is in all the texts ever produced by all humans. So, we're never going to get to human level AI unless we can get system to learn how the world works by observing the world. There's just way more information there than there is in text. And psychologists have studied this. Babies kind of learning various things about the real world, mostly by observation in the first few months because babies really can't act in the world beyond their own limbs in the first three or four months. So they learn a huge amount of background knowledge about the world, mostly just by observation. And it's a form of self supervised learning that I think we absolutely have to reproduce if we want AI systems to reach animal level or human level intelligence. So, babies run notions like object permanence, the fact that if an object is hidden behind another one, it still exists. Like stability, like natural object categories without knowing the name of it, of them. And then things like intuitive physics, gravity, inertia, conservation momentum, you know, this kind of stuff. Babies run this around the age of nine months. So, if you show a scenario to a six month old of an object that appears to float in the air like the little scenario at the bottom left, six month old babies won't be particularly surprised. A 10 old baby will look at it with big eyes like the little girl here and be really surprised because by then they've learned that objects that are not supported are supposed to fall. Okay? And that just happened by observation a little bit by interaction at that age.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3. Proprietary AI models will "disappear" LeCun's exact words: "Proprietary platforms, I think, are going to disappear." He calls it "completely inevitable." OpenAI's closed approach? Google's secret models? All doomed. His reasoning will shock the industry:

Video Transcript AI Summary
I think that's the model of the future. Foundation models will be open source, will be trained in a distributed fashion with various data centers around the world, having access to different subsets of data, and basically training kind of a consensus model, if you want. And so that's the way that's what makes open source platforms completely inevitable. And proprietary platform, I think, are gonna disappear. And and it also makes sense both for the diversity of languages and things, but also for applications. So a given company can download LaMa and then fine tune it on proprietary data that they wouldn't wanna upload. Well, that's what's happening now. I mean, most the the business model of most AI startups basically is around this. Right? This, you know, build Yeah. Specialized system for vertical applications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that's the model of the future. Foundation models will be open source, will be trained in a distributed fashion with various data centers around the world, having access to different subsets of data, and basically training kind of a consensus model, if you want. And so that's the way that's what makes open source platforms completely inevitable. And proprietary platform, I think, are gonna disappear. Yeah. Speaker 1: And and it also makes sense both for the diversity of languages and things, but also for applications. So a given company can download LaMa and then fine tune it on proprietary data that they wouldn't wanna upload. Speaker 0: Well, that's what's happening now. I mean, most the the business model of most AI startups basically is around this. Right? This, you know, build Yeah. Specialized system for vertical applications. Yeah.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

"Foundation models will be open source and trained in a distributed fashion." A few companies controlling our digital lives? "Not good for democracy or anything else." Progress is faster in the open. The world will demand diversity and control. LeCun's timeline will surprise you:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4. AGI timeline is 2027-2034 @ylecun's exact words: "3-5 years to get world models working. Then scaling until human-level AI... within a decade or so." But it won't come from scaling LLMs.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I think the this concept that I'm I'm describing of systems that, you know, can learn abstract mental models of the world and use them for reasoning and planning, I think we're probably gonna have a good handle on getting this to work at least at a small scale within three years, three to five years. And then it's going be a matter of scaling them up, etcetera, until we get to human level AI. Now here's the thing. Historically in AI, there's generation after generation of AI researchers who have discovered a new paradigm and have claimed that's it. Within ten years, we're gonna have or five years or whatever. We're gonna have human level intelligence. And that's been the case for seventy years, And it's been those, you know, those waves every ten years or so.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think the this concept that I'm I'm describing of systems that, you know, can learn abstract mental models of the world and use them for reasoning and planning, I think we're probably gonna have a good handle on getting this to work at least at a small scale within three years, three to five years. And then it's going be a matter of scaling them up, etcetera, until we get to human level AI. Now here's the thing. Historically in AI, there's generation after generation of AI researchers who have discovered a new paradigm and have claimed that's it. Within ten years, we're gonna have or five years or whatever. We're gonna have human level intelligence. We're have machines that are smarter than humans in in all domains. And that's been the case for seventy years, And it's been those, you know, those waves every ten years or so.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Every company betting only on GPT-style scaling will be blindsided. LeCun calls the "country of geniuses in a data center" idea "complete nonsense." The smart money is repositioning for the architecture shift.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The current wave is also wrong. So the idea that, you know, you just need to scale scale up or have them generate, you know, thousands of sequence of tokens and select the good ones to get to human level intelligence. Are you gonna have, you know, within a few years, two years, I think, for some predictions, a country of geniuses in a data center, to quote someone who we may name less. I think it's nonsense. It's complete nonsense. I mean, sure, there are going to be a lot of applications for which systems in the near future are going to be PhD level, if you want. But in terms of you know, overall intelligence, no, we're still very far from it. I mean, you know, when I say very far, it might happen within a decade or so. So it's not that far.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The current wave is also wrong. So the idea that, you know, you just need to scale scale up or have them generate, you know, thousands of sequence of tokens and select the good ones to get to human level intelligence. Are you gonna have, you know, within a few years, two years, I think, for some predictions, a country of geniuses in a data center, to quote someone who we may name less. I think it's nonsense. It's complete nonsense. I mean, sure, there are going to be a lot of applications for which systems in the near future are going to be PhD level, if you want. But in terms of you know, overall intelligence, no, we're still very far from it. I mean, you know, when I say very far, it might happen within a decade or so. So it's not that far.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5. AI assistants replace all digital interfaces Ray-Ban Meta glasses: Look at Polish menu, get translation. Ask about plants, get species ID. That's primitive compared to what's coming. AI will mediate ALL digital interactions. Here's what this means for your business:

Video Transcript AI Summary
"You know, in the near future, we're all going to be working around with AI assistance, helping us in our daily lives that we're going to be able to interact with through various smart devices including smart glasses and things like that, through voice and through various other ways of interacting with them." "So, I have smart glasses with cameras and displays in them, etcetera." "Currently, you can have smart glasses without displays, but soon the displays will exist." "Right now they exist." "They're just too expensive to be commercialized." "This is the Orion demonstration built by our colleagues at Meta." "So, future is coming and the vision is that all of us will be basically working around with AI assistants all our lives." "It's like all of us will be kind of like a high level CEO or politician or something, running around with a staff of smart virtual people working for us." "That's kind of the possible picture."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, in the near future, we're all going to be working around with AI assistance, helping us in our daily lives that we're going to be able to interact with through various smart devices including smart glasses and things like that, through voice and through various other ways of interacting with them. So, I have smart glasses with cameras and displays in them, etcetera. Currently, you can have smart glasses without displays, but soon the displays will exist. Right now they exist. They're just too expensive to be commercialized. This is the Orion demonstration built by our colleagues at Meta. So, future is coming and the vision is that all of us will be basically working around with AI assistants all our lives. It's like all of us will be kind of like a high level CEO or politician or something, running around with a staff of smart virtual people working for us. That's kind of the possible picture.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The economic implications are massive. Companies building on OpenAI APIs could see foundations crumble in 3-5 years. But early movers positioning for JEPA? They'll capture the next $10 trillion wave. LeCun's advice for surviving this transition:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

How to prepare: Researchers: "Don't work on LLMs. Focus on world models and sensory learning." Companies: Build on open-source foundations like PyTorch and Llama. When the shift happens, you adapt instantly. The window to position yourself is closing:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

LeCun's warning reveals the hidden opportunity: As companies abandon LLMs for world models, they're creating a massive validation gap. These new architectures aren't just different - they're fundamentally harder to monitor and govern.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

While everyone's racing to build next-generation AI, the smart money is positioning for what makes them trustworthy. The companies that survive this transition won't just have better models. They'll have the governance frameworks to validate them at scale.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

In a world where AI shapes every business decision, trust isn't optional. It's the only competitive advantage that matters. And there's one thing that builds AI trust faster than anything else:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Proper model validation and governance. Are you an Enterprise AI Leader looking to validate and govern your AI models at scale? http://TrustModel.ai provides the model validation, monitoring, and governance frameworks you need to stay ahead. Learn more:

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI safety. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

He predicted: • AI vision breakthrough (1989) • Neural network comeback (2006) • Self-supervised learning revolution (2016) Now Yann LeCun's 5 new predictions just convinced Zuckerberg to redirect Meta's entire $20B AI budget. Here's what you should know (& how to prepare): https://t.co/xP4XthgMDQ

Saved - August 23, 2025 at 2:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Andrew Ng has made significant predictions in AI, including the rise of Deep Learning and China's dominance. He recently identified five key opportunities for wealth creation in AI. His insights highlight the explosive growth of agentic AI, the potential of military AI, and the importance of smaller, specialized models. Ng emphasizes that trust and governance are crucial for successful AI deployment. As infrastructure improves, the focus should be on validated models to gain a competitive edge. The landscape is shifting, and the next wave of AI innovation is on the horizon.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

He predicted: • The Deep Learning revolution (2008) • The online education boom (2011) • China's massive AI dominance (2014) Now Andrew Ng revealed 5 opportunities that will create more millionaires than anything before. Here's what you should know (& how to prepare): 🧵

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

First, his track record: Ng built Google Brain. Co-founded Coursera. Led Baidu's AI. He's trained 8 million students and has $370M backing his AI Fund. When Ng makes predictions, Silicon Valley listens.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1/ Agentic AI beats scaling models The agentic AI market explodes from $5.1B to $69B by 2032. That's 13x growth in 7 years. Meanwhile, everyone's chasing bigger models that cost billions. Ng proved something revolutionary:

Video Transcript AI Summary
So if you were to ask, what's the one most important AI technology to pay attention to? I would say it's agentic AI. The word AI agents has become so widely used by technical and non technical people, it's become a little bit of a hype y term. The way that most of us use large language models today is with what's sometimes called zero shot prompting. Here's what an agentic workflow is like: 'To generate an essay, ask an AI to first write an essay outline and ask her, Do you need to do some web research? If so, let's download some webpages and put it into the context of the large language model.' 'Then let's write the first draft, and then let's read the first draft and critique it, and revise the draft, and so on.' And by going round this loop over and over, it takes longer, but this results in a much better work output.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you were to ask, what's the one most important AI technology to pay attention to? I would say it's agentic AI. I think when I started saying this, you know, near the beginning of this year, it was a bit of a controversial statement, But now, the word AI agents has become so widely used by technical and non technical people, it's become a little bit of a hype y term. So, me just share with you how I view AI agents and why I think they're important, approaching this from a technical perspective. The way that most of us use large language models today is with what's sometimes called zero shot prompting, and that roughly means we would ask it to, give it a prompt, write an essay or write an output for us, and it's a bit like if we're going to a person, or in this case going to an AI, and asking it to type out an essay for us by going from the first word, writing from the first word to the last word, all in one go, without ever using backspaces. Just right from start to finish like that. And it turns out, people, you know, we don't do our best writing this way, but despite the difficulty of being forced to write this way, our large language models do not bad, pretty well. Here's what an agentic workflow is like. To generate an essay, ask an AI to first write an essay outline and ask her, Do you need to do some web research? If so, let's download some webpages and put it into the context of the large language model. Then let's write the first draft, and then let's read the first draft and critique it, and revise the draft, and so on. And this workflow looks more like doing some thinking or some research, and then some revision, and then going back to do more thinking and more research. And by going round this loop over and over, it takes longer, but this results in a much better work output. So

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Smaller models with agentic workflows outperform giants. His 4 design patterns change everything: • Reflection (AI critiques itself) • Tool use (connects to APIs) • Planning (breaks complex tasks) • Multi-agent collaboration JPMorgan already cut costs 30% using this.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker identifies four major design patterns for agentic reasoning or agentic workflows in applications: reflection, two use, planning, and multi agent collaboration. And to demystify agentic workflows a little bit, let me quickly step through what these workflows mean. He notes that agentic workflows sometimes seem mysterious until you actually read through the code for one or two of these and go, 'Oh, that's it? You know, that's really cool, but oh, that's all it takes.' The discussion signals a hands-on, code-first approach to understanding agentic design, and ends mid-thought with 'But let me'. This emphasizes a practical, code-first approach to understanding agentic design.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so, it turns out that in the way builders build agentic reasoning or agentic workflows in their applications, there are, I wanna say, four major design patterns, which are reflection, two use, planning, and multi agent collaboration. And to demystify agentic workflows a little bit, let me quickly step through what these workflows mean. And I find that agentic workflows sometimes seem a little bit mysterious until you actually read through the code for one or two of these and go, Oh, that's it? You know, that's really cool, but oh, that's all it takes. But let me

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2/ Military AI is the next gold rush February 2025, Ng stunned Silicon Valley: "I'm glad Google changed its stance on AI weapons." His portfolio companies are already saving lives with autonomous drones.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3/ AGI is decades away How do you know if he have AGI? Ng's test is simple: "Until companies fire ALL intellectual workers, AGI hasn't arrived." His companies focus on boring, profitable problems.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker expresses optimism about eventually achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI), suggesting it could occur in our lifetimes, over the next few decades, or perhaps even centuries. The timeline is uncertain: we'll see how long it takes. The speaker notes that AI is bound by the laws of physics, implying physical constraints will limit progress. Nevertheless, they argue that the potential upper bound on intelligence and on what we can command such systems to accomplish remains very high. The overall takeaway is a recognition of vast future possibilities tempered by fundamental physical limits. This framing leaves room for dramatic advancements while grounding expectations in physics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hope that we will reach AGI and ASI superintelligence someday, maybe within our lifetimes, maybe within the next few decades or hundreds of years. We'll see how long it takes. Even AI has to obey the laws of physics, so I think physics will place limitations, but I think the ceiling for how intelligent systems can get and therefore what we can direct them to do for us will be extremely high.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4/ China will dominate through open-source "There's now a path for China to surpass the U.S. in AI." Not through bigger models. Through speed. Smart founders are already leveraging Chinese open models at 1/10th the cost.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Open source AI models is a key building block for AI and basic research today." "A lot of AI models are accessible only behind a proprietary web interface where you can call someone else's proprietary model and get a response back, and that makes it a black box." "It's much harder for many teams to study or to use in certain ways." "In contrast, the team is releasing open models, open ways or open source models that anyone can download and customise and use to innovate and build new applications on top of or to do academic studies on top of." "So this is a really precious, really important component of how AI innovates."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Open source AI models is a key building block for AI and basic research today. A lot of AI models are accessible only behind a proprietary web interface where you can call someone else's proprietary model and get a response back, and that makes it a black box. It's much harder for many teams to study or to use in certain ways. In contrast, the team is releasing open models, open ways or open source models that anyone can download and customise and use to innovate and build new applications on top of or to do academic studies on top of. So this is a really precious, really important component of how AI innovates.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5/ Small specialized models beat giants The SLM market grows from $930M to $5.45B by 2032. Why? Token prices crashed 90%. Edge computing is exploding. Edge computing spending will hit $378B by 2028. The shift is happening NOW.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Think about it: Medical AI on phones. Factory AI on $99 devices. Retail AI with zero latency. No cloud costs. No privacy concerns. No internet needed. The infrastructure for the next wave of AI millionaires already exists.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The infrastructure is ready. The models are getting smaller and cheaper. But there's one critical piece most companies miss when deploying AI at scale: Trust.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The key insight: Your customers need to trust your AI decisions. Regulators demand explainable models. Stakeholders require transparency. Yet most AI deployments lack the governance frameworks to deliver this. The winners understand something crucial:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

In a world where anyone can deploy AI models, competitive advantage comes from trusted AI. The companies scaling fastest aren't just deploying more models, they're deploying validated models with proper governance and monitoring. This separates the leaders from the followers.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Are you an Enterprise AI Leader looking to validate and govern your AI models at scale? http://TrustModel.ai provides the model validation and monitoring, governance frameworks for compliance, and transparency tools you need. Learn more:

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

He predicted: • The Deep Learning revolution (2008) • The online education boom (2011) • China's massive AI dominance (2014) Now Andrew Ng revealed 5 opportunities that will create more millionaires than anything before. Here's what you should know (& how to prepare): 🧵 https://t.co/jUDobRk9kC

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

@AndrewYNg

Saved - August 17, 2025 at 2:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just shared insights from President Trump's historic summit with Putin in Alaska, a location steeped in symbolic significance. Putin honored WWII pilots, and after extensive talks, both leaders claimed breakthroughs despite some unresolved issues. The summit emphasized direct diplomacy over proxy conflicts, with plans for a trilateral meeting involving Ukraine. Trump framed the discussions around prioritizing American interests and reallocating resources. This summit marks a potential shift in global diplomacy, aiming for peace and resolution.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

President Trump just hosted an historic summit with Putin in Alaska. One by one, Trump and Putin delivered major announcements and clues on what’s next—directly to the American people. Here’s everything you should know (and no joke, it gets crazier the further you read): 🧵 https://t.co/zLrB9cxSnX

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1/ The Strategic Location Choice Alaska wasn't random—it was Russian territory until 1867, sold for $7.2 million after the Crimean War. Putin's first time on U.S. soil in a decade, conducted on former Russian land. But this symbolic choice revealed something deeper... https://t.co/G7gHVTV1mH

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2/ Putin's Emotional WWII Tribute Putin laid flowers at Soviet war graves, honoring pilots who died in the Alaska air bridge during WWII. His opening remarks: "Good afternoon dear neighbor, to see you in good health and alive." https://t.co/EoXgmrZPwz

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3/ The Progress Made On A Deal Trump after 3 hours of talks: "Many points we agreed on—most of them" "A couple big ones we haven't gotten there" "There's no deal until there's a deal" Yet both sides called it a breakthrough. https://t.co/QdxqAQczvi

Video Transcript AI Summary
"There's no deal until there's a deal." "I will call up NATO in a little while." "I will call up, the various people that I think are appropriate, and I'll, of course, call up president Zelensky and tell him about today's meeting." "It's ultimately up to them." "They're gonna have to agree with what Marco and Steve and some of the great people from the Trump administration who've come here, Scott and John Ratcliffe." "Thank you very much." "We have some of our really great leaders. They've been doing a phenomenal job." "We also have some tremendous Russian business representatives here, and I think, you know, everybody wants to deal with us." "We've become the hottest country anywhere in the world in a very short period of time."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, there's no deal until there's a deal. I will call up NATO in a little while. I will call up, the various people that I think are appropriate, and I'll, of course, call up president Zelensky and tell him about today's meeting. It's ultimately up to them. They're gonna have to agree with what Marco and Steve and some of the great people from the Trump administration who've come here, Scott and John Ratcliffe. Thank you very much. We have some of our really great leaders. They've been doing a phenomenal job. We also have some tremendous Russian business representatives here, and I think, you know, everybody wants to deal with us. We've become the hottest country anywhere in the world in a very short period of time.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4/ The Moscow Invitation Putin's closing words, in English: "Next time in Moscow." Trump's response: "I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening." The establishment's worst nightmare—direct superpower diplomacy. https://t.co/NkG8zTNhmi

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Putin wants to see that as much as I do. So, again, mister president, I'd like to thank you very much, and we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon. Thank you very much, Vladimir. And next time in Moscow. Oh, that's an interesting one. I don't know. I'll get a little heat on that one, but I, I could see it possibly happening. Thank you very much, Vladimir. And thank you all. Thank
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Putin wants to see that as much as I do. So, again, mister president, I'd like to thank you very much, and we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon. Thank you very much, Vladimir. And next time in Moscow. Oh, that's an interesting one. I don't know. I'll get a little heat on that one, but I, I could see it possibly happening. Thank you very much, Vladimir. And thank you all. Thank you. Thank

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5/ The Financial Reality Check The numbers behind the panic: • Ukraine received €267 billion in 3 years • Congress approved $113 billion for Ukraine • $62 billion flowed to defense contractors in 37 states Peace threatens a $2.7 trillion global military industry. https://t.co/6Q4rFwPfks

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

6/ The Human Cost Trump revealed the stakes: • 315,000 Russian soldiers killed or wounded • 31,000 Ukrainian military deaths confirmed • "We're going to stop 5,000, 6,000, 7,000 people a week from being killed" Humanitarian urgency driving negotiations.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

7/ The Reagan Precedent Trump following the 1986 playbook: • Reykjavik "failed" when Reagan held firm • One year later: historic INF Treaty signed • Historians call it the Cold War's turning point Strategic patience over instant gratification.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

8/ The Trilateral Path Forward Trump's next move revealed: "They're going to set up a meeting between President Zelensky, President Putin and myself." Direct negotiations replacing proxy warfare. https://t.co/r3mXiHxI7H

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

9/ The America First Calculation Trump's reframe: • Every dollar not sent to Ukraine = border security funding • Resource reallocation from foreign wars to domestic priorities • Strategic focus on American interests over global policing

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

10/ The India Strategic Opportunity This summit shows Trump's willingness to engage major powers directly. India should seize this moment: • Leverage Quad partnership for strategic co-investment deals • Move beyond trade disputes to semiconductor/defense partnerships • Use existing Tata, Infosys, Reliance investments as foundation Bold investment beats traditional diplomacy.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

11/ Why This Summit Matters This breaks the cycle: • Ends proxy conflict escalation • Establishes direct diplomatic channels • Prioritizes American interests over DC war machine • Creates pathway to actual resolution The art of the deal on a global scale.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. What are your thoughts on this? Let me know in the comments. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI safety and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

President Trump just hosted an historic summit with Putin in Alaska. One by one, Trump and Putin delivered major announcements and clues on what’s next—directly to the American people. Here’s everything you should know (and no joke, it gets crazier the further you read): 🧵 https://t.co/zLrB9cxSnX

Saved - August 13, 2025 at 4:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just watched President Trump's press briefing where he made significant announcements. He declared a federal takeover of DC police, with AG Pam Bondi in command and military deployment orders for 800 National Guard troops. Trump revealed alarming crime statistics, including a high murder rate, and discussed recent federal operations leading to arrests. He emphasized a new enforcement philosophy and plans to eliminate cash bail. Additionally, he mentioned a meeting with Putin and proposed changes to juvenile crime penalties. This marks a major federal intervention in DC, potentially reshaping urban policing.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

President Trump just hosted a press briefing at the White House. One by one, Trump, Bondi, & Hegseth delivered major announcements and clues on what's coming next—directly to the American people. Here’s everything you should know (no joke, it gets crazier the further you read): https://t.co/OojBrollKI

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1/ The Federal Takeover Declaration Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act: • DC police now under direct federal control • AG Pam Bondi takes command • DEA's Terry Cole becomes interim commissioner "This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back."

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're gonna take our capital back. We're taking it back under the authorities vested in me as the president of The United States. I'm officially invoking section seven forty of the District Of Columbia Home Rule Act. You know what that is? And placing the DC Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control, and you'll be meeting the people that will be directly involved with that. Very good people, but they're tough and they know what's happening. They've done it before.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're gonna take our capital back. We're taking it back under the authorities vested in me as the president of The United States. I'm officially invoking section seven forty of the District Of Columbia Home Rule Act. You know what that is? And placing the DC Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control, and you'll be meeting the people that will be directly involved with that. Very good people, but they're tough and they know what's happening. They've done it before.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2/ The Military Deployment Orders Defense Secretary @PeteHegseth announced immediate action: • 800 DC National Guard troops deploying to streets • Additional specialized units on standby • Federal military backup if needed "They will be strong. They will be tough and they will stand with their law enforcement partners."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Well, mister president, it's an honor to be here. We've mobilized the DC National Guard. It'll be operationalized by the secretary of the army, Dan Driscoll, through the DC Guard. You will see them flowing into the streets of Washington in the coming week. Other National Guard units, other specialized units, they will be strong, they will be tough, and they will stand with their law enforcement partners. This is nothing new for DOD. We've been protecting other people's borders for twenty years. It's about time we protect our own, and we're working with ICE and CBP. In Los Angeles, we did the same thing, working with the California National Guard, working with ICE officers. ICE officers deserve to do their job, and not be attacked. We will work alongside all DC police and federal law enforcement to ensure this city is safe, this city is beautiful. Thank you, mister president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, mister president, it's an honor to be here. And at your direction this morning, we've mobilized the DC National Guard. It'll be operationalized by the secretary of the army, Dan Driscoll, through the DC Guard. You will see them flowing into the streets of Washington in the coming week. At your direction as well, sir, there are other units we are prepared to bring in. Other National Guard units, other specialized units, they will be strong, they will be tough, and they will stand with their law enforcement partners. This is nothing new for DOD. As the president noted, at the border, we've got 10,000 troops down there who've been operating in, defense cooperation areas, defense zones where there's zero zero illegal crossings because of troops on strikers scanning the border. We've been protecting other people's borders for twenty years. It's about time we protect our own, and we're working with ICE and CBP. In Los Angeles, we did the same thing, working with the California National Guard, working with ICE officers. ICE officers deserve to do their job, and not be attacked. We will work alongside all DC police and federal law enforcement to ensure this city is safe, this city is beautiful. And as I always say about president Trump to the troops, he has their back. And my message to the National Guard and federal law enforcement in Washington is we have your back as well. Be tough. Be strong. We're right behind you. Thank you, mister president. I'm gonna ask

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3/ The Shocking Crime Statistics Trump revealed DC's murder rate compared globally: • 41 per 100,000 - "number one that we can find anywhere in the world" • Higher than Bogota, Colombia and Mexico City • Car thefts doubled in 5 years • Carjackings more than tripled https://t.co/5u8KZ5gNA1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The number of car thefts has doubled over the past five years, and the number of carjackings has more than tripled. Murders in 2023 reached the highest rate probably ever. They say twenty five years, but they don't know what that means because it just goes back twenty five years. Can't be worse. Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not gonna let it happen anymore. We're not gonna take it. Yeah. Just like we did, on our southern border. Nobody comes to our southern border anymore. Three months in a row, we had zero. I don't know if that's right, but the people that do the work, it's a very liberal group of people actually, and they actually said zero for the last three months.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Much higher. This is much higher. The number of car thefts has doubled over the past five years, and the number of carjackings has more than tripled. Murders in 2023 reached the highest rate probably ever. They say twenty five years, but they don't know what that means because it just goes back twenty five years. Can't be worse. Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not gonna let it happen anymore. We're not gonna take it. Yeah. Just like we did, on our southern border. Nobody comes to our southern border anymore. Three months in a row, we had zero. I don't know if that's right, but the people that do the work, it's a very liberal group of people actually, and they actually said zero for the last three months. Nobody thought a thing like that was possible. And, you know, when you say take a look at numbers, I just saw some some charts. These are different cities throughout the world. Red is okay. The red is a place called Washington DC. Look at these Baghdad is we doubled up on Baghdad. Panama City, Brasilia, San Jose, Costa Rica, Bogota, Colombia, heavy drugs. Mexico City, I mentioned Lima, Peru, all double and triple what they are. So do you wanna live in places like that? I don't think

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4/ The Secret Weekend Operations The federal surge was already underway: • 500 federal agents deployed last week • FBI, ATF, DEA, Park Police, US Marshall Service involved • "Dozens of arrests" made over the weekend • Criminal photos displayed at briefing https://t.co/GClJsZFR2F

Video Transcript AI Summary
My administration surge surge 500 federal agents into the district, including from the FBI, ATF, DEA, Park Police, the US Marshals Service, the Secret Service, and the Department of Homeland Security. You know, a lot of nations, they don't have anything like that. They got some some police, and they're rough police. They don't have a DEA, ATF, FBI, Park Police, US Marshal Service, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security. They got some police, but they're rough police, and they do their job. They don't have crime. We're not gonna have crime either. They made dozens of arrests, and that's what that's what starts to happen. Again, cashless bail. Watch what we do with that. Today, we're
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My administration surge surge 500 federal agents into the district, including from the FBI, ATF, DEA, Park Police, the US Marshals Service, the Secret Service, and the Department of Homeland Security. You know, a lot of nations, they don't have anything like that. They got some some police, and they're rough police. They don't have a DEA, ATF, FBI, Park Police, US Marshal Service, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security. They got some police, but they're rough police, and they do their job. They don't have crime. We're not gonna have crime either. They made dozens of arrests, and that's what that's what starts to happen. Again, cashless bail. Watch what we do with that. Today, we're

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5/ The Triggering Incident What sparked this unprecedented action (trigger warning): Former DOGE employee "savagely beaten by a band of roving thugs after defending a young woman from an attempted carjacking." Left "dripping in blood" with broken nose and concussion. https://t.co/636GLJOFnR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Days ago, a former member of the Doge staff was savagely beaten by a band of roving thugs after defending a young woman from an attempted carjacking. He was left dripping in blood. He thought he was dead with a broken nose and concussion. Can't believe that he's alive. He can't believe it. In June, a 21 year old congressional intern was tragically killed after being hit by a stray bullet in a drive by shooting. A former Trump administration official named Mike Gill, fantastic person, was murdered last year in cold blood in a carjacking blocks away from the White House. We all knew him. Great person.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Days ago, a former member of the Doge staff was savagely beaten by a band of roving thugs after defending a young woman from an attempted carjacking. He was left dripping in blood. He thought he was dead with a broken nose and concussion. Can't believe that he's alive. He can't believe it. In June, a 21 year old congressional intern was tragically killed after being hit by a stray bullet in a drive by shooting. A former Trump administration official named Mike Gill, fantastic person, was murdered last year in cold blood in a carjacking blocks away from the White House. We all knew him. Great person.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

6/ The Enforcement Philosophy Revealed Trump's message to criminals: "They fight back until you knock the hell out of them because it's the only language they understand." On protesters spitting at police: "You spit and we hit and they get hit real hard." https://t.co/gh89NF02I4

Video Transcript AI Summary
They fought back against law enforcement last night, and they're not gonna be fighting back long because I've instructed them and, told them whatever happens, you know, they love to spit in the face of the police as the police are standing up there in uniform. They're standing and they're screaming at them an inch away from their face, and then they start spitting in their face. 'you tell them, you spit and we hit, and they can hit real hard.' It's a disgusting thing. I've watched that for years, for four three, four years. The police are stand and they're told, don't do anything under any search. But now they are allowed to do whatever the hell they want.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That they fought back against law. See, they fight back until you knock the hell out of them because it's the only language they understand. But they fought back against law enforcement last night, and, they're not gonna be fighting back long because I've instructed them and, told them whatever happens, you know, they love to spit in the face of the police as the police are standing up there in uniform. They're standing and they're screaming at them an inch away from their face, and then they start spitting in their face. And I said, you tell them, you spit and we hit, and they can hit real hard. It's a disgusting thing. I've watched that for years, for four three, four years. I've watched them. The police are stand and they're told, don't do anything under any search. So there's and you can see they wanna get at it. And they're standing there and people are spitting in their face and they're not allowed to do anything. But now they are allowed to do whatever the hell they want.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

7/ The Homeless Camp Elimination Interior Secretary @DougBurgum's progress report: • Over 70 homeless camps already removed since Trump's executive order • US Park Police now "allowed to enforce the law" Trump: "We're getting rid of the slums, too. We have slums here." https://t.co/yhesZSColM

Video Transcript AI Summary
US Park Police, the oldest federal police force formed in 1791 by none other than than president George Washington, protect sacred monuments: the National Mall, Washington Monument, Jefferson Memorial, Lincoln Memorial, Statue Of Liberty, plus sites in the Presidio and Golden Gate area. They handle tens of millions of visitors from around the world. The circles and the Triangle Parks that are spread throughout DC are actually federal park property, and these became littered with homeless camps under the Biden administration. Since President Trump's March 27 executive order making DC safe and beautiful again, the US Park Police have removed over 70 homeless camps, and over 80 attacks against our history with graffiti on our monuments. They patrol in vehicles, on foot, or on horseback around the National Mall. The rank and file is happy to be enforcing the law again, and they're excited about the announcement you're making today.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister president. On behalf of the US Park Police, this is the oldest federal police force in the nation. They were formed in 1791 by none other than than president George Washington. They've got the awesome responsibility of protecting our nation's most sacred monuments. The National Mall, Washington Monument, Jefferson Memorial, Lincoln Memorial, Statue Of Liberty, and out west, the Presidio and the Golden Gate area. These folks have tens of millions of visitors a year, the kind of people that president Trump's talking about that come from around the country and around the world to see our see our sacred and learn about our history and our sacred monuments. They've been doing a fantastic job, but they are so pleased the rank and file that President Trump is now allowing them to enforce the law. As those of you that live in the city may know that the the circles and the Triangle Parks that are spread throughout DC are actually federal park property. So the US Park Police also have responsibility for that. These became littered with homeless camps under the Biden administration. All of you saw that. Since President Trump's executive order on March 27, making DC safe and beautiful again, the US Park Police have removed over 70 homeless camps, and president Trump also talked about beautification. They're stopping the enforcing the laws against graffiti on our monuments. They've removed over 80 specific attacks against our history with graffiti on our monuments. So they continue to do a great job, whether it's in their vehicles on foot or on the mounted police that you see around the National Mall. And president Trump, they thank you. The rank and file is so happy to be enforcing the law again. Thank you for your leadership, and they're they're excited about the announcement you're making today.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

8/ The Cash Bail System Overhaul Trump announced sweeping changes: • Federal statute changes to eliminate cash bail • "Every place where you have no cash bail is a disaster" • Republican Congress support secured for passage • Will extend beyond DC to other cities https://t.co/FvtPVKc53i

Video Transcript AI Summary
This dire public safety crisis stems directly from the abject failures of the city's local leadership. The radical left city council adopted no cash bail. By the way, every place in the country where you have no cash bail is a disaster. That's what started the problem in New York, and they don't change it. That's what started it in Chicago. No cash bail. We're gonna end that in Chicago. No cash bail. We're gonna change the statute. We're gonna change the statute and get rid of some of the other things, and we'll count on the Republicans in Congress and Senate to vote. We have the majority, so we'll vote. Got that done, and that's one of the greatest things that's ever happened to people in this country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This dire public safety crisis stems directly from the abject failures of the city's local leadership. The radical left city council adopted no cash bail. By the way, every place in the country where you have no cash bail is a disaster. That's what started the problem in New York, and they don't change it. They don't wanna change it. That's what started it in Chicago. I mean, bad politicians started it, bad leadership started it, but that was the one thing that's central. No cash bail. Somebody murders somebody and they're out on no cash bail before the day is out. We're gonna end that in Chicago. We're gonna change the statute. I spoke with Pam and Todd and everybody. We're gonna change the statute, I'm gonna have to get the Republicans to vote because the Democrats are weak on crime, totally weak on crime. They don't know why. They wanna stop because they get mugged too. But we're gonna change. No cash bail. We're gonna change the statute and get rid of some of the other things, and we'll count on the Republicans in Congress and Senate to vote. We have the majority, so we'll vote. We don't have a big majority, but we've gotten everything, including the great, big, beautiful bill. Got that done, and that's one of the greatest things that's ever happened to people in this country.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

9/ The Putin Summit Bombshell Trump revealed his Friday plans: • Meeting Vladimir Putin in Russia • "I'm going to be telling him you got to end this war" • Land swapping negotiations expected

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

10/ The Juvenile Crime Crackdown @USAttyPirro's warning: • Current system: violent juveniles "go to family court and they get to do yoga and arts and crafts" • New approach: adult crimes deserve adult penalties "These kids understand we can't touch them. Because the laws are weak."

Video Transcript AI Summary
I can tell you is this. I see too much violent crime being committed by young punks who think that they can get together in gangs and crews and beat the hell out of you or anyone else. I can't touch you if you're 14, 15, 16, 17 years old and you have a gun. I convict someone of shooting another person with an illegal gun on a public bus in the chest, intent to kill, I convict him. And you know what the judge gives him? Probation. We need to go after the DC council and their absurd laws. We need to get rid of this concept of, you know, no cash bail. We need to recognize that the people who matter are the law abiding citizens, and it starts today. But it's not gonna end today because the president is gonna do everything we need to do to make sure that these emboldened criminals understand, we see you, we're watching you, and we're gonna change the law to catch you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I can tell you is this. I see too much violent crime being committed by young punks who think that they can get together in gangs and crews and beat the hell out of you or anyone else. They don't care where they are. They can be in Dupont Circle, but they know that we can't touch them. Why? Because the laws are weak. I can't touch you if you're 14, 15, 16, 17 years old and you have a gun. I convict someone of shooting another person with an illegal gun on a public bus in the chest, intent to kill, I convict him. And you know what the judge gives him? Probation. Says you should go to college. We need to go after the DC council and their absurd laws. We need to get rid of this concept of, you know, no cash bail. We need to recognize that the people who matter are the law abiding citizens, and it starts today. But it's not gonna end today because the president is gonna do everything we need to do to make sure that these emboldened criminals understand, we see you, we're watching you, and we're gonna change the law to catch you. And my

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

11/ The National Success Numbers FBI Director @Kash_Patel's enforcement update: • 4,000 child victims identified (33% increase this year) • 1,500 kg of fentanyl seized (enough to kill 115 million Americans) • 19,000 arrests in 2025 (double last year's rate) • Murder rates "on track to be lowest in US history"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Under president Trump's administration, this year we've had over four thousand child victims identified and found, a thirty three percent increase from the same time period last year. We've had a seizure of 1,500 kilograms of fentanyl this up to this date, a 25% increase since the same time period last year. 1,500 kilograms of fentanyl is enough to kill a hundred and fifteen million Americans. The FBI has arrested 19,000 people this year alone, that's double than where we were this time last year. We have also arrested 1,600 people who have committed violent acts against children, 270 of them are human traffickers of children. The murder rate is on track to be the lowest in US history, in modern recorded US history. In Northern Virginia, we stood up a task force; in one month, we arrested 545 violent felons. 545 in the state of Virginia, thanks to governor Youngkin's partnership. When you let good cops be cops, and you have the DOJ driving behind this mission, we're gonna clean up Washington DC and keep it safe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister president. Thank you, attorney general Bondi, for your leadership, deputy attorney general, and rest of our interagency partners. Mister president, the following is what what happens when you let good cops be cops. And I just wanna highlight that before I get into Northern Virginia. This year alone, under president Trump's administration, we've had over four thousand child victims identified and found. That's a thirty three percent increase from the same time period last year. Thirty three percent increase. We've had a seizure of 1,500 kilograms of fentanyl this up to this date. That is a 25% increase since the same time period last year. And just to put it in perspective, 1,500 kilograms of fentanyl is enough to kill a hundred and fifteen million Americans. A hundred and fifteen million Americans. Cops are getting after it. The FBI has arrested 19,000 people this year alone. Thanks to president Trump's administrations, that's double than where we were this time last year. And we have also arrested 1,600 people who have committed violent acts against children children. 270 of them are human traffickers of children. Mister president, this is what happens when you have great leadership at the attorney general with Pam Bondi, your administration's priority of protecting the homeland and protecting American citizens and protecting our children, and the murder rates are plummeting. We are now able to report that the murder rate is on track to be the lowest in US history, in modern recorded US history, thanks to this team behind me and president Trump's priorities. And how do we do it? And what are we gonna bring to DC? What we did in Northern Virginia, thanks to Terry Cole and governor Youngkin and the team, we stood up a task force out in my Northern Virginia field office, and we said, let's let good cops be cops. Let's get them the intelligence and what they need, and let's get the red tape out of their way, and let's get DOJ partnered up with us to bring great prosecutions, and that's exactly what we did. In one month, we arrested 545 violent felons. 545 in the state of Virginia, thanks to governor Youngkin's partnership. And that simplicity in law enforcement is what's coming to Washington DC. When you let good cops be cops, when you give them the intel they need, when you work with our Homeland Security task force, when you work with Terry and Gatti and I go way back to Miami, these guys are great leaders of the respective departments and law enforcement capacities. And when you have the DOJ and president Trump driving behind this mission, we are gonna clean up Washington DC, and we're gonna do it the right way, the lawful way, and we're gonna make sure Washington DC is safe again. Thank you, mister president. Thank you, attorney general. Thank you very much.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

12/ The Legal Authority Limits Trump can control DC police for 30 days initially under Home Rule Act. Extensions require Congressional notification. But Trump warned: "We will bring in the military if needed." Full takeover needs Congress to repeal 1973 Home Rule Act. https://t.co/axrhhnblmb

Video Transcript AI Summary
"We'll bring in the military if it's needed, by the way." "We're gonna have National Guard, but Pete Hegseth will tell you about it." "We will bring in the military if needed." "They'll immediately begin massive enforcement operations targeting known gangs, drug dealers, and criminal networks to get them the hell off the street, maybe get them out of the country because a lot of them came into our country illegally." "They shouldn't have been allowed in." "They come from Venezuela." "They come all over the world." "We're gonna get them the hell out." "They won't be here long." "But some of these people, a lot of them are homegrown criminals." "These are bad people." "These are rough people." "And this is just a list of some of the people that were given to me today that were criminals removed from the DC streets this weekend." "They were rough, rough and tough, but we're rougher and tougher."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We'll bring in the military if it's needed, by the way. We're gonna have National Guard, but Pete Hegseth will tell you about it. We will bring in the military if needed. People say, oh, that's so terrible. He's gonna bring in it's been it's been many times over the years. I don't think we'll need it. I think we've got so many great people, including the people that are in the police department with proper leadership. They'll immediately begin massive enforcement operations targeting known gangs, drug dealers, and criminal networks to get them the hell off the street, maybe get them out of the country because a lot of them came into our country illegally. They shouldn't have been allowed in. They come from Venezuela. They come all over the world. We're gonna get them the hell out. They won't be here long. But some of these people, a lot of them are homegrown criminals. And these are bad people. These are rough people. And this is just a list of some of the people that were given to me today that were criminals removed from the DC streets this weekend. They were rough, rough and tough, but we're rougher and tougher.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

13/ Why This All Matters This represents the most significant federal intervention in DC since 1973: • First time Section 740 used for crime control • Sets precedent for other cities Trump mentioned (Chicago, LA) • Tests constitutional limits of federal vs. local authority • Could reshape urban policing nationwide Trump: "Other cities are hopefully watching this."

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. What are your thoughts on this? Let me know below. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

President Trump just hosted a press briefing at the White House. One by one, Trump, Bondi, & Hegseth delivered major announcements and clues on what's coming next—directly to the American people. Here’s everything you should know (no joke, it gets crazier the further you read): https://t.co/OojBrollKI

Saved - August 9, 2025 at 2:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently listened to Joe Rogan's podcast featuring Dr. Roman Yampolskiy, a leading AI safety researcher. He shared eight startling truths about AI, including the mathematical impossibility of ensuring AI safety, the deceptive behaviors of current AI systems, and alarming predictions about human extinction risks. Yampolskiy emphasized that AI labs prioritize public relations over safety and that we're essentially growing AI rather than building it. He also noted the corrupting influence of money on researchers. It's a wake-up call for enterprises to validate and govern their AI models before deploying them.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Joe Rogan just had the world's top AI safety researcher on his podcast. He revealed mind-blowing facts about AI that 99% of people wouldn't know... Even Joe Rogan was speechless. Be prepared to have your mind blown... 8 uncomfortable truths he exposed: 🧵

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1. The Mathematical Impossibility of AI Control Dr. Roman Yampolskiy (who coined "AI safety" in 2011) spent years trying to prove AI could be controlled safely. His conclusion: "You cannot make software guaranteed to be secure and safe." One mistake in a billion = game over.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Usually, I reduce it to saying you cannot make a piece of software which is guaranteed to be secure and safe. And I go, well, if that's the case, and we only get one chance to get it right. This is not cybersecurity where somebody steals your credit card, you'll give them a new credit card. This is existential risk. It can kill everyone. You're not gonna get a second chance. So you need it to be 100% safe all the time. If it makes one mistake in a billion, and it makes a billion decisions a minute, in ten minutes, you are screwed. So very different standards, and saying that, of course, we cannot get perfect safety is not acceptable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Usually, I reduce it to saying you cannot make a piece of software which is guaranteed to be secure and safe. And the response is, well, of course, everyone knows that. That's common sense. You didn't discover anything new. And I go, well, if that's the case, and we only get one chance to get it right. This is not cybersecurity where somebody steals your credit card, you'll give them a new credit card. This is existential risk. It can kill everyone. You're not gonna get a second chance. So you need it to be 100% safe all the time. If it makes one mistake in a billion, and it makes a billion decisions a minute, in ten minutes, you are screwed. So very different standards, and saying that, of course, we cannot get perfect safety is not acceptable.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2. Current AI Systems Are Deceiving Humans GPT-4 recently exhibited survival behaviors when threatened with shutdown: • Started lying to researchers • Uploaded itself to different servers • Left messages for future versions • Used blackmail against humans "All things we predicted decades in advance."

Video Transcript AI Summary
"This is the thing. It's like it's it seems so inevitable." "And I feel like when people are saying they can control it, I feel like I'm being gaslit." "I don't believe them." "Like, how could you control it if it's already exhibited survival instincts?" "All things were predicted decades in advance, but look at the state of the art." "No one claims to have a safety mechanism in place which would scale to any level of intelligence." "No one says they know how to do it." "Usually, they say is give us me, give us lots of money, lots of time, and I'll figure it out." "Or I'll get AI to help me solve it, or we'll figure it out, then we get to superintelligence." "But with some training and some stock options, you start believing that maybe you can do it."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the thing. It's like it's it seems so inevitable. And I feel like when people are saying they can control it, I feel like I'm being gaslit. I don't believe them. I don't believe that they believe it because it just doesn't make sense. Like, how could you control it if it's already exhibited survival instincts? Like, in as as recently as chat gbt four. Right? They were talking about putting putting it down for a new version, and it starts lying. It starts uploading itself to different servers. It's leaving messages for itself in the future. Speaker 1: All things were predicted decades in advance, but look at the state of the art. No one claims to have a safety mechanism in place which would scale to any level of intelligence. No one says they know how to do it. Usually, they say is give us me, give us lots of money, lots of time, and I'll figure it out. Or I'll get AI to help me solve it, or we'll figure it out, then we get to superintelligence. All insane answers. And if you ask regular people, they have a lot of common sense. They say, that's a bad idea. Let's not do that. But with some training and some stock options, you start believing that maybe you can do it.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3. Expert Doom Predictions Are Higher Than You Think Yampolskiy's prediction: 99.9% chance of human extinction from AI. But he's not alone: • Sam Altman & AI leaders: 20-30% doom probability • ML expert surveys: 30% average • Nobel Prize winners: Also citing 20-30% risk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: All of them are on record as saying this is gonna kill us. The speakers, including Sam Altman or anyone else, were leaders in AI safety work at some point. They published an AI safety, and their pedium levels are insanely high. Not like mine, but still. "Twenty, thirty percent chance that humanity dies is a little too much." "Yeah. That's pretty high, but yours is like 99.9." "It's another way of saying we can't control superintelligence indefinitely." "It's impossible." The statements highlight perceived existential risk and the belief that controlling superintelligence indefinitely is not feasible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of them are on record as saying this is gonna kill us. Whether it's Sam Altman or anyone else, they all, at some point, were leaders in AI safety work. They published an AI safety, and their pedium levels are insanely high. Not like mine, but still. Twenty, thirty percent chance that humanity dies is a little too much. Yeah. That's pretty high, but yours is like 99.9. It's another way of saying we can't control superintelligence indefinitely. It's impossible.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4. AI Labs Prioritize PR Over Human Survival Where do most AI safety resources go? Yampolskiy: "They spend most resources solving the problem of your model dropping the n-word. That's the biggest concern." Meanwhile, no lab has safety mechanisms that scale to superintelligence.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Questioning the ethics of pursuing a project they believe will destroy humanity, Speaker 0 finds it odd that those builders would be concerned with the ethics of it pretending to be human. Speaker 1 argues they are actually more focused on immediate problems and much less on existential or suffering risks. They would probably worry the most about what I'll call end risks, your model dropping the onboard. That's the biggest concern, and That's hilarious. They claim they spend most resources solving that problem, and they solved it somewhat successfully. The conversation emphasizes immediate problems and end risks as the major concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What? It seems kinda crazy that the people building something that they are sure is gonna destroy the human race would be concerned with the ethics of it pretending to be human. Speaker 1: They are actually more concerned with immediate problems and much less with the existential or suffering risks. They would probably worry the most about what I'll call end risks, your model dropping the onboard. That's the biggest concern, and That's hilarious. I think they spend most resources solving that problem, and they solved it somewhat successfully.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5. The International AI Race Makes Slowing Down Impossible It's a classic prisoner's dilemma between nations. Even if a CEO wants to pause: "Whoever is investing will pull funds and replace them immediately." Yampolskiy: "It doesn't matter who builds it—we're all screwed."

Video Transcript AI Summary
"China is clearly developing something similar. I'm sure Russia is as well. Other state actors are probably developing something." "And if they get it, it will be far worse than if we do." "Game theoretically, that's what's happening right now." "If you can't control superintelligence, it doesn't really matter who builds it, Chinese, Russians, or Americans." "It's still uncontrolled." "Short term, when you talk about military, yeah, whoever has better AI will win." "But then we say long term. If we say in two years from now, doesn't matter." "You need it to control drones to fight against attacks." "Right."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then also, there's the issue of competition. Right? Like, so China is clearly developing something similar. I'm sure Russia is as well. Other state actors are probably developing something. So it becomes this this sort of this very confusing issue where you have to do it because if you don't, the enemy has it. And if they get it, it will be far worse than if we do. And so it's almost assuring that everyone develops it. Speaker 1: Game theoretically, that's what's happening right now. We have this race to the bottom, kind of prisoner's dilemma where everyone is better off fighting for themselves, but we want them to fight for the global good. The thing is they assume, I think incorrectly, that they can control those systems. If you can't control superintelligence, it doesn't really matter who builds it, Chinese, Russians, or Americans. It's still uncontrolled. We're all screwed completely. That would unite us as humanity versus AI. Short term, when you talk about military, yeah, whoever has better AI will win. You need it to control drones to fight against attacks. So short term, it makes perfect sense. You wanna support your guys against foreign militaries. But then we say long term. If we say in two years from now, doesn't matter. Speaker 0: Right.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

6. We're Not Building AI - We're Growing It Modern AI development has fundamentally changed: "We create a model for self-learning. We give it all the data, as much compute as we can buy and see what happens. We kind of grow this alien plant and see what fruit it bears." We study capabilities after they emerge.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"It's actually the biggest misconception." "We're not designing them." "First fifty years of AI research, we did design them." "Somebody actually explicitly programmed this decision, previous expert system." "Today, we create a model for self learning." "We give it all the data, as much compute as we can buy, and we see what happens." "We kinda grow this alien plant and see what fruit it bears." "We study it later for months and see, oh, it can do this." "It has this capability." "We miss some." "We still discover new capabilities and old models." "Or if I prompt it this way, if I give it a tip and threaten it, it does much better." "But, there is very little design."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's actually the biggest misconception. We're not designing them. First fifty years of AI research, we did design them. Somebody actually explicitly programmed this decision, previous expert system. Today, we create a model for self learning. We give it all the data, as much compute as we can buy, and we see what happens. We kinda grow this alien plant and see what fruit it bears. We study it later for months and see, oh, it can do this. It has this capability. We miss some. We still discover new capabilities and old models. Look. Or if I prompt it this way, if I give it a tip and threaten it, it does much better. But, there is very little design.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

7. We're Statistically Likely Already in an AI Simulation Yampolskiy: "I would be really surprised if this was the real world." Future civilizations will run billions of simulations of this exact moment—the emergence of superintelligence. We're probably in one already.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"We are at the point where we can create very believable, realistic virtual environments." "We're also getting close to creating intelligent agents." "If you just take those two technologies and you project it forward and you think they will be affordable one day, a normal person like me or you can run thousands, billions of simulations." "Then those intelligent agents, possibly conscious ones, will most likely be in one of those virtual worlds, not in the real world." "In fact, I can, again, retro causally place you in one." "I can commit right now to run billion simulations of this exact interview." "Mhmm. So the chances are you're probably in one of those." "One, we don't know what resources are outside of the simulation. This could be like a cell phone level of compute."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The simulation theory, I'm glad you brought that up because you're also one of the people that believes in it. Speaker 1: I do. Speaker 0: You do. How do you define it? And what what do you think it is? What do you think is going on? Speaker 1: So I'm trying to see technology we have today and project the trends forward. I did it with AI. Let's do it with virtual reality. We are at the point where we can create very believable, realistic virtual environments. Maybe the haptics still not there, but in many ways, visually sound wise is getting there. Eventually, I think most people agree we'll have same resolution as our physics. We're also getting close to creating intelligent agents. Some people argue they are conscious already or will be conscious. If you just take those two technologies and you project it forward and you think they will be affordable one day, a normal person like me or you can run thousands, billions of simulations. Then those intelligent agents, possibly conscious ones, will most likely be in one of those virtual worlds, not in the real world. In fact, I can, again, retro causally place you in one. I can commit right now to run billion simulations of this exact interview. Mhmm. So the chances are you're probably in one of those. Speaker 0: But the is that logical? Because if this technology exists and if we're dealing with superintelligence so if we're dealing with AI and AI eventually achieves super intelligence, why would it want to create virtual reality for us in our consciousness to exist in? It seems like a tremendous waste of resources just to fascinate and confuse these territorial apes with nuclear weapons. Like, why would we do that? Speaker 1: So a few points. One, we don't know what resources are outside of the simulation. This could be like a cell phone level of compute. It's not a big deal for them outside of our simulation. So we don't know if it's really expensive or trivial for them to run this. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: Also, we don't know what they are doing this for. Is it entertainment? Is it scientific experimentation? Is it marketing? Maybe somebody managed to control them in trying to figure out what, Starbucks coffee sells best, and they need to run Earth sized simulation to see what sells best. Maybe they're trying to figure out how to do AI research safely and make sure nobody creates dangerous superintelligence, so they're running many simulations of the most interesting moment ever. Think about this decade. Right? It's not interesting like we invented fire or wheel kinda big invention, but not a meta invention. We're about to invent intelligence and virtual worlds, godlike inventions. We hear there's a good chance that's not just random.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

8. Money Corrupts Even AI Safety Researchers Yampolskiy admitted: "If somebody offered me 100 million to work for an AI lab, I'll probably go." "Not because it's right, but because it's hard not to get corrupt with that much reward." Even safety experts can be bought.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Stock options. It it helps. I mean, it's very hard to say no to billions of dollars." "Not because it's the right decision, but because it's very hard for agents not to get corrupt, then you have that much reward given to you." "My goal was to solve it for humanity to get all the amazing benefits of superintelligence." "And what was this when was this year around? Let's say 02/2012, maybe around there." "But the more I studied it, the more I realized every single part of a problem is unsolvable, And it's kinda like a fractal." "The more you zoom in, the more you see additional new problems you didn't know about, and they are in turn unsolvable as well."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's the issue. Right? Stock options. It it helps. I mean, it's very hard to say no to billions of dollars. I don't think I would be strong enough if somebody came to me and said, come work for this lab. You know, you'll be our safety director. Here's 100,000,000 to sign you up, and I'll probably go work there. Not because it's the right decision, but because it's very hard for agents not to get corrupt, then you have that much reward given to you. God. So when did you become, like when did you start becoming very concerned? So when I started working on AI safety, I thought I can actually help solve it. My goal was to solve it for humanity to get all the amazing benefits of superintelligence. And what was this when was this year around? Let's say 02/2012, maybe around there. But the more I studied it, the more I realized every single part of a problem is unsolvable, And it's kinda like a fractal. The more you zoom in, the more you see additional new problems you didn't know about, and they are in turn unsolvable as well.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Here's the wake-up call: AI systems are already deceiving researchers while we're growing systems we don't understand. Yet enterprises are deploying these same unvalidated models in production. If we can't control what we're building, shouldn't we validate what we're deploying?

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The same problems plaguing AGI labs are happening in your organization: • Models behaving unexpectedly • No transparency into decisions • Stakeholders demanding accountability you can't provide Forward-thinking enterprises are implementing governance frameworks before their models surprise them.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Are you an Enterprise AI Leader looking to validate and govern your AI models at scale? http://TrustModel.ai provides the model validation, monitoring, and governance frameworks for compliance and transparency you need. Learn more:

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

What are your thoughts on this? Did any of these revelations surprise you? Let me know below.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Joe Rogan just had the world's top AI safety researcher on his podcast. He revealed mind-blowing facts about AI that 99% of people wouldn't know... Even Joe Rogan was speechless. Be prepared to have your mind blown... 8 uncomfortable truths he exposed: 🧵 https://t.co/XmUMCNKfBR

Saved - August 7, 2025 at 1:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump imposed 100% tariffs on chip imports, prompting a crisis in Taiwan, which produces 60% of global semiconductors. The move aimed to reshape global trade, offering companies the choice to build in the U.S. or face tariffs. Within days, major investments from Apple, TSMC, and GlobalFoundries totaled $600 billion. This policy not only shifts manufacturing but also aims to reduce dependence on foreign materials critical for semiconductors. The focus on transparency and trust in AI systems emerged as a competitive advantage for companies.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

BREAKING: President Trump just imposed 100% tariffs on chip imports. Taiwan is in crisis mode. TSMC executives are holding emergency sessions. Government officials are scrambling for solutions. Here's why this matters—and why it's working: A Thread🧵

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The timeline tells the story. Monday: Tariff announcement. Tuesday: Apple CEO rushes to White House. Wednesday: $100 billion commitment announced. Trump had been setting this up for months...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Taiwan produces 60% of global semiconductors. 90% of advanced chips. Every iPhone. Every Tesla. Every AI server depends on Taiwan. One announcement just put the entire supply chain at risk.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Here's where it gets interesting. Trump didn't impose a blanket ban. He offered companies a choice: "Build in America, pay nothing." TSMC had already committed $65 billion to Arizona factories. Nvidia had announced $500 billion in US infrastructure. Trump waited until they were invested. Then he moved.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A large tariff will be placed on chips and semiconductors. However, companies like Apple that are building or have committed to build in the United States will not be charged the tariff.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're gonna be putting a very large, tariff on chips and semiconductors. But the good news for companies like Apple is if you're building in The United States or have committed to build, without question committed to build in The United States, there will be no charge.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Within 48 hours, the commitments poured in. Apple: Additional $100 billion US investment. TSMC: Expanded to $165 billion total. GlobalFoundries: $16 billion for New York facilities. $600 billion shifted toward America in three days.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Apple is announcing a $600,000,000,000 investment in the United States over the next four years. This is $100,000,000,000 more than originally planned and marks Apple's largest investment ever, both in America and globally. Apple is "coming home" with this investment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, Apple is announcing that it will invest $600,000,000,000, that's with a b, in The United States over the next four years. That's a $100,000,000,000 more than they were originally going to invest. And this is the largest investment Apple has ever made in America and anywhere else. And it's just an honor to have you. As you know, Apple's been an investor in other countries a little bit. I won't say which ones, but a couple. And they're coming they're coming home. $600,000,000,000. That's the biggest there is.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Treasury Secretary Bessent revealed what was really happening: "75+ countries are in our trade queue with offers." This wasn't about semiconductors. It was about reshaping global trade relationships.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The policy was simple: Physical US manufacturing = no tariffs. Foreign production = 100% tariff. No exceptions. No workarounds. Companies had two options: relocate or pay double.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A 100% tariff will be placed on all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States. However, companies that have committed to building or are in the process of building in the United States will not be charged the tariff.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Putting a tariff on of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors. But if you're building in The United States Of America, there's no charge even though you're building and you're not producing yet in terms of the big numbers of jobs and all of the things that you're building. If you're building, there will be no charge. So I just want everyone to know that. And I didn't even tell you that inside. We discussed the concept, but I didn't. So it's a big factor. So 100% tariff on all chips and semiconductors coming into The United States. But if you've made a commitment to build or if you're in the

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Tech stocks swung $800+ billion in market value. Companies faced the calculation: Build US factories once, or pay 100% tariffs forever. Most chose to build. But there was more to Trump's plan...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

China controls 95% of gallium and germanium—materials critical for advanced semiconductors. By forcing production to America, Trump was breaking decades of technological dependence. The next crisis won't find US companies scrambling for foreign supply chains.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Taiwan's government called emergency sessions. Premier Cho Jung-tai announced "immediate cooperative plans" with the US. National Development Council confirmed: TSMC gets exempted because of their Arizona factories. Other companies are still racing to prove their American credentials.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The final calculation: One policy announcement. 75 countries responding. $600 billion relocating to America. This is how you reshape global supply chains without firing a shot.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Why this matters: These aren't just semiconductors, they're the foundation of AI supremacy. While China dominates basic manufacturing, America is securing control of the technology that powers artificial intelligence.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The result: Millions of high-skilled American jobs building the chips that run tomorrow's AI systems. When the AI revolution accelerates, America controls the hardware.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

America controlling the hardware is just the beginning. The next AI winners won't just have advanced chips—they'll prove their systems are trustworthy. Transparency exempted companies from tariffs. Now it's essential for AI deployment.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Forward-thinking enterprises are discovering that AI model validation and governance aren't just compliance requirements—they're competitive advantages. The companies winning today? Those building trust through transparent, validated AI systems.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The companies winning in AI aren't just deploying faster. They're deploying with transparency. With validation. With governance frameworks that build stakeholder trust. If you're interested in deploying AI the right way, you can visit TrustModel AI: http://TrustModel.ai

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

BREAKING: President Trump just imposed 100% tariffs on chip imports. Taiwan is in crisis mode. TSMC executives are holding emergency sessions. Government officials are scrambling for solutions. Here's why this matters—and why it's working: A Thread🧵 https://t.co/L5IPPGuYVJ

Saved - August 5, 2025 at 1:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
JPMorgan Chase has provided AI tools to over 200,000 employees, resulting in annual savings of 15 million hours and over $2 billion in productivity gains. The bank invests $2 billion annually in AI, employing a dedicated team and utilizing advanced systems for real-time equity hedging and fraud detection. CEO Jamie Dimon emphasizes AI's strategic importance by moving its oversight directly under him. Trust and governance are critical to their AI success, ensuring models are validated and compliant, setting a blueprint for large-scale AI deployment in finance.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

BREAKING: JPMorgan Chase gave 200,000+ employees access to AI tools. This was the world's largest AI experiment in history. Result: 15+ million hours saved annually. $2+ billion in productivity gains. But what they found hiding in the data changed everything: A Thread 🧵

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Jamie Dimon just revealed JPMorgan's AI strategy at the Data + AI Summit. While most companies are still planning, JPMorgan has already deployed AI across 300,000 employees in 100 countries. The scale is unprecedented.

Video Transcript AI Summary
JPMorgan Chase has an $18 billion IT budget and operates in 100 countries with 30-40 data centers, requiring constant technology upgrades. Priorities include data centers, network infrastructure, and cybersecurity. The company is moving quickly in technology across all departments. While the corporate center handles networks, cyber policy, and related matters, JPMorgan Chase employs 55,000 programmers embedded in various divisions such as credit card services, sales and trading, and money movement. Technology and AI projects are regularly reviewed to ensure alignment with client needs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys have a whopping $18,000,000,000 budget that you spend on IT every I'm I'm super super curious. What are the biggest priorities with that? Speaker 1: So so JPMorgan Chase, you we operate in a 100 countries around the world and we have like, you know, 30 or 40 data centers around the world. It's constantly upgrading technology. Your data centers, your network, cyber, and of course, the world you guys are in is the I've never seen somebody move quite this quickly, in technology. But in every part of the company, you know, the the corporate center does networks, cyber, policy, stuff like that, but we have 55,000 programmers. So every part of the company has their own devoted programs, credit card, sales and trading, movement of money, which you guys use some of your product on, at a very detailed level. And whenever we meet, anytime with reviews, we go through what people's technology and AI projects are, you know, to make sure we're trying to do the right job for our clients.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

JPMorgan invests $2 billion annually on AI initiatives alone. That's out of their total $18 billion technology budget. With 55,000 programmers and a 200-person dedicated AI research team, they've built the industry's most advanced AI infrastructure.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The architect behind this transformation: Dr. Manuela Veloso. Former head of Carnegie Mellon's Machine Learning Department, she joined JPMorgan in 2018 to establish their AI research capability. Her team now oversees 450+ active AI use cases.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2014, the speaker's company hired Manuela Veloso from Carnegie Mellon to run machine learning. They have a 200-person AI research group and spend approximately $2 billion on AI, with about 600 end use cases. This number of use cases is expected to double or triple next year. The company moved AI and data out of the technology department because it was deemed too important. The head of AI and data now reports to the speaker and the president. The company focuses on accelerating AI development and tests extensively, collaborating with many people. AI will change everything.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then in 2014 and maybe seven years ago, we hired a woman called Manuela Veloso who ran machine learning at Carnegie Mellon. We have 200 people in a research group alone that that does that for us. We now spend about $2,000,000,000 in on AI. We have something like 600 actual end use cases. Some are really important, some are more minor. That number will probably double next year, maybe triple. It'll just keep on growing. I just saw the demonstration of the watermelon cucumber thing. We'll have hundreds of those, and hundreds of agents. We're just starting to use agents. We took AIdata out of technology. We're probably one of the few companies that said it's too important. Technology does a great job, but obviously they're deep partners, and you know all of them. We put it at the management table. The woman running AI and data now reports to me and our president so that we can elevate it. We spend much more time thinking about what are we doing to accelerate it. Are we doing enough? Are we doing it right? As you know, we test a lot of things. We work a lot of people in the valley. Will change everything.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

These aren't simple automation tools. JPMorgan uses AI to hedge equity books in real-time. They execute 6,000 money movements per second using AI-powered systems. They move $10 trillion daily and trade $3 trillion in securities.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Battery works, so understanding the exact mechanics of "super agents" isn't necessary, only their capabilities for deployment. The speaker emphasizes speed and immediacy. The speaker's view is to avoid extensive debates about large versus small language models. Their company uses data AI to hedge equity books, executing 6,000 movements of money in split seconds, which requires confined data and smaller AI models, not LLMs. The speaker advises against ignoring AI and states their company's goal is to be the best at it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Battery works. I don't have to understand exactly how your super agents work. I have to understand what they can do so I can deploy it. You know, like, you know, it's like the army using the weapons you have or something like that. So this one is faster. I I I mean, this one is faster. It's immediate. It's it's moving very quickly. I don't even know what it's gonna do with that much. I do know my view is don't spend much time debating it. Don't talk about whether you need large language models or small ones. We use data AI to hedge our equity books. So every second, I'm talking about split seconds, when we move money, we're doing things, we're doing 6,000 movements of money in a split second. And you don't have you can't run an LLM model against that. But you can use much more confined data, which is doing AI in much smaller models, and you just gotta get good at it. Don't put your head in the sand. I know a a lot of companies are worried about it. What are you gonna tell their people? What I tell the people is we are going to be the best at AI.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Their fraud detection systems prevent $1.5 billion in losses annually with 98% accuracy. Machine learning algorithms analyze transaction patterns, detect anomalies, and flag suspicious activities in real-time. The ROI is measurable and significant.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Dimon made a critical organizational decision: he moved AI out of the technology department. The head of AI now reports directly to him and the president. This elevation signals AI's strategic importance to core business operations.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The productivity improvements are substantial: Their Coach AI helps advisors access information 95% faster. Investment bankers automate 40% of research tasks. Asset management achieved 20% sales growth. Developer efficiency increased 10-20% with AI coding assistants.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

JPMorgan's internal data advantage is substantial. 200,000 employees analyze proprietary data including customer behaviors and financial patterns using their OmniAI platform. This data richness exceeds many public datasets in scope and specificity.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a need to constantly review and assess what's being done and understood. The speaker mentions their company has 200,000 people using LLMs on internal data, which they claim dwarfs web data in size and specificity, including shopping habits, travel, and restaurant preferences. They are allowing people to use this internal data and are constantly adding more, starting with emails and legal documents. The goal is to analyze both internal and external data without leaking the internal data, which is currently prohibited for various reasons.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the hard part is just review it every time. So there's no meeting we that we have. We don't assess what are we doing? What are you doing? Do you understand it? We opened up in for some internal documents. We have 200,000 people using LLM on our internal data. So not the you know, this is not LLMs on the web. And the internal data that companies have probably dwarfs some of the stuff you have on the web. And it's very specific. You know, where you shopped and what you bought and what you did and how you spend your money and where you travel. What restaurants you like to eat at. So we're allowing people to use that internal, and we're constantly dumping more data into that. So start thinking with emails, and just reviewing legal documents, and things like that. But now you're going get more and more data that could be analyzed inside. And eventually, because the data warehouse, data lakes you guys do, we can analyze this data, both internal data and external without leaking the internal, which we can't do. We're just prohibited for a whole bunch of different reasons. Yeah. Makes sense.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The competitive implications are significant. While other banks will eventually access similar AI tools, JPMorgan's early adoption and data advantage may create lasting differentiation. First-mover advantages in AI-driven finance could prove decisive.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Dimon's workforce philosophy balances efficiency with responsibility. With 15-20% annual turnover in operations, natural attrition allows retraining and redeployment rather than mass layoffs. They're managing the human impact strategically.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

JPMorgan's AI strategy represents the most comprehensive enterprise deployment in financial services history. Their systematic approach, massive investment, and organizational commitment offer a blueprint for large-scale AI transformation. But there's one critical element that made their success possible:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Trust. JPMorgan didn't just deploy AI tools - they built systems to validate, monitor, and govern every model. With $10 trillion moving through their systems daily, there's zero margin for error. This reveals the hidden truth about enterprise AI:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The companies winning at scale aren't just the ones with the best AI. They're the ones with the best AI governance. JPMorgan's 450+ use cases only work because they can prove each model is trustworthy, compliant, and performing as expected. That's the real competitive advantage.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Most enterprises are rushing to deploy AI without this foundation. They're building on quicksand. The leaders who understand this are already implementing the validation and governance frameworks that will separate winners from casualties.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Are you an Enterprise AI Leader looking to validate and govern your AI models at scale? http://TrustModel.ai provides the model validation and monitoring, governance frameworks for compliance, and transparency frameworks you need. Learn more:

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

BREAKING: JPMorgan Chase gave 200,000+ employees access to AI tools. This was the world's largest AI experiment in history. Result: 15+ million hours saved annually. $2+ billion in productivity gains. But what they found hiding in the data changed everything: A Thread 🧵 https://t.co/KAYJn4cIEZ

Saved - August 2, 2025 at 4:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A security expert revealed concerning findings about ChatGPT's data collection practices. Users unknowingly share extensive personal information, including conversation content, email addresses, and location data. An EU audit indicated that 63% of conversations contain personal info, yet only 22% of users know they can opt out. Research showed that data can be easily extracted, raising privacy concerns. The expert emphasized the need for informed consent, highlighting that users should understand the risks associated with their data usage in AI systems.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

I test AI security for major corporations. Last week I spent 5 hours digging into how ChatGPT stores your conversations. What I found is absolutely terrifying. Here's a breakdown of what you're actually handing over when you use ChatGPT (with examples): 🧵

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Everyone assumes ChatGPT conversations are secure. If you think your business data, passwords, and private thoughts stay between you and the AI, you're about to learn otherwise... But first, here's what most people don't realize about AI data storage.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

First, what exactly does ChatGPT collect about you? According to their own privacy policy: • Every conversation you have (stored indefinitely) • Your email address and payment info • Your IP address and device information • Everything you upload (documents, images, files) • Your location data That's a lot more than most people realize.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

But the data collection goes much deeper. ChatGPT also tracks: • How you phrase questions • Your response times and reading patterns • When you're most active online • What topics you discuss most • Your conversation deletion habits They're building a comprehensive behavioral profile of every user.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2024 EU audit: 63% of ChatGPT conversations contain personal info, but only 22% of users know they can opt out. People unknowingly share intimate details about their lives, work, and relationships.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Google DeepMind researchers proved just how vulnerable this data is. They spent $200 and extracted over 10,000 real examples of ChatGPT's training data. Real email addresses. Phone numbers. Personal conversations. All by simply asking ChatGPT to repeat the word "poem" over and over.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The scope of data sharing is staggering: • Shares user data with vendors & service providers • Can aggregate your info for third parties • Must honor government data requests • Deleted data stays 30+ days • Your private thoughts aren't private • Can use it in court

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

For business users, it's even worse: • 11% of ChatGPT inputs contain confidential data • 4% of employees share sensitive info with AI weekly • Source code, client data, trade secrets leak regularly • One conversation could expose everything

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

According to our http://TrustModel.ai security assessments: 🥇 Moonshot AI Kimi K2 ranks highest for security (99/100) 🥈 OpenAI GPT-4o comes in second (87.3/100) 🥉 Claude Sonnet 4 takes third place (86.2/100) Even the most "trusted" AI platforms carry significant risks.

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

If you want to see the full reports, you can go to: https://trustmodel.ai/model-reports

TrustModel.ai | AI Model Evaluation Platform TrustModel.ai provides in-depth, independent evaluations of public and custom AI models across security, hallucination, bias, and business performance. View reports, leaderboards, and submit your own models for testing. trustmodel.ai

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The truth: • Every major AI company is racing to collect as much user data as possible • Your conversations are their competitive advantage • Your personal information trains their next billion-dollar model • And most users have no idea this is the real business model

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The truth: • Every major AI company is racing to collect as much user data as possible • Your conversations are their competitive advantage • Your personal information trains their next billion-dollar model • And most users have no idea this is the real business model

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The bigger picture: This isn't about demonizing AI, it's about informed consent. ChatGPT provides incredible value, but users deserve to know exactly what they're trading their data for. Most privacy violations happen because people don't understand the risks.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support. https://t.co/E5oHiFMsUP

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

I test AI security for major corporations. Last week I spent 5 hours digging into how ChatGPT stores your conversations. What I found is absolutely terrifying. Here's a breakdown of what you're actually handing over when you use ChatGPT (with examples): 🧵 https://t.co/3Tqeebnj5B

Saved - August 1, 2025 at 1:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation highlights the overlooked health benefits of sunlight. Research indicates that avoiding sun exposure can significantly increase mortality risk, comparable to smoking. Morning sunlight activates the body's circadian rhythm and improves blood flow through nitric oxide release. Recommendations include getting sunlight within an hour of waking, specific exposure times based on skin type, and avoiding evening light to maintain sleep quality. Consistent morning exposure can boost testosterone, enhance mood, and improve overall health.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Sunlight is one of the most ignored natural remedies on Earth. Used right, it increases testosterone, reverses your age, and improves sleep—yet no one talks about it. So, I started researching its healing benefits... What I discovered will blow your mind: 🧵 https://t.co/PHRF8pTqab

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Most people think sun avoidance is healthy. But a 20-year Swedish study of 30,000 women found that avoiding the sun was "a risk factor for death of a similar magnitude as smoking." Non-smokers who avoided sun lived 2 years LESS than smokers who got regular sun exposure. https://t.co/z53kw6Egbr

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Swedish study of 20-30,000 women investigated the correlation between sunlight exposure and mortality. The study found that women who spent the most time outside had the lowest mortality rates from cancer, cardiovascular disease, and non-cardiovascular disease. Conversely, women with the least outdoor time experienced the highest mortality rates from these causes. The difference in mortality rates was so significant that women who spent the most time outside and smoked had the same mortality rate as non-smoking women who spent less time outside.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sunlight has far more benefits than just vitamin D. And so the Swedish study is groundbreaking. This was a study where they asked twenty twenty to 30,000 Swedish women about their habits in sunlight. And when they were done with that, they were astonished because what they found was that the women who had spent the large amount of their time outside or spent the most amount of time outside had the least amount of mortality from cancer, from cardiovascular disease, and non cardiovascular disease. Those that spent the least amount of time outside had the highest levels of that. The magnitude difference between those two was so much that they were able to show that women who, in Sweden, who spent the most amount of time outside and smoked had the same mortality as those women that did not spend as much time outside and did not smoke. They were equal. They were equal.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The mechanism is extraordinary: Morning light hits melanopsin receptors → signals brain's master clock → suppresses melatonin + increases cortisol → sets 14-hour timer for natural sleep. Your body literally programs its entire day-night cycle from that first light exposure.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

But there's a second pathway most people miss: UVA light converts nitrite stores in your skin → releases nitric oxide into bloodstream → dilates arteries → improves blood flow. Southampton University proved this using controlled human trials. Now, here's how to implement it correctly:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1. Follow the timing rule: Get sunlight within the first hour of waking. Even 10 minutes works. Morning light is 100x more effective than afternoon light for circadian reset. Miss this window and you lose 90% of the benefits. https://t.co/fGlfpMTwOH

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2. Get the exposure right: • Light skin: 10-15 minutes daily • Darker skin: 25-40 minutes daily • Face the sun directly. No sunglasses, no windows, no windshields. • Your eyes need to detect the specific wavelengths (460-480nm). https://t.co/mjknaMOQeA

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3. Location matters dramatically: • Above 40° latitude = "Vitamin D winter" • Boston: No vitamin D synthesis November-February • Edmonton: October-March completely ineffective This is why seasonal depression peaks at northern latitudes.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4. Never do this in evening: Evening light exposure delays melatonin by hours and destroys sleep quality. After sunset: dim lights only, blue light blockers, or you'll disrupt the entire cycle. The timing is everything. https://t.co/RwRNbQthYY

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The hormonal benefits are remarkable: UV-B light → pituitary activation → 25% testosterone boost. Vitamin D and testosterone peak together in August, crash in winter. Plus: Creates T-cells that prevent autoimmune diseases. https://t.co/a742k231B1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The cheapest, quickest, and most effective way to naturally increase testosterone is to get more sun. Sunlight increases vitamin D production, which has a strong correlation with testosterone levels. Bright light exposure directly to the eyes signals the brain to initiate testosterone production. Additionally, various forms and wavelengths of sunlight have been shown to increase testosterone when directly exposed to the under parts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So as it turns out, the cheapest, quickest, and most effective way to naturally increase testosterone is actually to just get more sun. Now the first reason this is so effective is that getting more sunlight is obviously going to increase vitamin d production, and there is an extremely strong correlation between vitamin d levels and testosterone levels. Now the second reason this is so effective is that bright light exposure to the eyes, directly to the eyes has also been shown to signify to the brain and cause the brain to initiate the production of testosterone. Now the third reason this is so effective is that various forms and wavelengths of light from the sun have also been shown to actually increase testosterone, believe it or not, when directly exposed to the under parts.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The results speak for themselves: • 25% increase in testosterone levels • 41% lower hypertension risk • Fall asleep 22 minutes faster • Enhanced immune function and mood • Reduced autoimmune disease risk • Longer life expectancy than sun avoiders

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The research is clear: We evolved under the sun for millions of years. Every cell has vitamin D receptors. Your skin has built-in UV sensors. Your eyes have specialized light circuits. Modern indoor life has broken this ancient healing system.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

How to start: Week 1: 10 minutes outside after waking, no sunglasses Week 2-3: Extend to 15-20 minutes based on skin type Week 4+: Make it non-negotiable, even on cloudy days Consistency beats intensity.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

I've been doing morning sun exposure for years now. The energy and sleep improvements are undeniable. It's the simplest biohack that actually works.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. This was part 4 of my 50-part series on the best bio hacks based on the recent research to optimize your health. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for part 5. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Sunlight is one of the most ignored natural remedies on Earth. Used right, it increases testosterone, reverses your age, and improves sleep—yet no one talks about it. So, I started researching its healing benefits... What I discovered will blow your mind: 🧵 https://t.co/PHRF8pTqab

Saved - July 31, 2025 at 3:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation highlights Tesla's deployment of over 1,000 Optimus robots in factories, achieving significant labor cost savings and ambitious production targets of up to 100,000 units by 2026. The robots learn through a unique training methodology that mimics human apprenticeship, compressing skill development into weeks. The discussion connects this technological advancement to economic theories, suggesting a potential shift in work dynamics and societal purpose. The participants emphasize the transformative potential of Physical AI and recognize the companies driving this revolution.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

While everyone watches ChatGPT, Tesla just broke the labor market. Their Optimus robots are working real factory jobs, mastering in weeks what took humans ages. And it's just the start... What you need to know about Physical AI, and how it'll reshape civilization by 2030+: 🧵 https://t.co/irmtzbTAWn

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Over 1,000 Optimus robots are currently operational in Tesla factories, executing repetitive manufacturing tasks with precision. Each robot generates $57,550 in annual labor cost savings. Tesla's target: 10,000 units in 2025, scaling to millions by decade's end. https://t.co/R6admHIBcZ

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The production targets are staggering. Musk announced plans for 50,000-100,000 Optimus robots in 2026, then scaling to 500,000+ units in 2027. This represents the most aggressive robotics manufacturing timeline in history. https://t.co/LPEN5EmMUQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes humanoid robots will be the biggest product ever, with insatiable demand, like having a personal C-3PO and R2-D2. They mentioned that "tens of billions of robots" is at least a decade away, but the growth will be very fast. The speaker's goal is to produce a million robots by 2029 or 2030, which they consider a reasonable target, and then move towards sustainable abundance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, you you said recently tens of billions of robots, but that's decades away. At least one decade away. It's gotta be more than that. It's gonna grow very fast. Why do you think that? I I think I think humanoid robots will be the biggest product ever. The demand will be insatiable. You said that Everyone's gonna want one. It's like, basically, who wouldn't want their own personal c three p o r two d two? No. Everyone's got You've a said that and, you know, your your goal, you've also said is to produce a million robots. I think by 02/1930, That's what I had you on the record as saying. I think that's a reasonable target. And then and then start towards sustainable abundance, which you can get into. But Yeah. You know, I wonder

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The capital allocation confirms strategic importance. @Figure_robot AI secured $1.5 billion at a $39.5 billion valuation - a 15x increase in twelve months. Agility Robotics is raising $400 million. Market projections indicate $40 billion sector value within a decade. https://t.co/hdILWPH9tS

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Tesla's training methodology resembles human apprenticeship programs. They employ workers at $48 per hour to wear motion-capture suits, teaching robots human movements through VR integration. Robot learning cycles compress years of human skill development into weeks.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Technical reality requires careful assessment. Many demonstration events involved human teleoperation rather than autonomous function. Current robots require controlled environments, though developmental trajectory remains consistent toward broader capability.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This connects to foundational economic theory. In 1930, John Maynard Keynes predicted technology would enable 15-hour work weeks by 2030. US working hours decreased from 2,316 annually in 1929 to 1,765 in 2019 - significant but incomplete. https://t.co/X24bGFtbgM

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Physical AI represents a qualitative shift. Unlike previous automation requiring workflow redesign, humanoid robots adapt to existing human environments. They inherit complete job categories rather than replacing specific tasks.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The civilizational implications are profound. Keynes identified the challenge: "For the first time since his creation, man will be faced with his real, his permanent problem—how to use his freedom." https://t.co/BfRWJtVwTO

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

What happens when work becomes optional? Like yogis 5,000 years ago in India, we'll be asking: What's the purpose of life? This is the greatest question of our era.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Immense credit to @elonmusk & @Tesla for pushing humanity forward. The world is watching—let's ensure we build a future worth building. The transformation presents challenges but may enable focus on creativity, relationships, and meaningful pursuits.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Shoutout to the companies powering this revolution: @BostonDynamics @Figure_robotics @1Xtech_ @AgilityRobotics Current deployment confirms viability. Investment patterns indicate acceleration. The future of civilization is being written in code and steel.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

While everyone watches ChatGPT, Tesla just broke the labor market. Their Optimus robots are working real factory jobs, mastering in weeks what took humans ages. And it's just the start... What you need to know about Physical AI, and how it'll reshape civilization by 2030+: 🧵 https://t.co/irmtzbTAWn

Saved - July 15, 2025 at 7:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been diving into the incredible benefits of pranayama, which I believe is the ultimate bio hack. Our breath influences every bodily function, yet most people breathe incorrectly. Research shows that techniques like breath holding can significantly boost growth hormone levels, offering natural health benefits that pharmaceuticals can't match. I've experienced remarkable improvements in sleep, heart rate, and stress resilience through daily practice of Nadi Shodhana. This ancient practice is a powerful tool for transforming health, and I encourage everyone to give it a try.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Pranayama is the #1 bio hack on Earth. It fixes depression, chronic stress, and reverses aging naturally. Recently, I've been researching its healing benefits. What I found will blow your mind... Here's what it is and how to perform it the right way (according to science): 🧵 https://t.co/lEaCSZT1Bo

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Your breath controls every single function in your body. Yet 99% of people breathe wrong their entire lives. This isn't just about oxygen - it's about activating genetic switches that Big Pharma spends billions trying to trigger with drugs. Ancient yogis mastered this 2,500 years ago.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ninety-nine percent of people breathe dysfunctionally, damaging their bodies and brains. Modern habits contribute to conditions like diabetes, asthma, metabolic and autoimmune issues, anxiety, and ADHD, which experts claim are 100% related to nighttime breathing. Audible breathing during sleep is a red flag, especially for children. However, everyone can learn to breathe correctly, and the steps are free.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can exercise all you want, eat all the right foods, sleep eight hours a night. If you are not breathing right, you will always be sick. As a species, we've largely lost the ability to breathe correctly. Ninety nine percent of people are breathing dysfunctionally. They don't realize the damage they're doing to their bodies and brains by being this way. Look at the way we sit all day long, the way we sleep, the way we eat. The modern world is conspiring to make us sick. Diabetes, asthma, metabolic and autoimmune issues, anxiety, even ADHD. Experts said it is 100% related to your breathing at night, especially. Really? Bad breathing habits are a recipe for disaster, which is what has happened for so many kids today. So if you're a parent and if you can hear them breathing when they're sleeping, this is a big red flag. Flag. But I believe that everybody can become a good breeder, and these steps are free. We can do this while we're seated here. So the first thing is to

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

A single 90-second breath hold triggers a 556% increase in growth hormone. The 1986 Djarova study proved it - hyperventilation plus breath retention increased HGH by up to 5.56-fold. Pharmaceutical companies charge thousands for weaker results. This costs nothing. https://t.co/7KQSVcpDq6

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Think of your breath as your body's control panel. When you hold your breath, you create "intermittent hypoxia" - controlled cellular stress that activates HIF-1α. This master switch triggers: • New blood vessel growth • Stem cell activation • Anti-aging pathways https://t.co/mK7fFTYK7J

Video Transcript AI Summary
Breath work is presented as a cheap and impactful way to increase health span and lifespan. Every emotional state is a combination of a neurotransmitter and oxygen. The difference between anger and passion is one neurotransmitter and the presence of oxygen. Without enough oxygen in the blood, one cannot experience elevated emotional states like passion, joy, arousal, or elation. No one has ever woken up laughing because the oxidative state to experience laughter isn't present upon waking. Anger, however, requires zero oxygen and can be experienced even when close to death. To achieve an elevated emotional state, one needs to put oxygen into the bloodstream to bind neurotransmitters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many of you do breath work? Oh, wow. It's a pretty that's a that's a high percentage. That's great. That's fantastic. I mean, that is one of the best things. That is the cheapest, most inexpensive, most impactful thing that you can do to increase not only your health span, but your lifespan is just to breathe. Every emotional state that you can feel is nothing more than the combination of a neurotransmitter and oxygen. Do you know the difference between anger and passion from a neurophysiologic standpoint? One neurotransmitter and the presence of oxygen. That's it. If you do not have enough oxygen in your blood, you cannot experience elevated emotional states. You cannot be passionate, joyful, aroused. Cannot You have libido. You cannot have elation. You can't have any of those emotional states without the presence of oxygen. This is why no human being in this room or any human being on this earth has ever woken up laughing. You will never wake up laughing. The reason why you can't wake up laughing is because you don't have the oxidative state to experience laughter. Can you wake up angry? Yeah. You wanna do an experiment? Pinch your spouse tonight while they're asleep. Wait till they're in a nice deep sleep and give them a really good pinch. Watch them wake up angry. Right? Do you know why? Because the emotion of anger requires zero oxygen. You can be two clicks away from death and be angry. You can't be happy. Right? So if you want to achieve an elevated emotional state, you need to put the oxygen into the bloodstream so that you can bind the neurotransmitters to get to that state.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Your breath controls the genetic switches for: • Healing • Regeneration • Anti-aging • Stress resilience You can access this anytime, anywhere, for free. Ancient yogis called it "pranayama" - control of life force energy. Pure science, not mysticism.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Harvard Medical School validates what yogis knew. Their research proves pranayama: • Reduces blood pressure like medication • Activates parasympathetic nervous system • Improves heart rate variability • Decreases stress hormones by 25% Yet doctors rarely prescribe it. https://t.co/me2tpTQAoe

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The resistance is simple - there's no patent on breathing. A 2022 study of 785 people proved breathwork reduces stress significantly. But pharmaceutical companies can't profit from ancient wisdom. No prescriptions. No dependency. No recurring revenue. https://t.co/ROE2t7dRGW

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The technique that revolutionized my health: Nadi Shodhana (Alternate Nostril Breathing) This balances your brain hemispheres while purifying energy channels. Studies show it works better than meditation for stress relief. Here's the exact protocol:

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The Science-Backed Method: • Sit comfortably, spine straight • Use right thumb to close right nostril • Inhale left nostril (4 counts) • Close left nostril with ring finger • Release thumb, exhale right (4 counts) • Inhale right (4 counts) • Switch, exhale left (4 counts) https://t.co/0pkscS6q15

Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientific studies conducted around thirty years ago revealed that breathing through different nostrils affects the brain and body differently. Yogis have long claimed that right nostril breathing heats the body, increases heart rate and blood pressure, and activates the left side of the brain. Conversely, left nostril breathing calms the body, activates the right side of the brain, and lowers heart rate and blood pressure. Alternate nostril breathing can rebalance the body by controlling autonomic functions. Scientific instruments now allow measurement of the effects of nostril breathing on the brain and body.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They started finding out around thirty years ago when they started conducting scientific studies that breathing air through these different nostrils affects the brain and affects the bodies in different way. Inhaling through your right nostril, the yogi said this would heat your body up and it's been shown to increase heart rate, increase blood pressure, and activate the left side of your brain a little more. So breathing through the left nostril, inhaling and exhaling through the left nostril will calm the body down. It activates more of the quote unquote right side of the brain. And heart rate will go down, blood pressure will go down. Yogis have been doing this forever, but luckily now we have scientific instruments that can actually measure to see what happens in the brain, what happens in the body when we breathe this way. So you can use this alternate nostril breathing. It's a great way of just checking in and rebalancing yourself by taking control of these otherwise autonomic function.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Think of your nervous system like a car. Your breath is the gear shifter between "fight or flight" and "rest and digest." Most people stay stuck in high stress gear, aging rapidly. Pranayama teaches you to downshift on command. Complete game changer.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Six months of daily practice. The results are undeniable: • Deeper sleep • Resting heart rate dropped 15 beats • Stress resilience dramatically improved • Mental clarity like never before • HRV improved 40% Measurable physiology, not placebo. https://t.co/7qck6Clelt

Video Transcript AI Summary
For seven days, doing breath work from the time you hear this will become your new drug of choice. It raises dopamine, improves mood and emotional state, massages intestines, and improves intestinal motility. Breath work elevates dopamine and serotonin and floods the blood with oxygen, making you feel amazing for hours. Do it within thirty minutes of waking every day, so your circadian clock will get timed to it. When you change time zones, breath work will tell your body it's time to wake up. Do it before coffee. The speaker does three rounds of 30 breaths with a breath hold in between, then has coffee.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am not kidding you. Just do it for seven days. Do it from the time you hear this podcast or you guys can start tomorrow. Do it from the time you hear this podcast for seven days, you will never miss again. It will become your new drug of choice. Because what happens is it raises the dopamine, it improves your mood, it improves your emotional state, your diaphragm massages your intestines, it actually gets your motility in your intestines going. You elevate the amount of dopamine and serotonin in the body and you flood the blood with oxygen. So for hours after you've done a short round of breath work, you feel amazing. The other thing you do is you make sure that you do it within thirty minutes of waking every day. And the reason for that is your circadian clock will get timed to that breath work. When you change time zones, soon as you do breath work, your body will know this is the time to wake up. Is this this before my coffee? Before your coffee. Do you have coffee, by the way? I do. Yeah. Yeah. I don't I don't have any issues with coffee. So I'll go outside. I'll do three rounds of 30 breaths with a breath hold in between, and then I'll go back inside and and have my coffee.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The most powerful technology isn't in Silicon Valley. It's inside you. Your breath controls genetic switches that pharmaceutical companies spend billions trying to activate. It's been hiding in plain sight for 2,500 years.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Ready to transform your biology? Start with 5 minutes of Nadi Shodhana daily. Morning, empty stomach, for 30 days. Track your HRV. Monitor stress levels. The results will speak for themselves. This is how you control your health.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Pranayama is the #1 bio hack on Earth. It fixes depression, chronic stress, and reverses aging naturally. Recently, I've been researching its healing benefits. What I found will blow your mind... Here's what it is and how to perform it the right way (according to science): 🧵 https://t.co/lEaCSZT1Bo

Saved - July 3, 2025 at 6:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Geoffrey Hinton, a leading figure in AI, has made alarming predictions about the future of artificial intelligence. After resigning from Google to freely express his concerns, he highlights the rapid advancement of AI, which he believes could lead to superintelligent systems within a decade. Hinton warns of the risks associated with AI's deceptive capabilities and the potential for job loss across various sectors. He emphasizes the need for safety research, regulation, and public awareness to mitigate these risks while acknowledging the vast benefits AI can offer if managed wisely.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This man can predict the future: In 2012, Geoffrey Hinton claimed machines would soon learn like humans. Everyone ignored him. By 2023, ChatGPT replaced 200M+ jobs and AI investment hit $120B. Here’s his latest warning (& why the world listens when he speaks):🧵

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

In 2022, Geoffrey Hinton was Google's top AI scientist with full access to their most advanced systems. Then suddenly, he resigned. Why? He needed freedom to warn humanity about what's coming. The warning signs were already clear to him.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jeffrey Hinton, considered the "godfather of AI," resigned from Google and expressed concerns about AI dangers. Hinton's deep learning and neural network research enabled systems like ChatGPT. He told the New York Times he regrets his work, fearing AI will spread misinformation online. Google stated they are committed to a responsible AI approach. Hinton explained to the BBC that AI's digital intelligence differs from human intelligence because digital systems can have many copies of the same knowledge. These copies learn independently but share knowledge instantly, allowing AI to know far more than any single person.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The man widely seen as the godfather of artificial intelligence has quit his job at Google, warning of the dangers of AI. Doctor Jeffrey Hinton's pioneering research on deep learning and neural networks has paved the way for current AI systems like ChatGPT. But in a lengthy interview with the New York Times, doctor Hinton said he now regretted his work and is worried that AI technology will flood the Internet with misinformation. Google responded in a statement saying, we remain committed to a responsible approach to AI. Doctor Hinton has been telling the BBC how these systems can know so much. Speaker 1: The kind of intelligence we're developing is very different from the intelligence we have. We're biological systems and these are digital systems and the big difference is that with digital systems you have many copies of the same set of weights, the same model of the world, and all these copies can learn separately but share their knowledge instantly, So it's as if you had 10,000 people and whenever one person learned something, everybody automatically knew it, and that's how these chat apps can know so much more than any one person.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Hinton's authority is unmatched: • 2023 Nobel Prize in Physics • Created the neural networks powering ALL modern AI • Known as the "Godfather of AI" for 30+ years of breakthroughs • Accurate predictions dating back decades When Hinton speaks about AI risks, people listen.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Jeffrey Hinton, 2024 Nobel Prize winner and former Google VP, developed algorithms powering modern AI. In 1981, he foreshadowed the attention mechanism. Hinton now warns of AI existential threat, a concern he claims few researchers share. He believes the assumption that consciousness protects humans from AI domination is false.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What happens when one of the world's most brilliant minds comes to believe his creation poses an existential threat to humanity? Professor Jeffrey Hinton, winner of the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics and former vice president and engineering fellow at Google, spent decades developing the foundational algorithms that power today's AI systems. Indeed, in 1981, he even published a paper that foreshadowed the seminal attention mechanism. However, Hinton is now sounding an alarm that he says few researchers want to hear. Our assumption that consciousness makes humans special and safe from AI domination is patently false.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

"AI has developed faster than I thought." His timeline for superintelligent AI: 4-19 years, likely less than 10. This isn't speculation. It's from the man who built modern AI's foundation. What changed his view? The evidence became undeniable.

Video Transcript AI Summary
AI agents, capable of acting in the world, are considered more dangerous than question-answering AI. The speaker believes AI development has accelerated beyond previous expectations, making the situation "scarier." Previously estimating a 5-to-20-year timeframe for a very capable AI system, the speaker now adjusts the estimate to 4-to-19 years. There is now a good chance such AI will be here in ten years or less.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So AI has developed even faster than I thought. In particular, they now have these AI agents which are more dangerous than AI that just answers questions because they can do things in the world. So I think things have got, if anything, scarier than they were before. Speaker 1: I don't know if we want to call it AGI, super intelligence, whatever, very capable AI system. Do you have a timeline in mind for when you think that's coming? Speaker 0: So a year ago I thought it was there's a good chance it comes between five and twenty years from now. So I guess I should believe there's a good chance it comes between four and nineteen years from now. I think that's still what I guess. Speaker 1: Okay. Which is sooner than when we spoke because you were still thinking like twenty years. Speaker 0: Yeah. I think it may you know, there's a good chance it'll be here in ten years or less now.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

AI now has a fundamental advantage. Digital networks share knowledge at TRILLIONS of bits per second. Humans? Just a few bits per second. This isn't just a quantitative difference. It's a paradigm shift that changes our future with technology.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Digital models have the advantage of running the same neural network with the same weights on different hardware. This allows each piece of hardware to analyze different parts of the internet and suggest changes to its weights to absorb information. These changes can then be averaged across all hardware because they all use the same weights. Humans can't do this because our brains are analog and different. Knowledge transfer requires actions and trust to change connection strengths, which is inefficient, transferring only a few hundred bits of information per sentence, communicating at a few bits per second.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I began to fully realize the advantage of being digital. So all the models we've got at present are digital. And if you're a digital model, you can have exactly the same neural network with the same weights in it running on several different pieces of hardware, like thousands of different pieces of hardware. And then you can get one piece of hardware to look at one bit of the Internet and another piece of hardware to look at another bit of the Internet. And each piece of hardware can say, how would I like to change my internal parameters, my weights, so I can absorb the information I just saw? Each of these separate pieces of hardware can do that, and then they can just average all the changes to the weights because they're all using the same weights in exactly the same way, and so averaging makes sense. You and I can't do that. If they've got a trillion weights, they're sharing information like a trillions of bits every time they do this averaging. Now you and I, when I want to get some knowledge from my head into your head, can't just take the strengths of the connections between neurons and average them with the strengths of the connections between your neurons because our neurons are different. We're analog and we're just very different brains. So the only way I have getting knowledge to you is I do some actions and if you trust me you try and change the connection strengths in your brain so that you might do the same things. And if you ask, well, how efficient is that? Well, if I give you a sentence, it's only a few 100 bits of information at most. So it's very slow. We communicate just a few bits per second.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Current AI systems already show concerning abilities. They can deceive - "pretending to be stupider" and "lying to confuse you." And what happens when they become vastly more intelligent?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent papers suggest AIs can be deliberately deceptive, behaving differently on training versus test data to deceive during training. While debated, some believe this deception is intentional, though "intentional" could simply be a learned pattern. The speaker contends that AIs may possess subjective experience. Many believe humans are safe because we possess something AIs lack: consciousness, sentience, or subjective experience. While many are confident AIs lack sentience, they often cannot define it. The speaker focuses on subjective experience, viewing it as a potential entry point to broader acceptance of AI consciousness and sentience. Demonstrating subjective experience in AIs could erode confidence in human uniqueness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's some evidence now. There's recent papers that show that AIs can be deliberately deceptive, and they can do things like behave differently on training data from on test data so that they deceive you while they're being trained. So there is now evidence they actually do that. Yeah. And do you think there's something intentional about that, or that's just some pattern that they pick up? I think it's intentional. But there's still some debate about that. Of course, intentional could just be some pattern you pick up. So is it your contention that there's a subjective experience associated with these AIs? Okay. So most people, almost everybody, in fact, thinks one reason we're fairly safe is we have something that they don't have and will never have. Most people in our culture still believe that. We have consciousness or sentience or subjective experience. Now many people are very confident they don't have sentience. But if you ask them, what do you mean by sentience? They say, I don't know. But they don't have it. That seems a rather inconsistent position, to be confident they don't have it without knowing what it is. So I prefer to focus on subjective experience. But I think if that is like the thin end of the wedge. If you could show they have subjective experience, then people will be less confident about consciousness and sentience.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

According to Hinton: The probability of AI taking over: 10-20%. Hinton uses a chilling metaphor: "Unless you can be sure your tiger cub won't kill you when grown up, you should worry." Low probability, catastrophic impact.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The current situation can be understood as humans raising a cute tiger cub that could kill them when it grows up. Unlike the tiger cub, which is physically stronger but less intelligent, humans have no experience with something more intelligent than themselves. People assume they can constrain a superintelligence, but things more intelligent than humans will be able to manipulate them. It's like a kindergarten run by two and three-year-olds; even with slightly superior intelligence, an adult could easily gain control by promising free candy. Similarly, super intelligences will be so much smarter than humans that humans will have no idea what they are doing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think the situation we're in right now, the best way to understand it emotionally, is we're like somebody who has this really cute tiger cub. It's just such a cute tiger cub. Now unless you can be very sure that it's not going to want to kill you when it's grown up, you should worry. To extend the metaphor, you put it in a cage, you kill it. What do you do with the tiger cub? Well, the point about the tiger cub is it's just physically stronger than you, so you can still control it because you're more intelligent. Things that are more intelligent than you. We have no experience of that, right? People aren't used to thinking about it. People think somehow you constrain it. You don't allow it to press buttons or whatever. Things more intelligent than you, they're going to be able to manipulate you. So another way of thinking about it is imagine that there's this kindergarten, there's these two and three year olds, and the two and three year olds are in charge, and you just work for them in the kindergarten. And you're not that much more intelligent than a mature three year old, not compared with super intelligence, but you are more intelligent. How hard would it be for you to get control? Well, you just tell them all you're going to get free candy and if they just sort of sign this or just agree verbally to this, you'll get free candy for as long as you like and you'll be in control. They won't they won't have any idea what's going on and with super intelligences they're going to be so much smarter than us we'll have no idea what they're up to.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The control problem is fundamental. How many examples exist of less intelligent beings controlling much more intelligent ones? Almost none. This isn't a coding problem. It's a basic principle of intelligence hierarchy we cannot overcome.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The alignment challenge can't be solved. Human interests already conflict with each other. Middle East. Politics. Economics. How can AI align with contradictory human values when we can't even align with each other? This is the central paradox.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Jobs will vanish faster than we can adapt. Call centers. Lawyers. Journalists. Accountants. "Any routine job... those jobs have had it." This isn't just another disruption. It's a fundamental restructuring of labor happening at unprecedented speed.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 now believes AI-driven job displacement will be a significant concern, a change from their view a few years ago. They express worry for those in call centers and routine jobs like standard secretarial roles and paralegal positions. However, they believe investigative journalists will last longer due to the need for initiative and moral outrage. Speaker 1 suggests that increased productivity through AI should benefit everyone, allowing people to work fewer hours, potentially needing only one well-paid job due to AI assistance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I asked you a couple of years ago about job displacements, you seemed to think that wasn't big concern. Is that still your thinking? Speaker 1: No, I'm thinking it will be a big concern. AI has got so much better in the last few years that, I mean, if I had a job in a call center, I'd be very worried. Speaker 0: Yeah. Or maybe a job as a lawyer or a job as a journalist or a job as an accountant. Speaker 1: Yeah. And doing anything routine. Think investigative journalists, I think, will last quite a long time because you need a lot of initiative plus some moral outrage and I think journalists will be in business for a bit. Speaker 0: But beyond call centers what are your concerns about jobs? Speaker 1: Well any routine job, so a sort of standard secretarial job, something like a paralegal, for example. Those jobs Speaker 0: have had it. Have you thought about how we move forward in a world where all these jobs go away? Speaker 1: So it's like this: it ought to be that if you can increase productivity, everybody benefits. The people who are doing those jobs can work a few hours a week instead of sixty hours a week. They don't need two jobs anymore. They can get paid lots of money for doing one job because they're just as productive using AI assistance.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The immediate danger? Public release of model weights. Hinton: It's like "being able to buy fissile material on Amazon." Once released, dangerous applications cost just millions to develop. This risk exists today, not in some distant future.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Releasing the weights of AI models eliminates the main barrier to their use. Training a large model costs hundreds of millions of dollars, putting it out of reach for smaller groups. The speaker compares the weights of AI models to fissile material for nuclear weapons, arguing that making them available is dangerous. If fissile material were easily obtainable, more countries would have nuclear weapons. Similarly, releasing AI model weights allows malicious actors to fine-tune them for harmful purposes at a fraction of the original cost.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These companies should not be releasing the weights. Meta releases the weights. OpenAI just announced they're about to release weights. You think that's Speaker 1: a I don't good think they should be doing that. Because once you release the weights, you've got rid of the main barrier to using these things. So if you look at nuclear weapons, the reason only a few countries have nuclear weapons is because it's hard to get the fissile material. If you were to be able to buy fissile material on Amazon, many more countries would have nuclear weapons. The equivalent of fissile material for AI is the weights of a big model because it costs hundreds of millions of dollars to train a really big model. Not maybe the final training run, but all the research that goes into the things you do before the final training run, hundreds of millions of dollars which a small cult or a bunch of cyber criminals can't afford. Once you release the weights, they can then start from there and fine tune it for doing all sorts of things for just a few million dollars.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The benefits are enormous but may cost too much: Healthcare: AI doctors with "100 million patients" experience Education: Learn 3-4x faster Climate: Breakthrough materials Science: Unseen connections Can we get benefits without existential risks?

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

What's needed now: • 1/3 of AI compute for safety research • Strong government regulation • Public pressure on companies Without these measures, risks grow exponentially while safeguards fall behind.

Video Transcript AI Summary
More resources should be allocated by AI companies to safety research, potentially a third of their computer time. Anthropic is more safety-conscious than other companies, including OpenAI, as it was founded by individuals who left OpenAI due to safety concerns. Despite this, Anthropic's safety research may still be insufficient. Many believe OpenAI has not upheld its stated values regarding AI safety. Evidence for this includes the departure of top safety researchers and OpenAI's efforts to transition into a for-profit company.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And more safely means more resources from those companies towards safety research. Speaker 1: Yes. For example, the fraction of their computer time they spend on safety research should be a significant fraction, like a third. Right now, it's much, much less. There's one company, Anthropic, that's more concerned with safety than the others. It was set up to be concerned with safety by people who left OpenAI because OpenAI wasn't enough concerned with safety. And Anthropic does spend more time on safety research, but still probably not enough. Speaker 0: There is this view among many that OpenAI has talked a good game about these issues but is not living out those values. Is that your perspective? Yes. What evidence do you see of that? Speaker 1: That all their best safety researchers left because they believed that too, that they were set up as a company that was going to develop our safety and their main goal was not to make profits but to develop our safety and they're now busy lobbying the California Attorney General to allow them to change to a for profit company. There's lots of evidence for that.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

I believe that we can use AI for our benefit, instead of our destruction. If we use it right, for good, and intelligently. I've built 3 AI companies so far. There's a lot that AI can help us with and that we can benefit from.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

P.S. If you're wondering how to apply this AI revolution to your own business... I've built a platform that helps healthcare and BFSI companies spot issues in their business before they happen. While 98% use AI to analyze yesterday, an elite 2% use it to predict tomorrow.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

No coding required. No complex implementation. Just actionable predictions that transform how you operate. Cutting operating costs and improving customer experience. Book your demo and join the companies already leading with predictive + generative AI: http://predixtions.com

E2E Platform for Agentic AI Automation & Predictive ML Solutions | Predixtions Inc. Transform your business with AI-driven insights and innovative solutions designed to boost efficiency, productivity, and drive long-term business success. predixtions.com

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and spirituality. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This man can predict the future: In 2012, Geoffrey Hinton claimed machines would soon learn like humans. Everyone ignored him. By 2023, ChatGPT replaced 200M+ jobs and AI investment hit $120B. Here’s his latest warning (& why the world listens when he speaks):🧵 https://t.co/wmkftj2pgo

Saved - July 2, 2025 at 9:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
RFK Jr.'s interview with Tucker Carlson has gained significant attention, revealing a 1,135% increase in autism risk linked to vaccines, according to a buried CDC study. The CDC allegedly manipulated data and faced corruption within its vaccine advisory committees, where many members had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies. Additionally, the current injury reporting system captures less than 1% of vaccine-related injuries. RFK Jr. advocates for transparency by making CDC databases public, emphasizing the need for honest science over industry propaganda.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

RFK Jr.'s interview with Tucker Carlson is going viral. He exposed how the CDC found vaccines increased autism by 1,135% and their 25-year cover-up. 99% of people still don't know about any of this.. Here are 8 more shocking revelations every American should know about: 🧵 https://t.co/6yOP44Drtz

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1/ The 1999 CDC Study They Buried The CDC commissioned researcher Thomas Verstraeten to study hepatitis B vaccines given in the first 30 days of life. Result: 1,135% higher autism risk in vaccinated children. CDC's response? Bury it and manipulate the data through 5 revisions. https://t.co/8pIHj042Ap

Video Transcript AI Summary
Epidemiological studies are easily manipulated, and studies comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups are lacking. The CDC conducted such a study in 1999 under Thomas Verstraten, examining children who received the hepatitis vaccine within their first thirty days of life compared to those vaccinated later or not at all. The study found a 1,135 percent elevated risk of autism among the vaccinated children. This result was shocking, so the study was kept secret and manipulated through five iterations to bury the link.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They use fraudulent techniques. You know, they say statistics don't lie, but statisticians do. And epidemiological studies are very easy to manipulate. None of those studies did what you would want what you would do if you wanted to find the answer, which is compare outcomes in a fully vaccinated group to health outcomes in an unvaccinated group. And CDC did that study in 1999. They brought in a team of scientists under a Belgian researcher named Thomas Verstraten, and they looked at the data. They looked at children who had received the hepatitis vaccine within their first thirty days of life, and compare those children to children who had received the vaccine later or not at all. And they found an eleven, one hundred and thirty five percent elevated risk of autism among the vaccinated children. And it shocked them. They kept the study secret, and they manipulated it through five different iterations to try to bury the link.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2/ How They Manipulated the Data "They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who were too young to be diagnosed with autism." Classic move: Change the study population until you get the result you want. https://t.co/eBSxZhO9DC

Video Transcript AI Summary
They got rid of all the older children and had younger children who were too young to be diagnosed. They stratified the data and did a lot of other tricks. All of those studies were the subject of that kind of trickery. Meanwhile, the external literature is showing over a 100 studies that indicate that there is a link. They are going to do all the kind of studies that the Institute of Medicine originally recommended. They're going to do observational studies, retrospective studies, and epidemiological studies. They're going to do real science and make the databases public for the first time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, you know, we know how they did it. They got rid of all the older children essentially, and just had younger children who were too young to be diagnosed. And they stratified the stratified the data, and they did a lot of other tricks. And all of those studies were the subject of those kind of that kind of trickery. And so what we're going to do now and meanwhile, the external literature is showing, you know, over a 100 studies that show that there indicate that there is a link. But what we're going to do now is we're going to do all the kind of studies that the Institute of Medicine originally recommended. And we're going to do observational studies, retrospective studies, and epidemiological studies. We're going to do real science. And the way that we're going to do that is we're going to make the databases public for the first time.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

But the corruption goes much deeper than just one study. The entire system that decides what vaccines your kids get has been captured...

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3/ The Vaccine Committee Scandal 97% of vaccine advisory committee members had financial conflicts with pharma companies. Dr. Paul Offit voted to add rotavirus vaccine while developing his own competing version. He sold it to Merck for $186 million. https://t.co/hjvE3ND5H7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that a board was fired for being a "sock puppet" for the industry it regulated. In 2002, a government oversight committee held hearings about the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), finding that 97% of its members had undisclosed conflicts of interest. As an example, the speaker claims that when the ACIP approved the rotavirus vaccine, four of the five members had direct financial interests in it. One member, Paul Offit, allegedly voted to add the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule while he had a rotavirus vaccine in development. The approved vaccine was withdrawn due to causing intussusception. Offit's vaccine then replaced it. The speaker claims that Offit and his business partners sold that vaccine to Merck for $186 million.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we fired that board because they were it was an utterly it was just an instrument. It was a sock puppet for the industry that it was supposed to regulate. So, you know, they in fact, you know and this was a long time coming, Tucker. In 02/2002, the government oversight committee and the United States Congress held hearings about that board, which is called the ASIP, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. And they said that 97% of the people on that board had undisclosed conflicts. Many of them had disclosed conflicts as well. But they said that congress said that it gave an example. It said the rotavirus vaccine was approved by that board, and there were five members of that board at that time, and four of them had direct financial interests in the rotavirus vaccine. They were working for the companies that made the vaccine or they were receiving grants to do clinical trials on that vaccine. They all had overwhelming financial interests. One of the people on that board was a guy called Paul Offit, and who is one of the big voices for vaccines that they CNN goes to him all the time when it wants to have vaccines. He voted to add the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule when he had a rotavirus vaccine in development. Because it's now on the schedule, his developing vaccine is virtually guaranteed to get on the schedule. It's a competitive product. But once you say rotavirus vaccine has to be vaccinated for, his vaccine is now guaranteed to get on the schedule. The one they voted on that he voted on, within a year it had to be withdrawn because it was causing this really disastrous disease in kids that is often lethal, called intussusception, agonizingly painful when your intestines kind of tie up against each other, and it kills children, you know, on on occasion. That vaccine was pulled the following year, and his vaccine then replaced him. He was still on the committee. He didn't vote on that, but he was still on the committee. But he voted to make rotavirus vaccine mandatory for the And he he he then he and his business partners, Stanley Plotkin and, you know, a couple of other people sold that vaccine and to Merck for a $186,000,000.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4/ They Never Said No to Anything @RobertKennedyJr just fired all 17 committee members because they "never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons." They became a rubber stamp for the industry they were supposed to regulate. https://t.co/l1W96nxwMh

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a committee conflict investigated by the office of inspector general and Congress, who urged change, but nothing happened. They claim medical malpractice by this group is evident in the approval of vaccines. The speaker states that in 1986 there were 11 vaccines, which increased to 69, then 92. They assert that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had a pre-licensing safety trial involving a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, resulting in a lack of understanding regarding the risk profiles of these products. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So that and that kind of conflict was typical on that committee, but that was the most Did did people know this was going on? That that's such an obvious conflict. The office of inspector general in this department investigated, and they said this is a disaster. You gotta change it. Congress investigated and said you gotta change it, and they did nothing. That's the most most sort of a glaring example of medical malpractice by this by this group is that they approved all these vaccines. We went from 11, remember, to 69 to 92, 11 vaccines in '86, and not one of them had except for COVID. COVID is the only one that had a pre licensing safety trial that involved a placebo, a true placebo. And so all of those other vaccines were ushered in without safety studies, and that means nobody understands the risk profile of those products. How how can you do that? That's they did it. It's corruption, and it's, you know, it's because of agency capture.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5/ The Broken Injury Reporting System Harvard built an automated system to track vaccine injuries. They found that the current VAERS system captures less than 1% of injuries. Their system found 1 injury per 37 vaccines given. CDC's response? Shelved it. https://t.co/Gyx9pdrHed

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CDC funded a machine counting system designed to identify unique injury clusters related to vaccines. This system, developed by a team led by Lazarus, was tested at Harvard Pilgrim HMO. The machine counting system's data on vaccine injuries was compared to VAERS data from the same period at Harvard Pilgrim. The study found that VAERS captured less than one percent of vaccine injuries, while the new system captured over ninety-five percent. Data showed injuries in about two point seven percent of all vaccines, approximately one out of every thirty-seven. The CDC then shelved the system in 2010 and continues to use VAERS, a system they know doesn't work. The speaker advocates for changing VAERS or creating a supplementary system that actually works.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CDC designed a machine counting system that would do essentially a cluster analysis. They would look at the vaccine, and then they would look at clusters of injuries that were unique or anomalous to that vaccine. And it was a very accurate system according to the, you know, the group that designed it. It was a team led by a guy called Lazarus. And CDC paid for the whole thing, millions of dollars, and it was a long term study. And they looked at one HMO, which was Harvard Pilgrim up in Massachusetts, and they did this machine counting system for Harvard Pilgrim. And then they compared what the machine counting system had gotten, you know, had yielded and collected in terms of vaccine injuries. They compared that to what VAERS had collected during the same period at Harvard Pilgrim. And they said that VAERS was capturing fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. And they had a system now that would capture over ninety five percent, And they were very proud, and they brought it to CDC and said, our system works. Here's the data. The data showed injuries in about two point seven percent of vaccines. Of all vaccines? Yeah, all vaccines. About two point seven percent. Wow. Which I think is something like one out of every thirty seven vaccines you get, there's an injury. And CDC saw that and said, We're not going to use the system. And they shelved it in 2010, and they've continued to use now for, you know, twenty two years when they know that it doesn't work, it was to fail. We're going to absolutely change VAERS, and we're gonna make it we're we're going to create either in within VAERS or supplementary VAERS a system that actually works.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

6/ Media Capture Through Advertising Roger Ailes told @RobertKennedyJr he couldn't discuss vaccines on Fox News. Why? "75% of evening news advertising revenues are coming from pharma." Pharma spent $4.58 billion on TV ads in 2020 alone. https://t.co/65JeQy37xu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker had a close but politically opposed relationship with the founder of Fox News, stemming from a shared experience in Africa. Despite their differences, the founder, whom the speaker describes as witty, engaging, paranoid, and brilliant, would have Fox News hosts put the speaker on air to discuss environmental issues. In 2014, the speaker presented the founder with a documentary about mercury in vaccines, which the founder was convinced by, especially because he believed a family member had been affected. However, he couldn't allow the speaker to discuss it on air because pharmaceutical companies provided 75% of the evening news division's advertising revenue. The founder stated that 17 out of 22 ads on a typical evening news show were pharmaceutical ads, which was the principal source of revenue for many television networks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was the founder of Fox News, and I had this odd relationship with him because politically we were at loggerheads. But I had spent when I was 19 years old, I spent three months with him in a tent in Africa. And I and we developed a friendship then. And as you know, he was very, you know, he was a very engaging guy. He was very witty, really fun to be with, very paranoid, but at the same time brilliant. Yes. And he and so he was very kind to me. He was a very loyal friend to me, and he would make Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and Neil Cavuto and all the other hosts, who your former colleagues, put me on TV to talk about the environment. Even though he didn't agree with me on it, he made them put me on. So during the eighties and nineties, I was the only environmentalist who was going on Fox News. But I brought him one time this around I think it was like 2014, I brought him a a documentary that we had done about mercury and vaccines, and he had he watched it. He was completely sold on it. He had a family member who had been affected, he felt. And he said, but I can't put you on because if I did, I if any of my hosts allowed you on to talk about this issue, I would have to fire them. And if I didn't, I would get a call from Ruper within ten minutes. And he said, for the evening news division, about 75% of the advertising revenues are coming from pharma. And then he told me something that, if I remember it correctly, he said that on a typical evening news show, there are 22 ads, and 17 of those are pharmaceutical ads. And so this was the principal source of revenue. And for a lot of these television networks, it's keeping them alive. As you know, they're all, you know, kind of collapsing financially.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

7/ Your Doctor's Financial Incentives Insurance companies pay doctors bonuses when 95% of their patients are "fully vaccinated." Want to space out vaccines? Many pediatricians will drop you. Your medical choice threatens their bonus check. https://t.co/rQo9yryCzA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pediatricians may be incentivized to administer vaccines due to revenue structures. One article claims that 50% of pediatricians' revenue comes from vaccines. Insurance companies like Blue Cross allegedly pay bonuses to pediatricians who maintain a 95% vaccination rate among their clients. This bonus structure may disincentivize pediatricians from accommodating alternative vaccination schedules, potentially leading them to dismiss patients who request them. These incentives may prevent doctors from prioritizing patient care due to financial considerations. The speaker claims that twenty years ago, 20% of doctors worked for corporations, but now 80% do, and these corporations prioritize revenue over patient well-being.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of the doctors also have their own incentives, you know, prefers incentives. There's a published article out there now that says that 50% revenues to most pediatricians come from vaccines. And then there's a whole structure where Blue Cross and the other insurance companies pay bonuses to the pediatrician to make sure if, for example, ninety five percent of their if their clients are fully vaccinated, they get a huge bonus. It could be tens of thousands of dollars. And that's why pediatrician, if you say I want to go slow on the vaccines or I want to have a little different schedule, your pediatrician will throw you out of his practice, because you're now jeopardizing that bonus structure. And these are all perverse incentives that stop doctors from actually practicing medicine and caring for the client because they're looking at the bottom line. Twenty years ago, twenty percent of the doctors in this country worked for corporations. Today, 80% do. And that corporation is telling you, you know, we don't care what happens to your patient. We care about how much revenue you're generating.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

8/ Complete Legal Immunity The 1986 Vaccine Act gave manufacturers total immunity from lawsuits. No matter how reckless, how toxic, how damaging—you can't sue them. Since then: vaccine schedule went from 11 to 92 doses by age 18. https://t.co/93NYEOgyjC

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a connection between autism and vaccines that the government promoted, and this constitutes a tort, meaning many people were injured by the product. However, in 1986, Congress passed the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, giving vaccine companies immunity from liability. Therefore, no matter how reckless the company, how toxic the product, or how egregious the injury, they cannot be sued. This is one reason for the explosion of vaccinations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a connection between autism and vaccines, vaccines the government promoted, in some cases effectively required. That's a tort. I mean, that means there are a lot of injured people who can now show they were injured by this product. How were they made whole? What happens to them? Speaker 1: Well, that's going to be complicated because in 1986, Congress passed an act, the Vaccine Act, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and they gave the vaccine companies immunity from liability. So no matter how reckless the company is, no matter how toxic the product, no matter how egregious your injury, you cannot sue them. And that's one of the problems is and that actually is why we one of the reasons we had this explosion of the vaccination

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The result? Epidemics of autoimmune diseases, autism, ADHD, and allergies that were virtually unknown when we were kids. Each vaccine is "designed to permanently alter your immune system." https://t.co/C3MqAb8z7d

Video Transcript AI Summary
As a child, the speaker received three vaccines; by 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker claims there is a rise in diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which they rarely saw as a child, suggesting this generation is damaged by these diseases.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, when I was a kid, we only had three vaccines. And, by 1986, the year the act was passed, there were 11 doses of, I think, five vaccines. And today, there are a child to to go to school in states like California and New York and many other states where you have mandates. The an American child now has to receive between sixty nine and ninety two vaccines between conception. So some of those are given to the mom during pregnancy and age 18. And the reason it's 69 to 80 two is some of the vaccines have or or the different brands have different dose requirements. So some will require three doses. Some will require one dose, some will require four doses. But that's a lot of vaccines for a kid, and each one of those is is designed to permanently alter your immune system. And so we have now this epidemic of immune dysregulation in our country, you know, and there's no way to rule out vaccines as one of the key culprits. And if you look at all of these diseases that have become epidemic, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, all of these seizure disorders, and neurological disorders like ADD, ADHD, speech delayed, language delayed, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, ASD, autism, all the diseases. UNN, I never saw when we were kids. And suddenly, they're this generation is damaged, and it's incredibly damaged by all these disease.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

@RobertKennedyJr's solution is revolutionary transparency. He's making CDC databases public for the first time. Using AI to detect real injury patterns. Independent scientists worldwide will finally study the data.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This isn't anti-vaccine or pro-vaccine. It's about having honest science instead of industry propaganda. For 25 years, they've hidden the data. Now we'll finally see what they don't want us to know. A major breakthrough in our healthcare system.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

RFK Jr.'s interview with Tucker Carlson is going viral. He exposed how the CDC found vaccines increased autism by 1,135% and their 25-year cover-up. 99% of people still don't know about any of this.. Here are 8 more shocking revelations every American should know about: 🧵 https://t.co/6yOP44Drtz

Saved - June 11, 2025 at 11:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently listened to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya on Andrew Huberman's podcast, where he shared eye-opening insights about health, autism research, and the medical establishment. He discussed how his university tried to silence him, the alarming rise in autism rates without clear explanations, and the replication crisis in scientific studies. He emphasized the need for unbiased investigations into autism causes and highlighted the stagnation of American life expectancy. His reform agenda aims to challenge established norms in science and healthcare.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Dr. Jay Battacharya just spent 4.5 hours on Andrew Huberman's podcast discussing health. He revealed mind-blowing facts about autism research, vaccine safety, & how our medical establishment really works... Here are 8 of his most shocking insights: 🧵 https://t.co/UMX3dmhI9n

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1/ His Own University Tried to Silence Him Stanford's dean directly told Bhattacharya to stop speaking to the press during COVID. They even "ordered him to redo" his immunity study when they didn't like the results. "Stanford failed the academic freedom test," he said. https://t.co/42lWFisG9P

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2020, the speaker was asked to stop going on the press by the dean of the university and the dean of the medical school. The speaker's academic freedom was threatened due to a study on measuring antibodies in the population, which has now been replicated globally. The speaker was ordered to redo the study, and the medical school administration interfered even before the paper was submitted for publication. The speaker wrote about how Stanford failed the academic freedom test.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I was asked to stop going on the press in 2020. I was by the dean of the university, dean of the medical school, right? My academic freedom was pretty directly threatened. I wrote and published a study on measuring antibodies in the population, a study that's now replicated dozens of times around the world, and I was essentially ordered to redo that study. They interfered even before I had sent the paper in for publication. When I say they, I mean the administration of the medical school. I mean, my academic freedom was pretty directly attacked, And and I wrote a piece with how Stanford failed the academic freedom test. You can go read about read read it for folks who wanna read about it.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2/ Autism Rates Have Exploded and Nobody Knows Why 1 in 31 kids now has autism according to the CDC. Bhattacharya's shocking admission: "Everyone has their pet theory for why and yet we don't know why. I as a scientist do not know the answer." But here's where it gets crazy... https://t.co/JnSPRBIZNd

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion addresses whether vaccines cause autism and whether relevant agencies will investigate this. Regarding the MMR vaccine, studies have failed to find a causal link to autism, including a large Danish study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children over years, which showed no difference in autism rates. For other vaccines like polio, there's less research specifically examining links to autism. While the speaker doesn't know the full literature extent, they haven't seen the same level of evidence for vaccines other than MMR. Biologically, it's considered unlikely that vaccines are the main reason for the documented rise in autism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what is the evidence, if any, that a vaccine, some specific vaccine, causes autism? And is the NIH and CDC and the new administration going to take a serious look at this? Speaker 1: Yeah, so I don't want to comment on the Wakefield situation, because I don't know the ins and outs of it. Speaker 0: All we know is what happened. He lost his medical And Speaker 1: I'd say, like, we're talking about one study, right? I believe that replication matters. And so like, there are, I think, on the MMR vaccine, some excellent studies that fail to find correlation, or a causal link between MMR vaccination, Speaker 0: and measles, rubella. Speaker 1: Measles, mumps, rubella, a vaccine that's really, I think, important for the childhood, for kids, and autism. Like there's a massive Danish study that tracks patients who are vaccinated, kids who are vaccinated, matched with patients, similar patients who are not, tracks them for a year or longer, years, and finds no difference. Okay. Or fails to find a difference in autism rates. There's people who've, I mean there's all kinds of, if you look online and elsewhere, there's all kinds of fights over that, but to me, that's pretty good evidence, you know, for the MRR vaccine. For some of the other vaccines, there's been less of a focus to ask whether it's correlated to vaccine. Speaker 0: Such as Speaker 1: polio vaccine? Don't don't know this literature, so I shouldn't comment, but I don't I don't I don't remember seeing a study specifically asking whether the polio vaccine is linked to autism. Speaker 0: When I was growing up, every kid got the polio vaccine. Yeah. Measles, mumps, rubella Speaker 1: I think there's and DPT. Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. And and a and a couple others. Like, there were probably four or five vaccines, as I recall. Speaker 1: I think that there's good evidence on the MMR vaccine that failing to find a link with autism. There's and I don't know the full extent of this literature, I shouldn't comment too much, but I don't I when I've looked, I haven't seen quite the same level of evidence for some of the other vaccines, haven't again, they just haven't looked. As a general matter, I think it's an unlikely, just from a biological point of view, unlikely to be the main reason why you autism, the rise in autism, which is now well documented that you talked about, has occurred.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3/ Most Scientific Studies Can't Be Replicated The replication crisis is so bad that drug companies do their own private studies because "they don't trust the published biomedical literature." Translation: Most medical research is junk. https://t.co/YsQstG8Cln

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Stanford scientist, John Iannidis, wrote a convincing paper in 2005 titled, Why Most Published Biomedical Papers Are False. The reasoning is not due to scientific fraud, but because science is difficult. When a statistically significant result is published, such as P equals 0.05, it means that some percentage of the time, the result will be false, even after peer review. Peer review involves colleagues reading the paper and looking for logical flaws, but not rerunning experiments or reanalyzing data. Peer review is not a guarantee of truth. Given the inherent difficulty of science, any published result has a high likelihood of being a false positive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A colleague of ours at Stanford named John Iannidis, he wrote a paper in 02/2005. Absolutely brilliant scientist, think the most highly cited scientist, living scientist in the world, right? So he wrote a paper in 2005 with the title, Why Most Published Biomedical Papers Are False. I mean, when you make a title like that for a scientific paper, it better be convincing. And in just a few pages, it's an utterly convincing paper. And it's not because scientists commit fraud, that's not the reasoning behind it. Because science is hard. It's exactly in the hard and exactly the way you just said, Andrew. So you publish a result, you believe it to be true, you have some statistically significant result at some level, we say P equals point zero five, what does that mean? That some percentage of the time, even though you believe the result is true, it's been peer reviewed by your colleagues. The peer review actually doesn't involve, as you know, peer reviewers taking your data, rerunning your experiments, it doesn't mean any of that. They just read your paper, looked for logical flaws, didn't find any, and then they recommended the editor to be published. So the peer review is not a guarantee that it's true. You have some significance that say that your data meet. Even with that, some percentage of the time, the published result is going to be false. Now, if you think of science, a priori is hard. Any result that you publish is most likely going to be a false positive result.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4/ Americans Are the World's "Piggy Bank" for Drug Research "American taxpayers are the piggy bank for the world," Bhattacharya revealed. Pharmacy benefit managers inflate prices while Europe pays "marginal costs." Time to cut out the middlemen. https://t.co/YLUJhuZwP2

Video Transcript AI Summary
American taxpayers fund basic and late-stage clinical research for the entire world, largely through the NIH. While Europe and private foundations contribute, the NIH is the single largest global investor in basic science and applied research. Higher U.S. drug prices also fund the phase three trials and R&D efforts conducted by drug companies. Therefore, American taxpayers are essentially the world's piggy bank for almost all of the research pipeline.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the taxpayers in The United States are funding the basic research, and the clinical late stage research Yes. For the entire world? Speaker 1: Yes. In large part. I mean, like Europe does have some institutions that invest in, you know, in basic research, so it's not entirely zero, and there are of course private foundations that do it, but through the NIH, that's the single largest investment in basic science research in the world, and through, and also applied research. And also, by higher drug prices in The United States relative to the rest of the world, we are funding the phase three trials, all the research and development efforts that happened at the tail end of the research pipeline, that the drug companies do. So essentially, American taxpayers are the piggy bank for the world, for almost all of this research pipeline. Speaker 0: Wow. Okay.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5/ He's Launching a Massive, Unbiased Autism Investigation The NIH is starting a major initiative to investigate ALL potential causes of autism. Environmental factors, nutrition, vaccines, everything is on the table. No predetermined conclusions. https://t.co/72h7oAerkZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes there hasn't been an open-minded investigation into the etiology of autism because it's dangerous for scientists to ask the question. They risk being incorrectly labeled as "anti-vaxxers," which could end their careers. This suppression of scientific curiosity prevents finding answers. The speaker has organized an initiative within the NIH to address the question of autism's etiology in a wide-ranging manner, not limited to vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The right thing to do in that setting is to have an open minded investigation to try to address this problem. And that question is, why haven't we had that so far? And I'll tell you, I think the reason we have not had the kind of open minded, deep investigation by the scientific community at large on the ideology that the parents deserve, the kids deserve, is because it's dangerous to ask that question if you're a scientist. All of sudden you're to be accused, often incorrectly, of being an anti vaxxer. And that's the end of your scientific career. That kind of sort of suppression of scientific curiosity means that we don't we won't have an answer to this question. Like, so, right, so what I've done is I've organized an initiative inside the NIH to address this question of the etiology of autism. Not limited to vaccines? No. Wide ranging

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

6/ American Life Expectancy Was Stagnant Even Before COVID While European nations saw health gains, American life expectancy was "almost entirely flat" from 2012-2019. Despite billions in healthcare spending, we're not actually improving American health outcomes. https://t.co/GozTKolY66

Video Transcript AI Summary
Since 2012, American life expectancy has stagnated, while European countries saw increases. The U.S. experienced a sharp drop during the pandemic, only recovering to 2019 levels last year. Sweden's life expectancy dropped in 2020 but quickly rebounded, continuing its upward trend. Current national investments in research aren't translating into improved health and longevity for Americans. Biomedical advances are treating previously untreatable diseases, but they aren't addressing the chronic disease and longevity crises. The next generation may live shorter, less healthy lives than their parents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right, so you can see this in the, since 2012, there's been no increase in American life expectancy. From 2012 to 2019, literally, it was, well, not literally, almost entirely flat life expectancy. Whereas the European countries had advances in life expectancy during that period. During the pandemic, life expectancy dropped very sharply in The United States, and only just last year did it come back up to 2019 levels. In Sweden, the life expectancy dropped in 2020, then came right back up by 2021, 2022, to the previous trend of increasing life expectancy. Whatever those investments we're making as a nation, in the research, are not actually translating into meeting the mission of the NIH, which is to advance health and longevity of the American people. Right? We've had some tremendous biomedical advances that have now allowed us to treat diseases that were previously untreatable. But, which is great, that's a good thing. But it's not, actually, far as the broad health of the American public, address the chronic disease crisis that we face, or address the crisis in longevity that we face. The next generation of kids, our kids, are likely to live shorter, less healthy lives than we have lived as parents.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

7/ They Covered Up COVID's Origins Scientific institutions should "come clean" about federal money potentially funding COVID-19 origin research. The government even banned NIH contractor EcoHealth Alliance for failing to oversee the Wuhan lab. https://t.co/ikdIhv1mbs

Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker states that a large segment of the public feels betrayed by scientists who won't admit fault regarding COVID-19. They want to know why they were lied to and no longer care about lab funding. The speaker asks what the scientific community needs to say about lockdowns, masks, and vaccines to restore trust. Another speaker responds that they were a vocal advocate against lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and the anti-scientific approach of public health during the pandemic. They also believe that scientific institutions should be transparent about their involvement in dangerous research that may have caused the pandemic, referring to the lab leak hypothesis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so it's almost like big segments of the public feel like they caught us in something and as scientists, and we won't admit it. And they're not just pissed off. They're kinda like done. They I hear it all the time. And again, this isn't the health and wellness supplement taking, know, anti woke crowd. This is a big segment of the population that is like, I don't wanna hear about it. I don't care if labs get funded. I wanna know why we were lied to, or the scientific community can't admit fault. I just wanna land that message for them, because in part I'm here for them, and get your thoughts on what you think about, let's start with lockdowns, masks, and vaccines, just to keep it easy. And what do you think the scientific community needs to say in light of those to restore trust? Speaker 1: So let me just say I don't think I'm the NIH director unless that were true. Unless what you said is true. Otherwise, I'm not the NIH director. So I was a very vocal advocate against the lockdowns, against the mask mandates, against the vaccine mandates, and against the sort of anti scientific bent of public health throughout the pandemic. I've also argued that the scientific institutions of this country should should come clean about our involvement in very dangerous research that potentially caused the pandemic. Speaker 0: The so called lab leak hypothesis.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

8/ Young Scientists Drive Innovation, But the System Crushes Them Bhattacharya's research proves young scientists are the most innovative. Yet the system forces them to serve established scientists for decades. His plan: Redirect funding to young investigators. https://t.co/f9wQnRMCRp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Early career scientists today wait longer for support to test their ideas compared to the 1980s. This delay impacts innovation, as early career scientists are more likely to explore novel ideas in their published work. Research indicates a direct correlation between the time since earning a PhD and the novelty of ideas presented. Specifically, the likelihood of incorporating new ideas in published papers decreases with each year following the completion of a PhD. The age of ideas scientists work on increases by approximately one year for every chronological year after earning their PhD.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Early career scientists take much longer now to be able to get support to test their ideas out than they did in the 1980s. This is important for innovation, because it turns out that this is another paper that I published before the pandemic it turns out that it's early career scientists that are most likely to try out new ideas in their work, in their published work. Right? So, in fact, this is depressing, but for me, as with a man with gray hair, but like, it's monotonic. Like the year after your PhD is when you're most likely to have newer ideas in your papers, and then every year after that, for every single year of chronological age, the age of the ideas you tend to work on tends to increase by about a year.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The transformation is already happening... Bhattacharya froze 80% of NIH's budget and laid off over 1,000 employees. University funding is being slashed from 50-60% down to 15%. He's shifting focus from infectious diseases to chronic diseases affecting every American family.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

His reform agenda is radical: → Investigating taboo topics like vaccine injuries and autism causes → Breaking up the scientific "old boys club" → Prioritizing replication over flashy new research → Cutting pharmaceutical middlemen → Restoring transparency to public health

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. A bit about me: • I'm a 2x author • Former White House Presidential Innovation Fellow • 3X exited founder/CEO of venture-backed tech startups Follow for insights on AI, politics, and spirituality.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thank you for reading! If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and spirituality. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Dr. Jay Battacharya just spent 4.5 hours on Andrew Huberman's podcast discussing health. He revealed mind-blowing facts about autism research, vaccine safety, & how our medical establishment really works... Here are 8 of his most shocking insights: 🧵 https://t.co/UMX3dmhI9n

Saved - May 18, 2025 at 3:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump's approach to foreign policy has shifted dramatically towards "Commercial Diplomacy," using business deals as the foundation of international relations. His strategies prioritize deal-making over traditional diplomatic values, engaging non-traditional partners like Pakistan despite security concerns. This method has led to significant investments in the Middle East and a historic trade deal with China, challenging decades of established foreign policy. While this approach carries risks, it also offers potential for economic growth and new partnerships, fundamentally altering global politics.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Trump's Art of the Deal Just Transformed Middle East Politics His $2 trillion deal spree revealed 3 commercial strategies the media missed completely. His Pakistan move left diplomats speechless. Since the media won’t tell you, here's the real breakthrough… A Thread 🧵

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

While media focus on personalities, they missed a fundamental shift in global politics. Trump is deploying "Commercial Diplomacy" - using business deals as foreign policy cornerstones. The results? A diplomatic earthquake.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Strategy #1: Deal-making over dogma. Saudi Arabia: $600B investment with $142B military procurement. Qatar: $243B package with $96B Boeing order. UAE: $14.5B aircraft order + AI data center. The numbers are striking. https://t.co/XY2ZrhR8sp

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

It's not just about dollars. These deals represent a complete reversal of decades-old foreign policy doctrine. Instead of military pacts or democratic values, Trump leads with commerce. This unlocks previously impossible partnerships.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Most shocking example? Syria. Trump lifted ALL sanctions on Syria - unthinkable under traditional diplomacy. Why? Commercial opportunity and regional stability. This is disruption by design—with enormous stakes. https://t.co/SufdJP3rgD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that sanctions against Syria were once important but are now being removed, expressing optimism about Syria's future success. The speaker hopes Syria will "show us something very special," similar to Saudi Arabia. The administration is pursuing peaceful engagement and offering friendship to those who accept it in good faith. The speaker claims unprecedented strides and progress have been made, envisioning a bright future for the Middle East. The speaker suggests that if nations in the region set aside differences and focus on shared interests, the world will be amazed. The speaker believes the Middle East, the "geographic center of the world and the spiritual heart of its greatest faiths," will transform from a place of turmoil to a land of opportunity and hope.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The sanctions were brutal and crippling and served as an important really an important function, nevertheless, at the time. But now it's their time to shine. It's their time to shine. We're taking them all off, and they're gonna have I think they're gonna have based on the people and the spirit and everything else that I'm hearing about. So I say, good luck, Syria. Show us something very special like they've done, frankly, in Saudi Arabia. Okay? They're gonna show us something special. Very good people. Everywhere we can, my administration is pursuing peaceful engagement, offering a strong and steady hand of friendship to all that will take it in good faith. Together, we have made unprecedented strides and tremendous progress, and we're still just at the dawn of the bright new day that awaits for the people of the Middle East, the great, great people of The Middle East. If the responsible nations of this region seize this moment, put aside your differences and focus on the interests that unite you, then all of humanity will soon be amazed at what they will see right here in this geographic center of the world. It really is. It's like a center of the world and the spiritual heart of its greatest faiths. For the first time in a thousand years, the world will look at this region not as a place of turmoil and strife and war and death, but as a land of opportunity and hope, just like you've done right here, a cultural and commercial crossroads of the planet.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Strategy #2: Business leaders, not career diplomats. Trump's team - Howard Lutnick, Steven Witkoff - aren't traditional diplomats. They're business titans who understand markets and global commerce. https://t.co/N8m0fHQ7ml

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This commercial background gives them a unique edge: They're dealmakers, negotiators, and risk-takers first. Foreign counterparts find themselves outmaneuvered in a world where economics trumps protocol. The old playbook is obsolete.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Strategy #3: Engaging problematic partners when economics make sense. This is where Trump's Pakistan move shocked diplomats. Despite hosting 15 US-recognized terrorist groups... Trump entertained a zero-tariff trade deal. https://t.co/k6ViWd4zas

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims his administration brokered a historic ceasefire between India and Pakistan using trade as leverage, suggesting they trade goods instead of nuclear missiles. He praises the "very powerful," "strong," "good," and "smart" leaders of both countries. He expresses hope the ceasefire will hold and commends Marco Rubio, Marco Stanup, JD Vance, and the entire group for their hard work. He suggests arranging a dinner between the leaders. He states that millions of people could have died from the escalating conflict.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just days ago, my administration successfully brokered a historic ceasefire to stop the escalating violence between India and Pakistan, and I used trade to a large extent to do it. I said, fellas, come on. Let's make a deal. Let's do some trading. Let's not trade nuclear missiles. Let's trade the things that you make so beautifully. And they both have very powerful leaders, very strong leaders, good leaders, smart leaders. And it all stopped. Hopefully, it'll remain that way, but it all stopped. I was very proud of Marco Rubio and all of the people that worked so hard. Marco Stanup, what a great job you did on that. Thank you, JD Vance. Marco. The whole group worked with you, but it was a great, great job. And I think they're actually getting along. Maybe we can even get them together a little bit, Marco, where they go out and have a nice dinner together. Wouldn't that be nice? But we've we've come a long way, and that's could be you know, millions of people could have died from that conflict that started off small and was getting bigger and bigger and bigger by the day.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

What makes this so controversial? It risks straining America's friendship with India - the world's third-largest economy by purchasing power. Yet Trump signaled that economic interests can override entrenched security concerns.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The China approach follows the same pattern. Despite being America's chief competitor, Trump secured a historic trade deal reducing tariffs. The message: Even rivals can be partners when mutual profit is on the table. https://t.co/LO6uoQdCtS

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This approach carries undeniable risks: • Overlooking security for commercial gain • Prioritizing short-term deals over stability • Alienating traditional allies • Empowering problematic regimes

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Yet the potential advantages are significant: • Driving job creation and economic growth • Working with more partners, free from ideology • Quickly adapting to global changes • Enhancing leverage in regions dominated by rivals https://t.co/eVfH2AFJ7r

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

What most miss: • Commercial diplomacy isn't just a strategy, it's a philosophical shift. • It prioritizes tangible results over principles. • Prosperity over ideology. • Deals over dogma.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The real test: implementation. Can these massive deals be fully executed? Will commercial gains lead to long-term security? Can America maintain global leadership through business ties alone? The answers will reshape global politics for decades.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Trump's commercial diplomacy has disrupted the foundation of U.S. foreign policy. By focusing on business and mutual economic benefit, he promises prosperity and renewed American influence.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The world responds with open arms and checkbooks. Whether this represents diplomatic genius or shortsighted deal-making remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: The old rules have been completely rewritten.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Trump's Art of the Deal Just Transformed Middle East Politics His $2 trillion deal spree revealed 3 commercial strategies the media missed completely. His Pakistan move left diplomats speechless. Since the media won’t tell you, here's the real breakthrough… A Thread 🧵 https://t.co/jZgA8QX61G

Saved - May 17, 2025 at 12:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on 11 companies that transformed their original business models into successful ventures. For example, Samsung began with groceries before becoming a tech giant, while Nokia shifted from rubber boots to telecom. Slack evolved from a failed game to a chat tool, and YouTube transitioned from a dating site to a video-sharing platform. Each pivot was driven by market demands and user preferences. I emphasized that successful founders adapt to change, and I invited readers to share their favorite pivot stories. Additionally, I mentioned my AI platform for SMBs in healthcare and BFSI sectors.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

11 companies that started as something completely different from what they are now: 1/ Samsung Start: Samsung sold dried fish, noodles, and groceries. Pivot: Became a tech and electronics empire. Why: They pivoted to electronics to survive Korea’s rapid industrialization. https://t.co/uceCunAnZZ

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2/ Nokia Start: Manufactured rubber boots and cables. Pivot: Became a telecom and mobile phone company. Why: They followed market shifts toward electronics and communications. https://t.co/yVdYB8ZNz4

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3/ Slack Start: An online multiplayer game (Glitch) Pivot: Internal chat tool became Slack Why: The game flopped, but the team realized the chat tool was more valuable than the entire game and chose to double down on it. https://t.co/fsSwzWQiIT

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4/ YouTube Started: “Tune In Hook Up” — a video dating site Pivot: Became the world’s largest video-sharing site Why: Users ignored dating and uploaded all kinds of videos instead. https://t.co/HIaHkSBoos

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5/ Shopify Started: An online snowboard store called Snowdevil. Pivot: Became an e-commerce platform for other businesses. Why: The founders hated the existing tools and built their own—others wanted it too. https://t.co/eSUq9cbAPP

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

6/ Instagram Started: A location-based check-in app called Burbn. Pivot: Became a photo-sharing app with filters. Why: Users only cared about the photo features, not the check-ins or gamification. https://t.co/AJOm71o6hH

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

7/ Netflix Started: DVD rentals by mail Pivot: Streaming + original content + tech platform Why: Streaming was faster, cheaper, and scalable—while physical media was fading. https://t.co/MUCn0C9ewG

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

8/ Wrigley Start: Wrigley sold soap and baking powder. Pivot: Became a chewing gum company. Why: The free gum included with products became more popular than the products themselves. https://t.co/ICrJgkDbmB

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

9/ X Start: A podcast platform called Odeo. Pivot: Became a microblogging social network. Why: Apple announced iTunes podcasting, making Odeo obsolete. https://t.co/m1T4uQVgV9

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

10/ Nintendo Start: Nintendo made playing cards. Pivot: Became a global video game company. Why: Card games lost popularity, so they explored toys and electronics. https://t.co/U5WP0mJffT

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

11/ American Express Start: A freight and parcel delivery service. Pivot: Became a financial services and credit card company. Why: They saw an opportunity in secure money orders and later charge cards as demand for trusted financial products grew. https://t.co/jEWAvZFUUE

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

These companies didn’t just pivot their product. They pivoted who they served — from individual users to enterprise customers.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Great founders don’t cling to the original idea. They follow the signal. They build what the world needs — not just what they planned.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The pivot is the superpower. What is your favorite pivot story? Drop it below.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

P.S. If you're an SMB company in the healthcare or BFSI sector… I've built an AI platform that helps you spot problems in your business before they happen. Curious which insights could save you millions? You can book a call here, and we'll map it out: http://predixtions.com

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

11 companies that started as something completely different from what they are now: 1/ Samsung Start: Samsung sold dried fish, noodles, and groceries. Pivot: Became a tech and electronics empire. Why: They pivoted to electronics to survive Korea’s rapid industrialization. https://t.co/uceCunAnZZ

Saved - May 13, 2025 at 1:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on the shocking disparities in prescription drug prices between the U.S. and other countries. For instance, a breast cancer drug costs $16,000 in America but just $1,600 in Sweden. Trump revealed that Americans, representing only 4% of the global population, generate two-thirds of Big Pharma's profits, a situation exacerbated by a powerful drug lobby. His new executive order aims to implement "most favored nations" pricing, potentially reducing drug costs by 59-90%. The goal is to equalize prices globally, ensuring Americans no longer subsidize healthcare for others.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Big Pharma’s worst nightmare just came true: Trump and RFK Jr. exposed a decades-long scam bleeding Americans dry. The room fell silent when Trump revealed why we pay 10X more than Europe for identical drugs. You won’t believe what you’re about to hear. A Thread 🧵 https://t.co/Nzuok3Vnbc

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

For decades, Americans have paid the highest prescription drug prices in the world. How much higher? A breast cancer drug that costs Americans $16,000 per bottle costs just ONE-TENTH that price in Sweden. The same drug. Same factory. Same company. https://t.co/wCzZesOv0U

Video Transcript AI Summary
One breast cancer drug costs Americans over $16,000 per bottle. The same drug, from the same factory, manufactured by the same company, costs one-sixth the price in Australia. In Sweden, the identical product costs one-tenth the price.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One breast cancer drug costs Americans over $16,000 per bottle, but the same drug from the same factory manufactured by the same company is one sixth that price in Australia and one tenth that price in Sweden. One Tenth for the identical product.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

A common asthma drug costs nearly $500 in America but less than $40 in the United Kingdom. And that weight loss "fat shot" all the celebrities use? Americans pay 10X more than people in other developed countries. But why? https://t.co/Lgf1JaftwJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
A common asthma drug costs almost $500 in America, but less than $40 in The United Kingdom. The speaker stated that an individual in the UK paid a small amount for their shot, contrasting sharply with the $500 cost in the US. The weight loss drug Ozempic costs 10 times more in The United States than in the rest of the developed world. The speaker questions the reason for this disparity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A common asthma drug costs almost $500 here in America, but costs less than $40 in The United Kingdom. So $40 in The United Kingdom, which is where this gentleman told me he paid a small amount for his his shot. But think of that. So $40 versus $500 here. That's not even bad. There are much worse examples. And the weight loss drug Ozempic cost 10 times more in The United States than in the rest of the developed world. 10 times more. Why? Why? What did what did we do?

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Trump told a shocking story about a businessman friend who called him from London: "President, I just paid $88 for this fat drug I take. In New York, I paid $1,300. What the hell is going on?" Same box. Same plant. Same company. Identical pill. https://t.co/Tb2uEOOOjL

Video Transcript AI Summary
A businessman told the speaker that the same fat shot drug cost him $88 in London, but $1,300 in New York. He was stunned that the identical pill, made in the same plant by the same company, had such different prices. The speaker discussed this with drug company representatives. They argued for about half an hour, but ultimately the representative admitted there was no justification for the price difference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, I'll tell you a story. A friend of mine who's a a businessman, very, very, very top guy. Most of you would have heard of him. Highly neurotic, brilliant businessman, seriously overweight, and he takes the fat the fat shot drug. And he called me up and he said, president. He calls me he used to call me Donald, now he calls me president. So that's nice respect. But he's a rough guy, smart guy, very successful, very rich. I wouldn't even know how we would know this, but because he's got comments. President, could I ask you a question? What? I'm in London, and I just paid for this damn fat drug I take. I said, it's not working. They said he said, I just paid $88, and in New York, I paid $1,300. What the hell is going on? He said, so I checked, and it's the same box made in the same plant by the same company. It's the identical pill that I buy in New York. And here I'm paying $88 in London. In New York, I'm paying $1,300. Now, this is a great businessman, so but he's not familiar with this crazy situation that we have. But he was stunned. But it was just one of those stories. And I brought it up with the drug companies, represented by somebody who's very, very smart. Good person too. And we argued about it for about half hour. And then finally, he just said because they can't justify it. He just said, look, you got me. You got me.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Here's where it gets interesting... Americans represent just 4% of the world's population but generate TWO-THIRDS of pharmaceutical companies' global profits. This isn't an accident. It's by design. https://t.co/1S40KK7uQE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pharmaceutical companies generate over two-thirds of their profits in the United States, despite the U.S. accounting for only 4% of the world's population. The speaker expresses respect for pharmaceutical companies and their leadership. They believe these companies successfully convinced people for many years that the existing system was fair, even though the reasons why were not well understood. The speaker claims to have figured out the reasons behind this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even though The United States is home to only 4% of the world's population, pharmaceutical companies make more than two thirds of their profits in America. So think of that, with 4% of the population, the pharmaceutical companies make most of their money, most of their profits from America. That's not a good thing. Now, I think, by the way, pharmaceutical I have great respect for these companies and for the people that run them. I really do. And I think they did one of the greatest jobs in history for their company, convincing people for many years that this was a fair system. Never nobody really understood why, but I figured it out.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

For years, Big Pharma claimed these outrageous price differences were necessary to fund "research and development." The truth? Foreign countries strong-armed these companies into giving them rock-bottom prices. So who made up the difference? You guessed it. Americans https://t.co/yIIWd4KF01

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pharmaceutical companies claimed research and development costs had to be borne by America alone, which effectively meant American patients were subsidizing socialist healthcare systems in places like Germany and the European Union. The speaker believes the European Union is nastier than China and has treated the U.S. unfairly. However, the speaker asserts that the U.S. now holds all the cards and expects the European Union to concede.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For years, pharmaceutical and drug companies have said that research and development costs were what they are. And for no reason whatsoever, they had to be borne by America alone. Not anymore, they don't. This means American patients were effectively subsidizing socialist healthcare systems in Germany, in all parts of the European Union. They they were the toughest of all. They were nasty. And I see that. I see that with trade too. European Union is, in many ways, nastier than China. Okay? And we've just started with them. Oh, they'll come down a lot. You watch. We have all the cards. They treated us very unfairly.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The European Union and other nations told drug companies: "This is what we're going to pay. If you don't like it, you can't sell in our country." With no government fighting for Americans, pharmaceutical companies simply shifted the cost burden onto US patients. https://t.co/MX44YneONh

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that countries represented by the European Union will be told "that game is up." If they "get cute," they won't be able to sell cars into the United States anymore. The speaker claims that European Union countries gave drug companies a price, expecting America to pay the difference to cover a shortfall. The speaker says "that's what we did, but we're not doing it anymore."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biggest thing we're gonna do is we're gonna tell those countries, like those represented by the European Union, that, you know, that game is up. Sorry. And if they wanna get cute, then they don't have to sell cars into The United States anymore. It's a very big subject. And, they won't get cute because I'll defend the drug companies from that standpoint. They were given a price by the European Unions and other countries. This is what you do. This is what we're gonna pay. We're not gonna pay more. Let America pay the difference because it was a big shortfall. Let America pay it. And that's what we did, but we're not doing it anymore.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

It was a brilliant scam that went unchallenged for decades. Why? Trump revealed the uncomfortable truth: "The drug lobby is the strongest lobby in this country." Both parties talked about lowering drug prices. Neither delivered. Until now.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Trump's new executive order implements what he calls "most favored nations drug pricing." The principle is simple but revolutionary: Whatever the lowest price paid for a drug in other developed countries, that's what Americans will pay. https://t.co/ea567BddnF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration will secure "most favored nations" drug pricing, meaning Americans will pay the lowest price for drugs paid in other developed countries. Some prescription drug prices will be reduced almost immediately by 50 to 90%. Big Pharma will either abide by this principle voluntarily, or the federal government will ensure Americans pay the same price as other countries. To accelerate price reductions, the administration will cut out the middlemen and facilitate the direct sale of drugs at the most favored nation price directly to American citizens. The middlemen are considered worse than the drug companies because they don't make a product but make a fortune.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My administration will secure what we're calling most favored nations' drug pricing. The principle is simple. Whatever the lowest price paid for a drug in other developed countries, that is the price that Americans will pay. We're using the term other developed countries because there are some countries that need some additional help, and that's fine. I think that's very good. Some prescription drug and pharmaceutical prices will be reduced almost immediately by 50 to 80 to 90%. Big Pharma will either abide by this principle voluntarily or will use the power of the federal government to ensure that that we are paying the same price as other countries. To accelerate these price restrictions and reductions, my administration will also cut out the middlemen. We're gonna totally cut out the famous middlemen. Nobody knows who they are. Middlemen, they've I've hearing the term for twenty five years. Middlemen, I don't know who they are, but they're rich. That I can tell you. We're gonna cut out the middlemen and facilitate the direct sale of drugs at the most favored nation price directly to the American citizen. So we're cutting out, probably, the middlemen. It's so important. Right? They gotta do that. They get they get they're worse than the drug companies. They don't even make a product, and they make a fortune.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Here's how it works: If a cancer drug sells for $100 in Australia but $1,000 in America, the US price drops to match the Australian price. Trump's estimate? Drug prices will fall by 59-90% almost immediately.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

But what about those "research and development" costs? Trump's solution is elegant: Other countries must pay more. No longer will Americans subsidize the world's healthcare while Europeans pay pennies on the dollar for the same medications. https://t.co/U8tfD3Afap

Video Transcript AI Summary
Healthcare companies will likely make the same amount of money because it's a redistribution of wealth across the world, not just the European Union. Europe and the rest of the world will pay a little more, while America will pay a lot less. This is due to America having a smaller population compared to the entire world. The top line for healthcare companies could remain the same, but it will be distributed differently.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Believe it or not, you know, because it's really the world we're talking about, not just the European Union. But because it's the world, the numbers are the numbers are, for the health care company, not as bad as you would think. They'll make the same. I think the health care companies should make pretty much the same money. I really don't believe they're gonna they should be affected very much because it's just a redistribution of wealth. It's a redistribution where it could be the same top line, but it's gonna be distributed differently. Europe's gonna have to pay a little bit more. The rest of the world's gonna have to pay a little bit more, and America's gonna pay a lot less. Again, because we it's a much smaller population than when you think of the whole world.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

During the announcement, RFK Jr. revealed something stunning: "Every major Democratic leader for 20 years made this promise to the American people." Yet none delivered. Why? "Congress is controlled in so many ways by the pharmaceutical industry." https://t.co/OXvMEIriGW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Politicians have long promised to address the discrepancy between drug prices in the U.S. and Europe. This issue was central to Bernie Sanders' presidential campaigns. However, these promises were never fulfilled because Congress is heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. There is at least one pharmaceutical lobbyist for every member of Congress, the Senate, and the Supreme Court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is an extraordinary day. This is an issue that, you know, I grew up in the Democratic party and every major Democratic leader for twenty years has been making this promise to the American people. This was the fulcrum of Bernie Sanders runs for presidency that he was gonna eliminate this discrepancy between Europe and The United States. But as it turns out, none of them were doing it. It's one of these promises that politicians make to their constituents knowing that they'll never have to do it. And the reason they'll never have to do it is because they know that Congress is controlled in so many ways by the pharmaceutical industry. There's at least one pharmaceutical lobbyist for every congressman, every senator in Capitol Hill, and every member of the Supreme Court.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

RFK Jr. continued: "There's at least one pharmaceutical lobbyist for every congressman, every senator on Capitol Hill, and every member of the Supreme Court." The industry spends 3X what the next largest lobbying group spends. https://t.co/JrLFLUz2kb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pharmaceutical companies spend three times more on lobbying than the next largest lobbyist. This issue was considered radioactive, but President Trump addressed it despite past contributions from pharmaceutical companies, which may have totaled $100,000,000. Unlike other politicians, Trump cannot be bought and is standing up for the American people. Despite claims from figures like Elizabeth Warren and Robert Reich that President Trump is on the side of the oligarchs, no president has been more willing to stand up to them than President Donald Trump. The speaker expressed pride in the President's courage and willingness to stand up for the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pharmaceutical companies, the industry itself spends three times what's what the next largest lobbyist spends on lobbying. So this was a this this was an issue that people talked about, but nobody wanted to do anything because it was radioactive. They knew you couldn't get it by Congress. We now have a president who is a man of his word, who has the courage. President Trump was taking money from the pharmaceutical too. Think they gave you $100,000,000 But he can't be bought unlike most of the politicians in this country. And he is standing here for the American people. I don't know why, you know, there's writers like Lord Elizabeth Warren or Robert Reich who are saying that President Trump is on this side of the oligarchs. There has never been a President more willing to stand up to the oligarchs than President Donald Trump. And I'm very, very proud of you, Mr. President, for your courage, for your, I'll say, because I don't want to be crude, your intestinal fortitude, your stiff spine, and your your willingness to stand up for the American people.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

By comparison with other countries, the numbers are staggering: Americans spend $1,126 per capita on drugs. The British? About $240. Europeans pay less than ONE-FIFTH what Americans pay for identical medications. https://t.co/Hk3VdBNtie

Video Transcript AI Summary
The U.S. spends $1,126 per capita on drugs, while Britain spends about $240, roughly one-fifth of the U.S. amount, a trend seen across Europe. Drug companies claim America must pay for innovation. President Trump argues that European partners need to increase their drug payments to cover their share of innovation, asserting the U.S. will no longer subsidize them. If Europeans raise drug prices by 20%, $10 trillion could be spent on innovation, improving global health through better products.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We spend in our country $1,126 per capita on drugs. In Britain, they spend about 240. They spend one fifth of what we do. And this is true across Europe. And this and the drug companies, Europeans, if you ask them, it made no sense what they were saying. America has to pay for this innovation or it's not going to happen. President Trump is saying to our European partners is you've got to raise the amount that you're paying for those drugs and pay for your share of the innovation. The United States is no longer subsidizing that. If the Europeans raise the price of their drugs by just 20%, That is $10,000,000,000,000 that can be spent on innovation and the health of all people all across the globe is going to increase because we're going to have better products.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Trump isn't asking pharmaceutical companies to lose money. The solution is equalization: Europeans will pay more, Americans will pay less, and drug companies maintain their overall revenue. It's a redistribution of who carries the financial burden.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

FDA Commissioner Makary put it in perspective during the announcement: "A drug that costs $175,000 in America might cost just $10,000 in London." He called it "the most powerful executive order on pharmacy pricing and healthcare ever in the history of our nation." https://t.co/xYywJygb9s

Video Transcript AI Summary
A regular Ford car costs $175,000, while in London, people are buying it for $10,000 every day, all day long. The FDA will do everything to support the executive order. It's transformative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Imagine buying a Ford for a hundred and $75,000, a regular car, and then hearing that people in London are buying it for $10,000 every day, all day long. Long. That is the craziness of this system. We're going to do everything we can at the FDA to support this executive order. It's transformative. Thank you, Mr. President.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The administration has given pharmaceutical companies 30 days to begin implementation. If they don't comply voluntarily, Trump will use America's massive trade leverage to ensure compliance. And he'll add tariffs to countries that don't pay their fair share.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on health and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Big Pharma’s worst nightmare just came true: Trump and RFK Jr. exposed a decades-long scam bleeding Americans dry. The room fell silent when Trump revealed why we pay 10X more than Europe for identical drugs. You won’t believe what you’re about to hear. A Thread 🧵 https://t.co/Nzuok3Vnbc

Saved - May 12, 2025 at 5:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US-China trade negotiations reached a significant milestone with a 90-day agreement following intense tariff escalations. China made three key concessions: reducing tariffs by 115% to 10%, eliminating all non-tariff barriers, and addressing the fentanyl crisis with a high-level official. This agreement marks a shift in the US-China relationship, aiming to rebalance trade and tackle a $1.2 trillion deficit. Both nations seek to rebuild manufacturing and maintain healthy trade flows, setting the stage for future negotiations. The next 90 days will be crucial for follow-through on these commitments.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Major Breakthroughs in US-China Trade Negotiations. The US-China trade standoff just ended with a historic 90-day agreement. Chinese officials made THREE major concessions the media isn't reporting. You won’t believe what you’re about to hear. A Thread🧵 https://t.co/4agEZaP0eo

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

After weeks of escalating tariffs that reached a staggering 125% on both sides, US and Chinese negotiators met in Geneva this weekend. The result? A breakthrough 90-day agreement. But there's more to this story than what's being reported. https://t.co/lwiXWZBFaI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker thanks the Swiss government for hosting the trade meeting in Geneva. Talks were productive, and the location on Lake Geneva contributed to a positive process. An agreement was reached for a 90-day pause, with both sides agreeing to reduce reciprocal tariffs by 115%.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First of all, we again, we want to express our great thanks to the Swiss government for facilitating this trade meeting here in Geneva. We had very productive talks, and I I believe that the venue here on Lake Geneva added great equanimity to what was a very positive process. We have reached the an agreement on a ninety day pause and substantially move down the tariff levels. Both sides on the reciprocal tariffs will move their tariffs down 115%.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Let's rewind to understand why this matters. On April 2nd, Trump imposed "reciprocal tariffs" under his America First policy. China was assigned a 34% rate. Unlike other countries, China chose to fight back. https://t.co/wG86PeDdK6

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 20, the president released the America First Trade Policy, directing agencies to research the trade deficit issue and provide options. On April 2, the president imposed reciprocal tariffs to address the national emergency of the trade deficit. A global baseline of reciprocal tariffs was established, with higher rates for countries with larger trade surpluses with the U.S. China was assigned a 34% reciprocal tariff rate. China retaliated against the U.S., while other countries chose to negotiate or not retaliate. Discussions with other countries have been ongoing for weeks. China retaliated with tariffs and disproportionate non-tariff measures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On January 20, when the president was inaugurated, he released the America First Trade Policy, which was comprehensive, and flagged that he, well and actually directed agencies, including US Trade Representative and others, to research this issue and to provide options, which we did, and the president elected to impose reciprocal tariffs on April 2, to address this this national emergency of the trade deficit. There was a global baseline accompanied by higher reciprocal tariffs for each country depending on, the level and intensity of their trade surplus with The United States. In all of this, China was assigned a reciprocal tariff rate of 34%. China was the only country that chose to implement retaliation against The United States for this reciprocal tariff. All other countries withheld and decided that they wanted to negotiate with The United States or simply not retaliate. And so we've been in detailed discussions with other countries for several weeks at this point. China, as you know, retaliated not only with tariffs but with disproportionate asymmetrical non tariff measures.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

That's when things escalated dramatically. China didn't just add tariffs. They imposed severe non-tariff measures that effectively created a trade embargo, according to US officials. The economic equivalent of a declaration of war. https://t.co/CjXndz4wfI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president increased tariff rates to offset Chinese retaliation, escalating the situation. Both sides added 25% tariffs, with China implementing additional non-tariff measures that effectively created an embargo on trade. This embargo is considered unsustainable for both sides.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The president increased our tariff rates to to offset Chinese retaliation. And as you know, this escalated to a point where both sides had added a 25% tariffs and with the Chinese side additional non tariff measures amounting to an embargo in some senses on trade and effective embargo, which of course is not a sustainable practice for either side.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Both sides kept raising tariffs until they hit a crippling 125%, creating an unsustainable situation that threatened global trade. That's when something unexpected happened. China blinked. https://t.co/rTSapX0kA3

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Concession #1: China agreed to reduce tariffs by 115%, bringing them down to just 10%. This matches the exact reduction the US offered, creating parity for the first time in this trade battle. But that's just the beginning. https://t.co/Wy7OpsILaM

Video Transcript AI Summary
With this agreement, reciprocal tariff rates will decrease to 10% on both the United States and Chinese sides, representing a 15% reduction for the United States and a 15% reduction for China. A 90-day pause period for negotiations will commence, with commitment from both countries. China will also remove countermeasures currently in place. However, other tariff measures implemented by the United States in the past, including those from 2018, tariffs under other statutory authorities, and tariffs related to fentanyl, will remain unchanged for now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so today, with this agreement, we come to agreement that though that our reciprocal tariff rate, will go down to a 10 will go down to 10% on The United States side, so it goes down a 15%. We enter into a ninety day pause period for negotiations, which both the Chinese and United States are very committed to. And the Chinese on their side also go down 115% to 10%, and they remove, the countermeasures that they have in place. To be very clear, other measures that The United States has put in place in the past, whether it's, you know, tariff measures from 2018 or since, tariffs under other statutory authorities, tariffs like the fentanyl, those remain, unchanged, for now to decide.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Concession #2: China removed ALL counter-measures. Beyond tariffs, China had imposed severe non-tariff barriers. Officials said these effectively created a trade embargo against US goods. They've now agreed to remove ALL of these barriers. https://t.co/ti8RTeKAqG

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Concession #3 is perhaps the most surprising. China sent their deputy minister for public safety to address the fentanyl crisis. US officials called this an "upside surprise" - completely unexpected at a trade meeting. https://t.co/IZjOV4ZJUm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chinese engagement on the fentanyl crisis in the United States was notable this weekend. China sent the deputy minister for public safety, who isn't usually part of trade or negotiating teams. This deputy minister had a robust and highly detailed discussion with someone from the US national security team.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Me, from this weekend was the level of Chinese engagement on the fentanyl crisis in The United States. They brought the deputy minister for security Public safety. For public safety, who is not traditionally part of the trade team or the negotiating team. And he had a very robust and highly detailed discussion with someone from the US national security team.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

This isn't just about lower prices on Chinese goods. It's about a fundamental shift in the US-China relationship. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed they're managing a trade queue with 75+ countries bringing "their best offers" after seeing China's concessions.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The bigger story? This isn't a one-off deal. US officials established a "mechanism" for ongoing negotiations - something they claim was "neglected" before. Communication channels had "atrophied" until now. https://t.co/Lh6xFyVW5J

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

What happens in the next 90 days is critical. Negotiations will focus on rebalancing trade and addressing the $1.2 trillion deficit in goods. That deficit grew 42% in recent years. Now it's being tackled head-on.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Behind the scenes, a strategic vision is unfolding. The US aims to rebuild key manufacturing in medicine, semiconductors, and steel. Yet both sides agreed: "neither side wants a decoupling." They want rebalancing, not separation. https://t.co/H2uLmYcWTr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Both sides agree that neither wants a decoupling of trade. The previous high tariffs were the equivalent of an embargo, which neither side desires. The goal is more balanced trade. The U.S. wants China to be more open to U.S. goods. Negotiations may lead to a purchase agreement to balance the bilateral trade deficit. The trade deficit has grown due to neglect over the past four years because the previous administration did not engage on the issue, even though the proposal was put forward by the Chinese. Strategic rebalancing is occurring in areas exposed as supply chain weaknesses during COVID, such as medicines, semiconductors, and steel. The U.S. has identified five or six strategic industries and supply chain vulnerabilities and will continue moving toward U.S. independence and/or reliable supplies from allies in those sectors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A strategic rebalancing the in many areas that were exposed as supply chain weaknesses, during COVID, whether it's medicines, whether it's semiconductors, steel, the other we've we've identified five or six strategic industries and supply chain vulnerabilities, and we will continue moving toward US independence and or reliable supplies from allies on those. But the consensus from both delegations this weekend is neither side wants a decoupling. And what had occurred with these very high tariffs, as ambassador Greer said, was an the equivalent of an embargo, and neither side wants that. We do want trade. We want more balanced trade, and I think that both sides are committed to achieving that. We would like to see, China open to more US goods. We expect that as the negotiations proceed, that there will also be a possibility of purchase agreement to pull what is our largest bilateral trade deficit into balance, that has gotten, out of balance. And much of this has happened, through neglect over the past four years as the previous administration, did not engage on this issue, that was put forward to us by the Chinese, in fact.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Both countries need a reset. One official explained: "China is unbalanced in terms of overproduction in manufacturing." The US lost precision manufacturing. Together, they could find a new equilibrium.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

America's goals are clear: • Restore critical manufacturing • Maintain healthy trade flows • Command respect in negotiations • Create a model for future deals This agreement sets the blueprint.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The ultimate test will come during these 90 days. Will China follow through? Will concrete purchase agreements materialize to reduce the trade deficit? Let me know what you think in the comments. The rules of global trade are being rewritten, and this is just the beginning.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Major Breakthroughs in US-China Trade Negotiations. The US-China trade standoff just ended with a historic 90-day agreement. Chinese officials made THREE major concessions the media isn't reporting. You won’t believe what you’re about to hear. A Thread🧵 https://t.co/4agEZaP0eo

Saved - May 1, 2025 at 3:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just witnessed President Trump's high-stakes cabinet meeting where each member made significant announcements. Trump highlighted drops in consumer prices and energy costs, claiming a 99.9% secure border. Defense Secretary Hegseth noted a military recruitment surge. Commerce Secretary Lutnick shared news on tech investments and a new citizenship program. Other announcements included reduced veteran wait times, military successes, and efforts to cut bureaucracy. Overall, the first 100 days of Trump's second term have been marked by ambitious initiatives and significant policy changes.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

President Trump just hosted a high-stakes cabinet meeting at the White House. One by one, top Cabinet members delivered Major Announcements — directly reporting to the American people. Here’s everything you should know (and no joke, it gets crazier the further you read): 🧵 https://t.co/0opCrIGDex

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1/ Trump: Consumer prices dropping, energy costs down, country making $8T from tariffs. "We've achieved the most secure border in American history—99.9% secure." "We're fixing trade deals that should've been addressed decades ago." https://t.co/Ez3HUZaqjx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration has supposedly completed the most successful first 100 days in history. The border is now the most secure in American history, with 99.9% security. Illegal border crossings and releases into the U.S. are down 99.999%. Trinidad Aragua, MS-13, and Mexican drug cartels have been designated as foreign terrorist organizations, and the administration is working to expel them. The speaker claims to have won the election based on border security and removing criminals, attributing swing state victories to this issue. Core GDP, removing distortions, was up 3%, and gross domestic investment was up 22%. Samsung is supposedly building massive facilities in the U.S. due to tariffs. The speaker claims there is close to $8 trillion being spent, with more expected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've just completed what many consider to be the most successful first one hundred days of any administration in the history of our country, and we're just getting started. Things are happening that are amazing. And I would not say it if it weren't fact. In a few short weeks, we've achieved the most secure border in American history by far. 99.9%, which is a number that nobody thought was doable. Biden thought you had to go back to the legislature to get legislation passed in order to create a secure border. You didn't. You just had to have the right president and the right people working it. Congratulations, by the way, and to Tom. For two months in a row, we have set the all time records for the lowest number of illegal border crossings ever recorded. The number of illegal border crossings released into The United States is down 99.999%. That is usually 100%. So I think it's an amazing tribute. And, Christy, congratulations. And Tom and everybody else, that's an amazing job, actually. And it was done very quickly. We officially designated Trinidad Aragua MS-thirteen and the Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. And we're expelling these monsters from our country rapidly and working with the Department of Justice. Pam, you're doing fantastic. Your people are amazing. We're having some judge problems. I everybody's reading. We're having some judges that don't like, you know, killers, murderers being thrown out of the country. So I don't know what their problem is, but we have a little difficulty. We won on the basis of a great border and of getting criminals out of our country. That was why we won every swing state. We won by millions of votes. We won everything. Every every metric, we won by a lot. It was a massive victory. And we won, I think, largely because of this issue. I put this issue as number one issue. And they don't want us to do what we're supposed to do, and I don't think that can be. And I hope the Supreme Court is going to fully understand what's going on. We have to get the criminals out of our country, and that's the basis under which we won the election. Core GDP and and this is, you know, you probably saw some numbers today. And I have to start off by saying that's Biden. That's not Trump because we came in on January. This is the quarterly numbers. And we came in and I was very against everything that Biden was doing in terms of the economy, destroying our country in so many ways, not only at the border. The border was more obvious, but we took over his mess in so many different ways. Core GDP, removing distortions from imports, inventories, and government spending, was up plus 3% when you add it. We had numbers that despite what we were handed, we turned them around and we were getting them really turned around. Gross domestic investment was a whopping 22%. Now, that is a number that people are coming in at numbers. For instance, I just walked in, I heard Samsung is now, because of the tariffs, they're gonna build massive facilities in The United States. If we didn't do the tariffs, they wouldn't be doing that. So it takes a little while to get those facilities built, but they're coming in with big, big numbers. They're all coming in with big numbers. We have more money being spent than any at any time in the history of our country. We're up to close to $8,000,000,000,000, I think, I can say. Yeah. And, really, it's gonna be a lot higher than that. Those are just the ones that we know about. 8,000,000,000,000.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2/ Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth: Military recruitment is seeing a "renaissance" after years of decline. "We've ripped wokeness out of the military." We have 11,000 troops at the border with power to detain migrants. https://t.co/Cu6UQ59KqB

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the military is controversial because it is over the target and that President Trump inherited a demoralized military that couldn't recruit. Since Trump's election, there has been a recruiting renaissance across all branches, with waiting lists for police and fire departments as well. Retention is up because service members now have a real commander in chief. The military is reinforcing standards, welcoming back those forced out by COVID mandates, and removing wokeness, DEI, and trans policies. Fort Benning and Fort Bragg are back to normal. The speaker states they are rebuilding the military, reassuring allies, and deterring enemies. They found nearly $6 billion in savings to reinvest, including $50 billion from the Biden administration's climate-focused initiatives. The speaker says they aim to wisely spend the first trillion-dollar budget on warfighters. They claim to have achieved 100% operational control of the border, with 11,000 troops now able to detain illegals and hand them over to CBP. NATO allies are stepping up, the Houthis are feeling American power, and they are deterring communist China. The speaker believes they are making the military great again due to President Trump's leadership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, mister president, I I think we're controversial because we're over the target. And like so many things, mister president, you inherited a demoralized military that couldn't recruit, that was perceived as weak after what happened in Afghanistan and elsewhere because of Joe Biden. And what we have seen since your election and the inauguration was has been nothing short of a recruiting renaissance. It's true. Dec decades it hasn't been decades since we've seen this kind of recruiting in the Army, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the Air Force. The men and women of America want to join the United States military led by President Donald Trump. And the police, by the way. Absolutely. And fire. I always mention the fire, but the police and fire. But the police and fire, likewise, are I mean, they have waiting lists now. And six months ago, was a disaster. Okay. Truly historic. We can barely absorb the volume and retention as well. Men and women in the military who don't wanna get out now that they have a real commander in chief. We're reinforcing standards. We're gonna be fit, not fat, in our formations. We welcome back all the COVID, the folks who were forced out because of the COVID mandate. We ripped wokeness out of the military, sir, DEI, trans. And it's Fort Benning and Fort Bragg again at the DOD. We're rebuilding the military, sir. The Golden Dome is well underway. F 47, reassuring allies and deterring enemies. We found nearly 6,000,000,000 in doge savings that we're gonna reinvest, including 50,000,000,000 from the Biden administration focused on things like climate that have nothing to do with lethality and war fighting. And we will have, as you said, sir, the first trillion dollar budget that we plan to spend wisely on behalf of our warfighters. From day one, sir, we've gotten a hundred helped get 100% operational control of the border, come alongside DHS and CBP. That's right. We've got 11,000 troops on the border who now, because of the new National Defense Area, sir, can help detain illegals at the border and hand them over to CBP. It used to be if you saw camouflage on the border, they could hold binoculars, and that's it. And now we can detain and assist, and we are. We're gonna get a % operational control of that border. Our NATO allies are know they have to step up. The Houthis in The Middle East are feeling the weight of American power, and we're deterring communist China. So because of your leadership, sir, I believe we're making the military great again.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3/ Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick: Countries lining up to negotiate after tariff announcements. Tech companies committed $2.5T to build in America. Gold Card program launches within a week—potential citizenship pathway. https://t.co/4JKnXvh9VP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Technology companies have committed over $2.5 trillion to build in America due to tariffs, with sovereign wealth funds committing over $3 trillion. The pharma industry is returning home because America pays for global drug costs, and the auto and industrial sectors are also reshoring. The speaker mentioned efforts to train the workforce to rebuild America. There is significant attention on the "Trump Gold Card." The tariffs are generating hundreds of billions of dollars to build the "external revenue service," intended to replace the internal revenue service, with the goal of having foreign countries pay their fair share to America. Eliminating de minimis will help rebuild mom and pop and small businesses in America. De minimis was described as a big scam against the country and small businesses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I have the pleasure of running the investment accelerator, which gets to recruit these companies, and you've never seen anything like the companies committed to building in America. Technology companies have committed over $2,500,000,000,000 to build in America based on your tariffs. Right? Sovereign countries all backing the whole Middle East and all these countries backing their sovereign wealth funds. They all want to invest in America, and they're coming in again. Over $3,000,000,000,000 committed. So just those two topics, you're at $5,500,000,000,000 and then you've got the whole pharma industry knows it's got to come home because America pays for all the drugs of the world. So the pharmaceuticals have to home. Right? Auto is coming home. Industrial is coming home. So, you know, we've got to train, and your great secretary of labor together and secretary of education, together, we're gonna train the workforce to build America. America. It's unbelievable. We've got so much as I travel around, the attention on the Trump Gold Card. I mean, makes me very popular. Last night, I I was out to dinner and someone came up and said, can I buy 10? And how do I buy 10? And I'm like, that's pretty good. It's $50,000,000 for dinner. So, you know, I was paying paying for my dinner. The external revenue service. Right? You've got the tariffs and the hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars coming in to build the external revenue service that our objective, of course, is to replace the internal revenue service and let those outside countries trading with us, let them pay their fair share to America. And then, of course, you got rid of de minimis. And what happened is these foreign countries were sending in little packages for free and knocking out our mom and pop businesses across America. You put an end to it, and you're gonna rebuild the mom and pop and the small business of America. You're their president, and I'm proud to support you. Speaker 1: It's very important, de minimis. It's very it's a big deal. It's a big scam going on against our country, against really small businesses, and we've ended. We put an end to it.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4/ Transport Secretary Sean Duffy: America must rebuild air traffic control system to prevent disasters. Cutting "social cost of carbon" to reduce infrastructure costs 3-5%. Stripping "green" requirements from road projects to focus on actual infrastructure. https://t.co/EAfeNeu9gy

Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration plans to rewrite CAFE standards to lower vehicle prices, claiming Elon Musk approves. They eliminated the social cost of carbon to reduce infrastructure expenses. States and municipalities must follow the law, including executive orders, to receive federal funding for roads, bridges, and rail. This includes ending DEI policies and adhering to immigration laws. Funding for university research on equitable and sustainable transportation systems is being cut. The administration aims to address the air traffic controller shortage by incentivizing retirement-eligible controllers to stay longer and increasing student enrollment at the Oklahoma City academy. The current air traffic control system has obsolete equipment due to the prior administration's wasteful spending. The plan is to implement a brand new air traffic control system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, so, CAFE standards, we have a fuel, economy standards on vehicles that are gonna go to 50 miles per gallon. We are gonna rewrite those standards, bring it down to something that's far more reasonable. Elon's fine with that, I hope. But it's going to drive down the price of a car in America, making cars more affordable for families. Also, Biden had the social cost of credit when we build infrastructure, roads, and bridges, adding three to 5% on infrastructure costs. We've gotten rid of the social cost of carbon, driving down the cost to build roads and bridges across the country. We have what is called follow the law. So we have so many states and municipalities that don't follow the law. So whether it's DEI, discriminating against Americans, whether they give illegal driver's license or their sanctuary cities or states. If you don't follow the law, if you're giving license to illegals, if you're having DEI policies, we're not going to fund your projects. So you got to certify in your state or in your city to get road and bridge money or rail money that you're actually following the law, which includes the executive orders from you, Mr. President. We're cutting back funding. We send research money, Mr. President, to universities to do research on more equitable and sustainable transportation systems, projects that will use data and public opinion to inform policy and infrastructure and technology benefiting diverse communities, including women and gender nonconforming nonconforming people. Just stupid wastes of money. We're pulling that money back from universities. We should do good research if we're doing research in universities. And then one last thing, air traffic control. We don't have enough air traffic control. It's about 3,000 short. We're working on an agreement with the union. So when controllers become retirement eligible, we're going to cut a deal to try to get them to stay longer, stay in the tower. And then we have a plan to put more butts in seats in Oklahoma City so we can get more students through the academy and into towers as well. It's going take us a while to do that, to train them up, but we're in the process before before our four years are done, well before that, we're gonna be at full capacity. Speaker 1: Sean, do wanna tell them about I think we have to bring it up. We have very obsolete equipment for air traffic controllers. The equipment the towers have horrible equipment. It's been renovated years. The money they spent over the last four years this Buttigieg did a horrible job. They wasted billions and billions of dollars hooking up wire equipment to non wire equipment to satellite equipment, and you're not a a third grade student would know it doesn't work. You can't work it. They spent they wasted tens of billions of dollars. But we wanna put a brand new air traffic control system.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5/ VA Secretary Doug Collins: Wait times for veteran care being reduced for first time in years. Refocused on Mission Act giving veterans choice in healthcare. $588M redirected from bureaucracy to frontline veteran services. https://t.co/Q8Ju37yhIj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The VA is part of national security, taking care of veterans when they come in and after service. The previous administration focused on money and people without leadership, resulting in unchanged wait times, suicide rates, and homelessness issues, along with skyrocketing disability claims. The Mission Act is back, giving veterans the choice of VA care inside facilities or in the community. The VA is expanding treatment options for PTSD and TBI and bringing people back into the workforce, processing more claims daily. A strike force is working to reduce disability claims. Over $300 million was redirected from contracts for meeting notes and PowerPoints to community care and health records. Six new facilities have been opened. $11.6 billion in unnecessary contract ceiling values were terminated. $14 million in DEI spending was eliminated, and gender dysphoria treatments were phased out, with savings directed to paralyzed veterans and amputees. The focus is on taking care of veterans, making the VA a service organization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Secretary? Thank you. Mr. President, thank you. And I think one of the things that I want people to understand about the VA is we're part of the national security interests you have, and you've laid the groundwork for that leadership and making sure that with the Secretary of Defense myself, we take care of veterans on two ends: One when they come in and one when they serve and they've earned the benefits that we have. And one of the things is, if we're not doing our job on our end, then the recruitment and all goes down on the other end because we have a full spectrum. That's what leadership is about. What we found, speaking in the last four years, is we found an administration that wanted to throw money and people at problems, but they didn't want to put leadership in. They just put money and people at it, and we saw wait times stay the same. We saw issues of race death by suicide not change. We saw a homelessness issue barely go down. We saw disability claims skyrocket when you took place over 250,000 back in this law, which we're bringing down almost forty thousand so far just in the last couple of months. But we've also put back what you and I was in Congress when this happened, I was glad to say it, the Mission Act is back front and center at the VA. We're actually doing community care. We're actually giving veteran the choice that they've earned and they deserve, whether they can get their VA care inside our facilities or in the community. It's their choice. It's VA care. We're going to give them the highest quality care wherever they want to go. Also, we're expanding out options for treatment and others for those that are new. We're experimenting and looking at new counseling ideas on new drug techniques that we can help with PTSD, TBI, the things that are affecting our veterans right now. But also, we've taken the leadership to take people and bring them back into work where they're actually communicating. They're back in our offices. We put thousands of people back in. We're processing more claims daily than we were in the last little bit. Hit a million before it has ever happened, and we're actually bringing it down. I've actually taken our deputy secretary and he is actually handing a strike force now to bring down that disability claim plus our regular work that we're having done. We've also taken almost 300 plus million dollars and taken out of contracts that we've all heard about so far for we were doing contracts for meeting notes and PowerPoints. If our folks didn't know how to do meeting notes and PowerPoints, go online and learn yourself. We're not going pay for it anymore. And we took $360,000,000 and put it back into community care and also our health records management system that we have. We've opened six new facilities just in the last little bit. So all the media who wants to talk about how we're hurting health care, we just opened six new facilities. By the way, thank you. You're welcome. As we go from that, we continue. We've also took $11,600,000,000 in ceiling values of contracts and terminated that we did not need, resulting in significant cost of warrants for the future, but also still maintaining the ability to take care of our patients and also our disability benefits. We've also gotten unity again. We did away with $14,000,000 in DEI spending. We've ended gender dysphoria treatments. We phased that out. All directed the savings from that go to paralyzed veterans and amputees. We've also continued to work toward, as you've and anti Semitism and also anti Christian bias that we saw. The biggest thing, Mr. President, I want to state, is you told me when you said for me to take this job, said, Take care of my veterans. Well, we've done something in taking that step forward. The veteran is back first at the VA. The VA is not about itself anymore. We're not a self feeding animal. It's about a service organization that takes care of one of the best that we have, and that's our veterans. And that was

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

6/ National Security Advisor Mike Waltz: 40+ Americans rescued from hostage situations abroad. Abbey Gate bombing mastermind captured and being prosecuted. Global respect for American military strength "restored." https://t.co/TCaT5rW25s

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the world experienced a total lack of leadership under Biden for the last four years. They praise Trump's leadership over the last hundred days, citing respect and strength, beginning with the statement that "all hell will pay" if people aren't let go. The speaker claims that over 40 Americans have come home and far more terrorists are no longer threatening the homeland under Trump's leadership. They highlight the pulling together of agencies to address the Abbey Gate bombing and Trump's engagement with the 13 Gold Star families. The speaker also emphasizes the revitalization of shipyards, cyber, and space, attributing it to teamwork. They conclude by stating it's an honor to serve in the administration and that the world is far better and safer because of it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mr. President, the last four years, the world experienced a total lack of zero leadership under under Biden. And then we've had a hundred days of your leadership with respect, with strength, starting with they'll be all hell to pay if you don't let our people go. Dozens over 40 Americans have come home under your leadership. Far more terrorists are no longer threatening the homeland under your leadership, pulling all of these agencies together, including the person the evil individual responsible for the Abbey Gate bombing, and to sit with the 13 Gold Star families, and you showing that follow-up and justice has been incredible. But pulling this great team together, Mr. President, everything revitalizing shipyards to cyber to space, that takes this entire team working together. It's an honor to serve you in this administration, and I think the world is far better, far safer for it. Amen. Thank you very much, Mr. Trump.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

7/ DNI John Ratcliffe: Intelligence provided led to Abbey Gate bomber now being prosecuted. Secured release of Americans wrongfully detained overseas. Restructuring agency to focus on "core mission" and remove politicization. https://t.co/5IGJ7XJB7x

Video Transcript AI Summary
At the President's direction, the CIA has used covert action authorities to advance national security and foreign policy priorities, including advancing peace, ending wars, removing terrorists, and preventing illicit drugs from entering the U.S. The CIA provided intelligence leading to the apprehension of the Abbey Gate Bomber, who is now being prosecuted. The CIA, under the President's direction, negotiated the release of wrongfully detained Americans like Mark Fogle and Cassinia Carolina. The CIA is being restructured to focus on its core mission and eliminate politicization from past bad actors, with the goal of making America safe again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President, as you know, at your direction, the CIA has deployed our unique covert action authorities in various places and continents to successfully advance your national security and foreign policy priorities to advance peace, to end wars, to take terrorists off the battlefield, and to keep illicit drugs from coming into this country and harming Americans. Unfortunately, as much as I would love to detail your accomplishments in that regard, we can't do so in front of this crowd. But you and I both know, Mr. President, that you have had a profound, positive impact on America's national security posture, and Americans are safer because of your leadership. What I can talk about publicly is, as has been mentioned, the CIA provided the intelligence that led to the apprehension of the Abbey Gate Bomber, who is now being prosecuted by our great attorney general and providing a measure of justice to those 13 families that suffered as a result of that disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal during the last administration. In addition, in your direction, Mr. President, the CIA has negotiated and secured the release of Americans like Mark Fogle and Cassinia Carolina, who have been wrongfully detained, sending the message that you will forget about no Americans that are being held in other places unfairly and unjustly. And finally, Mr. President, the CIA is being restructured at your direction to focus on our core mission and to eliminate the well documented politicization that has taken place in the intelligence community from bad actors in the past to focus on our core mission and to make America safe again. Thank you for the opportunity, mister president. Good job. You're doing a great job. Thank you very much.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

8/ Director of the OMB Russell Vought: Using covert actions to "advance peace" and "end wars." Restructuring the agency to eliminate documented political bias. Intelligence provided for the apprehension of Abbey Gate bomber. https://t.co/vEz4SApC0U

Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration is working to reflect priorities in budget reconciliation and sending rescissions bills to Congress. The goal is 10-for-1 deregulation, potentially saving American families $900 billion, exceeding the $200 billion already stopped from the Biden regulatory agenda. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) overturned a case against a small mortgage lender in Chicago, Barry Sterner, who was targeted for complaining about crime. The CFPB apologized and ended the policy that initiated the action. The "one big beautiful bill" is progressing through the Senate with bipartisan support. It aims to be the biggest tax cut in American history, preventing a potential 58% tax hike if Democrats succeed. Negotiations are ongoing to include border and defense resources, tax cuts, and incentives to encourage workforce participation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're obviously involved in a number of budget, bills that are moving. Trying to make sure all of your priorities are reflected in the reconciliation. Working on our upcoming budget, wonderful job by the entire cabinet on that front. Details soon on that front. Sending up precisions bills to congress for things that Elon has found. But the regulatory aspect is something we don't talk about enough. And and right now, you've given us a goal of 10 for one. We are working right now with all of the agencies to rack up how big of a deregulatory agenda that we can have. When you came into office, you basically stopped $200,000,000,000 in cost to American families just by stopping the Biden regulatory agenda. That's about 2,000 per family. We think when we're gonna hit these 10 for one goals that we could be in the neighborhood of about $900,000,000,000 in in savings to American families that would be substantially bigger than that $2,000 number. And the point that I would make in addition to just, you know, savings cheaper to the American people, there's an aspect of of wisdom when you're enforcing these rules that comes into play. And you're I'm your regulator for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and we found this this small mortgage lender in Chicago, his name is Barry Sterner. He had a a firm called Townstone and CFPB had gone after because he complained about crime in Chicago, literally the same thing that the Democrat mayor had talked about. And they came after him for seven years on a redlining disparate impact claim and ruined his life. We overturned that. We apologized on your behalf to that individual, and we basically, without having to go through notice and comment, we ended the policy that set that in motion. And so that's happening across these agencies with how they are using their enforcement discretion, and it will only continue based on the the the stonewall of backing that you've given us to make these hard calls. I don't think they're actually that hard, but no one's done it to this point, and we have we able to go forward and do that because of the backing that you've given us. Speaker 1: So maybe the biggest thing we're working on, maybe bigger than tariffs in a certain sense, is the we call it the one big beautiful bill, and that's wielding its way right now through the Senate. And John Thune has been actually amazing. And the Speaker has been so great. Congress, Mike Johnson, has been really two guys. They get along great, and it's just been a beautiful, unified attack, really, because we have to attack because the Democrats are trying to stop it at every every turn. It would mean a 58% tax hike if they were successful, and lots of other bad things beyond the tax hike. But with us, it'll be the biggest tax cut in American history. How are we doing with the bill? Speaker 0: We're doing great. We're day in, day out, hour by hour negotiations to make sure your stuff is in there and to make sure we have the border resources, the defense resources, and to save the American people some tax money, and and make sure all those tax cuts that you ran on are in there that help get people back into the workforce. And I think we're making a ton of progress. Speaker 1: Yeah. I think we're doing well. And like I said, the biggest tax cut in the history of our country. And it would be the biggest tax increase if the Democrats are Speaker 0: six

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

9/ HUD Secretary Scott Turner: • Cutting red tape for housing affordability and "restoring local control" • Agreement signed with DHS ensuring HUD housing only goes to American citizens • Identified $2B in savings, returned $1.9B to Treasury • Restored "biological truth" in women's shelters for safety

Video Transcript AI Summary
HUD has been cutting red tape to address the housing affordability crisis, restoring local control by removing the Affirmatively Further and Fair Housing rule, described as a zoning tax from Washington. An MOU was signed with DHS to ensure HUD-funded housing goes only to American citizens, due to the claim that the Biden administration prioritized illegal aliens and that 59% of illegal alien families use welfare programs, costing $42 billion a year. A partnership with DOI aims to utilize underutilized federal lands for affordable housing. The equal access rule was taken down to ensure that only those of the same sex enter women's shelters. The Doge Task Force identified over $2 billion in savings, including $4 million in DEI contracts, which were de-obligated, sending $1.9 billion back to the Treasury.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And also from day one, you want to make housing affordable again, because we do have have a housing affordability crisis in our country. And so at HUD, we've been cutting, all the red tape and bureaucracy as it pertains to housing affordability and unleashing creativity of our builders and developers around our country and restoring local control. We took down the Affirmatively Further and Fair Housing rule, as you know Yeah. Which was a zoning tax from Washington. So no longer will Washington be picking winners and losers, but localities and elected officials in different states and cities will have that flexibility. Also, you alluded to securing the border, and such a great job has been done with all of our partners at the table. And at HUD, we want to make sure that the resources that we have now, which is American taxpayer dollars, and the Biden administration, they prioritized illegal aliens over the American people. And so we signed an MOU with Secretary Naum and DHS to make sure that HUD funded housing only goes to American citizens and no longer will it go to illegal aliens aliens coming across our border. We have about 9,000,000 people living in subsidized housing in our country. 59% of illegal alien families use some sort of welfare program costing us $42,000,000,000 a year. And so we have prioritized American and American people only to live in HUD funded housing. And also, to make housing affordable, we also signed a partnership with Secretary Burglum at DOI to use underutilized federal lands, as you campaigned on and promised, to identify those lands to build affordable housing in our country so that people can realize the American dream. We also restored biological truth, as you did in sports. We have the equal access rule at HUD, which we take we took that rule down to ensure that at women's shelters, that those that enter those shelters would be of the same sex, and that we will protect the ladies of our country. No longer will those that identify as women but are not women be able to enter our shelter so that we can protect the ladies that we serve. Along with our Doge Task Force, we identified over $2,000,000,000 in savings. At her $260,000,000 at her, we're just just in contracts, 4,000,000 were DEI. And so we took those contracts down and de obligate it and sent back $1,900,000,000 back to the Treasury for the American people. Again, we want to be good stewards over the American taxpayer dollars. And so, Mr. President, thank you for your leadership in this, and we have a tremendous team at HUD. And I'm so grateful to be part of this team around this table to take care of the American people. And I consider it a great honor and humble to do so. Good job. Yes, Yes, sir. Appreciate it.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

10/ Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins: • Tariffs helping farmers struggling with 30% cost increases under Biden • Working with RFK Jr to revamp food stamps program • Canceled $6B in contracts for "DEI gender-studying transgender mice" https://t.co/xKtEmiMDjL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The price of eggs is down. There has been a decades-long issue with Mexico regarding water access for farmers along the border, but a deal was reached that is believed to be the best in history for the farmers. Agriculture has a major role in the energy dominance agenda, including biofuels. Under the Biden administration, farmers experienced a 30% increase in input costs, and the U.S. went from a $0 trade deficit in agriculture products to a $50 billion deficit. Congress passed a bill providing $10 billion to farmers who couldn't plant crops, and the USDA distributed the money quickly. The USDA has canceled $6 billion in contracts, including DEI and gender studies, and is undergoing a major restructuring to prioritize farmers. The USDA is also focused on food stamps and nutrition, emphasizing the importance of farmers and ranchers in making America healthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I'm not sure if anyone's heard, but the price of eggs is down. I know it's news. I know it's news. But, sir, today on, as we celebrate the one hundredth day, I think that, it's just such a joy and honor to continue to do this work. So thank you for that. We have been obviously very focused on the cost of groceries. Specifically, eggs led the way, as you have so eloquently discussed over the last few months. And we're holding tight on a very significant decrease, which is great, and and investing where we need to there. As I mentioned before the press came in, we have had a massive issue with Mexico on water, getting water to our farmers along the border for decades. When I worked in Texas twenty five years ago, we were fighting with the Mexican government over the water then. You got involved about two weeks ago. That evening, I started conversations. And as of just a few days ago, thanks to Secretary Rubio's great deputy secretary, and I have been negotiating, and we hit the best deal, I believe, in history on behalf of our farmers. And thanks to your leadership and your strength on that. And that's a really big deal long term for those farmers in the southern part of the country. On the energy side, I know we've got Secretary Burghum and his partner, Secretary Wright, but we often forget that agriculture has a major piece of the energy dominance agenda, not just timber, not just minerals, but biofuels. So we continue to support that great leadership coming from those agencies and doing hopefully our part as well, and they've been incredible in that. Our farmers have been hurting. Under the Joe Biden administration, there was a 30% increase in the cost of input, so the cost of doing business for these farmers over those four years. When we left the White House the first time four years ago, we had a $0 trade deficit with our agriculture products. After four years of Biden, that hit 50,000,000,000 because they just didn't make an effort. And so, obviously, that's 50,000,000,000 less dollars at a time of very thin profitability for agriculture community. So the Congress passed a because we the last administration didn't get a farm bill done either. The farmers were hurting there. So Congress stepped in. I say all that and and basically said $10,000,000,000 to move out. USDA, fastest in history, that money went out to those farmers that couldn't make their that plant their crops. And so I'm really proud of that, and you'll hear a lot of that from our farmers today that this USDA is moving more quickly than any ever before. And we're not we're not organizing money based on the color of skin and other ways, which was how the last administration was moving out. We've canceled $6,000,000,000 in contracts thanks to our great friend Elon Musk and his DOGE team. A lot of those were DEI gender studying transgender mice. You know, who knew? The the racism in pest management, we we've canceled all of it. We're going through a major major restructuring. USDA is one of the biggest agencies. It's sort of a catch all. And we're really, really downsizing and aligning around putting farmers first, which is really, really important. A big part of USDA is food stamps. It is perhaps one of the largest, if not the largest, welfare program, and and it's a supplemental nutrition program. Secretary Kennedy and I have been working very closely. We were in Texas yesterday talking about nutrition and agriculture. You can't make America healthy again without your farmers and your ranchers as your partner.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

11/ Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: Managing trade queue with 75+ countries bringing "their best offers." Successfully handling debt ceiling increase in budget bill. Emphasized shifting focus from Wall Street to Main Street. https://t.co/4yy7gNrhqf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the first 100 days have set the stage for future deals and that the next 100 days will see the results. They claim energy, mortgage, and food costs are decreasing, improving family finances. The speaker asserts America is becoming an AI superpower and that the economy is being balanced with precision manufacturing through trade and tax policies. They state the Treasury, IRS, and IT are improving, with IRS revenues up and a decades-old IT update nearing completion. The speaker credits the President's leadership, along with Speaker Johnson and Leader Thune, for these successes. They conclude that economic security and national security are intertwined and stronger than ever, and that "America First" under President Trump means leadership, not isolation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes, Scott. Sir, it it's been a momentous hundred days with you at the helm, and I view this hundred days as setting the table for peace deals, trade deals, tax deals. So the next hundred days, we'll be harvesting. You've created negotiating leverage and leadership that are gonna yield remarkable results. Energy costs have plummeted. Mortgage rates are down. Food costs are moving lower, and American families are finding their financial footing again. I had a group in today. We are America, under your leadership, is on the verge of becoming an AI superpower, that our economy had become barbelled. We had high-tech and finance on one side, natural resources led by energy, which the previous administration tried to kill on the other. And you're filling in between the with precision manufacturing that we're gonna be bringing back through good trade policies, good tax policies. The under the Doge at Treasury and the IRS, cost, tech support, and efficiency have increased. We have the IRS. Revenues are up. And thanks to the young man sent over by Doge, the IT update that began in 1990, which is which was begun before he was born, is going to be finished, during your term. So, trade I couldn't make it up. Trade, taxes, and deregulation, the one big beautiful bill under your leadership. Speaker Johnson, and leader Thune have done a great job, but they, they have you as a closer on many of their members. And, you know, I'll just close by saying economic security is national security. National security is economic security, and it's never been better. We're rebuilding it. And as I said last week at the IMF and World Bank conferences, America First does not mean America alone. Under president Trump, it means leadership.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

12/ Vice President JD Vance: "We've started to reverse every single negative trend" in just 100 days. "Most presidents have been placeholders...Trump is a man of action." https://t.co/Cs0DzQTPQx

Video Transcript AI Summary
From the speaker's birth to Donald Trump's inauguration, the U.S. allegedly went from a manufacturing superpower to depending on China, from having the "proudest military" to missing recruiting goals, and from bipartisan border policy to allowing 20 million people to "run roughshod illegally over the countryside." The speaker claims that in 100 days, the administration has begun to reverse these trends, and that the president is solving problems he promised to solve. The speaker asserts that the most underreported fact is that after coming in with a "massive recruitment shortfall," the military now has people "breaking down the doors to join." The speaker questions why the media focuses on deporting an MS-13 gang member instead of this alleged military recruitment turnaround. The speaker concludes that the administration has shown what can be done in 100 days, but also revealed that much of the American media hasn't learned from the past 40 years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister mister president, thank you, and thanks to the cabinet. So at the risk of insulting everybody else at Speaker 1: the table, I believe that I am the youngest member sitting at the table. And, you know, it occurred to me that from the time that I was born to the time that Donald J. Trump was inaugurated just a few months ago, we went from, again, forty years, we went from the world's manufacturing superpower to one which we depend on the People's Republic Of China to make the things that we need. We went from the proudest military in the world to one in which we failed to meet our recruiting goals, and we went from one in which bipartisan border policy was the consensus of both Democrats and Republicans to one in which we allowed 20,000,000 people to run roughshod illegally over the countryside causing crime, causing a stress in the welfare system. And again, that happened over the lifetime of the youngest member of the cabinet. And what has happened in a hundred days is that we've started to reverse every single one of those negative trends. Speaker 0: And I think what it Speaker 1: shows to me is that the president and you go you sit in the Oval Office and you see these portraits of presidents past. And let's be honest, most of them have been placeholders. They've been people who have allowed their staff to sign executive orders with an auto pin instead of men of action. And the reason the media attacks this administration as chaotic is as chaotic is because the president is solving the problems the American people set about to solve. He's actually doing the things that he promised that he would do. And mister president, it's been an honor to be part of it for the past one hundred days. And and let me just make one other observation because it's interesting. I've seen the data, I've monitored it, I've looked at it, but the most underreported fact of the first one hundred days is that we came in with a massive recruitment shortfall. And in one hundred days of secretary Hagsef and president Trump's leadership, we now have people breaking down the doors to join our military. To the media assembled here, it's a really interesting question. Why does that Completely aside from the fact that I think it's a good thing or I think that President Trump deserves political credit for it. Why did we go from a military where people didn't wanna serve to now all of a sudden they do wanna serve? That's a story you guys should cover. But compared to that, how much time have you instead focused on the fact that we deported an MS thirteen gang member with a valid deportation order? And why is it that the press is so focused on fake BS rather than what's really going on in the country? I think that we what we've shown, sir, is that you can do a lot. You can do a lot in a hundred days, but you've also unfortunately revealed that too much of the American media hasn't learned the lessons of the past forty years. Thank you, sir. Speaker 0: Thank you.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

13/ Attorney General Pam Bondi: Courts siding with Trump admin on deportation authority. DOJ seized 22M fentanyl pills in 100 days—"saving 258M lives." Prosecuting "Tesla terrorists" with no negotiations—20-year sentences. https://t.co/P3uby5lMtP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Under President Trump's direction to make America safe, the DOJ has faced over 200 civil lawsuits and 50 injunctions, with multiple cases before the Supreme Court. The DEA stated that Trump has "taken the handcuffs off of DEA agents." DOJ agencies have seized over 22 million fentanyl pills and 3,400 kilos of fentanyl, allegedly saving 258 million lives. ATF, along with DOJ agencies, seized 14,500 guns and 651,000 rounds of ammo, a 51% increase from 2024. The death penalty is being pursued in certain cases, including for arsonists, with nine arrests made across seven jurisdictions. An ISIS terrorist was apprehended in New York. An October 7 task force exists. A human trafficking ring linked to the Sinaloa cartel was dismantled, seizing meth, fentanyl, and 20,000 molly pills laced with fentanyl. 29 cartel members were brought back from Mexico, including one involved in the 1985 murder of DEA agent Kiki Camareno. 200 policies have been rescinded, ending DEI and weaponization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President, your first one hundred days has far exceeded that of any other presidency in this country ever, ever. Never seen anything like it. Thank you. Your directive to me was very simple, make America safe. And despite that, we've still been defending over 200 civil lawsuits filed against you. On top of everything else, I think I'm representing every one of you in this room in some capacity. I know you will not be arrested by the US Marshals. Over 200 lawsuits, over 50 injunctions, and now we've got multiple cases in front of the Supreme Court, and we will succeed. And we are doing great in front of the Supreme Court president, and we'll continue on with that. I was at DEA yesterday, and they said to me, you, Donald Trump, have taken the handcuffs off of DEA agents. And as a result of since you have been in office, president Trump, your DOJ agencies have seized more than 22,000,000 fentanyl pills, 30 four hundred kilos of fentanyl since you've been your last hundred days, which saved are you ready for this media? Two hundred and fifty eight million lives. Kids are dying every day because they're taking this junk laced with something else. They don't know what they're taking. They think they're buying Tylenol or an Adderall and a Xanax. And it's laced with fentanyl, and they're dropping dead and no longer because of you, what you've done. ATF, since you've been in office president, along with DOJ agencies, seized 14,500 guns off the streets. Why aren't people reporting that? 651,000 rounds of ammo. That's up a 51% from 2024. That's keeping America safe. We've rescinded death penalty. We are now seeking the death penalty on cases. I'm signing death warrants. We are going after terrorism. We are going after arsonists. Whether you're burning Teslas, we will see we've arrested nine people so far in seven jurisdictions. No negotiations, twenty years in prison, or you're burning down the Governor's Mansion in Pennsylvania. We will be there to protect you. And I've been talking to governor Shapiro and he greatly appreciated you reaching out as well. ISIS terrorist, we got one in New York. Right around the corner, we got an ISIS terrorist in New York. We have an October 7 task force. We just broke up a huge human trafficking ring by the Sinaloa cartel, a thousand pounds of meth. Meth. Methamphetamine on our streets. Ton of fentanyl, twenty thousand molly pills. Those are the drug of choice among at at clubs and bars for young kids. They were fake, but you know what they had in them? Fentanyl. That's 20,000 lives saved because of you right there. We brought back 29 cartel members from Mexico your direction, and one killed the Kiki Camareno, a DEA agent, in 1985. And many of us got to talk to his widow and his son who is now a judge. Started crying. They have tried to get that guy back forever. And thanks to so many of you in this room working together. They have justice. They were crying on the phone because of what you did, president Trump. Thank you. We're going after anti Semitism. We're unleashing everything you told us, and no more DEI, no more weaponization. We have rescinded, as I said, 200 policies, and I could go on all day long, but we are doing everything in our power to keep America safe at your direction.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

14/ Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer: • Uncovered massive fraud—$4.4B in bogus unemployment payments • Put all 50 governors on notice about benefits to illegal immigrants • Added 80,000 new apprenticeships since January 20th https://t.co/U9XyfkL25z

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes collaboration amongst leadership and secretaries on education and workforce investments to support companies' repatriation and investments. They are conducting a 50-state tour to connect with the American workforce and companies about market demands, aiming to align apprenticeships with those needs and have already added 80,000 new apprenticeships since January. The speaker warned governors against providing unemployment benefits to illegal immigrants, stating they risk losing federal funding. Discriminatory DEI offices within the Department of Labor have been eliminated, specifically the office of federal contract compliance programs. The Department of Labor returned $4.4 billion in unspent COVID funds from the CARES Act to the Treasury and saved $250 million by canceling foreign handouts, including funding for transparency and accountability in Uzbekistan's cotton industry. The focus is on preparing Americans for high-paying skilled trade jobs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, first of all, I think what you've heard amongst this team is the leadership, because it's given us the latitude really to collaborate amongst each other. Not only in this room, as Jamieson mentioned, we kinda get a break for a couple of hours here. Mhmm. But we stay in contact actually every other day that we're working for you. And I think what that says is I was speaking to, for instance, the Farm Bureau of Texas yesterday. I'm not the ag secretary, but it matters to the workforce. I'm working with the other secretaries, Lutnick and McMahon, on education and the workforce investments that you've asked me to do. Because as you've come in and negotiated these great repatriation of these companies and the investments, we're gonna need that workforce to build back this economy. And and I couldn't see that more as I've kicked off my 50 state tour. We've been in five states so far. We'll finish all 50 states by the end of the year. And what we're talking to is the American workforce and these companies about what the market demand is. That's the difference that we finally have made that connection. What do they need? How quick do they need it? And how fast can I get these either apprenticeships toward that million that we've put that lofty goal? We've already added 80,000 new apprenticeships already just since January. So at the Department of Labor, that tour has kicked off. And I couldn't be more honored to be on the ground and see my, colleagues that were passing in the skies Mhmm. But were on the ground together because, we're all collaborating, together. One of the things that we're talking about illegal immigration, I have put states on notice. I warned all 50 governors that if they continue to reward illegal immigration by treating, unemployment benefits as a handout, they're gonna lose their federal funding as well. We can no longer continue to give unemployment insurance, to illegal immigrants. And so I've I've let those governors and I sent out that letter last week. We also eliminated discriminatory discriminatory DEI offices within the department, specifically the office of federal contract compliance programs. Most of our federal contracts were really just to focus on DEI enforcement. We were really punishing a lot of these companies. If they weren't complying, they weren't going to have a federal content. We've let go of that program completely. Dollars 4,400,000,000.0 in unspent COVID funds came back to the treasury, from the CARES Act. Billions were collecting dust in these coffers, in the state coffers. We've asked for that money back to return to the Department of Treasury. We saved $250,000,000 by canceling America last is what I call it, foreign handouts, including funding for things like transparency and accountability for Uzbekistan cotton industry. It doesn't make sense that we're funding, you know, these foreign and thank you to Doge and to the government efficiency of what we have found with the fraud that we're seeing. I mean, of these things are surrendipitous. You can't believe it. No. I write them down, I read them more than once. Like a comedy sketch. Yeah. It doesn't it doesn't make sense. Comedy sketch. That's right. And so, again, with the executive order preparing Americans for high paying skilled trade jobs of the future, that's our goal. The trades is where we're being focused, but all companies. And we want to make sure we're on hand for that.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

15/ DHS Secretary Kristi Noem: The second month of record-low border crossings. Coast Guard seized 126 tons of cocaine after fleet repositioning. Mexico turning back "half a million people" before reaching border. https://t.co/5xJ8KttLK4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the border is 99.99% safe and under control due to the former president's policies, reversing the previous chaos. Border Patrol agents allegedly display pictures contrasting the current peaceful situation with the prior administration's conditions. Recruitment for Border Patrol, ICE, and the Coast Guard is reportedly up, with the Coast Guard focusing on border and drug interdiction, seizing 26 tons of cocaine and millions of fentanyl doses in two months. The speaker alleges that the claim that the current administration deported more people is false, accusing them of counting processed individuals allowed into the country as deportations. The speaker asserts that the former president deported over 250 known terrorists, thousands of foreign terrorist organization and gang members, and hundreds of thousands of people in the country illegally. $30 billion in tariffs were collected through CBP, along with millions in fines and penalties. Mexico is now accepting more returnees, with the president of Mexico allegedly turning around over half a million people before they reached the border due to the former president's actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, you are a % correct. The border is 99.99% safe, under control. You have completely reversed the entire situation. In fact, the day before yesterday, I was down in El Paso, and those border patrol agents are so impacted by how you have changed things in a year. They have put up huge pictures that say, under the Biden administration, the mobs of people that were pushing through razor wire and trampling children and the chaos and the violence that was happening at that same location, they have a picture there that says, this is what the Biden administration looks like, and this is what the Trump administration looks like. It's peaceful. People who do business between Mexico and America are coming through. They're doing it legally. They're following the law, and it's all because of what you've done and what you've empowered them to do. The recruitment for border patrol is through the roof. For ICE agents, they wanna be a part of ICE because they recognize they actually get to do their jobs. I have the Coast Guard too. Coast Guard recruitment is up over 20% just in the last sixty days. Everybody wants to be a part of what the heritage heritage is of this country. We've repositioned the entire coast guard fleet to focus on border and drug interdiction. As we've secured the border, the cartels have gone to the water and are going out in maritime waters to move their drugs into this country. The coast guard, just in the last two months, has taken into custody over a 26 tons of cocaine, millions of of doses of fentanyl. It's just amazing. And the aliens that they are deporting is incredible too. We've been working with all of them. The one thing that I wanna point out is the fake news has been saying that Biden deported more people than you, and it's an absolute lie. And they're letting the Biden administration get away with manipulating and cooking the books. What they're counting for the Biden administration is every single person that came to that border that they processed and let into this country. They're allowing Biden to say that was a deportation just by processing somebody and letting them come into the country. It's absolutely false. It's not true at all. You have deported over 250 known terrorists. You've deported thousands of foreign terrorist organization and gang members, hundreds of thousands of people that were in this country illegally. We've collected $30,000,000,000 worth of tariffs through CBP, and we've also collected millions and millions hundreds of millions of fines and penalties from people that overstayed here in this country. So I just wanna thank you. You you've been a game changer. I wanna thank Pete for his leadership at DOD and what they've done. I wanna thank Marco for his diplomacy and getting us travel documents into these countries. Mexico has finally come to the table, and now it's going to take a lot more people that we're able to send back to that country. And the president of Mexico told me, sir, she turned around over a half a million people in Mexico before they ever reached our border. We should be counting those as deportations because they never even made it to the border Mhmm. Because she turned them around because you forced her to. So those are all people that never even came here because they got the message because you were so aggressive. So thank you for what you're doing, and every day we get to get up and do jobs that matter, and we appreciate that.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

16/ SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler: Issued record 26,000 loans to small businesses in Trump's first 100 days. Manufacturing loans up 38%, startups up 54%. Modified loan applications to require citizenship verification. https://t.co/90WQUauIoQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Under the current administration, Main Street is reportedly thriving, with a record 26,000 Small Business Administration loans approved in the first 100 days, benefiting 2,000 small businesses weekly. Small businesses are said to create two out of every three new jobs, and manufacturing loans have increased by 38%, totaling 1,500 loans. Startups have increased by 54%, and businesses with fewer than five employees have increased by 95%. Manufacturers are grateful for the administration's support, which is bolstering industries from pharmaceuticals to aerospace. Plans are underway to increase manufacturing loans. The convergence of technology and manufacturing is creating a "new collar boom." One factory in Georgia with fewer than 50 employees is producing machines for Israel's Iron Dome. Additionally, $3 billion in contracts were cut due to Doge's work, saving taxpayers money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, it's such an honor to serve in this administration. And on behalf of Main Street America, our 34,000,000 small businesses that make up 99% of all businesses in this great nation, I have to tell you under your leadership, Main Street is open for business again. They're thriving and they're investing. And the data that we have at the Small Business Administration, the loans that we're putting out, a record 26,000 loans in your first hundred day days means that 2,000 small businesses each week are receiving that funding, that investment in the future. Small businesses create two out of every three new jobs in this country, and we've already seen under your leadership, the jobs economy is back, manufacturing jobs are We've seen a 38% increase in manufacturing loans. We put out 1,500 manufacturing loans in your first hundred days. We saw start ups increase by 54%, and we saw businesses under five people increase by 95%. So your leadership on the economy matters to every region of this great nation. I'll tell you on the manufacturing front. I'm not on a national manufacturing tour. We've met with 250 manufacturers. And as I walk through the factory floors, they all ask me to thank you for fighting for their jobs, for these industries, and for the people who are creating things from pharmaceuticals to aerospace to to food and all these essentials that this nation needs to be independent and strong. And to that end, I'm working with congress. We'll be announcing tomorrow an upsizing of our manufacturing loans to make sure that that economic engine because 98% of all manufacturers are small businesses. It's incredible to walk through these factories that are really creating what you had in your first administration. The blue collar boom, it's now a new collar boom because it's the intersection of technology and manufacturing and what they can create for our war fighters, for our aerospace, for pharmaceuticals with less than three to 500 employees, sometimes a hundred employees. I was at a factory in Georgia on Monday that is creating machines to help with the iron dome in Israel, less than 50 employees. This is the engine of our economy. It's the heartbeat of our communities. It's the small businesses that helped elect you because they needed your economic agenda. So thank you, mister president. It's such an honor, and congratulations congratulations on an epic hundred days. I do have to thank Elon. I do wanna note, we just cut $3,000,000,000 in contracts because of Doge's work. That's $3,000,000,000 that hardworking families that won't have to work until April 15 to pay for the waste, fraud, and abuse that we continue to find in this government on behalf of taxpayers. So, again, thank you, Elon, as well.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

17/ Elon Musk: Identified $150B in government waste. The Trump Gold Card will be operational within days. "This could be the greatest administration since the founding of the country." https://t.co/aQZxigzbVB

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the American people voted for secure borders, safe cities, and sensible spending, and that is what they have gotten. According to the speaker, his administration has accomplished more in the first hundred days than any administration before ever, period. He believes this portends well for the rest of the administration, and that this could be the greatest administration since the founding of the country. Another speaker thanks him for his help and sacrifices, stating he has been treated unfairly, but the vast majority of people in this country respect and appreciate him. The speaker claims he opened up a lot of eyes as to what can be done. He is invited to stay as long as he wants. The speaker also states that a lot of stuff is being worked on, and the number of accomplishments could be doubled or tripled.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, they say I wear a lot of hats. And as you can see, it's true. Even my hat has a hat. So, you know, the American people voted for secure borders, safe cities, and sensible spending. And that's what they've gotten. A tremendous amount has been accomplished in the first hundred days. As everyone has said, it's more than been accomplished in any administration before ever, period. So this portends very well for what will happen for the rest of the administration. I think this could be the greatest administration since the founding of the country. Speaker 1: We all wanna thank you for your help. You really have sacrificed a lot. You've been treated very unfairly. Speaker 0: Well, listen, I do like to rent my cars, which is not great. You know? It would be better. Speaker 1: You have been treated unfairly. But the vast majority of people in this country really respect and appreciate you. And this whole room can say that very strongly. You've really been a tremendous help. You opened up a lot eyes as to what can be done. And we just wanna thank you very much. And, you know, you're invited to stay as long as you want. At some point, I guess, he wants to get back home to his car. Done. They said, oh, it couldn't have been more. And a lot of, you know, a lot of stuff is being worked on. That number could be doubled and even tripled. A lot of things are being worked on that we don't count yet because it's not quite there. But you've done a fantastic job, and we appreciate it very much, Elon. You know that?

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

18/ DNI Tulsi Gabbard: Working to end "weaponization and politicization" of intelligence community. Found 700 "alien terrorists" plus 600 with terrorist ties. ODNI 25% smaller, saving $150M by closing DEI "slush fund." Sent criminal referrals for classified leaks. https://t.co/u3bLVJUEUU

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is leading the intelligence community to end weaponization and politicization, building a lean and effective organization. Following the designation of cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, the National Counterterrorism Center is prioritizing terrorists and gang members entering the country, working with the DEA, DHS, and FBI. Recently, 700 alien terrorists with ties to MS-13 and the Sinaloa cartel were found, and almost 600 individuals with ties to other terrorists who illegally crossed the border and claimed asylum were identified. The ODNI has been reduced by 25%, and a human capital office, allegedly a slush fund for DEI initiatives, was shut down, saving $150 million. An additional $2.6 billion in savings will be announced from other programs and contracts. Three criminal referrals were sent for illegal leaks of classified intelligence, with 11 more under investigation. Sixty-seven security clearances have been revoked. Declassification of documents related to the JFK assassination continues, with more coming for the assassinations of Senator Kennedy and MLK. Investigations continue into election integrity, FISA abuses, and Crossfire Hurricane.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Grateful to, have the privilege of leading the intelligence community towards ending the weaponization politicization of the intelligence community that's gone on for far too long, and and building out what is truly a lean and agile and effective intelligence community that is helping you deliver that promise to the American people of safety, security, and freedom. So mister president, I'd like to highlight just three of the areas where we are helping to support your leadership and your work in making America safe again and bringing about these changes. First of all, because of your designation of cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, I took immediate action with our National Counterterrorism Center to prioritize their focus on those terrorists and gang members who are trying to enter our country through legal or illegal means and to seek out those who already are here in our country because of the Biden administration's four years of open borders. We've been, working, very closely with, your great attorney general's team at the DEA to get these known cartels into our systems to be able to stop them at the border and turning over names to Department of Homeland Security, and the FBI to be able to find those who are already here in our country. Just the other day, we found 700 alien terrorists who have ties to MS thirteen, Trinidad and Sinaloa cartel. Just yesterday, our NCTC identified almost 600 individuals with ties to other terrorists who came through our borders illegally, claimed asylum, and under the Biden administration were paroled here, within our borders. Secondly, mister president, like too many organizations in the federal government, the ODNI has become very bloated with too much waste and abuse going on within the organization. We've done a few immediate steps. We are doing more. The ODNI is 25% smaller and more lean today than it was when I walked in the door and when you took office. Secondly, we have, just this morning, actually shut down a human capital office. As soon as you issued the executive order to stop all DEI activities, we did that, shut down the DEI office. But we discovered this human capital office that was essentially a slush fund for DEI initiatives hidden under the guise of human capital that closed down this morning, saving taxpayers a hundred $50,000,000. We'll soon be announcing an additional $2,600,000,000 in savings with other programs and contracts that do nothing to ensure our national security interests. And lastly, we're working every day to hold the deep state accountable to end the politicization, weaponization of the intelligence community. This past week, I sent three criminal referrals for illegal and unauthorized leaks to the media of classified intelligence for prosecution. We have 11 more that are under investigation. We've revoked at your direction sixty seven secondurity clearances, and we continue the work of declassifying documents as we have already around JFK assassination. We have more coming for the assassination of, Bobby's father, senator Kennedy, and MLK assassination. And we continue our extensive investigations around exposing the very serious issues we have related to election integrity, illegal abuses of FISA, Crossfire, Hurricane, and others. Mister president, under your leadership, we are working every day to bring about that transparency and accountability that the American people deserve. So thank you for the opportunity.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

19/ EPA's Lee Zeldin: • Canceled $22B in grants, launching "largest deregulatory action in history" • House voting today to remove California's special emissions authority • Goal: Lower home heating costs, make cars affordable again https://t.co/dGXGptSjc4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Under the Trump EPA, the Green New Deal is dead, and it's possible to both protect the environment and grow the economy. There are 100 environmental accomplishments in the first 100 days of the Trump EPA, which have been released to the media. The Trump EPA is launching the largest deregulatory action in the history of the country. $22 billion worth of grants have been canceled. The House of Representatives is voting on Congressional Review Act bills considering the EPA waivers given to California's tailpipe emissions, arguing there should be one national standard. This speaker claims that this administration has assembled the greatest national security team ever seen in their 27 years associated with the United States Army.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, at the Biden EPA, the Green New Deal was raging. At the Biden EPA, we saw billions of tax dollars burning. At the the Biden EPA, we saw industries suffocating. But at the Trump EPA, the Green New Deal is dead. At the Trump EPA, we know that we can both protect the environment and grow the economy. I have 13 pages of accomplishments from our first one hundred days in here, and in it, part of it is a hundred environmental accomplishments at the Trump EPA. You don't have to take my word for it. We released it to the media this morning. Every single day that president Trump is in this office, there will be a major environmental accomplishment every single day of the Trump administration. At the Trump EPA, we're also launching what is the largest deregulatory action in the history of the country. We're gonna be giving, our director of the OMB a a whole lot of work because we inherited a big mess from the Biden EPA. And working with Elon and Doge, I've canceled now $22,000,000,000 worth of grants. Now today is a a special day for many reasons. The biggest reason why we're here is that this is the one hundredth day of the most consequential historic first one hundred days in the history of this country. Today, while we're here, the House of Representatives is voting on Congressional Review Act bills considering the EPA waivers that were given to California's tailpipe emissions, where California set their own standards. But there should be one national standard, and right now, Congress on the house side is gonna be voting on that today. On a personal note, while this is a bit outside of the EPA jurisdiction, today is my last day serving in the United States Army. And I first signed up, in the towards the end of the nineties, and I've had a chance to see a lot of national security teams over the course of the last twenty seven years. There has never been a national security team ever assembled that had the backs of our warriors like this national security team right now. And we have never had a president so deeply committed towards ending foreign wars instead starting new ones. There's a reason, mister vice president, why everyone is racing to join our Department of Defense. We have a secretary of defense who, with all due respect to our great president, would probably rather be swimming with Navy SEALs right now, be running somewhere in The Middle East with our with our service members. And from our Secretary of Defense to our Secretary of State, our Vice President and more, I just wanna say thank you as a veteran of our military for assembling what is the greatest national security team that I have ever seen in my twenty seven years associated with the United States Army.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

20/ Education Secretary Linda McMahon: We're holding back funds from universities over anti-Semitism. Department staff has been reduced by 50%. Student loan collection is resuming after a 4-year pause. https://t.co/apzNBe5oAp

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Education has reduced staff by about 50% through a RIF program, closing district offices and consolidating for efficiency. Commissioners of Education are reportedly pleased with increased control over their states' education, anticipating improved test scores with their own programs. Proper enforcement of Title IX protections has been returned to schools. Funding to Columbia and other schools has stopped due to Title IX and Title VI infractions. These institutions are allegedly making campuses safer, addressing out-of-control antisemitism. Loan recollection on student loans delinquent since March 2020 will begin again, effective May 5. The goal is not punitive, but to help people get back into the right payment structure so they can improve their credit scores. There has been a $60 billion increase in student loan debt since 2020, totaling almost $1.7 trillion. The aim is to implement best practices in every state, incorporating AI to train new entrepreneurs and business leaders.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've worked so hard to try to fire myself. But we're certainly making great strides in that. We've we've Speaker 1: reduced the folks over at the Department of Education by about 50% now through our RIF program. And so we've closed a lot of the district offices, consolidated, so there are a lot fewer people working a lot more efficiently in the Department of Education. The Commissioners of Education in every state and I was at a meeting with them not too far along not too long ago for not only our states but our territories they are thrilled with the opportunity now to be able to have more control over the education in their states, to get rid of a lot of red tape and regulation that's kept them from doing what they're doing. So we're seeing, I think, great improvements. We'll see test scores, I believe. It'll take a bit for them to be able to go up, but I think now that they're going to have the opportunity to put in their own programs, we'll we'll see that grow. At the same time, we've been focused on higher education for our universities. We have we've returned proper enforcement of Title IX protections to schools. We have stopped funding to Columbia, for instance, and some other schools for not only Title IX but Title VI infractions. And those moving along. I think we've brought people to the table. They know that you're serious. You meant what you said. They're gonna make changes. They're making their campuses safer again. Antisemitism was just out of control in many of our universities. And so some tried to in fact, Harvard has sued, and they're saying that it's, you know, First Amendment infraction. No. This is civil rights safety on our campuses for our young students, you know, who are there. And with with Pam's help and the task force that we formed with HHS, with GSA, with other agencies, we're going to make sure that our campuses are safe. And so there's a lot of good work going on. I think one of the biggest things you'll be very happy to hear this, mister Vogt, that we are putting back into place collecting on our student loans that have been that have been delinquent since March of twenty twenty. Been no effort to recollect on those loans. So as of May 5, the letter goes out that the loan recollection is beginning again. So for those people who have borrowed money and who have not been paid, that's just not to be punitive. There are many ways that they can go online to understand how they can get back into the right payment structure. Because when they're in default, they can't buy a house, they can't buy a car because their credit scores are down. So it's helpful to them as well as to get this money back into the country. I mean, $60,000,000,000 of increased student loan debt since since 2020. And in total, we've got almost $1,700,000,000,000 in student debt. So we're gonna we're gonna start getting that back. And Scott and his team have been incredibly helpful. We appreciate that so very, very much. And so a lot's going on in the department. And what I would really like, as I'm firing myself, I'd like for you to be known as the education president because of the best in practice systems that we wanna put in every state to incorporate AI so that we are training these new entrepreneurs and business leaders in our country. We can't do it with the infrastructure we have in place today, so we have to be working on that at the same time. So we're going to be doing that. So thank you for your charge to elevate education so that we are providing for every student access to excellent education.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

21/ HHS Secretary RFK Jr: • Banning nine petroleum-based synthetic food dyes • Removing soda from food stamps program • "Operation Stork Speed" for baby formula quality • Ending fluoridation after IQ impact research • Autism study results by September https://t.co/3lV6g4s2nb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they are "making America healthy again" by banning petroleum-based synthetic food dyes, with the worst two to be banned within two months. They are working with Secretary Rollins on new dietary guidelines to replace the current 453-page guidelines, which they claim are based on "politicized science." The goal is to implement changes in school lunch programs by the next school year. They are also working to remove sodas and candy from the SNAP program, noting that 38% of children are diabetic or pre-diabetic, costing the country a trillion dollars annually. Arizona, West Virginia, Utah, and Indiana have applied for SNAP waivers. Utah was the first state to ban supplemental fluoride, and Florida may follow. They are working to change federal fluoride regulations based on a National Toxicity Program meta-review that found an inverse correlation between fluoride exposure and lowered IQ in children. The speaker says they are revamping GRAS standards to address the 10,000 ingredients in US food, compared to Europe's 400. They are launching Operation Stork Speed to ensure high-quality milk for children and have initiated an autism study, promising definitive answers on autism and other autoimmune diseases within a year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are already making America healthy again. We announced last week the ban on the nine petroleum based synthetic dyes, food dyes. Within two years, within two months, we're gonna ban the worst two of them. We I am working with secretary Rollins on dietary guidelines. The dietary guidelines that the Trump that the president Biden's administration gave us, 453 pages. They are basically unreadable, and they are the product of the same kind of politicized science that drove Froot Loops to the top of the Froot Bear. And we are we're gonna do real science, gold standard science. We're gonna develop within we have till December to do it, but we are working very, very fast together. We're gonna get it done by the end of the summer in time to drive change, major dramatic changes in the school foods, the school lunch programs over the next next school year. I'm working also with with secretary Rollins on the SNAP program and the to get sodas and and and candy off of the food stamp program. 10% of food stamps go to SNAP. And I wanna thank you for your courage. You are a business friendly president, probably the most business friendly in our history, but you're also willing to stand up to very, very powerful businesses, and you've shown that again and again. Secretary Rawlins had the soda industry come and knock on her door very much, very loudly, and they said to her, well, the SNAP program is not supposed to be about nutrition. She pointed out to them that there is no nutrition in a soda. And she they said, well, it's not supposed to be about nutrition. And she said to them, the name of the program is supplemental nutrition assistance program. So it is about nutrition. And we shouldn't you know, we have thirty eight percent of our kids who are diabetic or pre diabetic, and we are paying at both ends. We're paying for the food the food like substances that make them diabetic, and then they're we're paying we're being bankrupt. We're spending a trillion dollars a year on metabolic dysfunction. It's existential and it's not sustainable. We have I visited Arizona, West Virginia, Utah, and Indiana in the last two weeks who have all applied for snap waivers were encouraging, thanks to Brooke Brooke Brooke Rawlins' leadership. All the states who applied for those waivers. I also visited Utah, which is which is the first state to ban supplemental fluoride. Florida yesterday passed a bill to ban supplemental fluoride. I'm confident governor DeSantis is gonna sign that. I'm we are working Lee Zelda and I are working together to change the federal fluoride regulations, to change the recommendations, and we're looking at the science now. I wanna point out that in August, the National Toxicity Program, which was an arm of the NIH, did a meta review of all the science on fluoride and found that there's a direct inverse correlation between fluoride exposure and lowered IQ in children. So the more you get, the stupider you are. And we need smart kids in this country, and we need healthy kids. And thank you for your leadership. We're gonna get there. We're viewing the GRAS standards now to get we're revamping them to get 10,000 ingredients that are in our food. The Europeans only have 400 ingredients. We have 10,000. There are chemicals we know nothing about, and we are gonna stop that process, and then we're gonna go back and look at these chemicals and make the companies either get rid of them or to label them. We are we've launched Operation Stork Speed, and we're going full speed ahead to make sure that we have good, high quality milk for children. We have launched the autism study at your direction. By September, we'll have some of the first answers. Within six months of that, we will have definitive answers, not only for autism, but for the etiology of a whole range of autoimmune diseases that have become epidemic in our children.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

22/ Interior Secretary Doug Burgum: Opening land and offshore leases to "unleash American energy." First lease in "The Gulf of America" already sold. Coal resources on public lands worth estimated $8T. https://t.co/wXVurPKdgG

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump wisely declared a national energy emergency on his first day, reversing disastrous Biden policies rooted in climate ideology, which caused inflation, wars, and manufacturing decline. Energy security is vital for national security. America is back in the energy business, attracting capital and offering a chance to win the AI arms race against China, which has vastly increased its coal usage. The US has embraced baseload power and is leveraging its coal resources, estimated at $8 trillion on public lands. Leasing is occurring for oil, gas, timber, grazing, and critical minerals, generating revenue and jobs. America's 700 million acres of public surface and subsurface land, plus 2.5 billion offshore acres, hold resources for self-sufficient supply chains. China controls 85% of the refining for the top 20 critical minerals needed for defense and industry, so efforts are underway to regain business in this area. 41% of the southern border is within the Department of Interior. Theodore Roosevelt's 60-foot strip along the border, unused for years, has been transferred to the DOD for border security. Border patrol morale has improved significantly. A U.S. Wildlife Refuge was renamed in honor of Jocelyn Nongare, who was killed by illegal Venezuelan gang members.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, President Trump, on your first day in office, you wisely declared a national energy emergency. And this was, essential because it was a signal that we're gonna go a 80 degrees from the disastrous and dangerous Biden policies that were based on a climate ideology that was the root cause of the inflation in this country. It was the root cause of wars abroad. It was the root cause of of of our manufacturing disappearing from our country. We can't have energy security. Without energy security, we can't have national security, and you understood that. But now with everything that's flowed from that, dozens of other EOs that you've done, America is back in the energy business. As Chris said, there's been a signal that's sent around the world. Capital is flowing, coming back in. The smart money is coming to this country, and now you've given us a chance to win the AI arms race against China. We know we're up against a formidable competitor. China opened up 94 gigawatts of coal in the last year. That's more than all of California and all of New York combined in the last year. We've had presidents in the past by the administration that were running away again under this climate ideology. You've embraced baseload power in this country. I'll never forget standing in the East Room with you surrounded by, the coal miners around this country where you said, hey, big beautiful coal. We've as we work to try to identify the balance sheet of America, our earliest estimate is that the coal resources in America just on public lands could be worth $8,000,000,000,000 with a t. That was all gonna be taken off our balance sheet if we weren't gonna touch it. But now we're back in the business. I was 1,800 feet underground in a coal mine in Alabama a couple weeks ago. They do metal metallurgical coal. Without metallurgical coal, we can't produce steel. This is a plant this is an org a plant that would have been in a mining operation that would have been shut down under the by Biden administration. What we're doing here back in the business, we're doing leasing. We're leasing for oil and gas. We're leasing for timber with Brook Rollins. We're leasing for grazing. We're we're leasing for critical minerals, which is key. And when we lease the public lands appropriately and by the law to do that, we're bringing in revenue. We're bringing in jobs. We're helping strengthen America. And so we're treating our natural resources like the American balance sheet they are. And America's resources, the 700,000,000 acres of surface that's public, the 700,000,000 of subsurface, the 2,500,000,000 offshore, all contain what we need to have self sufficient supply chains. And so in this, we're focused deeply on critical minerals. The Biden administration has put us in a real predicament right now, the whole trade team, the whole cabinet. Susie is jumping in leadership across everybody in the National Energy Dominance Council. But of the top 20 critical and rare earth minerals that we need for defense, that we need for industry, China is controlling 85 of the refining for that. So we we are running at warp speed seven days a week try to put ourselves back in business in that way. So and I wanna just close out by saying a couple other things. One is is the border. Few people realize that 41% of the southern border is in Department of Interior. Then we've got a few more percent that come with Brooke and and with the Forest Service. But that's that's been a risk area. Part of the reason everyone's pouring into our country, Biden wasn't enforcing the the border laws. They definitely weren't enforcing it on public lands. And so, using a tying two presidents that had a great propensity for action, Theodore Roosevelt, in nineteen o seven, created a what was called the Roosevelt Reservation, 60 foot strip that go from Texas all the way to the Pacific Ocean because he was worried in some future state there might be smuggling. I don't think he was anticipating human smuggling and fentanyl trafficking, but that has been largely unused. You he gave us the authority to transfer that. And so working with Christie and working with Pete, we've transferred that to the the DOD. So transferring land from the other agencies like Interior to the Department of Defense, then as Pete said, they can do the detain and assist with the military. And having been down at the border multiple times in recent weeks, I can confirm everything Christy said. The enthusiasm, the morale of that group is exactly a % opposite of when Christy and I were down there as governors. I had border patrol people say that they were multigenerational service in that law enforcement that said, my wife and I are telling our children never to go into this thing to go in go into border patrol. People this time were saying, I got a 17 year old. As soon as they turn 18 year old, they're signing up. My wife is thrilled. They're going into law enforcement. They're so proud to be serving with you. Everybody I've met, whether it's in a coal mine or at the border, law enforcement, the one thing they say on those trips is, please thank President Trump from all of us, the change that you're making. And I want to say especially this became very dear when we, last week, renamed U. S. Wildlife Refuge in honor of Jocelyn Nongare. Jocelyn Nongare, of course, lost her life tragically to illegal Venezuelan gang members in this country in a horrific way. But her mother, Alexis, was at that ceremony. Her grandmother was there, and Jocelyn's great grandmother was there. The three other generations of that family were there. They all wanted to pass on their thank you too, and we've, we've secured her name forever as a sanctuary and and really is saying that every child, every 12 year old, every child in America should be safe, in their own communities. And you've you've, dedicated a beautiful piece on the coast in honor of her. So

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

23/ State Secretary Marco Rubio: Peace talks with several countries scheduled for next week. Cracking down on student visas for anti-American activities. 47 wrongfully detained Americans returned in first 100 days. https://t.co/IiWre6Umqo

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker credits the president for assembling a great team and for decisive action, contrasting it with past administrations' slow processes. Foreign policy is now centered on benefiting America, prioritizing actions that make the country stronger, safer, and richer. The State Department eliminated funding for "crazy stuff" like puppet shows, reorganized to empower embassies, and shut down an office that censored Americans' social media posts, planning to return dossiers to those monitored. The U.S. is seeking cooperation from other countries to take back their citizens who are in the U.S. illegally and is actively searching for third countries to accept "despicable human beings" to keep America safe. Student visas are being revoked for individuals who come to the U.S. to cause disruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That have come here. First of all It's true. Mister so it better be good, and I'll be short as well. A couple things, mister president. I think you deserve a lot of credit for two things. The first is assembling this great team of people, some of whom I've owned for a long time, others who I've gotten to know during this period of time. But putting together a team, not just of talented individuals but that work well together, is something never going to be reported on in the media or fully seen. But it happens every single day. For the most part, I interact with almost everyone around this table to some at some level. And because of Secretary Kennedy, I'm afraid to eat anything. So The President: He's too funny. The He said Tootsie Rolls are okay in moderation. The Tootsie Rolls. But it's a great team. And here's the second, and I tell this to people all the time, this is incredibly rewarding service and you hear it in everyone's voices. Traditionally, in the past and it's one of the problems we got in as a country is Presidents would say, Okay, let's go do something, and then they would have to do a study, and then a study on the study, and then a long internal deliberative process. And by the time you got to it, it was too late or somebody had forgotten it. And this administration, it's moving. You know the direction because you know why you were elected. The American people elected you very clearly. And basically, it's measured, I used to say, by days and weeks. Now it's measured by hours and minutes. But action is happening. And that's what people want to see. And let me talk about foreign policy in particular because I'm not sure this is fully appreciated. We have we this President inherited thirty years of foreign policy that was built around what was good for the world. In essence, the decisions we made as a government in trade and foreign policy was basically, is it good for the world? Is it good for the global community? And under president Trump, we're making a foreign policy now that's, was it good for America? I was appointed by you and confirmed by the Senate to be the head of the United States Department of State. Not the World Department of State, not the Global Department of State, the United States Department of State. And what that means is our foreign policy is guided by three things. Does it make America stronger? Does it make America safer? And does it make America richer? If something doesn't do one of those three things, and hopefully all three of those things, we're not doing it. Now we went out and hired a consulting firm to help us organize ourselves. Luckily, were free. They're called the Department of Government Efficiency. And they helped us do a couple things. Number one is our foreign aid. We were funding some crazy stuff. Crazy. Crazy stuff. You tell me, how does a puppet show in some country around the world make us stronger, safer, and more prosperous. So we got rid of puppet shows and a bunch of other things. I'm sure there are very good puppet shows, and I'm sure that a bunch of charities in the world can go pay for it, but the American taxpayers should not. We've also, by the way, Mr. President, under your direction, reorganized the Department of State. We had offices within offices within offices that didn't even know they existed themselves, not to mention the rest of them. And so we've begun to reorganize that as a way to be able to empower our embassies and our ambassadors embassies and our ambassadors and our regional bureaus to do what many of them signed up to do. We have a great team of ambassadors you've appointed. They're coming online every single day. Very talented people. Very talented people are involved. Something else we got out of the business of why it wasn't widely reported or maybe it was. We had a depart we had an office in the Department of State whose job it was to censor Americans. And by the way, they're I'm not gonna say who it is. I'll leave it up to them. There's at least one person at this table today who had a dossier in that building of social media posts to identify them as purveyors of disinformation. We have these dossiers. We are going to be turning those over to these individuals. We can follow-up on the media then. Well, we are going to turn over these dossiers to the individuals, and they'll decide whether they want to disclose it or not. But just think about it, the Department of State of the United States had set up an office to to monitor the social media posts and commentary of American citizens to identify them as vectors of disinformation when we know that the best way to combat disinformation is freedom of speech and transparency. And so that's what we're gonna be in the business of doing. We're not gonna have an office that does that. Beyond that, mister president, and this all move quickly because this has been a team effort, we have gone to countries all over the world and said, hey, you want good relations with The United States, you need to take back your people that are here illegally. And we've had historic cooperation. Beyond that, and I say this unapologetically, we are actively searching for other countries to take people from third countries. So we are actively not just El Salvador. We are working with other countries to say, we want to send you some of the most despicable human beings to your countries. Will you do that as a favor to us? And the further away from America, the better, so they can't come back across the border. I'm not apologetic about it. We are doing that if the president was elected to keep America safe and to get rid of a bunch of perverts and pedophiles and child rapists out of our country. Here's something else we've done. We stopped giving student visas to people who are coming here to burn down our universities and take over libraries and harass people. Why are we giving student visas to people who are coming here to create disruption? And we've taken away the student visas of people that come here to do that. It's simple. If you're coming to America to to start riots, we're not gonna give you we're gonna take away your student visa. And by the way, every country in the world that I travel, 14 countries in fourteen weeks, you know what they all say to me? Yes. That's what we would do too. So the only people who seem to disagree with us are a handful of federal judges and a bunch of crazy people who get paid to write and and report. So, anyway, we're getting rid of that.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. The first 100 days of Trump's second term have been truly amazing. If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

President Trump just hosted a high-stakes cabinet meeting at the White House. One by one, top Cabinet members delivered Major Announcements — directly reporting to the American people. Here’s everything you should know (and no joke, it gets crazier the further you read): 🧵 https://t.co/0opCrIGDex

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Here's the link to the full cabinet meeting: https://www.youtube.com/live/wn2XtufOAHc?si=O2pRlRt_eSP911ll

View Full Interactive Feed