reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @kiwiwayne2

Posted - April 22, 2024 at 8:52 PM

Saved - April 22, 2024 at 11:32 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The head of the World Council for Health raised several important questions at the Geneva conference regarding COVID-19. These questions include the patenting of the virus, the production of vaccines before the pandemic, the use of lockdowns and masks, the distribution of the vaccine in the body, the suitability of PCR testing, the changing definitions of "vaccine" and "herd immunity," the declaration of a pandemic, the lack of certain tests, the need for proper follow-up, the reporting of adverse reactions, the recommendation of vaccines during a pandemic, the discouragement of early treatment, the discrediting of effective medicines, the lack of data transparency, the recommendation of vaccines for children and pregnant women, the emergency approval process, the side effects of the vaccine, conflicts of interest among medical authorities, the lack of education and informed consent, media influence, the banning of effective treatment protocols, the attribution of deaths to COVID-19, the importance of Vitamin D, diet, and the microbiome, the violation of individual will, and the regulation of gain of function research.

@kiwiwayne2 - Kiwiwayne2 ex Kiwiwayne1

Just sent to me 🤔👇 Here are some very good questions posed by the head of the World Council for Health raised at the Geneva conference. "Geneva press conference on Human Rights and COVID-19: 1- Why were we not told that the Covid 19 virus was patented by Moderna in 2018? 2- Why did Moderna produce 100,000 Covid-19 vaccine doses in 2019 before the pandemic started? 3- Why, against all scientific evidence, were lockdowns and masks used? 4- Why were we not told that the ‘vaccine’ does not remain in the arm, but accumulates all over the body? 5- Why was PCR testing recommended when it is not designed for diagnostic purposes? 6- Why were the definitions of ‘vaccine’, and ‘herd immunity’ changed prior to the Covid-19 outbreak? 7- Why was a pandemic declared when the case fatality rate was akin to ’flu? 8- Why were tests on genotoxicity, teratogenicity, and carcinogenicity not carried out, and yet we were told the ‘vaccine’ was safe? 9- Why was there no proper follow-up of all people injected when using a new gene therapy product? 10- Why were doctors and the public not reminded regularly about the need to report adverse reactions to these new and experimental genetic ‘vaccines’? 11- Why was a ‘vaccine’ recommended during an ongoing pandemic, which is contraindicated in vaccinology? 12- Why was a ‘vaccine’ recommended for those who had superior natural immunity? 13- Why was a novel gene therapy launched after three months, instead of the required ten years? 14- Why were we not told that, in the Pfizer trial, more people died in the vaccinated group than in the control group? 15- Why were we told that Covid injections were ‘safe and effective’ when the evidence did not substantiate this? 16- Why were – and are – opposing voices from science and practicing medicine discredited, punished, and jailed? 17- Why were doctors, for the first time in history, discouraged from treating a disease, and told to wait for a vaccine? 18- Why was early treatment discouraged, whilst we know it is the most important tool to address any infectious disease? 19- Why were effective and very safe medicines like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin discredited and even prohibited? 20- Why did the producers of the novel gene therapies not want their data to be published for 75 years? 21- Why were Covid injections, masks and lockdowns recommended for children when it was known that they were not severely affected and did not spread Covid? 22- Why were the Covid injections recommended in pregnancy, when over 80% of babies were lost in trials when women were vaccinated in the first trimester? 23- Why was emergency approval guaranteed when over 2,000 people died within the first three months after vaccination roll-out? 24- Why is there no scientific outcry after over 3,500 papers have been published demonstrating side effects of the Covid-19 injections? 25- Why are conflicts of interest tolerated among medical authorities, with the FDA, EMA, and WHO being 80-90% funded by industry? 26- Why was there no adequate education of doctors, patients, and the public, and thus no possibility of informed consent? 27- Why and how were the media captured so that they pushed only one agenda worldwide? 28- Why were and are effective treatment protocols, which have existed since 2020, banned and declared illegal? 29- Why are we not told about the unnecessary deaths that were attributed to Covid but actually caused by iatrogenic measures (e.g. Midazolam, ventilation) carried out in early 2020? 30- Why was the fundamental role of Vitamin D status, diet, and the microbiome not communicated, when these measures could have prevented almost 100% of Covid deaths? 31- Why was and is a certain medical procedure forced upon people against their will, whilst the Nuremberg Declaration clearly opposes this? 32- Why is gain of function research, like that relating to Covid-19, not banned worldwide?

@kiwiwayne2 — Kiwiwayne2 ex Kiwiwayne1

Posted - December 9, 2023 at 8:07 AM

Saved - December 9, 2023 at 6:05 PM

@kiwiwayne2 - Kiwiwayne2 ex Kiwiwayne1

Nothing to see here!!! It’s all misinformation 🙄 https://t.co/53CSuzfVbV

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all of these batches were from Pfizer. Batch number 1 had 711 vaccinated and 152 deaths, resulting in a 21% mortality rate. The expected mortality rate is 0.75%. These batches included all age groups, not specific to one age group. Other batches in the top 10 had mortality rates of 17%, 15%, and 4%. The speaker concludes that the chances of these batches not being a killer are extremely low, with odds of $100,000,000,000 to 1.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top 10, batches that were had a high death count, high mortality rate, and I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID. So what I did was our internal batch ID. I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio. Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top ten? Speaker 0: Yes, they are. Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% Speaker 0: Percentage, yes. Speaker 1: Death mortality rate from Speaker 0: mortality rate. Speaker 1: They are high. Now what's our normal that we would expect? Should be the mortality Speaker 0: rate 0.75. 0.75. These batches are against all age groups as well. It's not one particular batch for 1 particular age group. It's across all ages. So all the vaccination centers, whoever rocked up on the day, whatever age you were, and it would average out. It would all average out. So there's not 1 particular batch that points to 1 particular age group. Speaker 1: So looking as if batch number 8, second one, yeah. 221, Jabs, 38, that's a 17% mortality rate. Batch number 3 here, And we've got 48 out of 310. So that's a 15%. And if we go right down the the in the top ten, batch 71, 11,000 vaccinated with batch number 71, 498 dead, and that's a 4%. Now you say down the bottom on the screen, could you just tell us what this is saying? Speaker 0: We Speaker 1: The chances of these batches not being a killer are $100,000,000,000 to 1. Explain that as a statistician. Speaker 0: Yes.