reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @myletrinh123

Saved - March 4, 2025 at 10:32 AM

@myletrinh123 - Dr My Le Trinh (suspended)🐭8:32

This is the story of my life and my persecution by health regulators over the past 3.5 years for prescribing ivermectin, the drug that could independently end the provisional approval of the experimental gene therapy. ( please share🌿)

@myletrinh123 - Dr My Le Trinh (suspended)🐭8:32

Dr My Le Trinh https://t.co/S33CqBQPcp

Saved - March 18, 2024 at 2:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin should be given to all hospitalized patients, according to one post. Another suggests considering manslaughter charges against hospitals and doctors for not administering it, potentially leading to Covid deaths in Australia.

@myletrinh123 - Dr My Le Trinh -unlawful indefinite suspension8:32

“Every Single Hospitalized Patient Should Have Received Ivermectin.” For the majority of patient that did not receive ivermectin and died, should the hospital or the doctor caring for the patient be charged with manslaughter? Every covid death in Australia most likely did not receive ivermectin. They have grounds to sue the hospital and the doctor and many senior health officials for manslaughter.

@VigilantNews - Vigilant News

Dr. McCullough: Every Single Hospitalized Patient Should Have Received Ivermectin Why? 1.) “Safer than Tylenol” 2.) “It appeared to have a very prompt effect in helping people get through the illness.” 3.) “Papers ... showed that even in patients with low oxygen levels, they could promptly rebound at home and not be hospitalized.” Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. Yet hospital administrators fought tooth and nail to make sure patients didn’t get ivermectin. Why would they do such a thing? One reason is that hospitals were financially incentivized to use deadly interventions like ventilators and Remdesivir. Dr. Joseph Mercola calls this the “hospital death trap.” In multiple court cases, when families fought for their loved ones to be given ivermectin, “even very late in the illness, many were revived and survived,” testified @P_McCulloughMD.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin is a safe and effective drug for treating COVID-19, with studies showing it is safer than Tylenol and can help patients recover quickly, even those with low oxygen levels. A study in 2020 found a 50% reduction in hospitalizations when Ivermectin was used. Despite its proven benefits, hospital staff often resisted giving it to patients, leading to legal battles. However, when administered, even late in the illness, many patients improved and survived. The use of Ivermectin in hospitals is crucial for saving lives. Translation: Ivermectin es un medicamento seguro y efectivo para tratar el COVID-19, con estudios que muestran que es más seguro que el Tylenol y puede ayudar a los pacientes a recuperarse rápidamente, incluso aquellos con bajos niveles de oxígeno. Un estudio en 2020 encontró una reducción del 50% en hospitalizaciones cuando se usaba Ivermectin. A pesar de sus beneficios comprobados, el personal hospitalario a menudo se resistía a administrarlo a los pacientes, lo que llevaba a batallas legales. Sin embargo, cuando se administraba, incluso tarde en la enfermedad, muchos pacientes mejoraban y sobrevivían. El uso de Ivermectin en hospitales es crucial para salvar vidas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivermectin, which is one of many drugs we used, to treat acute COVID nineteen. There were dozens and dozens of randomized trials, observational studies that showed, number 1, it's extraordinarily safe. It's safer than Tylenol through a large range of doses. And that, number 2, it appeared to have a very prompt effect in helping people get through the illness. And in 3 papers that were summarized by first author and colleagues showed that even in patients with low oxygen levels, they could promptly rebound at home and not be hospitalized. So in 2020, a prospective study was published in one of the best pulmonary journals, CHEST, by Doctor. Roeschter and colleagues. He testified at the US Senate on December 8, 2020. And with Ivermectin given in the hospital, which was easy to give, orally or down to an NG tube, there was a 50% reduction in Americans who took ivermectin in these Florida hospitals. So in the absence of any concerns on safety, every single American admitted to the hospital should have been administered Ivermectin because it gave a chance at survival, and there was nothing to suggest that it was unsafe. Yet hospital administrators and chief medical officers and those in the hospital fought tooth and nail to be sure patients didn't get ivermectin. And multiple court cases like the one Doctor. Bowden described went to court. And there were court orders to administer ivermectin. And this occurred in Buffalo, New York, in Chicago, and elsewhere. And when patients were given Ivermectin, even very late in the illness, many were revived and survived. So the Ivermectin story in the hospital is a very important one for people to understand.
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 8:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dear Twitter community, I kindly request your help in sharing this tweet. On December 15, 2023, I have a hearing for a prosecution case filed by AHPRA. They accuse me of practicing below standard and seek to cancel my registration for 3-5 years. This hearing will take place before the NCAT. Earlier this year, I had a case in the Supreme Court of Appeal against the Medical Council's unlawful suspension. If I win, it will end the indefinite suspension. The tribunal mishandled my case, and the same biased judge will preside over my current matter. I ask the president of the tribunal to intervene for justice. Thank you for your support.

@myletrinh123 - Dr. My Le Trinh -unlawful indefinte suspension8:32

🌸 Dear Twitter community,  [ 🌿please retweet my tweet ] I am reaching out to kindly request your assistance in sharing this tweet with as many people as possible.   On December 15, 2023, I have a direction of hearing for the prosecution case filed against me by the Health Care Complaints Commission (AHPRA). They have accused me of practicing below standard and are seeking to cancel my registration for a period of 3 to 5 years. Additionally, I am required to pay for this four-day prosecution hearing.   This hearing will take place before the NCAT (Tribunal).   Earlier this year, I had another matter before the tribunal related to my case in the Supreme Court of Appeal, where I am taking the Medical Council to court over their unlawful suspension of me. If I win, it will mark the end of the unlawful INDEFINITE suspension. During the course of my lawsuit, it was revealed that the Medical Council did not follow the law and did not properly delegate power to those who suspended health practitioners. This matter was before the Tribunal in May, and they delayed the release of the judgement for 9-13 weeks. In my opinion, based on the facts surrounding the case, the tribunal did not handle my case as they were obligated to. They were required to handle my case with clarity, transparency, integrity, equality, and fairness as mandated by law.   Below is a letter I sent to the president of NCAT, outlining the mishandling of my earlier case. I am particularly concerned that the same member (judge) who displayed biased behavior towards me has been appointed to preside over my current prosecution matter. I firmly believe that this member's bias will impact the fairness of the proceedings. Therefore, I humbly ask the president of the tribunal to intervene and ensure justice is served.   I appreciate your support.Thank you all. May God help us all. 🙏

Saved - December 4, 2023 at 7:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dear Prime Minister Luxon, I write on behalf of concerned individuals worldwide, urging transparency regarding the Covid-19 vaccine and associated risks. Barry Young, the whistleblower, acted out of moral duty to protect New Zealanders. Granting him immunity would demonstrate your commitment to truth and citizen well-being. Prioritize the people over politics. Uphold transparency, accountability, and the pursuit of truth. Protect their right to know the vaccine's risks and measures taken. Make the right decision for the people. Sincerely, Dr. My Le Trinh

@myletrinh123 - Dr. My Le Trinh -unlawful indefinte suspension8:32

Dear Prime Minister Luxon, I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. I am writing to you on behalf of concerned individuals around the world, including myself, who are deeply invested in the pursuit of truth and justice. We believe that it is essential for the people of New Zealand to know the truth about the Covid-19 vaccine and any associated risks. I am sure you are aware of the recent events surrounding Barry Young, the whistleblower who allegedly leaked important vaccination data to the public. Mr. Young's actions, though considered outside the bounds of his responsibilities, were driven by a deep sense of moral duty to protect the people of New Zealand. It is our belief that he should be commended for his courage rather than punished. The importance of transparency and accountability cannot be overstated, especially when it comes to matters of public health. It is crucial for the citizens of New Zealand to have access to accurate information regarding the safety and efficacy of the Covid-19 vaccines. Any attempts to suppress or cover up the truth would be detrimental to the well-being of the people and erode trust in public health institutions. We humbly request that you consider granting Mr. Young immunity from prosecution for his actions. By doing so, you would not only be demonstrating your commitment to transparency and accountability but also sending a powerful message to the people of New Zealand and the world that the pursuit of truth and the well-being of the citizens are of utmost importance to your government. We understand that granting immunity may be a complex decision, but we believe that it is a necessary step toward fostering an environment where whistleblowers can come forward without fear of reprisal. Mr. Young's actions, although unconventional, were driven by a genuine concern for public safety, and he should not be penalized for his efforts to shed light on the potential risks associated with the Covid-19 vaccines. Furthermore, we implore you to prioritize the welfare of the people over political considerations. The world is watching, Prime Minister, and your actions in this matter will have a lasting impact on the credibility and trustworthiness of your administration. We urge you to resist any pressure to engage in a cover-up and to instead uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and the pursuit of truth. Please, Prime Minister, do what is right for the people of New Zealand. Protect their right to know the truth about the Covid-19 vaccine, its possible adverse effects, and the measures that will be taken to address any risks. Granting Mr. Young immunity is not just an act of justice; it is an act of protecting the well-being and trusting relationship between the people and their government. Thank you for your attention to this matter. We have faith that you will make the right decision and act in the best interests of the people. Yours sincerely, Dr. My Le Trinh #BarryYoung @chrisluxonmp @minhealthnz

View Full Interactive Feed