TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @mario4thenorth

Saved - March 3, 2026 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I checked a new site claiming to hold Mark Carney accountable—flip flops, broken promises, cover-ups, counterfeit Conservative policies, all fully sourced. It warns liberals will hate it if you share. Seriously, look for yourself—this is all from the last year. Insanity.

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

BREAKING: A website was just launched that holds Mark Carney accountable.  It's the most robust, fully sourced record of:  -Flip Flops -Broken Promises   -Cover Ups   -Counterfeit Conservative Policies And so much more.  Liberals are going to hate it if you share it. https://t.co/HbmVEU0Vvy

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

In all seriousness, Just take a look for yourself. This has all been, IN THE LAST YEAR! Insanity. http://CarneyWatch.ca

Saved - October 18, 2025 at 10:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I list things the RCMP has not charged the Liberals for: Green Slush Fund—$1B; SNC-Lavalin—Trudeau interfered, fired AG; WE Charity—$912M contract, Trudeau family paid; Morneau ethics breach. Lost infrastructure funds; ArriveCAN—$60M app, fake contracts, missing records. Foreign interference in 2019/2021; Emergencies Act ruled illegal; LeBlanc family deal; Aga Khan trip; WPG Lab; Governor General expenses; COVID contracts to donors; Indigenous Housing Fund underperforming; Infrastructure Bank concerns. Despicable.

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Things the RCMP has not charged the Liberals for: ✅ Green Slush Fund: Billion dollars (refused to hand RCMP documents & froze government) ✅ SNC-Lavalin: Trudeau interfered. Fired attorney general. Major corruption charges. WPG Lab ✅ WE Charity: $912M contract. Trudeau family paid. Morneau broke ethics law. ✅ Lost Infrastructure Funds: Billions unaccounted for in “green” & transit projects. ✅ ArriveCAN: $60M app. Fake contracts. Missing records. RCMP investigating. ✅ Foreign Interference: China & others meddled in 2019 & 2021 elections. Trudeau hid reports. ✅ Emergencies Act: Court ruled illegal. Rights violated. No accountability. ✅ LeBlanc Family Deal: $28M contract to cousin’s company. Ethics breach ignored. ✅ Aga Khan Trip: Trudeau vacationed on billionaire’s island. Found guilty of ethics violation. ✅ Lost Infrastructure Funds: Billions “unspent” or “missing” from transit & green projects. ✅ WPG Lab: Secret China-linked lab. Scientists escorted out. Documents hidden. ✅ Governor General Expenses: $3M+ spent on luxury trips. ✅ COVID Contracts: PPE & ventilator deals to Liberal donors & former MPs. Millions wasted. ✅ Indigenous Housing Fund: $1.5B fund. Only 1% of homes built. ✅ Canada Infrastructure Bank: $35B fund. Political appointees. Almost no projects finished. Calling the RCMP leadership “despicable” is being kind.

Saved - September 28, 2025 at 7:06 PM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Bill C8: The Liberal Internet Censorship Bill. If this goes through, I’ll be offline and probably in a jail cell the day after it passes. No trial, no warrant, and no police. LIBERALS CAN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT. INSANE https://t.co/Y4OIJIvzAy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Liberals are proposing a law where a minister can ban me from the Internet, my Internet service provider ban me from the Internet, and neither of us be able to say anything about it. Matt Strauss, who's a doctor and a physician and also a member of parliament, said that you need to be concerned about bill c eight. It allows Melanie Jolley to kick anyone off the Internet with no trial and no warrant. Worse off, you won't be able to say that you've even been kicked off. And this is the Emergencies Measures Act on steroids, only permanent and secret? "Watch this. Ministers order if there are reasonable grounds to believe that it is necessary to do so to secure the Canadian telecommunication system against any threat, including that of interference, manipulation, disruption, degradation, the minister may by order and after consultation with the minister of public safety, prohibit a telecommunications service provider from providing any service to any specified person, including telecommunications service provider." "The order may also include a provision prohibiting the disclosure of its existence or some or all of its contents by any person." "This is crazy." "The minister may require any person to provide to the minister or any person designated by the minister, meaning she's able to designate whoever the heck she wants, within any time and any subject to any conditions that the minister may specify." "Any information that the minister believes on reasonable grounds is relevant for the purpose of making, amending, or revoking an order under section 15." "This is insane." "This is a minister that will have the sole power to kick you off the Internet at their will, then ban you or anyone else from being able to speak on this." "If the conservatives did this, there would be an uproar all over the media, all over the world." "They would call them a dictatorship. They would call them communist. They would say this is Nazi like." "But the liberals are doing this, and now everyone's quiet." "Come people have to speak up." "I promise you, if this bill goes through, it's gonna be ugly for everyone." "And if I get kicked off, I'm going to break that ban." "I will talk about it. I will let the world know that a totalitarian state, a communist state of the Liberal Party is trying to silence its people at its discretion, not the police, but the government." "Ridiculous."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Liberals are proposing a law where a minister can ban me from the Internet, my Internet service provider ban me from the Internet, and neither of us be able to say anything about it. So Matt Strauss, who's a doctor and a physician and also a member of parliament, said that you need to be concerned about bill c eight. It allows Melanie Jolley to kick anyone off the Internet with no trial and no warrant. Worse off, you won't be able to allow to say that you've even been kicked off. And this is the Emergencies Measures Act on steroids, only permanent and secret? Watch this. Ministers order if there are reasonable grounds to believe that it is necessary to do so to secure the Canadian telecommunication system against any threat, including that of interference, manipulation, disruption, degradation, the minister may by order and after consultation with the minister of public safety, prohibit a telecommunications service provider from providing any service to any specified person, including telecommunications service provider. The order may also include a provision prohibiting the disclosure of its existence or some or all of its contents by any person. This is crazy. The minister may require any person to provide to the minister or any person designated by the minister, meaning she's able to designate whoever the heck she wants, within any time and any subject to any conditions that the minister may specify. Any information that the minister believes on reasonable grounds is relevant for the purpose of making, amending, or revoking an order under section 15. This is insane. We're not talking about the police. We're not talking about the RCMP. This is a minister that will have the sole power to kick you off the Internet at their will, then ban you or anyone else from being able to speak on this. If the conservatives did this, there would be an uproar all over the media, all over the world. They would call them a dictatorship. They would call them communist. They would say this is Nazi like. They would throw every single word possible against them. But the liberals are doing this, and now everyone's quiet. Come people have to speak up. I promise you, if this bill goes through, it's gonna be ugly for everyone. And if I get kicked off, I'm going to break that ban. I'm telling you right now, yes, I don't care if it becomes law, and I'm not supposed to talk about it. I will talk about it. I will let the world know that a totalitarian state, a communist state of the Liberal Party is trying to silence its people at its discretion, not the police, but the government. Ridiculous.
Saved - September 13, 2025 at 12:44 PM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

He needs to be fired. No Canadian institution, can ever employ those who express joy out of a political assassination. I hope the US also ensures he’s never able to visit their country again. Actions need to start having consequences. https://t.co/cftRJ0bLvl

Saved - May 16, 2025 at 3:55 AM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

I’m expecting nothing less than an explicit and clear apology for the misinformation CBC presented. https://t.co/eIzpYLqpCO

Video Transcript AI Summary
A CBC News TikTok video, viewed over 64,000 times, falsely accused Mario Zileia of accusing the Liberal government of gerrymandering Pierre Pauliev's riding boundaries. Zileia states he never made that accusation. After Zileia emailed CBC citing breaches of journalistic standards, CBC News edited the video, removed the reference to the Liberal government, and added a correction note. Zileia claims this response was insufficient, as he requested a public retraction, formal apology, corrected video, and removal of the original video. Zileia criticizes the new video's description for referring to "some" claiming the Liberal government was to blame, arguing that CBC used his name and picture, so they should use his name in the apology. He demands a public apology and retraction for misrepresenting his video and falsely accusing him of accusing the Liberal Party of gerrymandering. He believes this is necessary given CBC's taxpayer funding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This might be my favorite video of the year. Watch this. The boundary change was the liberal government's doing to make it harder for Polyab to get elected. But this is false too. That video there has since been taken down, but it was viewed by over a 64,000 people. And it accused me of accusing the Liberal government of gerrymandering, which is redrawing the boundaries of Pierre Pauliev's writing. Never at any given point in time have I ever said that, that I accused specifically the Liberal Party of doing that themselves. So I wrote in, and they wrote back, and they said, dear Myers Ley, I'm the managing editor of digital publishing for CBC News. I'm writing your reply on your email, blah blah blah, regarding the video that was posted to the CBC News TikTok account. Brody, editor in chief of CBC News, asked me to respond. I wanted to thank you for pointing out the error in the narration that accompanied a screenshot of one of your social media posts. We have edited the video to change the narration and removed the reference to the liberal government. We have also put a correction note in the text accompanying the new video. I'm only getting the apology because I wrote them a very lengthy email that I said that this constitutes a clear beach breach of CBC's journalistic standards and practices, specifically those related to accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. They said that I want a public retraction, I want a formal apology, I want a correctional video, and I want the immediate removal of the original video. They did this. They sorta did that. They did this through email. And this wasn't really done because watch this. This video was just posted, and it just said, in a previous version of this video, the section about alleged gerrymandering, including an incorrect statement that some, it's not some, it's me. You used my picture. You used my name. That's not some. My name's Mario Zileia. Blame the liberal government. In fact, there was no reference to the government in the source material. Of course not, because I know they don't do the redrawings. It may have benefited them when they redrew it, but I didn't accuse the Liberal Party of doing it, and they know that. My friends, this is exactly why people are starting to lose trust in CBC. I still do not have my public apology because I'm not some. You use my name, so you use my name and apologize. You say we apologize to Mario Zleia for misrepresenting his video and accusing and making false accusations that he accused the Liberal Party of gerrymandering. We fully retract that statement. We apologize. That's what the video should say. That's what the descriptions should say. When it's my taxpayer dollars and yours that are funding this to the tune of $2,000,000,000 and they're making false accusations like this publicly, well, at the bare minimum, they should apologize publicly, not privately through email. Oh, you know, sorry, you know, and and put in the description. You know, there's some claim it wasn't some claims. You used my name. You used my name to incorrectly state something, you used my name to make it correct. Do me a favor, blow this up.
Saved - April 30, 2025 at 10:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was taken aback by Pierre losing his seat, so I decided to investigate further. I discovered that his riding expanded into strong Liberal territory, which explains Carney's choice to run there instead of in Edmonton, where he has roots. The impact of immigration in these metro areas is staggering. I rarely feel surprised, but my research revealed unsettling trends. I genuinely believe we're heading towards a one-party state, with the Liberals potentially importing voters, which might clarify their fast-track citizenship system and their stance on birth tourism.

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Pierre losing his seat made absolutely no sense. So I dug into things a bit further. What I didn’t know, was that his riding expanded into heavy Liberal territory. Exactly why Carney chose his riding right beside Pierre’s, instead of Edmonton where he announced his leadership bid and where he grew up. Once you factor in immigration into all these metro areas, the whole thing is mind blowing. I’m rarely surprised, but as I was researching more, I was shocked by this too. I truly believe we are moving towards a one-party state, where Liberals are importing voters. Which partially could explain the fast track system to citizenship & why they won’t stop birth tourism or any of the loopholes that exist today.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pierre Pauliev's recent loss is suspicious because his riding of Carlton, held for 20 years, was altered before the election. The riding was expanded to include a heavily liberal region, increasing its size by nearly 50% due to immigration. Nearly 93% of immigrants move into Canada's 44 census metropolitan areas and tend to vote liberal due to social assistance programs. Canada added a record one million people through immigration in under nine months. The naturalization rate has dropped by 30% due to the country's unaffordability under liberal policies, leading more immigrants to the Maritimes. The Liberal party is allegedly importing voters, with Atlantic Canada having disproportionately more federal seats (32) compared to Alberta, despite having almost half the population. Mark Carney launched his bid to become prime minister in Edmonton, while his riding was beside Pierre Pauliev's in Nepean, a liberal area. Carney obtained his seat by removing a sitting member of parliament.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pierre losing his riding just never sat well with me. He's held it for twenty years, so I decided to do some digging. Watch this. As many of you know, Pierre Pauliev has held his riding of Carlton for nearly twenty years. He was just recently beaten, and this is what his riding looks like. This is Carlton. And as you can see, it wraps around this area around there. I'll move my head out of the way. I want you to see the full area of Carlton. And this is from the Elections Canada website. His area, the region that I just showed you, it didn't look like that. In fact, in all of the other elections, it looked like this. It never had this area. Remember that. This area right here, that's brand new. I'm gonna shrink myself down to size so you can see that new area that was integrated with his. This is what it looked like in 2021 when they had the forty fourth election. And I'm gonna explain all this red in just a second, and it's all gonna make sense. So Pierre's area labeled as number 88 over here, that's what he had the whole time. Before, it was integrated with this. And everything I'm taking is publicly available, so check it yourself. But this is how much he won last time, a 15% margin. Just to remind you, that's the area that he used to represent before that came into the picture in 2023. Yes. The adjustment was done recently. Let me put it to you this way. Pierre Poliev's writing, which had always been conservative and he held for twenty years, was merged with a heavy liberal region, an area altogether that had grown by nearly 50% due to immigration. That's gonna be important. Watch this. Now this is where we get to the good part. Did you know that nearly 93% of all immigrants move into one of Canada's Forty Four census metropolitan areas? And I know this is talking about nonpermanent residents as well, which is also calculated is is very similar percentage, which is almost the 93%. But when you have that, that's why metropolitan areas like Ottawa, the whole Greater Toronto area includes Burlington, Oakville, Milton's getting there too. Look at Hamilton. And I know this says Hamilton here, but this is the outskirts of Hamilton. That's the city core. And let's not forget Montreal, all red, and the same holds true for all of Metro Vancouver. Take it from an immigrant. When immigrants move into the country, they generally vote liberal because that's the same party that offered social assistance. It's the same party that pays them each month more than Canadians get in old age security. They are now giving them free health care. They are able to stay at four star hotels. They get access to the same child benefit as you have, as Canadians who've paid taxes your whole life, sorry, your whole working life. Roughly $7,000 per child per year. Child of three gives you over $21,000 depending on their age. It might even be more. We are talking about more money than they would ever earn or save in their lifetime in one or two years. And I know what you're thinking. These are immigrants. They're not actual Canadian citizens. In the nineties, Canada was affordable, so nearly 75%. This is called the naturalization rate, the percentage of immigrants that come into Canada that then become citizens. Right now, it's at about 45%. We've seen a massive 30% drop because of how unaffordable the country's become under liberal policies, and that's why out in the Atlantic, you see a lot of red. More permanent immigrants heading for the Maritimes. And let's not forget that Canada grew by a record 1,000,000 people solely from immigration, and we did it in under just nine months. That's how we were able to hit a population of 41,000,000. And this article was from back in March 2024 using twenty twenty three data. A similar thing happened in 2022, '20 '20 '1, to the point where the immigration minister said Canada should have acted sooner on migration. And guess what? As an immigrant myself, I'm gonna say the quiet part out loud. The Liberal party is importing voters. Here's an example of something that should be questioned. Was it that the maritime provinces, the ones where all the immigrants are headed to and experiencing record growth? Was it that they have 2,400,000 people and have 32 federal seats? Alberta has almost double. Not quite, but almost. They only have five more seats. Why don't they have 60? Each voter in Atlanta, Canada has 55% more representation than an Albertan. Take a guess which one's liberal and which one's conservative. My friends, there's always more to the story. This is what Pierre had. This is what he was given in this election. Why else do you think that Mark Carney launched his bid in Edmonton, this was back in January, to become the next prime minister and take over for Trudeau? He did it there because that's where he was raised. That's where he grew up, but remember his riding was not there because he was at risk, and he knew that. And where was Mark Carney's riding? It was right beside Pierre Paulievsk in Nepean, the red zone. My friends, these things do not happen by accident. Let me remind you, how did Carney get his seat? They kicked out a sitting member of parliament, Chandra Ariya. They revoked his ability to reenter nomination so Carney could have a safe seat. There's always more to the story, and I can promise you, you won't see this on TV. You won't see this on the news. Share this. Share this with everyone you know because that, my friends, is the truth.
Saved - April 16, 2025 at 11:24 AM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Update: the petition to ban my TikTok because I’m “a white supremacist” has now been taken down by Hiren Mistry - a Vice Principal at White Oaks high school in Oakville. https://t.co/ZgNVHJms6k

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was labeled a white supremacist, which prompted a detailed complaint to the Halton District School Board by a vice principal at White Oaks High School. The speaker had a petition to take down his TikTok account, but it is now gone. The speaker quotes a friend from Brampton who claims that brown people moved to Richmond Hill and Oakville to escape other brown people moving into Brampton. The friend states that while it's taboo to criticize one's own race, private conversations reveal complaints about new immigrants. He alleges that immigration standards have declined, leading to exploitation, with immigrants paying consultants and inflated tuitions for a better life. He claims that non-residents are subsidizing the college system. The speaker asserts that facts are not racist and that open discussions are necessary. He believes immigrants are being human trafficked and exploited, and that the Liberal Party's policies and the move away from the point system are to blame. He concludes that immigration is now a Pandora's box.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday I found out I was called a white supremacist. In fact, it wasn't just anyone that said it. It was someone that used his position as a vice principal at White Oaks High School in Oakville. Sent a very detailed complaint to the Halton District School Board yesterday. And at the bottom of it, which you can't see over here, is actually a link to the website. I actually had this petition to take down my TikTok account because I'm apparently a white supremacist. Since he had it on for approximately two months and today, it's now gone, I'm assuming he got the message. But if you saw that video, you might have remembered. Actually, I had one of my closest friends text me while I was actually making that video, and that's why I was laughing about because he's actually Indian. And he had something interesting to say, which I wanna share with you. Saw the video brown people that live in Richmond Hill and Oakville moved there to get away from brown people that were moving into Brampton. These private school, you know, want to talk about the community never having lived amongst the community. Born in Brampton, lived there from '89 to 02/2005. I've seen all of the changes. Been trying to get my parents to move out for ages. Rule number one about being a brown guy from Brampton is that you don't talk bad about your race or culture, but I can tell you in the private conversations, we're all complaining about this new crop of immigrants. Back when my parents came into the country, there were standards on who they let in, educated and business people. Now they seem to be letting everyone and anyone in. It's not the immigrant's fault. They come here to build a better life, paying tens of thousands of dollars for their consultants and three times the tuitions for the fallacy of a better life. I know you're not racist. You're just talking about the stuff that's normally reserved for private conversations among brown people. This mystery guy is an educator. The college system hugely subsidized by the fees that nonresidents pay. Just take a look at the picture of Sheridan College Brampton in the late nineties and compare it to now. All that infrastructure is being funded by nonresidents, my unsolicited 2¢. This is exactly my point. Facts, my friends, will never be racist, and we will not live in a society where we cannot speak openly and have these open discussions with one another. You deserve to know the truth. You deserve to know the facts. You deserve to come to your own conclusions, because he is right, and I've said this many times over again. These immigrants, they pay to have the jobs that they have. They are being human trafficked in Canada. They are being taken advantage of. They came here for a better life, and they're getting screwed in the process, and so are we. There's a reason why many food banks stop giving food to first year international students. The majority of them are actually utilizing these food banks because they were promised this life that they cannot live. These facts, nothing racist about them. This is the reality of what the Liberal Party has done over the last ten years. It's only getting worse. The move away from the point system is the biggest disaster ever made in our history. Immigration is Pandora's box. You can't go back.

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Looks like he may have deleted his X account too. ☹️ I wanted to tag him.

Saved - April 13, 2025 at 1:06 AM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Viral video of man describing the difference between Carney rallies vs Poilievre rallies. He describes the MASSIVE difference in the leaders & rallies. His conclusion: he doesn’t believe the polls. https://t.co/cXkVPdkIzj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker attended Mark Carney's rally in Richmond, BC, after attending Pierre Poilievre's rally. The crowd at Carney's rally consisted mostly of older people, Gen X, boomers, and people from the Punjabi community, with a noticeable absence of Chinese and Asian attendees. The speaker felt the rally resembled a retirement home. Carney's speech lacked substance, with no policy discussion or solutions to key issues like the cost of living or housing crisis. The speaker claims the message focused on the idea that America and Trump are bad, and that voting Liberal would solve that crisis. Carney read from a teleprompter, unlike Poilievre, who used bullet points and spoke with passion. The speaker believes the polls are inaccurate, as the support for Poilievre seems much stronger. The speaker alleges that Liberals are supported by boomers who benefit from rising home values and the Punjabi community who benefit from lax policies and the temporary foreign worker program.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I attended the Mark Carney rally that was being held in Richmond, BC this past Monday, and the experience was interesting. Now a week and a half ago, I went to Pierre Pauliev's rally, which was also held in Surrey, closer to Langley. And, you know, it was massive crowds, that type of stuff. And after I attended that rally, I was like, you know what? I wanna go to the Liberal Party's rally. I wanna go to Mark Carney's rally. I wanna see what he has to say. I wanna see what the vibe is like. I wanna see what the energy is like. And I just wanted to see what Mark Carney would say to his supporters and how he would rally the troops. And, fuck. Boy, oh, boy. I I don't even know where to begin. First of all, the lineup. It, there was a lineup. There's no doubt about that. There was a lineup stretching from the front door wrapped around the the building of the Sheridan Hotel, and, you know, there was quite a lot of people there. And that's great and all, but one thing I had noticed when I was standing in line was the demographics. A lot of older folks, a lot of Gen X, a lot of boomers, a lot older crowd that were attending this rally. Also saw a lot of Indian folks in the crowd and in the lineup as well. A lot of people from the Punjabi community, particularly in attendance at this liberal rally. Now what I didn't see was a lot of Chinese and a lot of Asian folks in attendance. You know, this was held in Richmond, and Richmond is a predominantly Chinese and and Asian community. And to see not a lot of numbers from that community at this rally was interesting as well to see. But, you know, the lineup is whatever. You know? Maybe maybe it's different if we get into the venue. Maybe there's gonna be a change of, scenery in there. Nope. The entire venue was just packed with old folks. Like, it it honestly felt like a retirement home. I'm not even saying that to be funny. I'm not even, like, trying to throw jabs or anything, but it literally felt like a fucking old folks home. It was it was jarring, honestly. So now Mark Carney comes onto the stage, and I was listening very closely for his one hour speech. And fuck. There was literally no substance. Like, no substance. He did not discuss policy. He did not talk about how he was gonna fix things. He did not talk directly about how he was gonna address the key issues facing Canada and Canadians, such as the cost of living, the housing crisis, you know, how we're gonna deal with the economy, all that stuff. There was no concrete proposals or any sort of messaging to be like, You know, this is the problem. Here's our solution to solve it. His entire speech basically boils down to America is bad. You know, Trump is bad. Orange man bad. You know, they're the biggest threat to us right now. Vote liberal to to solve that crisis. That was basically his his message for that past hour. And the the old folks were just eating that shit up. I mean, they're screaming stuff like never 51 and, like, elbows up and all this shit. And it was like clockwork. I don't know. It just was really weird to to see all that. And I was, you know, disappointed. I I thought maybe, you know, Mark Carney would step up to the plate here. You know, he's he's been around now. He's got a lot of experience. He's you know, he was the the governor of two central banks of two g seven countries. He's, you know, got an impressive resume, but man, just so unenthusiastic, lacking any sort of inspiration, like no kind of enthusiasm behind his messaging. I mean, read off a teleprompter as well the entire time. Like he had a teleprompter right next to him, and he was literally reading an entire script. Like it was a full on script. Whereas at Pierre's rally, Pierre also had a screen. It was a teleprompter, but he had bullet points to speak on. So they're like one, two, three liners or just like one like, two, three words per per, like, bullet point. And the rest of the time, Pierre is actually just, you know, going off the top of his head and just actually, you know, he was you can see there's passion. There's you can see there's enthusiasm behind his messaging. I mean, overall, I I think the the Kearney event is, it's really fucking boring. Like, it's it's so interesting to see that the polls are saying, you know, that Carney's slated to win. But when you go in reality and you see the fucking rallies, like, compare them night and day. I went to both Pierre and Carney's rally now, and I I don't see how the polls are accurate here. Like, it just doesn't make any sense. Like, is the media telling me my eyes are fucked? Like, I'm not seeing what I'm supposed to be seeing? Like, this is it's ridiculous. Like, the the the support for Pierre is night and day difference compared to Carney. And the numbers that Pierre is pulling compared to Carney are completely different as well. He's pulling in thousands and thousands on Pierre's side, and then Carney is pulling in, like, couple hundred at least. But, yeah, I just thought that going to my Carney's event was good after I've been to Pierre's because I wanted to see, you know, the difference between the two. I didn't wanna be stuck in an echo chamber and just be like, oh, yeah. I know. Pierre's fucking rally was better. Yeah. Yeah. But, like, I wanted to go see it. I wanted to go see it for myself and to see if, you know, Mark Carney is actually, you know, a a legitimate contender here, if the polls are actually correct. And I can confidently say that the polls are fucking bullshit. I mean, the only people that are voting for the Liberals are fucking boomers. It's boomers. It's people that are gonna be benefiting from Liberal policies. Like, the folks that were from the Brown and and Punjabi community at this event, oftentimes, those are the people that are gonna be benefiting from liberal policies because they have businesses that they're running who rely on cheap foreign labor, and they can bring all their relatives and all their friends in from India with the very lax liberal policies. And so it makes sense that those particular people from that from the Punjabi community would be at the Liberal Party rally because the Liberal Party has made it very easy for them to make money through essentially abusing the temporary foreign worker program. And then in the boomers case, it's the fact that their home values have risen, their equity has tripled in their homes. And so, you know, of course, they don't wanna let go of all those property values because if the government starts building homes now, it's gonna increase the supply, decrease the the costs, and then, you know, it's gonna be devaluing the property or so they feel. So, I mean, yeah, that was that was kind of the whole experience that I had at the event. Yeah. Let me know what you guys think in the comments below, and catch on the next one.
Saved - April 7, 2025 at 3:19 PM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Extremely disturbing. Sent to me by a union member. Facebook group rules for a union that represents government employees: “No tolerance for content….promoting the Conservative Party”

Saved - April 3, 2025 at 5:30 PM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Chinese woman rips Canadians for being so easily brainwashed by CBC. And even in China, many Chinese do not trust their own state media. She thought Canadians would be critical thinkers. Is she wrong? 🤔 https://t.co/mLEfqc06TK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes Chinese people are not taught critical thinking. They expected Western countries to be different, but finds Canadians are easily brainwashed and only one voice is heard. Mainstream media is one-sided and biased, with almost no opposing voices. The speaker claims 70% of CBC's funding comes from the federal government. Mainstream media are mouthpieces for the Liberal party. Ironically, Chinese people distrust their own government-controlled media, but Canadian liberals worship mainstream media like CBC.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I thought Chinese people don't have a critical thinking because living in China, nobody ever taught us to question things, to doubt things. I thought Western country would be different. However, people here are the same and even worse. Canadians are so easy to be brainwashed. In Canada, we only have one voice to be heard. Main street media here is entirely one-sided. It's biased. You almost cannot hear any opposite voice in this country. Who funds CBC? Seventy percent of its funding comes from federal government. All the main street media are just mouthpieces for liberal party. Ironically, many Chinese people don't even trust our own media, which are controlled by Chinese government. However, Canadian people, especially liberals, just worship main street media like CBC.
Saved - April 2, 2025 at 10:30 PM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Such an insane story from an accountant of how the CRA is freezing people‘s bank account’s and turning them homeless over BOGUS filings that they made on behalf of the individual. Mind blowing. https://t.co/7W4LU5ScO5

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration with Revenue Canada's alleged aggressive actions against taxpayers, citing over 20 years of experience. They claim Revenue Canada is filing taxes for clients, leading to bankruptcy with no recourse, and that many people are unaware they can fight back. The speaker describes a client who didn't file taxes for two years due to life circumstances. Revenue Canada allegedly filed for her, assigning a $400,000 income during COVID, then imposed a $98,000 penalty and $54,000 in interest. After the speaker refiled for 2019 and 2020, Revenue Canada allegedly froze the client's bank accounts, seized her funds, and is now refusing to accept the 2019 filing. The speaker asks how many people have had their lives ruined or gone bankrupt due to Revenue Canada's actions. They claim Revenue Canada is applying rules that aren't legal, such as keeping refunds from business owners who haven't filed taxes for two years while still charging them penalties and interest if they owe money. The speaker urges people to fight back and unite against these allegedly unfair practices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning everybody. I'm making this video because I just got fed up. I've been doing income tax returns for a long time. Think about it over twenty years of my life and I have never seen the Revenue Canada come after people the way they have been. They have been filing taxes for the client, for businesses and actually making them to the point of bankruptcy, giving them no option to fight back and majority of people come across when they receive those letters they have no idea they actually can fight back and they're lost. I have a client who, did not file her taxes for two years, something happened in her life and this is prior COVID so this is twenty nineteen-twenty twenty and in 2021 then you know just a lot of things happen in our life, things happen in our lives and so she then Revue Canada decided to file for her giving her an income of $400,000 especially in Covid because in Covid no one was working so why is this woman earning 400,000? That makes no sense. But anyway so they end up going and they filed, they give her a notice of assessment, then they give her a penalty of $98,000 fine for filing late, then they decided to add $54,000 of interest on top of that. So we've been fighting this case for two years now. We refiled her 2019 and 2020 saying that no she did not earn $400,000 and you know they took no deductions off this income. They sent her a bill again and they actually went into her bank account, froze her accounts, took all the money left that she had in her account and she's about to become homeless. This is unfair and I'm fed up and need more people to step up and fight this. You have rights as a taxpayer. They cannot just file for you and tell you, sorry, too bad so sad. This is the way it goes. I filed her 2019 and 2020 and 2021, and we've been filing it since. Now Revenue Canada decided that they will not accept her 2019 filing. So she's really been wronged. My question to you is, how many people do you actually know that Revenue Canada has come and ruined their lives? How many people have gone bankrupt because Revenue Canada decided that you owe so much money? Majority of people have no idea they can fight back and say no I have a right, I have proof, and I'm gonna fight this. This is becoming so unfair, so many things that it's been happening behind people's backs. We're also busy thinking, you know, of tariffs and so many other things while revenue canvas sneaked in there. And they're just applying rules that actually are not even legal. Did you know now that if you as a business owner, if you have not filed your taxes for two years or your HST and if you have a refund, they'll keep it. They said sorry but you're a specified person we're keeping your return but if you owe them they will charge you plus interest plus penalties And if you don't pay them, you will go to the collection agency. After they send out the letter, if you don't reply and do nothing about it, they will come into your bank account and freeze your accounts and take whatever money you have left. Or if you have tons of money, they will take it all. But I'm here and I'm pissed off, and I'm sick and tired of having people come into the office crying. Their entire life has been messed up. This is so unfair. If this is happening to you or anybody you know, we need to come together. This is unfair.
Saved - March 31, 2025 at 6:54 AM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

The video Mark Carney doesn’t want Canadians to see. Tucker Carlson ripping into him in 2022. https://t.co/JUBy92slFB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Carney, a former Goldman Sachs executive, believes anyone who sent money to the Canadian trucker convoy is funding sedition and that foreign funders interfered in domestic affairs from the start. Carney says those helping to extend the occupation must be identified and punished to the full force of law, and people who sent money should be prosecuted. He claims the constant blaring of horns will bankrupt businesses. Justin Trudeau has ordered police to shut down the protest by seizing the truckers' fuel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: His friend Mark Carney has been speaking for him. Carney is a former Goldman Sachs executive who many believe will replace Justin Trudeau if Trudeau ever decides to give up power. In a recent op ed, Mark Carney vented his rage at the impudent truckers in Ottawa and anyone who sent the money on the Internet. Quote, anyone sending money to the convoy should be in no doubt, Carney wrote, you are funding sedition. Foreign funders of an insurrection interfered in our domestic affairs from the start. Got that? It's not a protest. It's sedition. It's an insurrection. Clearly, Mark Carney's been watching a lot of CNN up there in Canada, and that's why he's concluded the truckers should be crushed by force. Quote, those who are still helping to extend this occupation must be identified and punished to the full force of law. People who sent the money should be prosecuted. If they're not prosecuted, Mark Carney Fierce quote, the constant blaring of horns at all hours will bankrupt our businesses. Are you laughing yet? So the very same finance ghouls who cheered lockdowns for two solid years are now deeply concerned that small businesses might be hurt by the trucker protests. Hilarious. It'd be interesting, by the way, to poll small business owners in Ottawa to see what they think. How do they feel about the truckers? Somehow you know exactly what those results would be, but no one's doing that poll, of course. Instead, they found an easier way. Justin Trudeau has just ordered police to shut the whole thing down. How do you do that? How do you stop a truck protest? Simple. You seize their fuel. That's exactly what police in Canada are doing.
Saved - March 30, 2025 at 1:18 PM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

A beautiful & comprehensive breakdown of why the Canadian Polls are bullsh** & the Liberal history behind the ownership. Hint: one of the owners was Dan McTeague’s former Liberal campaign manager! As always, @Additives_ca did ALL THE research & work https://t.co/8L9m1LcwK1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that recent polls showing a surge in Liberal support in Canada are a "scam." They focus on two polling firms, Liaison and Main Street. According to the speaker, Liaison started shortly after Mark Carney's announcement and is run by a Liberal party operative. They allege this operative has been plotting to manipulate Canadian politics since high school. Regarding Main Street, the speaker claims their methodology of online surveys via text message is flawed due to a potentially unrandom sample. They state that Main Street's president and CEO was the campaign manager for a former Liberal MP. The speaker references a tweet from someone who claims to have conducted 3,025 surveys showing the Conservative Party ahead, in contrast to polls showing a Liberal lead. They also mention that the Canadian Research and Insights Council imposed sanctions against this person following complaints. The speaker expresses skepticism towards polls and betting markets, believing they rely on manufactured data. They emphasize that polls are not votes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the polls are a scam, and I'm gonna prove it. Actually, I take that back. I'm not gonna prove it. He is, and I'm just gonna make it quicker. So if you've all seen in the last two, three weeks, the polls have suddenly reversed where the liberals are winning just everywhere. And this chart should be of no surprise where all of a sudden, there's this mass surge and the liberals now all of a sudden are headed towards a majority territory. This is what the polls are made up of. He highlights the ones that we're gonna focus on. That's Main Street and Liaison. And as he noticed, Liaison started right when Mark Carney became the prime minister of Canada. I correct myself. It happened three days after. See how it says March 12? March ninth was when he was announced. So he does what he does, and he paid for a corporate search for this company, which is this one right here. And he got this comment where it says, I know Alex. This is the person that's in charge of liaison. He's a Liberal party operative who worked with the Ontario provincial Liberals during their failed 2018 and twenty twenty two elections. Now he has graduated to treason evidently. One of his best friend works for Ford. They have been plotting to manipulate Canadian politics since they were in high school. I skipped a bunch of screenshots, but he tried going to his website. But instead, since nothing was coming up in 2025, he went to the way back time machine on that URL that he had found, and he went back in time. There he had found that he was the executive assistant to Amanda Simard. I might have butchered that name. Amanda's a former MPP for the Ontario Liberal Party. And that previous corporation was tied to another one, so then he did another search, and he found this name. He paid again to find the certificate of incorporation, and he found this name Raymond Edwards. Ray Edwards seems to be the deputy minister and chief equity and inclusion officer, a DEI officer. He works for the government of Canada. He used to be the director general at Corporations Canada, and Liaison touts themselves as the most accurate polling firm in of the twenty twenty five Ontario provincial election. The one thing that is crystal clear to me is there is a heavy bias in these polls. But wait. It gets better. Look at Main Street, and this is where it gets good. Main Street says that their methodology is among a sample size of about 1,600 adults 18 years or older living in Canada, and they conducted it via text messages to complete an online survey. And he brings up a good point. I have no idea who's opting in to get these text messages and who's to say how random that sample truly is, especially given all the regions that Canada has. 1,600 isn't that much. The number has to be somewhere around 40 people per electoral district. Now this is where it gets good. The president and CEO is Quito Maggi. Quito over here, I know for a fact, he was the campaign manager for Dan McTeague. Those who don't know, this is Dan here. He was a former member of parliament of the Liberal Party of Canada. I know what you're thinking. What proof do you have that Quito was his campaign manager? I was just talking to Dan five hours ago, and he told me so. He liter he literally told me so. He told me that Quito literally told me Quito owns Main Street polling. He used to be my campaign manager. He bleeds liberal red. Quito is apparently fighting online with other people doing polls. As you can see in this tweet here, he says Ponyboy and Soda Pop are claiming a 20 shift in Ontario for Canadian politics in less than two weeks. The tweet that this guy had put out says, I literally got out in the field in Ontario with 3,000 surveys. 3,025 surveys. I have the Conservative Party ahead of the Liberal Party, not Czechs Frank's post again, not 22 points behind. This guy is just laughing. My stomach hurts from laughing so hard. And this is the guy. His name's real Nick Colveyus, and I may have butchered that name too. And he literally says, you are dumb, and then you come out as dumber, dumb and dumber. Five weeks ago, the Conservative was pulling 10 points higher in Ontario, forty two to 44 than they are today, 33%. He said, hey, numb nuts. When I said to voice of Frankie that the Liberal party was not 22 points ahead of the Conservative Party of Ontario, I literally had a tie. CPC, had by two point. He deleted his findings and his tweet. He literally ends it off, I get paid no matter what the polls actually say, unlike you who gets paid when you sell subscriptions, close race, clown, street, tarot cards, and astrology strikes again. You guys wanna know who Frankie Graves is? It's the guy who's the founder of Eco's Research. This is from the Eco's polling website right now. They have it at a 50% majority for the Liberal Party of Canada. Get this spike. Mike Carney gets elected. Boom. 50%. Fifty %. Guess what? In order to submit your polls, that stands for the Canadian Research and Insights Council, responded to a CTV News article on a questionable poll. That questionable poll, that was the Nick guy that did the three thousand twenty five minute surveys that had the conservatives ahead of the liberals. They imposed sanctions and censure and expulsion against him and the campaign research following unresolved complaints. So my friends, the polls, mm-mm. I have no trust in them. Absolutely no. There is such ridiculous conflicts, such ridiculous bias, and that doesn't even touch the funding that some of these guys have gotten from the government because that's a whole other video. Said it once, and I'll say it again. Polls are not votes. And that's also why I'm very skeptical of the polymarket data. It has Mark Harney with a 71% chance of winning. I believe these bets heavily rely on the manufactured polls that you've been seeing. At least that's my opinion.
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 11:24 PM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

All of his political videos are gone. Of all my years doing this, I’ve never seen anything like this, especially a few weeks before an election. @Additives_ca is the number one investigator, that has found the most damning information about Mark Carney. https://t.co/xJm00L9ArS

Video Transcript AI Summary
A TikTok user discovered that all of their political videos had vanished from their account. A fellow user confirmed the videos were gone and expressed disbelief, stating they had never seen anything like it before. The speaker credits the user with uncovering information, such as Mark Carney's offshore accounts in Bermuda, deforestation in Brazil, and a lawsuit showing Brookfield was guilty of slave-like labor. The user also allegedly had unredacted information years ago that Diana Fox, Mark Carney's wife, was in Epstein's black book. The speaker believes the user's research is extensive and that the information uncovered is often ignored by the media. The speaker questions whether the removal of the videos is a coincidence or an act of censorship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, guys, guess what happened? I hop on TikTok on my break here at work, and every single one of my political videos are gone. Vanished, disappeared, not account anymore. Go have a look. Speaker 1: I went to go check, and he's right. Every single one that he's done is gone. I've been posting for a really long time. I've never seen anything like this before. He is honestly, in my opinion, probably one of the best investigative, like, journalists, and I'm using air quotes because he's not a journalist, but he does a better job than journalists do in investigating work. Those things that I found, I'm not even gonna take credit about Mark Carney and having these offshore accounts in Bermuda where you can actually look up the 48 companies, that was him. That was him that actually uncovered that. The deforestation that happened in Brazil, the translation of the document, of the lawsuit that shows that Brookfield under Carney's leadership was found to be guilty of slave like labor? That was him. The person who uncovered that Diana Fox, Mark Carney's wife, was in Epstein's black book, he had it. He had that information unredacted years ago and he showed us that. That was him. And there's so many other things that he has uncovered that the media won't touch that he has put out. It's all gone. I've never seen that before in my life. It is unreal. And I've said this before, and I'll say it again. He is literally one of my favorite TikTok accounts because the amount of research that he goes into, the amount of information he uncovers, He he he makes me look like an intern. He's amazing. Sorry. Let me ask you this. Do you guys think he's being silenced, or is this just a weird coincidence?
Saved - March 26, 2025 at 5:36 AM

@mario4thenorth - Mario Zelaya

Breaking News: Carney has conflicts of interest with China & has publicly spoken about replacing the USD with the Chinese Yuan. He has met & knows their President. https://t.co/uysuqrxjnP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Carney allegedly stated at the China Development Forum in 2024 that the Chinese currency becoming a global reserve currency is a positive development, citing China's contributions to combating climate change through investments in clean technologies and financial system development. This is juxtaposed with reports of China's increasing construction of coal power plants. In 2019, Carney advocated for the Chinese currency and a new synthetic hegemonic currency to replace the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. After Carney became chair of the Liberal Party of Canada's task force on economic growth on September 9, 2024, he met with the deputy director of the People's Bank of China on October 22. This occurred after his company, Brookfield Asset Management, secured a $276 million loan from the Bank of China. Concerns are raised about potential conflicts of interest, given Carney's advocacy for the Chinese currency and his financial ties to China.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Government want to replace our Canadian dollar with the Chinese yuan? Watch this. Plan to tank the US dollar. In 2024 in the China Development Forum, Carney said that it is good that the Chinese currency has become the global reserve currency. He said that China has made huge contribution to fight against climate change, not only in terms of its massive investment in clean technologies and exporting them to other countries, but also in actively developing the financial system needed for the green transition. Just such a strange thing to say because I clearly remember reading an article talking about the construction of China's new power coal power plants reached a ten year high in 2024. As you can see here, they're building nearly a hundred of them in 2024. That's 10 massive coal powered plants per month. The reality is China's building more than half of the world's new coal power plants. Let's go back to what he said. He said, I've been arguing for many years that it would be more beneficial for the global system if our reserve currency system could be richer and more accurately reflect the weight of the Chinese economy in the global economy given the rise of the Chinese economy. If anyone out there has the video where he says this, please let me know. Because in the China development forum, he said it's good that the Chinese currency has become the global reserve currency. This is what he wants. Sorry. Just to be clear, that's Carney with the president of China. That's him as well in the Chinese development forum where he gave that speech. There's the Chinese president, and there is Mark Carney. It's not the first time Carney has said this. At the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium in 2019, Carney advocated for both a the Chinese currency and also a new synthetic hegemonic current currency to be used to replace the US dollar as the world's currency reserve. And you can check this yourself. It's in this report, and it's literally titled the speech given by Mark Carney. Now this is where it gets interesting. Remember last year when Mark Carney became the chair to lead the task force on economic growth for the Liberal Party of Canada? Because I do. That was in 09/09/2024. Remember that date. September 9. And then on October 22, he met with the deputy director of the People's Bank of China. Mark Harney, the vice chairman of Brookfield Asset Management. Although this may appear to be a normal meeting, what are the underlying secrets to this exchange? I don't know. Could it have something to do with the fact that his company secured a fifteen year onshore loan worth $276,000,000 from the Bank of China. So does he not have a conflict of interest here? He has massive options in the millions of dollars with Brookfield. He took advantage of his position as the liberal leader of the economic task force, then went to China, met up with him after saying he wants to replace the currency, the global reserve currency, with the Chinese yuan, or is it yuan? Mark Arnie would know. I no longer care that his assets are in a blind trust because it sounds like to me he's compromised. He needs to tell us what went into that blind trust before he shielded it from Canadians on purpose.
View Full Interactive Feed