TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @mattgaetz

mattgaetz
Posted - October 21, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:13 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Bibi has been exposed.

@OANN - One America News

Israel lied… and Trump knew it. Breaking Points co-host @RyanGrim details how the Trump White House caught the Netanyahu government lying about Gaza ceasefire violations and intervened to uphold the deal. https://t.co/cZLy5QZdUM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ryan explains the observations about the violence in Rafa, referring to a map of the Rafa site. On Sunday, the IDF reported an RPG attack at Rafa Airport, which has not operated for some time. They also said snipers appeared, the IDF was trying to clear a tunnel, and that some fighters might be hiding in that tunnel. The key point, according to Ryan, is how far Rafa Airport is behind enemy lines, with IDF positions nearby and extensive rubble all around, and no tunnel network connecting Rafa to the rest of Gaza. This leads to two possibilities if the IDF story is accurate: either Hamas fighters managed to move through the rubble for kilometers to ambush from behind the lines, or they have been hiding in a tunnel for eight months since the area has been under IDF control for roughly eight months, raising questions about how they would be provisioned (food and water). Ryan then relays information from a source familiar with the situation who says that shortly after the attack, American intelligence indicated that a bulldozer operated by a settler company that has been destroying homes in Rafa ran over either unexploded ordinance or some improvised explosive device that had not detonated during the fighting in Rafa many months ago, and that the United States relayed this intel to Israel. He notes that there is a large stock of IDs and a large amount of unexploded ordnance from shells and bombs that did not explode, and that a bulldozer hitting such ordnance could cause an explosion. Ryan adds a fine point: if this account is true, it would suggest White House officials believe Israel lied to them. He states that they “believe” this, and when they conveyed that they knew what had happened, Netanyahu responded by reopening the crossings. Netanyahu had previously said that because of the attack, all crossings would be closed with no food or medicine entering. After the White House’s message related to Israel, Netanyahu announced the crossings would be reopened on Monday morning, just a few hours later due to the time difference. The closure and then rapid reversal are highlighted as a consequence of the White House’s position. The discussion then returns to whether US officials “called Netanyahu out” and whether Netanyahu’s initial story about the violence was challenged, leading to the reversal of the crossing closures.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ryan, what are you learning regarding the impetus for this violence in Rafa? We've got a map here of the site in question, so walk us through your observations. Speaker 1: Yeah. So on on Sunday, the IDF reported that there had been an RPG attack right here at if you look at the screen there at the what used to be the Rafa Airport. It's still still called the Rafa Airport. It hasn't operated in some time now. They also said that some snipers had come out, that that the IDF was trying to clear a tunnel, and that some fighters may have been hiding out in this tunnel. But what's important for people to understand when they look at this map here is, look how far behind enemy lines the this Rafa Airport is. So you have IDF positions right nearby. You have absolute moonscape rubble as far as the eye can see, and you don't have a tunnel network that connects to the rest of Gaza from there. So, there are two possibilities here, if the IDF story is accurate. You know, either some Hamas fighters managed to somehow sneak through this rubble for, you know, many kilometers, get behind the enemy lines, and then launch an ambush, or that just days after agreeing to a ceasefire, or they've been hiding out in this tunnel for eight months at this point, because the IDF has controlled this area for roughly eight months at this point, you know, how they would be provisioned, Speaker 0: you Speaker 1: know, food and water, you know. So those are the two credible possibilities. Now, what I was told, my source familiar with this situation, is that shortly after this happened, the Americans had intelligence that what happened was that a bulldozer, that was operated by a kind of settler company that is destroying homes in Rafa, the homes that remained standing, had run over either unexploded ordinance or some type of improvised explosive device that had had not detonated during the the fighting that had taken place in Rafe many months ago, and that The United States then relayed to Israel that they that they had this intel, that this is what had happened, that we know, like, there's enormous amount their IDs and there's enormous amount of unexploded ordnance from from shells in particular, but also from, you know, bombs dropped from the sky that hasn't blown up. And when a bulldozer runs over that, it might it might blow up, and that's what happened. Speaker 0: And Well, hold on. I I I wanna draw a fine point on that, Ryan, because if if that's true, it would seem to suggest that White House officials believe Israel has has lied to them. Is is that what you're reporting? Speaker 1: Yes. That's that's what that's what they believe. And they when they conveyed to them that they knew what had happened, if you noticed, shortly after that, Netanyahu said that he was opening the crossings back up. It's what he said. He said, alright. Because of this attack, we are closing just like they did on March 2. We're closing all of the crossings and no food, no medicine, nothing is getting in. After this message from the White House, which is related to Israel, Netanyahu announced, actually, we're gonna reopen them on Monday morning, which is just because of the time difference just a few hours later. So the closure of all of these crossings, this this major dramatic move that Netanyahu made was then, you know, fully reversed within a matter of hours. Speaker 0: But what and you attribute that to the fact that The US officials basically called Netanyahu out. That Netanyahu had this story about the violence. US officials say, we actually know that you're not telling us the truth, and then that explains the reversal.
mattgaetz
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 8:37 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Ambassador Huckabee - who I like a great deal - threatened Boycott, Divestment and Sanction of Israel earlier this year.

@ArutzSheva_En - Israel National News - Arutz Sheva

In a special interview, which will air shortly, US Amb. @GovMikeHuckabee spoke to Arutz Sheva about his friend, pro-Israel conservative activist #CharlieKirk, and slammed conspiracy theorists who claimed that Israel was behind his murder. @Yoni_Kempinski https://t.co/IA5MXm4xpk

Video Transcript AI Summary
So first of all, I have to ask you, how did we reach a situation that prime minister Netanyahu needs to clarify today that Israel was not involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Because there are some people in The United States that have lost their minds. This is a blood libel. It's absolutely disgusting and, vicious. The level of untruth is such that it's hard even to think that you have to defend it, that you have to repudiate it. But there are people who will believe the most outrageous lies, and I guess we should learn from history that this is not something new. Where does this stop? And it's really, really disgusting, but I'm very glad the prime minister addressed it. Charlie Kirk was a true friend of Israel. True friend of mine. I've known Charlie since he was 19. A brilliant, brilliant young man.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So first of all, I have to ask you, how did we reach a situation that prime minister Netanyahu needs to clarify today that Israel was not involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Speaker 1: Because there are some people in The United States that have lost their minds. This is a blood libel. It's absolutely disgusting and, vicious. The level of untruth is such that it's hard even to think that you have to defend it, that you have to repudiate it. But there are people who will believe the most outrageous lies, and I guess we should learn from history that this is not something new. But it is new in The US. It's something that we're not used to seeing, is these extraordinary untruths being said about Israel as if Israel is to blame for anything in the world. I I'm I'm wondering what's next. Did they kidnap the Lindbergh baby in the twenties? Did they, bring down the Hindenburg in the thirties? I mean, where does this stop? And it's really, really disgusting, but I'm very glad the prime minister addressed it. I know some people probably thought he didn't need to address that, but truthfully, you gotta push back on this nonsense. Speaker 0: And this is the point to add that Charlie Kirk was a true friend of Israel. Speaker 1: True friend of mine. I've known Charlie since he was 19. In fact, just before I came to live in Israel, he took the time slot for my daily television show. And so, I went to Phoenix at his studio. We made the handoff official. We visited for I was the first interview on his new show, and he was the last interview on my closing out the show. And Charlie had been on my shows over the years many times. A brilliant, brilliant young man. When I got the news, it was about 03:00 in the morning, my phone started ringing, and I got word that he had been shot and didn't know the condition. And then about, I don't know, an hour later, then I found out that he had died, and and it just it was something I couldn't process for a while, because why don't you kill Charlie Kirk? He was one of the most civil, kind, thoughtful people. He, he would go and he would let anyone challenge him. That was the whole point, but he did it with respect and decency. So I don't know what the shooter thought he was gonna do, but I'll tell you what he has done. He has awakened a sleeping giant in The United States. And not just among young conservatives, but he's awakened a sleeping giant, even among people who are a little left of center. But they know that you don't murder somebody because he says something you don't agree with. And one of the things I'm happy to see is that schools and governments, television networks, are not putting up with the nonsense where people who work for them are celebrating the murder of a young father and husband. And people are being terminated for this, and they should be because if I'm a, let's say, a patient of a doctor, and the doctor is saying, I'm glad he's dead, I don't wanna go to that doctor. I don't want my child in a school where the teacher celebrates the murder of somebody. So we're seeing some real reaction that needed to happen, Tova.
mattgaetz
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 12:13 PM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 6:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find the perspective from “Zionist donors” problematic because it ultimately leads to failure. Even if their demands were met, what happens next? Banning figures like Tucker, Candace, or Gaetz won't stop the growing audience that shares our views. Who would attend a conference focused solely on sending money abroad?

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

The problem with this perspective from the “Zionist donors” is that it inevitably fails. Even if their wishes were granted by Charlie (they weren’t), what’s next? After you ban Tucker/Candace/Gaetz, what’s next? You gonna ban the substantial portion of the audience that increasingly agrees with us based on their own observations? Who would go to a conference that is just @marklevinshow trying to send your money to a foreign country?

@RealCandaceO - Candace Owens

Charlie was falling out of love with Israel because they were controlling who he could invite to his conferences (as they did with me at Amfest) and therefore running afoul of his free speech values. Zionist donors were threatening him over Tucker, me, Matt Gaetz and others.

mattgaetz
Posted - September 17, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Saved - September 18, 2025 at 7:48 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

I’m just going to leave this here…

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

The Romans and Persians are gone, Charlie. The Jews are still here. How do you explain that?  And Israel has defeated the Iranian military. Did it in 2-days. Come back home, Charlie. Reject the kooks my friend. https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/charlie-kirk-warns-against-war-with-iran-not-even-the-romans-could-defeat-persia

Charlie Kirk Warns Against War With Iran: ‘Not Even the Romans Could Defeat Persia’ Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk criticized Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and other Republicans "cheering" for a war with Iran on Thursday. mediaite.com
mattgaetz
Posted - September 17, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:25 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

👀

@mtgreenee - Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸

Charlie Kirk invited me to speak at Amfest a few weeks ago before he was martyred. This was after I called for AIPAC to register under FARA and said that the nuclear armed secular government of Israel was committing genocide in Gaza and killing innocent children, Christians, and people. He asked if I wanted to debate about AIPAC but made it clear NOT against him. He said “we”, him - TPUSA, would do whatever I want on the issue. If you don’t know who to believe, between Bibi Netanyahu (a foreign country’s leader) or Charlie’s personal friends Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, I’m posting my last text message with Charlie. Believe Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson. And at the same time always remember: 1. Charlie Kirk is an American Christian. 2. Charlie Kirk is a devoted loving husband and father. 3. Charlie Kirk is a Christian movement leader, a giant in American history. 4. Charlie Kirk is a Christian martyr for Jesus Christ. 5. Charlie Kirk is a Free Speech warrior and was committed to non-violent debate. Do not allow a foreign country, foreign agents, and another religion tell you about Charlie Kirk. And I hope a foreign country and foreign agents and another religion does not take over Christian Patriotic Turning Point USA.

mattgaetz
Posted - September 17, 2025 at 3:43 AM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 4:55 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

I have personal knowledge as to many of the claims Tucker is making here. They are 100 percent true.

@AFpost - AF Post

Tucker Carlson said that Charlie Kirk told him at a TPUSA Student Action Summit last July to highlight Epstein’s connections to Mossad. Distinguishing between Netanyahu and the State of Israel, Carlson claimed that Kirk hated Netanyahu and his war against Gaza despite loving Israel, and that Kirk was “tormented” until the day he died by Zionist donors for platforming Carlson at his event. Two days before Kirk’s death, Carlson revealed that Kirk lost a $2 million donation for pledging to platform him at TPUSA’s December AmericaFest conference. Follow: @AFpost

Video Transcript AI Summary
Epstein clearly had contact with Israeli intelligence and American intelligence and French intelligence, but the only one you're not allowed to talk about is Israeli intelligence. "Go all the way." He calls Netanyahu's reaction to Charlie Kirk's death a "ghoulish and really repulsive reaction." He says, "Charlie didn't hate Jews. He loved Jews. He had tons of friends who were Jews. He loved the state of Israel. He loved going there." He asserts, "Charlie did not like Bibi Netanyahu" and was "appalled by what was happening in Gaza" and "resentful that he believed Netanyahu was using The United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for The United States." He notes donors, including that "two days before he died, he lost a $2,000,000 donation." He mentions the American Jewish Committee calling him "an anti Semite" and "dangerous," which he says "He was not an anti Semite. He was the opposite, and he was not dangerous." He concludes, "There are many liars out there... Bibi Netanyahu, number one among them, shamefully, who are trying to distort the truth, a truth that I know and can prove." "I don't know who murdered Charlie."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I said, Probably not going to talk about that. I'm not going to torture you. I know your donors hate this when I say that. And also Epstein was in the news and it was clear to me that Epstein's probably not like a Mossad agent or something, but Epstein clearly had contact with Israeli intelligence and American intelligence and French intelligence, but the only one you're not allowed to talk about is Israeli intelligence. But it seemed true to me, and I had done some work on that. I knew a bunch of people pretty close to that story. I thought that. And I said that to Charlie and I said, But I'm not going to say that because I don't want to make your donors mad. Know it's just going be like an endless flurry of texts telling you to stop or you're going to lose a bunch of funding. He looked at me, I'll never forget it, and said, Go all the way. Do it. Go all the way. I said, Man, a lot of things I can talk about. I don't need to talk about that. And he said, Do it. So I did it. By the way, think that that conversation hit a mic on and so did I, probably exists somewhere on somebody's server. But that's, I think, a faithful rendition of what he said. And by the way, I'm not trying to blame him for my remarks. You can agree or disagree with those remarks. But I'm saying this only because I was shocked and sickened by the reaction of the ghoulish and really repulsive reaction of the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, to Charlie's death. Basically made it all about him and all about his country immediately trying to take the energy, the sadness, the grief that people felt over Charlie's murder and redirect it towards support for whatever project he's involved in. And by the way, Benjamin Netanyahu is not the same as the nation of Israel at all. Bibi is despised by many people in Israel. And if you know people who live there, know that that's true. There are huge divisions within the Israeli government. There are certain parts of the intel world in Israel that do not support some things that Benjamin Netanyahu has done recently. So it's not the same as attacking Israel, attacking Bibi. But I don't think I've ever seen anything lower than his attempt to hijack Charlie's memory and use it for his own political ends, particularly because what he said was completely untrue. Charlie didn't hate Jews. He loved Jews. He had tons of friends who were Jews. He loved the state of Israel. He loved going there. He did not like Bibi Netanyahu, and he said that to me many times, and he said to people around him many times. He felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force. He was appalled by what was happening in Gaza. He was above all resentful that he believed Netanyahu was using The United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for The United States. He resented it. Didn't hate Netanyahu. He wasn't out there with a placard saying that, but he certainly expressed that to me and a lot of other people. There's no question that BB's defenders on the internet will call me a liar or a kook, but that's a fact. And enough text messages exist that I think it can probably be verified in pretty short order. Not that it needs to be because that is true. Shortly after that speech, there was a very intense attack on Charlie and to some extent, I mean, not that I really noticed, But on him, I have no donors. He had $100,000,000 worth of donors. And so because he was involved in a different project from just yapping on the internet, which is what I do for a living, he was dependent to a great extent on his donors, of course. It's a nonprofit. And they went after him and tormented him, not all, of course, many were supportive, but the ones who were offended by my speech, and there was a small, very intense group who were, tormented Charlie Kirk until the day he died. Two days before he died, he lost a $2,000,000 donation because he had publicly pledged to bring me to the next Turning Point conference in December. And he told me over the past couple of months, he was losing a lot of donations over that pledge. They put out a flyer basically saying that I was going to be at this event giving a speech. And so he would text me and say, Man, I'm really taking a lot of heat for this and people are really mad. The American Jewish Committee called in a statement Charlie Kirk an anti Semite and quote dangerous. Charlie Kirk, an anti Semite. Yeah. He was not an anti Semite. He was the opposite, and he was not dangerous. He was a great lover of people and a purveyor of peace. He was the opposite, and he was very stung by that. Those of us who've been called names for a long time are a little bit harder to offend. Charlie was deeply offended by that and expressed some of those feelings on Megyn Kelly's show and in other places, but that did not let up. The reason I'm telling this story is because he called me and then came to see me at my house about this topic. And I said to him every single time, Look, I've got my own way to communicate my views. This is actually not the most important issue to me. There are lots of things I can talk about. I don't need to come to Turning Point. I can take a year off, no problem. I hated seeing how much he was suffering, the hassle he was getting from people, and I was being attacked too. By the way, it was a huge effort. I wasn't fully aware of it actually because I don't go online that much, but there was a huge effort by people, some of whom I know and have helped and like Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee, for example. Someone who had his own problems with free speech who was famously canceled. And I like Seth Dillon. I had him on a couple of times. I had dinner with him to show support. Seth Dillon was out there demanding that Charlie Kirk take me off the roster, pull me off stage because I had said things that BB didn't like or that he didn't like or whatever. Shocking that someone whose whole persona is wrapped up in the idea that we all get to speak and if you don't like it, make a more compelling case That that person and many others like him were advocating for me getting pulled off the stage because they don't like what I'm saying. This is a trend and one that we should be really concerned about. It's not just about Israel, by the way, at all. The trend is really simple. People with power don't want to hear disagreement. They don't want to be challenged ever. That's why we have free speech, to acknowledge that even those of us or people with less power still have a right to talk because they're human beings. You don't own them. So time after time, Charlie would call me or come to see me and let me know. Wow. Or show me text messages. These people are really mad that you're speaking. And I would always have the same thought. Like, I feel pretty moderate, actually. I've never been an Israel hater. Obviously, I'm not an anti Semite. I just don't want more wars and I don't want a foreign country humiliating my country and telling us what our laws have to be. Mean, this seems like pretty basic America first stuff. And he would say, I totally agree with you, but they want you off the stage. And I would always say, no problem. And he would say, no, it's important. It's a matter of principle. I want you to be there. Great. By the way, I'm not accusing anyone of being involved in that murder. I'm not trying to mutter darkly or imply anything. We don't There's a lot we don't know about who murdered Charlie and why, but I I don't know, and I'm not gonna pretend that I do. But I think it's important to say that out loud because it's a fact and there are many liars out there trying Bibi Netanyahu, number one among them, shamefully, who are trying to distort the truth, a truth that I know and can prove.
mattgaetz
Posted - August 29, 2025 at 5:36 AM
Saved - August 30, 2025 at 1:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find this post from 2025 to be incredibly intriguing. AIPAC's accusation against MTG highlights their miscalculation, revealing significant bipartisan issues. This situation underscores AIPAC's greatest vulnerability: increasing opposition from both the political left and right. MTG's stance isn't isolated; support for Israel is declining due to AIPAC's role in fostering division and conflict. I believe they should register as foreign agents. I stand proudly with MTG and my fellow Americans.

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

This is the most fascinating X post of 2025. AIPAC thinks it’s an attack on MTG to accuse her of sharing the Squad’s unwillingness to be slavishly loyal to Israel. But what this attack reveals is that AIPAC has so badly “overplayed tbeir hand” that they now have REAL PROBLEMS on the political left and right. The post literally advertises their greatest weakness - growing bipartisan opposition. MTG isn’t some outlier here. Support for Israel is at a historic doldrum precisely because AIPAC has driven division, war and chaos. They should register as the foreign agents they are. I proudly stand with MTG and my fellow AMERICANS.

@AIPAC - AIPAC 🇺🇸🇮🇱🎗️

.@RepMTG has gone full Squad. Same message, same legislation, same anti-Israel vision. The horrible war is only happening because Hamas refuses to free the hostages & surrender power. Yet, MTG and her friends in the Squad won’t take any action to pressure Hamas to end it. Why?

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

If America was being bombed day and night because of something horrific our government did, and many innocent Americans and American children were being killed and traumatically injured, and we begged for mercy, but the rest of the world said, “Americans voted for their

mattgaetz
Posted - July 22, 2025 at 2:28 AM
Saved - July 22, 2025 at 2:47 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Yes. He lied to congress.

@OANN - One America News

Gaetz: Should John Brennan Be Prosecuted? @MikeBenzCyber: Absolutely! https://t.co/te0prtTPWC

mattgaetz
Posted - June 19, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Saved - June 20, 2025 at 6:46 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Well yeah

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

Matt Gaetz flips the script on Middle East diplomacy: If both Iran and Israel have secret nuclear programs with no IAEA oversight, why not have them both give them up? A dual disarmament deal, brokered by Trump, sealed with a Nobel Peace Prize. https://t.co/kpNSmHq68p

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes Israel's recent attack on Iran is politically motivated, referencing a close Knesset vote where Netanyahu narrowly avoided another election. They argue that focusing on Iran's nuclear program is a distraction, as North Korea poses a greater nuclear threat to the U.S. and Iran lacks the necessary delivery systems. The speaker highlights Israel's own uninspected nuclear program, suggesting a double standard. They propose a deal where both Iran and Israel denuclearize, potentially brokered by Trump. They draw a parallel to South Africa's denuclearization and the possibility of Israel needing to grant voting rights in the West Bank. The speaker criticizes the enthusiasm for regime change wars, citing the Iraq War as a costly failure that benefited China and ISIS. They question whether those advocating for regime change in Iran have sufficient knowledge about the country, referencing a senator who couldn't estimate Iran's population or ethnic makeup. They contrast the comfort of advocating for war from safe positions with the sacrifices made by those who fight and die in them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel didn't kick their regime change habit with Iraq or Libya or Syria, it seems. They need another fix. But, Matt, this isn't a regime change war. It's about Iran's nuclear program. I wish that were true, but it's not. Congresswoman Marjorie Marjorie Taylor Greene opined that maybe Netanyahu is so feisty about regime change in Iran because he was facing regime change in Israel. Speaker 1: It's not being reported enough that on Thursday, they held a vote in the Knesset, and it was only by two votes that Netanyahu won. If he had lost, they would have had another election in Israel, and the polling shows that he would lose if an election were to occur today. That vote happened last Thursday. And then Friday, Israel attacked attacked Iran. That's why the bombs are falling, and it seems very political. Speaker 0: Here's how you know this isn't about Iran's nuclear program. We aren't taking these steps to force denuclearization where the threat is higher and the leaders are even crazier. Take North Korea. North Korea's nuclear program is a far greater threat to The United States than Iran's. It is not even close. I know. I've had the briefings. I was on the House Armed Services Committee for eight years. Iran has neither the bomb, the delivery system, nor the reentry vehicle that you would need for any intercontinental ballistic missile to launch and reenter orbit. North Korea has all three. North Korea could launch a nuclear weapon at Mainland United States today. And we've probably got the ability to knock it out of the sky, but Iran can't even get their bird in the air. Iran's death to America chant isn't really my bag, obviously. But Kim in the Hermit Kingdom points to US cities like Los Angeles and San Diego and Seattle on maps, and he openly discusses wiping off major US population centers from existence. Of course, we aren't looking to drop a 100 bunker busters in the mountains of North Korea. President Trump took other brilliant diplomatic steps to constrain North Korea's hostilities. And the same could be done with Iran. But mad. Iran has kicked out IAEA inspectors. There could be portions of their nuclear program that are secret. A nuclear secret in The Middle East. How about it? If the world is interested in a secret nuclear program in The Middle East, there is a country that won't allow any international inspectors. Israel. Israel has a nuclear weapon. Did you know that? I do. They allow no inspections. They are fully secretive and clandestine about it, and the Americans are fully aware. You know what? I don't even blame Israel for this. If they wanna develop a nuclear weapon, if they had the blessing to do so secretly, I'm not in judgment of that. But to drag the world into a regime change war over secret nuclear weapons when you have secret nuclear weapons is a bit hypocritical. President Trump is the kind of guy who never gives up on a deal. Throughout his life, he's probably made deals and made lots of money on them even when others walked away or didn't see value in a transaction. So here's a deal. How about Iran and Israel both give up their secret nuclear weapon programs? If Trump got that deal, he wouldn't only get the Nobel Peace Prize, they'd probably name it the Trump Peace Prize forevermore. And it's not that crazy to think about Israel denuclearizing. Look at the model in South Africa. South Africa denuclearized right before they stopped being an apartheid state. Prominent voices in Israel and America have called for Trump to recognize Israel's sovereignty over Judea And Samaria, which some people call the West Bank. If that happens, Israel will have to let the five to 6,000,000 people who live there vote, and they don't wanna do that. I'm not calling Israel an apartheid state right now. I don't think they are. But if they are ruling the West Bank, as the neocons would suggest, then the South Africa model for denuclearization is not totally off base. There's a certain bravado at the beginning of a Middle East regime change war. There's enthusiasm, bold predictions of swift victory, and usually a total misunderstanding of what happens next. And the leading voice championing regime change wars for decades has been Fox News. Speaker 2: We must do the right thing. Saddam is evil and a threat to the world. He must go. We should have just taken 1441 and rammed it down Saddam's throat. It is dangerous to allow an evil dictator to remain in power. Now if you want a chance that Saddam would never use those deadly weapons, that is your right in a free society and I respect that right. But I don't want a chance that. Saddam Hussein is the largest army in the Middle East. Alright? He has developed these weapons for no purpose. He doesn't need them defensively. Alright? He doesn't need them at all. He's used them as you know. Alright? And he's invaded two other countries. But this isn't enough for you to have him removed. You need to think you're dead wrong. I don't think that there's any reason on this earth that that man should remain in power. In the end, Saddam will be removed from power, and the world will be a better place. Speaker 3: Tragically, will lose American lives, but it will be brief. We're gonna find out massive evidence of weapons of mass destruction. Speaker 4: I am confident that all those things that you predict are going to come true, and a lot of people that have been laying out the case against us are gonna be very embarrassed. Speaker 5: Iraqi regime did not and has not disarmed. Saddam Hussein is deemed by the White House a threat to American national security, a brutal, murderous dictator, and a menace to the world. It is the hope of the administration and the goal of the war planners that disarmament and regime change be accomplished as swiftly as practical. Some number of our sons and daughters, our brothers and sisters will give their lives for the cause of freedom. Speaker 6: Things that we haven't seen in the past, very accurate weapons, very lethal. The Moab is a daisy cutter on steroids, and Iraq is not prepared for what's gonna be thrown at them. Speaker 0: Oh, Iraq wasn't prepared. Daisy cutter? This is how easily the so called foreign policy experts believed we would carve our way through Iraq. I saw how many of our bravest patriots were pushing up daisies as a consequence of that war. I went to their funerals. I visited their gravesites. I saw the true cost of a flawed regime change war in The Middle East. The problem is we had no plan to get out. Iraq cost America $3,000,000,000,000, and this distraction and disaster aided in both the rise of China and ISIS. Whoever was telling you that we had the ability to topple a regime in Iraq and then come out with something better was either one, lying to you or, two, so wholly ignorant about the country they were invading that their lack of knowledge or curiosity or understanding led to blood and terrorism and chaos. So as we approach the 2025 vintage of regime change wars in Iran, I wonder if those now cheerleading attacks on Iran know anything about the country they wanna topple. Speaker 7: How many people live in Iran, by the way? Speaker 8: I I don't know the population. Speaker 7: At all? Speaker 8: No. I don't know the population. Speaker 7: You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple? How Speaker 8: many people live in Iran? 92,000,000. Okay. Yeah. How Speaker 7: could you not know that? Speaker 8: I I don't sit around memorizing population tables. Speaker 7: Well, it's kind of relevant because you're calling for the overthrow of the government. Speaker 8: Why is it relevant whether it's Well, because 90,000,000 or 80,000,000 or a 100,000,000? Why is that relevant? Speaker 7: If you don't know anything about the country Speaker 8: I didn't say I don't know anything about Speaker 7: the Okay. What's the ethnic mix of Iran? Speaker 8: They are Persians and predominantly Okay. Speaker 7: No, no. Don't know anything about Iran. So Okay. I'm not Speaker 8: the the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran. A senator Speaker 7: who's calling to overthrow the government. You're the one who knows anything about the country. Speaker 0: It's easy to sit in a senator's office or a perch in the Pentagon and send out tweets, press releases, and blustered statements about war. Nobody is shooting missiles at you in a Fox News studio. People barely even shoot divergent opinions at you in that myopathy. That's the comfortable political move in the short term, to support regime change wars. But that comfort is not shared by those who have to go fight in these wars and die in them, and many will.
mattgaetz
Posted - June 19, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Saved - June 19, 2025 at 5:58 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

I wish every country would give up their nuclear weapons. Then we’d never have to worry about the N-word again!

@hodgetwins - Hodgetwins

We know why Gaetz wasn’t picked for AG He’s calling for both Iran and Israel to give up their nukes https://t.co/UtnLTnNLXa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Iran has kicked out IAEA inspectors, potentially concealing parts of its nuclear program. Israel, which won't allow inspections and is secretive about its nuclear weapons, is also a concern. The speaker does not blame Israel for wanting nuclear weapons but finds it hypocritical to push for regime change wars over secret nuclear weapons when it has them. The speaker suggests a deal where both Iran and Israel give up their secret nuclear weapon programs. The speaker references South Africa's denuclearization before ending apartheid and notes that if Israel recognizes sovereignty over Judea and Samaria, it may have to enfranchise millions of Palestinians. The speaker believes that the South Africa model for denuclearization is not totally off base. The speaker criticizes the Iraq War, stating it cost America $3 trillion and aided the rise of China and ISIS. The speaker questions whether those advocating for attacks on Iran understand the country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But mad. Iran has kicked out IAEA inspectors. There could be portions of their nuclear program that are secret. A nuclear secret in The Middle East. How about it? If the world is interested in a secret nuclear program in the Middle East, there is a country that won't allow any international inspectors. Israel. Israel has a nuclear weapon. Did you know that? I do. They allow no inspections. They are fully secretive and clandestine about it, and the Americans are fully aware. You know what? I don't even blame Israel for this. If they wanna develop a nuclear weapon, if they had the blessing to do so secretly, I'm not in judgment of that. But to drag the world into a regime change war over secret nuclear weapons when you have secret nuclear weapons is a bit hypocritical. So here's the deal. How about Iran and Israel both give up their secret nuclear weapon programs? If Trump got that deal, he wouldn't only get the Nobel Peace Prize, they'd probably name it the Trump Peace Prize forevermore. And it's not that crazy to think about Israel denuclearizing. Look at the model in South Africa. South Africa denuclearized right before they stopped being an apartheid state. Prominent voices in Israel and America have called for Trump to recognize Israel's sovereignty over Judea And Samaria, which some people call the West Bank. If that happens, Israel will have to let the five to 6,000,000 people who live there vote. And they don't want to do that. I'm not calling Israel an apartheid state right now. I don't think they are. But if they are ruling the West Bank, as the neocons would suggest, then the South Africa model for denuclearization is not totally off base. There's a certain bravado at the beginning of a Middle East regime change war. There's enthusiasm, bold predictions of swift victory, and usually a total misunderstanding of what happens next. Oh, Iraq wasn't prepared. Daisy cutter? This is how easily the so called foreign policy experts believed we would carve our way through Iraq. I saw how many of our bravest patriots were pushing up daisies as a consequence of that war. I went to their funerals, I visited their gravesites. I saw the true cost of a flawed regime change war in The Middle East. The problem is we had no plan to get out. Iraq cost America $3,000,000,000,000, and this distraction and disaster aided in both the rise of China and ISIS. Whoever was telling you that we had the ability to topple a regime in Iraq and then come out with something better was either one, lying to you or two, so wholly ignorant about the country they were invading that their lack of knowledge or curiosity or understanding led to blood and terrorism and chaos. So as we approach the 2025 vintage of regime change wars in Iran, I wonder if those now cheerleading attacks on Iran know anything about the country they want to topple.
mattgaetz
Posted - June 18, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Saved - June 19, 2025 at 2:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see parallels between the current rhetoric and Bush's "you're with us or you're with the terrorists." It felt good initially, but led to prolonged conflicts and political shifts. I'm not supporting Iran or Putin; I'm simply anti-war when U.S. interests and exit strategies are unclear.

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

This is the 2025 version of Bush saying “you’re with us or you’re with the terrorists.” It felt good for awhile, then it resulted in Forever Wars, Republicans losing control of Congress, and Obama being elected. It was a dumb argument then and now. I’m not “pro-Iran” I’m not “pro-Putin” I’m anti-war when the US interest and exit plans are unclear and uncertain.

@EconomicDefense - Economic Defense Fund - Macro Long/Short Equities

@OANN Glad you found who's good and who's bad @mattgaetz. Moral clarity is important. You chose to side with the IRGC against Israel.

mattgaetz
Posted - June 17, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 9:22 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

He’s so good. https://t.co/Op8h6WjQr4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The war in Iraq was a mistake by George Bush. The U.S. should have never been in Iraq because it destabilized the Middle East. The speaker claims "they" lied about weapons of mass destruction, asserting that there were none.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obviously, the war in Iraq was a big fat mistake. George Bush made a mistake. We can make mistakes, but that one was a beauty. We should have never been in Iraq. We have destabilized the Middle East. But they lied. Okay. They said there were weapons of mass destruction. There weren't none.
mattgaetz
Posted - March 25, 2025 at 1:54 AM
Saved - March 25, 2025 at 10:36 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

The DOJ is telling the judge: it’s over, move on https://t.co/C7wC2UZmEC

mattgaetz
Posted - March 12, 2025 at 9:12 PM
Saved - March 13, 2025 at 12:11 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

BREAKING: Ousted @SpeakerMcCarthy joins think tank with @johnpodesta, who ran Hillary Clinton’s campaign!

@AspenEcon - Aspen Economic Strategy Group

Today, the AESG announced eleven new members are joining our bipartisan group. We are also pleased to welcome back three members who recently completed their service in the Biden administration. https://t.co/nbMlDu8FS9

mattgaetz
Posted - March 1, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 2:13 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

So great https://t.co/tfqhDCfN40

mattgaetz
Posted - February 23, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Saved - February 23, 2025 at 8:31 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

This is the Governor of Maine at a drag show. In related news, shrooms are awesome. https://t.co/HFTfPgUjvh

Video Transcript AI Summary
The end is inevitable when the truth is revealed. You can try to escape, but ultimately, you're just digging your own grave.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The truth comes down. When the truth comes out. You can run, but you know it's ending. At the bottom of the grave, you're digging out.
mattgaetz
Posted - February 9, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Saved - February 9, 2025 at 11:33 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Question for @hotelindigo https://t.co/LLra6Gxr62

Video Transcript AI Summary
I saw water jugs near the San Diego border, set up by someone, possibly an NGO. They were near the Hotel Indigo. I'm curious if this is a Hotel Indigo initiative, a targeted strategy, or if the water was stolen and placed there. Perhaps Hotel Indigo can clarify their involvement. Was this a deliberate action, or was their water improperly used? I'd appreciate any information to understand the situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I'm out on the San Diego border, and there are these piles of water set up by NGOs, or someone, and it's the Hotel Indigo. So I don't know. Hotel Indigo, you let me know. Is this is this a special brand, strategy you have for illegal aliens coming through the country, or maybe did somebody rip you off, steal your water, and then put it out on the San Diego border? Maybe you'll let us know.
mattgaetz
Posted - January 29, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Saved - January 30, 2025 at 1:43 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

We are defunding the invasion.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

BREAKING: DHS Secretary Kristi announces that all grant funding to NGOs facilitating the invasion of American has been STOPPED. This is big. https://t.co/pkvMVFVg2z

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're announcing that we've halted all grant funding to NGOs that facilitate illegal immigration. It's shocking how much federal money has been misused in this way. I've taken action to reevaluate these funds to ensure taxpayer dollars are used to strengthen our country and keep it safe. We need to scrutinize how federal grants are utilized. No more money will be spent to undermine our nation. We will uphold President Trump's commitment to secure our border, remove those here illegally, and ensure taxpayer funds are not used to support this situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So now let's turn back to the border quickly. Now joining me is the Department of Homeland Security Secretary, Kristi Noem, who has an exclusive announcement on more action her department is taking. Secretary, thanks for being with us here today. I understand you have something to share with us that we haven't heard yet about what you're gonna be doing at DHS. Speaker 1: Yes. Well, thank you, Will, for inviting me to be with you. Today, we are announcing that we have stopped all grant funding that's being abused by NGOs to facilitate illegal immigration into this country. So it's amazing to me the 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars that have been spent by the federal government that has been sent to NGOs to facilitate this invasion of our country. So, I've taken action to stop that of our country. So, I've taken action to stop that those funds to reevaluate them and to make sure, that we're actually using the taxpayer dollars in a way that strengthens this country, that keeps us safe. So I think people are curious when we look at grants that are given out by federal agencies at how they're utilized, and that evaluation needs to be done. We're not spending another dime, to help the destruction of this country. We're gonna make sure that we follow through on what president Trump has promised, and that's to make sure that we're securing our border, departing those who are here illegally, and, committing criminal actions. And that our taxpayer dollars aren't spending aren't spent to help it.
mattgaetz
Posted - January 25, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Saved - January 26, 2025 at 4:19 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Confirm @TulsiGabbard! https://t.co/NHOzdRXQUK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Key national security confirmations for the Trump administration are underway in the Senate. Tulsi Gabbard's important confirmation hearing is scheduled for Thursday. Gabbard, a former congresswoman and military veteran, has been a strong advocate for truth on the House Armed Services Committee. She has shown courage by opposing her own party's impeachment efforts against President Trump and standing up to Kamala Harris during presidential debates. As the director of National Intelligence, she is expected to defend constitutional rights and challenge those promoting unnecessary wars.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now all of this is happening against the backdrop of key national security confirmations for the Trump administration before the United States Senate. Former congresswoman, Tulsi Gabbard, has her critical senate confirmation hearing on Thursday. I know Tulsi well. She was a warrior for our nation in uniform and a warrior for the truth on the House Armed Services Committee where we both served. She stood up to her own Democrat party and refused to vote to impeach president Trump. She stood up to Kamala Harris in the presidential debates. As director of National Intelligence, she will stand up to those who have violated our constitutional rights while they cheerlead for needless, endless war.
mattgaetz
Posted - January 20, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 9:03 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Oh that’s good…

@SeanYoo - sean yoo

when you realize you took an edible before doing something serious https://t.co/Yz1ArvHFqH

mattgaetz
Posted - January 20, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 8:48 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

😂

@NatashaBertrand - Natasha Bertrand

Update: this Milley portrait is no longer up in the Pentagon hallway, just 10 days after it was unveiled… h/t @OrenCNN https://t.co/DdUeEEZ9zR

mattgaetz
Posted - January 11, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Saved - January 12, 2025 at 2:15 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Multiple male FBI agents once startled and scared my ex in a dark parking garage after she got off work. They tried to get her to lie. She refused. She called me after and asked, “Doesn’t the FBI have better things to do than ask me about gifts my ex-boyfriend got me 3 years ago?”

@Cobratate - Andrew Tate

They love to threaten your exs. Trying to scare girls into lying. They kicked my exs door down at 5am the day after she refused to give a negative statement against me and re interviewed her hoping the police raid would scare her into changing her story. These are the "good guys"

mattgaetz
Posted - December 26, 2024 at 3:45 PM
Saved - December 27, 2024 at 1:01 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Ban Congressional Stock Trading!

@QuiverQuant - Quiver Quantitative

Viasat stock has now risen 41% since we posted this report. It's been just over a month. Up another 6% so far today: https://t.co/nYhpBOBcHn

mattgaetz
Posted - December 25, 2024 at 4:41 PM
Saved - December 26, 2024 at 9:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Merry Christmas! I want to share some key points from the House Ethics Report. The alleged "prostitutes" confirmed there was no agreement for sex in exchange for money. The supposed "minor victim" claims I was at a party, but logs prove otherwise. This individual also dropped similar allegations against a friend when faced with inconsistencies. They attempted to extort me for money. I helped a woman I dated with a passport appointment, as I often did for Floridians. Over the years, I supported several women I dated and occasionally used marijuana, sometimes having someone else get it for me. Lastly, the Biden/Garland DOJ investigated me for years without any charges.

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Merry Christmas! A few key take aways from the House Ethics Report: ⁃the alleged “prostitutes” testified that there was never an agreement to exchange sex for money with me ⁃the alleged “minor victim” says I was at a party where the community gate logs show otherwise ⁃the alleged “‘minor victim” abandoned similar allegations against my friend in a civil lawsuit when confronted with her inconsistent statements ⁃the alleged “minor victim” tried unsuccessfully to shake me down for money ⁃I got a passport appointment for a 27 year old woman I dated (I regularly did this for Floridians in a travel bind, as was my job) ⁃I provided financial support to about a dozen women I dated over half a decade in my mid 30’s. ⁃I have used marijuana, and would occasionally have someone else acquire it for me. - the Biden/Garland DOJ investigated me for years without accusing me of any crime.

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

ANOTHER ONE of the ethics witnesses who was an alleged “prostitute” claims she was indeed NOT when actually pressed in a deposition. This won’t be in the “ethics” report because of course. https://t.co/SpZDPitbRp

mattgaetz
Posted - December 25, 2024 at 6:19 PM
Saved - December 26, 2024 at 3:07 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

This thread shows how people coordinated to lie about me.

@FmrRepMattGaetz - Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

My final response to the Ethics Committee: https://t.co/iCBR3fyB6D

mattgaetz
Posted - December 23, 2024 at 11:52 PM
Saved - December 24, 2024 at 9:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m being accused of attending a party five years ago, but the gate log shows I wasn’t there. Others who were there are listed, yet some who claim to remember me admit to being on drugs. It's as if they also recall seeing Jimmy Hoffa and Tupac there.

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

I’m accused of being at some party five years ago. Here is the gate log for that home, in a community that checks DL’s for entrants. I’m not on the log. The other attendees are. But people who said they were on drugs say they remember me there. Do they also remember seeing Jimmy Hoffa there? And TuPac?

mattgaetz
Posted - December 23, 2024 at 2:54 PM
Saved - December 24, 2024 at 2:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m baffled that giving money to someone I’m dating, without any expectation, is being labeled as prostitution. It’s telling that this was reported on Christmas Eve-Eve, avoiding a courtroom where I could present my evidence and challenge witnesses. This testimony from one of the alleged “prostitutes” is missing from the report.

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Giving funds to someone you are dating - that they didn’t ask for - and that isn’t “charged” for sex is now prostitution?!? There is a reason they did this to me in a Christmas Eve-Eve report and not in a courtroom of any kind where I could present evidence and challenge witnesses. This is testimony from one of the alleged “prostitutes” that you won’t see in the report!

mattgaetz
Posted - December 10, 2024 at 1:48 PM
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 4:10 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

I’m one of only a few members of Congress who has gone through the J6 committee files. Things were purposely deleted. Especially in re Steve Bannon!

@OANN - One America News

Cheney Slams Trump After Stating J6 Committee Should Be Jailed For Suspiciously 'Deleting and Destroying' Evidence https://www.oann.com/newsroom/cheney-slams-trump-after-stating-j6-committee-should-be-jailed-for-suspiciously-deleting-and-destroying-evidence/ #OAN

Cheney Slams Trump After Stating J6 Committee Should Be Jailed For Suspiciously 'Deleting and Destroying' Evidence Former GOP Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, a harsh critic of President-elect Donald Trump, blasted him after he stated that House committee members who “destroyed” January 6th evidence should go to jail, characterizing Trump’s comments as another “assault on the rule of law.” oann.com
mattgaetz
Posted - November 25, 2024 at 10:37 PM
Saved - November 27, 2024 at 4:27 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

100 percent innocent! https://t.co/f3hM8hYv6m

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congratulations to President Trump for being found not guilty. It's important to recognize that if the election outcome had been different, the charges would still be pursued. This victory is significant for all Americans, but we must remember how close we came to serious conflict during this process, including an assassination attempt on Trump. The stakes were high; it was either victory or prison for him, as he wouldn't have received a fair trial. While we celebrate this win, we must work to prevent anyone from facing such a situation again and strive to make America great again.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congrats to president Trump for being 100% not guilty, but I want all Americans to remember this. If we had somehow not prevailed in this election, Jack Smith would not be dismissing these charges. He would be proceeding to trial. And though this monumental victory was won for all Americans led by president Trump, we have to remember, just like we came within fractions of fractions from civil war when president Trump survived an assassination attempt. We also were just fractions away from, like, these people trying to throw Donald Trump in prison. So while all of us are grateful for this victory, for Trump, it was victory or prison because he wasn't gonna get a fair trial. It was gonna be some knock down, drag out deal with a predetermined outcome. So enjoy the victory, president Trump, but the rest of us have to do all we can to ensure that no one is ever put in this type of a situation again, and we make America great again.
mattgaetz
Posted - March 16, 2022 at 12:24 AM
Saved - November 16, 2024 at 9:18 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

BREAKING VIDEO: Unconstitutional Pre-Dawn FBI Raid on Project Veritas Journalist Shows Armed Agents Clutching Weapons, Tossing Belongings, and Ransacking Home at Direction of Biden DOJ “LET ME SEE YOUR HANDS!” #VeritasRaids https://t.co/zNBrkWi1Cj

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hidden camera footage shows the FBI raiding the home of a Project Veritas journalist last November. This invasion of First Amendment rights is alarming for journalists nationwide. The government targeted Project Veritas, following our lawful acquisition of materials related to Ashley Biden's diary in 2020, which we chose not to publish and returned to local law enforcement. This raid is part of a broader effort to intimidate and silence journalists, but Project Veritas remains committed to defending our rights and those of all journalists. More revelations about the SDNY's attacks on journalism are forthcoming, and we will continue to fight for our First Amendment protections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. So what is this regarding? This is a third floor. Open up. What you're about to see is very disturbing. Hidden camera footage capturing the moments the FBI raided the home of a Project Veritas journalist last November. The government's invasion of our first amendment rights should send shivers down the spine of every journalist around the country. Months ago, I explained how the government conducted predawn raids at my home and at the homes of 2 former Project Veritas journalists. Many came to our defense, including the ACLU, the Society of Professional Journalists, the Committee to Protect Journalists, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, as well as the Freedom of the Press Foundation. Federal prosecutors from the Department of Justice in the Southern District of New York and the FBI appear to have targeted Project Veritas because of our investigative journalism. In 2020, we lawfully received material from sources concerning Ashley Biden's diary and what it said about her father, then presidential candidate Joe Biden. We ultimately decided not to publish the story and worked with local law enforcement to return these materials to her. What you've just seen is an effort by the government to intimidate and silence us as journalists, but Project Veritas will never be silenced. The First Amendment protects journalists and all people who speak out. We will stand firm to vindicate our own First Amendment rights, fight for the rights of our fellow journalists and all Americans. This footage of the FBI raid isn't even the most shocking thing about the SDNY's attacks against journalism. There's more coming out soon. We are just getting started.
mattgaetz
Posted - September 3, 2024 at 12:50 PM
Saved - September 4, 2024 at 4:15 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Trump is right They aren’t sending their best Kamala would bring this to every neighborhood

@nypost - New York Post

Today's cover: Migrants flooding NYC’s justice system — making up ‘75% of arrests in Midtown’ — as ‘pathetic’ sanctuary city laws handcuff cops https://trib.al/YsNOiuM

SocialFlow trib.al
mattgaetz
Posted - July 25, 2022 at 6:07 PM
Saved - May 1, 2024 at 4:38 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Today on @TheView Whoopi Goldberg strongly disagreed with my assessment that people who rally at these Pro-Abortion, Pro-Murder events are disgusting and need to work in a salad. https://t.co/Q0qnTxQf8H

mattgaetz
Posted - October 28, 2023 at 1:22 PM
Saved - October 29, 2023 at 12:43 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Elect this man New York Mayor immediately https://t.co/Eim2vZDI4z

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, a veteran, expresses their opinion about someone wearing a Palestine flag in New York City. They assert that in the US, everyone has the right to express themselves freely, but throwing the flag on the floor is disrespectful. The speaker threatens to litter on the floor with the person if they continue to disrespect the flag. They also mention that the person is not Jewish, but it doesn't matter. The speaker challenges the person to prove their claims and tells them to stop lying. The transcript ends abruptly.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright? I'm a veteran. I'm telling you. Right? Don't republic. And I'm not fucking Jewish. He's not Jewish. I don't know if he is not it doesn't fucking matter. This is fucking the US. That's New York City. You don't have a fucking right to touch that shit. It's a free country. You can wear your Palestine flag and Yeah. You are. When you throw that on the floor, you're literally in the city. In a minute, I'm gonna litter on the fucking floor with you. So move the fuck You have proof they're not you're not no. So shut the fuck up. I'm not sure. You want that straight? I know that's what you want. Don't lie. Die
mattgaetz
Posted - October 5, 2023 at 5:55 PM
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 6:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Negotiating with GOP colleagues on motion to vacate. RepRoKhanna's reforms are key. What's the desired MTV threshold? Willing to accommodate.

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Ok. Let’s negotiate. My GOP colleagues want to raise the threshold on the motion to vacate. This is a question for all of them. If we enact the reforms @RepRoKhanna lays out here…. How high would you like the MTV threshold to be? Because I’ll basically give you whatever you want on the MTV for this stuff

@QuiverQuant - Quiver Quantitative

Last month, Rep. Ro Khanna announced an anti-corruption plan that includes a: - Ban on congressional stock trading - 12-year term limit for Congress - Ban on political donations from lobbyists or PACs. He mentioned Quiver Quantitative’s work in his speech on the House floor:

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am introducing a 5 point plan to address the frustration and exhaustion of the American people regarding corruption and big money in Congress. Firstly, I propose banning all PAC and lobbyist money in congressional campaigns, as I do not accept any of it. Secondly, I suggest a complete ban on stock trading and prohibit members of Congress from becoming lobbyists. Thirdly, I propose implementing term limits for both members of Congress and Supreme Court Justices. Lastly, an ethics code should be established for Supreme Court Justices. These reforms are common sense and demanded by the people. It's time to return the government to the people and bring about change in Washington. Bipartisan support for this plan is crucial. Thank you.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: American people are frustrated and exhausted with the corruption and role of big money in the halls of Congress. That is why I'm introducing a 5 point plan. 1st, ban all PAC and lobbyist money to congressional campaigns. I don't take a dime of it. Second, ban completely stock trading And members of Congress from ever becoming lobbyists, activists like Unusual Whales, Quiver Quantitative, and the leaders at CREW have been mobilizing for this. 3rd, term limits for members of Congress. 4th, term limits for Supreme Court Justices. And 5th, an ethics code for Supreme Court Justices. This is common sense. The people demand it. It's time we give them back their government and we reform in Washington. We should have bipartisan support for this 5 point plan. Thank you Madam
mattgaetz
Posted - October 2, 2023 at 11:45 PM
Saved - October 2, 2023 at 11:58 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Just did.

@SpeakerMcCarthy - Kevin McCarthy

Bring it on.

mattgaetz
Posted - September 25, 2023 at 1:10 PM
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 6:29 PM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

Trump agrees with me Not @SpeakerMcCarthy No Continuing Resolution Break the Fever Hold the Line

mattgaetz
Posted - August 31, 2023 at 6:46 PM
Saved - September 2, 2023 at 4:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump charged with 91 counts; GOP House falls short on key issues: no vote on term limits, balanced budget, individual appropriations bills, full J6 tape release, or spending cuts to raise debt limit. No subpoenas for Hunter Biden or any Biden. Positive reforms insufficient; time for change.

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

No vote on Term Limits No vote on a balanced budget No plan to have individual appropriations bills considered No full release of J6 tapes No spending cut to raise the Debt Limit. Trump has been charged with 91 counts. We haven’t even subpoenaed Hunter Biden - or any Biden for that matter. I know it is the tendency of political leaders to self-preen, but the truth is that while some GOP House work has made positive reforms - it isn’t good enough. Not even close, actually. We are going to have to seize the initiative and make some changes.

@SpeakerMcCarthy - Kevin McCarthy

Republicans have made this Congress more productive, more open, and more transparent than at any time in recent history. The People’s House is getting back to work.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In comparing this Congress to the previous one, it's interesting to note that despite the Democrats having control over the house, senate, and presidency in the last Congress, this Congress has actually produced more bills that have become law. This is due to the changes we have made, such as opening up the House and requiring members to come to work. Bills now have to go through committee and there is a 72-hour reading period, not just for members but also for the American public. This return to a more transparent and inclusive process is a positive step towards fulfilling our commitment to the American people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Someone did an analysis of this congress versus the last congress. And, the last congress, the Democrats controlled the house, the senate, and the presidency, but this Congress actually has produced more bills, more to become law, which makes it more difficult. But the bigger things we also change is we open the House back up, Members now have to come to work, bills have to go through committee, you get 72 hours of read it, not just the members, but the people, the American public themselves. The people's house is back, and so I think that's a very big positive and we continue to work on that with which was our commitment to America.
mattgaetz
Posted - April 19, 2023 at 5:29 PM
Saved - April 20, 2023 at 12:22 AM

@mattgaetz - Matt Gaetz

BREAKING: Top Army General ADMITS that the BIZARRE practice of forcing women to shower w biological males is harmful to Army recruiting. Meanwhile, the Biden admin official defended the creepy showers! https://t.co/dGOsqhSYl4

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a congressional hearing, concerns were raised about the negative impact of certain diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities on the army's recruiting efforts. One specific example discussed was the use of showers by transgender service members. The army's policy states that soldiers should use facilities based on their gender marker in official records. The congressperson questioned whether this approach promotes cohesive team building and suggested that it may hinder recruitment efforts, particularly among women. The general acknowledged the importance of privacy and creating an environment where everyone can thrive but emphasized the army's focus on building highly trained and disciplined teams. The congressperson expressed concerns about potential sexual harassment and the impact on recruitment, especially in certain regions of the country. The general admitted that such activities may not help recruitment efforts. The hearing concluded with a call for reflection on the potential damage caused by the army's approach to DEI.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When secretary Austin was here, neither he nor general Milley could defend some of the bizarre DEI activities that were going on at Dodoah. And then promptly after my questioning, they shut down the DEI entity at Dodoa. And so, like, maybe we can make similar progress today. Miss Warmoth, do you acknowledge that some of the strange manifestations of this DEI embrace have put negative pressures on the army's recruiting? Speaker 1: Congressman, I'm not sure exactly what specifically you're referring to, but when we've done surveys put Speaker 0: that slide up on the screen? I'll give you one. I thought that might be where this was going. So this is a vignette aid. It's an army training, and it's regarding the use of showers. The vignette reads, a a soldier transitioned from male to female as indicated in Deers. The soldier did not have sex reassignment surgery. The transgender service member is using the female showers and has expressed privacy concerns regarding the open bay shower configuration. Similarly, other soldiers have expressed discomfort showering with a female who has male genitalia. And then if you look over at Subpart 3 regarding the considerations, it just says, all soldiers will use the billeting, bathroom, and shower facilities associated with their gender marker in Deers. What's your reaction to that? Speaker 1: My reaction, congressman, is we're focused on building Cohesive teams that are trained, disciplined, and Speaker 0: General McGonville, I'll give you the next chance. Do you think that it builds cohesive teams to have biological males showering with women? Speaker 2: I think we need to respect the privacy of our soldiers and and have a environment where everyone can thrive. Speaker 0: Well, of course, but that's not an answer to my question. Speaker 2: Well, that's the Speaker 0: You you and I spent a good amount of productive time yesterday talking about Cohesive team building. Speaker 2: We did. Speaker 0: Does this advance cohesive team building in your best military opinion? Speaker 2: Well, I think the fact we're talking about this and not talking about war fighting, is is is problematic. Well, but Speaker 0: that's what the army does, general. I'm looking here. Army policy on transgender military service where you guys require training on this stuff. So don't you think that when you require training on how to deal with men and women's shower stalls and the and when you have these mandatory trainings on transgender service members, that that takes away from our focus on war fighting? Speaker 2: Yeah. I think I think what you know, again, from chief staff of the army, My focus is very clear. I talk to every commander, every sergeant mate in the army. I do it every single month, and what I talk about is Our job is build cohesive teams that are highly trained, they're disciplined, they're fit, and they're ready to fight and win. And that's where I'm at. Speaker 0: But, right, but I I am positing that when there is a focus on how biological men are gonna shower with women and on unconscious bias training, which you require, and on mandatory gender sensitivity training that, Like, the call is coming from inside the house at DOD on some of these problems. And the proof's in the pudding. There seems to be a cognitive dissonance between your recruiting nightmare that we are living through, the nation's recruiting nightmare at the army, and this kind of stuff. Because I I don't think it's gonna be a big, like, positive recruiting pitch to women that when someone shows up with male genitalia in their shower stall, that we tell them that we're trying to build a cohesive team. I would posit to you that that probably makes the team a little less cohesive. Will will you allow for even that possibility? Speaker 1: Congressman, what we've seen in our surveys is that basically women are more worried about being sexually harassed in the army than they are about the kinds of things that Speaker 0: you're bringing up. Think that someone might get sexually harassed if they're showering with a biological male? Don't you think that that that that environment could potentially increase the likelihood of that? We're all concerned about sexual harassment. We've grappled with these challenges about how to have it in the chain of command or outside the chain of command, but it seems a little silly to sit here and have discussions about the flowchart of a sexual harassment, you know, complaint when you've got people with male genitalia showering with your female soldiers. I I wanna recruit talented women into our army, and I'm concerned that this weird stuff that you guys are doing is not going to make it more likely that those people are going to sign up. General McDonough, you and I spoke yesterday about the fact that the army has to recruit extensively men from the American South, that that that that makes up a wide variety of who's coming into the United States Army. You think you're gonna recruit more of them with this kind of stuff? Speaker 2: Probably not. Speaker 0: And that's the point. And I appreciate the honesty. And I know that in August, you conclude a storied career, and and we thank we thank you both for your service. And we did get somewhere with this last time with secretary Austin, and I hope you all will reflect on the damage that this embrace of
View Full Interactive Feed