reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @leahfiles

leahfiles
Posted - June 23, 2026 at 10:34 PM
Saved - June 24, 2026 at 7:12 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

The surveillance state is already spying on us. No ballroom necessary. https://t.co/uOnCZjyb5V

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes U.S. surveillance as more advanced than the White House ballroom “underground surveillance center,” claiming that a large-scale system is already deployed and not widely understood enough to stop it. They say they followed the money behind “Flock” after hearing about it. The speaker identifies Flock Cameras as the company behind surveillance cameras (not bird-monitoring game cameras), formed around 2018 by three Georgia Tech students. They claim Flock is deployed across “5,000 towns” with “over 80,000 cameras” in the United States, originally intended to catch crime using license-plate tracing. The speaker then claims that in the past two years Flock added accessories that they describe as “more electric dog collars,” shifting “innocent” crime-capture capabilities into “nefarious” uses. The speaker outlines three parts of the claimed system: 1) Flock cameras mounted on light poles that trace license plates, with added AI capabilities said to include identifying vehicles from “dents,” “scratches,” and “bumper stickers,” and then tracing the car using these features rather than license plates alone. 2) A drone-related capability, attributed to Flock buying a drone company: it is said to hear someone scream or respond to a camera detecting a crime, then automatically deploy a drone that surveils a chase “2,000 feet up in the air.” 3) “Nova,” described as an accessory added to Flock cameras that tracks people and “turns your license plate into everything about you,” including marital status, kids, address, and phone number, plus “pattern of life.” The speaker claims an investigation found Nova pulls data not only from legal/open sources but also from the dark web, including social security numbers, bank information, leaked email, leaked passwords, and other leaked data. They give an example involving a Texas police officer searching a “Flock database” for an abortion-related case and then seeking expansion into states where abortions were legal, after receiving “1800 results.” The speaker then connects the surveillance technologies to specific investors and related companies. They claim Andreas Horowitz is an investor in Flock. The speaker says they recognized Horowitz from research on Ehud Barak and asserts Barak created related companies including “TOCA,” described as technology that can alter live camera footage in real time, add or remove content, create fake footage, and “leave no forensic evidence.” They also claim Barak is connected to “Carbine,” described as a 911 system capable of accessing microphones, cameras, and location. The speaker further claims Horowitz and additional investors link Flock to these technologies through Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, which they say also invested in Flock and Carbine. The speaker says all these companies connect through large investors and says it enables additional capabilities such as drone use and footage manipulation. They announce “part two,” claiming the next topic is a competitor that previously worked with Flock, branched off, and can track Bluetooth devices, described as linked to an Italian military defense company.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The White House ballroom, you know, the underground surveillance center, is child's play compared to what I'm about to tell you about. They've already set up the scariest surveillance apparatus that I've ever seen, and it's being deployed, and I don't think enough people know about it to stop it. But we can stop it. I went to follow the money on flock cameras because I had been hearing about them, and I wanted to learn more about them and see what was going on. So as I do, I follow the money. If you're new here, I spent 20 years in intelligence. I now follow the money, uncover fraud, corruption in nonprofits, corporations, politicians, people trying to screw Americans. You can find my deep dives on Substack and it's free to subscribe. All right, so Flock are the actual cameras. They're not the game cameras. Like I actually thought the ones that monitor birds, the name of the company is called Flock Cameras. It was born, I think like 2018, three Georgia Tech students, One of them was a victim of a crime, and he found out that, hey, license plates are pretty much the linchpin in catching a criminal. And then Flock was born. And it's in like 5,000 towns, and there's over 80,000 cameras now across the United States. And it's meant to catch crime. However, however... Since the past like two years, they've started to add accessories to their flock cameras. And those accessories aren't like bracelets. Think of them as more electric dog collars. And they take an innocent capability to catch criminals, and they start turning it into something that gets pretty nefarious pretty quick. And that's what I found in My Father Money. So let's go through the different parts of it. Your flock cameras are your cameras that are attached to light poles, pretty much. and they trace license plates, but they've gotten an AI capability since, and they can also tell just by dents on your car or scratches or bumper stickers, which by the way, you'll never have bumper stickers on your car, please, just personal security things, but they'll trace the car via that now, not just license plates. Okay, great, you're gonna catch the criminals, great. Well, then Flock was like, well, I'm gonna buy a drone company, And now what happens is it can hear someone scream or a camera says you need to deploy, there's a crime, and it automatically deploys a drone that can surveil the car or whatever it's chasing 2,000 feet up in the air. Well, now let's talk about its other dog collar apparatus called Nova. Nova is an accessory that goes onto the flock cameras, but it tracks you as a person. It turns your license plate into everything about you. So you're driving along and the flock camera that has this Nova apparatus on it, well, all of a sudden, it's like not only does this car and this license plate belong to this person, but this person is married to this person and has these kids and lives in this place and here's their phone number. Everything about you, your pattern of life, everything. An investigation just like a year or two ago found that Nova didn't just pull from open source or legal data sets. It pulled from the dark web as well, which includes your social security number, your bank information, you know, your email that was leaked. Oh, your password that was leaked. So now they have all of that and can do whatever they want technically. And you're like, oh, they would never do that. Well, a cop in Texas was found searching flock database for had an abortion, woman. And when he didn't like the results, when it turned 1800 results, he's excited to expand it into different states where abortions were legal, by the way. So now he has access to all the flock cameras. That should scare the out of you, but it gets better. As I do, when I follow the money, I start to put together a puzzle, right? It's an analytical puzzle. It's how is everything connected? And when I started looking at these surveillance companies and I was like, well, flock's getting a little weird. Who's their investor? Because it's starting to look nefarious. Well, their investor, Andreas Horowitz, one of the first investors, the biggest investors in flock cameras. Well, I've heard that name before because I've done a lot of research on Ehud Barak, you know, JE's best friend who lived in his place. Ehud Barak was also the prime minister of the blue and white country and probably the most decorated military intelligence person that they've ever had. Well, he created three companies and I recognized Andre Horowitz because he invested in TOCA, If you want to go back and look at my videos on TOCA, you can. It's very scary. But TOCA is the company that Ehud Brock had that he helped sell to our intelligence agencies that can go into any live camera and alter the footage in real time or pass. It doesn't matter. It can take things away. It can create fake footage, whatever. It doesn't matter. And leave no forensic evidence. Andreas Horowitz, well, he was an investor in TOCA. Ehud Barak also is the co-founder of Carbine that has since been sold, but it's the 911 system that when you call 911, it can get into your microphone, it can get into your camera, it can know your exact location. Well, they've also sold this technology to the cars that are about to spy on us. That's this. I'm gonna show you how all this connects. Because if you think about it, we have a surveillance system that already exists run by corporations, okay? Like where's the privacy? getting all of our data, knowing everything about us, connected to a company through an investor, the biggest investor, that can alter any footage they want, and then you've got a drone involved, you could technically make someone a criminal. And here's how they all connect. All of the companies, you have Andre Horowitz up there, and you also have Peter Thiel. Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, well, they also invested in Flock. and Carbine. So we've got Carbine, Toka, all connected to Flock through large investors. Okay, nothing to see here though, folks. I'll put this graphic on my sub stack for you guys. All right, stay tuned for part two, where I'm going to tell you about their competitor that used to work with Flock that now branched off and they're doing their own thing. And now they can track our Bluetooth devices. And the company is from an Italian military defense company. We've got like spy competitors for the United States. Stay tuned.
leahfiles
Posted - June 22, 2026 at 11:57 PM
Saved - June 24, 2026 at 7:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I call for ADL to be investigated, alleging illegal spying on Americans via corporate intelligence and Big Tech ties. I spent a month digging into the record: the FBI cut ties in Oct 2025; FBI chief said ADL ran “disgraceful ops” and likened it to a terrorist-functioning group. I also cite past surveillance and board/payout patterns showing millions moving among related entities.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

🚨 The Anti Defamation League should be investigated They look to be illegally spying on Americans for Israel through corporate intelligence and Big Tech. With millions going to Corporate Intelligence and FARA registered firms. I spent a month investigating ADL. Full deep dive investigation is on my Substack now (free). Link is in bio. Highlights below: The FBI broke ties with the ADL in October 2025. FBI Director Kash Patel's exact words: "James Comey embedded FBI agents within the ADL, a group that ran disgraceful ops spying on Americans." He called the ADL "a group functioning like a terrorist organization." Six months later, DOJ indicted the SPLC for similar conduct. The organization is run by ex-Clinton/Obama aides and they labeled TPUSA as an extreme hate group, only deleting the list after Charlie Kirk's assassination. Just like SLPC. ------- THE HISTORICAL PATTERN: In 1993, the San Francisco DA caught the ADL running a private database on 12,000 Americans. The targets: → Arab-American groups → The NAACP → Anti-apartheid activists → The International Jewish Peace Union → Women in Black → Trade unions The ADL's operative sold the surveillance material to apartheid-era South African intelligence for $16,000. ADL settled the class-action suit in 1999. But that didn't stop them. -------- Follow the Money shows: 1️⃣ 5 entities at ONE Manhattan address moving $19.3 MILLION per year between themselves 2️⃣ $675,841/yr to a private executive-protection and corporate-intelligence firm in the Helmsley Building (T&M USA). This is the group who is most likely spying on Americans who speak out against Israel 3️⃣ $577,500/yr to a PR vendor whose name appears on Foreign Agents Registration Act filings (First International Resources LLC) 4️⃣ An $11B shareholder fund (JLens) that defeated 2025 votes asking Lockheed Martin to do a human rights review of Israeli arms sales ------- So why aren't they getting investigated like SPLC? Maybe because their board includes: → Johnnie Moore (one of the most awful men in the world), founder of Trump's 2016 evangelical advisory board → The CEO of Google's content-moderation subsidiary (Google is also a paying corporate partner) → Tony Blair as Special Advisor. The Tony Blair Institute is funded by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Larry Ellison, and Oracle. The ADL is bigger and more opaque than the SPLC on EVERY documentable financial metric on the public 990s. But they're not being investigated..... yet. They are on my list though, along with TPUSA. Full deep-dive investigation (free) on my Substack.

leahfiles
Posted - June 22, 2026 at 1:09 AM
Saved - June 23, 2026 at 7:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned the US Treasury is cracking down on tax-exempt orgs that hide fraud behind nonprofit complexity. I outline how wire/mail fraud can be charged per misleading solicitation, and list TPUSA-related red flags: most “grants” parked in an endowment, shell “research” invoices, insider/related-entity payments, and lack of truly independent audits.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

TPUSA, you may want to pay attention to this one. April 26, 2026 the US Treasury said they were cracking down on tax exempt non profits, specifically those that "hide fraud, abuse, and extremist activity behind complicated nonprofit arrangements,” and said every tax-exempt organization should be able to show “who controls the money and where it goes.” Let's talk fraud. Wire fraud is lying to get money, using a wire. Mail fraud is lying to get money, using mail services (USPS, FedEx, UPS, etc). That’s it. The legal name is 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Each email, each letter can be an instance of fraud, so ten misleading fundraising emails can be ten counts of wire fraud. How a charity commits it: A charity commits fraud when it raises or moves money on a false premise. The two classic versions: (1) Telling donors one thing and doing another, ie you solicit money “to educate students,” then route it somewhere else. (2) Self-dealing dressed up as charity, ie you move the money to companies and people connected to the insiders, and label it a “program expense” or a “vendor payment.” Intent is what separates aggressive bookkeeping from fraud. But both are exactly what investigators like myself look for. Typically, red flags are identified, then Investigators would go in and pull the bank records, transfers, etc. and that's how it's proven. Now let's look at some red flags I identified in TPUSA's filings that could flag an investigator to seek further documentation. This is not proof of a crime, this is a roadmap of where I'd recommend investigating if Treasury ever decided to. - Red Flag #1: TPUSA raises over $85 million a year in tax-deductible donations to “educate students.” But based on my forensic examination of their 990s, only 63 cents out of every $100 reaches an actual student as a grant (and that's being generous). What they did is tag roughly $57 million as "grants" for their mission, but that $57M actually got parked in the organization’s own endowment, a savings account that’s grown to ~$70 million. (I have done a deep dive on this endowment and it's shady behavior if you want to go look a few posts back) ~$62.6 million, 95% of all their grants, went to entities the same people control. That’s the gap between their pitch to get donations and the actual use. - Red Flag #2: A related Turning Point charity paid a Las Vegas shell company $999,000 for a “research project” with no product, at an amount $1,000 under the million-dollar line that triggers review. Vague service, no deliverable, dissolved vendor. This is the hallmark indicator of a fake invoice. - Red Flag #3: Over $20M funneled back to insiders. $128,101 to a company owned by the treasurer, for t-shirts. More than $2.7 million to one staffer’s rotating LLCs. Fundraisers who kept more than they raised. And three private companies, Resolute Media, Superfeed, and TPUSA Merch, owned by the people who run the charity. TPUSA Merch and Resolute Media profit off the TPUSA name while not appearing on none of its books. - Red Flag #4: No independent audit on an $85 million organization in 2024, and for years before that, the "independent auditor" was in a reciprocal business relationship with the co-founder, not very independent if you ask me. The control that’s supposed to catch all of this wasn’t there. Those are just a few. So, now let's look at the charges an investigation would actually test. These are the specific federal and tax exposures a prosecutor or the IRS would line this conduct up against: (1) Wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343). If donations were solicited over email/online on a false premise, or money was moved by wire as part of a scheme to deceive, each communication is a potential count. (2) Mail fraud (§ 1341). The same idea for direct-mail fundraising. (3) Conspiracy (§ 1349). If more than one person agreed to run the scheme. - Filing false tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 7206). A Form 990 signed under penalty of perjury that misstates how money was spent, or hides who controls it, is its own offense. - Money laundering (§§ 1956–1957). Routing the proceeds through related entities to obscure the source and destination, the “conduit” pattern, is the textbook fact pattern. - Private inurement / excess-benefit (IRC § 4958).Civil, not criminal, but powerful: the IRS can impose penalty taxes on insiders who got an improper benefit and on the managers who approved it, and can revoke tax-exempt status. That’s the menu. Which, if any, applies depends on the one thing a public-records review can’t see: intent, and the bank records that prove it. That evidence lives behind a subpoena that would be part of any discovery. Next up we have Rob McCoy and TPUSA Faith coming tomorrow, stay tuned.

leahfiles
Posted - June 22, 2026 at 7:49 PM
Saved - June 23, 2026 at 7:32 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

What do TPUSA, the US Treasury, and fraud have in common? Did a video version of my analysis from yesterday bc I know it’s a lot. Source document can be found in my Linktree (it’s free. Link in bio). https://t.co/oFCkBv4kEH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a months-long forensics and fraud examination of Turning Point USA’s (TPUSA) financials and operations, beginning after Charlie Kirk requested a “doge-like assessment” into TPUSA’s finances and right before Kirk was assassinated. The speaker says the IRS later indicated it would begin examining nonprofits for hiding fraud, abuse, or extremism and for determining transparency in control of money—prompting the speaker to offer the investigation to the IRS. The speaker explains fraud types in an organization context, stating that wire fraud involves electronic lying to obtain money (e.g., email or bank transfers) and mail fraud involves similar conduct via the US Mail or FedEx/UPS, adding that each instance of a detected fraudulent letter or email would constitute an additional count. The speaker claims TPUSA could face “a lot of counts” if found guilty. A “Substack” post is referenced as containing a source document for how numbers were derived. The speaker describes two main ways charities commit fraud: (1) spending money differently from what donors are told, and (2) “self-dealing” where charity funds are used for the benefit of insiders or related LLCs/entities, including through vendor payments. The speaker lists “big red flags,” focusing on a claimed “63 cents” outcome: an analysis based on TPUSA’s IRS Form 990s alleging that for every $100 donated, 63 cents goes back to students. The speaker asserts that fundraising events and their costs mean the “63 cents” is not “of $1.” The speaker further describes an alleged transfer of $57 million to TPUSA’s own endowment, stating that TPUSA lists charitable contributions and program expenses in a way that makes spending appear normal while it is not, according to the speaker’s analysis. Additional red flags include a $999,000 payment to “Clock Tower” (Clock Tower LLC), described as slightly below a threshold the speaker says triggers reporting scrutiny. The speaker says the entity formed in 2019 before receiving the payment, had no listed officers, no identifiable ownership, no employees, no website, and was dissolved a year and a half after receiving the funds; the speaker claims the payment was for a research project “nobody saw.” The speaker also alleges over $20 million in vendor payments to LLCs or entities tied to Turning Point, citing a pattern involving Stacey Sheridan forming LLCs, receiving funds, dissolving them, and repeating. The speaker claims many vendors had worked for Turning Point or had ties to it, and that in a 2024 990 TPUSA had 62 vendors making over $100,000 that were not reported because only the top five are reported, describing this as a red flag that could be obtained through subpoena or discovery. Finally, the speaker alleges TPUSA was not independently audited in 2024, pointing to Form 990 Schedule 12A and stating the answer is “no.” The speaker claims that for many years co-founder Bill Montgomery’s personal financial advisors served as auditors and were paid for bringing in business, and says this undermines claims of independent auditing. The speaker says they will work with Treasury and is planning additional analysis after receiving 2025 and 2026 990s.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: days before Charlie Kirk was assassinated, he asked for a doge-like assessment into TPUSA's financials and operations. The minute I heard that, as somebody who works with CEOs and boards, he thought that something was up. Typically, they'll call me in. Where is the money going? Well, I consider forensics like this and fraud examination a puzzle. Normal people do puzzles. This is my puzzle. So I spent the last few months looking at their financials. Funny, a few weeks ago, the IRS came and said, Hey, we're going to start looking into nonprofits. Yeah, we want to look into nonprofits who are trying to hide fraud or abuse or extremism under the guise of these complex structures that we've seen. We also want to make sure that we know who controls the money, that that's transparent, where it's coming from and where it's going. Well, I'm about to hand them this investigation on the silver platter, so we'll see if they're going to put their money where their mouth is. In addition, they're accepting whistleblower tips on fraud, so buckle up. Typically nowadays you see wire fraud because we do everything electronically. Wire fraud is the act of lying about getting money via email or tax, bank transfers, wire transfers, whatever that looks like. So it's so prevalent because we do everything online now. But there's also mail fraud and that is where you're doing the same thing. via the US Mail or FedEx or UPS. This is important because every instance, every email, every letter that is sent out that is found to have committed this fraud, which we're gonna get into, well, that's one count. So for an organization like TPUSA, if they actually were found guilty of something like this, well, that's a lot of counts. This is on my Substack. And if you want the source document, as well as how I came up with the numbers and trace them, That source document I put in my link tree. So if you go in there, I'll have a source document file and it'll say TPUSA fraud source document. It's free. That way you can start to learn how to look for stuff like this. So a charity typically commits fraud in two ways. One is that their mission, what they tell their donors they're spending their money on, isn't actually where their money goes. If you're saying that your money is going to educate students and your money is actually going elsewhere, well, that's a sign. The second way is self-dealing dressed up as a charity. You'll see this a lot with like what's happening in Minnesota. They're getting money for their charity, but actually they're spending it on themselves or other LLCs and they're funneling money to employees or other entities. Vendor payments are a big way that they do this. All right, let's just go through some of the big red flags for TPUSA. Here's a little graphic I did for you. I don't want to focus on all of this because it's just not relevant to this conversation. I want to focus on this very bottom number. That's 63 cents. So this was the analysis I did based on their 990s. Every $100 that you donate, here's what it's doing for them. And with most of the letters that I've seen going out, it's, hey, we need you to open chapters. This goes to the students. Well, 63 cents on every $100 ends up going back to the students. We'll go into it in a different TikTok, but that top number, those are also fundraising events and you have to pay for them. It is a self-licking ice cream cone. 63 cents of $100, not of $1, 100 goes back to the students. Well, that's red flag one because what they did was in their 990s, they listed charitable contributions and program expenses, which is how they're judged of if, hey, are you doing what you say you're going to do? as transfers of money to their endowment. This big red part right here, $57 million is how much they transferred to their own endowment. So yeah, they consider this part of the mission, which is why when you look at their 990s, it looks like they're spending a normal amount going towards their programs, but they're not. And if you go to my source document that's in my link tree, you can see how I came up with the 63 cents. Second red flag, I'm going to do a whole thing on America's Turning Point, this Shell 501c3, in my opinion. But specifically for the fraud piece, this transaction right here to Clock Tower, $999,000. Just slightly under the million dollar threshold that will use flags. That's an indicator. Clock Tower LLC is alone just a very strange entity that somebody should look into, but I've got a whole list of those. It formed in 2019, right before it turned and received this payment for $999,000 for a research project, okay? A research project that nobody saw. So it has no listed officers. Nobody knows who owned it. It had no employees, no website, nothing. And then it dissolved a year and a half after it got this payment. You should be able to show a research project for a million dollars from a nonprofit, period. So if anyone at Turning Point has this research project or knows what it was for, feel free to send it to me and I will retract my statement and be on my way. But huge red flag for fraud because this looks like what happened was it was just a pass through. And this is the key is that a 501c3 gets tax exempt money means it's subsidized by the government and us. And so you can't just money launder. The third red flag, and I've done videos on this and I've done a huge deep dive investigation. Feel free to go look at it on my sub stack. It's the fact that they have over $20 million going to vendors that are LLCs or like entities with turning point. And this is one of the huge red flags for fraud. For instance, Stacey Sheridan stood up an LLC, got money, dissolved it, stood up another one, got money, dissolved it. Three different vendors. And the way that I found it was through one common address of hers the amount that they spend on printing and digital products for education is another red flag in itself but some of those people had worked for turning point at one point their vendors most of them worked for turning point or have ties to turning point and they get millions to do in addition on their 2024 990 They had 62 vendors that made over $100,000 that they didn't have to report because you only have to report your top five. That is a red flag. That is what a subpoena could pull. That is what Discovery would pull if they ever sued anybody. And the last one is they said that they were audited. And in 2024, TPUSA was not audited. You could see it in 12A. That's where it's at, 12A. Were these financial statements independently audited? The answer is no. What are you trying to hide? And I've done a whole video on the auditing of this because for many years, the co-founder, Bill Montgomery, well, the auditors were his personal financial advisors and he got paid for bringing in business. So if you wanna tell me that's an independent audit, you need to check yourself. I know this was a long one, but it's a lot of information and it's so important. I have the full deep dive coming. I'm obviously going to work with Treasury to get this in, see if they're going to put their money where their mouth is. I've done the legwork for you. You just need to go find some documents. This doesn't even include 2025 or 2026 990s. Wait till I get my hands on those. Stay tuned.
leahfiles
Posted - June 18, 2026 at 9:56 PM
Saved - June 19, 2026 at 10:06 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Let’s follow the money on Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Specifically, Accurate Energetic Systems. https://t.co/vfDv0bnXj3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that “certain nefarious characters within the FBI and Department of War” helped assassinate Charlie Kirk and cover it up, and says they will present “correlated events” and “receipts.” They describe Stu Peters as an early proponent of an “exploding microphone theory,” and say they investigated further. The speaker’s first focus is an explosives procurement involving Acura Energetic Systems (AES). They say AES makes explosives and has government contracts, but highlight alleged anomalies tied to timing around Charlie Kirk’s assassination. They claim an AES contract had a procurement period from May 1 through August 2025, ending about eight months later “right before Charlie Kirk’s assassination.” The speaker says the contract was signed April 22, one month after Steven Feinberg took office, adding that Feinberg owned Cerberus, which the speaker says has CIA agents working for him and other intelligence personnel, and also owns DynCorp and special operations units “on how to detonate tiny explosives.” The speaker claims the AES contract used a simplified acquisition procedure (SAP) to streamline procurement, and they state the contract amount was “440,000, some odd change.” They allege there was only one bidder, and that in Federal Business Opportunities it was labeled “not applicable,” meaning it was never posted on SAM.gov even though they say SAPs are posted there. They also claim the contract was for “extra small, tiny explosives,” and that the speaker reviewed decades of online procurements and found nothing similar besides this one time. They further claim that the Department of the Navy made the contract, received devices, and that AES exploded “exactly one month after Charlie Kirk is assassinated.” The speaker states a CSB investigative report identifies the explosion timing as around 7.47 a.m., after the third shift ended around 7 a.m. and the first shift began. They claim the plant operated 24 hours per day with three shifts and that the explosion detonated about 23,000 tons of explosives, felt “from like miles away,” described as like an earthquake. They state all 16 people in the building died, and multiple people outside or in other buildings were severely injured. They also say the building made PETN and claim the company’s facility contained PETN. The speaker describes the post-explosion response as inconsistent. They say the Humphreys County Sheriff (Tennessee) stated it would take a long time to rule out “nefarious play,” while within two weeks, the ATF said it was an accident involving mixtures mishandled on the ground floor and a spark. The speaker claims AES’s building was “literally leveled.” They say OSHA closed its April 2026 investigation with 56 violations and that AES had “tons” of violations for decades. They add that OSHA closure did not stop government procurement from AES, and that press coverage “got under that rug.” They state AES has wrongful death lawsuits and should be unable to bid on federal contracts, yet they claim AES received its biggest contract “just a few weeks after Charlie Kirk’s assassination,” and in January 2026 received another largest contract valued at $377 million. They say they are not claiming bribery directly, but assert the situation “looks” like something was arranged. The speaker also references other procurements they plan to investigate, including FBI-related aerial surveillance in Arizona and an FBI procurement for truck beds from an automotive shop near UVU. They conclude by saying they believe “someone in the Department of War ordered the contract” and that FBI/ATF were part of a cover-up. They mention Senator Jamie Raskin discussing Kash Patel having “slush funds” paying $8,000 every two weeks to executive advisors, and say they want to check the timing of those payments.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that certain nefarious characters within the FBI and Department of War helped assassinate Charlie Kirk and cover it up. And I want to show you why I think this, with receipts. I also spent my career in intelligence and know damn well what we're capable of doing. Now, what happened here was obvious fed slop, which is what I'm going to walk you through as well. But anyway, let's look at the correlated events around this, and then you guys tell me what you think. All right, Stu Peters was one of the first people to vocalize this exploding microphone theory, and ever since he was talking about it, I was like, that's really interesting. Let me go dig into my rabbit holes, right, my areas of expertise, and see what I can find. I did a video on this a few months ago, but I have found a lot of information since, and that's what I want to talk about today. First up, we have the Acura Energetic Systems contract. This is one of the biggest red flags. So Acura Energetic Systems makes explosives, and they have a lot of government contracts. not abnormal. What caught my attention was the procurement period. The procurement period was for May 1st through August of 2025. So what is that? Like an eight month procurement period ending right before Charlie Kirk's assassination. So this contract is signed on April 22nd and That is one month after Steven Feinberg got into office. He also owned Cerberus that has CIA agents working for him and all these people in Intel. They also own DynCorp and special ops units on how to detonate tiny explosives. The other thing that caught my eye about this contract was that it was an SAP, a simplified acquisition procedure, basically intended to streamline the procurement process in the government, which is very lengthy. And if you want it done really fast and it's this much money, 440,000, some odd change, You have to go through this process. The strange things about it as well, there was one bidder. And in the federal business opportunities slot, it's labeled as not applicable, meaning it was never posted on SAM.gov, which is where contracts are posted, even SAPs. That's strange. The other thing about this one specifically is if you look above, it was for extra small, tiny explosives. Well, I went back and looked at every single procurement that we have done in the history of procurements that you can capture online, which goes back over decades. Never have we ever procured anything like this. Happened to be just this one time. Buckle up for this ride, guys. So that contract happens, somebody, the Department of Navy is the one who made the contract, they receive their tiny little explosive devices that no one's ever procured before in this crazy simplified acquisition procedure with one bidder never put on sam.gov. But then Accurate Energetic Systems, exactly one month after Charlie Kirk is assassinated, well, it blows up. The specific building, because there were a few buildings, quite a few buildings around, the specific building that made this blew up. They were operating 24 hours a day. They had three shifts, working eight hours a day. Third shift had just gotten off around 7 in the morning, and the first shift was taking over, and it happened around 7.47 a.m. You can go to this website, the CSB, and get this investigative report. There's the whole report about what happened. So Acura Energetic Systems blows up the building one month after Charlie Kirk is assassinated. They had been in business since I think like 2008. Apparently it started in the ground level. It's two levels. And then obviously there were like 23,000 tons of explosives that detonated and it could have been felt from like miles away. They said it was like an earthquake. All 16 people that were in that building at the time died. And then there were multiple people outside of the building or in other buildings that got severely injured. Another interesting note is that in this building, they make PETN. And I know some people have talked about PETN. I have been sent photos of how this could work with explosives in the microphone from some sources. And yeah, it's gnarly material. And what do you know? They have it in this building. So Acura Energetic Systems creates these extra small explosives. And then a month, literally one month later, happens to explode. And an investigation was opened. First on the scene, ATF and FBI and OSHA. I'll do a podcast on this, but I don't want this video to get too long. And I'll also post this on my sub stack in long form, readable with all the receipts. So here's some weird things about this explosion and how it was handled and what happened after with procurements. The Humphreys County Sheriff, the county in which this happened in Tennessee, said on day one, it would take them a very long time to rule out nefarious play, criminal activity. which I think is interesting because within two weeks, the ATF said that it was an accident. What? The same ATF that works under the FBI. I'm just saying these are correlated events, all right? So the sheriff says it's going to take a long time to rule out nefarious activity, which means I think he's got red flags going off. Then two weeks later, the ATF's like, oh, no, no, it happened because some mixtures got messed up on the ground floor and then, oops, sparked something and then, ah, pounds of explosives detonated and, oh, the building that made these... extra small, really strange palms, well, doesn't exist anymore. Literally leveled. Nothing to see here, folks. And then just like a month and a half ago, in April of 2026, OSHA closed its investigation. It found 56 violations. But accurate energetic systems had had violations for decades. No one seemed to care. They had no sprinkler system. They had tons of violations. And our government's just like, oh, no, we're just going to keep ordering from you. But whatever. That's for another day. And the press, well, we never heard anything about it after that day. That story was like, get under that rug, go. The other things that make me really believe that this was someone in the government is because they had 16 deaths. They found 56 OSHA violations and they have all these wrongful death lawsuits against them. Technically, they should not be allowed to bid on federal contracts right now. Sam.gov, nothing. In fact, they got their biggest contract ever just a few weeks after Charlie Kirk's assassination. And then in January 2026, their biggest one, $377 million. They never had one that big. I'm not saying that they were paid off or that this was given as a we owed you, but that sure as hell what it looks like. They should have been debarred or suspended, nothing. Not only were they not, but they got their biggest contract ever. And that is the other huge red flag for me. There were some other strange procurements I was looking at too specifically. One, not AES, there were totally different procurements. One was for an aerial surveillance in Arizona from the FBI. And the other was from the FBI for truck beds from an automotive shop, just 30 minutes from UVU. So I need to look into those more. It's based on the procurement alone, and then what happened to this plant, and then what should have happened after it exploded, if it was truly an explosion, and then what did happen. They got their largest contract. It was basically closed in two weeks. They were like, nothing to see here. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. I'm not buying it for a second. So I think someone in the Department of War ordered the contract, and then some nefarious characters, I won't name names, and the FBI, ATF, whatever it was, We're part of this cover-up. There was a senator, I think it was Raskin, Jamie Raskin, who had talked about Kash Patel having slush funds for his executive advisors, basically other agents. And they were getting like $8,000 every two weeks. But I'd be really interested to see the timing of these payments. So I'm not going to give up on that one. Anyway, there you have it. Stay tuned.
leahfiles
Posted - June 18, 2026 at 3:20 PM
Saved - June 18, 2026 at 10:00 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Trump signed the MOU early to catch everyone off guard (IMO). I usually don’t post my news updates on here, but thought today’s was a good analysis for anyone interested :) https://t.co/WB9yoJATi8

Video Transcript AI Summary
On Thursday, June 18, the host discussed key political updates and focused on the day’s MOU related developments. First, the host said Donald Trump signed the MOU in person in Versailles yesterday, two days early. They claimed the live signing was supposed to be in Geneva, and that JD Vance digitally signed it while Trump did not sign it there. The host said the U.S. still wants Vance to go for a live signing, but Iran responded that the matter is finished because “we all signed it” and there is no need to go to Geneva. The host added that Netanyahu posted that he was meeting with his head of Mossad, and comments included speculation about potential threats and assassinations. The host said the host was concerned about being a “sitting duck” during a live trip and suggested the “blue and white country” could “ruin it.” Second, the host said the 14-point MOU was released and reviewed specific points they had not seen widely. They said the U.S. will work with regional allies to develop a $300 billion reconstruction fund. They said the MOU states up to $100 billion in frozen assets will be released to Iran, contrasting this with claims by Vance and Trump that money would not exchange hands and with their understanding of the prior “24 billion with 12 billion up front, and then another 12 later.” The host argued that closing the Strait of Hormuz was leverage and that Iran could keep it closed even if the U.S. left, framing this as the reason the U.S. is paying. They said the MOU also provides that, upon signing, the U.S. Treasury will issue waivers for export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products, and derivatives, and associated services including banking transactions, insurance, and transportation. They said the MOU includes waivers for all sanctioned exports. Finally, the host said the MOU states Iran will maintain the current nuclear-program status quo and “doesn’t bar them from owning their enriched uranium,” and cited ABC News and an older commitment described as avoiding nuclear weapons development for 50 years. Third, the host claimed the “blue and white country” published a map showing the IDF 10 kilometers deep in Lebanon and said they are not leaving. The host referenced an MOU statement that the U.S. and its allies will leave Lebanon and Iran and that permanent termination of military operations on all fronts is stated, while arguing that events within 24 hours show violations. They also described Iranian leverage to “walk away” by suggesting prior actions by the “blue and white country” already undermined the agreement. The host also said Netanyahu plans to use Mark Levin and pro-Israel senators to influence the final deal, implying Trump signed early due to distrust. The host stated that a foreign prime minister told Trump the U.S. president had “no effing judgment,” and that the prime minister is planning a public pressure campaign using U.S. Senate influence and right-wing media to shape policy, which the host characterized as influence operations requiring FARA registration. The host then listed stories they planned to watch, including who appears in Geneva on Friday, Trump’s reactions before then, continued pressure and bombing in Lebanon, media campaigns, and which senators publicly back the “blue and white country.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is Thursday, June 18th. Welcome to your Unhinged News Update, where I give you the top political stories from the day before and what I'm paying attention to today. We have big updates today. Let's go. Number one, Trump signed the MOU in person in Versailles yesterday, two days early. Live signing was supposed to be in Geneva, so apparently JD Vance was the one that digitally signed it. Trump did not sign it at all. This was his live signature. They were going to go to Geneva. JD Vance, the US still wants him to go for this live signing. Iran's like, no, it's done. We all signed it. We don't need to go to Geneva. Interestingly enough, Netanyahu yesterday posted that he was meeting with his head of Mossad and everyone in the comments was like, is this a threat? Who are you assassinating next? Trump signs the MOU in person. And part of me wonders if he was just concerned for going and doing it live, being a sitting duck, the blue and white country would ruin it, find a way to ruin it. Like they do everything else. Just something that made me think. Number two, the 14-point MOU was released. So I want to go through some of the points and talk about what it actually entailed. I want to go through some of the points that are in here that I found important that I haven't seen or heard about at all. First one, the U.S. will work with regional allies to develop this $300 billion reconstruction fund. Trump said so many times that that's not true. That's not true. The lead document's fake. That's not true. But it is. It's just like, ah. Whatever, again, I have stated if our tax dollars aren't going to it at this point, I don't have the energy to be mad about it. But I am going to make sure to follow the money on this one because I want to make sure they aren't sneaking it into some special contracts that they can then funnel it over on. So I got us. Second one that you're not hearing a lot about is that it says to $100 billion in frozen assets will be released to Iran. And Vance says, said numerous times, that's not true, that's false. Trump said numerous times, money's not exchanging hands. We thought it was 24 billion with 12 billion up front, and then another 12 later, and it's up to $100 billion of their frozen assets released. I wanna park here for a second because this alone tells me, I've talked to you about how we didn't have leverage. This is the only way out. We had to pay them. Here's the thing, when you're doing war games or strategy, I've done it with the government. I do it with corporations as well. You're looking at, hey, what does my opponent or what does my competitor have that, what are their strengths and weaknesses? What are mine? If I do this, what could be their counteractions to it? So for instance, if we go into Iran, what could be their counteractions? You look at the economy piece and one of the biggest ones is closing the Strait of Hormuz and we act like we didn't know they would do that. We act like we didn't know. That's the leverage they had and they did it. And we were like, wait, what? We can't do that. And now we're paying them because even if we left, even if we left, they could keep the Strait closed. This is why I have continuously said, and I said it in my podcast, this is the biggest foreign diplomacy disaster of our era because we are paying Iran now hundreds of billions of dollars to get them back and us back to where we were prior to to this entire thing starting so for everyone who was like we needed to go in i hope you're starting to realize that they didn't have the nuclear capabilities it's not that hard let's just use your brain but there's no other way out there is no other way out we had we have to pay them in two more points on the mou i'm going to read this one to us immediately upon signing the u.s treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products, and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, and transportation. All sanctioned exports are getting a waiver. Last one is just, this one just makes me laugh. Iran will maintain the current status quo under the nuclear program. Doesn't bar them from owning their enriched uranium, which I've talked about. They're not going to give up. And according to ABC News and according to, I don't know, the deal that was made years and years, decades ago, Iran has been committed to not developing a nuclear weapon for 50 years. But definitely since 2003. So we are literally leaving and nothing. accomplished. You want to know why? Because there was nothing to accomplish. Because we didn't go in for the reasons we said we went in because they didn't have a nuke and we weren't going in to help the people. This sums it up and the only way out of it is to pay them. All right number three. Our good friends the blue and white country they published a map this morning and the IDF is 10 kilometers deep in Lebanon. They're not leaving. They have made it clear they're not leaving. Article one of the MOU is that the U.S. and its allies will leave, leave Lebanon, leave Iran. Permanent termination of military operations on all fronts is what it states. And within 24 hours of it being signed, of course they're gonna go mess it up because they're war criminals. I don't think they should have a nuke. I think we should work on them not having a nuke and they have plenty. And part of me wonders if they threaten us with one because their Jericho missiles can reach pretty much everywhere except Argentina where Peter Thiel moved. So technically, Iran already has a way out. They have a way to walk away from this deal because blue and white country has already just negated 0.1. So we'll have to see if they actually walk away. But I think that that's why we made the money so enticing. It's like a scale, right? It's like, do you really, how bad do you want to protect Lebanon from those crazy people? Or do you want money? Because we know we can't control them. Last one, Netanyahu plans to use Mark Levin, who, ah, he's the most atrocious human being besides Howard Lutnick. But he plans to use Mark Levin and pro-Israel senators to influence the final deal. But I think that's why Trump signed early. I think he knew. He doesn't trust them. And I don't blame him. So a foreign prime minister last week told Trump, the US president, that he had no effing judgment. And he's now planning a public pressure campaign using our Senate and public influencers to pressure not doing this deal. We aren't going to get a better deal. And he's using the right-wing media, which they own, and our senators to shape U.S. policy. That is influence operations, and anyone who does it is a foreign agent and needs to be registered in FARA. The pieces are starting to fit together, but I also think it's starting to fall apart. Maybe, just maybe, we're not going to merge militaries. People are waking up. Here are the stories I'm paying attention to. Obviously, who shows up in Geneva on Friday? What's going to happen? I also want to see Trump's reactions from now until then. The blue and white countries continued pressure and bombing of Lebanon. Schmitt and Yahoo's media campaign and who jumps on board and who's starting to pressure. I mean, you see these coordinated messages across social media. That's the number one sign that they're being paid to do this. Watch to see which senators start to come out and publicly stand up for the blue and white country because they need to go. That's blue and white country over America. Those are your news updates. Stay tuned.
leahfiles
Posted - June 16, 2026 at 3:33 PM
Saved - June 16, 2026 at 10:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I know this may get suppressed, but it’s time. Musk promised DOGE would save $1T; the final claim was $214B, yet the independently verifiable amount was under 5% (excluding costs). The churn cost about $135B, including firing 17 inspector generals. They didn’t touch the un-audited $850B Pentagon or Elon’s $38B contracts, and DOGE employees caused data privacy breaches. Musk also donated $290M to Trump, then had regulators shut down and secured ~$6B in new defense contracts—costing taxpayers more than it saved.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

This will probably get suppressed, but I don’t care. It’s time. Elon Musk promised DOGE would save taxpayers $1 TRILLION. But, it actually just paved his path to become a trillionaire. Let’s follow the money. - “Claimed savings”: Final DOGE claim was $214B saved. The independently verifiable amount was less than 5% of that, not including the actually costs. Costs - The firing-and-rehiring churn cost ~ $135B. - Week one: 17 inspector generals fired who return $26 per $1 spent and catch the very things happening right now with the Trump family ventures, Elon’s ventures, AI, etc. - They didn’t touch the $850B Pentagon budget that has never passed an audit. - Also untouched were the $38B in government contracts flowing to Elon. - Data privacy breaches by DOGE employees And before you say that he worked for free, he did not have to file a financial disclosure because he "worked for free". This looks more like a workaround. Elon donated over $290M to Trump’s campaign. The morning Trump was sworn in, Musk's companies faced $2.37B in legal exposure across 11 federal agencies. Then he was handed power over those same agencies. Inside the first quarter, six of the regulators investigating Elon’s companies were cut, closed, or told to stand down. So, he spent ~$290M to elect Trump and he left office with his cases dead and SpaceX ~$6B RICHER in NEW defense contracts. That is not a Department of Government Efficiency. And as someone who was on the inside when this all went down, the strategy behind finding these contracts was incredibly inefficient and just caused defense contractors, such as Booz Allen Hamilton, to merely change their name from consulting to technology. It merely caused word changes in contracts. Contracts that are bloated and should be cut, weren’t even looked at. And in the end, it cost tax payers exponentially more than it saved, including data privacy, Just want to call out the reality of how Space X and this shady IPO even came about.

leahfiles
Posted - June 13, 2026 at 10:51 PM
Saved - June 14, 2026 at 7:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I think Sen. Tom Cotton is actively committing treason with colleagues. He slipped Section 622 into the intel bill, forcing the U.S. to permanently hand intelligence secrets to Israel, making it hard for future presidents to scale back. I looked into his motive: Bill Kristol helped put him in office; pro-Israel megadonors funded him, his war chest is largely out of state, and he’s an Iran war hawk pushed by the same Iraq-connected interests.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@SenTomCotton seems to be actively committing treason with some of his colleagues. He is up for reelection in Arkansas and is the Chair of Senate Intelligence Committee. This month he slipped Section 622 into the intel bill. It would force the US to hand intelligence secrets to Israel and write it into permanent law, so no future president can scale it back without filing paperwork and picking a public fight. I thought this was pretty bold (and treasonous), so I looked into him to figure out his motive. You have some explaining to do, Cotton. 2014: Bill Kristol, the guy who sold America the Iraq war with the WMD lie, ~4,500 dead Americans, and zero apology, spends $960K to launch an unknown 37-year-old into the Senate. Cotton wins. Then hires Kristol’s son to run his office. Who else paid to put him there? The most pro-Israel megadonors in the country. The NYT literally named that donor circle as why Republicans went “more fervently pro-Israel than ever.” One of them, Paul Singer, just cut a $2.5 MILLION check to AIPAC’s super PAC this cycle. Singer is who poured a lot into Ed Gallrein. Today Cotton’s war chest is ~$9.8M. Nearly $7M of it comes from out of state. Wall Street and Palm Beach, not Arkansas. So what does Arkansas’s senator do with the power they bought him? As Senate Intelligence Chairman, he just wrote a law forcing every future president to hand US intelligence secrets to Israel, permanently, with no price tag the public can see. He also is an Iran war hawk, pressed by the same man who got us into Iraq…. So, it’s pretty clear who Cotton works for and it’s not the American citizens.

leahfiles
Posted - June 13, 2026 at 5:56 PM
Saved - June 13, 2026 at 10:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I did a deep dive on FARA and followed the money. I saw 6–8 companies registered for Israel within weeks of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, and 8 firms registered in 2025 (over a third of the 21 total). Israel spent $150M in 2025 and $730M in 2026, with major funding going to ads, trips, and a media/lawfare push beyond what FARA captures.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

I saw that 6-8 companies registered in FARA for Israel within weeks of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. So, I did a deep dive on FARA and followed the money. It's worse than we thought... We are all aware of the “Israel pays influencers" story. But that’s only 10% of the money. 8 companies registered in FARA in 2025. There are only 21 ever. So that’s more than 1/3 in one year to influence you. Let’s follow the $ on how Israel is buying Americans Israel's government spent $150M in 2025 and $730M for 2026, to move American opinion. - $9M to Brad Parscale to flood Gen Z and reshape what AI says about Israel - $900K to pay US influencers up to $7,000 a post, no disclosure, 25-30 posts a month - $3.26M for a church campaign with a VR "October 7" trailer built to tour Christian colleges. They literally did a VR campaign to put people on the music festival field during the attack. That's about $15M. Roughly a tenth. The real money is in the fat blue pipes in the graphic, and none of it touches FARA: ~$52M paid straight to Google, YouTube and X for pro Israel / anti Palestine ads ~$40M to fly 400 pastors, influencers and lawmakers to Israel - +$20M on a media war room, campus ops and lawfare Why don't you see it? FARA only catches Americans hired to do politics. Ad buys and free trips don't qualify. So the filings everyone quotes were only ever going to show you the tip of the iceberg…intentionally. And it all routes through one Havas ad office in Frankfurt, so the paperwork reads "Havas," not "Israel." The influencers pushing Israel sympathy propaganda are getting paid $175k-$200k/ month. So next time someone tries and discredits you for posting facts about Israel or is sympathizing with these war criminals, just know they are either 1- being paid like the wh*res they are or 2- pathetic sheep falling for the paid propaganda

leahfiles
Posted - June 13, 2026 at 4:13 PM
Saved - June 13, 2026 at 5:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling Randy Fine a fraud who bought influence at Harvard, never cleared up $24,000 in federal grant money, and now sits in Congress. He still earns casino dividends despite claiming retirement, escalated antisemitic/anti-women attacks, and became “Jewish” only when politically useful. Even Florida’s governor said lawmakers wanted him gone. August 18, 2026 will test whether his brand still works.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Randy Fine probably came out of the devil's womb a fraud. Now, he is a political wh*re that no one respects. He has never truly won anything on his own. If he loses or may lose, he just tries to bribe them or he gets people to bail him out. He is merely a repulsive, sweaty, sad excuse for a man who is known for attacking and doxxing women who challenge him. Let's shed the snake skin of Randy Fine.... In 1992, a Harvard freshman named Randall Fine was accused of paying eight people's club membership fees to vote for him in a campus election. He lost anyway. Two years later, the Harvard Crimson ran a column about him called "Scandal Before Service." He had used the Harvard Undergraduate Council's name to apply for a $24,000 federal grant. He never told the council. To this day, in the Crimson's own words, "what exactly happened to the $24,000 is still not clear." That was thirty-two years ago. He's a sitting member of Congress now. The Harvard kid who tried to buy a club election grew up to run casinos. He spent a decade squeezing money out of gamblers for Carl Icahn and a Detroit creditor group that took a tribal casino away from the Sault Ste. Marie Chippewa during the financial crisis. He says he retired at 40 to raise his sons. He didn't. His own House financial disclosure, signed December 29, 2024, shows he is still collecting up to $50,000 a year in dividends from a Canadian software company called Tangam Systems whose entire business is teaching casinos how to extract more profit from gamblers at table games and slot machines. Penn Entertainment. Caesars. Choctaw. Sycuan. The retired man is still on the casino payroll. His personal holding company, named after his sons, holds between ten and fifty million dollars. He listed zero mortgage. Zero liabilities. On a million-dollar beachfront house. He won a Florida House seat in 2016 and called himself the only Jewish Republican in the legislature. He picked up a nickname there. The Hebrew Hammer. He liked it so much he named his federal PAC after it. What he doesn't tell you is that the Hebrew Hammer brand started getting loud right after October 7, 2023. Before that, he was a backbench Florida Republican with one antisemitism bill on his resume and a side career calling fellow Jewish women "Judenrat" on Facebook, the Nazi-collaborator slur, twice, aimed at Jewish women who refused to support his legislation. He told Israel Hayom in June 2026, on the record: "I have unquestionably become more Jewish as I've been in politics." Those are his own words. He started wearing a kippah only after his son asked him to, in 2024. He grew a beard in December 2025. He told the same Israeli paper he wraps tefillin "many, many more times as a politician than I ever did as a non-politician." His Brevard County synagogue, Temple Beth Sholom, says he and his wife Wendy resigned over a dispute about an LGBTQ staff member, allegedly threatened to burn the place down, and demanded a refund of every dollar they had ever contributed. He is the man who calls women he doesn't like "whores" in text messages, the school board mom Jennifer Jenkins, twice, in writing, on her local school district business. He is the man who posted her personal cell phone number on Facebook and got suspended by Facebook for it. He is the man the Armenian Bar Association is formally trying to get censured for saying, on the record, "we don't want Armenians to be able to serve in Congress." He is the man who tried to become president of Florida Atlantic University in 2023, was not named a finalist, and within hours emailed the state chancellor to complain. The chancellor suspended the entire FAU presidential search. State investigators later found the process had violated state law. The day after Fine won his congressional seat, the sitting Republican governor of his own state, Ron DeSantis, looked into a camera and said state legislators had asked him to install Fine at FAU just to get him out of Tallahassee. The whole university board, DeSantis said, would have resigned before letting him have the job. That is a Republican governor saying out loud that the legislature, the FAU trustees, and he himself view this man as toxic. Fine won FL-6 anyway. By 14 points. In a district Trump had carried by 30. Outraised ten to one by a public school employee with no political background. House GOP leadership had to personally call donors to bail him out. That is not a politician with a district. It's a politician with patrons. The man who gave him the Hebrew Hammer nickname, Joe Gruters, is now Chairman of the Republican National Committee. The position Fine wanted at FAU went to a man whose wife runs the Florida arm of the Republican Jewish Coalition, the same organization that branded Fine. His federal PAC is run by Paul Kilgore, the GOP's most repeatedly investigated treasurer, named in multiple FEC enforcement matters, running PAC plumbing for "hundreds" of committees out of a mailbox in Athens, Georgia. His seat came from Mike Waltz, demoted as National Security Advisor a month after Fine took office in the biggest scandal of Trump's second term. His most flattering interview ran in Israel Hayom, owned by Miriam Adelson, the same family whose casino fortune built the political infrastructure that promotes him. Strip the brand off Randy Fine and what is left is this. A Harvard kid who tried to buy an election and never accounted for $24,000 in federal money. A casino operative who still collects casino dividends. A man whose religious observance got dramatically louder the moment it became politically useful. A legislator who threatens funding for special needs charities and university zoos when private institutions decline to bend to him. A congressman whose own state's governor said the legislature wanted him gone. He calls women whores. He calls Jewish women collaborators. He calls Armenian-Americans unfit for Congress. He says on television we should starve children in Gaza, and his Foreign Affairs Committee assignment was announced the same day he posted "Starve Away" in response to news about Palestinian famine deaths. This is a man who was handed a seat, handed a brand, handed a committee, and handed a network, and whose only original contribution has been the volume. The Hebrew Hammer is not a fighter, he is a weak man with a marketing campaign and pick me energy. And on August 18, 2026, twenty candidates on the FL-6 primary ballot are going to test whether the marketing still holds up.

leahfiles
Posted - June 12, 2026 at 9:42 PM
Saved - June 12, 2026 at 11:00 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

TPUSA is one person not part of their coverup away from losing their tax exempt status and ending the legacy CK built because they are grifters and dumb ones at that. https://t.co/YcSF6CqwGt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker alleges that people in TPSA are trying to discredit anyone who questions “their narrative,” specifically related to Charlie Kirk’s assassination, and claims that ongoing behavior “reinforced the fact that you’re part of the coverup.” They then focus on an “endowment” described as one of the “shadiest” entities in Turning Point’s structure. The speaker says Turning Point has “like six entities” and that these entities allow Turning Point to move money while “water down any sort of forensic accounting.” They claim Turning Point Endowment has zero employees, no websites, and supports no programs, while holding $69.9 million “as of their 990 filing in 2024.” The speaker says they traced every dollar in and out of the endowment and that, for years from 2017 through 2024, the endowment’s money comes from Turning Point USA, with “zero outside donors” providing funds. The speaker says TPUSA reported giving money to the endowment as one of its mission goals, and characterizes an endowment as a “war chest” to move money in during a “bad year,” which the speaker says occurred when TPUSA had deficits in 2023. The speaker claims the endowment owns real estate connected to Turning Point: they say it owns 4930 East Beverly Road (also identified as Turning Point Action’s address), 4940 Beverly Road (Turning Point USA’s address), and that the endowment’s letterhead address lists 4950 (next door). They state that Turning Point USA “deeded its own building to the endowment” as a “charitable contribution,” and that in 2021 it bought in cash the political arm’s real estate. They add that “the mystery donor is themselves,” which they say they found through deed filings. They describe a “rent math” analysis: the speaker says that for three straight years, Turning Point’s charitable program donation to the endowment was for “occupancy and depreciation” and the upkeep of Turning Point’s own buildings, matching dollar-for-dollar. They state that the endowment has not had an independent audit and that, on their 990 forms, the relevant audit box is “always no” for the endowment; they add that TPUSA was only “no in 2024.” They provide figures: four years of building costs totaling $949,000, with rent collected back totaling $232,000, and claim that the remaining amount went to leasing those buildings “to themselves, and the political arm.” They also say the rent line lists rent as zero and that the speaker characterizes this as “penalty of perjury” if false. The speaker further claims timing and purchasing activity: on August 1, 2025, they say Turning Point Endowment bought a third building for $3.85 million, which they claim would not show up on 990s until 2027, and they say the purchase occurs “40 days before Charlie Kirk is assassinated.” The speaker also alleges that on August 1, 2025, a “Doge-like assessment” was requested 30 days before the assassination. They claim additional financial activity: in 2023, when TPUSA had a deficit and assets fell 41%, the endowment sent “500K” while putting “some $9 million” into private equity, which they say cannot be exited for 10 years. They state the private equity fund names and fund managers are “secret,” and claim $565,000 was paid in investment fees over four years to someone not named on other forms. They also describe March 2025 filing activity: they say three Turning Point entities filed within a 72-hour period, and that “buried inside of that” the endowment “became five,” adding new names including Justin Olson (CFO, previously Arizona State Corporate Commissioner) and Frank Carney. They conclude: “This endowment, in my opinion, exists to hide money.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: people in TPSA are on one lately and they're just trying to discredit anybody who questions their narrative, the BS narrative about Charlie Kirk's assassination. Like we don't, I don't buy it for one second, no part of it. And your behavior since that day and every day after has just reinforced the fact that you're part of the coverup. That's what your behavior looks like. Anyway, they continuously say that the As a follow the money person, I'm like, there's no rumors when it comes to money. So okay, bet. I'm going to expose it, every single entity, because you want to know what? You are doing things that will lose your 501c3 status, your tax exempt status. And if that happens, you're done. You're done. So let's go. We're going to start with the endowment. One of the shadiest ones there is. The deep dive article is on Substack for you all with RoofSource is everything. So you can go head over there. It's free to check out. That link is in my bio. But let's do a video. Turning Point has like six entities, something like that. It's a lot. It's insane, actually. And all it does is allow them to move money and water down any sort of forensic accounting. They did try to hide this. They tried to hide this. But I'm good at what I do. And I have found what you guys are doing with this endowment. All right. Turning Point Endowment has zero employees, guys. Zero. They have no websites and they support no programs. But you know what they do have? They have $69.9 million. And that's just as of their 990 filing in 2024. I traced every dollar that went in and every dollar that went out. And this right here is the shadiest of them all. 2017, they get their money from Turning Point USA. 2019, Turning Point USA 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, all of their money comes in through Turning Point USA, which means that if you've donated to TPUSA, more than likely your money is sitting in what I'm about to talk about. Zero outside donors have given to the endowment. It has all been through TPUSA grants. In fact, TPUSA claimed giving money to the endowment as one of their mission goals. mission-oriented accomplishments for the year. I'm sorry, that's not an accomplishment. You're moving money into a war chest. An endowment exists so that if TPSA has a bad year, they can move money in. And we're going to get to that because they did have a bad year. But they call this on TPSA's 990 a charitable accomplishment. The same category that they're spending on their campus events, that's what they consider transferring money into this savings account. But this savings account, when I dug, and they tried to hide this, they tried to hide this, it owns real estate, specifically 4930 East Beverly Road. That's Turning Point Action's address too. The political arm, you know? They own 4940 Beverly Road. That's Turning Point USA's address. And the address on their letterhead is 4950, which is right next door. So Turning Point USA deeded its own building to the endowment and called it a charitable contribution. And in 2021, it bought in cash the political arms real estate. Do you want to know what can't be done? Oh, that. The mystery donor is themselves. And again, I only found this through the deed filings. If you want to see the proof, you can go to Substack. Okay, so all that happens. Now let's look at the rent math because this one was fun too. I audited their expense statements line by line. The entire charitable program donation that was given to the endowment from Turning Point for three straight years was for occupancy and depreciation. The upkeep of their own buildings. That's it. That's it. That's what they consider a charitable contribution. That matched dollar for dollar. The money going out of TPUSA to this and the amount coming in, they just didn't think anyone would look. And by the way, the endowment hasn't had an independent audit. It's not in their 990s, they have to check a box that says, have you had an independent auditor look at this? It's always no for them. TPUSA was only no in 2024. Endowment's always been no. Shady, shady kids. Four years of building costs, $949,000. The rent that they collected back was $232,000. So 700 and some odd thousand dollars went to leasing that building to themselves, and the political arm. Charitable money subsidizing politics is the exact thing that the tax code says cannot happen. And on the rent line, they list rent as zero. You know, it's penalty of perjury for whoever signs these forms if they're lying. August 1, 2025. August 1, 2025. 40 days before Charlie Kirk is assassinated and 30 days before he asked for a Doge-like assessment Well, on August 1, 2025, they buy a third building for $3.85 million. I'm not saying they're connected. I'm just saying that the correlation is there, that they purchased a $3.85 million building that will not show up on their 990s until 2027, a month before Charlie Kirk was assassinated. I only found this because when I was searching for the other buildings, when I was like, this looks like real estate, let me find out and went to trace what they've been purchasing. That's how I found the purchase. They really did a good job hiding this. I'm not gonna lie. Like someone got smart. They're just not as smart as I am. You guys know that? Their spokesman said, we are audited every year. But that is a lie because their 2024 file says they were not audited. And the endowment has never been audited. A $70 million vault has never been audited. That's purchasing up real estate, getting money from a charitable organization and doesn't actually have a mission. Here's the other thing that bothered me about this. When, and the thing that got me even looking so deep into this, it took me weeks, guys. It took me a few weeks to dig this deep into it. In 2023, Turning Point USA had a big deficit. 41% of their assets were down. Like it was negative. And the endowment exists to send money to support the mission of the charitable organization. And they were down millions. And do you wanna know how much the endowment sent over? 500K. Do you know what it did with some $9 million? It put it into private equity. And by the way, they can't exit that $9 million of private equity funds that they put in 10 years. The fund names that it went to, they're secret. The fund managers, they're secret. And over four years, it paid $565,000 in investment fees to someone whose name isn't on any of the other forms. March 2025, six months before Charlie Kirk was assassinated, which March 2025 to me is a very important month. I think that is when not the plan went down, but I think that is when a plan started. Three of the Turning Point entities filed within a 72-hour period. Buried inside of that, the vault that was three people for this endowment became five. New names, Justin Olson, who's the CFO, who for years was also the Arizona State Corporate Commissioner. agency that receives their filings. That was him. That was him. And Frank Carney, who's a ghost. He has filings in over 20 states. Like this man is... This endowment, in my opinion, exists to hide money. Hide money from the charitable organization. Go take a look at the write-up on Substack again. It's free. There's just so much to this. I'm gonna keep going. So stay tuned for the next one.
leahfiles
Posted - June 11, 2026 at 3:50 PM
Saved - June 11, 2026 at 7:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m launching a series exposing TPUSA’s shady entities, starting with Turning Point Endowment. After TPUSA lost 41% in 2023, it allegedly sent just $500k while locking $9M in unnamed private equity. I found the “vault” owns TPUSA HQ, the board expanded with unseen IRS names, “charitable accomplishments” allegedly hid $11M surplus, and it’s board-designated with no legal restriction. Full investigation is on my Substack.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

The arrogance of the puppets in TPUSA is astounding. So, welcome to my series where I expose every single one of their shady entities. Let’s start with my favorite one, the entity that may hold the financial map to a timeline into the cracks of the org before CK’s assassination, Turning Point Endowment. A little background for you: An endowment fund exists to help an organization when it has a bad year to ensure grants can still go out and the mission can be executed, but in 2023 TPUSA lost 41% of its assets. Interestingly enough, the endowment only sent $500k and instead locked $9M into private equity that nobody will name. This is what caused me to investigate the endowment and…well, get ready. Highlights below: (this one took a few weeks but it’s worth it. Deep dive with sources is free on my Substack now. Link in bio) → The vault secretly owns TPUSA’s own headquarters building and is the landlord to its political arm at roughly $51K/yr on $8M of property. Charity money subsidizing partisan politics is the one thing the tax code flatly forbids. They made this one a little difficult to figure out, but unfortunately for them, I’m very good at what I do. → The board expanded from 3 to 5 people just six months before Kirk’s death, (March 2025) with names the IRS has still never seen, in a transaction that wouldn’t surface in any public filing until 2027 if I hadn’t figured it out through other filings. → TPUSA claimed moving donor money into its own savings account as a “charitable accomplishment,” on their reports. This is the same category as the campus tours. But, that one entry actually just hid $11M of surplus from people who donate to these corrupt grifters. → It’s not an endowment. It’s 100% board-designated, and 0% legally restricted. Three people can spend all $70M tomorrow on anything they can call the mission. “Endowment” is the marketing word for tax purposes, but in reality it’s a war chest with no oversight. → The endowment ran real estate and private equity for years, then quietly rewrote the charter to allow it two years after the fact. This is another huge red flag and the charter was the cleanup. The full investigation is up on my Substack (link in bio) with sources, charts, etc. If you’re reading this, Kolvet, Neff, Bowyer, Kirk, buckle up because this is just your appetizer.

leahfiles
Posted - June 2, 2026 at 7:07 PM
Saved - June 2, 2026 at 11:13 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

The CIA Officer who had the gold bars…hot dam* did this story take a dark turn when I followed the money https://t.co/YHRjRAWQBP

leahfiles
Posted - May 31, 2026 at 8:41 PM
Saved - May 31, 2026 at 10:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
You say I’m profiting off Charlie’s death, so here’s the timeline: TPUSA Merch was incorporated in Mar 2022, then after Charlie Kirk was assassinated on Sep 10, you shifted to merch. You later incorporated TPUSA Merch in NJ, IN, ID, MO, and PA from Oct 2025–Mar 2026. Within 48 hours, donation boxes for Erika/TPUSA were up and memorial merch sold on your site.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Since you want to bring up profiting off of Charlie's death, I have a fun timeline for you, @BlakeSNeff - TPUSA Merch is incorporated in Mar 2022 and that is the only one UNTIL - Sep 10, Charlie Kirk is assassinated, then you all got busy focusing on Merch like the grifters you are.... - Oct 2025, you incorporate TPUSA MERCH in NJ - Nov 2025, you incorporate TPUSA MERCH in IN - Nov 2025, you incorporate TPUSA MERCH in ID - Feb 2026, you incorporate TPUSA MERCH in MO - March 2026, you incorporate TPUSA MERCH in PA Within 48 hours of Charlie's death, you had donation boxes up for Erika, TPUSA, and you had memorial merch for sale on your website... And I'm just getting started.

leahfiles
Posted - May 30, 2026 at 1:47 PM
Saved - May 30, 2026 at 8:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I clarify that Section 224 doesn’t literally merge U.S. and Israeli troops. It would institutionalize deep defense-technology cooperation—joint research, weapons co-development/production, shared networks/data fusion, and combined program offices—yet it’s not law (in the House chairman’s mark, still pending votes/signature). Critics flag reduced oversight, irreversibility, sensitive data sharing, and deeper entanglement; proponents say it formalizes successful innovation and deters Iran.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Are we merging forces with Israel or is this all clickbait? I read Section 224 so you don't have to. Here you go! First, one clarification to what is being communicated online, Section 224 does not "literally" merge U.S. and Israeli "troops" into one army. No American soldiers are put under Israeli command, and no Israeli soldiers are folded into U.S. units. The phrase "merge the militaries" comes from critics of the provision, and it is a characterization of the effect they fear, not the literal text. What the provision actually does though is fuse the two countries at the level of defense technology and the defense industry. It calls for joint research, joint weapons development and production, shared military networks, shared data, and interoperable systems. Critics argue that doing all of that effectively welds large parts of the two defense establishments together, which is where the "merging the militaries" language comes from. The provision sits in the House version of the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 8800), in the chairman’s mark released in late May 2026. It is not yet law. It still has to survive committee markup, a House floor vote, reconciliation with the Senate, and the President’s signature. Exactly what Section 224 says: The section is titled "United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative." According to reporting that quotes the bill language, it would do the following. 1- It directs the Secretary of Defense to name a senior official as an "executive agent" responsible for synchronizing and overseeing cooperation between the two countries. That gives the program a permanent home and a single point of authority inside the Pentagon. 2- It authorizes cooperation across a sweeping list of "covered technologies": artificial intelligence, quantum computing, autonomous systems, directed energy, hypersonics, advanced manufacturing, cybersecurity, biotechnology, microelectronics, and space-based systems. That list covers essentially every frontier military technology that matters right now. 3- It goes well past shared research. The text calls for "network integration" and "data fusion" between the two militaries, "interoperability of systems and platforms," "co-development and co-production" of weapons, and the creation of "combined program offices" to run joint projects. 4- It requires regular reports to Congress on the state of the cooperation. Critics note that these kinds of reporting requirements are routinely treated as a formality and rarely constrain the executive branch in practice. The practical takeaway from it: research cooperation is normal between allies. What makes Section 224 unusual is the combination of shared networks, shared data, jointly run program offices, and co-production all wrapped into one institutionalized, permanent structure. Have we done this with anyone else? On the operational and command side, yes, the United States has integrated its forces with other countries before, and far more deeply than Section 224 proposes. The clearest example is NORAD, the North American Aerospace Defense Command, a genuinely binational command the U.S. has shared with Canada since 1958, where a single command structure runs air and missile warning for both nations. In Korea, the U.S.-Republic of Korea Combined Forces Command, set up in 1978, even places certain forces under a combined command in wartime. NATO has an integrated military command structure as well. So actual command-level integration with allies is not new. On the industrial and technology side, which is what Section 224 is really about, the U.S. does have close partners, but the arrangement here would go further. The most direct comparisons are the National Technology and Industrial Base, a statutory framework that links the U.S. defense industrial base with Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia, and AUKUS, the technology-sharing pact with the U.K. and Australia covering submarines and advanced capabilities. Intelligence sharing runs through the Five Eyes network with those same English-speaking allies. Here is the key contrast, though. Those deep industrial and technology partnerships are with treaty allies, countries the U.S. is legally bound to defend and that are inside formal frameworks like NTIB. Israel is not a NATO member, is not party to a mutual defense treaty with the United States, and is not part of the National Technology and Industrial Base. Yet Section 224 would give it a level of defense-industrial integration that, according to the reporting, the U.S. does not maintain even with its closest NATO allies. That combination, an unusually deep arrangement with a country that sits outside the usual alliance structures, is what makes this provision stand out. For context, the U.S. and Israel already cooperate heavily. The two have co-developed and co-funded missile defense systems like Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow, run joint exercises, and maintain a U.S. weapons stockpile in Israel. Section 224 is best understood as a large escalation of an existing relationship, not something built from nothing. The red flags critics are pointing to A few specific concerns are driving the criticism. 1- It trades visible oversight for an opaque process. Today, U.S. support for Israel runs largely through annual aid votes that Congress debates in public. Section 224 would shift much of the relationship into defense acquisition channels, where oversight is thin and public visibility is low. The result, critics say, is a relationship that is both deeper and harder to see. 2- It is very hard to reverse. Annelle Sheline of the Quincy Institute, a former State Department official, put it this way: once you build combined program offices and integrate networks, you cannot easily vote to end that the way you can vote to end an aid package. It becomes embedded in the bureaucracy. An aid package expires and gets renewed; institutional integration tends to be permanent. 3- Data fusion means sharing sensitive U.S. military data with a foreign government. Merging networks and fusing data raises real counterintelligence and technology-transfer questions, even with a close partner. 4- It deepens entanglement at a tense moment. The provision is advancing while the Trump administration weighs military action against Iran. Critics warn that tightly fusing U.S. and Israeli systems could pull Washington more directly into Israel’s conflicts, exactly as many Americans say they want less involvement in the region. 5- The process has been quiet. The provision was tucked into the chairman’s mark, the base text the committee chair writes to start markup, with little public debate for something this consequential. 6- The mismatch with alliance structure. Israel would receive integration deeper than treaty allies get, without the mutual obligations a treaty alliance carries. The case for it: In fairness I need to present both sides and the proponents of it have a good argument (if this is really what the plan is). Israel is one of the world’s leaders in defense technology, and systems it pioneered, Iron Dome among them, have already shaped American missile defense thinking. Deeper cooperation, the argument goes, gives the U.S. military access to that innovation, spreads development costs, strengthens a key ally in a volatile region, and improves deterrence against Iran. From this view, Section 224 simply formalizes and accelerates a partnership that has paid off for decades. The required reports to Congress, supporters would add, preserve a measure of oversight. Why would Washington do this? Several motives line up at once. Strategically, it is about countering Iran and locking in regional deterrence while gaining access to Israeli innovation. Industrially, co-production and shared supply chains can lower costs and speed up fielding of new weapons. Politically, there is a durable bipartisan consensus in Congress in favor of Israel, which makes pro-Israel measures unusually easy to pass. And there is a structural motive: shifting from the annual aid model, which is becoming more politically contentious as public opinion shifts, to a permanent institutional partnership that does not have to be re-litigated every year. Who put it in the bill? According to the reporting, the provision was championed by Representative Mike Lawler, a New York Republican and a strong supporter of Israel. Because it appears in the chairman’s mark, its inclusion would have required sign-off from the House Armed Services Committee chairman, Mike Rogers, an Alabama Republican. Support is bipartisan: Representative Brad Sherman, a California Democrat, and other pro-Israel Democrats are expected to back it. These attributions come from the originating report and have not, as of this writing, been independently confirmed by the members’ offices. Where it stands and how to verify As of May 30, 2026, Section 224 is text in the House chairman’s mark of the FY2027 NDAA. It is not law. The path ahead is committee markup, a House floor vote, a conference to reconcile with the Senate version, and then the President’s signature, with many opportunities for the language to be changed or stripped out. To check the primary source yourself, look up H.R. 8800, the FY2027 NDAA. Hope this was helpful!

leahfiles
Posted - May 28, 2026 at 11:50 PM
Saved - May 29, 2026 at 11:42 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Let’s follow the money on this DOE weapons grade plutonium deal. One of the companies has a venture firm partner that is owned 80% by France and that same firm has a technology deal with the Russian Nuclear Corporation. What could possibly go wrong? https://t.co/yODSrnZauI

leahfiles
Posted - May 28, 2026 at 8:40 PM
Saved - May 28, 2026 at 11:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw 12 nuclear scientists mysteriously found dead and/or missing, then the DOE announced deals to sell 20 tons of weapons-grade plutonium from Cold War nukes to five private companies. I followed the money, mapped connections between the scientists, the companies, their leadership, and the deal—plus Pam Jo Bondi. Deep dive on my Substack.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

12 nuclear scientists are mysteriously found dead and/or missing. Then, a few days ago, the DOE announces it's working deals to sell 20 tons of weapons grade plutonium from cold war nukes to five private companies. NOTHING TO SEE HERE FOLKS. I followed the money on the five companies. Then mapped connections to the missing/dead nuclear scientists, the companies, their leadership, and this deal. Oh, and Pam Jo Bondi. Deep dive is on my Substack (link in bio). It's WILD. Enjoy :)

leahfiles
Posted - May 25, 2026 at 10:24 PM
Saved - May 26, 2026 at 12:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I did a forensic analysis on Massie’s primary and found that on Dec 9, 2025, they already knew Ed Gallrein would win no matter what. There’s no other reason to build a Leadership PAC before a primary, especially against a seven-term Congressman. The RNCC treasurer issue is also telling. Podcast releases tomorrow; it’s worse than we thought, but we have their playbook.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

I did a forensic analysis on Massie’s primary and it was clear that on Dec 9, 2025, they knew that Ed Gallrein would win the primary, no matter what it took. There is NO other explanation to develop a Leadership PAC before the primary, especially for someone running against a seven time Congressman?? In addition, the Treasurer is usually someone on the campaign or a local, but Ed had the RNCC treasurer? Okay bro. Podcast on this releases tomorrow or you can go on Substack (link in bio) and watch it now. It's worse than we thought, but now we have their playbook. The uniparty is in full force to get people in who want to serve the interests of the billionaires who run this country.

leahfiles
Posted - May 23, 2026 at 9:18 PM
Saved - May 24, 2026 at 11:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I don’t think people talk enough about how Erika Kirk stopped posting Bible verses on X on 9/19/2023—“Also, I will teach you to respect me completely…”—then didn’t post again until 2 days before Charlie was killed, with “saved by grace…not your own doing,” and then another on 9/9 and the morning before he was assassinated: “God is our refuge…” It really looks like she knew.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

We don’t talk enough about the fact that Erika Kirk stopped posting bible verses on X on 9/19/2023. And it’s “Also, I will teach you to respect me completely, and I will put a new way of thinking inside you. I will take out the stubborn hearts of stone from your bodies, and I will give you obedient hearts of flesh” WTFF And then she doesn’t post another one until 2 days before Charlie was killed “for by grace you have been saved by faith; and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of his, not the result of works, so that no one may boast” Then another on 9/9. And another on the morning before he was assassinated “god is our refuge in strength, a very present help in trouble”. Yeah, it really looks like she knew.

leahfiles
Posted - May 18, 2026 at 6:39 PM
Saved - May 18, 2026 at 9:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m skeptical of last-minute election accusations and followed the money. I found a Florida school board candidate with $82K raised (including a $65K self-loan), funds routed through multiple LLCs, and sudden Republican PAC support after Q1 2026. I also traced links to an AZ/UT connection, a matching LLC name in UT, and public claims from her MMTLP community about recruiting Massie.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

I know the games played on the Hill, and I'm always skeptical of last minute accusations before campaigns. Did a follow the money, and turns out, the Massie accuser, is not who they're telling us she is. 1. She is running for school board in Florida and raised $82K for her race that's in August. - $65K is a self-loan, which is a red flag considering she is a "substance abuse counselor" and makes nothing a year. Getting a loan for that much would be hard to get on her own...Campaign financing should look into this. - $9K of her donations is stacked across 9 LLCs that share two addresses, one being her neighbor and the other his business partner, including a Bingo hall. - In Q1 2026 all of a sudden, Republican PAC money came flowing in. - Hired a comms director who was also comms director for "Americans for Prosperity" and the "Florida Republican Party"...interesting how a "substance abuse counselor" who's running for the SCHOOL BOARD gets those resources - This is her third school board district. Looks like she hopped around until she found one she could win maybe? 2. In Aug 2025 she opened a Florida LLC called ATSAT, the exact same unusual name as a dissolved 2006 political org LLC out of Roy, Utah owned by a guy who was a military relocation realtor out of the Hill AFB community, same place where her ex-husband appears to have been stationed. 3. She is a documented MMTLP shareholder and naked-shorting activist who has lobbied Congress for years. Her own MMTLP community is publicly saying she was a "valued member of our movement" who tried to recruit Massie. He didn't sign their letter. Did she get mad? Watch out for her rise in the political realm after this, including how they position her, her campaign contributions, and lifestyle. My guess is that she was promised a lot to do this....

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

I forgot to tell you all that she lived in, none other than ARIZONA prior to moving to FL. lol. That state needs to move up on my list. So, she has connections to AZ and UT. We definitely live in the matrix 😂

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@jennessie7 @FredomOfSpch Awww 😊 Once I found out she was running for the school board, I was like, they aren't that good at hiding it..someone is funding this woman. Bam. She's being funded by literal GOP Operatives lol. For the SCHOOL BOARD. no

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@MrRelatable88 The people who weren't going to vote for him because Trump said not to are the only people believing this nonsense. They will never sway. I guess we will see tomorrow if our country has caved to the Epstein class or if there is hope.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@caffeineandpray It's insane the...I can't even call it hypocrisy because it doesn't touch the level that they are willing to "forgive and forget" and they want us to believe they actually care about this? lmao.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@FireNewz @JohnKendall05 Agree. Let me look more into this connection. BRB :)

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@AZionLion Who are hypocrites? I was skeptical of all of them...anyone who comes forward before an election, like I said. I just didn't have an account at that time to do any of this.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@LukeSlywaker I knew the trolls were out in droves today lol

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@imstartingover1 Cool story bro. You didn't even spell his name correctly

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@heyhoosier @RepThomasMassie 🤗🤗🤗 I'll be the Glenda to Loomer's Wicked Witch of the West lol

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@PanDulce_72 @Lily4Liberty I'll look into this race

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@130Shewo Great find!

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@AZMaGHaMaMa Nooo, thank you for sending! Listening to her thought, she sounds like a loony bin

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

@JustDoItPruett Insane. I definitely think she was promised a political career out of this. They aren't even good at hiding it, lol.

leahfiles
Posted - May 15, 2026 at 3:40 AM
Saved - May 15, 2026 at 4:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling out what I see as a foreign-donor Israel money network buying the Kentucky GOP primary against Thomas Massie. I point to Gallrein’s donors: most were Democrats in prior giving and mostly came from CA/NY/FL, not Kentucky. I cite $10M+ outside spending, including MAGA KY Super PAC, Paul Singer, Miriam Adelson, John Paulson, and RJC Victory Fund.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

KENTUCKY VOTERS: Let's follow the money on MASSIE AND ED. Ed isn’t just funded by Israel, he’s funded mostly by democrats :) This race is an Israel donor network buying a Kentucky primary, and it's glaringly obvious: Gallrein's Donors are VERY suspicious: In Q4 2025: 141 donors maxed out at $3,500 to Gallrein. Of those 141: 120 (85%) had previously donated to Democrats and 112 are high-dollar Democratic contributors. All for a Republican primary..ask yourself why? 66% of his individual donations came from California, New York, and Florida. Only 2.6% of his donations came from Kentucky. Here is every dollar behind the Massie vs. Gallrein primary on May 19. - $10+ million in outside money has been spent to unseat Thomas Massie. Three billionaires from New York, Florida, and Nevada are funding it, all with strong Israel ties. None of them live in Kentucky and none of them can vote in your primary. - MAGA KY Super PAC: $5 million AGAINST Massie - Paul Singer (NY hedge fund): $1,000,000 - Miriam Adelson's Preserve America PAC (NV): $750,000 - John Paulson (FL hedge fund): $250,000 - Republican Jewish Coalition Victory Fund: $2.9 million AGAINST Massie Massie is the ONLY Republican to have never taken AIPAC money. He votes in the best interest of KY and our country, that's why they want him out. VOTE WISELY. They are desperate and it’s showing. We will not let them buy our politicians any longer.

leahfiles
Posted - May 14, 2026 at 6:29 PM
Saved - May 14, 2026 at 10:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeing TPUSA send bizarre letters to college kids asking for donations to open new chapters, while they’ve supposedly already brought in over $100M. The letter sounds desperate, pushing claims like “free your children and grandchildren from the far left.” I’m not giving money to them, and my internal audit is up—Part 1 is on my podcast.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

TPUSA is sending out bizarre letters (received this week) asking college kids to donate money to open new chapters, while simultaneously bringing in over $100M to do just that? The letter itself screams desperate, saying things such as "A student chapter will free your children and grandchildren from the far left" lmao WHAT? Please do not give your money to an organization that gives 1.4% of it's $85M revenue to actual grants (that don't include themselves). My "internal audit" on them has started, Part 1 is up on my podcast (you can listen to it on any platform, including youtube, substack, spotify...oh, and rumble :)) Enjoy!

leahfiles
Posted - May 13, 2026 at 5:13 PM
Saved - May 14, 2026 at 12:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw Eric Trump on X claiming the economy is great and that he voted to end fraud. I pointed out his net worth jump and questioned a Pentagon-linked contract. Then I asked Congress if they’ve looked into the CEO and investors.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Eric Trump got on X and said the economy is great and getting rid of fraud is what he voted for. No bro, your net worth went from $40M pre 2025 to $750 today and when I dug into just one of your contracts recently rewarded with the Pentagon, well…doesn’t look good. Speaking of eliminating fraud, Congress, have you looked into this and the CEO and investors??

leahfiles
Posted - May 9, 2026 at 8:29 PM
Saved - May 9, 2026 at 10:53 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Nick Shirley goes to Cuba and well, now it all makes sense https://t.co/djwaNsQL2Q

leahfiles
Posted - May 6, 2026 at 1:23 AM
Saved - May 7, 2026 at 11:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling out Howard Lutnick, outlining his ties to JE—neighboring, a home moved through trusts from JE to him, bringing his family to the island in 2012 and four days later signing a JE deal, and a pool photo. With 800+ LLCs and profits from decisions, I doubt you’ll escape scrutiny. I’d say I hope you resign, but that would be too much to ask for.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

In honor of Howard Lutnick going before Congress tomorrow to explain the fact that he blatantly lied to them about his connections with JE, I figured I’d orient everyone to just who Lutnick is. From him being JE’s neighbor and having his home transferred through a series of trusts from JE to Lutnick. To him bringing his family to the island in 2012 and 4 days later signing a business deal with JE. Photographed with him at his pool. Man, you thought you were slick and this would never come out…but it did. No wonder you laugh uncomfortably when the JE files come up. And that doesn’t even cover your 800+ LLCs or profiting off decisions you’re making. I would say I hope you resign, but we could only be so lucky…

leahfiles
Posted - May 2, 2026 at 4:46 PM
Saved - May 7, 2026 at 11:45 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

TPUSA, did you think you could get away with abandoning your largest High School chapter…your chapter of the year when they need you most? Of course you did. But,I’m not letting your corrupt lying a**es off the hook so easily 🥷💃🏻❤️ You need to go make it right https://t.co/Cwn3X5JzVU

leahfiles
Posted - May 1, 2026 at 1:11 AM
Saved - May 7, 2026 at 11:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw Erika Kirk do a bizarre live to spotlight political violence, yet in my opinion she’s inciting it, dressed like a weird ninja. If you scroll past posts that disagree with the narrative, you’ll find hateful rhetoric from her defenders. So what is she really doing?

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Erika Kirk did a bizarre live yesterday to create awareness about political violence, while simultaneously, IN MY OPINION, inciting it…dressed up like a weird ninja 🥷 Don’t believe me? Go into any post disagreeing with the narrative we are given and watch the hateful rhetoric being spewed by those defending her. Pretty wild. So what is she really doing?

leahfiles
Posted - April 24, 2026 at 4:42 PM
Saved - May 7, 2026 at 11:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2018 Ehud Barak emailed Epstein about a company that can hack into, edit, and delete any security camera footage without a trace. A year later most cameras are down and minutes are missing. Now he’s in bed with our government. The footage of Tyler Robinson isn’t so crazy after all…

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

In 2018 Ehud Barak emailed Epstein about his company that can hack into, edit, and delete any security camera footage without a trace. A year later 10/11 cameras are down and 1 is missing 3 min of footage. Now he’s in bed with our government. The footage of Tyler Robinson (that makes no sense) isn’t so crazy afterall….

leahfiles
Posted - April 28, 2026 at 1:07 AM
Saved - May 7, 2026 at 11:42 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

You may not like this video but it’s one of the most important ones I’ve done. The future of work and societal success in an AI world. https://t.co/dPgGFG4NZg

leahfiles
Posted - April 22, 2026 at 3:49 AM
Saved - May 7, 2026 at 11:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting TPUSA used Vote dot online to collect user data at their April 17 rally, while hiding it’s their app. Vote dot com LLC was registered six days before Charlie Kirk’s assassination. They’re building a voter info database and seem to hide their link to it.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

TPUSA used Vote dot online to collect user data at their rally on April 17th but didn’t want you to know that it’s their app. Fun fact, Vote dot com LLC was registered 6 days before Charlie Kirk’s assassination. They are building their own voter info database and *seemingly trying to hide their connection to it. It’s getting sketch.

leahfiles
Posted - April 28, 2026 at 11:53 PM
Saved - May 7, 2026 at 11:41 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Did a Follow the Money on the White House ballroom and the financial structure that we are being sold on may have started back in 2019….. https://t.co/gPF05kwGoe

leahfiles
Posted - April 16, 2026 at 2:19 AM
Saved - April 21, 2026 at 10:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told 59 senators voted to send $295M for armored bulldozers and $152M for 12,000 1,000‑lb bombs to Israel; 7 Democrats backed it, the rest are “Republican traitors.” The post lists all 59 names (e.g., Armstrong, Banks, Barrasso, Blackburn, Blumenthal, Boozman, Britt, Budd, Capito, Cassidy, Collins, Coons, Cornyn, Cortez Masto, Cotton, Cramer, Crapo, Cruz, Curtis, Daines, Ernst, Fetterman, Fischer, Gillibrand, Graham, Grassley, Hagerty, Hawley, Hoeven, Husted, Hyde‑Smith, Johnson, Justice, Kennedy, Lankford, Lee, Marshall, McConnell, McCormick, Moody, Moran, Moreno, Murkowski, Paul, Ricketts, Risch, Rosen, Rounds, Schmitt, Schumer, Scott, Scott, Sheehy, Sullivan, Thune, Tillis, Tuberville, Wicker, Young).

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Here are the 59 Senators who are paid off traitors, voting to send $295M for Armored Bulldozers to Israel, BECAUSE THEY NEED THOSE and $152M for 12,000 1,000lb BOMBS. I will give credit where credit is due, only 7 Democrats voted for this BS. The rest are the Republican traitors. Take note: Armstrong (R-OK) Banks (R-IN) Barrasso (R-WY) Blackburn (R-TN) Blumenthal (D-CT) Boozman (R-AR) Britt (R-AL) Budd (R-NC) Capito (R-WV) Cassidy (R-LA) Collins (R-ME) Coons (D-DE) Cornyn (R-TX) Cortez Masto (D-NV) Cotton (R-AR) Cramer (R-ND) Crapo (R-ID) Cruz (R-TX) Curtis (R-UT) Daines (R-MT) Ernst (R-IA) Fetterman (D-PA) Fischer (R-NE) Gillibrand (D-NY) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Hagerty (R-TN) Hawley (R-MO) Hoeven (R-ND) Husted (R-OH) Hyde-Smith (R-MS) Johnson (R-WI) Justice (R-WV) Kennedy (R-LA) Lankford (R-OK) Lee (R-UT) Marshall (R-KS) McConnell (R-KY) McCormick (R-PA) Moody (R-FL) Moran (R-KS) Moreno (R-OH) Murkowski (R-AK) Paul (R-KY) Ricketts (R-NE) Risch (R-ID) Rosen (D-NV) Rounds (R-SD) Schmitt (R-MO) Schumer (D-NY) Scott (R-FL) Scott (R-SC) Sheehy (R-MT) Sullivan (R-AK) Thune (R-SD) Tillis (R-NC) Tuberville (R-AL) Wicker (R-MS) Young (R-IN)

leahfiles
Posted - April 20, 2026 at 11:45 PM
Saved - April 21, 2026 at 10:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
To the congressmen who voted YES to continue spying at 2:09am, I hope you have a plan B—you're gone come Nov. I’ve posted 37 deep dives on the fraudsters and criminals on my Substack (free). The patterns are telling when you look at their campaign financing... more to come https://substack.com/@theleahfiles

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

To all the congressmen who voted YES to continue spying on us at 2:09am, I hope you have a plan B bc you’re gone come Nov. 37 deep dives on the fraudsters and criminals are on my Substack now (it’s free). The patterns are incredibly telling when you look at their campaign financing….more to come https://substack.com/@theleahfiles

leahfiles
Posted - April 16, 2026 at 9:10 PM
Saved - April 17, 2026 at 10:16 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Scott Bessent collapsed the British pound in 1992, the Japanese yen in 2013, and the Iranian Rial in 2025. Is the US dollar next? My deep dive investigation on Scott Bessent is up on Substack now (it’s free!) https://substack.com/@theleahfiles https://t.co/0Jtg2mqfFL

leahfiles
Posted - April 7, 2026 at 6:17 AM
Saved - April 14, 2026 at 3:17 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Hey, @RonWyden you need to get the unredacted DEA investigation. Also, how can they dismantle a task force in existence since 1982 for no reason? We need answers because this screams coverup. Todd Blanche cannot get away with this. Congress needs to do better for us!! https://t.co/ey7tASlVJG

leahfiles
Posted - April 2, 2026 at 6:34 PM
Saved - April 14, 2026 at 2:35 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Part 2 of my Pam Jo Follow the money series looks at the connections to the Epstein files and Bondi, but through the money lens (from 3/11). https://t.co/biER1fY5WS

leahfiles
Posted - April 2, 2026 at 6:25 PM
Saved - April 14, 2026 at 2:05 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Pam Jo didn’t do “nothing” during her year in office. She did damage starting day 1. Here’s her Part 1 Follow the Money from 3/10. Enjoy! https://t.co/6638nhkOtr

leahfiles
Posted - April 1, 2026 at 11:47 PM
Saved - April 14, 2026 at 1:29 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

TPUSA’s downfall is happening and it starts with Erika Kirk. There are 5 stages to a non profit downfall and they are well on their way unless they pivot ASAP. Full write up coming tonight on Substack 🤗 https://t.co/jcuK5DoQcn

leahfiles
Posted - March 31, 2026 at 7:41 PM
Saved - April 14, 2026 at 1:05 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Who would search for “Charlie Kirk microphone”, “Charlie Kirk assassination”, and more bizarre terms May-July 2025? Need your help, what (or who) is in West Virginia that could be relevant to Charlie Kirk? https://t.co/nr2W1UIIc7

leahfiles
Posted - March 31, 2026 at 2:06 AM
Saved - April 14, 2026 at 12:23 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Were our tax dollars used to assassinate Charlie Kirk? If you understand the DoD procurement process…this gets interesting. Didn’t post this here bc I just got X last week, but if you’ve seen my timeline from today and combine it with this video…just food for thought. https://t.co/1PNMZR0pEK

leahfiles
Posted - April 13, 2026 at 8:45 PM
Saved - April 14, 2026 at 12:05 AM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

We may have a warm lead on who holds the insurance policy that was taken out by TPUSA through GGLF. Details with websites and sources so you all can help trace this further will be on my Substack by 6pm EST. https://substack.com/@theleahfiles https://t.co/WCjxpaZXuc

leahfiles
Posted - April 7, 2026 at 6:04 PM
Saved - April 7, 2026 at 8:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I deep-dived into Harmeet Dhillon and assess that if she becomes AG, she’d be highly conflicted (risk score 91/100). I present a 12-page Substack with highlights: attacks on Massie and Ro Khanna; Center for American Liberty paid her firm $1.32M, she took $120k salary, $132k to a PR firm; spoke at Israel Hayom Summit funded by Adelson; claims $4M owed in a lawsuit with undisclosed party; concerning Warrington ties; likening her to Bondi/Blanche. I’d pick someone else.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

By popular request, I did a deep dive on Harmeet Dhillon. My assessment is that if she becomes AG, she would be the most conflicted AG in modern day history. Her risk score (based on my proprietary risk model) is 91/100. She’s not just politically compromised, she’s also embedded in a network of foreign adjacent financial relationships, personal enrichment structures, and patron relationships. There’s a lot - 12 pages to be exact. It will be up on Substack tomorrow. Highlights below: - She publicly attacked @MassieforKY and @RepRoKhanna for releasing the abusers names in the Epstein files. - She has a non profit (Center for American Liberty). That non profit paid her law firm $1.32M in legal fees. She drew a $120k salary from her non profit for her 2 hours/week. And paid $132k to a PR firm that represented her law firm. More to come on this one. - She spoke at the Israel Hayom Summit in Dec 2025, the newspaper that was funded by none other than Sheldon Adelson (Trump’s largest donor) as a Netanyahu propaganda machine (in my opinion) - She reported being owed $4M from a lawsuit but didn’t disclose the party who owes her money. The disclosure is to prevent OCI so not disclosing this makes me believe it’s an OCI. We need to know the other party. I’ll look more into this today. - Her relationship with Warrington is concerning. He is pushing her promotion and was a partner at her firm. He also defended Zuberi who was a foreign agent donating to Obama and Clinton but Trump commuted his sentence when he hired Warrington? This one is concerning… So. Much. More. She’s just like Bondi and Blanche, a loyalist who will coverup the Epstein files and not do anything for the people. Pick someone else.

leahfiles
Posted - March 28, 2026 at 10:44 PM
Saved - March 28, 2026 at 11:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing TPUSA Follow the Money Deep Dive. If you have these apps on your phone, you’ll want to watch: The Western Journal, TPUSA, TPACTION, Conservative News America, The Patriot Project, AZGOP, Nevada GOP, Georgia GOP, PA Chase, Team Michigan, Early Vote Action, Moms for America App, Liberty Rising, Irvine Neighbors, We Are Costa Mesa, Little Saigon Voice.

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

TPUSA Follow the Money Deep Dive - If you have these apps on your phone you’re going to want to watch this: The Western Journal, TPUSA, TPACTION, Conservative News America, The Patriot Project, AZGOP Arizona Republicans, Nevada GOP, Georgia GOP, PA Chase, Team Michigan, Early Vote Action, Moms for America App, Liberty Rising, Irvine Neighbors, We Are Costa Mesa, Little Saigon Voice.

leahfiles
Posted - March 26, 2026 at 9:52 PM
Saved - March 28, 2026 at 1:39 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Part 4 - TPUSA Follow the Money Deep Dive Fun fact, addresses are the best way to find connections across LLCs https://t.co/5DvitPczlM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rally Forge is the focal point of the discussion about Turning Point USA’s money trail. The presenter analyzes TPUSA’s September filings from the five zero one (c)(3) while noting the differences with (c)(4) and (c)(3). He states that (c)(3) funds, not (c)(4), are restricted and that the (c)(3) brings in upwards of over $84,000,000 in 2021 and later “like over 120” (million). He later discusses the (c)(3) and (c)(4) dichotomy in political spending. Rally Forge emerges as a recurring top vendor to TPUSA via the (c)(3) filings: - 2017: Rally Forge is the number one vendor to the tune of $6.30 thousand. - 2018: Rally Forge is the number one vendor for the (c)(3) at $479,000. - 2020: Rally Forge again top vendor at $531,000. Rally Forge is said to be owned by Jake Hoffman, an Arizona state senator, former communications director at Turning Point USA, who, as of four days prior, was “going to take a lot of Arizona taxpayer money towards a memorial for Charlie Kirk.” The Guardian is cited as reporting in 2018 that Rally Forge was linked to American Progress Now and faced trouble for pushing ads to split the Democratic Party to help the Green Party, a move the presenter says benefited Republicans. After the 2020 elections, Facebook shut Rally Forge’s accounts for “troll farms,” including fake accounts and misinformation aimed at steering votes. Rally Forge’s accounts were banned, including Jake Hoffman’s and his employees’, while Turning Point USA’s (c)(4) funds claimed they did not know how the money was used; the presenter notes that they could claim ignorance about its use, whereas the (c)(3) funds had disbursement linked to Rally Forge. The presenter asserts that the ads were paid for by TPUSA’s (c)(4), but the efforts were carried out by Rally Forge under their (c)(3) alignment. Rally Forge then rebranded to 110 LLC, remaining connected via a UPS mailbox and the same “resource one” address, implying continued coordination. The presenter highlights Jay Kaufman signing on 12/14/2020 as one of Arizona’s official presidential electors, a fake elector, with Tyler Boyer (then COO) signing the same documents on the same day and time, facing nine felony counts of fraud, forgery, and conspiracy. The rebranding to 110 transferred over, and these activities purportedly continued to be funded by donor money. The speaker concludes that donor money from TPUSA is being used in ways that benefit Rally Forge/110 LLC activities, implying misalignment between donors and the use of funds for the activities described. The summary emphasizes that TPUSA donors’ money is purportedly fueling these operations, and that the “kids in these schools” hosting TPUSA events may not be receiving the intended benefits.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to part four of my TPUSA follow the money deep dive. I spent my career at the CIA and NSA and also advised other intelligence agencies. I now have my own corporate intelligence firm. All of these opinions are my own. This analysis is my own for entertainment purposes only. Part four to me is one of the most interesting pieces of this. Let's get into it. We're gonna talk about Rally Forge. Before we get into the mess that is Rally Forge, I wanna look at how much Turning Point USA is spending on this company. By the way, I'm only analyzing the September from the five zero one c This is very important because they also have a five zero one c four. They can spend whatever they want on politics, but five zero one c threes cannot spend 1 dime because it is tax deductible. Everything is, and it doesn't work like that with the five zero one c four. In addition, the five zero one c three is the one that brings in all the money for Turning Point USA, upwards of over 84,000,000 in 2021. But by now, it's like over 120. Alright. So 2017, RallyForge is the number one vendor and to the tune of like $6.30 some odd thousand dollars. 2018 they're the number one vendor for the 501c3 $479,000 and then 2020 you're looking at 5 and $31,000 same thing top vendor. Rally Forge is owned by was owned by this guy, Jake Hoffman. He is an Arizona state senator. He was also communications director at Turning Point USA and as of four days ago, going to take a lot of Arizona taxpayer money towards a memorial for Charlie Kirk. All right. 2018, according to The Guardian, Rally Forge is linked to an American Progress Now, and they got in trouble for pushing out ads. This is going to be important. Trying to separate the Democratic Party and get people to vote for the Green Party, you split the Democratic Party and the Republicans win. And they got in trouble for this. Then after the twenty twenty elections, Facebook shut their accounts down because they were caught running troll farms. Rally Forge was, same thing. They had all of these kids and other people making fake accounts, pushing out fake news to CNN, misinformation, trying to get people to vote different ways. Facebook found out it shut down all their accounts, banned Jake Hoffman's account, all of the people who worked for him's account, but the people paying for these ads, Turning Point USA, but it was their five zero one c four. Turning Point USA five zero one c four did not get in trouble for this because they could claim that they didn't know how he was using the money. They just gave him money for advertising, and this is how he chose to do it. So go back to the 1,600,000.0 that the five zero one c three was spending on Rally Forge and tell me how this is aligned to digital education, which is what they classified it as. What are you educating us on Pookie? Except for Troll Farms. No, not buying it. RallyForge ended up getting, you know, banned and so they changed their name and rebranded to one hundred ten LLC. That UPS mailbox was linked to the same resource one address. And if you've learned anything from this exercise, it is that when addresses match on these LLCs, they're all in bed together. But our boy Jay Kaufman, on 12/14/2020, while the Troll Farm was still running, Jay Kaufman walked into the Arizona Republican headquarters and signed a document falsely certifying himself as one of the Arizona's official presidential electors. He was a fake elector. Fun fact: Tyler Boyer, who at the time, we've heard his name right, was the COO, he signed the same documents, same day, same time, same room. They got nine felony counts of fraud, forgery, and conspiracy. And when they rebranded to 110, that transferred over to the 50 and they're still getting paid. This is donor money that is being used to do all of this. People who donate to TPUSA, it is your hard earned money that is going to then feed the pockets. In my opinion, what we have found through some of this Follow the Money of people who do not care about you and who are not doing right by your funds. The kids in these schools that are setting up these TPUSA events are not getting it and that is what the five zero one c three is meant to do. Stay tuned.
leahfiles
Posted - March 27, 2026 at 11:43 PM
Saved - March 28, 2026 at 1:22 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

TPUSA Follow the Money Deep Dive - Part 6. At least $19M to non existent employees from a shell non profit over 2 years. Please don’t donate your money to this goat rodeo that is TPUSA. https://t.co/ICWFet3MFO

leahfiles
Posted - March 26, 2026 at 1:18 PM
Saved - March 27, 2026 at 11:28 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Part 3 of my TPUSA follow the money deep dive series. Trying to get them all over here from TikTok for you all, so bare with me 🙏 https://t.co/wPmfiprinn

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is part three of a TPUSA Financial Series deep dive focused on the $350,000 life insurance policy. The speaker, who has prior experience with the CIA and NSA and now runs a corporate intelligence firm, presents his own analysis and notes that the opinions are for entertainment purposes only. He discusses an alleged development eight days before Charlie Kirk’s murder and references Justin Strife as COO, describing an internal assessment that raised red flags and a feeling of being kept in the dark. He emphasizes that the series uses public information to piece together patterns and has published a thorough Substack write-up (link in his bio). Key points and findings: - A shell LLC named GGLFM LLC appears in May 2023, with a Charleston mailing address traced to an asset management tax law firm. The Wyoming entity is described as a shell, and it is linked to a $350,000 life insurance policy involving Charlie Kirk. - The life insurance policy is described as a split policy: the donors pay the $350,000, TPUSA covers the same amount, and if something happens to Charlie Kirk, the payout would be split between TPUSA and Charlie Kirk’s payers. - The speaker notes that a $350,000 premium for a healthy 30-year-old male would typically correspond to a $30–$50 million policy value, highlighting the size of the coverage and implying it is substantial. - The question is raised: why in May 2023? The speaker asks what happened around that time to warrant such a life insurance policy on Charlie Kirk about a year and a half before his death. - TPUSA has existed since 2012, with revenue growth milestones: $8.4 million in 2017, $84 million in 2021, and around $8.4–$8.5 billion annually afterward, with 5% of proceeds typically going to schools. The speaker uses these figures to question the policy’s timing and purpose. - The speaker reports finding that GGLFM dissolved on July 9 (date appears in the Wyoming records) because they did not pay a $60 tax bill. On December 3, 2025, two and a half months after Kirk’s death, the tax bill was paid. This is interpreted as suggesting someone pursued the insurance policy after the dissolution event. - Questions posed include whether Charlie Kirk knew about the life insurance policy, who benefited financially from Kirk’s death via the policy, which insurance company issued it, and who collected the payout. - The speaker notes prior reporting about the LLC’s status changing and the life insurance policy appearing and disappearing, but asserts his own verification of the Wyoming records. The message ends with the promise of further information in Part Four and invites readers to stay tuned for additional details.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This one's for Charlie Kirk. Welcome to part three of my TP USA Financial Series deep dive. Part three is going be around the insurance policy, the $350,000 insurance policy that I think there are some interesting things we should be asking and that I found surrounding that. I spent my career at the CIA and NSA and also advised other intelligence agencies. I now have my own corporate intelligence firm. All these opinions are my own. This analysis is my own for entertainment purposes only. Eight days before Charlie Kirk was murdered, he announced Justin Strife as the COO and an internal Doge like assessment that he wanted the company to have, which to me, as somebody who reads CEOs, is like, hey. I saw some red flags. I'm not liking how things are going. I kinda feel like I'm being left in the dark. This is just my opinion, and I wanna know what's going on. What this series is doing is looking at what would they have found using all public information, and I'm just putting the pieces together and pulling threads based on pattern recognition and my experience. And we are uncovering some interesting things. I've done a full write up to pretty thorough investigations on my Substack, so go over there. The link is in my bio. It is free to subscribe. We are number 27 trending in politics, so thank you all so much for your support. Let's get into it. 05/15/2023 gglfm LLC appears and it is a Shell LLC out of Wyoming which is Wyoming is becoming the new like Delaware. Charleston mailing address traces back to an asset management tax law firm. Then on the September, the twenty twenty three nine ninety, it appears the GGLFM appears and it is for a $350,000 life insurance premium taken out under. You can see CEO is is Charlie Kirk. So Charlie Kirk owns this GGLFM, and it is a split life insurance policy, which means that the donors pay the $350,000. TPUSA pays the $350,000. And if something were to happen to Charlie Kirk, the amount would be split between TPUSA and whoever Charlie Kirk's payers are. A $350,000 premium for a healthy 30 year old male, you're looking at 30 to $50,000,000. So it is not a small jump up change. My first question is why May 2023? Because if that company formed May 15, the life insurance policy was taken out around then. What happened around that time that would make them want to take out such a substantial life insurance policy on Charlie Kirk in only a year and a half before he was killed? Because TPOSA had been in existence since 2012. And 2017, they brought in 8,400,000.0 in revenue. 2021 was when they exponentially grew to 84,000,000, and then it just kinda stayed steady around $8,485,000,000 a year. 2022 is when they spent 8 or 9,600,000.0 more than they brought in, which is insane considering you're bringing in 84,000,000 and you're a nonprofit who only gives 5% of your, proceeds to, you know, the schools and stuff. But that's for another TikTok. So why May 2023? I had seen some reporting about the LLC going away and the life insurance policy not being there until a few days before he died and then it coming back up. So I wanted to check for myself and that's not the case. I went to the Wyoming website, you can see GGLFM here. What we did find here, if you look at the bottom, look at the second yellow line, turns out on July 9, GGLFM did dissolve because they did not pay their $60 tax bill. And on 12/03/2025, two and a half months after Charlie Kirk died, they did pay it. What this tells me is that that's when they went to collect on the life insurance policy, and the life insurance policy was like, yeah. G g l f m does, like, get dissolved. You have to get that back up and running. They were like, oh, crap. So around this time is when somebody was collecting on that insurance policy. My questions are simple. Did Charlie Kirk know about the life insurance policy taken out on him? Probably, but it's worth asking, especially considering everything else that we've seen and the fact that it was a year and a half before he ended up dying and the fact that or being killed. And the fact that TPUSA would have benefited from his death as far as financially in this life insurance policy. I want to know who benefited. These are just questions. And I want to know who the insurance company is and who collected. Stay tuned for part four.
leahfiles
Posted - March 26, 2026 at 2:47 AM
Saved - March 27, 2026 at 4:47 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Part 2 - TPUSA Follow the money deep dive https://t.co/wkToaL9Ehe

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a deep-dive into TPUSA’s financials focusing on one of the largest vendors that appeared in the forms: Resource One, a printing company. The speaker, who previously worked for the CIA/NSA and now runs a corporate intelligence firm, frames the analysis as public and for entertainment purposes only, aiming to uncover why an audit was requested and to connect the dots in the nine-nine forms. Key findings and questions raised: - In the 2022 filing, Resource One appears as a new vendor with a charge of 2,900,000. - In the 2023 filing, Resource One becomes TPUSA’s top vendor, with expenses of just over 6,000,000 for printing services. - There is a discrepancy: TPUSA reports 6.1 million in printing expenses, yet a separate line item shows only 1.3 million spent on printing, leaving about 4.8 million unaccounted in printing expenses. The speaker asks, “Where’s the other 4,800,000?” - The Tulsa, Oklahoma address associated with Resource One appears to be a front; OpenCorporates lists the actual company as Worldwide Printing and Distribution, with Resource One doing business as Resource One. The LLCs connected to Resource One trace to Delaware, but the filing address points to Tulsa. - Worldwide Printing and Distribution is connected to James Moore, who is the CEO and the chairman of Moore DM Group. Moore DM Group is described as a $700,000,000 direct mail political conglomerate that brings in over $16,000,000 from PACs per FEC filings and has 33 subsidiary companies. Their website highlights political fundraising as one of their four major service lines. - The speaker notes that a 501(c)(3) cannot spend money on political activities, and TPUSA’s revenue reportedly comes largely from donations, making the financial links to a political fundraising conglomerate appear problematic. - The unaccounted $4.8 million is suggested to have gone to a politically affiliated entity; the speaker points to TPUSA’s 501(c)(4) or related arms and questions the clarity of the relationship. - Additional payments are noted: 1,100,000 paid to Conrad, another subsidiary of Moore, via TPUSA’s 501(c)(4) filings; 1,300,000 reported as printing expenses; 4,800,000 unaccounted for in relation to the Resource One/Worldwide Printing and Distribution connections. - The speaker mentions CREW has filed complaints about these issues and states that they have not been able to connect all the dots conclusively, but believes something noteworthy has been found. - The speaker reiterates that all claims are presented as alleged for entertainment purposes, and notes the White House’s stance on audits as a broader, related context. - Teases Part Three with more to come. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes tracing the money, the murky relationship between Resource One/Worldwide Printing and Distribution, Moore DM Group, and TPUSA’s fundraising-related expenditures, while highlighting discrepancies in reported printing expenses and the potential political nature of the funding. The segment concludes with a promise of further discoveries in Part Three.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This one's for Charlie Kirk. Welcome to part two of my deep dive assessment and to follow the money on TPUSA's financials. I spent my career at the CIA and NSA and also advised other intelligence agencies. I now have my own corporate intelligence firm. All of these opinions are my own. This analysis is my own for entertainment purposes only. Everything that I have found in my Doge assessment is public. Okay? I'm just putting the pieces together and asking the questions because in a lot of this stuff, although it's public, the deeper you dive, the more connections you make, and that's where it really starts to get interesting. And I have found so much. Really, what we wanna do is get to the bottom of why did he ask for this audit in the first place. I've done two full write ups so far. You can follow my investigation on my Substack channel. It is free to subscribe. It's not behind a paywall. There are only few things behind a paywall, so please go over there. We are also number 27 in rising politics, so let's go. Alright. If you haven't seen part one, head over there. But part two, we're gonna look into one of the largest vendors that showed up. See what they're up to. As I'm going through the nine ninety forms, I see their twenty twenty two filing, this new vendor pop up, resource one, and it's to the tune of 2,900,000. At this point, I've seen so many vendors that have made me question a lot, so definitely took note of this one. Then I go to 2023, and I see that they're now the number one vendor, to the tune of over 6,000,000 for a printing company. So I was like, why would a nonprofit in Arizona need not only $9,000,000 of printing services, but why would they go to a printing company that's based out of Tulsa, Oklahoma? Why wouldn't they go to a local one? There's tons of big ones in Arizona, and this is where we pull the thread. So I'm like, okay. They're paying 9,000,000 to or in that year, $6,000,020.23 to a printing company. Let's go to their expenses. Why are we reporting that we're spending 1,300,000? So you spend 6,100,000.0 on a printing company, but you report in your expenses that you're spending 1,300,000.0 on printing. So where's the other $4,800,000? I got pretty pictures for Where's the other 4,800,000.0? Question mark. So I pull the thread. Interestingly enough, when I go on open corporates to look at the LLC for resource one, I see a bunch of different LLCs out of Delaware. Agent addresses are in Delaware, so blah, dead end. But here on the form they gave us a Tulsa Oklahoma address so I look at that address. The address that we just saw 2800 Apache Street when I look it up on open corporates we find worldwide printing and distribution because Resource One isn't even the company's real name. They're just doing business as Resource One. So if you look it up in filings, you're never gonna be able to know who the real daddy is. There are multiple branches under the worldwide printing and distribution. The one that I found the most interesting was this one in North Dakota. We have our little fundraising consultant branch. Why is a printing and distribution company having a fundraising consulting branch? Doing business as resource one so that it can nestle itself under, nobody's gonna look into it and figure it out. It was interesting. It also dissolved in 2025. I'm like, something's not smelling right. Because we all know that a five zero one c three can't spend a penny on political anything because they're everything's tax deductible for them. And if you're a political arm, it's not. And when your revenue is 84,000,000 a year mostly through donations, well, that's important to your donors. So I was like, and I started digging more. Meet James Moore. He is the CEO of Worldwide Printing and Distribution. He is also the chairman of a group called Moore DM Group. Moore DM Group is not a print shop. Moore DM Group is a 700,000,000 direct mail political conglomerate that brings in over $16,000,000 according to their FEC filings, from PACS. They have 33 subsidiary companies, and if you go to their website, wearemore.com, you'll see that one of their four major service lines is political fundraising. So why is a five zero one c three that can't spend a penny on political fundraising, sending over $9,000,000 in two years to a political conglomerate and then going to great lengths to kind of make that relationship murky. So this $4,800,000 that didn't go to printing, that's unaccounted for, but went to a company that is a political powerhouse. You know, TPUSA, don't blame us because y'all aren't good at doing this. Like, should have someone like me come in, kind of like a pen tester to test your vulnerabilities, to tell you that this is the dumbest I've ever seen. Also, I looked at the five zero one(four) filing, which is the arm of TPUSA because I was just like, what are who are they paying over there? And, oh, they're paying, you know, our our girl Stacy at Cloverstone. She's she's paid out of there too from part one, but they pay a company called Conrad over $1,100,000 and Conrad is another subsidiary of D. M. Moore. So you've got $1,100,000 going to the political arm and then you've got 1,300,000.0 going to printing and then you've got 4,800,000.0 just we can't we don't know where it went. CREW, c r e w, has filed complaints about this and people could not put the dots together. So I do think that I found something here. All of this is alleged for entertainment purposes only. The fact that the White House put out a we're not gonna audit them, which is bizarre, really, you aren't doing yourself any favors. Alright. Stay tuned for part three, guys. I have a lot coming.
leahfiles
Posted - March 26, 2026 at 2:45 AM
Saved - March 27, 2026 at 4:23 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Part 1 of my TPUSA Follow the money deep dive. This one went viral here on X so I figured I’d post the original 🥰 https://t.co/KCJE3U2C1Q

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, who claims a background with the CIA and NSA and now runs a corporate intelligence firm, discusses an investigation into TPUSA (Turning Point USA). They present that on 09/02/2025 Charlie Kirk sent an internal memo announcing Justin Streiff as Chief Operating Officer, stating Streiff would lead a “doge like” effort into TPUSA’s financials and operations, described as an internal audit without triggering red flags. Eight days later, the speaker claims Charlie Kirk was murdered, and within the week Eric Kirk was announced as CEO, with the audit and the “doge like effort” never materializing. TPUSA is identified as a 501(c)(3) with public financials, enabling the speaker to review them. The speaker positions themselves as an independent investigator who followed the money to look for fraud or red flags, noting that a key part of such an audit is examining vendors and consultants. They focus on three entities: Lion Rock Ventures, Cloverstone, and GSM Strategies. The speaker asserts that these three LLCs shared a director and an address, and that Stacy Sheridan is the common individual involved in all of them. Sheridan is described as the TPUSA senior advancement employee, earning upwards of $200,000 annually to perform the same function allegedly outsourced to these consulting firms. The speaker implies that Sheridan owned the consulting businesses. A further red flag highlighted is the formation and quick dissolution of Lion Rock Ventures (formed in 2019 and dissolved about a year and a half later) and Cloverstone (formed and dissolved while Sheridan was performing the same job for TPUSA). The nine ninety forms for these entities allegedly show directors and Sheridan’s position sign conflict of interest forms, which the speaker claims indicates a conflict of interest given Sheridan’s dual roles. The firms are said to have generated nearly $3,000,000 across four years. The speaker mentions a $350,000 payment that is frequently discussed in relation to these deals, stating that they found it in the Form 990 (9/90) filings and that they will discuss it in part two. The transcript ends with “They do” and promises a continuation with a full write-up on a Substack channel and a new podcast next week, inviting support.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This one's for Charlie Kirk. I followed the money on TPUSA. I found a lot. Let's go. I spent my career at the CIA and NSA and also advised other intelligence agencies. I now have my own corporate intelligence firm. All of these opinions are my own. This analysis is my own for entertainment purposes only. 09/02/2025, Charlie Kirk sends out an internal memo to TPUSA saying, hey, I'm announcing Justin Streiff as our COO, and with that, he's going to lead a doge like effort into our financials and operations. Yay. Basically an internal audit, but without setting off red flags to the rest of the company that he wanted an audit. That's how I read it anyway. Eight days later, Charlie Kirk was murdered. Within the week, Eric Kirk was announced as the CEO and that audit and doge like effort never happened. But lucky for us, TPOS is a five zero one(three) and their financials are public. So I went in and dove in, announced myself as the independent doge to do the follow the money because in my mind, if the CEO is asking for an internal audit, he thinks something is up. And so I wanted to see what was going on. This is part one. If you wanna see the full write up on my Substack channel, you can head over there and subscribe. Very grateful for all your support. I will start a podcast there next week as well. In part one, I wanna talk about what I think maybe gave him a sense that he needed to do an audit, and it's three vendors, Lion Rock Ventures, Cloverstone, and GSM Strategies. Whenever I'm asked to go into a corporation and assess the CEO or leadership or financials for fraud or potential red flags, because sometimes there aren't, but the first place that I go in their financials is their vendors and consultants. Who are you paying money to? Because to me that's one of the easiest ways to hide and kind of show your cards. When I was looking at TP USA's nine ninety forms, I realized that these three LLCs in particular shared not only a director, but an address. And then I started doing digging, and I realized Stacy Sheridan is the common person in all of these. Well, Stacy Sheridan is also the senior advancement for TPUSA making upwards of at least $200,000 a year to do the exact same job that apparently they were paying these consulting firms to do that she owned. Allegedly. Let's say you can look past that, let's say it's like so what? Well, next red flag is Lion Rock Ventures formed in 2019, and then it dissolved a year and a half later, and then Cloverstone formed, and then Cloverstone dissolved, all while she was doing the same job for TPUSA. And on their nine ninety forms they did check the box where they have their directors and people in her position sign conflict of interest forms, and this would be a conflict of interest absolutely. And they brought in almost $3,000,000 across those four years. But you have an employee who is also getting paid to do the same thing as her job through these vendors allegedly. I found the $350,000 payment that people keep talking about and the shady things around it. I found it in their $9.90. I'll do that in part two. They do
leahfiles
Posted - March 25, 2026 at 2:10 AM
Saved - March 27, 2026 at 3:40 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

A Follow the money on Howard Lutnick. Just trying to help Congress prepare for his hearing @RepThomasMassie @RepRaskin @RepRoKhanna https://t.co/WBFor5xki9

leahfiles
Posted - March 25, 2026 at 1:40 AM
Saved - March 27, 2026 at 3:21 PM

@leahfiles - theleahfiles

Red flags behavior assessment of Erika Kirk. My own opinions and for education purposes only. Full assessment is up on Substack 🙏 https://t.co/miJoF2Rxcz

View Full Interactive Feed