@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
A new book by @waitbutwhy, 6 years in the making, is out tomorrow (Feb 21)! It's on political polarization: π± https://waitbutwhy.com/ π± I already knew lots on this topic, yet Tim's book *still* gave me fresh angles & insights. Sharing some highlights in this thread! π§΅1/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
First, why care about polarization? Well, no matter what big problem you care about β bioweapons, World War 3, environmental damage, AI β we can't fix it if our ability to collectively think & act is wrecked. Thus: polarization is *the* meta-problem. π§΅2/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
The most fruitful insight from Tim's book: We should see political questions not as 1D (left-right, pro-anti), but at *least* 2D: The old axis is *what* we think. The new axis is *how* we think. π§΅3/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
Low-Rung: think like we're fighting (ideas are "attacked, defended". don't "give ammo to other side", "infighting" is bad...) High-Rung: think like we're building (ideas have "foundations, pillars, steps". it's *good* to critique own team, try outsider alternatives...) π§΅4/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
You may think, that's just @GeorgeLakoff's Metaphors, or @juliagalef's Scout/Soldier Mindset. Well, yeah. To paraphrase AndrΓ© Gide: "Everything wise was said before... but folks weren't listening, so say it again, in a new way." For me, Tim's new book's new way *works*. π§΅5/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
Unlike most anti-polarization essays, Tim makes VERY clear that "high-rung" DOES NOT MEAN "CENTRIST". There *are* low-rung moderates, and there *are* high-rung radicals. High-rung thinking, like true science, is a *process*, not Thou Shalt Believe X. π§΅6/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
For years, I wanted to call out the toxicity "on my side", but felt "that's infighting, still Us vs Them", etc But the book showed me: boundaries are *healthy*. We *need* lines of what's role-model-worthy & not. But: the line ought not be WHAT we think, but HOW we think. π§΅7/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
The book closes with this humbling, scary loop: Bad times β Wise folks β Good times β Fools β Bad times I hope we find a solution out of this cycle. Failing that, I hope we can minimize the depth of the bad times, & get to wisdom soon. I hope Tim's book helps. π§΅8/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
I read the pre-release copy of "What's Our Problem" in one 6-hour sitting. (Screenshots shared with permission) It's *that* funny & insightful. Again, it launches tomorrow, Feb 21 Tuesday: https://waitbutwhy.com/?v=2 Thanks again, @waitbutwhy! π§΅END p.s: more pix
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
@threadreaderapp unroll
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
A new book by @waitbutwhy, 6 years in the making, is out tomorrow (Feb 21)! It's on political polarization: π± https://waitbutwhy.com/ π± I already knew lots on this topic, yet Tim's book *still* gave me fresh angles & insights. Sharing some highlights in this thread! π§΅1/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
First, why care about polarization? Well, no matter what big problem you care about β bioweapons, World War 3, environmental damage, AI β we can't fix it if our ability to collectively think & act is wrecked. Thus: polarization is *the* meta-problem. π§΅2/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
The most fruitful insight from Tim's book: We should see political questions not as 1D (left-right, pro-anti), but at *least* 2D: The old axis is *what* we think. The new axis is *how* we think. π§΅3/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
Low-Rung: think like we're fighting (ideas are "attacked, defended". don't "give ammo to other side", "infighting" is bad...) High-Rung: think like we're building (ideas have "foundations, pillars, steps". it's *good* to critique own team, try outsider alternatives...) π§΅4/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
You may think, that's just @GeorgeLakoff's Metaphors, or @juliagalef's Scout/Soldier Mindset. Well, yeah. To paraphrase AndrΓ© Gide: "Everything wise was said before... but folks weren't listening, so say it again, in a new way." For me, Tim's new book's new way *works*. π§΅5/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
Unlike most anti-polarization essays, Tim makes VERY clear that "high-rung" DOES NOT MEAN "CENTRIST". There *are* low-rung moderates, and there *are* high-rung radicals. High-rung thinking, like true science, is a *process*, not Thou Shalt Believe X. π§΅6/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
For years, I wanted to call out the toxicity "on my side", but felt "that's infighting, still Us vs Them", etc But the book showed me: boundaries are *healthy*. We *need* lines of what's role-model-worthy & not. But: the line ought not be WHAT we think, but HOW we think. π§΅7/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
The book closes with this humbling, scary loop: Bad times β Wise folks β Good times β Fools β Bad times I hope we find a solution out of this cycle. Failing that, I hope we can minimize the depth of the bad times, & get to wisdom soon. I hope Tim's book helps. π§΅8/9
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
I read the pre-release copy of "What's Our Problem" in one 6-hour sitting. (Screenshots shared with permission) It's *that* funny & insightful. Again, it launches tomorrow, Feb 21 Tuesday: https://waitbutwhy.com/?v=2 Thanks again, @waitbutwhy! π§΅END p.s: more pix
@ncasenmare - Nicky Case may soon quit birdsite for elephantsite
@threadreaderapp unroll