TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @myhiddenvalue
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Jeffery Epstein’s butler was caught in an FBI sting in 2009 trying to sell the client & victim list. He told them the entire operation, 17 years ago. And the FBI did NOTHING. https://t.co/VPfw5DULaj
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 asks, “Who created this book?”
Speaker 0 explains that it’s there because he’s also his computer, but it “just gives it power of failure.” He then references Eastern countries in Europe and finding girls there, saying he knew that because he went with his wife. He states they used to have a computer so powerful, and they used to have a waterfront vehicle to call the computer, because they downloaded pictures that fast.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You told me to. Come on in. How are you?
Speaker 1: Good. Good. Good. Yeah. The, documents.
Who created this book?
Speaker 0: It's, I have it there because I'm also my computer, but just gives it power of failure. East Eastern countries in Europe and find girls where it's and I knew that because I went with my wife. They used to have a computer so powerful. They used to have a waterfront vehicle to call the computer because they used to download pictures like that so fast.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Can you believe the banks have been getting away with this? https://t.co/GfSYaQRXPg
Video Transcript AI Summary
A man questions a judge about how banks supposedly operate with borrowed funds. He presents a scenario: “I gave you the equivalent of $200,000. You returned the funds back to me, and I have to repay you $200,000 plus interest. Do you think I’m stupid?” He asserts that banks and Congress allow practices where banks breach written agreements, use false or misleading advertising, act without written permission or the borrower’s knowledge, and transfer actual cash value from the borrower to the bank, then return it as a loan. The man asks if, in this system, the borrower’s actual cash value funds the bank loan check and how the bank then uses those funds.
The other participant, identified as a borrower in the discussion, responds that the borrower “got a check in the house.” The man pushes: is it true the actual cash value funding the loan check came directly from the borrower and that the bank received the funds from the borrower “for free”? He states, “No equal consideration. They got it from you for free,” and presses that the bank’s policy is to transfer the borrower’s cash value from the check to themselves and keep the money as the bank’s property, which they then loan out back to the borrower as if they own it and loan their own money. The other participant answers affirmatively, though notes not being present at the time to know the borrower’s intent.
The man asks further: if a lender loans a borrower $10,000 and the borrower refuses to repay, is the lender damaged? The reply: yes, the lender is damaged if the loan isn’t repaid. He asks whether the bank’s practice is to take the borrower’s actual cash value, use it to fund the bank loan check, and never return it to the borrower. The response: the bank returns the funds, but as a loan to the borrower. The man clarifies: was the cash value returned as the bank loan to the borrower or as return of the money the bank took? Answer: as a loan.
The man concludes, “So how did the bank get the borrower’s money for free? … It doesn’t make any sense.” A narrator then frames the scene: a man discussing banking with a judge, summarizing the exchange about funding checks with the borrower’s name, and the judge’s reaction that “all the banks are doing this” and that Congress allows it. The narrator describes the process in which you apply for a loan, a check with your name is issued, the bank takes it, and then “gives it back to you as a loan plus interest,” sourced from your own funds. He asserts there is no equal consideration and suggests people don’t understand truth in lending. The speaker claims that if the public understood the financial system, there would be a revolution, but people prefer to “dance.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Never came up with any of his own mind to obtain the promissory notes. Am I hearing this right? I gave you the equivalent of $200,000. You returned the funds back to me, and I have to repay you $200,000 plus interest. Do you think I'm stupid?
All the banks are doing this. Congress allows this. Does congress allow the banks to breach written agreements, use false misleading advertising, act without written permission, authorization, and without the alleged borrower's knowledge to transfer actual cash value from the alleged borrower to the bank and then return it back as a loan?
Speaker 1: But the borrower got a check-in the house.
Speaker 0: Is it true the actual cash value that was used to fund the bank loan check came directly from the borrower and that the bank received the funds from the alleged borrower for free? This is true. Is it the bank's policy to transfer actual cash value from the alleged borrower to the bank and then keep the funds as the bank's property, which they then loan out as bank loans as if they actually own own it and own their own money?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Was it the bank's intent to receive actual cash value from the borrower and return the value of the funds back to the borrower as a loan? Yes. Do you believe that it was the borrower's intent to fund his own bank loan check?
Speaker 1: I was not there at the time, and I cannot know what went through the borrower's mind.
Speaker 0: So if a lender loaned a borrower $10,000 and the borrower refused to repay the money, do you believe the lender is damaged?
Speaker 1: If the loan is not repaid, the lender is damaged.
Speaker 0: So is it the bank policy to take actual cash value from the borrower, use it to fund the bank loan check, and never return the actual cash value to the borrower?
Speaker 1: The bank returns the funds.
Speaker 0: Was the actual cash value the bank received from the alleged borrower returned as a return of the money the bank took, or was it returned as a bank loan to the borrower? As a loan. So how did the bank get the borrower's money for free? That's how it works. No more questions, your honor.
Speaker 2: This video is between a man talking to a judge and asking him questions about how banks work, and we're gonna cover a few things here that are very important. But first, we're gonna go through all these screenshots. I give you the equivalent of $200,000. You return the funds back to me, and I have to repay you 200,000 plus interest. The judge's response is, all the banks are doing this.
Congress allows this. The guy says, does congress allow the banks to breach written agreement, use false and misleading advertising without your written permission or authorization, and without your knowledge, transfer the actual cash value from the alleged borrower to the bank? So what happens is you go into the bank and you apply for a $200,000 loan, they get a check with your name on it after you gave them your Social Security, and they then take that check for $200,000 with your name on it, and they give it back to you as a loan plus interest, but they got it from you. And then, again, like I said, return it back as a loan. The judge's response is, but the borrower got a check-in house.
So when you even go to finance a car, you give them your Social Security number, your credit. You're there all day because they're waiting on the check with your name on it to come through so that they can then give it back to you as a loan. So then he asked, is it true that the actual cash value that was used to fund the bank loan check came directly from you because your name was on it? It's your money. And that the bank got that money from you for free.
No equal consideration. They got it from you for free. And he says, this is true. That is the section that you hear in the beginning that I stitched. He then asked, is it the bank's policy to transfer the actual cash value from the check to themselves and then keep the money as the bank's property, which they then loan out as bank loans back to you as if they actually owned it and that they actually loan their own money.
And he says, yes. I mean, there's really nothing else to say. It's been proven time and time again. They get money from you, your money, then give it back to you, and somehow you have to pay them interest. It doesn't make any sense.
It's your money. What they're actually supposed to do is give you the check with your name on it when it comes in house, which is why if you go and watch that video, the judge says, I don't know what's going on in the borrower's mind, but they also know that you're not reading your contracts. You have no idea about truth in lending, and you don't know anything about money. For if the people understood the financial system, there would be a revolution before tomorrow, but y'all don't care about that. Y'all just wanna dance.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
The truth about Digital IDs for children https://t.co/yikMQzMMlE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The speaker argues that digital ID is bad and that the government is coming for children by announcing digital ID cards for 13-year-olds. They claim this is not a good thing because children have the right to grow up in privacy, to come of age, to explore, to experiment, and to make mistakes, with everything they do logged, tracked, and documented into a device that will follow them for the rest of their life and potentially discriminate against them. They say digital ID will document things like skill reports, mental health issues, behavioral issues, accomplishments, and failures, and that having so much information about a person before adulthood would make it easy to build systems that profile people based on socioeconomic background, behavior, and psychology, determining what type of citizen they are before they have a chance at life.
They posit that as a parent you raise your children with boundaries, ethics, and moral, but the government has its own ethics, morals, and boundaries. They claim the government will have the power to give a child a bus pass, a bank account, access into entertainment venues, and a work permit when they turn 16, and the government can decide what makes a child applicable for that. They ask who should raise the child— you or the state. They argue that assigning a QR code to enter a playground and another to go skateboarding normalizes surveillance as safety for children, and that future generations could be convinced to accept more surveillance and control because they have been conditioned since childhood to see it as normal.
They acknowledge pushback, noting some may call the concerns exaggerated, but they insist there is no reason to think digital ID will be used ethically, and they insist digital ID is forever. They challenge the idea that the last 500 years of humanity justify the next 500 years as superior, and say the government cannot provide a solid explanation for this institutional change. They dismiss migration as “bollocks” and claim the only justification given is convenience. The core claim is that the refusal to provide a straight answer hides a motive: control, plain and simple.
The speaker concludes that there is an opportunity to change history in a positive way, and that opportunity starts with individuals choosing not to comply and saying no, for the sake of their kids and future generations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you thought digital ID was bad? Well, they're coming for your kids. That's right. The government have announced that they're going to be giving digital ID cards to 13 year olds. And this is not a good thing because your children have the right to grow up in privacy, to come of age, to explore, to experiment, to make mistakes with every single thing they do being logged, tracked, documented into a little device that is going to follow them for the rest of their life and potentially discriminate against them too because that's what Digital ID means for kids, guys.
It is an eventuality that Digital ID will document things like skill reports, mental health issues, behavioral issues, accomplishments, failures. And the thing is, whenever you have that much information about a person before they've even come into adulthood, it would be so easy to bring in systems where we profile people based on their socioeconomic background, based on their behavior, based on their psychology, deciphering what type of citizen they are before they've even had a chance at life. I'm assuming, as a parent, you raise your children with boundaries, ethics, and moral. But the government also have their own ethics, morals, and boundaries. And to be fair, the government will have the power to give your child a bus pass, a bank account, access into entertainment venues, and a work permit when they turn 16, and they can decide what makes your child applicable for that.
Who do you want raising your child? You or the state? Also, when we give children a QR code to get into the playground and a QR code to go skateboarding, what we're doing is we're normalizing our children to think that surveillance equals safety. And what that means is that in generations to come, it is very, very easy to convince an entire population that we need more surveillance and more control. Why?
Because they've been institutionalized and conditioned since childhood to think that that is very normal. You can say, oh, you're being so over the top and you're exaggerating. Why? There is no reason for us to think that digital ID is going to be used in an ethical way. Digital ID is forever.
What about the last five hundred years of humanity makes you think that the next five hundred years is going to be somewhat superior? And so far, our government can't even give us a solid explanation as to why they are bringing in this huge institutional change. Because we all know that migration's bollocks. The best they can give us is convenience. Convenience.
The reason they can't give you a straight answer is because it is about control, Plain and simple. But look, we actually have an opportunity to change history in a positive way, it starts with you. It starts with you not complying and saying no. Do it for your kids and do it for future generations to come.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
The government has a $105,000,000 contract with the WEF for a Digital Identity Program https://t.co/XI20HxVm07
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "Do you owe your conspiracy theory friend an apology? The government has finally admitted that they have a contract with the WEF, a $105,000,000 for a digital identity program. No. Would you take a look at that? Oh, there it is. Right there. Okay."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you owe your conspiracy theory friend an apology? The government has finally admitted that they have a contract with the WEF, a $105,000,000 for a digital identity program. No. Would you take a look at that? Oh, there it is.
Right there. Okay.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe we’re witnessing one of the greatest crimes in history. A product injected into children 70+ times, never properly tested against a saline placebo. From 10% of kids with chronic conditions to over 50%, and 76% of Americans with one or more chronic conditions. About 3 million children with autism, up from near zero in 1970. I’m outraged and say we must change course, hold the medical profession and those who cover up epidemics of iatrogenic injury to account.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
"I believe that we are in the midst of one of the greatest crimes in human history. We have a product being injected into children 70+ times over the course of their development that’s never been tested against a proper saline placebo. Over the course of that time period (1970 – 2025), chronic illness in this country has gone from 10% of children having one or more chronic conditions to now more than 50% of children having one or more chronic conditions. Secretary Kennedy in the hearing that was last week said — the latest data from the CDC says that 76% of Americans now have one or more chronic conditions. And I believe that lots of these chronic conditions stem from iatrogenic injury. We have 3 million children with autism. Back in 1970 the rate was so low that it was essentially zero. I’m outraged by that and I think every person in this room should be outraged by that. I don’t know how to say it anymore clearly that we need to change course in this country. And I’m terribly disappointed by the medical profession. In the social sciences, there’s this term called epistemic capture, which is when the entire knowledge production process becomes captured by one industry (Big Pharma). And that’s what’s happened with science and medicine. And so I think we need to change course. And I think the people who have covered up the autism epidemic and the epidemics of iatrogenic injury should be held to account for their actions."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that we are in the midst of one of the greatest crimes in human history, describing a situation in which a product is being injected into children more than seventy times over the course of their development, and noting that this product was never tested against a proper saline placebo. They claim that, over the span of this development, chronic illness in the United States has risen from ten percent of children having one or more chronic conditions to more than fifty percent, and they reference Secretary Kennedy’s statement in a recent hearing that the latest CDC data indicate seventy-six percent of Americans now have one or more chronic conditions. The speaker expresses the belief that many of these chronic conditions stem from iatrogenic injury.
They highlight that there are three million children with autism and contrast this with the 1970 rate, which they describe as so low as to be essentially zero. The speaker voices outrage and emphasizes the need to change the course in the country, expressing deep disappointment with the medical profession. In discussing broader social science concepts, they reference the term epistemic capture, defining it as a situation where the entire knowledge production process becomes captured by one industry, and they argue that this is what has happened with science and medicine.
The speaker reiterates the call to change course and asserts that those who have covered up the autism epidemic and the epidemics of iatrogenic injury should be held to account for their actions. Throughout, the focus remains on linking medical interventions and their perceived consequences to widespread public health concerns, urging accountability and systemic reform. The overall message combines accusations of untested medical practices, dramatic increases in chronic conditions and autism, disappointment with the medical establishment, and a critique of how knowledge is produced and controlled within science and medicine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe that we are in the midst of one of the greatest crimes in human history. We have a product being injected into children 70 plus times over the course of their development that's never been tested against a proper saline placebo. Over that course of that time period, chronic illness in this country has gone from ten percent of children having one or more chronic conditions to now more than fifty percent of children having one or more chronic conditions. Secretary Kennedy in the hearing that was, last week said that the latest data from the CDC says that seventy six percent of Americans now have one or more chronic conditions. I believe that lots of these chronic conditions stem from iatrogenic injury.
We have three million children with autism. Back in 1970, the rate was so low that it was essentially zero. I'm outraged by that, and I think every person in this room should be outraged by that. I don't know how to say it anymore clearly that we need to change course in this country. And I am terribly disappointed by the medical profession.
In the social sciences, there is this term called epistemic capture, which is when the entire knowledge production process becomes captured by one industry. And that's what's happened with science and medicine. And so I think we need to change course. And I think the people who have covered up the autism epidemic and the epidemics of iatrogenic injury should be held to account for their actions.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
'An Orwellian experience' — George Galloway on his arrest Phrase 'you're not under arrest but are not free to leave' ought to chill the blood, he warns 'It could happen to any of you' https://t.co/jiNld2w3NF
Video Transcript AI Summary
This was an Orwellian experience. I invite you and all citizens to contemplate the meaning of the phrase, you are not under arrest, but you are not free to leave. You have no right to silence. If you refuse to answer any and all of our questions, you will automatically be committing an offense under the act that terrorism act, albeit scheduled to be of it. I'm I've been around the block, but I never expected such words to be addressed to me. The doublespeak in the phrase you are not under arrest, you are not free to leave, is one that chills or ought to chill the blood, and it could happen to any of you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was an Orwellian experience. I invite you and all citizens to contemplate the meaning of the phrase, you are not under arrest, but you are not free to leave. You have no right to silence. If you refuse to answer any and all of our questions, you will automatically be committing an offense under the act that terrorism act, albeit scheduled to be of it. I'm I've been around the block, but I never expected such words to be addressed to me.
The doublespeak in the phrase you are not under arrest, you are not free to leave, is one that chills or ought to chill the blood, and it could happen to any of you.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
That wouldn't surprise me https://t.co/yeUffZYWa8
Video Transcript AI Summary
What if I told you that a vaccine was secretly laced with a hormone to cause infertility was given to hundreds of thousands of women and girls without their knowledge? What if I told you that a vaccine that was banned in the West for killing girls was pushed on African girls making them 10 times more likely to die? And what if I told you that the man behind all of this funding it, promoting it, has just had his legal immunity stripped in Kenya? Bill Gates through the WHO has funded programs that have been exposed as dangerous, unethical, and deadly. In 02/2013, the World Health Organization launched a neonatal neonatal tetanus campaign in Kenya claiming to protect newborns from deadly infections. But the vaccines contained h c g hormones, a hormone vital in pregnancy chemically bonded to the tetanus vaccine. What were they for?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if I told you that a vaccine was secretly laced with a hormone to cause infertility was given to hundreds of thousands of women and girls without their knowledge? What if I told you that a vaccine that was banned in the West for killing girls was pushed on African girls making them 10 times more likely to die? And what if I told you that the man behind all of this funding it, promoting it, has just had his legal immunity stripped in Kenya? This isn't a conspiracy theory. This did happen, and the evidence is undeniable.
Bill Gates through the WHO has funded programs that have been exposed as dangerous, unethical, and deadly. And it's time the world started asking some very serious questions. In 02/2013, the World Health Organization launched a neonatal neonatal tetanus campaign in Kenya claiming to protect newborns from deadly infections. But doctors started noticing something very strange. Many women in this vaccination campaign could no longer carry a pregnancy to term.
Suspicious, these doctors took these vials and took them for testing in independent labs. The vaccines contained h c g hormones, a hormone vital in pregnancy chemically bonded to the tetanus vaccine. These vaccines weren't just about tetanus. So what were they for?
Speaker 1: We cannot afford to trust WHO anymore, your excellency. In twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen, WHO brought tetanus eradication campaign in our country. The vaccine that was used is a different type of a tetanus vaccine that is a fertility regulating vaccine. Where they take tetanus and combine it with a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin that supports pregnancy. And when we inject a woman with that vaccine, she produces antibodies against that hormone and therefore is rendered sterile.
We are noticing an increase in the number of infertility cases among young couples who you examine and they are normal but cannot get children. Or couples who are losing three, four, five pregnancies before they can carry any pregnancy to term. We were able to expose this, and, we have even published a paper that is available.
Speaker 0: But it doesn't stop there. Let's talk more about the DTP vaccine, the world's most popular vaccine thanks to Bill Gates and the WHO. In the nineteen eighties, the vaccine was banned in The United States and Europe after studies showed it caused brain damage and even death. While it was replaced with a safer version in these countries, the older, deadlier versions were still being distributed to children in Africa. When Danish scientists studied more than thirty years of vaccination records in Africa, they found a chilling discovery.
Girls who received the DTP vaccine were 10 times more likely to die than children that were unvaccinated. But these girls weren't dying from tetanus, diphtheria, or pertussis. They were dying from anemia, pneumonia, dysentery, and the diseases that the vaccine left them more vulnerable to. This isn't just about bad science. It's a pattern of unethical experiments on vulnerable populations.
Vaccines that were deemed too dangerous for the West pushed in Africa under the guise of philanthropy. And who's funding this? Bill Gates, the same man whose foundation controls much of the World Health Organization's budget. The same man who just lost his immunity for prosecution in Kenya. Knowledge is power, and this is why we must question the narrative, the motives, and demand accountability.
Bill Gates and the WHO must answer for these actions, and we, the people, must stand together for transparency and justice. If you believe the world needs to know the truth, share this video, and let's make this conversation so it can't be silenced.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve observed that unvaccinated children show no signs of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral issues, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or psychological disabilities. In contrast, vaccinated children appear to have significantly higher rates of asthma, ear infections, atopic diseases, autoimmune diseases, and neurological disorders, including ADHD, autism, and various learning and speech disorders. The differences in health outcomes between these two groups are striking.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Unvaccinated Children: - ZERO Brain dysfunction - ZERO diabetes - ZERO behavioural problems - ZERO learning disabilities - ZERO intellectual disabilities - ZERO tics - ZERO psychological disabilities Vaccinated Children: - Asthma: 4.29 times higher in vaccinated children. - Acute and chronic Ear Infections: 600% more likely with a vaccinated child - Atopic disease: 3.03 times higher. - "Autoimmune disease: 5.96 times higher - Neurological Disorders: 300-616% increase in vaccinated children — ADHD, Autism, Behavioral Disability, developmental delay, Learning Disability, Intellectual Disability, speech disorder
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Chronic disease has gone from twelve point eight percent in our children in the nineteen eighties to over fifty four percent of our kids now." "72 times we are altering the immune system of our children with our vaccine program." "There'd be one easy study to rule it out, compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children." "But we don't know because they've never done the study." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Chronic disease has gone from twelve point eight percent in our children in the nineteen eighties to over fifty four percent of our kids now. That's the greatest decline in human health that's ever been recorded. And people will say, how do you know it's not the pesticides sprayed all over our crops or the hormones in our beef or plastics or forever chemicals? But when we're talking about an autoimmune disease crisis, which is what's happening in America, shouldn't we look closest at the one product that's designed to alter our immune system for life. And we don't just inject it one time or two times or 10 times or 15 times or 20 times or 50 times.
72 times we are altering the immune system of our children with our vaccine program. There'd be one easy study to rule it out, compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children. But we don't know because they've never done the study.
Speaker 1: It's the CDC's responsibility to do those studies, and they've been ordered again and again and again to do them, and they have refused.
Speaker 2: This is information that vaccine safety advocates want, and I'm not sure why it hasn't been done.
Speaker 3: What we would need is a scientist that the CDC could trust.
Speaker 0: They would have to be a passionately pro vaccine, highly accredited group of scientists willing to do a super robust retrospective vaccinated versus unvaccinated comparative study.
Speaker 3: As fate would have it, Dell met the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health System, Marcus Zervos.
Speaker 0: Doctor Zervos is the perfect epidemiologist for the study. He's incredibly pro vaccine, and he's also used to being in high profile cases because he was at the center of the Flint, Michigan water investigation. Doctor Zervos only agreed to do this study to prove us wrong.
Speaker 3: Dell and I thought that was an excellent opportunity. We only had one request. Whatever the outcome, you publish it. He said, whatever the results, they get published. Would he stick to that promise if the results show that unvaccinated kids are healthier?
Didn't know.
Speaker 4: Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. I've never seen this study before.
Speaker 2: 18,468 subjects.
Speaker 4: Henry Ford, like other institutions, has a bias towards the goodness of vaccines. If the results came back demonstrating that the battery of vaccines was associated with chronic diseases, such a result would be particularly convincing. This could be essentially one of the most valuable studies in the field.
Speaker 2: The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis.
Speaker 5: Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections.
Speaker 0: Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.
Speaker 5: Five and a half times risk. Six and sixteen percent increase. Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities.
Speaker 2: None. It's a big difference.
Speaker 4: It's very important that this study sees the light of day.
Speaker 2: This is devastating.
Speaker 3: This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis.
Speaker 2: We are systematically making kids sick and not just a little bit sick, very sick.
Speaker 0: This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published.
Speaker 5: He knows. If he puts his name on this, his career is over.
Speaker 2: I mean, obviously, like, really emotional.
Speaker 4: Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a significant revelation from a Senate hearing where Dr. Peter McCullough discussed a peer-reviewed autopsy study. Conducted by Nicolas Hulscher, it revealed that 73.9% of examined deaths were likely caused or significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccinations.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Senate hearing bombshell: Dr. Peter McCullough, a prominent cardiologist, exposes a peer-reviewed autopsy study in Forensic Science International titled "A systematic review of autopsy findings in deaths after COVID-19 vaccination." The study, led by Nicolas Hulscher, found 73.9% of examined deaths were likely caused or significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccines.
Video Transcript AI Summary
And do you have any signs to back up your your opinion? The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author. Of all the deaths examined and we re reviewed them. We had an adjudication committee. We had ways of arbitration deciding on did the vaccine cause death. The answer is of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, seventy three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. First off, there's Hocher and colleagues who's sitting right behind me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And do you have any signs to back up your your opinion?
Speaker 1: The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author. Of all the deaths examined and we re reviewed them. We had an adjudication committee. We had ways of arbitration deciding on did the vaccine cause death.
The answer is of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, seventy three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. First off, there's Hocher and colleagues who's sitting right behind me.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
The person on the stretcher is Anne Heche, What did she do to deserve this? https://t.co/ISVkablZMn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ambulance, that's some sort of sign, but yes. So, basically, the activity that we were looking for that, that anxious or that quick moving that was going on on the other side of the vehicle. Oh my gosh. He's completely alive. What the hell?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ambulance, that's some sort of sign, but yes. So, basically, the activity that we were looking for that, that anxious or that quick moving that was going on on the other side of the vehicle. Oh my gosh. He's completely alive. What the hell?
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Frequency sound healing and deworming treatment 👇 https://t.co/GyLI1WtJxV
Video Transcript AI Summary
"They have bad breath. Halitosis is a is a main cause. By the time you got halitosis, you're you're loaded because that's worm urine and worm droppings that you're breathing out." "The critters, when they pee, that's called ammonia." "So just go to a doctor, have a blood test, and see what level of ammonia is in your blood." "If you have ammonia in your blood, that's called worm urine. That's what it is." "So we have a test to see if you've got a lot of worms." "It's time to deworm and it's time to get them out." "If you take an aspirin, it changes the way you vibrate. And so it walks the nerves so that you can't feel pain."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They have bad breath. Halitosis is a is a main cause. By the time you got halitosis, you're you're loaded because that's worm urine and worm droppings that you're breathing out. So it's no wonder your breath's bad. The critters, when they pee, that's called ammonia.
So just go to a doctor, have a blood test, and see what level of ammonia is in your blood. If you have ammonia in your blood, that's called worm urine. That's what it is. So we have a test to see if you've got a lot of worms. If you're on a fast and you're fasting and you're you're you're on a diet and you get a headache, you got the headache because the worms are all peeing, trying to get you to eat something else.
They're trying to make you sick so you'll get off of what you're doing and start eating. So you take some arginine and northenine in a matter of twenty minutes. If the headache's gone, you've neutralized the worm urine and you know that you're loaded. All children that have little tiny pimples on the backs of their arms or little tiny pimples here on the edges of their cheeks have five varieties of critters in them. Five varieties.
It's time to deworm and it's time to get them out. Now what I found out was is that vibration and frequency is everything. It is literally everything. If you take an aspirin, it changes the way you vibrate. And so it walks the nerves so that you can't feel pain.
If you take deworming programs, you change your vibration and you change your vibration so dramatically that the worms and parasites either have to get out of you, this is no longer a good home, or they die in you. And then your lungs and your liver and all that stuff handle it. And you do it with water. And out of all of this, I handled my cancer, my stomach and esophagus cancer, which is a terminal problem. I am the only that I know survivor of stomach and esophagus cancer in this nation.
I'm the only one that I know. Alright? I did it with frequency. A man by the name of Royal Rife in 1934 had a microscope and invented a particular device. I found one of his original devices.
I used it, and it got rid of my cancer, and I haven't had it since. Now that was in 1934. So you can see what they've held from you. So what we did is we looked at Nikola Tesla. We looked at all his equipment.
We did all his stuff, and I went out searching out original pieces of his equipment. I own more pieces of original Tesla equipment than any other human that I know. And so use
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
RFK Jr. A child must take 69-92 vaccines just to stay in school https://t.co/zYfAY0W2m1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Changes to ACIP are occurring after over two decades of congressional investigation. In 2002/2003, a government oversight committee found conflicts of interest, citing that four out of five people who added the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule had direct financial interest in it. One individual voted the rotavirus vaccine onto the schedule and then sold his rotavirus vaccine in development for $186 million.
That year, Congress stated that 97% of ACIP members had undisclosed conflicts. The speaker claims that adding new products to the schedule without pre-licensing safety studies is malpractice. In 1986, there were 11 vaccines on the schedule, but now children must take between 69 and 92 vaccines to stay in school in some states, and none have been safety tested in prelicensing placebo-controlled trials. The speaker states that the people in charge are now gone, and new credentialed scientists and physicians will be brought onto the ACIP panel to do evidence-based medicine and follow the science.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In terms of changes to ASIP, this has been a long time coming. More than two decades ago, congress investigated ASIP. A government oversight committee found that, for example, that year, which was 02/2003, they gave one example that four out of the five people who added the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule had direct financial interest in that vaccine. One of those individuals voted the rotavirus onto the vaccine and sold his rotavirus vaccine that he had in development for a $186,000,000. He said he won the lottery.
That year, congress said that ninety seven percent of the people on AASIP had undisclosed conflicts. People have known about this for years. You know, probably the worst example of malevolent malpractice has been adding all of these new products to the schedule without doing pre licensing safety studies. Oh, in 1986, there were 11 vaccines on the schedule. Today, a compliant child must take between sixty nine and ninety two vaccines to stay in school in some states.
And now one of them has been safety tested in a prelicensing placebo controlled trial. And that is just malpractice. So the people who were in charge of that are now gone. And we're gonna be bringing people onto the ACIP panel, not any vaxxers. We're bringing people on who are credentialed scientists, who are highly credentialed physicians, who are gonna do evidence based medicine, who are gonna be objective, and who are gonna follow the science and make critical public health determinations for our children based upon the best science.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
People were trying to warn us back in the 90s about vaccinating our children https://t.co/uvdAL9e6LP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alisa did not vaccinate her child because she is scared of both vaccinating and not vaccinating. She read warnings about introducing alien microorganisms into children's blood, citing potential long-term effects ranging from allergies and asthma to cancer, leukemia, multiple sclerosis, and sudden infant death syndrome. She felt it was wrong to vaccinate and believes people should think twice.
One speaker questions the biochemical legacy of vaccinations and how long the effects last. Another speaker states that putting something into a baby's bloodstream requires careful consideration. They claim information about vaccines isn't really known or researched, and cite the original birth control pill as an example of something once considered safe that later proved detrimental to health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's why I'm here, you know, to share what information I've learned.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Now tell me, Alisa, just, you're not scared you didn't vaccinate you, do you?
Speaker 0: I'm scared. I'm scared, and I'm scared to vaccinate her, which is why I didn't vaccinate her in the first place, and which led me to to read about the warnings that are out there. And what I've learned are there are warnings about introducing these alien microorganisms into our children's blood and the long term effects, could be trivial or they could be quite hazardous and they could be just allergies or asthma or sleep disorders or they could be cancer, leukemia, multiple sclerosis, sudden infant death syndrome. It's very scary and it's very serious and I and I think because I I felt wrong doing it is that's why I didn't do it. And, you know, I mean, we have to think twice.
Why are our children getting these diseases?
Speaker 2: What
Speaker 1: what is the biochemical legacy of the vaccination? How long does it last? And what might it be? It's effect. Yeah.
You're putting something into your baby's bloodstream. Everybody ought to think about that twice. We gave
Speaker 2: this official stamp and someone's designated to give us this information which isn't really, really known about or researched, know, and we find out the hard way, you know. No one knew that, you know, the pill in its original state, you know, for women birth control, and we'll get into this, this is a big one, but was so detrimental to health and the hormonal imbalance and all of the above.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
"Brain death" is a lie they use for organ harvesting. https://t.co/Nhq0oWZkmW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Organs cannot be taken from cadavers because brain cells die within minutes of oxygen deprivation. A person is not dead if their heart is beating, they are metabolizing fluids, or having bowel movements. Brain death is a lie manufactured for eugenics, to facilitate organ harvesting.
The best organ donors are 30 years old, with a beating heart, circulation, and on a ventilator. The decision to take organs is made early, as treatment to preserve organs differs from life-saving treatment.
In the UK, everyone is an organ donor unless they opt out. When a 999 call is made, the system assesses the caller's medical history, tax contributions, and worth to determine if they receive life-saving treatment or are considered an organ donor. This system is eugenics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First of all, you cannot take an organ from a dead body, from a cadaver. Within three minutes of no oxygen, you're going to start damaging brain cells, and within five minutes, you're gonna have cellular death. You have got to be alive to take your organs. That's the end of it. You're not dead.
There's no such thing as brain dead. Brain death. If your heart is beating, if you are metabolizing fluids, if you are metabolizing a liquid feed, a soya feed, which they give you and you're having bowel movements, you are not dead. You're not dead. It's a lie.
They're talking about the brain stem where you've got the hypothalamus, the center that controls your blood pressure, your heartbeat, but the rest, you're not dead. It's a lie. It was a lie that was manufactured so that they could do their eugenics, taking organs from one person to the next. Who makes the best organ donor? 30 with a beating heart, a circulation, and ideally on a ventilator.
When is the decision made to take your organs very early on, probably before you are even aware what they are doing? Because the treatment to preserve your organs is very different to the treatment to save your life. In The UK on the May 22, everybody became an organ donor unless you opt out. People do not know. So the minute that you make that 999 phone call, everything's up there on the screen.
They know who you are. This is why they want you on a digital system. Your entire medical history is going to be fed through AI, how much tax you pay, what you're worth to the system, and that's going to come up with whether you're a yay or a nay. Are you getting life saving treatment, or are you on end of life care? What age are you?
Are you then for organ donor? This is very important that people know this. And so you have to ask, what is this? It's eugenics. It's eugenics.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Virginia Giuffre’s ‘Deadman’s Switch’ https://t.co/M1T2es10yZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Virginia Louise Dufres, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein, states she was murdered to keep secrets buried and that her "dead man switch" has released this video to expose the truth. She claims that while working at Mar-a-Lago at 16, Ghislaine Maxwell lured her into Epstein's network.
Dufres alleges that Barack Obama frequented Epstein's island for young boys, often accompanied by George Clooney and Tom Hanks. She further claims Bill Gates was involved in genetic experiments on children, including injecting a young girl with a "genetic enhancement."
Dufres asserts that Epstein is not dead but hidden and protected by the elite he once served. She says her video is the first in a series of data releases, including hidden servers, encrypted drives, and witness testimonies, timed to go to people who can make a difference. She urges viewers to expose the "monsters behind the masks" and encourages other survivors to continue fighting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're watching this, it means they got me. My dead man switch activated automatically after I missed two scheduled check ins. I had it set up months ago because I knew this day was coming. I did not die by accident. I was murdered to keep their secrets buried.
My name is Virginia Louise Dufres. I was one of Jeffrey Epstein's victims. I survived Little Saint James, but survival came at a price. I saw too much, knew too much, and now they've silenced me, but it's too late for them. They thought killing me would bury their secrets, but this video is going to a few organizations I trust, ones that have been exposing the truth for decades.
You know who you are. It's your job to continue this fight. I was 16 when they reeled me in. I worked at Mar a Lago, folding towels, cleaning lockers. My father kept the tennis courts immaculate.
We were just working folks trying to scrape by. Trump, he was around, but he was never the threat. The real predator was Ghislain Maxwell, prim and proper, smiling, promising to teach me massage therapy at the Pink Mansion in Palm Beach. I had no idea I was being fed into a nightmare machine. Epstein's Island was hell disguised as paradise.
You've heard some names linked to him, but those are just the sacrificial pawns. The real players, the ones they've protected at all costs, are still hiding in plain sight. I'll name two now. The first, a former US president, Barack Obama. Publicly, he's revered.
Privately, he was one of the worst. He wasn't there for the girls. He was there for the island boys, young boys, trafficked and groomed. I saw him more times than I can count, always without his Secret Service detail, sometimes with his Hollywood friends, George Clooney and Tom Hanks. I still have nightmares about them, arrogant and drunk on power, slinking into the cabanas with kids barely out of childhood.
The second, Bill Gates, the billionaire philanthropist, loved by the media, hailed as a savior. We called him the benefactor, and we used to dread seeing him naked. But he didn't come to party. He came to experiment. Genetic experiments, human experiments.
I saw him inject a young girl with something they said was a genetic enhancement. She was younger than me, strapped to a table, terrified, treated like a lab rat while they muttered about seeding the future of the species. These men think they are gods, playing with life like it was theirs to own. I'm telling you now, Epstein isn't dead. They staged his death because he was too valuable.
He held blackmail on some of the most powerful people on earth, files, videos, confessions. They couldn't risk him talking, but they also couldn't risk him gone, so they hid him, stashed him under the protection of the same elite who once paid him to supply them with flesh. And they thought killing me would stop this from coming out. They were wrong, and there is so much more to come. Hidden servers, encrypted drives, witness testimonies, it's all gonna hit the light.
This video is just the first detonation. The data drops are timed and automatic. They are going to people who can make a difference, and nobody can stop it now. Not even the law enforcement agencies in The US and UK, the same ones that buried the evidence I handed them, can stop this truth from getting out. If you're watching this, you are the resistance.
Don't let my death be just another headline. Burn their lies to the ground. Make the world see the monsters behind the masks. And to any survivors out there, don't give up. We're in this together.
They can't kill us all. Make them pay.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
There must be some reason they're hiding this from us.... https://t.co/gTnDPwTnHE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Antarctica is more mysterious than we think. In 1912, Captain Robert Scott's expedition mapped the South Pole before tourism restrictions. Official photos showed a barren landscape, but leaked photos reveal hidden ancient ruins, statues, and pyramids of a lost civilization.
Shortly after taking these photos, Scott and his team died on their return journey, and a search party recovered the images. Some claim the photos are fake, but ancient maps depict a green Antarctica.
Antarctica, twice the size of Australia, was likely ice-free 6,000 years ago. It's hard to believe ancient humans explored every continent but skipped a green Antarctica. Photos confirm a pyramid-like structure under the snow, verified by satellite footage. Is it a natural formation or something more?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Antarctica is a lot different than you think. Videos like this painted as a barren yet beautiful land of ice and snow, but apparently there are leaked photos that show us they're trying to cover up something big down there. Back in 1912, Captain Robert Scott led an expedition to the South Pole to map it out and take some pictures. This was forty seven years before the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, which heavily restricted tourist travel to the majority of Antarctica for your own safety, of course. Now, these were the photos released by National Geographic of the expedition.
Just some family friendly fun adventure. Right? But apparently, that was just the tip. And if you know me, I do not like just the tip. Story goes, Robert Scott and his team went down there to map the South Pole.
And these are the photos they took, which were hidden from the public and apparently recently got leaked. Ancient ruins, statues, and even what looked like pyramids of some long lost civilization that they don't want anyone to know about. And the crazy part is, in March of nineteen twelve, just two months after these photos were taken, Robert and his whole team died on their journey back home due to starvation and extreme cold. And these photos got later recovered by some search party that found them. Now doubters will tell you these photos are fake because Google told them, but even ancient maps painted Antarctica as green.
And this map from 1512 even shows South America connecting to the Antarctic shoreline with incredible accuracy. Antarctica is twice the size of Australia and was thought to be ice free as recently as six thousand years ago. And we're supposed to believe ancient humans managed to find their way around every single continent in the world, even discovering the microscopic islands of the Pacific Ocean. And somehow, they just fully skipped Antarctica, even when it was a luscious green paradise. A lot of people argue these ancient ruins aren't real, and who knows?
But you gotta keep an open mind. Right? But what are confirmed real are these photos of what looks like a pyramid hidden under the snow in Antarctica. There are many photos that prove it exists and even professors admit it. And obviously the Google debunkers will tell you, oh, it's a natural mountain formation, form three erosion, but I don't know what kind of looking ass mountains are cut this perfect.
Even satellite footage confirms it, so I don't know. You think there's something down there or are we the trippy ones?
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Do you believe there's Titanic conspiracy? https://t.co/wcuKo2qb3d
Video Transcript AI Summary
What if the Titanic disaster was more than just an accident? Some suggest it was orchestrated to eliminate rivals of JP Morgan, a key figure in the establishment of the Federal Reserve. Morgan opposed the creation of a government-controlled Federal Reserve, favoring a private one instead. Notable opponents included Jacob Astor, Benjamin Guggenheim, and Isidore Strauss, all of whom perished in the sinking. Coincidences surround the event, such as Morgan canceling his trip at the last minute due to illness. The Federal Reserve was established a year later, and President Wilson later expressed regret over its creation, fearing concentrated power among a few men. The questions remain: Was it mere coincidence or a calculated move? The Titanic's wreck lies deep in the ocean, along with the mystery of its sinking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if there was more to the story than an iceberg and a faulty assumption that the ship was unsinkable? What if the accident was orchestrated to remove the powerful and wealthy rivals of JP Morgan, one of the men that owned the Titanic? If this were true, what could possibly be worth the lives of more than 1500 people? Why would he do such a thing? Is there evidence that points to such a plot?
It is important to understand everything that was happening behind the scenes and all the facts before deciding whether or not this could be true. The level of influence and wealth involved is staggering, and the more questions you ask, the stranger the facts become. So, is there more to the story about the sinking of the Titanic? Who are the players and what are the facts? JP Morgan, one of the most ruthless financiers of the age, was a strong proponent of the development of an organization that had yet to be built, the Federal Reserve.
He believed that the Federal Reserve was not only a good idea, but a necessary 1. He and his bank had to personally organize and oversee the bailouts of many smaller banks and businesses, using his leverage and clout to convince others to go along with his plans. He believed that a central bank system would ease the stress of the large banks that were at the mercy of bank runs caused by smaller banks and market forces. JPMorgan wanted a private version of the Federal Reserve as opposed to a government controlled Federal Reserve, which was being proposed at the time by progressives in Washington. Only professionals and expert bankers should be in charge of the central bank, not government bureaucrats, thought Morgan.
He was in favor of and a vocal proponent for the private Federal Reserve option. Other wealthy and influential members of society were opposed to the development of the Federal Reserve in opposition to JPMorgan. Three of these people were Jacob Astor, Benjamin Guggenheim, and Isidore Strauss. Isidore Strauss was co owner of Macy's department store with his brother Nathan. Benjamin Guggenheim was a wealthy Jewish American businessman.
Jacob Astor the fourth was the fourth generation of wealthy Astors who dealt in real estate, among other business concerns spanning The United States. Jacob Astor was the wealthiest person on the Titanic when it sunk and was, in relation to GDP, 1 of the richest men to ever live. These men and many others were opposed to the development of the Federal Reserve Bank, thinking that the system would give the bankers too much power. The bankers, including JPMorgan and the Rockefeller family, already had far too much power in their opinion, and they did not want to give them any more leverage. The Federal Reserve would do just that, and they were in vocal opposition to the idea.
Having wealthy business rivals and strong personalities with differing viewpoints isn't uncommon in the world of high finance. However, the fact that these disagreements exist isn't enough to imply that the crashing and sinking of the Titanic was planned and coordinated by JP Morgan. Interestingly, when you dig deeper, you find a string of coincidences, incredible luck, and stories that don't quite line up, particularly when it comes to JP Morgan himself. What kind of coincidences and luck, you may ask? Well, while JP Morgan was scheduled to be on the Titanic for her maiden voyage, he abruptly canceled his trip at the last minute.
Why was he not taking this momentous and grand voyage? He was supposedly ill. Fast forward one year, the year after the sinking of the Titanic, the Federal Reserve was created. With much squabbling in Washington about the details of the Federal Reserve Act, it passed, and the Federal Reserve was born. JPMorgan's vision of a Federal Reserve Bank controlled by bankers was not exactly and stated as much after it had been passed by Congress.
President Woodrow Wilson himself, who helped form the bill and used much of his political capital to get it passed, eventually came to regret signing it. He said this near the end of his life. I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit.
Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be 1 of the worst ruled, 1 of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men. It would seem JPMorgan got his way after all.
The Federal Reserve was created with minimal oversight from the federal government. He would never live to see the Federal Reserve in action as he passed away in 1913, the same year the bill had passed. The question remains, did he have a direct hand in making sure that the opposition to this massive change in The US financial policy was silenced? Would he go to such lengths to ensure the completion of this institution? Was it a string of coincidences and bad luck that led to 1 of the worst maritime disasters in history?
Or were there more sinister motives at work? The truth to these questions may never be fully clear. The only certainty is this, deep at the bottom of the ocean lies the wreck of 1 of the most magnificent ships ever to be built. An unsinkable ship that met its fate 1 frigid April 0 evening, taking with it 1500 souls and a mystery that can never be solved.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Apple is going too far..... https://t.co/dDctAUhAl6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Apple's upcoming upgrade will integrate ChatGPT into every iPhone, enabling the collection and analysis of user data. A side-by-side test revealed that both Google and Apple phones transmit significant data dumps, around 50 megabytes, between 2 and 3 AM nightly, sharing user preferences and daily activities. By age 13, an average American child has had 72 million data points collected on them by big tech, tracked through a unique 32-digit advertising ID. This ID allows companies to monitor device locations for targeted advertising and sales. The goal of unplugged communication is to help people connect without surrendering their digital data to tech companies. Some individuals prefer to remain uninformed and compliant, while others seek to protect their privacy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Apple just announced that in their next upgrade coming this fall that they're gonna actually put Jet GPT on every iPhone to collect and analyze all the data of yours that's flowing through an iPhone if you're using it. We did a side by side test between our phone and Google and Apple's. The Google and Apple phones seem to wake up between 2 and 3 at night, and they have this huge, like, a 50 megabyte data dump that's just sent out from the phone every night, sending off your preferences, everything you've done that day. Average kid in America, by the time they reach the age of 13, has had 72,000,000 data points collected on them by big tech Wow. Using that advertising ID.
Wow. Each each Google or Apple phone has a, like, a 32 digit advertising ID. Mhmm. It's a code. You can someone could call it the mark of the beast that follows that device around everywhere.
And that's how the tech companies track where that device goes to figure out proximity for advertising, sales, and who you're interacting with in your schedule. So, again, we did unplugged as a way for people to still communicate in the world, but not be giving off all their digital data to big tech to people that really don't like them. Some people are sheep and wanna live like sheep and be treated like sheep, and, you know, not everyone is a sheep.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Tucker Carlson: “I would never go to a doctor who was still lying about COVID because that’s a dangerous person. That’s an immoral person and a dangerous person.” https://t.co/qyYIquIZCT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors are generally educated and capable of understanding evidence, yet many have made incorrect statements about vaccines, causing harm. It's surprising that most American doctors haven't acknowledged their mistakes. Personally, I wouldn't trust a doctor who continues to misrepresent COVID information.
One doctor I know treated me after I experienced vaccine-related issues. She recognized early on that something was wrong and treated her patients with steroids when others wouldn't, leading to better outcomes. Unfortunately, many people lack access to compassionate and knowledgeable doctors like her. It's hard to overlook the lack of accountability from many in the medical field, as credibility hinges on acknowledging past errors and the reasoning behind them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think what's so interesting is that doctors who clearly can read I mean, they're literate by definition. They're not stupid by definition, you hope, but I think it's true. They're smart. They look at the evidence and, like, everything they said was, fundamentally, everything they said was wrong about the vax, and it's hurt a lot of people. And, like, where all the and some doctors I know the 3 that you mentioned, and they're great, but there are tens of thousands of doctors in the United States.
And why aren't they all standing up and saying, oh my gosh. I'm so sorry. I cannot believe I recommended it. I mean, I endorsed the Iraq war in 2003. And at the end of 2003, I realized I was wrong, and I felt bad about it for 20 years, 20 years.
In fact, it was 20 years ago this week that I went to Iraq. And I felt bad about it ever since then. And at every opportunity, I apologize not to please other people, but to maintain my dignity, my self respect. I mean, that's a prerequisite. You have to if you hurt someone unintentionally, you have to say I'm sorry.
And I can't believe that 99% of American doctors won't do that. And it I'm not going to them, by the way. I would never go to a doctor who is still lying about COVID because that that's a dangerous person. That's an immoral person and a dangerous person.
Speaker 1: My own personal doctor, who I won't name because she's already been attacked, was it was, the one who pushed back. She she, treated me when I when I was vaccine injured. I I called her Yeah. And, I was afraid that she wasn't gonna believe me. She said, Jimmy, I'm treating 5 people just like you.
3 of them are nurses, 2 of them are doctors, and none of them, feel comfortable to talk about it. And so she knew really early on that there was something nefarious going on. She was the one she they told her they wouldn't let her treat patients. They would when they would come in for COVID, they would just tell her to intubate them. And she was like, everybody's dying.
So she started giving them steroids. And they came to her and said, hey, you're breaking the rules. You're not allowed to give people steroids. And she said, yeah, but my patients are living and your patients are dying. And then 6 months later, the FDA and the CDC reversed their advice on that and said, okay, you can give them steroids.
And so I was very, very lucky to have my own personal doctor be on the forefront of that, and so I trust her more than, anything. Now I wanna go back What
Speaker 0: a blessing. I mean, you yes.
Speaker 1: Go ahead. Go ahead.
Speaker 0: What a blessing. No. You're just so fortunate to have someone with deep medical knowledge who is a decent human being and not insane. And, you know, most people, including me, do not have access to a doctor like that. And I've met doctors I like, and I'm sure they're competent in their specialties, but I can't get past it.
It's like, oh, you know, I'm great at my job. I I killed a bunch of people, but I'm a great it's like, no. It's too it's too big a sin to overlook. Like, you have no credibility unless you apologize for that and explain how you reached that wrong conclusion. That's like it anyway, I can't get past it.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
How many soldiers now feel like this? https://t.co/kW6rN03JAe
Video Transcript AI Summary
I fought not for my country, but for politicians' agendas. I remember killing a man in his bedroom while his wife watched. He reached for a gun because I was in his room at 2 AM. I was there because of a political decision tied to George Bush's vendetta against Saddam Hussein, based on false claims of weapons of mass destruction. I wonder about the man I killed—what if we had met under different circumstances, like sharing coffee in Paris? Would we have liked each other?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm in the point now where I I don't think I fought for the country. I fought for some politicians view on something, and I remember one dude in particular that I killed him. Like, I shot his buddy, and then I came through his room. I killed him in front of his wife in a bedroom because he went for a gun, and I think about him now and it's like, alright. Why did I kill that guy?
Well, because he went for a gun. Okay, but why did he go for a gun? Well, because I was in his fucking room at 2 in the morning. Well, why was I in his room at 2 in the morning? Well, because George fucking Bush was pissed that Saddam Hussein allegedly wanted to kill his dad, so we invaded.
And then I start to think, was this guy funny? What if I met him in Paris over a coffee? Would we actually like each other and I just kill him because a politician sent us here for weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist?
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
The CIA was involved with the 💉 https://t.co/aPDVVdqGTz
Video Transcript AI Summary
I discovered the CIA's involvement in vaccine production while researching Pfizer. Notably, the CEO of In-Q-Tel, the CIA's investment group, is on the board of Resilience, a biotech company that partnered with Moderna. Resilience has received significant government funding and has ties to various high-profile investors. Key figures like Bob Nelson and Luciana Borio, who have connections to the intelligence community and the FDA, are involved with Resilience. During Operation Warp Speed, Moderna collaborated with this newly formed company, which aims to innovate biomanufacturing and develop gene therapies and vaccines. The connections between these organizations and individuals raise questions about the intertwining of intelligence, big pharma, and government interests in public health initiatives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So yesterday, I accidentally discovered that the CIA was heavily involved in producing the vaccines. What a rabbit hole. This one's gonna go deep, but I'm gonna try to speed run it as fast and concisely as possible. I was a little confused when this video got completely throttled on such a big account compared to, like, 100 of thousands of views because I had no idea what I had just stumbled across. On x, we were doing work, and homegirl put me on a thread that is pinned to the top of her profile.
And I started double checking all of her work, and it just went from there. So speed run. Yesterday, Pfizer had a really bad day after a really bad year. Looking into Pfizer's board of directors, Scott Gottlieb, led me to this company called Resilience. Also note Illumina just for a second.
And looking into Resilience, oh, boy. I was just wondering why the CEO of In Q Tel, the CIA's investment asset management group, was on the board of this weird biotechnology company. What I didn't realize is that Resilience partnered with Moderna in 2021. And I made a joke that Whitney Webb probably would already have the scoop on this, and lo and behold, Whitney Webb reported in 2022 on this exact company. And she has done her own dig into the board of directors, and we're gonna put it all together right now.
But first, let's revisit what Destiny put together in her thread. She pointed out that when you go to usaspending.gov and you look up contracts that Resilience Government Services has had with the government, they're getting funded by our government to the tune of a $142,000,000 all the way back in 2013 and, what, $66,000,000 in 2020, but they're also known by 7 other names. Nanosphere, Nanotherapeutics, Nanotherapeutics, Ology. But I noticed that this address that they give on this website is not the same as on Resilience's own website. So I double checked us and made sure that Resilient Government Services that's getting these awards is this website, just to make sure we're all on the same page.
Yeah. We're on the same page. When you look up resilience on Crunchbase, they're being funded by the US International Development Finance Corp, the Department of Defense, Google, Lux Capital. They've apparently raised $2,500,000,000. If you look up Nanosphere on Crunchbase, they've been funded by Allen and Company and Bain Capital.
But now let's dig into the team at Resilience, starting with Robert Nelson, better known as Bob. Whitney Webb put me on to this article where Bob Nelson is real tight with Luciana Borio. Apparently, I was actually talking to Borio on the phone about her work running the pandemic preparedness at NSC that led to his idea of starting resilience. And Scott Gottlieb, the guy on Pfizer's board that started this whole investigation, he's also homies with Boreal. He tweeted about how great she is.
Turns out she is also vice president at In Q Tel. Weird. Previously served on the National Security Council, acting chief scientist at the FDA. She's an infectious disease physician who, you know, has ties with Bill and Melinda, the Council on Foreign Relations. And for some reason, Goldman Sachs wants a consultant that is an infectious disease position.
Because, you know, banking and infectious disease positions are, like, tight. Then we have Drew Owetting, who is the cofounder of 8BC Capital Partners, which is private equity. Cofounded with Joe Lonsdale of the PayPal Mafia. Joe Lonsdale worked with PayPal while he attended Stanford, but more importantly, Joe cofounded Palantir. You know, this Palantir, the one that's pretty much a CIA company designed to network all of our data and give it to these people and these people.
So what is that? Like, 3, 4 connections to the intelligence community now? But wait, because we don't wanna skip old Bob, who is also on the board of directors, who is an ex Navy Seal who served in Vietnam. And according to one of his SEAL team members, Clon, the team rounded up the women and children from the shelters and decided to kill them and get out of there for fear that they would alert enemy soldiers. Obviously, he made that up though.
Kerry responded by saying, that's not my memory of it, and accused Klon of being jealous of him. So what has he been up to since his time in Vietnam? Well, he was on the 911 commission, and he was a big part of Allen and Company, specifically a managing director at Allen and Company according to Tenet Health where he's on the board. Worth noting that the former director of the CIA is also associated with Allen and Company. They are a low profile banking boutique that has no website.
They work on high profile deals with companies like Google, Twitter, Facebook, Activision, eBay, Verizon, Time Warner. They host the Sun Valley Conference, which is a billionaire retreat every year, where these people go. I'll give you a real screenshot so you can read them if you wanna pause because there's a lot of names on there. So what have we learned so far? We've learned that during Operation Warp Speed, Moderna partnered with this brand new company that was hastily thrown together by all these dudes with ties to intelligence and Pfizer and big banking.
Oh, yeah. And the ex CEO of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. And they produced all the genetic material for Moderna's vaccines. Thank goodness it intends to reinvent biomanufacturing and democratize access to medicines, namely gene therapies, experimental vaccines, and other medicines of tomorrow. I mean, if you think about it, this makes a lot of sense.
And this is exactly what the CIA is supposed to be doing. They're protecting us from bioweapons and from I mean, like, from, like, viruses and, like, dangerous things that this is just the world in 2023. And thank goodness we have all these rich people and their friends to do such a selfless act of service to protect us from dangerous thing. I mean, I just hope that they can manufacture the next vaccine to the next big pandemic before that pandemic hits. I'm sure they already have it all figured out.
So normal people like you and me, we have nothing to worry about. Thank goodness. The experts have it under control. Oh, yeah. I almost forgot.
Remember I told
Speaker 1: you Illumina would come back up? Well, Francis Arnold
Speaker 0: is
Speaker 1: on that board along with Scott Gottlieb. You know, Francis Arnold and Scott Gottlieb. Sorta like Susan Desmond Hellman and Scott Gottlieb. You know, like Susan Desmond Hellman
Speaker 0: and Scott Gottlieb. It seems like they all know each other. Weird.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
I remember this interview I didn't realise he died, RIP https://t.co/Hd2jKGUB4C
Video Transcript AI Summary
I got the vaccine. Did you really? Yeah, even the fourth one. Were you pressured into it? Kind of. I went to the doctor for blood work, and we noticed some unusual particles. I asked what they were, and the doctor revealed they were related to the vaccine. I was shocked. This is why some people experience severe issues, like having numerous white blood clots in their blood.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I got the vaccine. Did you really? Yeah. Even 4. Really?
Yeah. A peer pressure into the vaccine? Yeah. Kinda Is that what you're saying? Yeah.
That's I don't I went to the doctor and I did my blood work again because I checked my blood work all the time and then I show it to the doctor and we kind of see these particles. And I'm like, what is this? And then they all No way, dude. This is Shut the fuck up. This is from this.
And I'm like, oh my god. Isn't why people, they die. They have these white blood clots. Tons of them in their blood everywhere.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
They're committing treason against the United States https://t.co/cHsqh57YHN
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are military and law enforcement individuals frustrated with illegal operations they view as treasonous. This group has a long-term agenda that poses a serious threat. A legal fund is being established to sue corporations under the RICO Act, similar to actions taken against the mafia. There’s urgency for Congress to act quickly, but alternative measures are being pursued. Public pressure is essential; citizens should contact their representatives to advocate for open hearings and witness protection. Disturbingly, there are claims that this covert group has the capability to manipulate natural disasters, posing an existential threat to humanity. The speaker left a lucrative medical career to address these issues after uncovering the truth about these operations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are military and law enforcement people who are quite fed up with this, you know, illegal operation that's treasonous. I mean, I'll just be flat out, put it out there. They are committing treason against United States. When I tell you that this group are a bunch of sociopaths and psychopaths capable of this, people need to believe it. And not letting those letting those guys get away with their agenda because this is a 70 year long term plan that they're coming to ahead now, which can be and you can be executed for that, as you know, by federal law.
I think there are certain people who are not gonna sit on their hands if the Congress just dithers for another 2, 3, 4 years. Because from a law enforcement point of view, we've been able to prove that these operations are already criminal enterprises. And by the way, anyone who's listening, who is an attorney, we're starting our own legal fund to sue all these corporations for these technologies under the civilian RICO provision, racketeering influence, corrupt organization. It's been used against the mafia. I always point out to people, this organization is the world's largest and deadliest mafia.
So you can invoke that RICO Act that was passed in 1970 as a civilian organization, which is what we're about to do. And there are there's a US attorney on our team, federal prosecutor, that when we go to discovery and get evidence, we'll turn over to him. He can do a criminal prosecution at that point. So we're not gonna sit on our hands. Now we're encouraging Congress to move quickly.
But in the meanwhile, I can tell you there are things afoot that are gonna go more quickly. So what I'm trying to do is be sure This is why listen. Everyone writing sitting here listening should write to your member of congress and your 2 senators, whatever state you're from, and encourage them to pass these laws protecting the witnesses and to hold open hearings. Because, I don't think we need to continue this process like at the this last small hearing with the 3 guys. We're aggressive.
I can't talk about that. I have to be in a SCIF, which is a secure compartment and information facility, top secret facility. No. Because these projects should not be afforded any national security protection since they are being run illegally. I think we should take a much more aggressive stand towards fully open hearings on this, which we've been calling for for 30 years.
But I think your listeners have more power than they realize if they were to write their member of Congress, their representative in the House and their 2 senators because they need to hear from the people. They need to hear that the people care about this issue. The most dangerous is their capabilities to, a, stage a alien invasion that would convince everyone it's false, and, b, things that they can do geophysically. What I mean by that is I have a NOC, a non official cover, a guy who's deep cover currently in the system that described this illegal covert group was were able to move an asteroid on a trajectory coming from the sun to skim over the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific, caused massive tidal waves and destruction deliberately. And an ET craft intercepted that and saved our bacon.
Now I also know that they have systems that they can put on fault lines off the coast of various landmasses like California and elsewhere, and they can trigger those. And those can cause massive earthquakes and tsunamis. When I tell you that this group are a bunch of sociopaths and psychopaths capable of this, people need to believe it. And not letting those letting those guys get away with their agenda, because this is a 70 year long term plan that they're coming to a ahead now, is a true threat to humans. So that those two areas are the most disturbing, things I have discovered, about this organization or what their plans are and what their capabilities are.
And these aren't theoretical capabilities. These are actual ones. So to have an organization that's not being overseen by the people or by Congress or the White House that have those sort of technologies and that kind of malicious intent, We're talking an existential threat to humanity and to our country. And that's why, you know, I left my medical career a few years ago to fix this. Because once I learned what was really happening, I was ready to walk away from, you know, whatever it is, you know, 4 or 5, 600000 a year as a doctor to fix this problem.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Big Pharma CEO says he's not allowed by law to take the vaccine because they need to ensure a functioning company. Well, that's very telling.... https://t.co/Knuem2YfJA
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am currently not allowed to take the vaccine due to legal restrictions. There is a priority list for vaccination, and we are not permitted to participate in clinical trials as company employees. Our focus is on ensuring the functionality of our teams and the company as a whole. We are working towards finding a legal and fair solution to this situation, prioritizing the vaccination of our coworkers and partners.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have heard that you yourself have not taken the, the vaccine yet. Why not? So I am I am legally not allowed to take the vaccine at the moment. We, of course, consider, to make that possible. It is more important for us that our coworkers and partners, get vaccinated.
Why are you not legally allowed to take the vaccine? Because you know that, that there is a priority, the vaccine is not allowed to be taken outside of this priority list. And what is also important, we were even not allowed to participate in clinical trials because per law, it is not possible to include company people into such trials, which is really fine. But now we have to deal with the more important challenge that we need to ensure functionality of our whole company, of our teams. And therefore, this is needed, and I think we will find a legal and fair solution for that.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Dr. David E. Martin Calls For Total Destruction Of The World Health Organization (WHO) For Crimes Against Humanity & Bio-Terrorism. https://t.co/t8jmkrJzAi
Video Transcript AI Summary
A small group of conspirators has exploited the global population for profit, leading to an unacceptable death rate, as noted by the World Health Organization. The WHO has operated as a criminal cartel since its inception, using a four-step process: planning, funding, rationalizing, and profiting from their actions. Evidence shows that the organization has manipulated public health narratives for financial gain, including the controversial funding from the Gates Foundation. The intent behind their actions has been to instill fear and control populations, rather than promote health. This is not merely a public health issue but a criminal conspiracy that requires urgent action to dismantle the WHO and hold accountable those responsible for these crimes. The focus should be on ending this corrupt organization rather than debating its legitimacy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity. And I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite. When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words.
Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cartel. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit.
Well, I'm going to tell you since its formation in the 19 forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent. And I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation. This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand. And they use a 4 step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans.
They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale for the thing that they're going to do, and then they deploy and profit from it. And in violation of 15 U. S. Code Section 19, which for those of you listening, coincidentally started with the Clayton Act in the same year that the World Health Organization in the United States, 1913, the same year the World Health Organization's progenitors also started. So I find it fascinating that we passed the Clayton Act in 1913, and we set in motion a 110 years ago the criminal conspiracy which we now call the World Health Organization, a 110 years later.
And in violation of TFEU or TFEU, I don't know even how to say it, the TFEU, the treaty allegedly for the functioning of the European Union, which I think needs to now be called the Treaty for the Dysfunctional European cabal, Article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions that this was never a public health anything. It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behavior of a population, period. That's what it was. That's what it always was. And we can come up with every theoretical argument we wanna make about things, but the problem even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something is falsifiable for the data from Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance companies paid $30,000,000,000 less in claims.
Now if there's a medical professional or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate that we could develop a virus cunningly that could find out your bank account, your insurance policy statements, and whether you're paid up on your premiums, that's a big ask. It turns out that the data is unambiguous. We did not have a pandemic. We had genocide, and we need to call it what it is. Next slide.
When I say we planned it, let's make sure we understand exactly the not so fine print of the fine print. And I want to call your attention first to the right hand column of this slide. This is the 2011 data that the World Health Organization, the Wellcome Trust, PATH and the Gates Foundation did on their wonderful worldwide program for malaria vaccine for children under the age of 6 months of age. And in their clinical trial, it's helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the vaccine group and then cunningly used the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28 children. Now the reason I said murdered and the reason why I use that term is because it's exactly what it was.
Because it turns out that this control group was not a saline injection. It was not some sort of innocuous innocent thing. It was actually a cocktail of other known pathogenic disease carrying injections. The control group was known to kill people and the experimental control group was actually theoretically maybe gonna kill people. And what we did was we actually went ahead and murdered them all.
And cunningly, under article 5, section 13, which I've put on this slide, I want you to understand why I said at its formation in 1947, when the WHO was funded and founded, it was funded and founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language. Section 13 of article 5 ends with the following statement, immunity from personal arrest or detention, blah blah blah, immunity from legal process of every kind. Now if you didn't intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution and its worst, even investigation for prosecution of every kind? People sit there and pretend, well, that's like diplomatic immunity. Do you realize this isn't even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity?
This is a criminal organization who set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit. And when I say they knew they were going to commit, I mean they knew it because their first director general, none other than doctor Renee Sand, who happened to be in the hospitality of the Germans in Dachau in 1940 earlier in 1947 mysteriously with the largest of the Rockefeller Foundation was nominated to become the 1st director general of the WHO. And within 5 short years, Rene Sand decided to authorize the real purpose of the WHO in writing by then director general, doctor Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population control as its primary objective. Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room? This is not public health.
This is the advancement of the same genocidal program that began with the Carnegie Foundation's funding of the Eugenics office at Cold Spring Labs in the United States in 1913 under the philanthropy philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie. People stop fooling yourself. We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing, but we're not going to the root. This was an organized crime racketeering entity set up to give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it controls who lives, who dies, and who gets any chance at life. And if you think that I am somehow inflating numbers, let me be unambiguous.
Under every treatment of tax provision, if I were to tell you that there is an 88% controlling interest of any organization, you might conclude that that actually aggregates into a controlling interest. And it turns out that if we look at the foundation donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those come from a single organization, the Gates Foundation. That constitutes a violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitor's law in the United States. This is absolutely not only not an independent charitably funded donation, but more importantly, under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic, this constitutes directed donations which specifically are forbidden and do not have any place anywhere in the charter of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations. When I say this is a crime, I mean it's a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime, and now the crime of racketeering leading to murder and global terrorism.
Next slide. I told you that the second thing after they plan it is they fund it. And why don't we use the criminals' language in their own words? Because it's the best way to say it. When they actually planned the release of the use of a biologically modified chimera associated with the model derived from coronavirus, they actually said the following.
To sustain the funding based beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding for the needful medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. Now let me pause for just one moment and remind you that the crisis that they were speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding. There was no health crisis. This was a crisis of their coffers were starting to run dry. That's the crisis.
And let's read on. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. That is officially the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal that by that time was the decade of vaccines put in motion in 2011 by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board of the World Health Organization and it was the funding base for Peter Daszak's partnership with the chimeric production of pathogens both in North Carolina and in Wuhan.
So don't tell me that we have to do an investigation into where this came from. The criminals have admitted to it in their own words. Next slide. And now we get the fun one that no one in congress is willing to address, which is the elephant in the room. On October 21, 2014, despite the multiple conversations between senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci, where we've been told that Rand Paul has done everything he can to put Fauci on the ropes, he has had in his possession the letter that you see on the left.
And it is the letter conveniently on NIAID letterhead sent to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, which unambiguously states that during the gain of function moratorium, which by the way, if we use the word moratorium, feels like that means you're supposed to stop, why don't we go ahead and look at 2 pieces of this letter? 1st, the second bullet under project 1, which by the way was not part of the original grant. This was to look at the novel functions of the virus pathogenesis in vivo. You know what that means? In living systems.
The grant was supposed to be clinical simulations and models. But this grant was modified with this letter to say we were going to authorize gain of function research during the moratorium in living systems. And then we love the last paragraph of this letter, which conveniently says, as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary. How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium? And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line or continue to conduct the applicable gain of function research until the end of the currently active budget period.
But here comes the problem. You know who is supplying the budget? An indefinite term, unlimited amount contract from DARPA and from NIH. Isn't it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out, when you find out that there is no point where the money runs out because there is no end to the thing that has no end? And lest you think that I'm making an allegation, which I'm not, I'm making an accusation.
Let's be clear. And there's a big difference. I'm not alleging anything. They actually went to the trouble of telling us that it was going to be the Wuhan virus that was gonna get us. As you see on the right hand side of the screen, published in 2016, March 14, 2016, the SARS like Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1, and I quote, is poised for human emergence.
Does that sound like we're just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little haywire in December of 2019? Or does it feel like we were told, look at Wuhan and look at coronavirus and look at what we've been doing to manipulate coronavirus in Wuhan and in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. And lo and behold, we're going to go ahead and tell you that we're ready to release it in 2016. Next slide. We're almost done.
And then they created it. Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use of the term biological warfare. I do that because I am credentialed to do that. I happen to be, for the United States government, in the early part of 2000s and the latter part of 90s, a person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of biological and chemical weapons. I'm acutely familiar with the definition of what a biological warfare agent is in the 18 US code, the criminal code of violations of biological and chemical weapons.
And so my assessment is in fact professional and right. And the reason for that is I'm the one credentialed to make that determination for the United States government for many years. That's why I say it. But let's pretend for the moment that I'm just a nut job. Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about.
So why don't we look at what the criminals said themselves, shall we? In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation, Ralph Barrick, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into 1,000,000 and billions of people's arms, arms, that Ralph Barrick was sponsored to present the following, and let's go ahead and use his words, presentation. Synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, bio warfare enabling technologies. Does that sound like a public health distribution program? Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else?
Or does biological warfare enabling technology sound like not countermeasures or pandemic preparedness? It sounds to me like biological warfare enabling technologies. And the reason why I have that hunch is what followed was he received, next to his NIAID grants, noncompetitive DARPA grants in matching funds for over $140,000,000 of aggregate funding going into his and his related programs on synthetic biological warfare enabling technologies. So do I have a problem calling the injection a biological warfare enabling technology? Absolutely not.
Because that's what they called it. And we know that they knew they called it that on September 18, 2019. Because on September 18, 2019, the racketeering, co conspiring cabal of interlocking directorates, also known as the World Health Organization, said that they were going to conduct an expert experience for the world that was going to be a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen. The lethality in that statement is the problem. They didn't say we're gonna maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around.
They said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent. And the stated reason, in September 2020, the progress indicator is that the world would accept a universal vaccine. Not, we'll look at other options of treatment, not, we'll have a look at what might be early intervention as Doctor. McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances. Not that we stated on September 18, 2019, we were intending to kill.
And we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion, no one would have accepted. And that's published by the criminal racketeers. Next slide, and there's only 2 to go if you're following. Deploy and profit from it. We were told investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
And lo and behold, guess what they saw? Profit at the end of the process. 2022, $100,000,000,000 for Pfizer, of public funds. Moderna, after lying to the congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID, where Anthony Fauci and the entire team at NIH said that they had no financial interest in their recommendation, they receive a back payment royalty of $400,000,000 for the first payment of the royalty. $400,000,000 More than any institute of health has ever received in a single payment for a single invention in the history of American medical research.
And lo and behold, what do we receive after that? A request from the World Health Organization to expand its budget by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from it donate to it, and guess what they just did? They laundered the money right back. That's what they did. Next and now you get the final slide.
This is not a public health crime. This is actually not a constitutional crime. This is a criminal act done by a criminal institution established to enable criminal behavior since its foundation in 1947. That is what this is. And we should not be debating the merits of democracy or liberty or anything else, as irrational as that would be if we stood at a bank robbery and debated the merits of printing dollar bills.
The problem is not the dollar bills. It's the bank robber. And the problem here is not health, and it's not public health, and it's not the suppression of information, and the suppression of dissident views, and the absolute unconscionable treatment of physicians around the world academicians around the world who spoke out against this, that's not the crime. The crime is that we had criminal racketeers who conspired and developed a quote emergency, the same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured, and did all agency capture to make sure that you were told that you would use terms that they tell you to use, vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition. So we just used them.
Criminal racketeers price fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and fixed prices in direct collusion in violation of both European Union standards and in violation of both the Sherman and the Clayton Act in the United States. These were crimes. It was organized crime, and we should treat it as such. Criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath, and this resulted in the death and destruction of liberty, and most importantly, the death and destruction of the integrity of well meaning people who sit here today doing everything they can within their power to try to treat the calamities created by this catastrophe. I will not for a moment denigrate the multiple contributions of amazing academic and medical professionals who've tried desperately to step into the gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes.
But I will, without doubt, say the following. Until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering and murder. Until we have that conversation, we're having the wrong conversation. Because we are not here to debate the merits of a modified agreement for a criminal racketeering organization. We are here to end the criminal organization itself.
This is my call to every single person on this planet. Don't just limit the power of the who. Destroy the who. Thank you very much.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Chemical A-113 Adrenochrome.. https://t.co/xj5MzAp86z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Most celebrities seem to defy aging due to a dark secret involving children. A recurring number, 113, appears in many children's movies, linked to a chemical produced by adrenaline. This chemical is harvested when children experience fear, as depicted in films like Monsters Inc., where monsters scare kids to obtain this energy. Further investigation reveals a disturbing connection to detention centers that track the production of this substance, including names and birthdays. It's crucial for society to recognize this issue and push for change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna know the dark secret behind how most celebrities just don't age? Like harvesting kids between the ages of 5 12 to be able to do this. Let's first talk about why a 113 appears in all and I mean all children movies. It's actually a chemical and that chemical is only produced by adrenaline. You know, when you get that spike of energy when you're super angry or super afraid.
Super afraid, Like in Monsters Inc, when they can only survive by scaring little kids and getting that juice. And if you do some deep digging, you'll find the production of raw per detention center in which they list all of the names, the birthdays and how much they produced. We collectively have to wake up and make change.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Dr. buttar was murdered shortly after this interview... He knew what Fauci was up to and was telling the world. https://t.co/pS0DoWlVnp
Video Transcript AI Summary
You believe Dr. Fauci is involved in a plot to harm people? While I think he’s not innocent, I can't confirm the extent of his involvement. Disinformation about COVID is rampant, with figures like Dheeraj Bhutar spreading false claims, such as more deaths from vaccines than from COVID. He suggests the pandemic was planned to reduce the population, which is dangerous rhetoric. Bhutar compares Fauci to Hitler and claims vaccines are more harmful than the virus, despite evidence showing vaccines are effective in preventing severe outcomes. His misinformation has led to his removal from some platforms, yet he continues to spread falsehoods elsewhere. The latest studies indicate vaccines remain highly effective, contradicting Bhutar's claims about vaccine dangers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You think doctor Fauci is involved in some kind of plot to kill millions of people? I just wanna make sure I understand this.
Speaker 1: Drew, I'm a reasonable person. You're asking me what I think, and I said it could be this, but I can tell you that doctor Fauci is not an innocent bystander. He's very well aware of what he's doing, and the extent of it in his involvement, I don't know. I'm not privy to that information.
Speaker 0: As atrocious as doctor Pitar's fake conclusions and conspiracy theories are, he is just one of the doctors spreading dangerous COVID disinformation to millions of people across social media according to the Center For Countering Digital Hate. Dheerajid Bhattar at one time had more than a 1000000 followers and is considered one of the top spreaders of disinformation about COVID 19.
Speaker 1: More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID.
Speaker 0: That is not true. Neither is his tweet that the Red Cross won't accept blood from people who have had the COVID 19 vaccine. He posted most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025, but his biggest whopper is the overarching conspiracy theory that COVID was a planned operation, which was politically motivated as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. You believe the pandemic was planned? I do.
Okay. But you don't know by that?
Speaker 1: I have no idea.
Speaker 0: And you don't know why?
Speaker 1: Well, I I suspect that there's the research that's coming now that would indicate that it's probably something to reduce the population or or minimize reproduction rates.
Speaker 0: It would be laughable if it wasn't so dangerous. Ptahr compares COVID and the vaccine to World War 2, doctor Anthony Fauci to Adolf Hitler.
Speaker 1: Fucci is a criminal. You talk about Hitler? Okay.
Speaker 0: Well, whoever doubt doctor Fauci is in your mind, he is a government bureaucrat and you are comparing him to Hitler. Oh, I mean Binaxes. I I am. Who killed 6,000,000 Jews.
Speaker 1: I think this is this number is gonna be higher.
Speaker 2: Let's be absolutely clear. Lives cost lives in a pandemic. If you're encouraging people not to vaccinate, you will cause people to lose their lives.
Speaker 0: Qatar is encouraging people to distrust life saving vaccines. And like other disinformers, he is using false twisted information and unproven conspiracies to do it. Do you think the COVID vaccine works?
Speaker 1: I think that the COVID vaccine is very effective at what it was designed for perhaps, but it's not preventing death. Certainly not.
Speaker 0: It's not preventing death. No. Even faced with indisputable facts, Bhutar doubles down on his belief that life saving vaccines are more dangerous than the virus itself.
Speaker 1: People don't die from COVID. You've already seen the data. So why are we getting a vaccine that causes more deaths than the problem itself?
Speaker 0: 6.34000000000 doses of this vaccine have been given. If you're right, people could drop and bend all around us.
Speaker 1: It's not orchestrated to do that. Each vaccine has been geared up. So you can look at the ingredients of the vaccines themselves. It's all been published.
Speaker 0: Complete the sentence. Each vaccine has been geared up for what? Well, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Each vaccine is designed it appears to be different. I don't know the details because I'm not a vaccine developer.
Speaker 0: Scientific corruption. Because of his disinformation, Qatar has been removed from Facebook and Instagram, but he's still going strong on Twitter, Telegram, and his own website all filled with falsehoods. On September 5th, you retweeted a photo of a AstraZeneca packaging that seems to indicate the vaccine was made in 2018. That picture that you retweeted was a doctored photo. It was fake.
Speaker 1: Perhaps it was fake. But why would you do that? So, Drew, let me ask you something. You're saying it's not reasonable to question the same agencies that have resulted in numerous deaths, I e d f?
Speaker 0: It's reasonable to ask questions. What I don't understand is how you get from your asking questions to your belief. You had 1,200,000 followers at one point.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: They got false information from you. Not not correct or challenging medical information. They got a a doctor photo.
Speaker 1: If I sent a tweet out of a picture that was doctored and I didn't know about it, I'm not perfect. Maybe I did make that mistake, but I cannot make mistakes on the numbers.
Speaker 0: The very latest vaccine study show they remain 90% effective in preventing hospitalization and death. Bhutar tells his followers it is the vaccine that is the danger.
Speaker 1: We already see thousands of people dying. This delta variant is all vaccine danger. I mean, the the CDC's own data is showing that.
Speaker 0: That's just not true.
Speaker 1: I don't want to be part of this mass genocide that I see happening. And I think that what's going on right now will be remembered as a worst time in history compared to what World War 2 happened.
Speaker 0: I just wanna be straight with you. I
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that cutting umbilical cords immediately after birth is misguided, especially since they are rich in stem cells. It's concerning that these stem cells are often sold back to parents. Cord circulation continues for over 30 minutes post-birth, providing essential nutrients and oxygen to the baby. When clamped too soon, babies may gasp for air, as they rely on the cord for oxygen initially. Allowing the cord to detach naturally, as seen in nature, promotes healthier development in infants. I advocate for homebirth to support this process.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
UMBILLICAL CORD They cut those cords KNOWING they are packed full of stem cells! Then they try to sell those stem cells back?? No way! Homebirth each and every time!! We are not meant to cut and clamp umbillical cords. Cord circulation continues for 30+ minutes after birth- meaning for over 30 minutes, stem cells, blood and vital nutrients are meant to be pumping into the baby. When the cord is clamped right away, the child usually gasps for air, because they were recieving oxygen from the cord. This is why babies can be born underwater and not drown, as they don't need to use their lungs right away. Letting the cord detach on its own, like all animals in the wild, allows for maximum stem cell and blood tranfusion to the baby, leading to healthier, more developed babies.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
When a woman becomes pregnant, cells are exchanged between her and the child, remaining in her body for life, even after a miscarriage or abortion. Research shows that when a mother falls ill, these cells from her children can migrate to the affected areas, helping to combat disease and promote healing. This connection highlights the enduring impact of motherhood. The concept of being "saved through childbearing" reflects the idea of health, suggesting that even if a child is no longer present, their cells continue to support the mother's well-being.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Woman who becomes pregnant, even if that woman suffers a miscarriage, even if that woman tragically makes the wrong choice and gets rid of the life within her through an abortion, or if the baby comes to full term, cells are exchanged between the mother and the child so that after either a miscarriage, tragically, sadly, an abortion, or birth, those cells will remain in your body, ladies, for the rest of your life. You have living cells of all your children in your body right now, even if you had a miscarriage. Scientists discovered that when a woman becomes sick who has been a mother, they noticed certain clusters of cells from her body going to the ill area in her body and would be seeking to make her well, to fight off the whether it was a disease, whether it was a sickness, whatever it was, and guess what cells those were? The cells of your children. See, maternity has its blessings.
That's why even at the beginning when Adam and Eve fell, when god says, you will be saved through childbearing, the word saved literally means health. When those cells run to the defense of the mother, even if the child no longer is here on earth through a miscarriage or through an abortion, your child is fighting to save your life.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
US Government trying to pass 2024 Bill ‘HSB 737’ which will grant immunity to pesticide manufacturers for poisoning Americans! https://t.co/K5AdkLwmvp
Video Transcript AI Summary
I just attended a subcommittee hearing on HSB 737, a bill that would grant pesticide companies immunity from lawsuits filed by citizens for damages. This bill, previously rejected by the House Ag Committee, has now passed the subcommittee. It threatens farmers' rights to seek legal action for damages affecting their families and livelihoods. Bayer and other chemical companies argue that these lawsuits threaten their business, citing $3 billion spent annually on legal battles versus $300 million in profits. However, only 1% of Bayer's lawsuits come from Iowa farmers. I'd prefer to see Bayer face challenges rather than Iowa farmers suffer. The interests of industry should not outweigh those of the people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just came out of this subcommittee hearing on HSB 737, which would give pesticide companies immunity for citizens trying to file lawsuits against them for damages. This bill was already shut down in the House Ag Committee, and now it's being brought back in ways and means. This bill just passed the subcommittee, and it will take away farmers' rights to pursue legal action after damages are caused to their families and themselves. The basic argument presented by Bayer and other chemical companies is that the lawsuits that are being brought up by them about the damages caused by their products is going to put them out of business. And it's true.
Bayer spent $3,000,000,000 on average a year over the last 6 years fighting lawsuits and only brought in 300,000,000 in profit. But only 1% of Bayer's civil suits come from Iowa's farmers. I don't know about you, but I would rather see Bayer suffer as a company than Iowa's farmers suffer. Industry should not have more say than the people.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Can't wait to see someone going to jail for this. https://t.co/KIn4u8u77d
Video Transcript AI Summary
The outer structure of the buildings was designed with a robust steel frame, capable of withstanding significant loads. Unlike the Twin Towers, which collapsed from the top down, Building 7 fell uniformly from the bottom, indicating that all load-bearing columns failed simultaneously, which fire alone cannot explain. The collapse occurred near free-fall speed, suggesting controlled demolition. Dust samples contained incendiary materials, and extensive elevator renovations prior to the attacks allowed workers access to the building's core. On the day of the attacks, the elevator company refused to assist, later going out of business. Firefighters reported explosions, but these testimonies were suppressed, preventing a thorough investigation into the events surrounding Building 7.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the impact of a, of a jet. From what I understand, the, the outer, skeleton of the building, the outer columns was like a, a fishnet, and you had these inner core columns, which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand 4 or 5 times what the loads were. The engineers always overdesigned the building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 911. So that should say something right there.
And it said that building 7, it was a progressive collapse that it was caused by fire. But progressive collapse, unlike the Twin Towers, the Twin Towers collapsed from the top down. That's a progressive collapse Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building 7 collapsing, it collapses uniformly.
It's collapsing from the bottom. The building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground, and you could see the sides caving in on. For a building to collapse uniformly, which the video show, all the load bearing columns would have to have failed simultaneously. Now fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers.
And if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked 1 on top of each other, the stoves up at the top, yes, there's fire and that they've been damaged. But the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So the structure underneath all of that is intact. So it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase Without the control demolition.
You're running into the path of most resistance. I see. Something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just, the planes or the fires. I think that and they examined the dust and they found what they call fermitic material, which is like an explosive incendiary, which was in the dust samples.
And that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing an extensive elevator renovation renovation in the 2 or 3 years prior to. All kinds of workers, they had access to the the core the cores of the building. And on the day of the attack, the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators. And the elevator company was the elevator company.
It subsequently went out of business in a couple of years after that. The information is out there. At one time, when I was heavily engaged in trying to get a new investigation, I definitely felt threatened. I felt threatened for my family, and it wasn't a pleasant experience. You have sworn testimonies from firefighters regarding explosions in the building.
They were suppressed. Just somebody making a statement, especially from Feynman Police, if they make a statement, I heard an explosion. That's grounds to initiate an investigation. The firefighters, a bomb went off. This this is their own words made that day.
They just ignored it. Just like, building 7 was
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
H.A.A.R.P. Geoengineering is used for depopulation. https://t.co/ktdrgKkYvH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Questions were raised about HAARP, the high-frequency active auroral research program in Alaska, which is currently managed by the Air Force Research Lab. The Air Force has completed its work at HAARP and plans to demolish the facility this summer. There was also a discussion about the potential for collaboration with the University of Alaska to take over HAARP.
In a separate inquiry, a statement was made regarding government-created weather tampering techniques intended to control populations. The speaker claimed that such techniques exist, backed by patents and historical usage dating back to the Vietnam War. They expressed belief in the existence of weather manipulation, suggesting that recent weather events were not coincidental and provided assurance of supporting documents to substantiate these claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To ask a question a couple questions here about HAARP, the high frequency active auroral research program. Several of you at the table have a little bit of a piece here. As you know, this is located up in Alaska. It's currently funded by the Air Force Research Lab. It was formerly funded by the Office of Naval Research.
One of the prime customers is DARPA, which is currently running experiments at the facilities here. Then to to, doctor Walker and and mister Schaeffer then, doctor Walker, your agency is currently running the facility. I've mentioned that it's our understanding through the president of U, AAF that that the plans are to move forward and and demolish the facility this summer. So the question to you is, is that accurate? Can you explain why?
And then, perhaps to both you and mister Schaefer, is there any benefit in exploring a potential relationship with the University, of Alaska to to perhaps take over the harbor?
Speaker 1: Thank you, senator. The Air Force has gotten great value out of HARP in the past. We took over from the Navy and managed it and actually did a number of experiment campaigns up there, and have finished our work that we're interested in doing up there. We've moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere which the HARP was really designed to do was to inject energy into the ionosphere be able to actually control it. And but that work is has been completed.
Speaker 2: Another question on the, in an interview with the Los Angeles Times on April 21st, you said that the you told the Associated Press that the American government has created weather tampering techniques so that the new world order will be able to starve millions of Americans and to control the rest. Would you explain what you were trying to say?
Speaker 3: Well, it it what I was trying to say is exactly what I said. There is weather control techniques. We have a complete package on that which I did not bring, but I certainly will see to it that it is brought in for the record. Number 1, the entire patents on the equipment. Number 2, Senator Claiborne tells complete statement and story of his own that not only does it exist, but that we even utilized it as far back as the Vietnam War.
You might wanna touch
Speaker 2: base with Senator Bill. I I just wanna repeat before I
Speaker 3: turn it So yes. But we do have all that information.
Speaker 2: You're saying the government has created weather tampering techniques so that the, quote, new world order will be able to starve millions of Americans Worldwide. Millions of Americans and to control the rest.
Speaker 3: Yes, sir. And that's my belief. As bizarre as that sounds, when if somebody had told me that that equipment even existed 10 years ago, I would have thought they were nuts, sir. And at this point in time, we have all the documents to prove it. And if you think that 85 tornadoes takes place in the middle of our growing area by simultaneous accident, I'm I'm sorry.
With the equipment that's already set up internationally and as bizarre as that is, it is proven and documented. We will supply you with those documents. As bizarre as that is, I would say that weather wars, and this is quoting actually senator Claiborne Pell himself, that they are the greatest weapon ever created in the world, and that's the senator's own statement. So, yes, I have to do stand on that. Thank you,
Speaker 2: miss Fletcher.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Project Slam Dunk https://t.co/QCofZsIu6s
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1968, while stationed at Cannon Air Force Base in New Mexico, my father, a military police officer, witnessed a secret project called Project Slam Dunk. He described large hangars where a lunar landscape was created using sand and cement, concealing the assembly of the lunar lander. He was sworn to secrecy by the NSA and became emotional watching the moon landing on TV, believing it mirrored what he had seen. Only 15 people, including President Johnson and key NASA figures, were allowed access. Filming lasted three days, after which the site was restored. My father felt compelled to share this information on his deathbed, emphasizing its importance. He raised me with honesty, and I believe his account.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't want any money for what I'm doing because hopefully this video won't come out until after my death. So I have nothing to gain, nothing to profit by telling you what I'm gonna tell you. In 1968, my father was stationed at Cannon Air Force Base in New Mexico. We lived in Clovis, New Mexico. He was in the military police for over 20 years.
And on his deathbed in 2002, we made a recording of what happened. Project Slam Dunk was the name of of this. President Johnson in 1968. Okay? In Cannon Air Force Base in 1960 8, he said by that time, by the time he got there, that there was already 2 large hangars that were connected.
There was hundreds of dump trucks came in and dumped sand and, stone and, cement powder was powdered over the top of all that to make it look like a lunar landscape. They had men that fashioned it into a lunar landscape, he said. Okay. I've never known my dad to lie, so this all took me by surprise. And, you know, what's that all about?
So anyway, he said that in front of the, the airplane hangars, was, pole framing with a large canvas tents, that was, concealing the inside of the staging area. Inside the staging area, on flatbed trucks was on crated, the lunar lander that was assembled, reassembled back inside the hangers. All of the walls were painted flat black and the ceilings as well. He was sworn to secrecy by the NSA, and, they would put him in prison for breaking that oath. When dad saw the the moon landing on TV, he cried.
He said he knew, that what he had witnessed on TV was exactly what they recorded in that hangar. There was no reason for them to go flying around and everything. They had detailed high definition photos of the landing area. There was no reason for them to go flying around to a different landing area that almost exhausted their fuel except for drama because everything had gone so smoothly. Nothing, you know, so it had to be something.
Anyway, dad was one of 3 guards. They guarded the, the inside of the front entrance. There was a list of 15 people who could enter. No one else was allowed by order of president Johnson. Here is that list, and I gave it to Bart's eyebrow as well.
He checked out a lot of these names, and he says he can verify a lot of these people and what they do. And I come across a couple myself. Anyway, president Johnson, Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldwin, Werner Von Braun, Robert Emanager, Gene Krantz, James Webb, Joe Kerwin, doctor Thomas Payne, Glenn Lutting, doctor for Christopher Kraft, doctor James Van Allen, general Trudeau Trudeau, lieutenant colonel, Donald Simon, and Grant Norwood. Now the only 2 that I really have information on is Robert Emanager. Apparently, he did, a lot of, video work and stuff for, the Department of Defense.
So the the the DOD did know him. Okay? And the other one was, Grant Norray, n o r r a y, I believe, was, to the best of my to the best of my dad's knowledge was a, like, some FBI, CIA, NSA, who knows? Something like that. Okay.
President Johnson only showed up for the 1st day of filming. Filming lasted for 3 days and the entire project was restored to original. In other words, the hangers were all taken apart. The sand was all removed. Dad said there was a lot of building going on at the base.
So at the time, so sand and cement powder was never questioned. I can see how they could smuggle that all in with him and everything else that's going on. Since 2002, I have dug up at I already told you about that the evidence for the moonlight that I have found. If you go to Google and go to Cannon Air Force Base website, they admit that president Johnson was there. The lunar lander was there.
The astronauts were there. I also have, verified some of the people on the list were there. I also verified there are a lot of, building going on in the base just as he had told me. And all of this was going on at the same time, on the same date. Dad told me all these things father to son.
He also told me not to ever tell anyone what he had said, but he said on his deathbed that he had to tell somebody before he died because it was just too important not to tell. That's about all I can think of. I I, my dad, he raised me by the book. I know he didn't lie to me.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Alan Bergman, co-chair of Disney's entertainment division, and we have an exciting announcement. Disney has a long history of magic and trust with families, and we have subtly included LGBTQ representation in our films. This summer, we will open Disney-themed pediatric transgender clinics across the country to help reduce stigma around gender identity. Our goal is to normalize these ideas and make them mainstream, following the lead of other brands. Each patient will receive a free consultation, a six-month Disney Plus subscription, and a pass to our theme parks. We look forward to welcoming families and supporting their children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Alan Bergman. I'm the cochair of the entertainment division at Disney, and we have a special announcement to make today. As you know, Disney is a place of magic. It's where frogs turn into princes, where orphans like Cinderella can transform into beautiful princess. And unlike us jaded adults, the children believe in men.
And we spent a 100 years cultivating a brand that has been trusted and loved by families for generations. And with that trust, we've covertly been inserting queerness into our films and television shows. 1st as LGBTQ background characters and later in leading roles and plot. And few parents know that 2 years ago now for Pride Month on Disney Plus, our streaming service, we streamed the Disney Plus Drag Queen Extravaganza to help introduce queer ideologies and sexualities to children and encourage them to experiment on their own. And we're proud of our perfect DEI score, our diversity, equity, and inclusion score, but we always strive to go above and beyond what is expected.
And so we're proud to announce that this summer we're going to be opening Disney themed pediatric transgender clinics for the children across the country. As you know, there's still a tremendous stigma against parents deciding to change the gender of their children, especially for those raising their children as gender non binary using they, them pronouns. And so we're confident that with our Disney brand puberty blockers and our character themed clinics that we can help reduce this stigma and we can normalize these ideas and we can make them mainstream. Other brands like Bud Light, Gillette, and Pantene have helped pave this path and we're proud to take the lead and bring us into the new world order. We wanna thank governor Gavin Newsom, president Joe Biden, assistant health secretary, Rachel Levine, an incredible woman.
I noticed I didn't say transgender woman. She's a real woman, and it's about time that we stop making these divisive distinctions when talking about her and others. So every patient will receive a preseason pass to any Disney theme park. And just for coming in for a consultation, you'll get a free 6 month subscription to our Disney plus streaming service. So bring the kids on in.
We look forward to to taking care of them. We'll be seeing you soon.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
It's happening 🔥🔥🔥 Thomas Massiejust introduced the Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act, HR 8421 https://t.co/ueHEX8r7kd
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's time to end the Federal Reserve. Representative Thomas Massie from Kentucky has introduced the "End the Feds" bill, HR 8421, aiming to abolish the Federal Reserve Act. He believes that the Federal Reserve is responsible for crippling inflation, having created a trillion dollars during COVID to fund unprecedented deficit spending. This has devalued the dollar and led to high inflation, effectively acting as a hidden tax on Americans. The national debt has soared to $34 trillion due to continuous money printing. To support this initiative, contact your state representative and express your support for Massie's bill. Stay updated by following him on social media and sharing this message.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is time to end the feds. And from a unanimous vote from the ex community to end the feds at 87%, US Representative Thomas Massie from Kentucky, the bluegrass state, let's go, 4th congressional district, has just introduced a bill called in the feds, Federal Reserve Board Abolish Act, HR 8421. This bill would remove the Federal Reserve Act of 13 that was introduced into law. And the reason why he introduced this bill is because he understands that Americans are suffering under crippling inflation, and it's the Federal Reserve that is to blame. During COVID, the Federal Reserve created 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars out of thin air and loaned it to the Treasury Department to enable unprecedented deficit spending.
By monetizing the debt, the Federal Reserve devalued the dollar and enabled free money policies and caused high inflation we see today. If we really want to reduce inflation, the most effective policy is to end the Federal Reserve. Did you know that inflation is just another form of taxation? And it's true because if you understood how the money really operated, then you would know that we have lost over 99.7% of our purchasing power since the creation of the Federal Reserve. They're one of the many reasons why the US national debt is at a staggering $34,000,000,000,000 because they just keep on printing the money, taking care of themselves on the back end while We The People are the ones that are suffering.
So this is where We The People from the United States of America come in to help. Contact your state representative. Let them know that you are in support of Tom Massey in the fed bill, h r 8421. Make sure you give him a follow on x so you can keep up with the bill. Like this post, share it, hashtag in the feds.
And this is why it's so important to know what you hold. Let's go.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
MRNA injections are secretly being administered to animals. And guess who's behind it? 👇 https://t.co/oY31tLAfx2
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a Pfizer subsidiary called ZOTIS that has mRNA injected over 100 million wildlife in the U.S., including pets. This initiative, funded by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, has been ongoing for the past year and a half. Hunters were the primary source of information about this, as it was published in their magazines. A study on Staten Island involved injecting 100 white-tailed deer with Pfizer's mRNA vaccines, leading to widespread administration across the country without public knowledge. Concerns arise about hunters consuming venison, believing it to be organic. Additionally, mRNA technology is being used on vegetables and cattle, raising further worries about food safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Actually, there's a company, a subsidiary company of Pfizer. It's called ZOTIS, z o t I s. Do you know they've already mRNA injected a 100000000 wildlife in America? I guarantee you they're doing it to pets too. It's only mRNA technology funded completely by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife's foundation.
They've been doing it all over the country for the whole last year and a half. Xodus is its name. It's a subsidiary of Pfizer. This is some real sugar honey iced tea. You ain't lying.
You know what's interesting? When I learned about ZOTUS and this sugar honey iced tea, because that's what it was to me. You know who would do you know who were the only people that knew that the wildlife deer, for example, elk, for example, were actually being mRNA injected for COVID? It was all the hunters. Hunters, it was being published in hunters magazines.
I'm not a hunter, but hunters were aware the whole time that this was actually being done and it was being published inside their literature. I had no idea. But when I discovered it, I was like, what? Why is no one talking about this? When I discovered it on Staten Island, Zuckerberg and his wife funded a research study.
They went out and gathered up a 100 white tailed deer and then PCR tested them all for COVID and then injected them all with the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer with this company called Xodus, and then went and did a 100,000,000 animals. A 100,000,000 doses have been administered at that point all throughout the country, and no one knew it, and no one's talked about it. What's it gonna be like when a hunter goes out and gets the deer and then brings home the venison, they think it's organic and wild? Pretty disgusting, but I would be worried about that. Gonna put that in their body when they eat it.
They're gonna they're already injecting mRNA technology into into vegetables, tomatoes, avocados, lettuce, gavi. Bill Gates' foundation is already doing that. And in China, they're already mRNA injecting cattle for our beef supply. This is Christ.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
I've been saying this for years The LGBTQ+++++ movement is is a trojan horse for the paedophiles, FACT. https://t.co/WEbhon2PZC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pedophiles are attempting to normalize their behavior by linking it to LGBTQ rights. They argue that if children can make significant decisions about their bodies and identities, such as undergoing medical procedures or choosing their gender, then they should also be considered capable of consenting to sexual activity. This rationale is seen as a way for pedophiles to justify their actions in court, suggesting that the LGBTQ movement is being exploited to further their agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why do the pedophiles care about lesbians, bisexuals, homosexuals, and transgenders? If I am a pedophile, I don't wanna go to jail. I'm a celebrity. I'm famous. Ritualistic sex is what we do with kids.
It's quite about demonic culture. I want pedophilia to become normal. I want it stricken from the criminal cold altogether. I'm gonna push LGBTQ because if a child is old enough to decide I never wanna have children, take my testicles, take my ovaries. If a 8, 9, 10, 11 year old child is old enough to make those three decisions, how can you argue that they're not old enough to decide to have sex?
The argument of the pedophile is going to be backed up by this LGBT crusade against our children because in their sick minds, they are rationalizing the argument before the courts. If he's old enough to say I don't want my testicles, if she's old enough to say I never wanna have children, if he's old enough to say I wanna live my life as a girl, if she's old enough to say I wanna live a life as a boy and I don't care about having kids and she can say this at 12, is she not also old enough to decide when she's ready to have sex? That is going to be the argument that the pedophiles are gonna take into court. LGBTQ is the mask the pedophile movement wears to get their agenda pushed.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Asheville, North Carolina resident just got a letter notifying her that her mortgage loan has been sold to Vanguard owned company Still think Hurricane Helene isn’t being used as a land grab? https://t.co/FxKUx9tjAc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hey everyone, Jennifer from Western North Carolina here with an update. My husband and I received a letter from our mortgage company, Flagstar, informing us that our loan has been sold to a new servicer called Mr. Cooper. Interestingly, Vanguard owns a significant part of Mr. Cooper. This situation is quite intriguing, but I wish I could share more without risking my post being taken down. Overall, I'm not too pleased about this development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, y'all. Jennifer in Western North Carolina here. I have an update for everyone. I got a a letter. Me and my husband got a letter from our mortgage company, Flagstar.
And they have sold our loan to a new servicer called mister Cooper. Guess who owns mister Cooper or at least a pretty big part of it? Vanguard. So, yeah, all related to, what's going on here in the area. Wish I could communicate more without having my post taken down.
But this is this is pretty interesting, guys. Don't like it very much.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
He's suing the corporations for treason 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/ScT3vrXSlK
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are military and law enforcement individuals who are frustrated with a treasonous operation that has been ongoing for 70 years. This group is likened to a deadly mafia, and there are plans to use the RICO Act to hold them accountable. A legal fund is being established to pursue this. It's crucial for the public to contact their Congress members to advocate for laws protecting witnesses and open hearings. The group has capabilities to stage false alien invasions and trigger natural disasters, posing an existential threat to humanity. The speaker left a successful medical career to address these issues after uncovering the truth about this organization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are military and law enforcement people who are quite fed up with this, you know, illegal operation that's treasonous. I mean, I'll just be flat out, put it out there. They are committing treason against United States. When I tell you that this group are a bunch of sociopaths and psychopaths capable of this, people need to believe it. And not letting those letting those guys get away with their agenda because this is a 70 year long term plan that they're coming to ahead now, which can be and you can be executed for that, as you know, by federal law.
I think there are certain people who are not gonna sit on their hands if the Congress just dithers for another 2, 3, 4 years. Because from a law enforcement point of view, we've been able to prove that these operations are already criminal enterprises. And by the way, anyone who's listening, who is an attorney, we're starting our own legal fund to sue all these corporations for these technologies under the civilian RICO provision, racketeering influence, corrupt organization. It's been used against the mafia. I always point out to people, this organization is the world's largest and deadliest mafia.
So you can invoke that RICO Act that was passed in 1970 as a civilian organization, which is what we're about to do. And there are there's a US attorney on our team, federal prosecutor, that when we go to discovery and get evidence, we'll turn over to him. He can do a criminal prosecution at that point. So we're not gonna sit on our hands. Now we're encouraging Congress to move quickly.
But in the meanwhile, I can tell you there are things afoot that are gonna go more quickly. So what I'm trying to do is be sure This is why listen. Everyone writing sitting here listening should write to your member of congress and your 2 senators, whatever state you're from, and encourage them to pass these laws protecting the witnesses and to hold open hearings. Because, I don't think we need to continue this process like at the this last small hearing with the 3 guys. We're aggressive.
I can't talk about that. I have to be in a SCIF, which is a secure compartment and information facility, top secret facility. No. Because these projects should not be afforded any national security protection since they are being run illegally. I think we should take a much more aggressive stand towards fully open hearings on this, which we've been calling for for 30 years.
But I think your listeners have more power than they realize if they were to write their member of Congress, their representative in the House and their 2 senators because they need to hear from the people. They need to hear that the people care about this issue. The most dangerous is their capabilities to, a, stage a alien invasion that would convince everyone it's false, and, b, things that they can do geophysically. What I mean by that is I have a NOC, a non official cover, a guy who's deep cover currently in the system that described this illegal covert group was were able to move an asteroid on a trajectory coming from the sun to skim over the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific, caused massive tidal waves and destruction deliberately. And an ET craft intercepted that and saved our bacon.
Now I also know that they have systems that they can put on fault lines off the coast of various landmasses like California and elsewhere, and they can trigger those. And those can cause massive earthquakes and tsunamis. When I tell you that this group are a bunch of sociopaths and psychopaths capable of this, people need to believe it. And not letting those letting those guys get away with their agenda, because this is a 70 year long term plan that they're coming to a ahead now, is a true threat to humans. So that those two areas are the most disturbing, things I have discovered, about this organization or what their plans are and what their capabilities are.
And these aren't theoretical capabilities. These are actual ones. So to have an organization that's not being overseen by the people or by Congress or the White House that have those sort of technologies and that kind of malicious intent, We're talking an existential threat to humanity and to our country. And that's why, you know, I left my medical career a few years ago to fix this. Because once I learned what was really happening, I was ready to walk away from, you know, whatever it is, you know, 4 or 5, 600,000 a year as a doctor to fix this problem.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Colorado Rep Scott Bottoms Confirms People Are Buying 1-5 Year Old Children For Sex https://t.co/RGzjflnteR
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm feeling discouraged about our efforts to pass a bill that would impose minimum jail sentences for those who buy children for sex. Currently, many offenders receive only probation after committing these heinous acts. During discussions, Democrats opposed the bill, arguing that these buyers are victims themselves, which I find deeply troubling. They voted unanimously against holding these offenders accountable. It’s frustrating to see our moral stance dismissed. I urge you to pray for our cause and to participate by voicing your support for legislation that protects children. Your involvement is crucial, as we are in the minority but can become stronger together.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are the times that I am discouraged about my job as a representative and also just what happens here at the capitol. We set the committee all day discussing whether or not somebody that buys little children, these are 2, 3, 4, 5 year old kids, they buy them for sex that we tried to get a bill through, represent Bradley sent one through, that was gonna put these buyers in jail. Right now, most of the time, they get off on probation. Almost all the time, they get off on probation after buying a child and raping a little child. And we tried to say, well, they need to at least serve a minimum of 4 years.
Then we sat and listened to the democrats fight against this bill, fight against putting these people in jail, and came up with all kinds of reasons including that these fighters are victims themselves. This is very discouraging and it's also very disgusting for me that they would actually defend this. And then they voted completely along party lines. Democrats voted a 100%, that they did not wanna put these pedophiles in jail. They defended the pedophiles.
This is why it's so difficult sometimes to do what we do around here. We know we're on the side of riot. We know we're on the side of morality, and we get shot down by I do not understand the thought process behind this, but we do get shot down. This is why I would encourage you to do a few things to help us with this. 1st, if you believe in prayer at all, please pray.
We are fighting truly dark forces here. This is not okay. This is evil stuff that we're dealing with. And if you have the ability to come up and testify on bills or anything like this, please do so. Your voice is very important to what we're trying to accomplish around here.
We are the minority, but with you, we become a powerful
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
"Nobody forced you to take the vaccine” Video of forced vaccination: https://t.co/wTDDEbKCTj
Video Transcript AI Summary
You can't force me to do anything. Am I under arrest? If not, how can you make me do something? I'm a grown man and I know my rights. This situation needs to change; it's a revolution. I came here because I felt sick, but you can't just put a needle in my arm against my will. I want a lawyer before anything happens. I won't get on the bed; I'm not a prisoner. This is a free country, and I know what's right. You don't care about me; you're greedy and selfish. This isn't right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can't force me to do anything. Alright. You can't force me to do anything.
Speaker 1: No more.
Speaker 0: I asked for a lawyer, bro. I can't do that. I can't do that. Am I under arrest? Am I under arrest?
No.
Speaker 2: It's under arrest.
Speaker 1: Well, how can
Speaker 0: you force me to do something?
Speaker 2: So James So I got to. How do you force me to do something if I'm not under arrest? What? I'm trying to explain to you. How do you force me to do something if I'm not
Speaker 0: under I'm trying to explain to you.
Speaker 2: And I'm
Speaker 0: a grown man now. How do I not have the protection?
Speaker 1: Okay. Y'all
Speaker 0: know what revolution is?
Speaker 1: Do you know what revolution is? What does that have to do with you being zed? Do you know what revolution is? Do you know what revolution is? What does that have to
Speaker 2: do with you being zed? Do you know what revolution is? Do you know what revolution is? What does that have to do with you being zed?
Speaker 0: Do you know what What does that have to do with you being sick? Do you know what a revolution is? Do you know what
Speaker 1: a revolution is? Do you know what a
Speaker 0: revolution is, brother? You don't even know
Speaker 2: what a revolution is.
Speaker 0: This shit gotta change. All this shit gotta change. Mhmm. It's called a revolution.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: So why did you come here? Because I feel like I was sick. Okay. And then I feel like I was sick. We're the people that can help me.
Okay. But y'all not gonna put a needle in my arm. It doesn't work like that.
Speaker 3: Okay. Well
Speaker 0: You can't make me do something against my will. That is not right. I'm a man. So And I was out for that, bro. You got doctors?
I was out for that, bro. You got doctors in nursing? It doesn't work like that. Even if I'm feeling bad, you I'm not getting on the bed, bro. You can't make me get on the bed, bro.
I'm not a prisoner. I'm in a very good, bro. It's a free country. I know my life. Oh, okay.
Speaker 3: Alright. Give me a real
Speaker 1: give me
Speaker 0: a lawyer. I want a lawyer before y'all touch me. Okay. You can't it doesn't work like that, bro. You can't no.
Right. Here's the No.
Speaker 3: I'm I'm giving it to you cold, man. Alright? But that we just like you don't wanna put your hands on me, I wanna put my hands on you.
Speaker 0: It doesn't work like that. No. Don't don't touch me, bro. I will turn this pizza up, bro. Okay.
I'm a tell you. You watch me. You watch me. I have my person's face. Okay.
I'm a show y'all. I will show y'all, bro. Okay. I know what's right, bro. Okay.
Alright. It's gonna be revolution now. Y'all don't even know how to start. You have to get in the brochure. Yeah.
She gotta tell you this very, bro. This is not right, bro. This is not right, bro.
Speaker 2: This is
Speaker 0: not right, bro. This is not right, bro.
Speaker 2: I'm talking about. This is not
Speaker 0: right, bro. Just say it. Uh-huh. We don't need anything happen to you. No, man.
Y'all don't care about me, man. Y'all greedy, bro. Y'all selfish. Y'all greedy. Y'all weak in a bit too.
Speaker 2: That's
Speaker 0: all. So y'all y'all do, man. Yeah. We Get
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
200 congressmen have been treated with Ivermectin against Covid. https://t.co/MLi2YK2g0y
Video Transcript AI Summary
200 congresspeople have been treated with Ivermectin for COVID, which was a common off-label treatment before vaccines were available. The motivation behind the negative perception of this medication is unclear, but it may relate to financial interests since Ivermectin is a generic drug with a low cost of about 30 cents per dose.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 200 congresspeople have been treated with Ivermectin for COVID. Did you know that? Did not know that. Yeah. Holy 200.
I I believe you could probably find it in doctor Pierre Kory's, Twitter page. Yeah. Be before there were vaccines, this was a common treatment, an off label treatment for COVID. Now I do not know what the motivation for demonizing this this particular medication is. Again, I'm not a doctor and I'm not a scientist, But I would imagine some of it has to do with money.
The reason being is that it is a generic drug now. They've the patent has run out. So anybody can make it, and it's worth, like, 30¢ a dose.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Do they allow human meet in the food supply in your state? https://t.co/ul9cqKafSW
Video Transcript AI Summary
RS 31078 addresses concerns about cannibalism and human composting. In 2019, I learned about Washington state's human composting initiative, which disturbed me due to the potential for human bone fragments in compost. My goal is to prevent this from entering the food supply. During a food show, contestants were told that cannibalism is illegal in Idaho, but it’s not illegal to unknowingly serve human remains to others. This bill aims to close that loophole. I propose including language about flesh, blood, bones, and organs to ensure comprehensive coverage. My hope is to address this issue incrementally, starting with this legislation and potentially expanding it in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: RS 31078, cannibalism. Might seem kind of gruesome and it kinda is. I'm gonna give you a little background of what got me to this position to run this bill. Back in 2019, I heard that Washington state was starting to to do human composting And that disturbed me. I wanted to address this because what I didn't want to see is bags of compost with human bone fragments.
I want to stop it getting into the human food supply. I was on a plane this summer, watched a video of some food show and the 3 contestants tasted the food and they had to guess what was in it. It was some kind of a sausage. And one of the options they told these people that was in the food was it is illegal. Cannibalism is illegal, and that is Idaho.
It is illegal. Cannibalism is illegal, and that is Idaho. Already illegal for someone to do it themselves, but it is not illegal for them to give it to somebody unknowingly. So what that language does is captures, it getting into the food sources. That that's really my concern.
Would you want to sources. That that's really my concern. Would you want to include, on line 11, flesh, blood, bones, and organs? I do believe flesh would would cover the organs. Hopefully, we don't ever have to add the bones to this.
But I was doing that incrementalism thing. I mean, if it's not even illegal to feed it to someone. So I was thinking like maybe next year, we come back and go the next step.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
They're adding cancer causing ingredients to the Food Supply, so they can make money from chemo later. https://t.co/8Flv3y6Eat
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the US, Skittles contain 11 ingredients, including harmful substances like dimethylpolysiloxane and artificial dyes, while the UK version has only 3 ingredients and optional salt. The US version includes 10 artificial dyes and titanium dioxide, banned in Europe for its potential DNA damage and links to cancer. Gatorade in the US uses red 40 and caramel color, whereas Germany opts for natural colors from carrots and sweet potatoes. Doritos in the US contain multiple artificial dyes and MSG, while the UK version does not. General Mills recently launched a dye-free version of Trix in Australia, highlighting the disparity in food safety standards. This motivates the push for equal treatment of American consumers by food companies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the US, there's 11 ingredients. In the UK, there's 3. And salt is optional. An ingredient called dimethylpolysiloxane is an ingredient preserved with formaldehyde, a neurotoxin. This is Skittles.
Notice the long list of ingredient differences. 10 artificial dyes in the US version and titanium dioxide. This ingredient is banned in Europe because it can cause DNA damage. Artificial dyes are made from petroleum, and products containing these dyes require a warning label in Europe. And they have been linked to cancer and disruptions in the immune system.
This on the screen back here is Gatorade. In the US, they use red 40 and caramel color. In Germany, they don't. They use carrot and sweet potatoes to color their Gatorade. This is Doritos.
The US version has 3 different artificial dyes and MSG. The UK version does not. General Mills is definitely playing some tricks on us. They launched a new version of Trix just recently in Australia. It has no dyes.
They even advertised that when the US version still does. This is why I became a food activist. My name is Vonnie Hari, and I only want one thing. I want Americans to be treated the same way as citizens in other countries by our own American companies.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Doctors have limited knowledge, and it's by design to profit the drug industry. https://t.co/7lgVsoL2Uv
Video Transcript AI Summary
Medical doctors are trained in allopathic reductionism, which focuses solely on drugs and surgery. While these interventions have their place, MDs receive training limited to this area.
The pharmaceutical industry influences medical education and research in the United States, prioritizing pharmaceutical research over other areas like homeopathic or botanical medicines, acupuncture, or medical nutrition. The focus is on developing new drugs or gene splices.
Just as one wouldn't seek advice from a Republican about social programs or a Democrat about military funding, medical doctors are not trained in medical science, but rather in allopathic reductionism, which exclusively values drugs and surgery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Medical doctors are trained in allopathic reductionism and allopathic reductionism has no time, no concern, no appreciation for anything other than drugs or surgery. This is very important thing to understand, right. Medicine is like a big pizza and there are different slices of the pizza. The slice of the pie of medicine that the MDs are trained in has no time, no respect, no appreciation and no concern for anything other than drugs and surgery. And there's nothing wrong with drugs and surgery when they're used appropriately.
Again, right? Thank God for Novocaine and morphine and the sterile technique in Penicillin. But MDs are not taught anything other than their piece of the pie because the pharmaceutical industry has leverage over what the MDs are taught. Also the pharmaceutical industry has leverage over what type of research is done at universities in the United States. It's not medical research that's done.
It's pharmaceutical research. Is any research being done about homeopathic medicines or botanical medicines or the use of acupuncture or the use of medical nutrition? No. None of that's being done. It's all about inventing a new drug or a new gene splice or something else.
It's all filling in the piece of the pie of science that the MDs are trained in. It's kind of like, you wouldn't expect a Republican in the United States to give you advice about a social program, nor would you expect a Democrat to give you advice about war funding, military funding, because it's not really their thing. Right? You wouldn't expect a Buddhist to tell you about, Judaism, and you wouldn't expect a Roman Catholic to tell you about reincarnation because it's just not their thing. Well, medical doctors are not trained in medical science.
Nobody is. Medical doctors are trained in allopathic reductionism and allopathic reductionism has no time, no concern, no appreciation for anything other than drugs or surgery. That's the short answer.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
The timing of the boosters was to cause maximum damage 👇 https://t.co/3sxCXnNEDl
Video Transcript AI Summary
The first vaccine decreases the ability to reduce white blood cells by 50%. Eight weeks later, a second dose attacks the ability to make white blood cells by an additional 25%, leaving only 25% functionality. The booster contains 81 strands of foreign bacteria, leading to chronic inflammation in areas of predisposition due to a low immune response.
The second booster contains 8 strands of HIV, shutting off the ability to make white blood cells. Individuals are left with no immune system, 81 strands of foreign bacteria, and 8 strands of HIV, without saline. 20-30% of the population will die during each series of this process. Three more boosters are planned. The goal is to make people dependent on boosters to survive, creating recurring customers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It decreases the ability to reduce white blood cells by 50% from your first vaccine. Then 8 weeks later, which is white blood cell reproductive system, So your ability to make another generation of white blood cells is 8 weeks. That's why they set it up 8 weeks later to hit it again. So you hit the white blood cell ability while it's down. So now what you do is now they are they they they decrease the saline in the second one and they increase the, harmful ingredients.
So now you have a shift in the ingredients. So they decrease the saline and increase. So now there's a shift. And then what they do is that second dose attacks your ability to make white blood cells by an additional 25%. So now you only have an, white blood cell ability like, the ability to make white blood cells functioning at 25%.
So you just wiped out 75% of your military and the ability to make that military. Then what they do is they set in the booster. The booster has 81 strands of foreign bacteria that your cells have never come across. You don't have the antibodies to fight it, but you only have 25% of your white blood cell production to be able to fight it. So it's a losing battle.
So then when you starts to happen is you start to get chronic inflammation that goes to the areas that you had, you had predisposition. So if you were someone that has gut health issues, that's your area that it's gonna focus on, and you're gonna have inflammation in the gut health. If it's respiratory, if you have, tumor or cancer or if you have, say, endometriosis or you have a skin condition. Whatever that is, it's gonna inflame that area because now the body has hit the sympathetic nervous system, which is the fight or flight, and the body has is in a chronic, inflammatory state with a low immunity and a low immune response. Then you get your 2nd booster.
What the second booster has is it has 8 strands of HIV. And now what that does is it completely shuts off your ability to make white blood cells. And if you Google what that disease is, it is HIV. So now we have people that are walking around with no immune system, no ability to make an immune system, 81 strands of foreign bacteria, and then also 8 strands of foreign HIV, along with all the other harmful ingredients, and then they remove all the saline from the first and second booster. Now, to make matters worse, the during this process, 20 to 30% of the population is gonna die every single series of this process.
There's 4 series. They have 3 more boosters that are coming out, and the reason why is because once they make you so that your immune system can't make white blood cells anymore, you become dependent on the boosters to survive just like someone becomes dependent on insulin. Big pharma is looking for people that either die off to protect our, population control and then those that don't die off, we will have reoccurring customers for life with the boosters so that they will be able to maintain income and collect the money back from all the funding that they put in to make these vaccines in the first place. So hope you, hope that was helpful. I hope that you listen to this properly, and I hope that you take the time to do your own critical thinking and just give it 2 to 3 years.
Every single animal that was part that
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Video Transcript AI Summary
The first detoxification protocol was published in US medical literature, allowing individuals to use natural substances to help the body clear a dangerous protein. The protocol involves three over-the-counter natural substances: nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin. Nattokinase is an enzyme derived from fermented soy, bromelain is derived from pineapple stems and is a US FDA-approved topical treatment for wounds, and curcumin is derived from turmeric. The recommended doses are 2,000 units of nattokinase twice a day, 500 milligrams of bromelain daily, and 500 milligrams of curcumin three times a day. The duration, according to the publication, should be at least 3 months, or 12 months or more for people who have taken multiple shots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So yesterday was a historic day as the very first detoxification protocol was published in the US medical literature that gives people a chance to take, this whole issue into their own hands and use natural substances to begin to help the body clear this very, dangerous protein from its cells and tissues. And it involves 3 natural substances that are available over the counter at any type of, online retailer or the natural food, store or pharmacy. And they are nattokinase, which is an enzyme that's derived from the fermentation of soy, bromelain, which is a set of enzymes derived from the the stems of pineapple by the way, bromelain is a US FDA approved drug as a, deep a topical treatment for wounds. And then the third is curcumin derived from turmeric. The doses of nattokinase are 2,000 units twice a day, bromelain 500 milligrams a day, and curcumin 500 milligrams 3 times a day.
The duration in this publication, and I'm the first author so I'm the one to bring this forward, is at least 3 months, I think, for people who have taken multiple shots 12 months or more.