TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @kayleighmcenany
reSee.it AI Summary
I spoke with an eyewitness who was walking down the street just minutes before the "person of interest" in Charlie Kirk's assassination was captured on footage. Their car and aunt's driveway are also visible in the newly released video as authorities continue their investigation.
@kayleighmcenany - Kayleigh McEnany
🚨 NEWS: As authorities track down the assassin, I spoke with an eyewitness whose car and aunt's driveway are seen in the newly released footage of the "person of interest" in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. This eyewitness was walking down the street minutes before the "person of interest" is seen walking toward campus.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"It's not my driveway. It's my aunt's driveway." "I parked there probably ten minutes before he walked by." "I had not seen this footage till just now." "This is his Ring camera." "the killer walked down that street nineteen minutes after you were there." "I believe it was 02:30 local time." "We got there probably about 01:45." "National Guard was going up and down the street." "there's maybe another suspect." "no information to suggest there's another suspect." "the first two that they arrested were released." "So I'm not suggesting there were two. I'm suggesting that the one that we thought was the one they had in custody was then released, and then the second one was released." "FBI was swarming that street when you went back to this location two hours later."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I do wanna linger on a moment for what you just told us, and I'm gonna ask the team to pull back up that surveillance footage that we've gotten from TMZ from those neighborhood cameras. You said that in that footage is your driveway, and you parked there at 11:30AM. We know this footage that you're looking at was taken at 11:49AM. So so you would have been on that street, that driveway, 19
Speaker 1: Right across. Yeah. It's not my driveway. It's my aunt's driveway. Parking lot was very full.
He's walking he's walking in front of my aunt's house there right now. My cousin's house is the driveway that is taking that photo and my CRV, the gray CRV in the distance there is that is my car. I parked there probably ten minutes before he walked by, and I had not seen this footage till just now. And I'm I it just keeps so many things that keep, linking up. It's really astonishing to me.
And then then we went back to this house afterwards. They thought they had the the shooter. So I took a friend of mine. We went back to my aunt's house. He said, well, we'll just hang out here for a while.
And, and and before long, the people were combing the backyard as you saw. She had the footage of that, and and pretty soon helicopters are overhead. And so this is very, very local to me. Very I mean, not only is it Utah, but it's kind of my neighborhood where I spent so much of my childhood and all of my relatives. I this is this is really astonishing.
It's been a I got up yesterday morning at at 06:00 to drive up and and meet Charlie, and and I haven't been I haven't been to bed since then because it's just one thing after another after another, and so astonishing that this could happen in Utah. And, yeah, all of these things that are coming to life. Yeah. Mean,
Speaker 0: you say this you say this is local. I I just wanna point out, I mean, you can't get more local than your aunt's driveway, which is there, your gray CRV.
Speaker 1: That's
Speaker 0: I I just wanna try to gather some information right now. Do you know anything about the cameras beside? Have you observed the Ring cameras there? Do we think that there could be additional angles? We know the FBI was swarming your street when you went back to this location two hours later.
What can you tell us about the camera situation or anything you may know about what it's like to walk down that street?
Speaker 1: So you've got the you've got the the cameras that are on this side of the street that are taking the footage that you're looking at. On the other side of the street, they're older homes. They don't have any any any camera surveillance on the other side. So I think what I think what you're seeing there, and I I know the end of I mean, he's my age. He's my first cousin.
He lives in that house, and this is his Ring camera. And, really, it's I'm just, like, blown away right now.
Speaker 0: I would be pretty blown away as well. I mean, the killer walked down that street nineteen minutes after you were there, and you returned to that location. I believe it was 02:30 local time. So it would have been, correct me if I'm wrong, two hours after the shooting. When you came back two hours later, the FBI was swarming that street.
Do you have any indication at what time the FBI and law enforcement got to that location? Because it seems like there's some pretty critical evidence to collect right in front of your aunt's driveway.
Speaker 1: Yeah. We got there probably probably about 01:45 is is about the time that we got back to her house, and and it was a half hour, forty five minutes later that someone said, hey. There's there are military guys in the backyard. And and National Guard was was going up and down the street. And then I got a call from the person who owns this house, my cousin Sam, and he said, hey.
I've I've I've got some connections to the military. They said or to the police department. They said that there's maybe another suspect, so just lock the doors just in case. And, of course, this was after the shooting. So, yeah, just right there.
And and that would have been around two 02:15, 02:30.
Speaker 0: I see. Any indication you mentioned another suspect? I mean, that's the first. We have no information to suggest there's another suspect. We also have no information to suggest that this is the only individual involved in this.
Did you ever hear anything else from neighbors? I've seen any any anything else suspicious right there in front of where your car was parked?
Speaker 1: No. I mean, we were standing we were standing in that driveway for for fifteen, twenty minutes talking. Because we we were under the impression that the shooter had been apprehended. And that's why that's why they said, you know, maybe there's a second suspect. But there wasn't the the first two that they arrested were, you know, that didn't pan out.
So I'm not suggesting there were two. I'm suggesting that the one that we thought was the one they had in custody was then released, and then the second one was released. So but yeah.
@kayleighmcenany - Kayleigh McEnany
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Vance Boelter now faces federal charges, which are death penalty eligible, in the murder of Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband. ⬇️ https://t.co/Uk8A5eO6bQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Vance Belter faces federal charges, including stalking and murder, in connection with the death of Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband. The murder charges are death penalty eligible at the federal level. The DOJ source stated that the US Attorney for Minnesota has been heavily involved, with federal law enforcement prioritizing the case.
The Trump administration's involvement is noted as crucial to the quick filing of federal charges, which will be pursued first, though local murder charges remain. The rise in political violence is addressed, with a congresswoman stating that cases against congressmen and women have risen from 700 in 2016 to 9,000. The increase in hate is attributed to the Internet, social media, and potential foreign adversaries stoking conflict. Threats against public servants are considered a serious issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's some news. Federal charges against Vance Belter and the killing of house speaker in Minnesota, Melissa Hortman and her husband. Amazing police work after the shooting at the Hoffman residence. Police just proactively thought to go to a wellness check at the Hortman home, and that is where they encountered the suspect who is now charged counts one and two with stalking. This is on the federal level.
Counts three and four murder charges that are death penalty eligible. Not at the state level, but now these federal charges make him death penalty eligible. Nicole Parker, a source at DOJ told me that this US attorney for Minnesota, we've been watching Joe Thompson. He's been an FBI command center with his entire team. When this crime occurred, the entire weekend, he has not once gone home.
Federal law enforcement from top to bottom has been on this. And the Trump administration in particular, they say this speaks to their involvement to get federal charges this quickly.
Speaker 1: Absolutely crucial in this investigation. When I initially saw the news break, you know, we don't know all of the facts. We don't know all of the evidence, but we knew, obviously, that there were going to be local charges. I cannot tell you how important it is that we have president Trump in the office and that we have Pam Bondi, the attorney general of you know, she is head of department of justice, and they are not going to let him get away with anything. He obviously has been charged on the local level, but these additional counts on the federal level, he is going to face those first.
And they will be working these investigations simultaneously. It doesn't mean that the the local charges go away. Those murder charges do not go away. But, again, title 18 US code twenty two sixty one, stalking charges. Title eighteen nine twenty four j, murder using a firearm, which you mentioned is death penalty eligible.
This administration, they will go for the death penalty, and that is what this individual deserves. What he did is sick. It is evil. I do not care what side of the political spectrum you stand on. No form of political violence is okay.
No form of violence, period, is okay in our country. And I am so glad to see that they are being very, very aggressive, and he will be held accountable.
Speaker 0: Nicole, to that point, they they called it the most recent example of the trend of political violence. Amy Klobuchar, who's personal friends with Melissa Hortman, I believe she had dinner with her just before this happened. She made the point this weekend that in 02/2016, there were a 700 cases of political violence against congressmen and women. There are now nine thousand. What happened over the last few years?
Speaker 1: There is so much hate going on in our nation, and I'm telling you it is being fueled by a lot of these I mean, we're seeing it with these riots. We're seeing people that are hating on law enforcement, people hating each other. I personally believe a lot of it stems back to the Internet, social media, and people stoking flames of hate and violence. And, again, I wouldn't be
Speaker 0: shocked if there's outside foreign adversaries that
Speaker 1: are trying to rile up our our nation and create conflict. If they can create conflict with between each other, that's what they want. But, again, these charges against public servants I've worked investigations for the FBI, threats against senators in Florida. It is very serious, and they do not deserve this. No one should be in fear of their life because they are serving.
reSee.it AI Summary
I had a 1 hour, 15 minute call with Vladimir Putin. He expressed strongly that he will respond to Ukraine's recent attack on the airfields. I found the conversation to be good, but it won't lead to immediate peace.
@kayleighmcenany - Kayleigh McEnany
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: President Trump had a 1 hour, 15 minute call with Vladimir Putin. The Russian president said "very strongly" that "he will have to respond to the recent attack [by Ukraine] on the airfields." Trump characterized the call as "a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace." ⬇️
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump announced on Truth Social that he spoke with Russian President Putin for an hour and fifteen minutes. They discussed Ukraine's attacks on Russian airplanes and other attacks from both sides. Putin stated he will have to respond to the airfield attacks.
Trump and Putin also discussed Iran and its nuclear weapons program, agreeing that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Putin offered to participate in discussions with Iran to help reach a rapid conclusion, with Trump stating Iran has been slow-walking their decision.
The conversation occurred after Ukrainian and Russian representatives met in Istanbul to discuss swapping injured soldiers, but admitted there is no immediate end of peace in sight. Some believe Putin is testing Trump's administration to see how far he can push. Others question Trump's ability to influence Putin, as the U.S. has limited leverage over Russia. There are also concerns about Putin's actions beyond Ukraine, including construction on the Estonian border.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we have some breaking news. President Trump announcing he has just spoken with Russian president Vladimir Putin. He wrote this on True Social. I just finished speaking by telephone with president Vladimir Putin of Russia. The call lasted approximately one hour and fifteen minutes.
We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes by Ukraine and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides. It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace. President Putin did say and very strongly that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields. Those were those Ukrainian attacks on the airfields with the drones. We also discussed Iran and the fact that time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons, which must be made quickly.
I stated to president Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. And on this, I believe that we were in agreement. President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could perhaps be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion. It is my opinion, the president continued, that Iran has been slow walking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time. A few interesting notes here.
First, just yesterday in Istanbul, you had the Ukrainian side meet with the Russian side, and they were talking about swapping injured soldiers, but they admitted there is no immediate end of peace in sight, an immediate ceasefire. Not only that, we know that Russia is a close ally of Iran. They partner together strategically, militarily. So any assistance on that front could push Iran perhaps into an agreement. So two interesting notes there.
And, Ari, this all comes against the backdrop of president Trump saying, I'll know in two weeks whether Putin is serious, and he said that about about a week and a half ago. So this development coming as he's really prodding Putin to push towards peace.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And it doesn't sound like there's gonna be any prospect of peace between Ukraine and Russia if there were. If the president had any inclination from president Putin that there was something encouraging, we'd have seen it in that true social. Its absence speaks volumes. Look, I think the only way to get peace between Ukraine and Russia is for Ukraine to continue to bring the war into Russia.
That strike against the 40 Russian long range bombers was instrumental in telling Russian people and the Russian government, there's a cost to you for continuing your attacks in Ukraine. You need a stalemate in order for two parties to come to a peace terms. Right now, there's been an imbalance until this recent Ukrainian attack inside Russia. I don't know if the Ukrainians can sustain it though. And if you're Russia, you might wanna just continue to keep the attacks going because you think you can win.
That's why I think this was very risky for president Trump to think he could be the peacemaker. America's strong. President Trump is strong. But we can't do everything around the world. And I think if Russia and Ukraine won't make peace, we can't do it for them.
Speaker 0: Kaylee, interestingly, in in the middle of that true socialist, president Putin did say and very strongly that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields. I'm sure that caught the ear of Zelenskyy.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. And I think that one thing to Trump's credit is we have full confidence that both Putin and Iran, all these other countries that he's dealing with, know for a fact that Donald Trump is not messing around. I think what's happening here is Putin is deliberately testing the bounds to see how far he can push Trump, how far he can push this administration before receiving a really harsh rebuke. But Donald Trump is not messing around. And I think that these countries know that.
The American people know that, and that's why they elected him to handle our foreign policy.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And, Laurie, this comes against the background of the hill. The Russia Hawks are meeting today. It's a bipartisan group. It's Blumenthal and Graham about potential sanctions on Russia.
You know, notably, I would I would I always point out president Trump on his watch, you did not see Putin go into sovereign territory. You did see that with his predecessor. You saw that with president Biden. There was an absence for years. So there is a respect there that could be leveraged by president Trump.
Speaker 3: Yeah. And he's talked about that too. You know, we didn't see the issue in The Middle East. Donald Trump was in the White House, we didn't see an issue with Russia, in by in large part when he was in the White House. I interviewed last week, on my show, general Keith Kellogg, who is a special envoy to Russia and Ukraine.
And when he was talking about the discussions that have been had, that he was privy to between these two, countries, he says Ukraine is very clear on what their parameters are, where they are, and what it would take for them to come to a a peace agreement. Russia is not. He said they will not actually give us any framework to use. And so I think that's the needle that president Trump is trying to thread. If there's anyone who can thread that needle, if there's anyone, to Kaylee's point, who can tell the rest of the world, I mean business, and they know he means business, it's president Donald j Trump.
And I'm still hopeful that we're gonna see peace.
Speaker 0: Keith Kellogg is the perfect person to talk to, Emily, because there's the public conversation where president Trump is broadcasting one message. The private conversation with the world leader is very, very different, and sometimes we've seen that spillover in Oval Office meetings we've covered here. But how he talks to Putin, know from talking to Kellogg, it's it's going to be in a tough manner. Kellogg has stories about him picking up the phone, talking to the Taliban, to Bardar saying, do not harm the head on an American troop, and thereafter, many, many months, not a single American troop was harmed. Those kinds of hard conversations are the hour and a half ones that happened behind the scenes.
Speaker 4: Yeah. And I think we've caught glimpses of that in the public eye of exactly who the president is. He's the same off air as he is on air. And I think while that's many may have surprised members of the public, it doesn't surprise those who look at him with respect and value the fact that he is authentically himself in every conversation. I'm grateful that you pointed out the the Ukraine point because I think specifically that Putin apparently talked about sort of a retaliation.
And I point that out that Ukraine bombed them because they were the ones that were invaded. This is an oversimplification, but it seems to me that Putin is sort of interested in an eye for an eye at every point of the way because to your point, Putin sees Ukraine as his territory. Like, nothing less than subsuming it back within his borders will suffice because to him, that's a loss. That was a lost territory this entire time. He sees it as as not sovereign.
So I'm not quite sure if that that approach and that perspective that Putin has is something workable on the Ukrainian side. Because it's like it's like a, you know, football penalties. I mean, he's never it's he's like, oh, I have to get them back for this. Wasn't it enough that you invaded? But clearly, it's not.
So tough road ahead. I agree that my faith is in our president to get it done if it's possible, but I think we still have a
Speaker 1: rock this is also where I question president Trump's ability to influence these events because president Putin does not care. And we, as Americans, we don't have much leverage over Russia. We're adversaries of Russia for the most part. We don't do a lot of commercial trade with Russia. So we don't have the leverage we have in other places that president Trump can use.
So I I think this is a lonely mission for president Trump, and he's gonna quickly come to the realization Putin's not listening. America doesn't have a lot of leverage. There are other priorities for The United States around this And
Speaker 3: he also said last week that something is off with Putin. Something is different about Vladimir Putin. So I'm I'm wondering if that's playing into this as well. Maybe it's a different Vladimir Putin than he dealt with the first term in office.
Speaker 1: Of course, it's the same Vladimir Putin he's always been.
Speaker 0: And Putin, it's worth noting. I know that all eyes are on Ukraine, but he is constructing on the border of Estonia. They call that the edge of the free world because that's where you start to get into NATO territory. Does he have designs beyond Ukraine? Let's certainly hope not, but we'll see.
More Outnumbered in a moment.
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm concerned about a bill in Illinois that would force homeschool parents to register their children and possibly submit teaching materials. It raises questions for those of us teaching Creation or beliefs about life beginning at conception. Can we trust the state with this power?
@kayleighmcenany - Kayleigh McEnany
🚨 Parents in Illinois are protesting a bill that would require homeschool parents to REGISTER their children and could potentially require submitting teaching materials to authorities. What if you are a parent that teaches Creation? What if you are a parent that teaches life begins at conception? Do you trust the state of Illinois to use this newfound power responsibly? ⬇️
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about government overreach in education, citing critical race theory, critical gender theory, and transgender policies in schools. They claim schools are hiding gender transitions from parents via parental secrecy policies.
The speaker questions the requirement to register children with schools and potentially disclose parental teaching methods. They worry about parents teaching creationism or the belief that life begins at conception being targeted.
The speaker does not trust the Illinois governor and state government, believing these policies will be weaponized against those with differing beliefs, similar to how adoption has allegedly been restricted for some Christians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think about the long arm of government and what it has done in our classrooms. First, it was critical race theory pushed on our children, then critical gender theory, then biological men and women's sports, locker rooms, they all get to be there. Then, oh, wait. Your son wants to become a daughter. We'll hide that from you because we have parental secrecy policies.
And now you want us to register our child with the school, which may include requiring parents to turn over what they're teaching. Well, what if you're a parent who says, I'm teaching creation to my child Right. And not evolution? What if you're a parent who's going to teach life begins at conception and a heartbeat begins at five weeks? What's gonna happen to you?
Do you trust JB Pritzker, the governor of Illinois and the state of Illinois to not come for you, this is a huge deal. Good for you for standing because mark my words, this will be weaponized the same way adoption has been pulled from underneath many Christians who want to adopt. The government will take advantage of this.
@kayleighmcenany - Kayleigh McEnany
🚨 Why did the State Department hold THERAPY SESSIONS for federal employees after Trump's election victory? QUESTION: How do they handle foreign adversaries if they can't handle democracy? ⬇️ https://t.co/r2NwpGZz66
Video Transcript AI Summary
A report claims the State Department used taxpayer funds for therapy sessions to help employees cope after Trump's election win. Congressman Darrell Issa is demanding details on the costs and frequency of these sessions, questioning the appropriateness of using government resources for employees' emotional distress over a democratic outcome. Concerns were raised about the professional capabilities of federal employees who struggle with such events. Reports indicate that some sessions involved emotional discussions and stress management techniques. Critics argue that this focus on feelings resembles college campus culture and could compromise the effectiveness of foreign service officers. The broader implications of these practices within the federal bureaucracy remain unclear, raising questions about accountability and priorities in government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A new report claims that the state department, listen to this, used taxpayer dollars, your money, to fund therapy sessions to help employees cope after Trump's win. These are federal employees. In California, congressman Darrell Issa is demanding a private briefing by the end of today on the alleged sessions. He wants answers on how much money they cost the department, how many took place. Have these types of therapy sessions for employees ever taken place before?
And if so, what events prompted them? Writing in a scathing letter to secretary Blinken, quote, I am concerned that the department is catering to federal employees who are personally devastated by the normal functioning of American democracy through the provision of government funded mental health counseling because Kamala Harris was not elected president of the United States. He continues, quote, it is disturbing that ostensibly non partisan government officials would suffer a personal meltdown over the results of a free and fair election. It is unacceptable that the department accommodates this behavior and subsidizes it with taxpayer dollars. You know, Todd, I immediately thought of my time in college campuses where kids are given emotional support at least during exam time.
Only difference, these are foreign service officers of the United States. How do they handle foreign adversaries if they can't handle democracy?
Speaker 1: That's the question, and I love every part of ICE's lead except for the following. Ostensibly nonpartisan government officials. ICE knows that he's being tongue in cheek with that. He's getting human language because 92.4% of the individuals in DC voted for 1 Kamala Harris. They're scared for their jobs because every part of DC, regardless of whether it's a Republican or Democrat administration, is Democrat.
I mean, everybody who works in those government offices is by and large a Democrat. They know Trump and Doge are coming after them. They're gonna lose their jobs if they don't tow the company line, which is being nonpartisan, which is what you're supposed to be in the first place.
Speaker 0: DC, one of 2 areas in the country that did not trend right, proving your point. Dagan, this part struck me too. This is a free beacon. Great reporting on their part. They say sources described one informal meeting held, for Near Eastern Affairs Bureau Staffers as a cry session over Trump's win.
An agency wide email also touted an insightful webinar where we delve into effective stress management techniques to help you navigate these challenging times. This is taxpayer money, and they're crying over Trump.
Speaker 2: These are the same type of people who won't go back into the office. Not one out of 24 agencies in 1 quarter last year had even half of the staff back in federal office buildings, not one. So you're asking to lose your job, quite frankly. But I do see the need in this if it alleviates the pain that friends and family members experience because these individuals have to basically find their therapy by attacking and yelling at people close to them, which I personally have experienced. Like, you know, getting phone calls and getting screamed at about past deportations.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I like them. It's bigger than one agency. The free beacon also reports this. But the short answer is we won't change that because those are one of our core values.
We're not going to sell out those values to anyone. We're not going to be bullied changing them. It goes on. But look, the port the part I was trying to highlight on that screen was one US official with knowledge of the session said that during the Biden Harris term in office, there have been an overemphasis on people's feelings often with the college campus like fervor. Yeah.
This is the federal government.
Speaker 3: It's the federal government. You can imagine how appealing this is to foreign agents in the country. That you've got foreign worker, you know, the our own foreign service workers who are vulnerable, who are crying during the day, who as because they hate who became became president. They hate what the country is doing. Suddenly, they become, I think, a more viable mark if you wanna get somebody who's who's unhappy.
But I really like ISAAC asking what materials were used in these sessions and what was the agenda. Because they're not talking about trying to get over something. They're organizing. That's what I contend, having come from the left. You get people together and there is a a gathering of trying to understand what your feelings are.
It's always about organizing, how to get back at people, how to make something as you want it to be. It is not about coping. It is about how to resist. This is why I love this. What materials are used?
What was the agenda? Are you doing this overseas? That kind of stuff. And that's what we're gonna find out. It's gonna be very, very, educational.
Speaker 0: Emily, what kills me is what we don't know. Because we know the state department cry sessions. We know from 3 weeks ago, FEMA official was skipping over Trump houses. What don't we know that happens in this vast bureaucracy? Totally.
I I January 20th cannot come fast enough, first of all. I also wanna say that if we get an answer and if the answer is no. No. No. It was free and
Speaker 4: it was voluntary, I want you all to remember that you paid for it anyway because anyone that went to that meeting, you were paying their salary and you were paying for any materials that were used. And did they take leave for it? We have baked into our system appropriate leave that if someone is suffering a mental issue and needs to to remove themselves from work, that's what leave is for. So just know that you are paying for this no matter what, and the cost is in the billions as we learn every day from Open the Books and now Doge moving forward. And remember that, you know, trash rolls downhill.
So remember how the reports that Kamala Harris, upon receiving an intelligence community report, instead of focusing on the substantive issue, she focused on how someone phrased or or referred to a female foreign leader. Remember that? That was her takeaway. So here, everything is based on feelings and no base on actions. Again, everything is gonna change, however, come January 20th.
And so until then, I'll be toasting to liberal tears.
Speaker 1: Trash rolls downhill is a Dakin line. You stole that from Dakin.
Speaker 0: That's a good one. I didn't wanna say the
Speaker 4: word crap, and so I was repeating it. That's what I felt was
Speaker 0: a better word. If if they cry over democracy, I'd love to know if these guys cry in front of Russian operatives or Iranian operatives. Oh, that's right. Pulling. We're outnumbered.
That's right.
reSee.it AI Summary
A Democrat governor dismissed Venezuelan gang takeovers in Aurora, Colorado, as imaginary. Martha Raddatz downplayed the issue, claiming it was limited to a few complexes. I can't help but wonder how many more need to be seized for journalists in DC to take it seriously.
@kayleighmcenany - Kayleigh McEnany
🚨 First, a Democrat governor told us that Venezuelan gang takeovers of Aurora, Colorado apartment buildings were a "figment of our imagination." Then, Martha Raddatz protested that the takeovers "were limited to a handful of apartment complexes...” -- as if that somehow makes the situation better. Martha... Martha... Martha... How many apartment complexes have to be seized to make a DC Swamp journalist care? ⬇️
Video Transcript AI Summary
People are reportedly terrified by Venezuelan gangs. Senator Vance claims Trump addressed these concerns in Aurora, Colorado. Martha Raditz countered that incidents were limited to a few apartment complexes, and the police addressed the concerns. Vance questioned if Raditz was unconcerned about violent gangs taking over apartment complexes because Kamala Harris has an open border. Raditz stated that gangs did not invade or take over the city as Trump claimed. Another speaker said the Democratic governor of Colorado initially dismissed the concerns. Raditz is accused of being a DC swamp journalist who is telling working-class people to be okay with their residences being taken over. Gang members are committing crimes across the nation, including by Trunde Agua in multiple cities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Trump was actually in Aurora, Colorado talking to people on the ground. And what we're hearing, of course, Martha, is that people are terrified by what has happened with some of these Venezuelan gangs.
Speaker 1: Senator Vance, I'm gonna stop you because I know exactly what happened. I'm gonna stop you. The incidents were limited to a handful of apartment complex apartment complexes, and the mayor said our dedicated police officers have acted on those concerns. A handful of problems.
Speaker 0: Only, Martha, do you hear yourself? Only a handful of apartment complexes in America were taken over by Venezuelan gangs, and Donald Trump is the problem and not Kamala Harris's open border? Americans are so fed up with what's going on, and they have every right to be. And I I really find this exchange, Martha, sort of interesting because you seem to be more focused with nitpicking everything that Donald Trump has said rather than acknowledging that apartment complexes in the United States of America are being taken over by violent gangs.
Speaker 1: Okay. Let's let's just let's just end that with they did not invade or take over the city as Donald Trump said. I I wanna move on to
Speaker 0: Just a few apartment complexes. No big deal.
Speaker 2: Oh, my gosh. Kaylee, what a remarkable exchange. That right to JD Vance's point illustrates exactly where the left wing media is.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Martha, Martha, Martha. Okay. Look, Martha. First we were told by the Democratic governor of Colorado that this was a figment of our imagination.
Then Martha Raditz tells us, oh, it's just a handful. She is a DC swamp journalist telling people who live in these working class apartments in Aurora, Colorado that they should be okay with this? That their residences should just be taken over? This has happened across the nation, gang members committing crimes. In fact, we've seen crimes by Trunde Agua in Aurora, Miami, Chicago, Indianapolis, New York City, Dallas and Wisconsin.
Martha, how many buildings have to be taken over for you to give a flying flip about this? What if it was your home, Martha Raditz? Tell us you're a DC swamp journalist without telling us outright. That is shameful.
Speaker 2: And bringing
reSee.it AI Summary
The White House press shop is being called out for scripting questions for reporters. This raises concerns about a scripted and false reality. The American people deserve better. According to the NYT, questions for President Biden were provided in advance to radio interviewers by his aides.
@kayleighmcenany - Kayleigh McEnany
The White House press shop must answer this immediately. Suggesting topics is one thing, but scripting out questions for a reporter? It's all been a Truman Show, folks. American people deserve better than a scripted, false reality. NYT: "The questions asked of President Biden by two radio interviewers this week were provided in advance to the hosts by Mr. Biden’s aides at the White House, one of the hosts said Saturday morning on CNN." https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/06/us/politics/biden-radio-interviews-questions.html
Biden Aides Provided Questions in Advance for His Radio Interviews
A radio host told CNN that she had received a list of eight questions to approve before one of the president’s interviews on Wednesday.
nytimes.com