@noctis_research - Noctis Research
I believe $KOSS could be bigger than $GME... Extremely small float, no options, and chart technicals mirroring GameStop. The setup looks 🔥. Also did I mention that many brokers are sell only on that ticker...
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$CBRL 🤯 I kid you not, every time a company makes a boneheaded move that tanks its reputation or finances, there’s a Boston Consulting Group alum sitting in the strategy seat. Don’t take my word for it, check their Chief Strategy Officer. It’s the same story, over and over. The O.G. $GME investors know. @ryancohen knows.
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME @ryancohen 🌎 The world has no idea what’s coming… GameStop is about to send shockwaves. 📈 Back on a clear growth trajectory. 💥 Earnings are near, and this time, it’s going to be legendary.
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME ‼️ CRITICAL ‼️ 😡🤬 🚨 This one is going to blow your mind. Share far & wide ‼️ In a class action filed Nov 17, 2017 (Case No. 17-cv-06221, KPF) we learn that the stock lending market has been under the grip of a cabal of banks and prime brokers. We all know the NSCC’s CNS program launders billions of beneficial entitlements. But have you ever heard of the Five Families… and Project Gateway? For years, the stock lending business was dominated by a cartel calling themselves the Five Families, a clear nod to the infamous NYC mafia clans. Yes, a literal cartel: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, Credit Suisse, Bank of America… (later joined by UBS). Totally legit, right? Led by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, they launched Project Gateway, a coordinated plan to keep lending markets opaque, sabotage every fintech that tried to add transparency, and then bury the tech so it could never threaten their control. (Stock lending is 75% of their revenues...) (Chances are, this is why $GME has been dragging for so long, as it could connect directly to abusive short selling.) And believe it or not, it gets even darker… In the class action, we learn that every single one of these banks also holds critical roles inside the OCC and DTCC; the very clearinghouses meant to oversee and safeguard the system they were exploiting. 🤯🤯🤯 🧵
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
BANK OF AMERICA: "During the Class Period, Bank of America was a co-owner of EquiLend and Bank of America employees served on EquiLend’s Board of Directors in, at least, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.9 Bank of America employees served on the OCC’s Board of Directors in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 and on the Depository Trust Clearing Corporation’s (“DTCC”) Board of Directors in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017." CREDIT SUISSE: "During the Class Period, Credit Suisse was a co-owner of EquiLend and Credit Suisse employees served on EquiLend’s Board of Directors in, at least, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.10"
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
GOLDMAN SACHS: "During the Class Period, Goldman Sachs was a co-owner of EquiLend and Goldman Sachs employees served on EquiLend’s Board of Directors Case 1:17-cv-06221-KPF Document 73 Filed 11/17/17 Page 23 of 144 21 in, at least, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.12 Goldman Sachs employees served on the OCC’s Board of Directors in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 and on DTCC’s Board of Directors in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017." JPMORGAN: "During the Class Period, JP Morgan was a co-owner of EquiLend and JP Morgan employees served on EquiLend’s Board of Directors in, at least, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.13 JP Morgan employees served on the OCC’s Board of Directors in 2009 and on DTCC’s Board of Directors in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017."
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
MORGAN STANLEY: "During the Class Period, Morgan Stanley was a co-owner of EquiLend and Morgan Stanley employees served on EquiLend’s Board of Directors in, at least, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.14 Morgan 14 Information about EquiLend’s Board of Directors prior to 2012 is not currently publicly accessible. Case 1:17-cv-06221-KPF Document 73 Filed 11/17/17 Page 27 of 144 25 Stanley employees served on the OCC’s Board of Directors in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014 and on DTCC’s Board of Directors in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017." UBS: "During the Class Period, UBS was a co-owner of EquiLend and UBS employees served on EquiLend’s Board of Directors in, at least, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.15 UBS employees served on DTCC’s Board of 15 Information about EquiLend’s Board of Directors prior to 2012 is not currently publicly accessible. Case 1:17-cv-06221-KPF Document 73 Filed 11/17/17 Page 29 of 144 27 Directors in 2009."
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
Until this structure is exposed and dismantled, stocks like $GME will remain trapped in a rigged game. Source: Case 1:17-cv-06221-KPF Document 73 Filed 11/17/17
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
@JJ_TNG 💯No doubt.
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
@tomtomaru Yes, they are shit stains. We need a new system.
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
@DrFCKW_0815 Treason.
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME They figured out a way to let GameStop rip without shaking the entire market. 🚀 That’s the reality of convertibles acting as collateral. Brilliant. 🧠✨
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME Curious how you unwind a 700% short position when liquidity's dried up and the other side knows you're trapped. Asking for a prime broker.
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME Once you understand that not a single share has ever been traded in the American stock market, everything becomes clearer. 1) The real shares are held at / by the DTC. 2) Only **NET VALUES** between brokers / clearing firms are tracked in the DTC ledger. 3) Only brokers and clearing firms have accounts at the DTC. Think about it for a second. If you can find the loophole (when paired with short selling), congratulation, you might want to have your IQ tested. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6HPefU_qww
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME @ryancohen @TheRoaringKitty FTD reports and RegSho threshold security lists are based on brokers NETTED FTD VALUES. Nearly all FTD are hidden and buried during the clearing & net settlement process at the NSCC. The circulating FTD size is SO MUCH BIGGER than what is reported. @The_DTCC, @SECGov, @GaryGensler WE KNOW.
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME Every share you buy will be used against you.☠️☠️☠️ Simply said, when short selling is paired with continuous net settlement (NSCC), every single share you buy becomes a +1 on the book that can be used to match a short sellers' sale (-1 on the book) if you are trading through THE SAME BROKER or trading through brokers that use THE SAME CLEARING FIRM. It is a loophole for clearing and settling an INFINITE amount of shares. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6HPefU_qww
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME GameStop selling imbalance (short) is near a 1000%. To dilute 45 million shares is a drop in a bucket and wont have meaningful impact on the overall short position. And in exchange, the company gets massive capital intake. GameStop will shine. Great move @ryancohen @TheRoaringKitty
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME @ryancohen To the people who bought my publication in the last week. Thank you! And thank you for supporting independent journalism!📚 You'll have the ability to explain the GameStop situation to anyone with clarity. Including family and friends who may have developed trust issues over the past three years. 😅 And if you are time constrained, read the purple frames first. Good read!💥
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME Short sellers covered ~2/5 of their 🩳and the price went to 500$. How do I know? Because I reverse engineered this graph from the @SECGov staff 'GameStop Report'. https://t.co/GKuzRB7rsF
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
@kay_enne What is your favorite programming language?
@noctis_research - Noctis Research
$GME 💥💥💥 This might explain why we're not seeing actual updated DRS values. If accurate data were released, every quant on Wall Street would recognize that the NSCC could be on the verge of collapsing. As we are somewhere in zone 1, the exponential burden has not reached unbearable levels yet. However, if we were to enter zone 2, the exponential burden would become too significant not to disrupt the NSCC continuous net settlement process. Once we surpass the 60% mark, it could signal the endgame. *This plot assumes 1 billion shares in circulation. **The derivatives curve is the same regardless of the actual number of shares in circulation.