TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @marc_g_wathelet

Saved - September 27, 2023 at 4:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chemtrails, often dismissed as a conspiracy theory, are actually aerosol trails left by certain planes. Unlike contrails, chemtrails linger in the sky for hours, spreading and thickening over time. Evidence includes the recent emergence of chemtrails, distinct patterns in the sky, and abrupt interruptions in their release. Chemical analysis reveals the presence of aluminum and barium, potentially harmful substances. The purpose of these aerosol releases remains unclear, with theories ranging from climate modification to environmental poisoning. Lack of transparency and public consent raises concerns about health and environmental impacts.

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

1 Hier matin, je sors de chez moi pour découvrir le ciel quadrillé par des chemtrails. Idem ce matin. C’est quoi les chemtrails, n’est ce pas une fable de complotistes? Un petit fil🧵 pour expliquer ce que c’est et les éléments qui prouvent leur réalité. Villers🇧🇪 ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

2 Si vous pensez que les chemtrails n’existent pas, n’hésitez pas à démonter mes arguments, et un petit sondage en fin de fil pour savoir si ces arguments sont convaincants ou non. ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

3 Contrails, contraction en anglais de “trainée de condensation”, sont observées dans le sillage des avions à réaction dans le ciel et sont de la vapeur d’eau qui se condense et gèle, formant des microcristaux de glace qui se dissipent relativement rapidement, en minutes.

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

4 Par analogie, chemtrails sont des trainées de nuages/aérosol de produits chimiques qui sont observés dans le sillage de certains avions, ils restent longtemps en suspension dans le ciel et diffusent lentement, la trace de l’avion s’épaississant au fil des heures. ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

5 Le phénomène des chemtrails est nié par la plupart des autorités et sociétés savantes, attribuant toutes les observations à des contrails. N’en croyez surtout pas vos propres yeux, faites confiance aux experts!! Ne soyez pas complotistes!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory ⬇️

Chemtrail conspiracy theory - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

6 Voici les éléments de preuve en faveur de la réalité des chemtrails : C’est un phénomène beaucoup plus récent que l’usage des avions à réaction, je n’en ai jamais vu enfant et jeune adulte alors que ce type d’avions sillonnaient déjà les ciels. ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

7 À part qlq jours de pluie, il a fait très beau ces 2 derniers mois, ciel bleu après ciel bleu, et pas la moindre contrail pendant toute cette période jusque hier et aujourd’hui. Certainement le trafic aérien n’a pas changé entre ces 2 mois et ces deux derniers jours, non? ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

8 Les conditions météo étaient peut-être différents ces deux derniers jours? En fait non a priori, même ciel bleu, même température. De plus, je pouvais voir un avion de ligne voler parmi les contrails qui s’étendaient à perte de vue, qui n’avait qu’une courte contrail. ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

9 Donc clairement des phénomènes différents. Un autre avion par contre produisait un chemtrail, lui, et c’est le même jour dans le même ciel, donc condition météo identique. ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

10 Si les chemtrails ne sont que le produit normal d’avion de ligne, comment explique-t-on le quadrillage observé dans le ciel, une série de lignes parallèles dans un sens et une autre perpendiculaire à la première? Cela ne correspond pas à la trajectoire des avions de ligne. ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

11 Comment explique-t-on les tournants de 180° des chemtrails? De nouveau, ces routes ne correspondent pas à celles d’avions de ligne mais conviennent parfaitement pour l’épandage systématique de produits au-dessus d’une zone ciblée d’un territoire. ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

12 Si les chemtrails ne sont que le produit normal d’avion de ligne, comment explique-t-on cette vidéo d’un avion où le phénomène s’interrompt brutalement? Elle s’explique parfaitement par l’arrêt de l’épandage décidé à bord de l’avion.

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

13 Les avions de ligne ne servent pas à produire des chemtrails, ce sont des avions spécialisés contenant de larges citernes de produits chimiques et un système de valves pour les épandre sur commande. ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

14 Par exemple la compagnie 2excelaviation produit ce type d’avion, pour épandre des produits chimiques pour neutraliser des déversements accidentels d’hydrocarbures dans les océans, ce qui bien sûr ne justifie par leur usage dans nos ciels au-dessus de nos terres. ⬇️

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

15 Que contiennent ces chemtrails? A priori n’importe quel liquide. Selon une lanceuse d’alerte de la force aérienne américaine, on retrouve notamment de l’aluminium et des sels de barium et de strontium. Aluminium et barium sont des poisons. ⬇️

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

Kristen Meghan Is a Whistle-Blower From the Air Force Speaking Out Against Chemtrails and Geo-Engineering as One of the Biggest Problems We Face. It’s Just One Part of HAARP.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the US Air Force, I worked in bio environmental engineering, responsible for tracking the military's impact on the environment. While going through a computer system, I discovered large quantities of hazardous materials like aluminum, barium, and strontium. I started investigating further and found the same substances at another Air Logistics Center. Conducting air and soil sampling, I confirmed high levels of contaminants. When I questioned this, my superiors threatened me with a mental evaluation. This validated my suspicions that we were violating laws and harming people instead of protecting them. Geoengineering is the most critical issue we face, as it affects our food, water, and health. We are overexposed to toxins from various sources, including water and vaccines. Despite the consequences, I will continue to speak out because I took an oath to protect human health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Job in the US Air Force was working in bio environmental engineering. So what bio environmental engineering is in the air force is equivalent to that of the OSHA and the EPA, if you're familiar with that. So we were an embedded liaison to make sure that we were tracking all of the aspects and impacts of the military. Meaning, what is the military doing, and how is it impacting the environment, because we were accountable for that. One day I was going through that computer system, which if you want to look it up, it's called an air force form 3,952. It is the approval of hazardous there's materials. I was finding tons and tons of large quantities of aluminum, barium, strontium in the forms of oxides and sulfates. So I started asking questions. And and at that point, my demonization began. You know, I made my rank. I was decorated. I was a non commissioned officer of the quarter. I won lots of awards. I had no reason for anyone to attempt to demonize me. So then I get moved over to the other Air Logistics Center. There's only 2 in the Air Force, which is in Warner Robins, Georgia. This kind of carried with me. And I thought, you know what, should I revisit this? Is it worth it? Did I hit something? Maybe it's need to know. I started finding the same things at Robins Air Force Base. I was now doing some more investigation work. Part of what I did was to use a high volume air sampler to air sample up to I'd say a football field in about 10 minutes. I also conducted soil sampling because I I thought, you know, if this is real and they are spraying this, it's going to get to the ground. So I conducted air sampling. I conducted soul sampling, and I was getting high levels of these contaminants. When I started asking the question again under a new commander, I never in my life thought I would have somebody look me in the face and tell me, I am I'm questioning you. Is there something wrong with you? You've been looking really depressed lately. You know, I can put you under a mental evaluation for up to a 120 days. Who would take care of your daughter? Because I was divorced at the time. As soon as I heard that, I knew it validated they did everything I ever thought. And I thought I'm spent 9 years of my life trying to it protects human health. And here we are violating law after law after law. Just sitting here instead of protecting the people we are poisoning the people. So I just want everyone to know and understand that of all things, of all the freedoms that we are losing, geoengineering is the number one issue that we are facing. Because you can have guns and money, and you can have everything. If you don't have food and water, and you were dying a respiratory and neurological illnesses, what does it matter? So you've heard about vaccines and you'll hear, you know about smart meters and you'll hear about other issues like fracking. These are all systemic effects. We are getting over exposed to toxins. People will tell you fluoride is in the water, but it's not a lot. It is a lot because you're getting it everywhere in your food, you know, water that you drink, everything is, excuse me, is washed with that water. And you're getting your vaccines all this it's a coupled systemic effects and our bodies cannot metabolize these toxins. So I just want to thank you for taking the time to listen to my story, and I will continue to shout from the rooftops, I don't care how many jobs I lose. I don't care how many friends or family I lose because I took an oath. And in 9 years I was not able to honor that oath, but I am today.

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

16 L’analyse de l’eau ou de la neige de haute montagne montre une contamination croissante et très importante par de l’aluminium, sans qu’une source naturelle pour cette contamination récente soit identifiable. ⬇️

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker shares alarming figures about the levels of aluminum found in rainwater and snow. They mention that in 2013, the rainwater tested showed 13,100 micrograms per liter of aluminum, which is significantly higher than the normal level of 0. The speaker also highlights that the amount of aluminum in the soil has doubled in the last 10 years. They express concern about the impact of aluminum on essential nutrients and mention that nanoparticles are now present in both plants and humans. The speaker concludes by expressing worry about the potential collapse of agriculture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You want some figures? Okay. Latest water test. Tested the rain. 13,100 micrograms per liter of aluminum in the rain in 2013, normally, it should be 0. So 13,100 is pretty damn much folks. It used to be 0, then it was 100s in the 2000s. And then in, since 2010, it's into the 1,000s and the latest 13,000 one hundred. In the snow on Mount Shasta, pristine Mount Shasta, 61,000 feet no, excuse me, 8,000 foot level, Rollech, 61,000 micrograms per liter, 4 times the amount that is found in the soil up there. Where in the hell is this rough coming from it, but it's not coming from the soil. These tests are international in scope. We're seeing this all over the world, guys. Okay. PH of russet soils is 20 times more alkaline. The aluminum in the soil has doubled in the last last 10 years. Aluminum blocks essential nutrients. I am unable in my garden to restore normal pH, and that's because nanoparticles are now in the circulatory systems of both plants and humans. So welcome fellow guinea pigs. The collapse and decrease of agriculture is something I worry about even more than the previous info about autism and timers.

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

17 L’analyse radiométrique des chemtrails prouve qu’il ne s’agit pas de contrails. Le spectre de la lumière du soleil montre l’absorption de différentes fréquences par des substances dans les chemtrails et qui ne correspondent pas à de la glace. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340348307_Chemtrails_are_Not_Contrails_Radiometric_Evidence ⬇️

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

18 Pourquoi cet épandage de produits chimiques dans notre atmosphère? Il y a 2 hypothèses généralement avancées, la modification du climat, la géoingénierie, et l’empoisonnement de notre environnement. ⬇️ https://t.co/0epcem0air

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

19 Il existe des brevets sur des méthodes d’ingénieries pour produire certains types d’aérosol/nuages. P.ex.: ⬇️ https://t.co/M61cz7JmjS

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

20 Ce désir de manipulation du climat est admis par le directeur de la CIA, p.ex., on ne peut donc pas parler de complot. ⬇️ https://t.co/uZ40738jSX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Geoengineering technologies, like stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), could help reverse global climate change by reflecting the sun's heat. SAI is a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles, similar to volcanic eruptions. It could limit temperature increases, giving time for the transition from fossil fuels. The estimated cost of a fully deployed SAI program is $10 billion annually. However, SAI alone cannot remove greenhouse gases, so greenhouse gas emission reductions are still necessary. Implementing SAI would also pose challenges. It could alter weather patterns and benefit some regions while harming others, leading to opposition from certain nations. Additionally, some countries might prioritize SAI's benefits over carbon dioxide reductions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another example is the array of technologies, often referred to collectively as geoengineering, that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI. A method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun's heat in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do. An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. This process is also relatively inexpensive. The National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10,000,000,000 yearly. As promising as it may be, Moving forward on SAI would also raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. On the geopolitical side, the technology's potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions of the world at the expense of other regions could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI's benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions.

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

21 On retrouve des officiels comme Angela Merkel inspectant ces avions d’épandage spécialisés. ⬇️ https://t.co/DpkjNPcD7n

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

22 Les contrails existent, les preuves sont là, les gouvernements sont impliqués, mais c’est un sujet largement tabou. Quelque soit la motivation, il n’y a aucune transparence, le processus démocratique n’est pas respecté. ⬇️ https://t.co/UM7vUxReWh

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

23 Si le but est d’affecter le climat, une fois de plus on joue à l’apprenti-sorcier, sans le consentement des populations, sans s’inquiéter des effets sur la santé et sur l’environnement de ces épandages. ⬇️ https://t.co/3VLq3eMHL7

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

24 Est-ce que vous avez trouvé ces arguments convaincants?

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

25 Ceux qui répondent non, n'importe quoi, n'hésitez pas à critiquer les arguments avec lesquels vous n'êtes pas d'accord!

Saved - August 30, 2023 at 7:44 PM

@marc_g_wathelet - Marc G Wathelet, Ph.D.

3.400 descriptions de cas et études documentant effets indésirables vax C19. N'allez pas en déduire que les autorités sanitaires suent des grosses gouttes en réexaminant le rapport bénéfice risque, ils sont trop occupés à lancer la nouvelle campagne.

3400 COVID Vaccine Publications and Case Reports - React19 Publications & Case Reports Collection of 3,400 peer reviewed case reports and studies, across 24 general health categories, citing adverse effects post COVID vaccination. Researching Covid vaccine adverse events can be daunting in part due to a broad myriad of factors. Primarily, the information is incredibly challenging to find. Here, we share an ever growing list of peer-reviewed studies […] react19.org
View Full Interactive Feed