TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @kevinnbass

Saved - March 10, 2026 at 12:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read about the Gates “files” claiming Bill Gates had extensive, ongoing interactions with Jeffrey Epstein—far more than a casual acquaintance. The post cites DOJ materials: 205 meeting/dinner dates, 93 Epstein schedules with Gates, 8 Gates Foundation staff in direct contact, and Gates’ own emails with Epstein. It claims Epstein influenced foundation work, law firms, and PR for Gates, with numerous serious allegations and documented emails.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass

THE BILL GATES FILES. Over the past day, I have read some of the most insane things I have read in my life. I cannot believe it. Gates said he had "several meetings" with Jeffrey Epstein. The documents show at least 205 dates with meetings or dinners and at least 93 of Epstein's daily schedules with Gates on them. Gates said it was about philanthropy. At least 122 documents mention dollar amounts -- investment funds, hush payments, fund structures, reimbursements. Gates said it wasn't deep. Epstein's assistant Lesley Groff has at least 141 documents coordinating Gates logistics. Gates' own scheduler Larry Cohen has at least 138 documents on email chains with Epstein. These are operational volumes -- not a casual acquaintance. This is going to sound insane. That is because it is. BUT JEFFREY EPSTEIN WAS A CENTRAL INSIDER AT THE GATES FOUNDATION--CRITICAL TO ITS FINANCES AND OPERATIONS. 8 senior Gates Foundation staff had direct, documented contact with Jeffrey Epstein. Not through Gates -- directly and constantly. Gates personally sent at least 42 emails to or through Epstein. The relationship was still active in January 2019 -- six months before Epstein's arrest. Gates has been systematically, relentlessly lying about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Here are the most nuclear documents from the BILL GATES FILES. 275 documents of pure dynamite from the DOJ release from Jeffrey Epstein. Read the summary first. Then the docs. Here's just a tiny sample of some of the more outlandish: 1. Epstein drafted a fake Gates Foundation resignation letter to himself describing "helping Bill to get drugs, in order to deal with consequences of sex with russian girls, to facilitating his illicit trysts, with married women." 2. Gates paid his science advisor Boris Nikolic $500,000 in hush money structured as a "gift" to avoid income reporting -- and when Boris wanted more, Gates threatened him through Epstein: "Boris can make whatever he wants public at that point and I will explain to the right people what was done to me and by whom." 3. The Gates Foundation's own General Counsel wrote legal memos to Epstein, called their collaboration "our work," and took direction from him on which law firms to use. YES, "OUR WORK". JEFFREY EPSTEIN WAS A PART OF THE GATES'S FOUNDATION'S "OUR WORK"--IN GENERAL COUNSEL'S OWN WORDS. 4. Epstein installed his own girlfriend -- Kathryn Ruemmler, former White House Counsel -- as Gates' personal attorney. She was in a 9-year relationship with Epstein while simultaneously representing Gates, and debriefed Epstein on her meetings with Gates' leadership. 5. Melanie Walker, Gates Foundation director overseeing $315 million in grants, had a 20-year friendship with Epstein, called him "superfly," tried to bring his microcurrency scheme into the Foundation, and forwarded Microsoft insider information to him. 6. The CEO of JPMorgan Chase could not get a meeting with Bill Gates at Davos without going through Jeffrey Epstein. 7. Gates shared his diplomatic itinerary to meet the Saudi King, Crown Prince, and Deputy Crown Prince with Jeffrey Epstein -- who responded with six demands to Bill Gates. And then a dirty joke about a proctologist. 8. In February 2013, Gates spent three straight days with Epstein -- meetings at the Four Seasons, evenings at his townhouse, a planned flight on Epstein's plane to Palm Beach, and a lunch with Woody Allen. His spokesperson later said he met Epstein just "several times." This was an outrageous lie. 9. Bill and Melinda Gates attended a dinner at Epstein's townhouse where "Eva & Celina will stop by but not be seated for dinner" -- unnamed young women dropping in at a convicted sex offender's dinner party. The other guests? A former Norwegian PM now charged with corruption. Earlier that same day, former Israeli PM Ehud Barak was at the house meeting Gates' science advisor Boris Nikolic. 10. And when Bill Gates was having PR problems? Epstein was suppressing negative news stories about him through his contacts. Yes, Epstein was running PR crisis management for Bill Gates. READ THAT AGAIN. I cannot even do justice to all of this in a post. So read the document yourself. It starts with a 7-page summary. Enjoy: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xFIFTvnR1DwrwQsGoZtzDQA11PaoOi-A/view?usp=sharing

Saved - March 4, 2026 at 1:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize the Feb. 27, 2026 deposition of Bill Clinton before the House Oversight Committee, supported by 765 DOJ documents. The record shows 147 messages with Maxwell, Clinton on Epstein’s plane with young victims, visits to Epstein’s island, erotic massages, and four locations of encounters. A coordinated denial machine—Epstein, Maxwell, Band, Ruemmler—contradicts Clinton’s claim of a brief, limited relationship and no knowledge.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass

"I never went to his island." -- Bill Clinton, under oath, February 27, 2026 "say PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON was never on EPSTEIN's island" -- Jeffrey Epstein, to a trafficking victim THE BILL CLINTON FILES: CLINTON'S FEB. 27 STATEMENTS UNDER OATH--VERSUS THE FACTUAL RECORD On February 27, 2026, Bill Clinton testified under oath before the House Oversight Committee. He had been held in contempt of Congress one month earlier for refusing the subpoena. It was the first time a former president had been compelled to testify before Congress. For four and a half hours, he was calm. Measured. Lawyerly. He told them: "through my brief acquaintance with Jeffrey Epstein, though it ended years before his crimes came to light, and though I never witnessed during our limited interactions any indication of what was going on, I'm here to offer what little I know" [00:16:00]. He sounded reasonable. To anyone who hasn't read the documents. 765 DOJ documents say otherwise. Every quote below is verbatim. I will prove it. Document by document. I. THE REASONABLE MAN Listen to how Clinton told the story. He said the introduction was academic. Larry Summers called: "a man named Jeffrey Epstein who had made a substantial commitment of several million dollars... and he wanted to spend some time talking to me about economics and politics" [00:24:40]. He described the relationship as distant: "We were friendly, but I didn't know him well enough to say we were friends" [00:58:48]. He said the contact was limited: "Usually only on the trips. I did go to his house once" [00:58:58]. He said the conversations were professional: "I don't believe we ever talked about anything but the work we were doing" [01:00:51]. Sounds like a former president who had a passing acquaintance with a philanthropist. Now read the documents. Maxwell told DOJ attorneys under oath: "they met because of me and the plane was because of me" [DOJ-OGR-00022795]. Not Summers. Not Harvard. Maxwell -- the woman convicted of sex trafficking. Clinton told Congress: "I don't believe I met her when I was President" [00:31:06]. Maxwell's own proffer: "I went to the White House with Epstein once for, I think it was for a historical, like one of those benefits and I met the President then" [DOJ-OGR-00022543]. She met him during his presidency, at the White House, with Epstein. And by December 2001 -- before the plane trips even began -- Clinton was already texting Maxwell from a Cingular mobile device, tagged "(WJC wjc)" in every header: "Let me know when you do come home so we can play" [EFTA02333865]. He did not meet her through humanitarian work. He was chasing her. II. THE MESSAGES Clinton told Congress: "I don't believe we ever talked about anything but the work we were doing" [01:00:51]. Clinton told Congress: "I never talked to her on the phone more than twice in my life" [02:38:09]. Clinton told Congress: "She was very interested in CGI. I remember that. And that's it" [02:38:33]. The documents show 147 personal messages between Clinton and Ghislaine Maxwell -- the woman convicted of sex trafficking for Jeffrey Epstein. These are not business emails. These are not charity logistics. These are sexually explicit messages between a former president and a convicted sex trafficker. Clinton to Maxwell: "you are my pimp but that at the same time, you are my lover" [EFTA02332252]. Clinton to Maxwell: "I like naughties" [EFTA02332254]. Clinton to Maxwell: "I want to spank bottoms tonight" [EFTA02333884]. Clinton to Maxwell: "I did the same old blonde last night, boooorring" [EFTA02332316]. Clinton to Maxwell, about another woman: "she is hot looking." Maxwell replied: "I have decided to have a jealous rage" [EFTA02335614]. Clinton to Maxwell: "tied up, not like I was last night" [EFTA02332329]. He described encounters with a "big boobby widow" [EFTA02332259]. She responded: "ALMOST ENOUGH INFO TO STOP ME FANCYING YOU" [EFTA02333515]. She asked: "When did we get married and how many kids do we have?" [EFTA02335667]. He wrote: "We have to have alone time soon" [EFTA02333676]. She wrote: "I would love some private time" [EFTA02333598]. He shared his full travel schedule with her [EFTA02333866]. He authorized her to plant press stories: "you can put that out as much as you like then my dear" [EFTA02333873]. He asked her to keep secrets: "Pls don't my dear, I don't want her to think I am chatty" [EFTA02333882]. The messages repeatedly reference Epstein directly. Maxwell to Clinton: "JE wants to know if you want to come to breakfast before church" [EFTA02333574]. Maxwell to Clinton: "I am w/JE and he is flying back" [EFTA02333565]. Clinton to Maxwell: "Pls tell je I just had a good chat with leon" [EFTA02333712]. Clinton asks for guest bios for an event "at je's house" [EFTA02333294]. One message in particular: Maxwell to Clinton: "Good place for you to pick up chicks! All good girls that go to church!" [EFTA02335695]. It was not just Clinton. Doug Band -- Clinton's chief of staff and closest aide -- was also in a sexually charged relationship with Maxwell. Maxwell to Band, 3 AM: "Carol and I were plotting disgusting things with your body" [EFTA02333108]. Band to Maxwell: "boobihead miss you say hi to jeeeeeeffffffffrey" [EFTA02332772]. Band used Maxwell's connection for Clinton's benefit: "imp for wjc/me to get her taken care of" [EFTA02332671]. And the message that shows how the chain worked: Band to Maxwell: "the pres wanted me to tell you to tell jeffrey he says hello and he misses him. Maybe dinner or drinks late next week" [EFTA00578457]. Everything Band saw at Epstein's house, heard from Maxwell, or learned about the operation was one conversation away from the President. When Congress showed Clinton the "spank bottoms" message, he squinted and said: "It says this email is silly. I want to spank bottoms to involved. Who's it from?" [02:52:47]. He pretended he couldn't read his own text. When asked if he sent the messages: "I never sent one email on it... I think Doug thought it would increase his cachet" [02:48:10]. He blamed his aide. When asked if he shared a BlackBerry with Band: "Well he says we did but I think he's stretching that" [02:48:27]. 147 messages. "I don't believe we ever talked about anything but the work we were doing." III. THE FLIGHTS Clinton told Congress he took "all or part of four or five trips" on Epstein's plane [00:22:57]. His own pilot, under oath, said otherwise. Pilot Larry Visoski, testifying under oath: "ten or twenty times" [386-02]. A second pilot, David Rodgers, confirmed Clinton on the 2002 flights with unidentified young women on board [EFTA00159180]. The handwritten pilot logs list Clinton under three name variations: "BILL CLINTON," "PRESIDENT CLINTON," "WELLIAM J. CLINTON" -- alongside Chris Tucker, Nicole Junkermann, and Cendy Lopez [DOJ-OGR-00015916]. The formal flight records: 26 individual flight segments across 6 trips, February 2002 to November 2003 [EFTA01335688]. Clinton told Congress: "I have never signed off Secret Service protection" [03:12:23]. The flight logs show Secret Service agents absent from at least 5 flight segments [EFTA01335688]. But when they were present, they were repurposed. From the shared Clinton-Band device to Maxwell, February 2002: "We will take you guys from phils to the plane obviously in our motorcade" [EFTA02333868]. The presidential protective detail, used to shuttle Maxwell to Epstein's plane. Epstein, in an email: "my plane was set up for the Clinton trips -- $7 million" [EFTA00919204]. You do not spend $7 million configuring an aircraft for someone who takes four trips. FBI evidence CDs from Epstein's safe contain folders labeled: "Clinton Far East." "Clinton St Trop Morocco Nude Far East." "JE Clinton on 727, GM, Mali, Twintowers" [EFTA00159789]. Organized video archives of Clinton's trips, stored in a safe, alongside folders marked "Nude" and "Girl Pics Nude." The most devastating flight-related finding comes from Brad Edwards, the victims' attorney, questioning Epstein under oath: "Clinton was traveling on your plane at the same time you were paying for VR to travel to Thailand" [EFTA00841357]. Clinton was on Epstein's plane while Epstein was simultaneously paying for a victim to travel to Thailand. The presidential flights and the trafficking were concurrent operations on the same aircraft. "Four or five trips." IV. THE NAMES HE DOESN'T KNOW The committee showed Clinton names from Epstein's operation. Watch the pattern. Lesley Groff -- Epstein's executive assistant who scheduled every visitor to every property for over a decade. She was copied on emails arranging Clinton's own visits [EFTA00918742]. Clinton's pilot testified she was present for his flights [386-02]. Clinton, under oath: "I'm sorry, I don't know who that is" [00:36:18]. Jean-Luc Brunel -- the model scout later arrested and charged with sex trafficking as part of Epstein's operation. The handwritten pilot logs list "BILL CLINTON" and "JEAN LUC BRUNEL" as passengers on the same flights [DOJ-OGR-00015916]. Three Epstein associates took the Fifth rather than answer questions about Brunel and Clinton [1328-44]. Clinton, under oath: "I don't know who that is. I don't believe" [00:36:32]. Nadia Marcinkova -- one of Epstein's most prominent alleged co-conspirators. When asked under oath: "Have you witnessed improper sexual activity between Jeffrey Epstein and minors, while he was in the presence of Bill Clinton?" her answer was: "Fifth" [1328-44]. Clinton, under oath, described Maxwell's role: "I thought she was sort of his chief of staff or administrator" [00:30:48]. Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking. She was not an administrator. Clinton didn't know the scheduler. Didn't know the model scout on his flights. Didn't know what the convicted sex trafficker actually did. He claims to have spent years in this orbit and to have noticed nothing and no one. That is not ignorance. That is a strategy. V. THE ISLAND Clinton told Congress: "No" [01:06:02]. He denied visiting Epstein's island at least five times during the deposition. At least four independent witnesses say otherwise. Virginia Roberts Giuffre, sworn testimony given three separate times: "We all dined together that night. Jeffrey was at the head of the table. Bill was at his left. I sat across from him. Ghislaine was at Bill's left and at the left of Ghislaine there were two olive-skinned brunettes who'd flown in with us from New York. I'd never met them before. I'd say they were no older than 17" [036-10]. "Were sexual orgies a regular occurrence on the island?" "Yes" [1090-16]. Epstein told her Clinton "owed me favors." A second witness, identified in the record as 435-09: "Former President Bill Clinton was present on the Island at a time when I was also present" [435-09]. A third victim, documented in an FBI FD-302, places Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore on the island [EFTA01699136]. Two days before Epstein's death, a fourth victim called the FBI and described "big orgy parties" with Clinton on the island [EFTA01249520]. Handwritten notes from September 2005 list a "Clinton Guest list" at LSJ -- Little St. James, Epstein's island [EFTA00007585]. From the shared Clinton-Band device to Maxwell, August 2002: "Island looks unlikely for me. Going with wjc on a brief vacation" [EFTA02333889]. The island was a standing invitation. While publicly denying Clinton was ever there, Epstein privately admitted it. In a September 2015 email, while drafting a denial strategy, he wrote in parentheses: "(me flying him)" [EFTA02487405]. He was writing a press statement denying he flew Clinton to the island. In the same document, in parentheses, he acknowledged doing exactly that. Even Epstein's own attorney Dershowitz privately doubted it: "worried you are mistaken and that Clinton might have been on the Island" [EFTA00864877]. Maxwell, in her DOJ proffer, caught herself mid-sentence: "a flight that came from the island from -- not from the island" [DOJ-OGR-00022916]. Two lines later, unprompted: "the ex-president never came to the island." He coached witnesses. He told a victim directly: "say PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON was never on EPSTEIN's island" [EFTA01246874]. The word Clinton repeated under oath -- "No" -- is the word Epstein coached a trafficking victim to say. "I never went to his island." VI. WHAT HE SAW Clinton told Congress: "I saw nothing that ever gave me pause" [01:18:25]. Clinton told Congress: "I did go to his house once" [00:58:58]. Just one house, one time. A DOJ prosecution memo from March 2011 -- "Preliminary Investigation of Additional Crimes of Jeffrey Epstein" -- states: "President Bill Clinton came to Epstein's house several times and received erotic massages, although not from her, and at least one of these happened while he was still president. Some of these encounters occurred in Palm Beach, some in New Mexico, some in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and some in Europe" [EFTA01249058]. Four locations. While still president. The WJC-Maxwell messages show Clinton attending dinners at Epstein's New York residence. He curated guest lists: "eric schmidt is founder of google" [EFTA02333297]. He messaged Maxwell: "Pls tell je I just had a good chat with leon" [EFTA02333712]. Another time: "bringing the brit to je's" [EFTA02333820]. The evidence that Clinton was at Epstein's homes is in Clinton's own messages. "I did go to his house once" [00:58:58] -- four locations says the prosecution memo. A victim traveled to Africa with Clinton, Epstein, and Maxwell. At the hotel on that trip, according to an FBI FD-302: "EPSTEIN told [her] to go up to her hotel room and take a shower because she had been traveling." He then assaulted her. Clinton was in the hotel [EFTA01245656]. Giuffre described naked photos of young girls openly displayed in the villa during the island dinner where Clinton was present [1090-16]. An independent witness -- Dr. Bledsoe, a doctor on the Africa trip, not a victim -- noted unexplained young women on the plane [EFTA00173826]. Clinton's own characterization of the young women he saw: "I never saw anybody do anything wrong. I thought they were flight attendants" [02:26:44]. Epstein's plane had no flight attendants. The young women on board were trafficking victims. A separate victim, in a proffer to federal prosecutors, said she "met President Clinton on different trip" and that he was "on the plane a lot, and a lot happened on that plane" [EFTA01248576]. When pressed further: "On this big plane that was working long hours, having two to four people on there, I thought was... as far as I know they were of age" [03:58:36]. "As far as I know they were of age" is not the language of a man who saw nothing. When asked about Chauntae Davies -- an identified Epstein trafficking victim -- giving him a massage on the plane, Clinton said: "You've seen the pictures. There was one time when I was sitting up and I got a back rubber... And I think Shantae did it, but I'm not sure" [01:05:47]. He received a massage from a trafficking victim on a sex trafficker's plane and characterized it as a neck rub. Alan Dershowitz -- Epstein's own defense attorney -- testified under oath that Clinton was "offered underage girls for sex" but "turned them down" [HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757]. Even the defense lawyer's best-case scenario: Clinton was in a situation where underage girls were being offered. Confronted with Epstein's statement to a witness that Clinton "likes them young," Clinton said: "That I have any interest in underage" [03:55:43]. The questioner pressed: "I didn't say underage. I said young." Clinton reached for the word "underage" when nobody used it. That is not a denial. That is a tell. Three Epstein associates were asked under oath whether they witnessed sexual abuse in Clinton's presence. All three took the Fifth [1328-44]. The FBI's own internal case index flagged Clinton for "salacious information" [EFTA00161528]. A prosecution strategy memo listed Clinton among "individuals with significant knowledge" of Epstein's crimes [EFTA00098755]. Prosecutors themselves made that assessment. Epstein's people used Clinton's name to intimidate victims [DOJ-OGR-00000639] and to recruit them. A 17-year-old was told "Bill Clinton and Allen Dersuwitz would also be aboard the Lolita Express" -- $800 an hour [EFTA01244950]. Clinton's name was used to lure a teenager onto the plane. "I saw nothing." VII. THE MACHINE Asked whether, with the benefit of hindsight, there were things he witnessed that could have suggested Epstein was trafficking young women, Clinton said: "I do not believe so" [01:19:24]. Asked whether he ever volunteered information to law enforcement: "I didn't know enough to volunteer" [00:50:49]. This is the biggest story in the dataset. Not the sex. Not the flights. The cover-up. 90+ documents show a coordinated information warfare campaign to suppress the truth. It ran from January 2015 through at least March 2019 and involved lawyers, journalists, newspaper owners, coached witnesses, and Clinton's own former White House Counsel. Within 72 hours of the Giuffre allegations going public, Epstein activated a multi-vector denial operation. Epstein to journalist Michael Wolff: "clinton was NEVER EVER there, never" [EFTA00866974]. Wolff to Epstein: "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there?" [EFTA00866985]. The same briefing was sent to Wolff [EFTA00867022], to Mort Zuckerman, owner of the NY Daily News [EFTA00867023], and to a NYT journalist "off the record" [EFTA00867017]. Three journalists, one newspaper owner, one talking point. Coordinated. Epstein coached witnesses. He drafted denial statements for his ex-girlfriend [EFTA01789311], his pilot [HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021808], and Maxwell [EFTA00638130]. Point 5 of his 8-point "joint defense agreement": "she knows clinton was never on the island" [EFTA02348919]. He offered bounties to disprove Giuffre's testimony, identifying her Clinton island dinner account as "the strongest" claim against him -- meaning it was the hardest to disprove [EFTA02373048]. He told a victim directly: "say PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON was never on EPSTEIN's island" [EFTA01246874]. He made the Clinton denial the center of his entire defense. To Maxwell: "I am convinced your statement should be about the Clinton story being easily disproved" [EFTA00865888]. And again: "Ok, tie it to the easily disproved Clinton" [EFTA00866995]. Clinton was not collateral damage. He was the load-bearing wall of the defense strategy. Epstein told his own lawyer why: "the only thing that can be proven, is that her story re clinton is totally made up... as it is the only non he said she said argument" [EFTA00865969]. Every other allegation -- the abuse, the trafficking, the orgies -- he could not disprove. Only the Clinton denial could be defended. In his most desperate moments, the defense collapsed into a single sentence. To Maxwell, 2:41 AM: "I am not a pedophile, you are not a child abuser... you never flew clinton on a heli" [EFTA01837250]. Three denials. One breath. The Clinton cover and the sex crime defense were the same operation. Then there is Kathryn Ruemmler. She was Obama's White House Counsel. Then Clinton's personal lawyer. And she was on Epstein's legal team -- simultaneously. Clinton, under oath, described Ruemmler as merely: "a lawyer who has done some, on occasion, some help for the Foundation. I don't believe I would discuss Ms. Maxwell with her" [00:44:22]. Ruemmler to Epstein: "Clintons are so happy with me" [EFTA02394779]. Ruemmler offered to call David Kendall -- Clinton's personal lawyer -- to coordinate the denial for Epstein: "I can call David Kendall, his longtime lawyer and a longtime friend of mine" [EFTA02385431]. She confirmed: "Left a message" [EFTA02348207]. Three weeks later, Epstein followed up: "kendall?" [EFTA02512164]. Ruemmler drafted ABC News suppression letters using the Clinton island denial as "readily provable" [EFTA02503892]. She placed stories with Jeffrey Toobin at The New Yorker [EFTA00822947] and called Epstein "our friend Jeffrey" [EFTA02610284]. She was Clinton's lawyer and Epstein's operative at the same time. She is the mechanism connecting Clinton's official denial to Epstein's legal defense. The most telling detail: Epstein told Ruemmler in January 2016: "I stopped talking to Clinton when he swore the exact opposite to me" [EFTA02473045]. Clinton lied to Epstein about something -- and Epstein knew it was false. Clinton was constructing a false narrative before the public denials even began. Sandy Berger -- Clinton's former National Security Advisor -- called Epstein 18 days before a raid that was described as having been "cleaned up" [Letter-InCamera-Sep2025]. And the relationship didn't end when Clinton says it did. Clinton told Congress: "The last time I remember was with him was sometime in 2003" [03:33:46]. Epstein's crimes became public in 2005-2006. Through intermediaries, the contact continued -- 2010, 2011, 2013 [EFTA02431960; EFTA00903517; EFTA02371081]. Post-conviction. Every year. Then it went direct. March 2016: Epstein's schedule notes: "i have a call with clinton at 1230" [EFTA00831113]. Eight years after conviction. October 2017: "Did Clinton change his mind." Response: "No. Working on dates" [HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027250]. February 2018: Epstein to Ruemmler: "do you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and Larry for dinner... all off the record" [EFTA02521747]. "All off the record" -- both sides knew. A decade of post-conviction contact. Fifteen years after he says it ended. "The last time I remember was sometime in 2003" [03:33:46]. The denial chain is complete. Epstein coached it. Maxwell repeated it. Ruemmler drafted it. Clinton's spokesman echoed it. And on February 27, 2026, the former president repeated it under oath before Congress -- a cover story written by a convicted sex offender. The man who said he "didn't know enough to volunteer" [00:50:49] instead helped build the machine that made sure nobody could. THE EVIDENCE LOCKER Photos: Clinton getting a neck massage from an Epstein victim [EFTA00037125]. Clinton and Maxwell boarding Epstein's plane [EFTA00037126]. Clinton, Mick Jagger, and Epstein at dinner [EFTA00003379]. Deutsche Bank classified Epstein as a Politically Exposed Person because of his "close relationship with Ex Clinton" [EFTA01420713]. And a $1 million wire to Maxwell for something called the "Clinton Project" [EFTA00579174]. Never explained. THE SCORECARD Bill Clinton made 81 testable claims under oath. We checked every one. 67 are contradicted: 18 disproven, 24 misleading, 18 disputed, 7 implausible. 2 confirmed. 107 DOJ documents. Every quote verbatim. He said "brief acquaintance" [00:16:00]. 147 sexually explicit messages with a convicted sex trafficker. He said "four or five trips" [00:22:57]. His own pilot said ten or twenty [386-02]. He said "No" to the island -- five times [01:06:02]. Four witnesses, Epstein's own admission, and a coached victim denial. He said "I did go to his house once" [00:58:58]. A DOJ memo documenting erotic massages at four locations while he was still president [EFTA01249058]. He said "I do not believe so" when asked if he saw signs of trafficking [01:19:24]. Dershowitz testified he was offered underage girls [HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757]. Three associates took the Fifth [1328-44]. He said "sometime in 2003" was the last time [03:33:46]. Contact continued until at least 2018 [EFTA02521747]. He said "I didn't know enough to volunteer" [00:50:49]. His own lawyer helped build Epstein's denial campaign [EFTA02394779]. And when Congress asked: "Have you ever lied under oath in a deposition?" Clinton said: "No" [02:20:40]. In 1999, he was found in civil contempt for giving "intentionally false" testimony under oath. Fined $90,000. Law license suspended. Surrendered it on his last day in office. He has done this before. And he just did it again. 765 DOJ documents. 81 sworn statements. 67 false. Bill Clinton lied under oath. To Congress. That is a federal crime.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass

SOURCES: Deposition: Bill Clinton, House Oversight Committee, February 27, 2026, https://youtu.be/rgJrYKAl6T0 Full transcript: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UTyVzoazeEV3GVaD66HlO941wJkewKug/view?usp=sharing DOJ-OGR-00022795, Maxwell proffer: "they met because of me and the plane was because of me" (House Oversight Committee release) DOJ-OGR-00022543, Maxwell proffer: met Clinton at White House with Epstein (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA02333865, WJC to Maxwell: "Let me know when you do come home so we can play" (Dec 2001), https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333865.pdf EFTA02332252, WJC to Maxwell: "you are my pimp but that at the same time, you are my lover", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332252.pdf EFTA02332254, WJC to Maxwell: "I like naughties", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332254.pdf EFTA02333884, WJC to Maxwell: "I want to spank bottoms tonight", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333884.pdf EFTA02332316, WJC to Maxwell: "I did the same old blonde last night, boooorring", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332316.pdf EFTA02335614, WJC/Maxwell: "she is hot looking" / "I have decided to have a jealous rage", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02335614.pdf EFTA02332329, WJC to Maxwell: "tied up, not like I was last night", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332329.pdf EFTA02332259, WJC to Maxwell: encounters with a "big boobby widow", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332259.pdf EFTA02333515, Maxwell: "ALMOST ENOUGH INFO TO STOP ME FANCYING YOU", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333515.pdf EFTA02335667, Maxwell: "When did we get married and how many kids do we have?", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02335667.pdf EFTA02333676, WJC: "We have to have alone time soon", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333676.pdf EFTA02333598, Maxwell: "I would love some private time", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333598.pdf EFTA02333866, WJC shares full Glasgow/Manchester/London itinerary with Maxwell, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333866.pdf EFTA02333873, WJC: "you can put that out as much as you like then my dear", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333873.pdf EFTA02333882, WJC: "Pls don't my dear, I don't want her to think I am chatty", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333882.pdf EFTA02333574, Maxwell: "JE wants to know if you want to come to breakfast before church", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333574.pdf EFTA02333565, Maxwell: "I am w/JE and he is flying back", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333565.pdf EFTA02333712, WJC: "Pls tell je I just had a good chat with leon", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333712.pdf EFTA02333294, WJC asks for guest bios for event "at je's house", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333294.pdf EFTA02335695, Maxwell: "Good place for you to pick up chicks! All good girls that go to church!", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02335695.pdf EFTA02333108, Maxwell to Band 3 AM: "Carol and I were plotting disgusting things with your body", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333108.pdf EFTA02332772, Band: "boobihead miss you say hi to jeeeeeeffffffffrey", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332772.pdf EFTA02332671, Band: "imp for wjc/me to get her taken care of", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332671.pdf EFTA00578457, Band: "the pres wanted me to tell you to tell jeffrey he says hello", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00578457.pdf EFTA00159180, FBI FD-302: Pilot Rodgers confirms Clinton on flights with young women, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00159180.pdf DOJ-OGR-00015916, Handwritten pilot logs: "BILL CLINTON," "JEAN LUC BRUNEL" on same flights (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA01335688, Formal flight records: 26 segments across 6 trips (Feb 2002 - Nov 2003), https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01335688.pdf EFTA02333868, WJC: "We will take you guys from phils to the plane obviously in our motorcade", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333868.pdf EFTA00919204, Epstein: "my plane was set up for the Clinton trips -- $7 million", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00919204.pdf EFTA00159789, FBI evidence CDs: "Clinton Far East," "Clinton St Trop Morocco Nude Far East", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00159789.pdf EFTA00841357, Brad Edwards questioning Epstein: Clinton on plane while paying for VR to travel to Thailand, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00841357.pdf EFTA00918742, Lesley Groff emails arranging Clinton visits, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00918742.pdf 386-02, Pilot Larry Visoski sworn testimony: "ten or twenty times" (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) 1328-44, Three Epstein associates take the Fifth on Clinton-related questions (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) 036-10, Virginia Giuffre: Clinton island dinner account with two girls "no older than 17" (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) 1090-16, Virginia Giuffre deposition: sexual orgies on island, naked photos of young girls (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) 435-09, Second witness: "Former President Bill Clinton was present on the Island" (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) EFTA01699136, FBI FD-302: victim places Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore on the island, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01699136.pdf EFTA01249520, FBI: fourth victim describes "big orgy parties" with Clinton on island, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01249520.pdf EFTA00007585, Handwritten "Clinton Guest list" at LSJ (Little St. James), https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%204/EFTA00007585.pdf

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass

SOURCES (continued) EFTA02333889, Clinton-Band device: "Island looks unlikely for me. Going with wjc on a brief vacation", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333889.pdf EFTA02487405, Epstein drafting denial with parenthetical admission: "(me flying him)", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02487405.pdf EFTA00864877, Dershowitz privately doubted island denial: "worried you are mistaken", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00864877.pdf DOJ-OGR-00022916, Maxwell proffer Day 2: catches herself mid-sentence "from the island from -- not from the island" (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA01246874, Epstein coached victim: "say PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON was never on EPSTEIN's island", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01246874.pdf EFTA01249058, DOJ prosecution memo: Clinton "received erotic massages" at four locations "while he was still president", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01249058.pdf EFTA02333297, WJC curating Epstein dinner guest list: "eric schmidt is founder of google", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333297.pdf EFTA02333820, WJC: "bringing the brit to je's", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333820.pdf EFTA01245656, FBI FD-302: Epstein assaulted victim at Africa trip hotel while Clinton present, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01245656.pdf EFTA00173826, Dr. Bledsoe: unexplained young women on Africa trip plane, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00173826.pdf EFTA01248576, AUSA proffer: second victim "met President Clinton on different trip," "on the plane a lot", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01248576.pdf HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757, Dershowitz deposition: Clinton "offered underage girls for sex" but "turned them down" (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA00161528, FBI internal case index: Clinton flagged for "salacious information", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00161528.pdf EFTA00098755, Prosecution strategy memo: Clinton among "individuals with significant knowledge", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00098755.pdf DOJ-OGR-00000639, Victim impact hearing: Epstein's people used Clinton's name to intimidate victims (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA01244950, 17-year-old lured: "Bill Clinton and Allen Dersuwitz would also be aboard the Lolita Express", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01244950.pdf EFTA00866974, Epstein to Michael Wolff: "clinton was NEVER EVER there, never", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00866974.pdf EFTA00866985, Wolff to Epstein: "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there?", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00866985.pdf EFTA00867022, Epstein briefing sent to Michael Wolff, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00867022.pdf EFTA00867023, Epstein briefing sent to Mort Zuckerman owner of NY Daily News, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00867023.pdf EFTA00867017, NYT journalist briefed "off the record", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00867017.pdf EFTA01789311, Epstein drafted denial statement for ex-girlfriend, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01789311.pdf HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021808, Epstein drafted denial statement for his pilot (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA00638130, Epstein drafted denial for Maxwell, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00638130.pdf EFTA02348919, Joint defense agreement point 5: "she knows clinton was never on the island", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02348919.pdf EFTA02373048, Epstein: Clinton island dinner is "the strongest" claim against him -- offered bounties, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02373048.pdf EFTA00865888, Epstein: "your statement should be about the Clinton story being easily disproved", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00865888.pdf EFTA00866995, Epstein: "Ok, tie it to the easily disproved Clinton", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00866995.pdf EFTA00865969, Epstein: Clinton denial is "the only non he said she said argument", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00865969.pdf EFTA01837250, Epstein to Maxwell 2:41 AM: "I am not a pedophile, you are not a child abuser... you never flew clinton on a heli", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01837250.pdf EFTA02394779, Ruemmler to Epstein: "Clintons are so happy with me", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02394779.pdf EFTA02385431, Ruemmler offers to call David Kendall to coordinate Clinton denial for Epstein, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02385431.pdf EFTA02348207, Ruemmler confirms: "Left a message" for Kendall, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02348207.pdf EFTA02512164, Epstein follows up three weeks later: "kendall?", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02512164.pdf EFTA02503892, Ruemmler drafted ABC News suppression letters -- Clinton denial "readily provable", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02503892.pdf EFTA00822947, Ruemmler suggests placing favorable Epstein stories with Jeffrey Toobin at New Yorker, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00822947.pdf EFTA02610284, Ruemmler calls Epstein "our friend Jeffrey", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02610284.pdf EFTA02473045, Epstein: "I stopped talking to Clinton when he swore the exact opposite to me", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02473045.pdf Letter-InCamera-Sep2025, Sandy Berger called Epstein 18 days before raid described as "cleaned up" (congressional in-camera document) EFTA02431960, 2010: "Larry informed him that pres Clinton is landing at galaxy tonight at 7pm", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02431960.pdf EFTA00903517, 2011: Epstein offers to summon Clinton for dinner with Boris Nikolic, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00903517.pdf EFTA02371081, 2013: Doug Band sends warm regards to Epstein, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02371081.pdf HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027250, 2017: "Did Clinton change his mind" / "No. Working on dates" (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA00831113, 2016: Epstein schedule "i have a call with clinton at 1230", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00831113.pdf EFTA02521747, 2018: Epstein to Ruemmler "do you think Bill Clinton would like to join... all off the record", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02521747.pdf EFTA00037125, Photo: Clinton getting neck massage from Epstein victim, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037125.pdf EFTA00037126, Photo: Clinton and Maxwell boarding Epstein's plane, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037126.pdf EFTA00003379, Photo: Clinton, Mick Jagger, and Jeffrey Epstein at dinner, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%202/EFTA00003379.pdf EFTA01420713, Deutsche Bank classifies Epstein as PEP: "close relationship with Ex Clinton", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01420713.pdf EFTA00579174, $1 million wire to Maxwell for "Clinton Project" -- never explained, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00579174.pdf

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass

SOURCES: Deposition: Bill Clinton, House Oversight Committee, February 27, 2026, https://youtu.be/rgJrYKAl6T0 Full transcript: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UTyVzoazeEV3GVaD66HlO941wJkewKug/view?usp=sharing DOJ-OGR-00022795, Maxwell proffer: "they met because of me and the plane was because of me" (House Oversight Committee release) DOJ-OGR-00022543, Maxwell proffer: met Clinton at White House with Epstein (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA02333865, WJC to Maxwell: "Let me know when you do come home so we can play" (Dec 2001), https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333865.pdf EFTA02332252, WJC to Maxwell: "you are my pimp but that at the same time, you are my lover", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332252.pdf EFTA02332254, WJC to Maxwell: "I like naughties", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332254.pdf EFTA02333884, WJC to Maxwell: "I want to spank bottoms tonight", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333884.pdf EFTA02332316, WJC to Maxwell: "I did the same old blonde last night, boooorring", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332316.pdf EFTA02335614, WJC/Maxwell: "she is hot looking" / "I have decided to have a jealous rage", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02335614.pdf EFTA02332329, WJC to Maxwell: "tied up, not like I was last night", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332329.pdf EFTA02332259, WJC to Maxwell: encounters with a "big boobby widow", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332259.pdf EFTA02333515, Maxwell: "ALMOST ENOUGH INFO TO STOP ME FANCYING YOU", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333515.pdf EFTA02335667, Maxwell: "When did we get married and how many kids do we have?", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02335667.pdf EFTA02333676, WJC: "We have to have alone time soon", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333676.pdf EFTA02333598, Maxwell: "I would love some private time", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333598.pdf EFTA02333866, WJC shares full Glasgow/Manchester/London itinerary with Maxwell, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333866.pdf EFTA02333873, WJC: "you can put that out as much as you like then my dear", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333873.pdf EFTA02333882, WJC: "Pls don't my dear, I don't want her to think I am chatty", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333882.pdf EFTA02333574, Maxwell: "JE wants to know if you want to come to breakfast before church", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333574.pdf EFTA02333565, Maxwell: "I am w/JE and he is flying back", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333565.pdf EFTA02333712, WJC: "Pls tell je I just had a good chat with leon", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333712.pdf EFTA02333294, WJC asks for guest bios for event "at je's house", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333294.pdf EFTA02335695, Maxwell: "Good place for you to pick up chicks! All good girls that go to church!", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02335695.pdf EFTA02333108, Maxwell to Band 3 AM: "Carol and I were plotting disgusting things with your body", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333108.pdf EFTA02332772, Band: "boobihead miss you say hi to jeeeeeeffffffffrey", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332772.pdf EFTA02332671, Band: "imp for wjc/me to get her taken care of", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02332671.pdf EFTA00578457, Band: "the pres wanted me to tell you to tell jeffrey he says hello", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00578457.pdf EFTA00159180, FBI FD-302: Pilot Rodgers confirms Clinton on flights with young women, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00159180.pdf DOJ-OGR-00015916, Handwritten pilot logs: "BILL CLINTON," "JEAN LUC BRUNEL" on same flights (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA01335688, Formal flight records: 26 segments across 6 trips (Feb 2002 - Nov 2003), https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01335688.pdf EFTA02333868, WJC: "We will take you guys from phils to the plane obviously in our motorcade", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333868.pdf EFTA00919204, Epstein: "my plane was set up for the Clinton trips -- $7 million", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00919204.pdf EFTA00159789, FBI evidence CDs: "Clinton Far East," "Clinton St Trop Morocco Nude Far East", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00159789.pdf EFTA00841357, Brad Edwards questioning Epstein: Clinton on plane while paying for VR to travel to Thailand, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00841357.pdf EFTA00918742, Lesley Groff emails arranging Clinton visits, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00918742.pdf 386-02, Pilot Larry Visoski sworn testimony: "ten or twenty times" (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) 1328-44, Three Epstein associates take the Fifth on Clinton-related questions (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) 036-10, Virginia Giuffre: Clinton island dinner account with two girls "no older than 17" (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) 1090-16, Virginia Giuffre deposition: sexual orgies on island, naked photos of young girls (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) 435-09, Second witness: "Former President Bill Clinton was present on the Island" (Giuffre v. Maxwell case exhibit) EFTA01699136, FBI FD-302: victim places Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore on the island, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01699136.pdf EFTA01249520, FBI: fourth victim describes "big orgy parties" with Clinton on island, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01249520.pdf EFTA00007585, Handwritten "Clinton Guest list" at LSJ (Little St. James), https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%204/EFTA00007585.pdf

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass

SOURCES (continued) EFTA02333889, Clinton-Band device: "Island looks unlikely for me. Going with wjc on a brief vacation", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333889.pdf EFTA02487405, Epstein drafting denial with parenthetical admission: "(me flying him)", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02487405.pdf EFTA00864877, Dershowitz privately doubted island denial: "worried you are mistaken", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00864877.pdf DOJ-OGR-00022916, Maxwell proffer Day 2: catches herself mid-sentence "from the island from -- not from the island" (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA01246874, Epstein coached victim: "say PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON was never on EPSTEIN's island", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01246874.pdf EFTA01249058, DOJ prosecution memo: Clinton "received erotic massages" at four locations "while he was still president", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01249058.pdf EFTA02333297, WJC curating Epstein dinner guest list: "eric schmidt is founder of google", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333297.pdf EFTA02333820, WJC: "bringing the brit to je's", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02333820.pdf EFTA01245656, FBI FD-302: Epstein assaulted victim at Africa trip hotel while Clinton present, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01245656.pdf EFTA00173826, Dr. Bledsoe: unexplained young women on Africa trip plane, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00173826.pdf EFTA01248576, AUSA proffer: second victim "met President Clinton on different trip," "on the plane a lot", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01248576.pdf HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757, Dershowitz deposition: Clinton "offered underage girls for sex" but "turned them down" (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA00161528, FBI internal case index: Clinton flagged for "salacious information", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00161528.pdf EFTA00098755, Prosecution strategy memo: Clinton among "individuals with significant knowledge", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00098755.pdf DOJ-OGR-00000639, Victim impact hearing: Epstein's people used Clinton's name to intimidate victims (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA01244950, 17-year-old lured: "Bill Clinton and Allen Dersuwitz would also be aboard the Lolita Express", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01244950.pdf EFTA00866974, Epstein to Michael Wolff: "clinton was NEVER EVER there, never", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00866974.pdf EFTA00866985, Wolff to Epstein: "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there?", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00866985.pdf EFTA00867022, Epstein briefing sent to Michael Wolff, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00867022.pdf EFTA00867023, Epstein briefing sent to Mort Zuckerman owner of NY Daily News, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00867023.pdf EFTA00867017, NYT journalist briefed "off the record", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00867017.pdf EFTA01789311, Epstein drafted denial statement for ex-girlfriend, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01789311.pdf HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021808, Epstein drafted denial statement for his pilot (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA00638130, Epstein drafted denial for Maxwell, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00638130.pdf EFTA02348919, Joint defense agreement point 5: "she knows clinton was never on the island", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02348919.pdf EFTA02373048, Epstein: Clinton island dinner is "the strongest" claim against him -- offered bounties, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02373048.pdf EFTA00865888, Epstein: "your statement should be about the Clinton story being easily disproved", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00865888.pdf EFTA00866995, Epstein: "Ok, tie it to the easily disproved Clinton", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00866995.pdf EFTA00865969, Epstein: Clinton denial is "the only non he said she said argument", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00865969.pdf EFTA01837250, Epstein to Maxwell 2:41 AM: "I am not a pedophile, you are not a child abuser... you never flew clinton on a heli", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01837250.pdf EFTA02394779, Ruemmler to Epstein: "Clintons are so happy with me", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02394779.pdf EFTA02385431, Ruemmler offers to call David Kendall to coordinate Clinton denial for Epstein, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02385431.pdf EFTA02348207, Ruemmler confirms: "Left a message" for Kendall, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02348207.pdf EFTA02512164, Epstein follows up three weeks later: "kendall?", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02512164.pdf EFTA02503892, Ruemmler drafted ABC News suppression letters -- Clinton denial "readily provable", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02503892.pdf EFTA00822947, Ruemmler suggests placing favorable Epstein stories with Jeffrey Toobin at New Yorker, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00822947.pdf EFTA02610284, Ruemmler calls Epstein "our friend Jeffrey", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02610284.pdf EFTA02473045, Epstein: "I stopped talking to Clinton when he swore the exact opposite to me", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02473045.pdf Letter-InCamera-Sep2025, Sandy Berger called Epstein 18 days before raid described as "cleaned up" (congressional in-camera document) EFTA02431960, 2010: "Larry informed him that pres Clinton is landing at galaxy tonight at 7pm", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02431960.pdf EFTA00903517, 2011: Epstein offers to summon Clinton for dinner with Boris Nikolic, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00903517.pdf EFTA02371081, 2013: Doug Band sends warm regards to Epstein, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02371081.pdf HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027250, 2017: "Did Clinton change his mind" / "No. Working on dates" (House Oversight Committee release) EFTA00831113, 2016: Epstein schedule "i have a call with clinton at 1230", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00831113.pdf EFTA02521747, 2018: Epstein to Ruemmler "do you think Bill Clinton would like to join... all off the record", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02521747.pdf EFTA00037125, Photo: Clinton getting neck massage from Epstein victim, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037125.pdf EFTA00037126, Photo: Clinton and Maxwell boarding Epstein's plane, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037126.pdf EFTA00003379, Photo: Clinton, Mick Jagger, and Jeffrey Epstein at dinner, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%202/EFTA00003379.pdf EFTA01420713, Deutsche Bank classifies Epstein as PEP: "close relationship with Ex Clinton", https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01420713.pdf EFTA00579174, $1 million wire to Maxwell for "Clinton Project" -- never explained, https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00579174.pdf

Saved - January 5, 2026 at 5:23 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass

I crunched the data. Again. I made a map. Again. The picture is now even CLEANER. States without voter ID requirements are 16x more likely to offer welfare benefits to illegal immigrants than states requiring ID (67% vs 4%, p<0.0001). Dems are importing and paying illegals for votes. Details👇

Saved - September 6, 2025 at 12:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Rochelle Walensky, CDC Director, made false claims on MSNBC about vaccinated individuals not carrying the virus, despite knowing the truth, as revealed by FOIA emails. These statements influenced Supreme Court decisions on vaccine mandates, leading to widespread persecution and personal tragedies. Many who complied faced severe health issues. The scientific community raised concerns about Walensky's claims undermining public trust, yet she continued to promote them. This has resulted in a significant backlash against the CDC and its handling of the pandemic narrative.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

March 29, 2021 Rochelle Walensky, Director of CDC, infamously declared on MSNBC: "Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick." Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it. 1/12

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to our data from the CDC today, vaccinated people do not carry the virus and do not get sick. This finding is not limited to clinical trials; it is also supported by real-world data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick, and and that it's not just in the clinical trials, but it's also in real world data.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

See for yourself. Without these lies, unconstitutional vaccine mandates would have been much more difficult to argue in court. That's why she lied. 2/12

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

The claims made by Walensky ended up in arguments at the Supreme Court, influencing Biden vs. Missouri (a 5-4 decision) about COVID-19 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers at facilities receiving federal funding. And a huge impact on vaccine mandates more broadly. https://web.archive.org/web/20220108022241/https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2021/21a240_l537.pdf 3/12

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

The outcome, as @galexybrane reported, were mass persecutions and the destruction of people's lives throughout the Western world. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/vaccines-never-prevented-transmission-covid-alex-gutentag 4/12

Covid Vaccine Does Not Prevent Transmission The Covid vaccine does not prevent transmission. Censoring the news and spreading vaccine misinformation in the name of 'science' is a danger to public health. tabletmag.com

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Some of those who did go along with the mandates experienced life-threatening complications, like myself. Some people died. All because we were brainwashed or bullied into getting a vaccination that didn't stop the spread of the virus. https://substack.com/@kevinbass/p-98829734 5/12

How the FDA failed America by pushing approval for the COVID vaccine for children, ignoring danger signals, over protests and resignations from its own leadership I have a COVID op-ed coming out soon, and I have been moving to a new apartment. substack.com

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Furthermore, without these lies about transmission, the global campaign stigmatizing the unvaccinated people (who were largely low-income) and scapegoating them for the pandemic would not have been possible. 6/12

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Now, the science. Immediately after Walensky made these claims, the scientific community erupted, expressing concerns that they would undermine public trust. Here's from the New York Times. https://archive.ph/PCl7B 7/12

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Here's an article published in Nature in March 2020 that articulated similar concerns, though more systematically. This article would turn out to be remarkably prescient, but the points made were widely known by the scientific community. https://archive.ph/9BnBN 8/12

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Take a World Health Organization virtual press conference back in December 2020. Repeatedly the top scientists at WHO emphasized the lack of impact of the vaccine on transmission, the problem of new variants, waning immunity, etc. https://www.who.int/multi-media/details/who-daily-press-conference-on-novel-coronavirus---28-december-2020 9/12

WHO Daily press conference on novel coronavirus - 28 December 2020 WHO regular press briefing on COVID-19, 28 December 2020. who.int

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Yet, Walensky presented only one side of the story, which scientists knew risked undermining trust. Why? She had an agenda. Deceive the courts, browbeat the employers, impose the mandates by fiat. Truth, science, transparency, honesty, public trust be damned. 10/12

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Later, at an event at Washington University at St. Louis, Walensky would express astonishment that her claims would have all turn out to be wrong and that nobody predicted what happened with the vaccine. But as we have seen this is a complete lie. The formula: lie, lie, lie. 11/12

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recalls where improvement was: when the CNN feed said, "it was ninety 5% effective on the vaccine." They note perhaps too little caution and too much optimism; many wanted this to be their ticket out. Nobody said waning, or that the next variant might be less potent. They discuss the 'area of gray' between science and decision-making: "we're gonna lead with the science. Science is gonna be the foundation of everything we do." The public heard that as science is foolproof, "Science is foolproof. Science is black and white." Yet, "Science is not always immediate," and it "sometimes it takes months and years to actually find out the answer, but you have to make, you know, decisions in a pandemic before you have that answer."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where could we have improved? Well, you know, I think I can tell you where I was when the CNN feed came, that it was ninety 5% effective on the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be helpful. So many of us wanted to say, okay, this is our ticket out. Right? Now we're done. So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way. I I really do. I I think all of us wanted this to be done. Nobody said waning when when, you know, oh, this vaccine's gonna work. Oh, well, maybe it'll work. It'll wear off. Nobody said, what if the next variant doesn't it doesn't it's not as potent against the next variant. And then maybe the other thing I'll say is this area of gray. I have frequently said, you know, we're gonna lead with the science. Science is gonna be the foundation of everything we do. That is entirely true. I think public heard that as science is foolproof. Science is black and white. Science is immediate and we get the answer and then we, you know, make the decision based on the answer. And the truth is science is great. And science is not always immediate. And it sometimes it takes months and years to actually find out the answer, but you have to make, you know, decisions in a pandemic before you have that answer. Is it

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

After her claims on MSNBC, Walensky didn't stop spreading these lies, and neither did Fauci. They went on a media campaign for months making these claims. Where were the doctors and scientists who are saying that RFK Jr. is undermining the CDC when this was happening? You were silent then. You are silent now. You do not care about science. You care about social media engagement, about propagandizing to your braying and ignorant colleagues. You are partisan liars. You spent the last 5 years destroying science and supporting the CDC in doing so. The hypocrisy of you people saying ANYTHING about RFK Jr. and the CDC now is disgusting. 12/12

Saved - August 27, 2025 at 10:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Rochelle Walensky, CDC Director, made a controversial claim on MSNBC that vaccinated individuals do not carry the virus or get sick, despite knowing it was false, as revealed by FOIA emails. This misinformation facilitated unconstitutional vaccine mandates. The scientific community, including experts in Nature and the New York Times, criticized her for undermining trust in vaccines. Despite this, Walensky and Fauci continued their media campaign. I question the silence of those who previously condemned perceived attacks on science, highlighting a troubling hypocrisy in their stance.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

March 29, 2021 Rochelle Walensky, Director of CDC, infamously declared on MSNBC: "Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick." Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it. 1/5 https://t.co/hcqOW45VhZ

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

See for yourself. Without these lies, unconstitutional vaccine mandates would not have been possible. That's why she lied. 2/5 https://t.co/5hgjjkwz6c

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

The scientific community knew she was wrong, too. Here is an article in Nature just weeks before Fauci and Walensky's PR campaign--where they repeated these lies--about the vaccine started in March 2021: https://archive.ph/9BnBN 3/5

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

There are others. Take this one by scientists interviewed by the New York Times. They knew what Walensky was doing and said she should stop, because her lies would destroy trust in vaccines and public health. They did just that. https://archive.ph/PCl7B 4/5

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

She didn't stop spreading these lies, and neither did Fauci. They went on a media campaign for months making these claims. Where were the doctors and scientists who are saying that Trump has launched an "attack on science" when this was happening? You were silent then. You are silent now. You do not care about science. You care about social media engagement, about propagandizing to your braying and ignorant colleagues. You are partisan liars. You spent the last 5 years destroying science. The hypocrisy of you people saying ANYTHING about science now is disgusting. 5/5

Saved - March 17, 2025 at 3:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was a lifelong Democrat, viewing conservatives as ignorant or malicious. My perspective shifted when I faced criticism for my pandemic writings, leading to my dismissal from medical school. I realized I had been biased, interpreting criticism of liberal institutions as bad faith. The experience was dehumanizing, as I was reduced to a caricature. However, with support, I understood the hysteria on the left and recognized a shared struggle among many. I don't seek pity; my life is promising now, and I'm excited about a new venture related to my experiences.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

I was a lifelong Democrat. I thought most conservatives were ignorant or evil or lying. I believed almost everything written in the New York Times, The New Republic, and the Atlantic. I was horrified when conservatives criticized the authorities. Every criticism I saw: I thought all of it was motivated by animus, resentment, self-interest, or ignorance. Whatever truth there might have been in the criticism, I saw as a mere "half-truth": an exploitation of this or that cherrypicked fact being weaponized. Why did I see it in terms of weaponization? Because I was biased: I saw liberal establishment institutions and figures as fundamentally good, so all criticism of them was automatically interpreted as being in bad faith. Didn't the critics know that these institutions or figures were fundamentally good? If they didn't, they were ignorant. If they did, they were evil. It was that simple. This meant that any legitimate criticisms would just be dismissed, as if bouncing off of an impenetrable bulletproof shield. This all changed once I started writing about the pandemic. Soon people started talking about me the way I once thought about conservatives. This led to a complete identity collapse as I came to understand that my old worldview was hateful and ignorant, that I hadn't understood what I had been judging. I cannot forget the hearing that led to my dismissal from medical school a year after I started writing. During the hearing, people talked about me as if I wasn't human. My behavior was interpreted in the worst possible light. Complete fabrications were created. Nobody was concerned with the truth, only horrified at my apparent "unprofessional behavior", which was really a mirror of their unprofessional behavior directed at me. They structured the hearing to make it virtually impossible for me to speak and explain that what was being said was a lie. And nobody seemed to have any problem with this. Why? Because I was bad. If I am bad, then every mistreatment and every violation of the school's own policies became justified. A person who is bad does not deserve any rights. They only deserve punishment. But the thing I remember most was the allusions to my social media activity. They said, "Kevin is driven by resentment from his childhood." I wasn't. I was on good terms with my parents. They alleged that I needed psychotherapy to deal with this trauma. It was a completely fake story that they had constructed about me, to demean me, to marginalize me, to try to explain the views I had expressed: that something terribly wrong had happened during the pandemic. They couldn't imagine that I might have legitimate points. So they reduced me to the same kinds of psychological caricatures that I once reduced conservatives to in my own mind. When I was dismissed, I was broken. But I had help from friends who helped me understand what happened. And I came to realize that a hysteria had overtaken the left. I spent a lot of time reading about show trials, about witch trials, and so on. I also connected with people who had experienced similar things and came to realize that something similar had happened to hundreds of physicians around the country. My story wasn't unique. It was all the same story over and over again. I cannot believe the person I once was. I cannot believe that I could exist like that. I still don't understand how I could be like that, or how millions of people in this country could continue being like that. It disturbs me greatly. One thing I know is that whatever this thing is that is driving people crazy needs to be destroyed. It is hostile to civilization and to our humanity. It causes us to dehumanize each other and try to destroy each other. It is the very same monstrous thing that I once attributed to conservatives. But it had been inside me, and I could now see it inside others. This is something I still grapple with.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

That said... I don't want anyone to feel bad for me. I just wanted to share my thoughts about leftism, from someone who has been there, and been put through the fire. But my life is good now. Or at least it's promising. I couldn't be happier. https://t.co/TdvWbtq6mL

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

For those tuning in, I'm not planning to go back to medical school. I don't want to live in fear about saying what I really believe. I do have something else cooking that is related, and I feel more excited about it than I've felt about anything in my life. I hope to share soon.

Saved - February 28, 2025 at 1:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I analyzed CDC data on measles cases over the past ten years and found that claims of a measles resurgence due to "antivaxers" are misleading. While there has been a slight increase in cases from about 80 to 240 per year, this period (2016-2025) is historically low, with only one death reported, the same as the previous decade. In fact, children are safer from measles than ever before. I shared detailed rolling averages since 1960 for transparency and will provide more on cases and deaths in a future post.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Doctors often claim that measles is making a comeback because of "antivaxers". So I plotted measles cases as a ten-year rolling average using CDC data. And I found that measles is actually not making a comeback. These "doctors" and "experts" are simply lying to everyone. https://t.co/YLqjHTqJyU

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

It's true that there have always been sporadic outbreaks. And after the "golden period" of about 5 years in the 2000s when there were only about 80 cases per year, we're up to about 240 cases per year now. https://t.co/kyGdnIoDMT

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

But historically speaking, the 2016-2025 10-year period is the second-lowest for measles cases in American history, second only to 2006-2015. In the 1990s, there were ~8000 cases per year. But that's not all.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

There were actually the same number of deaths in 2016-2025 as in the previous ten-year period 2006-2015: one. Yes, that's right, during 2006-2015, there was one death. During 2016-2025, there is also one death. Both ten year periods were record lows in number of measles deaths.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Imagine: children have been more safe from dying from measles over the past twenty years than at any time in American history. Meanwhile doctors are saying measles is making a comeback. The data show that these "doctors" simply don't know what the hell they are talking about.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

For transparency's and discussion's sake, I am pasting all of the rolling 10-year averages since 1960. 1960,560991.1 1961,550371.2 1962,530216.5 1963,523817.5 1964,501353.8 1965,472028.6 1966,431248.6 1967,388839.2 1968,314752.9 1969,276719.3 1970,237284.1 1971,202421.2 1972,157495.7 1973,121649.1 1974,78050.2 1975,54297.2 1976,37996.2 1977,37460.2 1978,37924.2 1979,36701.3 1980,33316.8 1981,26100.2 1982,23044.1 1983,20524.8 1984,18574.1 1985,16418.9 1986,12934.5 1987,7565.5 1988,5218.0 1989,5677.6 1990,7105.6 1991,7757.5 1992,7809.8 1993,7691.3 1994,7528.9 1995,7277.6 1996,6700.2 1997,6348.5 1998,6014.5 1999,4205.2 2000,1435.2 2001,482.5 2002,263.2 2003,237.6 2004,145.0 2005,120.7 2006,75.4 2007,65.9 2008,74.3 2009,71.4 2010,69.1 2011,79.5 2012,80.6 2013,93.7 2014,156.7 2015,168.9 2016,172.0 2017,179.7 2018,203.2 2019,323.5 2020,318.5 2021,301.4 2022,308.0 2023,295.2 2024,257.0 2025,247.5

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

And here are the cases and deaths I will do a separate thread on this tomorrow https://t.co/SXkVK8zOWe

Saved - February 18, 2025 at 4:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I highlighted CDC Director Rochelle Walensky's statement on MSNBC claiming vaccinated people don't carry the virus or get sick. Emails reveal she knew this was false. These lies enabled unconstitutional vaccine mandates, and I believe accountability is necessary for her and her colleagues.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

March 29, 2021 CDC Director Rochelle Walensky infamously declared on MSNBC: "Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick." Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it. 1/2 https://t.co/D3Uph6hHdP

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the latest CDC data, vaccinated individuals do not carry the virus or get sick. This observation isn't limited to clinical trials but extends to real-world scenarios as well.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick, and and that it's not just in the clinical trials, but it's also in real world

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

See for yourself. Without these lies, unconstitutional vaccine mandates would not have been possible. That's why she lied. She and her colleagues need to be held accountable for these lies. 2/2 @SecKennedy https://t.co/SIbMgu2cSK

Saved - November 14, 2024 at 4:39 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

A journalist at @Telegraph is under investigation by British police for an alleged “hate crime”. The “hate crime” is a year-old social media post. She hasn’t been allowed to know what the post is. She hasn’t been allowed to know who her accuser—her“victim”—is. Insane. https://t.co/GzA9qBrRKo

Saved - November 11, 2024 at 8:59 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Lol https://t.co/tGGrU91vo8

Saved - October 25, 2024 at 2:33 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Mandy Cohen, current @CDCDirector, talking and laughing about how she made policy decisions during COVID. Her approach? She would ask friends, "Well, what are you planning to do?" And they would casually agree on some policy on the phone and then do that. Completely unreal. https://t.co/ADkGUMeCwJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker frequently called the Secretary of Health and Human Services in Massachusetts, who worked for a Republican governor. The Secretary asked if they would allow professional football, and the speaker responded that they would not. The Secretary replied that neither would they. The speaker also had conversations about when Massachusetts would consider easing restrictions, with the state official suggesting "next Monday."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I would call, probably the person I called most was the Secretary of Health and Human Services in Massachusetts. She worked for a Republican governor just to, but when she was like, are you going to let them have professional football? And I was really like, nope. And she's like, okay, neither are we, neither are we. So, you know, it was like conversations like that. So or or I'd be like, so when are you gonna think about lightening up a mess? They were like, they're, like, next Monday. I'm, like, okay, next Monday.
Saved - October 6, 2024 at 10:32 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

March 29, 2021. Rochelle Walensky, Director of CDC, infamously declared on MSNBC: "Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick." Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it. 1/3 https://t.co/ojcidh0PVL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Data from the CDC suggests vaccinated people do not carry the virus or get sick. This observation is based not only on clinical trials but also on real-world evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our data from the CDC today suggest, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick, and and that it's not just in the clinical trials, but it's also in real world
Saved - September 23, 2024 at 12:45 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

June 2022 JIM JORDAN: “When the government told us that the vaccinated couldn’t transmit it, was that a lie or was that a guess?” DEBORAH BIRX: “I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way” The govt promoted its fantasies as facts. https://t.co/cMK2bhdtnu

Video Transcript AI Summary
One speaker states that you cannot conclude vaccines will do better than natural infection, although they can often do slightly better. When asked if the government lied about vaccinated people not getting the virus, the speaker responded that they don't know about the task force's discussions. They vaccinated their susceptible family members but still used layered protection during surges, knowing vaccine immunity could wane like natural immunity, with reinfection occurring every four months in South Africa. When asked if the government's claim that the vaccine prevented transmission was a lie or a guess, the speaker said it was hope. They added that the original phase three trials only measured symptomatic disease, not proactively testing for mild or asymptomatic infections, so there was never data showing protection against asymptomatic infection. Another speaker expressed frustration that government agencies were guessing, hoping, or lying to the American people, calling them the biggest purveyors of misinformation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You cannot make the conclusion that the vaccine will do better than natural infection. Although it can often do slightly better Speaker 1: Well, I think that's I mean, you're you're an expert. You were on the task where you were part of this this effort when you were in the previous administration. And you're saying in this administration that you can't rule out the fact that our government was lying to us when they told us the vaccinated could not get the virus. Speaker 0: I don't know about their discussions that they had in the task force, so I can't tell you that. I can tell you as a family member who had individuals that were susceptible, of course, we got everybody vaccinated. But we still used layered protection during surges because I knew, potentially, the vaccine immunity would wane like natural immunity waned. And there was evidence that every 4 months, reinfection was occurring in South Africa. Speaker 1: Wow. When the government told us that the vaccine, it couldn't transmit it, was that a lie or was that a guess? Or is it the same answer? Speaker 0: I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way. And that's why I think scientists and public health leaders always have to be at the table, being very clear what we know and what we know. Speaker 1: This is important for the country to know. So when I ask a question, when the government told us that the vaccinated couldn't get it, and I asked you if it was a guess or a lie, you said you don't know. You said you think it was hope. So what we do know is it wasn't the truth. So they were either guessing, lying, or hoping, and communicating that information to the to the to the citizens of this country. Speaker 0: I think they were hoping, but you should know in those original phase three trials that were done in this country, that we only measured for symptomatic disease. So we weren't proactively testing everybody in those trials to see if they got infected with mild or asymptomatic disease. And so people had to present within the clinical trial. Speaker 1: I I'm just I'm Speaker 0: So we never had the data that it was going to protect against asymptomatic infection. Speaker 1: I'm just struck with the irony. We got we got government agencies guessing, hoping, or lying, with with the information they're presenting to the American people. And this is the government governance disinformation governance board and wants to talk about misinformation. And they're the biggest purveyors of misinformation, false information, hopeful information, but not accurate and true information, which is, again, the frustration I think so many of the folks I get the privilege of representing have shared, have shared with me.
Saved - September 10, 2024 at 6:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Last year, I appeared on Tucker Carlson's show to apologize for the medical community's pandemic response, which led to a targeted smear campaign against me. Despite attempts to expel me from medical school, I remain committed to speaking the truth, regardless of the consequences. I have dedicated my life to medicine and public health, and I will continue to fight for these ideals, even if it means facing significant challenges. My recent article was moderate, and the extreme reactions to it highlight serious issues within American medicine.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Last year, I went on @TuckerCarlson to apologize for the way that the medical community handled the pandemic. Tucker expressed concern that I might lose my career. He was right. Soon after the appearance, a very intense, orchestrated smear campaign was launched by doctors online to have me expelled from medical school. These doctors repeatedly tried shaming and denigrating my school publicly for having me as a student. My school responded by fabricating disciplinary infractions, creating a paper trail to justify my expulsion. I told Tucker that I would tell the truth with a pure heart, regardless of the consequences. After what happened, I will keep telling the truth with a pure heart, regardless of the consequences. Medicine, public health, and medical science are all that I am. I have dedicated my life to them. If that means fighting, I will fight. If that means fighting for the rest of my life, I will fight for the rest of my life. If that means I will lose, then I will lose. If I have no chance against the forces of darkness, then I will still keep fighting against the forces of darkness. Win or lose, I will never give up. It will be my honor to fight for the truth, for the highest aspirations of medicine and public health, for patients and the public, no matter the consequences.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Medical researcher Kevin Bass wrote a Newsweek piece admitting the scientific community was wrong about COVID, which cost lives. He felt compelled to write it because the healthcare industry has lost the trust of ordinary people, who are angry. Bass wanted to do his part to make things better by apologizing for supporting policies, hoping change starts one person at a time. Bass is worried about the effect of the piece on his career, as his view is unpopular with older individuals, but he is trying to speak the truth with a pure heart. He believes senior people in the medical business and those who ran medical agencies haven't apologized because they are in echo chambers, surrounded by like-minded people, and alternative views are demonized due to political polarization. Bass thinks a reckoning is necessary to restore trust in the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, there's really no institution in American life that had higher trust than health care and now has lower trust after a couple of years of COVID. The entire sector has been gravely discredited for obvious reasons if you've lived here since 2020. But what's interesting is that very few people who work in the health care sector seem to understand this, and certainly no one has apologized. We bring it tonight one notable exception. Kevin Bass is a medical researcher. We don't know his politics. Sorry. He doesn't seem like a right winger or anything at all. But he just wrote one of the remarkable pieces we've seen this year in Newsweek admitting that his entire business got wrong. It's time for the scientific community to admit we were wrong about COVID, and it cost lives. God knows what the effect of that level of honesty will be on his career, but in the meantime, we're happy to have him join us now. Kevin Bass. Thank you for coming on, and thank you for writing this piece, which I I wanna recommend everyone. Totally nonpolitical. Again, I don't even know what your politics are. I assume you're liberal, but you're honest in this piece. Why were you moved to write this? Speaker 1: Well, for many of the reasons that you discussed that I realized that we have lost trust in this country as a health care industry from the the ordinary person. Anybody who knows, anybody who's watching the media, anybody who is on social media and is talking to ordinary people realizes just how angry so many ordinary people are. And I felt that if I wrote a piece like this apologizing for, you know, I didn't set policy, but I certainly supported it. And every single day, I certainly patted all my friends on the back for supporting it and for for for thinking the right kinds of thoughts. I thought if I apologized, then at least I was doing my part to to to make things better. And as we know, change starts 1 person at a time, so that's why I wrote the piece. Speaker 0: Amen. It's such an honorable and difficult thing to do. I was so very impressed by your piece for exactly that reason. If we're gonna say change starts one person at a time, the first thing we should all do is apologize for what we've done wrong, but no one ever does. What did you and, again, we don't have time to go through all the different things, but you you basically hit everything from masks to vaccines to the lockdowns. Are you worried since you're a younger man still in school? Are you worried about the effect of this piece on your career? Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. I'm saying something that's not gonna be very popular. A lot of people don't understand this point of view, when you talk to especially a lot of older individuals, including some people I admire greatly for all sorts of other different reasons, including great scientists. They often, don't understand what I'm doing. And so, but, you know, some of the younger generation does, and, there are some there are many people within the health care industry who do understand. So I think if I just speak the truth, which is what I'm trying to do, just speak the truth, and and I do so with a pure heart, that's that's what I'm here to do. Speaker 0: I wonder why this hasn't occurred and and again for the 3rd time, bless you for doing it, but I wonder why it hasn't occurred to to senior people in this business. Maybe people who ran, I don't know, our our medical agencies, to do the same. I mean, that would just that would do a lot for the country. Don't you think? Speaker 1: I think it would do, it is a necessary thing for to happen for this country for us to have a reckoning about this particular issue so that we can restore trust. People will remember this for the rest of their lives. I think the reason that these that the people who are in charge of these institutions don't do such a thing is because they're surrounded by a bunch of people who all think very similar to them. They're not really being exposed to ordinary people in a regular basis. They're in an echo chamber. They're patting each other on the back all the time. And for that reason, they can't see anything but their own perspective. In fact, it's been politicized. So everybody with the other perspective is in the other political party. So then you have the whole other dimension where where actually alternative views get demonized. So it's, they're entrenched, and and and there's a lot of polarization. So I think that's the reason it's gonna take a long time. Speaker 0: Can't come too soon, and yours is the first step of this piece. Kevin Bass, thank you so much. Speaker 1: Thank you.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

If anyone wants to know what I wrote, it was a very moderate piece. Read past the headline. Read the actual article. When people are this unhinged in response to the truth, something is seriously wrong in American medicine. https://www.newsweek.com/its-time-scientific-community-admit-we-were-wrong-about-coivd-it-cost-lives-opinion-1776630

It's Time for the Scientific Community to Admit We Were Wrong About COVID Intellectual elitism, credentialism, and classism must end. Restoring trust in public health—and our democracy—depends on it. newsweek.com
Saved - March 19, 2024 at 2:08 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

July 25, 2020 Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand: "We will continue to be your single source of truth. ... Unless you hear it from us it is not the truth." What do you think America would be like if the U.S. government became our "single source of truth"? https://t.co/N38n1cWxhD

Video Transcript AI Summary
We provide the latest information daily at covid19.govt.nz. Trust only us, the director general of health, and the Ministry of Health for accurate information. Dismiss rumors and hoaxes, like the fake news of an imminent lockdown in New Zealand. Prepare, but do not panic. Visit our website for up-to-date information and avoid spreading misinformation. Stay informed and calm during these uncertain times.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most up to date information daily. You can trust us as a source of that information. You can also trust the director general of health and the Ministry of Health. For that information, do feel free to visit at any time to clarify any rumor you may hear. Covid19.govt dotnz. Otherwise, dismiss anything else. We will continue to be your single source of truth. We will provide information frequently. We will share everything we can, everything you out, else you see, a grain of salt. And so I really ask people to focus. Alyssa, a very just example of that appears to be this text which originated in Malaysia and has kind of has become a viral hoax in Australia and in New Zealand. How irresponsible is it for people that are sharing that news of the lockdown imminent in New Zealand? Yeah. And and, look, that's the kind of thing that adds, to the anxiety that people feel. So I continue to share the message. New Zealanders must prepare, but do not panic. Prepare. And and when you see those messages, remember that unless you hear it from us, it is not the truth. And I really ask people, just visit, covid19.govt.ng. It has all of the up to date information, and we will continue to provide everything you need
Saved - February 12, 2024 at 4:27 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

FULL INTERVIEW with Soviet Defector Yuri Bezmenov: The Four Stages of Ideological Subversion (1984) https://t.co/nnK5Jtw45N

Video Transcript AI Summary
Yuri Alexandrovich Besmionov, a former KGB agent, shares his experiences growing up in the Soviet Union and working for the KGB in this video. He discusses the propaganda and brainwashing techniques employed by the Soviet government to control its citizens and manipulate foreign diplomats. Besmionov emphasizes the oppressive nature of the Soviet system, highlighting the lack of freedom and rights for individuals, as well as the corruption and dishonesty within the country. He compares life in the Soviet Union to that in the United States, warning of the dangers of socialism and urging people to stop supporting the Soviet regime. Besmionov reveals the KGB's strategy of recruiting leftists and intellectuals to destabilize nations, targeting those disillusioned with the Marxist-Leninist regime. He explains the process of ideological subversion, which involves gradually altering a country's perception of reality. Besmionov asserts that the United States is currently in a state of demoralization and urges Americans to educate themselves about the dangers of socialism and communism. He calls for an end to government aid to communism and encourages individuals to take action to save themselves and the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My father was he's on the left here. My father was officer of the General Staff of the Soviet Army. He was inspector of land forces, Soviet troops stationed in countries like Mongolia, Cuba, East European countries. This is the picture taken at the entrance of my Institute of Oriental Languages. It's a part of Moscow State University. As every Soviet student, I was quote unquote volunteering for harvesting grain in Kazakhstan. By the end of my training in school, I was recruited by the KGB. This picture was taken on that day and you can see again how happy It feels to be recruited by the KGB. Pay special attention to number of bottles on the table. One of my functions was to keep foreign guests permanently intoxicated the moment they land at Moscow Airport. In 1967, the KGB attached me to this magazine, Look Magazine. A group of 12 people arrived to USSR from United States to cover the 50th anniversary of October socialist revolution in my country. From the first page to the last page, it was a package of lies. Speaker 1: Our conversation is with mister Yuri Alexandrovich Besmionov. Mister Besmenov was born in 1939 in a suburb of Moscow. He was the son of a high ranking Soviet Army officer. He was educated in the elite schools inside the Soviet Union and became an expert in Indian culture and Indian languages. He had an outstanding career with Novesty, which was the and still is, I should say, the press arm or the press agency of the Soviet Union, it turns out that this is also a front for the KGB. One of his interesting assignments was to brainwash foreign diplomats when they visited Moscow. And he'll tell us a little bit about how they did this and how they planted information which eventually wound up in the press of the free world. He escaped to the West in 1970 after becoming totally with the Soviet system, and he did this at great risk to his life. He certainly is one of the world's outstanding experts on the subject of Soviet propaganda and disinformation and active measures. Mr. Besmionov, I'd like to begin by having you tell us a little bit about some of your childhood memories. Speaker 0: Well, the most vivid memory of my childhood was 2nd World War, or to be more precise, the end of the 2nd World War when all of a sudden United States from a friendly nation, which helped us to defeat Nazism, turned overnight into a deadly enemy. And it was very shocking because all newspapers were trying to present an image of belligerent, aggressive American imperialism. Most of the things that we were taught is that United States is aggressive power, which is just about to invade our beautiful free socialist country, that American CIA is dropping Colorado beetles on our beautiful potato fields to eliminate our crops. And each Schoolboy had a picture of Colorado bug on the back page of his notebook, and we were instructed to go into collective fields to search for those little Colorado bugs. Of course, we couldn't find any, neither we could find many potatoes. And that was explained again by the encroachments of the decadent imperialist power. The anti American paranoia hysteria in the Soviet propaganda was to such an of such a higher degree that many less skeptical people or less stubborn would really believe that United States is just about to invade our beautiful motherland, and some secretly hope that it will come true. Speaker 1: That's interesting. Yes. Well, getting back to life inside the Soviet Union or inside Communist countries in general, In this country, at the university level primarily, we read and hear that, the Soviet system is different from ours, but not that different, in that there is a convergence developing between all of the systems of the world and that, really, it doesn't make an awful lot of difference what system you live under because you have corruption and dishonesty and tyranny and all that sort of thing. From your personal experience, what is the difference between life under communism and life in the United States? Speaker 0: Well, life is obviously very much different for for simple reason that, The Soviet Union is a state capitalist economically. It's a state capitalism where an individual has absolutely no rights, no value. His life is nothing. It's just like an insect. He's disposable. Whereby in United States, even the even the worst criminal is treated as a human being. He has a fair trial, and some of them capitalize on their crimes. They they publish their memoirs in their prisons and get handsomely paid by your crazy publishers. The differences, of course, in the daily life are very various depending on who whom we are talking about. In my own private life, I never suffered from communism simply because I was brought up in the family of high ranking military officer. Most of the doors were open for me. Most of my expenses were paid by the government, And I never had any troubles in with the authorities or with the police. So in other words, I would say I enjoyed or I had good reasons to enjoy all the advantages of so called socialist system. My main motivations to defect was Had nothing to do with effluents. It was mainly moral indignation, moral protest, rebellion against the inhuman methods of Of the Soviet system? Speaker 1: Well, specifically, what did you object to? I objected, first Speaker 0: of all, against oppression of my own dissidents and intellectuals. And that was the most disgusting thing that that I witnessed as a as a young man, young student who was brought up a very troublesome period in our history from Stalin to Khrushchev, from total tyranny and oppression to some kind of liberalization. 2nd, when I started working for the Soviet Embassy in India, I to my horror, I discovered that we are millions times more oppressive than any colonial or imperialist power in the history of mankind, that my country brings to India not freedom, progress, and and friendship between the nations, But, racism, exploitation, and slavery, and and, of course, economical inefficiency to this country. Since I fell in love with India, I developed something which, by KGB standards, is extremely dangerous thing. It's called split loyalty. When an agent likes a country of assignment more than his own country. I literally fell in love with this beautiful country, a country of great contrasts, But also great humility, great tolerance, and and if philosophically and intellectual freedoms. My ancestors used to live in caves and eat raw meat when India was highly civilized nation 6000 years ago. So obviously, the choice was Not to the advantage of my own nation, I decided to defect and to entirely dissociate myself from the brutal regime. Speaker 1: Mister Besmianoff, we've read a lot about the concentration camps and the slave labor camps under the Stalin regime. Now the general impression in America is that those things are part of the past. Are they still going on today? Or what is the status? Speaker 0: Yes. There is no qualitative change in in the Soviet concentration camp system. There are changes in in numbers of prisoners. Again, this is unreliable Soviet statistics. We don't know how many political prisoners are there in the Soviet But we sure know from various sources that at each particular time, there are close to 25 to 30,000,000 of Soviet citizens who are virtually kept as slaves in forced labor camp system. Size of population of country like Canada is serving terms as as prisoners. Incredible. So I would say that those intellectuals who try to convince American public that Concentration camp system is a thing of a past are either conscientiously misleading public opinion Or they are not in very intellectual people. They they're selectively blind. They don't they lack Intellectual honesty when they say that. Speaker 1: Well, we've spoken about the intellectuals in this country and also the intellectuals in the Soviet Union. What about down at the broad mass level? Do the people in general, the worker the working people, the workers General in the Soviet Union, do they support the system? Do they tolerate it? What is their attitude? Speaker 0: Well, every Soviet citizen, if there is such an animal, of course, does not like the system because it hurts. It kills. He may not understand the the reasons. He he may not have enough information or or educational background to understand, but I doubt very much there are many people who are conscientiously supporting the Soviet system. There are no such such people in USSR. Even those who have all the reasons to enjoy socialism, people like myself, who are a member of journalistic elite, They they also hate system for for different reasons, though, not because they lack material effluents, But because they are unfree to think, they're in constant fear, duplicity, split personality, this is the greatest tragedy for my nation. Speaker 1: Well, what do you think are the chances of the people actually overcoming their system or replacing it? Speaker 0: There is a great possibility that system will sooner or later be destroyed from within. There is a self destructive mechanism built into any socialist or communist or fascist system because there is lack of feedback because the system does not rely upon loyalty of population. But until and until this Soviet junta is being supported by the Western so called imperialists, that is multinational companies, establishments, governments, And let's face it. Intellectuals, so called academia in the United States is famous for supporting the Soviet system. As long as the Soviet junta will keep on receiving credits, money, technology, grain deals and political recognition from all these traitors of democracy or freedom, there is no hope. There is not much hope for changes in my country. And the system will not collapse by itself simply because it's it's being nourished by so called American imperialism. This is the greatest paradox in history of mankind when, capitalist world supports and actively nourishes its own destroyer destructor. Speaker 1: I think you're trying to tell us something. Oh, yes. Country. Mhmm. Speaker 0: I'm trying to tell you that it it has to be stopped unless you want to end up in in gulag system and enjoy all the advantages of socialist equality, working for free, catching fleas on your body, Sleeping on the planks of plywood in Alaska this time, I guess. That's where Americans will be wrong unless they will wake up, of course, and force their government to stop aiding Soviet fascism. Speaker 1: Well, you told us a moment ago why you left the system. I'd like to hear the details of how you did it. It must have been a very dangerous thing. Speaker 0: It was not so dangerous. It was crazy. First of all, because defecting in India is virtually impossible. Thanks to very strong pressure from the Soviet government. Speaker 1: Excuse me. You were in India on assignment at Speaker 0: this time. I was working for the Soviet embassy in New Delhi as a press officer. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: And, defecting for a Soviet diplomat is next to impossible. It's a suicide, as I said, because a great friend Indira Gandhi pushed a law through parliament which says, and I quote, No defector from any country has a right of political asylum in any embassy on the territory of Indian Republic, which is a masterpiece of hypocrisy. No other defector, but the Soviet one needs a political asylum. So knowing that perfectly well, I I I planned a craziest possible way to defect. I studied counterculture in India. There are there were thousands of young American boys and girls with no shoes, long hair, smoking hush and marijuana, studying sometimes Indian philosophy, sometimes simply pretending that they study. And they greatly annoyed Indian police, and they were laughing stock of Indians because, obviously, they they were good for nothing students. I studied carefully where they congregate, what routes they travel, what language they speak, what do they smoke. And one day, I simply joined a group of hippies to avoid detection of Indian police. I was dressed as a typical hippie with blue jeans, long Kamiz shirts with all kind of nice decorations like these long hairs. I I I bought a wig because for several weeks, I had to turn myself from a conservative Soviet diplomat into a very progressive American hippie. And that was the only way that that I could avoid detection. It was very interesting experience, but it was necessary because, From my own knowledge as a as a member of Soviet embassy staff, I knew that there were many cases when Soviet defectors were betrayed by Indian police and also some Western embassies played a very dirty role in betraying the Soviet defectors. According to our information, there were some I wouldn't call them double agents, but simply a model people working for this for the United States embassy and confining in in people like this would be a suicide. So I had to be extremely careful. I could not trust anyone. And That was the reason for such a crazy way to defect. Speaker 1: Well, had you been caught in the act of trying to get out, What would have happened to you? Speaker 0: Oh, most likely, I would end up in in concentration camp. Or Depending on the situation and on on the on the whim of some bureaucrat in KGB, maybe even executed. This is normal practice, Quietly, of course, not publicly. But that would be the end of my introduction, of course. Speaker 1: Well, when did you finally make it to the United States? Speaker 0: In 1970, after about 6 months of debriefing in Athens by the CIA, and I presume FBI too. They let me go first to Germany then to Canada. That was my decision. I had to change my identity to protect my family and my friends in in USSR. And, also, I was a little bit paranoid knowing that both Soviet KGB and probably some double agents within American system may be after me. So I wanted to settle down as far away as possible. I requested CIA to give me some kind of new identity and just let me go on my own. And I settled in Canada. I was a student. I changed many professions from farm help and and laundry truck driver to instruct language instructor and broadcaster for Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in Montreal. Well, have you had any threats on your life or any Yes. Unpleasant In about 5 years, KGB eventually discovered that I am working for Canadian Broadcasting. See, I made a very big mistake. I started talk I started working for Overseas service of CBC, which is similar to Voice of America in Russian language. And, of course, monitoring service in USSR picked up every new voice. Every new announcer would They they would make it a point to discover who he is. And in 5 years, sure enough, slowly but surely, they discovered that I am Not Thomas Schuman, that I am Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmianov, and that I'm working for Canadian Broadcasting. And undermining beautiful detente between Canada and USSR. And the Soviet ambassador, Alexander Yakovlev, made it his personal effort to discredit me. He complained to Pierre Trudeau, who is known to be a little bit soft on socialism. And The management of CBC behaved in a very strange, cowardly way, unbecoming to representatives of an independent country like Canada, they listened to every suggestion that Soviet ambassador gave, And they started shameful investigation, analyzing content of my broadcasts to USSR. And sure enough, they discovered that some of my statements were probably to, would be offending to the Soviet Polidoro. So I had to to leave my my job. And, of course, subtle intimidations. They would say something like, please cross the street carefully because, you know, traffic is very heavy in Quebec. And, Fortunately, I know about the psychology and and the logic of activity of the KGB, and I never allowed myself to be intimidated. This is the worst thing. This is what they expect a person, the defector to be intimidated. Once they spot that that you are scared, They keep on developing that line. And then eventually, you either have to give up entirely and and and work for them, or you they neutralize you. They they they would definitely stop all kind of political activity, which they failed to do in my case because I was stubbornly working for the Canadian Broadcasting. And In response to their intimidations, I said that, look, this is a free country, and I am as free as you are. And I also can drive very fast. And gun control is not yet established in Canada. So I had a couple of good shotguns in my basement. So welcome to visit me someday with your Kalashnikov's machine guns. So, obviously, it didn't work. Intimidation didn't work. So they tried different approach, as I described, they approach on the highest level, on the level of Canadian bureaucracy. Speaker 1: And at that level, they were successful. Speaker 0: On that level, they were successful. On an individual level, they failed flat. Speaker 1: Mister Besmayanov has brought a series of slides with him that he has taken from the Soviet Union, and I think this is a good time to, Take a look at the slides. Now, the viewers will be able to see these slides as we talk about them. Speaker 0: Yes. This is a collection of slides, which are Some of them are, snapshots from my family album. Some of them are documents which I smuggled from the Soviet Embassy, And some are reproductions from local mass media. I usually show them to establish my credibility as a defector. This is a picture of of my native town, Matish, about 20 miles north from Moscow. Characteristically, there's a statue of Comrade Lenin in the central square. This is myself at the age of 7. Again, characteristically, under the statue of Comrade Stalin extending his friendly hand to Peoples of the world. At that age, of course, I was still idealistically minded young communist, And, I still believe that sooner or later, things will go for better, but I realized that the system stinks, that something is fishy, And that ideology is is fake and the, propaganda about advanced Soviet agriculture simply didn't meet the criteria of reality. If they talk about, abundance of food and and there's none in the stores, there must be something wrong. My father was he's on the left here. My father was officer of the general staff of the Soviet Army. He was inspector of land forces, Soviet troops stationed in countries like Mongolia, Cuba, East European countries. Were he alive today, most likely, he would be inspecting Soviet troops in in Nicaragua, Angola, and many other parts of the world. Fortunately, he died, and he didn't see the disgrace because deep inside, he was a Russian patriot. He didn't He didn't like the idea of expanding Soviet military might, especially in the areas where where we were not welcomed at all. Unlike many other military officers, He was reporting directly to the minister of defense bypassing KGB and diplomatic service. In other words, he was a trusted military professional. And my impression that this type of people are much less hulkish and adventuristic than party bureaucrats In Kremlin, when American mass media described Soviet military as potentially dangerous counterpart for for Pentagon, I simply laugh Because I know better. I know that the most dangerous part of the Soviet power structures are not military at all. Most likely, if they come to power in my country, there'll be more sensible negotiators for nuclear disarmament and withdrawal of the Soviet troops from many parts Speaker 1: of the world. But if someone from the party structure or the KGB structure were to give the orders for a military Speaker 0: They have to obey. They have Speaker 1: to follow. Speaker 0: They are professional military. But they you see the triangle of power and hate in USSR is the party at the top, the party elite, the oligarchy of the party, then the military and the KGB at the bottom. They hate each other. And, the most hated triangle, The most hated corner of the triangle is the Communist Party bureaucrats. They are the most adventuristic, senile, megalomaniacs. They can start war. I wouldn't be surprised. Not the military. They know what war is. At least my father did. This is the picture taken at the at the entrance of my Institute of Oriental Languages. It's a part of Moscow State University. I, graduated in 1963, and I Excuse me. Which one were you on? I I am on the Right. You're on the right. And on the left is my, colleague, my schoolmate, Vadim Svyronov, who later was a apparatchik in the Central Committee of the Soviet Union Communist Party. What is an apparatchik? It's it's a it's a function. It's something like civil service in British Empire. Some someone who is never fired from from the service. He stays there internally. He may not be promoted too high, but he's a dependable bureaucrat who will stay forever. I studied not only languages, but also history, literature, even even music. I'm I'm on this picture, I'm trying to learn how to play musical, Indian musical instrument. I even tried to look like an Indian when I was 2nd years to Speaker 1: Not bad. Right? Speaker 0: Yes. And actually, it was strongly encouraged by the by the instructors in my school because This the graduates of my school were later on employed as diplomats, foreign journalists, or spies. As every Soviet student, I was, quote unquote, volunteering for harvesting grain in Kazakhstan. This is a a biggest, agricultural blunder of the Soviet government. But, I didn't have much choice, course, because the communist motto borrowed from the Bible says, those who do not work shall not eat, and you can see me eating. Therefore, I was working, and you can see how happy I was about it. I went through a very extensive physical and military training, including the manure, and including the, military gains in in, areas, suburban areas of Moscow. And here, for example, we are on the tour in Arkhangelsk area. And by the end of my training in school, I was recruited by the KGB. This picture was taken on that day, and you can see again how happy It feels to be recruited by the KGB. Speaker 1: Our conversation with Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmianoff, who was a defector from the Soviet Union, a former propaganda Agent for Novesty and the KGB will continue after this message. Speaker 0: Alright. As every student in USSR, I I went through very extensive physical and military training and civil defense training too. Unlike in United States, where civil defense is virtually nonexistent, 0. In USSR, every student, whatever is major subject, has to go through very extensive 4 year military and civil defense training. You can see me here with a group of students during one of the war games near Moscow. The main idea, of course, is to prepare a huge reserve army of of of the USSR. Each student has to to graduate as a junior lieutenant. In my case, it was administrative and military intelligence service. My first assignment was to India as a translator with the Soviet economical aid group building refinery complexes in Dihar state and Gujarat state. At that time, I was still naively, idealistically believing that what I was doing contributes to the understanding and cooperation between the nations. It took me quite a number of years to realize that what we were bringing to India was a new type of colonialism, thousand times more oppressive and exploitative than any colonialism or imperialism in in history of mankind. But at that time, I was still hoping that, well, maybe it's not that bad, could be worse, and things may go for better. And I even tried to implement the beautiful Marxist motto, proletarians of all the countries unite. I tried to unite with a nice Indian girl, and I was actually, I was fascinated by Indian culture, by by the family life in in this country. But obviously, Communist Party had different plans for my genes, so I had to marry this beautiful Russian girl. In the span of my career, I married 3 times. Most of these marriages were marriages of convenience on advice from the Department of Personnel. This is normal practice in USSR. When the Soviet citizen is assigned to a foreign job, he has to be married either to keep family in USSR as hostages. Just or if it's a convenience marriage like mine, so that the husband and wife are virtually informers on each other to prevent defection or, contamination by decadent imperialist or capitalist ideas. In my case, I hated that girl so much that the moment I landed in Moscow, we, we were divorced, and I, I married late the second time. By the end of my first assignment in India, I was promoted to the position of of public relation officer. You can see me here translating a speech by a Soviet Boss. Speaker 1: And you're on the right. Speaker 0: I'm on the right here. Yes. And it was the occasion was commissioning of the refinery complex in Bihar Baroni. Back in Moscow, I was immediately recruited by Novasty Press Agency, which is a propaganda and ideological the version front for the KGB. 75% of the members of the Novice Tea are commissioned officers of the KGB. The other 25 are like myself co opted agents who are assigned to specific operations. In this particular case, you can see me talking to students of Lumumba Friendship University in Moscow. This is the unit a huge school under the, direct control of the KGB and Central Committee where future leaders of the so called National Liberation Movements are being educated and selected carefully. And some of them have absolutely they neither this, for example, is a group of students from Lumumba. They don't look like students at all. They look more like military, and that's exactly what they were. They were dispatched back to their countries to be leaders of the so called national liberation movements or to be translated into normal human language, leaders of, international terrorist groups. Another, area of activity when I was working for the novice team was to accompany groups of so called progressive intellectuals, Writers, journalists, publishers, teachers, professors of of of colleges. You can see me here in Kremlin. I'm second on on the left with a group of Pakistani and Indian intellectuals. Most of them pretended they don't understand that, we are actually working on behalf of the Soviet government and the KGB. They pretended that they are actually being guests, a VIP intellectuals, that they are treated according to their merits and and and their intellectual abilities. For us, they were just a bunch of intellectual abilities. For us, they were just a bunch of political prostitutes to be taken advantage for various propaganda operations. Therefore, you can see perfectly well, the senior colleague of mine on the left doesn't really have that much respect on his face and myself with a very skeptical smile, typical KGB sarcastic smile, anticipating another victim of of ideological Brainwashing. This is how a a typical, conference in Novosti headquarters in Moscow look like. Sitting in the middle is Boris Burkhov, the then director of Novasty Press Agency, high ranking party bureaucrat In the department of propaganda, I am standing next to a famous Indian poet, Sumitranandan Panth. He was famous because he was an author he was the author of a famous poem titled Rapsody to Lenin. That's why he was invited to USSR, and everything was paid, by the Soviet government. The pay special attention to number of bottles on the table. This is one of the ways to kill the awareness or curiosity of of foreign journalists. My one of my functions was to keep foreign guests permanently intoxicated. The moment they land at Moscow Airport, I had to take them to the VIP launch and Toast to friendship and understanding within the nations of the world, glass of vodka, then the second glass of vodka. And in no time, my guest would be feeling very happy. They would see everything in kind of pink, nice color, and, that's the way I I had to keep them permanently for the next 15 or or 20 days. At certain point in time, I had to withdraw alcohol from them so that some of them who are the most would feel a little bit shaky, guilty trying to remember what they were talking last night. That's the time to approach them with all kind of nonsense, such as joint communique care or statement for for Soviet propaganda. That's the time they are in the most flexible. And, of course, what they didn't Then they didn't realize or pretended not to realize that myself who was drinking together with them, was not drinking at all. I had ways to get rid of alcohol through various techniques, including special pills, which were given to me by my colleagues. But they were taking it seriously. In other words, they they they would consume quite a large volumes of alcohol and feel quite uneasy next morning. In 1967, the KGB attached me to this magazine, Look Magazine. A group of 12 people arrived to USSR from United States to cover the 50th anniversary of October socialist revolution in my country. From From the first page to the last page, it was a package of lies, propaganda cliche, which were presented to American readers as opinions and deductions of American journalists. Nothing could be far from truth. This were not opinions. They were not opinions at all. They were the cliches which the Soviet propaganda wants American public to think that they think that if it does make any sense at all. It sure does because From the viewpoint of the Soviet propaganda, although there are some subtle criticism of the Soviet system, the basic message is that Russia today is a nice functioning, efficient system supported by majority of population. That's the biggest lie. And, of course, American intellectuals and journalists from Luke Magazine Eliberated on that untruth in various different ways, they intellectualized that lie. They found all kind of justifications for telling lies to American public. This is Speaker 1: Excuse me, it was partly your job To make sure that they got these ideas and accepted them as their own ideas. Speaker 0: Right. Actually, even before they arrived to USSR, and they paid astronomical sum of money for that visit. They were submitted the this Novosib press agency developed so called backgrounder, 20, 25 pages of information and opinions, which were presented to the journalists even before they bought their tickets to Moscow. They had to analyze the situation. And judging on their reaction to that background, the local Mavista representative If our local Soviet diplomat in Washington DC would assess whether they have whether they'd be given visa to USSR or not. Well, they were selected all the time. They were preselected very carefully, and there is not much chance for honest journalists to arrive to USSR and to stay there for 1 year and to bring this, package of lies back home. This, for example, is a centerfold of the tie of of the Look Magazine. They presented this monument erected by Communist Party in Stalingrad as the symbol personification of Russian military might. And they said in the article, which is published on on the side, that Soviets are very proud of the victory in the 2nd World War. This is another big myth, a lie. Most sensible people would be proud to lose 20,000,000 of their countrymen In a war which was started by Genovese, Hitler, and comrade Stalin and paid by American multinationals, most of the Soviet citizens look at this type of monuments with disgust and sorrow because every family lost father, brother, sister, or child in the 2nd World War. Yet American journalists were trying to appease, to please their hosts, Presented this picture on the centerfold as the symbol and personification of Soviet national, they call it Russian national spirit. And it was greatest greatest misconception and and a very tragic misunderstanding. Of course, Luke Magazine was not distributed in USSR. The main, audience was in United States. But, I presume that many Americans, millions of Americans who were reading LOOK Magazine at that time had absolutely wrong idea about the sentiments of my nation, about what the Soviets are proud of, and what they hate. This is a group. You see the same lady with the sword in Stalingrad. This is the group of journalists. Myself is in the center with the same devilish smile, and mister Philip Harrington is on the extreme left there with with his camera. This is the gentleman which was so deaf or so uninterested in what I had to say to him. This is the same picture, a blow up of the same of the same picture. Many many guests from various countries, in this particular case from Asia and Africa were taken by me as a novice press agency employee, for a tour across Siberia, for example. We would show them typical kindergarten. You see? Nothing special by American standards. Just nice children sitting, eating their breakfast or or lunch. What they could not understand or they pretended not to understand that is an exemplary kindergarten. This is not the kindergarten for every person or every family in USSR, And we maintain that illusion in their minds. You can see myself under the red spot in the middle there, with the same business like expression. I'm on you know, I'm doing my job. That that's what I'm assigned to do, and that's what I was paid to do. But deep inside, I still hope that at least some of these useful idiots would understand that what they are looking at has nothing to do with the level of affluence in my nation. This is a better picture which reflects the true spirit of of the Soviet, Soviet childhood. This picture was printed in a Canadian government publication by mistake. In the middle, you can see children playing on a a small courtyard, and the caption goes, this is a typical kindergarten in Siberia. What these idiots didn't understand that it is not kindergarten at all. It is a prison for children of political prisoners. But there was not a single mentioning that what they were visiting actually was an area of concentration camps. And the job of people like myself To help them to not to notice that they are actually talking to prisoners, most of the children were dressed, especially on the occasion of the foreigners visit. The, of course, there were no corpses in on the ground. There were no machine gun guards. And, the well, it looks Not very pleasant as you see. It's a it it looks dull, but, obviously, it does not create an impression that this is actually a prison. Speaker 1: Well, did any of the journalists have the curiosity to ask about prisons and that kind of thing? They were in Siberia, Speaker 0: is what you were saying? Yes. Some of them ask questions and naturally, we we would give them the for the stupid question, we give them stupid answer. No. There are no prisons in Siberia. No. Most So the people who who you see are free citizens of USSR, they're very happy to be here, and and they are contributing to the glory of the socialist system. Some of them pretended that they they believe what what I was telling them. And Most of them, we may discuss it later. What are the motivations of these people? Why would they stubbornly bring lies to their own population through their own mass media. I have various answers to this. There is not a single explanation. It's a complex of explanations. It's fear, pure biological fear. They understand that they are on the territory of an enemy state, a police state. And just to save their rotten skins and their miserable jobs, their effluents back home, they would prefer to tell a lie than to to ask truthful questions and and report truthful information. 2nd, most of these schmucks were, afraid to lose their jobs because, Obviously, if you tell truth about my country, you will not last long as a correspondent of New York Times, or or Los Angeles They will fire you. What kind of correspondent are you? You obviously cannot find common language with Russians if they kick you out in 24 So just by by trying to be conformist to their own editorial bosses, they tried not to offend the sentiments of the Soviet administrators and people like myself. Deep inside, I hope they would insult my or offend my sentiments. Obviously, they preferred not to. Another reason, I did I I refuse to believe it, but obviously, there is another reason. Obviously, it's agreed. These people earn a lot of money when they come back to USA. They claim that they are experts in my country. They write books which sells a 1000000 copies, titled like Russians, the truth about Russia. Most of it is lie about Russia, Yet they claim to be Sovietologists. They they bring they play back myths about my country, the propaganda cliches, yet they stubbornly resist the word of truth. If a a person like Solzhenitsyn is either defecting or kicked out of USSR. They try all their best to dis to discredit him and to discourage him. I don't have much chance to appear on national network, with a true story about my country. But a useful idiot like Kendrick Smith or Robert Kaiser. They are big heroes. They come back from USSR. They say, oh, we were talking to dissidents in Russia. Big deal. Soviet dissidents are chasing American correspondents in the streets, and they are cowardly escaping from these contacts. For some strange reason, if you want to know more about Spain, you refer to Spanish writers. If you want to learn more about French, you read French writers. Even about Antarctica, I bet you would read penguins. Only about the Soviet Union for some strange reason, You read Hendricks and Schmendricks and all kind of Kysinger's because they claim that they know more about my country. They know nothing or next to nothing, or they pretend that they know more than they actually do. I would say they are dishonest people who lack integrity and common sense and intellectual honesty. They bring back all kind of stories like that. A kindergarten in Siberia, Meeting the most important fact, it's a prison for children of political prisoners. Another greatest example of monumental idiocy of American politicians. Edward Kennedy was in Moscow, And he thought that he is a popular charismatic American politician who is easygoing, who can smile, dance at the wedding in in Russian Palace of Marriages. What he done what he did not understand or maybe he pretended not to understand that actually he was being taken for a ride. This is a staged bedding especially to impress foreign media or or useful idiots like Ed Kennedy. Most of the of the guests there, they they they had security clearance, and they were instructed what to say to foreigners. This is exactly what I was doing. You can see me in the same damn bedding Palace in Moscow where Ed Kennedy was dancing here. You see smiling. He thinks he's very smart. From the viewpoint of Russian citizens who observe this idiocy, he's he's narrow minded, egocentric idiot who tries to earn his own popularity through the, through participation in propaganda farces like this. Here, you can see myself On the right, again, exemplary Soviet bride. On the left, 3 journalists from various countries, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Obviously, they enjoying the situation. They they will go back home and write the reports. We were present in the On the regular Soviet wedding, they were not present on the regular Soviet wedding. They were present. They were parts of a farce of a circus performance. Another thing which I had to sometimes risking my life to explain to foreigners. Time Magazine, for example, is very critical of South African racist regime. The whole article was dedicated to the shameful internal passport system where black blacks are not allowing to live with whites. For some strange reason, for the last 14 years since my defection, nobody wanted to pay attention to my passport. This is my passport. It also shows my nationality, and it it it has a police rubber stamp, which is called in Russian language, which assigns me to a certain area of residence. I cannot leave that area. Same way as this black man cannot leave the area in South Africa, yet we call South African government racist regime. Not a single Jane Jane Schmonder or Fonda is brave enough, courageous enough To come to media and say, look. This is what happens in USSR. I send a copy of of my passport to many American liberals and civil rights, defenders and and all the other useful idiots, they never they never bothered to answer me back. This shows what kind of integrity, what kind of honesty these people are. They're a bunch of hypocrites because they don't want to recognize a good example of racism in my country. This is the first stage of befriending a professor. You can see myself on the left with the same James Bond smile. On my on the right is my KGB supervisor, comrade Leonid Mitrokhin, and in the middle, a professor of political science in Delhi University. The next stage would be to invite him to a gathering of in the Soviet Friendship Society. There he is sitting next to his wife before he is being sent to USSR for free trip. Everything is paid by the Soviet government. He was made to believe that he's invited to USSR because he's a talented, Sober thinking, intellectual, absolutely false. He's invited because he's a useful idiot, Because he would agree and subscribe to most of the Soviet propaganda cliche. And when he is coming back to to his own country, he is going for years years to teach the beauties of Soviet socialism to, newer and newer generations of his students, thus promoting the Soviet propaganda line. The KGB was even curious about this gentleman. It may look innocent. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, a great spiritual leader or maybe a great charlatan and crook, depending on which from which side you are looking at him. Beetles were trained at his Ashram in in India how to meditate. Mia Farrow and and other, useful idiots from Hollywood visited his school, and they returned back to to United States, absolutely out of their minds with marijuana, Hashish, and crazy ideas of meditation. To meditate, in other words, to isolate oneself from the current social and political issues of your own country to get into your own bubble, to forget about troubles of the world. Obviously, KGB was very fascinated with such a beautiful school, such a brainwashing center for stupid Americans. I was dispatched by the KGB to check what kind of VIP Americans attend this school Speaker 1: at UN11. Speaker 0: Yes. I'm on the left. I I I was trying to get enrolled in that school. Unfortunately, the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi asked too much. He wanted 500 American dollars for enrollment, But my function was not actually to get enrolled in the school. My function was to discover what kind of people from United States attend this school. And we discovered that, yes, there are some influential members of family, public opinion makers of United States who come back with the crazy stories about Indian philosophy, Indians themselves look up upon them as idiots, useful idiots, to say nothing about KGB who looked at them as as as extremely Naive misguided people. Obviously, a VIP, say, a wife of of of a congressman or or a prominent Hollywood personality after the after being trained in that school is much more instrumental in the hands of of manipulators of public opinion and KGB than a normal person who who understands, who who who looks through this this, this this type of of, fake religious training. Speaker 1: Why would they be more susceptible to manipulation? Speaker 0: I just mentioned that because, you see, a A person who is too much involved in in in in introspective meditation. You see, If you carefully look what what Maharishi Mahesh Yogi is teaching to to Americans is that all most of the problems, most of the burning issues of today can be solved simply by meditating. Don't don't don't rock the boat. Don't get involved. Just sit down, look at your navel, and meditate. And the things due to some strange logic due to cosmic vibration will will will settle down by themselves. This is exactly what the KGB and Marxist Leninist propaganda wants from Americans to distract their opinion, attention and mental energy from real issues of United States into a non issues, into a non world, nonexistent harmony. Obviously, it's more beneficial for the Soviet aggressors to have a bunch of duped Americans than Americans who are self conscious, healthy, physically fit, and alert to to the reality. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi obviously is not on the payroll of the KGB. But whether he knows it or not, he contributes greatly to demoralization of American society, and he's not the only one. There are hundreds of those gurus who come to you to your country to capitalize on naivete and stupidity of of Americans. It's a fashion. It's a fashion to meditate. It's a fashion not to be involved. So, obviously, you can see that if if KGB were, that curious, if they paid my trip to Hadwar, if they assigned me to that to that strange job, Obviously, they were very much fascinated. They were convinced that that type of of of brainwashing is very efficient and instrumental in demoralization of the United Speaker 1: Our conversation with Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmianoff, who is a defector from the Soviet Union, a former propaganda agent for Novesty and the KGB will continue after this message. Speaker 0: This picture shows the part of the building of USSR embassy and my supervisors. On the left is comrade Meghdi, an Indian communist, And on the right, comrade Mitrokhin, my supervisors in the secret department of research and country propaganda. It has nothing to do with either research or counter propaganda. Most of the activity of that department was to compile huge Amount volume of information on individuals who were instrumental in creating public opinion, publishers, editors, journalists, actors, educationalists, professors of political science, members of parliament, representatives of business circles. Most of these people were divided roughly in 2 groups. Those who would tow the Soviet foreign policy, they would be promoted to the positions of power through media and public opinion manipulation. Those who refuse the Soviet influence in their own country would be character assassinated or executed physically come revolution. Same way as in a small town of Hue in South Vietnam. Several thousands of Vietnamese were executed in one night when the city was captured by Vietcong for only 2 days. An American CIA could never figure out how could possibly communists know each individual where he lives, where where to get him, and would be arrested in 1 night, basically, in some 4 hours before dawn, put on a van, taken out of the city limits, and shot. The answer is very simple. Long before communist occupied the city, there was extensive network of informers, Local Vietnamese citizens who knew absolutely everything about people who are instrumental in public opinion, including barbers and taxi drivers. Everyone who is sympathetic to United States was executed. Same thing was done under the guidance of of the Soviet embassy in Hanoi. And same thing I was doing in New Delhi. To my horror, I discovered that in the files where people were doomed to execution, there were names of of pro Soviet journalists with whom I was personally friendly. Speaker 1: Pro Soviet. Speaker 0: Yes. They were idealistically minded leftists who, made several visits to USSR. And yet the KGB decided that come revolution or drastic changes in political structure of India, they will have to go. Why is that? Because they know too much simply because, you see, the useful idiots, the the leftists who are Idealistically believing in the beauty of Soviet socialist or communist or whatever system. When they get disillusioned, they become the worst enemies. That's why my KGB instructors specifically made the point, never bother with leftists. Forget about these political prostitutes. Aim higher. This was my instruction. Try to get into into, large circulation, established conservative media, Rich, filthy rich moviemakers, intellectuals, so called academic circles, cynical, egocentric people who can look into your eyes with angelic and tell you a lie. These are the most recruitable people, people who lack moral principles, who are either too greedy or to suffer from self importance. They feel that, they they matter a lot. These are the people who KGB wanted very much to recruit. Speaker 1: But to eliminate the others, to execute the others, don't they serve some purpose? Wouldn't they be the ones Speaker 0: you rely on? They serve purpose only at the stage of destabilization of a nation. For example, your leftists in in United States. All these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defender, they are instrumental in the process of the of the, subversion only to destabilize the nation. When their job is completed, they are not they are not needed anymore. They know too much. Some of them, when when they get disillusioned, when they see that Marxist Lenin has come to power, obviously, they get offended. They think that they will come to power. That will never happen, of course. They will be lined up against the wall and shot, but they may turn into the most bitter enemies of Marxist Leninists when they come to power. And that's what happened in Nicaragua. You remember most of these, former Marxist Leninists were either put to prison or one of them split, and now he's working against Sandinistas. It happened in in, Grenada when Boris Bischoff was he was already a Marxist. He was executed by by a new Marxist who was more Marxist than this Marxist. Same happened in Afghanistan when, first, there was Taraki. He was killed by Amin. Then Amin was killed by Babrakar Mal with the help of KGB. Same happened in in Bangladesh when Mujibur Rahman, very pro Soviet leftist, was assassinated by his own Marxist Leninist military comrades. It's the same pattern everywhere. The moment they serve their purpose, all the useful idiots are used either be executed entirely, All the idealistically minded Marxist or, exiled or put in prisons like in Cuba. Many many former Marxists are in Cuba, I mean, in prison. So most of the Indians who were cooperating with the Soviets, especially without the Department of of, Information of the USSR Embassy were listed for execution. And when I discovered that fact, of course, I was sick. I was mentally and physically sick. I thought that I'm I'm going to explode one day during the briefing of the ambassador's office. I would stand up and say something that we are basically a bunch of murderers. That's what we are. We, it has nothing to do with friendship and understanding between the nation and blah blah blah. We are murderers. We behave as as bunch of thugs in in a country which which is hospitable to us, a country which which with ancient traditions. But I I I did not defect. I tried to get the message across to my horror. Nobody wanted even to listen, least of all to believe what I had to say. And I tried all kinds of tricks. I would I would I would, leak information through letters, or lost documents something like that. And still, I got no message. The message was not published even in the conservative mass media of of India. The immediate impulse to defect was Bangladesh crisis, which was described by American correspondence as Islamic Grassroot Revolution, which is Absolute baloney. There was nothing to do with Islam, and there was no Grassroot Revolution. Actually, there are no Grassroot Revolutions, period. Any revolution is a byproduct of a highly organized group, of conscientious and professional, organizers, but Has nothing to do with grassroots. In Bangladesh, it was nothing with grassroots. Most of the, Avami League party members, Avami Lignin's People's Party, were trained in Moscow in the high party school. Most of the Muqtifalje leaders Muqtifalje is in Bengali People's Army, same as Swapo and and all kind of liberation armies all over the world, the same bunch of useful idiots. They were trained at Lumumba University and various centers of the KGB in Simferopol, in in Crimea, and in Tashkent. So when I saw that India Indian territory is being used as a as a jumping board to destroy East Pakistan, I saw myself thousands of of so called students traveling through India to East Pakistan, through the territory of India, and Indian government pretended not to see what what's going on. They knew perfectly well. The Indian police knew it. The intelligence department of Indian government knew it. The KGB, of course, knew it, and the CIA knew it. That that was most infuriating because when I defected and I explained to the CIA debriefers, they should watch out because East Pakistan is going to erupt any moment. They said I I I was I was reading too too many James Bond novels. Anyway, so East Pakistan was doomed. One of my colleagues in in the Soviet consulate in Calcutta, when he was dead drunk, he ventured into the basement to to relieve himself. And he found the big boxes, which said printed matter to Dhaka University. Dhaka is a capitalist, Pakistan. And since he was drunk and curious, he opened one of the boxes, and he discovered not printed matter. He discovered Kalashnikov guns and ammunition in there. Anyway, it's a long story. When I saw the the preparations for the for the invasion into East Pakistan, obviously, I wanted to defect immediately. The only thing I couldn't I couldn't, at that time, make up my mind when and where and how. One of the reasons, of course, you see, I was In love with India, I mentioned it before. I spoke the languages. I socialized with people, and I understood that I had to to act fast unless I want this beautiful country to be permanently and irreparably damaged by our presence. One of the reasons not to defect was, as you can see, I was living in relative affluence. Who the hell in in in the normal mind would defect and do what? To be abused by your media? To be called McCarthyist and fascists and paranoid or to drive a taxi in New York City. What for? What the hell for should I defect? To be abused by by Americans, to be insulted in exchange for for my effort to bring the truthful information about impending danger subversion. As you can see, I was living in quite a comfortable conditions next to swimming pool where Indians were not allowed, by the way. I was highly paid expert in propaganda. I had my family. I was respected by my nation. My career was cloudless. The third reason, how to defect with the family? To the fact that the baby and the wife would be virtual suicide because according to the law, that hypocritical law which I quoted before, The Indian police will have to hand me over back to the KGB, and that will be the end of my defection and probably my life. Again, I cannot smuggle my wife because she was not quite sure what what I was doing. She was not that idealistically involved, and she was definitely not In in in the total picture, what I was doing for the KGB, she would be shocked if I if I, You know, put her in my van and and drive her to American embassy or elsewhere. That would be a greatest danger. So, again, I had to defect in such a way that my defection would look as simple disappearance. And there were many cases like that When the Soviet agents simply disappeared, either killed in action or thanks to their curiosity and and their close contacts radical. Some of them were killed by the Marxist, by the way. It happened in many African countries when the Soviet KGB were killed by Africans themselves. Not because they hated Marxist Leninist, but because they were simply trigger happy bunch of unruly characters. If you give them machine gun, they will shoot. And some of the Soviets, obviously, were not careful enough to protect themselves, and they got into embarrassing situations when they were shot at the crossfire between factions of of so called liberation movements. Anyway, so I I decided, as I said, to study the, counterculture. I decided this probably would be the best way to disappear. I socialized with characters like this on the left. You See, he's a barefoot American hippie. It took me quite a long time to study exactly what they were doing and how to mix with them, But eventually, I did it. Most of Indian newspapers carried my picture and promise of 2,000 rupees for information about my whereabouts, But they were looking for wrong person because they obviously tried to stop, young Soviet diplomat in white shirt and tie, and this is how I looked at the time of defection. Nobody could possibly think that the Soviet diplomat would be as crazy as to join a bunch of hippies. That's you. Yes. Travel Indian small cash. So I made it literally almost like a Hollywood style detective story. From under the nose of the KGB in Bombay Airport, I landed the plane, and I flew to to Greece where I was debriefed by the CIA. That's basically most that's all for for my slides. Speaker 1: We can turn off the projector, and that's very interesting. Well, you spoke several times before about ideological subversion. That is a phrase that, I'm afraid some Americans don't fully understand. When, the Soviets used the phrase ideological subversion, what do they mean by it? Speaker 0: Ideological subversion is is the process which is legitimate, overt, and open. You you can see it with your own eyes. All all you have to do, all American mass media has to do is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes, and they can see it. There is no mystery. There is nothing to do with espionage. I know that espionage intelligence gathering looks more romantic. It sells more deodorants through the advertising, probably. That's why Your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond type of of thrillers. But in reality, The main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion and opinion of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process, which we call either ideological subversion or active measures, in the language of of the KGB or psychological warfare. What it basically means is To change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, No one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. It's a great brainwashing, process which goes very slow and is divided in in 4 basic stages, the first one being demoralization. It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which requires to, educate 1 generation of students in the country of of of your enemy exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxism Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of of of at least 3 generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The result the result you can see, most of the people who graduated in dropouts or half baked intellectuals are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, Business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their mind even if you if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic Perception and the logic of behavior. In other words, these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To get rid society of these people, you have you need another 20 or 15 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of the United States society. Speaker 1: And yet these people who've been programmed and, as you say, in place and who are favorable to an opening with the Soviet concept, These are the very people who would be marked for extermination in this country. Speaker 0: Most of them, yes. Simply because the psychological shock, When when they will see in future what the what the beautiful society of equality and social justice means in practice, Obviously, they will revolt. They they they will, they they will be very unhappy, frustrated people. And Marxist Leninist regime does not tolerate these people. They obviously, they will join the links of dissenters dissidents. Unlike in present United States, there will be no place for dissent in in future Marxist Leninist America. Here, you can you can get, popular like, Daniel Ellsberg and filthy rich like Jane Fonda for being dissident, for criticizing your Pentagon. In future, these people will be simply squashed like cockroaches. Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful, noble ideas of equality. This, they don't understand, and, it will be greatest shock for them, of course. The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last 25 years. Actually, it's overfulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously, not even Comrad von Drokov and and all his Experts would would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans, Thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, Even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until He he's going to receive a kick in the in his fat bottom. When a military boot crashes his then he will understand, But not before that. That's the tragic of the situation of demoralization. So, basically, America is stuck with with demoralization. And unless Even if if you start right now, here, this minute, you start educating new generation of Americans, it will still take you 15 to 20 years to turn the tide of, of ideological perception of reality, back to normal normalcy and and, patriotism. The next stage is destabilization. This time, subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption. Whether you eat junk food and get fat and flab, it doesn't matter anymore. This time, and it takes only from 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation. It's what matters is essentials, economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as defense and economy. The influence of Marxist Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed, in this part of the world that the process will go that fast. The next stage, of course, is crisis. It it it may take only up to 6 weeks to to bring a country to the verge of crisis. You can see it in in Central America now. And after crisis, with a violent change of power, structure and economy, you have so called the period of Normalization. It may last indefinitely. Normalization is a cynical expression borrowed from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in 'sixty 8, Comrade Brezhiev said, now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized. This is what will happen in United States if you allow all the schmucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and the paradise on Earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition and to put a big brother government in Washington, DC with the benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale, who will promise lots of things. Never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of of new generation of Soviet assassins. Never mind. He will create false illusions that the situation is under control. Situation is not under control. Situation is disgustingly out of control. Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system trains another generation of people who think they are living at a peacetime. False. United States is in the state of war, undeclared total war against the basic principles and the foundations of of this system. And and the initiator of this war is not comrade Dondropov, of course. It's it's the system. However ridiculous it may sound, the world communist system or the world communist conspiracy, whether I scare some people or not, I don't give a hoot. If if you are not scared by now, nothing can scare you. But you don't have to be paranoid about it. What what actually happens now that unlike myself, you have literally several years to live on unless United States wake up. The the time bomb is ticking. With every second, The disaster is coming closer and closer. Unlike myself, you will have nowhere to defect to unless you want to live in Antarctica with penguins. This is it. This is the last country of freedom and possibility. Speaker 1: Okay. So what do we do? What is your recommendation to the American people? Speaker 0: Well, the the the immediate thing that comes to my mind is, of course, there must be a very strong National effort to educate people in in in the spirit of real patriotism, number 1. Number 2, to to explain them the real danger of socialist, communist, whatever, welfare state, big brother government. If people will fail to grasp the impending danger of that development, nothing ever can help United States, you may kiss goodbye to your freedom, including freedoms to to homosexuals, to prison inmate. All this freedom will vanish, evaporate in in 5 seconds, including your precious lives. Including your precious lives. The second thing I the moment At least part of the United States population is convinced that the danger is real. They have to force their government. And I'm not talking about sending letters, signing petitions, and all this beautiful, noble activity. I am talking about and all this beautiful noble activity. I am talking about forcing United States government to stop aiding communism Because there is no other problem more burning and and urgent than to stop the Soviet military industrial complex from destroying what is whatever is left of the free world. And it is very easy to do. No credits, no technology, No money, no political or diplomatic recognition. And, of course, no such EDS as great deals to USSR. The Soviet people, 270,000,000 of of Soviets, will be eternally thankful to you if you stop aiding a bunch of murderers who sit now in Kremlin and whom President Reagan respectfully calls government. They do not govern anything, least of all such complexity as the Soviet economy. So basic 2 2 very simple, maybe 2 simplistic answers or solutions. But never nevertheless, they are the only solutions. Educate yourself. Understand what's going on around you. You are not living at the time of peace. You are in a state of war, and you have precious little time to save yourself. You don't have much time, especially if you are talking about young generation. There's not much time left for convulsions to the beautiful, disco music. Very soon, it will go Just just overnight. If we are talking about capitalists or or or wealthy businessmen, they I think they are selling the rope on which they will hang very soon. If they don't stop, if they cannot curb their unsettled desire for profit, And if they keep on trading with the monster of the Soviet communism, they are going to hang very soon. And it they will pray to be killed, But, unfortunately, they will be sent to Alaska probably to manage industry of slaves. It's it's simplistic. I know it sounds Pleasant. I know Americans don't like to listen to things which are unpleasant, but I have defected not to tell you the stories about such idiocy As microfilm James Bond type espionage, this is garbage. You don't need any espionage anymore. I have come to talk about survival. It's a question of survival of this system. You may ask me, what is it in for me? Survival, obviously, because unlike I as I said, I am now in your boat. If if we sing together, we'll sing beautifully Together, there is no other place on this planet to defect to.
Saved - January 23, 2024 at 2:59 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Newly resurfaced interview Fauci: "It's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit and they get vaccinated." https://t.co/vqaQlNVEd2

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a recently resurfaced interview, it is revealed that the speaker's intention behind COVID mandates was to encourage people to get vaccinated. The speaker believed that once individuals felt legally protected and empowered, schools and universities would require vaccinations for admission. The speaker argued that when vaccination became a practical necessity, people would prioritize it over ideological beliefs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now this newly resurfaced interview reveals what he really wanted out of all those COVID mandates. Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you were gonna have schools, universities, And colleges are gonna say, you wanna come to this college, buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated. It's been proven that when you make it for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bull and they get vaccinated.
Saved - December 29, 2023 at 3:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During the pandemic, Kai Matthews was denied care at a Canadian hospital due to COVID-19 testing delays. He later died from treatable bacterial meningitis. Similar policies led to increased deaths from other conditions as well. Lack of proper medical care may have caused more deaths than were saved.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

How some pandemic policies cost more lives than they saved: the case of Kai Matthews On May 30th, 2021, 19-year-old Kai Matthews rapidly developed a fever and chills and was brought to a Canadian emergency room by his family [1]. However, he was repeatedly turned away due to the hospital needing to process his COVID-19 test. His illness, which turned out to be bacterial meningitis, was treatable. However, because no treatment was provided, his illness rapidly progressed. He died. The infection-fatality rate at the time in Canada was 0.26% [2], meaning that he would have had to infect 400 people with COVID-19 to cause one death. At the time, the average person with COVID-19 would spread the virus to just 5 people [3]. Thus, while Kai Matthews was almost certain to die without care, he was incredibly unlikely to cause any deaths by infecting others if he had been admitted. The same mad policies that caused the death of Kai Matthews would repeat over and over in other hospitals around the world. As emergency room visits for diabetes, strokes, and heart attacks plummeted, deaths from these conditions skyrocketed [4]. Meanwhile, cancer care, cardiovascular services, infectious disease programs (HIV, tuberculosis, malaria), neurological services, immunizations, and maternal health were disrupted [5]. As scientists recognized during the very earliest months of the pandemic, this led to countless deaths from lack of proper medical care [6-11]. As was the case for Kai, to the degree that the threat of the virus was exaggerated beyond what it actually was, these deaths from lack of proper medical care in many cases may have exceeded the lives saved. References [1] https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/halifax-family-questions-care-delay-after-19-year-old-son-dies-of-meningitis-1.6068149#:~:text=Nova%20Scotia-,Halifax%20family%20questions%20delay%20in%20treatment%20after%20son%2C%2019%2C%20dies,he%20first%20began%20showing%20symptoms. [2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851304/ [3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950018/ [4] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32584802/ [5] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4447806 [6] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7314091/ [7] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32383831/ [8] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32679111/ [9] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32609307/ [10] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2778361 [11] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32584802/

Halifax family questions delay in treatment after son, 19, dies of meningitis | CBC News A Halifax family whose 19-year-old son died of meningitis are left with questions about what might have happened if he’d had the right medical attention sooner. Kai Matthews died less than two days after he first began showing symptoms. cbc.ca
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivity During the First and Second Viral Waves in 2020 and 2021 Among Canadian Adults What was the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first 2 viral waves (April to July 2020 and October 2020 to March 2021) among the Canadian adult population?In this cohort study of a representative sample of 19 994 adult Canadians, ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The reproduction rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 different variants recently circulated in human: a narrative review SARS-COV-2 is responsible for the current worldwide pandemic, which started on December 2019 in Wuhan, China. On March 2020 World Health Organization announced COVID-19 as the new pandemic. Some SARS-COV-2 variants have increased transmissibility, cause ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Potential Indirect Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Use of Emergency Departments for Acute Life-Threatening Conditions - United States, January-May 2020 - PubMed On March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Subsequently, states enacted stay-at-home orders to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and reduce the burden on the U.S. health care system. … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
How Did the COVID Pandemic Response Harm Society? A Global Evaluation and State of Knowledge Review (2020-21) Early in the Covid pandemic concerns were raised that lockdown and other non-pharmaceutical interventions would cause significant multidimensional harm to socie papers.ssrn.com
Emergency hospital admissions and interventional treatments for heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias in Germany during the Covid-19 outbreak Insights from the German-wide Helios hospital network ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Collateral Effect of Covid-19 on Stroke Evaluation in the United States - PubMed Collateral Effect of Covid-19 on Stroke Evaluation in the United States pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
COVID-19 pandemic and admission rates for and management of acute coronary syndromes in England - PubMed UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Public Health England, Health Data Research UK, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Excess Deaths From COVID-19 and Other Causes, March-April 2020 - PubMed This study uses data from the National Center for Health Statistics to estimate excess deaths (ie, the difference between observed and expected deaths) in the US and the District of Columbia in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Potential Indirect Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Use of Emergency Departments for Acute Life-Threatening Conditions - United States, January-May 2020 - PubMed On March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Subsequently, states enacted stay-at-home orders to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and reduce the burden on the U.S. health care system. … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 1:07 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

The Democratic party has been the party of the rich since at least the 1980s. This trend, once modest, has grown steeply in recent years.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Source https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/27/business/economy/republican-party-voters-income.html

How the G.O.P. Became the Party of the Left Behind (Published 2020) Dayton, Ohio, typifies the forces that have pushed those hurt by economic change toward the Republicans, while affluent places become more Democratic. nytimes.com
Saved - November 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Ernest Ramirez’s 16-yo son died 5 days after receiving the Pfizer COVID vaccine. FEMA then contacted Mr. Ramirez and offered to pay for his son’s burial so long as he would report that he died from COVID, not the vaccine. https://t.co/WZ62hpoELU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernest Ramirez shares the heartbreaking story of his 16-year-old son, Ernesto, who tragically passed away just five days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. Ernesto's father met him at a summit in Kentucky. Following his son's death, FEMA reached out to Ernesto's father, offering to cover the burial expenses, but only if he claimed that his son had died from COVID. Ernesto's father finds this situation appalling and expresses his disgust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ernest Ramirez, 16 year old son. Ernesto. Yeah. I've met Ernest as well in Kentucky at a at a summit. His his son died 5 days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine, and then he was contacted by FEMA who said that they would pay for his son's burial if he who claimed that his son had died of COVID. It's disgusting. I wanted to
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 4:02 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Brilliant video showing when Trump said m the death rate from COVID was lower than 3.4%, the media angrily accused him of “misinformation.” Scientists at the time admitted that Trump might be right (he was), but media wouldn’t report that. https://t.co/lBp2fZ7C6s

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Health Organization warns that the death rate from the coronavirus is rising and currently stands at 3.4%. However, President Trump believes this number is false and that the actual death rate is way under 1%. He has been criticized for spreading misinformation and contradicting health officials. Some experts, including Dr. Fauci, suggest that the death rate could be considerably less than 1%. Trump's hunch is based on conversations with people in the field. Critics argue that he should trust information from doctors and scientists rather than relying on his own hunches. The president's statements have been labeled as reckless and dangerous, as conflicting messages can be harmful during a pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The new warning for the World Health Organization at death rate from the coronavirus is rising. 3.4% is higher. Speaker 1: Twice as deadly as previous estimates. Three point 4% Speaker 2: state of emergency. Well, I think the 3.4% is really a false number based on a lot of conversations with a lot The people that do this. I think the number is way under 1%. Speaker 3: So to fact check, the World Health Organization says the coronavirus Death rate is 3.4%. Speaker 1: President Trump lies that the World Health Organization is wrong. The number is 3.4%. 3.4% is what it's being reported around the world. Making it deadlier so much death. Speaker 3: The death Speaker 1: rate. The percentage is 3.4%. And no hunch from the president can change that. Trump lied about the most recent World Health Organization estimate that the global death rate of coronavirus is 3.4%. The 3.4% death rate was wrong, and WHO data later updated it to Speaker 2: For a fraction of 1 ahead. Speaker 1: Let's go back in the history. Trump has a hunch that the death rate is lower than 1%. Speaker 2: Way under 1%. Way under 1%. Speaker 1: Will someone put a mozzarella 2. Stupid old. Don't lie to viewers about the mortality rate. It's way under 1%. False information. He's spreading disinformation. Misinformation two dangerous. Disinformation. Maybe a president of the United States. You have the world's greatest scientist at your disposal. Speaker 4: Can you Speaker 1: listen to that? Leading scientists, including doctor Fauci, wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine that the death rate could be considerably less than 1%. Speaker 2: Way under 1%. Speaker 1: Why are you going on national television and contradicting experts based on a hunch? His fake hunch was some fake math. Speaker 5: The president somehow thinks it could be lower than 1% based on nothing. Speaker 2: Based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Speaker 6: Outright lies. Contradicting health officials on fatality rates. Speaker 7: It's not a time for Donald Trump to Speaker 1: be calling into cable shows. It's a time for the CDC. What is CDC's best estimate of the fatality rate? Somewhere between half a percent and 1%. Speaker 2: To a fraction of 1%. Speaker 1: The president is spreading false information. Information discarding what the health professionals The saying. Speaker 8: Outright bogus information. Speaker 1: Science is not based on hunches. Speaker 3: It's a hunch about what he thinks is going on. Speaker 1: Instead of trusting information from doctors and scientists. Speaker 3: He has a hunch. Time to hunch. Speaker 7: It's not a time for Donald Trump's hunches. It's a time for science. It's a time for doctors. Speaker 1: Welcome doctor j Bhattacharya. My hypothesis My hunch. Was as likely to be less deadly than Speaker 2: the World Health Organization's thing. 3.4%. There's no way that was Really, false numbers. Speaker 1: This is why I ran the study in April 2020. And what did you discover? The infection fatality rate was 0.2%. Way under 1%. Trump continues to contradict and downplay all things coronavirus. Speaker 3: The president appearing to contradict medical experts on the mortality rate of the virus. Speaker 2: Personally, I would say the number is way under 1%. Speaker 1: Later on CNN. Our estimates are probably pretty inflated. Speaker 2: Very high. Because the easy cases, they don't report The doctors or the hospital have been Speaker 4: a case. So Initially, WHO released the estimates of 3.4%. Speaker 2: Really, false number. Speaker 1: The true fatality rate is likely to be far far less. Speaker 2: Way under 1%. It could be in Speaker 1: the range of a seasonal influenza. We're a fraction Speaker 2: Should have 1%. This is just my hunch. Speaker 1: He is spreading misinformation and disinformation. Speaker 8: You can even call it information. Speaker 1: An outbreak of sketchy information coming from the president. Using a hunch instead of sending to the global authority on public health. Hunch. Speaker 9: There's lots to be concerned about. His hunch Speaker 1: A hunch. Hunches. Just by hunch and hunch. It's hunch. Speaker 2: By hunch. Based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people, that's not what you want for the American people. Speaker 1: A hunch. I think in retrospect, those quotes are gonna look even more damning. Sometimes you have to laugh to keep from five. The pandemic of misinformation. Put out misinformation. Redding false information. And the disinformation False. Wrong and misleading information. Misleading misinformation and misinformation. Misinformation. Just unspeakably reckless. It's totally reckless. Speaker 3: It's dangerous to have conflicting messages out out there. Speaker 1: That is very dangerous. Speaker 3: How dangerous is it? Really dangerous. Speaker 1: What is the danger? Speaker 3: I think we're in a very dangerous period. If The president continues to hunt
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 12:07 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

September 30, 2021 Canadian police arrest mother in front of four crying children for not providing COVID vaccine passport. The vaccine never stopped transmission of the virus. They called these laws scientific. They were not. https://t.co/yGielnMr0K

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions why someone is being asked to leave, stating that the conversation is between them and the lady. They argue that they are not trespassing as it is a public facility they have paid for. The speaker asks why the lady is being arrested, but the reason is not given. The officer explains that it is under the Trespass Property Act, while the speaker insists they are within their rights. The officer provides their name and asks for the speaker's identification. The conversation ends with a request to contact someone for clarification on the rules.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not talking to you. I'm talking to this lady right here. Why are you asking her to leave? K. This is between her and us, not yourself. Why are you asking her to leave? Answer. You can go over here. No. So You can give us a ticket to identify yourself to us. Right now, we're trespassing property because they asked Do not leave. This is a public facility that we've paid for. They've asked you to leave. Do you have identification on you? Because you will be arrested on Pass the property. After request of the facility. You don't wanna do this to Harry's children. Right? We are not trespassing. Okay. Why are you arresting her? Here it is. Why are you arrested? I told you. You didn't say why she's under arrest. Now it's under the Trespass Property Act. Oh my gosh. We are within our rights. Why did you arrest her? I've already told you twice. It's not trespassing. We are within our rights. We've been asked by the facility manager. We are what's your name? My name is right here in my And what's What's what and what's your what's your partner's name? 19. I'm out at Kincardine. Feel free to contact and find out the rules. Okay? I have to A mandate is not a lie. Don't push by. Excuse me.
Saved - October 26, 2023 at 2:22 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

New review of 77 studies published about masks by the CDC after 2019 shows that these studies systematically drew conclusions that overhyped the effectiveness of masks but which were not well-supported by the data. In other words, CDC publishes propaganda, not science. https://t.co/P44v0gxUeH

Saved - October 22, 2023 at 10:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In her memoir, Deborah Birx reveals that the initial "two weeks to flatten the curve" was a marketing strategy for implementing longer and stricter lockdown measures. She aimed to present simple mitigation measures to the vice president, gradually leading to more aggressive interventions. Birx admits that she had already planned to extend the shutdown beyond the initial two weeks, but needed time to gather supporting data. This insight sheds light on the intentions behind the initial approach to managing the pandemic.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Deborah Birx from her memoir, explaining how "two weeks to flatten the curve" was just marketing for harsh, months-long lockdowns that she was really planning: "On Monday and Tuesday [March 9th and 10th, 2020]…we worked simultaneously to develop the flatten-the-curve guidance I hoped to present to the vice president at week’s end. Getting buy-in on the simple mitigation measures every American could take was just the first step leading to longer and more aggressive interventions. We had to make these palatable to the administration by avoiding the obvious appearance of a full Italian lockdown. … No sooner had we convinced the Trump administration to implement our version of a two-week shutdown than I was trying to figure out how to extend it. Fifteen Days to Slow the Spread was a start, but I knew it would be just that. I didn’t have the numbers in front of me yet to make the case for extending it longer, but I had two weeks to get them."

Saved - October 16, 2023 at 3:28 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

BREAKING 98% of Americans are now antivax extremists

Saved - October 7, 2023 at 10:55 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

March 29, 2021. Rochelle Walensky, Director of CDC, infamously declared on MSNBC: "Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick." Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it. 1/2

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the CDC, vaccinated individuals do not carry or get sick from the virus. This finding is not only based on clinical trials but also reflects real-world data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus. Don't get sick. And and that it's not just in the clinical trials, but it's also in real world
Saved - October 7, 2023 at 7:49 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

In this video from May 16, 2021, Dr. Anthony Fauci claims that COVID vaccination turns the person vaccinated into a "dead end" for the virus. Fauci was claiming something that he could not possibly know based on evidence that did not exist. He was lying.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccination not only protects your health and your family's, but also contributes to community health by preventing the spread of the virus. By becoming a dead end to the virus, you help stop its transmission. When there are many dead ends, the virus cannot go anywhere, resulting in a significantly lower infection rate in the community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is absolutely the case, and that's the reason why we say. When you can vaccinate and do not only protect your own health, battle to family, but also you contribute to the community health by preventing the spread of the virus to allow the community. In other words, you become a dead end to the virus. When there are a lot of dead ends around, the virus is not going to go anywhere. And that's when you get a point that you have a markedly diminished rate of infection in the community.
Saved - October 6, 2023 at 6:10 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

“Nobody is safe until everybody is safe.” Why did pandemic public health communicators intentionally, relentlessly promote fear? And how healthy is a society where the overwhelming messaging is one of fear?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video emphasizes the importance of vaccination and the risks associated with being unvaccinated. It repeatedly states that no one is safe until everyone is safe from COVID-19. The speakers express frustration and anger towards the unvaccinated, suggesting they should be banned from certain places and denied healthcare. They argue that the unvaccinated are a threat to society and are responsible for the ongoing pandemic. The video also mentions breakthrough cases among the vaccinated, but highlights that vaccination significantly reduces the risk of severe illness and death. It concludes by urging people to get vaccinated and join the fight against COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanna make sure that people can discern the truth from the misinformation, and we wanna make sure that everyone understands that no one's safe till everyone's safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. Speaker 1: No one is safe. No Speaker 0: one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. Nobody is safe. This is Speaker 2: a post 9 11 axiom. Safer but not yet safe. Speaker 0: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe from COVID nineteen until everyone is safe. Speaker 2: If the whole world isn't safe, none of us are safe. Speaker 0: No one is safe. Speaker 1: No one is safe. Nobody is Speaker 2: safe until we're all safe. Speaker 1: Health experts have been saying nobody is safe. Speaker 0: Nobody is safe until everybody is safe. Nobody is safe. Science just clear. None of us are safe. There is no safety. Speaker 1: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. Speaker 2: No one is safe until everyone is safe. No one's safe. Speaker 0: Nobody is safe. Safe. Nobody's safe. Speaker 2: No one's safe. We'll never be safe. Until we're all safe. We are never gonna be safe. Speaker 0: 99.5% of people are safe and will survive COVID nineteen. The only positive thing out of this is we should be able to manufacture a lot of seen 10. Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. You don't have a choice. As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe. Normalcy We'll see only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population. So Get Speaker 1: the fucking vaccine. You need to get vaccinated. Vaccinated. And if you don't, you are going to die. I know you're vaccinated. You're the smart ones, but you know there's people out there who aren't listening to God and what God wants. You know who they are. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated people. My message to unvaccinated Americans is this. Speaker 2: If you are the unvaccinated, you are the problem. You'll Speaker 0: fucking dead. I'm saying no. Blame. The only people that you can blame are the unvaccinated. Speaker 1: Frankly, we can't trust the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: They should not be part of Polite society. Lunatics who won't take COVID vaccines walking around lawfully unvaccinated are psychotic. If you're willing to walk among us unvaccinated, you are an safe. You have no right not to be vaccinated. You don't have the right to contaminate someone. You can't go around pointing a gun in somebody's face, which is what it is when people are unvaccinated. They are all all idiots and losers. This is a real movement Speaker 2: in this country against the unvaccinated. Jennifer Aniston is cutting non vaccinated people out of her life. Unrepentant, unvaccinated. Speaker 0: They should be removed from the hospital. Those who refuse to be vaccinated should be denied health care. Vaccinated person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy, rest in peace, wheezy. You're Speaker 2: Some doctors are saying they'll refuse treatment For people who'd scooned not to get the shot. Why are hospital and ICU resources going to them? Morons. Speaker 0: You'll not get the shot. Vaccinated clowns. Idiots who think that they can do their own research. Speaker 3: Don't do any of your own research. Speaker 1: Doing your own research is associated with conspiracy theory safe. Speaker 0: This go it alone approach doing your own research that can have serious consequences. You should get prison time for even questioning the vaccines. Can we all stop saying, I need to do my own research? That phrase, do your own research, 4 words, 4 little words that are hurting America. Doing your own research hurts America. Everybody has a supercomputer in their hand that empowers them to do their own research, and that's the problem. You must not do your own research. There. I need to do my own research. I don't have never understand what that means. I'm doing my own research. Speaker 1: You can't do your own research unless you're a scientist. Safe. Come do your own research. Speaker 2: Maybe you've told yourself you're planning it safe. You just wanna wait and see since this is a new vaccine. Now. Speaker 1: Blow the up and get the vaccine. Speaker 0: Unvaccinated people spread the virus. It's a vaccine, you dopes. Don't be a Get yourself vaccinated. That's just all there is pooped. There's no excuse. No excuse for being unvaccinated. There's no rational and no emotional argument that adds up against getting your damn shot. There's a there's a Speaker 1: But you made a conscious decision not to get the vaccine. I also have natural immunity. So for me, personally, safe. This vaccine poses a greater risk than a benefit. I'm also not a risk to any of you. Let's look at the science. Speaker 0: So we see that the natural infection is given greater protection or slightly greater protection done vaccination. Speaker 1: This is a vaccine that was created to prevent severity of disease and to prevent hospitalizations, but the Steam does not prevent you from getting COVID and does not prevent you from transmitting Oh, my goodness. Reality out. We have seen that stuff. Come on. No. It'll go to Fox safe till everyone's safe. No one is Speaker 0: safe. Safe. When we've poked at, we'll be new. You're gonna be safe from the COVID infected you. Safe. Speaker 2: The virus stopped with every vaccinated person. Speaker 0: Do it so you stop spreading a terrible disease. And that seen. Our key goal is to stop the transmission so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Expectation for vaccines seems as not to get infected. Speaker 2: A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. Speaker 0: When the virus gets to you, you stop stopping. You're not gonna catch it. You're not gonna get sick. You're not gonna transmit it. The vaccine is absolutely bulletproof. Speaker 1: Vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus. 100% effective in preventing COVID. Speaker 0: The vaccine prevents you from getting infected. Speaker 1: It is Speaker 2: to keep you from getting it and then spreading it. Speaker 1: We safe. Have the ability to stop COVID in its tracks. Speaker 0: You're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Quaidant tests positive for COVID nineteen. When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Doctor Fauci tests positive for COVID nineteen. Speaker 1: Vaccinated people do not carrying the virus, don't get sick. Speaker 0: CDC director tests positive for COVID nineteen. Seeing. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID again. CDC director safe. Test positive for COVID again. Fauci test positive for COVID again. Joe Biden test positive for COVID again. Speaker 1: Cases up 258%, safe. The majority of these cases are among the vaccinated, and this area is the most vaccinated part of Massachusetts. Speaker 0: So many fully vaccinated. People are testing positive. Speaker 1: So people here are a bit angry. Speaker 0: We are all really concerned about what this means long term. I was vaccinated, and I got COVID. Safe. Almost everyone we know with vaccinations had at least 1 bout of it. Our vaccines work better, then we could have possibly hoped they would work. Speaker 1: We are not the problem. The problem are the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated threat. Unvaccinated people are a threat, a direct threat, a threat to all of us. Getting a risk to all of us. Speaker 1: People have a right to be protected from the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: Maybe there should be laws that allow them to be kept out of the building. So at least, thankfully, they're not breathing same error. Their freedom to breathe will diminish. Start firing the unvaccinated. If Speaker 2: you don't vaccinate, you'll be fired. Speaker 0: Time to come down on the unvaccinated. They should be banned from the VA, banned from restaurants, banned from other businesses and colleges. Companies should not treat us as equal. Sedating people under arrest. It Speaker 2: is the unvaccinated that has put America in the place that it is. Speaker 0: We are losing freedom because people are unvaccinated. Forced to unvaccinated. I'm curious that the unvaccinated. Frustrated with Americans. Still not vaccinated. Not to be vaccinated. Seems criminal. Suspects faced. Years behind bars for coughing on police officers. Freedom. For them. Charged with terrorist threats. You have no individual rights when it comes to the vaccine. Speaker 1: Really, you're killing other people. Speaker 0: You're being attacked by unvaccinated. Unvaccinated who aren't wearing masks. It's the unvaccinated who aren't social distancing. It's the unvaccinated going to crowded indoor events. It is not your right as an American citizen to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection. Don't screw you, Freedom. We can coerce you. Speaker 1: You're not going to be able to travel severe. If someone in your family isn't vaccinated, should you ask them not to show up? Speaker 0: Yes. You really shouldn't have anyone unvaccinated come to dinner. That's just a huge risk. Speaker 1: If you wanna Come out into public. If you wanna live your life, you need to get the vaccination. Speaker 0: It's time for people to see vaccination as literally necessary. You should have To show that you're vaccinated in order to go places. Unvaccinated. Can't travel to the US. Speaker 1: If you're not vaccinated, you're not welcome. Speaker 0: Our patience is wearing thin. Why hasn't the president focused more on taking the Unvaccinated. Refusal has caused all of us. Speaker 2: Continued damage the unvaccinated are doing to themselves and the country. Speaker 0: How come migrants are allowed to come into this country unvaccinated, but world class tennis players are not. Speaker 1: You know Speaker 0: And, back to our lead story, the pandemic of the unvaccinated. Fact is this is a pandemic Speaker 2: of the unvaccinated experts. Call it pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: It's still a pandemic of the unvaccinated. The disease of the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: It is the unvaccinated who are the problem. Period. End of story. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated also put our economy at risk. This is a tyranny of the unvaccinated right now. The unvaccinated, not the vaccinated. Unvaccinated. That's the problem. That's the pandemic. The unvaccinated. Pandemic of the unvaccinated. All this is a pandemic of the safe. The only pandemic we have is among the unvaccinated pandemic because the unvaccinated. Speaker 1: When you get the vaccine, you will not die. That's right. That's right. Speaker 0: It's a simple, basic proposition. If you're vaccinated, you are not gonna die. If you're vaccinated, you don't have a risk. It's as simple as black and white. Speaker 1: You are not going to die if you are vaccinated. That's it. Full stop. Speaker 0: You're unvaccinated, you're at risk. You're vaccinated. You're safe. A majority of Americans dying from coronavirus are vaccinated. COVID nineteen isn't the pandemic of the unvaccinated anymore. We didn't really understand the fatality rate. You know, we didn't understand that it's A fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like flu is, although a bit different. We We have 2 Americas, an unvaccinated at risk America and a vaccinated America. Speaker 1: I wear my vaccinated necklace all the time to Say I'm vaccinated. Speaker 2: You, the vaccinated, are the last best hope to overcome the unvaccinated minority. Speaker 1: I need you to be my apostle. I need you to go out And talked Speaker 2: about it. We are seeking to enlist you in a benevolent conspiracy to join in the unfinished war against the sins of the unvaccinated. Native. And it's a war forever war. The war against COVID nineteen. Speaker 3: The vaccine hesitancy on Earth 2 has the potential to compromise all of the hard fought progress that we've made here on earth one. Speaker 0: This is the greatest threat to life that we have ever faced. Speaker 1: Metropolitan areas are now banning all private gatherings. This bar owner arrested for reopening illegally. Speaker 0: Unvaccinated. We are looking at a woman of severe illness and death. Death. For yourselves, your families. If the unvaccinated are not to blame, who is? If only we had a vaccine against is. So part of preparing for hurricane season is to get vaccinated now. Everything is more complicated if you're not vaccinated in a hurricane.
Saved - October 6, 2023 at 1:34 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

August 9, 2021 Anthony Fauci says because we do not know the long-term effects of COVID, we should give children COVID vaccine. But why did he not entertain the opposite—because we do not know the long-term effects of the vaccine, we shouldn’t use it?

Video Transcript AI Summary
We cannot predict the long-term effects of COVID-19 on anyone, including children. It is possible that children who contract the virus may experience unknown long-term consequences. Considering the high transmissibility and severity of the disease, as well as the uncertainty surrounding its long-term effects, I strongly advocate for vaccinating our children.
Full Transcript
We don't know what the long-term effects are going to be on anyone, including children. So, it may be that, much to our dismay, that children who get infected have long-term consequences that we don't fully appreciate right now. So, for those reasons, one of transmissibility and one of seriousness of disease and one of uncertainty about long-range consequences, I come down strongly on ultimately vaccinating our children. Okay.
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 12:01 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Landmark paper shows COVID vaccine has 1/800 severe adverse event rate Rotavirus vaccine was pulled from market for 1/10,000 adverse events Swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1/100,000 As far as vaccines go, the COVID vaccine adverse event rate is historically extremely high

Saved - October 3, 2023 at 11:32 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

WHO found that masks do not work in 2019: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf CDC found that masks do not work in 2020: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article Cochrane found that masks do not work in 2022: https://cochrane.org/CD006207/ARI_do-physical-measures-such-hand-washing-or-wearing-masks-stop-or-slow-down-spread-respiratory-viruses Why do some places still have mask mandates?

Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures Pandemic Influenza—Personal Protective Measures wwwnc.cdc.gov
Do physical measures such as hand-washing or wearing masks stop or slow down the spread of respiratory viruses? cochrane.org
Saved - October 3, 2023 at 6:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nobel laureate Drew Weissman's 2018 paper cautioned about mRNA vaccines' risks: autoimmune reactions, blood coagulation, and thrombus formation. Pfizer and Moderna trials revealed clotting disorders linked to COVID-19 vaccines. Why aren't we discussing these potential mRNA vaccine risks more?

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

In a 2018 paper, Nobel Prize Winner Drew Weissman warned about the potential risks of mRNA vaccines, including the development of autoimmunity and "blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation". Both the Pfizer and Moderna randomized controlled trials showed signals of coagulation disorders--blood clots--resulting from the COVID-19 vaccine. Why are we not talking about these potential risks of mRNA vaccines more?

Saved - October 2, 2023 at 10:46 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

August 11, 2020 21-year-old Australian mother of three is choked and arrested for not wearing a mask. She had been to the doctor earlier and had a mask exemption. She was charged with assaulting a police officer. Masks have minimal effect at preventing COVID-19.

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 11:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Recounting my personal experience, I received multiple Moderna shots and suffered from acute pericarditis. The medical community initially downplayed vaccine-related myopericarditis, a grave error. CDC's past recommendations would have still advised boosters for me, despite my condition. Some companies even mandated additional shots for men with myopericarditis. Eventually, the advice shifted, but only after countless avoidable vaccine injuries to young men. These mistakes eroded trust in public health. While vaccines remain crucial for older at-risk individuals, CDC's messaging lacks nuance for young adults, undermining trust and harming them. The aggressive and evidence-free booster recommendations from the CDC are unparalleled globally. Though unsure if my pericarditis was vaccine-induced, I acknowledge the need for further research. It's disheartening to realize the vaccines I deemed safe were not, and I regret my decision. I should have been more open-minded and questioned more. For skeptics, I provide references supporting the vaccine-pericarditis link. The data is compelling. For non-Moderna vaccines, the situation remains unclear. (499 characters)

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

I had 2 Moderna vaccinations and a booster and was hospitalized for acute pericarditis last year. I was afraid for my life. The medical community minimized vaccine myopericarditis in young men early on. This we now know was a serious mistake. Back in those days, CDC would have still recommended further boosters for me, despite my pericarditis. Because I wasn't insane, I didn't get any additional shots. But some companies did mandate additional shots, based on CDC advice, even to men who experienced myopericarditis. Thankfully this advice has shifted. But this did not happen until after innumerable avoidable vaccine injuries to young men. These mistakes undermined trust in public health. I now trust public health messaging much less. The vaccines were a godsend for older, at-risk people. The data still show that, even if there is an ever-growing controversy about the effectiveness of boosters, which the public health establishment refuses to test using randomized controlled trial designs. But the CDC's messaging for young adults continues to lack nuance and undermines trust in public health authorities and harms young people. Nowhere else in the world are the booster recommendations as aggressive--and evidence-free--as they are from the CDC. I don’t know if my pericarditis was caused by the vaccine, but it is suspicious. I continue to read and learn, and I believe that for older people vaccination might be very important. This despite dissenting views by pro-vaccination figures like Paul Offit, who suggests that even older people should not get boosted. For me, it’s clear that my COVID vaccinations almost certainly caused more harm than good, and I regret having received them. I am reading to learn whether in healthy young adult men, any vaccination makes sense. It is incredibly disappointing to learn that the vaccines that I assured people were safe were not safe, and that I was wrong. When I was told in comments that the vaccine might have been responsible for my pericarditis, I blocked everyone who suggested it. I was emotional and closed-minded and wrong. I should have done better and questioned more and I am sorry.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

For skeptics, here is a reference. I started to believe that my pericarditis might have been related to the vaccine only after seeing these data. The data speak loudly and are hard to ignore. For non-Moderna vaccines, so far things are unclear to me. But see these two references for very young adults and children. Here: And here:

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Paper shows that the risk of myocarditis is much higher from the Moderna vaccine than it is from COVID for men under the age of 40. Millions of men under the age of 40 received the Moderna vaccine. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059970

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

"Our risk-benefit analysis suggests that among 12-17-year-olds, two-dose vaccination was uniformly favourable only in nonimmune girls with a comorbidity. In boys with prior infection and no comorbidities, even one dose carried more risk than benefit" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35156705/

BNT162b2 Vaccine-Associated Myo/Pericarditis in Adolescents: A Stratified Risk-Benefit Analysis - PubMed Our findings strongly support individualized paediatric COVID-19 vaccination strategies which weigh protection against severe disease vs. risks of vaccine-associated myo/pericarditis. Research is needed into the nature and implications of this adverse effect as well as immunization strategies which … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Analysis by leading researchers published last month on booster mandates in young adults: Per COVID-19 hospitalization prevented, there are 18.5 serious adverse events, including 1.5-5 myopericarditis cases in males (typically requiring hospitalization) https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2022/12/05/jme-2022-108449

COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities In 2022, students at North American universities with third-dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates risk disenrolment if unvaccinated. To assess the appropriateness of booster mandates in this age group, we combine empirical risk-benefit assessment and ethical analysis. To prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation over a 6-month period, we estimate that 31 207–42 836 young adults aged 18–29 years must receive a third mRNA vaccine. Booster mandates in young adults are expected to cause a net harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented, we anticipate at least 18.5 serious adverse events from mRNA vaccines, including 1.5–4.6 booster-associated myopericarditis cases in males (typically requiring hospitalisation). We also anticipate 1430–4626 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity interfering with daily activities (although typically not requiring hospitalisation). University booster mandates are unethical because they: (1) are not based on an updated (Omicron era) stratified risk-benefit assessment for this age group; (2) may result in a net harm to healthy young adults; (3) are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; (4) violate the reciprocity principle because serious vaccine-related harms are not reliably compensated due to gaps in vaccine injury schemes; and (5) may result in wider social harms. We consider counterarguments including efforts to increase safety on campus but find these are fraught with limitations and little scientific support. Finally, we discuss the policy relevance of our analysis for primary series COVID-19 vaccine mandates. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. The data are cited in table 1 and in the references. All data and calculations are included in the manuscript. We are providing the following citations as well: 18. Oliver S. Updates to the evidence to recommendation framework: Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine booster doses. ACIP Meeting. 19 November 2021 (Slides 26, 29, 30, 31, 37). Available at: . Accessed on 28 March 2022; 50. CDC. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE): Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen COVID-19 booster doses. 29 October 2021. Available at: [https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/covid-19-booster-doses.html23table03a][1]; 51. Shimabukuro T. Update on myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). 23 June 2022. Available at: Update on myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (cdc.gov). Slides 10 and 23. Accessed on 20 August 2022; 52. Shimabukuro T. Myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). 19 July 2022. Available at: Myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (cdc.gov). Slides 11 and 23. Accessed on 20 August 2022; 53. Sharff KA, Dancoes DM, Longueil JL, et al . Myopericarditis after COVID-19 booster dose vaccination. Am J Card 2022;172:165–166. ; 54. Friedensohn L, Levin D, Fadlon-Derai M, et al . Myocarditis following a third BNT162b2 vaccination dose in military recruits in Israel. JAMA Apr 26;327(16):1611–1612. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.4425. [1]: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/covid-19-booster-doses.html23table03a51 jme.bmj.com
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 5:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
New Nature paper reveals mRNA from COVID vaccines found in hearts of individuals who died from myocarditis. Immune cells also detected, indicating vaccine-induced immune response in the heart. #COVIDVaccine #Myocarditis #ImmuneResponse

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

New paper in Nature journal Vaccines shows vaccine mRNA in the heart of people who got myocarditis and died after COVID vaccination. It also shows infiltration of immune cells into the same areas, suggesting that the mRNA is provoking an immune response in the heart.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Reference https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00742-7

Duration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine persistence and factors associated with cardiac involvement in recently vaccinated patients - npj Vaccines At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the BNT162b2 (BioNTech-Pfizer) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) mRNA vaccines were expediently designed and mass produced. Both vaccines produce the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for gain of immunity and have greatly reduced mortality and morbidity from SARS-CoV-2 infection. The distribution and duration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine persistence in human tissues is unclear. Here, we developed specific RT-qPCR-based assays to detect each mRNA vaccine and screened lymph nodes, liver, spleen, and myocardium from recently vaccinated deceased patients. Vaccine was detected in the axillary lymph nodes in the majority of patients dying within 30 days of vaccination, but not in patients dying more than 30 days from vaccination. Vaccine was not detected in the mediastinal lymph nodes, spleen, or liver. Vaccine was detected in the myocardium in a subset of patients vaccinated within 30 days of death. Cardiac ventricles in which vaccine was detected had healing myocardial injury at the time of vaccination and had more myocardial macrophages than the cardiac ventricles in which vaccine was not detected. These results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines routinely persist up to 30 days from vaccination and can be detected in the heart. nature.com
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 3:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation began with a question about COVID policies and excess mortality in Florida and California. Elon Musk mentioned Sweden's lack of lockdowns. Other responses included unrelated promotions and a comment on the conversation's content.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

If stringent COVID policies save lives, why does Florida have a lower excess mortality than California? https://t.co/NSM22UJ3zR

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@kevinnbass And why is Sweden even alive? They never had even one lockdown! Have to admire Sweden for not buckling under pressure pressure from every direction.

@Fallingg_love - Falling_love

Capture the essence of togetherness with our circle ceramic ornament. 🎉 Cherish your family moments and make this holiday season unforgettable. 🌟 Order here 👉 fallingglove.com/you-re-by-far-… #HolidayDecor #CustomGift #FamilyMoments

@tommychong - Tommy Chong

This is the good stuff right here man💨

@NasdaqExchange - Nasdaq Exchange

Ensure company data is only accessible to trusted and secure devices.

@NasdaqExchange - Nasdaq Exchange

Experience the power of Jamf's endpoint protection that eliminates threats and keeps your devices safe.

@NasdaqExchange - Nasdaq Exchange

Automate data gathering and device analysis to fit your unique needs and requirements.

Saved - September 16, 2023 at 8:23 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

May 20, 2021 Grandmother and Sunday school teacher Kathleen Bossi speaks at school board meeting against policy forcing children to wear masks. She is arrested and silenced. Studies show masks do not work. Elites are bringing masks back. Be like Ms. Bossi. Do not comply.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 accuses someone of violating their rights and threatens to take them to court. They mention Sergeant Porter and demand that the person repeat what they said.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are violating my rights right now. This is a deal. You are in a mess. Opposite court. Sergeant Porter. Okay? Say it again. Take
Saved - September 12, 2023 at 3:08 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

In this video from 2020, a woman was tased and arrested at a high school football game for not wearing a mask. This happened because CDC's exaggerated and lied about the science of masking. The CDC called it science, but it wasn't. It was evil.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The officer arrests the person and uses a taser when she resists. Spectators are shocked as this incident is related to a mask.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The officer The officer explains that she's being arrested. When she continues to resist, he uses his taser. You can hear other spectators in disbelief. This is over a mask.
Saved - September 12, 2023 at 2:15 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Amsterdam, January 2022. Anti-lockdown protestors are viciously attacked by the police. This is what they did to people’s rights. They did this in the name of science. It was not science. It was evil.

Saved - September 12, 2023 at 12:35 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Just a year and a half ago, 30% of Democrats believed that children should be taken away from unvaccinated parents. Nearly 50% of Democrats believed that the unvaccinated should be sent to camps. This is what a totalitarian ideology looks like.

Saved - September 11, 2023 at 1:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent interview, Fauci claimed that the Cochrane meta-analysis is misleading. However, his arguments have changed since his last response. Most studies in the Cochrane review were conducted pre-COVID, and only two additional randomized controlled trials were done during COVID. Out of these, only one study showed a statistically significant reduction in symptomatic COVID from surgical masks. There is controversy surrounding this finding, and the overall scientific case for masks remains weak. Fauci's claim of good data supporting mask effectiveness is simply untrue. Only one flawed study suggests masks work, while others do not. Fauci's distortion of science is evident.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

In his latest interview, Fauci suggests that the Cochrane meta-analysis is "misleading" because: 1. Most of the studies it includes were done before COVID; and 2. "A number of studies actually show that masks do work" for COVID and that "there is a lot of good data that masks do work" for COVID. This is not true. First, it is notable that Fauci's arguments have already completely changed since he last answered this question. But let's talk about the argument itself. It is true that most of the studies that the Cochrane review contained were conducted pre-COVID. But that should not be any consolation. This is because only two additional randomized controlled trials for masks were conducted during COVID. Of these studies, Bundgaard et al. and Abaluck et al., only one showed a statistically significant result. In other words, there is only one COVID masking RCT that suggests that masks might work. Abaluck et al. showed an 11% reduction in symptomatic COVID from the use of surgical masks (but not cloth masks). Yet there has been some controversy even about this finding. Some researchers suggest that its methods were flawed, which led to its finding of a 11% reduction in COVID. Then, there is the question whether Fauci's criticism of Cochrane even masks sense. Why would masks work for COVID but not work for influenza, since influenza and COVID are the same size? So, the picture of the research literature we are left with is this: 1. Virtually none of randomized controlled trials analyzed in various meta-analyses (including meta-analyses by CDC, WHO, and Cochrane) show a benefit to masking; 2. Only one of two of the COVID RCTs show a benefit to masking; 3. This benefit is extremely small; 4. This benefit to might be due to flawed study design; 5. It is hard to explain why this study showed a benefit to masks when all of the prior literature did not. So one thing is for sure: the scientific case for masks is very weak. Masking is still simply not well-supported by strong scientific evidence. We know something else too. Fauci's claim that "there is a lot of good data that masks do work" is simply wrong. There isn't. Fauci is simply not reporting the truth here. Same with "a number of studies actually show that masks do work." No. Only one, flawed study suggests that masks work. Out of more than a dozen. Fauci simply doesn't know how to talk about science without distorting it. And that's the truth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Cochrane study on masks has caused confusion, but it can be misleading. Masks do work, as shown by several studies. However, only a few of these studies specifically looked at COVID. Federal mask mandates are not expected to return, but recommendations for mask use in indoor crowded settings may be made if cases increase. Local organizations may require masks, but recommendations are more likely than mandates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: John, some of the studies that are confusing, the study that recently has been now quoted a lot and causing a lot of confusion is this Cochrane study, which even the people who run the Cochrane study say that that study can be misleading because people have commented on that study saying absolutely masks don't work, which is absolutely not the case. Because there are a number of studies that show that masks actually do work. And there's a lot of confusion when you take a broad, a series of studies and you look at them in a meta analysis, only a couple of those studies were specifically looking at COVID. So I think we better be careful that that study that people keep talking about can be very, very misleading. There's a lot of good data that masks work. But you've also said we're not going to go back to the time of federal mask mandates. That's a thing of the past. No, I don't see that in the future at all. I mean, I can see that if we get a significant uptick in cases, that you may see the recommendation that masks be used under certain circumstances is in indoor crowded settings, but I don't see there be certainly not federal mandates. I would be extremely surprised if we would see that. There may be local organizations that may require masks, but I think what we're gonna see mostly, if the cases go up, that there might be recommendations, not mandates. There's a big difference there.
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 6:13 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

They masked toddlers. They did it in the name of science. It was not science. It was evil.

Saved - September 8, 2023 at 6:07 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

June 15, 2021 Employee at hardware store assaults a customer for not wearing a mask. These acts of violence were caused by the hysteria created by our institutions, which rejected science. There isn't any evidence that masks have more than a tiny impact on COVID transmission.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, an employee at Ace Hardware in Seattle, confronts someone and tells them to leave. The speaker expresses frustration and uses strong language. They mention having recorded the incident on video. The transcript is filled with profanity and aggressive language.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You talking to me? Get out. You talking to me? Get out. What the fuck you would get on, bitch? We're the employees at Ace Hardware in fucking Seattle. What a fucking punk bitch. Look at this shit. What the fuck, man? Real guy is here, Stop. You better get the fuck off him. I am. Damn you motherfucker. Look at these fucking pieces of shit. Look at these fucking pieces of shit. I got the whole fucking thing on video, bitch. Fuck your fucking shit. Cookie, you came out with a bet. I got the whole fucking thing on video, bitch.
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 3:34 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Masks themselves say that masks don't work.

Saved - September 8, 2023 at 1:13 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

May 9, 2020 An Australian man is restrained by police as they force a mask over his face. Masks do not prevent respiratory viral infection. All scientific bodies know this. Today our corrupt institutions are trying to re-impose mask mandates. Again. Evil.

Saved - September 7, 2023 at 7:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
An Australian man was arrested for not wearing a mask in a park. Despite being outside, he was deemed to lack a valid reason. This incident highlights Australia's pandemic policies, which some argue are based on pseudoscience. In contrast, Sweden's approach, without lockdowns or mask mandates, resulted in a lower excess death rate. The suffering caused by authoritarian measures likely had no health benefits and may have even harmed it.

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

July 24, 2021 An Australian man was sitting outside on a park bench without a mask when he was approached by police. He was told he was "not in a public place with a reasonable excuse." He was wrestled to the ground, arrested, and charged with "assaulting a police officer". Australia's pandemic policies were based on pseudoscience. Sweden, which did not lock down and did not have mask mandates, had a lower excess death rate than almost every country in the world, including Australia. The suffering inflicted by these authoritarian policies produced no benefit to health and probably harmed it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video begins with Speaker 0 stating that they are allowed to film in a public place. Speaker 1 acknowledges this and says they don't have to talk. Speaker 0 insists on speaking and explains that they need to establish why Speaker 1 is in the public place. Speaker 1 questions what crime has been committed and Speaker 0 mentions that Speaker 1 is not wearing a face mask, which is an offense. Speaker 1 claims to be exempt, but Speaker 0 insists on seeing their exemption and proceeds to place Speaker 1 under arrest. Speaker 1 resists and a struggle ensues. The video ends with Speaker 1 being restrained by the police.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is being audio and video recorded. We're in a public place I'm allowed to film. The reason why I'm engaging you, you can. Speaker 1: Of course, you can. Sense to talk to you. Speaker 0: You don't have to talk, but I'm gonna speak. Yeah. You're allowed to be quiet. I'll continue to talk. Yeah. Speaker 1: It's a public place. Yeah. Exactly. So do yeah. Speaker 0: The The reason why I'm engaging you is I need to establish why you're in the public place. Okay? I need to ascertain if you are here to ascertain any. Well, mate, I'm gonna to afford you an opportunity to either get up and leave or I'm gonna place you under arrest. Speaker 1: Under arrest for what? What crime has been committed? Speaker 0: If you're not if you're not committed. Can I please speak? Speaker 1: What What crime's been committed? You're gonna explain it. You're just fine. You're treating me with arrest. Yeah. What crime's been committed? Speaker 0: If you're not within your local LGA or you're not exercising, You are not in a public place with a reason we're pursuing you. Speaker 1: Establish your own. Well, I think that Speaker 0: Yeah. For for that reason, I'm now placing you under arrest. Speaker 1: For what? To establish your own Speaker 0: yes? No. I'm establishing your you're not wearing a face mask either. So what? Yeah. That's an offense. Speaker 1: So what now, Speaker 0: sir? Are you exempt? Yeah. I am exempt. Produce Your exemption should be duly. No. I don't. Further, you're under arrest for not producing your exemption. Speaker 1: Yeah. You are. You're not free to leave. My name's Tan. Speaker 0: My name's Tan. You're Briefly, if Speaker 1: you are Speaker 0: under arrest. Speaker 1: I'm not free to do whatever I want. I'm a Speaker 0: free man. I'm telling you you're under arrest. You're just hurting. So what? Are we just being Speaker 1: I believe your breach in the public health order. Okay. Would you stay at home? I think you're under arrest. Please stand up. You're under arrest. We don't wanna have to use force to get you to process area. Don't touch me. We're Speaker 0: asking for your cooperation. Speaker 1: I'd have an answer into a contract with you. Speaker 0: You're under arrest. Speaker 1: You're under arrest. I can use Speaker 0: reasonably Reason around a force if need be to get Speaker 1: you to yeah. Yeah. Do not touch me. I've been entered into a contract with you. I haven't consent to training. Having a great What are you talking about? Yeah. Just listen to me. I I know what you're saying. Second. Yeah? We have the suspicion that you are on breach. Based on that suspicion, you're not on arrest. You're not much Would you please stand up? No. I'm gonna turn to a contract with you. I'm gonna agree to you. You said I'm a free man. I'm a free man. Do not touch me. Get up. Get up. I can touch you there. Don't fucking touch me. What yourself? What are you talking about? What are you fucking doing? Just put yourself. Put yourself. Be under it. Mate, come down. Drop your hand. Drop your head. Drop your head. Come down. Come down. Come down. Alright. Drop your get on the floor. Stop resisting. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Stop resisting. On the floor. Get on the floor. Slow down. Slow down. Slow down. Get on the Stop resisting. Stop resisting. Stop resisting. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Get on the floor. Right, right? Yeah. Yeah. Clack into the deck. Come. You're alright, boys? Do work there, check. Buddy, get a boss. Do this. Yeah. Yeah. Slide down. Slow down. Slow down. Breathe. You got a hand. You got a hand. Slow down. We've got control here, boys. Take your time. Get your breath back. Come on, come on. You alright? Hey, come. I'm done. But you see, we'll let you out for a second. You're under arrest. I saw police. You don't have to say or do If you don't want to. Do you understand? Hey. Get them off me. Boys, grab my face mask. Hey. Get them off me.
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 3:31 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

WHO found that masks do not work in 2019: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf CDC found that masks do not work in 2020: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article Cochrane found that masks do not work in 2022: https://cochrane.org/CD006207/ARI_do-physical-measures-such-hand-washing-or-wearing-masks-stop-or-slow-down-spread-respiratory-viruses Why are we still debating masks?

Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures Pandemic Influenza—Personal Protective Measures wwwnc.cdc.gov
Do physical measures such as hand-washing or wearing masks stop or slow down the spread of respiratory viruses? cochrane.org
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 5:16 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

July 4th, 2021 12-year-old Australian girl is pepper sprayed and arrested by police for not wearing a mask. Some of the police involved were themselves not wearing a mask. Authorities claimed that these policies were scientific. They were not. They were evil.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A family is outraged after their sister is arrested for shopping without a mask. They confront police officers who are also not wearing masks. The family accuses the police of harassment and claims that their 12-year-old child was pepper sprayed. They express frustration with the officers' actions and demand to know their names. The family believes that the police are being hypocritical by arresting their daughter for not wearing a mask while not following the same rules themselves. The situation escalates as the family argues with the officers about personal space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Family. Look at this. Speaker 1: Family. Don't give any names. Speaker 0: My sister's arrested for shopping for food with no mask. So there's people walking around with no mask. Look. We'll pop this. Look at this. No. I was just saying it's not a part of the law to wear them off. Look at it. Just for not wearing a mask. It's Stupid. Look at this police over here. He's not wearing a mask. I will. Speaker 1: Look at all of this. Speaker 0: I it. All of this. Okay. No mask. Look, there's more coppers coming. It. It. It. It. Speaker 1: Look at all of these. Speaker 0: Look at this. No. Looked for nothing. Look at this. This is harassment. They're wrapped up to my sister's house for nothing. Speaker 1: Look at this. Get back. No. I don't have to. What'd you do? You can't do that. Speaker 0: Stool for nothing. Pushing my 40 year old sister, pushing my nephew, pushing my other sister. Look at this. Speaker 1: It. What the Speaker 0: hell? Yeah. It's Speaker 1: alright, sweetheart. Speaker 0: What? You wanna push me? Speaker 1: I'll arrest it. One more time. You go eat. What's my fucking brain? The kid was sprayed a 12 year old at Speaker 0: me. A Speaker 1: it. They're 12 year old. Thanks. It's okay. Just go. I'll get you out. Speaker 0: Oh my god. Speaker 1: Lawyers will love this. New South Wales police. Yeah. They call themselves cops. 12 year old. Pepper sprayed. Your 12 year old pepper sprayed it. Because she's a threat to all of these cops. Who has gone? Look at this. Because this is all over. Don't worry. The mask is just I have to go right on. What's your name, officer with no mask? No mask. They should just go, baby. Speaker 0: Let's go. Speaker 1: Say no mask, but they're arrested my daughter for no mask. Alright? Oh, another one with no mask. Yes. You're in my space. That's right. We told you to get back. Look. You're gonna be around Not 1.5. I'm not even the anything I recorded just like you. If you're I was gonna say I was gonna say as well. You're very welcome. No user in Myspace. Space.
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 5:07 AM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Stephanie Warriner left her Toronto hospital room to find something to eat. She wasn't wearing a mask. Guards confronted and restrained her. She died from "asphyxia following struggle and exertion". The judge dismissed the case. Nobody will be held accountable for her death.

Saved - September 4, 2023 at 9:59 PM

@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS

Sept. 24, 2021 Five men entered a store in Australia. For not wearing masks, police beat them savagely and arrested them. Sweden did not lock down or have mask mandates. It had lower excess deaths than Australia. Australia's draconian pandemic policies did enormous harm.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Police squad Strike Force Raptor targeted a group of men who were not wearing face masks. The men, including Khalid, Hussein, and Fadis Reika, were arrested after a scuffle broke out. The men claim they were just buying something at a shop. However, Raptor officers allege that Khaled Raker attacked them first, throwing punches and using his arms, elbows, and knees. Security and phone videos contradict this, leading to the withdrawal of charges for assaulting police and resisting arrest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Police describe Strike Force Raptor as proactive. Now these knees. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. A specialized squad that targets the criminal activity of outlaw biker gangs. But on this day in September, they were cracking down on offending of a different kind, a group of men who were not wearing face masks. They were Khalid, Hussein, and Fadis Reika along with 2 others. 1 is arrested before a melee erupts and backup arrives. They didn't do anything. They just didn't have a mask on. The men say they went into the shop to buy some. Raptor officers say they were attacked first. Khaled Raker used both hands to take hold of the police fist and threw a flurry of closed fist punches to the officer's head and torso. On the ground, he continued To use his arms, elbows, and knees to strike police, but security and phone video contradict that. And all charges of assaulting police and resisting arrest We're withdrawn by
View Full Interactive Feed