TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @mommaleo
@mommaleo - Jenny
@amtvmedia https://t.co/zW3D1Tp1EM
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are capable of so much more. Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space, enabling us to overcome physical separation and redefine how we operate across distances. By bending or compressing the barriers of distance, these technologies effectively annihilate the constraints that time and space would otherwise impose. This capacity to alter how we experience and interact with distance opens avenues for increased efficiency, faster cycles, and new modes of collaboration and production. The implication is that as these technological capabilities advance, there is a direct impact on growth and productivity, by enabling processes to occur more rapidly, coordination to become more seamless, and workflows to be optimized beyond traditional limits. The core assertion is that technological progress expands our potential to transcend conventional boundaries, creating opportunities for acceleration in development, manufacturing, communication, and logistics. In this view, time and space are not fixed barriers but dimensions that can be engineered to enhance performance, leading to tangible gains in output and effectiveness. The statement emphasizes that the expansion of what technology can do—manipulating temporal and spatial factors—translates into practical benefits: improved productivity, faster delivery of results, and the ability to scale operations in ways previously constrained by distance and duration. Ultimately, the message is that human capability, augmented by advanced technologies, has the capacity to push beyond current limits, with distance no longer a hindrance and productivity poised to rise as a direct consequence of these transformative tools. The overarching takeaway is that technological manipulation of time and space redefines efficiency, enabling growth and enhanced productivity by erasing the traditional frontiers that separate people, places, and processes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But we are capable of so much more. Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. They leave distance annihilated, causing to grow and improve productivity.
reSee.it AI Summary
I reviewed public and declassified DoD/IC materials on Cognitive Electromagnetic Warfare (CEW). The core is a modern EMS/ EW framework: DoD EMS Superiority Strategy, joint EW doctrine (JP 3-13.1), EMSO framing in Air Force and Army publications, and GAO warnings about spectrum control. CEW is AI-enabled spectrum operations, not mind control, framed as cognition as contested terrain. Related DIA CIA CREST/AHI, ODNI reports, NATO work, and a 2024 congressional hearing are cited.
@mommaleo - Jenny
WHAT IS actually public + declassified around Cognitive Electromagnetic Warfare… Below is the DoD + IC (CIA/DIA) + other declassified/public records
Video Transcript AI Summary
Electromagnetic warfare comprises two distinct concepts that cause confusion. First, a real, documented military doctrine: AI-driven electronic warfare that detects, classifies, and adapts across the electromagnetic spectrum faster than humans. Second, a contested but documented possibility: attempts to influence or affect human cognition through information operations and potential electromagnetic bioeffects. The thread separates doctrine from allegation and shows what's actually public, declassified, and on the record.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Electromagnetic warfare means two different things and that confusion matters. One is real documented military doctrine, AI driven electronic warfare that detects, classifies, and adapts across the electromagnetic spectrum faster than humans. The other is contested but documented, attempts to influence or affect human cognition through information operations and possible electromagnetic bioeffects. This thread separates doctrine from allegation and shows what's actually public, declassified, and on the record.
@mommaleo - Jenny
DoD doctrine and Strategy The “real” Electromagnetic Spectrum warfighting backbone DoD Electromagnetic Spectrum Superiority Strategy (2020) This is the modern DoD umbrella strategy tying EW + spectrum management into EMSO and “EMS superiority.” Link: https://media.defense.gov/2020/Oct/29/2002525927/-1/-1/0/electromagnetic_spectrum_superiority_strategy.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
@mommaleo - Jenny
Joint doctrine: Electronic Warfare JP 3-13.1 The core joint EW doctrine (definitions, missions, planning, EA/EP/ES, etc.). Link: https://jfsc.ndu.edu/Portals/72/Documents/JC2IOS/Additional_Reading/1C4_Mod_5_JP_3-13-4_MILDEC.pdf
@mommaleo - Jenny
Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations doctrine Air Force Doctrine Publication 3-85 Modern service doctrine framing EMS operations and referencing the joint EMSO doctrine ecosystem. Link: https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/AFDP_3-85/AFDP%203-85%20Electromagnetic%20Spectrum%20Ops.pdf
@mommaleo - Jenny
Army doctrine CYBERSPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE OPERATIONS FM 3-12 Army’s combined framing, often discussed as CEMA: cyberspace + electromagnetic activities. Link: https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/3678217/Document-11-Department-of-the-Army-FM-3-12.pdf
Page not found | National Security Archive
nsarchive.gwu.edu
@mommaleo - Jenny
ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM OPERATIONS GAO The GAO warned DoD that the U.S. was not organized or prepared to control the electromagnetic spectrum in modern war. If you lose the spectrum, you lose communications, GPS, radar, and command and control. This report explains why EMSO and AI-enabled electronic warfare became a top Pentagon priority. Link: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1163104.pdf
@mommaleo - Jenny
“Cognitive” electromagnetic warfare doesn’t mean mind control. In official use, it refers to AI enabled electronic warfare that can detect, classify, and adapt across the electromagnetic spectrum faster than humans. DoD Electromagnetic Spectrum Superiority Strategy (2020) official document showing where modern EW and spectrum operations are headed: Link: https://media.defense.gov/2020/Oct/29/2002525927/-1/-1/0/electromagnetic_spectrum_superiority_strategy.pdf
@mommaleo - Jenny
Example industry framing of Cognitive Electromagnetic Warfare (CEW) Link: https://hii.com/product/cognitive-electromagnetic-warfare-ew/
Cognitive Electromagnetic Warfare (EW)
Cognitive EW is the field of next-generation machine learning and AI-enabled electronic warfare solutions. Learn more about HII's solutions.
hii.com
@mommaleo - Jenny
Professional EW community argument for “cognitive EMS operations” Link: https://www.jedonline.com/2023/03/22/speak-over-the-noise-the-case-for-cognitive-electromagnetic-spectrum-operations/
Speak Over the Noise: The Case for Cognitive Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations - Journal of Electromagnetic Dominance
By Cmdr. Michael “Quatto” Posey, USN The promise of employing artificial intelligence (AI), specifically machine learning (ML), to enable predictive e
jedonline.com
@mommaleo - Jenny
C O G N I T I V E W A R F A R E …influence/decision warfare as DoD discusses it This is not “EM weapons,” but it is “cognition as the contested terrain.” NDU Press article pushing the idea of codifying cognitive warfare in doctrine and training the force against it. Link: https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/3853187/cognitive-warfare-the-fight-for-gray-matter-in-the-digital-gray-zone/
@mommaleo - Jenny
NATO Innovation Hub report on Cognitive Warfare: definitions threat framing criteria policy gaps Link: https://innovationhub-act.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Cognitive-Warfare.pdf https://t.co/divCPK13B5
@mommaleo - Jenny
🧵
@mommaleo - Jenny
• DIA • DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Anomalous Acute and Subacute Field Effects on Human Biological Tissues This is one of the most-cited DIA FOIA releases that examines RF/Microwave field effects, neurological correlates, and health symptoms in an unclassified context. https://t.co/1AcCuZuhkX
@mommaleo - Jenny
🧵
@mommaleo - Jenny
🧵
@mommaleo - Jenny
C I A • C R E S T The Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation on Biological Systems This is a declassified CIA document in the reading room focused on electromagnetic radiation effects on humans. It discusses: Effects of mm waves on human subjects. Electromagnetic radiation as a biological stimulus, thermal and non-thermal mechanisms. 📄 Document: The Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation on Biological Systems CIA Reading Room PDF
@mommaleo - Jenny
🧵
@mommaleo - Jenny
U.S. Congressional Hearing Anomalous Health Incidents H A V A N A S Y N D R O M E This is a public transcript of a U.S. House hearing where directed, pulsed radiofrequency energy is referenced as a possible explanation for observed health effects. Relevant excerpts: The prepared statement cites the National Academy of Sciences conclusion that unusual symptoms are “consistent with the effects of directed, pulsed radio frequency energy.” It also lists cognitive deficits, dizziness, nausea, memory loss, etc. as symptoms proposed to be consistent with RF effects. 📄 Document: Congressional hearing transcript: Examining Foreign Anomalous Health Incidents House, May 8, 2024
@mommaleo - Jenny
@MagnetReconnect 🔥 ❤️ Figured I’d share what I wanted to learn. 🤣
reSee.it AI Summary
Psilocybin is considered to be the safest and most effective psychedelic drug for treating various disorders. It has shown potential in treating mood and anxiety disorders, as well as providing relief from cluster headaches, phantom-limb pain, and chronic pain. The establishment of the Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research at John Hopkins University highlights the growing scientific interest in psychedelic drugs, with over 27K articles published, including over 1000 specifically on psilocybin.
@mommaleo - Jenny
Of all psychedelic drugs, psilocybin is reported to have the most favorable safety profile…the vast evidence-based data that exist for psilocybin alone suggest that psilocybin may be the most efficacious psychedelic drug for treating such disorders. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8156539/
The Therapeutic Potential of Psilocybin
The psychedelic effects of some plants and fungi have been known and deliberately exploited by humans for thousands of years. Fungi, particularly mushrooms, are the principal source of naturally occurring psychedelics. The mushroom extract, psilocybin ...
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
@mommaleo - Jenny
In addition to having the potential to treat mood and anxiety disorders, psilocybin has also demonstrated analgesic effects as evidenced by numerous clinical studies on the treatment of cluster headaches, intractable phantom-limb pain, and chronic pain. https://t.co/IOGOmexLZh
@mommaleo - Jenny
In September of 2020, the John Hopkins University built the Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness research, the first of its kind. To date, over 27K scientific articles have been published on psychedelic drugs, with over 1000 particularly on psilocybin. https://t.co/vIo5YbL3n7
@mommaleo - Jenny
👋😲👉Tucker Carlson’s Dad 📰 Dick Carlson reporting on The Zodiac Killer’s victim Paul Stein, October. 1969. https://t.co/wSjSgkTsRD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Police in San Francisco are receiving numerous tips and information to help catch the Zodiac Killer. A new team of detectives has been assigned to sift through this information. The police are now convinced that the killer sent a piece of bloody cloth from the murdered cab driver to the San Francisco Chronicle. Lab tests confirmed that the cloth came from the victim. Handwriting analysis also suggests that the same person is responsible for five murders, including the cab driver. A composite sketch of the killer has been widely circulated, although it may not be an accurate representation. The killer's letters have all been sent from San Francisco, leading police to believe he either lives or works in the city. Efforts are being made to prevent any future killings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bits and pieces of information, leads, and tips from people who want to help catch the Zodiac Killer have been pouring into police headquarters here at the Hall of Justice for the last few days. A new team of detectives has been added to the homicide detail in an effort to sift some of that information. Police are now convinced that it was the killer of a San Francisco cab driver who sent in a swatch of bloody cloth with a letter to the San Francisco Chronicle. Laboratory tests on the cloth torn from the shirt of Paul Stein prove that it came in fact from the cab driver when he was murdered last Saturday night in Presidio Heights. And handwriting analysis of a foreboding letter indicates the writer is the same man who's committed 5 murders.
1 here, 3 in Vallejo, and one in Napa over the last 10 months. A composite drawing sketched in 4 hours from witnesses' descriptions has been widely publicized. People tend to forget, however, that it is not necessarily an accurate portrayal of the killer's likeness, just a translated remembrance of a brief look at his face. All of the letters sent by the killer have been posted from San Francisco, and police believe the man either works or lives in this city. His chilling allusions to future slayings are being counted with an intense drive to prevent him from fulfilling and he promises.
Dick Carlson reporting for Newsbeat from San Francisco Hall of Justice.
reSee.it AI Summary
This comprehensive article covers various aspects of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic. It includes information about scientists investigating the virus, the ranking of bioweapons, the role of EcoHealth Alliance, the book "The Truth about Wuhan," gain-of-function research, the involvement of Dr. Anthony Fauci, whistleblowers, leaked emails, and the potential lab leak theory. The article also touches on the CIA's involvement, the role of Ukraine's biolabs, and the connection to Harvard University. It concludes with a summary of gain-of-function research and its implications.
@mommaleo - Jenny
THIS FRIDAY! Don’t miss this XSpace! 🔥@CharlesRixey is a member of DRASTIC, a group of international scientists and researchers investigating the origin of SARS-Cov-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic. He previously served as a career CBRN (WMD) professional in the United States Marine Corps including positions as an officer instructor and 8 years as the CBRN for Marine Corps Embassy Security Group, training the 2.000 Marines that guard American Embassies and consulates under the department of state. Bookmark the XSpace with Jake (@AmericaShaman ) - BE THERE! He has an announcement and he’ll let us know what the team has been up to! 🔥@AGHuff 🔥@NestCommander 🔥@Doctor_I_am_The 🔥@53v3n0fn1n3 https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1ynJOynXdBWKR
@mommaleo - Jenny
@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭
[1] In 2018, a group of retired military leaders/scientists ranked 33 known bi0weαροns in 12 relevant categories In 2022, they scored SARS-CoV-2 w/the same rubric As a potential BW, the COVID-19 virus was 4th-of 34 Food for thought @KimDotcom @RWMaloneMD https://academic.oup.com/milmed/advance-article/doi/10.1093/milmed/usac123/6586077?login=false
@mommaleo - Jenny
Bio: Honored Guest Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) @CharlesRixey
Video Transcript AI Summary
I served in the Marine Corps for 15 years, specializing in WMD. I was an instructor and worked with the Department of State. As the WMD chief, I oversaw the deployment of 2000 marines to embassies worldwide. I am also a member of the international group, Drastic, investigating the origin of the pandemic. Around 70-80% of the evidence presented to Congress comes from Drastic's findings. I worked with Major Murphy and together we released a grant proposal showing intent to create a virus similar to SARS CoV 2. Currently, I am collaborating with colleagues in Japan, Germany, and the United States, preparing evidence and affidavits for a future grand jury hearing to hold Fauci and the NIH accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 15 years in the Marine Corps. I was at WMD. That was my job. I was an instructor teaching our job to new new, enlisted and officers. I spent 8 years working with the department of state as part of that.
So I was the WMD chief on the marine side for the 2000 marines that go to the embassies. 188 embassies and consulates. So I'm pretty familiar with how things are supposed to go. And then, I've also been a member of drastic, for two and a half years, investigating the origin of pandemic and drastic. Is this A group of on international, scientists and researchers.
And I would say that 70 to 80% of the evidence that has been going around congress in the different committees over the last couple of years has come from drastic findings. Not just mine, but several several others. And, and I I was also the person, who purse who works with major Murphy. And then I brought the the diffuse proposal which basically was the grant that was where they where they showed. It's literally proof of intent to create a virus that looks exactly like SARS CoV 2.
So I I, I worked with him and we ultimately decided to release that through drastic. And Now, I work in a lot of different areas. I know all the topics you've talked about that you mentioned, I know a lot about. And currently, I'm working with my friend here, Kevin in Japan. And with friends in Germany, in the United States, and we're preparing what we've already prepared and submitted, evidence and affidavits for a future grand jury hearing involving one of the states, who's finally going to pick it up.
And, and the grand jury hearings and pull Fauci in the NIH into court because congress still won't do it. So so right now, I'm in Japan for a month working on some projects involving that.
@mommaleo - Jenny
Publication by Honored Guest: DR. Andrew G. Huff PhD, MS @AGHuff Former EcoHealth Alliance Vice President and Senior Scientist 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙒𝙪𝙝𝙖𝙣: 𝙃𝙤𝙬 𝙄 𝙐𝙣𝙘𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘽𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙇𝙞𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙃𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 Get the Book Here👉https://www.amazon.com/Truth-about-Wuhan-Uncovered-Biggest/dp/1510773886 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐖𝐮𝐡𝐚𝐧, 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐚, 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐈𝐃-𝟏𝟗 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫-𝐮𝐩. The day that Dr. Andrew G. Huff left his senior scientist and vice president role at EcoHealth Alliance was one of the happiest days of his life due to the corruption he had witnessed at the organization. However, he never thought working there would be of any great consequence to the future. He was wrong. Because, as an EcoHealth Alliance insider, Dr. Huff had had a ringside seat to one of the biggest cover-ups in history. The Truth about Wuhan contains new research and a breakdown of how and why the development of COVID-19 in the United States and China was supported by the US government to collect intelligence on laboratories in China. Dr. Huff, an expert in the fields of bioterrorism and bio warfare, is a whistleblower who will show why the reasons the lab leak was covered up are incorrect. He worked on the classified research side of the program as a US government scientist. He knows the real how and why COVID-19 emerged. Besides exposing the conspiracy and cover-up, Dr. Huff also puts forth policy solutions and recommendations to prevent a lab leak virus from plaguing the world again. The Truth about Wuhan simply explains the complexity of the system that led to COVID-19’s emergence; how the medical industrial complex grew and became entrenched in gain of function work after 9/11; why EcoHealth Alliance was the (almost) perfect intelligence collection cover; the policy actions and decision-making process as to why the United States government engaged in the COVID cover-up; how and why the United States swapped biotechnology with China and biomedical corporations; and the incentives for each of the actors or governments to engage and coordinate a global cover-up of COVID-19 origins. The Truth about Wuhan also shows how and why Dr. Anthony Fauci is intricately involved in the COVID cover-up; how scientists like EcoHealth Alliance president and CEO Dr. Peter Daszak rose to power and used their influence to corrupt science and the COVID origin investigation; and how the intelligence community likely orchestrated the cover-up with Dr. Anthony Fauci. Dr. Huff also provides personal harrowing accounts of how the US government waged a psychological operation against him to prevent him from speaking out. COVID-19 is the biggest lie, scandal, and intelligence failure in US history, and Dr. Andrew G. Huff is stepping out of the shadows to share his insider story about this failure that led to millions of deaths around the world.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker recounts their friend Andrew Hoff's ordeal with the FBI. They mention Donald Rumsfeld's quote about unknown unknowns and how Andrew's knowledge led to his family's tribulations. The speaker questions why they didn't take action against the pandemic despite their experience in public health preparedness. They highlight Andrew's surveillance by drones and invasion of privacy. The speaker urges viewers to consider Andrew's perspective and read his book, which claims that both science and the US government are broken. They mention Andrew's decision to become a whistleblower and his growing popularity on social media platforms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2021 at 9:27 AM Good morning, Jason. Have someone at the FBI that you can refer me to right now. It's an emergency. Now with good conscience, Can any of you honestly say that's how you want a conversation to begin? Unfortunately, That's my first memory of the journey that my friend, Andrew Hoff, and his family have been on for the last few months.
Donald Rumsfeld once said, and I've often repeated in various iterations, among other interesting lines of thinking, There are unknown unknowns. Well, in my mind, now There are things that I cannot unknow. I cannot forget the tribulations that Andrew and his family And community where they live had, have, and continue to endure since this Escapade began. One of my initial responses back to him, after confirming that I'd made a few phone calls and gotten him the contacts that he needed thanks to some trusted colleagues, was asking about his wife and young son. The goosebumps that I get, even today as I write this, Thinking about how she felt and what their little guy will never know about until he's able to read And understand the overt violations of not only their home and their civil liberties, But also their world as they know it.
And why? Because Andrew Hough knew, And nose, too much. What ensued in the following couple of days Not only gave me goosebumps but also forced me to rethink everything that I'd read, heard, Learned and followed since December 2019 when, as a public health guy, I was aware of what was going on and hoping it wasn't going to be as bad as it could be. I had worked in local, county, state, And Federal Public Health in various anti terrorism capacities and public health preparedness, Developing a myriad of response plans for everything from community based smallpox mass vaccination To pandemic influenza readiness, to Anthrax point of distribution, PODs, To antiviral distribution plans based on evolving guidance from the CDC's Public Health Emergency Response Teams. How could we have seen this coming and not done anything about it?
Why was this research being conducted? Who was paying for it? Could it really be the biggest Facade in the history of the world. Put yourself in Andrew's position. Imagine being surveilled by drones, tailed everywhere he went, and then to find out that they were in his house, Violating his personal space to listen to who he was talking to, what he was saying, And when?
Put yourself in his position and open your mind to all he has to say in this book. CHAPTER 1. Both science and the US government are broken. During the week of October 25th 2021, I decided to come forward as a material witness and whistleblower related to SARS CoV 2. That week, my popularity on LinkedIn and Twitter seemed to be taking off as my followings on both platforms were rapidly increasing.
Before the rapid increase, To say that I was bad at social media platforms was an understatement. Maybe it wasn't so much that I was bad at social media, but that my personality and style often come across to others
503 - Service Unavailable Error
amazon.com
@mommaleo - Jenny
@CharlesRixey @AGHuff 🦠@NameIsSpartacus SUBSTACK w/Everythjng COVID Spartacus @ICENI https://open.substack.com/pub/iceni?r=2ltpfv&utm_medium=ios Biodefense Mafia References https://open.substack.com/pub/iceni/p/7th-livestream-with-kevin-mccairn?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
ICENI Bulletins | Spartacus | Substack
Revealing COVID-19's Origins. Click to read ICENI Bulletins, by Spartacus, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.
iceni.substack.com
7th Livestream with Kevin McCairn and Charles Rixey & Biodefense Mafia References
We had a great discussion on a wide range of topics
iceni.substack.com
@mommaleo - Jenny
@CharlesRixey @AGHuff @NameIsSpartacus @Iceni Charles Rixey MA, MBA (c): @CharlesRixey ABOUT https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/about SUBSTACK: Prometheus Shrugged https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/
About - Prometheus Shrugged
DRASTIC's COVID-19 Origin Investigations - General Political & Data Analysis. Click to read Prometheus Shrugged, by Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c), a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers.
prometheusshrugged.substack.com
Prometheus Shrugged | Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c) | Substack
DRASTIC's COVID-19 Origin Investigations - General Political & Data Analysis. Click to read Prometheus Shrugged, by Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c), a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers.
prometheusshrugged.substack.com
@mommaleo - Jenny
FAUCI’s leaked emails https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23316400-farrar-fauci-comms
Farrar Fauci Comms (Tobias FOIA)
documentcloud.org
@mommaleo - Jenny
SARS CoVd2 Gain of Function Research Violations of Law Dr Richard Fleming's @Doctor_I_am_The ZOOM presentation for the BASES2021. July 11th 2021,. This is a crucial and extremely detailed presentation over the severe issues of criminal violations on many fronts , now proceeding to the Nuremberg courts. https://youtu.be/3GzzBD1kJ0g?si=woFD1F-LFoadusLs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Fleming presents on how SARS-CoV-2 gain-of-function research violated international law. He discusses topics such as the US funding for this bioweapon, the nature of the bioweapon as a prion with SARS-CoV-2 as the delivery system, identifying the virus, vaccine effectiveness, treatments, and the accountability of those responsible. He traces the research back to 1999 when funding was provided for infectious diseases of coronaviruses. Various grants and developments in the US and China are mentioned, including the synthetic alteration of coronaviruses. The presentation also highlights a 2007 research project recommending the immediate shutdown of international travel during a pandemic. Gain-of-function research gained attention in 2011 with the release of a highly infectious H5N1 avian influenza virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My pleasure to be here, Miles. Thank you so much. I'm gonna share the screen and, begin the presentation. Well, Myles and everyone, hello. This is Doctor.
Fleming from the Dallas Fort It's my pleasure to present how SARS CoV two gain of function research violated international law for the 2021 Basis Summer Conference this 11 July 2021. As always, I want to mention briefly the Conflict of interest that I am the patent owner for something called plumbing method or FMTVDM and the Author of the Inflammation Heart Disease Theory that explains how inflammatory diseases like heart disease and a variety of other diseases are associated with a number of factors including, bacteria and viruses, including SARS CoV-two. We're going to cover 6 topics today. We're going to look at how the United States paid for this gain of function bioweapon. We're going to look at this bioweapon for what it really is, a prion bioweapon with the virus SARS CoV-two merely being the delivery system.
We're gonna look at how do we know what virus we're actually dealing with. We're going to ask the questions, how effective are the vaccines really and are they needed? We're going to look at treatments for this bioweapon. And finally, we're going to address the very important issue of Nuremberg too, for holding the people accountable Responsible for funding, development and dissemination of this bioweapon. Research in the United States can be dated back to 1999 when the Health and Human Services Provided funding for infectious diseases of coronaviruses.
A year later in 2000, Ralph Barrick Began the initial process of using reverse genetics to rescue an infectious clone known as SARS CoV- urbani, something that will be very important as we get through the presentation. Within 2 years, colleagues of Ralph Barrick, including Curtis and Young at the University of North Carolina obtained a patent that was paid for by NIH grant GM 63228 For Recombinant Engineering or Reverse Genetics for the Development of Infectious Replication Defective Coronaviruses. Also in 2002, Doctor. Shizeng Li at the Wuhan Institute of Virology received funding Anne proceeded to develop infective, Coronaviruses, including the use of HIV pseudovirus Glycoprotein 120, a prion in its own right. The following year in 2003, Ralph Berwick received another NIH grant allowing him to synthetically alter Coronaviruses or Corona Veriday.
The first, notation in the published literature of SARS CoV 2 was not in 2019, But actually back to a Chinese paper in 2006 and any place that you see asterisk, as you see here, you'll see an associated Publication at the very bottom. Throughout these slides, you will be able to look up for yourself these actual published papers and read More detail on your own. In 2007, the National Science Foundation published research that Would have been well known to anybody in infectious disease in 2019. That research project looked at the best Plan of Action for a Pandemic. This was done at Indiana University and institutions in both Italy and France and the conclusion was You must immediately shut down international travel if you believe you have a pandemic.
4 years later in 2011, the world became Painfully familiar with gain of function research as labs at the University of Wisconsin and in the Netherlands Allowed to get out: a very infectious gain of function research virus for the H5N1 Asian Avionic Influenza
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2012, gain of function research was discussed at a conference, focusing on its importance in understanding disease pathogenesis, antimicrobial resistance, and developing better surveillance, vaccines, and therapeutics. The speaker mentioned that gain of function can occur naturally or be created through mutations and genetic techniques. They also noted that increasing transmissibility may decrease pathogenesis, and vice versa. In 2013, a new coronavirus called MERS emerged, and research showed that immediate treatment upon symptoms was effective. In 2014, there were incidents of accidental exposure to anthrax and the discovery of forgotten vials of smallpox.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this conference was done in 2012.
Speaker 1: Integral to that study has always been the issue of gain of function research, not only for influenza, but essentially for all infectious diseases research. Now there are a few ways to look at gain of function research. There's the naturally occurring mutations which naturally give gain of function, and investigators study these effects on the phenotypes of interest. Does this mutation make something more transmissible, more pathogenic or adapt to host better or what historically investigators have done is to actually create gain of function by making mutations, passage adaptation, or other newer genetic techniques such as reverse genetics x and genetic reassortment. When we do that, often some g some phenotypes appear and others disappear.
For example, it is commonly seen that when you increase a transmissibility, you may see a decrease in pathogenesis, or vice versa, you may deliberately increase pathogenesis and see a decrease in transmissibility, but the bottom line is that gain and loss of function research is critical to understanding disease pathogenesis, antimicrobial resistance and host responses as well as to developing better techniques of surveillance, vaccines, and therapeutics, specifically to gain a function research on HPAI h five n one.
Speaker 0: Okay. Because you've got the, the video, and you know who that is. That is, doctor Anthony Fauci in 2012 dealing with, the consequences of this. In 2013, Only a year later, another coronavirus was well documented for fatalities in Saudi Arabia and South Korea, and that virus is known as the Middle Eastern Respiratory Virus or MERS. We learned from research during that period of time that treatment of these viruses were quite doable and manageable.
However, it required immediate treatment upon symptoms of individuals. Barrick and several Chinese Physicians at the time began to isolate several coronaviruses of particular interest, those with what's known as an HKU four spike, Which up until that point in time had been unable to actually infect people, although their future work would change that. By 2014, the CDC had another problem with gain of function and release of infectious pathogens where several of the CDC workers were accidentally exposed to anthrax. Again, there was shipment of deadly influenza virus, and the NIH discovered 50 year old vials of smallpox Not kept in isolated areas that they had forgotten about.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The Here is another non-controversial thread by Andrew. 🤣Note the sarcasm. This is what we love about him. His courage, strength, and resilience.
@mommaleo - Jenny
WHAT is Gain of Function Research? Gain-of-function experiments aim to increase the transmissibility and virulence of existing viruses, making them deadlier for humans. The stated purpose is to better understand pathogens and to develop vaccines for possible future pandemics. Critics say this type of research is extremely dangerous and should be banned or regulated. They claim it has not prevented any pandemics to date, and that the COVID-19 outbreak might be the result of an accidental release from a lab that was conducting #gainoffunction research.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Gain of function research, which involves making viruses deadlier or more infectious, has sparked controversy amid debates about the origin of the coronavirus pandemic. The research aims to predict and prepare for future pandemics, but it has not yet resulted in any preemptive vaccines or prevented any pandemics. The methods used include genetically modifying pathogens and conducting experiments on animals. Concerns arise from the potential for accidents and the risk of manmade viruses falling into the wrong hands. The Wuhan Institute of Virology has been at the center of scrutiny, with allegations of inadequate safety protocols. The debate highlights the need for international investigation and community involvement in determining the risks and benefits of high-risk research.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are supercharged lab enhanced viruses becoming a global threat? Gain of function research?
Speaker 1: Gain of function.
Speaker 2: So called gain of function research known as gain of function.
Speaker 3: The controversy around so called gain of function research has erupted alongside the heated debate around the coronavirus pandemic's origin.
Speaker 2: It's a tale of 2 theories. A lot of Democrats pooh poohed the whole idea of the lab leak.
Speaker 4: Prominent public health experts saying that the lab leak theory, which was hawked by conspiracy theorists might actually be credible.
Speaker 0: This has moved high risk gain of function research from the secretive shadows into the public spotlight, we've set out to investigate why, how, and where this type of research is being done, and what the risks and benefits are.
Speaker 3: So what exactly is gain of function? It is a type of research that makes pathogens like like viruses, deadlier, are more infectious to humans. The researchers intentionally modify the virus in lab experiments to give new functions. For instance, the ability to spread by air or attack human nerve cells. Gna function research seeks to make a virus more easily con between humans to increase the severity of the disease it triggers or to make it resistant to existing treatments or vaccines.
Sounds crazy.
Speaker 0: Two main reasons are given for why this type of research is done. One is to better predict which viruses in animal relations might one day naturally mutate and become infectious for humans. The second is to be better prepared when a new pandemic hits, for instance, by already developing a vaccine for it preemptively.
Speaker 5: There are obviously valid reasons for gain of function research, and the main reason is to understand pathogens better, to understand the way they transmit and behave and thereby to make vaccines, drugs, etcetera.
Speaker 3: So how many vaccines have been developed as a result of gain of function research.
Speaker 6: None. There have been no Preemptive vaccines to date.
Speaker 3: Have any pandemics been prevented thanks to gain of function research?
Speaker 7: The answer is not that I know of.
Speaker 5: Not that I'm aware.
Speaker 3: What's clear is that it didn't prevent this coronavirus pandemic.
Speaker 8: Actually, none of the gain of function research that was done over the past decades, however, like, none of it contributed to finding a vaccine or or cure for SARS CoV 2 for COVID nineteen. But in the future, there could be potential for that.
Speaker 0: Some scientists think this is a perfectly legitimate endeavor. Others say it's akin to checking for a gas leak by holding a match to the gas pipe. In the effort to protect us from a pandemic, scientists could cause a pandemic.
Speaker 3: So let's look a bit more closely at how gain of function research is done. One method is to genetically re engineer pathogens by inserting genes from 1 virus into another to make it more aggressive.
Speaker 0: Another simpler method is called animal passaging. Researchers inject a virus into ferrets or so called humanized mice. These mice have been genetically manipulated to have human lung receptors. The virus undergoes slight mutations as it passes through several generations of mice. The scientists select the strongest mutations until the virus eventually becomes transmissible to humans.
Speaker 8: The scientific technology today is so good that you can make a whole genome of a virus with no scars, no no seams or anything. It looks perfectly natural. In 2011, an extreme gain of function experiment rocked the science world.
Speaker 0: Scientists used the serial passaging method to make the h 5 n one avian flu virus more transmissible to humans. The lead scientist, Ron Foucier, claimed he created one of the most dangerous viruses courses you can make.
Speaker 8: They had taken a virus that was deadly, but but not good at infecting humans and made it also very infectious. So that kind of research, I think, is the risk, immensely high. If it broke out, There would be just widespread death. But the benefits, what are they? Many scientists look at this experiment, and they think, why?
Why did you do this.
Speaker 0: The thing with the avian flu is that it is extremely deadly with an infection fatality rate of approximately 60%. Compare that to a a rate of under 1% for COVID nineteen. Luckily, this virus hasn't leaked from a lab so far, But another worry is that a manmade virus like this one could end up in the wrong hands.
Speaker 5: The main concern was the publication of the research because once you publish it, then nefarious actors can also have access. It's like if you publish a method on the internet on how to hack a bank account, do you think someone's gonna use it? Of course, they're gonna use it. Right? And several, you know, terrorist groups have made their intention to use biological warfare known.
Speaker 3: High security BSL 4 labs built for research on highly infectious pathogens are booming around the world, and 3 quarters of them are located in densely populated urban areas. Gain of function research is being conducted in some of these labs in the US, China, Europe, and other countries, although nobody knows for sure in how many of them. But surprisingly, gain of function experiments are not done exclusively in high security BSL 4 labs. Some are done in level 2 and 3 labs.
Speaker 8: We recently found out that the Wuhan your virology was doing a lot of this SARS, like, virus research at a very low biosafety level. So at a level that you would feel unsafe working with airborne viruses at BSL 2, you you may or may not be wearing a lab coat. You definitely should be wearing gloves, but normally you don't wear a mask at BSL 2. So if you're looking for airborne viruses, live viruses at BSL 2, viruses that can spread through the air like SARS COVID 2, then you are completely exposed. It it was not an appropriate biosafety level for working with these SARS like viruses.
Speaker 3: Researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were collecting and researching bad coronaviruses and using humanized mice called prior to the COVID nineteen outbreak. But the top researcher, doctor Xizeng Li, denies she was conducting gain of function research.
Speaker 1: We know, from all of the records from the NIH grant applications from papers published by the Wuhan Institute of Virology Experts That they were engaged in aggressive research and aggressive work that was making scary pathogenic viruses scarier. Better able to infect human cells.
Speaker 6: Doctor Shi, she says we did not do Gaining a function research to increase infectivity. Right? She picked out Just the one. No. She didn't do to increase infectivity.
She did to change the host range to make it infectious to us.
Speaker 0: Making the disease a virus triggers more deadly is one possible aim of gain of function research. Courage. Another is to make a virus that would normally only attack animals better able to infect a different type of host, humans. What is making things murky is that different definitions of gain of function are circulating simultaneously.
Speaker 8: The reason why it's so confusing and so complicated is because scientists do not know where to draw the line between regular experiments And gain of function experiments that are very concerning.
Speaker 5: So it's only when there is a potential to cause harm to humans that it becomes gain of function research of concern.
Speaker 0: But the question into the origins of the pandemic were stifled in early 2020 funny. When an open letter was published in the medical journal, The Lancet, that effectively snuffed out all the debates.
Speaker 1: They were very well intentioned. But even in the name of those good intentions engaged in what I call scientific propaganda and thuggery, designed to drive, consensus when the evidence didn't support that consensus.
Speaker 9: It was basically trying to called shut any scientific debate, and it was quite obvious because there is no way you can reach these conclusions when you don't have data.
Speaker 6: People said that's a conspiracy theory. That's That's no conspiracy theory. That's an honest, scientific possibility.
Speaker 5: You probably know that most people who've been, shouting down the possibility of a lab leak virologists. And you know, I'm not not casting aspersions here. You know, There's many imminent virologists, and we need them, and their work is vitally important in in, especially in pandemics, but, you've got to think about best interest.
Speaker 8: If this came from a lab, that means that Science has led to millions of people dying by accident. So it's a very uncomfortable thing to think about. It's very Unpleasant idea for scientists.
Speaker 3: It wasn't until a group of citizen journalists began to investigate and analyze online databases that the lab leak theory reemerged. The group calling themselves drastic revealed that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was actively working with SARS CoV-two viruses over many years, Including the closest known relative to the pandemic virus using inadequate safety protocols. They also discovered that the lab and Chinese authorities have methodically attempted to conceal these activities, I start to get suspicious and start to investigate.
Speaker 9: You have to called play games to try to, you know, get the data. And China is very good at removing things. But if you get there on time, You can get an awful lot.
Speaker 1: There's been a lot of important information that's come out as a result of what they're calling internet sleuths, but it's really it's people who were just recognizing that our world is at risk, and our governments and the UN system weren't doing, what needed to be done.
Speaker 0: When the WHO looked into the question in early 2021, it concluded that a lab leak was extremely unlikely. But the report was criticized due to the team's lack of access to key data. President Biden has since asked US intelligence agencies to look into the matter, but so far, there has been no thorough international investigation.
Speaker 8: Up to now, we have not had an investigation of the origins of COVID nineteen. That China WHO joint study, has been widely described as a investigation by a lot of media, but they admit that they never had the mandate and they never had the powers or influence to be able to go in there and investigate. So all the evidence right now is circumstantial. We need to have a credible investigation.
Speaker 5: If it does turn out that this pandemic was caused by a lab leak, It's going to change the practice of virology forever everywhere.
Speaker 0: Although the lab leak theory has recently gained traction, there's still no definitive proof of either a market origin or a lab leak, and both theories remain plausible. But the whole controversy around the origin of the coronavirus has deflected from the larger and arguably more important question, whether high risk research with deadly pathogens should be pursued at all.
Speaker 3: The reason being that accidents happen, and they happen a lot, even from the highest security labs.
Speaker 6: And it happens all over the world, internationally, crucially, not any one particular country.
Speaker 0: As a result of a slew of accidents in US labs Involving bird flu, Ebola, and anthrax. In 2014, the Obama administration put a moratorium on gain of function Research. But the ban was full of loopholes.
Speaker 6: First of all, it was a funding moratorium. You could go on working. If you had money from someplace else, from some other government, or out of your own university, you could go and do what you want. And, of Kurdish people went all all over the world and and continued to do it.
Speaker 0: The US moratorium, however limited, was lifted in 2017. But even if there are demonstrable and important scientific gains resulting from this type of research, the question remains, are the risks it's worth it.
Speaker 7: Such work can be important because you can argue that by such studies, we will understand better what it takes to block it if an epidemic appears. But at the same time, you're going to ask as an interested, intelligent person, not a virologist, You can say, yeah, but by doing so, aren't you creating something that will be more infectious for humans? The answer is yes, But we're learning. And you can say, yes, you're learning, but are you weighing the scale between risk and benefit? Is the gain, which you're not even sure of this much, but the risk is this much.
Isn't that really plausible here? And if so, should we be doing those experiments? I think that's a legitimate discussion.
Speaker 5: What's happened in biology is very analogous to cybersecurity, where the technology has just leaped ahead way beyond the governance. The governance our governance of these things is sitting in the last century. Called. But the technology has just stained the head.
Speaker 1: It cannot be that individual scientists are making species wide decisions. That doesn't mean there's not a very important role for scientists, but we need to have broader, more inclusive, more democratic frameworks for figuring out the best ways forward.
Speaker 7: I would not ban it, but I would Ask it to be reviewed with international standards. And I would have on committees people beyond Expert virologists.
Speaker 8: I think the public needs to be involved. So definitely this problem should not be regulated by scientists and then performed by scientists ourselves. So because the outcomes of a pandemic, it's not just that only scientists get sick, everybody gets sick. So it affects the whole globe. That's why this sort of research where the risks are extremely high, they need to be discussed with non scientists as well.
Speaker 5: I think we need community consultation. We need the community engaged and knowledgeable. We actually did some research to find out How much do people in the general community know about this stuff? And it's very little. And when you give them the information, the factual information, they don't find it acceptable.
You know? They they don't find it acceptable to begin with, but the more information get you give people, the less acceptable it becomes to them. So I think, You know, we need to involve the community, because the community is the most important stakeholder for which all the benefits and the harms apply.
Speaker 2: There should be transparency. It is not normal that the public didn't know before what was gain of function. The society has the right to know what what is being done.
Speaker 1: The worst case scenario is we have another pandemic that's much worse than this one. And we're entering the age of synthetic biology where it's easy to imagine a much more dangerous pathogen than the one we are facing now. This could be a life or death moment for our species. And we have this opportunity, of this pandemic as terrible as it's been to learn the lessons. And to learn those lessons, we need to do a fearless examination of what went wrong.
Speaker 8: With the growing number of labs in the world now working with these dangerous pathogens collecting them, studying them, maybe doing a bit of gain of functional research for them, we we are entering called an era, it's quite likely that there will be a lab based pandemic. And if we don't deal with that, we're just just flying blind.
Speaker 0: Regardless of the true origins of the COVID nineteen virus, which we may never know for sure, society still needs to grapple with where to draw the line for research that's done with good intentions and in good faith, but that could put all of humanity at risk if anything goes wrong.
@mommaleo - Jenny
#GuestSpeaker👉 Dr. Andrew Huff @AGHuff is a multidisciplinary scientist and conducts research in high performance computing, risk analysis, bioterrorism, spatial analysis, modeling and simulation, epidemiology, emerging infectious disease ecology, and environmental health as it relates to agricultural and biological food production systems, biosurveillance systems, and public health. Dr. Huff was a member of the U.S. Army where he served two combat tours as an infantryman and has been an active participant in government committees and private sector organizations that work to establish safe and effective policies for food production systems, the environment, and public health systems.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker begins by discussing their military career, serving in combat tours and doing counterterrorism work. They then talk about their educational background, including degrees in psychology and engineering, as well as a PhD in public health. They mention being offered positions at various government agencies and working at Sandia National Laboratories. They later transitioned to a job at ECLAF Alliance, where they focused on building machine learning and artificial intelligence platforms for detecting emerging infectious diseases. They mention being promoted to an executive position but becoming disillusioned with the company. They then discuss their expertise in SARS COV-2 and their belief that the government is lying about it. They mention being targeted and publishing a book called "The Truth About Wuhan."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I started off my career, in the US military. I enlisted right after 911 and served as an infantryman. Served 2 combat tours, Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, where I did counterterrorism work actually in Central America and then also did narcotics and addiction. So a little bit different there. After coming out of the military, I earned degrees in, psychology, that was my undergrad.
I switched to engineering for my master's degree, which was a lot of work. I also have a master's minor in, geographic information systems. I was gonna go work in the private sector, and I was talked into accepting a full research fellowship, for the Department of Homeland Security to earn a PhD in public health, emerging infectious diseases which is a subdivision of environmental health, but for all practical purposes, it's epidemiology. I really kick butt, I guess, at my At my dissertation, my PhD program, I I knocked it out in two and a half years, which is pretty much unheard of. They were paying me about 140 k a year salary as a research fellow as a PhD student.
So this is the the ultimate offer as a PhD student, and they were basically grooming me to be, an Anthony Fauci type of national security, I started spending about a week per month on average in Washington, DC, meeting with alphabet soup, of agencies where I became an expert in biowarfare, bioterrorism. And I was presenting my work, which was becoming an expert at poisoning people, actually. And then trying to figure out how to medic mitigate that kind of thing. So when I finished my PhD, I was offered positions at at all the alphabet soup at agencies. And my advisers pretty much told me, you know, if I wanted to work at a specific agency in the government, they could get me in there.
I I spoke I accepted a Top secret position at Sandia National Laboratories, which is where they primarily make nuclear weapons, out in the desert near Albuquerque. But Once again, I worked on public health, advanced simulation and modeling, and I also completed a postdoc, or I'd call more continuing education at MIT in complex systems, where we use, supercomputers to basically war game and predict the consequences, all sorts of what we lovingly referred to as painless shit. Well, I got sick of working in the classified space, and I applied to a job at a place called ECLAF Alliance. I was hired right away, as a senior scientist. I took over a failing department, and I brought in about $6,000,000 in department defense spending to build machine learning and, basically, artificial intelligence platforms, to predict and detect emerging infectious diseases, which is known as biosurveillance.
Well, be careful for what you with what you wish for, I guess, in life. I ended up basically ended working on the same kinds of things, at Equine Alliance, which I was doing on the classified side for the US government. But due to my success, I was promoted to, an executive as a vice president at equal health. And once I was promoted, I saw all sorts of craziness, which I couldn't really believe, but I went along with it, unfortunately. I actually reviewed the gain of function, SARS COVID 2 COVID proposal When I first started at equal health and when I left equal health, I was really happy.
I had a follow-up with my old boss, doctor Peter Gasick. He lied about a number of things. I found him to be a dishonorable person. And where my story gets crazy is I went on to be a a 10 year professor, as a tech executive. Then fast forward to late fall 2019 and I find out about the emergence of SARS COV 2 before they're talking about the news because this is my field of expertise.
I'm always looking for these kind of things. And Over the the course of 2020, every time the government opens its mouth, I know that they're lying about something. I began to investigate. I kept all my documents from my time at Equal clients. And fast forward Patient to, big name journalists where I believe the department defense, the FBI, and the CIA had been eavesdropping on my phone call phone calls with these journalists, namely Alex Berenson.
And then I'm targeted in drafts, like, you couldn't believe, and that goes on for about a year. And then I published a book which, I just arrived at my house today. The first copy is, The Truth About Wuhan, How I Discovered the Biggest Line in History, and I'm sure you'll have a ton of questions
@mommaleo - Jenny
Attached is a deposition filmed 17 days ago Andrew G Huff: ‘This is a deposition recorded at my home in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan with Attorney Thomas Renz, of Renz Law in Ohio. This deposition was under oath with penalty of perjury related to my employment at EcoHealth Alliance where Dr. Peter Daszak was my direct supervisor. If you are an attorney, and you would like to retain my services as an expert and first hand witness related to COVID wrongful death litigation, patient care wrongful death claims, mRNA vaccine injury claims, then please contact me via email at AGHUFF@protonmail.com Please follow him on X (formerly twitter) @AGHuff Link to full deposition rumble.com/v3wymtr-dr.-an…
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tom Reynolds interviews Dr. Andrew Hoff about his work with Equal Health Alliance. Dr. Hoff has a background in psychology, security technology, spatial science GIS, and environmental health. He also has a high-level security clearance and served as a combat veteran. Dr. Hoff worked at Eagle Health Alliance from the fall of 2014, initially as the senior scientist in charge of the data technology department and later promoted to associate vice president of data and technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many times are I
Speaker 1: for reading? Alright. So this is Tom Reynolds. I'm with doctor Andrew Hoff. And Andrew, we are going to have a written declaration on the penalty of I agree that's gonna reflect everything that we're talking about here.
You've agreed to that. Is that correct? Yes, sir. Alright. And we've talked already about the fact that you're providing us testimony until we turn to.
And I'd like to have you promised to tell Hello. Okay. So we're gonna talk about A few brief issues related to, your work with Equal Health Alliance. So, Doctor, you're Okay. What what is your, what's your your background?
Your scientific background? What are your degrees in?
Speaker 0: My undergraduate degree was psychology. My master's degree is security technology, spatial science GIS. My PhD is environmental health with the emerging infectious disease Just the at MIT in complex systems.
Speaker 1: Right. Alright. And you are also a veteran, and you have a pretty high level security clearance. Is that correct?
Speaker 0: Yes. I am combat veteran. Yes, sir. OEF and OIF. I had a Q clearance, which is a Department of Defense Top secreting.
The equivalent, through the Department of Energy when I worked at Sandy and Ash Laboratories.
Speaker 1: Alright. Wonderful. Okay. What years did you work at Eagle Health Alliance? In
Speaker 0: the fall of 2014.
Speaker 1: Alright. And you served there in what capacity?
Speaker 0: I was hired as the senior scientist in charge of the department of, data technology. And due to my SAS has promoted to associate vice president of data and technology.
Speaker 1: Alright.
@mommaleo - Jenny
Dr. Richard M Fleming @Doctor_I_am_The Dr. Richard M. Fleming is a physicist, nuclear cardiologist, and attorney with fifty-three years of research experience. He has spent decades investigating what causes multiple health problems including heart disease, cancer, and SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. He joined the American Heart Association in 1976 and actively began teaching and researching heart disease; including both what causes heart disease and how to accurately find heart disease. In 1994 he presented his original theory on "Inflammation and Heart Disease" which was published in a cardiology textbook in 1999 and presented on 20/20 in 2004. His research career has also involved investigating and correcting errors made in medical testing including coronary arteriography and nuclear imaging; for both heart disease and cancer. In 2017 after two decades of work he patented the first method capable of measuring regional blood flow and metabolic changes occurring inside the body. This method known as FMTVDM (Fleming Method) makes it possible to accurately determine what is happening inside the body as well as whether treatments prescribed for patients are working or not. Below is Dr Fleming’s sword deposition Link: https://youtu.be/odhkL2JTm7g?si=VkUaZqc__rczSNif
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Dr. Fleming if he is prepared to testify that COVID-19 is a bioweapon, to which he responds affirmatively. Dr. Fleming's qualifications are briefly discussed, including his medical and law degrees, as well as his experience as an inventor and author. He is asked if he has the ability to read and interpret medical patents, to which he confirms. Dr. Fleming wrote a book exploring the possibility of COVID-19 being a bioweapon, providing evidence of gain-of-function research and funding sources. He also discusses genetic modifications made to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including the PRRA insert and HIV insert, which are not naturally occurring. The research of Shi Zhengli and others is mentioned, highlighting their efforts to increase the virus's infectivity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you prepared to testify under oath here today that COVID nineteen is a bioweapon?
Speaker 1: Yes, I am.
Speaker 0: Doctor. Fleming, we've asked you to come testify about whether COVID nineteen and related vaccines are a Deliberate bioweapon attack on the United States. Madam, court reporter, can you please identify yourself for the record?
Speaker 2: My name is Karen Esher, Texas CSR number 5536.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Can you please swear in the witness?
Speaker 2: Doctor. Fleming, will you raise your right hand? Do you swear the testimony you give today will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? I do.
Speaker 0: Doctor Fleming, do you consent to this testimony being used in any appropriate proceeding? Yes, I do. 1st, I'd like to cover some of your qualifications, you have a Impressive 90 page resume. I'm not gonna go through that, but very briefly, are you a medical doctor? Yes, I am.
So therefore you have an MD degree as it's known?
Speaker 1: I do, yes.
Speaker 0: And what is your area of specialty?
Speaker 1: Nuclear cardiology, cardiology and internal medicine.
Speaker 0: And do you also belong to professional medical associations? Yes, I do. Are you a fellow of the American College of Physicians? Yes. And are you a fellow of the American Society of Internal Medicine?
Yes. And you also hold a PhD? Yes, I do. And in what field? Physics.
And you also have a law degree otherwise known as a JD? I do. And are you an inventor in the medical field? Yes. And very briefly, can you explain the type of medical inventions that you've invented?
Speaker 1: The ability to image the body and determine what types of disease processes are going on by looking at metabolism and blood flow.
Speaker 0: And do you hold patents for your inventions? Yes, I do. Is it fair to say you're familiar with the world of medical patents? Yes. Do you have the ability to read and interpret medical patents?
Yes, I do. And are you also an author of professional papers?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: And approximately how many? Somewhere between 4500. And do you also serve on the editorial board of professional journals? On editorial boards and review boards for the journals. And briefly, what does a reviewer in a professional journal do?
Speaker 1: The obligation is when somebody submits a paper for publication for reviewers to take a look at That material to determine if it's scientifically valid, to determine if it makes a difference in the field, and to Make recommendations back to the editorial board about whether the paper should be accepted or revised or rejected for publication.
Speaker 0: Are you prepared to testify under oath here today that COVID 19 is a bioweapon?
Speaker 1: Yes, I am.
Speaker 0: You wrote a book posing the question, is COVID nineteen a bioweapon, correct?
Speaker 1: Correct. The function of the book was to provide information that the general public could look at and also to provide evidence for the legal System and the medical system to understand the gain of function research that's been carried out over a couple decades To show where the monies came from, to show what papers were published, showing what types of gain of function research occurred, and to show the patents, To clearly lay out 2 decades' worth of work that's been conducted, funded primarily by the United States, although other countries have been involved, And to show how there's no evidence that SARS CoV-two, the virus that causes COVID nineteen, No evidence to show that it's naturally occurring, no animal model for it, and to show the type of research that's been done with coronaviruses, Funded by the U. S, supported by NIAID, NIH, Department of Defense, Monies went to Peter Daszak at EcoHealth, to Ralph Beric at the University of North Carolina, Chi Chi Zeng Li at the Lwuhan Institute of Virology And there's several other universities around the country, including in the state of Texas.
Speaker 0: [Dr. Did you also look at the genetic code of the SARS CoV-two virus and especially the spike protein? [Dr.
Speaker 1: We did as well as Professor Luc Montagnier, who is the gentleman who discovered the HIV virus, and several other individuals that we, note in the book.
Speaker 0: And based on that review of the genetic code, that informs your conclusion that this is a bioweapon?
Speaker 1: Right. So The Biological Weapons Convention treaty states that any adjustment or modification of a biological agent like this virus that doesn't provide a benefit for mankind, is a biological weapon. These particular changes in this virus, including the PRRA insert, which are Amino acids that were inserted that are very critical for the urine cleavage site for this virus to infect, the insertion sites that were made with HIV and simian or AEF like, HIV equivalent viruses, the prion like domain at the top of the spike protein as well as The HIV glycoprotein 120 insert that Xi ZhengLi put in early on that's critical for the attachment of this virus to cells, all of
Speaker 0: which are not naturally occurring. So to be clear, the SARS CoV two virus, otherwise known as COVID nineteen, And especially its spike protein is not something that's simply involved on its own in nature?
Speaker 1: We've looked at all the different coronaviruses that exist on the planet. None of them have the PRRA insert. None of them have this tremendous amount of HIV insert. None of them have a regional binding domain that is a Prion like binding domain, which means that where it attaches to the cells, it's a prion like domain and prions are things that Are abnormal proteins that cause other proteins to become abnormally folded? Doctor.
Speaker 0: Benjamin Greenberg: So to be clear, genetic changes were made to the spike protein In a lab to create what is known as the COVID nineteen, correct?
Speaker 1: That's what all the data shows.
Speaker 0: Your book references research in twenty And by Shi Zhengli, who's often called the bat lady. Was that research designed to determine how to increase the Like protein binding capacity to the human ACE2 receptor. So that was her goal of that
Speaker 1: of that research was to increase the ability of the virus to infect human cells.
Speaker 0: Now interestingly, I think in this published research, they discovered that the naturally occurring spike protein from Horseshoe bats was unable to bind to the human ACE 2 receptors.
Speaker 1: Right. That's exactly right.
Speaker 0: So as of 2010, scientists Including Xi ZhengLi in Wuhan, China knew that naturally occurring horseshoe backed coronavirus spike proteins could not infect humans.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 0: Based on your testimony, it sounds like you discovered at least 2 manmade inserts into the SARS CoV-two spike protein Genetic code that prove it was produced in a lab?
Speaker 1: Right. The research papers that Shizeng Li and Barrick and others published, they were very clear and Somewhat proud of the fact that they've been able to modify the virus and to insert changes into it that made it more infective and potentially more dangerous.
@mommaleo - Jenny
𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙂𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩: Dr Kevin McCairn PhD @NestCommander Principal Investigator at the Korea Brain Research Institute Systems Neuroscience and Movement Disorders Laboratory (Retired) The research conducted in my laboratory, using electrophysiology and PET imaging, is focused on trying to understand how the circuits of the cortico-basal ganglia-cerebella networks encode both motor and neuropsychiatric abnormalities in nonhuman primates. In addition, the lab is also focused on treatments for motor and neuropsychiatric disorders. We use a technique called deep brain stimulation to target critical nodes within the cortico-basal ganglia-cerebellar network and try to measure the behavioral and neural correlates of any therapeutic response. 𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙂𝙖𝙩𝙚 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kevin-Mccairn 𝙑𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙤 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙡 https://t.wtyl.live/accounts/kevin_w._mccairn_phd
Video Transcript AI Summary
I contracted SARS in South Korea during the outbreak. It caused neurological symptoms and was different from the flu or norovirus. I couldn't get a proper diagnosis, but I realized it was serious when I saw what was happening in Wuhan. There was an effort to suppress information beyond the official narrative. I believed it came from a lab and published a paper on it. I've been trying to inform people about the role of viruses in chronic neurodegenerative diseases. The spike protein in the virus can misfold and cause amyloidosis. There are safety concerns with gene transfection, and we're seeing excess deaths, especially in dementia cases. Synthetic peptides may be a contributing factor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, to cut a long story short, I came into contact with SARS, 2019, December, in the what was the biggest outbreak hotspot in South Korea. And this this was an illness that, was and let's say some people have an easy time with SARS and Some people don't and I had a number of predisposing comorbidities, including TBI and it was it was my, dalliance with the virus, which caused a lot of neurological symptoms with myself that I realized this isn't anything, usual. It's not flus. It's not like a norovirus or anything like that. It was long sustained.
Had a long fight to get back to, normal. And this was this happened just as the, outbreak was sort of being announced in Wuhan. And we have data now which shows that SARS was probably circulating far, far earlier, maybe in the summer, the September. And so I could I couldn't get a proper diagnosis. But as soon as I saw what was happening in Wuhan and what I'd been through personally, I was like, I went, to the effort of trying to, warn people that this isn't just a respiratory pneumonia.
This has far more, debilitating disease profile. And what I what I found personally was, and now with hindsight, we know that they had, in place organized narrative control networks to try to, contain public the public's the their curiosity, I guess, about the disease itself and what they were actually dealing with and there was a very large effort to suppress anything beyond the orthodox line coming out, say, from the CDC or European, medical institutes. And it was coming up against that initial, censorship that made again, sort of reinforced my idea because It was I was convinced that it came out of a laboratory very early on. I went public with that, but I I collaborated with a group called Plastiq. We published a paper about, the synthetic nature of SARS CoV-two.
And, you know, I was I was pushing that it comes out of a lab and it can have debilitating, a debilitating profile for again. At the beginning, we didn't know who and how many would, suffer in particular. And, you know, as we got wiser, we realized that there was a very, distinct age stratified risk. And what I've been trying to do since then is just inform people about the role of viruses in the formation of these chronic neurodegenerative inflammatory linked diseases that, in my opinion, come from. There's, well, there's multiple there's multiple peptides in the virus itself but also we've taken the very, very bizarre decision to have gene transfect people and have them make the same spike protein that, at the amino acid level, has the same profile.
And what we're talking about when we mentioned prions, is the ability to misfold and there's this you'll often hear sort of overlapping language with respect to, and something called amyloidosis. And the prediction software, so this is would be what we call in silico studies, identified that the spike protein has numerous amyloidogenic epitopes on its structure on its as part of its structure. And so we've been sort of aggregating the data with respect to how that's impacting at a clinical level with respect to the disease but also, people who have had, adverse events in response to gene transfection itself. And right now, I'm of the opinion that, considering the, prion like nature of these peptides, that there's too much of a safety signal that we're seeing right now that should preclude their use until we can, fully dismiss the potential that it could be causing, long chronic disease emergence, particularly in the neurodegenerative domain. And we must, the problem is, is that many studies don't have a long enough window to be looking for these types of adverse events.
So they'll say, oh, 14, 28 days later, generally people are okay but what we're seeing in the, statistical data at an epidemiological level is that we have sustained excess death, literally across all age groups but and the primary categories in which this is happening is the dementia categories and Richard can speak better to the cardiovascular but these signals are there and they're being classed as non COVID in these waves of excess death which we're having now, which are running generally around 10% to 20% above where they should be. And it would it's my contention that as we've seeded the environment with synthetic, chimeric amyloidogenic peptides, either through viral transmission or through direct gene transfection is probably one of the contributing factors to the deaths that we see. So I hope that wasn't
ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable
researchgate.net
Kevin W. McCairn PhD
http://www.mccairndojo.com https://www.mccairndojo.com/ Twitter @DrKevinWMcCair1 Telegram: https://t.me/DrkevinMcCairn Support the stream https://paypal.me/raccooncommander?country.x=GB&locale.x=en_GB https://www.buymeacoffee.com/DrKevinMcCairn https://streamlabs.com/kevin-OHneKg https://buy.stripe.com/28ofZqenB37z9KEfYZ https://www.patreon.com/join/4229182? https://www.subscribestar.com/kevin-w-mccairn-ph-d https://www.mccairndojo.com/ Research History - Kevin W. McCairn Ph.D. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kevin_McCairn Main/ Channel: Kevin W. McCairn Ph.D. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIXxVUZVApFm9oANI-ryYXA Bitcoin: 34JZjBeTrG2w9AVB8Tpdt1PVt78UoWrMZV Bitcoin Cash: qqfuagsmg9xk5gsptke88y42jan8x5mauyj2yng2hp Ethereum: 0xB8bE2a9A2edCbb77A6a2Cd289032Cecad3C92aFE Ethereum Classic 0xE4fa23aBBdA9B0c8DEa5d7Bfc2665E25dE83B58F Litecoin: MFVDyqCNpMfFnDPWTtaxVtgCcPpkaTeeuy XRP-Wallet: rw2ciyaNshpHe7bCHo4bRWq6pqqynnWKQg XRP-Tag: 470905637
t.wtyl.live
@mommaleo - Jenny
𝐁𝐈𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐆𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 𝐖𝐄𝐀𝐏𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐓𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐓𝐘 ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking never under any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile, acquire or retain biological weapons. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🅸🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking to destroy biological weapons or divert them to peaceful purposes. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🅸🅸🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking not to transfer, or in any way assist, encourage or induce anyone to manufacture or otherwise acquire biological weapons. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🅸🆅𒆜𓊉꧂ Requirement to take any national measures necessary to prohibit and prevent the development, production, stockpiling, acquisition or retention of biological weapons within a State’s territory, under its jurisdiction, or under its control. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🆅𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking to consult bilaterally and multilaterally and cooperate in solving any problems which may arise in relation to the objective, or in the application, of the BWC. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🆅🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Right to request the United Nations Security Council to investigate alleged breaches of the BWC, and undertaking to cooperate in carrying out any investigation initiated by the Security Council. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🆅🅸🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking to assist any State Party exposed to danger as a result of a violation of the BWC. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🆇𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and information for peaceful purposes. Link: https://disarmament.unoda.org/biological-weapons/
Biological Weapons Convention – UNODA
disarmament.unoda.org
@mommaleo - Jenny
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐂: 𝐃𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 Investigating Covid-19. D.R.A.S.T.I.C. are the scientists and researchers who came together in early 2020 to investigate the origins of Covid-19 and bring the TRUTH the world. 𝙆𝙚𝙮 𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 🅼🅰🆁🅲🅷 2020 Discovered the link between RaTG13 and BtCoV4991. In March 2020, Rossana Segreto made the first public connection between RaTG13 and BtCoV4991 and in April 2020 published a preprint about the possibility they might be the same virus. 🅰🅿🆁🅸🅻 2020 First comprehensive analysis of gain-of-function work done at WIV In April 2020, Yuri Deigin published the first in-depth analysis of gain-of-function work done at WIV and how it could have led to SARS2 leaking from their lab. 🅰🅿🆁🅸🅻 2020 Discovered the link between RaTG13 and the Mojiang mine In April 2020, Yuri Deigin traced the origin of RaTG13 to the mine in Mojiang, which then prompted TheSeeker to discover a Master’s thesis and a PhD thesis on an unusual case of pneumonia in the same mineshaft where RaTG13, the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2, was found. Mona and Rahul Bahulikar later published a paper on these Mojiang miners’ cases. 🅼🅰🆈 2020 Discovered that the WIV virus database has been taken offline In May 2020, Yuri Deigin was the first to publicly report the deletion of the WIV virus database. 🅼🅰🆈 2020 The peculiarities of the FCS: CGG-CGG codons and FauI site In May 2020, @ydeigin pointed out the peculiar CGG-CGG codons and FauI restriction enzyme site in the PRRA insertion in SARS2 which created a novel furin cleavage site. 🅹🆄🅽🅴 2020 Discovered that RaTG13 was sequenced long before 2020 In June 2020, after WIV released RaTG13 sequencing data, Francisco de Asis found that RaTG13 was sequenced long before the pandemic rather than after, as was implied in WIV’s February 2020 Nature paper. RaTG13 amplicon fasta headers showed dates back to 2017 and 2018, and also a label referred as “7896” pointing to one of the eight viruses close to SARS-CoV-2 after RaTG13. 🅽🅾🆅🅴🅼🅱🅴🆁 2020 Published the most widely cited lab leak hypothesis peer reviewed paper In November 2020, Rossana Segreto and Yuri Deigin published their paper “The genetic structure of SARS-CoV-2 does not rule out a laboratory origin”. Their paper was mentioned by several mainstream media outlets, as one of the first peer reviewed papers considering a possible lab origin of SARS-CoV-2. It has since become the most widely cited lab leak hypothesis paper, as well as one with the highest Altmetric score. 🅼🅰🆈 2021 Published 3 more WIV PhD theses showing work done on RaTG13/BtCoV4991 In May 2021, TheSeeker has published 3 more PhD theses from WIV which showed there was active work done on RaTG13/BtCoV4991, including full genome sequencing in the 2019 PhD thesis. We also pointed out that the BtCoV4991 spike gene seems to have a 1% difference from the RaTG13 spike gene, raising questions as to whether the two might actually not be identical.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A new investigative piece by Katherine Eban in Vanity Fair raises questions about the lab leak theory of COVID-19's origin. The analysis highlights how a group called DRASTIC, made up of scientists and researchers, examined the theory that was initially dismissed by those in charge. Conflicts of interest and political motivations hindered the investigation into the Wuhan Institute of Virology's gain of function research. The State Department received classified information about three researchers falling ill in November 2019, sparking renewed interest in the lab leak theory. The investigation also discovered that the lab's virus sample database was taken offline months before the pandemic officially started. The lab leak theory is plausible, but politics and bureaucratic obstacles have hindered a full explanation. This could further erode public confidence in institutions and impact democracy. The media's lack of independent investigation may also lead to a loss of credibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The coming crisis of confidence. I am Michael Smirconish in Philadelphia with a question. How did a novel bat coronavirus get to a major metropolis of 11,000,000 people in Central China in the dead of winter when most bats were hibernating and turn a market where bats weren't sold into the epicenter of an outbreak? When asked that way, the lab leak theory of the origin of COVID nineteen, it sounds quite plausible? A newly released investigative piece by Katherine Eban in Vanity Fair raises that Question and a lot more.
This analysis has accelerated a conversation long overdue. It tells the story of how a loose network of sleuths of varying scientific expertise spread around the globe undertook an examination of a theory of COVID origin that was initially discounted by those whose job it was to figure it all out? Together, they formed a group called DRASTIC, Decentralized Radical Autonomous search team investigating COVID nineteen? One founder was a data scientist who works for a bank in New Zealand whose Asperger's syndrome gives him a professional advantage in finding patterns in data? But while he was building a plausible case for lab leak, more than 2 dozen scientists released a statement in a respected medical journal saying this, We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID nineteen does not have a natural origin.
Now to be sure, there were crackpots and political hacks hoping to pin the origin on a Wuhan lab in the hope of gaining a cudgel on China and the boost to then President Trump? After all, it was Trump who said early on that he had seen classified information indicating that the virus had come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology? When asked what the evidence was, he said, I can't tell you that. I'm not allowed to tell you that. But the question now is whether people in government and the scientific community fearful of being drawn in a national political debate or being cast as nativist did not pursue a theory that was worthy of exploration?
EBAN conducted a months long investigation, interviewed more than 40 people, reviewed hundreds of pages of government documents and found this, conflicts of interests stemming in part from large government grants supporting controversial virology research, hamper the US investigation into COVID nineteen's origin at every step? In one state department meeting, officials seeking to demand transparency from the Chinese government say they were explicitly told by colleagues not to explore the Wuhan Institute of Virology's gain of function research because it would bring unwelcome attention to US government funding of it? In the summer of 2020, when state department leads had gone cold, they got a tip from a foreign source? Key information was likely sitting in the US intelligence community's own files unanalyzed. In November, that lead turned up classified information that was absolutely arresting and shocking, said a former state department official.
Three researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology all connected with gain of function research on coronaviruses had fallen ill in November 2019 and appeared to have visited the hospital with symptoms similar to COVID nineteen, so said 3 government officials to Vanity Fair? The reaction inside the State Department? Holy shit. According to 1 senior official who recalled the instance, we should probably tell our bosses and the investigation roared back to life? And remember the guy with Asperger's?
Well, in January of 2021, there was an international fact finding visit to Wuhan. A dozen international experts visited. They were told that the lab's database of some 22,000 virus samples had been taken offline to prevent a hack during the pandemic, which seemed to make sense, except that the ad hoc group of investigators at DRASTIC figured out that the database was actually taken offline on September 12, 2019, 3 months before the official start of the pandemic? So, here is my takeaway. 1st, that the lab leak theory is plausible, not assured, but plausible.
Second, that politics and bureaucratic turf wars hamper the full explanation of the lab leak theory. My ongoing larger concern is the damage this is going to do to public confidence in other institutions at a moment when we can least afford further erosion? If the lab leak theory was erroneously discounted, it will fuel speculation about the role of authority in other exercises like elections, just the sort of thinking that led to the events of January 6 and is already being used to imperil democracy all across the country? Suddenly, the phony Arizona audit will be harder to discount and science will suffer? Look no further than climate change?
I can hear the skepticism already. How do we really know it's man made because they told us the virus came from a bat at a wet market? The criticism of climate science has long been that it was research money driven. The Vanity Fair piece similarly highlights the role of money sum American in the Wuhan lab and raises questions about the solidarity of the gain of function research community? And this too must be said.
This will further revelations as they come out early discounting the lab leak theory, the media will suffer a loss of credibility for its lack of independent investigation. The Vanity Fair report, it doesn't come to a conclusion as to whether the COVID virus began naturally or in a lab leak, but It convinced me that politics mattered and thwarted the leaked investigation and one ramification of this analysis is bad news for our institutions. It will further distrust in science and even democracy when we can least afford it?
@mommaleo - Jenny
The documents seen by 𝘿𝙍𝘼𝙎𝙏𝙄𝘾 were made available by an anonymous source. They detail past achievements and planned experiments in collaboration with researchers from: Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) East China Normal University (ECNU) UNC-Chapel Hill, Duke-National University in Singapore The USGS National Wildlife Health Center (NWHC) Palo Alto Research Center (PARC). ꧁༒☬𝓓𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽 1:☬༒꧂ A brief DRASTIC Analysis of the EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE Proposal DRASTIC ANALYSIS OF DARPA DEFUSE PROPOSAL https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/10/preempt_hr00111880017_notes_v1_b-1.pdf ꧁༒☬𝓓𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽 2:☬༒꧂ The Reasons why the DEFUSE Proposal was Rejected by DARPA DEFUSE PROJECT REJECTION BY DARPA https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/defuse-project-rejection-by-darpa.pdf
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander 【D】【A】【R】【P】【A】 Preventing Emerging Pathogenic Threats (PREEMPT) https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/prempt-background-hr001118s0017.pdf
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander 𝘿𝙍𝘼𝙎𝙏𝙄𝘾 𝘼𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙮𝙨𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙀𝙁𝙐𝙎𝙀 𝘿𝙤𝙘𝙪𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/20/1583/
DRASTIC Analysis of the DEFUSE Documents
Exposed! How EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology Collaborated on a Dangerous Bat Coronavirus Project "The DARPA DEFUSE Project" Note: The original leaked documents are available there: https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/21/the-defuse-project-documents/ The DRASTIC analysis follows below: DRASTIC was recently made aware of documents provided by a whistleblower, which show that EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) in concert wIth…
drasticresearch.org
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander TRUMP didn’t know about gain of function nor WUHAN because FAUCI kept it secret.
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump was not aware of the gain of function ban repeal process that started before he became president. Anthony Fauci worked without supervision during the 18-month period when Trump did not appoint a new science adviser. Congressional investigators confirmed that Fauci and the new science adviser kept information about the research from Trump's administration. Trump himself admitted in an interview that he was not informed about most of it. Fauci has been in charge since the virus became public and has worked with his scientists, many of whom he funds, to promote the narrative that the virus is natural and not from a lab. The US intelligence community, including the Department of Defense, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security, likely played a role in this deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, so one thing I really want to say first is it there's this I think there's this big assumption that president Trump was aware of of everything that was going on because the gain of function ban itself was the the repeal process started. That decision was made before Trump had actually become president. And so and then
Speaker 1: That's an important part this is what happened. That's an important thing for the To know that President Obama starts the repeal process of that about 2 weeks before he exits office and and Trump takes over. Sorry to interrupt you, Charles.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So so basically and and Trump didn't appoint a new presidential science adviser for another 18 months. So there was a period of time during which they they restarted gain of function work that Anthony Fauci was basically working without any supervision. And he had rewritten the rules. So that way anything that he said was part of vaccine work would would just be completely passed over.
So
Speaker 2: So are are you saying there is a real possibility that when Trump gave these speeches and was blaming China for it, that he was kept in the dark by his own people, by his intelligence services about the involvement of the US government in this game of function research. Do you think he didn't know about it?
Speaker 0: I don't think that I know that's a I know that for a fact. In fact, I postulated that 2 years ago, and then last fall, when I spoke with congressional investigators in person, they they confirmed that that was correct, that Anthony Fauci had worked with Kelvin Drugmeier, the new presidential science adviser, to keep much of the information about what it was going on or what had been going on from Trump's administration. In fact, Trump himself in an interview on Australian TV with Sherry Markson, He people didn't realize it, but he actually answered that question himself and said, yeah. We we weren't told about most of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Wow. So Anthony Fauci was basically running this entire show in the background. When Trump came in, Trump was kept in the dark about what happened in Wuhan. And Anthony Fauci has basically been in charge also of everything that happened since the virus did, make it into the public, and has basically worked together with his scientists, many of whom He is funding to create this cover story that this is a natural virus, that this could not have come out of a lab. Is that right?
Speaker 1: I I think that's I think that's partially true. And and the reason why it's partially true is that, whatever needs to realize is that doctor Anthony Fauci is a sub agency See director for the national National Institutes of Health. He does not have the government control power reached to get into the other agencies that would be required to pull off this kind of charade. So it's my firm belief that the US intelligence community played a large role behind the scenes from the Department of Defense. Probably not so much of the CIA, but maybe parts of the FBI, and definitely the Department of Homeland Security, to pull off this big farce.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I definitely well, I just wanted to say that that that's what I was about to say is that it wasn't just him. This was This was intelligence agencies and others that had been working on this. They were helping they were they were basically working together.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander FAUCI lied before Congress, denying that the NIH funded Gain-Of-Function Research, when in fact he did. 𝐅𝐀𝐔𝐂𝐈 𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝
Video Transcript AI Summary
If COVID-19 originated from risky experiments at the Wuhan lab, it's important to note that the lab received funding from America. During a congressional hearing, Senator Paul questioned Dr. Fauci about the NIH's funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan, to which Fauci denied lying. However, a scientific paper from 2012 written by Fauci supports the benefits of gain-of-function research despite the risk of a pandemic. The decision to lift the ban on gain-of-function research during the Trump administration remains unclear. Former President Trump mentioned that Fauci did not inform him about the Wuhan Institute of Virology's activities, and emails later revealed Fauci's discussions about the possibility of genetic manipulation. Trump stopped the payments to the Chinese lab upon discovering them. Despite the controversy, Trump believes his administration did a great job with the vaccine and Operation Warp Speed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If COVID nineteen was the result of gain of function or other risky experiments at the Wuhan lab, remember this. That same lab was being partly funded by America.
Speaker 1: Doctor Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain
Speaker 2: of function Search in Wuhan. Senator Paul, I have never lied before the congress, and I do not retract that statement.
Speaker 1: Take an animal virus and you increase its transability to humans Right. You're saying that's not gain of function?
Speaker 2: That is correct. And and, senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly, and I wanna say that officially.
Speaker 0: Doctor Anthony Fauci is America's top medical adviser. I found a scientific paper he wrote in 2012, where he argued the benefits of gain of function research were worth the risk of a pandemic. In total, American agencies funded see 5 research projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Speaker 2: So you don't wanna go to Hoboken, New Jersey or to Fairfax, Virginia to be studying the bat human interface That might lead to an outbreak, so you go
Speaker 0: at all about how it happened that the gain of function ban was was lifted during the Trump administration. How was it that Anthony Fauci was able to to do this without anyone knowing?
Speaker 3: Well, I I don't know for sure who all was involved in that decision making process. I can I can say this much? When we look back and figure out how that decision was made, I hope that all of those parties were able to come to the table, express their viewpoints, their concerns So that we had not only a decision, but an informed decision that was made. I've seen very little evidence to date that there was a broad based Information exchange before the decision was made by doctor Fauci to lift that ban on gain of function research.
Speaker 0: Mister president Anthony Fauci, Did he ever once mention to you that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was genetically manipulating coronaviruses?
Speaker 4: Well, no. He didn't. And, you know, Anthony's been in government for many, many years. He's a, a bureaucratic kind of a guy, a very great promoter. I give him An a plus as a promoter and probably a c or a d as a doctor.
Speaker 0: We now know from emails that have been released under the Freedom of Information Act that he was getting his advice from the likes of Peter Dzic, a Wuhan collaborator. At the same time, he was telling you that this was a natural virus, while at the same time, behind the scenes in emails, He was having discussions about whether this might have been genetically manipulated. Does that shock you?
Speaker 4: Well, he was dealing with them, And my thing was a little bit different. I just wanted to stop it. Whether it developed one way or the other, I just wanted to stop it.
Speaker 0: But it's important to know where it came from. It's extremely important to know how it developed.
Speaker 4: Fauci was dealing with them, and I guess they were even making payments for certain kinds of research, and I ended that too. I stopped that when we found out about that. He was doing that during the Obama years. And when I found out about it, I said, can you imagine that the United States is making payments to a Chinese lab? So just that on his face didn't make sense, but I stopped that.
Speaker 0: The Obama administration did hit pause on gain of function research though, and that was lifted under your watch. Why did you allow the gain of function research to continue?
Speaker 4: Well, I think probably people that worked for me looked at it, and at one point, they might have, done that. But ultimately, what we did was We shut it off. We shut the whole thing off, and we stopped making payments that were approved much earlier than our administration.
Speaker 0: Do you regret now not paying closer attention? I mean, this gain of function research is extremely risky, you know, banned under the Obama administration, and then kick started in 2017 under your watch?
Speaker 4: Yeah. No. I I think we've done an incredible job between the vaccine and all of the operation warp speed, I think we did Great job. And people are now starting to see what a great job we did.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander Wuhan Institute of Virology - A Bioweapons Lab was working with funding from the NIH. Intel? Why?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Wuhan Institute of Virology is believed by some, including the speakers, to be a bioweapons lab with Chinese Communist Party officials. The speakers suggest that the US government may have been collecting intelligence on the lab through a scientist named Peter Daszak, who had a relationship with the CIA. They propose that the US government traded advanced biotech for access to the lab. The second speaker agrees with this theory and mentions that he received leaked documents related to the lab. The Department of Defense is also mentioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is this is the way of the the Wuhan Institute of Virology is known to be a bioweapons laboratory by people like Charles and myself. This is it's well known. They have, Chinese Communist Party officials working in that laboratory. And if you know that this laboratory is making bioweapons, You wanna be able to get your people in there to see what's going on. So a couple weird things happen.
So one, doctor Peter Daszak, asks me if he should work with the CIA one of the play at ECLOS Alliance. And then over the next few months, he tells me that the relationship is, with the CIA is progressing. So I take that to mean that he was collecting intelligence for the US government on that laboratory. That it would also make sense for the US government trying to get other spies or people into that laboratory. And I believe the contract with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for 5 or $600,000 initially, whatever was was just a mechanism for the US government to get our scientists, our people, into that laboratory to to collect, intelligence in exchange for advanced bioweapons technology.
So, you know, China doesn't need $600,000 money from the United States government, which they lent to us. Right? I mean, it's sort of it's laughable when you think about it. But the thing that they did need was our our superior, biotechnology. So I think we actually traded them, advanced biotech, for access to their laboratory.
That's quite an interesting theory. Charles, would you agree with that?
Speaker 1: 100%. And I think that that's just like just like you, at the very beginning of this, it made no sense why we would share this technology with with China because we I used to do modeling of potential bio attacks and we we already had all of the the labs and all the nuclear reactors and any sort of potential threat that was in the WMD space. We we were already monitoring that on on the classified and unclassified side. So there was no way that we didn't know that the the Wuhan Institute of Virology had at the time the only BSL 4 lab in China, so it's it's it's comical to think otherwise. So I think he's absolutely right, And I think that the the diffuse proposal that went to DARPA was a continuation of That research which is, and if you don't know that I am the person to whom those documents were given to leak.
So I'm I'm I'm very familiar with with, the background of that proposal.
Speaker 0: Well at least the Department of Defense
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom makes a powerful statement I believe we all can agree with: If we don’t have the media covering the WHOLE TRUTH, we run the risk of experiencing a mass causality event. The development of AI changes everything, what dangers are we at risk of?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the potential dangers of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in creating deadly viruses. They mention that AI has already been used to identify chemical combinations more lethal than nerve agents and explosive nanoparticles. They express concern that in a few years, it may be possible for individuals to create their own deadly viruses, leading to a mass casualty event. However, one speaker argues that the accuracy of such predictions is limited due to the quality of data and the complex dynamics of disease transmission. They suggest that a low-grade infection with long-term disability could be more catastrophic than a highly lethal virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't do something about this now. And if we don't have the media report about this truthfully and all of this being uncovered, then we will have no chance from stopping the ultimate disaster, a mass casualty event that could kill half or more of the earth population?
Speaker 1: I want to disagree with you, but I can't.
Speaker 2: I so some of that is actually happening already. So the machine learning artificial intelligence component of assembling viruses, That that works actually been happening for a number of years. It the the point we're not to the point where that information is then put into some kind of robotic system to then actually do the engineering on the biologic material. At least as far as I'm aware, there's always new things happening in the classified space, The US government all the time, but I haven't heard of that yet. And you know the one
Speaker 0: the one and logically, right, there's no reason why I we shouldn't have that in a couple of years, you know. I mean, you can apply CRISPR, through automated means to do the work for you, just because it hasn't been built yet or we don't know about it yet, doesn't mean it will not exist in 5 years.
Speaker 1: Well, there's actually a paper came out in February, I believe, Where they took a they took an AI and they had it run through alleged chemicals. They did well, basically, they gave it, They wanted them to find something that was more dangerous than a nerve agent, a chemical nerve agent. And they ran they had it run for 6 hours And it figured out 40,000 chemical combinations that were more lethal than the most dangerous nerve agent compound that we have today. And that was in 6 hours.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And they did the they actually did that. They did the same thing with, explosive, nanoparticles as well.
Speaker 0: I mean, isn't it this to me is more frightening than anything because you know, you cannot protect yourself against that. All it takes is a handful of people, like you said, a couple $1,000,000, the technology to advance a little bit further, maybe another 5 years, maybe if it's even already till today and you make your own Ebola, corona cocktail and literally kill half of the world's population. I mean, it's we're not far away from that possibility. Right?
Speaker 2: It depends. So the the interesting thing thing about disease dynamics and And how a disease functions in in a population and depending depending whether or not zoonotic, so transmitted between animals and people. You know, the environment always has the And so, oftentimes, it and, you know, luckily, humans, we have diverse genetics too. So, it sometimes it's difficult to determine when a new novel disease and is introduced to a population of animals or people, how it will behave. So while I think the fear here is that Artificial intelligence means machine learning will create some super bug which will, decimate the planet.
You know, my experience of being, not having the quantitative machine learning AI skills myself and also having the bio background is that, oftentimes these machine learning applications, it becomes a garbage in garbage out scenario because you necessarily don't have the best data going into the model to build the agent and you can't make all, all your assumptions can't be tight. So the predictive accuracy that you would actually produce a pathogen that would decimate the global population in all environmental conditions is hard to imagine. And there's other things that work against a disease. So a disease when it's, has high high lethality or violence, tends to burn out really quick, in terms of infectious disease outbreaks because It kills the host that will spread the infectious agent so quickly that other people do not come into contact With that person become infected in the 1st place. So disease transmission is very much, transmission risk in these novel pathogens is a trade off between, how virulent the pathogen is versus how, transmissible it is.
Actually a low grade infection, which would make people would be deput, which may be cause a life life lifetime disability like polio Would be far more catastrophic, in my opinion, than something that would had high really high lethality.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom FAUCI funded one a study for Ralph Baric to develop a technique called “seamless ligation” which hides the engineering of the virus by disguising the insertion sites. He taught this to the Chinese Scientists in the Wuhan Institute of Technology.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Tony Fauci funded a study by Ralph Barrick, which aimed to develop a technique called seamless litigation. This technique allows for the hiding of any traces of engineering in order to avoid detection. Dr. Fauci taught this technique to Chinese scientists, which goes against the principles of public health. Instead of ensuring transparency and accountability, this technique serves a nefarious purpose.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tony Fauci can still say, what I'm doing is for medical purposes. We're developing these things, and then we're gonna develop defenses against them. He funded 1 study that puts a lie to all of that. He funded Ralph Barrick to develop a technique called seamless litigation. And that is a technique for hiding the engineering project.
Mhmm. So you could normally, when you do that kind of engineering, you can see it and you can say that A bug was created in a lab. He developed a way of hiding all traces that was developed, and he taught that to the Chinese scientist, and that you know, there is no public health. It is the opposite of what you would do If you are interested in public health, it's the opposite. If you're interested in public health, you would make sure that any kind of tampering you did like that had red flags all over it that said we made this thing.
To teach it how to teach people how to hide that, it only has a nefarious purpose.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom 🦇The Bat Lady - Shi Zhengli operated in the United States and in the Wuhan Institute of Virolgy.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Michael Pillsbury, a Chinese expert, discusses the role of "Batwoman" in the virology lab and the origins of the virus. He mentions that Batwoman, who is proud of her work, claims to have seen the virus in Wuhan after it had already been circulating for a month. However, many doubt the truthfulness of her statement. The United States has not been allowed to investigate the Wuhan lab. Dr. Pillsbury also highlights China's interest in biological warfare, which has been discussed in Chinese military books and textbooks. President Obama had asked China about their biological weapons program, but they denied any violation of the treaty. The outrage in the US stems from the belief that China could have prevented the virus from spreading globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining us tonight is doctor Michael Pillsbury, leading Chinese expert and scholar, director now of the Center For Chinese Strategy at the Hudson Institute, author of The 100 Year Marathon. Mike, good to have you with us. Let me begin with the Batwoman, and her research in the virology lab, which at one time she was conducting in the United States.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 0: How did we get to this point?
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, Batwoman is a positive nickname. She likes it. She was profiled in Scientific American, not too long ago, a few months ago. She's very proud of being that woman. It takes considerable courage to go into as many caves as she's been into, get samples or bring the whole bat out and then do this work in this biosafety level four Laboratory.
So she's at the heart of the investigation in terms of what she knows, why she was doing this. And she says that she was first shown the virus not until December 30th. So her story is, Yes, the virus is in Wuhan. Yes, she saw it, but it was after a month that it was running around Wuhan before it was brought to her. If that's true, That's very good news for China.
Many people suspect it's not true, Lou.
Speaker 0: Well, I think Right Now that no one knows what is exactly the case, what we have are intelligence agencies that are aligning themselves with consensus on the part of scientists, but they don't have direct evidence. And since, the beginning of Story, US doctors have not been permitted, into that laboratory to do any kind of investigation. So I would like to turn now, with that statement from her, the Wuhan Virology Research, which was disallowed by the United States. She migrated then to China to carry on her research since that point in 2014. Now we go to doctor Ho and I mean doctor General Ho who is leading the defense planning arm of the PLA and who authored a book, you know, as you have informed us previously, on the commanding heights that he sees for biowarfare, give us a sense of why we haven't had more discussion about, China's biological warfare capabilities and interests.
Speaker 1: Well, president Obama in 2010, that's where the story begins, Lou. He asked the Chinese politely, Do you have a biological weapons program? He believed they were they might be in violation of a treaty That most countries in the world have signed not to develop or use biological weapons, except there's a loophole. Each country that wants to can keep a small sample possible biological weapons for reference purposes. So if you go beyond that, you're in violation of the treaty.
Obama basically was turned down by the Chinese and has not been pursued more recently, But in the last, I'd say 7 or 8 years, Lou, the Chinese military began to write a lot, of books, even textbooks On this idea that the commanding heights in the future will be 3 things, cyber warfare, outer space warfare, and biological warfare. General He, whose picture you put up, he's been the leader of this. He was president of something we don't have a counterpart for it. It's called the Chinese Academy of Military Science. We think of military science as casualties or surgery, keeping people from getting yellow fever.
The Chinese do all that, but they also have an offensive component to it that they write about. They shouldn't be doing this. It's against the treaty they signed. And if the inspections were carried out, they may fear That we would find something, that they're not allowed to have by treaty. I think that's the that's the sensitivity, Lou.
Speaker 0: Well there are many sensitivities and there is also much outrage in this country, for the deadly virus that China unleashed on an unsuspecting world World that they could well have worn, and saved, hundreds of thousands of lives, and millions of infection.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom D.R.A.S.T.I.C. member @MonaRahalkar on #ShiZhengli. What did we learn about her role in COVID-19?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zengdi initially worked on the original SAS and later discovered a cave with various viruses, including bits of the Saswan virus. She spent three years researching bat coronaviruses in the Mojang mine shaft and collected around 22,000 samples, which were brought to Wuhan. The database maintained by the Wuhan Institute of Virology went offline in September 2019, raising suspicions about the pandemic's timeline. The virus was previously known as 4 991 and was deposited by Zhengli Shi in 2013. The virus originated from a mine infested with bats, where six miners contracted pneumonia. The connection between Yunnan and Wuhan became clear, leading to investigations into how the Horseshoe bat viruses reached Wuhan. The WHO's investigation focused more on zoonotic origins and lacked depth in exploring the lab origin theory. The United States and India have expressed support for further investigation into the lab origin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Zengdi, she was initially working on the SAS one, original SAS And in 2013 in 2013, she found a mine, she found a cave where all these different viruses you know, the they were they had, the all the, small bits and pieces of the Saswan. But when, she was working with this other mine shaft, this Mojang mine shaft, She brought she researched this particular mine for bat, coronaviruses for 3 years, And they were bringing samples to, Wuhan. Zheng Dixi, the bat woman of China, they had collected around 22,000, different Coronavirus samples originating from bats and rodents. And the database, which was maintained in WIV, it went offline in September 2019. 12 September 2019.
So this was very mysterious because, The the pandemic, we thought that it began in, December. That's what China has told us, and WHO also told told us that it began in Early December. We dug out various research papers. We did some genomic, analysis, and we found out that this virus, actually and At that time, I think in April, it was already established that this virus had an older name. So what was the older name?
So this virus was earlier called as 4 991, and Zhengli Shi of Wuhan Institute of Virology had deposited this virus under the name 4 991, This particular sample, this was collected in 2013, and the history about the sample was it was from a Mojang mine. So this mine had another history which, the WIP researchers had not disclosed in their primary paper. The history was that there were 6 miners or People who went to a copper mine shaft, it was infested by bats, and horseshoe bats were there in more prevalence. So, what happened was that after working in this dirty, you know, circumstances of this all this bad fecal matter in the cave, They got infected, and they got pneumonia. 1st, they got fever, then cough, and then they were restless.
Right? So they got pneumonia, and they were admitted. 6 of them were admitted to the same hospital in Kunming in Yunnan. So this was one of the breakthrough because, one clue was that that this r a t g 13 was coming from the same mineshaft and the pneumonia cases also happened from the same mineshaft. So the connection between Yunnan and Wuhan, was clear that there, how, I mean, how this Horseshoe bat viruses Got into Wuhan, so that was, the through these researchers who were present in Wuhan Institute virology, who brought all these samples from such caves, and particular, their.
So, basically, these people want to know more about how this virus can infect human beings. So that that is the reason why they were doing this genetic engineering experiments. So this kind of work was routinely done in Muhan Institute of Virology, and also It is being done worldwide also. So the WHO joined team. They had their news conference.
They finished their study in February. 9 February, they concluded their studies. Now, what did they do? Actually, their mandate was, only basically to look at the zoonotic origins And very little emphasis, was given on the lab, origin. So they went to Wuhan Institute of Virology and few other labs, But, they did not didn't have enough time, and also, they did not go into very deep depths.
Actually, I mean, unless we Investigate the lab origin theory also. I think this investigation is some incomplete. So, recently, United States has, I mean, president Joe Biden has said that they would, conduct 90 days investigation, and I think that is maybe the way forward because The CNET has agreed, to this, and everyone thinks that we should look at this, even the lab origin in very much depth. Oh, and recently, India has also supported, this particular stance. We are truthful, unafraid, and
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar 𝚆𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚕𝚎𝚋𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛 @CharlesRixey exposed the 𝙳𝙴𝙵𝚄𝚂𝙴 𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝 led by Peter Daszak and Ralph Baric, rejected by DARPA, funded by the NIH. This leak was called the “smoking gun” that led to finally learning the TRUTH! Thanks Charles!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The leaked DEFUSE proposal from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their American partners reveals their risky research on the parts of COVID-19 that make it highly infectious to humans. Scientists believe this proposal provides a step-by-step guide to creating SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. The proposal's specificity in constructing a virus with all the key hallmarks of SARS-CoV-2 is seen as more than just a coincidence. Researchers, including Shizeng Li and Ben Hu, who is considered a potential patient zero, were involved in this research. Hu's work on genetically engineering coronaviruses from bats and his early COVID-like symptoms further support the possibility of him being patient zero.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The extent of their risky research came to light in this proposal, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their American partners drew up in search of funding. They were experimenting with the parts of COVID nineteen that scientists find so unusual. It's what makes the virus so infectious to humans. This proposal was leaked by a whistleblower. Why do many scientists consider this grant proposal a blueprint for SARS CoV-two.
Speaker 1: The DEFUSE proposal really provides step by step Instructions for how a scientist might create SARS CoV 2, the virus that causes COVID nineteen.
Speaker 0: Justin Kinney is an associate professor at New York's Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. His lab is at the forefront of data driven research into the virus that causes COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: To me and many other scientists, the diffuse proposal is the smoking gun. This is not something you would get from Just any virology lab working on coronaviruses. This is a very specific Blueprint for making SARS CoV-two. The fact that researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology explicitly proposed Constructing viruses that would have all the key hallmarks of SARS CoV-two is just a remarkable Coincidence if in fact it is a coincidence.
Speaker 0: Those researchers include bat lady, Shizeng Li, and her colleague, Ben Hu, who many consider to be patient 0. Is he patient 0, Ben Hu?
Speaker 1: I would say that a researcher working on novel SARS like coronaviruses from natural bat populations And genetically engineering them to be more dangerous in humans would be a prime candidate for patient 0. So that combined with reports that he and others at the Wuhan Institute of Virology came down with COVID like symptoms very early on, you know, before The outbreak at the Huanan Seafood Market, to me, It is strong circumstantial evidence that Ben Hu might be patient 0.
@mommaleo - Jenny
A senior-level CIA officer told House committee leaders that his agency tried to pay off six analysts who found SARS-CoV-2 likely originated in a Wuhan lab if they changed their position and said the virus jumped from animals to humans, according to a letter sent Tuesday to CIA Director William Burns.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey Top Chinese Whistleblower Exposes COVID-19 As An Unrestricted Warfare #Bioweapon
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a Chinese virologist, discusses the concept of "unrestricted bioweapons" and how China's strategies extend beyond traditional bioweapons. She claims that COVID-19 is an unrestricted bioweapon designed to spread globally and that China has engaged in scientific misinformation and information warfare. Dr. Yan also criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for covering up the origins of the virus and accuses China of infiltrating and manipulating American scientists and organizations. She emphasizes the need for policymakers to understand the evil tactics of the Chinese Communist Party and to hold them accountable. Dr. Yan also expresses concerns about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, Alex. This is a good question. Unrestricted means, at what I said, no constraints, no consideration of humanity. So China's unrestricted strategies not only applied on bioweapon. COVID nineteen is their unrestricted bioweapon.
But as I defend in my reports, there are also unrestricted scientific misinformation, And also there are unrestricted informative wars as we say we were censored and also misinformation spreading anywhere everywhere. They are not happy with me, and the China government doesn't happy with me. That's why they are hunting me, and they are using propaganda to smear me, just to describe me as some hamster keeper or some mire, which is very hilarious. But I have evidence. I have showed the scientific and intelligence evidence here.
Since I start to tell people that There would be, there would be pandemic if you don't encounter it in time on 19th January last year. At that time, I'm the only person tell it to the world, and the China know I'm the insider because I tell the world human to human transmission exists, And, also, this is not from the seafood market. There is no animal intermediate host. I told people that WHO is covering up with China. There will be strong very end in the future if not.
And, also, that day, 19th January, last year, I told people that this is a product from Chinese military lab by game of function engineering. It's not from some bad cave in somewhere in China. It is hatched by the PLA, People's Liberation Army, and then the Study because we don't know how many functions hidden in this virus. Tell your policy makers that is It's strictly the power weapon. They need to update the outcomes, and also they need to understand that to change America, to control America and also control the world, you don't have much Time, you have to understand how evil CCP is and not listen to them, not trusted them, and you have to defend to protect America and your next generations.
Speaker 1: You know where the CIA tunes in. Right? You know
Speaker 2: where the Russians tune in? You know everybody tunes in. Right? Know who Tucker Carlson tunes into and
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan, Elon Musk? You know where
Speaker 2: they tune in. Right?
Speaker 1: They tune in right here. Infowars, tomorrow's news, today. Welcome back. We are now into hour number 3 of this August 30th Monday broadcast, and we are joined by a leading Chinese virologist who has been totally and completely vindicated. She's come out in the latest article in New York Post as Fauci emails verify her Wuhan lab leak claim.
Li Mingyan is the doctor, and she's written a detailed report that has been proven to be a blueprint of what really happened. She's on Twitter At doctor Li Ming Yan one. People should be sure and follow her there at doctor Li, l I, Ming Yan one, And we can put that up on screen there. That is for you. She also has link up there.
Her report, SARS CoV 2 is an unrestricted Bioweapon, a truth revealed through uncovering a large scale organized scientific fraud. And it would take me an hour to go over her whole bio, but let me just read part of it. Doctor Li Mingyan is a medical doctor, PhD virologist, independent coronavirus expert. She Was educated at 2 top medical schools in China, Southern Medical University and Central South University. She was also a postdoctoral fellow in the School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, because of her extensive, professional network and scientific evidence, doctor Yan Has the distinction of being the only Chinese insider in the West with firsthand knowledge about the true nature of the virus as well as the CCP's deceptive methods Use of the skies, their international bioweapons research.
Since escaping from Hong Kong on April 28, 2021, she has been interviewed many, many times, 4 times by the FBI, including the FBI virologist, and each time she has been deemed credible. Doctor Yan has spent 5 years researching influenza vaccines when in January 2020, she was asked to investigate the Wuhan Pneumonia that was sweeping the city, And then it goes on from there. She can tell you the rest of the story about the CCP and and and what she witnessed And what unfolded. So, doctor Yan, thank you so much for coming on with us.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Alex. Thank you for having me.
Speaker 1: Every time I see on Fox or Newsmax, you get about 5 minutes. You've got the rest of the hour. You're gracious to be here. We got, like, 8 minutes to break. Start at the beginning or or or or or or or give us a summation.
Whatever you'd like to tell us, we wanna get it on record. We really appreciate you Coming on because we know that you've been right from the very, very beginning, and we appreciate your courage.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Alex. Then how about we start to talk about the Intellectual, reports from Biden's administration, which was released amongst the Friday on origin of COVID nineteen. How about we start talk from that?
Speaker 1: Absolutely, please.
Speaker 0: Okay. So according to that report, Biden administration said they judged that this COVID nineteen virus was not designed as a bioweapon. And, also, the intelligence agencies all think there is a more confidence that it is not bioengineered, lab products. So, actually, I think there are many media I mean, almost all the media try to claimed this report, but they actually made some misunderstanding because although they claim that this is not done as a bioweapon, it is not wrong, because the recent evidence verified my report and my evidence that the COVID nineteen virus is not designed as traditional bioweapon, it is designed as unrestricted bioweapon. This term is beyond bioweapon, without constraints and without considering of humanity to make the novel non traditional bioweapon and mix it with authoritarianism to conquer their, conquer their goal of making China great and also overcome the world.
Everything is under the instruction of Marxism. So this is what we should let more people know, because the outcome of foul weapon has its limitation, And the China government learned how to take advantage of the weakness from the mouse and from the surveillance, and then to get a void of the surveillance and the biodefense system all over the world to conduct this biowe attack.
Speaker 1: Wow. That is powerful information. So work obviously, they work with collaborators in the West. I think that's Very clear. You go off what you know about China, what you know about the weapon, but I have clips we'll play later of doctor Peter Daszak that ran the program with Fauci And with the Chinese government, and he was bragging in in December of 2019 that they were merging 5 viruses.
They were gonna make a vaccine for it, and he describes COVID nineteen. So, they weren't even hiding a lot of this, it looks like.
Speaker 0: Yes. From last February, since Peter Daszak start to publish his Lancet statement, claimed that COVID nineteen is from nature, and also said China has done great job in anti COVID nineteen they already exposed. At that time, I also had the firsthand that information that he tried to organize the scientists all over the world to help China. Is not a nonsense. Doctor.
Fauci is not a nonsense. Ralph Barrick, Christine Anderson, All these people are not a nonsense, but, sadly, they are used by Chinese government as a tool. The Chinese Communist Party spent decades, which is approved by my recent document from 1990s, they start to study the novel things in about weapon and the about war program. And the people from America, they are used by China to spread misinformation. They don't, they are not allowed to touch the core intelligence, in China because Chinese Communist Party don't trust these foreigners, but they are used and they enjoy it.
And they say the benefits. So they are willing to do that with China to undermine America, to on the mind of the world.
Speaker 1: And they're certainly working with the UN and Tedders and working with leftists here who wanna keep us locked down, who Who wanna bring in a communist revolution, who wanna create a universal income. I mean, the the Democrats now admit most health department leaders Are a a vowed communist, not just Tedros, but others that run London and run all these other big cities. They say, we're communist. We don't want the lockdown to ever end in the west. So, clearly, they're using it as a smokescreen, for martial law.
Speaker 0: The mandate is very useful because compared to America, China has the power to mandate everything, and they predicted that once such novel biowulfaire or bioterrorism happen, Pee, people in America cannot get enough help, I mean, in time because this is Democratic country, and in China, they can control it because that is centralized. And also To use mandate as a tool to divide American, divide, republican, democratic people, Divide the races, divide your policy is what China spend decades to work on.
Speaker 1: Incredible. Doctor Lee Ming Yan, stay right there. Is the best place for people to find you on Twitter at doctorleemingyan1?
Speaker 0: Yes. And there are hundreds of fake accounts established by CCP, so please notice that it's over 100 k Account is the only right one.
Speaker 1: Alright. Wow. I've got a lot I wanna cover. When we come back, what do you wanna get into next?
Speaker 0: We want to tell people that about how China's plan to undermine America and also control the organizations like WHO, UNF for years, and then makes a whole misinformation helping COVID nineteen pandemic.
Speaker 1: Alright. You're an amazing lady. Totally vindicated. The Pentagon and others came out and said, yes. Her report was correct.
It came out of the Wuhan lab with a high probability. We'll be right back. Stay with us on the other side. Doctor Li Ming Yan is our guest. She is Completely vindicated.
She was one of the 1st voices to come out early last year and say it's a bioweapon out of Wuhan. The Chicom's have co opted People inside the US government, inside the UN, and now she's been vindicated. The US intelligence agencies have come out, and even John Hopkins that came up with The SPARS event 4 years ago, wargaming, what's currently happening now, heavily involved in all this as well. This is a global government project. China is at the heart of it, obviously.
They've come out and attacked her and said, oh, it didn't come out of a lab. We've had Peter Daszak who helped secretly write the Lancet report saying it didn't come out of the lab, but told people in emails, don't tell people I'm involved writing this. He's finally been fired off of the latest whitewash. So they have worked around the clock to try to stop doctor Jan, but she is with us now, and, going over why this happened, where this is going, and I also wanna ask you because you've been on top of this like nobody else, How do you counter something like this? Because when you say unrestricted warfare, unrestricted bioweapon, Explain what that means.
It it doesn't mean you just spray it on your enemy. You just release it out of the open because you're premeditated. You know what your response is gonna be, you believe it'll divide and conquer and destroy open free societies, which she then our media even advertised and said, oh, America and Europe can't be free anymore. We've gotta be like China. We've gotta have a social credit score.
We've gotta listen to them. So we even saw the PR prepared. And as Americans and others got censored And as you got censored, I saw communist Chinese propaganda force fed by big tech.
Speaker 0: Hi, Alex. This is a good question. Unrestricted means, at what I said, no constraints, no consideration of humanity. So China's unrestricted strategies not only applied on bioweapon. COVID nineteen is the unrestricted bioweapon.
But as I defend in my reports, There are also unrestricted scientific misinformation, and also there are unrestricted informative wars John Hopkins, and also doctor Fauci. So my evidence actually based on my firsthand intelligence from China Military and the civil network, involve house detail, CDC, and also research maps. Also involve my knowledge about the WHO experts who work with me in the WHO reference lab in Hong Kong for 5 years. And, also, there are other evidence, like the People's Liberation Army's document, scientific evidence they publish from military and also civilian scientist network working with China, all together combined with my expertise, and In the new evidence it is a document from People's Liberation Army from end of 2014. That one is written by the leading bio expert, in the military of, medical science academy in China, that team work with general Wei Chen who pick in Take, in charge of Wuhan Lab, March of February.
I think definitely people know that. So this team actually focus on establishing the theory of the unrestricted bioweapon strategies for CCP, especially for Chairman Xi. And in that book, they claim that to divide America is very important, because in their strategy, America is the primary, enemy for them because America doesn't allow the dictatorship, or communism, and there is freedom in America, so they found out that they need to understand the policies, politicals and think tanks from America, and for example, they take the example that NIH, especially NIAID, And the Johns Hopkins, they are the organizations in the US to help surveillance about weapon related risk. That's why China knows if they can manipulate the top experts in this organization, then they can manipulate the information and the American policymakers. And now you say what happened now.
Speaker 1: Well and and at least the FBI did arrest the head of Harvard Science who was basically on the payroll of the Chinese giving him a lot of this technology. So clearly, you've got Bill Gates that helped open up China. You've got Fauci that's a a a a communist Chinese supporter. They're getting all this power. They're getting all this control, and Fauci bragged 2017, Trump will be challenged by a novel virus.
And then, of course, we'll play it next segment, Daszak bragging about how they were preparing it And, getting it ready, I think, to cover his butt later when he knew it would come out. They aren't very happy with you, though, are they? The I don't think they expected all this to come out.
Speaker 0: They are not happy with me, and the China government isn't happy with me. That's why they are hunting me, and they are using propaganda to smear me just to describe me as some hamster keeper or some liar, which is very hilarious. But I have evidence. I have shown the scientific and intelligence evidence here. Since I start to tell people that there would be, there would be pandemic if you don't count your egg in time on 19th January last year.
At that time, I'm the only person tell it to the world, and the China know I'm the insider because I tell the world human to human transmission exists, And, also, this is not from the seafood market. There is no animal intermediate host. I told people that Have the HOA is covering up with China? There will be strong very end in the future, if not. And, also, that day, 19th January, I told people that this is a product from Chinese military lab by game of function engineering.
It's not from some bad cave in somewhere in China. It is patched by the PLA, People's Liberation Army, and then modified did a lot of gain of function modification, which still need our to study because we don't know how many functions hidden in this virus. So these are all verified. That's why They don't wanna me talk about it, and that's why they wanna censor all the people that talking about that.
Speaker 1: Wow. Doctor Li Ming yan is our guest. Again, you can follow her on her real Twitter. We'll put it on screen for TV viewers. I'll give it to you next segment, but, while we come back, let's look.
Then I want you to get some time to talk about your research, what's in your paper, and how you could look at the virus and know it was manmade, which is now confirmed. These all these viruses combined, how they did it, what really won. They shut the lab down for weeks. We know no cell phone activity right before the outbreak was announced. So as best you can tell, was it done on purpose?
I think you're saying it was, you know, versus them saying, oh, it happened on accident. I look at the timing. I look at the media working with, The dictator of China, I mean, I see it all. It was clearly premeditated, and they told us 15 days to flatten the curve. And now here we are still under lockdown, around the world.
It is incredible. We'll be right back. Everybody listening on AM and FM, tell folks tune in. Everybody watching on TV or the Internet, you're how we expand the audience and people get the truth. Tell them whistleblower scientist who went to Wuhan and researched it, that first exposed it And risk to her life is on now telling us what's really happening.
This is so important. Stay with us. Well, authoritarians all Over the world love using this virus and the fear of it to lock down society, and then to bring us these vaccines. I'm gonna ask Her view on those as well, but the great part here on The Alex Jones Show about my job is that I don't care about Hollywood stars. I don't care about sports icons.
I care about trailblazers and interesting people and people that Tell the truth and and stand up and do what's right. Like, when I remember over in Asia where they had the big cave cave in with all the school kids in it, and The divers would go in and say them 1 by 1. Those are heroes. Those were interesting people. I'd like to interview them.
And then you've got somebody like doctor Li Ming Yan who Puts out the 1st paper, was there, was an expert, went and investigated it for a university, came back, documented it, And has now been vindicated. That that that's a hero. And I know she doesn't see herself as a hero, but it's people like her that are gonna turn the tide against this evil. So we got another 25 minutes left. I'd love for you to be able to go anywhere you want, but it's probably important for you to go back to the time Of your scent to investigate and then how you know this was staged, how you know it was chimeric, which they now admit.
It it's like saying a Swiss watch Puts itself together in the desert from sand, and the idea that from reading your paper that's now been proven right, it's preposterous to claim Five different species of animal jumped millions of years of, quote, evolution or whatever, and then magically made this this chimera. Then after your report came out, The Indians and the Australians and others scanned the virus and said you could see the insertion genes and how it had been Made. So so you're the virologist. You're the renowned doctor that first broke this. Walk us through how you knew it was manmade.
Speaker 0: By my supervisor, doctor Liu Peng, on behalf of WHO reference map in Hong Kong to understand what happened in Wuhan, on 31st December 2019. So at that time, China government blocked all the information even to the experts. So my access to China CDC, To the doctors and researchers, a over China gave me the quick, intelligence collection, and that tell us that China knows there is outbreak, and China was hiding this information. And then later on, the response from WHO shows that They compromise with China government and hide aid and check to the audience check the public together with Chinese Communist Party
Speaker 1: And you were the 1st to say that you were the 1st to say that when it was called the Wuhan, pneumonia. And just to be clear, it's all been proven that you're right. The UN did actively cover it up.
Speaker 0: Yes. They act actually, they covered up. And then more than covered up, They join into this kind of man, although they cannot catch the real secret, but they actually may deliver the technology and also help China to escape from the punishment. And, also, these are well planned by Chinese Communist Party since 20 years ago. And then, what I want to help you about is my research from last January shows that China actually tried to, frame some animal.
For example, dog. They tried to frame it. They try to make people start this as a wild animal, which carry this kind of virus and transmit to human from the seafood market, which is totally fine. You see, until now, they cannot find the animal, and, actually, From mid January when I was in Hong Kong, I had started email from some expert to my map that you better focus on the raccoon dog, and it implies that you find the raccoon dog from Wuhan, But at that time, I reveal it through Buddhist media in Chinese on YouTube, which actually triggered Chinese Communist Party and the chairman Xi's office, that's why they have to change their strategies and get avoid of more deaths, and also more damning. Somehow, they still do that.
Speaker 1: Well, I agree with you. The communist China quarterback this, and it's the heart of the New World Order, but clearly worked with Western criminals. You can see the scripting. But what do you make of Obama When when the media made a big deal of this in 2015 at Chapel Hill, North Carolina and when Fauci had it moved to Wuhan, I mean, clearly, there's major involvement with Obama and the globalist here as well. Because China Oh.
The the the communist, as you know, threatened back and said, If you blame us, we'll blame you. So I think that's why they did a joint operation so they could blame each other.
Speaker 0: Because China had infiltrated America for many years. They have their military civil infiltration, and that's why they can compromise and manipulate and cancels, concussion. Some of your many of your scientists or the officers to work with them.
Speaker 1: So you're saying many of them are in collusion?
Speaker 0: Yes, exactly, and that also has explained in the evidence I obtained. For example, they talked about that From 2005, bioweapon convention conference in Geneva told that All will be the surveillance organization for bioweapon.
Speaker 1: Sure. So China working through them with Gates set up how to respond so they could release it and then cover it up. What do you make of event two zero one and all this? Frantic governments at John Hopkins and the Chinese government frantically drilling For this happening in the months right before it happened, I see that as them preparing and getting ready and getting their people all trained.
Speaker 0: These people, they bring the Chinese sort of, academic spies came here, and also many innocent Chinese people are blackmailed by our government to deliver the technology back to China. And the American scientists, like in John Hawkins Or in lab, or New York Blood Center, which is very important because people can access American people's gene data, Genetic data from there are all helping I mean, many of them are helping China government to work on these things. They deliver these things back to China, and then they exchange for benefits. Like, they get promotion. They are Stand into the international organization, like Food and Agriculture Organization, World Animal Organization, WHO Sure.
Look at the head of Harvard scientist. China.
Speaker 1: The the Chinese government gave him millions of secret money.
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. I mean, that is just Piece of the iceberg, the amount of this China's massive infiltration in America actually didn't triggered among because China study your mouth. They study your policies. They know how to disguise aid and get a wide of This kind of surveillance and
Speaker 1: all of that. Societies, all of it, doctor Li Meng Yan. How do we counter this? How do we respond to this?
Speaker 0: Tell your policy makers that is unrestricted about weapons. They need to update the outcomes, And also, they need to understand that misinformation is another arm for this novel, nontraditional bioweapon. Together, this is SACEP's unrestricted strategies to change America to control America and also controls the world. You don't have much time. You have to understand how evil CCP is and not listen to them, not Trust the them, and you have to defend to protect America and your next generations.
Speaker 1: Powerfully said. Please continue, doctor.
Speaker 0: It's not a layman accident. This aid, because of their reckless operation, their trial in the neighborhood using Chinese people, then get out of control and make the local outbreak, and then they take advantage of that outbreak to spread it all over the world because this unrestricted bioweapon is designed to spread the pandemic all over the world.
Speaker 1: You're a 100% right, because I can see all the prescripting. It's like a new Chevy truck's coming out or a new Coca Cola. It's just, oh, the bio attacks coming. Give me your rights up when it does, and all the drills And all the preparation and then Obama working with, Xi Jinping, and then it all happens, and then China's good and we're bad, and then, oh, just 14 days and then it's forever. We're gonna talk about how to counter this and doctor Peter Daszak and the smoking gun with our amazing guests, and I'm gonna host some into the next hour to take your calls, folks.
Stay with us. Welcome back. Final segment with our incredible guests. I hope that all listeners realize that This interview's already got a couple 1000000 people watching live, but it'll be archived at man.video and freeworldnews.tv, And I'm just begging you for all our own futures to get the interview and to share it everywhere you can, especially your email and text message, Some of the final places not being totally censored. Doctor Li Meng Yan is on with us.
Hopefully, she'll join us again to get even into more, but she wanted to get into the communist Chinese party surveillance system, and then I wanted to get this latest article where she says Fauci's emails vindicate her. Well, she's already been vindicated. I've read the emails where he's, like, telling him in December of 2019, get the vaccine ready. So clearly, this whole thing's been a plan. It's sick.
So, doctor, please continue.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Since you talk about the vaccine, I really want to tell people, I work in the WHO lab, and I have my influenza universal vaccine Patent unpending, I'm not anti vaccine, but I'm anti vaccine mandate, and, also, I'm anti unsafe and an inefficient vaccine because this is Chinese Communist Party's unrestricted bioweapon, and especially in their spike protein of this virus, DCAP has, designed many functions, which they learn from, like, Dengue data and Ebola and the high pathogen, even influenza, all these things, and put them in to the coronavirus. It's like playing Michael, and then make you have moldy taste. That's why we still have amount of symptoms, like, Homer, like the brain fog, like you, start to get, like, disorder in China purposely done it using their expertise, using their talk technology.
Speaker 2: By the
Speaker 1: way, some people say it's not real, but we know it's a 5 virus Chimera, and it's it seems to me what I've seen is since it mutated, it's much worse this year. Because I talked to doctors. I got my ear to the ground. Last year, they were overblowing it at least here, but but now they're not overblowing it. This I mean, I I've got I know people personally Who, like, have basically Alzheimer's since they got it.
Totally sharp 3 weeks ago. Don't know who they are now. Can't taste, can't smell, And are basically half dead. I mean so I definitely know this is real.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Mike, the blood clot and also antibody dependent enhancement and also neurotoxicity on and also autoimmune disorder. All these are I mean, well studied by those military and civil scientist in China
Speaker 1: So how many viruses is it combined, doctor? Is is am I correct to say 5? Some say 6.
Speaker 0: Oh, I won't say like that. I will tell you that China studies about terrorism reagent in the east from America, Europe and also Russia, and that the folks on studying of this reagent, which can lead the bioterrorism, but they work directly, use aid, like direct copy paste to the coronavirus. They learn the mechanism, and they try to manage to make this mechanism happen on coronavirus. Some worked, some failed, but somehow, finally, it become like the Frankenstein, and that is what they have. They have knowledge, and they start still studying for other things.
Speaker 1: So you're saying they created a Frankenstein, a Frankenstein monster, and, regardless, they created it, and it got out of the lab. It's now terrorizing the countryside. So so let me ask you this. Obviously, I know vaccines are real science. They get contaminated.
They have side effects. There's problems. I don't even see these mRNA as a vaccine because it's it's it's it's it's alive, and it makes the body create the spike protein. So you are a virologist. You study this.
What do you make of of of the the reports of deaths and problems and people not being protected by this vaccine?
Speaker 0: First, I want to say that, yeah, we encourage the new technology, but we also need data, To to now SARS 2, we don't have the real efficient vaccines for over almost 20 years, And suddenly, within several months, they put it to market, and then, again, they start to mandate people to use that. And the very clear scenario since AIDS, the vaccine cannot stop transmission. Then why do you mandate people? Because As they claimed, if this vaccine can really reduce the severity and the death from the COVID nineteen, then it is a personal choice, unless it can prevent transmission. If not, there is no reason you have to force people to get it.
Speaker 1: And and I know that, doctor. You're you're you're amazing. Let me play a clip from doctor Peter Daszak in December of 2019 when he had been dispatched. We're the 1st to investigate this. Here he is covering his butt, Doing an interview saying, oh, we combined 5 viruses to make a vaccine, admitting basically gain a function here at
Speaker 3: But if you you're saying these are diverse, coronaviruses, and you can't vaccinate against them and no antivirus, what what do we What do we do?
Speaker 2: Well, so I I think that coronavirus is a pretty good I mean, urophrologists, you know all this stuff, but they you can, manipulate them in the lab pretty easily. It's just Spike protein drives a lot of what happens within coronavirus, zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, you can build the Protein. And we work with Ralph Barrick at UNC to do this. Insert into backbone of another virus Right.
And do do some work in the lab. So you can Get more predictive when you find a sequence. You got this diversity. Now the the logical progression for vaccines is If you're gonna develop a vaccine for SARS Mhmm. People are gonna use, you know, pandemic SARS.
Yeah.
Speaker 3: Sure.
Speaker 2: Sure. But let's try and insert some of these other Yeah. Related and and get a better vaccine.
Speaker 3: And I guess also knowledge of what's there. If you see something emerging, it'd give a head start on making A vaccine or a therapeutic?
Speaker 2: That's true. And and, you know, better knowledge of where they are as well so you can you can Put your money into these clinics that matter. And that's one of the big things that we've been trying to push. There's a lot of, The word predict or the word, you know, the, anticipating forecasting pandemics, it it doesn't mean you can stop them. That's the problem.
There's so so what we're trying to say on a global scale, if we can show where they most like to come from, the species they most like to originate in, The people most like to get affected, a global actor like WHO or a national, government can better allocate resources to the highest risk.
Speaker 1: Okay. So he just admitted, doctor, that they are merging the viruses together exactly what they did. I have another clip of him Admitting Chinese colleagues develop killer coronaviruses at Wuhan. What do you make of those admissions? And then his boss, Fauci, tells congress no such thing was done.
Speaker 0: Peter Daseke is more about the politician, and he's a dishonest politician than scientist. And this virus is not only designed in Wuhan. It is released in Wuhan, but it is designed and worked within the mid grade lab network from Beijing to Hong Kong to Wuhan to Habak all over China. I mean, if only folks on Wuhan, that is definitely cannot solve any problem of their bioweapon unrestricted bioweapon program. And, also, already admit that it's easy to manipulate the spike proteins.
And because he's not a good scientist, though his description is very simple, but China has made it more comprehensive because The unrestricted weapon, according to CCP's definition, has to look like from nature. And that's why they can't help him up. Oh, it's from nature. It's mysterious, and we have to Get money from America, get help to, look for, like, another 10 years to find the why it happened, and then people will forget The origin is the CCP, is the military
Speaker 1: Exactly. And and the CCP and their globalist allies are getting total power and control, Making 100 of billions off the vaccines in response to it, they need to be held accountable or their whole agenda will keep rolling forward. That's why your work and senator Rand Paul's work And others is so central, and the whole world is counting on what you and and senator Paul and others are doing. I mean, we were hit with a bioweapon. China is now superior, taking over the world economy.
We're still partially shut down. They've given us leaky bad vaccines. We are literally, under attack, do you agree that we should see Fauci criminally investigated and, Bill Gates and others? Because we can't get Xi Jinping right now, but Couldn't we start with their with his minions, here in America?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Of course. Because these people are in America. They are American Citizens, though, you're most I mean, applied to them, and they have to listen to that. But China, they can try to get rid of that.
That's why the policy makers, the legislators need to understand China's unrestricted evil tactics and fix this problem. And Xi Jinping is the 1 dominant by himself, and the whole Chinese Communist Party need to be How held accountable.
Speaker 1: Alright. Everybody should follow you on Twitter, doctor Lee Ming Yeon. We really appreciate you. Please come up back again to impart more amazing knowledge. Thank you so much.
Speaker 0: Miss, hi, Jess. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Wow. That was powerful. Great job the producers getting her. What an amazing lady and not sharing 5 minutes of her, Getting to hear 45 minutes of her on air. Please get her back as soon as you can.
Crew. Wow. With all the craziness going on in the world, It's more important than ever to protect our bodies. And infowarsstore.com has a line of high quality products have the very best ingredients for your body, for your body's natural defenses, for your immune system, for every cellular function that happens in these bodies that God gave us. And we've been sold out for months months months months Thank god they're finally back in.
But because of new COVID lockdowns around the world, we're already having problems Securing future orders. So I would take action now and get these great products at infowarsstore.com that you see in front of me because It also funds the InfoWar, and you don't know you'll be able to get them again. Vitamineral fusion has become probably our number 1 or 2 bestseller. It varies each month between x two because it's got all the vitamins, all the minerals that are essential, and a bunch of t amino acids, And it's all natural, and it tastes great. It's wonderful for children.
It's excellent for adults, but especially old people because older folks have trouble absorbing vitamin whether in pill form, this is in powder form. So, again, you get a much better absorption rate because you drink it in the mouth. It mixes with saliva that begins the digestion process, and then, again, It's liquefied in the gut, and you get almost a 100% absorption rather than just maybe 20, 30, 40% absorption depending on the studies you see out there, with the caplets. I mean, some of the vitamins minerals are great because they're in powder forms. You still get good absorption, but nothing like when it's in powder form, first put into water that you then drink.
So the final mineral fusion is back in stock, 33% off at infowarsstore.com, and it funds the Infowar. Then, of course, we have our pure turmeric concentrate formula, very similar to bodies, a very strong Turmeric concentrate, it's discounted. Infowarsstore.com. That's great for inflammation, great for immune system x two, the crystal iodine. We've got, Living Defense.
We got the palm and block. We've got the new toothpaste. All of it back in stock. When I say new toothpaste, we had our original tooth whitening, silver toothpaste that we, had to discontinue, but we had already come out with a new charcoal activated toothpaste that had gotten very popular. But it had been Almost 7 months since we had it, these are supply chain breakdowns.
It is now back in stock. Also, hit infowarsstore. With all the essential oils with also the activated charcoal, mouthwash with essential oils as well. So all of these products are back in stock, and they fund the info war. So I thank you all for shopping with us.
I thank you all for supporting us, and it's a smart move, for yourself and your body And your immune system, your health, and if your friends and family aren't aware of how this stuff is so important and needed, it's also a great gift to give, the gift of life, the gift health. And, again, it funds the tip of the spear at a critical time in the fight against the globalist. They're all available right now, discounted at infowarsstore.com. Thank you so much for your support.
@mommaleo - Jenny
CIA analysts were bribed to change their mind about a lab leak. A major zoonotic origin advocate was Adrienne Keene, a WHO spy and Director for Global Health Security in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. An obvious conflict of interest. John Ratcliffe, Former Director of ODNI says he and Pompeo BOTH were confident it was a lab leak.
Video Transcript AI Summary
CIA analysts who supported the lab leak theory were allegedly bribed to change their stance, diverting attention from China and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Adrian Keane, head of global health security at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, was reportedly promoting the natural origin narrative while having a history with the World Health Organization. Keane's potential conflict of interest remains undisclosed. The ODNI stated they followed intelligence community standards, but former ODNI director John Ratcliffe believes a lab leak is highly likely. Those with access to extensive intelligence, including Ratcliffe and Secretary Pompeo, agree that a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology is the most probable cause of COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CIA analysts who favored the lab leak theory were bribed to change their position. The reason to take the focus off China and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Over at the office of The director of National Intelligence, Adrian Keane, who's in charge of global health security, was also understood to be pushing the natural origin narrative. We can now exclusively reveal that in a clear conflict of interest, she has a history working with the World Health Organization.
Speaker 1: I had found out that, apparently, she was an outside adviser also, To the World Health Organization, they are a political agency, they're a UN agency. It's just not appropriate To, to do work for a foreign power, and that would include the United Nations. She was, I believe, an advocate For, for zoonosis, but she was very involved in, discrediting the information that we were trying to present to the secretary of state.
Speaker 0: Adrian Keane and the ODNI, the peak intelligence body in the US, didn't answer my questions about whether Keane had disclosed this conflict of interest. Instead, they sent this statement saying they'd complied with all of the intelligence community's analytics standards including objectivity. Former director of the ODNI, John Ratcliffe, says there's a very strong Essman, that this was a lab leak.
Speaker 2: Well, listen. The the people that had access to, the most access to the most intelligence, including myself and secretary Pompeo, are telling you that the most likely origin of of COVID nineteen of the Wuhan virus was what happened was a lab leak at Wuhan Institute of Virology. So all of the people that had access to the most data, the most intelligence will all tell you the same thing that this is really most what happened, and it's more than just a possibility. It's certainly a probability, and it's probably a certainty.
@mommaleo - Jenny
Those privy to the most intel, believed the lab leak theory: ODNI Director, John Ratcliffe. A key witness for the FBI was vaccinologist, Dr. Zhou Yusen was working on a vaccine for coronaviruses in Wuhan, and applied for mRNA vaccine patents as early as October 2019, shortly after he, was found dead. Intelligence agencies believe foul play, perhaps killed, by the People’s Liberation Army, or CCP.
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, including himself and Secretary Pompeo, the most likely origin of COVID-19 was a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They claim that this is not just a possibility, but a probability and possibly a certainty. The FBI has been cultivating a crucial witness, Dr. Zhou Yousen, a close relative of a Chinese military scientist who worked at the institute. Dr. Zhou published a patent for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, suggesting he started working on it no later than October 2019. However, he was found dead shortly after. While it is possible that he was killed by the People's Liberation Army for accidentally starting COVID-19, there is no evidence to support this claim. The Proximal Origins authors have been approached for comment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Listen. The the people that had access to, the most access to the most intelligence, including myself and secretary Pompeo, are telling you that the most likely origin of of COVID nineteen of the Wuhan virus was what happened was a lab leak at the Wuhan to the virology. So all of the people that had access to the most data, the most intelligence will all tell you the same thing that this is really most likely what happened. And it's more than just a possibility. It's certainly a probability, and it's probably a certainty.
Speaker 1: Perhaps one reason they're so adamant is because of a crucial witness the FBI has been cultivating Over the past 2 years, it's a close relative of a Chinese military scientist who worked With the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Speaker 2: He's published almost 60 papers, just on his study of SARS, and He was a professional, vaccinologist, meaning is that his study was focused on vaccines.
Speaker 1: His name, doctor Zhou Yousen.
Speaker 2: One of the things that we recognized very early in our study of this was he was one of the first individuals to publish a patent for a SARS CoV two vaccine.
Speaker 1: So where does that take the time frame back to? Where would Zhou Yusein have had to start working on His vaccine for COVID nineteen.
Speaker 2: No later than October of 2019. That's what our assessment is, and it's based on the fact that to do what he was trying to do, that's that's about the time that he had to start. And and and interesting enough, he published papers that described the process that he used to do that.
Speaker 1: Doctor Zhou Yusein is thought to have begun working on a vaccine for SARS CoV two No later than October 2019. In a mysterious turn of events, just months After this crucial discovery, he was found dead. Intelligence agencies suspect foul play. What do you think about this statement? Joe Youssaint may have been killed by the People's Liberation Army For accidentally starting COVID nineteen?
Speaker 2: It's certainly possible. We consider that as a plausible possibility. However, we had no evidence to make that assessment.
Speaker 1: The Proximal Origins authors have been approached for comment and to appear on this program
@mommaleo - Jenny
Legitimate conversations were stifled surrounding the lab leak and through FOIA requests, former Head of British Intelligence-MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove found that the culprit, was Anthony #FAUCI. John Ratcliffe, head of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, who oversees 18 intelligence agencies, found NO EVIDENCE to back Fauci up.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the investigation into the origins of COVID-19, it has been significant to discover that a scientific debate on the topic was actively suppressed worldwide. Sir Richard Dearlove, former head of British spy agency Mi6, claims that Anthony Fauci led the stifling of this debate. Meetings were held where one side of the argument was supported while the opposing view was denied media attention. Instead of disclosing suspicions about a lab leak, Fauci diverted attention away from this theory. Despite claims by evolutionary virologists that the virus evolved naturally, there was no intelligence or scientific data supporting this. These developments have shed light on the suppression of the origins debate. (116 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There have been a lot of developments in the investigation to the origins of COVID nineteen. What do you think has been most significant in the past 2 years?
Speaker 1: Well, I think what's been most significant is to discover That, a legitimate scientific debate about the origins of COVID was actually actively suppressed, Really around the world.
Speaker 0: Sir Richard Dearlove is the former head of the British spy agency, Mi6. He says stifling of the debate around the origins of COVID was led by Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 1: We've now, through FOI, Freedom of Information, got pretty clear idea of what meetings took place, what happened. They put forward one side of the argument, which they, for reasons I don't fully understand, decided to support and made Absolutely sure that the opposite view was not given any oxygen or media publicity.
Speaker 0: Instead of disclosing the scientists' and his secret suspicions, Anthony Fauci diverted attention away from the lab leak theory.
Speaker 2: Doctor Fauci, could you address these suggestions or concerns, that this virus was somehow man made, We came out of the laboratory in China. Can we go study this virus? What are the prospects of that?
Speaker 3: There was a study, recently that we can make available to you where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists Look at the sequences there and the sequences in, bats as they evolve, And the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.
Speaker 4: I watched what was happening in the public domain, and I listened to folks like, doctor Anthony Fauci. And what he said was The mutations of the virus were totally consistent with a jump from animals to humans.
Speaker 0: John Ratcliffe was the United States director of National Intelligence, the head of 18 different agencies.
Speaker 4: What I found was that there wasn't any intelligence that supported that, nor was there any scientific data that we could find.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey 😳EXCLUSIVE: THE END FOR FAUCI Dr Robert Kadlec reported directly to the President in Preparedness and Response, and was Fauci’s superior. He FINALLY tells the TRUTH. Why? Because he says it’s the RIGHT THING TO DO. ‼️🦠‼️🦠‼️🦠☣️🦠‼️🦠‼️🦠‼️
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a world exclusive, a former high-ranking US government official, Dr. Robert Kallic, reveals private discussions with Anthony Fauci about downplaying the lab leak theory. Dr. Kallic explains that the intention was to prevent accusations and allegations, but it backfired. Fauci's concern for his reputation and lack of visibility into the grants supporting the Wuhan Institute of Virology may have influenced his actions. Dr. Kallic feels an obligation to share the facts, not seeking sympathy or forgiveness, but to provide a factual account of what happened.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a world exclusive, an insider reveals private discussions he had with Anthony Fauci where they deliberately decided to downplay the lab leak theory.
Speaker 1: Doctor Robert Kallic was a high ranking official in the US government's preparedness and response department. He reported directly to the president, and he was also technically Fauci's superior. Here for the 1st time, he opens up on camera.
Speaker 2: The key is not to let the story die Because there are people who would like it to kinda go away. It's really important to kind of keep people, focused on it, And and I think there has to be accountability across the board.
Speaker 0: What discussions did you have with Anthony Fauci and others behind the scenes about deliberately deciding to turn down the temperature on a lab leak.
Speaker 2: Well, it was early on in the event When I did have the conversation with, doctor, Collins and doctor Fauci, it was the intent then to get the White House involved. What we were trying to do was trying to make sure that, politically, that you would not get into a situation where People would make accusations or allegations, but quite honestly, what happened was the exact opposite.
Speaker 0: You and Fauci in those discussions just wanted to turned the rhetoric down. Is that Correct.
Speaker 2: That was it.
Speaker 1: Kadleks says Fauci was worried about protecting his own reputation, and that could be why he diverted attention away from the lab leak.
Speaker 2: That would be a natural reaction of him or anybody, You know, particularly, you know, I think for him to saying, you know, what what could this do to me and to my to our institute As a consequence, if we were found to have some culpability or some involvement in this, and I think it would probably You know, made that even more acute was the fact that they didn't have good visibility into what they were doing and what they were supporting, through the grants, through EcoHealth Alliance that went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. I think that just That just probably magnified that concern.
Speaker 0: It's pretty extraordinary to to reveal the conversations that you had with Fauci and Collins. It's pretty extraordinary to publicly say that you did try to downplay the rhetoric around a bio weapon and a lab leak. Are you doing this interview in part because you feel guilty about that?
Speaker 2: I just feel like it it's an obligation that I Have to to kinda say what happened. And I think to factually try to portray this, not to to get sympathy or or forgiveness, but more to saying factually, here's here's what happened. This is what we tried to do. Did it work? No.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey ☣️BIOWEAPONS : AI : NANOTECH☣️ What did we do then? What do we do now?
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the history of the U.S. bioweapons program and its connection to the CIA. They explain how the CIA brought German and Japanese scientists to the U.S. after World War II and conducted unethical experiments on the American public. They also mention how President Nixon shut down the program in 1969, but the CIA continued their research and funded gain-of-function studies. The speaker highlights the role of Tony Fauci in bioweapons development and the connection between the CIA and the Wuhan lab. They conclude by urging people to resist government overreach and fight for their freedoms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, you know, I look back on, in my new book, I talk about the history of the U. S. Bio weapons program. And from the beginning, the CIA was running the bio weapons program. Why?
Because we didn't have a bioweapons program after World War II. And the CIA's first operation was called Operation Paperclip. And it was an operation to get all the bioweapons and nuclear and chemical scientists out of Germany and Japan, where they had extensive bioweapons program. The Japanese had a horrendous program where they were doing they did live visitations on 3,000 people. You know, they killed them all during the operation, removing their infected organs while they were alive with no anesthesia.
And these were horrible, horrible scientists. The CIA elevated them, brought them over to Fort Detrick, downloaded them and made made them the heads of hospital systems pharmaceutical companies in Japan and continued to work with them. And they brought all the German scientists over here. And then they did all these experiments unwittingly on the American public. They sprayed toxins in National Airport.
They sprayed them in the Pentagon, air conditioning system. They put poison water in NIH. They put light bulbs filled with bacteria that they broke on the grates and contaminated the New York City subway system, some of those microbes still in the subway today, they they did aerial dosing from ships of about, of about 60,000,000 Americans. At a dose, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, Virginia, Norfolk, Virginia, all of the seaside towns were dosed from the air. And a lot of the midwestern cities were also all unwitting.
They did 200 outdoor tests on Americans, unwitting. And they developed bioweapons by 1969 had a nuclear equivalent. They could kill people at $29 for death according to a CIA study, which they're bragging about. And then in 'sixty nine, President Nixon shocked the world by going to Fort Detrick and ending the U. S.
Bioweapons program. He was worried we were creating bioweapons that could be reproduced for nothing. They were kind of a poor man's nuclear bomb. Anybody could reproduce them once we. And we were publishing how you did it.
So they were giving blueprints to the to foreign nations to create these things that could be used against us. And he said, why are we doing this? We have nuclear bombs. We don't need these things. And we have a monopoly on nuclear bombs, 7 nations to have them.
We've agreed not to give them to anybody else. Why are we letting these guys get, you know, weapons that are going to be turned against us? So we shut down the whole program. The Pentagon destroyed all of its bio weapons. But the CIA went into Fort Detrick right before the Pentagon went in there and took cultures of all the different weapons and hid them in a warehouse.
A lot of it was in New York City and Washington DC. And they continued, we signed the bioweapons treaty, which Nixon, one of the great accomplishments of Nixon, he got all the nations in the world to sign it. We signed the Geneva Convention, finally, after delaying it for 50 years, the CIA was breaking the law the entire time. Then, in 2001, in June, the CIA sponsors the first of its pandemic simulations. It simulates a biological attack on Washington, D.
C. By Saddam Hussein. This is in June 2001. That simulation got international press. And a lot of the CIA people like Judith Miller from The New York Times was promoting it, going around doing all the talk shows.
It, it triggered 2 Senate hearings, 1 by Joe Biden's committee. And that hearing was in September 2001. What happened in September 2001? The 9/11. So that hearing was going on during 9/11.
As soon as 9/11 happened, the neocons, which were working on all this stuff with the CIA, pulled out the Patriot Act, a 3 50 page statue from a shelf where I had been waiting for a while. And in 1 week said we want to pass this in a week. There's only 1 member of Congress who read it, which was Dennis Kucinich. And he went crazy and said, you have no idea this is the end of American democracy if you do this. It allows the CIA to spy on Americans.
One of the things the Patriot Act did is it did not get rid of the Geneva Convention or the bioweapons treaty. But it said no federal official can be prosecuted for violating those 2 statutes. So it reopened the bioweapons arms race globally. And when the, a week after, when the Patriot Act was being debated, and it was being held up by 2 senators, there was an anthrax attack on the US capital. It was blamed on Saddam Hussein.
And they although the new consul said, the we were right in the pandemic simulations, Saddam Hussein attacked us. And we used that as a justification to go to war against Saddam Hussein. And within 2 days we passed the Patriot Act. Who got the anthrax? 2 Senate offices.
Tom Daschle and Patrick Lee, the 2 senators who were blocking the Patriot Act. The FBI did a 1 year investigation. They said this anthrax was unique. It was Ames Anthrax. There's only 1 place in the world that could have come from, Fort Detrick, the CIA lab.
So we went to war. We passed the Patriot Act and immediately started giving $2,000,000,000 a year to bioweapons development. The Pentagon didn't want to do it because it was nervous about the legality because it was a death penalty to violate the Geneva Convention. Oh, you would have been committing a, you know, a war crime even if somebody told you it was okay. It wasn't.
And so they funneled it through DITRA and DARPA. They funneled all of that money to NIH to NIAID, which became the primary spear tip of bioweapons development. So, Tony Fauci became the bioweapons czar in 2001. His budget went up by $2,200,000,000. He was personally given a 68% raise from the military.
That's why he was the highest paid individual in the federal government. Because he was getting about this 68% bonus every year from the military. But it meant that he could not stop. And the thing the military wanted was gain of function studies, where they could take wild viruses and turn them into bioweapons. And bioweapons development always includes vaccine development.
Because unlike chemical weapons, with bioweapons there's always blowback. It's called the boomerang effect. If you give your enemy bubonic plague, your guys are going to get it first, too. They're going to get it quickly. So the only way you can deploy a bioweapons is if you have already developed a vaccine.
So the race is to develop a vaccine simultaneously and then you can deploy the bioweapons and your enemy will take a couple of years to develop the vaccine. And you can inoculate all of your team. So in 2014, 3 of Tony Fauci's bugs escaped from federal labs. And their escapes were public. And it caused a huge Abruaha, there were senate hearings.
And people were immensely upset. And, and 300 scientists wrote letter wrote a petition to President Obama saying you have to shut down Tony Fauci. He's going to cause a global pandemic. And Obama declared a moratorium and told Fauci, ordered Fauci to shut down the 18 studies he was been doing. As I show in my book, he didn't do it.
He instead took that science And he moved it offshore to the Wuhan lab and to the Ukraine. And when he did that, he was not the only one who did it. Tony Fauci spent about $29,000,000 on gain of function science in Wuhan. I let the CIA spend over $100,000,000. And the military spent about that much too, about 64,000,000 And they, the CIA funneled the money, most of it through USAID.
But they also the CIA, as we now know, was also running this organization called the EcoHealth Alliance, which Fauci was funneling his money through. It was like a laundromat, where they funneled federal money so that it was so that their fingerprints would not be in the would not be visible on those studies. And, So, so that's important to understand now, just to get to the final thing in my book. And Tony Fallachy, if any of you end up reading the book. That last chapter is, talks about the, you know, the all of these, you know, these pandemic simulations.
I've been studying the CIA for much of my adult life. Because of my family's relationship, I wrote a book, which I, to me is my best book, American Values. And it is a story of my family's 60 year fist fight with the CIA, which began with my grandfather, Joseph Kennedy, who served on the Hoover Commission in 1955 and recommended the disbanding of the CIA's plans, the vision. It's, you know, it's the vision that was fixing elections and assassinating leaders and all of that. So the CIA never forgave my family for that.
And then when my uncle came in, you know, after the Bay of Pigs, he fired the top 3 officials, Bizzle and Goodell and and Alan Dulles, who then made himself the head of the Warren Commission 3 years later. And when my uncle died, he told a reporter, I'm glad the little shit is dead. He thought he was a god. And, So I, you know, I have I know a lot about the CIA. I've gotten their manuals.
I paid over a $1,000 get these manuals because, you you know, they're training manuals from MK Ultra. And MK stands for mind control, MK Naomi, MK Dietrich, it all came out of Fort Detrich and NIH. And then 150 colleges around our country where they were funding these studies. And if you look at what they do in these simulations, they're using all of these techniques that they developed in colleges in college laboratories, social scientists and other scientists, medical scientists for years who were studying how do you control individual behavior but also Mass Baby. How do you induce mass psychosis?
How do you create Manchurian candidates? You know, how do you do all these? And all these colleges studying these. And how do you, how do you impose centralized foreign control on indigenous populations. By coming into a country by using propaganda, by using fear, by sowing chaos, by destroying relationships, destroying faith in institutions, driving people apart and creating chaos so they will invite in an authority who will give them peace and safety.
And all of them, all of these mind control techniques are designed to accelerate that process. And they, you know, they study the Stockholm syndrome, for example. How do you, if you lock people, you know, down, they become grateful to their captors. And they become angry at the people who criticize their captors. And they believe that the only way that they can escape is confinement, is through total obedience and total compliance to, you know, to their to their jailers.
And, but, one of the most interesting experiments was called, the, Anyway, I'll think of it. It was, what Milgram Milgram. And it was a scientist, associate scientist at Yale, a sociologist called Stanley Milgram, who was a, who was part of the MK Ultra program. And he conducted this experiment where he recruited subjects from every Walk of American Life, there were students, there were professors, there were business people, there were blacks, whites, everybody from the New Haven area. And he would put the subject in a chair at a table where there was a dial in front of them that they could administer an electric shock to a person who is tied in the chair in the next room, who they told was tied in a chair, but he was actually a confederate of Milgram's.
He was an actor. And when they turn this dial up and administer the supposed electric shock, they could hear the man in the other room screaming, shouting, begging, struggling, bleeding with them, crying. And the thought that but and the most of the people who are participating in this experiment begged to stop. A lot of them were crying and telling the doctor. The doctor was standing behind them saying, turn it up, turn it down, turn it higher, turn it down, turn it even higher, turn it down.
And 67% of them turned it up to 2 50 volts where it was marked potentially fatal. 67%. You can go on Wikipedia and look the Milgram experiment. So, but 33% of the people got up and walked out. And what Milgram said that if you, for 67% of people, if you have an authority figure that has some imprimatur of legitimacy, like a doctor's title, that 67% of people will take his orders, even it means violating their most sacred values.
It'll go against everything they believe in. And to me, it occurred to me many times during that 2020 we were all involved in this huge Milgram experiment. And that Anthony Fauci was, you know, Doctor. Milgram telling us you can violate the constitution. You can censor speech.
You can close churches. You can shut businesses. You can ban jury trials. And you can, you know, tell people what they can and can't do. And you can gaslight them and marginalize them and vilify them.
And and, you know, no cruelty is too great for somebody who dissipates. And what I would say to you is that 33% of the people walked out. And the people in this room are the 33% who wouldn't be told what to do. And, you know, what our job is now is to fight for the 67% till they wake up until they're able to fight for themselves to restore the freedoms that all of us believe in. And I'll leave you with three thoughts.
1 is that any power that government takes from the people, it will never return voluntarily. Number 2 rule. Every power the government takes, it will ultimately abuse to the ultimate to the maximum extent possible. And number 3, nobody ever complied their way out of totalitarianism. The only thing we could do is resist.
Thank you all very much.
Speaker 1: I just saw this from Wall Street Silver, and it's got 4,700,000 views. So let's just start there. It says, His days are numbered, referencing me. They will make it look like an accident. He is likely correct.
The CIA does this, and it is used for blackmailing their assets in high places to keep them in line. Hollywood actor Jim Caviezel says CIA operates world's biggest pedophile ring. Well, let me explain something to All of you in the world that think that I'm a little girl and I'm afraid of you. I'm not scared in in the least bit. I gave God brought me into Hollywood to become an actor.
He asked me to do that. He was my intel officer, the greatest God, the only God, and he loved me enough to give me a purpose in my life because I was the lowest of the low at that time. And I would gladly trade my life to save these little ones because the screaming that I heard was so horrific. I can't sleep at night. At 3 in the morning, for whatever reason, I can hear it.
Speaker 2: It is the fastest growing international crime network that the world has ever seen. I'd it has already passed the illegal arms trade, and soon it's gonna pass the truck trade. Think you can sell a bag of coke cake one time to the child I'd 5 to 10 times a day. God's children are not for sale.
Speaker 0: How long even knew
Speaker 2: this. Paul hears now. How many pedophiles you got? 288. How many kids
Speaker 0: I I'd For homeland you know we can't go off rescuing Honduran kids in Colombia.
Speaker 2: Janice will disappear
Speaker 0: for good.
Speaker 2: I'm actually walking into her room right now I Stay in that seat there. What we do. You quit your job, and you go and rescue those kids. So this I She could be a block down the road or she could be in Moscow, Bangkok, LA. She's an agent operator.
There, it's all regulatory. No one goes in. On the army, on the police, no threats. When is this with you or daughter? There's no marine unit coming.
I It's still tears you to pieces. And that's just not a windshield. I that's again. God tells you what to do.
@mommaleo - Jenny
𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙉𝙪𝙣𝙣-𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙖𝙧 𝘾𝙤𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙏𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩 𝙍𝙚𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙢 : Biolabs in Ukraine The high-risk lab was the first built of a series planned under the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program: “The 𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥-𝟑 𝐛𝐢𝐨-𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐲 𝐥𝐚𝐛, which is the first built under the expanded authority of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program, 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙚 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙖𝙭, 𝙩𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙖 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙌 𝙛𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙖𝙨 𝙬𝙚𝙡𝙡 𝙖𝙨 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙙𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙥𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙨.” “Lugar said plans for the facility began 𝐢𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟓 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐁𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐎𝐛𝐚𝐦𝐚 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐔𝐤𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬. Lugar and Obama also helped coordinate efforts between the U.S and Ukrainian researchers that year in an effort to study and help prevent avian flu.“
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude to Secretary Pineda and acknowledges the outstanding work of Secretary of Defense Leon. The speaker then discusses the 20th anniversary of the Nunn Lugar program and thanks the individuals involved in its conception and implementation. The speaker acknowledges the leadership of Ash Carter and praises the visionaries Sam Nunn and Dick Lugar for their work in promoting cooperation and nuclear disarmament. The speaker also expresses gratitude to Nunn and Lugar for their guidance and shares personal experiences with them. The speaker emphasizes the importance of public service and bipartisanship in addressing national and global challenges. The speaker highlights the success of the Nunn Lugar program in securing nuclear materials and preventing the spread of deadly weapons. The speaker reaffirms the commitment to preventing nuclear terrorism and the need for continued investment in threat reduction programs. The speaker calls for sustained partnerships and collaboration, including with Russia, to ensure global security. The speaker concludes by sharing a story from a trip with Dick Lugar and emphasizing the importance of dismantling weapons for a safer future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon, everybody. It is wonderful to be back. Secretary Pineda, thank you for the introduction. Last week at the White House, we had our 1st Cabinet meeting since the election, and it was a chance for me to thank my entire team for their service, for keeping our country safe and strong these past 4 years. And, Leon, few have done more than you in that regard.
And that includes taking care of our remarkable men and women in uniform and their families, and keeping our military the absolute best in the world, bar none. So thank you, Leon, for being such an outstanding Secretary of Defense. We're very grateful. Now, I am not here to give a big speech. I wanted to just come by and join you in marking the 20th anniversary of one of the country's smartest and most successful National security programs none luger.
And I want to express my gratitude to all of you from government, academia, NGOs, and our partners around the world. People in this room conceived it. You built it. You've sustained it. And of course, I especially want to acknowledge a leader who helped create it and who now helps guide it as our outstanding Deputy Secretary of Defense, Ash Carter.
So thank you, Ash, for your great work. Of course, no one has done more than the 2 visionaries on this stage. You have to think about what real visionaries do. They look at the world and they see what's missing. So they set out to fill the gap, to build something new.
And that's what Sam Nunn and Dick Lugar did many years ago. They challenged us to think anew, to imagine, after decades of confrontation, how our nations My Engage in Cooperation: Early in the Cold War, Einstein warned of the danger of our wisdom not keeping pace with our technology. And with Nunn Lugar, our wisdom began to catch up. I also wanted to be here because of my own personal debt to these 2 leaders. When I was elected to the Senate, Sam Nunn was one of the first leaders I called.
Obviously, he had an extraordinary reputation for his work on a whole range of issues in the Senate. And, Sam, by the way, I should I always meant to say thanks for taking my call. So we do small talk. He congratulates me on being elected. And Then he says, I got 2 pieces of advice for you.
1st piece of advice, get a seat on the Foreign Relations Committee. I did that. 2nd piece of advice learn from Dick Lugar. I did that, too. So I took Sam's advice then, and as President, I continue to value his advice and his counsel.
Sam, as one of the so called Four Horsemen, which I'd say is a pretty ominous nickname, has spoken out for a world without nuclear weapons. And with your Nuclear Threat Initiative you helped us ratify the New START Treaty, rally the world to secure nuclear materials, Strengthen the Global Non Proliferation Regime and Create an International Fuel Bank for Peaceful Nuclear Power. Sam, that's an extraordinary legacy and an extraordinary record. Thank you for your partnership and your leadership. And because I took Sam's advice, I came to know and admire Dick Lugar.
I was a new junior senator, but, nevertheless, he was willing to take me in and Served in many cases, particularly on the issues that we're celebrating here today, took me in as a pupil for him. I watched And I learned. And when we worked together to pass a law to speed up the lockdown of nuclear materials, Obviously, it was called Blue Girl Obama in that order. And, Dick, I want to Take this opportunity to say something else. At times, we've disagreed on matters of policy, but one thing we've always shared is a notion of what public service should be, that it ought to be more than just doing what's popular in the moment, that it ought to be about what's right for our nation over the long term.
It ought to be about Problem solving and governance, not just how we can score political points on each other or engage in obstructionism. And Where compromise is not a vice and where bipartisanship is actually considered a virtue to be rewarded, not punished That's the essence of these 2 gentlemen, and that's the essence of nunn Lugar. That's the spirit that's defined Dick's public service for nearly 50 years, And that's the bipartisan tradition that we need more of here in Washington, especially on foreign policy. So, Dick, as you prepare to leave the Senate that you love, I think I speak on behalf of everybody here and millions of people across the country to say that your legacy will endure in a safer and more secure world, and a safer and more secure America. And we pray that this nation produces more leaders with your sense of decency and civility and integrity, we are grateful to you.
Thank you very much. Now, I will point out it was Dick who took me on my first Foreign trip, as a senator to Russia and Ukraine and Azerbaijan, we were there to see the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program in action. And the first thing I learned is that when Dick Lugar travels overseas, it's not a junket. We didn't stop and look at a lot of beautiful sites and sort of lounge around on Some shopping excursions. He wore out every 25 year old staffer that was part of this part of this delegation.
What you also learned is that, Dick Lugar the more remote the place is and the more obscure the facility is, The bigger a rock star Dick Lugar is. They love him in these places. I remember walking through 1 facility, I started leaning in for a closer look, and one of the workers said, Don't touch that orange stuff. This turned out to be TNT. At another point, the workers were taking apart munitions gloves on their hands, masks over their faces.
And I'm thinking, wait a second, why don't we have masks on? This is the kind of trip you take with Dick Lugar. We're traipsing through nuclear weapon storage sites, and junkyards full Old land mines and technicians showing off test tubes. You ask, well, what's that? Well, that's anthrax, that's plague.
Shouldn't you keep it in something a little more sturdy than this? Dick Lugar is standing in the back of the room. I remember I asked him, Dick, have you seen it? He said, yes, I've seen it. I don't get too close now.
That's what it's like traveling with Dick Lugar. And I had been a strong advocate for CTR before, but visiting those facilities, Seeing the work that so many of you do, seeing these old weapons once aimed at us now being turned into scrap truly brought home how important this work was. This is one of our most important national security programs, and it's a perfect example of the kind of partnerships that we need working together to meet challenges that no nation can address on its own. And so Nunn Lugar is the foundation for the vision that I laid out Once I was elected President and traveled to Prague, where nations come together to secure nuclear materials, as we're doing now with our nuclear security summits, where we build on New START and continue to work to reduce our arsenals, where we strengthen the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty and prevent the spread of the world's most deadly weapons, and where over time we come closer to our ultimate vision a world without nuclear weapons. That's why we haven't just sustained programs like Nunn Lugar over the past 4 years, we've worked with all of you to strengthen it, expanding it to some 80 nations far beyond the old Soviet Union moving ahead with the destruction of chemical weapons partnering with others countries from Africa to Asia, and global health organizations to prevent the spread of deadly diseases and bioterrorism.
And I have to give a shout out to somebody who was on the original team with Ash that conceived of CTR. She's been working it ever since, and now leads our effort at the White House. Laura Holgate is here, and so we're very proud of her for the outstanding work that she's done. And we've worked to keep weapons from spreading, whether it was nuclear material in Libya, or now chemical weapons in Syria. And on Syria, let me just say this: We will continue to support the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people engaging with the opposition, providing them with the humanitarian aid, and working for a transition to a Syria that's free of the Assad regime.
And today, I want to make it absolutely clear to Assad and those under his command The world is watching. The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable. And if you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable. We simply cannot allow the 21st century to be darkened by the worst weapons of the 20th century. And that's why over the past 4 years, we've continued to make critical investments in our threat reduction programs, not just at DOD, but at energy and at state.
In fact, we've been increasing funding and sustaining it. And even as we make some very tough fiscal choices, we're We're going to keep investing in these programs because our national security depends on it. After all, even with all your success, The thousands of missiles destroyed, bombers and submarines eliminated, the warheads that have been deactivated, we're nowhere near done, not by a long shot. And you all know this: There's still much too much material nuclear, chemical, biological being stored Without enough protection, there's still terrorists and criminal gangs doing everything they can to get their hands on it. And make no mistake: If they get it, they will use it, potentially killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people, perhaps triggering a global crisis.
That's why I continue to believe that nuclear terrorism remains one of the greatest threats to global security. That's why working to prevent nuclear terrorism is going to remain one of my top national security priorities as long as I have the privilege of being President of the United States. So I came here in part to say We cannot let our guard down. This needs to be a sustained effort across all your organizations, across our government. We have to keep investing in our people and in new technologies.
We have to sustain the partnerships we have, and that includes Russia. We're joined by some of our Russian friends here today. Russia has said that our current agreement hasn't kept pace with the changing relationship between our countries to which we say, Let's update it. Let's work with Russia as an equal partner. Let's continue the work that's so important to the security of both our countries.
And I'm optimistic that we can. We have to keep creating new partnerships. We have to make sure to paraphrase Einstein that our wisdom stays ahead of our technology. And I know you're committed to this. And I want you to know that I am, too.
So let me leave you with a story of that first trip Dick and I took together. You may remember this, Dick. I was in Ukraine. We went to a facility, an old factory. We walked down these long, dark corridors.
We're ducking our heads, stepping over puddles of something. We're not sure what it was. Finally, we came across some women sitting at a worktable. On it were piles of old artillery shells, and the women were sitting there taking them apart by hand, slowly, carefully, 1 by 1. It took decades and extraordinary sums of money to build those all arsenals.
And it's gonna take decades and continued investments to dismantle them. The 2 of you know this better than anybody. It's painstaking work. It rarely makes headlines. But I want each of you to know, and everybody who is participating in this important effort to know that the work you do is absolutely vital to our national security into our global security.
Missile by missile, warhead by warhead, shell by shell, We're putting a bygone era behind us. Inspired by Sam Nunn and Dick Lugar, we're moving closer to the future that we seek a future where these weapons never threaten our children again a future where we know the security and peace of a world without nuclear weapons. I could not be prouder of these gentlemen. I'm proud to call them friends. And I'm looking forward to continuing to work with them and all of you in the years to come.
Thank you very much.
@mommaleo - Jenny
☣️🅽🆄🅽🅽-🅻🆄🅶🅰🆁 🆁🅴🅿🅾🆁🆃☣️ The signing came as Lugar and Obama visited the Kiev Central Sanitary and Epidemiological Station, one of the facilities that will be covered under the agreement. The Station maintains a pathogen collection and conducts work on many highly dangerous infections reported in Ukraine. These include pathogens causing diseases such as: Anthrax, Tularemia, Brucellosis, Listeriosis, Diphtheria, Cholera, Typhoid, and others. SOUNDS LIKE A BIOLAB TO ME.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey 🪺🅼🅾🅲🅺🅸🅽🅶🅱🅸🆁🅳 🅼🅴🅳🅸🅰🪺 QANON! RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA QANON! The media went hard denying and twisted definitions, following in the footsteps of FAUCI when he denied gain-of-function. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/09/media/biolab-ukraine-russia-qanon-false-conspiracy-theory/index.html #CNNsux
Video Transcript AI Summary
Russian state media has been circulating a false story since 2015, claiming that America is running facilities in Ukraine and Georgia that caused deadly disease outbreaks. These claims were debunked in 2020, with the United States clarifying that the facilities are for vaccine development and reporting outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens. However, the story resurfaced recently, with the Russian foreign ministry and social media platforms sharing it widely. It has even gained attention in the United States, with figures like conspiracy theorist Stu Peters and platforms like Infowars promoting it. Russia's false narrative on American biolabs in Ukraine continues to spread.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The foreboding music, biohazard warnings. This Russian state media footage from twenty fifteen claims to show America running facilities in Ukraine and Georgia that caused deadly outbreaks of disease and killed local livestock. This story is false, but that has not stopped it continuing to circulate, evolving from biological hazards to biological weapons And becoming a key part of Russia's disinformation campaign, justifying the invasion of Ukraine. The claims were debunked several years ago when in twenty twenty, the United States issued a statement to, quote, set the record straight, explaining the facilities are in fact for vaccine development and to report outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens before they pose security or stability threats. But this week, the story was back.
Speaker 1: We are confirming the facts that were unveiled during the special military operation in Ukraine That indicates an emergency cleanup of military biological programs by the Kyiv regime. They were carried out by Kyiv and financed by the United States of America.
Speaker 0: Multiple times the Russian foreign ministry has resurfaced the debunked story. On Tuesday, it was mentioned by a Russian ally.
Speaker 2: It is reported that those biolabs store large number of dangerous viruses. During Russia's military operation, it was found that the US is using those facilities To conduct biological militarization activities.
Speaker 0: So alongside these official statements, it's being repeatedly shared across social media from Facebook to Twitter to Telegram, and CNN's been tracking its spread. And you can see here it's being posted in Canada, Australia, Germany and this tweet as one example, you can see it's being retweeted over 500 times already. The theory has now attracted the attention of figures and platforms with significant followings in the United States.
Speaker 2: Go into Ukraine and take out the biolabs.
Speaker 0: Such as the conspiracy theorist Stu Peters and has been featured on the far right platform Infowars.
Speaker 2: US bioweapons labs in Ukraine.
Speaker 0: And so Russia's false narrative on American biolabs in Ukraine continues to spread. Katie Pogles, CNN,
Analysis: Russia and QAnon have the same false conspiracy theory about Ukraine | CNN Business
A new conspiracy theory has become popular among some of the online communities that formed around QAnon – one simultaneously being promoted by the Kremlin as a justification for its invasion of Ukraine. The false claim: the United States is developing bioweapons in Ukraine and Vladimir Putin has stepped in to save the day and destroy the weapons.
cnn.com
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey 𝙊𝙊𝙋𝙎 𝙄 𝙂𝙐𝙀𝙎𝙎 𝙔𝙊𝙐 𝙒𝙀𝙍𝙀 𝙍𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 So it wasn’t QAnon? (are you seeing a pattern yet?) Victoria Nuland: Ukraine Has "Biological Research Facilities," Worried Russia May Seize Them
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine has biological research facilities that they are concerned Russian forces may try to gain control of. They are working with Ukraine to prevent any research materials from falling into Russian hands. Russian propaganda groups are spreading information about a Ukrainian plot to release biological weapons, but there is no doubt in the speaker's mind that if there is an incident or attack, it would be the Russians behind it. The speaker believes it is a classic Russian technique to blame others for what they plan to do themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I only have a minute left. Let me ask you, does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?
Speaker 1: Ukraine has, biological research facilities, Which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to, gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those Research materials from falling into the hands of, Russian forces should they approach
Speaker 0: I'm sure you are aware that the Russian propaganda The groups are already putting out there all kinds of information about how they've uncovered a plot by the Ukrainians to release biological weapons in the country and with NATO's coordination. If there is a biological or chemical weapon incident or, or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that 100% it would be the Russians that would be behind it?
Speaker 1: There is no doubt in my mind, senator, and it is classic Russian, technique to blame on the other guy what they're planning to do themselves.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Forbes suppressed safety and truth by stating that “Former presidential candidate and Congress member Tulsi Gabbard shared false information Sunday about U.S. involvement in Ukraine biological laboratories Sunday, giving credence to an unfounded Russian-backed conspiracy theory the U.S. has warned could serve as justification for Russia to use biological and chemical weapons against Ukraine.” 🤔Will the ever set the record straight?
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 25 to 30 U.S. funded biolabs in Ukraine conducting research on dangerous pathogens. These labs could easily be compromised due to the ongoing war in the region, potentially releasing deadly pathogens that could spread worldwide. To protect people, these labs should be shut down immediately and the pathogens destroyed. The Biden Harris administration should collaborate with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, and the UN to implement a ceasefire in the vicinity of these labs. Additionally, the U.S. funds around 300 biolabs worldwide, engaging in risky research similar to the Wuhan lab. These labs should have been closed two years ago. It is crucial for the administration and Congress to take action for the well-being of everyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The undeniable facts. There are 25 to 30 U. S. Funded biolabs in Ukraine. According to the U.
S. Government, these biolabs are conducting research on dangerous pathogens. Ukraine is in an active war zone with widespread bombing, artillery, and shelling, and these facilities, even in the best of circumstances, could easily be compromised and release these deadly pathogens. Now like COVID, these pathogens know no borders. If they are inadvertently or purposely breached or compromised, they will quickly spread all throughout Europe, the United States, and the rest of the world, causing untold suffering and death.
So in order to protect the American people, the people of Europe, the people around the world, these labs need to be shut down immediately, and the pathogens that they hold need to be destroyed. Instead of trying to cover this up, the Biden Harris administration needs to work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, the UN to immediately implement a ceasefire for all military action in the vicinity of these labs until they're secured and these pathogens are destroyed. Now in addition to all this, the US funds around 300 biolabs around the world who are engaging in dangerous research, including gain of function, similar to the lab in Wuhan where COVID nineteen may have originated from. Now, after realizing how dangerous and vulnerable these labs are, they should have all been shut down 2 years ago, but they haven't. Now this is not a partisan political issue.
The administration and Congress need to act now for the health and well-being of every American and every person on this planet.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes 𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐋 Russian Defense Ministry: investigating 240 disease causing pathogens discovered in US-sponsored biolabs in Ukraine including anthrax and cholera. Pathogens are studied and developed with intent of use for "offensive actions."
Video Transcript AI Summary
240 different substances of various types have been discovered and are being researched. Most of them are related to the treatment of certain diseases. It is believed that these substances can enhance functions not only in Ukraine but also in other countries. For example, a university in Ukraine continues to collaborate with other countries in this field.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Были обнаружены порядка 240 различных б могут су субстанция различного плана мы их и и продолжаем исследовать большая часть из них касается си болезни значит х у нас нет сомнений сомнения, что они работают над усиление функций не только на территории Украины больше не работать на территории штатах потому технологии это точно такие свое ну например бо университет когда-то с ним тоже сот Украины продолжает сотрудничать именно по этому направлению
@mommaleo - Jenny
✈️Now let’s move over to China and chat about “The Godfather of Nano-tech” with a 30 year career at one of our most prestigious Ivy League schools, HARVARD. 😉He helped build a lab in Wuhan for the CCP. 🤯Unbeknownst to Harvard University beginning in 2011, Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017.
@mommaleo - Jenny
🧵Thread🧵BioWarfare+Wuhan Harvard+Leiber Klaus+Yuval+Biotech #Nanotech #Biotech #Globalist https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2011/01/virus-sized-transistors
Charles Lieber's nanoscale transistors can enter cells without harming them | Harvard Magazine
Chemist Charles Lieber and his colleagues have developed a nanoscale transistor so small it can enter, probe, and communicate with cells without harming them.
harvardmagazine.com
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes I didn’t forget 𝙈𝙀𝙏𝘼𝘽𝙄𝙊𝙏𝘼
@mommaleo - Jenny
Hunter responsible for bio lab: Metabiota has worked in Ukraine for Black & Veatch, a US defence contractor with deep ties to military intelligence agencies, which built secure labs in Ukraine that worked on killer diseases and bioweapons, said Russia. https://www.opindia.com/2022/03/baraka-obama-spearheaded-bio-weapon-lab-in-ukraine-hunter-biden-secured-funding-reports/
Hunter Biden, Obama facilitated setting up Ukraine bioweapon lab: Reports
Russia said that US President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden and his investment fund Rosemont Seneca financed the Pentagon's bio-weapon programme in Ukraine | OpIndia News
opindia.com
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes @MarcoPolo501c3 and @KimDotcom
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker explains that Hunter Biden helped a company called Metabiota get federal contracts in Ukraine because his firm, Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners, had an ownership share in Metabiota. The speaker clarifies that Hunter Biden is not the mastermind behind the operation but rather relied on his partner to draft emails and make decisions. The speaker also mentions that the ownership of Metabiota has changed names and is now called Pilot Growth Equity. The speaker concludes by stating that Hunter's main business partner still owns a significant share of the company.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very good question. So we mentioned this briefly in the report because, again, the public reporting out there, from Jack Maxey and others who are, in my opinion, patriotic people, the reporting has been quite sloppy, and this is what we can surmise from the laptop. Again, I'm not saying that if another laptop, let's say, the one that the Russian drug dealers, according according to Hunter himself, stole in the summer of 2018. If that one's, surfaces, and there's a bunch of shit on Metabiot on that, you know, then that's that. But the one that we have, It's very simple.
Hunter helped Metabiota get contracts in Ukraine. And the reason why he did was because his firm, at that time, called Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners had an ownership share in Metabiota. And so, if anybody, if your liberal friend asks you, What was Hunter Biden's involvement? He, it's very simple. He helped MetaBio to get Federal contracts.
So, if you, if you read any Hunter Biden's correspondence. You know that he is not the guy they bring in to plan all this shit. He's just not sharp enough. But what he does have is the famous daddy, who, and he can send emails. In fact, a lot of the emails his, his partner Eric Schwaren would draft, and he would mark, you know, he would say yes or no to.
Meaning, Hunter, Hunter didn't even want to put in the mental effort to draft the email. He'd tell his partner, hey, draft this email, and, and see if, and I'll see if I approve of it. So, what Hunter Biden did very specifically was help Metabio to get Federal contracts through a prime contractor called Black and Veatch in Ukraine. And, the reason why we can say this for sure, is because of, and this has been published, the correspondence between Meta Biota And Hunter Biden, and Baden Pizarski of Burisma saying, Hey, there's a lot of opportunities for Metabiota here in Ukraine. And so, we don't allege that Hunter Biden was there, or you know, in his damn white, white, doctor suit, you know, measuring stuff in a biolab, but we can for sure say that he was involved in Metabiota, which is a, you know, plant pandemic, we call it plandemic.
The plandemic tracking company, that to this day, Hunter Biden's main business partner owner has a huge ownership share. And even larger than Hunter Biden's ownership share, there's a guy who lives in Little Rock, on Country Club Lane named Rob Acker. And they renamed This is what they do, they rename the firms once corruption services. So once evidence of corruption services, they change the names. And Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners, which has the ownership share of NetaBiota, is now called Pilot Growth Equity.
Everybody can go look it up. And it's in our report, and Rob Walker STILL owns a large portion of it, and there, the evaluation of that company has appreciated significantly since the Start of the Plandemic. And so, we know that there's one degree of separate there's there's not even one degree of separation in in many things, but in the laptop. But we can for sure say that Hunter helped them get contracts, and that Hunter's main business partner still owns a huge share of it. I can't for sure say that Hunter still owns a share of Pilot Growth Equity, but I can for sure say that, his business partner did
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes @MarcoPolo501c3
@mommaleo - Jenny
@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes @MarcoPolo501c3 The dynamic duo 💚 Fauci and his wife
@mommaleo - Jenny
★ 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐊 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐝; 𝐢𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐒𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐬 𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝟓𝟖 𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐬. 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐋𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐋𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 🦠𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐈𝐃-𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐂𝐄𝐒 𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐄𝐓! 👏𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐒! 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐑𝐢𝐱𝐞𝐲 𝐌𝐀 𝐌𝐁𝐀 (𝐂)! SARS-CoV-2 Origins Research Reference Project - 202304223 July 2021 DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.12600.47367/6 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353547700_SARS-CoV-2_Origins_Research_Reference_Project_-_202304223
ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable
researchgate.net
@mommaleo - Jenny
𝙂𝘼𝙄𝙉 𝙊𝙁 𝙁𝙐𝙉𝘾𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 ‘For those unfamiliar with gain-of-function research, it essentially means juicing up naturally occurring animal viruses in a lab to make them more infectious among humans. This practice is nothing new. Scientists in the United States have long known how to mutate animal viruses to infect humans.
@mommaleo - Jenny
@CharlesRixey has listed how the virus or the response to the virus shows evidence of all 7 categories of gain of function experiments: https://t.co/b78BgwbVoN
reSee.it AI Summary
Witnessed an unexpected encounter where ShittingDucks hilariously confronted VltraMK and DakotaSidwell XSpace, dropping mind-blowing conspiracy theories about the Clintons. Can't stop laughing! Follow ShittingDucks for more mind-blowing antics and crazy conspiracies. #ConspiracyComedy #MenInBlack #Parody
@mommaleo - Jenny, BSN RN, LMT
Just witnessed the most unexpected thing! Someone (@ShittingDucks) went full Karl from Sling Blade on a HILARIOUS parody account in @Vltra_MK and @DakotaSidwell XSpace, dropping conspiracy theories that left my mind blown! Unveiling shocking facts about the Clintons and more! Can’t stop laughing and mind racing. @LilMagatron and @rvalen81 you have to get a hold of this guy! FOLLOW @ShittingDucks now for more mind-blowing antics and crazy conspiracies! #ShittingDucks #ConspiracyComedy #MenInBlack #Parody
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss various conspiracy theories, including the JFK assassination, 9/11, and the Clintons' involvement in nefarious activities. They mention the leaked files about pedophilia and the suspicious circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. They also touch on the role of JPMorgan, Ericsson, and the Space Force. The conversation covers topics like censorship, hidden information, and the side effects of vaccines. They express distrust in Anthony Fauci and discuss the genetic sequencing of the universe. The speakers end on a lighthearted note, joking about christening a child for a large sum of money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hell, yeah. I agree with that a 100%. Let's clear these Nancy sauce, and then we'll get into a nice little place soon.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's, man.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Hello. My name is Carl. My brother, Clem, got on got on the microphone the other night. He was talking about aliens and such.
I just want to say I don't believe any of that crap, but I saw that here in States JFK files mentioning Mentioning about what happened with Trump. And he said he gonna he wanna declassify all that. I just don't understand How it is that if the Warren Commission was right about everything it is that they were saying, then why don't they just release all the damn files? To me, it don't make no sense. It's very strange and it's indicative of nefarious activity within their their government.
Think there's lots of people still alive that had something to do with that their assassination. And we talk about things like 911. We talk about things like, wake up Texas and and the the Sandy Hook and and And all the the the Vegas shooting and such. And it's it says a lot about the fact they they ain't telling us the truth.
Speaker 0: What what do you know of the assassination, mister Menin Black? What what it what are your thoughts?
Speaker 2: Well, you see, I heard that there was more than 1 bullet from more than one angle, but I think all you have to do is walk that there footage. You can see it big as a horse's ass. It's right They're in front of everybody. They tried to make an example out of that jared JFK because he didn't wanna play ball. So they shot him in broad daylight.
They shot him on live television, scaring buddy in in that there Washington DC. Play ball, they're gonna die. That's what I think. And if you look into the footage of the driver, And some people are saying the driver is the one that shot him in the head.
Speaker 0: How it's not possible that 1 man fired all those bullets. They won't tell you that. Right? But but you start to find out how many people that 1 man is connected to. Did you know he's actually a related direct descendant Of Roosevelt.
Speaker 2: It's all these families. They've been they've been screwing each other like they out from the backwoods of Arkansas or something. I just don't understand that these people are crazy. Like, yeah, like, damn, they're putting out there trafficking the drugs through the great state of Arkansas during the Iran Contra Candle. They're behind all of it.
How is it that 1 person has 56 friends that decide to commit suicide? That don't make no sense. Yeah. That woman, she's a demon. I tell you what.
She's a demon. I don't I don't trust her one bit. I think She even had JFK Junior killed because he was threatening her seat in there in New York City.
Speaker 0: What what are your thoughts on the Clintons and Easter gates.
Speaker 2: Oh, they're they're involved somehow or some way. That them their files that got leaked onto that website. That is very telling, you see. All you gotta do is come through them. You find all sorts of code that these pedophiles use.
The FBI I done admitted it themselves. They said that the words pizza and hot dog and and sauce and handkerchief, If all these things, they've they pedicle for some crazy or something or nothing, I don't even you read the emails with that context, And I tell you, it makes you sick to your stomach. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Did Jeffrey Epstein kill himself?
Speaker 2: Well, I think that's, that's just a ridiculous notion. If all you gotta do is look into the fact that the the tape recordings was cut off during that time, the the guards were falling asleep during his suicide watch. And the fact of the matter is the man worked for and CIA. Hey. And all you gotta do is just ask yourself.
Does the man that they said, well, Jeffrey Epstein on the slab look anything like Jeffrey Epstein alive, and I say no.
Speaker 1: Man, now let me tell you. How where's JPMorgan at in this?
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. They were trafficking that money right there through that bank, and all they had to do was place some pay some $200,000,000 or something to all them victims. That's all they had. They got a snap on the wrist is what they got.
Speaker 0: What what what if what if this this little company called Ericsson connects all of these dots And actually explains why Donald Trump launched the Space Force. What are your thoughts on the timing of Epstein's death and the fact fact that right right after that is when Ericsson took over. I don't know if you're familiar with Ericsson, but pretty important telecommunications company. Are you familiar with him?
Speaker 2: My brother told me all about what you were saying on these here spaces, and I think that it's it's very clear that there's something else going on your country. Now I I heard that that Maui fire that there's a Space Force base over there on that their island, And that they were trying to destroy that Space Force base, but the thing is my brother told me that all that stuff is in the cloud something or other. You said it's all on the Internet and that that they can try and destroy bases all day like, but it ain't gonna change the fact We have it all.
Speaker 0: Yes, sir. We were just talking about that. They're actually in the form of, of yeah. Under under Space Force. But, I I love I love everything you're saying, and I'm and I'm, definitely vibing with it.
Speaker 2: Well, I just wanted to say I Appreciate everyone in this airspace, and I appreciate all what you do. And it takes a lot of courage to stand up to these behemoths, these These evil machines that they got out there and all the censorship. And if if it wasn't true, why do they need to hide it? But what it true? Why they trying to censor it?
They've been doing it for a long time. And this term, conspiracy theories. That That done came after JFK got himself assassinated. Yes, sir. And I think that that term has been used far too liberally throughout the time I'm from JFK to now, and and it's starting to lose its health.
They just had this here shooting where they said that it was a a Nazi guy who shot people Because they was black, and and they released all his mementos and all his gun, and they released his manifesto. So but that their transgender that shot up that in school, they still haven't released any of that.
Speaker 1: I I tweeted that just just out. Where's the Transifesto?
Speaker 2: No. I heard that that that they released a bunch of them files from Pfizer The other day and they had 9 pages of side effects that they didn't tell anybody about. Do y'all hear about that?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir. How could they do that? How could They do that, mister men in black. Would wouldn't that only be possible if they're a corporation acting as an agency?
Speaker 2: The whole thing is fishy if you ask That's me. And I tell you right now, that there Anthony Fauci deserves to be behind bars.
Speaker 0: Not just behind bars. Right? Probably, 6 feet under with with,
Speaker 2: He doesn't deserve that. He deserved to live with what he done to the people.
Speaker 0: Yes. Buried alive. Correct. Correct.
Speaker 2: He deserved to live what he done to the people. God will take care of the rest of it, I tell you.
Speaker 0: Didn't he or didn't he Disrupt the AIDS. What was this? Not the the pet pandemic. Something to do with the vaccine he interfered with. Something
Speaker 2: Yeah. He was responsible for releasing that there is virus on the people. It's genetically engineered virus. I'm telling you right now. I've done the research.
Mhmm. Look into doctor Sebi. Doctor Sebi is curing stuff too, and then they threw him in the can. He died in prison. That's s e b I, doctor He's a black man.
He he know what he doing. I'll tell you.
Speaker 0: Your genetic sequencing is as is as far back, dates 13,800,000,000 years. Guess what else dates that far back?
Speaker 2: It's the birth of the universe. The birth of the universe. The 13 somewhat 1000,000,000,000 years ago.
Speaker 0: 8,000,000,000. Is that is that a coincidence? To, men in black, and now we're on to the universe and quantum. Here we are. We have arrived.
And that's
Speaker 1: why it's so crazy because, like, it seems like something out of a a a crazy movie. Like, if you saw a movie of this, you'd be like, wow. This is one of the best movies I've
Speaker 2: I know. Right? The truth the truth is stranger than fictions, sir. I tell you right now.
Speaker 1: True. Yeah. Very true, sir. There's a lot of propaganda.
Speaker 2: Well, just real quick, I gotta go to bed. I just wanna say thank you for giving me the mic. I love you all, and y'all have a good night. Do say
Speaker 0: Love you too, man. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I love you brother. Have a good one, man.
Speaker 0: Everybody follow men in black. He's, honestly, one of our one of our best, one of our best Teamsters that pops in and out gives us amazing knowledge and, just a good overall If you would have said
Speaker 1: the words blade one time, I would have actually probably shit my van.
Speaker 0: Hell, yeah.
Speaker 1: You're a funny guy. That's it. Hey. Hey. You wanna laugh?
This prick last week asked me to christen his kid. Yeah. I'm like for 7,000