TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @marklevinshow

Saved - May 28, 2025 at 1:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe any U.S.-Iran nuclear deal must be submitted to the Senate, as mandated by the Treaty Clause of the Constitution. This clause emphasizes the importance of involving the Senate in international agreements, particularly those with significant implications for national security. Recent trends of presidents using executive agreements to bypass this process undermine constitutional principles. A nuclear deal with Iran, given its threats and violations, clearly qualifies as a treaty that requires Senate approval. The constitutional requirement for shared power should not be overlooked, regardless of the president in office.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

ANY U.S.-IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE SENATE ARTICLE II, SEC. 2, CL. 5 is referred to as the Treaty Clause of the Constitution. It states, in relevant part: "The President ... shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur ..." Whether the Treaty Clause is an independent grant of power compelling the shared role of a supermajority of the Senate (two thirds of the senators present when a treaty is taken up) in making international agreements or an extension of already existing executive power with a role for the Senate is of no consequence to me. Either way, both the text and intentions of the Framers were: 1. to underscore the president's power to negotiate treaties; 2. to deviate from separation of powers in that the Senate would determine whether such treaties were to be adopted; and 3. most importantly, to involve the broader body politic in agreements with foreign governments given concerns about conferring essential sovereign powers and representational authorities to other countries. In short, international agreements were much too important to leave to one person -- a president. The Treaty Clause should be one in which the so-called anti-globalists, isolationists, and constitutionalists not only agree but celebrate. Yet, we have heard virtually nothing about the necessity of any agreement with Iran being submitted to the Senate for its advice, consent, or rejection. Indeed, the Treaty Clause should be endorsed by all parts of the political spectrum. That said, far too often, especially in the last half-century, presidents have relied on "executive agreements," with or without the consent of Congress, to sidestep the Constitution's treaty process. At times the argument is even persuasive, e.g., one of immediacy and necessity in which time is of the essence and national security threats are imminent. Even then, long-term or permanent agreements are to be avoided. Indeed, without a treaty, executive agreements can be altered or altogether dropped by a president, assuming no statutory limitations (however, even statutory limitations can raise significant constitutional questions, which are not the subject of this short essay). However, when a treaty is being negotiated over a period of time, there really is no excuse for excluding the Senate from the outset, such as keeping key senior members updated with the negotiations. It is also in the best interest of an administration to do so. This is not to say that all government-to-government or international agreements rise to the level of a treaty. Of course, this raises the question: which do and do not? It is more practical and relevant to determine the import and impact of any such arrangement on society to find an appropriate answer. Thus, let's look at the matter at hand: another nuclear deal with the terror state of Iran. Whatever constitutional standard exists for submitting a negotiated agreement to the Senate under Article II, Sec. 2, Cl. 5, two points are clear: 1. The Constitution's language is as broad as it gets, meaning there is at least an assumption that these agreements are to be approved by a supermajority of senators present -- that is, it is the rule for which exceptions must be made and defended; and 2. a nuclear deal with Iran, which daily threatens the annihilation of the United States, has violated the existing nuclear deal (although we withdrew from the agreement most of the rest of the world did not); and is also developing long-range missiles to attack our country with nuclear warheads, clearly falls into the category of agreements of the utmost import and urgency requiring treaty ratification. Indeed, if it does not, then nothing does. This was the position of a vast majority of Senate Republicans in 2015, when Barack Obama negotiated the first nuclear deal with Iran. They insisted the deal was a treaty. The Senate Democrats insisted it was not. Obama had no hope of getting it approved as a treaty. What resulted was a strange bill that, in essence, gave Obama what he wanted, a bad deal, but with tepid congressional oversight and possible intervention. Nonetheless, Obama was required to receive congressional input and defend what he had negotiated in the light of day. President Trump was able to pull out of the deal with the signing of a pen (incidentally, a pen that he handed me, and which hangs on the wall in our home). If the Obama deal had been a treaty, it is not clear that President Trump could have so easily dropped it. More to the point, if the Senate Republicans viewed the Obama deal as a treaty, will they feel the same way if a second deal, no matter how improved it is believed to be, is struck with the same terror regime? Of course, it should not matter who the president is as we are talking about the application of the Constitution not who sits in the Oval Office. Is not time of the essence, you may ask, making the treaty process too cumbersome? It certainly is. And if relevant senior senators had been involved in the process from the start, it would've made an expedited treaty process more possible. Regardless, there should at least be a statutory basis for an executive agreement, thereby involving all of Congress in the legislative process even if expedited. The shared power compelled by the Constitution should not be feared or avoided. Moreover, I believe the Constitution demands it. Nobody better understands this than our current secretary of state, Marco Rubio, who prudently insisted on this and more as a senator in 2015.

Saved - April 19, 2025 at 2:03 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

What an honor! Thank you, Mr. President! https://t.co/7KxLzTQ1Py

Saved - March 23, 2025 at 11:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Judge Boasberg, whom I view as a conflicted Obama appointee, attempting to hold the Trump administration in contempt. It feels like he’s aiming for media attention to undermine the administration, portraying the President as lawless. In reality, it seems to me that Judge Boasberg is the one acting outside the law. His actions appear to support the Democrat narrative of Trump as a dictator, while I believe he is the one exhibiting autocratic behavior.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Leftwing conflicted Obama judge, Boasberg, is looking to hold the Trump administration in contempt.  That's what he's doing, and he wants to make a big splash, get lots of media headlines, and try to sabotage the Trump administration.  He wants to create the impression that POTUS is lawless when, in fact, Judge Boasberg is lawless.  He wants to play into the Democrat Party narrative that Trump is a dictator, when it is Judge Boasberg who is the autocrat. https://www.aol.com/news/judge-boasberg-trump-justice-department-090053114.html

In another tense hearing, Judge Boasberg says Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act has ‘frightening’ implications US District Judge James Boasberg vowed on Friday to find out whether officials in the Trump administration violated his orders temporarily blocking the use of an 1798 law for deportations by refusing to turn two flights around last weekend. aol.com
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 12:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Elon Musk's legal team should consider pursuing tortious interference lawsuits against those attempting to undermine Tesla, including certain members of Congress. These officials may not be protected by the speech and debate clause when their statements are made outside of Congress and are unrelated to their official duties. Additionally, those involved in organizing and funding efforts against Tesla could be held liable for their actions. This situation warrants careful examination.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Elon Musk's attorneys should look at the possibility of bringing tortious interference lawsuits against those who are trying to destroy Tesla, including members of Congress.  Members of Congress are not protected by the speech and debate clause when: 1. their speech is made outside of Congress; and 2. it's unrelated to their official duties.  But those organizing and funding efforts to destroy Tesla, those carrying out the effort, and others, might well be liable for their activities.  It's worth a close look.  https://www.bing.com/search?qs=AS&pq=tortious+interference+with+busines&sk=CSYN1&sc=12-34&q=tortious+interference+with+business&cvid=1739018b140147b4940fccfc20fdba4a&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgYIABAAGEAyBggAEAAYQDIGCAEQABhAMgYIAhAAGEAyBggDEAAYQDIGCAQQABhAMgYIBRAAGEAyBggGEAAYQDIGCAcQABhA0gEJMTkxNDBqMGo0qAIAsAIA&FORM=ANAB01&PC=HCTS

tortious interference with business - Bing Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you. bing.com
Saved - March 13, 2025 at 4:42 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

BREAKING! SCHUMER & HIS LAPDOG SENATE DEMOCRATS SHUTTING DOWN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT! CHUCK SCHUMER AND THE SENATE DEMOCRATS DECLARE THEY WILL SHUT DOWN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ... AND THEY DO SO TO PROTEST THE ELIMINATION OF WASTE, FRAUD, AND ABUSE ... AND THEY DO SO BECAUSE THEY WANT HIGHER INFLATION AND MORE MASSIVE DEBT ... THEY ARE PREPARED TO STOP FUNDING MEDICAID, FOOD STAMPS, CHILDREN LUNCH PROGRAMS, ETC., AT THE DIRECTION OF THEIR RADICAL LEFTWING BASE!!!

Saved - January 10, 2025 at 1:40 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

You failed again, fraud

@mazemoore - MAZE

2021. Biden explains that his $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Bill includes billions of dollars for wildfire prevention. The money is allocated to be spent over five years. This is year 4 of 5 and CA is asking for volunteers and trying to figure out how to get water in hydrants. https://t.co/1owVnS3Jw7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The plan allocates $1 billion to enhance wildfire preparedness, resilience, and response. This funding will support prevention efforts, including forest management, to safeguard millions of acres in high-risk areas, protecting homes and public drinking water sources. Addressing climate change is also a crucial aspect of these initiatives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is that it includes 1,000,000,000 of dollars, 1,000,000,000 of dollars to strengthen wildfire preparedness, resilience, and response. It includes funding for prevention efforts, like forest management, and to ensure millions of acres of high risk areas to protect homes and public water sources for drinking. And overlaying all of this is the necessity to successfully confront climate change.
Saved - November 27, 2024 at 9:52 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Tom Homan revealed during my interview of him this past Sunday’s Life, Liberty & Levin that he has received threats and his family is now having to live elsewhere. Not a single news organization reported it or gave a damn. Not one.

Saved - October 15, 2024 at 11:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m watching a guy in Chicago question President Trump about economic policy, and his hostility and condescending attitude are striking. It really highlights the corrupt media. Despite this, President Trump handles the situation with impressive temperament, skill, and substance. I can’t help but think that Kamala Harris wouldn’t be able to cope with anything like this at all.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

I’m watching this guy question President Trump in Chicago ostensibly about economic policy and virtually every question out of his mouth is screamingly hostile and his attitude is condescending and off putting. A perfect illustration of the corrupt media aggregated into this single guy’s performance. And yet, President Trump has handle it all with a great temperament, skill and substance.  Extremely impressive. And I’m thinking there’s no way Kamala Harris could cope with anything like this on any level

Saved - October 7, 2024 at 10:05 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Going on in New York now. Chanting in support of Hamas. Calling for burning Tel Aviv to the ground. https://t.co/laU9kaBaDA

Saved - October 5, 2024 at 11:26 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

I repeat, Judge Chutkan and Jack Smith should be disbarred for this https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/jack-smith-october-surprise-donald-trump.html

Jack Smith’s October Surprise The special counsel had information he wanted to make public. But he bent important rules to do so, writes legal columnist Elie Honig. nymag.com
Saved - September 26, 2024 at 10:02 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

This is a big deal https://t.co/ufqWjQzy2Z

Saved - July 27, 2024 at 10:08 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

This is pure evil. Hezbollah slaughtered these children playing soccer. Look at it. Show everybody. Like Hamas on Oct. 7. Iran is behind all of it.

@Ostrov_A - Arsen Ostrovsky 🎗️

⚠️ GRAPHIC WARNING But world must see the pure evil of #Hezbollah! Today, they fired a rocket on #MajdalShams in northern Israel. They murdered 11 CHILDREN. Beautiful, innocent, children - bodies thrown, limbless, massacred. They were just playing football. Pure act of evil!

Saved - July 15, 2024 at 4:15 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Shouldn’t they pull their entire lineup?  Starting with Joy Reid. https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-yanks-anti-trump-morning-joe-off-air-following-assassination-attempt

MSNBC yanks anti-Trump 'Morning Joe' off air following assassination attempt MSNBC yanked its flagship, staunchly anti-Trump show "Morning Joe" off the airwaves Monday in the wake of the assassination attempt on former President Trump. foxnews.com
Saved - May 31, 2024 at 3:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author discusses the possibility of taking a case to the Supreme Court to address issues in the New York system. They draw parallels to the Bush v Gore case and suggest filing applications for common law writs with the Supreme Court. The author argues that the denial of due process in the case has implications for the federal electoral system and sets a precedent for future elections. They emphasize the need for the Supreme Court to intervene and address the situation promptly.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Thinking further out loud The issue is how to get out of the New York system and bring the case to the Supreme Court, which may or may not take it up. That is why I look to Bush v Gore, where the S Ct decided to step in BECAUSE it was a presidential election. There was another court involved, the Florida Supreme Court. And it was that court that the Supreme Court believed was violating the Equal Protection Clause. That was the doctrine it settled on, given the unequal treatment of voters. In New York, you would file the notice of appeal, ask for a stay of the trial court, and seek expedited review. You need to protect your ability to timely appeal and not abandon it. You might then file applications for common law writs with the US Supreme Court, where the S Ct can take action if it chooses, and legitimately claim the harm is immediate and ongoing not just to a presidential candidate, but to the federal electoral system, federal campaign jurisdiction (reverse federalism), and the precedent that might otherwise be set and spread throughout the country. The denial of due process infected every aspect of the case. The S Ct has common law powers (common law writs -- judicially created not statutorily created) it uses very sparingly, in extraordinary circumstances, to grant relief. Waiting would compound the problem. The problem now is that every day that goes by, the actions by the NY lower court bleeds into the federal, presidential election system. Where does this end? Will other DA's use the Bragg-Merchan precedent, such as it is, going forward, and not care what higher state courts have to say, in that those courts may not act quickly or at all. So, now local prosecutors and state judges will intervene in presidential elections or any federal election. We need to give the Supreme Court the opportunity to intervene. If it chooses not to, then it won't. But between Jack Smith criminalizing election challenges to the point that we do not know what is or is not legal, and now Bragg and Merchan criminalizing events and activities that are not illegal, to the point we don't now know what they are, the Supreme Court, in my view, must do something. In the end, the S Ct will not be able to avoid this forever. Better to deal with now than later, when it will get worse.

Saved - May 25, 2024 at 1:38 AM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Jamie the Red Raskin insists that illegal aliens should vote, as do a majority of the House Democrats https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/24/yes-democrats-want-aliens-to-vote-in-u-s-elections-take-jamie-raskins-word-for-it/

Dems Want Aliens Voting In US Elections. Take Raskin's Word For It Raskin suggested in a law paper that 'Alien suffrage' could 'become part of a basic human right to democracy.' thefederalist.com
Saved - May 20, 2024 at 4:48 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Hitler would be proud of the ICC and its antisemitic prosecutor https://therightscoop.com/despicable-international-criminal-court-issues-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-and-gallant/

Despicable International Criminal Court issues arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant The despicable, bogus, and anti-Israel International Criminal Court just issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. They claim their ‘charges&… therightscoop.com
Saved - May 1, 2024 at 1:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
We should take strict action against those on student visas, arresting and deporting them. Their names and photos should be made public to prevent future employment. No federal funds or loan forgiveness should be given. We must prioritize our safety as red-blooded Americans who own this country.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Round them up, deport those who are here on student visas, arrest all others, and put out their names and photos so everyone knows who never to hire.  Make sure they receive no student loan forgiveness or any other federal funds of any kind.  They might be Hamas.  We are red-blooded Americans.  We own this country.  They don't.  https://www.aol.com/news/columbia-university-president-says-negotiations-130828517.html

Student protestors defy Columbia University's deadline to vacate campus or face suspension Students defied Columbia University's orders to vacate their encampment protest by 2 p.m. Monday, despite warnings of suspension and after the school's president said it will not divest from Israel — a demand that has sparked protests on college campuses across the country. aol.com
Saved - May 1, 2024 at 11:39 AM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Must watch!  City College of New York. https://t.co/o4B5LcZFY6

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pro-Palestinian protesters at City College of New York attacked a man waving an American flag, resulting in violence. The man was punched, choked, and thrown down stairs. The incident highlights a hatred for America rather than just Israel or Jews. The protesters are seen as thugs and outside agitators. This violence occurred on a campus funded by American taxpayers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You attack me? I'm not scared of shit, man. I'm not scared of shit. Speaker 1: I'm Ami Horowitz, and there are protests breaking all across the country on our campuses. These are people who purport to support the Palestinians, but in reality, they simply have a base hatred for Israel. They also have a hatred for the United States. So I'm here on the campus of City College of New York, where there's a encampment and a protest. I'm simply gonna go into the middle. I'm gonna wave the American flag without saying a word. Let's see what happens. Speaker 0: Don't don't test me. I found it. American. American. I'm gonna hey. Hey. Give me my slide. Hey. Speaker 1: Give me Speaker 0: my slide. What the fuck, man? Oh. Hey. It's America. What the fuck, man? My hands are up. Hands up. Don't shoot. Hands up. Don't shoot. Hands up. Don't shoot. Hands Speaker 1: up. Don't shoot. Speaker 0: Hands up. And you're saying Don't hurt me. Here. Get out of here. I'm the American. Speaker 1: Get out. Alright. I'm an American. Speaker 0: American. Yo. Got it. We're all American, man. Speaker 1: Come on. Speaker 0: Grace, I'm sorry. You gotta go. You gotta Speaker 1: go, please. I'm an American. Speaker 0: You gotta go, man. You gotta go, man. Speaker 1: You gotta go, man. Speaker 0: Get the fuck Speaker 1: off me, man. Don't fucking bushy. Don't fucking bushy. Don't fucking bushy. Don't fucking bushy. Speaker 0: Please. I'm an American. I'm a fucking American. That's right. Speaker 1: Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. Speaker 0: Fuck out of here. Speaker 1: You gotta go. Speaker 0: I'm an American. I wanna go to city campus. I'm out of the fuck, man. Speaker 1: Stop. What are you doing? Fuck. Speaker 0: What are you doing? I'm looking off campus. Get the fuck off of me. Get out. Are you gonna hurt me? Speaker 1: Get out. Speaker 0: You attack me? I'm not scared of shit, man. You gotta go. I'm not scared of shit. Come down to me. Get out. I'm not scared of shit. I'm not scared of shit. You gotta call me. I'm an American. You gotta go. No, man. You gotta go. I'm an American. You got a watermelon. I'm an American. I'm an American. Leave Speaker 1: that leave Speaker 0: that, man. Speaker 1: If you do Speaker 0: what I want. Speaker 1: Like, a dude Speaker 0: I want. If you don't don't touch me. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Listen to me. I'm gonna get that. No choke, weed. What the fuck? What the fuck? Speaker 1: I'm a Speaker 0: fucking American. I wanna go to campus. You can go to the house. Stop. Out. Yo, man. Out. I'm not leaving. Speaker 1: You guys are punching me. Speaker 0: You guys are fucking punching me. Guys, guys. Excuse me. I hear this. There's punching me. Stop this guy, man. Speaker 1: I'm gonna Speaker 0: get him out of here. Walk back. Walk back. Okay. We're I'm breaking. We are not in America anymore. Boys and girls, we are not in America. We're in some kind of weird police state. Speaker 1: So I just got out of the police station. I went to this protest with American flag on a city college that I and all American taxpayers pay for and I got my ass kicked. I was punched. I was choked. I was thrown down a flight of stairs. And, yeah, that's how the Palestinian protesters are dealing with anybody. They are thugs, they are animals, they are outside agitators, they are people from school, and, yeah, this is what is going on on our campuses. Well, they will attack somebody who's just walking up with an American flag. Nothing about Israel, nothing about Jews, they hate America. Let's be very clear about what's going on here. They hate this country. That's what we're dealing with this country.
Saved - April 15, 2024 at 1:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Biden's Iran policy is concerning as it refuses to support Israel in taking offensive military action against Iran's nuclear facilities. This means Iran could develop a nuclear arsenal without fear of military attack. Biden's appeasement of Iran and efforts to cripple Israel's actions against Iran's military and terrorist operations will make Iran a nuclear power. This will have severe consequences, including potential closure of navigable waters for oil transport and the strengthening of the China-Russia-NK-Iran axis. Missile defenses are not enough to prevent attacks; destroying the capacity to launch missiles is necessary. There are allegations that Biden colluded with Iran to prevent Israel from neutralizing Iran's military capabilities. The Biden regime's actions against Israel are morally corrupt and hostile. These tactics are beneath contempt and stain America's reputation. Biden and Blinken are impulsive, ignorant, reckless, and dangerous, escalating military conflicts and abandoning rational foreign policy. Be very worried.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

BREAKING!! I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about the lunacy of Biden’s Iran policy. Biden’s position in refusing to support Israel from taking offensive military action against Iran means that BIDEN WILL NOT SUPPORT ANY MILITARY STRIKES AGAINST IRAN’S NUCLEAR FACILITIES AND THAT IRAN WILL HAVE A FUNCTIONING NUCLEAR ARSENAL WITH WHICH TO THREATEN THE UNITED STATES, ISRAEL, THE ARAB WORLD, AND THE REST OF THE WORLD WITHOUT FEAR OF MILITARY ATTACK. The best time for Israel to hit Iran’s nuclear sites, with critical U.S. support, would’ve been now. Biden’s appeasement of Iran and intentional funding of Iran, lack of deterrence against Iran and efforts at crippling Israel’s efforts to neutralize Iran’s military and terrorist operations, ensures that Islamist-fundamentalist Iran will become a nuclear power. And once that occurs there will be few options to limit Iran’s ambitions short of a devastating confrontation with frightening risks. What will we do if Iran closes the Red Sea and other navigable waters used to transport oil? And It will also contribute even further to the firepower of the China-Russia-NK-Iran axis and cause other Middle East countries to acquire nuclear weapons. THIS is the world Biden and Blinken are creating while sanctimoniously lecturing about their efforts to de-escalate military confrontations. Again, the crucial point is that Biden has not only signaled to Iran that no effective action will be taken to stop its nuclear program but Biden has actually acted to ensure that Iran’s final path to building nuclear weapons is open and clear. That’s what is meant by no support for offensive military action against Iran. The idea that missile defenses are the answer to preventing offensive strikes against Israel or any country is lunacy. On its face it’s illogical. It’s a deterrent under certain circumstances. Maybe in many circumstances. But ultimately you don’t stop missile attacks by chasing another country’s. You stop missile attacks with certainty by destroying that country’s capacity for launching missiles and/or deterring such attacks by subjecting that country to punishing offensive military attacks. Despite Biden’s massive and current propaganda operation to the contrary, facts are facts. Furthermore, it’s beyond debate that the duplicitous Biden actually colluded with Iran through intermediaries to create the events that took place in the skies over Israel a few nights ago. And, of course, Israel was in the dark about it. (This is the same Biden regime that outrageously demands tactical approval over Israel’s battlefield decisions.) Why? Because it wouldn’t have gone along with such treachery and put its people through such a heinous subterfuge. Think about how morally corrupt, among other things, the Biden regime's actions truly are. Biden and the Iranian regime sympathizer, Blinken, coordinated with Iran over the timing, types of missiles, and even Iranian propaganda. The purpose was to prevent Israel from pulverizing Iran’s military capabilities. Indeed, the Biden regime began leaking immediately to their favorite reporters and media outlets (many of the same press sympathizes they relied on during the Obama regime to promote the Iran nuclear deal) that Israel had provoked Iran and hadn’t told the U.S. in advance about the planned attack on Iran’s terrorist compound in Damascus. Obviously, Israel didn’t forewarn Blinken because he would’ve leaked it to the media! Moreover, Israel is not obliged to get permission from Biden on how and whether to defend its people. Biden and Blinken are hostile to Israel and seek to overthrow its democratic government. They’ve repeatedly told this openly to the entire world, including the Iranians. Every one of these shocking and appalling Biden regime mobster tactics, and there are more, with the attendant scheming, plotting, leaking, usurping, and back-stabbing against a longtime essential and loyal ally, which is in a daunting and bloody war literally triggered by the insane policies of the Biden regime, is beneath contempt and a stain on America’s character and reputation as the world’s moral beacon. It is Biden and Blinken who are impulsive, ignorant, reckless, incompetent, and dangerous. It is they who’ve abandoned a rational and prudent foreign policy in pursuit of incoherent and ideologically-driven utopian ambitions. And it is they who’ve escalated military conflict on multiple continents. For them, there is no good or evil, right or wrong. Hence, they fund Iran and threaten Israel. They seek Netanyahu’s ouster and the ayatollah’s approval. Be worried. Very worried.

Saved - December 28, 2023 at 5:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Special Counsel Jack Smith is facing criticism for his handling of the case against the former president. Concerns have been raised about his ability to make arguments unrelated to the charges brought about January 6, potentially inflaming the jury. Critics argue that Smith's actions are questionable and raise ethical concerns.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Jack Smith is revealing himself, again and again, to be a thug. He not only has an incredible favorable judge and jurisdiction, but he insists that only he can make whatever arguments he wishes to a potential jury and that he can constrain, through the judge, the arguments and opinions of the former president. Incredibly, he has already received approval from the judge to make arguments utterly unrelated to the charges he brought about January 6 (he brought 4 charges on preposterous applications of statutes that have nothing to do with insurrection, sedition, or even violence, yet he is going to arguments about insurrection, sedition, and violence against Trump, in order to inflame a potential jury). Everything this thug has done and is doing is as sleazy as it gets. https://www.aol.com/news/special-counsel-jack-smith-seeks-153905094.html

Special counsel Jack Smith seeks to block Trump from making political attacks during trial Special counsel Jack Smith seeks to block Donald Trump from making political arguments and referring to conspiracy theories in his federal election interference trial. aol.com
Saved - December 28, 2023 at 12:20 AM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

HELLO HOUSE REPUBLICNS! OVER HERE! THIS IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE AND IT IS LOW-HANGING FRUIT! ARE YOU OUT THERE! ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION! https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/three-times-biden-forgave-student-debt-supreme-court

Three times Biden forgave student loan debt despite Supreme Court ruling The Supreme Court put a roadblock in front of President Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness plans, but it has not stopped them. washingtonexaminer.com
Saved - December 19, 2023 at 1:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Democrats are accused of smearing Clarence Thomas through media and Senate hearings, aiming to force him to recuse himself from a Supreme Court motion. This is seen as an attack on the legal system, involving Democrat lawyers, DOJ prosecutors, judges, politicians, and the media. The question remains whether the Supreme Court will uphold the law or succumb to these alleged schemes.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

And this is no coincidence. The Democrats are relentlessly smearing Clarence Thomas through their media and Senate hearings. And the campaign to force him to recuse himself from the outrageous Smith motion to the Supreme Court to bypass the appellate court on the immunity issue is part of the plan. This is a full on attack on our legal system. From the bottom up. Democrat lawyers and law firms, a radicalized DOJ and its prosecutors, Democrat-appointed and Never-Trump judges, left-wing Democrat politicians, and the corrupt Democrat media are all in. They’re pursuing Trump as aggressively as they’re protecting Joe Biden. Will the Supreme Court uphold the law and the Constitution or will it fall under the weight of these diabolical people schemes? https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/18/clarence-thomas-finances-under-scrutiny-as-supreme-court-weighs-trump-case.html

Clarence Thomas faces new financial scrutiny, recusal calls as Supreme Court considers Trump election case Special counsel Jack Smith has asked the Supreme Court to quickly sink Trump's claim of "presidential immunity" in the criminal election case. cnbc.com
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 10:59 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

There Are No ‘Innocent Palestinians’ https://townhall.com/columnists/dwwilber/2023/12/07/there-are-no-innocent-palestinians-n2632056

There Are No ‘Innocent Palestinians’   townhall.com
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 11:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tanya Chutkan, a judge, has repeatedly ruled against Trump, violating his constitutional rights. She made biased statements, set short timelines for trial prep, and denied Trump's subpoena for Jan. 6 committee records. The judge also denied attorney-client privilege, and the grand jury and trial jury are predominantly Democrat. This interference in the upcoming election is a blatant abuse of power. The corrupt prosecutorial and judicial system is railroading a former president. Americans won't accept the 2024 election results if Trump loses due to this abuse. The media's irresponsible propaganda worsens the situation. [499 characters]

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

TANYA CHUTKAN, A TYRANT IN A JUDICIAL ROBE Chutkan rules against Trump over and over again, despite the seriousness of his motions -- she has violated his 1st (gag rule), 5th (due process), and 6th (effective representation of counsel) amendment rights; she has said outrageous things about Trump when sentencing other defendants yet refused to recuse herself; she put an outrageously short timeline on defense counsels' trial prep; and now she has rule he cannot subpoena the Jan. 6 committee records, yet a few days ago ruled that she would not strike references to the violence on Jan. 6 from papers filed by the government, which is obviously prejudicial to Trump. This follows the denial to Trump of his attorney-client privilege right by another judge on her last day as chief judge (thereby forcing his lawyer to testify against him and provide notes to the grand jury; this was done in a secret proceeding.). AND, of course, not only is the current judge a radical Obama appointee, the grand jury was made up of individuals who came out of DC's overwhelmingly Democrat population and the trial jury will be chosen from the same jury pool. Indeed, Chutkan even called the New York judge in the NDA case (another outrageous abuse of power) to allow her to set the Jan. 6 case first. Finally, the "special counsel" chosen in this case is a known rogue head-hunter admonished previously by the U.S. Supreme Court in an 8 - 0 decision against him. There is no question at all that this judge, working with the radical DOJ senior Biden team, is interfering with the upcoming election and is intent on ensuring that Trump is found guilty of at least one of the preposterous charges brought against him, thereby giving the Democrats and the media the tagline "convicted felon" when referencing Trump. There was no need for this case to be brought or scheduled during the election as there were no statute of limitations issues or urgency. This is one of the most obvious and appalling railroading of an individual in our republic's history, and it's being done to a former president of the United States who is running for another presidential term. Our prosecutorial and judicial system is now corrupt to the core. And tens of millions of Americans will not accept the 2024 presidential election results should Trump lose BECAUSE of the unconscionable abuse of power in pursuit of Trump. And no number of reporters and commentators labeling Trump worse than Hitler (another disgusting low point in our country), or accusing him of opposing democracy, or claiming he is going to "imprison" and "execute people" will change what they are doing. Their actions and propaganda are incredibly irresponsible and dangerous. https://www.aol.com/news/judge-rejects-trump-house-january-225131466.html

Judge rejects Trump’s House January 6 committee subpoena request, calling it a ‘fishing expedition’ The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s election subversion case in Washington, DC, denied the former president’s effort to subpoena records from the House select committee that investigated the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. aol.com
Saved - November 24, 2023 at 7:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Antony Blinken, the US Secretary of State, is facing criticism for his handling of foreign policy. Critics accuse him of prioritizing the Palestinians over Israel, using Israel's need for weapons as leverage. They claim he is rearming Iran, supporting the PLO, and neglecting the threat of Iran's nuclear missile project. Some even allege that an Iranian spy ring has infiltrated the US government. Congressional Republicans and concerned citizens are demanding answers and accountability.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Antony Blinken, the great traitor Blinken is a despicable con who is organizing Arab and European countries and the U.N. around the backs of our Congress and Israel to carve up Israel and gift the Palestinians massive swaths of Israel’s country, including Judea and Samaria. That’s his response for the Palestinians’ murderous slaughter of Israelis! Blinken is using Israel’s need for weapons to threaten and blackmail Israel diplomatically and impose his policies and will. Utterly contemptible. This is not how foreign policy is conducted — as a weapon against our great ally in the middle of a war. Blinken’s driving the Obama-Thomas Friedman agenda, continuing to rearm Iran, prop up the PLO, sabotage Israel’s war effort, and deceive the American people. Blinken is a dangerous ideologue and stupid man as John McCain warned years ago. He is obsessed and unrestrained. He was also the architect of the disastrous and deadly surrender in Afghanistan, but has no capacity for circumspection or recalculation. He’s a committed ideologue. Blinken is an American Marxist who appointed an Iranian-supporting stooge and longtime friend to negotiate with Iran, and who is now under federal investigation and lost his classified clearance. Indeed, the fact that they introduced an Iranian spy ring into our government is either underreported or totally ignored. It makes the Alger Hiss case look like small potatoes. It’s no surprise that there is no plan or actual effort to stop Iran from finishing its nuclear missile project. This is the greatest scandal of our times with unimaginable ramifications. Yet again, I’m calling on congressional Republicans and any patriots with a platform and voice to speak out and demand answers and accountability. https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/diplomacy/1700634287-u-s-state-secretary-blinken-to-visit-israel-for-gaza-war-talks-report

U.S. State Secretary Blinken to visit Israel for Gaza war talks - report - I24NEWS U.S. State Secretary Blinken to visit Israel for Gaza war talks - report i24news.tv
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 2:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Biden-Blinken's approach towards Israel's conflict with Hamas raises concerns. They impose tough conditions on Israel while aiming to divide the land and give it to Palestinians. Meanwhile, no demands are made of Iran, despite pouring billions into their war machine. Our armed forces face attacks from Iran's proxies without consequences. Source: Times of Israel.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

MUST READ! BREAKING: IT IS NOW OFFICIAL, BIDEN-BLINKEN DO NOT WANT ISRAEL TO WIN THE WAR AGAINST HAMAS as they continue to place more and more onerous conditions on Israel AND as they plot to carve up Israel and give Judea and Sumaria ("West Bank") to the Palestinians (ALL OF WHOSE LEADERS ARE TERRORISTS) and Gaza. The Biden-Blinken plan is to destroy Israel, which is the original Obama-Blinken plan. Meanwhile, while Biden-Blinken place crushing demands on Israel, NO DEMANDS are made of Iran as the administration CONTINUES TO POUR BILLIONS OF DOLLARS INTO IRAN'S WAR MACHINE without any conditions or limitations. In fact, THEY CONTINUE TO ATTACK OUR ARMED FORCES through their proxies without consequences! https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/us-urges-israel-not-to-expand-gaza-op-without-plan-to-protect-displaced-civilians/#:~:text=White%20House%20National%20Security%20Council,that%20region%20from%20the%20north.

US urges Israel not to expand Gaza op without plan to protect displaced civilians * * * timesofisrael.com
Saved - November 9, 2023 at 7:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In yesterday's off-year election, Virginia turned blue due to an influx of immigrants and federal bureaucrats in Northern Virginia. Meanwhile, in Kentucky, Cameron's loss was not solely due to Trump's endorsement, but because he lacked a strong advocacy for conservative principles and highlighted Biden's failures. This serves as a lesson for Republicans: RINOs have no winning message. Democrats' extensive TV ad spending on abortion misleads voters, distorting opponents' stance and policies. People are swayed by propaganda rather than the actual issue.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

The truth about yesterday's off year election. Once dark red Virginia has moved blue because immigrants and federal bureaucrats have flooded into Northern Virginia, which has changed the state politically. In Kentucky, Cameron lost not because Trump endorsed him, as obsessively stupid Trump-hater Chris Christie claims, but because he is a Mitch McConnell protege (McConnell is a Gerald Ford protege) who was not a forceful advocate of conservative principles and Biden's failures. This should be a lesson for Republicans, i.e., RINOs have no winnable message. Republicans will continue to lose on the abortion issue because the Democrat Party and their surrogates spend for more on TV ads than the GOP spends on this issue, and the Democrats use those funds to lie about their true policy, which is abortion until birth, no parental notification, and virtually no regulation at all, and lie about their opponents hating women. The point is people are voting on the propaganda they are being fed not the actual issue.

Saved - November 5, 2023 at 11:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The United States supports Israel, with Republicans and many Democrats calling for a ceasefire. However, some Democrats, media, and protestors are demanding it. These protestors, often backed by Hamas and Soros NGOs, are organized under the Democrat Party. Biden's push for a ceasefire is seen by some as prioritizing his re-election over Israel's safety. If Biden truly cared about humanitarian issues, he would focus on securing our borders and preventing American deaths from drugs like fentanyl.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

The United States is not calling for a ceasefire. The American people stand with Israel. The Republican Party stands with Israel. Republicans in Congress stand with Israel. The Democrat Party, the Democrat-Party media, and the Democrat Party protestors -- many of whom are calling for the annihilation of Israel and the Jews -- are calling for a ceasefire. And many of these protestors are organized by the well-financed Hamas network and Soros NGOs. The Democrat Party is the umbrella group for these protestors, as it was for the 2020 rioters. And Biden is demanding a ceasefire because he is worried about losing his re-election, which Biden puts before the safety of Israel -- that is, Israel is supposed to stop its military operation to help Biden's campaign. If Biden was really concerned about humanitarian issues, he would lockdown our borders rather than watching as his policies result in tens of thousands of dead American citizens resulting for fetanayl, etc.

Saved - November 1, 2023 at 12:07 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

The enemy within https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12683935/Fury-streets-NYC-members-Brooklyns-orthodox-Jewish-community-join-THOUSANDS-pro-Palestine-protestors-rally-slamming-Israels-war-Gaza.html

Fury on the streets of NYC THOUSANDS of pro-Palestine protestors The 'Flood Brooklyn for Palestine' protest attracted thousands of protesters. Amongst the protesters were members of the orthodox Jewish community. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 2:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the midst of ongoing debates, some question whether Trump violated a judge's "gag order." This raises concerns about the Bill of Rights, the 1st amendment, due process, and interference in a presidential election. It is crucial to remember that the 1st amendment protects not only certain individuals but all citizens, including defendants fighting for their liberty and against government leaks. The issue at hand is the constitutionality of such orders, which should be examined thoroughly.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Here's another group of basement-dwelling punks asking if Trump violated a gag order. That's the game now. The hell with the Bill of Rights and the 1st amendment, the hell with due process, the hell with interfering in a presidential election. The question of the day, every day now, is whether Trump violated some rogue judge's "gag order." It is utterly unconstitutional. It is just as unconstitutional as if a media outlet was hit with a judicial "gag order." The 1st amendment applies not just to a cabal of basement dwelling punks with a toxic website, like Mediocreite, but to all citizens -- and ESPECIALLY defendants fighting for their liberty and against endless government leaks. https://www.mediaite.com/trump/did-trumps-rant-against-bill-barr-violate-his-gag-order/

Did Trump’s Rant Against Bill Barr Violate His Gag Order? Donald Trump may have already violated a new gag order imposed on him by Judge Tanya Chutkan with a rant targeting his old attorney general, Bill Barr. mediaite.com
Saved - October 13, 2023 at 9:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Arab countries have not offered refuge to Gaza Palestinians, nor have they criticized Egypt for closing the main passageway. Qatar, with its Hamas Nazi leadership, has not asked any Arab country to take in Gaza Palestinians or urged Egypt to allow their exit. The Arab world's lack of assistance contrasts with the international community's potential support. Surprisingly, American and European media fail to address these issues. As Israel engages in urban warfare against Hamas, the media focuses on casualty numbers and calls for proportionate response, while Blinken lectures Israel on rules of war, despite terrorists being exempt.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

It's noteworthy that not a single Arab country has offered to accept Gaza Palestinians. Not one. And they are silent about Egypt keeping closed the main passageway for the Gaza Palestinians to leave Gaza, because Egypt doesn't want Gaza Palestinians coming into their country. Want more? Hamas Nazi leadership in Qatar has not asked Qatar, or any Arab country, take any Gaza Palestinians. Nor have Qatar or the Hamas Nazi leadership asked Egypt to stop blocking Gaza Palestinians from leaving Gaza. Of course, the Egyptians could house hundreds of thousands of Gaza Palestinians in the Sinai Peninsula. And no doubt the international community would assist with temporary housing, food, etc. But this would mean that the Arab world actually wants to help Gaza Palestinians rather than use their propaganda machine to attempt to turn Israelis into oppressors. It's also noteworthy that the American and European media don't ask the Biden regime or the other leaders of countries around the world about any of this; they don't even report it. Yet, because the Arabs will not provide refuge to the Gaza Palestinians, and because the Qatar-funded and Iran-funded Hamas wages war against Israel, and Israel must now lose Lord knows how many soldiers in urban warfare in Gaza, the media will report numbers, Israel will be told its response to the Hamas Nazis should be "proportionate," and Blinken will continue to lecture Israel about rules of war when fighting terrorists who -- by the way -- are an exception to rules of war.

Saved - August 10, 2023 at 3:45 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Pelosi's Jan 6 committee destroyed crucial, raw evidence and information in the greatest coverup operation in congressional history. In doing so, they violated the law, violated House rules, and violated Trump's right to have access to information that may have been useful to his defense. https://foxnews.com/politics/j6-committee-failed-to-preserve-records-has-no-data-on-capitol-hill-security-failures-gop-charges

Saved - August 9, 2023 at 10:27 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Yes I am

Saved - August 9, 2023 at 9:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
If the radical leftwing judge in DC tries to silence President Trump at the request of the Biden regime, he should challenge her order in the Supreme Court. Defying her order would make Trump a political prisoner, a first in American history. Trump must have the right to free speech and defend himself against constant leaks and indictments used by his opponents. Let's hope the judge upholds the Constitution and rejects the regime's motion.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

If the Obama-donating and appointed radical leftwing judge in DC attempts to gag President Trump in any significant way, at the behest of the Biden regime, Trump should defy her order and immediately take the matter to the Supreme Court. If she orders him sent to jail for defying such an order, it'll be the first time in American history such an outrageous act has been taken to silence a presidential candidate, making Trump officially a political prisoner of the Biden regime and their judge. Free speech, the right to defend yourself in the court of public opinion (especially given the relentless leaking by the prosecution), and the right to speak as a candidate when indictments are being used by the opposition party and your political opponents to defeat you (and which they talk about constantly), Trump cannot be gagged this way. Let's hope the Obama-donating and appointed radical leftwing judge in DC breaks from her record as a political activist and does the right thing -- that is, rejects the Biden regime's motion as an affront to the Constitution, the law, and the court.

Saved - August 9, 2023 at 3:48 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Unbelievably, still no special counsel has been appointed and no criminal investigation has been opened against Joe Biden! The GOP House is doing all the heavy lifting!

Foreign oligarchs moved millions to Biden-tied firms before meeting Joe Biden, investigators say House Oversight Committee now has traced more than $20 million in funds from Russians, Chinese, Ukrainians, Kazakhs and Romanians to Biden-tied entities. justthenews.com
Saved - August 3, 2023 at 11:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden administration's actions during the presidential election have created an unprecedented legal situation. The attorney general, appointed by the Democrat president, is authorizing indictments against his potential political opponent. These charges, approved by a special counsel, are intended to hinder Trump's campaign. The timing of the charges and the depletion of Trump's campaign funds raise concerns about political motives. This legal warfare undermines our electoral system and must be addressed. Seeking an emergency hearing before the Supreme Court is necessary to halt this assault on our democracy.

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

MY PUBLIC ADVICE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM ... The Biden administration has created a legal morass never seen or experienced in American history, as applies to a presidential election. The attorney general, appointed by the Democrat president, is authorizing indictment after indictment of his president's possible if not likely political opponent in the middle of a presidential election cycle. He is doing so through his appointment of a special counsel, whose appointment was a misapplication of the special counsel regulation, and whose charges must be approved by the attorney general. (By the way, as an important side issue, Jack Smith is not a presidential appointee; he never even stood for confirmation by the Senate to hold the position he holds and to exercise the authority he is exercising against a party opponent.) It should be noted at the same time, the attorney general refuses to appoint an outside special counsel to investigate his client, Joe Biden, despite the fact that the DOJ regulation was originally instituted for these exact circumstances. Of course, this underscores the purpose and motive of what is taking place before us today. The attorney general is approving the timing of dozens of charges against the former Republican president, who is actively seeking his party's nomination to challenge the Democrat president for whom he directly reports, which are intended to cripple the ability of Donald Trump to effectively run for president, regardless of what polls show today. And regardless of what the commentariat say, and despite President Trump's strength within the Republican Party, the outcome of the election is unknown. Therefore, the polls are irrelevant in this regard. Moreover, as further evidence that these indictments are being used as political weapons are the timing of the charges -- specifically, all of these charges by the separate grand juries, all controlled by the special counsel, should have been filed AFTER the election, as there was no possibility the statute of limitations would run on any of them. Further, the special counsel repeatedly insists that the charges must be quickly adjudicated, meaning before the people vote, for the purpose of having maximum influence on the election. In addition, the charges have resulted in the significant depletion of Trump's campaign funds to pay for millions in legal fees. Trump has to take significant time from campaigning to address the dozens of charges dropped on him by the Biden administration -- that is, he has to expend an enormous amount of time working with his lawyers in order to defend himself from charges that, collectively, would result in his imprisonment until his death. The fact is that this kind of legal warfare against a presidential and possible if not likely opponent to the present president, is not only unprecedented in the history of our republic it will destroy our electoral system for all time. It is not something that should left to various district courts or local courts to sort out in the course of regular judicial proceedings. In fact, that is part of the intended strategy by the prosecutors who are engaged in this assault on our electoral system. They must not be rewarded for their behavior. They must not be rewarded for their treachery and exploitation of the legal system and the courts to achieve their political ends. Even without getting to the merits of these multitude of charges, which are easily unraveled from my perspective, the process is what is being used to interfere with the election. And the near silence by those who are orchestrating this shocking legal warfare, when the American people are left in the dark, is untenable. Therefore, I want to publicly encourage the Trump legal team to seek an emergency hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court, not to resolve legal disputes, but to at least temporarily halt the abomination of this legal warfare that is unfolding in front of us -- where Democrats and anti-Trump Republicans are unashamedly celebrating the use of the courts by the Biden administration and Democrat DA's to further their political wishes, as the rest of the nation watches in shock. This unprecedented legal warfare requires an unprecedented response by the only constitutional body left that can do something about it -- the Supreme Court.

Saved - June 10, 2023 at 3:04 AM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Importantly, the Presidential Records Act has NO criminal penalty because the Congress and Carter had no intention of criminalizing document retention matters.  And never before has the 1917 Espionage Act was never even discussed as applying to a former president.  There is no justification for criminalizing this matter against Trump.

Saved - February 20, 2023 at 4:08 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

A MUST-SEE Life, Liberty & Levin at 8 PM eastern tonight on Fox!  Please do NOT miss it, from beginning to end!  If you can’t watch Live, please be sure to DVR the show!  It is an essential episode!  See you then!  God bless!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Patrick Bachemp, director of the Democracy Institute, discusses the puzzling aspects of the 2020 Presidential Election. He highlights how Donald Trump improved his performance compared to 2016, particularly with the white working class, women, suburban voters, Catholics, Jewish voters, African Americans, and Hispanics. Bachemp suggests that if observers were given the vote breakdown by demographic group without knowing the outcome, they would likely conclude that Trump won. He also mentions non-polling metrics, such as party registration trends and individual donations, which have historically predicted the election winner accurately. Bachemp questions the statistical implausibility of Biden winning against these trends and points out anomalies in the vote accumulation and tabulation process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our 1st guest wrote an incredibly powerful piece in The Spectator called Reasons Why the 2020 Presidential Election is Deeply Puzzling. His name is Patrick Bachemp. He is the director of the Democracy Institute, which is a wonderful group and a professional pollster. And Patrick, it's a pleasure to have you. I would like you to walk through these these issues that you found to be Deeply puzzling. Go right ahead. Speaker 1: Absolutely. I approached the article. None of us are objective, but we all try to be. We hoped We are at least independent minded. And so how would an independent minded person assess the outcome as the media has I designated it of the 2020 presidential election. And I looked at 3 aspects. First of all, I looked at the quasi results. And if you look at the results, you see how Donald Trump improved his performance, national performance over 2016 by almost 20%. No incumbent President has ever lost a reelection bid if he's increased his votes. Obama Went down by 3 a half 1000000 votes between 20 2008 and 2012, but still won comfortably. If you look at those results, you see that Donald Trump did, Very well. Even better than 4 years earlier with the white working class. He held his own with women and suburban voters against most of the polling Expectations did very well with Catholics. He improved his vote among Jewish voters. He had the best minority performance for a Republican since Richard Nixon in 1960, doing so well with African Americans and importantly with Hispanics. So I sort of suggest this thought experiment. I think if you one took 100, well informed about the American political scene. 100 observers who were sequestered For the, for the actual election night and since. And you gave them the vote breakdown by demographic group, and you saw where Biden and Trump did well or did poorly. You laid out all those numbers, but you admitted the one fact, or should I say the one assertion That Biden had won the national popular vote in there and and consequently, in the respective swing states was going to be the next president. And you gave them all the demographic data, all the To poll data, and you asked them, so who do you think won the election? My suggestion to your viewers is that 99, at least, out of those 100 independent, well informed observers would say, well, obviously, Trump. Right? So we we know from the vote itself, well, the the alleged vote, the alleged result, that it is something very strange has happened because the numbers just don't add up. They don't measure up to Our polling that was conducted right up to the election and the likes of Richard Barris or the Trafalgar Group, the polls that were, the most accurate by some distance. Everything suddenly went very strange in the middle of the night. Now that could happen, It's just very, very unusual. And if this was an exceptional election, as some people assert, and that's why the numbers seem strange, then you would Expect it to be have a uniformity to that exceptionalism. So Joe Biden would have increased his support, Not just in key precincts, in key cities, in key swing states, and nowhere else, but he would have had a sort of uniform victory. He was the challenger. He has apparently allegedly received more votes than any candidate for president in American history. And yet he has done very, very poorly in most of the country, except where it absolutely mattered. Another way of looking at this is to look at what I call the non polling metrics, The things like party registration trends, how the candidates did in their respective presidential primaries, the number of individual donations, how much enthusiasm each candidate generated in the opinion polls. There is sort of a dozen or more of these metrics. Now these metrics have a 100% accuracy rate in terms of predicting the winner of the presidential election. Some of them are more recent, like Google searches. Others obviously like registration trends are are have far more history behind them. In 2016, they all indicated Strongly that Donald Trump would win against most of the public polling. That was again the case in 2020. So if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of all these non polling metrics. Not only means that one of these metrics Was inaccurate this time for the first time ever. It means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time And at the same time as all of the others. It is not statistically impossible, but it's statistically implausible. Another way of looking at what happened is to look at how the vote was the vote ballots were accumulated and how they were tabulated and Counted on election night and obviously since then, in fact, in places like California, they are still counting. And what you see there is A ridiculous bizarre number of anomalies. Some of them are statistical, some of them are procedural. You have, for example, A historically low ballot rejection rate for absentee in mail in ballots. Rejection rates which, in the primaries earlier this year, We're well into the double digits and which historically have often been very, very high. In these key swing states, or at least in the key swing counties, We're seeing rejection rates of less than 1%, often very close to 0. Now given the increase In absentee balloting and the lack of experience that most of the new ballot new voters and those doing the counting would have with those ballots. It is implausible, to put it politely, that that figure would be as low as it was.
View Full Interactive Feed