reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @mhelmly

Posted - January 30, 2025 at 7:42 AM

Saved - February 25, 2025 at 6:50 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The conversation centers on a debate regarding a helicopter and commercial jet collision. One participant argues that the incident suggests intentional sabotage, citing the helicopter's sharp turn and its presence in busy airspace. The other counters that the pilot likely made a mistake during a training flight, emphasizing the difficulty of visibility in the cockpit and the possibility of human error. Both sides present questions and evidence to support their views, with one insisting on the need for rational explanations over conspiracy theories.

@mhelmly - Matt Helmly

@DraftDonks @ADSBex I joined X 10 years before you did. I don’t give a damn if you think I’m full of shit, because I’m right. You just can’t understand it and that actually makes sense. Not your fault. I’m just wondering what’s driving you so hard to think it’s intentional sabotage?

@DraftDonks - The Donks

You screen grabbed that video from another X user didn't you? Haha you haven't been right...again you said the flight path video uses ADSB, which is inaccurate since the chopper wasn't using it. I've already brought up many reasons why....now answer my questions - assuming that flight path video is accurate (and not a fake video), why does it make a sharp turn directly into the plane? Why does it look like it was headed straight towards the plane from miles away? Why is a military aircraft flying in busy commerical airspace? How does a Blackhawk with all the technology it has not see a commercial jet in a major airspace and city with plenty of illumation? Why do you deny sabotage as a possibility when you can remote control these Blackhawks, manned or un-manned? Why did the pilot acknowledge to ATC he had sight of the plane? Given all this circumstantial evidence it can't be an accident - at best extreme negligence but leans towards intentional more than anything.

@mhelmly - Matt Helmly

@DraftDonks @ADSBex Do you have answers to any of those questions? Any credible theories that could possibly be real? Or do you just know they make no sense to you, so there must be more to it? Because it sounds like you are saying this can’t be accidental, so it must be sabotage. That’s not weird?

@DraftDonks - The Donks

Yes, based on all the evidence it is not an accident. Again, at best extreme negligence. And I don't know why this is so hard for you to understand - I'm saying I think that flight path video that is circulating might be fake. You said it uses ADSB, not MLAT - the Blackhawk was using MLAT. If it is not fake, then how do you explain it making a sharp turn directly into the plane? If the chopper kept going straight it would have missed it. Yea, an amateur "mistake" right, by the best pilots in the world right?

@mhelmly - Matt Helmly

@DraftDonks @ADSBex So it must be sabotage based on nothing but the fact that it doesn’t make sense to you? Not a malfunction of some sort with the helo, or human error, or any other possiblity. It has to be intentional sabotage… cmon man! You can’t give one reason why you think that?

@DraftDonks - The Donks

@mhelmly @ADSBex For the millionth time, I gave you about 5 good reasons why. Yet you still can't give ONE reason or evidence why you think it was an accident.

@mhelmly - Matt Helmly

@DraftDonks @ADSBex I think he was a young pilot on a training flight. It was an executive transport helo so they fly in busy commercial airports at night, so they train to do so. I think he saw the plane behind the CRJ that was also on ATC audio and thought it was the one

@mhelmly - Matt Helmly

@DraftDonks @ADSBex They were talking about. That made him think he had more time. He maneuvered the way he did because he’s in what the local pilots call the “helicopter corridor” and tons of them have been posting that they’ve flown there 100’s of times and that it looked normal to them.

@mhelmly - Matt Helmly

@DraftDonks @ADSBex I think they never saw each other, at least not until it was too late. He’s flying forward and banking, meaning he’s facing nose down. The CRJ is landing, so it’s nose up to get more lift. The angle of each made it impossible to see each other.

@DraftDonks - The Donks

How does a Blackhawk not have the capability to see a commercial jet? It wasn't on the radar at all? Blackhawks have the ability to even see stealth aircraft. I'm not buying the narrative, sorry. It sounds fucking ridiculous, just think rationally - "let's train our new pilots in heavy commercial airspace where the altitude is so low you can't detect other aircrafts. The technology is the best in the world where it can see stealth aircraft though it isn't good enough to see a commercial jet." Despite all the technical jargon, quick reminder this is the video of the collision. Yea, I'm sure the chopper couldn't see the jet as it headed straight towards it from miles away.

@mhelmly - Matt Helmly

@DraftDonks @ADSBex You can’t hardly see shit in those cockpits completely level. Impossible at the angles they were at. Pilots don’t fly looking out the windshield like driving a car. CRJ on landing was definitely watching the gauges on the screens. A helo pilot tends to look down or at the screens