TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @michaelpsenger

Saved - April 15, 2024 at 12:23 PM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Walensky: “When the CNN feed came that it was 95% effective, the vaccine, so many of us wanted it to be helpful, so many of us wanted to say, ‘Ok this is our ticket out.’” Ok… But then you got millions fired and excluded from society for not taking it. https://t.co/Xcl7bUUrOi

Video Transcript AI Summary
We were all hopeful when we heard the vaccine was 95% effective, thinking it was our way out. But maybe we were too optimistic and not cautious enough. We didn't consider the possibility of the vaccine wearing off or being less effective against future variants.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can we have improved? Well, you know, I think I can tell you where I was when the CNN feed came that it was 95 percent effective on the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be helpful. So many of us wanted to say, okay. This is our ticket out. Right? Now we're done. So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism, for some good things that came our way. I I really do. I I think all of us wanted this to be done. Nobody said waning when when, you know, oh, this vaccine is gonna work. Oh, well, maybe it'll work. It'll wear off. Nobody said, well, what if the next variant doesn't it doesn't it's not as potent against the next variant.
Saved - January 22, 2024 at 2:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread compiling viral videos and events throughout the COVID-19 pandemic is shared. The videos include footage from Wuhan, China, lockdown measures, praise for China's response, the impact of lockdowns worldwide, debates on policies, controversies surrounding PCR tests and masks, and protests against mandates. The thread highlights various perspectives and actions taken during the pandemic.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

THREAD – The Ultimate COVID Video Library A semi-chronological, open-access library of the most important and viral video clips from throughout the response to COVID. This thread has no end, so videos after the first hundred or so may be added ad hoc. Be sure to bookmark! 1/ https://t.co/TV0DNBUiFQ

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jan 2020 – Shortly after Xi Jinping announces the strictest lockdown in history in Wuhan, China, videos begin going viral all over the world supposedly showing Wuhan residents spontaneously collapsing and falling to their deaths from the new virus. 2/ https://t.co/Wrg21sEnrn

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Feb 2020 – In some of the most powerful propaganda of the entire COVID saga, viral videos purport to show CCP officials welding Wuhan residents into their homes to prevent them from going outside during lockdown. 3/ https://t.co/hX52Xh5bzs

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Feb 2020 – A viral video shows Chinese police with the word SWAT written on their uniforms in English catching a man with a butterfly net for removing his mask during Wuhan’s lockdown. 4/ https://t.co/nQs0ebEvJy

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jan 2020 – WHO Director Tedros Adhanom heaps praise on Xi Jinping and China for the lockdown of Wuhan. However, the lockdown, being only days old, hadn’t produced any results, so Tedros was actually praising human rights abuses with nothing to show fro them. 5/ https://t.co/tuhjwk6FNs

Video Transcript AI Summary
China's actions in response to the coronavirus have been praised for their role in limiting its spread to other countries. The political leadership, including the president, has shown a remarkable level of knowledge and commitment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I will praise China again and again because its actions actually helped in reducing the spread of coronavirus to other countries. The the commitment of the political leadership starting from the number 1, from the president himself. And I said it in my speech, the level of his knowledge is very, very amazing.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Feb 2020 – In the WHO’s official press conference on Wuhan’s COVID response, Bruce Aylward, head of the WHO-China Joint Mission, waxes rhapsodic about the Wuhan lockdown: “What China has demonstrated is, you have to do this.” 6/ https://t.co/cGAr9Nul8h

Video Transcript AI Summary
China has shown that taking necessary measures can save lives and prevent numerous cases of a challenging disease.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What China has demonstrated is, you have to do this and if you do it, you can save lives and prevent thousands of cases of what is a very difficult disease.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Feb 2020 – Bruce Aylward, head of the WHO-China Joint Mission, explains how Wuhan’s COVID lockdown supposedly flattened the curve. “This is extremely important for China, but it’s extremely important for the rest of the world.” 7/ https://t.co/K9ytBH0Jws

Video Transcript AI Summary
When an infectious disease outbreak occurs, aggressive actions can change its expected shape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that's what happens when you have an aggressive action that changes the shape that you would expect from an infectious disease outbreak. World.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Shortly after advising the entire world to copy China’s lockdown policy, Bruce Aylward, head of the WHO-China Joint Mission, refuses to acknowledge Taiwan’s existence. 8/ https://t.co/qQkFCeRtJq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is asked if the WHO will consider Taiwan's membership, but there is no response. The question is repeated, but still no answer. The speaker then mentions wanting to discuss Taiwan's handling of the virus and plans to call someone named Dr. Auerd for more information. The speaker briefly mentions that China has done a good job in containing the virus. They thank the host for inviting them and wish them luck in their battle in Hong Kong.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Will the WHO consider Taiwan's membership? Hello? That's correct. I couldn't hear your question. Okay. Let me repeat the question. Let's move to another one then. Right. Because I'm actually curious on talking about Taiwan as well on Taiwan's Case. We decided to give doctor Auerd another call to follow-up. And I just wanna see if you can comment a bit on how Taiwan has done so far in terms of containing the virus? Well, we've already talked about China. And when you look across all different areas of, of China, they've actually all done quite a good job. So with that, I'd like to thank you very much for inviting us to participate and, And good luck as you go forward with the battle in Hong Kong.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – An anchor for CGTN, China’s largest state TV outlet, explains the “new norm” of “lockdown.” “We traded a little of our freedom for the greater good… This is exactly what Europe and America should know.” 9/ https://t.co/DsOMeLCVq2

Video Transcript AI Summary
China's response to the pandemic was initially seen as extreme, but people have now accepted it as the new normal. Lockdown measures have been criticized for violating individual rights, but the balance between personal freedoms and public safety is always changing. After 9/11, airports implemented strict security checks, and people accepted the trade-off for the greater good. China imposed the largest quarantine in history, shutting down factories, public transport, and keeping people indoors. This approach helped flatten the curve, preventing millions of cases and tens of thousands of deaths. However, it also stretched out the time and put strain on hospitals. Europe and America should learn from China's experience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stream, draconian, and aggressive. These are the words used to describe China's response. But now people have come to terms with the new norm, lockdown. Some people say, isn't that a violation of individual rights? Actually, the balance between individual rights and public safety is always an ever changing equation. After 911, all the airports in the world began to impose draconian safety checks on passengers, and people accepted it because we traded a little of our freedom for the greater good of the public. China imposed the largest and most draconian quarantine in history. Factories shut, public transport stopped, and people stayed indoors. By doing that, it flattened the curve. On one hand, China avoided many millions of cases and tens of thousands of death. On the other, it stretched out the time and make the hospitals restaaved and less strained. This is exactly what Europe and America should know.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte announces a lockdown of all of Italy—the first lockdown of an entire country in the history of the western world. 10/ https://t.co/excrbRhqhG

Video Transcript AI Summary
We must stay at home, as the future of Italy is in our hands. Each of us must be responsible and do our part. Therefore, starting today, these measures will apply throughout the country. We have already implemented them in the northern part, including Lombardy and some provinces. Unfortunately, the numbers show a significant increase in infections, hospitalizations in intensive and sub-intensive care, and sadly, deaths.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: E di restare a casa il futuro nostro dell'italia è nelle nostre mani e queste mani devono essere mani responsabili oggi più che mai ognuno deve fare la propria parte ed è per questo quindi che da oggi varranno su tutto il territorio della penisola queste misure che noi abbiamo già predisposto per la parte settentrionale come sapete lombardia più provincia in più province giusto qualche giorno fa purtroppo tempo non ce n'è I numeri ci dicono che stiamo avendo una crescita importante dei contagi delle persone ricoverate in terapia intensiva e subintensiva e anche ahimè delle persone decedute

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Footage of empty streets across Italy as the entire country is placed under lockdown. 11/ https://t.co/FweU14HihR

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Military police in Italy use automated drones to enforce the lockdown and monitor compliance with COVID restrictions. 12/ https://t.co/aSlZNXdFOY

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – A video goes ultra-viral all over the world showing Italians in lockdown with “a message to themselves from 10 days prior” urging viewers to be more afraid of the new coronavirus. 13/ https://t.co/DU8wFo3kng

Video Transcript AI Summary
Salvatore and Francesca talk to Anna about the situation in Italy regarding the coronavirus. They mention that the virus is spreading rapidly, with the number of cases and deaths increasing significantly. They discuss the strict quarantine measures in place, the overwhelmed hospitals, and the seriousness of the situation. They urge Anna to only leave the house for essential reasons and emphasize the importance of taking the situation seriously. They also mention that the virus is not just a problem in China, but is spreading quickly worldwide. They advise Anna to reconsider her plans and prioritize staying safe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ciao anna Speaker 1: ciao Salvatore ciao Francesca Speaker 2: il dirti? Speaker 1: Ciao da dire di dieci giorni fa, hai paura? Oh, sono te, prendi io sono te, tre dieci giorni. Speaker 3: Ti parlo dal futuro, Speaker 1: la solita di fretta ma fermati in su Google volevo aggiornarti sulla situazione in Italia Speaker 3: per succedere un casino pazzesco il fatto che tu abbia già sentito magari di coronavirus iniziano altrettanto certa del fatto che tu stai prendendo sotto ne ama la Speaker 0: cosa addirittura se vedevo qualcuno con la mascherina lo prendevo in giro Speaker 4: e smettila di prendere in giro tua madre quando ti dice di comprare le mascherine e comprare Speaker 0: scema fino a dieci giorni fa facevo riunioni di lavoro, andavo a cena con gli amici, palestra, parrucchiere, solite banalità che non hanno mai fatto del male a nessuno. Speaker 1: Vadinten days, life Welby non moll lights. Speaker 0: L'ipotesi forse peggiore è quello che succederà, Speaker 1: sì, perché I contagi in Italia saranno sempre di più dimostrandoti che non era una cazzata come credevi dieci giorni fa potevano essere duemila contagi adesso siamo arrivati a diciottomila abbiamo superato I mille decessi Speaker 2: quindi adesso ti ritrovi a fare dei turni mortali. Speaker 5: Adesso siamo in una situazione assurda, qua Speaker 1: non possiamo uscire di casa, oltre strettissime necessità, una bella quarantena, quella che hai visto soltanto nei film. Speaker 3: Una razione intera bloccata a casa. Non te l'aspettavi Speaker 5: gli ospedali stanno veramente scoppiando casi sono tanti anche tra I giovani ci Speaker 1: sono dei ragazzi della nostra età che sono stati intubati interamente si va, Speaker 2: guarda solo l'influenza, si va aperto a grave, però è stata presa con un Speaker 0: po' di leggerezza. La leggerezza va a coltivare dell'anima ma non nei gesti Speaker 1: se devi andare in giro fallo soltanto per cose veramente indispensabili Speaker 0: perché quello che rischi non è il fallito nel rettore. Vediamo immagini dalla Francia, dagli Stati Uniti preoccupanti, di persone che stanno tornando sotto da una cosa, è un problema al serio di quello che parte del mondo crede non è pessimismo cosmico quello che sta succedendo è molto più grave di quello che ti immaginarvi e tu capirai che solo il fatto di poter respirare anche solo l'aria di casa tua, insomma diciamo una grandissima cosa. Speaker 1: La Cina è lontana, ma il gusto più veloce di quanto credo quindi rivedi un attimo I tuoi programmi del sabato sera e che ne sarai che magari se non fossi stato un pochino più bello

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Tomás Pueyo, an influencer whose ultra-viral articles convinced many officials to adopt COVID lockdown policies, goes on tour advising leaders all over the world to adopt strict lockdowns. Here, Pueyo debates UK SAGE leader John Edmunds. 14/ https://t.co/vKsvZe5kWR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the concept of achieving herd immunity to stop the spread of the epidemic. Speaker 2 disagrees with this approach, stating that it would result in a significant number of deaths. They emphasize the need to prevent people from catching the virus and highlight the exponential increase in cases. Speaker 1 acknowledges the debate on herd immunity but doesn't believe anyone is advocating for intentionally causing deaths. Speaker 0 explains that there are two strategies: stamping out every case or achieving herd immunity. They mention the difficulty of containment and argue that achieving herd immunity is the only way to end the epidemic once the virus is widespread.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The only way to stop this epidemic is indeed to achieve herd immunity. Speaker 1: Okay. Thomas Pury, you're shaking your head and now you've got your head buried in your hands. What's your response to what John Edmunds just said? Speaker 2: This is like deciding, you know what, this forest might burn, so let's cut a third of it. This is crazy. We want to have 10, 20, 30 percent of the population catch this. The the the UK has what? 66,000,000 people. That's how many people? That's, around 20,000,000 people. 1 of 1 percent of these people are gonna die. So we're saying we wanna kill 200,000 people in the UK. It. So that's, the Speaker 1: I don't think anyone is saying that. I don't think anyone is saying that. But I think there is a real debate in the scientific community going on about the value of herd immunity. So just briefly, what do you think about the value of herd immunity and can it be created through the measures that the government is, you know, introducing right now? We need Speaker 2: to understand what it means, this herd immunity. They're saying everybody's gonna catch it. So once they catch it, they can't catch it anymore. That's crazy. We we don't want people to catch it. We want people not to catch it because, always, they're gonna die. And and right now, the cases are going exponentially. In a week, the NHS is starting to be collapsed. In 2 weeks, it's gonna be completely collapsed if we don't take measures now. Then people are gonna panic. Maybe not today if you don't take the measures, but they're gonna definitely back in panic next week or in 2 weeks. We have 13 days of advance compared to Italy. Right? They thought the exact same thing 2 weeks ago. And then 1 week later, they realized, oh my god, this is exploding. They have now, what, 17,000 cases? Mhmm. It's it. Calling them. They realized too late that they were not containing this. You you UK now has an opportunity to catch this before the weekend, and we need to catch this before the weekend because everybody's gonna spread this with their friends, with their families that they haven't been seeing in the during the week. So it needs to be declared now. That's why Speaker 1: Let's let's Thomas, where did let's let's bring in John. I mean, has he got a point here? We've got to catch this right now. Speaker 0: There's there's 2 things. There's 2 strategies it. With a new virus, a new epidemic, there's 2 strategies. 1, you can stamp out every single case in the world, every single case in the world, it. And then, the virus then you're free. You've stopped that epidemic without achieving herd immunity, but you must cut every single case in the world. With a mild disease, that's incredibly difficult. That's the phase that we were in when we were Trying to do containment and everybody else is trying to do containment, yeah? Trying to stamp out every single case in the world. It. It hasn't worked, yes? We haven't managed to do that. The next phase, when the virus, the genie is out of the bottle, the virus is all around the world and spreading, the next phase. The only other way that the epidemic's gonna come to a stop is achieving herd immunity.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, and Donald Trump smile and laugh as they announce “15 Days to Slow the Spread,” arguably the most destructive policy ever implemented in US history at the domestic level. 15/ https://t.co/UehUNnPyus

Video Transcript AI Summary
In states with evidence of community transmission, it is recommended to close bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, and other venues where people gather. The speaker asks if the president is instructing governors in those states to close all their restaurants.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just wanted to read there's a there's a there's an answer to this. Oh, yeah. Go ahead, Howdy. He was my mentor, so I'm going to have to let him speak. The small print here, it's really small print. In states with evidence of community transmission, bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, and other indoor and outdoor venues where groups of people congregate Should be closed. So, mister president, are you telling mister president, are are you telling are you telling governors in those states then to close all their restaurants?

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Cars line up for miles at food banks as COVID lockdowns begin in the United States. 16/ https://t.co/tVMAOKRCZQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video shows the impact of the health crisis on the economy. People are lining up for hours at food banks as supplies run out quickly. Volunteers are overwhelmed by the demand, with many first-time visitors seeking assistance. The situation is described as surreal and unlike anything seen before. The Labor Department has released shocking statistics, revealing a record-breaking 3,283,000 jobless claims filed in one week. This number far surpasses any previous records.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Clearly show us how this health crisis has become an economic crisis in this country. It is this right here. The Pittsburgh Gazette captured video of 100 of cards lining up for the Greater Pittsburgh Food Bank before it opened yesterday. Some waited 5 hours as volunteers distributed emergency supplies to 15 of 100 families, and then they ran out. Speaker 1: A new reality for those in need. Rick Paulson is the volunteer coordinator for the Joint Hands Food Pantry. He says they've been holding the food pantry for 15 years, But have never seen it like this. Speaker 2: Someone says, out of the 19 fifties movie or a bad dream, it's just so surreal. Speaker 1: On this day, £72100 of food was given away from the Chicago Food Depository, and it went fast. Speaker 2: We've had so many calls from people, and we know they're first time of asking where the location was. Speaker 3: Just moments ago, the Labor Department put out its statistics, a jaw A dropping. 3,283,000 jobless claims were filed last week. 3,000,000 of 283,000 jobless claims. That number Okay. Dwarfs any other week on record.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – People line up around the block in freezing temperatures outside grocery stores as COVID lockdowns begin in the United States. 17/ https://t.co/A9fRbKdaaY

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Footage of empty streets across New York City during lockdown. 18/ https://t.co/TkIdU4v4j3

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Stranded workers thrown out of their factory jobs march in exodus to villages thousands of miles away during lockdown in India. 19/ https://t.co/eGo2G3vBPj

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thousands of migrant workers, including Yogesh Yadav, are embarking on a long journey through Uttar Pradesh, India. Forced to leave their jobs due to the closure of businesses, they are walking approximately 650 kilometers. This mass exodus is a rare occurrence in India and hasn't been witnessed for decades.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Exodus that hasn't been seen in India in decades. Thousands of migrant workers are on the move, most of them on foot. Among them, Yogesh Yadav, who's walking 650 kilometers through the state of Uttar Pradesh after the clothing shop at which he worked as a tailor was closed.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – People line up for miles to receive food rations during lockdown in South Africa. 20/ https://t.co/1ybKTuWsJ3

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Centurion, South Africa, thousands of people lined up for emergency food parcels in an informal settlement called Moy Place. Businesses donated 8,000 food hampers to help residents in need. South Africa has been under strict lockdown measures for 5 weeks, with most of the population required to stay at home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lined up for nearly 2 and a half miles for emergency food parcels in the South African city of Centurion on Wednesday. A number of businesses donated 8,000 food hampers, which were given out to residents in the informal settlement of Moy Place. South Africa has spent 5 weeks under tough restrictions requiring most of the population to stay at home.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Under the banner of #Masks4All, a video goes viral all over the world touting the false claim that cloth masks had stopped the spread of COVID in the Czech Republic. This false claim played a major role in mask mandates all over the world. 21/ https://t.co/l72ifv0QGF

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss how the Czech Republic has successfully slowed down the spread of the new coronavirus. They attribute this to following social distancing measures, staying at home, and implementing strict hygiene procedures. However, the main difference is that everyone in the country is required to wear a face mask when leaving their house. They emphasize that masks, even homemade ones, offer some level of protection and are crucial in preventing transmission from individuals who may not show symptoms yet. Wearing masks is seen as a mutual protection measure, where both parties are safeguarded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have an important message for all of you, especially if you live in a country that is right now facing the new coronavirus. The pandemic is growing exponentially in many countries. But the Czech Republic is one the few in Europe that has significantly slowed down the spread of the virus. In this video, we would like to tell you what we did differently, And mainly, we would like to help you to do the same. We are following social distancing and the rules stay at home, but others do that too. We also have a strict hygienic procedures. Others do that as well. But the main difference is everyone who has to leave their house Speaker 1: has to wear a face mask. Everyone. I know. They may be told you that masks wouldn't protect you, but there are studies proving that even a homemade mask can be partially protective. Partially, any protection is essential today. But now the more important thing, masks Fundamentally prevent the transmission from you to others by sneezing, coughing, but also breathing. And many people are the most contagious before they start Showing symptoms. So when we both have a face mask, I protect you, you protect me, and we are both safe.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – The city of Los Angeles orders a skate park to be filled with sand so youth won’t try to go outside and skate during lockdown. 22/ https://t.co/3CQCApykGc

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Police detain a mother in Idaho for taking her kids to play at the playground during lockdown. 23/ https://t.co/tCi4lgtMVU

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Spring 2020 – ‘The COVID Religion’: A compilation of some of the most insane scenes of petty authoritarianism, theater, and mass psychosis during peak COVID hysteria. 24/ https://t.co/1Ym7lumvEu

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Chinese state media shares a video of a 7-year-old girl reciting a script on the importance of obeying COVID lockdown orders. “I am only 7 years old. I understand it, but why do some adults not get it?” 25/ https://t.co/izARFKhiiS

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am upset because I can't go to school, see my friends, or go to my favorite places due to the coronavirus. I have been staying at home for 2 months, wearing a mask and washing my hands to prevent the virus from spreading. I don't want to infect my family and potentially lose them. Coronavirus is a global health emergency and everyone has a responsibility to stop it. National leaders should stop blaming each other and focus on fighting this common enemy together. We need to use our strength, power, determination, and courage to overcome this. I don't understand why some adults don't get it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am not happy. I am upset because of the. I can't go to school. I can't see my friends. I can't go to my favorite restaurant. I can't go to parties. I can't go to Disneyland, but I know all these sacrifice this will be worth that ice. I stayed at home for 2 months already. I wear a mask. I wash my hands. I don't go to pottyladders in order to stop the virus spreading. Because if I know if I don't do so. I might be affected and infect my dad, mom, and my brother. If they are sick, they might die, and I won't see them anymore. I will be even more upset. Coronavirus coronavirus is global health emergency. Everyone on this earth has a responsibility to stop it. It should not be a political matter to be used against other nations. I'm only 7 years old. I understand it, but why do some adults don't get it? To those national leaders, stop blaming each other. Forget about your own interests. The virus won't go away by winning a political argument. We should use our strength, power, determination, and courage altogether to fight with this common enemy, coronavirus. I have this common sense. Why don't you?

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

May 2020 – Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet and lead advisor to the UK, said the world should thank China for lockdown: “Not only the right thing to do, but it also showed other countries how they should respond… I think we have a great deal to thank China for.” 26/

Video Transcript AI Summary
China's lockdown of Wuhan during the pandemic was a decisive and commendable action that set an example for other countries. Their swift response demonstrated leadership and provided guidance on how to handle such emergencies. We owe China a great deal of gratitude for their actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: China's decision to lockdown Wuhan showed that the government acted tremendously, decisively in the face of an acute emergency. And by taking those actions, China led the world in the response to this pandemic. It was not only the right thing to do, but it also showed other countries how they should respond in the face of such an acute threat. So I think we have a great deal to thank China for.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Spring 2020 – During peak COVID lockdown, high-production-value TikTok videos of nurses performing choreographed dance routines across the world began going viral. They appear to have been produced at significant cost, but the reason remains a mystery. 27/ https://t.co/IX8YzyH0im

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – In a viral video, Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell acted as an early whistleblower about COVID ventilator protocols that “will lead to a tremendous amount of harm.” Indeed, a study later revealed a 97.2% mortality rate among those over age 65 placed on ventilators. 28/ https://t.co/MiU0thnOqf

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the past 9 days, I have worked in an intensive care unit for COVID-19 patients and witnessed medical phenomena that don't align with the expected symptoms of viral pneumonia. While hospitals are preparing to treat acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), I believe we may be treating the wrong disease. The patients I've seen and the condition of their lungs indicate that COVID-19 is not following the expected pattern. I'm concerned that our current approach may cause significant harm to many people in a short period of time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 9 days ago, I opened an intensive care unit to care for the sickest COVID positive patients in the city. In these 9 days, I have seen things I have never seen before. In treating these patients, I have witnessed medical phenomenon that just don't make sense in the context of treating a disease that is supposed to be A viral pneumonia. 9 days ago, I presumed I was opening an intensive care unit to treat patients with a virus causing a pneumonia That was ravaging lungs across the world, starting out as something mild, cough, a sore throat, and progressively increasing in severity until ultimately ending in something called acute respiratory distress syndrome or ARDS. This is the paradigm that Every hospital in the country is working under. This is the disease ARDS that every hospital is preparing to treat. And this is the disease ARDS for which in the next 2 to 6 weeks, a 100000 Americans might be put on a ventilator. And yet, everything I've seen in the last 9 days, All the things that just don't make sense, the patients I'm seeing in front of me, the lungs I'm trying to improve have led me to believe That COVID 19 is not this disease, and that we are operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue. In short, I believe we are treating the wrong disease, and I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

July 2020 – Jeremy Hunt, powerful UK establishment politician and current Chancellor of the Exchequer, praises China’s draconian “Zero Covid” and quarantine measures and advocates for the UK to emulate them. 29/ https://t.co/fFZXG6R9vs

Video Transcript AI Summary
I agree with Gabriel's paper that we should aim for zero infections and eliminate the disease, as countries with a SARS strategy have been most successful in tackling coronavirus. For example, my sister flew back to Beijing during lockdown and was escorted by Ministry of Health officials to her home, where she underwent a two-week quarantine with a sealed door and periodic police monitoring. While we may not go to such extremes in our country, it shows the seriousness of countries that have dealt with SARS in stopping any possible source of infection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I very much agree with, the central point in Gabriel's paper that we should be aiming for 0 infection, and elimination of the disease because that is basically the approach taken in countries which have a SARS strategy as opposed to a a flu strategy, and those are the countries that have overwhelmingly been the most successful in in tackling coronavirus. And, you know, I just my sister, lives in Beijing, and she flew back to Beijing in the middle of lockdown. And just to give you an an idea of the contrast, she was escorted from the airport in Beijing to her home by Ministry of Health officials, and then, put into her home for 2 weeks quarantine. The door was sealed, and, she had a police car sitting outside the house, periodically. And I'm not We go that far in this country, but I just think it's an indication of how serious they are in the countries that have had to deal with SARS about stopping at the root every possible source of infection.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

July 2020 – In a brief limited hangout, FBI Director Christopher Wray discloses that the CCP specifically approached local politicians across the United States to endorse its pandemic response. “Yes, this is happening at both the federal and state levels.” 30/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chinese diplomats are actively seeking support for their country's handling of the COVID-19 crisis, according to various officials at federal, state, and local levels. This behavior has continued despite the ongoing pandemic. Recently, a state senator was even approached to introduce a resolution in favor of China's response to the pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I will note that the pandemic has unfortunately not stopped any of this. In fact, we've heard from federal, state and even local officials that Chinese diplomats are aggressively urging support for China's handling of the COVID-nineteen crisis. Yes, this is happening at both the federal and state levels. Not that long ago, we had a state senator who was recently even asked to introduce a resolution supporting China's response to the pandemic.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Aug 2020 – Deborah Birx: “I wish when we went into lockdown, we looked like Italy…people weren’t allowed out of their houses, and they couldn’t come out but once every two weeks to buy groceries…had to have a certificate that said they were allowed.” 31/ https://t.co/QASLEUeoRB

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the lockdown, I hoped that the situation in the US would be similar to Italy. In Italy, people were strictly confined to their homes and could only go out once every two weeks for an hour to buy groceries. They needed a certificate to prove they were allowed to do so. However, Americans don't respond well to such strict measures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wish that when we went into lockdown, we looked like Italy. But when Italy locked down, I mean, people weren't allowed out of their houses and they couldn't come out but once every 2 weeks to buy groceries for 1 hour they had to have our certificate that said they were allowed. Americans don't react well to that kind of prohibition.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

May 2020 – Stephanie Warriner, a patient at a hospital in Toronto, is forcibly restrained by hospital staff for not properly wearing her mask. Her body is then wheeled away, having died from “restraint asphyxia following struggle and exertion.” 32/ https://t.co/gVsHU83Qjv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Existing Existing angels Angelina 68 Angelina Anton 68 Angelina oils Angelina oils Angelina Andrew Angelina Andrew oils Chen Gali Andrew Elsie Andrew Emily hour oils series Master Chen passed Chen masks on on on ate kg with a neck scale effectively existing Existing angels Angelina 68 Angelina Anton 68 Angelina oils Angelina oils Angelina Andrew Angelina Andrew oils Chen Gali Andrew Elsie Andrew Emily hour oils series Master Chen passed Chen masks on on on ate kg with a neck scale effectively existing Existing angels Angelina 68 Angelina Anton 68 Angelina oils Angelina oils Angelina Andrew Angelina Andrew oils Chen Gali Andrew Elsie Andrew Emily hour oils series Master Chen passed Chen masks on on on ate kg with a neck scale effectively cattle option option change India speak highlighted sorry electoral cattle option option change India speak highlighted sorry electoral
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Існуючих Існуючі ангел ангеліна 68 ангеліна антон 68 ангеліна олії ангеліна олії ангеліна андрій ангеліна андрій олії чен галі андрій ельзи андрій емілі година олії серіал майстер чен проїхали чен масці на на на їв кг та шкалою шиї ефективно існуючих Існуючі ангел ангеліна 68 ангеліна антон 68 ангеліна олії ангеліна олії ангеліна андрій ангеліна андрій олії чен галі андрій ельзи андрій емілі година олії серіал майстер чен проїхали чен масці на на на їв кг та шкалою шиї ефективно існуючих Існуючі ангел ангеліна 68 ангеліна антон 68 ангеліна олії ангеліна олії ангеліна андрій ангеліна андрій олії чен галі андрій ельзи андрій емілі година олії серіал майстер чен проїхали чен масці на на на їв кг та шкалою шиї ефективно худоби варіант варіант change індії розмовляють виділив вибач виборчим худоби варіант варіант change індії розмовляють виділив вибач виборчим

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

May 2020 – An Ohio woman is arrested and tazed for refusing to wear a mask at a football game. 33/ https://t.co/xVFDe3gx0s

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is questioning whether someone can be arrested for not wearing a mask. They suggest calling the police to confirm if the person is a real officer. The speaker expresses confusion and frustration about the situation, mentioning that the person is being harassed for not wearing a mask and telling them to wear one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is over a match. It's not. I don't know. Somebody needs to call. Okay. So do you arrest me? I don't think he can arrest her for not wearing a mask. This is not a warning. Call the cops, Raven. Call the cops? Yeah. Will you talk to them? I don't know if he's a real officer. Look. Is this police on the side and on his back? I don't know anything. Arassing her for a mask. Not wearing mask. Where's your mask? I wear your mask.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Deborah Birx tells the press that in the US, “if someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death” regardless of any other health issues or comorbidities. 34/ https://t.co/iPg9LVniaQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, a question is posed to Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx about concerns regarding the misreporting of deaths due to COVID-19. Dr. Birx explains that in the United States, the reporting of COVID-19 deaths has been straightforward and accurate. However, in some other countries, deaths caused by COVID-19 may be categorized as heart or kidney issues if the person had preexisting conditions. In the US, if someone dies with COVID-19, it is counted as a COVID-19 death. The questioner raises doubts about the accuracy of this reporting, but no further discussion is provided in the video.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one for doctor Fauci or doctor Burks. Gotcha. Can you talk about your concerns about deaths being misreported, by coronavirus because of either testing standards for how they're characterized? Speaker 1: So I think in this country, we've taken a very liberal approach to mortality. And I think the reporting here Has been pretty straightforward over the last 5 to 6 weeks. Prior to that, when there wasn't testing in January February. That's a very different situation, and unknown. There are other countries that if you had a preexisting condition, And let's say the virus caused you to go to the ICU and then have a heart or kidney problem. Some countries are recording that as A heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID 19 death. Right now, we're still recording it, and we'll I mean, the great thing about having forms that come in and a form that has the ability to market as COVID 19 infection, The intent is right now that those if someone dies with COVID-nineteen, we are counting that as a COVID-nineteen death. Speaker 0: Can you be sure? I mean, you hear from coroners that that's not necessarily the case? How can you be confident about that? Is there any concern that it skews the

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jul 2020 – Anthony Fauci says if a COVID PCR test only yields a positive using a CT value of 35 or more, it should not be considered a real positive. Despite this, labs across the US used a CT of 37 for years based on the original WHO guidance, inflating COVID cases ten-fold. 35/ https://t.co/pvIb8G6Ort

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks if a PCR test can be used to determine if a patient is no longer infectious. They mention that if the cycle threshold is 35 or higher, the chances of the virus being contagious are very low. They also mention that even if a patient has a cycle threshold of 37 or higher, it is unlikely that the virus can be cultured. Therefore, they conclude that a cycle threshold of 37 or higher indicates that the virus is no longer viable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm wondering if you think we could use, a cutoff of viral loads determined by PCR to say this patient is no longer infectious, can go home, can go to a nursing facility? Because right now, the the physicians are really having a hard time with that. Speaker 1: Right. Again, a good question. And what is now sort of, evolving into a bit of a standard That if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are minuscule. So that if somebody and you know what? We do. We have patients, and it's very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians. Somebody comes in And they repeat their PCR, and it's like 37 cycle threshold. But you never you almost never can culture virus Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: From a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, Even 36, you gotta say, you know, it's just it's just dead nucleotides, period.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

1993 – American biochemist Kary Mullis, who received the Nobel Prize for his invention of PCR technology, states plainly that PCR should never be used for the purpose of diagnosing illness. Mullis passed away in August 2019, just months before the first reports of COVID. 36/ https://t.co/srtxoMCeJl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The measurement for HIV is not exact like it is for apples. HIV tests are based on invisible things and the results are inferred. PCR is a process used to make a lot of something out of something. It doesn't indicate if you're sick or if the thing you have will harm you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The measurement for it is not is not exact at all. It's not it's not as good as our measurement for things like apples. An apple is an apple. You know, you can get something that's kinda like if you got enough things that look kinda like an apple, you stick them all together, you might think it was an apple. But and HIV is like that. Those tests are all based on things that are invisible and they are the results are inferred in a sense. PCR. It's separate from that. It's just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That's what it is. And it's It is not it doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was gonna hurt you or

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

1996 – Kary Mullis, winner of the Nobel Prize for inventing PCR, blasts Anthony Fauci for his abuse of PCR for diagnosing illness. “Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lying directly into the camera.” 37/ https://t.co/G1FlUvDBLd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Humanity's tendency to focus on details and listen is questioned by one speaker. They criticize Dr. Fauci, claiming he lacks knowledge in various fields and shouldn't be in his position. The speaker believes that those in power have personal agendas and make up their own rules. They accuse Fauci of lying and state that the public cannot distinguish between good and bad scientists. Science is criticized for being judged and funded by people who don't understand it. The speaker challenges Fauci to debate someone knowledgeable on the subject. They mention an invitation from the president of the University of South Carolina to have a balanced discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is it what what is it about humanity that that that that wants to go to all the details and stuff and listen? Speaker 1: You know, know, these guys like Fauci get up there and start talking. You know, he don't know anything really about anything, and I'd say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope. And if it's got a virus in there, you'll know it. He doesn't understand electron microscopy, and he doesn't understand medicine. He that he should and not be in a position like he's in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people, and they don't know anything about what's going on at the bottom. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take know, of our health and someone. They've got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to, and they smuggle it like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera. You can't expect the sheep to really respect the best and the brightest. They don't know the difference, really. I mean, I I like humans. Don't don't get me wrong. But basically, there is a there is a there's a vast, the vast majority of them do not possess know, the the ability to judge who is and who isn't a really good scientist. I mean, that's a problem. That's the main problem actually with science, I'd Speaker 0: say, in this century, because science is Speaker 1: being judged by people. Industry because science is being judged by people. Funding is being done by people who don't understand it. Speaker 0: Okay. Who do we trust? Speaker 1: Fauci? Fauci didn't know, enough to you know? If Fauci wants to get on television with somebody who knows a little bit about this stuff and debate him, he could easily do it because he's been asked. I mean, I've I've had a lot of people, president of the University of South Carolina, asked about you if you'd come down there and debate me on the stage in front of the student body because I Speaker 0: wanted somebody who was from the other side to come Speaker 1: down there and balance my know, Benny, who was from the other side to come down there and balance my because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that's gonna tell me the other side. But

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Aug 2020 – Bill Gates expresses exasperation with the US response to COVID, which he blames on western “freedom”; China, by contrast, he says, “did a very good job of suppressing the virus,” thanks to the “authoritarian” approach and “individual rights that were violated.” 38/ https://t.co/o8TZVRatm2

Video Transcript AI Summary
China effectively suppressed the virus through strict measures, violating individual rights but achieving impressive results. Their ability to quickly build hospitals and enforce compliance with masks kept virus numbers low. This approach influenced other countries' responses, as it was not part of the traditional playbook. Even Sweden, often cited for its different approach, implemented behavioral changes. The US, despite being a leading economy and having top epidemiologists, performed poorly. The speaker attributes this to a belief in freedom without further elaboration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In their typical fairly authoritarian way, they did a very good job of suppressing the virus. You know, there may have been a lot of individual rights that were violated there, but the overall macro effect that they achieved is kind of amazing. They had the benefit that it was really Hubei, 60,000,000 people and they brought in the health resources, 1,400,000,000 and their ability to build hospitals, very, very quickly and force compliance with masks and and various other things, but they've kept the virus numbers to very low levels, compared to most countries. Speaker 1: Do you think the fact that China went into this very strict lockdown very quickly set the tone for the way other countries responded? Because that was not really part of the epidemiological playbook, before. Speaker 0: No. You're absolutely right. I, you know, I live in infectious diseases and how you stop them. And so when we were first talking about the shutdown, I was like, wow, we're really going to do this. Are people really willing to do this? How much productivity are we going to lose by doing this. So that day we sat there in early March and said, okay, no one comes to the foundation offices and they haven't been since, we were talking with Microsoft about it and they did the same thing. I remember thinking, gosh, I wish we did practice for this, because it's such a novel idea. And so I think, yes, that influenced things. The idea that you would just let it rip, and nobody really did that. Even Sweden that people call out did ask for behavioral change. They didn't do pure bans quite as much. And during the epidemic, there have been periods where it looked like their approach was smart, then it looked like it wasn't smart. You know, it that that still swerves around to this day about the relative health and economic effects that they experienced versus other countries. Speaker 1: Now let's turn to the US because it's the country, you know, it's the world's biggest economy. It's the preeminent public health Country in the world has got the world's best epidemiologist. I mean, why is it done so badly? Speaker 0: Well, we believe in freedom.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

2020 – A compilation of live interviews in which Anthony Fauci literally advises to “shut down the country” to control COVID. Fauci would later defend his record on COVID by arguing “I didn’t shut down anything.” 39/ https://t.co/lGsE5PP80g

Video Transcript AI Summary
I recommended shutting down the country to control the spread of the virus, but I don't regret it. If I had known earlier that shutting down would be so effective, we would have done it sooner. Some criticize the economic impact, while others question why we didn't shut down earlier if it saves lives. Regarding New York, you misunderstand my support for Cuomo.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you regret particularly the last one, the shutdown, the sweeping shutdown that some said made things worse? Speaker 1: No. I I I don't, Neil. And in fact, I think we need to make sure that your listeners understand. I didn't shut down anything. I recommended to the president that we shut the country down. And the only way to do that Is by draconian means of essentially shutting down a country. We know that we can do that if we shut down. Speaker 2: Well, I think one of the things you really need to do to the extent that you can shut down Temporarily, the country, I think, is important. Speaker 1: Well, if I knew at the time that Shutting down would have such a dramatic effect on controlling the spread. Obviously, we would have shut down earlier. There were those who say, you shut down your dis destructive things by disrupting the economy, and others say, well, if you save so many by shutting down. Why didn't you shut down 2 weeks earlier? But I don't regret saying that the only way we could have really stopped the explosion of infection was by essentially I'm I wanna say shutting down. I mean, essentially having the physical separation and the kinds of recommendations That we've made. Speaker 2: You've been a big fan of Cuomo and the shutdown in New York. You've lauded New York for their policy. New York had the highest death rate in the world. How can we possibly be jumping up and down and saying, Oh, governor Cuomo did a great job. He had the worst death rate in the world. Speaker 1: No. You misconstrued that, senator.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jun 2020 – A giant, 20-foot statue of a nurse in a biblical pose is unveiled in Latvia “in honor of COVID-19 healthcare workers around the world.” 40/ https://t.co/Lz1HPETepj

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jul 2020 – Throughout the response to COVID, governments used propaganda and censorship to support the illiberal measures being taken. Here, NZ PM Jacinda Ardern reassures viewers her government “will continue to be your single source of truth.” 41/ https://t.co/2siexDEHz8

Video Transcript AI Summary
We provide daily, trustworthy updates on the most current information. You can rely on us and the director general of health for accurate information. Visit covid19.govt.nz to verify any rumors you hear. Trust only us as your reliable source. We will share information frequently, but be cautious of any other sources. Please stay focused.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We will share with you the most up to date information daily. You can trust us as a source of that information. You can also trust the director general of health and the ministry of health. For that information, do feel free to visit at any time to clarify any rumor you may hear, covid19.govt.nz. Otherwise, dismiss anything else. We will continue to be your single source of truth. We will provide information frequently. We will share everything we can. Everything you add, else you see, a grain of salt. And so I really ask people to focus.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Apr 2020 – Around the world, media outlets often falsely associated opponents of COVID lockdowns with Donald Trump. Contrary to this portrayal, Trump worked hard behind to scenes to stop governors from ending lockdowns. “We’re not gonna let them open.” 42/ https://t.co/NgSgl30Imb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many states are reviewing the idea of reopening, with some wanting to do so immediately. However, if we disagree with their decision due to high numbers of cases and deaths, we will not allow them to open early.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But there are many states out there that are looking at this, and they're reviewing it, and they're saying, we shouldn't be even included in this. You know, there are some that wanna open up almost now. Now, if we disagree with it, we're not gonna let them open. We're not gonna let them open. If some governor said, you know, has a lot of problems, a lot of cases, a lot of death, and they wanna open early, we're not gonna let it happen.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Sep 2020 – When Scott Atlas joins the White House coronavirus task force, he begins unwinding the insanity that’s characterized the official response to COVID. Here, Atlas explains T cells and why immunity to COVID is far more widespread than realized. 43/ https://t.co/cnq2hIuQko

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Redfield stated that over 90% of the population is still susceptible to the coronavirus. However, the other speaker disagrees, pointing out that the data used by Dr. Redfield is outdated and only accounts for the presence of antibodies. The speaker explains that there is also immunity from T cells and cross-immunity from other infections, which means that the number of people with antibodies is only a small fraction of those with immunity. When asked who to believe, the speaker emphasizes that the science supports their viewpoint and mentions several epidemiologists who share the same perspective. The conversation ends with the acknowledgement of taking a break.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Redfield today said that more than 90% of the population remains susceptible to coronavirus. Do you agree with that assessment? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think that doctor Redfield, misstated something there. And the misstated last Speaker 0: time, Anna. Speaker 1: I'm gonna answer your question Speaker 0: if you Speaker 1: let me finish. The data on susceptible that he was talking about was his, surveillance data that showed that roughly 9% of the country Has antibodies. But when you look at the CDC data state by state, much of that data is old. Some of it goes back to March or April before many of these states had The cases, that's point number 1. Point number 2 is that the immunity to the infection is not solely determined by the percent of people who have antibodies. If you look at the research, and there's been about 24 papers at least on the immunity from T cells, that's a different type of immunity than antibodies. And without being boring, the reality is that according to the papers from Sweden, Singapore, and elsewhere, there is cross immunity Highly likely from other infections, and there is also t cell immunity. And the combination of those makes the antibodies a small fraction Of the people that have immunity. So the answer is no. It is not 90% of people that are susceptible to the infection. Speaker 0: So I guess my question is for I'm not a doctor. I defer to your on this end of his, but so Americans hear one thing from the CDC director and another thing from you. Who are we to to believe? Speaker 1: You're supposed to believe the science, and I'm telling you the science. Speaker 0: So he's not telling us science. Speaker 1: I'm telling you the science, and that's the answer. And if you wanna look up all the data, you're free to. You can also talk to the following epidemiologists. Why is Speaker 0: he still going out before Congress and speaking if you say he's misstated today and the president said he misstated last time? Americans are looking for the best information right now. Yes. Speaker 1: And I'm giving you the best information and it's confirmed by people like Martin Kohl Dorf, who's a Harvard epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School. Let me finish, please. Jay Bhattacharya and John Ioannidis, both epidemiologists at Stanford, Professor Gupta, University of Oxford, these are people who know The latest data on the immunology and what's happening, and I just recited it to you. Speaker 0: So we're gonna have a little time off.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Oct 2020 – Having joined the White House coronavirus task force, Scott Atlas explains the disaster of lockdowns. “People have been killed…when I say killed, look at the data…46% of the most common types of cancers were not diagnosed during lockdown.” 44/ https://t.co/NvAUJmlTBx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes prolonged lockdowns, stating that they have disastrous consequences for healthcare, working families, and lower-income individuals. They highlight the negative impact of missed cancer diagnoses, chemotherapy and immunization appointments, and the closure of schools leading to unreported cases of child abuse. They also mention a report stating that 1 in 4 young college-age Americans contemplated suicide in June. The speaker expresses frustration with public health experts, calling them failures for not considering the broader impact of lockdown policies and accuses them of causing harm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The prolonged lockdowns are a complete disaster. They're a complete disaster for missed health care. They're a complete disaster for average working families and particularly for people who are working class and lower income people. People have been killed by by people who want to have prolonged lockdowns. And when I say killed, I look at the data and that means, for instance, this week, it was shown 46% of the most common types of cancers were not diagnosed post during the lockdown. Those cancers didn't disappear. They are there. People will present with much later more widespread disease. Half of people who had chemotherapy appointments didn't show up. That 650,000 Americans, half of people who had immunizations for children didn't come in out of the fear instilled by our so called public health experts. You know, you could go on and on 40% of people with acute strokes, and this is sort of devastating when you close schools, just schools alone. We have more than 200,000 cases of child abuse not reported during the 2 months of spring school closures. And and now we're in a situation where 1 out of 4 young college age Americans have a planet killing themselves during the month of June. That's a CBC report. Speaker 1: And I'm telling you, this guy Peter Otis on CNN today, he said he's a vaccine Developer, he said, get ready. I'm telling my own family, get ready for lockdowns this winter. That's what they're saying. Speaker 0: I I can say this, history will record the faces of the public health expertise as some of the sinful, egregious, epic failures in the history of public policy. They have killed people with their lack of understanding and their lack of caring about not just the impact of cases of COVID nineteen, a virus that the overwhelming majority of people do well in. Notwithstanding, of course, we're not underestimating 200,000 Americans who died. That's tragic. But these people had been a gross failure because they never cared to consider the impact of the policy itself. And the policy self. It's been a complete epic failure and honestly some people say a crime against

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

2020 to 2021 – A compilation of footage of teachers’ union leader Randi Weingarten calling for COVID school closures. Weingarten was one of the most influential voices behind school closures, though she would later claim she boldly opposed them. 45/ https://t.co/UcWjfmqpno

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes that remote and hybrid learning are the safest options for reopening schools. They argue against taking risks with students' lives and criticize Donald Trump's approach. They mention that schools in Florida remained closed due to courageous individuals defying the government's denial. The conversation shifts to the rising COVID-19 cases and the importance of regional approaches to opening and closing schools. The speaker mentions the 3% threshold set by the mayor and the safeguards requested by the teachers union. They discuss how Europe and New Zealand successfully managed their schools during the pandemic through national leadership and effective measures. The conversation concludes with the speaker expressing the need for testing, vaccine prioritization, and mitigation strategies to ensure a safe return to full-time, in-person learning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if people are in high risk, they shouldn't be in school. They should be doing things remotely. Just because Donald Trump wants to take a risk with people who go to bars or beaches, those of us who have spent our life teaching kids are not gonna take a risk with kids or with our members' lives. Remote and hybrid are really the only two ways you can reopen, schools safely. You gotta delay school opening because if you don't have the mask, how are you gonna be able to do this? There's a huge difference between working in Walmart and working in a school. You know, even a situation like Florida where it was pretty clear that schools should not reopen And where Miami schools did not reopen because you had, people who were courageous and who were willing to defy DeSantis' denials. Speaker 1: And they're why are they closing now? Speaker 0: Martha, they're closing now because what the city said And frankly, what lots of other places, are are also seeing is a huge skyrocketing increase. Okay. Now you're Speaker 1: you're not listening to me. What are they telling us though is that the wisest scientific move is to have children in school. Speaker 0: To that they're trying to figure out a regional, a regional way of opening and closing like they did to After they Speaker 1: don't need to close. Speaker 0: That is the point. Speaker 1: Need to close is the point. Speaker 0: Martha. Speaker 1: That when you hit that date, it says a measure established the teachers union over the summer in order to reach an agreement to reopen in the first place was a 3% threshold. Speaker 0: The mayor set the 3% threshold. What the teachers union did in New York City Afterwards was to say these are the safeguards that we need and this is the testing we need. Speaker 1: Given that all of these experts and scientists to say that children are safer in school. It's worked across Europe. It's worked across the UK. They never closed their schools during their second spike, and now they're in recovery. They're down 10% and the kids are not missing out Speaker 0: on what it is. And what and what they did in Europe and what they did in New Zealand is That they had national leadership that closed that that did mass, that actually closed the bars that did some of those things with moving the stimulus. Yeah. Speaker 1: Given all that, they still say the kids are to They're Speaker 0: connected, Martha. Speaker 1: Look, the numbers rising. The kids are safer in school. Speaker 0: And and and so after hospitals, I think we have schools that reopen, that we can reopen elementary schools in particularly and schools for kids with special needs safely when we have the testing Speaker 2: members of that 25,000 strong union voted in the majority to stay at home for at least another 2 days to defy Chicago Public Schools' orders to return to the classroom, does the AFT stand 100% behind The Chicago Union. Speaker 0: So, of course, we stand a 100% behind the Chicago Union. Speaker 3: Is this semester is this school year probably not gonna have full school openings. Speaker 0: Well, so let me I'm glad you asked that question, Chuck, because what does full school opening mean? If you have if you do 6 feet of physical distancing, You're essentially saying in a school, you're gonna have you're gonna have about 50% or 60% of people in there at any one time, not a 100%. If we get the testing, the vaccine prioritization, and these mitigation strategies, 85% of them are comfortable being in school. So essentially, we got to put our money where our mouth is, which is if it's really important to do, we got a road map. Let's make it happen. Speaker 1: But that's a that's a lot of ifs. Everyone is asking When and how are we getting our students, our children, back into those classrooms full time? Speaker 0: So Full time is gonna depend upon, what's going on with physical distancing and, and what's going on with the variance. And I just hope this is not a rush to put in twice as many desks in a place where we're really starting to get things reopened. Speaker 1: I'm surprised to hear you think that this is a rush. The American Federation of Teachers president, Randy Weingarten, Says the union is reserving judgment for now. Why not trust the CDC's guidance? Speaker 0: We have to figure out in all these schools right now, which have been set up for 6 feet physical distancing, how this is going to work. Speaker 1: You recently pushed back on the CDC's new social distancing guidelines for schools from 6 feet to 3. Why? Speaker 0: Because, you know, in because trust is actually earned. Speaker 1: You're gonna have everyone back in September a 100% in class 5 days a week? Speaker 0: I hope so. I would hope that Fox would be just as focused on let's to get rid of the misinformation about what happened in this election. This election was free. On, Randy. Come on. But this is Speaker 1: not the topic that we're here to talk about. Speaker 3: Why not tomorrow? I mean, literally, why not tomorrow? If if 90% of your teachers are vaccinated, if we know what we know now, Why not just go back to school in person tomorrow? Speaker 0: Well, frankly, 97% of the schools are open for in person learning. Speaker 3: 5 days a week. Speaker 0: About 60% of them are. The real key right now is that about 2 thirds of our parents, particularly black and brown parents, Don't trust it. Speaker 1: The teachers union was back on TV today, and she admitted just a few hours ago that the White House did ask. So what specific language on reopening schools would you like to see us put in our CDC policy? Watch this. Speaker 0: They asked us for language and we gave them language when they asked us for it, we need to, you know, bring back our masks for schools. So the bottom line is We're gonna keep kids safe. We're gonna keep our members safe, and we're gonna try to open up schools. Speaker 1: Now the union leader says universal mask swearing must be in place in order to keep schools open. Speaker 4: Brandy Weingarten and the American Federation of Teachers had previously opposed the idea of mandating teachers to be vaccinated against the virus. But after visiting schools throughout the country, she said the union is now reconsidering it. Speaker 0: Everybody yearns Speaker 1: for normalcy. Speaker 0: You're not gonna You're not gonna have normalcy in the middle of an omicron, tsunami.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2021 – CDC Director Rochelle Walensky claims “vaccinated people do not carry the virus.” This false claim would convince many people to receive the virus and become a major impetus for vaccine mandates and stigmatization of the unvaccinated. 46/ https://t.co/5jAjxRgPrJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the CDC, vaccinated individuals do not carry or get sick from the virus, as supported by both clinical trials and real-world data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our data from the CDC today suggests, that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick, and that it's not just in the clinical trials, but it's also in real world data.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

May 2021 – Anthony Fauci falsely claims that the vaccinated become a “dead end” for the virus. 47/ https://t.co/zX2WrRpNKs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Getting vaccinated not only safeguards your health and your family's, but it also plays a vital role in promoting community well-being. By becoming vaccinated, you effectively create a barrier that prevents the virus from spreading further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health, that of the family, but also you contribute to the community health throughout the community. In other words, you become a dead end to the virus.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

2020 to 2021 – A compilation of virtually every top official and media personality during the response to COVID insisting, falsely, that the vaccines prevent infection and transmission. 48/ https://t.co/6PmlPAHoFY

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2021, the goal is to manufacture a lot of vaccines to stop transmission and increase immunity levels. Vaccinated people do not carry or get sick from the virus, and the virus cannot infect them or use them to spread. Vaccines block both getting and giving the virus. Fully vaccinated individuals have a very low risk of getting COVID-19 and no longer need to wear masks. Vaccinated people are safe from infection and can break the chain of transmission. With about 50% of adults fully vaccinated and 62% having received at least one dose, surges are not expected. Vaccinated individuals will not be hospitalized, in the ICU, or die from COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During 2021, we should be able to manufacture a lot of vaccines, and that vaccine, key goal is to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. Speaker 1: We can kind of almost see the the And we're we're vaccinating so very fast. Our data from the CDC today suggest, you know, that that people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Speaker 2: Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops the With every vaccinated person, a vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It Cannot use a vaccinated person as a host if they'll get more people. That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this. Speaker 1: Essentially, vaccines things block you from getting and giving, the virus. Speaker 3: Fully vaccinated people the are at a very, very low risk of getting COVID 19. Therefore, if you've been fully vaccinated, disease. You no longer need to wear a mask. Speaker 4: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. We have the All the vaccines we need. We just need our people to take it, a, for their own protection, For the protection of their family, but also to break the chain of transmission. You wanna be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you. You stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person. Them. I think given the country as a whole, the fact that we have now about 50% of adults fully vaccinated and about 62% of adults having received at least one dose as a nation. I feel fairly certain you're not gonna see the kind of surges we've seen in the past. The Speaker 3: If you're vaccinated, you're not gonna be hospitalized, you're not gonna be in ICU unit, And you're not gonna die. You're okay. You're not gonna you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Yeah.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

2020 to 2021 – Fauci and other top officials repeatedly advised masks were effective against COVID. But this contradicted Fauci’s prior statements that masking was merely psychological and sometimes harmful. Ultimately, masks did not stop the spread. 49/ https://t.co/wcdLZlCsTN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Masks provide some protection but are not foolproof. Wearing masks indoors is recommended, especially in crowded places, even if vaccinated. However, fully vaccinated individuals do not need to wear masks outdoors or indoors. Children should wear masks in the community, but when they are outside with their family, they can go without masks. The CDC suggests that one mask is better than none, and cloth masks can be effective if properly fitted. Double masking is not necessary. The interviewer jokingly asks if Dr. Fauci is a double masker, to which he replies with a laugh.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People should not be walking around with masks. Let me just state for the record that masks are not theater. Wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better. Masks are protective, and we But it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. There has not been any indication that putting a mask on and wearing a mask for a considerable period of time has any deleterious effects. There are unintended consequences. People keep fiddling with the mask, and they keep touching their face. And can you get some schmutz sort of staying inside there? Of course. You do not need to wear a mask indoors if in fact you've been vaccinated. Good that you're vaccinated, but in a situation When you have people indoors, particularly crowded, you should wear a mask. So even if you are vaccinated, you should wear a mask. If in fact you are vaccinated, fully vaccinated. You are protected, and you do not need to wear a mask outdoors or indoors. When the children go out into the community, you want them to continue to wear masks. You know, if you look at at at children outside, particularly when they're with the family walking down the street, playing a game, or what have you, don't have to wear a mask. The the the the pediatric the Academy of Pediatric actually makes that recommendation that children should be wearing masks, from 2 years old onward. And you're asking now if your child is a member of your household, can you walk outdoors with your child without a mask? According to that chart, the answer is yes. Speaker 1: But the child can't, not to beat Speaker 0: it beat Speaker 1: it to death. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. Okay. Because now the CDC says, Speaker 1: I mean, I think I've got this right. One mask is better than 0 masks. 2 masks is better than 1 mask, but you don't have to have double masks. Sick. Is that right? I mean Speaker 0: You know, it became clear that cloth coverings that you didn't have to buy in a store, that you could make yourself, we're adequate. And Betty wanted to fit better, so one of the ways you could do it if you would like to is put a cloth mask over which actually here and here and here where you could get leakage in is much better contained. Speaker 2: Are you a double masker, doctor Fauci? Speaker 1: It looks like you are.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Dec 2018 – Laurie Garrett, a vocal advocate of masks and strict mandates throughout the response to COVID, tells a panel that masks simply cause alarm. “But did the mask really help them? Did the mask keep the virus out? Almost certainly not.” 50/ https://t.co/Go5yGe8xmW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Japan conducted large-scale studies on the effectiveness of masks during the SARS epidemic. The studies suggested that masks primarily work by causing alarm, leading people to maintain distance from each other. However, it is unlikely that masks actually prevent the virus from entering the face. Therefore, while social distancing is important, the efficacy of masks in keeping the virus out is doubtful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's only a couple of countries that have ever really done large scale studies to try and figure out what might work. Japan, it may not surprise you, is one of them. And they, in one of their large studies, they basically showed that the masks, it seemed like the major Efficacy of a mask is that it causes alarm in the other person, and so you stay away from each other. And that's what I think happened with SARS. When I was in the SARS epidemic, I saw everywhere, all over Asia, people started wearing these masks and it is alarming when you walk down the street and everybody coming towards you has a mask on. You definitely do social distancing. You definitely it's just a gut thing. But did the mask really help them? Did the mask keep the virus out? Almost certainly not. If they if the virus was in their around their face, the mask would not have made the difference.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Dec 2021 –Horrifically, young children were often subjected to some of the most severe restrictions, despite their being at virtually zero risk from COVID. Here, kindergarteners in Oregon are forced to eat lunch outside in 40 degree weather. 51/ https://t.co/WKppD3bKgO

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Sep 2021 – Often, throughout the response to COVID, leading officials would put on masks simply for their photo ops. Here, NY Governor Kathy Hochul, NYC Mayor Bill DeBlasio, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle mask up for the cameras. 52/ https://t.co/gjKNv5k3GN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thank you, everyone. Let's go downstairs to celebrate the next year. Thanks so much.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, everyone. Just that center shot if you don't mind. That's great. That's great. That's perfect. Right there, Hughes? Thanks, Bob. Let's return downstairs. Thank you. We're gonna re celebrate the next year. Thanks so much,

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Apr 2022 – Joe Biden walks across the White House lawn in a mask for the cameras, only to take it off as he goes inside. 53/ https://t.co/Ykg93qCucI

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

2020 to 2022 – A compilation of top officials and commentators specifically advocating masking children for COVID on the basis that “kids are resilient,” though kids were always at virtually zero risk and masks never actually slowed the spread. 54/ https://t.co/e04IU2vwrI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Masks are important for children in schools, as they are safe and effective. Kids are resilient and can tolerate wearing masks, just like they do with seat belts and bike helmets. Wearing masks builds resilience and has no adverse effects. Children have a part to play in dealing with COVID, and wearing masks is a small task compared to the challenges faced by previous generations. Masks do not harm children and have been used in cancer wards for years. Research shows that masks do not put children at risk. It is the responsibility of parents and leaders to set an example and teach children to wear masks. Children are happy to wear masks and it is important for their protection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A really striking comment that you made in this interview. You said from a broad public health standpoint, and I'm quoting you now, at the population level, masks work at the margins maybe 10%. Speaker 1: In the schools, everybody should wear a mask. Speaker 2: Asking kids to wear a mask Is uncomfortable, but, you know, kids are pretty resilient. Speaker 3: Kids are resilient. And if anything, this is going to build resilience in our holder. Speaker 4: Women's have long term psychological effects on young kids, do you think? I don't think so. I think in fact it's good. Speaker 1: Masking, is very important, particularly in the schools. Masks are safe. Masks do work. Speaker 5: I have a 9 year old. He Tolerates masks for everything. I don't hear him whine just like I don't hear him whine about his seat belt or his bike helmet. Children have no problem with what Speaker 6: is going on. They want to deal sensibly by way of the science with COVID. They've Said we have no difficulty with students wearing masks. Speaker 3: When I look at the history of the world and when I think of, like, my parents and grandparents growing up in depressions, fighting wars, kids always had a part to play too. And when I look at the fact that they're just wearing a mask, but they have a roof over their head. They have food. Speaker 1: A mask is basically noninclusive completely. I've yet to see a child whose mask was bothering him or her. In fact, in Speaker 7: the emergency department, the kids are the best ones at wearing masks, and they often help their parents put masks on correctly. Speaker 1: There's nothing Adverse or bad about masks. We've used masks for decades. We mask kids in our cancer wards routinely. Speaker 8: We have now a plethora of ongoing research and studies, and documents that are showing us that masks do not put children at risk. Speaker 9: This concept that children somehow are harmed or abused by wearing masks is not founded in any science? Speaker 7: It's Simple. It does no harm. My kids wear them to school. Speaker 3: The idea that children won't wear masks is actually an application of leadership to say that we can't at them and won't set an example for them. Speaker 1: Those 50,000,000 children need to protect themselves by wearing masks. Speaker 2: If I'm going to get on an airplane, I don't have to wear a mask, but I will have my kids wear 1. Speaker 3: I don't think this is politically, dividing at all. I wear masks, my kids wear masks. I don't understand why parents are not listening to the science, not teaching their children to wear a mask. Speaker 10: My responsibility if I am lucky enough to be the next governor of Georgia is to look at the science to follow the protocols and Speaker 3: to set the right example. Speaker 7: I don't Speaker 9: think we're even talking to the children. When we talk to schools and classrooms of children, they are Happy to wear masks. Speaker 4: Be comforted by the fact that children have so much neuroplasticity that it this is a bump in their social development, but that they can repair very easily. Speaker 3: You don't go naked. Yeah. And right now, you shouldn't be going to school without a mask. Speaker 2: You're not likely to be able to be exposed to something and spread it to mommy or daddy. And it's not likely mommy and daddy are able will spread it to you either. So I wouldn't worry about it, baby. I promise you. That's why we need to make sure children are wearing masks in school.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jun 2021 – Florida Gov Ron DeSantis became the first major leader to call out the CCP’s role in lockdowns: “China was very much invested in promoting lockdown…public health guidance was never in a pandemic to just lock down…that was really fueled by the Chinese experience.” 55/ https://t.co/k5ilrIfsMP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Big tech's handling of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is concerning. They have been deferential to the CCP, which was invested in promoting lockdowns similar to those in Wuhan. Facebook and other companies elevated lockdown hysteria and suppressed those questioning it. This is troubling because lockdowns were not the norm in public health guidance before COVID, and it was a new concept influenced by China's experience. The relationship between big tech and the CCP is problematic, especially in fields like entertainment and the American economy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, this censorship feels like communist China. You know, you've talked about big tech and its relationship to the Chinese Communist Party. You've been researching this. You say that the lockdown approach that was led by the Democrats, was promoted by the CCP. Tell me about that. Speaker 1: Sure. Before I do, just point out, when we signed the the big tech bill, I had folks who had fled communist Cuba Speaking about how important it was. I had people that have that fled socialist Venezuela talking about how important it was to combat censorship because they lived, through really bad periods of censorship. You look at how big tech has handled the CCP. They are very deferential to the Communist Party of China. And I think that China was very much invested in promoting lockdowns as we started getting in To 2020, February, March, obviously, Italy. Those Italy lockdowns were very much patterned off what we saw in Wuhan. And, Facebook and some of these big companies, they were really serving to elevate the lockdown hysteria And to absolutely suppress people who are raising questions and concerns about lockdowns. And the the reason why that's so, I think, so galling is because Up until COVID, public health guidance was never in a pandemic to just lock down indefinitely. This was kind of a new invention That was really fueled by the Chinese experience. And so I think the relationship between big tech and the CCP is very problematic. And quite frankly, a lot of these big corporations, particularly in entertainment and some of these other, fields, of the American economy.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jul 2021 – DeSantis: “I think it’s very important that we say unequivocally: no to lockdowns, no to school closures, no to restrictions, and no mandates…Americans should be free to choose how they govern their affairs.” 56/ https://t.co/IGO1ytam7T

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker jokes about not seeing compliance with the CDC's memo and suggests that it may indicate a desire for more control in the future. They firmly reject lockdowns, school closures, restrictions, and mandates, emphasizing the importance of individual freedom. They express concern about living in a dystopia governed by bureaucratic authorities who disregard our freedom, aspirations, and happiness. The speaker concludes by stating that we must prevent this from happening in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you not get the CDC's memo? I don't see you guys complying. And I say that jokingly, but I I I think that that may be a sign of potentially seeking to do more things into the future. And I think it's very important that we say unequivocally. No to lockdowns. No to school closures. No to restrictions. And no mandates. Floridians are free to choose. And all Americans should be free to choose how they govern their affairs, how they take care of themselves and our families, and they should not be consigned to live regardless of which state in the union consigned to live in a Fauci and dystopia in which we're governed by the whims of bureaucratic authorities who care little for our freedom, little for our aspirations, and little for our happiness. No more. We can't let it happen going forward.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

2020 to 2022 – A compilation of the coordinated propaganda lines from major officials and commentators throughout the response to COVID, such as “No one is safe until everyone is safe” and “Don’t do your own research.” 57/ https://t.co/YtFYHtwn3q

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video emphasizes the importance of vaccination and the belief that no one is safe from COVID-19 until everyone is vaccinated. The speakers express frustration towards the unvaccinated and suggest measures such as banning them from certain places and denying them healthcare. They argue that the unvaccinated are a threat to society and should be blamed for the ongoing pandemic. The video also mentions breakthrough cases among the vaccinated but emphasizes that vaccination reduces the risk of severe illness and death. The speakers urge people to get vaccinated and dismiss the idea of doing personal research on vaccines. They highlight the need for collective action to overcome the pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanna make sure that people can discern the truth from the misinformation, and we wanna make sure that everyone understands that no one's safe till everyone's safe. No one is safe. Speaker 1: No one is safe in Speaker 2: the world. Speaker 3: No one is safe. Speaker 2: No one is safe. No one is safe. Nobody's safe. Speaker 1: No one is safe. Speaker 0: Nobody is safe. Speaker 2: This is Speaker 4: a post 9 11 Axiom. Safer, but not yet safe. Speaker 2: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe from COVID 19 until everyone is safe. Speaker 4: If the whole world isn't safe, none of safe. Speaker 2: No one is safe. No one is safe. Nobody is safe. Speaker 3: Until we're all safe. Speaker 4: Health experts have been saying nobody is safe. Speaker 0: Nobody is safe until everybody is safe. Nobody is safe. The science safe. Clear. Speaker 2: None of those are safe. There is no safe people. Speaker 3: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe until everyone is safe. Speaker 2: No one's safe. Nobody safe. Nobody's safe. Speaker 3: No one's safe. We'll never be safe. Until we're all safe. We are never gonna be safe. Speaker 2: 99.5 percent of people are safe And will survive COVID 19. The only positive thing out of this is we should be able to manufacture for a lot of vaccines and Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. You don't have a choice. As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody gonna be safe. Normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population. So Get the fucking vaccine. Speaker 3: You need to get vaccinated. And if you don't, you are going to die. I know you're vaccinated. You're the smart ones, but you know there's people out there who aren't listening to God and what God wants. You know who they are. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated people. My message to unvaccinated Americans is this. Speaker 4: If you are the unvaccinated, you are the problem. You're the Speaker 2: condemn them, shame them, blame them. The only people that you can blame, the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: Frankly, we can't trust the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: They should not be part of polite society. Lunatics who won't take COVID vaccines, walking around lawfully unvaccinated, a psychotic. Speaker 1: If you're willing to walk among us unvaccinated, you are an safe. Speaker 2: You have no right not to be vaccinated. You don't have the right to contaminate someone. Speaker 0: You can't go around pointing a gun in somebody's face, which is what it is when people are unvaccinated. They are All idiots and losers. Speaker 3: This is a real movement in this country against the unvaccinated. Jennifer Aniston is cutting non vaccinated people out of her life. Speaker 2: Unrepentant, unvaccinated. Speaker 0: They should be removed from the hospital. Speaker 2: Those who refuse to be vaccinated should be denied health care. Vaccinated person having a heart attack? Yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy, rest in peace, Wheezy. You're Speaker 3: Some doctors are saying they'll refuse treatment For people who choose not to get the shot. Speaker 4: Why are hospital and ICU resources going to them? Speaker 0: Morons who will not get the shot. Vaccinated. Clowns. Speaker 2: Idiots who think that they can do their own research. Speaker 0: Don't do any of your own research. Speaker 2: Doing your own research is associated with conspiracy theory circles. This go it alone approach, doing your own research, that should have serious consequences. You should get prison time for even questioning the vaccines. Can we all stop saying, I need to do my own research? That phrase, do your own research, 4 words, 4 little words that are hurting America. Doing your own research hurts America. Everybody has a supercomputer in their hand that empowers them to do their own research, and that's the problem. You must not do your own research. I need to do my own research. I don't Speaker 0: have I never understand what that means. Speaker 1: I'm doing my own research. Speaker 2: You can't do your own research unless you're scientists. Oh, do your own research. Speaker 3: Maybe you've told yourself you're playing it safe. You just wanna wait and see since this is a new vaccine. No. Throw the up and get the vaccine. Speaker 0: Unvaccinated people spread the virus. Speaker 2: Get the vaccine, you dopes. Don't be a Speaker 0: Get yourself vaccinated. That's just all there Speaker 1: is true. Speaker 0: There's no excuse. No excuse for being unvaccinated. There's no rational and no emotional argument that adds up against getting your damn shot. There just isn't. Speaker 3: But you made a conscious decision not to get the vaccine. I also have natural immunity. So for me, personally, safe. This vaccine poses a greater risk than a benefit. I'm also not a risk to any of you. Let's look at the science. Speaker 2: So we see that the natural infection is given greater protection or slightly greater protection done vaccination. Speaker 3: This is a vaccine that was created to prevent severity of disease and to prevent hospitalizations, but the Steam does not prevent you from getting COVID and does not prevent you from transmitting Oh my goodness. Reality out. We have to keep that. Safe. Come on. No. You're gonna Fox TV to have the joy. I don't really think that we should allow this kind of misinformation. Speaker 0: When we poke at, well, we know you're gonna Speaker 2: be you're gonna be safe on the COVID better than you. Speaker 3: The virus stops with every vaccinated person. Speaker 0: Do it so you stop spreading a terrible disease. Speaker 2: And that seen. Our key goal is to stop the transmission so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Expectation for vaccines is not to get infected. Speaker 3: A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. Speaker 1: When the virus gets to you, you stop Speaker 5: You're not gonna catch it. You're not gonna get sick. You're not gonna transmit it. Speaker 2: The vaccine is absolutely bulletproof. Speaker 3: Vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus. Speaker 2: 100% effective in preventing COVID. A vaccine prevents you from getting infected. Speaker 3: It is to keep you from getting it and then spreading it. We Have the ability to stop COVID in its tracks. Speaker 0: You're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Speaker 2: Biden tests positive for COVID 19. Speaker 1: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Speaker 2: Doctor Fauci tests positive for COVID 19. Speaker 3: Vaccinated people do not Carry the virus. Don't get sick. Speaker 2: CDC director tests positive for COVID 19. Seeing all negative. Pfizer's CEO test positive for COVID. Pfizer's CEO test positive for COVID again. CDC director Test positive for COVID again. Fauci test positive for COVID again. Joe Biden test positive for COVID again. Speaker 3: Cases up 258%. Set. The majority of these cases are among the vaccinated, and this area is the most vaccinated part of Massachusetts. Speaker 2: So many fully vaccinated people are testing positive. Speaker 3: So So people here are a bit angry. Speaker 2: We are all really concerned about what this means long term. I was vaccinated, and I got COVID. And and almost everyone we know with vaccinations had at least one bout of it. Our vaccines work better, than we could have possibly hoped they would work. Speaker 3: We are not the problem. The problem are the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: The unvaccinated threat. Unvaccinated people are a threat, A direct threat. Speaker 1: It's a Speaker 6: threat to all of us. Speaker 2: The unvaccinated are Speaker 0: a risk to all Speaker 3: of us. People have a right to be protected from the vaccinated. Speaker 2: Maybe there should be laws that allow them to be kept out of the building. So at least, thankfully, they're not breathing the same air. Their freedom to breathe will diminish. Start firing the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: If you don't vaccinate, you'll be fired. Speaker 2: Time to come down on the unvaccinated. They should be banned from the VA, banned from restaurants, banned From other businesses and colleges. Companies should not treat us as equal. Life's unvaccinated. People under arrest. Speaker 4: Here's the unvaccinated that has Put America in the place that it is. Speaker 2: We are losing freedom because people are unvaccinated. Towards the unvaccinated. I'm curious at the vaccinated. Speaker 0: Frustrated with Americans. Still not vaccinated. Not to be vaccinated seems criminal. Speaker 2: Suspects face years behind bars for coughing on police officers Speaker 1: freedom. For them charged with terrorist threats. You have no individual rights when it comes to the vaccine. Speaker 2: Really? You're killing other people. You're being attacked by unvaccinated. The unvaccinated who aren't wearing masks. Is the unvaccinated who aren't social distancing? Is the unvaccinated going to crowded indoor events. Speaker 0: It is not your right as an American citizen to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection. Speaker 1: Don't screw your freedom. Speaker 2: We can coerce you. Speaker 3: You're not going to be able helpful to see your family. If someone in your family isn't vaccinated, should you ask them not to show up? Speaker 2: Yes. You really shouldn't have anyone unvaccinated come to dinner. That's just a huge risk. Speaker 3: If you wanna come out into public, if you wanna live your life, you need to get the vaccination. Speaker 2: It's time for people to see vaccination as literally necessary. You should have To show that you're vaccinated in order to go places. Unvaccinated janitorial can't travel to the US. Speaker 3: If you're not vaccinated, you're not welcome. Speaker 0: Our patience is worried. Speaker 2: Why hasn't the president focused more on holding the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: The refusal has cost all of us. Speaker 4: Continued damage the unvaccinated are doing to themselves and the country. Speaker 0: How come migrants are allowed to come into this country unvaccinated, but world class tennis players are not. Speaker 4: You know? Speaker 1: And, back to our lead story, the pandemic of the Speaker 0: unvaccinated. Fact is this is Pandemic Speaker 3: of the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: Experts call it Speaker 3: pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: It's still a pandemic of the unvaccinated. It's a disease of the vaccinated. Speaker 4: It is the unvaccinated who are the problem. Period. End of story. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated also put our economy at risk. This is a tyranny of the safe right now. Speaker 1: The Speaker 0: unvaccinated, not the vaccinated. The unvaccinated. That's the problem. That's the pandemic. The unvaccinated. Pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: All this is Pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: Only pandemic we have is one of the unvaccinated. Pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: When you get the vaccine, you will not die. That's right. Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 0: It's a simple basic proposition. If you're vaccinated, you are not gonna die. Speaker 1: If you're vaccinated, You don't have a risk. It's as simple as black and white. Speaker 3: You are not going to die if you are vaccinated. That's it. Full stop. Speaker 1: You're unvaccinated, you're at risk. You're vaccinated, you're safe. Speaker 2: A majority of Americans dying from coronavirus are vaccinated. COVID 19 isn't the pandemic of the unvaccinated anymore. We didn't really understand the fatality rate. You know, we didn't understand that it's A fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like flu is, although a bit different. Speaker 1: We have 2 Americas, an unvaccinated at risk America and a vaccinated America. Speaker 3: I wear my vaccinated necklace all the Time to say I'm vaccinated. You, the vaccinated, are the last best hope to overcome the unvaccinated minority. I need you to be my apostle. I need you to go out And talked about it. We are seeking to enlist you in a benevolent conspiracy to join in the unfinished war against The sins of the unvaccinated. Safe. Speaker 2: And it's Speaker 3: a war forever war. The war against COVID 19. Speaker 6: The vaccine hesitancy on earth 2 has the potential to compromise all of the hard fought progress that we've seated here on Earth 1. Speaker 0: This is the greatest threat to life that we have ever faced. Speaker 3: Metropolitan areas are now banning all private gatherings. This Bar owner arrested for reopening illegally. Speaker 0: Unvaccinated. We are looking at a winner of severe illness and death. Death. Death. For yourselves, your families. Speaker 2: If the unvaccinated are not to blame, who is? If only we had a vaccine against b s. Speaker 0: A vital part of preparing for hurricane season is to get vaccinated now. Everything is more complicated if you're not vaccinated in a hurricane.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Nov 2021 – Michael Gunner, Chief Minister of Australia’s Northern Territories, announces that “positive cases and close contacts” will be transferred to quarantine camps via army truck. 58/ https://t.co/xQp5MtwEwt

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jul 2021 – Sydney, Australia announces a snap lockdown due to one COVID death. “A small list of essential stores can remain open…that’s 900,000 residents who can’t leave their area, even for work.” 59/ https://t.co/lJSkZT23yN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sydney is implementing tougher restrictions due to the delta outbreak. The state recorded 111 new cases and the third COVID death. Retail shops will close, except for essential stores. Construction sites citywide will shut down. Additionally, 110 suburbs in Liverpool, Fairfield, and Canterbury Bankstown will be sealed off, affecting 900,000 residents who cannot leave for work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening. Within hours, Sydney will be in the group of much tougher restrictions. The premier clamping down on the stubborn delta outbreak with what she's calling a no regrets policy. And this is why. From a record 82,000 tests, the state today recorded a 111 cases and tragically the 3rd COVID death in this outbreak. A man aged in his eighties from the city's southeast. Across Greater Sydney, retail shops will now close. A small list of essential stores can remain open. Construction sites across the city shut down. And from midnight tonight, 110 suburbs across Liverpool, Fairfield, and Canterbury Bankstown will be sealed shut. That's 900,000 residents who can't leave their area even for work.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Aug 2021 – Jacinda Ardern tells New Zealanders not to talk to their neighbors as she announces a “snap lockdown.” “Do not congregate. Don’t talk to your neighbors. Please, keep to your bubbles.” 60/ https://t.co/ugB0gIIWjZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Stay local, avoid gathering, and refrain from interacting with neighbors. Stick to your own social circles and minimize outdoor activities. Wear a mask, maintain physical distance, and limit movement to reduce the risk of spreading the Delta variant, which can be transmitted even by brief encounters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stay local and do not congregate don't talk to your neighbors please keep to your bubbles It comes down again to those very simple principles. We know from overseas, cases of the Delta variant that it can be Spread by people simply walking past one another. So keep those movements outside to the bare minimum. Wear a mask and make sure you keep up that physical distancing.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Nov 2021 – Police set up checkpoints after several wards escaped from quarantine camps in Australia’s Northern Territory. Every escapee who was caught tested negative for COVID. 61/ https://t.co/X04pm46Ghu

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Dec 2021 – Hayley Hodgson recounts how police came to her home in Australia after a friend tested COVID positive and took her to a quarantine camp, where she was forced to stay 14 days despite testing negative three times. 62/ https://t.co/WKnxXf8fJP

Video Transcript AI Summary
No one came to test the speaker for COVID, but two uniformed police officers arrived at their house and blocked their driveway. The police informed the speaker that they were being taken to Howard Springs and gave them the option of either going in a police van or a COVID cab. The speaker chose the cab to avoid a $5,000 fine. The speaker questioned why they couldn't self-isolate at home like others, but the police said they were following orders from higher authorities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just waited for someone to come and test me. No one came to test me. The next people who rocked up at my house were 2 other police officers. They blocked my driveway. These are actually uniformed police officers, normal police officers. Yep. So then the police says, blocked my driveway, I walked out, and I said, what's going on? Are you guys testing me for COVID? What's happening? They said, no, you're getting taken away, and you have no choice. You're going to Howard Springs. You either come with us now, and we'll put you in the back of the Divvy van, so or you can have a choice to get a COVID cab. So, Of course, I chose the COVID cab because I said, well, if we're to take you, we're gonna, hand you a $5,000 fine. So, of course, I didn't want that to happen. So I just said, look, I don't consent to this. I don't I don't understand why I can't just self isolate at home like a lot of other people are doing, and they just said we've just been told from higher up where to take you and that's all that there is.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Aug 2021 – Bill Gates calls for “all countries” to be “more like Australia.” Parts of Australia were then at 200 days in lockdown with COVID cases at all-time highs. Gates goes on: “flu and common cold…we can build tools that, over time, can get rid of those as well.” 63/ https://t.co/2CfANiKnOX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Understanding the origins of the pandemic is not crucial for preventing future outbreaks, according to Speaker 1. The focus should be on implementing measures like masks, vaccines, and a different approach to handling cases. Speaker 1 is involved in discussions about advancements in diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine production to eradicate not only COVID-19 but also the flu and common cold. Speaker 0 asks if it is important to know how the pandemic started from a justice or moral perspective, to which Speaker 1 agrees but doesn't elaborate further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How important do you think it is to understand how this happened, how it started? I mean, is that critical in terms of preventing it in the future? Speaker 1: No. The source isn't gonna change, you know, the need for masks and vaccines and the need to have A very different regimen so that, you know, all countries could get on top of the cases very quickly and be More like Australia than Europe or the United States ended up being. And so, you know, I'm involved in a lot of discussion about Breakthroughs in diagnostics and therapeutics, the scaling of vaccine factories in that less than 6 months, eradicating flu, You know, we need to resource, the preparedness for the next pandemic, and we can get a lot of benefits out of that. People don't like flu and the common cold, and, you No. We can build tools that over time will get rid of those as well. Speaker 0: From a a justice standpoint or just a a moral standpoint, do you wanna know how this started? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's they, you know, they I wouldn't I

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Nov 2021 – Michael Gunner, Chief Minister of Australia’s Northern Territory: “If you are anti-mandate, you are absolutely anti-vaxx… If you support, champion…give comfort to, support anybody who argues against the vaccine, you are an anti-vaxxer.” 64/ https://t.co/KpHFpYFCp6

Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe that anyone who opposes vaccine mandates or campaigns against vaccination in vulnerable settings is anti-vaxx, regardless of their personal vaccination status. It is crucial to protect lives, especially those of Aboriginal people, through vaccination. The vaccine mandate has been effective in increasing vaccination rates in remote communities. I will continue to support vaccines and anyone who opposes the mandate is also against vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You think at all that your rhetoric around calling people anti vaxxed, some of whom were vaccinated, has had an impact at all on vaccine take up in parts of the territory? No. I don't wanna repeat it. If you are anti mandate, you are absolutely anti vaxx. I don't care what your personal vaccination status disease. If you support champion, give a green light, give comfort to support anybody who argues against the vaccine, you are an anti vaxxer. Absolutely. Your personal vaccination status is utterly irrelevant. If you campaign against the mandate, if you campaign against People being vaccinated in vulnerable settings, teachers in classrooms. I'll be really clear. At that point in time, people were actually supporting the idea Of a teacher being unvaccinated in a remote community classroom with kids who cannot be vaccinated. I reject that. I lit I still reject it. And if you are out there in any way, shape, or form, campaigning against this man that you are absolutely anti vaxx. If you Say, pro persuasion, stuff it, shove it. We are absolutely gonna make sure as many territories as possible are vaccinated. That is our best protection against this thing. As you look at the Doty volume, it's only come out since. This is we've doubled those 80 in remote communities, 5 and up. I think you'll see our vaccine mandate is absolutely crucial to protecting life, particularly Aboriginal life. And I will never back away For supporting vaccines and anyone out there who comes for the mandate, you are anti vaxx.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Oct 2021 – Hawaii introduces a $150,000 ‘robot dog’ to scan people for COVID in public spaces. 65/ https://t.co/JwwbvBlLkq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Honolulu police department introduced Spot, a $150,000 robot dog used to screen homeless individuals for COVID-19 on Oahu. With only 14 positive cases out of over 1700 homeless individuals since the pandemic began, HPD credits the implementation of mitigation procedures and technologies like Spot for keeping the numbers low. Spot can measure temperature from 7 feet away, communicate, and provide PPE, food, and water to those who test positive. The department believes that the long-term investment in Spot is worthwhile as it eliminates the risk of transmission during interactions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the Honolulu police department provided an update on its newest tool, a robot dog. Spot, the $150,000 robot purchased earlier this year, is used to screen individuals at homeless sites on Oahu. HPD says since the start of the pandemic, The sites have taken in more than 1700 homeless individuals and have had only 14 positive COVID cases. They believe the mitigation procedures put in place and other technologies such as Spot have helped keep the numbers down. Speaker 1: Having the ability to deploy something that can do all the interaction with someone on a mobile mobile platform and take the possibility of transmission out of the equation, For me, I I really don't think that, over the long term, a $150,000 is a waste. Speaker 0: Spot is able to take a person's temperature from 7 feet away in a fraction of a second. It also has two way communication capability and can deliver PPE, food, and water to someone who does test positive for COVID.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jun 2021 – Anthony Fauci refers to himself as “science” incarnate: “A lot of what you’re seeing as attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science.” 66/ https://t.co/F9Hbe66zVP

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are concerns that discrediting public health officials could lead to a lack of trust in vaccines, similar to what is happening in Russia. Attacks on me are attacks on science, as everything I have said is based on scientific evidence. It is clear that science and the truth are under attack.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now you're at the focal point. What is your level of concern that we're gonna discredit public health officials to the point of, you know, look at Russia. They actually have a good vaccine, and none of their citizens will take it because they don't trust their own government. Speaker 1: Right. It's very dangerous, Chuck, because a lot of what you're seeing as attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science. Because all of the things that I have spoken about consistently from the very beginning have been fundamentally based on science. Sometimes those things were inconvenient truths for people, and there was pushback against me. So if you are trying to, you know, get at me as a public health official and a scientist, you're really Attacking not only doctor Anthony Fauci, you are attacking science, and anybody that looks at what's going on clearly Sees that. You have to be asleep not to see that. That is what's going on. Science and the truth are being attacked.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jul 2021 – UK SAGE advisor Susan Michie, a behavioral scientist with no background in epidemiology, seethes when asked whether her 40-year membership in the British Communist Party might inform her draconian policy preferences: “I’ve come on your program as a scientist…” 67/ https://t.co/tuQoKSepi0

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their belief that lifting restrictions would lead to increased transmission of the virus, considering the current serious situation. The interviewer questions the speaker's political affiliation with the Communist Party and suggests that their politics may influence their support for state control. The speaker clarifies that they are appearing on the program as a scientist and are willing to discuss scientific matters only, not politics. They emphasize that their opinion is based on scientific evidence and not their political beliefs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The logical extension of everything you just said would be that you think that we shouldn't lift restrictions at all on the 19th, that we should carry on exactly as we are. Is am I right? Is that what you're suggesting? Speaker 1: Well lifting restrictions will increase transmission and with all the problems that I've just talked about, It doesn't seem to me the best time to do that. Alright. So you're saying Speaker 0: we should stick If Speaker 1: you remember a few weeks ago, we actually postponed Lifting restrictions because the situation was so serious. But the situation's even more serious now than it was then. Speaker 0: Listen. There's a point I really have to put to you, and and you'll be aware of this Because there's been a lot of, of commentary about this in the British media about you, and it's to do with your politics. And you know what I'm going to ask you. You've been a member of the Communist Party for about 40 years now. You're still a member. And we know that communism is basically statist. We look at communist countries around the world and we see that they are tremendously top down dominant and controlled societies that they rule over. I just wonder, and I'm putting this question on behalf of those who wonder about your politics. If your politics actually informs your sense of control, It's not just it's not just the medical argument, but you have a kind of a political bent to want the state to tell people what to do. Speaker 1: I've come on your program as a scientist, as do all people who come onto your program as scientists. They come on to talk about the evidence, Relevant theories, how we approach our scientific disciplines. And you don't ask other scientists About politics. So I'm very happy to speak about science, which is what my job is, and to limit it to that. Speaker 0: So you're you're saying that your politics doesn't inform your opinion on Speaker 1: this subject? I'm saying that I agreed to come on this program As a scientist, and I'm very happy to talk to you about the issues that you're raising as a scientist, which aren't the same for other scientists that you Invite onto the probe.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Nov 2021 – In Senate hearing, CDC Director Walensky can’t say why CDC has done no field studies of natural immunity. “If we don’t know natural immunity confers protection…it’s because we’ve decided not to look…why have we not done the research?” 68/ https://t.co/MsODAr3tGX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why there hasn't been research done to show that natural immunity protects against recurrent infection. They mention that studies have shown that individuals with natural immunity have antibodies, T cells, and B cells that are considered adequate for protection. The speaker also mentions that the CDC has access to patient data. However, the other speaker responds by stating that their current stance is that everyone who has been previously infected should still be vaccinated, without directly addressing the question.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of either you or doctor Fauci were saying that the reason that we're not saying that natural immunity is protective as is recent publication showing that 6 to 8 months out, 92% of those with natural immunity have T cells, B cells, and antibodies that would be considered adequate to protect. And indeed, B cell continues to climb. That we don't have data. Now, in your response to Mr. Casey, you just mentioned that CDC has access to tens of thousands of EHRs And I've been told that HHS or CDC has access to patient identifiable data as to who tests positive. So I do that as a prologue. If we don't know that natural immunity confers Protection against future infection is because we've decided not to look. Because I've learned that there is a cohort of people that we know have been previously infected. We've got the bench research showing that the, triad of antibodies, T cells, and B cells are there and that 92% of them are still there at age 6 months out. So why don't we why have we not done the research showing that natural immunity confers protection against recurrent infection? Speaker 1: Yeah. Thank you so much for allowing me to clarify this point because I understand the question. First of all, let me just reiterate that our current stand after reviewing 96 papers and a scientific brief on this issue is that everyone who's been previously infected Should be vaccinated. Speaker 0: But that's not my question.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Sep 2021 – Orlando Magic star Jonathan Isaac explains his reluctance to get a COVID vaccine, given his understanding of natural immunity and his having had COVID before. 69/ https://t.co/sy04nyBKdw

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses hesitancy towards getting the vaccine due to several reasons. Firstly, they mention having had COVID in the past and believe they have natural immunity. They acknowledge that the vaccine could reduce severe symptoms if they were to contract the virus again, but they also mention the possibility of adverse reactions to the vaccine. They emphasize that being unvaccinated doesn't guarantee infection and being vaccinated doesn't guarantee immunity. They express discomfort with the pressure to conform and believe that everyone should have the freedom to make their own choice without being criticized. They also highlight the importance of loving and respecting those who hold different opinions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jonathan, Josh Robbins with The Athletic. What is it about the vaccine that that makes you, hesitant to to to get it? Speaker 1: I I would start with, I've I've had COVID, in the past? And so our our understanding of antibodies, of natural immunity has, changed a a great deal from the onset of the pandemic and is still evolving? I understand that the vaccine would, help if if if you catch COVID and, you'll be able to have less symptoms, from contracting it? But with me having COVID in the past and to having antibodies, with my current, age group and, fitness, physical fitness level? It's not necessarily a fear of mine. Taking the vaccine, like I said, it would decrease my chances of, having a severe reaction, but it does open me up to the albeit rare chance, but the possibility of having an adverse reaction to the vaccine itself. I don't believe that being unvaccinated means infected or being vaccinated means, uninfected? You can still catch COVID, with or we're not having the vaccine. I would say honestly the the the craziness of it all in terms of not being able to say that it should be everybody's fair choice without being demeaned or, talked crazy to doesn't, make more comfortable to do what said person is, telling them to do? Yeah. I I would say that's that's a couple of the reasons that, you know, I would say I'm hesitant at this time, but at the end of the day, I don't feel that it is, know anyone's reason to come out and say, well, this is why or this is not why. It should just be their decision and, you know, loving your neighbors not just loving those that that agree with you or look like you were, moving the same way that you do? It's it's, you know, loving those who don't.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Oct 2021 – Sen. Rand Paul: “You presume, somehow, to tell over 100 million Americans who survived COVID that we have no right to determine our own medical care?…an arrogance coupled with an authoritarianism that is unseemly and un-American.” 70/ https://t.co/KPyHnYNmFc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mr. Becerra, the speaker questions his knowledge of an Israeli study involving 2.5 million patients. The study reportedly found that the vaccinated group was seven times more likely to get infected with COVID compared to those who had recovered from the virus naturally. The speaker criticizes Mr. Becerra for insulting Americans who have had COVID and made their own decision about their immunity. He accuses Mr. Becerra of arrogance and authoritarianism, highlighting his lack of medical or scientific background. The speaker argues that numerous scientific studies demonstrate robust and long-lasting immunity after COVID infection. He urges Mr. Becerra to apologize for being dishonest about naturally acquired immunity and expresses a shared desire to increase vaccination rates and reduce hesitancy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mr. Becerra, are you familiar with an Israeli study that had, 2,500,000 patients and found that the vaccinated group was actually 7 times more likely to get infected with COVID than the people who had gotten COVID naturally? Senator, I'd have to get back to you on that one. I'm not familiar with that study. Well, you think you might wanna be if you're gonna travel the country insulting the, millions of Americans, including NBA are Jonathan Isaac, who have had COVID recovered, look at a study with 2,500,000 people and say, well, you know what? It looks like my immunity is as good as a vaccine or not. In a free country, maybe I ought to be able to make that decision. Instead, you've chosen to travel the country calling people like Jonathan and Isaac and others, myself included, flat earthers. Was we find that very insulting, goes against the science. Are you a doctor or a medical doctor? I have worked over 30 years on health policy. You're not a medical was do you have a science degree? And yet you travel the country calling people flat earthers who have had COVID, looked at studies of millions of people and made their own personal decision that their immunity they naturally acquired is sufficient. Was but you presume somehow to tell over a 100,000,000 Americans who survived COVID was they we have no right to determine our own medical care. You alone are on high and you've made these decisions. A lawyer with no scientific background, no medical whole degree. This is an arrogance coupled with an authoritarianism that is unseemly and un American. Was, you sir, the one ignoring the science. The vast preponderance of scientific studies, dozens and dozens show robust, was long lasting immunity after COVID infection. Even the CDC does not recommend measles vaccine if you have measles immunity. Was the same was true for smallpox. But you ignore history and science to shame the flat earthers as you call them. Was you should be ashamed of yourself and apologize to the American people for being dishonest about naturally acquired immunity. Was you want more people to choose vaccination? So do I. You want to lessen vaccine hesitancy? So do

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Mar 2021 – Frequent CNN contributor Leana Wen advocates keeping COVID restrictions in place so that reopening can be used as a “carrot” to promote vaccine uptake. 71/ https://t.co/9PPMBXdFgH

Video Transcript AI Summary
My concern is that vaccine hesitancy will prevent us from achieving herd immunity. It's not just the small percentage of anti-vaxxers, but also millions of people who have concerns about the vaccine and don't understand its benefits. We need to clearly communicate that the vaccine is the key to returning to normal life. With states reopening at full capacity, we have a limited opportunity to link reopening policies to vaccination status. If everything is reopened without incentives for vaccination, people will enjoy their freedoms without getting vaccinated. The CDC and the Biden administration should boldly state the benefits of vaccination and the freedoms it provides.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My main concern is that we're not going to reach herd immunity because of vaccine hesitancy. And I know that's hard for a lot of people to believe who desperately want the vaccine right now, and they're thinking, oh, well, it's just a small percentage of people who are actually anti vaxxers. And that's true. There is the anti science, anti vaxxer contingent. But I think that there are many more people, millions of people, who, for whatever reason, have concerns about the vaccine, who just don't know what's in it for them. And we need to make it clear to them that the vaccine is the ticket back to pre pandemic life. And the window to do that is really narrowing. I mean, you were mentioning, Chris, about how all these states are reopening. They're reopening at a 100%, And we have a very narrow window to tie reopening policy to vaccination status. Because otherwise, if everything is reopened, then what's the carrot going to be? How are we going to incentivize people to actually get the vaccine? So that's why I think the CDC and the Biden administration needs to come out a lot bolder and say, If you are vaccinated, you can do all these things. Here are all these freedoms that you have. Because otherwise, people are going to go out and enjoy these freedoms anyway.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jun 2021 – Heads of state exchange elbow bumps and stand in socially-distanced rows in a display of pandemic theater at the 2021 G7 conference. 72/ https://t.co/lZi1a7J7GS

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jul 2021 – Journalist Gerhard Wisnewski refers to governments’ COVID policies a series of “completely nonsensical and contradictory measures.” “There is a method behind this madness. It is actually a method of torture…and interestingly enough, they were developed in China.” 73/ https://t.co/zHfGuNlS7T

Video Transcript AI Summary
People wearing masks on trains and long-distance journeys while others don't. Some restaurants closing at 10 pm. These measures seem contradictory and nonsensical. It's actually a method to confuse and unsettle people, disrupting their lives and causing uncertainty. This method originated in China and was observed by Americans during the Korean War. Prisoners of war were subjected to conflicting measures, never feeling secure about what they should do. There were even occasional relaxations to prevent people from getting used to the measures. This is not a coincidence; it's an attempt to destroy people's psyche by politicians like Söder and Merkel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Man mit Maske fahren im Zug und im Fernverkehr ohne Maske. Warum haben manchmal die Gaststätten zweiundzwanzig Uhr schließen müssen? Ist denn das Virus erst nach zweiundzwanzig Uhr ansteckend und so, ja? Also vollkommen irrsinnige und widersprüchliche Maßnahmen. Der Wahnsinn ist eigentlich, dass sich dahinter Methode versteckt, ja. Das ist nämlich eine Foltermethode, die Leute total zu verwirren, in Unsicherheit zu stürzen, völlig im Ungewissen zu lassen, auch die gesamte Lebensführung zu stören. Niemand von uns kann ja planen oder eine normale Lebensführung gestalten. Und da hab ich also sehr viel Material drüber gefunden über diese Methode, die interessanterweise in China entwickelt wurde. Also die Amerikaner haben das an an Kriegsgefangenen festgestellt aus Korea, die dort von Chinesen befragt worden waren, dass diese Kriegsgefangenen also permanent mit widersprüchlichen Maßnahmen behelligt wurden und dass sie sich nie sicher fühlen konnten, ob jetzt alles richtig machen oder nicht, ja. Und dass es auch manchmal sogenannte Lockerungen gab, die gehören auch zu diesem Spiel, weil man sich dann also nicht so sehr an diese ganzen Maßnahmen gewöhnt, damit die noch wirken, damit man nicht abstumpft sozusagen, ja? Und dann wird man, wird das, werden die Züge wieder angezogen. Also was Söder hier macht oder Merkel oder diese Leute, Das ist kein Zufall, sondern das ist, sie versuchen einfach, die Psyche der Menschen zu zerstören aus meiner Sicht.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Oct 2021 – Spain’s Health Minister declares that masks are here to stay, even if only for normal seasonal flu: “Las máscaras llegaron para quedarse, al menos mientras tengamos influenze.” “Masks are here to stay, at least as long we have influenza.” 74/ https://t.co/OmXM5Tucpb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mascarillas son necesarias para prevenir la transmisión de virus como la gripe en espacios interiores durante el otoño.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Que las mascarillas han llegado para quedarse, al menos, mientras tengamos, pues bueno, virus de la gripe o otros otros virus posibles en este tiempo otoñal. Sabemos la importancia por la transmisión por aerosales de en aquellos espacios interiores de seguir llevando la mascarilla.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Dec 2021 – Rand Paul on the response to COVID: “I don’t think it’s been about science for a long time. It’s really been about conditioning the American individual to submit to government. And it never ends. The goalposts will continue to change.” 75/ https://t.co/Rjlz0ObUsE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers express concerns about the government's control over science, specifically mentioning Dr. Fauci. They argue that when science is dictated by the government, it can lead to the rise of flat Earthers. They also discuss the shrinking sphere of individual liberty and the increasing power of the government. The speakers believe that the government is conditioning individuals to submit to its authority and that this trend will continue, with more control over healthcare decisions being centralized. They criticize the idea of government bureaucrats like Fauci making decisions about vaccines and healthcare, warning against the potential for rationing and arbitrary choices. They emphasize the need to resist and fight back against this trend.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Them straight. So the danger is when you let science be controlled by government or by one sort of monolithic individual like Fauci, it really doesn't have anything to do with science. Science usually discovers the truth eventually. But when, science is dictated by the government, that's when you get, you know, flat Earthers. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, they seem to love the character assassination and insult, senator. But listen, as you well know, being an active proponent of, god given rights and liberty, liberty is a zero sum game. Set. You can't have a big sphere of individual liberty and a big government at the same time. And what's really concerning me, senator, is he's constantly moving goalposts, which don't seem to be grounded in science at all, keep shrinking the sphere of individual liberty and empowering more and more government. And it's not gonna stop until we stop it. There doesn't seem to be an endpoint here. Speaker 0: Set I don't think it's been about science for a long time. It's really been about conditioning the American, individual to submit to government. You're right, it never ends. The the goalpost will continue to change, and ultimately, more and more of your healthcare will be controlled. You know, under socialized medicine, when we centralize all controls, most of these decisions are made by government bureaucrats like Fauci. So if you love the dictates on vaccines, you'll love it when Fauci's in charge of who can be dialyzed. In England, for many years, they wouldn't dialyze you after age 50 because they thought, well, you don't have much left to live and over 50, you're over the hill. And I I personally resent that now that I'm well past 50. But the thing is nobody in government should be making those decisions. And once they do, it gets into rationing and arbitrary decisions by, little autocrats like Fauci. It's a huge mistake to let this happen, and we do need to fight back.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jan 2022 – During oral arguments, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor falsely claims there are “over 100,000 children” hospitalized with COVID, roughly 30 times the real number. 76/ https://t.co/24759Gk9a6

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker highlights the current state of the country, comparing it to a year ago. They mention that hospitals are nearly full with severely ill patients on ventilators. They also note that there are over 100,000 children in serious condition, a number that has never been seen before, with many of them also on ventilators. The speaker emphasizes that the presence of a different variant only emphasizes the existing challenges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Country today than we had a year ago in January. We have hospitals that are almost at full capacity with people severely ill on ventilators. We have over a 100000 children, which we've never had before, in in serious condition and, many on ventilators. So saying it's a different variant just underscores the fact that without the without

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jun 2021 – European Parliament releases this video explaining its new digital vaccine pass system for travel within the European Union. 77/ https://t.co/m2hTh4FWcS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The EU has introduced a digital COVID certificate to simplify travel between European countries while ensuring safety. The certificate can be on your phone or printed out and will prove vaccination, negative test results, or recovery from the infection. It will be valid for 12 months and comply with data protection rules. The certificate is free, and the European Parliament has allocated funds to purchase necessary tests. All EU countries will recognize the certificate, but travelers should still check for any local restrictions before their journey.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So why is the EU creating a digital COVID certificate? Speaker 1: Well, remember how hard it has been to travel in recent months? Or how we've had to quarantine after crossing a border. The EU wants to make moving between European countries simple again while staying safe. Speaker 0: How will it work exactly? Speaker 1: Flu. The EU digital COVID certificate can be on your phone or printed out. It will prove that you have been vaccinated against COVID 19, that you've had a negative test, all that you've recovered from the infection. It will be in use for the next 12 months in all member states. The certificate it will be subject to European data protection rules so your personal health information will be safe. Speaker 0: That sounds expensive. How much will it Speaker 1: cost. You don't have to pay for the certificate. Plus, most EU countries vaccinate Europeans for free. The European Parliament also backed plans to mobilize €100,000,000 to purchase tests needed to obtain the certificate. Speaker 0: Can I travel anywhere with the certificate? Speaker 1: All EU countries have agreed to recognize the certificate. In theory, that means they should not impose more restrictions on certificate holders unless they are necessary to protect public health. So check any local restrictions before traveling.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Nov 2021 – CDC Director Walensky tells the Senate the CDC hasn’t conducted any field studies as to whether natural immunity confers protection from COVID. “If we don’t know natural immunity confers protection…it’s because we’ve decided not to look.” 78/ https://t.co/MsODAr3tGX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why there hasn't been research done to show that natural immunity protects against recurrent infection. They mention that studies have shown that individuals with natural immunity have antibodies, T cells, and B cells that are considered adequate for protection. The speaker also mentions that the CDC has access to patient data. However, the other speaker responds by stating that their current stance is that everyone who has been previously infected should still be vaccinated, without directly addressing the question.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of either you or doctor Fauci were saying that the reason that we're not saying that natural immunity is protective as is recent publication showing that 6 to 8 months out, 92% of those with natural immunity have T cells, B cells, and antibodies that would be considered adequate to protect. And indeed, B cell continues to climb. That we don't have data. Now, in your response to Mr. Casey, you just mentioned that CDC has access to tens of thousands of EHRs And I've been told that HHS or CDC has access to patient identifiable data as to who tests positive. So I do that as a prologue. If we don't know that natural immunity confers Protection against future infection is because we've decided not to look. Because I've learned that there is a cohort of people that we know have been previously infected. We've got the bench research showing that the, triad of antibodies, T cells, and B cells are there and that 92% of them are still there at age 6 months out. So why don't we why have we not done the research showing that natural immunity confers protection against recurrent infection? Speaker 1: Yeah. Thank you so much for allowing me to clarify this point because I understand the question. First of all, let me just reiterate that our current stand after reviewing 96 papers and a scientific brief on this issue is that everyone who's been previously infected Should be vaccinated. Speaker 0: But that's not my question.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Sep 2021 – Bill Maher recalls a survey in NYT unintentionally revealing that most Democrats believed COVID’s infection fatality rate was dozens or hundreds of times higher than it really was. 79/ https://t.co/nc5HFb6o1t

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to a survey mentioned in The New York Times, Democrats were more likely to overestimate the chances of hospitalization due to COVID-19 compared to Republicans. Around 41% of Democrats believed the chances were over 50%, while another 28% thought it was between 20% and 49%. This misinformation may have been influenced by the liberal media, leading to unnecessary fear. The speaker highlights the impact of this fear on the entertainment industry, with touring acts struggling to sell tickets in blue states. However, they reassure the audience that safety measures are in place and encourage people to enjoy life while following guidelines. The speaker also mentions their personal experience of getting COVID-19 after being vaccinated, which they find strange but note that many others have had similar situations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I have I have to cite a a survey that was in The New York Times, which is a liberal paper, so they weren't looking for this answer. But they were talking about, this the question was, what do you think the chances are that you would have to go to the hospital if you got COVID? Mhmm. And democrats thought that was way higher than republicans. 41% of democrat and the answer is between 1 5%. K, 41% of Democrats thought it was over 50%. Another 28% thought it was 20 to 49%. So 70% of Democrats thought it was way, way, way higher than it really was. Liberal media has to take a little responsibility for that, for scaring the out of people. And the reason why I'm bringing this up is because it's much harder for every touring act to sell tickets in blue states. Oh, interesting. They were afraid to go out of the house. I see. Whereas in red states, it's all good to go. Uh-huh. So I just wanna say to those people in, say, Rafael in Pittsburgh and New York, I ain't gonna give it to you. I promise, you know, it's safe, we we're doing everything we can. There's distancing. There's masking. Enjoy. Live life. You did get it in the race life. You did get it. I got it after I was vaccinated. You got it after you're vaccinated. Right. And you didn't you wouldn't know that. Had no symptoms. That may be because I was vaccinated, but let's not even get into that because I know you and your boyfriend, Howard Stern, are very paranoid about this, but it's it's a little weird that I got it after. But now many, many, many people have had the same situation. Yes. We've I know people very well who are We do look.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Nov 2021 – In 2021, protests against COVID mandates began to break out all over the world. Here, tens of thousands take to the streets in some of the largest protests in the history of Vienna, Austria. 80/ https://t.co/FFriWCIfmG

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jan 2022 – Over 100,000 gather to protest lockdowns, vaccine passes and COVID mandates in Brussels, Belgium. 81/ https://t.co/8P5jE8mRoZ

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Sep 2021 – Tens of thousands spent months protesting against the COVID pass regime in cities all across France. This is Paris. 82/ https://t.co/SDXzIoFBKF

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jan 2022 – Thousands protest against COVID mandates at the Freedom Rally in London. 83/ https://t.co/NcE36lDWqs

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Oct 2021 – Massive protest against COVID mandates in Tel Aviv, Israel. 84/ https://t.co/10Ppi8ATMy

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Sep 2021 – Italians symbolically burn green passes in protest of Italy’s COVID vaccine “green pass” system. 85/ https://t.co/HMeyaeZW8w

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Feb 2022 – In Turin, Italy, citizens boycotted Italy’s vaccine pass system by hosting outdoor feasts attended by thousands. 86/ https://t.co/lXIEycYsNd

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jan 2022 – In Naples, Italy, the mayor cited COVID to ban fireworks during New Year’s Eve. This was the response from citizens. 87/ https://t.co/duu7JktgMS

Saved - December 9, 2023 at 11:32 AM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

During the last GOP debate, this entire discussion on liability for COVID vaccine injuries and the Trump administration’s fast-tracking development of these mRNA vaccines through “Operation Warp Speed” was blacked out, allegedly due to “technical issues.” https://t.co/vUlhXi3Ltz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the development of the COVID vaccine through Operation Warp Speed and the issue of liability for vaccine injuries. The program protected drug companies from lawsuits, but critics argue that the compensation program is bureaucratic and lacks accountability. The speaker believes that the special protection for vaccine manufacturers should be repealed, along with other forms of crony capitalism. They emphasize the importance of free speech and open debate in making decisions about vaccines. The speaker also calls for an end to government officials joining the boards of companies they have dealt with. They highlight the need to address corruption in government to prevent exemptions and ensure accountability. The video ends with a mention of Alabama and a final question about the vaccine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Market place begins. That's crony capitalism, and that's the answer. Speaker 1: Okay. Through Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration and private industry developed a COVID vaccine in record time. Vaccine. The Trump administration and private industry developed a COVID vaccine in record time. Vaccine. The program protected the drug companies from virtually all lawsuits over vaccine injuries. The government has a program to compensate for such harm, but critics say it is a black hole of bureaucracy. 12,000 claims filed, 10% decided, only 8 payouts so far in a forum with no right to counsel, no hearings, no appeals. Mister Trump says he's very proud of warp speed. Should he be? Speaker 0: Vaccine. Well, this question specifically on liability goes back to actually Reagan. And Reagan is a president who I admire. Many of us do. I think that vaccine. Reviving that spirit is in many ways gonna be good for this country in so many ways, but one of the areas where he erred was this special form of lobbying to say that one kind of manufacturer, vaccine. A vaccine manufacturer cannot be sued for their product liability. So I have pledged it is part of my legislative agenda. We will repeal that, vaccine. Just like we will repeal every other form of crony capitalism, people who have been harmed by those vaccines deserve accountability. They cannot be forgotten Americans. And I think one of the top lessons we learned from that COVID pandemic is that free speech in this country is most important in those alleged times of emergency. If we had been allowed to openly debate the merits of those vaccines, they would have been never mandated in the way that they were. And in general, I don't think that we should want capitalism and democracy to share the same bed anymore. It's time for a clean divorce. Let companies be companies, but I don't like the crony capitalism. Vaccine. This dates back a long time in both parties, and I think that we need to end the lobbying. And I personally believe that if you have been working in the government, you should not lobby that government for 10 years. Vaccine. If you have been a government elected official doing deals with companies, be they Boeing or be they pharmaceutical companies, you should not join the board of that company for 10 years after. Vaccine. The former chairman of the FDA, the leader commissioner of the FDA ended up on the board of Pfizer. Nikki Haley did deals with Boeing, ends up on the board of Boeing. I don't care if it's a Republican or a Democrat. Vaccine. We need some basic principles that end the corruption in government. That's how we got the health insurance exemptions. That's how we got Pharmaceutical product liability exemption to end the corruption. We need vaccine. Speaker 2: Alabama. Final question before vaccine. Statements, and we wanna get you all in. So we're gonna give you 45 seconds for this last one. Governor Christie, we're gonna start with you. Vaccine.
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 6:47 PM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

JFK: “The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society… We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.” https://t.co/K1Qv0Ivj5w

Video Transcript AI Summary
Secrecy is not compatible with a free society. We oppose secret societies and oaths. The dangers of hiding important facts outweigh the reasons given to justify it. We shouldn't imitate a closed society's restrictions. Our nation's survival is meaningless without preserving our traditions. Increased security should not lead to censorship and concealment. No official in my administration should interpret my words as an excuse for censorship or covering up mistakes. We face a ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means to expand its influence. It's a tightly knit system that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. We must inform and alert the American people. We welcome controversy and will admit our errors. Debate and criticism are essential for success and survival. The press has a duty to inform, reflect, and lead public opinion. We need better coverage and understanding of international news. Government must provide full information within the limits of national security. The printing press is crucial for strength and assistance in maintaining freedom and independence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society, and we are, as a people, inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, There is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it, and there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That, I do not intend to permit to the extent that it's in my control. And no official of my administration, whether his rank is high or low, Civilian or military should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes, or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know, for we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for expanding its sphere of influence, on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned. No rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. No president should fear public scrutiny of his program for from that scrutiny comes understanding, and from that understanding comes support or opposition and both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support an administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people, for I have complete confidence and the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed. I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers, I welcome it. This administration intends to be candid about its errors, for as a wise man once said, an error doesn't become a mistake until you refuse to correct it. We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors, and we expect you to point them out when we miss them. Without debate, without criticism, no administration and no country can succeed, and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy, and that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment, the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution, not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply give the public what it wants, but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate, and sometimes even anger public opinion. This means greater coverage and analysis of international news for news, for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission, and it means, finally, that government at all levels must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security. And so it is to the printing press, to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news, that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help, Man will be what he was born to be, free and independent.
Saved - November 2, 2023 at 6:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk subtly defends the Chinese government's handling of ventilator usage during the pandemic, suggesting that they warned Americans against intubating as many COVID patients. However, it is important to note that the initial guidance to use ventilators extensively came directly from China. This pattern of protecting the CCP and their investments has been observed among influential figures, even those opposing lockdowns, contributing to the chaotic situation we endured.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

See how Elon Musk frames the ventilator discussion so as to exculpate the CCP: The heroic Chinese warning their hapless American friends not to intubate as many COVID patients as they did!

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

But in fact, the record is very clear that that guidance to place patients on ventilators early and for extended periods, which proved so deadly in the early days of COVID, came directly from China. https://www.michaelpsenger.com/p/the-great-covid-ventilator-death

The Great COVID Ventilator Death Cover-up Tens of thousands of Americans died after being placed on mechanical ventilators in spring 2020. It’s long past time we got real answers as to how many were killed this way. michaelpsenger.com

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

We’ve seen this dynamic since COVID began, in which major financial and political players—even ones who oppose lockdowns—twist and restrain the discussion so as to protect the CCP and their investments in China, leading in part to the totalitarian mess we experienced for years.

Saved - November 1, 2023 at 7:52 AM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Chief COVID lockdown architect Neil Ferguson denies ever calling for a lockdown: “The reality is a lot more complex…what I tried to do…which was stepping outside the scientific advisory role to try and focus people’s minds on what was going to happen and the consequences.” https://t.co/oxg8oWrNkM

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was involved in policy determination, but it's hard to say if I became too involved. While I'm associated with a specific policy, the reality was more complex. I never explicitly said we should take action immediately. Instead, I sometimes went beyond my scientific advisory role to make people aware of the potential consequences of current trends.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Or did you become, despite your best endeavors, irrevocably involved in the determination of policy? It's a difficult question to answer. I know I'm associated very much with particular policy. But as you'll be aware from the evidence I've given in my statement and the statement of others, the reality was a lot more complex. I was, I don't think I stepped over that line to say we need to do this now. What I tried to do was, at times, which was stepping outside the scientific advisory role, To try and focus people's minds on what was going to happen and and the consequences of current trends.
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 9:37 AM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Reporter who wrote in NYT that 900,000 children had been hospitalized with COVID when the real number was 63,000—and that 4,000 had died from MISC-C when the real number was 68—tells Harvard governments should be more active in policing “misinformation.”

NYT reporter explains how federal missteps opened door to COVID misinformation Anti-vaxxers, others benefited from mistrust engendered by early stumbles in messaging about virus, prevention, says New York Times health and science reporter Apoorva Mandavilli. news.harvard.edu
Saved - September 19, 2023 at 6:56 PM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

In this video from 2021, a Burmese influencer livestreams her dance exercise routine while masking for COVID as a coup unfolds on the street behind her, with the military deposing the country’s ruling party to impose a junta.

Saved - June 20, 2023 at 7:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky initially believed COVID vaccines would stop infection and transmission, according to a recollection from last year. Her recent testimony to Congress confirms this belief, meaning she did not lie in 2021. However, her initial belief has since been proven incorrect, leading to criticism of her profession.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky tells Congress COVID vaccines “initially” stopped infection and transmission, so what she said in 2021 wasn’t a lie. Somehow, even after losing her job, she still manages to embarrass her whole profession. https://t.co/UnUNfQtmLO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that the vaccine did not completely stop the spread or infection, but clarifies that initially it did for the Wuhan strain and the alpha strain. Early data and literature published in the New England Journal showed that those who were vaccinated and didn't get infected were not transmitting the virus to others. The vaccine had a high efficacy of up to 96% early on and this efficacy did not change over time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The vaccine did not stop spread or infection. I'm not saying it was completely bad, but it did not stop the spread or infection. I think actually, if I could actually, just Correct that point. And that is initially it did. For the Wuhan strain and for the alpha strain, all of the early data and the literature published in the New England Journal Demonstrated that for those who worked, if you didn't get infected, that you were not transmitting it to other people. And it had very high efficacy early on up to 96%. So it didn't change over time.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

This from last year seems like a more accurate recollection of her thought process. Receipts. “When the CNN feed came that it was 95% effective, the vaccine, so many of us wanted it to be helpful, so many of us wanted to say, ‘Ok this is our ticket out.’” https://t.co/CXASyXdpIA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reflects on the initial excitement and optimism when news broke that the vaccine was 95% effective. They acknowledge that many people, including themselves, wanted to believe that this was the end of the pandemic. However, they admit that perhaps there was too little caution and too much optimism. They highlight that nobody considered the possibility of vaccine effectiveness waning or the potential challenges posed by future variants.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can we have improved? Well, you know, I think I can tell you where I was when the CNN feed came that it was 95 effective on the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be helpful, so many of us wanted to say, okay, this is our ticket out, right, now we're done. So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism, for some good things that came our way, I really do. I I think all of us wanted this to be done. Nobody said waning when when, you know, oh, this vaccine is going to work. Fifty, oh, well, maybe it'll work it all way off. Nobody said, well, what if the next variant doesn't, it doesn't, it's not as potent against the next variant.
Saved - June 5, 2023 at 4:25 PM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Tens of thousands of Americans died after being placed on mechanical ventilators for COVID in spring 2020. It’s long past time we got real answers as to how many were killed this way. https://www.michaelpsenger.com/p/the-great-covid-ventilator-death

The Great COVID Ventilator Death Cover-up Tens of thousands of Americans died after being placed on mechanical ventilators in spring 2020. It’s long past time we got real answers as to how many were killed this way. michaelpsenger.com
Saved - June 5, 2023 at 4:17 PM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

“Lockdown benefits ‘a drop in the bucket compared to the costs,’ landmark study finds…the findings showed that lockdowns had been ‘a global policy failure of gigantic proportions…the biggest policy mistake in modern times.’” https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/04/first-lockdown-prevented-1700-deaths-landmark-study-finds/

Lockdown benefits ‘a drop in the bucket compared to the costs’, landmark study finds Researchers say draconian measures taken in spring 2020 had 'negligible impact' on Covid mortality compared with lighter-touch countries telegraph.co.uk
Saved - May 28, 2023 at 3:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In spring 2020, tens of thousands of Americans died after being placed on mechanical ventilators. Ventilators were vastly overused, and patients were often put on them not for their own benefit but to protect hospital staff. Prolonged intubation was consistent with guidance from China, and split-ventilation made intubation even more dangerous. Mortality among COVID patients in New York area hospitals fell by over two-thirds between spring 2020 and summer 2020. Despite all this evidence, the establishment is arguing that no patients were killed by ventilators in spring 2020.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

THREAD – The Great COVID Ventilator Death Cover-up Tens of thousands of Americans died after being placed on mechanical ventilators in spring 2020. It’s long past time we got real answers as to how many were killed this way. 1/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Early COVID data from China had suggested that ventilators would need to be used widely in the treatment of COVID patients, and this led to a major rush by politicians and hospitals to procure tens of thousands of ventilators. A small sample of the headlines from that period. 2/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

However, it soon became clear that ventilators were being vastly overused. Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell acted as an early whistleblower, sounding the alarm in a widely-shared video. 3/

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the past 9 days, I've been working in an intensive care unit for COVID-19 patients. However, I've noticed some unusual medical phenomena that don't align with the expected viral pneumonia. The common understanding is that patients start with mild symptoms and progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). But based on what I've seen, I believe we may be treating the wrong disease. This could lead to significant harm for many people in a short period of time. I fear that our current medical paradigm is incorrect and that COVID-19 is not the disease we thought it was.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 9 days ago, I opened an intensive care unit to care for the sickest COVID positive patients in the city. In these 9 days, I have seen things I have never seen before. In treating these patients, I have witnessed medical phenomenon that just don't make sense in the context of treating a disease that is supposed to be a viral pneumonia. 9 days ago, I presumed I was opening an intensive care unit to treat patients with a virus causing a pneumonia That was ravaging lungs across the world, starting out as something mild, cough, a sore throat, and progressively increasing in severity until ultimately ending in something called acute respiratory distress syndrome or ARDS. This is the paradigm that Every hospital in the country is working under. This is the disease ARDS that every hospital is preparing to treat. And this is the disease ARDS for which in the next 2 to 6 weeks, a 100000 Americans might be put on a ventilator. And yet, everything I have seen in the last 9 days, All the things that just don't make sense, the patients I'm seeing in front of me, the lungs I'm trying to improve have led me to believe That COVID nineteen is not this disease and that we are operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue. In short, I believe we are treating the wrong disease and I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

In interviews with major media outlets, several practitioners later disclosed that patients had often been put on ventilators not for their own benefit, but in order to protect hospital staff and stop the virus from spreading. 4/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

As Dr. Rich McCormick told the House COVID Select Subcommittee, “we were intubating people that probably shouldn’t have been intubated.” 5/

Video Transcript AI Summary
In my 20 years of military and ER experience, I witnessed the challenges of dealing with a novel virus. As healthcare professionals, we made mistakes due to outdated knowledge and assumptions. We intubated patients unnecessarily and didn't consider alternative treatments. Families suffered as they were unable to be with their loved ones during their final moments. I held dying patients' hands, knowing there was little I could do. The government exacerbated the situation by interfering with healthcare decisions and keeping families apart. We shouldn't rely on the government to solve problems it created.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In my experience, over 20 years in the military and and finished up as an ER doc. And matter of fact, from the beginning of the pandemic, I was serving as a night shift ER doc, full time, working in the ER, being exposed to fevers. We didn't know where it came from and trying to figure out what this novel virus would do to our patient population, and we got it wrong. I'll tell you, when the novel virus hits you or any novel disease, you don't know what to do. That's a fact. So we're the healthcare professionals, the people with the scientific background, the people who understood how viruses work, how they propagate, how they crate inflammation got it wrong. We're going off of old technology, old assumptions. And I remember we were intubating people that probably shouldn't have been intubated. We didn't use NSAIDs. We didn't use steroids. We didn't, take into account how this virus could be different from other viruses we knew in the past. Let me tell you what else I witnessed as an ER doctor. I watched families struggle with this. Once we we're no longer able to allow families into the ER or watch people die by themselves. I held the hands of people who were dying and looked in their eyes and and told them I was gonna do my very best, but knew there was very little I could do because we didn't know what to do. I I watched and prayed with people, knowing that the outcome was gonna be very poor and knowing we're doing some things very wrong, over time and and realizing As it continued, I became very aware that the government was the biggest problem of all. They didn't help this pandemic. They got in the way of the conversation. They interjected themselves between the professionals and the patients. They kept families apart. They didn't let people even die with dignity or with any choice in their own health care. Let me ask you this. This this is my take home, is why do we keep on turning back to the government to solve the problems that the government created? That's what I get out of this.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

As Meredith Case, an internal medicine resident at NewYork-Presbyterian hospital, put it in a series of since-deleted threads, hospitals were “early intubating” patients for “many days if not weeks” “to avoid aerosolizing procedures to protect staff.” 6/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

This practice of prolonged intubation was apparently consistent with guidance from China. As Zeynep Tufekci had put it, “Chinese scientists” advised “many COVID-19 patients need to stay on mechanical ventilators as long as four weeks.” 7/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Some hospitals in New York began engaging in “split-ventilation”—putting patients on ventilators two-at-a-time. “Split-ventilation” made intubation even more dangerous than it already was. 8/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Even Anthony Fauci eventually admitted that having “very very readily put people on mechanical ventilation” may have “caused more harm than good.” 9/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Intensive care has improved as we now understand that mechanical ventilation may not always be necessary. Instead, proper positioning in the prone or supine position can be beneficial without the need for intubation. This new approach has been learned through clinical experience, as it has been found that intubation can sometimes cause more harm than good.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think the intensive care has improved. We very, very readily would put people on mechanical ventilation. When we found out through clinical experience, it might have been better just to make sure we position them properly in the prone or supine position and not necessarily intubate somebody so readily, which might have actually caused more harm than good. We learned that as we got more

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

The New Yorker featured a harrowing account of one early victim’s final moments before he was put on a ventilator and died—even though he didn’t even “feel sick” at the time he was intubated. 10/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

A study in JAMA later revealed a 97.2% mortality rate among those over age 65 put on mechanical ventilators. Patients over age 65 were more than 26 times as likely to survive if they were NOT placed on mechanical ventilators. 11/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Overall, mortality among COVID patients in New York area hospitals fell by over two-thirds between spring 2020 and summer 2020. 12/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Yet astonishingly, despite all this evidence, the establishment is arguing that *no patients* were killed by ventilators in spring 2020. An astonishing argument, even by the abysmal standards of the COVID era. 13/

@Craig_A_Spencer - Craig Spencer MD MPH

You know why we intubated people for Covid in March 2020? Because otherwise they were going to die. Full. Stop. I remember a patient rolling in with an oxygen saturation of 42%, breathing twice as fast as normal,struggling on a face mask with oxygen all the way up. What to do?

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

The data bears out that ventilator use was sharply curtailed after spring 2020. Overall, CDC data shows that about 10,000 patients died with COVID in NYC hospitals after being put on ventilators in spring 2020. 14/ https://www.michaelpsenger.com/p/the-great-covid-ventilator-death

The Great COVID Ventilator Death Cover-up Tens of thousands of Americans died after being placed on mechanical ventilators in spring 2020. It’s long past time we got real answers as to how many were killed this way. michaelpsenger.com

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

As I’ve previously written, the percentage increase in excess deaths in the greater New York area in spring 2020 vastly outstrips the percentage increase even in other cities with similar climate and social and economic demographics. 15/ https://www.michaelpsenger.com/p/an-estimated-30000-americans-were

An Estimated 30,000 Americans Were Killed by Ventilators & Iatrogenesis in April 2020 Reexamining excess deaths during peak lockdown michaelpsenger.com

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Further, as @ewoodhouse7 has documented in meticulous detail, New York City experienced an unnaturally sharp, breathtaking mortality event just after its lockdown began, unlike anywhere where else or at any other time. 16/ (Source: CDC Wonder mortality, 2018–last month).

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

A side-by-side comparison of inpatient hospital mortality from 2018 to present in NYC vs America’s other largest metro areas illustrates this unnatural, sharp spike in mortality in NYC in spring 2020. 17/ (Source: CDC Wonder mortality, 2018–last month).

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Moreover, the spike in mortality among young people is inconsistent with COVID’s heavily-stratified IFR by age. This is the most widely-cited data on COVID’s IFR by age. Thus, the unnatural spike in mortality in NYC in spring 2020 cannot be attributed to COVID. 18/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

The establishment has responded with studies claiming “early intubation” actually reduced time on ventilators, but this is a straw-man. The real issue is whether patients were put on ventilators unnecessarily, or kept on them too long. 19/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Even more strangely, most attorneys with whom I’ve discussed the ventilator issue agree that there’s actually little litigation risk for the medical establishment given the perceived global emergency and the information coming from China at the time. 20/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

This, too, leads me to believe that the real number of patients killed by ventilators must be frighteningly high; even absent any real litigation risk, the embarrassment alone is leading to this broad cover-up. 21/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Given all the clumsy, self-contradictory arguments about ventilator deaths coming from the medical establishment, you’ve probably gathered that these are not sophisticated crooks. Rather, these are ordinary people who can’t seem to face what really happened. 22/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

As I detailed in Snake Oil, it’s the hallmark of any great dictator to be able to bring out the evil even in ordinary people. And some men are uncannily good at what they do. 23/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Nonetheless, the situation is morally inexcusable. We need to know how these patients died, not only so we know what really happened during the initial response to COVID in spring 2020, but also because it’s the least we can do to honor the deceased. /end https://www.michaelpsenger.com/p/the-great-covid-ventilator-death

The Great COVID Ventilator Death Cover-up Tens of thousands of Americans died after being placed on mechanical ventilators in spring 2020. It’s long past time we got real answers as to how many were killed this way. michaelpsenger.com
Saved - May 18, 2023 at 2:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A library of viral videos from the COVID response shows propaganda, human rights abuses, and authoritarianism. The WHO praised China's lockdown, while Italy and the US implemented their own. Mask mandates were based on false claims, and PCR tests were abused to inflate cases. Biochemist Kary Mullis warned against using PCR for diagnosis, and Anthony Fauci was criticized for lying on camera. The COVID hysteria led to authoritarianism, theater, and mass psychosis.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

THREAD – The Ultimate COVID Video Library A semi-chronological, open-access library of the most important and viral video clips from throughout the response to COVID. This thread has no end, so videos after the first hundred or so may be added ad hoc. Be sure to bookmark! 1/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jan 2020 – Shortly after Xi Jinping announces the strictest lockdown in history in Wuhan, China, videos begin going viral all over the world supposedly showing Wuhan residents spontaneously collapsing and falling to their deaths from the new virus. 2/ https://t.co/Wrg21sEnrn

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Feb 2020 – In some of the most powerful propaganda of the entire COVID saga, viral videos purport to show CCP officials welding Wuhan residents into their homes to prevent them from going outside during lockdown. 3/ https://t.co/hX52Xh5bzs

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Feb 2020 – A viral video shows Chinese police with the word SWAT written on their uniforms in English catching a man with a butterfly net for removing his mask during Wuhan’s lockdown. 4/ https://t.co/nQs0ebEvJy

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jan 2020 – WHO Director Tedros Adhanom heaps praise on Xi Jinping and China for the lockdown of Wuhan. However, the lockdown, being only days old, hadn’t produced any results, so Tedros was actually praising human rights abuses with nothing to show fro them. 5/

Video Transcript AI Summary
China's actions have greatly contributed to reducing the president's knowledge level, which I praised in my speech.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I will praise China again and again. Because its actions actually helped in reducing the president of the president of the president of the president of the and I said it in my speech, the level of his knowledge is very, very amazing.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Feb 2020 – In the WHO’s official press conference on Wuhan’s COVID response, Bruce Aylward, head of the WHO-China Joint Mission, waxes rhapsodic about the Wuhan lockdown: “What China has demonstrated is, you have to do this.” 6/

Video Transcript AI Summary
China has shown that taking necessary measures can save lives and prevent thousands of cases of a challenging disease.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What China has demonstrated is, you have to do this and if you do it, you can save lives and prevent thousands of cases what is a very difficult disease.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Feb 2020 – Bruce Aylward, head of the WHO-China Joint Mission, explains how Wuhan’s COVID lockdown supposedly flattened the curve. “This is extremely important for China, but it’s extremely important for the rest of the world.” 7/

Video Transcript AI Summary
An aggressive action can alter the expected shape of an infectious disease outbreak, which is significant for China and the rest of the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that's what happens when you have an aggressive action that changes the shape that you would expect from an infectious disease outbreak. Outbreak. This is extremely important for China, but it's extremely important for the rest of the

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Shortly after advising the entire world to copy China’s lockdown policy, Bruce Aylward, head of the WHO-China Joint Mission, refuses to acknowledge Taiwan’s existence. 8/ https://t.co/qQkFCeRtJq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if the WHO would consider Taiwan's membership, but Speaker 1 couldn't hear the question. Speaker 0 repeats the question, but Speaker 1 suggests moving on. Speaker 0 insists on discussing Taiwan's handling of the virus. Speaker 1 mentions that they have already discussed China's efforts and thanks the host for the invitation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would the WHO consider Taiwan's membership? Hello? Was it not? Speaker 1: I couldn't hear your question. Speaker 0: Okay, yes, let me repeat the question. Speaker 1: Let's move to another one then. Speaker 0: Right, because I'm actually curious on talking about Taiwan as well on Taiwan's Speaker 1: Case. We decided to give Doctor. Auerd another call to follow-up. Speaker 0: And I just want to see if you can comment a bit on how Taiwan has done so far in terms of containing the virus? Speaker 1: Well, we've already talked about China. And when you look across all different areas of China, they've actually all done quite a good job. So with that, I'd like to thank you very much for inviting us to participate And good luck as you go forward with the battle in Hong Kong.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – An anchor for CGTN, China’s largest state TV outlet, explains the “new norm” of “lockdown.” “We traded a little of our freedom for the greater good… This is exactly what Europe and America should know.” 9/

Video Transcript AI Summary
China's response to the pandemic was initially seen as extreme and aggressive, but it has now become the new norm. Lockdown measures have been implemented, raising concerns about individual rights. However, the balance between individual rights and public safety is constantly evolving. After 9/11, airports worldwide introduced strict safety checks, and people accepted them in exchange for greater public good. Similarly, China imposed the largest and most extensive quarantine in history, shutting down factories, halting public transport, and enforcing stay-at-home orders. This approach helped flatten the curve, preventing millions of cases and tens of thousands of deaths. However, it also strained hospitals over a longer period. Europe and America should take note of China's experience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Extreme, draconian, and aggressive. These are the words used to describe China's response. But now, people have come to terms with the new norm, lockdown. Some people say, isn't that a violation of individual rights? Actually, the balance between individual rights and public safety is always an ever changing equation. After 911, all the airports in the world began to impose draconian safety checks on passengers, and people accepted it because we traded a little of our freedom for the greater good of the public. China imposed the largest and most draconian quarantine in history. Factories shut, public transport stopped, and people stayed indoors. By doing that, it flattened the curve. On one hand, China avoided many millions of cases and tens of thousands of death. On the other, it stretched out the time and make the hospitals restaaved and less strained. This is exactly what Europe and America should know.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte announces a lockdown of all of Italy—the first lockdown of an entire country in the history of the western world. 10/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The future of Italy is in our hands, and we must be responsible. Everyone needs to do their part. Therefore, starting today, these measures will be implemented throughout the country. We have already implemented them in the northern regions, including Lombardy and some provinces. Unfortunately, the numbers show a significant increase in infections, hospitalizations in intensive care units, and deaths.
Full Transcript
E di restare a casa il futuro nostro dell'italia è nelle nostre mani e queste mani devono essere mani responsabili oggi più che mai ognuno deve fare la propria parte ed è per questo quindi che da oggi varranno su tutto il territorio della penisola queste misure che noi abbiamo già predisposto per la parte settentrionale come sapete lombardia più provincia in più province giusto qualche giorno fa purtroppo tempo non ce n'è I numeri ci dicono che stiamo avendo una crescita importante dei contagi delle persone ricoverate in terapia intensiva e subintensiva e anche ahimè delle persone decedute

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Footage of empty streets across Italy as the entire country is placed under lockdown. 11/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Military police in Italy use automated drones to enforce the lockdown and monitor compliance with COVID restrictions. 12/

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – A video goes ultra-viral all over the world showing Italians in lockdown with “a message to themselves from 10 days prior” urging viewers to be more afraid of the new coronavirus. 13/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ciao Anna! Ciao Salvatore! Sono qui per dirti che la situazione in Italia è diventata molto grave. Dieci giorni fa non credevi al virus e facevi tutto come al solito. Ma ora ci sono migliaia di contagi e centinaia di morti. L'intero paese è bloccato e gli ospedali sono pieni. Non puoi uscire di casa se non per cose indispensabili. È un problema serio che sta colpendo tutto il mondo. Non è pessimismo, è la realtà. Quindi, anche solo poter respirare l'aria di casa tua è una cosa grandissima.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ciao Anna! Ciao Salvatore! Il dirti. Speaker 1: Ciao da dire di dieci giorni fa, Speaker 2: hai paura? Oh, sono te, prego, io Speaker 3: sono te, tre, dieci giorni. Speaker 4: Ti parlo dal futuro, Speaker 1: la solita di fretta ma fermati in su Speaker 3: Google volevo aggiornarti sulla situazione in Italia Speaker 5: per succedere un casino pazzesco il fatto che Speaker 6: tu abbia già sentite una di Speaker 7: colonna virus, io sono altrettanto certa del fatto che tu stai prendendo sotto ne manca la cosa. Speaker 0: Addirittura se vedevo qualcuno con la mascherina lo prendevo in giro Speaker 5: e smettila di prendere in giro tua madre quando ti dice di comprare le mascherine e comprale Speaker 0: scema fino a dieci giorni fa facevo riunioni di lavoro, andavo a cena con gli amici, palestra, parrucchiere, solite banalità che non hanno mai fatto del male a nessuno. Speaker 1: Vadinten days, life Welby non moll lights. Speaker 0: L'ipotesi forse peggiore è quello che succederà, Speaker 8: sì, perché I contagi in Italia saranno sempre Speaker 2: di più dimostrandoti che non era una cazzata come credevi Speaker 9: dieci giorni fa potevano essere duemila contagi adesso siamo arrivati Speaker 1: a diciottomila abbiamo superato I mille decessi Speaker 4: quindi adesso ti ritrovi a fare dei tuoi bimbi mortali. Speaker 10: Adesso siamo in una situazione assurda, qua Speaker 3: non possiamo uscire di casa se non una Speaker 2: bella quantità quella che hai visto soltanto nei film. Speaker 4: Una nazione intera bloccata a casa. Non te l'aspettavi? Speaker 10: Gli ospedali stanno veramente scoppiando casi sono tanti anche tra I giovani ci Speaker 1: sono dei ragazzi della nostra età che sono stati intubati in termini si va, Speaker 4: guarda solo l'influenza, si va aperto a grave, però è stata presa con un Speaker 0: po' di leggerezza. La leggerezza va a coltivare dell'anima ma non nei gesti Speaker 3: se devi andare in giro fallo soltanto per cose veramente indispensabili Speaker 0: perché quella che rischi non è il fallito nel rettore. Speaker 4: Vediamo immagini dalla Francia, dagli Stati Uniti preoccupanti, di persone che stanno tornando sotto da una cosa, è un problema al serio di quello che è il gran parte del mondo crede Speaker 0: non è pessimismo cosmico quello che sta succedendo è molto più grave di quello che ti immaginarvi e tu capirai che solo il fatto di poter respirare anche solo l'aria di casa tua, insomma diciamo una grandissima cosa.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Tomás Pueyo, an influencer whose ultra-viral articles convinced many officials to adopt COVID lockdown policies, goes on tour advising leaders all over the world to adopt strict lockdowns. Here, Pueyo debates UK SAGE leader John Edmunds. 14/ https://t.co/vKsvZe5kWR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 emphasizes that achieving herd immunity is the only way to stop the epidemic. Speaker 1 asks for a response from Thomas Perry, who strongly disagrees, stating that wanting a percentage of the population to catch the virus would result in many deaths. Speaker 2 argues against the concept of herd immunity, highlighting the need to prevent people from catching the virus to avoid fatalities and the overwhelming of healthcare systems. They urge immediate action to prevent panic and a situation similar to Italy. Speaker 0 explains that there are two strategies: stamping out every case worldwide or achieving herd immunity. The containment strategy has not been successful, so achieving herd immunity is the only option left.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The only way to stop this epidemic is indeed to achieve herd immunity. Speaker 1: Okay. Thomas Perry, you're shaking your head and now you've got your head buried in your hands. What's your response to what John Edmunds just said? Speaker 2: This is like deciding, you know what, this forest might burn, so let's cut a third of it. This is crazy. We want to have 10, 20, 30% of the population catch this. The the the UK has what, 66,000,000 people. That's how many people? That's, around 20,000,000 people. 1 of 1% of these people are gonna die. So we're saying we wanna kill 200,000 people in the UK. So that's, the biggest thing. Speaker 1: I don't think anyone is saying that. I don't think anyone is saying that, but I think there is a real debate in the scientific community going on about the value of herd immunity. So just briefly, what do you think about the value of herd immunity? And can it be created through the measures that the government is, you know, introducing right now? Speaker 2: We need to understand what it means, this herd immunity. They're saying everybody's gonna catch it. So once they catch it, they can't catch it anymore. That's crazy. We don't want people to catch it. We want people not to catch it because otherwise they're gonna die. And and right now the cases are going exponentially. In a week, it. The NHS is starting to be collapsed. In 2 weeks, it's gonna be completely collapsed. If we don't take measures now, then people are gonna panic. Maybe not today if we don't take the measures, But they're gonna definitely back in panic next week or in 2 weeks. We have 13 days of advance compared to Italy. Right? They thought the exact same thing 2 weeks ago. And then 1 week later, they realized, oh my god, this is exploding. They have now, what, 17,000 cases? Mhmm. It's exploding then. They realized too late That they were not containing this. You you UK now has an opportunity to catch this before the weekend, and we need to catch this before the weekend because everybody's gonna spread this with their friends, with their families that they haven't been seen in the during the week. So it needs to be declared now. That's why Speaker 1: Okay. Let's Thomas, where did let's bring in John. I mean, has he got a point here? We've got to catch this right now. Speaker 0: There's 2 things, there's 2 strategies with a new virus, a new epidemic. There's 2 strategies. One, You can stamp out every single case in the world, every single case in the world and then the virus it? Then you're free. You've stopped that epidemic without achieving herd immunity but you must cut every single case in the world. With a mild disease That's incredibly difficult. That's the phase that we were in when we were trying to do containment and everybody else was kind of trying to do containment yeah Trying to stamp out every single case in the world. It hasn't worked, yeah? We haven't managed to do that. The next phase when the virus, it. The genie is out of the bottle. The virus is all around the world and spreading. The next phase, the only other way that the epidemic is going to come to a stop is achieving herd immunity.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, and Donald Trump smile and laugh as they announce “15 Days to Slow the Spread,” arguably the most destructive policy ever implemented in US history at the domestic level. 15/ https://t.co/UehUNnPyus

Video Transcript AI Summary
In response to a question, the speaker mentions that there is an answer to the situation. They defer to someone named Howdy, who was their mentor, to speak. The speaker then mentions that in states with evidence of community transmission, certain places like bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, and other venues where people gather should be closed. However, they clarify that they haven't explicitly stated that governors in those states should close everything.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just wanted to read there's a there's a there's an answer to this. Oh, yeah. Go ahead, Howdy. He was my mentor, so I'm going to have to let him speak. The small print here, it's really small print. In states with evidence of community transmission, bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, and other indoor and outdoor venues where groups of people congregate should be closed. So mister president, are you telling mister president, are are you telling are you telling governors in those states then to close all their Terry. Well, we haven't said that

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Cars line up for miles at food banks as COVID lockdowns begin in the United States. 16/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hundreds of cars lined up for the Greater Pittsburgh Food Bank, with some waiting up to 5 hours for emergency supplies. The Joint Hands Food Pantry, which has been operating for 15 years, experienced an unprecedented demand. The Chicago Food Depository gave away 7,200 pounds of food, quickly running out due to the high number of first-time callers. The Labor Department reported a staggering 3,283,000 jobless claims filed in one week, surpassing any previous record. This health crisis has clearly turned into an economic crisis, as demonstrated by the long lines at food banks and the unprecedented number of jobless claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Clearly show us how this health crisis has become an economic crisis in this country. It is this right here. The Pittsburgh Gazette captured video of hundreds of cards lining up for the Greater Pittsburgh Food Bank before it opened yesterday. Some waited 5 hours as volunteers distributed emergency supplies to 15 of 100 families, and then they ran out. Speaker 1: A new reality for those in need. Rick Paulson is the volunteer coordinator for the Joint Hands Food Pantry. He says they've been holding the food pantry for 15 years, But have never seen it like this. Speaker 2: Someone says, out of the 19 fifties movie or a bad dream, it's just so surreal. Speaker 1: On this day, 72 100 pounds of food was given away from the Chicago Food Depository, and it went fast. Speaker 2: We've had so many calls from people, and we know they're first time of Speaker 3: Just moments ago, the Labor Department put out its statistics, a jaw dropping 3,283,000 jobless claims were filed last week. 3,000,000 of 283,000 jobless claims. That number Okay. Dwarfs any other week on record.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – People line up around the block in freezing temperatures outside grocery stores as COVID lockdowns begin in the United States. 17/ https://t.co/A9fRbKdaaY

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

March 2020 – Footage of empty streets across New York City during lockdown. 18/ https://t.co/TkIdU4v4j3

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Stranded workers thrown out of their factory jobs march in exodus to villages thousands of miles away during lockdown in India. 19/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thousands of migrant workers in India, including Yogesh Yadav, are embarking on a long journey on foot. Yogesh, a tailor, lost his job when the clothing shop he worked at closed down. He is now walking 650 kilometers through Uttar Pradesh. This mass exodus of workers is a phenomenon not seen in India for many years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Exodus that hasn't been seen in India in decades. Thousands of migrant workers are on the move. Most of them on foot. Among them, Yogesh Yadav who's walking 650 kilometers through the state of Uttar Pradesh after the clothing shop at which he worked as a tailor was closed.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – People line up for miles to receive food rations during lockdown in South Africa. 20/

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Centurion, South Africa, residents in the informal settlement of Moy Place lined up for nearly two and a half miles to receive emergency food parcels. Businesses donated 8,000 food hampers to help those in need. This comes after South Africa has been under strict restrictions for 5 weeks, with most of the population required to stay at home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lined up for nearly two and a half miles for emergency food parcels in the South African city of Centurion on Wednesday. A number of businesses donated 8,000 food hampers, which were given out to residents in the informal settlement of Moy Place. South Africa has spent 5 weeks under tough restrictions requiring most of the population to stay at home.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Under the banner of #Masks4All, a video goes viral all over the world touting the false claim that cloth masks had stopped the spread of COVID in the Czech Republic. This false claim played a major role in mask mandates all over the world. 21/

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, we have an important message for those living in countries affected by the new coronavirus. The Czech Republic has successfully slowed down the spread of the virus, and we want to share what we did differently to help you do the same. We followed social distancing and strict hygiene procedures, but the main difference is that everyone who leaves their house in our country wears a face mask. Studies show that even homemade masks offer some protection. Masks not only protect you from others, but also prevent transmission if you are contagious before showing symptoms. By both wearing masks, we protect each other and stay safe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have an important message for all of you, especially if you live in a country that is right now facing the new coronavirus. The pandemic is growing exponentially in many countries. But the Czech Republic is one the few in Europe that has significantly slowed down the spread of the virus. In this video, we would like to tell you what we did differently, And mainly, we would like to help you to do the same. We are following social distancing and the rules stay at home, But others do that too. We also have a strict hygienic procedures. Others do that as well. But the main difference is everyone who has to leave their house has to wear a face mask. Everyone. I know. They may be told you that masks wouldn't protect you, but there are studies proving that even a homemade mask can be partially protective. Partially, any protection is essential today. But now the more important thing, masks Fundamentally prevent the transmission from you to others by sneezing, coughing, but also breathing. And many people are the most contagious before they start Showing symptoms. So when we both have a face mask, I protect you, you protect me, and we are both safe.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – The city of Los Angeles orders a skate park to be filled with sand so youth won’t try to go outside and skate during lockdown. 22/ https://t.co/3CQCApykGc

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Police detain a mother in Idaho for taking her kids to play at the playground during lockdown. 23/ https://t.co/tCi4lgtMVU

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Spring 2020 – ‘The COVID Religion’: A compilation of some of the most insane scenes of petty authoritarianism, theater, and mass psychosis during peak COVID hysteria. 24/ https://t.co/1Ym7lumvEu

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Chinese state media shares a video of a 7-year-old girl reciting a script on the importance of obeying COVID lockdown orders. “I am only 7 years old. I understand it, but why do some adults not get it?” 25/ https://t.co/izARFKhiiS

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm upset because of the coronavirus. I can't go to school, see my friends, or go to my favorite places. But I know these sacrifices are necessary. I've been staying at home for 2 months, wearing a mask, washing my hands, and avoiding crowded places. I don't want to get sick and pass it on to my family. Coronavirus is a global health emergency and everyone has a responsibility to stop it. It shouldn't be used for political arguments. We need to come together, use our strength and determination to fight this common enemy. I'm only 7 years old, but I understand. Why don't you?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am not happy. I am upset because of the coronavirus. I can't go to school. I can't see my friends. I can't go to my favorite restaurant. I can't go to parties. I can't go to Disneyland, but I know all these sacrifices will be worth it. Ice I stayed at home for 2 months already. I wear a mask. Wash my hands. I don't go to toilet areas in order to stop the virus spreading. Because if I know if I don't do so. I might be affected and infect my dad, mom, and my brother. If they are sick, they might die, and I won't see them anymore. I will be even more upset. Coronavirus is It's a global health emergency. Everyone on this earth has a responsibility to stop it. It should not be a political matter to be used against other nations. I'm only 7 years old. I understand it. But why do some adults don't get it? To those national leaders, Stop blaming each other. Forget about your own interests. The virus won't go away by winning a political argument. We should use our strength, power, determination, and courage. Altogether to fight with this common enemy, coronavirus. I have this common sense. Why don't you?

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

May 2020 – Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet and lead advisor to the UK, said the world should thank China for lockdown: “Not only the right thing to do, but it also showed other countries how they should respond… I think we have a great deal to thank China for.” 26/

Video Transcript AI Summary
China's lockdown of Wuhan demonstrated decisive action in response to an acute emergency, setting an example for other countries. Their prompt response not only led the world in combating the pandemic but also highlighted the appropriate approach to such threats. China's actions deserve our gratitude for both doing what was necessary and guiding other nations in their response.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: China's decision to lock down Wuhan showed that the government acted tremendously, decisively in the face of an acute emergency. And by taking those actions, China led the world in the response to this pandemic. It was not only the right thing to do, but it also showed other countries how they should respond in the face of such an acute threat. So I think we have a great deal to thank China for.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Spring 2020 – During peak COVID lockdown, high-production-value TikTok videos of nurses performing choreographed dance routines across the world began going viral. They appear to have been produced at significant cost, but the reason remains a mystery. 27/ https://t.co/IX8YzyH0im

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – In a viral video, Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell acted as an early whistleblower about COVID ventilator protocols that “will lead to a tremendous amount of harm.” Indeed, a study later revealed a 97.2% mortality rate among those over age 65 placed on ventilators. 28/

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the past 9 days, I have been working in an intensive care unit for COVID-19 patients. However, I have noticed some unusual medical phenomena that don't align with the expected viral pneumonia. The common understanding is that COVID-19 starts with mild symptoms and progresses to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). But based on what I have seen, I believe we may be treating the wrong disease. This misconception could potentially harm a large number of people in a short period of time. I fear that our current medical paradigm is incorrect and that we need to reevaluate our approach to COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 9 days ago, I opened an intensive care unit to care for the sickest COVID positive patients in the city. In these 9 days, I have seen things I have never seen before. In treating these patients, I have witnessed medical phenomenon that just don't make sense in the context of treating a disease that is supposed to be a viral pneumonia. 9 days ago, I presumed I was opening an intensive care unit to treat patients with a virus causing a pneumonia That was ravaging lungs across the world, starting out as something mild, cough, a sore throat, and progressively increasing in severity until ultimately ending in something called acute respiratory distress syndrome or ARDS. This is the paradigm that Every hospital in the country is working under. This is the disease ARDS that every hospital is preparing to treat. And this is the disease ARDS for which in the next 2 to 6 weeks, a 100000 Americans might be put on a ventilator. And yet, everything I have seen in the last 9 days, All the things that just don't make sense, the patients I'm seeing in front of me, the lungs I'm trying to improve have led me to believe That COVID nineteen is not this disease and that we are operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue. In short, I believe we are treating the wrong disease and I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

July 2020 – Jeremy Hunt, powerful UK establishment politician and current Chancellor of the Exchequer, praises China’s draconian “Zero Covid” and quarantine measures and advocates for the UK to emulate them. 29/ https://t.co/fFZXG6R9vs

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker agrees with Gabriel's paper that the goal should be to eliminate the disease and achieve zero infection. They mention that countries with a SARS strategy, rather than a flu strategy, have been the most successful in tackling the coronavirus. The speaker shares an example of their sister's experience in Beijing, where she was escorted from the airport to her home by Ministry of Health officials and put into quarantine for two weeks. The seriousness of these measures reflects the determination to stop any potential source of infection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I very much agree with the central point in in Gabriel's paper that we should be aiming for zero infection, and elimination of the disease because that is basically the approach taken in countries which have a SARS strategy as opposed to a a flu strategy. And those are the countries that have overwhelmingly been the most successful in in tackling coronavirus. And, you know, I just my sister lives in Beijing, and she flew back to Beijing in the middle of lockdown. And just to give you an an idea of the contrast, she was escorted from the airport in Beijing to her home by Ministry of Health officials, and then, put into her home for 2 weeks quarantine. The door was sealed, and, she had a police car sitting outside the house, periodically. And I'm not we go that far in this country. But I just think it's an indication of how serious they are in the countries that have had to deal with SARS about stopping at the root every possible source of infection.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

July 2020 – In a brief limited hangout, FBI Director Christopher Wray discloses that the CCP specifically approached local politicians across the United States to endorse its pandemic response. “Yes, this is happening at both the federal and state levels.” 30/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chinese diplomats are actively seeking support for China's handling of the COVID-19 crisis, according to federal, state, and local officials. This influence is happening at both the federal and state levels, with a recent incident involving a state senator being asked to introduce a resolution in support of China's response to the pandemic. Unfortunately, the pandemic has not deterred these efforts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I will note that the pandemic has unfortunately not stopped any of this. In fact, we've heard from federal, state, and even local officials that Chinese diplomats are aggressively urging support for China's handling of the COVID-nineteen crisis. Yes, this is happening at both the federal and state levels. Not that long ago, we had a state senator who was recently even asked to introduce a resolution supporting China's response to the pandemic.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Aug 2020 – Deborah Birx: “I wish when we went into lockdown, we looked like Italy…people weren’t allowed out of their houses, and they couldn’t come out but once every two weeks to buy groceries…had to have a certificate that said they were allowed.” 31/ https://t.co/QASLEUeoRB

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the lockdown, Italy implemented strict measures where people were only allowed to leave their houses once every two weeks for one hour to buy groceries. They had to carry a certificate to prove they were allowed to do so. However, Americans didn't respond positively to such prohibitions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wish that when we went into lockdown, we looked like Italy. But when Italy locked down, I mean people weren't allowed out of their houses and they couldn't come out but once every 2 weeks to buy groceries for 1 hour they had to have our certificate that said they were allowed. Americans don't react well to that kind of prohibition.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

May 2020 – Stephanie Warriner, a patient at a hospital in Toronto, is forcibly restrained by hospital staff for not properly wearing her mask. Her body is then wheeled away, having died from “restraint asphyxia following struggle and exertion.” 32/ https://t.co/gVsHU83Qjv

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

May 2020 – An Ohio woman is arrested and tazed for refusing to wear a mask at a football game. 33/ https://t.co/xVFDe3gx0s

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 tells someone to get off of them and questions what they can do with them. Speaker 1 mentions that it's about a map, but Speaker 0 disagrees. Speaker 1 suggests calling someone, possibly the police, but Speaker 0 asks if they will arrest them. Speaker 1 doesn't think the person can be arrested for not wearing a mask. Speaker 2 tells someone named Raven to call the cops and asks if they will talk to them. Speaker 0 expresses uncertainty about whether the person is a real officer. Speaker 1 mentions that the person is harassing someone for not wearing a mask. Speaker 0 asks about their own mask. The conversation ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Get off of me. What can I do with you? Get off of me. You're not a rescue. You're Speaker 1: This is over a map. Speaker 0: It's not. Speaker 1: I don't know. Somebody needs Speaker 0: to call. Okay. So do you arrest me? Speaker 1: I don't think he can arrest her for not wearing a mask. This is not a warning. Speaker 2: Call the cops, Raven. Speaker 0: Call the cops? Yeah. Speaker 2: Will you talk to them? Speaker 0: I don't know if Speaker 2: he's a real officer. It says police on the side and on his back. Speaker 0: I don't know anything. Speaker 1: Arassing her for math. Not wearing We need that one Speaker 0: on. Right. Hey. Where's your mat? Remember we're

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

April 2020 – Deborah Birx tells the press that in the US, “if someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death” regardless of any other health issues or comorbidities. 34/ https://t.co/iPg9LVniaQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Fauci and Dr. Brooks discuss concerns about the misreporting of deaths due to COVID-19. They mention that in the past, when testing was not widely available, some countries recorded deaths caused by the virus as heart or kidney issues instead of COVID-19. However, in the US, if someone dies with COVID-19, it is counted as a COVID-19 death. There are concerns raised by coroners about the accuracy of this reporting. The conversation ends with a question about whether this reporting method skews the data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just want to hear doctor Fauci or doctor Brooks. Can you talk about your concerns about deaths being misreported, by coronavirus because of either, testing or standards for how they're characterized? Speaker 1: So I think in this country, we've taken a very liberal approach to mortality. And I think the reporting here Has been pretty straightforward over the last 5 to 6 weeks. Prior to that, when there wasn't testing in January And let's say the virus caused you to go to the ICU and then have a heart or kidney problem. Some countries are recording that as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID nineteen death. Right now we're still recording it. The great thing about having forms that come in and a form that has the ability to market as COVID-nineteen infection, the U. S. The intent is right now that if someone dies with COVID-nineteen, we are counting that as a COVID-nineteen death? Speaker 0: You hear from coroners that that's not necessarily the case? How can you be confident about that? Is there any concern that it skews the

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Jul 2020 – Anthony Fauci says if a COVID PCR test only yields a positive using a CT value of 35 or more, it should not be considered a real positive. Despite this, labs across the US used a CT of 37 for years based on the original WHO guidance, inflating COVID cases ten-fold. 35/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks if a PCR test can be used to determine if a patient is no longer infectious. The other speaker explains that if the cycle threshold is 35 or higher, the chances of the virus being able to replicate are very low. They mention that it is frustrating for both patients and physicians when the cycle threshold is high, but it is unlikely to culture the virus. They conclude that if the cycle threshold is 37, 38, or even 36, it is just dead nucleotides.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm wondering if you think we could use, a cutoff of viral loads determined by PCR to say this patient is no longer infectious, can go home, can go to a nursing facility? Because right now the physicians are really having a hard time with that. Speaker 1: Right. Again, a good question and what is now sort of, evolving into a bit of a standard That if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are minuscule. So that if somebody and you know, we do. We have patients and it's very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians. Somebody comes in and they repeat their PCR and it's like 37 cycle threshold, but you never you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, Even 36, you gotta say, you know, it's just it's just dead nucleotides, period.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

1993 – American biochemist Kary Mullis, who received the Nobel Prize for his invention of PCR technology, states plainly that PCR should never be used for the purpose of diagnosing illness. Mullis passed away in August 2019, just months before the first reports of COVID. 36/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The measurement for HIV is not as exact as measuring apples. HIV tests are based on invisible factors and the results are inferred. PCR is a process used to create a large quantity of something, but it doesn't indicate illness or the potential harm of the virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The measurement for it is not is not exact at all. It's not it's not as good as our measurement for things like apples. An apple is an apple. You know, you can get something that's kind of like if you got enough things that look kind of like an apple, you stick them all together, you might think it was an apple. But and HIV is like that. Those tests are all based on things that are invisible and they are the results are inferred in a sense. PCR. It's separate from that. It's just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That's what it is. And it's It's not it. It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was gonna hurt you or

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

1996 – Kary Mullis, winner of the Nobel Prize for inventing PCR, blasts Anthony Fauci for his abuse of PCR for diagnosing illness. “Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lying directly into the camera.” 37/ https://t.co/G1FlUvDBLd

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes Dr. Fauci, claiming he lacks knowledge in electron microscopy and medicine. They believe that most top officials, including Fauci, have personal agendas and make up their own rules. The speaker argues that the majority of people cannot judge good scientists, which is a problem in science today. They mention that Fauci has been asked to debate someone knowledgeable on the subject, as they believe he lacks understanding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is it about humanity that wants to go to all the details and stuff and listen know, guys like Fauci get up there and start talking. You know, he don't know anything really about anything, and I'd say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and sticking in an electron microscope and if it's got a virus in there, you'll know it. He doesn't understand electron microscopy and he doesn't understand medicine and that he should did not be in a position like he's in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don't know anything about what's going on with the bottom. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take know, of our health and some. They've got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to, and they smuggle it like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera. You can't expect the sheep to really respect the best and the brightest. They don't know the difference really. I mean I, I like humans, don't, don't get me wrong, but basically there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn't a really good scientist. I mean that's a problem, that's the main problem actually with science I would say in this century because science is being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don't understand it, okay. Who do we trust? Fauci. Fauci didn't know, enough to, you know if Fauci wants to get on television with somebody who knows a little bit about this stuff and debate him, he could easily do it because he's been asked. I mean, I've I've had a lot of people, president of the University of South Carolina, ask about you if you'd come down there and debate me on the stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody Benny who was from the other side to come down there and balance my because I felt like well these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that is going to tell me the other side.
Saved - May 12, 2023 at 4:34 AM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Deborah Birx, Aug 2020: “I wish when we went into lockdown, we looked like Italy…people weren’t allowed out of their houses, and they couldn’t come out but once every 2 weeks to buy groceries…they had to have a certificate that said they were allowed.” https://t.co/QASLEUeoRB

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the lockdown, Italy implemented strict measures where people were only allowed to leave their houses once every two weeks for a one-hour grocery shopping trip. They had to carry a certificate to prove they were allowed to be out. However, Americans didn't respond positively to such prohibitions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wish that when we went into lockdown, we looked like Italy. But when Italy locked down, I mean people weren't allowed out of their houses and they couldn't come out but once every 2 weeks to buy groceries for 1 hour they had to have our certificate that said they were allowed. Americans don't react well to that kind of prohibition.
Saved - April 26, 2023 at 9:21 PM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

The damage that lockdowns would cause was far too well known, far too uneven, and far too catastrophic to assume their chief instigators must have had good intentions. https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/no-lockdown-instigators-do-not-deserve

No, Lockdown Instigators Do Not Deserve the Benefit of the Doubt The damage that lockdowns would cause was far too well known, far too uneven, and far too catastrophic to assume their chief instigators must have had good intentions. michaelpsenger.substack.com
Saved - April 24, 2023 at 8:02 PM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Doctor testifies that a woman who went into early labor was denied treatment at a hospital and had to wait in the ambulance because she hadn’t been vaccinated for COVID. She was forced to deliver her baby onboard the ambulance, attended by a paramedic. https://t.co/HyqKEsVUF6

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pregnant women in Manitoba were mandated to receive the vaccine, with severe consequences for those who refused. A woman's doctor refused to attend her delivery because she declined the vaccine, leading her to choose a home birth. However, when she went into labor prematurely, she had to go to the hospital. The obstetrics and gynecology department refused to treat her because she was unvaccinated, leaving her in the ambulance bay for 30 minutes. Eventually, she delivered with the help of a paramedic while her husband waited outside. The pressure on pregnant women to get vaccinated was deemed unethical, as they were told they needed the vaccine or their delivery would be unsupported and their husband couldn't be present.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did they inject pregnant women in Manitoba with the vaccines? Yes. They, in fact, they made it so mandatory that a friend of mine who refused to take the vaxx was told by her doctor that he would not attend her delivery. And, she and her husband made a decision that they would deliver the baby at home. It was her 4th, it was an uncomplicated pregnancy. But the labour started 4 weeks before her due date so they became concerned that, they might be dealing with a preemie and they decided she should deliver in the hospital. And, when she arrived in the ambulance bay in labour no one from the obstetrics and gynecology department at that hospital where she was at would come downstairs and treat her because they said she was unvaxxed and they didn't want anything to do with her. So she sat in the ambulance bay for 30 minutes and finally delivered having a paramedic attend her while their husband sat outside in the parking lot trying to follow on a cell phone. The pressure on pregnant women was extreme and totally unethical. You they were told they must have this vaccine or I will not attend your your delivery. You must have this vaccine or else your husband won't be able to be with you when the baby's born.
Saved - March 27, 2023 at 2:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard played a role in shifting CDC guidance and ushering in mask mandates across America. A Cochrane review confirmed that masks made little to no difference in preventing COVID or flu. However, Tufekci's op-ed in the NYT went viral and drowned out news of the Cochrane review. Tufekci and Howard submitted a preprint arguing that everyone should wear masks, which influenced the CDC to reverse its mask guidance. They then focused on getting states to mandate masks. Tufekci advocated for child masking and full lockdowns. They also pushed for more COVID interventions based on information from China.

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

THREAD - HOW ZEYNEP TUFEKCI AND JEREMY HOWARD MASKED AMERICA Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard played a decisive role shifting CDC guidance and ushering in mask mandates across America. Zeynep’s role in the COVID story goes far deeper than most realize. 1/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/how-zeynep-tufekci-and-jeremy-howard https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/how-zeynep-tufekci-and-jeremy-howard

How Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard Masked America Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard played a decisive role in shifting CDC guidance and ushering in mask mandates across America. Zeynep’s role in the COVID story goes far deeper than most realize. michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

After three years of speculation, an authoritative gold-standard Cochrane review including results from 78 peer-reviewed RCTs confirmed that across populations, masks, regardless of type, made “little to no difference” in preventing COVID or flu. 2/ https://www.city-journal.org/new-cochrane-study-on-masks-and-covid

New Cochrane Study on Masks and Covid | City Journal Masks make no difference in reducing the spread of Covid, according to an extensive new review. city-journal.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

The Cochrane review seemed to settle the matter. Mask opponents had their trump card. But alas, the pro-mask establishment responded with a trump card of their own: an NYT op-ed by Zeynep Tufekci: “Here’s Why the Science Is Clear That Masks Work” 3/ https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/10/opinion/masks-work-cochrane-study.html

Opinion | Here’s Why the Science Is Clear That Masks Work A respected science organization says its review of studies about respiratory viruses was misinterpreted to incorrectly claim masks were useless. nytimes.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

This new trump card was a disaster for mask opponents—the proverbial queen of spades—and it quickly went viral among mask devotees, newly reassured in the righteousness of their talismans, drowning out news of the Cochrane review itself. 4/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Yet Zeynep’s op-ed brought new attention to a lingering question: Where exactly did all these mask mandates come from? Why did the US CDC suddenly reverse its longstanding guidance and begin recommending masks for the first time in modern history in April 2020? 5/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Zeynep’s first article on COVID appeared Feb 27, 2020, in which she stressed the importance of getting ready for major disruptions during COVID in order to “flatten the curve.” At the time, her advice on masks followed the public health establishment. 6/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/preparing-for-coronavirus-to-strike-the-u-s/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/preparing-for-coronavirus-to-strike-the-u-s/

Preparing for Coronavirus to Strike the U.S. Getting ready for the possibility of major disruptions is not only smart; it’s also our civic duty blogs.scientificamerican.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Over the next few days, Zeynep’s views on masking apparently changed dramatically, and this about-face would have a profound impact on all Americans. As NYT wrote, her writing in the next few days was the “tipping point” changing CDC’s masking guidance. 7/ https://nytimes.com/2020/08/23/business/media/how-zeynep-tufekci-keeps-getting-the-big-things-right.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/23/business/media/how-zeynep-tufekci-keeps-getting-the-big-things-right.html

How Zeynep Tufekci Keeps Getting the Big Things Right (Published 2020) Dr. Tufekci, a computer programmer who became a sociologist, sounded an early alarm on the need for protective masks. It wasn’t the first time she was right about something big. nytimes.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Around this time, Zeynep began working with Howard, who founded the American branch of #Masks4All. Howard is a WEF AI expert and something of a Sinophile who repeatedly advocated for the use of information and expertise from China during COVID. 8/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

It’s not entirely clear how they began working together. Zeynep and Howard’s first public interaction regarding COVID was when Howard cited Zeynep as a contributor to his viral March 9, 2020 article encouraging shutdowns on China’s example. 9/ https://fast.ai/posts/2020-03-09-coronavirus.html https://www.fast.ai/posts/2020-03-09-coronavirus.html

fast.ai - Covid-19, your community, and you - a data science perspective fast.ai

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Howard says he’d been inspired by a viral video posted on March 14, 2020, by Petr Ludwig, a founder of the original #Masks4All movement in the Czech Republic, in which Ludwig encouraged everyone to wear homemade masks. 10/ https://youtube.com/watch?v=K5xy2n941jM… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5xy2n941jM

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

The internationalization of #Masks4All was based on the story that universal adoption of homemade masks in the Czech Republic had “slowed the spread” of COVID cases, preventing them from “growing exponentially” as they had in the rest of the world. 11/ https://youtu.be/HhNo_IOPOtU

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

This story was always false, if not a lie. Today, the Czech Republic is among the 10 worst countries in the world in terms of its recorded number of “COVID deaths.” Yet this falsehood was the impetus for #Masks4All and soon a basis for mask mandates across the world. 12/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

With the assistance of the WEF Young Global Leaders, Howard published “Simple DIY masks could help flatten the curve. We should all wear them in public.” in WaPo, gushing about the Czech Republic’s mask mandate and citing Chinese CDC Director George Gao. 13/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

We see Gao’s emphasis on “droplets” reflected throughout Howard and Zeynep’s work. For example, the “sources” section of the official #Masks4All website prominently features another quote on droplets from Gao: 14/ https://masks4all.org/sources

Sources — #Masks4All masks4all.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Howard then went on a media blitz. As Howard tells it, his GMA interview, in which he was joined by Fauci, was monumental in that it was the first time Fauci had ever come to advise mask use by the American public. GMA also repeated Gao’s quote on masks preventing “droplets”. 15/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Howard then discussed masking with Senator Pat Toomey, who briefed the CDC and President Trump. The next day, Trump announced that universal masking might be needed. 16/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Howard then began making inroads at the CDC, which was still reluctant to reverse its longstanding guidance on masks because “the science wasn’t strong enough.” So Howard “tried to ratchet up the public pressure.” 17/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Zeynep and Howard submitted their preprint, an “interdisciplinary narrative review of the literature on the role of face masks in reducing COVID-19 transmission,” soon the most-viewed paper of all time on http://preprints.org. It begins: 18/ https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118 http://preprints.org. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118

Preprints - The Multidisciplinary Preprint Platform Preprints is a multidisciplinary preprint platform that accepts articles from all fields of science and technology, given that the preprint is scientifically sound and can be considered part of academic literature. preprints.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

In their paper, Zeynep and Howard argued that “everyone, adults and children, should wear masks,” citing as a major benefit masks’ potential to “shape new societal behaviors” as “a visible signal and reminder of the pandemic.” 19/ https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

The CDC officially reversed its mask guidance on April 3, 2020, and Zeynep and Howard’s preprint was a factor. Zeynep and Howard then turned their focus toward getting states to mandate masks. 20/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

USA Today published Zeynep and Howard’s op-ed, titled “Over 100 health leaders to governors: Require masks to help contain the coronavirus,” in which they wrote it was necessary to have “80% of the population wearing masks to stop the spread.” 21/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/05/14/require-masks-stop-coronavirus-spread-over-100-health-leaders-column/5182076002/

Over 100 health leaders to governors: Require masks to help contain the coronavirus The economy cannot rebound until people feel safe. The focus has to stay on containing COVID-19, and masks are a crucial part of winning this battle. usatoday.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Over the next three years, mask use exceeded 80% of the population in countless states and countries, but in no instance did it “stop the spread” of COVID. 22/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Howard had no relevant credentials in the field, but he was forceful. When virologist Angela Rasmussen questioned his analysis, Howard went so far as to email her boss to demand a “public retraction” of her critique. 23/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Zeynep and Howard were invited to present their masking preprint and advise the WHO. When WHO officials expressed concern that people wearing masks might start behaving recklessly, Zeynep advised them, “No, listen, I’m a sociologist, I know that’s not true.” 24/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

In Zeynep’s work, we see this repeated insistence that masks have no “plausible” downsides. Zeynep claimed the WHO “went out of their way to inflate a harms list,” and decried doctors focused on “alleged ‘harms’” which she believed to be “ridiculous.” 25/ https://kelleyk.substack.com/p/where-us-mask-rhetoric-went-wrong

Where US Mask Rhetoric Went Wrong Refusal to consider harms led to nuance-free policies kelleyk.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Though it’s always been well known that COVID poses virtually no risk to schoolchildren, Zeynep repeatedly advocated child masking, urging school mask mandates on the false basis “even the vaccinated may pose a danger to unvaccinated children.” 26/ https://nytimes.com/2021/07/24/opinion/coronavius-vaccine-masks.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/24/opinion/coronavius-vaccine-masks.html

Opinion | American Dysfunction Is the Biggest Barrier to Fighting Covid (Published 2021) Lax vaccination and haphazard rules on masking sabotage the fight against the Delta variant in the U.S. nytimes.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Zeynep’s indifference to harms during the response to COVID wasn’t limited to masking. Though the policy had no precedent in the modern western world until Xi’s lockdown of Wuhan and wasn’t part of any pandemic plan, Zeynep argued the US “should be in full lockdown.” 27/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Later, Zeynep wrote about "3 Ways the Pandemic Has Made the World Better," citing “mRNA vaccines,” new “digital infrastructure,” and the fact we’d “unleashed the true spirit of peer review and open science” as reasons to be thankful for COVID. 28/ https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/03/three-ways-pandemic-has-bettered-world/618320/

3 Ways the Pandemic Has Made the World Better COVID-19 has inflicted devastating losses. It has also delivered certain blessings. theatlantic.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Like Matt Pottinger, Zeynep pushed for more COVID interventions in part based on information from China, though she simultaneously fashions herself as something of a China hawk and supports the “lab leak theory” of COVID’s origins. 29/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/matt-pottinger-the-intelligence-agent

Matt Pottinger: The Intelligence Agent Who Shut Down America The Manchurian candidate? michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Despite knowing that “no scientist in China can operate truly freely,” when it came to arguing in favor of more COVID interventions, Zeynep repeatedly advocated the use of information from Chinese scientists, apparently without questioning any of it. 30/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Eg, Zeynep advocated for increased ventilator use in early March 2020 based on information from Chinese scientists, noting in a widely-shared tweet that “Chinese scientists” had advised “many COVID-19 patients need to stay on mechanical ventilators as long as four weeks.” 31/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Indeed, in journal articles, “Chinese expert consensus” had advised ventilators as the “first choice” for COVID. This advice was slurped up by the WHO and spat out all over the world in the WHO’s initial guidance on ventilators for COVID patients. 32/ https://who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

This guidance proved extremely deadly. JAMA later revealed a 97.2% mortality rate among those over 65 put on ventilators in accordance with initial WHO guidance. Overall, mortality among COVID patients in NY hospitals fell over 2/3 after spring 2020. 33/ https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2765184

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

The initial ventilator guidance from Chinese scientists led to countless thousands of deaths. Yet despite having specifically disseminated this guidance—while knowing “no scientist in China can operate truly freely”—Zeynep never apologized or acknowledged the error. 34/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Finally, Zeynep’s op-ed on the recent Cochrane review. The title is a lie, given it specifically calls for scientists to “continue to collect data on mask wearing.” 35/ https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/10/opinion/masks-work-cochrane-study.html

Opinion | Here’s Why the Science Is Clear That Masks Work A respected science organization says its review of studies about respiratory viruses was misinterpreted to incorrectly claim masks were useless. nytimes.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Zeynep relies on a selection of clinical studies, none of which are RCTs; this same level of evidence would show that any number of silly things work against COVID, from ginseng to magnesium to melatonin to fish oil. 36/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Zeynep cites a trial from Bangladesh which found an 11% reduction in COVID cases when villagers were given masks, without disclosing a re-analysis that found no benefit and attributed that finding to bias. 37/ https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-022-06704-z

Re-analysis on the statistical sampling biases of a mask promotion trial in Bangladesh: a statistical replication - Trials A recent randomized trial evaluated the impact of mask promotion on COVID-19-related outcomes. We find that staff behavior in both unblinded and supposedly blinded steps caused large and statistically significant imbalances in population sizes. These denominator differences constitute the rate differences observed in the trial, complicating inferences of causality. trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Glaringly, Zeynep apparently didn’t disclose her advocacy or conflicting narrative review concluding “everyone, adults and children,” should wear masks when she elicited Cochrane’s EIC’s clarification of the wording of the review’s conclusion. 38/ https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/unmasking-the-new-york-times-zeynep

Unmasking the New York Times’ Zeynep Tufekci Neither scholar nor journalist, a media influencer cuts down competitors in an academic knife fight. disinformationchronicle.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Regarding Zeynep and Howard’s masking of America, there are only two possibilities—neither good. The first is it was essentially scripted theater—a pretext for actions that a network of elites was planning to take anyway, unbeknownst to the public. 39/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/how-zeynep-tufekci-and-jeremy-howard

How Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard Masked America Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard played a decisive role in shifting CDC guidance and ushering in mask mandates across America. Zeynep’s role in the COVID story goes far deeper than most realize. michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

The second possibility is that it really was this easy for ambitious activists with no relevant expertise to convince institutional leaders to reverse longstanding public health guidance—who then spent years closing their ears to all contrary evidence. 40/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

When asked if the CDC will revise its guidance to mandate masks in schools in light of the Cochrane review showing masks do not curb COVID, CDC Director Walensky tells Congress its advice on child masking will never change. “Our masking guidance doesn’t really change with time.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CDC is the only agency recommending masks for 2-year-old children. The process for updating guidance involves reviewing studies like the Cochrane review, which mainly includes trials for other respiratory viruses. COVID-19 is different because it can transmit before symptoms appear. Wearing masks is crucial, but the study mentioned had limitations, such as people not fully engaging in the intervention. Masking guidance for schools depends on COVID-19 transmission levels in the community. In low or moderate transmission areas, masking is not recommended, but it is for high transmission areas. The timeline for updating guidance depends on disease levels in the community. When there is a lot of disease, masks are recommended, and when there is less, they can be removed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In fact, Speaker 1: the CDC is currently the only national or international public health agency that recommends masking 2 year old children. I'd like you to explain in detail the process and the timeline by which evidence such as this is used by the CDC to update, modify or Necessary, withdraw current guidance. Speaker 0: Great, thank you for the opportunity to clarify on those points. So I believe you're referring to the Cochrane review study. This is an important study. But the Cochrane review only includes randomized clinical trials. And as you can imagine, many of the randomized clinical trials that were included in that were other respiratory viruses, not COVID nineteen. Some of them were for COVID nineteen, just to be clear. But it is very different for COVID nineteen because you have a virus that Different from flu, potentially different from SARS or MERS transmits before you actually have symptoms. It's also the case that one of the limitations in that study was Clearly stated that people were not actually engaged in the intervention. So you actually have to wear the mask for it to work. So there are lots of studies now in Georgia. Doctor. Belinsky, Speaker 1: Why are we masking our kids today? Speaker 0: Thank you. Also, so our guidance for school based masking is related to our COVID nineteen community levels. And in this country where most of our country is in green or yellow, that has Low or moderate transmission are COVID-nineteen community levels. And in those situations, we actually don't recommend masking. We recommend it for high COVID-nineteen community levels. Speaker 1: So what is your timeline for updating, reevaluating these guidance? Speaker 0: You know, our masking guidance doesn't really change with time. What it changes with is disease. When there's a lot of disease in a community, we recommend that those communities and those schools mask. When there's less disease in the community, we recommend that those masks Speaker 1: then come off. So Okay, so It's just going to continue

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

When asked if the CDC will revise its guidance to mandate masks in schools in light of the Cochrane review showing masks do not curb COVID, CDC Director Walensky tells Congress its advice on child masking will never change. “Our masking guidance doesn’t really change with time.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CDC is the only agency recommending masks for 2-year-old children. The process for updating guidance involves reviewing studies like the Cochrane review, which mainly includes trials for other respiratory viruses. COVID-19 is different because it can transmit before symptoms appear. Wearing masks is crucial, but the study mentioned had limitations, such as people not fully engaging in the intervention. Masking guidance for schools depends on COVID-19 transmission levels in the community. In low or moderate transmission areas, masking is not recommended, but it is for high transmission areas. The timeline for updating guidance depends on disease levels in the community. When there is a lot of disease, masks are recommended, and when there is less, they can be removed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In fact, Speaker 1: the CDC is currently the only national or international public health agency that recommends masking 2 year old children. I'd like you to explain in detail the process and the timeline by which evidence such as this is used by the CDC to update, modify or Necessary, withdraw current guidance. Speaker 0: Great, thank you for the opportunity to clarify on those points. So I believe you're referring to the Cochrane review study. This is an important study. But the Cochrane review only includes randomized clinical trials. And as you can imagine, many of the randomized clinical trials that were included in that were other respiratory viruses, not COVID nineteen. Some of them were for COVID nineteen, just to be clear. But it is very different for COVID nineteen because you have a virus that Different from flu, potentially different from SARS or MERS transmits before you actually have symptoms. It's also the case that one of the limitations in that study was Clearly stated that people were not actually engaged in the intervention. So you actually have to wear the mask for it to work. So there are lots of studies now in Georgia. Doctor. Belinsky, Speaker 1: Why are we masking our kids today? Speaker 0: Thank you. Also, so our guidance for school based masking is related to our COVID nineteen community levels. And in this country where most of our country is in green or yellow, that has Low or moderate transmission are COVID-nineteen community levels. And in those situations, we actually don't recommend masking. We recommend it for high COVID-nineteen community levels. Speaker 1: So what is your timeline for updating, reevaluating these guidance? Speaker 0: You know, our masking guidance doesn't really change with time. What it changes with is disease. When there's a lot of disease in a community, we recommend that those communities and those schools mask. When there's less disease in the community, we recommend that those masks Speaker 1: then come off. So Okay, so It's just going to continue

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Either way, Zeynep pushed falsehoods and harmful policies based on info from China. She and Howard played a decisive role in the mask mandates that so intimately affected every American, for dubious reasons like “shaping new societal norms.” /end https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/how-zeynep-tufekci-and-jeremy-howard

How Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard Masked America Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard played a decisive role in shifting CDC guidance and ushering in mask mandates across America. Zeynep’s role in the COVID story goes far deeper than most realize. michaelpsenger.substack.com
Saved - March 10, 2023 at 6:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Balaji Srinivasan, a tech mogul, predicted the global adoption of China's COVID response, including remote work, face masks, and reduced vaccine approval time. He also coined the term "new normal," which was later used by pro-lockdown officials. Balaji's tweets may suggest a plan to recreate China's COVID response globally.

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

THREAD: Balaji Srinivasan: The Man Who Couldn’t Wait for COVID to Ring In the ‘New Normal’ Balaji’s ‘prophecies’ may be the best evidence yet that there was a plan to recreate China’s COVID response globally, down to the particular details of how the world would transform. 1/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Going back to the initial weeks of 2020, prior to the western world’s first lockdown in Lombardy, Italy, on February 21, it’s remarkable how normal things were. The Atlantic, for example, published a great piece titled You’re Likely to https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/02/covid-vaccine/607000/

You’re Likely to Get the Coronavirus Most cases are not life-threatening, which is also what makes the virus a historic challenge to contain. theatlantic.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

There was Xi’s lockdown in Wuhan, but most commentators opined on how brutal and illiberal it was. One thing virtually no one in the world was doing prior to the lockdown of Lombardy was hoping the rest of the world would adopt China’s lockdown policy. 3/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/02/chinas-reaction-to-the-coronavirus-outbreak-violates-human-rights

China's reaction to the coronavirus violates human rights | Frances Eve The WHO has praised country’s response, but heavy-handed approach could make things worse theguardian.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Among the few people in the world who looked positively on the prospect of global adoption of China’s lockdowns, one stands out: Balaji Srinivasan, a tech mogul who couldn’t tweet enough about all the details of the “new normal” the world would soon see 4/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Balaji first began tweeting about the new virus on Jan 30, 2020. This is the same day an anonymous stock tip was posted saying the WHO was already privately planning to recreate China’s response across the world, first by locking down Italian cities. 5/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/241674007/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Balaji’s first tweets on the subject came in the form of a detailed and widely-shared thread about all the changes the world would soon see if this turned out to be “the pandemic that public health people have been warning about for years.” 6/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Like the anonymous stock tip, an unbelievable number of Balaji’s seemingly-wild “predictions” turned out to be near-perfect prognoses. With the entire world following China’s containment model, remote work did soon take over the world. 7/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Though they’d been ruled out by existing public health literature across the western world, everyone did soon begin wearing face masks following a sharp, unscientific reversal by the public health establishment in April 2020. 8/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

And, governments across the world did sharply reduce the approval time for vaccine development. 9/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Days later, Balaji posted another thread in which he observed the Wuhan lockdown would precipitate a flip into digital life, moving “away from handshakes, restaurants, and public gatherings.” 10/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Balaji “predicted” it would take a year for a vaccine to arrive, and in the meantime, the rest of the world would follow Wuhan’s COVID response into this new form of “remote life.” 11/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Balaji’s language about moving away from “handshakes” mirrored that which would soon come from leading public health officials including Anthony Fauci, who two months later suggested that Americans should never shake hands again due to COVID. 12/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

This idea that COVID would soon lead the world into a “new normal” is one that Balaji repeated several times. 13/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Like his messaging about moving away from “handshakes,” Balaji’s exact term, the “new normal,” would soon be used by leading pro-lockdown officials all over the world—such as vocal “Zero Covid” advocate Walter Ricciardi, liaison between WHO and Italy. 14/ https://sciencemediahub.eu/2020/03/27/how-to-achieve-the-nuova-normalita/amp/

How to Achieve the "Nuova Normalità"? - ESMH Interview with Walter Ricciardi, Advisor to the Italian government for Italy’s relationships with international health organisations. sciencemediahub.eu

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Balaji was especially excited about all the CCP propaganda on new tech being deployed during China’s lockdowns, owing to their “wartime levels of medical innovation.” 15/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

After the WHO issued its February 2020 report endorsing the global adoption of China’s lockdowns, NYT reporter Donald McNeil wrote an article admiring how “China is a place where a leader can ask himself, ‘What would Mao do?’ and just do it.” 16/ https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/sunday-review/coronavirus-quarantine.html

To Take On the Coronavirus, Go Medieval on It (Published 2020) Quarantines and restrictive measures served a purpose in the old days. They can now, too. nytimes.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

At the time, many commentators found the idea of copying China’s lockdown policy so ridiculous that they thought McNeil’s article had to be satire. 17/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

But Balaji cited McNeil’s article positively in a thread about how Saint Louis had supposedly saved many lives by canceling parades during the Spanish flu, a kind of propaganda story shared widely as part of the initial justification for lockdowns. 18/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Balaji later cited one of McNeil’s interviews for the proposition that “we should know *exactly* what the Chinese did, and determine which of those features are compatible with our ethics and which are not, and then execute.” 19/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Balaji expressed great admiration for Bill Gates, an influential advocate for the global adoption of China’s lockdown policies, and on multiple occasions proposed the idea of making Bill Gates America’s “virus czar.” 20/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Gates later complained “freedom” was hindering the western COVID response; China, by contrast, “did a very good job of suppressing the virus,” he said, thanks to the “authoritarian” approach and the “individual rights that were violated.” 21/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

On many occasions, Balaji stressed that leaders needed to be more afraid of the coronavirus, quoting WHO Director Tedros Adhanom: “All countries must use the window of opportunity created by the containment strategy to prepare for the virus’s possible arrival.” 22/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

When a tech reporter wrote an article poking fun at Balaji’s tweets, he wrote a detailed thread in retort, purporting to show why panic about COVID was justified—while also taking the opportunity to plug “tech the Chinese are using to fight virus.” 23/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

To recap, Balaji, a high-profile investor, began tweeting on January 30, 2020—three weeks before the modern western world’s first-ever lockdown in Lombardy, Italy—and the same day an anonymous stock tip was posted saying: 24/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/241674007/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Balaji had supposedly predicted COVID would be a global pandemic; the world would adopt China’s lockdown policy; everyone would soon wear a mask; life would go remote; it would take a year for a vaccine to arrive; and by that time the world would shift into a “new normal.” 25/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Frankly, I don’t buy it. Balaji’s supposed fear of the coronavirus seems belied by the excitement he so frequently expressed about all the new tech being unveiled in Wuhan, as well as his utter loss of interest in COVID after spring 2020. 26/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Imo, it’s far more likely Balaji is exactly the kind of “high profile investor” described in the stock tip, who’d caught wind of the seismic plans being hatched by the WHO and their collaborators to recreate China’s COVID response across the world. 27/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Astonishingly, Balaji even referred to lockdown in the US as a “bottom-up” policy—utterly belied by the fact he was one of only a few people in the world who’d expressed anything close to a desire to emulate China’s lockdowns prior to Lombardy. 28/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Unlike Tomás Pueyo, it’s unlikely that Balaji’s Twitter prophecies had a major effect on policy—though he did spread a bit of panic to bring these outcomes about. 29/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/tomas-pueyo-returns-the-mba-who-shut

Tomás Pueyo Returns: The MBA Who Shut Down Europe on Masks and the Cochrane Review Depending on your level of familiarity with the story the global lockdowns of spring 2020, you may or may not have heard of Tomás Pueyo. Pueyo is an MBA and thinkfluencer who came to sudden fame for his March 10, 2020, article Coronavirus: Why You Must Act Now michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Rather, Balaji’s Twitter ‘prophecies’ may be the best evidence yet that there was a plan to recreate China’s COVID response globally, down to the particular terms and details of how the world would transform. /end https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/balaji-srinivasan-the-man-who-couldnt

Balaji Srinivasan: The Man Who Couldn’t Wait for COVID to Ring In the ‘New Normal’ Balaji’s Twitter ‘prophecies’ may be the best evidence yet that there was a plan to recreate China’s COVID response globally, down to the particular terms and details of how the world would transform. michaelpsenger.substack.com
Saved - February 16, 2023 at 1:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
As we continue to navigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it's important to reflect on the decisions and actions taken by those in power. A real inquiry into the response to COVID would investigate many disturbing questions that have yet to be fully answered. One such question is why the CDC suddenly adopted social distancing measures in 2004. Additionally, who exported the concept of lockdowns to Liberia and Sierra Leone in 2014? These are important questions that need to be addressed in order to fully understand the decisions made during the pandemic. Another concerning issue is why pandemic plans were not followed. It's important to understand why these plans were not implemented and what could have been done differently to better prepare for a pandemic. Furthermore, why were health security officials talking about curfews of indefinite duration by February 24, 2020? This raises questions about the extent of government control and the potential infringement on individual rights. Additionally, why were beaches and other outdoor spaces closed? It's important to understand the reasoning behind these decisions and whether they were truly necessary. Finally, why were so many federal officials so intimately involved in the censorship of dissenting COVID opinions on social media? This raises concerns about freedom of speech and the potential for censorship to be used as a tool of those in power. Without answers to these questions, democracy is at risk. It's important to continue to investigate and hold those in power accountable for their actions during the pandemic. For more information on this topic, visit https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/nuremberg-ii-what-a-real-inquiry.

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

THREAD – Nuremberg 2: What a Real Inquiry into the Response to COVID Would Look Like Given the magnitude of the harm that’s been done, the public deserves to know exactly who knew and did what, when, and why in the days leading up to the lockdowns of spring 2020 and beyond. 1/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Though it may not be politically feasible, ideally an inquiry into the response to COVID would take the form of an international tribunal. Below are just some of the many disturbing questions to which any leader who claims to represent the public ought to demand answers. 2/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The top leaders were convicted despite not directly committing the crimes. There was no international court, body of law, judges, or courthouse at the time. They had to start from scratch. A lawyer named Marie Bernays devised a philosophy for the trial, the conspiracy theory. It claimed that the Nazi movement was not just a political movement, but a criminal conspiracy to seize territory, steal wealth, exterminate Jews, etc. Being part of the Nazi leadership meant being part of this criminal conspiracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But what about the top leaders? How did you convict them? None of them, shot the bank guard, blew the safe, or drove the getaway car. Their hands were clean. There existed no international, court. There there existed at the time, they were preparing for the trial, no body of law. There existed no judges. There existed no courthouse. The the instruments for trying, a drunk driver in any part of the United States were more complete than the instruments for trying mass murderers in Europe at the end of World War 2. So they started from scratch. A lawyer in the war department by the name of Marie Bernays was given the task of devising some kind of of philosophy for this trial. Bernays came up with a brilliant idea, which was the conspiracy theory. That the whole Nazi See, movement was just not simply a legitimate political movement, but it was a criminal conspiracy designed to seize the territory of Germany's neighbors, to steal from these nations their wealth and their people and to exterminate their Jews. And this conspiracy theory meant that by being a part of the Nazi leadership, you were part of a criminal conspiracy, and it was a net that held

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

1. Why did the CDC suddenly adopt “measures to increase social distance” as official policy in 2004, contrary to all the epidemiological guidance it had developed throughout the 20th century? 3/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-real-story-of-the-birth-of-social

The REAL Story of the Birth of ‘Social Distancing’ — the Western Term for Lockdown (封锁) That ‘social distancing’ arose from a school science project appears to be an elaborate cover story for the fact the concept was lifted directly from China’s lockdown measures during SARS in 2003. michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

2. Who was behind the campaign to export the concept of “lockdown” to Liberia and Sierra Leone in 2014? 4/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/bombshell-template-to-export-lockdowns

Bombshell: Template to Export Lockdowns Existed by 2014 Bots supported Sierra Leone’s unprecedented lockdowns in 2014 and 2015 with millions of posts specifically using the word “lockdown.” michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

3. Some intelligence reports have indicated that members of the western national security community were aware a new virus had emerged in China by fall 2019. What was being said about the virus at that time? 5/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-earliest-events-of-the-covid

The Earliest Events of the COVID Coup Will Jones at the Daily Sceptic has written a peerless synopsis of the individuals, institutions, and events involved in the earliest days of the response to COVID—at least, that we know of so far. Our perspectives on these events differ in certain respects. At a high level, Jones tends to treat the Chinese government as an ordinary government, whereas I consider it best to think of the Chinese Communist Party, like other totalitarian regimes, as a michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

4. If some national security officials had been worrying about a new virus in China since fall 2019, how could they have possibly believed China’s two-month lockdown of Wuhan eliminated the virus several months later? 6/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/lockdown-is-a-national-security-catastrophe

Lockdown is a National Security Catastrophe or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Biosecurity State michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

5. By January 2020, tips began to emerge that the World Health Organization was planning to recreate China’s lockdowns across the world, starting in Italy. When and on what basis did the World Health Organization make this decision? 7/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-dragnet-in-lombardy-italy-patient

The Dragnet in Lombardy, Italy: Patient Zero of Lockdowns The Manifesto of Health Minister Roberto Speranza michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

6. Lockdowns had been ruled out by the pandemic plans of the WHO and every developed nation. Why weren’t these pandemic plans followed? 8/ https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/masked-ball-cowardice

Just a moment... tabletmag.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

7. Why were health security officials talking about “curfews of indefinite duration” by February 24, 2020? 9/ https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/how-the-lockdown-came-to-germany

How the lockdown came to Germany On the role of privately funded networks in the run-up to the corona crisis multipolar-magazin.de

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

8. Why does the WHO’s February 2020 report rely on flagrant logical fallacies in its promulgation of China’s lockdown measures as global policy? 10/ https://www.aier.org/article/whats-behind-the-whos-lockdown-mixed-messaging/

What’s Behind The WHO’s Lockdown Mixed-Messaging "Tedros aligned himself not with democracies and their fundamental principles but with an autocratic dictatorship, the same dictatorship that helped him assume power within the WHO. Together, using logical fallacies and pseudo-science, they betrayed international law governing human rights, the... aier.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

9. Why was the current Director of National Intelligence sitting next to China’s CDC director at the Event 201 simulation of a coronavirus pandemic in October 2019, just weeks before a real coronavirus pandemic emerged? 11/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-prophetic-monkeypox-simulation

The Prophetic Monkeypox Simulation First-ever global Monkeypox outbreak happens in exact week predicted in biosecurity simulation a year prior michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

10. Former White House COVID Coordinator Deborah Birx has made conflicting statements about how she got her job. The former Deputy National Security Advisor offered her a job in the White House as far back as Nov 2019. How was Birx chosen for this? 12/ https://brownstone.org/articles/how-did-deborah-birx-get-the-job/

How Did Deborah Birx Get the Job?  ⋆ Brownstone Institute The most revealing parts of the book are the claims about Birx herself that, upon close inspection, make little sense brownstone.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

11. Who was behind the terror campaign of fake videos showing Wuhan residents spontaneously dying and convulsing in the streets in January and February 2020? 13/ https://www.revolver.news/2021/02/how-phony-coronavirus-fear-videos-were-used-as-psychological-weapons-to-bring-america-to-her-knees/

How Phony Coronavirus “Fear Videos” Were Used as Psychological Weapons to Bring America to Her Knees - Revolver News Phony coronavirus fear videos imported from China are making us wonder whether this whole thing was one giant psy-op. revolver.news

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

12. Why is there no record of the hero doctor Li Wenliang before he appeared in Chinese state media at the end of January 2020? On what basis did western media outlets adopt this story as true? 14/ https://redstate.com/michael_thau/2021/01/12/308650-n308650

'Investigate China's Global Lockdown Fraud!' Demand Lawyers, Retired Brig. Gen. in Open Letter to FBI The timeline and activities are a tad suspicious. redstate.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

13. High-level national security officials have stated that Covid came from a lab in Wuhan. At the same time, high-level scientific officials have stated it is “molecularly impossible” for Covid to have come from there. Why the disconnect? 15/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/drastic-founder-renounces-lab-leak

DRASTIC Founder Renounces Lab Leak Theory of COVID’s Origins The testimony of DRASTIC founder J.J. Couey provides powerful firsthand insight into the perpetuation of the lab leak theory as a controlled opposition narrative. michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

14. Why has overwhelming peer-reviewed evidence that COVID was already spreading globally by fall 2019 been so widely downplayed by federal officials and major media outlets? 16/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/leading-virologists-wrongfully-assumed

Leading Virologists Wrongfully Assumed Covid Began in Wuhan in December 2019 in Major New Study Something rotten in the state of virology… michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

15. Reports have revealed that military leaders saw COVID as a unique opportunity to test propaganda techniques on the public. Who advised western leaders to use military-grade propaganda on their own people? 17/ https://nationalpost.com/news/national/defence-watch/military-leaders-saw-pandemic-as-unique-opportunity-to-test-propaganda-techniques-on-canadians-forces-report-says/wcm/22733c97-39f0-4ba4-8a26-478af5e215f3

Military leaders saw pandemic as unique opportunity to test propaganda on Canadians: report A plan devised by the Canadian Joint Operations Command relied on propaganda techniques similar to those employed during the Afghanistan war. nationalpost.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

16. Some officials in the UK later expressed contrition about the fear campaigns that the UK Government used on its own people to convince them to support Covid mandates. How was the decision to use these fear campaigns made? 18/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/05/14/scientists-admit-totalitarian-use-fear-control-behaviour-covid/

Use of fear to control behaviour in Covid crisis was ‘totalitarian’, admit scientists Members of Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour express regret about ‘unethical’ methods telegraph.co.uk

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

17. Who was behind the massive bot and astroturf campaigns to popularize lockdowns among western citizens and officials in March 2020? 19/ https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/china-covid-lockdown-propaganda

Just a moment... tabletmag.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

18. How many deaths were caused by the WHO’s initial guidance on mechanical ventilators, which cited Chinese journal articles advising ventilators as the “first choice” for those hospitalized with Covid? 20/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/an-estimated-30000-americans-were

An Estimated 30,000 Americans Were Killed by Ventilators & Iatrogenesis in April 2020 Reexamining excess deaths during peak lockdown michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

19. The initial guidance from the WHO advised using mechanical ventilators not necessarily for the patient’s benefit, but to control the spread of the virus. Why was the WHO advising doctors to violate the Hippocratic Oath? 21/ https://www.wsj.com/articles/hospitals-retreat-from-early-covid-treatment-and-return-to-basics-11608491436

Hospitals Retreat From Early Covid Treatment and Return to Basics Changing practices, based on data and experience, appear to be improving outcomes for the sickest coronavirus patients wsj.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

20. Why were numerous, credible predictions of famine, human rights disasters, and economic collapse as a result of lockdowns ignored at the time they were implemented? 22/ https://brownstone.org/articles/governments-were-given-credible-warnings-about-lockdown-harms-but-didnt-listen/

Governments Were Given Credible Warnings about Lockdown Harms but Didn’t Listen ⋆ Brownstone Institute Instead of conducting and publishing rigorous cost-benefit analyses, governments and ministries of health turned into Covid-only bureaus brownstone.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

21. Why was natural immunity to COVID so long downplayed? 23/ https://brownstone.org/articles/the-psychological-cruelty-of-denying-natural-immunity/

The Psychological Cruelty of Denying Natural immunity ⋆ Brownstone Institute Take away the knowledge of natural immunity, and thus the realization that there can be a better life on the other side of sickness, and you leave people with existential emptiness and a lasting sense of despair. No one can live that way. No one should have to.  brownstone.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

22. Why were initial seroprevalence studies demonstrating COVID’s ubiquity downplayed? 24/ https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20062463v1

COVID-19 Antibody Seroprevalence in Santa Clara County, California medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

23. Why were beaches and other outdoor spaces closed? 25/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/lockdowns-the-great-gaslighting

Lockdowns: The Great Gaslighting The lockdowns of 2020 were very real. And few opposed them. michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

24. Why was the public kept in the dark about low early estimates of COVID’s infection fatality rate? 26/ https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/

A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data Countermeasures like social distancing may help stop the spread of Covid-19. But how can policymakers tell if they are doing more good than harm? Data! statnews.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

25. What was the source of the guidance to move patients who were still sick into nursing homes? 27/ https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-requesting-data-governors-states-issued-covid-19-orders-may-have-resulted

Department of Justice Requesting Data From Governors of States that Issued COVID-19 Orders that May Have Resulted in Deaths of Elderly Nursing Home Residents Today the Justice Department requested COVID-19 data from the governors of states that issued orders which may have resulted in the deaths of thousands of elderly nursing home residents. New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan required nursing homes to admit COVID-19 patients to their vulnerable populations, often without adequate testing.  justice.gov

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

26. Remdesivir and midazolam were initially widely used, but didn’t lead to positive health outcomes. How was the decision made to use these over other treatment protocols? 28/ https://www.science.org/content/article/very-very-bad-look-remdesivir-first-fda-approved-covid-19-drug

The ‘very, very bad look' of remdesivir, the first FDA-approved COVID-19 drug The Food and Drug Administration held no advisory meeting on antiviral, and the European Union signed contract without knowing of failed trial science.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

27. Leading officials have made conflicting statements as to whether the goal of lockdowns was to eliminate the virus, slow the spread, or buy time for vaccines. What was the actual goal they had in mind at the time they implemented these policies? 29/ https://thedispatch.com/article/our-failed-covid-response/

Our Failed COVID Response If, God forbid, we face another pandemic, we cannot use our COVID strategy as the baseline. thedispatch.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

28. Why did key public health officials make statements about using the response to COVID to advance non-health-related policy goals? 30/ https://dailysceptic.org/2022/08/05/neil-ferguson-china-and-a-fanatical-socialist-health-minister-the-untold-story-of-how-lockdowns-came-to-italy-and-the-west/

Neil Ferguson, China and a Fanatical Socialist Health Minister: The Untold Story of How Lockdowns Came to Italy and the West – The Daily Sceptic The free world's first lockdowns were imposed on towns in Lombardy, Italy, on February 21st 2020 by Health Minister Roberto Speranza. What influences lay behind his momentous decision? dailysceptic.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

29. How was the decision made to suppress and censor scientific opinions that dissented from lockdowns? 31/ https://www.wsj.com/articles/fauci-collins-emails-great-barrington-declaration-covid-pandemic-lockdown-11640129116

Opinion | How Fauci and Collins Shut Down Covid Debate They worked with the media to trash the Great Barrington Declaration. wsj.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

30. Why were so many federal officials so intimately involved in the censorship of dissenting COVID opinions on social media? 32/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/faucis-red-guards-lawsuit-reveals

Fauci’s Red Guards: Lawsuit Reveals Vast Federal Censorship Army “This evidence suggests we are uncovering the most serious, coordinated, and large-scale violation of First Amendment free speech rights by the federal government’s executive branch in US history.” michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

31. Why were social media executives given Top Secret US Security Clearances for purposes of censoring content, and what was the vetting process, if any, for these clearances? 33/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/fbi-agent-elvis-chan-gave-twitter

FBI Agent Elvis Chan Gave Twitter Execs Top Secret Clearance in Advance of 2020 Election New internal documents from Twitter, revealed today as part of Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” series, show FBI Agent Elvis Chan arranged for Top Secret security clearance—the highest level of US national security clearance—to be granted to Twitter executives for the purpose of facilitating the censorship of suspected misinformation in advance of the 2020 election. michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

32. Why were federal officials working so closely with Twitter to censor legal speech by American citizens while an AI expert with deep ties to the military of America’s chief adversary was on Twitter’s Board of Directors? 34/ https://www.jenniferzengblog.com/home/2020/5/25/twitters-new-director-has-ccp-ties-deeper-than-you-know-fei-fei-li

Twitter's New Director has CCP Ties Deeper Than You Know: Fei-fei Li — Jennifer's World So, to put it simply, CCP’s police team and the team of the largest surveillance equipment manufacturer were given top prizes at the ImageNet’s competition, and ImageNet was founded by Li Fei-fei. jenniferzengblog.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

33. Why did elite western newspapers, media networks, and public health leaders so diligently repeat the absurd line that China had eliminated Covid by shutting down one city for two months? 35/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/chinese-protest-the-same-lockdowns

Chinese Protest the Same Lockdowns that Elites Advocated Here If we’d taken health officials and media elites seriously, the entire free world would look like China does today. michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

34. Why did elite western publications begin explicitly urging the public to adopt a response to COVID that was more like China’s? 36/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-gall-of-lockdowners-supporting

The Gall of Lockdowners Supporting China’s Anti-Lockdown Protests If the intent was to get western elites to simultaneously support totalitarianism in their own countries while pretending to oppose it in China, then Xi Jinping has certainly made his point. michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

35. Why were mechanical drones initially deployed by various states and countries to monitor lockdown compliance? 37/ https://www.nationalreview.com/news/chinese-company-suspected-of-spying-on-u-s-citizens-donates-police-drones-to-22-states/

Chinese Company Suspected of Spying on U.S. Citizens Donates Police Drones to 22 States | National Review Police in Elizabeth, N.J., for example, are using the drones to surveil residents in places where patrol cars can't easily reach, such as spaces between buildings. nationalreview.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

36. Why did masks shift from being not advised to being mandatory? 38/ https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51729647

Coronavirus: Face mask ads banned for 'misleading' claims Adverts by two firms made false claims about preventing the spread of coronavirus, watchdog rules. bbc.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

37. The New York Times confirmed that at the standard cycle threshold level used for PCR testing, 85 to 90% of Covid cases were false positives. How did this practice become standard? 39/ https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be. (Published 2020) The usual diagnostic tests may simply be too sensitive and too slow to contain the spread of the virus. nytimes.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

38. Why were widely-known and publicized problems with PCR testing and comorbidities ignored for purposes of counting COVID deaths? 40/ https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/deceptive-construction-why-we-must-question-covid-19-mortality-statistics

A Deceptive Construction - Why We Must Question The COVID 19 Mortality Statistics How many people have actually died of Covid-19, compared to the governent's claimed headline figure. ukcolumn.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

39. Why did key public health officials so quickly shift from saying vaccines would prevent Covid to saying proof of vaccination should be mandatory to partake in everyday activities? 41/

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a significant return on investment, but it's not as high as claimed. Vaccinated individuals are protected against COVID-19 and its variants, reducing transmission and allowing society to return to normal. Getting both vaccine shots is crucial. Vaccinated people are unlikely to get infected, be hospitalized, or die from the virus. They can participate in activities without masks or distancing, but they can still transmit the virus. Vaccines slightly reduce transmission, but a new approach is needed. Israel's experience suggests a potential need for booster shots. The plan is for every adult to receive a booster shot. Overall, it has been a great investment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been over a 20 to 1 return. Speaker 1: If you had put that money into an S and P 500 and reinvested the dividends, you'd come up with something like $17,000,000,000, but you think it's $200,000,000,000? Here, yeah. Speaker 2: You're okay. You're not gonna you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Speaker 3: These vaccines are Highly, highly effective. Speaker 1: Vaccinated people do not carry the virus. Don't get sick. Speaker 3: They're really, really good against variants. Speaker 0: Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back To normal. Speaker 1: Get your 1st shot, and when you're due for your 2nd, get your 2nd shot. Speaker 0: Our key goal is to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Speaker 3: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected. Speaker 2: If you're vaccinated, You're not gonna be hospitalized. You're not gonna be in ICU unit, and you're not gonna die. If you are fully vaccinated, You no longer need to wear a mask. Speaker 1: Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, Large or small, without wearing a mask or physical distancing. But what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission. Speaker 0: You know, we didn't have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines to help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce transmissions. We need a new New way of doing the vaccine. Speaker 4: The level of virus in the nasopharynx of a person who's vaccinated and infected is the same level As the level of virus in the nasal variance of an unvaccinated person. Speaker 1: Reports from our international colleagues, Including Israel suggests increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early. Speaker 4: And if you look at Israel Mhmm. Which There's always been a month to a month and a half ahead of us. They are seeing a waning actually be an essential part of the primary regimen that people should have. Speaker 2: Plan is for every every adult to get a booster shot. Speaker 0: Dollars? Clearly one of the best investments, I've ever been involved in.

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

40. Why has there been so little public discussion of China’s influence on the global response to COVID, despite the FBI Director’s disclosure that Chinese officials were “aggressively urging support for China’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis?” 42/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chinese diplomats are actively seeking support for China's handling of the COVID-19 crisis, according to federal, state, and local officials. This influence is occurring at both the federal and state levels, with a recent incident involving a state senator being asked to introduce a resolution in support of China's response to the pandemic. Unfortunately, the pandemic has not halted these efforts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I will note that the pandemic has unfortunately not stopped any of this. In fact, we've heard from federal, state, and even local officials that Chinese diplomats are aggressively urging support for China's handling of the COVID-nineteen crisis. Yes, this is happening at both the federal and state levels. Not that long ago, we had a state senator who was recently even asked to introduce a resolution supporting China's response to the pandemic.

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

41. Why were governments across the western world so deferential to Neil Ferguson and Imperial College during the response to COVID, despite Imperial having the closest relationship with China of any western university? 43/ https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/168497/chinese-president-sees-uk-china-academic-partnerships/

Chinese President sees UK-China academic partnerships at Imperial | Imperial News | Imperial College London XI JINPING'S STATE VISIT - President Xi Jinping of the People's Republic of China visited Imperial College London today (21 October). imperial.ac.uk

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

42. Why has the editor-in-chief of the Lancet been so publicly deferential to China? 44/ https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1187265.shtml

China shows world the right way for pandemic response: The Lancet chief editor - Global Times globaltimes.cn

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

43/ Why did Bill Gates express such admiration for China’s response to Covid? 45/

Video Transcript AI Summary
China effectively suppressed the virus through authoritarian measures, violating individual rights but achieving impressive results. Their ability to quickly build hospitals and enforce mask-wearing kept virus numbers low. This strict lockdown approach set a new tone for other countries' responses, deviating from the traditional epidemiological playbook. Even Sweden, often cited for its different approach, still implemented behavioral changes. As for the US, despite being the world's largest economy and having top epidemiologists, its response has been poor. The speaker attributes this to a belief in freedom, implying a reluctance to implement strict measures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In their typical, fairly authoritarian way, they did a very good job of suppressing the virus. You know, there may have been a lot of individual rights that were violated there, but the overall macro effect that they achieved, is, you know, quite, kind of amazing, they had the benefit that it was really Hubei, you know, 60,000,000 people and they brought in the health resources, 1,400,000,000 and their ability to build hospitals, very, very quickly and force compliance with masks and various other things, but they've kept the virus numbers to very low levels, compared to most countries. Speaker 1: Do you think the fact that China went into this very strict lockdown very quickly set the tone for the way other countries responded? Because that was not really part of the epidemiological playbook, before. Speaker 0: No, you're absolutely right. I, you know, I live in infectious diseases and how you stop them. And so when we were first talking about the shutdown, I was like, wow, we're really gonna do this. Are people really willing to do this? How much productivity are we gonna lose by doing this. So that day we sat there in early March and said, okay, no one comes to the foundation offices and they haven't been since, you know, we were talking with Microsoft about it, and they did the same thing. I remember thinking, gosh, I wish we practice for this because it's such a novel idea. And so I think, yes, that influence things. The idea that you would just let it rip, and nobody really did that. Even Sweden that people call out did ask for behavioral change. They didn't do pure bans quite as much and during the epidemic there have been periods where it looked like their approach was smart, then it looked like it wasn't smart, you know, that still swivels around to this day about the relative health and economic effects that they experienced versus other countries. Speaker 1: Now let's turn to the US because it's the country, you know, it's the world's biggest economy. It's the preeminent public health Country in the world has got the world's best epidemiologist. I mean, why is it done so badly? Speaker 0: Well, we believe in freedom.

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

44/ How did a 40-year member of the British Communist Party with no background in epidemiology become a leading advisor to the UK Government on COVID, and why was she recently promoted to lead the WHO’s nudge unit? 46/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/uk-sages-susan-michie-promoted-to

UK SAGE’s Susan Michie Promoted to Lead WHO’s Nudge Unit Susan Michie, a 40-year member of the British Communist Party and a leading participant in the UK Government’s Scientific Pandemic Insights group on Behaviour (SPI-B) “nudge unit” to drive consent for Covid mandates, has been promoted to Chair of the WHO’s Technical Advisory Group for Behavioural Insights and Science for Health. michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

45. Why did economists at leading universities assume that a short, sharp lockdown would “eliminate the resurgence risk” when the policy had no precedent? 47/ https://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/policy-for-the-covid-19-crisis/

Policy for the COVID-19 Crisis - Clark Center Forum This week’s IGM Economic Experts Panel statements: A) A comprehensive policy response to the coronavirus will involve tolerating a very large contraction in economic activity until the spread of infections has dropped significantly. B) Abandoning severe lockdowns at a time when the likelihood of a resurgence in infections remains high will lead to greater total […] kentclarkcenter.org

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

46. Why did politicians and public health officials demonstrate so little concern for following their own COVID rules? 48/

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

47. If COVID was actually deadly enough to kill millions and justify an indefinite state of emergency, why has so little effort been expended to hold China accountable for its initial coverup of that virus? 49/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-china-situation-isnt-as-bad-as

The China Situation Isn’t As Bad As It Looks. It’s Far Worse. The International Criminal Conspiracy of “Change Through Trade” michaelpsenger.substack.com

@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger

Though many in positions of power would prefer we forgot, the strict lockdowns that consumed the world in 2020 are extremely well documented. Until we have real answers as to how exactly they happened, and why, we won’t be living in a real democracy. /end https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/nuremberg-ii-what-a-real-inquiry

Nuremberg II: What a Real Inquiry into the Response to Covid Would Look Like Disturbing questions remain as to who did what, when, and why in the days leading up to the lockdowns of spring 2020 and beyond. michaelpsenger.substack.com
View Full Interactive Feed