reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @livefreeopinion
@livefreeopinion - livefreeopinion
@ShadowofEzra NEVER FORGET — Treason was admitted by ‘Senator’ Tel Aviv Ted Cruz to Tucker, not long ago when he admittedly said: ‘I came into Congress 13 years ago with the stated intention of being the largest defender of Israel in the United States.’ https://t.co/8I01Ij3OcR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that they have never taken money from the Israel lobby and asks if Speaker 1 has. Speaker 1 clarifies that APAC raises a lot of money for him, but emphasizes that the fundraisers are individuals, not the PAC itself, meaning it’s a misnomer to say the PAC raises money. He describes APAC as an American lobby and explains that APAC stands for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. He admits APAC is not a “foreign lobby” and says its purpose is not effectively defined as a single objective. He states his own entry into Congress thirteen years ago with the goal of being the leading defender of Israel in the United States Senate and says he has worked every day to that end. He notes that APAC is sometimes more effective than he wishes and then characterizes APAC as “a fever swamp of terrified of APAC.”
Speaker 0 challenges the idea that APAC lobbies on behalf of the Israeli government, insisting that APAC lobbies for a foreign government. Speaker 1 responds that APAC is not lobbying for a foreign government; it is lobbying for a strong US–Israel relationship and for America and Israel to be closely allied. Speaker 0 maintains that APAC is lobbying for the interests of another country and reiterates that it is not true that APAC has nothing to do with the government. Speaker 0 asks about how much contact APAC leaders have with the government of Israel, and Speaker 1 acknowledges some contact, suggesting that the government of Israel is often frustrated with APAC, and asks whether they talk. He compares the situation to lobbying for more US–Mexico trade, noting that one would talk to both sides.
Speaker 0 accepts that there are many countries that lobby Washington, including Israel, and expresses familiarity with how lobbying works, including knowing Americans who lobby on behalf of foreign governments and even being related to some. The central question for Speaker 0 is not whether foreign governments lobby the United States, but why it isn’t admitted as a common practice. He states that it’s true that many countries lobby Washington, including Israel, and asks why they aren’t registered as foreign lobbies. Speaker 1 responds that they are not registered as such.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I've never taken money from the Israel lobby. Have you?
Speaker 1: Taken money from the Israel?
Speaker 0: From APAC.
Speaker 1: So APAC raises a lot of money for me, but it's actually a misnomer because the people who raise money are individuals. So it's not the PAC itself, but they're individual members who believe in the American Israeli friendship and Is
Speaker 0: it a PAC of foreign lobby?
Speaker 1: No, it's an American lobby. It's the eight PAC stands for the America Israeli political action.
Speaker 0: What is it lobby for?
Speaker 1: So to be honest, not a whole lot effectively. Listen, I came into Congress thirteen years ago with the stated intention of being the leading defender of Israel in the United States Senate. And I've worked every day to do that. APAC, a lot of times APAC, I wish were much more effective. They're fun.
But what they
Speaker 0: do are
Speaker 1: are like, fever swamp of terrified of APAC.
Speaker 0: I'm not terrified of APAC at all. I'm You're the one who seems a little uncomfortable when I'm asking.
Speaker 1: No, I'm not uncomfortable at all.
Speaker 0: I'm just asking what APAC does. My understanding, having known a lot of
Speaker 1: people I could tell you,
Speaker 0: is that it lobbies on behalf of the Israeli government. Wrong. Oh, okay. When was the last time APAC took a position that deviated from Prime Minister Netanyahu?
Speaker 1: All the time. Anyone? Let me go back and give a little history. You want do a deep dive on APAC,
Speaker 0: which I don't. I want do a shallow dive if it gets No, no, no, no. I want get to the core question. APAC is lobbying for a foreign government. And I don't It's not.
No. It's lobbying for The United States?
Speaker 1: It is lobbying for a strong US Israeli relationship.
Speaker 0: Okay. So it's not has nothing to do with the foreign government.
Speaker 1: It wants America and Israel to be closely allied.
Speaker 0: Okay. But it's lobbying on behalf of the interests of another
Speaker 1: country. So that's not true at all.
Speaker 0: It's not true. No. How much contact do you think APAC leaders have for the government of Israel?
Speaker 1: No idea. I imagine some. Think the government of Israel is often frustrated with APAC. Do think there's
Speaker 0: between the government of Israel and APAC?
Speaker 1: Do they talk? Sure. If you're lobbying for more US Mexico trade, would you talk to people in The US and Mexico and the government? Sure. Like if
Speaker 0: So I'm not mad about that. There are a million countries that lobby Washington. I like a lot of those countries, including
Speaker 1: But APAC or Americans? They're Hold not on.
Speaker 0: There are tons of Americans who lobby on behalf of foreign governments. I know them. I'm related to some of them. I know how it works. I'm from here.
So my question is not, is it outrageous that foreign governments lobby The United States? They all do, Okay? Including Israel. My only question is why don't we admit that is what's happening? You're denying it, but it's true.
And why aren't they registered Because as a foreign
Speaker 1: they're not.
@livefreeopinion - livefreeopinion
BREAKING — Johnson & Johnson Lead Scientist Joshua Rys Confesses J&J COVID-19 Vaccine Was 'Not Safe and Effective,' Reveals “Lack of Research” From Rushing to Release Vaccine: “People Wanted It, We Gave It to Them” https://t.co/SuQN7N4cki
Video Transcript AI Summary
A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just throw[s] the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine.
According to Rees, the typical clinical trial testing process was bypassed, and the vaccine was tested on lab models to "see if it works." He acknowledged the lack of research and the potential for side effects, stating that for cancer patients, the focus was on quality of life rather than a cure.
The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the United States, which J&J claims is due to declining use and a strategic shift. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into a restroom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you have any idea of the lack of research that was done on those products?
Speaker 1: Why did it say that it's safe and effective? But, like, he didn't know.
Speaker 0: There's no proof. I mean, none of that stuff was safe and effective. Wanted it. We gave it to them. It's like, alright.
You know what? Cancer patient's gonna die anyway. I'm sure somebody's
Speaker 2: gonna get sued for that stuff eventually.
Speaker 3: Hi, Josh. Are
Speaker 4: you Josh Rice from Johnson and Johnson?
Speaker 3: You're you're gonna deny your identity?
Speaker 2: Yes, sir.
Speaker 5: And you said that your vaccine was not safe and effective? You said that. Deep
Speaker 6: inside Johnson and Johnson's global machine is a scientist, a lead scientist whose very approval or disapproval of J and J products can change millions of American lives. Meet Joshua Rees, a lead regulatory scientist at Johnson and Johnson. Joshua, in his role, leads the creation and execution of regulatory strategies for new and existing products across Johnson and Johnson.
Speaker 0: We run the whole soup to nuts, like not only we're working on the products, but everything that has to do with the drug. We have to make sure that you understand how to use the drug, how to be able to, you know, prescribe certain pieces of information, how to communicate that to the patient.
Speaker 6: Now according to a Johnson and Johnson press release from December 2021, the safety and well-being of those who use the Johnson and Johnson vaccine continues to be our number one priority. Now for the first time ever, an official from Johnson and Johnson admits to our hidden cameras that the Johnson and Johnson COVID vaccine was, quote, not safe and effective, unquote. And the company wanted to, quote, just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens, unquote.
Speaker 1: You know, they're like, Joe Biden says that it's safe and effective, but, like, he didn't know
Speaker 0: There's no proof. I mean, none of that stuff was safe and effective. We didn't do the typical test. Like, the typical process that's why it takes so long to get a product on market. Typical process is all this clinical trial testing and stuff in a small population.
This was just let's test it on some, you know, lab route models, analyze and see if it works and stuff like that, just throw it to the wind and see what happens. Are people gonna know that?
Speaker 6: Like, the
Speaker 0: patients do. That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: I'm sure somebody's gonna get sued for that stuff eventually.
Speaker 6: The lead regulatory scientist for Johnson and Johnson went into detail about how the federal government applied heavy pressure on big pharma in order to hastily create the Johnson and Johnson COVID vaccine, encouraging speed over efficacy or safety.
Speaker 0: Do you have any idea the lack of research that was done on those products? Like, are you you shouldn't be surprised that this happened. It was pretty much the government kinda made a deal with pharmaceutical companies and kinda pressured the pharmaceutical companies because we're we're not gonna say no to help, like, the government. Like, the government's like, yo. These three big ass companies, we need help.
We need to figure this out. You're you're solving this problem.
Speaker 1: Was that operational warp speed?
Speaker 0: I mean, we basically just had a race to figure out who could solve it best. People wanted it. We gave it to them.
Speaker 6: The CDC has previously announced they're pulling the j and j vaccine from use in The United States. J and J claims this is due to the vaccine's declining use and the company's strategic shift away from the vaccines. But as you just heard, J and J's own regulatory scientist was well aware of the ineffectiveness of their own COVID vaccine.
Speaker 0: There's something side effect that's gonna happen. It's more or less, alright. What's the worst side effect that's gonna happen? And is that better than the benefit that the consumer's gonna get? It's like that's that's the interesting thing that I found about it because it's like, alright.
You know what? Cancer patients gonna die anyway. So quality of life is the question in that instance as opposed to whether you're curing something. You're not curing anything at that point. It's just, alright, are you gonna have a nicer six months?
Speaker 6: Now I caught up with Joshua Rye in Toms River, New Jersey on the Jersey Shore to get clarification on what he meant by his comments on hidden camera. What led him to say this? What led him to tell a total stranger that his product was not safe and effective? Here's a little sneak peek of how this went. This is one of the most extraordinary interactions ever, maybe rivaling the one that I had with the other guy inside Pfizer back two and a half years ago.
Speaker 4: Are you Josh Rice from Johnson and Johnson?
Speaker 3: You're you're gonna deny your identity?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir.
Speaker 5: And you said that your vaccine was not safe and effective. You said that. You know? Where is he going? He's gonna run away.
He's going in the women's restroom. Are you confused?
Speaker 6: I I am a human man. I am allowed to take a pee in the man's restroom. You shouldn't be surprised that this happened. We have no idea people get some of pee I got it from your mouth. No.
No. No. No. Stand behind what you said and explain to us what you meant by it. Undercover investigations like these carried out by our OMG undercover journalists are pulling back the veil on the corruption and lies in our government, in our corporations, in the pharmaceutical industry.
Remember, sometimes sixty, seventy, 80% of revenue for cable news organizations and other organizations in the news business come from big pharma. The last time we did an undercover investigation into big pharma, like Pfizer, just a couple weeks later, I was indefinitely suspended from the organization I created. But we are going to report the news and tell the truth without fear and without favor. But we need you to reach out to our tip line at tips@okeifmediagroup.com or send us a message on our signal, that's (914) 491-9395. You can even connect with me on Menekt, the app, and ask me James O'Keefe a direct question.
I'll get back to you. One of our reporters will get back to you at the other tip lines. Thank you and stay tuned.
@livefreeopinion - livefreeopinion
JUST IN — Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick issues further details on President Trump’s goal to waive taxes for Americans making $150,000 or < per year https://t.co/vdYtPi2kP5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The president plans to balance the budget by cutting a trillion dollars from waste, fraud, and abuse in entitlements and other systems. He intends to raise another trillion dollars through revenue producers like the "Trump gold card" and tariffs.
The plan involves eliminating tax scams, such as those involving Ireland's trade surplus and ships avoiding US taxes by using Liberian flags.
The president has suggested waiving taxes for people under $150,000 when the budget is balanced. Additionally, there will be no tax on tips, overtime, or Social Security.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When the president balances the budget, his first move is going to be, he has suggested that he would like to waive taxes for people under a hundred and $50,000. That's that's aspirational that when we balance the budget and let me tell you, he's got a plan to balance this budget. Right? We are going to take a trillion dollars out of the waste, fraud, and abuse of our all of our entitlements and all of our systems and all of our waste, and then we are going to raise a trillion dollars. That's the Trump card.
The Trump gold card is gonna be a huge revenue producer. Tariffs are gonna be a huge revenue producer. And then getting rid of all the tax scams like Ireland making $75,000,000,000 trade you know, budget surplus. We've got all the ships of the world having Liberian I mean, imagine a Liberian flag so they get out of paying US taxes. You cut all that stuff out.
You got a balanced budget. But on the way, we're gonna cut no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on Social Security.
@livefreeopinion - livefreeopinion
@WallStreetApes UPDATE — EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin found $20,000,000,000 billion worth of LOST ‘Gold Bars’ not $50B.