@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
ANY U.S.-IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE SENATE ARTICLE II, SEC. 2, CL. 5 is referred to as the Treaty Clause of the Constitution. It states, in relevant part: "The President ... shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur ..." Whether the Treaty Clause is an independent grant of power compelling the shared role of a supermajority of the Senate (two thirds of the senators present when a treaty is taken up) in making international agreements or an extension of already existing executive power with a role for the Senate is of no consequence to me. Either way, both the text and intentions of the Framers were: 1. to underscore the president's power to negotiate treaties; 2. to deviate from separation of powers in that the Senate would determine whether such treaties were to be adopted; and 3. most importantly, to involve the broader body politic in agreements with foreign governments given concerns about conferring essential sovereign powers and representational authorities to other countries. In short, international agreements were much too important to leave to one person -- a president. The Treaty Clause should be one in which the so-called anti-globalists, isolationists, and constitutionalists not only agree but celebrate. Yet, we have heard virtually nothing about the necessity of any agreement with Iran being submitted to the Senate for its advice, consent, or rejection. Indeed, the Treaty Clause should be endorsed by all parts of the political spectrum. That said, far too often, especially in the last half-century, presidents have relied on "executive agreements," with or without the consent of Congress, to sidestep the Constitution's treaty process. At times the argument is even persuasive, e.g., one of immediacy and necessity in which time is of the essence and national security threats are imminent. Even then, long-term or permanent agreements are to be avoided. Indeed, without a treaty, executive agreements can be altered or altogether dropped by a president, assuming no statutory limitations (however, even statutory limitations can raise significant constitutional questions, which are not the subject of this short essay). However, when a treaty is being negotiated over a period of time, there really is no excuse for excluding the Senate from the outset, such as keeping key senior members updated with the negotiations. It is also in the best interest of an administration to do so. This is not to say that all government-to-government or international agreements rise to the level of a treaty. Of course, this raises the question: which do and do not? It is more practical and relevant to determine the import and impact of any such arrangement on society to find an appropriate answer. Thus, let's look at the matter at hand: another nuclear deal with the terror state of Iran. Whatever constitutional standard exists for submitting a negotiated agreement to the Senate under Article II, Sec. 2, Cl. 5, two points are clear: 1. The Constitution's language is as broad as it gets, meaning there is at least an assumption that these agreements are to be approved by a supermajority of senators present -- that is, it is the rule for which exceptions must be made and defended; and 2. a nuclear deal with Iran, which daily threatens the annihilation of the United States, has violated the existing nuclear deal (although we withdrew from the agreement most of the rest of the world did not); and is also developing long-range missiles to attack our country with nuclear warheads, clearly falls into the category of agreements of the utmost import and urgency requiring treaty ratification. Indeed, if it does not, then nothing does. This was the position of a vast majority of Senate Republicans in 2015, when Barack Obama negotiated the first nuclear deal with Iran. They insisted the deal was a treaty. The Senate Democrats insisted it was not. Obama had no hope of getting it approved as a treaty. What resulted was a strange bill that, in essence, gave Obama what he wanted, a bad deal, but with tepid congressional oversight and possible intervention. Nonetheless, Obama was required to receive congressional input and defend what he had negotiated in the light of day. President Trump was able to pull out of the deal with the signing of a pen (incidentally, a pen that he handed me, and which hangs on the wall in our home). If the Obama deal had been a treaty, it is not clear that President Trump could have so easily dropped it. More to the point, if the Senate Republicans viewed the Obama deal as a treaty, will they feel the same way if a second deal, no matter how improved it is believed to be, is struck with the same terror regime? Of course, it should not matter who the president is as we are talking about the application of the Constitution not who sits in the Oval Office. Is not time of the essence, you may ask, making the treaty process too cumbersome? It certainly is. And if relevant senior senators had been involved in the process from the start, it would've made an expedited treaty process more possible. Regardless, there should at least be a statutory basis for an executive agreement, thereby involving all of Congress in the legislative process even if expedited. The shared power compelled by the Constitution should not be feared or avoided. Moreover, I believe the Constitution demands it. Nobody better understands this than our current secretary of state, Marco Rubio, who prudently insisted on this and more as a senator in 2015.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Leftwing conflicted Obama judge, Boasberg, is looking to hold the Trump administration in contempt. That's what he's doing, and he wants to make a big splash, get lots of media headlines, and try to sabotage the Trump administration. He wants to create the impression that POTUS is lawless when, in fact, Judge Boasberg is lawless. He wants to play into the Democrat Party narrative that Trump is a dictator, when it is Judge Boasberg who is the autocrat. https://www.aol.com/news/judge-boasberg-trump-justice-department-090053114.html
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Elon Musk's attorneys should look at the possibility of bringing tortious interference lawsuits against those who are trying to destroy Tesla, including members of Congress. Members of Congress are not protected by the speech and debate clause when: 1. their speech is made outside of Congress; and 2. it's unrelated to their official duties. But those organizing and funding efforts to destroy Tesla, those carrying out the effort, and others, might well be liable for their activities. It's worth a close look. https://www.bing.com/search?qs=AS&pq=tortious+interference+with+busines&sk=CSYN1&sc=12-34&q=tortious+interference+with+business&cvid=1739018b140147b4940fccfc20fdba4a&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgYIABAAGEAyBggAEAAYQDIGCAEQABhAMgYIAhAAGEAyBggDEAAYQDIGCAQQABhAMgYIBRAAGEAyBggGEAAYQDIGCAcQABhA0gEJMTkxNDBqMGo0qAIAsAIA&FORM=ANAB01&PC=HCTS
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
BREAKING! SCHUMER & HIS LAPDOG SENATE DEMOCRATS SHUTTING DOWN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT! CHUCK SCHUMER AND THE SENATE DEMOCRATS DECLARE THEY WILL SHUT DOWN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ... AND THEY DO SO TO PROTEST THE ELIMINATION OF WASTE, FRAUD, AND ABUSE ... AND THEY DO SO BECAUSE THEY WANT HIGHER INFLATION AND MORE MASSIVE DEBT ... THEY ARE PREPARED TO STOP FUNDING MEDICAID, FOOD STAMPS, CHILDREN LUNCH PROGRAMS, ETC., AT THE DIRECTION OF THEIR RADICAL LEFTWING BASE!!!
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
You failed again, fraud
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Tom Homan revealed during my interview of him this past Sunday’s Life, Liberty & Levin that he has received threats and his family is now having to live elsewhere. Not a single news organization reported it or gave a damn. Not one.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
I’m watching this guy question President Trump in Chicago ostensibly about economic policy and virtually every question out of his mouth is screamingly hostile and his attitude is condescending and off putting. A perfect illustration of the corrupt media aggregated into this single guy’s performance. And yet, President Trump has handle it all with a great temperament, skill and substance. Extremely impressive. And I’m thinking there’s no way Kamala Harris could cope with anything like this on any level
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Going on in New York now. Chanting in support of Hamas. Calling for burning Tel Aviv to the ground. https://t.co/laU9kaBaDA
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
I repeat, Judge Chutkan and Jack Smith should be disbarred for this https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/jack-smith-october-surprise-donald-trump.html
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
This is pure evil. Hezbollah slaughtered these children playing soccer. Look at it. Show everybody. Like Hamas on Oct. 7. Iran is behind all of it.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Shouldn’t they pull their entire lineup? Starting with Joy Reid. https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-yanks-anti-trump-morning-joe-off-air-following-assassination-attempt
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Thinking further out loud The issue is how to get out of the New York system and bring the case to the Supreme Court, which may or may not take it up. That is why I look to Bush v Gore, where the S Ct decided to step in BECAUSE it was a presidential election. There was another court involved, the Florida Supreme Court. And it was that court that the Supreme Court believed was violating the Equal Protection Clause. That was the doctrine it settled on, given the unequal treatment of voters. In New York, you would file the notice of appeal, ask for a stay of the trial court, and seek expedited review. You need to protect your ability to timely appeal and not abandon it. You might then file applications for common law writs with the US Supreme Court, where the S Ct can take action if it chooses, and legitimately claim the harm is immediate and ongoing not just to a presidential candidate, but to the federal electoral system, federal campaign jurisdiction (reverse federalism), and the precedent that might otherwise be set and spread throughout the country. The denial of due process infected every aspect of the case. The S Ct has common law powers (common law writs -- judicially created not statutorily created) it uses very sparingly, in extraordinary circumstances, to grant relief. Waiting would compound the problem. The problem now is that every day that goes by, the actions by the NY lower court bleeds into the federal, presidential election system. Where does this end? Will other DA's use the Bragg-Merchan precedent, such as it is, going forward, and not care what higher state courts have to say, in that those courts may not act quickly or at all. So, now local prosecutors and state judges will intervene in presidential elections or any federal election. We need to give the Supreme Court the opportunity to intervene. If it chooses not to, then it won't. But between Jack Smith criminalizing election challenges to the point that we do not know what is or is not legal, and now Bragg and Merchan criminalizing events and activities that are not illegal, to the point we don't now know what they are, the Supreme Court, in my view, must do something. In the end, the S Ct will not be able to avoid this forever. Better to deal with now than later, when it will get worse.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Jamie the Red Raskin insists that illegal aliens should vote, as do a majority of the House Democrats https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/24/yes-democrats-want-aliens-to-vote-in-u-s-elections-take-jamie-raskins-word-for-it/
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Hitler would be proud of the ICC and its antisemitic prosecutor https://therightscoop.com/despicable-international-criminal-court-issues-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-and-gallant/
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Round them up, deport those who are here on student visas, arrest all others, and put out their names and photos so everyone knows who never to hire. Make sure they receive no student loan forgiveness or any other federal funds of any kind. They might be Hamas. We are red-blooded Americans. We own this country. They don't. https://www.aol.com/news/columbia-university-president-says-negotiations-130828517.html
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Must watch! City College of New York. https://t.co/o4B5LcZFY6
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
BREAKING!! I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about the lunacy of Biden’s Iran policy. Biden’s position in refusing to support Israel from taking offensive military action against Iran means that BIDEN WILL NOT SUPPORT ANY MILITARY STRIKES AGAINST IRAN’S NUCLEAR FACILITIES AND THAT IRAN WILL HAVE A FUNCTIONING NUCLEAR ARSENAL WITH WHICH TO THREATEN THE UNITED STATES, ISRAEL, THE ARAB WORLD, AND THE REST OF THE WORLD WITHOUT FEAR OF MILITARY ATTACK. The best time for Israel to hit Iran’s nuclear sites, with critical U.S. support, would’ve been now. Biden’s appeasement of Iran and intentional funding of Iran, lack of deterrence against Iran and efforts at crippling Israel’s efforts to neutralize Iran’s military and terrorist operations, ensures that Islamist-fundamentalist Iran will become a nuclear power. And once that occurs there will be few options to limit Iran’s ambitions short of a devastating confrontation with frightening risks. What will we do if Iran closes the Red Sea and other navigable waters used to transport oil? And It will also contribute even further to the firepower of the China-Russia-NK-Iran axis and cause other Middle East countries to acquire nuclear weapons. THIS is the world Biden and Blinken are creating while sanctimoniously lecturing about their efforts to de-escalate military confrontations. Again, the crucial point is that Biden has not only signaled to Iran that no effective action will be taken to stop its nuclear program but Biden has actually acted to ensure that Iran’s final path to building nuclear weapons is open and clear. That’s what is meant by no support for offensive military action against Iran. The idea that missile defenses are the answer to preventing offensive strikes against Israel or any country is lunacy. On its face it’s illogical. It’s a deterrent under certain circumstances. Maybe in many circumstances. But ultimately you don’t stop missile attacks by chasing another country’s. You stop missile attacks with certainty by destroying that country’s capacity for launching missiles and/or deterring such attacks by subjecting that country to punishing offensive military attacks. Despite Biden’s massive and current propaganda operation to the contrary, facts are facts. Furthermore, it’s beyond debate that the duplicitous Biden actually colluded with Iran through intermediaries to create the events that took place in the skies over Israel a few nights ago. And, of course, Israel was in the dark about it. (This is the same Biden regime that outrageously demands tactical approval over Israel’s battlefield decisions.) Why? Because it wouldn’t have gone along with such treachery and put its people through such a heinous subterfuge. Think about how morally corrupt, among other things, the Biden regime's actions truly are. Biden and the Iranian regime sympathizer, Blinken, coordinated with Iran over the timing, types of missiles, and even Iranian propaganda. The purpose was to prevent Israel from pulverizing Iran’s military capabilities. Indeed, the Biden regime began leaking immediately to their favorite reporters and media outlets (many of the same press sympathizes they relied on during the Obama regime to promote the Iran nuclear deal) that Israel had provoked Iran and hadn’t told the U.S. in advance about the planned attack on Iran’s terrorist compound in Damascus. Obviously, Israel didn’t forewarn Blinken because he would’ve leaked it to the media! Moreover, Israel is not obliged to get permission from Biden on how and whether to defend its people. Biden and Blinken are hostile to Israel and seek to overthrow its democratic government. They’ve repeatedly told this openly to the entire world, including the Iranians. Every one of these shocking and appalling Biden regime mobster tactics, and there are more, with the attendant scheming, plotting, leaking, usurping, and back-stabbing against a longtime essential and loyal ally, which is in a daunting and bloody war literally triggered by the insane policies of the Biden regime, is beneath contempt and a stain on America’s character and reputation as the world’s moral beacon. It is Biden and Blinken who are impulsive, ignorant, reckless, incompetent, and dangerous. It is they who’ve abandoned a rational and prudent foreign policy in pursuit of incoherent and ideologically-driven utopian ambitions. And it is they who’ve escalated military conflict on multiple continents. For them, there is no good or evil, right or wrong. Hence, they fund Iran and threaten Israel. They seek Netanyahu’s ouster and the ayatollah’s approval. Be worried. Very worried.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Jack Smith is revealing himself, again and again, to be a thug. He not only has an incredible favorable judge and jurisdiction, but he insists that only he can make whatever arguments he wishes to a potential jury and that he can constrain, through the judge, the arguments and opinions of the former president. Incredibly, he has already received approval from the judge to make arguments utterly unrelated to the charges he brought about January 6 (he brought 4 charges on preposterous applications of statutes that have nothing to do with insurrection, sedition, or even violence, yet he is going to arguments about insurrection, sedition, and violence against Trump, in order to inflame a potential jury). Everything this thug has done and is doing is as sleazy as it gets. https://www.aol.com/news/special-counsel-jack-smith-seeks-153905094.html
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
HELLO HOUSE REPUBLICNS! OVER HERE! THIS IS AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE AND IT IS LOW-HANGING FRUIT! ARE YOU OUT THERE! ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION! https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/three-times-biden-forgave-student-debt-supreme-court
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
And this is no coincidence. The Democrats are relentlessly smearing Clarence Thomas through their media and Senate hearings. And the campaign to force him to recuse himself from the outrageous Smith motion to the Supreme Court to bypass the appellate court on the immunity issue is part of the plan. This is a full on attack on our legal system. From the bottom up. Democrat lawyers and law firms, a radicalized DOJ and its prosecutors, Democrat-appointed and Never-Trump judges, left-wing Democrat politicians, and the corrupt Democrat media are all in. They’re pursuing Trump as aggressively as they’re protecting Joe Biden. Will the Supreme Court uphold the law and the Constitution or will it fall under the weight of these diabolical people schemes? https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/18/clarence-thomas-finances-under-scrutiny-as-supreme-court-weighs-trump-case.html
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
There Are No ‘Innocent Palestinians’ https://townhall.com/columnists/dwwilber/2023/12/07/there-are-no-innocent-palestinians-n2632056
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
TANYA CHUTKAN, A TYRANT IN A JUDICIAL ROBE Chutkan rules against Trump over and over again, despite the seriousness of his motions -- she has violated his 1st (gag rule), 5th (due process), and 6th (effective representation of counsel) amendment rights; she has said outrageous things about Trump when sentencing other defendants yet refused to recuse herself; she put an outrageously short timeline on defense counsels' trial prep; and now she has rule he cannot subpoena the Jan. 6 committee records, yet a few days ago ruled that she would not strike references to the violence on Jan. 6 from papers filed by the government, which is obviously prejudicial to Trump. This follows the denial to Trump of his attorney-client privilege right by another judge on her last day as chief judge (thereby forcing his lawyer to testify against him and provide notes to the grand jury; this was done in a secret proceeding.). AND, of course, not only is the current judge a radical Obama appointee, the grand jury was made up of individuals who came out of DC's overwhelmingly Democrat population and the trial jury will be chosen from the same jury pool. Indeed, Chutkan even called the New York judge in the NDA case (another outrageous abuse of power) to allow her to set the Jan. 6 case first. Finally, the "special counsel" chosen in this case is a known rogue head-hunter admonished previously by the U.S. Supreme Court in an 8 - 0 decision against him. There is no question at all that this judge, working with the radical DOJ senior Biden team, is interfering with the upcoming election and is intent on ensuring that Trump is found guilty of at least one of the preposterous charges brought against him, thereby giving the Democrats and the media the tagline "convicted felon" when referencing Trump. There was no need for this case to be brought or scheduled during the election as there were no statute of limitations issues or urgency. This is one of the most obvious and appalling railroading of an individual in our republic's history, and it's being done to a former president of the United States who is running for another presidential term. Our prosecutorial and judicial system is now corrupt to the core. And tens of millions of Americans will not accept the 2024 presidential election results should Trump lose BECAUSE of the unconscionable abuse of power in pursuit of Trump. And no number of reporters and commentators labeling Trump worse than Hitler (another disgusting low point in our country), or accusing him of opposing democracy, or claiming he is going to "imprison" and "execute people" will change what they are doing. Their actions and propaganda are incredibly irresponsible and dangerous. https://www.aol.com/news/judge-rejects-trump-house-january-225131466.html
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Antony Blinken, the great traitor Blinken is a despicable con who is organizing Arab and European countries and the U.N. around the backs of our Congress and Israel to carve up Israel and gift the Palestinians massive swaths of Israel’s country, including Judea and Samaria. That’s his response for the Palestinians’ murderous slaughter of Israelis! Blinken is using Israel’s need for weapons to threaten and blackmail Israel diplomatically and impose his policies and will. Utterly contemptible. This is not how foreign policy is conducted — as a weapon against our great ally in the middle of a war. Blinken’s driving the Obama-Thomas Friedman agenda, continuing to rearm Iran, prop up the PLO, sabotage Israel’s war effort, and deceive the American people. Blinken is a dangerous ideologue and stupid man as John McCain warned years ago. He is obsessed and unrestrained. He was also the architect of the disastrous and deadly surrender in Afghanistan, but has no capacity for circumspection or recalculation. He’s a committed ideologue. Blinken is an American Marxist who appointed an Iranian-supporting stooge and longtime friend to negotiate with Iran, and who is now under federal investigation and lost his classified clearance. Indeed, the fact that they introduced an Iranian spy ring into our government is either underreported or totally ignored. It makes the Alger Hiss case look like small potatoes. It’s no surprise that there is no plan or actual effort to stop Iran from finishing its nuclear missile project. This is the greatest scandal of our times with unimaginable ramifications. Yet again, I’m calling on congressional Republicans and any patriots with a platform and voice to speak out and demand answers and accountability. https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/diplomacy/1700634287-u-s-state-secretary-blinken-to-visit-israel-for-gaza-war-talks-report
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
MUST READ! BREAKING: IT IS NOW OFFICIAL, BIDEN-BLINKEN DO NOT WANT ISRAEL TO WIN THE WAR AGAINST HAMAS as they continue to place more and more onerous conditions on Israel AND as they plot to carve up Israel and give Judea and Sumaria ("West Bank") to the Palestinians (ALL OF WHOSE LEADERS ARE TERRORISTS) and Gaza. The Biden-Blinken plan is to destroy Israel, which is the original Obama-Blinken plan. Meanwhile, while Biden-Blinken place crushing demands on Israel, NO DEMANDS are made of Iran as the administration CONTINUES TO POUR BILLIONS OF DOLLARS INTO IRAN'S WAR MACHINE without any conditions or limitations. In fact, THEY CONTINUE TO ATTACK OUR ARMED FORCES through their proxies without consequences! https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/us-urges-israel-not-to-expand-gaza-op-without-plan-to-protect-displaced-civilians/#:~:text=White%20House%20National%20Security%20Council,that%20region%20from%20the%20north.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
The truth about yesterday's off year election. Once dark red Virginia has moved blue because immigrants and federal bureaucrats have flooded into Northern Virginia, which has changed the state politically. In Kentucky, Cameron lost not because Trump endorsed him, as obsessively stupid Trump-hater Chris Christie claims, but because he is a Mitch McConnell protege (McConnell is a Gerald Ford protege) who was not a forceful advocate of conservative principles and Biden's failures. This should be a lesson for Republicans, i.e., RINOs have no winnable message. Republicans will continue to lose on the abortion issue because the Democrat Party and their surrogates spend for more on TV ads than the GOP spends on this issue, and the Democrats use those funds to lie about their true policy, which is abortion until birth, no parental notification, and virtually no regulation at all, and lie about their opponents hating women. The point is people are voting on the propaganda they are being fed not the actual issue.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
The United States is not calling for a ceasefire. The American people stand with Israel. The Republican Party stands with Israel. Republicans in Congress stand with Israel. The Democrat Party, the Democrat-Party media, and the Democrat Party protestors -- many of whom are calling for the annihilation of Israel and the Jews -- are calling for a ceasefire. And many of these protestors are organized by the well-financed Hamas network and Soros NGOs. The Democrat Party is the umbrella group for these protestors, as it was for the 2020 rioters. And Biden is demanding a ceasefire because he is worried about losing his re-election, which Biden puts before the safety of Israel -- that is, Israel is supposed to stop its military operation to help Biden's campaign. If Biden was really concerned about humanitarian issues, he would lockdown our borders rather than watching as his policies result in tens of thousands of dead American citizens resulting for fetanayl, etc.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Here's another group of basement-dwelling punks asking if Trump violated a gag order. That's the game now. The hell with the Bill of Rights and the 1st amendment, the hell with due process, the hell with interfering in a presidential election. The question of the day, every day now, is whether Trump violated some rogue judge's "gag order." It is utterly unconstitutional. It is just as unconstitutional as if a media outlet was hit with a judicial "gag order." The 1st amendment applies not just to a cabal of basement dwelling punks with a toxic website, like Mediocreite, but to all citizens -- and ESPECIALLY defendants fighting for their liberty and against endless government leaks. https://www.mediaite.com/trump/did-trumps-rant-against-bill-barr-violate-his-gag-order/
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
It's noteworthy that not a single Arab country has offered to accept Gaza Palestinians. Not one. And they are silent about Egypt keeping closed the main passageway for the Gaza Palestinians to leave Gaza, because Egypt doesn't want Gaza Palestinians coming into their country. Want more? Hamas Nazi leadership in Qatar has not asked Qatar, or any Arab country, take any Gaza Palestinians. Nor have Qatar or the Hamas Nazi leadership asked Egypt to stop blocking Gaza Palestinians from leaving Gaza. Of course, the Egyptians could house hundreds of thousands of Gaza Palestinians in the Sinai Peninsula. And no doubt the international community would assist with temporary housing, food, etc. But this would mean that the Arab world actually wants to help Gaza Palestinians rather than use their propaganda machine to attempt to turn Israelis into oppressors. It's also noteworthy that the American and European media don't ask the Biden regime or the other leaders of countries around the world about any of this; they don't even report it. Yet, because the Arabs will not provide refuge to the Gaza Palestinians, and because the Qatar-funded and Iran-funded Hamas wages war against Israel, and Israel must now lose Lord knows how many soldiers in urban warfare in Gaza, the media will report numbers, Israel will be told its response to the Hamas Nazis should be "proportionate," and Blinken will continue to lecture Israel about rules of war when fighting terrorists who -- by the way -- are an exception to rules of war.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Pelosi's Jan 6 committee destroyed crucial, raw evidence and information in the greatest coverup operation in congressional history. In doing so, they violated the law, violated House rules, and violated Trump's right to have access to information that may have been useful to his defense. https://foxnews.com/politics/j6-committee-failed-to-preserve-records-has-no-data-on-capitol-hill-security-failures-gop-charges
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Yes I am
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
If the Obama-donating and appointed radical leftwing judge in DC attempts to gag President Trump in any significant way, at the behest of the Biden regime, Trump should defy her order and immediately take the matter to the Supreme Court. If she orders him sent to jail for defying such an order, it'll be the first time in American history such an outrageous act has been taken to silence a presidential candidate, making Trump officially a political prisoner of the Biden regime and their judge. Free speech, the right to defend yourself in the court of public opinion (especially given the relentless leaking by the prosecution), and the right to speak as a candidate when indictments are being used by the opposition party and your political opponents to defeat you (and which they talk about constantly), Trump cannot be gagged this way. Let's hope the Obama-donating and appointed radical leftwing judge in DC breaks from her record as a political activist and does the right thing -- that is, rejects the Biden regime's motion as an affront to the Constitution, the law, and the court.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Unbelievably, still no special counsel has been appointed and no criminal investigation has been opened against Joe Biden! The GOP House is doing all the heavy lifting!
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
MY PUBLIC ADVICE TO PRESIDENT TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM ... The Biden administration has created a legal morass never seen or experienced in American history, as applies to a presidential election. The attorney general, appointed by the Democrat president, is authorizing indictment after indictment of his president's possible if not likely political opponent in the middle of a presidential election cycle. He is doing so through his appointment of a special counsel, whose appointment was a misapplication of the special counsel regulation, and whose charges must be approved by the attorney general. (By the way, as an important side issue, Jack Smith is not a presidential appointee; he never even stood for confirmation by the Senate to hold the position he holds and to exercise the authority he is exercising against a party opponent.) It should be noted at the same time, the attorney general refuses to appoint an outside special counsel to investigate his client, Joe Biden, despite the fact that the DOJ regulation was originally instituted for these exact circumstances. Of course, this underscores the purpose and motive of what is taking place before us today. The attorney general is approving the timing of dozens of charges against the former Republican president, who is actively seeking his party's nomination to challenge the Democrat president for whom he directly reports, which are intended to cripple the ability of Donald Trump to effectively run for president, regardless of what polls show today. And regardless of what the commentariat say, and despite President Trump's strength within the Republican Party, the outcome of the election is unknown. Therefore, the polls are irrelevant in this regard. Moreover, as further evidence that these indictments are being used as political weapons are the timing of the charges -- specifically, all of these charges by the separate grand juries, all controlled by the special counsel, should have been filed AFTER the election, as there was no possibility the statute of limitations would run on any of them. Further, the special counsel repeatedly insists that the charges must be quickly adjudicated, meaning before the people vote, for the purpose of having maximum influence on the election. In addition, the charges have resulted in the significant depletion of Trump's campaign funds to pay for millions in legal fees. Trump has to take significant time from campaigning to address the dozens of charges dropped on him by the Biden administration -- that is, he has to expend an enormous amount of time working with his lawyers in order to defend himself from charges that, collectively, would result in his imprisonment until his death. The fact is that this kind of legal warfare against a presidential and possible if not likely opponent to the present president, is not only unprecedented in the history of our republic it will destroy our electoral system for all time. It is not something that should left to various district courts or local courts to sort out in the course of regular judicial proceedings. In fact, that is part of the intended strategy by the prosecutors who are engaged in this assault on our electoral system. They must not be rewarded for their behavior. They must not be rewarded for their treachery and exploitation of the legal system and the courts to achieve their political ends. Even without getting to the merits of these multitude of charges, which are easily unraveled from my perspective, the process is what is being used to interfere with the election. And the near silence by those who are orchestrating this shocking legal warfare, when the American people are left in the dark, is untenable. Therefore, I want to publicly encourage the Trump legal team to seek an emergency hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court, not to resolve legal disputes, but to at least temporarily halt the abomination of this legal warfare that is unfolding in front of us -- where Democrats and anti-Trump Republicans are unashamedly celebrating the use of the courts by the Biden administration and Democrat DA's to further their political wishes, as the rest of the nation watches in shock. This unprecedented legal warfare requires an unprecedented response by the only constitutional body left that can do something about it -- the Supreme Court.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
Importantly, the Presidential Records Act has NO criminal penalty because the Congress and Carter had no intention of criminalizing document retention matters. And never before has the 1917 Espionage Act was never even discussed as applying to a former president. There is no justification for criminalizing this matter against Trump.
@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin
A MUST-SEE Life, Liberty & Levin at 8 PM eastern tonight on Fox! Please do NOT miss it, from beginning to end! If you can’t watch Live, please be sure to DVR the show! It is an essential episode! See you then! God bless!