reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @oldschoolethos

oldschoolethos
Posted - February 26, 2024 at 1:45 PM
Saved - February 26, 2024 at 2:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Key points from the series of posts: 1. COVID-19 may have been U.S. funded and made, causing global deaths and economic losses. 2. The Wuhan Lab in China received American tax dollars and conducted gain of function research. 3. Dr. Fauci knew that the virus likely originated from the lab. 4. There are concerns about other BioLabs, such as the one in Odessa, Ukraine, and the NIH Lab in Hamilton, Montana. 5. The NIH Lab in Montana has studied Q fever and is working on a better vaccine. 6. Q fever is a potential bioterrorism threat and has been neglected in China. These posts raise questions about the origins of COVID-19, the role of Dr. Fauci, and the potential risks associated with bio-labs and diseases like Q fever.

@oldschoolethos - Only The Dead

7 key points by @Jim_Jordan are below regarding the COVID pandemic and Dr. Fauci -COVID-19 was U.S. funded & made. -6+ Million died globally. -Unprecedented excess mortality. -Trillions in economic losses. -Countless Americans lost their jobs and businesses for COVID vaccine mandates and lockdowns. -Unknown long term effects of coronavirus and the vaccine. From Video below: 1. American tax dollars were given to EcoHealth alliance which funded research at the Wuhan Lab in China. 2. EcoHealth was given an exemption to the pause in gain of function research. 3. Security standards at the Wuhan Lab were deficient. 4. EcoHealth was not compliant in the Grant 5. Gain of Function research was being conducted at the lab in Wuhan 6. The approval process was not followed in the Grant to EcoHealth 7. Dr. Fauci knew that the virus likely came from the lab in Wuhan. Statements from Experts like: “Virus looks engineered” “I don’t know how this gets done in nature but it can get done in a lab” “A lab leak is the only credible explanation” Where is the outrage and reporting on these events? Big Media, Big tech, Big Pharma, Big Government are at a minimum implicit in it all. How many more people died or are injured due to mass censorship? Link all that to the Timeline in post below. Interesting connections to everything @RobertKennedyJr has talked about. Without people like @shellenberger @mtaibbi @glennbeck @dbongino @BlazeTV @X @rumblevideo @elonmusk we would all be clueless about all of it still. What will we continue to find out about other BioLabs like the one in Odessa, Ukraine built by Lugar/Obama in 2010 and the NIH Lab in Hamilton, Montana now linked to coronavirus research prior to the pandemic?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Fauci misled the country by withholding key information about the origins of the virus. He knew American tax dollars funded a lab in Wuhan conducting gain-of-function research. Despite this, he did not disclose the lab's deficiencies or compliance issues. Fauci organized a conference call with virologists who changed their tune on the lab leak theory shortly after. The government failed to share the truth, leading to misinformation about the virus's origins. The Director of National Intelligence believes Fauci and Collins withheld information to avoid scrutiny over their relationships with the lab in China.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think the key lesson learned is that doctor Fauci misled the country, and he did so right from the get go. By February 1, 2020, doctor Fauci knew 7 fundamental facts represented by the first 7 posters behind me, 7 fundamental facts that he did not share with the American people. 1st, he understood that American tax dollars went to ecohealth and that money was then funneled to a lab in Wuhan, China. 2nd, he knew ecohealth was given an exemption from the pause on gain of function research. 3rd, the security standards at this lab in China were deficient. 4th, doctor Fauci knew that EkoHealth was not in compliance with their grant reporting requirements. They weren't adhering to the contract. 5th, gain of function research was in fact being conducted in the lab in Wuhan, China. 6th, the p3 c0 interagency review process wasn't followed in approving the grant to EkoHealth. And finally 7, doctor Fauci likely knew let me say it the other way. Doctor Fauci knew that the virus likely came from the lab that our money was sent to. So think about it. American tax dollars went to a company that wasn't properly vetted, that didn't comply with its contract, who sent that money to a lab in China that wasn't up to code and was doing gain of function research. And what happens? The very city where that lab is at, a deadly virus breaks out, a deadly virus that would ultimately kill 6,000,000 people around the world. What did doctor Fauci do when he had this information? Again, February 1, 2020, what did he do with this information? Did he tell the president of the United States? Did he go to the did he go to the commander in chief and said, hey. We got a deadly virus that's broken out in China, in Wuhan, where we've been sending American tax dollars to a lab that's not up to code that's doing gain of function? Did he tell the president of the United States? Didn't tell the president. Did you tell the chief of staff? You know, maybe he thought, you know what? I don't wanna take this bad news to the commander in chief. Maybe I'll give it to the chief of staff. I know he'll tell him. He talks to him every day. Did he tell the chief of staff? Didn't tell him either. How about the experts in our government? Did he tell did he tell his boss? Did he tell secretary Azar? Did he tell doctor Redfield, doctor Birx? Did he tell doctor Giroir, one of our witnesses today? Didn't tell any of them either. No. What he did instead was organize a conference call, February 1, 2020, 2 PM with him, mister Collins, and 11 virologists from around the world who he had been handing out American tax dollars to for years years years. And on that call, it's interesting, on that call are a couple virologists, doctor Gary, Christian Andersen, who had said things like this. Here's what Christian Andersen said, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. He said that on January 31st, the day before. Doctor Gary said on February 1st, that very day they had the conference call. I don't know how this gets done in nature, but it would be easy to do in a lab. They all get on this conference call. They get their story straight. And 3 days later, the very people who said this thing came from a lab changed their tune and say that anyone who thinks that's crazy. Wow. That's a dramatic change in a matter of days, and the only real intervening event was this conference call that doctor Fauci organizes. You know, it's bad enough when you have the truth and you don't share it, but what's worse is when you have the truth and you say things that directly contradict it. Doctor Fauci told us over the last several years, it wasn't our tax dollars. Yes, it was. Right there's the grant to ecohealth. He told us it wasn't gain of function. How about this email from NIAID, excuse me, from, mister Daszick, the head of EcoHealth to NIAID where he says, dear Jenny, this is terrific. We are happy to hear that our gain of function research funding pause has been lifted. Doctor Fauci told us it wasn't a lab leak. Sure looks like it was. Sure looks like it was and the people he's been handing out the money to, mister Anderson, mister Gary, said it was. And that's not to mention all the other crazy things he's told us. The vaccinated can't get it. The vaccinated can't transmit it. Boy, he was he was wrong about those. He told us that masks work. He told us that there's no such thing as natural immunity when it came to this virus. All kinds of things he told us are all. So the lessons we learned is you can't trust some of the folks who were supposed to be giving us accurate information because they sure didn't, and they knew from the get go. They knew from the start. So I look forward to hearing from our witnesses. I look forward to seeing exactly what's in this report that we we didn't get into any of this. Not we didn't get into any of this. The the chairman mentioned we can't look backwards. Well, we sure should look backwards because if you got a government not giving it to you straight, that's something that you have to make sure we understand so it doesn't happen again. Not only a we don't want a terrible virus happen again, we don't want the government misleading us about a virus that could happen. So I I, we're gonna look at this issue starting next month. We'll look into it. We'll make sure the country gets the facts like they should have had like they should have had on February 1st, 3 years ago. With that, mister chairman, I yield back. I now recognize mister Jordan from Ohio for 5 minutes. Thank you, mister chairman. Mister Ratcliffe, I think doctor McCormick was was on to the right question. Seems to me the fundamental question is why. Why did they lie to us? And why is it taking so long? You point this out in your testimony. Why is it taking so long for every government agency to admit what we all know? Because belief in a lab leak as the origin of, as the start of this is not a conspiracy theory. Is it, mister Ratcliffe? No. Why has it taken so long then? I mean, you knew that early on. Right? If I if I look here, you knew that in you were confirmed, I think, in May of 2020, and you knew that within weeks that it this thing came from the lab. In fact, you say that I think in your testimony, you say a lab leak is the only explanation, only credible explanation. This were a trial, the preponderance of the evidence is all on the side of the lab leak. You knew that within weeks. So why did the why did the government not tell us the truth? Speaker 1: Well, I think, you know, when you look at the, intelligence community report that the Biden administration put out in October 21. They they acknowledge that, China's refusal to cooperate, but the report in any way, ignores what I think is the inescapable fact and reality that if the CCP had anything exculpatory, anything at all, anything that would be helpful, to showing that no one was to blame for this, that this occurred naturally, that that they would share that. And, why not share data, samples, research, everything that tends to show that they had access to that would tend to show that this was naturally occurring and tend to show that lab leak theory really was a conspiracy theory. But they didn't do that because they couldn't do that. And to me, that's why making an assessment with some level of confidence is something that should have been done a long time ago by the intelligence community. Yeah. We need to protect sources and methods. It's why Mike Pompeo and I labored over how much of this can we put out, hoping that it would would drive, the the next administration coming in to declassify more information, which they haven't, and would drive congressional hearings, into the origins of this, which it didn't. Speaker 0: Here's here's here's what gets me. So the the director of National Intelligence knew this thing came from a lab. The secretary of state knew this thing came from a lab. Common sense tells you this thing came from a lab. And frankly, even the guys who called us names knew it came from a lab because we have their emails. We have their emails from the start. Mister Gary says I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. Mister Anderson says this is not consistent with evolutionary. Everyone knew at the get go. You knew at the get go and yet they tell us Speaker 1: just the opposite. Why? Well, you left out the the top, public health official, a virologist, doctor Redfield. Doctor Redfield did. Speaker 0: He's testified. Yes. Speaker 1: Also testified. So you did. You had the top diplomat, the top of the intelligence community, the top public health official, all, telling you with some confidence level that that, the most likely, origin of this was a lab leak. And I think that, you know, unfortunately for political reasons and political narratives, it was difficult. Speaker 0: So did you talk with doctor Fauci during this time frame when you get in in May and over the next several months? Did you talk to doctor Fauci anytime? Speaker 1: No. Never spoke with doctor Fauci? No. Speaker 0: Do you find that strange when he's out saying something directly contrary to the Secretary of State, to the Director of National Intelligence, and to the top virologist, doctor Redfield, that doctor Fauci wouldn't talk with you? Speaker 1: Yeah. To to be clear, there were there were folks within the coronavirus task force that were communicating, you know, medical and scientific information to the intelligence community, not me directly. But none of that information was frankly consistent with what we've talked about, what the intelligence showed. Again, some of those individuals to include doctor Fauci were were promoting the idea, that this was natural origins and notwithstanding, you know, the language that was read, they were referring to it publicly as a conspiracy theory in certain conversations. Speaker 0: Doctor Collins called us an conspiracy theorist if you believed in the in in the lab as the as the origin. Tell me your why do you think Fauci and Collins took that? I got my theory, and I think I'm right. But I'd like to hear from the director of National Intelligence what he thinks Fauci and Collins' motivation for sharing false information with the American people. Speaker 1: Well, I think the best evidence of that is their own conversations, which which say that they didn't want unwarranted or unwanted or I think the term was unwanted attention to the relationships, that were taking place between Western virologists and those working within the the the Wuhan Institute of Virology and funding sources for some of that research? Speaker 0: Our money to a lab in China that wasn't up to code that was doing gain of function research and that's where this thing came from. That's what they did.

@oldschoolethos - Only The Dead

Joe Rogan and Aaron Rodger’s discuss Robert F Kennedy Jr. The Real Anthony Fauci Book Interesting Basic Timeline that incorporates BioLabs, zoonotic research, vaccine programs, climate crisis, zoonotic spillover. o 2005 Obama and Lugar start working in Ukraine to reduce nuclear stockpiles and Bioweapons. o 2010 Obama, Lugar, and the DOD build a level 3 BioLab in Odessa, Ukraine that researches zoonotic threats. The initial build was done under DOD contract costing $3,492,551. The level-3 bio-safety lab, which is the first built under the expanded authority of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program, will be used to study anthrax, tularemia and Q fever as well as other dangerous pathogens. Central Reference Laboratory. o December 2009, President Obama released the National Strategy for Countering Biological Threats, which listed as one of seven objectives ‘‘Promote global health security: Increase the availability of and access to knowledge and products of the life sciences that can help reduce the impact from outbreaks of infectious disease whether of natural, accidental, or deliberate origin’’.   o In 2014 3 bugs escape from Fauci run BioLabs inside the United States. 300 scientists say stop gain of function research. RFKJrbelieves they just Shifted projects overseas to China and Ukraine. Robert F Kennedy Jr. an excellent resource on all things vaccine and Bioweapon research. I highly recommend you listen to his interviews and read his book on Fauci.   o Obama passes his 2014 Global Health Security Agenda GHSA with the W.H.O. Using the NDAA. United States and nearly 30 other nations launched the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) to address several high- priority, global infectious disease threats. On November 4, 2016, President Obama signed Executive Order No. 13747, ‘‘Advancing the Global Health Security Agenda to Achieve a World Safe and Secure from Infectious Disease Threats’’. In 2015, the United Nations adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which include specific reference to the importance of global health security as part of SDG 3. In October 2017 at the GHSA Ministerial Meeting in Uganda, the United States and more than 40 GHSA member countries supported the ‘‘Kampala Declaration’’ to extend the GHSA for an additional 5 years to 2024.   o Obama uses an executive order in 2016 to establish the Global engagement Center to counter propaganda and disinformation of foreign enemies. He used FY17 NDAA to fully fund the GEC. Later an OIG investigation was opened on the GEC and America First Legal does FOIA requests and finds out the GEC was being used in the United States to censor Americans information using a “cartel” of fact checkers.   o Obama uses a different NDAA to support the GHSA and attempts to form a DOD Council to help support it.    o Trump stops the formation of the DOD Council and shifts focus to DOD Biodefense instead of “global health security”   o Trump put the WEF on notice that the United States wants nothing to do with their globalist plans. He let them know exactly what he thought of them.   o The Event 201 Pandemic Exercise is conducted 4 months prior to the pandemic heavily funded by the Gates Foundation and WEF with WHO, World Bank, Chinas head of their CDC, and the now Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines.   o The pandemic begins. Lockdowns, masks, vaccines, and more. The NIH, DOD, and their contractors rapidly create the COVID vaccine.   o Trump cuts funding to the W.H.O. After their many failures during the Pandemic and lets them know exactly what he feels about their organization.   o The pandemic opened the door to mass mail in balloting for the “safety and protection” of all people. And Biden wins the election.    o Biden re-establishes full funding to the WHO and even adds a lot more additional funding.    o Elon buys Twitter and releases the Twitter Files. We all know what that proved.    o Another pandemic scenario event is done SEERS.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses admiration for Bobby and his views on vaccines and the environment. Bobby's book, "The Real Anthony Fauci," is praised for revealing disturbing truths. Bobby's environmental work, including cleaning up the Hudson River, is highlighted. Bobby suggests that poor health outcomes during the pandemic are linked to diet-related chronic diseases like diabetes and obesity, which are profitable for the medical industry. Bobby's critical stance on the influence of money in healthcare is emphasized.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. And they're so in your face with it and no one does anything about it. You had Bobby on the on the podcast? Yes, I did. Yeah. What do you think of him? I love him. Yeah. I I love look, look, if forget about the vaccine stuff, which, like, I think he's got very good points about all that stuff. It's there's real data. And if you read his book, if you read the real Anthony Fauci, you would be sick to your stomach if you know the absolute truth. If it wasn't truth, he wasn't gonna be sued. He'd be sued. Yeah. He's not getting sued for a fucking reason, but just that alone. But then if you if you forget about the vaccine stuff, you just look at his environmental record, what he did when he was an environmental attorney, when he was suing these companies that were VA. Yeah. I mean, he they cleaned up the Hudson River because of him. Yeah. He's amazing guy. I love I really love him. And the things that he's been saying about what what happened during the pandemic, you know, he he had some talk that he did recently, some, speech some, conversation he did recently that was public where he was talking about this is we're being poisoned by food and this is why everybody got so sick from COVID. The disparity between people who got COVID and it was just a cold versus people who got COVID and they were deadly ill is a 100% what they're eating and what that does to their body and how it compromises their immune system and how it causes comorbidities, like diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and obesity, and heart disease. It's this is all a direct relationship to food. But there's no money in in, in healing people. You know, the chronic disease, that's it's a huge money maker.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Patriot Act relaunched a bioweapons arms race by allowing federal officials to conduct bioweapons research without prosecution. Anthony Fauci's NIAID became the official biodefense agency. Bioweapons research is tied to vaccine development. Obama halted Fauci's risky research, which was moved offshore to evade scrutiny. The US bioweapons program inherited unethical practices from Nazi and Japanese scientists. Pandemic preparedness involves collecting potential pathogens and conducting gain-of-function research. The response includes authoritarian controls and censorship. Deposing key figures like Fauci, Gates, and Haines could reveal the truth behind the cover-up.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Had effectively relaunched a bioweapons alarms race. The Patriot Act said we're not revoking the Geneva Protocol or or the bioweapons treaty, but we are saying that any federal official who participates in bioweapons research cannot be prosecuted under those treaties. So it it it launched this new bioweapons arms race. Initially, the the Pentagon was was reluctant to do it openly because, you know, experimenting with bioweapons was a hang offense in under Geneva. So they so they sent the research over to Anthony Fauci's shop to NIAID, which became the the official. Speaker 1: Who sent it over to Speaker 0: The Pentagon did. The Pentagon did. Yeah. Pentagon sent it over there, and NIAID under Anthony Fauci became the official biodefense agency in the United States government. Speaker 1: But how does bioweapons research go into a health agency? Speaker 0: Because bioweapons research is is always done coterminously with vaccine research. Every offensive bioweapon program requires a vaccine. So vaccines are actually part of offensive bioweapons. You cannot unlike chemical weapons with bioweapons, there's always blowback a 100% of the time, which means if you infect your enemy, your troops are also gonna get infected. And so you cannot launch a bioweapon unless you first have the antidote and you've inoculated all of your group with the antidote with, you know, your side, your civilians and your soldiers with the antidote, and then you can release it. So anytime you develop a bioweapon, you have to develop a vaccine, and and vaccine research was legal under the bioweapons treaty, but, but but bioweapons research was not. I'd say we're the same thing. If you developed a, a vaccine the way that you would develop a vaccine was by saying, well, we're gonna make a, we're gonna take a wild virus, and we're gonna make it more pathogenic, more virulent, more deadly, and then we're gonna develop a vaccine for that. And that was that's classic inner function research. Why are they doing that? You know, why what is the rationale for them doing that? The only real rationale, if you think about it, is to develop bioweapons and then develop a defense to those bioweapons. So that's what they were doing, and Anthony Fauci was given a 68% raise by the military because of these new military responsibilities. He continued to do that to 2014. And that year, 3 of the bugs escaped in high profile escapes from 3 different labs in the United States. Really deadly bugs escaped or were found in unsafe circumstances. And, and 300 scientists sent a letter to president Obama asking him to shut down Anthony Fauci's research on gatofunction, saying that it was highly likely that he would start a global pandemic with this kind of very dangerous research. And President Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of the worst projects by Anthony Fauci or ordered them shut. In the end, he really didn't shut them. He instead moved the research offshore where he would be out of the oversight of these trouble trouble some scientists, the 300 scientists, a group that called itself the Cambridge Working Group, and of the, and of White House officials. And the major lab offshore that they moved this research. There were other ones too. They moved research to Ukraine, to the former Soviet state of Georgia. But some of the worst research, they moved to a Chinese lab that was run by the Chinese military, the Wuhan lab in Wuhan, the Wuhan Institute of Neurology in Wuhan. Mission of the CIA when it was started in 19 47 was called Operation Paperclip, and Operation Paperclip was an effort to get German the Nazi scientists, many of whom were sentenced to death or who were facing prosecution at Nuremberg, to smuggle them out on rat lines and put them to work developing bioweapons and chemical weapons and nuclear weapons and missile systems in the United States. So a lot of them ended up in Fort Detrick. They ended up down in Galveston or one of the Navy labs. And that was the beginning of the United States program, and everything and the and the US bioweapons program inherited the culture from Germany and from Japan. And I talk about a lot about this. Japan was the one nation that really had used bioweapons at an industrial scale. They killed half a 1000000 Chinese during, during their war with the, which was coterminous with World War 2. So that war started. They were fighting the Chinese since the mid thirties, and they were using bioweapons. They were not being on chemical weapons because they didn't have the the oil stocks. They didn't have the, you know, the oil resources, so they really leaned on bioweapons programs, and they had done more than anybody to develop bioweapons. They had huge laboratories. They, they did live vivisections on 3,000 human beings, mainly Chinese, but people of every race, including US soldiers that they captured, and they would give them a disease and then they would dissect them alive without anesthesia, and extract their organs. They wanted to look at the living organ. So they had all of these cultures and they had all this knowledge, this technical know how. And he, the intelligence agencies and the military wanted to start that to to figure it out, start our own bioweapons program. So they brought those. They gave they exonerated those groups, and they brought them over to the United States. And what I show is that the U. S. Bioweapons program, from the beginning, inherited not just the cultures and the techniques, but also the, kind of moral bankruptcy of the Nazi and Japanese scientists that would always that was incredibly persistent within that program up until the modern time. And so the more I found out about it, the more important In the Speaker 1: book you said that pandemic preparedness and response is a new forever war. Would you explain that to us? Speaker 0: There's a whole ideology now and an industry that's built around pandemic preparedness and response And the first part of that is harvesting all of the, potential zoonotic spillover bugs from all over the world. In other words, to find every bug in the world that lives in the wild, in bats and monkeys and birds, avian flu, etcetera, that may someday jump to human beings and cause a virus. Well, when you collect all those, it it is the opposite of a good public health policy. You should leave them alone. The only real reason to collect them is if you're trying to weaponize them. And, it's, you know, you can fabricate another reason, but the rationales for those other reasons all fall apart when you start asking questions. So that's part of it. And then the second part of it is, is gain a function, is to take those and say, Okay. Now something bad might come from these bugs one day. Let's make bad things and see if we can defend ourselves against them. It's crazy. It's crazy when you even try to explain it. And then the last part of, pandemic preparedness and response, PPR, is is the the coordinated governmental response through WHO and through all the governments in the world that will cede authority to the WHO and coordinate another clampdown of authoritarian controls to remove democratic and civil rights from nations and individuals. And, you know, that's part of every response plan. Here's what you do. You start censoring people as soon as the pandemic is declared. And guess who gets to declare that? People who are controlled by the industry that's about to make huge profits. You know, so how do you integrate the military? How do you integrate the intelligence agencies? How do you stop people from complaining? How do you clamp down dissent? How do you control movements? How do you shut down business, control economic activity, control transactions? Every aspect of our life, control what we read, what we think. And all of that is legitimized by the fear of the pandemic. And, so, you know, we know what they're doing, and, and we need to step in and stop them. I mean, all gain of function, science should be illegalized. It should be criminalized. And we should have an international treaty that says that. We should have we should agree to open door transparency with all the people who now are enemies. You know, all these people are are working on these very, very frightening bugs, and we need we need to stop it. Speaker 1: So you're a litigator, Bobby. If you could depose any of these cover up coconspirators, Which ones would you depose and what would you ask? Speaker 0: You know, the most important ones to depose would be Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Jeremy Farrar, who's the head of the Wellcome Trust, which is the British version of the Gates Foundation, Bill Gates himself, and April Haines, who is the, who was the Deputy Director of the CIA and is now the, Director of National Intelligence and has played a very, very critical role in, you know, in pandemic preparedness and response and in, you know, the cover up. I would also want to depose Peter Daszak. And, you know, if I could get jurisdiction, some of the Chinese scientists, Xi Jing Li, and then the US scientist, Ralph Barrick, those I think are, kind of the principal villains in the book. There are a lot of others still.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses pandemic preparedness as a new "forever war" driven by an industry focused on collecting potential zoonotic spillover bugs for weaponization. They criticize gain of function research and highlight the authoritarian response to pandemics, including censorship and control of civil rights. The speaker suggests criminalizing gain of function research and calls for transparency. They identify key individuals to depose, including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and others involved in the cover-up.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You said that pandemic preparedness and response is a new forever war. Could you explain that to us? Speaker 1: There's a whole ideology now and an industry that's built around pandemic preparedness and response. And the first part of that is harvesting all of the, potential zoonotic spillover bugs from all over the world. In other words, to find every bug in the world that lives in the wild, in bats and monkeys and birds, avian flu, etcetera, that may someday jump to human beings and cause a virus. Well, when you collect all those, it it is the opposite of a good public health policy. You should leave them alone. The only real reason to collect them is if you're trying to weaponize them. And it's, you know, you can fabricate another reason, but the rationales for those other reasons all fall apart when you start asking questions. So that's part of it. And then the second part of it is, is gain a function, is to take those and say, Okay, now something bad might come from these bugs one day. Let's make bad things and see if we can defend ourselves against them. It's crazy when you even try to explain it. And then the last part of, pandemic preparedness and response, PPR, is is the the coordinated governmental response through WHO and through all the governments in the world that will cede authority to the WHO and coordinate another clampdown of authoritarian controls to remove democratic and civil rights from nations and individuals. And, you know, that's part of every response plan. Here's what you do. You start censoring people as soon as the pandemic is declared. And guess who gets to declare that? People who are controlled by the industry that's about to make huge profits. You know, so how do you integrate the military? How do you integrate the intelligence agencies? How do you stop people from complaining? How do you clamp down dissent? How do you control movements? How do you shut down business, control economic activity, control transactions? Every aspect of our life control what we read, what we think, and all of that is legitimized by the fear of the pandemic. And, so, you know, we know what they're doing, and, and we need to step in and stop them. I mean, all gain of function, science should be illegalized. It should be criminalized. And we should have an international treaty that says that. We should agree to open door transparency with all the people who now are enemies. You know, all these people are are working on these very, very frightening bugs, and we need we need to stop it. Speaker 0: So you're a litigator, Bobby. If you could depose any of these cover up coconspirators, Which ones would you depose and what would you ask? Speaker 1: You know, the most important ones to depose would be Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Jeremy Farrar, who's the head of the Wellcome Trust, which is the British version of the Gates Foundation, Bill Gates himself, and April Haines, who is the, who was the Deputy Director of the CIA and is now the, the Director of National Intelligence and, has played a very, very critical role in, you know, in pandemic preparedness and response and in, you know, the cover up. I would also want to depose Peter Daszak. And, you know, if I could get jurisdiction, some of the Chinese scientist, Xi Zhengli, and and then the US scientist, Ralph Barrick, those I think are, kind of the principal villains in the book. There are a lot of others still.
Video Transcript AI Summary
To combat disinformation, it is crucial to unite countries and trusted sources to address false campaigns effectively. Trusted interlocutors, such as survivors, employers, faith leaders, and health workers, can help spread accurate information. Collaboration with the private sector to remove false information is essential. International organizations like the UN and WHO play a vital role in combating misinformation at a government level. Trust in these organizations is key to countering disinformation effectively.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Address that situation, not the least of which is bringing together other countries to effectively take action against them for the kind of campaigns that they're propagating. But it's, but generally, I mean, I would say the disinformation, the line between disinformation and misinformation is not always an easy one to find. And the reality is the greatest way to impact it in my experience is not to let it sit. So in other words, find your trusted interlocutors that are capable of saying this is not acceptable, this is in fact the truth, here is the information. And I think the community of survivors is one example, but there's a whole series, employers, trusted faith leaders, variety of health workers and so on can be part of that. In addition, obviously you want to work with private sector and those who are spreading information generally to see that they can bring things down that are in fact lies or false information that's being put forward as a way to minimize it. But having a source, a national source, an international source, other trusted sources and really guiding everybody towards that information is one of the most effective ways to deal with the situation like that. Speaker 1: Great. Martin, Tim. If it comes back to misinformation on a level of governments of countries, then we need, as Sofia mentioned, trustable international organizations, UN, WHO, and they have to come together to get together to spread this trust and to work against this. We cannot hold governments from doing misinformation on their own. So I fully trust on disinformation in organizations. Tom, just to build on that.

@oldschoolethos - Only The Dead

NIH Lab In Hamilton, MT Congressman Matt Rosendale (MT-02) issued the following statement after reports that the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China shipped a strain of coronavirus, WIV1, to the National institute of Health Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Hamilton, Montana, in 2018 for experiments. “Our government helped create the Wuhan flu, then shut the country down when it escaped from the lab,” said Rep. Rosendale. “Fauci and his cohorts must be held accountable!” https://rosendale.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=691 https://www.nationalreview.com/news/gop-senators-demand-answers-from-nih-on-montana-lab-studying-coronaviruses-from-wuhan/amp/ EXCLUSIVEInside NIH virus lab in Montana - that has eerie ties to Wuhan - where US scientists inject pigs and monkeys with EBOLA and other dangerous bio-agents https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13008119/montana-lab-scientists-experimenting-dangerous-pathogens.html “A key component of NIAID’s Division of Intramural Research, RML is perhaps best known for its research into vector-borne diseases, such as Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Q fever, and Lyme disease—three illnesses caused by microbes whose names pay tribute to the former RML scientists who discovered them.” https://www.niaid.nih.gov/about/rocky-mountain-overview Carrie Mae Long, Ph.D. Worked under Fauci and studied the COVID-19 coronavirus at the NIH in Montana. She also works on Development of a safe and effective Q fever vaccine at the NIH Hamilton, Montana. “Additionally, we are focused on developing a “better” Q fever vaccine. The current Q fever vaccine is highly efficacious but can cause a post-vaccination hypersensitivity (PVH) response; thus, the vaccine is not widely deployed. We seek to understand the immunologic mechanisms underlying vaccine-mediated protection and the PVH response.” https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/carrie-mae-long-phd https://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/6053 “In early January, before COVID-19 and coronavirus became daily news, a Gardner-Webb University alumna worked in a lab that was gearing up to study the disease. Dr. Carrie Long, who graduated in 2011 with a degree in biology, is an independent research scholar at Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Hamilton, Mont., part of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). “You may have seen Dr. (Anthony) Fauci on TV recently,” Long noted. “He’s my boss about five times removed.” https://gardner-webb.edu/news/alumna-conducts-tests-on-covid-19-virus/ “Top U.S. virologist Ralph Baric engineered the COVID-19 virus SARS-CoV-2 in his lab at the University of North Carolina as part of his work in connection with the 2018 DEFUSE funding proposal.” The winning 2018 DARPA bid – for a project called PREEMPT – was led by Dr. Vincent Munster (pictured above) based at Anthony Fauci’s NIH Rocky Mountain Lab. Both Munster’s PREEMPT proposal and Baric’s losing DEFUSE project had the same basic idea: to try to prevent a (hypothetical) future pandemic by using an engineered virus to vaccinate the bats from which it is believed such a virus was likely to spill over. https://dailysceptic.org/2024/01/30/is-this-the-man-who-created-covid-19-in-faucis-u-s-lab/ Interesting the MT researcher that worked on coronavirus is working on a Q fever Vaccine: WHO/BS/2023.2456 WHO 1st International Standard for anti-Q Fever serum (human) July 2023 https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-bs-2023.2456 Oct 2023: Pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturer BioCina is industry partner in an ambitious research project that aims to develop vaccine candidates to protect against biowarfare threats including Q Fever, tularaemia, and melioidosis. https://www.aumanufacturing.com.au/biocina-aims-for-vaccines-against-biowarfare-threats Jan 2023: A nearly $3 million grant from the National Institute of Health is being funded to WSU. The grant will enable scientists to uncover how a parasitic bacterium uses a human immune system response to replicate and cause the debilitating disease known as Q Fever. https://pullmanradio.com/wsu-q-fever-research-earns-3-million-in-funding/

GOP Senators Demand Answers from NIH on Montana Lab Studying Coronaviruses from Wuhan | National ReviewClose National Review NavigationOpen National Review NavigationLarge National Review LogoLarge National Review Logo nationalreview.com
Inside NIH lab where US scientists experiment with dangerous pathogens Photos and videos obtained exclusively by DailyMail.com show US researchers experimenting on animals (pictured) at a controversial lab in Montana where risky virus research is carried out. dailymail.co.uk
Rocky Mountain Labs Overview An overview of the Rocky Mountain Labs, a premier NIH facility for biomedical research. niaid.nih.gov
Carrie Mae Long, Ph.D. Carrie Mae Long, Ph.D. is an Independent Research Scholar in the Coxiella Pathogenesis Section at NIAID. Our group seeks to gain a better understanding of bacterial and host factors involved in C. burnetii virulence. Additionally, we are focused on developing a “better” Q fever vaccine. The current Q fever vaccine is highly efficacious but can cause a post-vaccination hypersensitivity response. niaid.nih.gov
Interview with Dr. Carrie Mae Long—Winner of the Pathogens 2022 Young Investigator Award We had the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Carrie Mae Long, winner of the Pathogens 2022 Young Investigator Award. Dr.... mdpi.com
Gardner-Webb Alumna Conducting Tests on COVID-19 Virus Dr. Carrie Long, a 2011 Gardner-Webb alumna, is studying COVID-19 at Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Hamilton, Mont. gardner-webb.edu
Is This the Man Who Created COVID-19 in Fauci's U.S. Lab? – The Daily Sceptic Was COVID-19 created in Fauci's NIH lab in Montana, USA, by a virologist paid to engineer a SARS virus to infect bats? New evidence points to this strange scenario being ever more likely. dailysceptic.org
WHO/BS/2023.2456 WHO 1st International Standard for anti-Q Fever serum (human) Publications of the World Health Organization who.int
BioCina aims for vaccines against biowarfare threats - Australian Manufacturing Forum Pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturer BioCina is industry partner in an ambitious research project that aims to develop vaccine candidates to protect against biowarfare threats including Q Fever, tularaemia, and melioidosis. BioCina, the health Security Systems Australia (HSSA) division of defence innovation group DMTC, and academics led by Griffith University, including the Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory… aumanufacturing.com.au
WSU Q Fever Research Earns $3 Million in Funding A nearly $3 million grant from the National Institute of Health is being funded to WSU. The grant will enable scientists to uncover how a parasitic bacterium uses a human immune system response to … pullmanradio.com

@oldschoolethos - Only The Dead

Q Fever research Some interesting links to Fauci and the Q Fever are below. There are many more out there though. ARTICLE 1: The genetic blueprint of yet another important disease-causing microbe, the bacterium Coxiella burnetii, has been deciphered and analyzed. C. burnetii -- a highly infectious organism that sickened thousands of soldiers in Europe during World War II -- can cause a debilitating flu-like illness in humans called Q fever. "The genomic revolution promises profound benefits to human health," says NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, M.D. https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/849709 ARTICLE 2: Q fever: “the microbe is a potential agent of bioterrorism. Although only severe cases of Q fever are fatal, C. burnetii is of concern as a potential bioterrorist threat because early diagnosis of the disease is difficult, and the microbe is a hardy organism that can be aerosolized.” https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/view/genetic-blueprint-q-fever-bacterium-unveiled INTERESTING NOTE: The NIH Lab in Hamilton, Montana now linked to Fauci and COVID is also known for its work on the Q Fever and similar zoonotic specimens. The center is also working on a better “Q-Vax” Vaccine for Q fever. Zoonotic Q Fever Information. The epidemic of Q fever in 2018 to 2019 in Zhuhai city of China determined by metagenomic next-generation sequencing https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34264939/ June 2021 A case report of autochthonous Q fever with pneumonia and hepatitis in northeastern China https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590053621000215 Sept 2021 A case of tick-transmitted Q fever in Lishui, China diagnosed by next-generation sequencing https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34590876/ December 2022 CDC Delayed Diagnosis of Acute Q Fever, China December 2022 “We report a patient in China with fever of unknown origin who visited 3 hospitals in 3 weeks and was finally given a diagnosis of acute Q fever, determined by metagenomics next-generation sequencing. Our results indicate that physicians are unfamiliar with Q fever and the disease is neglected in China.” “Q fever is an important worldwide zoonosis with nonspecific symptoms, making diagnosis challenging (1–3). Humans become infected mainly by inhalation of Coxiella burnetii–contaminated aerosols from animal waste or contaminated soil (4). C. burnetii is listed as a biologic weapon in the United States” https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/28/12/22-1118_article Q Fever—A Neglected Zoonosis https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/8/1530

Genetic blueprint for Q fever bacterium unveiled The genetic blueprint of yet another important disease-causing microbe, the bacterium Coxiella burnetii, has been deciphered and analyzed. eurekalert.org
Genetic Blueprint for Q Fever Bacterium Unveiled infectioncontroltoday.com
The epidemic of Q fever in 2018 to 2019 in Zhuhai city of China determined by metagenomic next-generation sequencing - PubMed Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii (Cb). From January 2018 to November 2019, plasma samples from 2,382 patients with acute fever of unknown cause at a hospital in Zhuhai city of China were tested using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Of those tested, 138 patie … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A case report of autochthonous Q fever with pneumonia and hepatitis in northeastern China There are only a few case reports of Q fever caused by Coxiella burnetii in China, despite the nature as a ubiquitous zoonotic disease worldwide. In t… sciencedirect.com
A case of tick-transmitted Q fever in Lishui, China diagnosed by next-generation sequencing - PubMed Q fever is a zoonotic disease caused by Coxiella burnetii. Most patients have non-specific symptoms at onset. In addition, routine diagnostic tests for C. burnetii are not sensitive, and the bacterium cannot grow in general culture medium. The diagnosis of Q fever therefore poses a cha … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Delayed Diagnosis of Acute Q Fever, China Delayed Diagnosis of Acute Q Fever, China wwwnc.cdc.gov
Q Fever—A Neglected Zoonosis Q fever remains a neglected zoonosis in many developing countries including Pakistan. The causing agent Coxiella (C.) burnetii is resistant to environmental factors (such as drying, heat and many disinfectants), resulting in a long-lasting infection risk for both human and animals. As the infection is usually asymptomatic, it mostly remains undiagnosed in animals until and unless adverse pregnancy outcomes occur in a herd. In humans, the infection leads to severe endocarditis and vascular infection in chronic cases. Limited data are available on molecular epidemiology and evolution of this pathogen, especially in ruminants. Genomic studies will help speculating outbreak relationships in this scenario. Likewise, pathogenesis of C. burnetii needs to be explored by molecular studies. Awareness programs and ensuring pasteurization of the dairy milk before human consumption would help preventing Q fever zoonosis. mdpi.com
oldschoolethos
Posted - January 8, 2024 at 10:41 PM
Saved - January 11, 2024 at 8:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The podcast with Joe Rogan and Taylor Sheridan offers great insight on the topic of control. The FY23 NDAA and specific sections like "Preventing Future Pandemics" and "End the Commercial Trade in Live Wildlife" are worth exploring. The establishment of the Global Health Security Agenda and its impact on society, politics, and health is also discussed. Treaties with the WHO and the legal framework of the International Health Regulations are important to consider. For more details, check out the Substack in the bio.

@oldschoolethos - In God We Trust - Matthew 13:15

So much great insight in the podcast with @joerogan and Taylor Sheridan Seizing Power “It’s human nature to want more control” “Now we have the NDAA, now we have the Patriot Act, now we have this. Ok now we have a lot more control. Now we have the NSA spying on everbody” The FY23 NDAA is also very fascinating in regard to control. Page 2951 TITLE LXIII—PREVENTING FUTURE PANDEMICS is fascinating reading. Page 2,954 SEC. 6302. COUNTRY-DRIVEN APPROACH TO END THE COMMERCIAL TRADE IN LIVE WILDLIFE AND ASSOCIATED WILDLIFE MARKETS. Page 3,289 SEC. 6908 Establishment of Fund for Global Health Security and Pandemic Preparedness. §  Accelerate country COMPLIANCE with the International Health Regulations (2005) and fulfillment of the Global Health Security Agenda 2024 Framework. (Interesting they are expanding the W.H.O. Authority under the Pandemic Accords and we already have 3 Treaties with the W.H.O.) ·       “Enable international collaboration to gain understanding and measure the impacts of the content moderation, product design decisions, and algorithms of online platforms on society, politics, the spread of hate, harassments, and extremism, security, privacy, and physical or mental health, including consideration for youth development”  “Conduct research that explores the impact of published media such as television, podcast, radio, and newspapers, on society, politics, the spread of hate, harassment, and extremism, security, privacy, and physical or mental health, including considerations for youth development”   Page 3,275 SEC. 6904. GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY AGENDA INTERAGENCY REVIEW COUNCIL. (a) ESTABLISHMENT. (AKA the new 2023 DOD Biodefense Council) “Develop a hub for biosurveillance data including information collected from wearable devices, medical records, & genomic sequencing.”  Treaties currently in place with the W.H.O including the IHR and Constitution of the WHO https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/TIF-2020-Full-website-view.pdf Article VI of the United States Constitution “all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land” International Health Regulations 2005 edition  “The International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) provide an overarching legal framework that defines countries’ rights and obligations in handling public health events and emergencies that have the potential to cross borders. The IHR are an instrument of international law that is legally-binding on 196 countries, including the 194 WHO Member States.”  A central and historic responsibility for the World Health Organization (WHO) has been the management of the global regime for the control of the international spread of disease.  Under Articles 21(a) and 22, the Constitution of WHO confers upon the World Health Assembly the authority to adopt regulations  “designed to prevent the international spread of disease” which, after adoption by the Health Assembly, enter into force for all WHO Member States that do not affirmatively opt out of them within a specified time period.  https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241580496  I break it down in my Substack in bio. I won’t be adding to it but I’ll leave it open. Feel free to use anything you find interesting.

Video Transcript AI Summary
People naturally crave control and always seek to expand it. This leads to the creation of new laws and strategies to gain more control, such as the NDAA, Patriot Act, and NSA surveillance. Each time this happens, more control is obtained. However, this constant pursuit of control poses a problem.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have the ability to enact control. And when you give people the ability to enact control, they always take it. That's why you have to always resist them moving those fucking boundaries, because it's just human nature. You could call it evil, you could say all these different things, you can call it greedy, it's human nature to want more. And when you have a certain amount of control and you lot more things done with more control, you try to get more control. And then you try to figure out strategies. How do we what what can we do in order to make, it important that we pass a new law. So now we have the NDAA. Now we have the Patriot Act. Now we have this. Now okay. Now we don't got a lot more control. Now we have the NSA spying on everybody. Much more control. It's much and every time this happens you get more and more. The problem is
Technical Difficulties state.gov
International Health Regulations (2005) – Third edition The International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) provide an overarching legal framework that defines countries’ rights and obligations in handling public health events and emergencies that have the potential to cross borders. who.int
oldschoolethos
Posted - December 13, 2023 at 9:57 AM
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 2:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The proposed rule change by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) aims to introduce a new listing standard for Natural Asset Companies (NACs). These companies would hold rights to the ecological performance of natural areas and have the authority to manage them for conservation or sustainable management. The NYSE has an exclusive license from Intrinsic Exchange Group Inc. (IEG) to use the Reporting Framework for NAC listings. The article highlights the importance of bringing natural assets into the financial mainstream and mentions the estimated value of ecosystem services at over $100 trillion per year. It also raises concerns about the involvement of global organizations and the potential implications of this action.

@oldschoolethos - Down The Rabbit Hole

The below action seems like a giant American land grab by Globalists. It looks more like something the U.N., W.H.O., and WEF would do. Public Private partnership to control public lands. That seems like a very bad idea to me. I don’t think Theodore Roosevelt would be down for this either. Question is which and how much land will they put under these “Natural Asset Companies” •look through the attached pictures of the footnotes. See anything that stands out? •Lots of United Nations policies and regulations cited. Environmental economic accounting, Force for good, Transformation required to limit global warming, global sustainable investment alliance, How to contact them with your comments on this change will be in comments below. Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Listed Company Manual To Adopt Listing Standards for Natural Asset Companies “The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Listed Company Manual (“Manual”) to adopt a new listing standard for the listing of Natural Asset Companies.” “These and other benefits derived from ecosystems are called ecosystem services, and in aggregate, economists estimate their value at more than US$100 trillion dollars per year.” “Ending the overconsumption of and underinvestment in nature requires bringing natural assets into the financial mainstream. To that end, the Exchange proposes to adopt listing standards to introduce a new type of public company called a NAC, a new concept pioneered by Intrinsic Exchange Group Inc. (“IEG”). Founded in 2017, IEG is a private company structured as a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware that advises public sector and private landowners on the creation of NAC structures and strategies.” “NACs will be corporations that hold the rights to the ecological performance (i.e., the value of natural assets and production of ecosystem services) produced by natural or working areas, such as national reserves or large-scale farmlands, and have the authority to manage the areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. These rights can be licensed like other rights, including “run with the land” rights (such as mineral rights, water rights, or air rights), and NACs are expected to license these rights from sovereign nations or private landowners.” “The Exchange and IEG have entered into an agreement pursuant to which IEG has granted the Exchange an exclusive license in the United States to use the Reporting Framework in connection with the listing of NACs on the Exchange (although the Reporting Framework will remain proprietary to IEG). Under the terms of the agreement, the Exchange has acquired a small minority interest in IEG and one seat on IEG's board of directors. IEG has agreed to seek to identify and develop NACs for listing on the Exchange, in addition to marketing the listing and trading of NACs on the Exchange and providing training with respect to the NAC structure and the Reporting Framework to NYSE personnel and currently listed and potential listed NACs. IEG will be entitled to a share of the revenues generated by the Exchange from the listing and trading of NACs on the NYSE.” “Ecological Performance Rights—The rights to the value of natural assets and the production or ecosystem services in a designated area, including the authority to manage the area. These rights are granted to a NAC, from a natural asset owner, as provided through a license agreement.” “Ecosystem Service Valuation—The assignation of an economic value to an ecosystem service using one of many valuation methodologies accepted today.” https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/10/04/2023-22041/self-regulatory-organizations-new-york-stock-exchange-llc-notice-of-filing-of-proposed-rule-change All outdoor lovers should get eyes on this. @joerogan @JackCarrUSA @jockowillink @TimKennedyMMA @EvanHafer @NockOnTV @Montanaknifeco @Silencercentral @onXmaps @realalexjones @ChadRobo @TuckerCarlson @glennbeck @mikeaglover1 @BlazeTV @theblaze @charliekirk11 @elonmusk @dbongino

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

HIGHEST IMPORTANCE ‼️ Hidden On Page 68,811 Of The Federal Registry Is A Proposal To Sell Off America’s Public Lands To Wall Street, Including Our National Parks 🚨 “We’ve seen a lot of people ask why we are seeing so many closures of our public lands. You can find the answer on page 68,811 of the Federal Register, where there is a proposal to basically sell off our public lands to Wall Street. Page 68,811 of the federal register in the year 2023, the year we're in, which was published on October 4, 2023, page 68,811, you find that the New York Stock Exchange is working with the Securities and Exchange Commission to create a rule to allow for the creation of a new type a company called a natural asset company. And what is it that a natural asset company is gonna do, might you ask? Well, they will hold the rights these are corporations that will hold the rights to the ecological performance produced by natural or working areas, such as national reserves, which is public lands, or large scale farmlands, and have the authority to manage the areas. So that means the public land management agencies won't be managing these areas anymore. It's these Natural asset companies will be the ones with the authority to manage the areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. These rights can be licensed with like other rights. Such as mineral rights or water rights or air rights. And they're expected to license these rights from sovereign nations, so governments, or private landowners. So they don't wanna just lock up our public land. They wanna lock up our private land. And these assets can be areas that are publicly owned, such as a national park or tracks of privately owned property held by individuals. So they wanna privatize our national parks to these NACs so that they can get returns on investment on them. This is the Rockefellers. This is the stock New York Stock Exchange. This is Wall Street is interested in these conservation leases. So you asked me the question, like, who stands to benefit from this? It's BlackRock. I mean, they they are looking at this and seeing not just 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of economic value. They're seeing quadrillion of dollars of economic value.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Federal Register in 2023 reveals that the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission are collaborating to establish natural asset companies. These corporations will hold rights to ecological performance in areas like national reserves and farmlands, taking over management from public land agencies. The companies can license these rights from governments or private landowners, including publicly owned areas like national parks. The aim is to privatize these areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. Wall Street, particularly BlackRock, stands to benefit greatly from this, with the potential for trillions of dollars in economic value.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Page 68,811 of the Federal Register in the Speaker 1: year 2023, the year we're in, which was published on October 4, 2023, page 68,811, you find that the New York Stock Exchange is working with the Securities and Exchange Commission to create a rule to allow for the creation of a new type of company called a natural asset company. And what is it that a natural asset company is gonna do, might you ask? Well, they will hold the rights these are corporations that will hold the rights to the ecological performance produced by natural or working areas such as national reserves, which is public lands, or large scale farmlands, and have the authority to manage the area. So that means the public land management agencies won't be managing these areas anymore. It's these natural asset companies will be the ones with the authority to manage the areas for conservation, restoration, or sustainable management. These rights can be licensed with like other rights, such as mineral rights or water rights or air rights, and they're expected to license these rights from sovereign nations, so governments, or private landowners. So they don't wanna just lock up our public land. They wanna lock up our private land. And these assets can be areas that are publicly owned, such as a national park or tracts of privately owned property held by individuals. So they wanna privatize our national parks to these NECs so that they can get returns on investment on them. This is the Rockefellers. This is the Stock New York Stock Exchange. This is Wall Street is interested in these conservation leases. So you you asked me the question, like, who stands to benefit from this? It's BlackRock. I mean, they they are looking at this and seeing Not just 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of economic value. They're saying quadrillion of dollars of economic value.
oldschoolethos
Posted - December 10, 2023 at 2:49 PM
Saved - December 10, 2023 at 5:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Obama and Biden have utilized the NDAA and executive orders to advance their agendas. They established the Global Health Security Agenda and One Health, which Trump later terminated. Biden revived these initiatives and funded the WHO and UN. The FY23 NDAA established the DOD Biodefense Council. Trump and Elon Musk faced attacks for opposing these globalist efforts. Robert Kennedy Jr. provides valuable insights on government bio tactics, vaccine development, and pandemic response. The future looks challenging with the convergence of climate crisis, global health, Ukraine, biolabs, vaccines, and various influential entities. This information is further detailed in the tweet mentioned.

@oldschoolethos - Down The Rabbit Hole

Let’s go down a deep and dark rabbit hole. Obama and “Biden” are experts in using the NDAA and executive orders to push their agendas. They have been very busy the last 3 years also. I put a basic timeline below. Globalists figured out Pandemics and Climate Crisis is the way to move forward. Obama & Biden are all in. Video of @RealAlexJones Below is 9/6/18 “Obama openly set up an CIA office in the last National Defense Authorization Act” He is referring to the NDAA prior to Trump getting in. “They have a Rogue Group in the FBI and Justice Department running around terrorizing everyone” I agree with Alex on all of this. “Baby we believe in America” “You can feel it she’s in a lot of trouble right now” “We are facing true unadulterated pure Evil” Background of what happened after that using the NDAA’s: 1.Obama went all in with the W.H.O. & U.N. In 2014 he started the Global Health Security Agenda GHSA and “One Health” 2.Obama in 2016 attempted to form a massive DOD “Biodefense” Council to help enforce his GHSA. 3.Trump killed both programs in 2017 and later massively cut funding to the W.H.O. 4.Biden brought back the GHSA and One Health and provided massive funding to the W.H.O. And U.N. 5.Biden using the FY23 NDAA established the DOD Biodefense Council that Obama dreamed up. 6.Trump has been under massive attack. Why? Because he would shut it all down. And because he can’t be bought. 7.Elon has been under massive attack. Why? He loves America and free speech. He thinks freedom of speech and information is essential for a society to thrive. And he can’t be bought. 8.FY23 NDAA was a win for globalists. FY24 NDAA is looking like a win for the Military Industrial Complex. Nothing like a Globalist Warmonger combo huh? Video 1: Info Wars 2018 Video 2: clips showing why they need to get Trump off the chessboard Video 3: clips of Dr. Brandi C. Vann. One of the founding members of the 2023 DOD Biodefense Council. Her thoughts on climate, new vaccines for troops, and “disinformation” about U.S. involvement in BioLabs. Video 4: @RobertKennedyJr 3 Clips explaining things very well. (Put politics aside. He puts out a lot of great deep state information. Who you’re voting for is irrelevant in this instance.) He goes over Government Bio tactics, Vaccine Development, Fauci, Wuhan, Pandemic preparedness and response under Health organizations. This next year is going to be a hell of a ride. Thanks @elonmusk & @X for listening to the people and bringing Alex back. Climate Crisis + Global Health + Ukraine + BioLabs + W.H.O. + U.N. + Vaccines + Bill Gates + WEF + Obama/Biden/Kerry + Pfizer & other Big Pharma + Military Industrial Complex + DOD Council + new FCC Rules + executive orders for AI regulation = Nothing good for America or Humanity. I explain a lot of it in the tweet below. If you really want to start to go Down the Rabbit Hole build upon my “case file” in tweet below. It is housed in a proton drive. Feel free to save a local copy and use whatever you find interesting.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Obama set up a CIA office in the Defense Authorization Act, which is how they're funding their activities. They use spies to train reporters to intimidate and threaten people. There's a rogue group in the FBI and justice department terrorizing everyone. They're threatening to set up me and Roger Stone or go to prison. They're going to extreme lengths to remove Trump, but he remains confident. The New York Times published a fake piece to make him paranoid. We are the resistance, being deplatformed and under siege. Trump is under attack, but we believe in America. I'm not scared because I trust God to take care of my children. We're close to midnight, facing pure evil.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say this again. I'm a say it very, very slowly because I know the audience gets it. But what horrifies the bureaucrats, CNN, The New York Times is, Obama openly set up a CIA office in the last Defense Authorization Act. And I know you're like, Alex, you say this every day. I know for 2 years. Because that's how they're funding and doing all this, and they're using spies training reporters how to intimidate and threaten people, and then they've got a rogue group in the FBI And justice department running around terrorizing everyone, and we're gonna get to that. And they're going and threatening people that they need to set up me and Roger Stone or they're gonna go to prison. They have gone into criminal overdrive. And they're doing things so criminal. It's like when a bank robber gets caught, and he grabs a little girl and puts a gun to their head. I mean, they're at the gun to the head thing going, get back. Get back. Get back. And then there's Trump totally confident, kicking butt, economy coming back, all these great things. And they are saying, remove him, and this is meant to make him totally paranoid, this fake New York Times piece. Yes. Obviously, it's Nikki Haley is one of the main sources and one of his former lawyers, but it's a composite professionally written by the New York Times as Annette D'Souza and others have said, the kingpin owned New York Times is not the resistance. We are the resistance. We're the ones being deplatformed. We're the ones under siege. Trump's the one under attack, and you just crack the door to letting us in, and everything gets better. Because, baby, we believe in America. I'm in the cult of America. And you can feel it. She's in a lot of trouble right now. And so I I'm not scared at all. I've got it mentally. Know that whatever happens, god's gonna take care of my children. You get to the point where you gotta tell your kids, like, I took them to school this morning. Someday your daddy's not gonna be here. You just need to be good people and be strong and stick up for each other. Do what's right. But when you come to that point, you're already starting to say bye to your kids. You know how close we are to midnight, folks. But you know what? It makes you wanna do it even more because we're facing true unadulterated, pure evil.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight the US's high financial contribution compared to China's, and criticize President Biden for rejoining the WHO without negotiation or reform. The speaker opposes a pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies to other countries and promote censorship. They pledge to withdraw from the WHO and create a new coalition of nations committed to health protection, sovereignty, and freedom. The second speaker expresses concern about dangerous rhetoric and calls for the speaker to be eliminated from public office. The third speaker defends their client in a courtroom, criticizing the judge and accusing the opposing attorney of political bias. They argue for the importance of a fair judicial system and criticize corruption and bias in the courtroom.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The World Health Organization has become nothing more than a corrupt globalist scam paid for by the United States, but owned and controlled by China. When the China virus reached our shores 3 years ago, the World Health Organization disgracefully covered the tracks of the Chinese Communist Party every single step of the way. For this reason, it was my great honor to terminate America's relationship with the World Health Organization. The United States was paying the World Health Organization almost $500,000,000 a year. When I dropped out, I took it out of there. And for 330,000,000 people, even though China was paying only $40,000,000 for 1,400,000,000 people. So we had 330. They have 1.4, and we're paying more than 10 times the amount. That's typical for the United States because they don't know what the hell they're doing. Unfortunately, Crooked Joe Biden foolishly reentered the World Health Organization at the full price and without any negotiations or reforms. And now Biden is pushing to bypass the United States Senate to enter a Pandemic treaty that would surrender American sovereignty to the World Health Organization, again, controlled by China. The draft treaty would require the United States to send vast quantities of medical supplies to other countries in the event of another pandemic, and it would push aggressive Censorship of free speech on issues of public health just like they censored the truth about the Wuhan lab, which I said That's where it came from, remember. Under the next Trump administration, that treaty will be immediately terminated. I would not allow public health to be used as a pretext to advance the march of global government. That's what they're doing, globalists. The United States will withdraw from the corrupt World Health Organization, which in light of its utter failure on COVID, they had a tremendous Disaster on COVID. Deserves to be completely abolished and replaced. Then I will work to forge a new coalition of nations that are Strongly committed to protecting health while also upholding sovereignty and freedom. I wanna thank you very much, but I also wanna say this. I could have renegotiated the deal. I could have gone into the World Health Organization for $25,000,000. Biden didn't take that deal. He's paying almost $500,000,000. They were so anxious to get the United States back after I terminated the the agreement. They were so anxious to get it back that they offered me a deal, 25 to $30,000,000, and I said, no. I'll wait. Could've gotten it for less, but I didn't want less at that point. We're paying almost 500,000,000. Could've done it for 25 to 30. Biden took the 500, almost the $500,000,000 deal. He knew he could have gotten back in for less. So why did he pay so much? But that's just one of many things that are wrong with our country. Speaker 1: Rhetoric is really getting dangerous, more and more dangerous. And we saw what happened on January 6th when he uses inflammatory rhetoric now. And his recent True Social post, is incredibly, incredibly scary for anyone, that might be trying to up work in government. And, it is just, unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see public office again. He is not only unfit, He is destructive to our democracy, and he has to be, he has to be eliminated. Speaker 2: Coming from the judge who was already predetermined that my client committed fraud before we even walked into this courtroom. I'm not not here to hear what he has to say. Then why exactly am I being paid as an Kearney, and why exactly are taxpayer dollars being used in this courtroom? The answer is very clear. Because miss James Wants to stand right here like she did this morning, and call my client a liar. Call the company and make a name for herself. She said this morning that the numbers don't lie, And they won't lie in this case. Well, miss James, I have a message for you. The numbers didn't lie when you ran for governor, and that's why you dropped out. And the numbers don't lie when president Trump runs for office in 2024, and those numbers are loud and clear. This country is falling Apart. And if we don't stop corruption in courtrooms where attorneys are gagged, where attorneys are not allowed to say what they need to say to protect their clients' interests. It doesn't matter what your politics are. Everyone has a right in this country to get up and put a defense. I don't care who you are. You have a right To hire a lawyer who can put objections on the record. You have a right to hire a lawyer who can stand up and say something when they see something wrong. But I was told to sit down today. I was yelled at, and I've had a judge who is unhinged slamming a table. Let me be very clear. I don't tolerate that in my life. I'm not gonna tolerate it here. And you know what? You shouldn't either. Because not Every American citizen gets a camera and a microphone, and what I'm seeing is such a demise of American judicial system and democracy. Miss Ames came out this morning and said that she knew mister Trump, and she always calls him mister Trump because it kills her that he was But the 45th president of this country, one of the best presidents we've had, has built a great company. It's worth a ton more than that statement of financial condition, and she doesn't know how to get out of it because her politics won't allow her. She calls him a bully. She says He's going to bring out racial slurs. He's going to say things today and taunt her. Well, miss James, you taunted him before you came into office, Before you saw one record, one statement of financial condition, you taunted him. You said his administration was Was 2 male and 2 pale. Those are her words. She said that she and Michael Cohen We're going to be his biggest nightmare where I have some news for you, miss James. Michael Cohen folded, lied, and crumbled. Your star witness, along with all the DAs and corrupt AGs, need to be paying attention to what happens when you let us take the stand, when you let my client speak the truth, and the judge can tell me to Sit down. And he can try and shorten my client's testimony, but it is loud and clear. They've got nothing but their politics. She's got nothing but her Soros backing, which we discovered recently. And I am sick and tired of seeing it. Pay attention, America. Pay attention. Because when you're in court one of these days and you don't have a lawyer that has a microphone, and you don't have a lawyer that can go on TV, and you've got judges gagging them. What are you gonna do? We need to fix this country, And we need to stop what is happening in this courtroom. President Trump is worth a lot more, and she wasn't ready for it. She doesn't understand it. And before she rushed to judgment, She should have thought about attacking somebody with over 50 years of real estate expertise who changed single handedly the skyline of New York City. She picked the wrong person, and her politics will fail for it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the current state of biodefense and the need for a different approach due to emerging threats and advancements in technology. They highlight the importance of collaboration and the removal of bureaucratic barriers in addressing these challenges. The speaker also mentions the development of nonspecific medical countermeasures to enhance the immune system's response to unknown agents, as well as the rapid advancement of specific drugs through computational systems. They emphasize the role of situational awareness and the vulnerabilities in the industrial base and supply chain. The speaker concludes by discussing the review of policies, strategies, operational posture, research and development pipeline, and total force readiness in biodefense.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where where are we now? Right? And and where do we think we need to go? Our current state, in terms of the threat environment, especially up until recently, we were really defending against a legacy list of chemical and biological warfare threats, right? These have been around a while. You know, you have the Dirty Dozen. You have the this very standard list of chemical agents. And we really knew what we were up against. And we had effective capabilities to to defend against those. Right? And we were really good at doing that. And our war fighters under our nation, it wasn't perfect, but we were pretty well protected and had a pretty good understanding of what our capabilities were and we're not. And that was then. What we are facing now is both an acceleration of our natural environment due to due to global, global warming, right, we actually see things like the permafrost melting and the emergence of, you know, long forgotten pathogens on the nefarious side. We have adversaries, and we have technologies that have been enabled to broaden our scope of what biodefense even is beyond the ability to have a list of threat agents, right? So how does the department or how do we, again, within national security, look at that prioritization and look at that capability development in a different way. So, Combatant commands and the services. So all of those components that might have or might play apart in a global response or or a targeted response will all come together in this, this council moving forward. The other thing that I would like to to highlight is, you mentioned the working groups, right? So the council recognizes that in order to be able to rests of these evergreen issues that we're identifying with the complexity of the environment that Doctor. George mentioned, the policy challenges, strategy challenges, and then ultimately, how do we appropriately prioritize some of the efforts that we need to do moving forward? We we can't do that by just kind of dropping something on the council. So there will be bodies that are either ad hoc or evergreen that will help shape that environment across the Department of Defense and the enterprise of biodefense within the Department, you know, within the CBDP and see if you can get a copy of that document. What this document really does is, looks at how we are going to do like a 2 pronged approach to the RDA investments within the medical countermeasures space. And the first one really delivers or talks about the delivery of non specific medical countermeasure products to the warfighter. And the other one establishes capabilities for how we are going to do rapid development of very specific medical countermeasure products. So let me let me talk very quickly about the 1st prong. So the development of nonspecific medical countermeasure products, which is something new to kind of, umwell, it's new and it's not new for the Chembio Defense Program, but it's an area that we are really seeking a lot of guidance and assistance from folks within the community. What this prong really focuses on is developing medical countermeasures that can help enhance a human immune system against exposure to unknown agents, right? So instead of thinking about chasing pathogen after pathogen, we're actually turning the camera lens, as it were, to the other side and really looking at how the person or the host responds, or how we can protect the host holistically rather than chasing, the the pathogen pipeline. Right? So for example, administering drugs, right, to prep a host's immune system against a pathogen, a broad pathogen, you know, whether it's viral or bacterial or a protein of some sort, is really optimal in this space, right, or substances that target host molecular processes to reduce or slow the rate of disease and kind of general symptomology. Right? So the Chembio Defense Program, for example, is blurring existing and novel adjuvants or immune potentiators, right, that can combine with vaccines to stimulate immunogenicity profiles without trying to compromise vaccine safety. And then licensed vaccines known for their ability to trigger a rapid immune system response will also kind of be looked at for development and determine if kind of systemic states can be created for broad spectrum protection. So this is, I think, a really siting capability area for the CBDP and again it just shows is a slight difference in how we are approaching future medical countermeasures. Right? The 2nd prong that I mentioned, the ones that are looking for specific rapid advancements in development of drugs is, is really focused on things like, again, for those of you who know the CBDP, they have a new program out called Guide, which is, essentially, unconstrained intelligent drug engineering. So what they're trying to do there is develop, a computational system by which you can do drug development risk mitigation through throughout the life right? And thus hopefully accelerating candidate development and enable preemptive kind of preparedness activities and rapid response capabilities, right? So this is really about how do we take, again the lessons learned from Operation Warp Speed, without the big dollars of Operation Warp Speed, and how do we then do drug discovery drug design and biologic products like monoclonal antibodies for example and other kind of small molecule drugs while simultaneously optimizing the critical quality reboots that you're really needed in order to get to the later stages of that drug development. Right? The safety efficacy of the Ukraine. Russia has used the idea of nefarious biological labs, that are owned, or or at least operated by the US or collaborative with the US as, as pretext for invasion. Right? So we've been doing a lot of or hearing a lot of misinformation about some of the biological defense activities and biosafety activities that we've supported, and I know Charles has supported in the past. Right? So we're actually living in a time where information itself has become a weapon, and truth has become questionable. We have this now as a power dynamic to think about within our national security domain and our biodefense domain. So that's the threat space we're working in, right? It's very complex. It's dynamic. One of the lessons that I learned from COVID, and I think we all have, is that no one institution or no one government agency can take on these challenges alone. And oftentimes, especially as we work through Operation Warp Speed and some of those technological advances there and with Health and Human Services, we also saw that the Department of Defense really stood up and supported our global and our domestic mission by supporting things like our logistics supply chain. Right? But ultimately, in the end, it was a great collaboration, whether it was the Joint Acquisition Task force or Operation Warp Speed, where we saw collaborations, that removed our bureaucratic barriers and aligned the interests of industry, academia, HHS, and DoD, altogether, with strong partnerships, and no matter, you know, what line you were on in terms of your your host organization, we were all kind of rowing in the same direction. We are trying to, within the department at this point, identify how we can best keep those ties going, right? Especially as we are looking at some of these new approaches to biodefense, and how we can continue to knock down those bureaucratic barriers that prevent collaboration across borders and across lines of effort. Something else that COVID, I think, highlighted for us all was the need for situational awareness, right, to extend beyond the Department of Defense and government agencies, but ultimately to the public as well. This includes everything from industry leaders and researchers and frankly the people in this virtual room, right? We needed better understanding of situational awareness, really in terms of real time understanding of not only what was happening within the environment and the local communities, but also from the DOD again mentioning the logistics pipeline, understanding what that material readiness was, and what our vulnerabilities were in order to better prepare our supply chains for that. So you know I'll talk a little bit about, our biosurveillance pipeline, but I don't want to forget the fact that our industrial base, and our supply chain vulnerabilities actually played a really critical role in COVID and and plays also a critical role in how we are looking at our biodefense posture going forward. So within the BPR, we are separating our capabilities and our reviews into 4 main areas. And those areas are, starting with how are we built against our policies and our strategies and our operational posture within the the global combatant commands, but also within the services, and then, in whether or not we are, have the right policy humans aligned in order for us to be most effective in how we are building our resiliency and our force structure. The 2nd part is looking at how do we have our research development acquisition pipeline aligned and whether or not we are funding and putting our priorities in the right places in order to overcome the demands or the vulnerabilities associated with the strategy and policy and plans as they get laid out again by the services, by the combatant commands. The next review that we're looking at is whether or not our total force readiness, so again, much more about our medical posture and our medical treatment facilities and how well aligned those are in order to, in the case of an incident, be able to effectively respond and support those within the total force structure, in the event of, you know, within the CBDP and see if you can get a copy of that document. What this document really does is, looks at how we are going to do like a 2 pronged approach to the RDA investments within the medical countermeasures space. And the first one really delivers or talks about the delivery of nonspecific medical countermeasure products to the warfighter. And the other one establishes capabilities for how we are going to do rapid development of very specific medical countermeasure products. So let me let me talk very quickly about the 1st prong. So the development of non specific medical countermeasure products, which is something new to kind of, well, it's new and it's not new for the Chembio Defense Program, but it's an area that we are really seeking a lot of guidance and assistance from folks within the community. What this prong really focuses on is developing medical countermeasures that can help enhance a human immune system against exposure to unknown agents, right? So instead of thinking about chasing pathogen after pathogen, we're actually turning the camera lens, as it were, to the other side, and really looking at how the person or the host responds or how we can protect the host holistically rather than chasing, the pathogen pipeline, right? So for example, administering drugs, right, to prep a host's immune system against a pathogen, a broad pathogen, Jen, you know, whether it's viral or bacterial or a protein of some sort, is is really optimal in this space, right, or substances that target host molecular processes to reduce or slow the rate of disease, and kind of general symptomology. Right? So the CHEM BioDefense Program, for example, is exploring existing and novel adjuvants or immune potentiators, right, that can combine with vaccines to stimulate immunogenicity profiles without trying to compromise vaccine safety. And then licensed vaccines known for their ability to trigger a rapid, immune system response will also kind of be looked at for development and determine if kind of STEMI states can be created for broad spectrum protection. So this is, I think, a really exciting capability area for the CBDP. And again, it just shows, a slight difference in how we are approaching future medical countermeasures. Right? The 2nd prong that I mentioned, the ones that are are looking for specific rapid advancements in in development of drugs is really focused on things like, again, for those of you who know the CBDP, they have a new program out called Guide, which is essentially Unconstrained Intelligent Drug Engineering. So what they're trying to do there is develop, a computational system by which, you can do drug development risk mitigation through throughout the life cycle right and thus hopefully accelerating candidate development and enable preemptive kind of preparedness activities and rapid response capabilities. Right? So this is really about how do we take, again, the lessons learned from Operation Warp Speed, without the big dollars of Operation Warp Speed, and how do we then do or a drug design in biologic products like monoclonal antibodies for example and other kind of small molecule drugs while simultaneously optimizing the critical quality attributes that you're really needed in order to get to the later, stages of that drug development, right? The safety, efficacy,
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the relaunch of the bioweapons arms race through the Patriot Act, which allowed federal officials to engage in bioweapons research without prosecution. The Pentagon sent the research to Anthony Fauci's shop, NIAID, which became the official biodefense agency of the US government. Bioweapons research is always done alongside vaccine research, as vaccines are necessary for offensive bioweapon programs. In 2014, three deadly bugs escaped from US labs, leading 300 scientists to urge President Obama to shut down Anthony Fauci's gain of function research. Instead, the research was moved offshore, including to the Wuhan lab in China. The US bioweapons program inherited its culture and techniques from Nazi and Japanese scientists. Pandemic preparedness and response is seen as a forever war, involving the collection of potential zoonotic spillover bugs, the creation of dangerous pathogens for defense purposes, and the coordinated governmental response to remove civil rights. The speaker suggests that gain of function research should be criminalized and an international treaty should be established to stop it. The key individuals to depose would be Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Jeremy Farrar, Bill Gates, April Haines, Peter Daszak, Xi Jingli, and Ralph Baric.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And effectively relaunched the bioweapons alarms race. The Patriot Act said we're not revoking the Geneva Protocol the Bioweapons Treaty, but we are saying that any federal official who participates in bioweapons research which cannot be prosecuted under those treaties. So it launched this new bioweapons arms race. Initially, the Pentagon was reluctant to do it openly because, you know, experimenting with bioweapons was a hang offense under Geneva. So they So they sent the research over to Anthony Fauci's shop, to NIAID, which became the official. Speaker 1: Who sent it over to everybody? The Pentagon did. The Pentagon did. Speaker 0: Yeah, Pentagon sent it over there, and NIAID under Anthony Fauci came the official biodefense agency of the United States government. Speaker 1: But how does bio weapons research go into a health agency? Speaker 0: Because bioweapons research is always done coterminously with vaccine research. Every offensive bioweapon program requires a vaccine, so vaccines are actually part of offensive bioweapons. You cannot unlike chemical weapons, with bioweapons, there's always blowback a 100% of the time, which means If you infect your enemy, your troops are also going to get infected. And so you cannot launch a bioweapon unless First have the antidote and you've inoculated all of your group with the antidote, with, you know, your side, your civilians and your soldiers with antidote and then you can release it. So anytime you develop a bioweapon, you have to develop a vaccine, and vaccine research It was legal under the bioweapons treaty, but bioweapons research was not. I'd say we're the same thing. If you developed a vaccine, the way that you would develop a vaccine was by saying, Well, we're going to make a, We're going to take a wild virus and we're going to make it more pathogenic, more virulent, more deadly, and then we're going to develop a vaccine for that. And that's classic inner function research. Why are they doing that? What is the rationale for them doing that? The only real rationale, if you think about it, is to develop bio weapons and then develop a defense to those bio weapons. So that's what they were doing. And Anthony Fauci was given a 68% raise by the military, because of these new military responsibilities. He continued to do that to 2014, and that year, 3 of the bugs escaped. In high profile escapes from 3 different labs in the United States, really deadly bugs escaped, or we're found in unsafe circumstances. And 300 scientists sent a letter to President Obama asking him to shut down Anthony Fauci's research on gain of function, saying that it was highly likely that he would start a global pandemic with this kind of very dangerous research. And President Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of the worst projects by Anthony Fauci or ordered them shut. In the end, he really didn't shut them. He instead moved the research offshore, where he would be out of the oversight of these Troublesome, troublesome scientists, the 300 scientists, a group that called itself the Cambridge Working Group, and of the, and of White House officials and the major lab offshore that they moved this research. There were other ones too. They moved research to Ukraine, to the former Soviet state of Georgia. But some of the Soviet State of Georgia. But some of the worst research, they moved to a Chinese lab that was run by the Chinese military, the Wuhan lab in Wuhan, you know, in Wuhan, the Wuhan Institute of Neurology in A mission of the CIA, when it was started in 1947, was called Operation Paperclip. And Operation Paperclip was an effort to get German, the Nazi scientists, many of whom were sentenced the deaths, or who are facing prosecution at Nuremberg, smuggle them out on rat lines and put them to work developing bio weapons and chemical weapons and nuclear weapons and missile systems in the United States. So a lot of them ended up in Fort Detrick, they ended up down in Galveston or one of the Navy labs. And that was the beginning of the United States bioweapons program, and everything and the U. S. Bioweapons program inherited the culture from Germany and from Japan. And I talk a lot about this. Japan was the one nation that really had used bioweapons at an industrial scale. They killed half a 1000000 Chinese during their war, which was coterminous with World War II. So that war started. They were fighting the Chinese since the mid '30s, and they were using bioweapons. They were not being on chemical weapons because they didn't have the oil stocks. They didn't have the oil resources. So they really leaned on bio weapons programs and they had done more than anybody to develop bio weapons. They had huge laboratories. They did live vivisections on 3,000 human beings, mainly Chinese, but people of every race, including US soldiers that they captured, and they would give them a disease, and then they would dissect them alive without anesthesia, and extract their organs.' They wanted to look at the living organ. So they had all of these cultures and they had all this knowledge, this technical know how. And the intelligence agencies and the military wanted to start to figure it out, to start our own bioweapons program. So they brought those. They exonerated those groups and they brought them over to the United States. And What I show is that the U. S. Bioweapons program from the beginning inherited not just the cultures and the techniques, but also the kind of moral bankruptcy of the Nazi and Japanese scientists that would always that was Incredibly persistent within that program up until the modern time. And so the more I found out about it, The more important In the Speaker 1: book you said that pandemic preparedness in response is a new forever war. Would you explain that to us? Speaker 0: There's a whole ideology now and an industry that's built around pandemic preparedness and response. And the first part of that is harvesting all of the potential zoonotic spillover bugs from all over the world. In other words, to find every bug in the world that lives in the wild, in bats and monkeys and birds, avian flu, etcetera, that may someday jump to human beings and cause a virus. Well, when you collect all those, It is the opposite of a good public health policy. You should leave them alone. The only real reason to Collect them is if you're trying to weaponize them. And it's, you know, you can fabricate another reason, but the rationales for those other reasons all fall apart when you start asking questions. So That's part of it. And then the 2nd part of it is, in a function, is to take those and say, 'OK, now Now, something bad might come from these bugs one day. Let's make bad things and see if we can defend ourselves against them. It's crazy. It's crazy when you even try to explain it. And then the last part of Pandemic Preparedness and Response, PPR, it is the coordinated governmental response through WHO and through all the governments in the world that will cede authority to the WHO and coordinate another clampdown of authoritarian controls to to remove democratic and civil rights from nations and individuals. And, you know, that's part of every response plan. Here's what you do, you start censoring people as soon as the pandemic is declared. And guess who gets to declare that? People who are controlled by the industry that's about to make huge profits. You know, so how do you integrate the military? How do We integrate the intelligence agencies. How do you stop people from complaining? How do you clamp down dissent? How do you control movements? How do you shut down business? Control economic activity? Control transactions? Every aspect of We're like, Patrol what we read, what we think, and all of that is legitimized by the fear of the pandemic. And so, you know, we know what they're doing and we need to step in and stop them. I mean, all gain of function, science should be illegalized, it should be criminalized, and we should have an international treaty that says that. We should have, we should agree to open door transparency currency with all the people who now are enemies. You know, all these people are are working on these very, very frightening bugs, and we need we need to stop it. Speaker 1: So you're a litigator, Bobby. If you could depose any of these cover up coconspirators, which ones would you depose and what would you ask? Speaker 0: You know, the most important ones to depose would be Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Jeremy Farrar, who's the head of the Wellcome Trust, which is the British version of the Gates Foundation, Bill Gates himself, and April Haines, who is the, who was the deputy director of the CIA and is now the, the director of National Intelligence and has played a very, very critical role in, you know, in pandemic preparedness and response and in the cover up. I would also want to depose Peter Daszak, And, you know, if I could get jurisdiction, some of the Chinese scientists, Xi Jingli, and then the U. S. Scientist, Ralph Baric, Those I think are, kind of the principal villains in the book. There are a lot of others

@oldschoolethos - Down The Rabbit Hole

GREEN COP28 John Kerry reaffirming Climate Agendas. Says no one, not even Trump can stop it. Biden/Harris all in on the Climate Agenda $6 Billion & $3 Billion Still think the newly formed 2023 DOD Biodefense Council’s top priority is “Biodefense”? (17 federal agencies including CDC, DHS, DOJ, under 1 DOD Umbrella) One founding member is Dr. Brandi C. Vann in interviews she is very concerned about climate change in regard to Biodefense and thinks we need to use an “Evergreen” approach. A new aspect of Biodefence is the “acceleration of natural development due to global warming, seeing things like the Permafrost melting and the emergence of long forgotten pathogens” I have to ask though. Could their top priorities be: 1. Stop Trump in 2024 2. Push the Climate Fear button and connect it to the Global Health Fear button for a massive power grab? 3. Use DOD authorities and protections to up their censorship game under National Security. Lately @shellenberger @mtaibbi @glennbeck @dbongino @joerogan have shined light on the massive amount of government censorship that has occurred. I think what may be coming next with dwarf that. But you decide: https://drive.proton.me/urls/ZFE7C186A4#ekVC2Yeue1X1

Video Transcript AI Summary
American leadership is making progress, but there is concern about the possibility of Donald Trump returning to the White House. The question arises about how the United States is perceived on the international stage. One person believes it is 100% good, while another cannot comment on politics. Despite potential impacts from leaders who disregard science and facts, the speaker is not worried. They believe that nothing can stop the global economic transformation, which will be the largest in human history, surpassing even the industrial revolution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can feel American leadership at this, you know, at this comp. We've made progress, but hanging over all of this, of course, is the prospect of Donald Trump coming back into the White House next year. Hangover. Speaker 1: I don't think so. Speaker 0: That's journalistic license. If he gets in, the prospect there's no there's that is that there's this possibility that all of this could be for naught. So that begs perhaps an awkward and difficult question. How good is the word the United States on the international stage at this point. I Speaker 1: think it's a 100% good, and I think that that nightmarish Prospect, I'm not allowed to comment on politics, actually, so I should I can't Speaker 0: I'm not stopping you. I'm sure the word the room would love to hear You'd love it. Your thoughts. Speaker 1: My body language was enough of that. Yeah. Folks, no. I am not worried. Honestly, Could could he or someone else who doesn't wanna listen to the science, who doesn't read about it and doesn't care about the facts have an impact? Sure. But they're not gonna turn this they're not gonna stop this. I will say to you stop. They're not going to stop what is happening on a global basis. This economic transformation is going to be the biggest transformation in human history where it's bigger by far than the industrial revolution, and it is going to happen.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Winter storms and tornadoes have devastated Texas, Kentucky, and Mississippi, causing widespread destruction. Wildfires in Idaho, Maui, New Mexico, California, and Colorado have destroyed neighborhoods and sacred tribal sites, affecting air quality for millions. Record temperatures in Texas, Arizona, and other states have impacted over 100 million Americans. This summer and fall have been the hottest on record since the 1800s. It is undeniable that climate change is causing these extreme events. However, some Republican leaders still deny the problem, endangering the American people's future. Action is needed to address the impacts of climate change.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Families in Texas, Kentucky, Mississippi were catastrophic winter storms and tornadoes devoured everything in their past, schools, businesses, police stations, firehouse. I've seen firefighters in Idaho, Maui and New Mexico, California, Colorado where wildfires destroyed whole neighborhoods and sacred tribal sites spreading smoky haze thousands of miles and forcing millions of Americans the shelter indoors and unsafe air to breathe. Look, by the way, and I've flown over all these areas in helicopters. They tell me that more of our forest land has forest has burned to the ground that make up the entire state of New Jersey, the entire state, some say Maryland, New Jersey, but the force is, it's that just gigantic and has incredible impacts. Record temperatures in Texas, Arizona and elsewhere affecting lives and livelihoods of more than 100,000,000 Americans. And this summer and this fall have been the Earth's hottest since the global records began to be kept in the 1800s. Think about that. The hottest we've ever recorded in history. It's an impact, an impact decades are making because inaction was, there was inaction for much too long. Look, but we're acting now. We have been acting. We've come to the point where it's foolish for anyone to deny the impacts of climate change anymore. But it's simply a simple fact that there are a number of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, mega Republican leaders who still deny climate change still deny that it's a problem. My predecessors, much of the MAGA Republican Party, in fact, are still very strongly about that. Anyone who willfully denies the impact of climate change is condemning the American people to a very dangerous future.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The inflation reduction passed a year ago has put the US back on the map as a global climate leader. However, concerns arise that the momentum may change after the 2024 elections. Speaker 1 believes that no politician can halt the ongoing transition towards addressing climate change. This transition is driven by scientific evidence and is not influenced by politics or ideology. It is crucial for everyone to contribute to this transition as it directly affects the air we breathe, pollution levels, farming, living conditions, children, and disease.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's been, just over 1 year that inflation reduction that has been passed, and many are appraising it as, something that actually put US back on the map Right. That mental of being a global climate leader. But there are worries that it the momentum could change after after 2024 elections. Do you care? Speaker 1: Can I don't believe any politician can stop what is happening now? This transition is much bigger than any one party in a country or one you know, it's not gonna happen. People are moving because the science is telling us we have to move in this direction. It's not political. It's not ideological. It's about, the air people breathe. It's about pollution going up in the air, actually About the impact on countries of their farming, of their living conditions, of children, of disease, those things should motivate everybody to be helping to make this transition happen.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We used to defend against a known list of chemical and biological threats, but now we face new challenges. Global warming is causing the permafrost to melt, revealing forgotten pathogens. Additionally, our adversaries have advanced technologies that expand the definition of biodefense beyond known threat agents. To address these changes, the Department of Defense is forming a council that will involve combatant commands, services, and other components. Working groups will be established to tackle the complex policy and strategy challenges and prioritize efforts. These bodies will shape the biodefense environment within the department.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where where are we now? Right? And and where do we think we need to go? Our current state, in terms of the threat environment, especially up until recently, we were really defending against a legacy list of chemical and biological warfare threats. Right? These have been around a while. You know, you had the Dirty Dozen. You have the this very standard list of chemical agents. And we really knew what we were up against. And we had effective capabilities to bet to defend against those. Right? And we were really good at doing that. And our war fighters under our nation, it wasn't perfect, but we were pretty well protected and had a pretty good understanding of what our capabilities were and we're not. And that was then. What we are facing now is both an acceleration of our natural environment due to due to global warming, right, we actually see things like the permafrost melting and the emergence of, you know, long forgotten pathogens on the nefarious side. We have adversaries, and we have technologies that have been enabled to broaden our scope of what biodefense even is beyond the ability to have a list of threat agents, right? So how does the department or how do we, again, within national security, look at that prioritization and look at that capability development in a different way. So, combatant commands and the services. So all of those components that might have or might play a apart in a global response or or a targeted response will all come together in this, this council moving forward. The other thing that I would like to to highlight is, you mentioned the working groups, right? So the council recognizes that in order to be able to rests of these evergreen issues that we are identifying with the complexity of the the environment that Doctor. George mentioned, the policy challenges, strategy challenges, and then ultimately, how do we appropriately prioritize some of the efforts that we need to do moving forward? We we can't do that by just kind of dropping something on the council. So there will be bodies that are either ad hoc or evergreen that will help shape that environment across the Department of Defense and the enterprise of biodefense within the department.
Proton Drive Proton Drive allows you to securely store and share your sensitive documents and access them anywhere. drive.proton.me
oldschoolethos
Posted - December 4, 2023 at 11:25 PM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 4:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
America is facing a critical situation. Under the Biden Administration, we've witnessed a military recruiting crisis, strained relations between the military and leaders, a disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal, and a failing Veteran Affairs system. COVID mandates have led to troop cuts and vaccine-related concerns. The military has also been embroiled in controversies like drag queen recruiting and the promotion of divisive ideologies. Open borders pose security risks, with numerous individuals on the terror watch list and criminals entering the country. Government misinformation, censorship, corruption, and human trafficking are rampant. Our leaders seem more focused on climate and global health agendas, neglecting the real issues. This is a dire state of affairs, disregarding the sacrifices made by previous generations. It's not about political affiliations; it's about good versus evil.

@oldschoolethos - Sergeant Schultz

America needs to wake up. We are on the verge of losing our freedom and our country. 3 years under the Biden Administration: 1. Massive Military Recruiting Crisis 2. On the edge of War with numerous countries 3. Trust has been smashed between the Military and our leaders. Failed Afghanistan Withdraw (13 Heroes lost and countless innocent Afghans) Failed Veteran Affairs (1,098,000 claims “pending”, 300,000 “backlogged”, 44 Veterans per day suicide rate, thousands of Veterans dying from chemical and burn pit exposure) COVID mandates, The DOD cut 8,000 troops with 60,000 more on the chopping block for a mandated Vaccine that is now showing links to Vaccine injury. They threw those 8,000 out with their families. Cut their pay, removed their housing, cut their medical care, ruined their careers with “dishonorable” “other than honorable” and “general” discharges. Navy Drag Queen Recruiting effort, Officers posing in Dog Masks, Drag shows on bases, DEI training, and so much more. 4. Full push for DEI, “Woke”, Marxist ideologies in the Military, in our schools, and in our colleges has led to generations that would not be capable of fighting on a battlefield. If a Draft occurred the Draft boards would most likely take all the normal kids and waive all the ones suffering from mental health and other issues here in America. How do you think that would work out? 5. Open borders allowing thousands of people in per day. At a time we are seeing savage terrorists do monstrous things overseas. (Hamas, Taliban, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, ISIS-K) Many of the people entering our country don’t really care for America much. Last count CBP was reporting “contact” with almost 700 people on the Terror Watch list and over 37,000 known criminals. This is Putting your families at risk of internal attacks and increased crime. 6. Almost daily reporting on the misinformation & disinformation the government is putting out. Even when they are caught in lies they stick to them. 7. Almost daily reporting of whistleblowers telling us just how much we have been censored, spied on, and lied to by our government. 8. Almost daily reporting of corruption at our highest levels of government beyond what we have ever seen before. 9. Almost daily you’re seeing more reports on the massive increase in human trafficking including child sex trafficking. Yet no large investigations seem to be occurring. No names have been linked to Epstein or his island. 10. America and the globe is in chaos and our “Leaders” are more focused on the “climate crisis” and “global health security agendas” It’s pure insanity. A massive amount of sacrifices have been made to make America great. They are systematically destroying this great Nation and spitting on the graves of those who made the ultimate sacrifice for it. Just listen to some WWII Veterans talk about the current state of America if you need proof. The Greatest Generation is heartbroken at what we have become. This isn’t Left vs Right or Republican vs Democrat. This is GOOD VS EVIL.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🔥 Dana White: “We Need to Wake Up” https://t.co/cxmwkcRMHw

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker expresses concern about the lack of respect for the police, military, and country. They emphasize that if the United States falls, there is no other place to go. The speaker mentions people threatening to leave the country if President Trump wins, but believes they won't actually do it. They also discuss how COVID has revealed the true nature of certain places. The speaker urges everyone to appreciate what they have and quotes Ronald Reagan, stating that freedom is at risk and feels further away with each passing decade.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you look at all the shit that's going on in the world right now, if we went to war, right, there's no respect for the police anymore. There's no respect for the military. There's no respect for for for, our country, our freedom, or or or or way of life that we have here. You can sit around and you could pick, you know, nitpick and and talk about things that are wrong with the United States. Let me tell you something. I'm gonna tell fucking your generation, my generation, everybody's generation. This is it. If this falls, there's no other fucking place to go. So all these fucking people are like, oh, god. If President Trump wins. I'm fucking leaving the country. They all say it. Yeah. They all say it. Yeah. Of course. Nobody fucking does it. Where are you gonna go? Nowhere. All these other fucking places that that you think are fucking cool and you think are so fucking great. When the shit hits the fan, You find out who's who or what's what. We saw it during COVID. Places that I thought were awesome. Places that I thought I would love to live. And then we go through COVID. Gang, this is it. We're all Americans. We need to stop, fucking look around, and realize It's what we have and how good it is. Ronald Reagan, great quote from Ronald Reagan. We're 1 generation away from losing our freedom. And every fucking 10 years, it feels like we keep getting further and further away from that.
oldschoolethos
Posted - December 3, 2023 at 10:03 PM
Saved - December 4, 2023 at 6:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The 2023 DOD Biodefense Council, led by Dr. Brandi C. Vann, focuses on addressing transboundary threats like climate change and pandemics. The council aims to unify efforts globally, combining vaccines and drugs to enhance human immune systems. Biosurveillance and integrated layered defense are key components. Collaboration with industries, governments, and organizations is crucial. Controlling misinformation and strengthening pharmaceutical capabilities are also priorities. The goal is to ensure national security and the health of all people.

@oldschoolethos - Sergeant Schultz

The 2023 DOD Biodefense Council is now formed based off the DOD Biodefense Posture Review. One founding member is Dr. Brandi C. Vann serves as the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs. Dr. Vann connects Climate, Vaccine, Warpspeed, health, W.H.O., Military COVID mandates, and Biden priorities very well in a 30 minute clip. She has some interesting thoughts on the connection between National Security, Climate changes, Vaccines, and Health of our Military using rapid development of drugs programs to combine Vaccines with drugs to enhance human immune systems. Pay close attention how she doesn’t confine her thoughts to the DOD and Military personnel. She speaks about safety of our Nation and the Globe in general and all its people. The goal is to unify efforts through empowered collaborative and integrated approaches with our federal departments & Agencies, along with allies and partners. So Globally. She says the Biodefense council aligns with Biden Priorities to address trans boundary threats like climate change and pandemics. Global warming and the melting of the permafrost has made us aware of long forgotten pathogens. She also discuses “Integrated Layered Defense” not just Vaccines, Masks, and Monitoring sensors but a multi layered system to include also Medical Counter Measures. Interesting “Biosurveilance” keeps coming up lately. The DOD Biodefense Posture Review thoughts on it: “Develop a hub for biosurveillance data including information collected from wearable devices, medical records, & genomic sequencing.” She explains we need “real time” threat awareness data. Environmental surveillance measurements. This data can assist in restricted movement and triage. She goes over their plans moving forward based on the lessons learned from COVID. We can’t ignore global economical situations. We need to strengthen our pharmaceutical capabilities here at home to make it easier to make and distribute vaccines and other drugs. (Note: I agree with bringing the production of needed medications back to the United States) She goes over the Medical Countermeasures approaches for RDA of countermeasures and test products. 2 pathways. None specific and Specific. Goals to enhance human immune systems against unknown agents using a combination of vaccines and drugs. Use known vaccines for a rapid immune system response. She was a more rapid advancement development of drugs using lessons learned from operation Warpspeed. IS IT JUST ME OR DOES IT SOUND LIKE SHE WANTS TO USE MILITARY PERSONNEL AS GUINEA PIGS? (We already know the vaccine injuries from Anthrax Vaccines, COVID Vaccines but this one sounds even scarier to me) Side Note: those vaccines didn’t seem to help the Warfighter much. She explains no government agency can do it alone. It’s a collaboration between aligned industries, Academies, Governments, and other strong Organizations. She explains Biodefense has expanded to include economic and political inputs. She explains we need to control the misinformation about the United States governments roles in BioLabs. Information is a weapon and we can’t allow truth to be questionable. Russia has used this misinformation as pretexts to actions. National Defense Strategy Report https://www.defense.gov/National-Defense-Strategy/ OPCW https://www.opcw.org/ Brandi Vann Interview: https://federalnewsnetwork.com/defense-main/2023/09/how-and-why-dod-has-updated-its-readiness-plan-for-biodefense/?readmore=1 Brandi Vann Bio https://www.defense.gov/About/Biographies/Biography/Article/2047620/dr-brandi-c-vann/#:~:text=Full%20image%20Dr,Chemical%2C%20and%20Biological%20Defense%20Programs Biodefence Council Meeting https://www.csis.org/analysis/department-defenses-newly-released-biodefense-posture-review#:~:text=Brandi%20Vann%20is%20the%20principal,the%20fore%2C%20were%20heavily Brandi Vann YouTube interview https://youtu.be/f5n-41Rcftc?si=Se7pYEhRq3rf8BUV @IvanRaiklin @shellenberger @LTCTheresaLong @ted_macie @jordanbpeterson @JordanLkarr @LetsGoBrando45 @KLVeritas @JoshWalkos @MdBreathe @TheChiefNerd @DrJBhattacharya @P_McCulloughMD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the importance of biodefense and the need to prioritize it beyond just the context of COVID-19. They highlight the need to prevent the acquisition of dangerous pathogens and maintain the capability to control outbreaks in the event of a biological attack. The speaker mentions the inaugural biodefense posture review and efforts to align with the national defense strategy. They emphasize the need for collaboration and integration across departments, agencies, and allies. The speaker also discusses the evolving threat landscape, the importance of biosurveillance, and the concept of integrated layered defense. They mention the development of non-specific medical countermeasures and advancements in drug development. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the need for cohesion, coordination, and collaboration within the biodefense community.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, few weeks or so. And we are also doing all of this kind of resilience and assessment within the context of the department's 1st ever biodefense posture review. So that's really where I want to focus some of our conversations today and where we look at kind of what our battlespace and readiness and resilience actually looks like. So everybody's aware, right? Over the last 2 years, 3 years almost now, whenever the topic of biodefense and readiness comes up, the discussion about COVID-nineteen what really takes the center stage. While this certainly has provided us within the community, especially the R and D community, a valuable case study and evaluating kind of our biodefense capabilities and how we maintain operations. There's really a lot more to biodefense. And within our department we oftentimes do an acknowledgement of COVID and future pandemics, but also put out the warning that, you know, in the larger context of things, preventing the acquisition of dangerous pathogens, equipment, and expertise for really nefarious purposes, and maintaining the capability to rapidly control those outbreaks in the event of a biological attack and the DoD's ability to operate in the biologically challenged areas are really the strategic interest to the U. S. National security as it relates to the Defense Department. So as we think about future threats within the context of our national defense strategy, We know that there are times we will likely not know if a biological incident is naturally occurring, accidental or deliberate in nature. Right? So acknowledgment of this ambiguity of origin is really starting to be built into what we call the DNA of the department. Right? So acknowledging attribution will always lag, and thus we need to be prepared no matter what the risk is, no matter what the threat is. So and being able to operate across the spectrum of understanding or recognizing that threat, being able to mitigate and being able to protect people against that threat. So the inaugural biodefense posture review and then recent efforts related to our National Defense Policy and Strategy development has really played a major role over the last few months, and a role and also shaping the interagency National Biodefense Strategy moving forward. So for those of you who don't follow this very closely, back in November of last year, Secretary Austin, the secretary of defense, signed out a first ever Biodefense Vision memo. And essentially what that Vision memo did was acknowledging again the, the lack ofor the ambiguity of origin ofbiological threats and the acknowledgement that COVID has really opened our eyes that the future of biodefense, especially for national security, was a critical priority. And so that Secretary of Defense memorandum also asked for the Department to kick off this inaugural biodefense posture review with specific tasks. Those tasks were: reviewing first our approach to biodefense and to include clarification of what our priorities needed to be associated with biodefense, what our roles are, responsibilities, authorities, and capabilities, and the like. So to take a pause on that for a moment, the current administration has really prioritized biodefense based on a number of doctors. Right? Again, we've talked about this from a COVID lens, but it's not just about the COVID nineteen pandemic. It's also looking at the rapid advancement within the life sciences, the potential role that these technologies could play in future future conflicts with our near peer adversaries especially, all contribute to the prioritization of biodefense. Also included in that is the erosion of our social norms as it relates to things like chemical and biological use. So these are all really critical. And the BPR is really guided by 3 main principles from that. So first, the posture review is looking to how the Department can unify efforts through empowered, collaborative, and integrated approaches across the Department and with our allies and partners, globally, including interagency industry academia. Second, the posture review is looking at how the DoD can modernize our operations and optimize our capabilities, capacity, resilience, and readiness posture. So again, end to end, right? So whether it is looking at our force structure and our force designs all the way through our industrial base and our supply chains. These are all aspects of that optimization of our capabilities and capacity. And then lastly, the BPR continues to look at the synchronization of planning with the department's new national defense strategy and through collaborations with federal departments agencies, allies and partners, etc, etc. And really for that, what we're looking at is, kind of broadly, how do we how do we look at what that demand signal is and then how we shape our response to our global posture and partnering with our, again, interagency allies as well as our international allies and partners to do the best for support for our broader biodefense efforts in alignment with national security goals and strategy. So we are, frankly, one of the acknowledgments we have is that we are living in a very signing time of technological revolution. Right? It means that science is cutting edge, and in so many ways, the impossible has become possible, right, this is great, from cell therapeutics and wearable sensors that detect early exposure to CB threat agents, we're really seeing the capabilities of tomorrow enabled and emerging, right? Last week, I think it was, I saw the, on the news that there was the 1st monoclonal antibody that was in a clinical trial for colorectal cancer, and they had 100% efficacy. And that's, you know, absolutely unheard of, but just amazing kind of technology within those monoclonal antibodies. So it's things like this that we've really taken ideas out of the realm of sci fi, right, to bringing it to reality. It. So we have the opportunity to do things like strengthening the warfighters' immune systems, looking at almost completely autonomous sensing capabilities. So these are all opportunities that are very positive and promising advancements. Right? Cell therapeutics is a great example of that. And they can really make benefits to millions upon millions of people. But it also offers and introduces an opportunity for bad actors to use those same types of technologies to advance their own agendas. So again, from the BPR standpoint, we are never wanting to shut down these types of technological advancements, but we do have to take an eye to understand what are both the pros and opportunity space as well as the potential for negative impact and be prepared for what those are, right? So within that convergence of multiple sciences, within the rapid technological advancements and developments, adapting to this rapidly changing environment really does require the DoD to align efforts and resources in a different way so that we're much more relevant, much more effective, innovative, agile, and ultimately have unified ventures across the needs of all of our biodefense enterprise. We also can talk about the change in these technological environments also increase its contested domains. Right? And the fact that we continue to see a decrease in traditional obstacles to accessing technology, the NCB is really looking at how to do better innovation at speed and at scale to allow the Department to successfully counter a number of those emerging unprecedented events. Where are we now? And where do we think we need to go? Our current state, in terms of the threat environment, especially up until recently, we were really defending against a legacy list of chemical and biological warfare threats. Right? These have been around a while. You know, you had the Dirty Dozen. You have this very standard list of chemical agents. And we really knew what we were up against and we had effective capabilities to defend against those, right? And we were really good at doing that. And our war fighters and our nation, it wasn't perfect, but we were pretty well protected and had a had a pretty good understanding of what's, what our capabilities were and were not. And that was then. What we are facing now is both an acceleration of our natural environment due to global warming, right? We actually see things like the permafrost melting and the emergence of, you know, long forgotten pathogens on the nefarious side. We have adversaries, and we have technologies that have been enabled to broaden our scope of what biodefense even is beyond the ability to have a list of threat agents. So how does the department or how do we, again within national security, look at that capability development in a different way. So especially as we talk about adversarial approaches, right, we have to think about, in the past 5 to 10 years, not only militarily have the global dynamics shifted, but so have the economics and political environment as well. And while the Department's focus logically remains on our military, we cannot ignore the implications of our global economic and political changes and how those factors directly impact our ability to maintain the upper hand against some of the most powerful adversaries, right? So each state adversary that has identified in the 2022 National Security Strategy are actively developing sophisticated and novel capabilities in the hopes of using them to destabilize and weaken the U. S. And our allies, right? So with that, you know, I want to pause for a moment and talk a little bit about our national defense strategy as it relates to to, how we are looking at our defense posture. So again, as I mentioned, the unclassified version is forthcoming, but the the new national defense strategy showcases certain alignments with the the Biden administration's priorities that I want to want to go through. So for example, it identifies the trans boundary threats such as climate change and pandemics transforming the context in which the Department operates. So crucially, the National Defense Strategy has moved Chembio Defense from a real siloed and kind of stove piped program and moved it into the broader conversation for preparedness and national security, both home and abroad. So this is really critical, and this is really kind of transformational for the types of work that we do within the NCB. So now CHEM Bio Defense is actually part of the discussions on the defense industrial base. It's part of broader conversations existing in kind of pre existing treaties and our relationships with allies ships with allies and partners and governing bodies like the OPCW. And when we're talking about military readiness now, we're also talking about resilient human systems, both in theater health monitoring and in theater diagnostic capabilities, and then ultimately defending the homeland against multi domain threats posed by China really remains central to this overarching strategy. So coupled with that, the administration is focusing a lot on deterring aggression while being postured to prevail should conflict ensue. As we look at the Chinese aggression in the Indo Pacific region or to the challenges posed by Russia and Europe, this is all part of now the conversation. So China and Russia have all, of course, gained power in military might and are acting with a boldness that has not been seen in previous years or that we thought at least 10 years ago would be unimaginable. And as we've seen with the invasion of the Ukraine. Russia has used the idea of nefarious biological ethical labs that are owned or at least operated by the U. S. Or collaborative with the U. S. As pretext for an invasion, right? So we've been hearing a lot of misinformation about some of the biological defense activities and biosafety activities that we've supported, and I know Charles has supported in the past. Right? So we're actually living in a time where information itself has become a weapon, and truth has become questionable. This now as a power dynamic to think about within our national security domain and our biodefense domain. 'so that's the threat space we're working in.' Right? It's very complex. It's dynamic. It's not just about biodefense. It's also about politics and the idea of destabilizing effects across the entire spectrum of warfare, right, which also means that we can't just look at chem biodefense or biodefense, especially in terms of we have a single pathogen and thus we just need boots, suits, masks, and vaccines to take care of it, we truly have to think about things both in current military operations but also earlier in the spectrum of conflict or within it within the gray zone. So, and with so that deliberate kind of threat evolution will continue, right, alongside natural and environmental changes that present their own risks, as I mentioned before, and as we've seen with COVID, we can't take the view that biological weapons or biological incidents are actually completely separate. It's clear that there's a significant amount of overlap in the two terms and how we respond to those terms? Again, it's an ambiguity question, right? So, now we have to grapple with what does that mean in terms of response and how do we build a structure within the department to mitigate the entire spectrum of biological threats, again, to include natural, accidental, and deliberate. And knock on wood, soon we will actually see a new version of the National biodefense strategy that is published that can help us align our national security efforts underneath that domain. So one of the lessons that I learned from COVID, and I think we all have, is that no one institution or no one government agency can take on these challenges alone. And oftentimes, especially as we work through Operation Warp Speed and some of those technological advances there. And with Health and Human Services, we also saw that the Department defense really stood up and supported our global and our domestic mission by supporting things like our logistics supply chain. But ultimately, in the end, it was a great collaboration, whether it was the Joint Acquisition Task force or Operation Warp Speed, where we saw collaborations that removed our bureaucratic barriers and aligned the interests of industry, academia, HHS, and DoD all together with strong partnerships. And no matter what line you were on in terms of your host organization, we were all kind of rowing in the same direction. We are trying to, within the department at this point, identify how we can best keep those ties going, right? Especially as we are looking at some of these new approaches to biodefense how we can continue to knock down those bureaucratic barriers that prevent collaboration across borders and across lines of effort. Something else that COVID, I think, highlighted for us all was the need for situational awareness, right, to extend beyond the Department of Defense and government agencies, but ultimately to the public as well. This includes everything from industry leaders and researchers and frankly the people in this virtual room. Right? We needed better understanding of situational awareness really in terms of real time understanding of not only what was happening within the environment and the local communities, but also from the DOD again mentioning the logistics pipeline, understanding what that material readiness was and what our vulnerabilities were in order to better prepare our supply chains for that. So you know I'll talk a little bit about, our biosurveillance pipeline, but I don't want to forget the fact that our industrial base and our supply chain vulnerabilities actually played a really critical role in COVID and plays also a critical role in how we are looking at our biodefense posture going forward. So within the BPR, we operating our capabilities and our reviews into 4 main areas. And those areas are starting with how are we built against our policies and our strategies and our operational posture within the the global combatant commands but also within the services. And then whether or not we have the right policy documents aligned in order for us to be most effective in how we are building our resiliency and our force structure. The 2nd part is looking at how do we have our research development acquisition pipeline aligned whether or not we are funding and putting our priorities in the right places in order to overcome the demands or the vulnerabilities associated data with the strategy and policy and plans as they get laid out again by the services, by the combatant commands. The next, review that we're looking at is whether or not our, total force readiness so, again, much more about our medical posture NAR medical treatment facilities, and how well aligned those are in order to, in the case of an incident, be able to effectively respond and support those within the total force structure in the event of an actual outbreak. And then finally, coming back to that kind of common operational picture understanding, looking at our industrial base and our supply chain to understand what our logistics pipelines are, our material readiness are, and then really building a common operating picture from that as well. I'm sure many of you know that when we start looking at our pharmaceutical base, many of our APIs and many of our supplies that we rely on, we got constrained within COVID because many of them were coming from overseas. So as our logistics pipelines were getting shut down here in the US, it made it more and more difficult for us to develop and deliver our vaccine and therapeutic products because we didn't have the raw materials in order to support that development. So those are the types things that we are looking at within our supply chains and our logistics pipelines. Excuse me. But let's talk a little bit more about biosurveillance, so in in our view, biosurveillance is really critical in understanding what that future operating environment is, and then ultimately trying to achieve a real time threat awareness in order to inform then everything else in that pipeline that we were just talking about. Right? How are we gonna respond to? How are we gonna mitigate the threat? If we don't know it's happening then it's very difficult for us to build a posture to respond. So in our mind, biosurveillance includes both the medical surveillance requirements that are needed, right, so the diagnostics data, the metadata from force health, but also environmental surveillance measures. Right? So what does, you know, the air environment around a specific facility or broadly look like? What types of environmental triggers might we need to be collecting and identifying in case of a potential outbreak? And can we get an early surveillance from that? Monitoring in my mind, for both is really critical, and further supports really the need for an integrated framework where this information is ultimately acquired, but the acquisition of this information is not sufficient, nor is it sufficient enough to just being able to analyze this information, really it's about trying to identifying and characterize and understand what that environment is in order to affect decision making, right? It affect research and development capabilities, effect posturing of logistics and supplies, and then also ultimately support things like restricted movement and triage from a medical standpoint and in other types of decision pipeline information that is necessary. So where do we go from here? Right. So in order to continue staying ahead of if like emerging and evolving threats, we you've probably heard and anybody that's worked a lot with our community has the term integrated layer defense or defense in-depth. Right? So I think this is also really critical. But if you haven't heard this term before, let me just kind of walk through it. What it really means is that there's really no such thing as a single stand alone dilution for anything in our threatened landscape. So in order to really adequately address today's threat, it means that we need layers of capability that allow us to protect the war fighter. Right? It's not just about a vaccine. It's about a vaccine plus a mask or plus a detection system or, you know, probably multiple layers of all of those things. We need accurate sensors to detect traces of material. We need to have things like suits and masks, which keep the threat from going you know, into our respiratory system or mucosal pathways. We also need things like medical countermeasures, right? So monoclonal clonal antibodies, nerve agent antidotes. We need to be able to decontaminate. So all of these things kind of create a defense layer that is not just 1, one level short. It's it's actually about having multiple multiple layers and and opportunities for that defense pipeline. The concept for integrated layered defense isn't really new, but it is still a leap from where we were 5 years ago. Right? I think where we were 5 years ago is really talking about things in terms of, again, my personal term. I often talk about we used to do youth soccer, right, where everybody was kind of chasing the ball and trying to identify a whole host of potential options. In the terms of integrated layer defense in today's language, it's really about doing the characterization sufficient to understand what are the opportunities to layer defense postures against different types of threats? Not specific threats, but again, broad spectrum threats. So that's kind of where I've seen the leap ahead within our community go to, is thinking less about defense capabilities and silos and thinking about it again from a complementary and integrated posture or looking at it as trying to put all of the puzzle pieces together to see the bigger picture. And we're seeing real success in the CBDP program that I used to manage in that type of logical threat analysis and characterization prior to developing capabilities. And so these, building up of defensive layers has really built an integrated enterprise of capabilities rather than having individual parts and pieces. So I think that's really, really exciting. So we're also beginning to see some early benefits for the way the DoD is now performing acquisition of certain products like within the Chembio space and especially within the area of medical countermeasures because of some of these shifts in our mindsets, right? So for example, the Chem Bio Defense Program recently released a new medical countermeasure strategy. It's a document titled The Approaches for RDA of medical countermeasures and test products. So if you guys haven't seen that, I encourage you to reach out to to folks that you know within the CBDP and see if you can get a copy of that document. What this document really does is looks at how we are going to do, like, a 2 pronged approach to the RDA investments within the medical countermeasures space. And the first one really delivers or talks about the delivery of nonspecific Pacific Medical countermeasure products to the warfighter. And the other one establishes capabilities for how we are going to do rapid development of very specific medical countermeasure products. So let me let me talk very quickly about the 1st prong. So the development of non specific medical countermeasure products, which is something new to kind of, well, it's new and it's not new for the Chembio Defense program, but it's an area that we are really seeking a lot of guidance and assistance from folks within the community. What this prong really focuses on is developing medical countermeasures that can help enhance a human immune system against exposure to unknown agents, right? Instead of thinking about chasing pathogen after pathogen, we're actually turning the camera lens, as it were, to the other side and really looking at how the person or the host responds or how we can protect the host holistically rather than chasing the pathogen pipeline. So for example, administering drugs, right, to prep a host's immune system against a pathogen, a broad pathogen, you know, whether it's viral or bacterial or a protein of some sort is really optimal in this space, right or substances that target host molecular processes to reduce or slow the rate of disease and kind of general symptomology. So the Chembio Defense Program, for example, is exploring existing and novel adjuvants or immune potentiators, right, that can combine with vaccines to stimulate immunogenicity profiles without trying to compromise vaccine safety. Licensed vaccines known for their ability to trigger a rapid immune system response will also kind of be looked at for development and determine if kind of systemic states can be created for, again, broad spectrum protection. Right? So this is, I think, a really exciting capability area for the CBDP. And again, it just shows, a slight difference in how we are approaching future medical countermeasures. Right? The 2nd prong that I mentioned, the ones that are are looking for specific rapid advancements in in development of drugs, is really focused on things like, again, for those of you who know the CBDP, they have a new program out called Guide, which is essentially Unconstrained Intelligent Drug Engineering. So what they're trying to do there is develop a computational system by which you can do drug development risk mitigation through throughout the life cycle. Right? And thus hopefully accelerating candidate development and enable preemptive kind of preparedness activities and rapid response capabilities, right? So this is really about how do we take the lessons learned from Operation Warp Speed without the big dollars of Operation Warp Speed and how do we then do drug discovery, drug design, and biologic products like monoclonal antibodies, for example, and other kind of small molecule drugs while simultaneously optimizing the critical quality attributes that you're really needed in order to get to the later stages of that drug development. The safety efficacy analysis, the manufacturability and kind of the the the PKPD type, studies. Right? So these are these are all types of technologies that we're we're looking at, and these are all types of technologies that are informing our biodefense posture the review. And we're hoping, knock on wood, that by the end of the biodefense posture jury review, we will have a better aligned, a better organized program and pipeline across the threat domain to help us be able to not only respond to, but ultimately, hopefully, terror against any kind of a future? Combatant commands and the services. So all of those components that might have or might play a a a part in a global response or a targeted response will all come together in this, this council moving forward. The other thing that I would like to to highlight is, you mentioned the working groups, right? So the council recognizes that in order to be able to address these evergreen issues that we identifying with the complexity of the the environment that Doctor. George mentioned, the policy challenges, strategy challenges. And then ultimately, how do we appropriately prioritize some of the efforts that we need to do moving forward, we we can't do that by just kind of dropping something on the council. So there will be bodies that are either ad hoc or evergreen that will help shape that environment across the the Department of Defense and the enterprise of biodefense within the department. I'm doctor Brandy Van And I am the new head of the Chemical and Biological Defense Program. First, I'd like to say thank you to to Ron and his team and the conference organizers for, the opportunity to speak to you this afternoon. This is this is great. You know, I have a a very long standing history with this conference, as as Carl mentioned, actually started as a contract support to to this conference. And then I went to a presenter, and then a, you know, I I hosted sessions, and then I got to be on the panel last year. And now I get to sit here in front of all of you as as the as the DASD. So but what I know about this conference firsthand is that there are great ideas that are generated here every single conference, and I'm actually very excited to see what are the outcomes gonna come out of this this meeting. So like many of you in the audience Who have worked with the Chembio Defense Program for a long time. I'm aware that in many ways, I don't really fit the mold of my predecessors, But that's okay. And I am looking forward to breaking many more molds in the name of progress for the CBDP. Progress for the sake of protecting our war fighters, progress for the sake of safeguarding our national security, and progress that's going to drive the Chembio Defense program forward into a capability revolution. So don't get me wrong though, for 26 years, The CHEM Biodefense program has successfully developed and delivered what the war fighters needed to conquer the hazards on the battlefield. But many of you know that the pace need us to rise to that challenge that is already beating down our front door. So as I work in my position to reform our strategies, our policies, and our practices, We have 4 organizations that make up the CHEM Bio Defense Program that will continue to improve the alignment of their efforts from one end of the enterprise to the other. We have the joint requirements office, the joint science technology office, the joint program executive office and the CBRN test and evaluation executive. And they all play a critical role, and each one is essential to the success of the others. For the whole Chembio Defense enterprise to be successful, no single organization can operate out of step with the others or each will flounder and fail. And ultimately, it's the warfighter that loses. But as an enterprise, we recognize that we cannot do this alone. The cohesion and coordination and integration amongst the Chembo Defense program and amongst our strategic partners and performers are absolutely required for our collective success. The strength of those relationships, the bonds and the bridges between our organizations are the structure with which we will build our warfighters ability to continue winning in a world of complex threats. Now I consider all of you in the audience today members of our Greater Chem Bio Defense community and we need your help to make a huge leap towards revolutionary ideas and real world solutions. So I will say if you have a crazy idea that might not work, but you think it's worth a shot, go talk to Ron and his team of of division chiefs and STEMs. If you've got something that's already developed that you think could be useful to our war fighters, I would encourage you to go talk to the JPO, to Doug Bryce, and to Jason Roos and show them what you've got. As I said, we are all part of the same team and working together is the only way that we'll be able to be behind the war fighter but ahead of the threat.
National Defense Strategy In October 2022, the Department of Defense released its National Defense Strategy. defense.gov
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons As the implementing body for the Chemical Weapons Convention, the OPCW, with its 193 Member States, oversees the global endeavour to permanently and verifiably eliminate chemical weapons. opcw.org
Dr. Brandi C. Vann Dr. Brandi C. Vann currently serves as the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs. This position serves as the principal advisor to the defense.gov
The Department of Defense’s Newly Released Biodefense Posture Review Please join the CSIS Bipartisan Alliance for Global Health Security to discuss the newly released Department of Defense’s Biodefense Posture Review. csis.org

@oldschoolethos - Sergeant Schultz

The Newly established DOD Biodefense Council is very interesting. 1. Obama attempted to establish this council in 2016. Trump stopped it and the Obama W.H.O. Global Health Security Agenda GHSA. Biden brought back GHSA and built the Council. 2. This Council appears to place 17 separate federal agencies and private companies under 1 DOD Umbrella. 3. Some goals of the Council is to support GHSA, One Health, pandemic preparedness. They link those things by linking reduction of things like zoonotic threats which are labeled bioweapons like Q Fever. TITLE LXIX—GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY ACT OF 2022 Page 3,275 SEC. 6904. GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY AGENDA INTERAGENCY REVIEW COUNCIL. (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The President shall establish a Global Health Security Agenda Interagency Review Council (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Council’’) GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Council shall be responsible for the following activities: (1) Provide policy-level recommendations to participating agencies on Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) goals, objectives, and implementation, and other international efforts to strengthen pandemic preparedness and response. (2) Facilitate interagency, multi-sectoral engagement to carry out GHSA implementation. (3) Provide a forum for raising and working to resolve interagency disagreements concerning the GHSA, and other international efforts to strengthen pandemic preparedness and response. (d) PARTICIPATION.—The Council shall be headed by the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, in coordination with the heads of relevant Federal agencies. The Council shall consist of representatives from the following agencies: (1) The Department of State. (2) The Department of Defense. (3) The Department of Justice. (4) The Department of Agriculture. (5) The Department of Health and Human Services. (6) The Department of the Treasury. (7) The Department of Labor. (8) The Department of Homeland Security. (9) The Office of Management and Budget. (10) The Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (11) The United States Agency for International Development. (12) The Environmental Protection Agency. (13) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (14) The Office of Science and Technology Policy. (15) The National Institutes of Health. (16) The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. (17) Such other agencies as the Council determines to be appropriate. Page 3,281 SEC. 6906. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of the Congress that, given the complex and multisectoral nature of global health threats to the United States, the President— (1) should consider appointing an individual with significant background and expertise in public health or emergency response management to the position of United States Coordinator for Global Health Security, as required by section 6905(a), who is an employee of the National Security Council at the level of Deputy Assistant to the President or higher; and (2) in providing assistance to implement the strategy required under section 6907(a), should— (A) coordinate, through a whole-of-government approach, the efforts of relevant Federal departments and agencies to implement the strategy; (B) seek to fully utilize the unique capabilities of each relevant Federal department. NOTE: The Council is requesting $810 Million in the FY24 NDAA as a “down payment” for their program This is a meeting of the Council that is posted on Youtube. I put a few clips below. One thing that stands out is the council using the term “Evergreen Agenda”. Interesting for a Department of Defense Biodefense council. Listen to Brandi Vann Principal Deputy Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs. She is the one that mentions it directly. The Council acknowledges the FY23 NDAA funding led to their creation. https://www.youtube.com/live/BNLEZSXRZRQ?si=PWAFRRClTRrXWQVh https://www.csis.org/analysis/department-defenses-newly-released-biodefense-posture-review Is it this Evergreen program? https://www.evergreenaction.com/blog/the-defense-production-act

Video Transcript AI Summary
All components involved in global or targeted responses will come together in this new initiative. Working groups will address the complex policy and strategy challenges, as well as prioritize future efforts. The Department of Defense and the biodefense enterprise will have ad hoc or evergreen bodies to shape the environment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Combatant commands and the services. So all of those components that might have or might play a part in a global response or a targeted response will all come together in this ball moving forward. The other thing that I would like to highlight is, you mentioned the working groups, right? So the council recognizes that in order to be able to address these evergreen issues that we are identifying with the complexity of the environment that George mentioned, the policy challenges, strategy challenges. And then ultimately, how do we appropriately prioritize some of the efforts that we need to do moving forward, we can't do that by just kind of dropping something on the so there will be bodies that are either ad hoc or evergreen that will help shape that environment across the Department of Defense and the enterprise of biodefense within the department.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the importance of the Bioposture Review (BPR) and the need for active US government engagement in biodefense. They mention the appointment of new leadership, the creation of a Biodefense Council, and the need for better biosafety and biosecurity. The BPR addresses bio threats from various sources, including natural, man-made, and accidental, and emphasizes the importance of international cooperation. The speaker also highlights the role of the Department of Defense (DoD) in supporting civilian efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic and other bio threats. They mention the need for ongoing reviews and the establishment of working groups to address policy and strategy challenges in biodefense. The speaker concludes by discussing the funding request for biodefense initiatives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Port for an active US government, engagement in this area at home and abroad, the appointment of new senior leadership team at the White House, at CDC, at NIH, and elsewhere, new new capacities at the Department of State at the White House and CDC and elsewhere, and a de facto bipartisan consensus despite the rancor and the noise in our country to better protect Americans through investing in new technology and better biosafety and biosecurity among other issues. And the and the moment has arrived to accelerate implementation. The review was driven by the sense, as we'll hear, that the world of biodefense has changed profoundly and DoD needs to change accordingly and indeed, racing to move ahead. The BPR lays down a new paradigm around bio threats coming from multiple directions, including natural, man made, and accidental from China, Russia, Iran and North Korea from accelerating changes in science itself that creates new opportunities and new acute dangers and from the massive proliferation of laboratories where biosafety and biosecurity are often weak in the midst of this in the midst of this competition. The BBR, as we'll hear today, creates a new biodefense council. Its secretariat to be headed by assistant secretary Rosenblum. That institution is to bring about greater accountability, unity of effort, begins its work in the coming days. It's charged with preparing an action plan next 12 months. The speed and quality of its performance will really be a critical test of the long term value of the BPR, whether it becomes authoritative, not just in coordinating and sharing information, but in making decisions and shaping budgets. The BPR is linked to the proposal in the in the budget president's budget request for new money of 812,000,000. We'll hear more about that. That's a bit of a down payment in beginning to scale up the response. Speaker 1: As for your collective team's patience, as we, as Steve mentioned, 24 months it wasn't quite 24 months. But 24 months later, we are here, to discuss the bio the results of the bioposture review and how our work at the department also fits well into the work of the National Security Council and the White House, under previously, doctor Beth Cameron, doctor Raj Punjabi, and now doctor Paul Friedrich, who's with us today, in updating the National Biodefense Strategy as well as developing the implementation plan where DOD plays a significant role. As colead of the BPR, I am assuming a new one, as Steve mentioned, As the executive secretary of the Biodefense Council, chaired by my boss, the undersecretary of defense For acquisition and sustainment, doctor Bill LaPlante, the biodefense council is charged with implementing Key BPR reforms and empowering the department to take this more collaborative approach to biodefense. We must continue to emphasize and maintain the energy of the BPR as the council takes on and authoritative strategic role Speaker 2: USS Roosevelt, an aircraft carrier was taken out of service. It was by it was placed in out of service in Guam for quite some time. Various exercises were canceled. Operation Warp Speed, that very successful program that brought our Vaccines to the fore were heavily supported by DoD assets not only in our science world but also in the logistics world. The Military supported civilian activities with logistics and medical support in hospitals and at the various vaccination centers around the country, large support for the, civilian effort. And our military labs were supporting other laboratories around the country in diagnosing and finding out just what was going on. Lot of work both in the military and, supporting our civilian colleagues. But the question then is, As Steve mentioned, the title of their paper I think is extremely impression. The worst is over, now what? So Speaker 3: One of the key outcomes of the BPR was a discussion that, As doctor George just said, this is not an issue just for the United States to deal with. It's an issue for all of us to have to deal with globally, certainly with our allies and partners, and frankly, with those who are not our allies and partners, including the PRC. And I think this administration has been pretty clear At the outset, that we are prepared to and want to cooperate with the PRC in areas where it is in our joint interest, and that is on things like pandemic preparedness. And so we have sort of put that door open, and I think the national security advisor has spoken about this in the context of things like arms control and strategic stability, and sort of putting guardrails in the relationship between the United States and the PRC. And I would put these biological issues sort of in that bucket. And so certainly, we continue to be interested in and having a dialogue with Beijing on these issues and making sure that we understand where we're coming from. Unfortunately, the response that we've gotten from the PRC to the release of the Bioposture Review was basically an influx of disinformation and misinformation about what the United States is doing on bio issues, and I won't repeat them because they're not true, but just to say that we've heard this before. And, we are focused on exactly what the document, if you read it, says, which is to prevent and to protect and to mitigate against impacts. Example, the Ukraine scenario has reminded us, unfortunately, we talked about COVID, we talked about anthrax, but unfortunately, Countries like Russia have also reminded us globally that these threats have not gone away and, in fact, are still there and are growing. And so our support to Ukraine in turning by making sure they have the PPE that they need, our ability to downgrade intelligence, to note if there are concerns about false flag operations, All of these things emerge at the beginning of the conflict, and that's why we're really pleased to see, for example, that NATO has updated its Chembio rad and nuke policy, which was outdated to reflect these, these threats. That's why we're really pleased to see that the UK has released a new biodefense related document just as we are doing this, and that we do dialogues, for example, that I lead with our our allies in South Korea, encountering WMD. Speaker 4: This. It it opens up the conversation to how do we effectively partner with those countries, and how do we talk about, Laboratory safety, appropriate types of research and understanding what is the potential risk Of, exploring certain types of very, you know, unique or high risk life science work. So we recognize from the DoD standpoint that we need to enhance that conversation. We need to utilize those, opportunities and those research cells that we have across the globe to help generate more of Speaker 1: that conversation worldwide. Needed and requested both in the FY 'twenty three bill as well as what's up right now with Congress in the FY24 bill. And by having the Bioposture Review Operating as an early rendition, if you will, of the Biodefense Council, We were able to work together collaboratively on what is the full scope of those investments whether it be for Training and exercises, you know, early warning and biosurveillance. And came up with what we believe is A very defensible request for about $800,000,000 in FY24 And was something that we, spend a lot of time with Congress discussing and have had a good amount Of support, and Congress, of course, has been a very important Speaker 3: This collective group of people and officials into the same room on really a weekly basis, to have these discussions and dialogue and identify gaps and seams wherever they may be. And so, we kind of recognized, you know, we probably should sustain this in some way to the point on sustainment. And I always laugh, I think people wince when I say this because it did take us a while to do. But just as with a nuclear posture review, I would hope that this would not be the 1st and the last biodefense posture review. I think that there will need to be a regular review of this, which again, is the value of the council existing to determine and I'm not saying it has to be every presidential term or every administration. That may be up to the council to decide, but there should be sort of a regular relook at this. And then, of course, in stride, if issues are identified or need to be adjusted, that's why the council exists. One of the things that we talked about in the charter for the council was, if we have a major issue, a pandemic of some sort, how do we mobilize and respond? And I know I see Doctor. Friedrichs in the office in the audience who lived with this before I was there. But I know there was a lot of scramble at the beginning of COVID to figure out who are the right people, What was the right venue? What was the right body? How to bring all this together? Well, guess what? We will have a council now that is basically all of those people, right, and allows us, working in collaboration with my colleagues in policy that do these kinds of responses, to quickly bring folks together and not have to fight the bureaucratics, but then to worry about what is needed to do response to get Coordinated way, right? Speaker 4: So, that is going to be the key of the council whenever there is a response is the council will have all of the OSD elements engaged the joint staff, combatant commands and the services. So all of those components that might have or might play A part in a global response or a targeted response will all come together in this council moving forward. The other thing that I would like to highlight is, you mentioned the working groups, right? So the council recognizes that in order to be able to Dress these evergreen issues that we're identifying with the complexity of the environment that Doctor. George mentioned, the Policy challenges, strategy challenges, and then ultimately, how do we appropriately prioritize, some of the efforts that we need to do moving forward. We can't do that by just kind of dropping something on the council. So there will be bodies that are either ad hoc or evergreen That will help shape that environment across the Department of Defense and the enterprise of biodefense within the department.
The Department of Defense’s Newly Released Biodefense Posture Review Please join the CSIS Bipartisan Alliance for Global Health Security to discuss the newly released Department of Defense’s Biodefense Posture Review. csis.org
Here’s How the Defense Production Act Can Be a Major Climate Tool Hitting our climate goals requires a historic economic mobilization for manufacturing and deployment. The Defense Production Act is a powerful tool that President Biden can wield to meet these demands and propel us toward our clean energy future. evergreenaction.com
oldschoolethos
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 3:48 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 8:02 PM

@oldschoolethos - Sergeant Schultz

Remember Obama started the Global Health Security Agenda GHSA with the W.H.O. And attempted to form the DOD Biodefense Council in 2016. Trump stopped both in 2017 Biden brought it all back and formed the Council

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This Is One Of The Most Eye Opening Interviews You’ll Ever Hear. In 1992, A Real Communist Party USA Meeting Was Held In California At The University Of Berkeley. Many Of The Attendees Ended Up Working In The Barack Obama Administration Their Goal “Use the environmental movement to take down the free enterprise system in America.” 🚨 “Back in 1992, uh, an older friend of my father who was from Saint Louis asked me to go to this meeting that the Communist Party USA was having at the University of California Berkeley. And he had studied communism and written books about communism back in the sixties and stuff. And he was curious Because if you remember back in 1989, the Berlin Wall had come down, and everyone was saying communism is dead. It's over. Then in 91 in December, the Soviet Union dissolved. And so this is 6 months later, the summer of 92, and the Communist Party USA is having a meeting. So he asked me to go out to this meeting. He said, would you go out there and just see what they're talking about? Because we we won. This thing's over. And so I went to that. And for 3 days, I sat there in breakout sessions and lectures and and listened to these hardcore communists. And and one thing shocking about it too, I thought it'd be college radical since it was at Berkeley, so I dressed like a college radical with some radical t shirt on it. I walk into the autumn the auditorium, there's 14 or 1500, 50, 60, and 70 year olds with briefcases. And I thought, woah. This is actually serious. It's not just some radicals. And many of those exact people, as I researched them later, ended up being in Obama's cabinet in 2008. And that's what motivated me to make movie because I rise these are the people that were at this communist meeting with me back back in 1992. But at that meeting, they laid out this plan how they wanted to take America down from the inside. They were gonna focus all their energies on that now. They've been focusing on it for a while, but they realized they could never outspend America because capitalism, free enterprise is so successful. And they kind of that woke them up. Okay. We gotta go to plan b. They they just keep building more and more. And, of course, we had all the years of Reagan where he'd really built the military up, so they realized We're in trouble here. Um, and so that's what they talked about to me and how they were going to do that from the inside, and I didn't think that much about it, went on with my life. But then again, 16 years later in 2008 from 92, when I remembered what they had talked about, like, one thing, uh, that is so clear how it had changed. They had said back in 92, we're gonna use the environmental movement to take down the free enterprise system in America.” I can’t transcribe it all due to X’s text limits but this is a CRAZY listen… This is the systematic takedown of America from the inside under the disguise of Climate Change

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1992, the speaker attended a meeting of the Communist Party USA at UC Berkeley. He was surprised to find that the attendees were not just college radicals, but also older individuals who later became part of Obama's cabinet. They discussed their plan to take down America from within, focusing on using the environmental movement as a vehicle for totalitarian control. The speaker later discovered a book from 1958 called "The Naked Communist," which outlined 45 communist goals for America. One of these goals was to gain control of schools and promote socialist ideas to influence future generations. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transitioning to socialism before implementing communism. He also mentions how communism has historically taken over countries by stirring up radical movements and using puppet leaders. The speaker believes that toxic masculinity has been targeted as the enemy, and that the current state of American youth reflects the success of their long-term plan.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back in 1992, an older friend of my father who was from Saint Louis asked me to go to this meeting that the Communist Party USA was having at the University of California, Berkeley. And he had studied communism and written books about communism back in the sixties and stuff. And he was curious because If you'll remember back in 1989, the Berlin Wall had come down, and everyone was saying communism is dead. It's over. Then in 91 in December. The Soviet Union dissolved. And so this is 6 months later, the summer of 92, and the Communist Party USA is having a meeting. So he asked me to go After this meeting, he said, would you go out there and just see what they're talking about? Because we we won. This thing's over. And so I went to that. And for 3 days, I sat They're in breakout sessions and lectures and and listen to these hardcore communists. And and one thing shocking about it too, I thought it'd be college radical since it was at Berkeley, So I dress like a college radical with some radical t shirt on it. I walk into the autumn auditorium, there's 14 or 1550, seeing 70 year olds with briefcases. And I thought, woah. This is ex serious. It's not just some radicals. And many of those Exact people, as I researched them later, ended up being in Obama's cabinet in 2008. And that's what motivated me to make the movie because I realized, well, these are the people They were at this communist meeting with me back back in 1992. But at that meeting, they laid out this plan how they wanted to take America down from the inside. They were gonna focus all their Sergei's on that now. They've been focusing on it for a while, but they realized they could never outspend America because capitalism, free enterprise is so successful. And they kind of that woke them up. Okay. We gotta go to plan b. They they just keep building more and more. And, of course, we had all the years of Reagan where he'd really built the military up, so they because we're in trouble here. And so that's what they talked about to me and how they were going to do that from the inside. And I didn't think Much about it went on with my life, but then again, 16 years later in 2008 from 92 when I remembered what they had talked about, like, one thing, that is so clear how it had changed. They had said back in 92, we're gonna use the environmental movement to take down the free enterprise system in America. And in 90 That didn't make sense because that was not a big movement. It was literally people, you know, chaining themselves to trees in Oregon so they can't cut them down. I mean, it was nothing. And so I was like, how would you do that? But in 2008, An Inconvenient Truth by Al Gore had come out. It was the biggest movement in the world, and it still is, because they realized it's the ultimate vehicle for totalitarian control because it's a global problem, so it demands global solutions by a global government. That's that's the way they look at it. So they that's why that issue will never go away no matter how many facts we have and how many Charts we can show them, hey. It's not going up. And if it went up a little bit, actually would be good. Warm warmth is the friend of life. Cold is the enemy of life. All the Logical things that they don't, but from that, I wrote a letter when I was a representative on that communist meeting in 1992, and it just blew up into a huge thing. And one of the men that responded to that and said, what representative Bauer says is true, but it's nothing new. That's That's not from 1992. It was all written in a book in 1958, and I got to know the man. And it was, of course, the book, The Naked Communist, and it had the 45 current communist goals as of the 19 fifties in America. And I got that book for the first time in 2008. So 50 years later, And I read through the list of goals. And as I did, I couldn't believe how specific and how purposeful and how All premeditated, the collapse of our country had been. It had been people and groups for a 100 years working to take us down from within. And I just I couldn't believe. As I read through these things, one of them goal 17. This is from fifties America. Get control of the schools, use them as transmission belts for socialism, soften the curriculum. Well, people wonder, why do all the kids want socialism today? Because in the fifties, they said we gotta put socialist ideas. We gotta push it. So these kids think it's Good. I think it's it's wonderful. And so because they know all the hardcore communists know. You have to transition through socialism before you can go to communism. You cannot go from a prosperous free enterprise system to communism because the problem is in the prosperous free enterprise system, you and all the people owned all the stuff. Mhmm. Speaker 1: And Speaker 0: so they can't because, like, how do we get this? They have the wealth. They have the guns. They have the property. They have a we gotta transition into socialism where we slowly get control of everything. And then it's easy to flip overnight, especially if you can disarm them. Then overnight, it's no more mister nice guy. You do what we say or you get a bullet in your head. Mhmm. I mean, that's that's and that That happened over and over again throughout the 20th century. So it's not like some new strategy. That's what they did to most of the countries that fell to communism, and a lot of people don't know this. During the 20th century, like, 65 or 70 countries that fell. That's how they fell. They did not. The Tanks didn't roll in and take them over. They stirred up their radical, stirred up the college professors, disturbed the young people for freedom, for for no. You these it's not a just government because it wasn't a perfect government, whatever country. It might have been like Cuba or something. No. It wasn't a perfect government, but it was pro American. They had a lot of freedom. They were prosperous, but the people there Jerked it up and said no. And so when what happens is the communists do that, then they put up their puppet as the guy that's for the people, and the people usually vote put that person in the power. And then once they get the levers of control, they the iron fist comes out in in like Casper did. It started slaughtering by the 1,000, Anyone who resisted in Cuba. Yeah. They've been brainwashed that toxic masculinity because they knew that's their number one enemy. Yeah. Back in the 19 thirties, even the Frankfurt School, one of the groups that my movie talks about, they talked about that. They said we're never going to be able to get these children away from the parents in the families where the father is leading the home. I got we we gotta pull him out. We gotta get him sidetracked on other things, sports or whatever, and then we gotta create enough inflation So the mother has to work whether she wants to or not so we can raise the children. They were writing about that in the 19 thirties. Speaker 2: And now you have them on the White House podium saying these are our children. Exactly. These are not your children. They're our children. That's right. Speaker 1: You know, you know, coming from the White House. Speaker 0: That's right. Speaker 2: Legitimately, like, 3 months ago. Mhmm. Speaker 1: You know, one one thing that I always think to as well, like, every now and then, you'll see one of these pictures pop up. So this is a picture of, like, a 17 year old in Vietnam. Mhmm. Right? And, like, knowing that, like, That was that was that was the normal here. Right? Like, just this peak male. Right? Like, I mean, he's 17 year old, he got muscle tone, and he's out Fighting a war. You know what I'm saying? Compared to what our 17 year olds look like now, they're dressing up as fur babies and and and furries and stuff. It's like, How do we get there? Like, and it could, like, instead just, you know, for this conversation, it couldn't just be this one way that we got to this place. It's all these different facets on all these different they've been able to use to get us to exactly where we are now. And it's not a overnight process. Right? Like, they've been planning this stuff for you. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. For a it's been going on in earnest for right at about a100
oldschoolethos
Posted - November 15, 2023 at 3:57 PM
Saved - November 16, 2023 at 8:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Crowdfunding platforms like Angel Studios enable initiatives like Citizen Portal to come to life. Startengine.com, regulated by the SEC and FINRA, allows investment in such projects. President Biden's Executive Order on Digital Assets prioritizes consumer protection, financial stability, and responsible innovation. Regulators like the SEC and CFTC are actively working to safeguard consumers and combat fraud in the digital asset space. [499 characters]

@oldschoolethos - Sergeant Schultz

Crowd funding like @AngelStudiosInc has done is the way things like this happen. https://www.startengine.com/offering/citizenportal http://Startengine.com allows investing in things like this and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Is there an executive order already done to possibly manipulate those agencies? Courtesy of ChatGPT4: On March 9, President Biden issued an Executive Order (EO) on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets. This EO marked the first comprehensive, whole-of-government approach to managing digital assets. It aimed to address potential risks while capitalizing on the benefits of digital assets and their underlying technologies. Key priorities of this order included consumer and investor protection, financial stability, counteracting illicit finance, enhancing U.S. leadership in the global financial system, promoting financial inclusion, and fostering responsible innovation [oai_citation:1,FACT SHEET:  White House Releases First-Ever Comprehensive Framework for Responsible Development of Digital Assets | The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/09/16/fact-sheet-white-house-releases-first-ever-comprehensive-framework-for-responsible-development-of-digital-assets/). Following this order, the Biden-Harris Administration and independent regulators, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), have been working to protect consumers and ensure fair play in digital asset markets. This includes issuing guidance, increasing enforcement resources, and aggressively pursuing fraudulent actors in the digital asset space [oai_citation:2,FACT SHEET:  White House Releases First-Ever Comprehensive Framework for Responsible Development of Digital Assets | The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/09/16/fact-sheet-white-house-releases-first-ever-comprehensive-framework-for-responsible-development-of-digital-assets/).

Citizen Portal | StartEngine The Future of Democracy startengine.com
StartEngine: Invest in Startups Online On StartEngine, everyday people can invest and buy shares in startups and early stage companies. startengine.com
FACT SHEET:  White House Releases First-Ever Comprehensive Framework for Responsible Development of Digital Assets | The White House Following the President’s Executive Order, New Reports Outline Recommendations to Protect Consumers, Investors, Businesses, Financial Stability, National Security, and the Environment The digital assets market has grown significantly in recent years. Millions of people globally, including 16% of adult Americans, have purchased digital assets—which reached a market capitalization of $3 trillion globally last November. Digital… whitehouse.gov
FACT SHEET:  White House Releases First-Ever Comprehensive Framework for Responsible Development of Digital Assets | The White House Following the President’s Executive Order, New Reports Outline Recommendations to Protect Consumers, Investors, Businesses, Financial Stability, National Security, and the Environment The digital assets market has grown significantly in recent years. Millions of people globally, including 16% of adult Americans, have purchased digital assets—which reached a market capitalization of $3 trillion globally last November. Digital… whitehouse.gov
oldschoolethos
Posted - November 15, 2023 at 3:28 PM
Saved - November 16, 2023 at 8:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden Administration seems concerned about the potential impact of AI, prompting them to take control measures. They plan to regulate and control AI and modern technology through FCC changes and the Defense Production Act. This move aims to make information easily accessible and searchable by citizens, making it harder to hide or manipulate data. Check out the Citizen Portal AI for comprehensive searches and stay tuned for the upcoming GPT Store for apps. For more details, listen to the Glenn Beck podcast.

@oldschoolethos - Sergeant Schultz

I bet this scares the crap out of the Biden Administration. No wonder they are in panic “control AI” mode. Biden recently announced FCC changes and the use of the Defense Production Act to regulate and control AI and modern technology. All information would be laid bare and easily searchable by citizens. It would be difficult to bury information or funding and stick with lies. Search School Board meetings, House and Senate sessions, and so much more. Citizen Portal AI https://citizenportal.ai/search?qq=Global%20health%20security%20agenda%20&taxId=1831&ds=&de= And upcoming “GPT Store” for apps. Listen 1 hour 27 minutes into @glennbeck podcast https://open.spotify.com/episode/59hjTVkZ4CvRBwUmMzG7Q7?si=52yMiUSWT_OYsmNuhsQI6g #citizenportal #AI

CitizenPortal.ai - Homeland Security: House Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation citizenportal.ai
Page not found open.spotify.com
oldschoolethos
Posted - February 22, 2023 at 8:29 PM
Saved - October 22, 2023 at 6:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This comprehensive article covers a range of important topics for veterans and their families. It includes information on VA claims, survivor benefits, military medical processes, retirement, blast trauma research, treatments for veterans, burn pit exposure, NDAA updates, and resource lists. Explore this valuable resource for concise insights into various veteran-related subjects.

@oldschoolethos - Sergeant Schultz

I am Pinning this Long Continuing thread of Tweets containing Substack, Videos, Audio, and direct links covering: 1.Veteran Affairs Claim Information 2.Survivors benefits (burial, college, DIC, SBP, Life Insurance) 3.Military MEB, PEB, IDES information 4.Military retirement, CRSC, CRDP info 5.Blast Trauma/Brain impact Research 6.Treatments and Therapies for Veterans 7.Chemical/Burn Pit Exposure Research 8.Updates to NDAA and Benefits 9.Resource lists for Veterans and families 10.Other Veteran Topics

oldschoolethos
Posted - October 9, 2023 at 3:39 PM
Saved - October 22, 2023 at 6:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) focuses on the Biden Administration's "Global Health Security Agenda." However, some question if their priorities are misplaced given the global state of affairs. The NDAA authorizes defense spending and includes sections related to global health security, pandemic preparedness, and countering misinformation. It also emphasizes collaboration with international organizations like NATO, the World Health Organization, and the World Bank. The NDAA is a lengthy document, but specific sections highlight these areas of interest. For more details, refer to the provided links.

@oldschoolethos - Sergeant Schultz

With the numerous possibilities of War across the globe over the past 2 years I find it interesting that the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) AKA Military/Defense funding bill focused heavily on the Biden Administration and NATOs “Global Health Security Agenda” It seems “their” priorities are misplaced. Was that intentional or are they just delusional at the state of the Globe right now? Seems like the UK, Canada, Australia, and the United States have agendas very similar to the World Economic Forum WEF. While our increasing list of adversaries are building strong relationships. (Iran, Russia, China, North Korea) The 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). If you don’t know about the NDAA basically The NDAA is the country’s annual defense spending authorization bill, setting our military budget for the next year. The House of Representatives puts forward its bill first, then the Senate introduces its own version, followed by a conference committee – a group of members from both the House and Senate – combining the two versions into one final bill. The NDAA authorizes appropriation of funds for the Department of Defense, along with defense activities in other federal departments and agencies (think intelligence work or nuclear programs within the Department of Energy). Here are a few examples though. Again very strange things for an NDAA. The NDAA is 3,854 pages and a good way to bury a lot of things. If you stick the document in a PDF search tool you can find all the sections I am referring to in my writing and use any other search terms that possibly I am not thinking about yourself. “Global Health Security Agenda 2024”, “GHSA”, International Health Regulations 2005”, “Global Health Security Initiative”, “pandemic”, “COVID-19”, “vaccines”, “World Health Organization”, “disinformation”, “NATO”, “World Bank”, “misinformation” SEC. 6908 Establishment of Fund for Global Health Security and Pandemic Preparedness. Starts at page 3289. Very interesting verbiage for an NDAA. Establish A multilateral, catalytic financing mechanism for global health security that aligns with and complements ongoing bilateral and multilateral efforts and financing, including through the World Bank, The World Health Organization, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance. Accelerate country COMPLIANCE with the International Health Regulations (2005) and fulfillment of the Global Health Security Agenda 2024 Framework.        “Enable international collaboration to gain understanding and measure the impacts of the content moderation, product design decisions, and algorithms of online platforms on society, politics, the spread of hate, harassments, and extremism, security, privacy, and physical or mental health, including consideration for youth development”       “prioritize efforts to enhance the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO’s) capacity to counter misinformation and disinformation.”      “support an increase in NATO’s human, financial, and technological resources and capacity dedicated to understand, respond to, and fight threats in the information space; and support building technological resilience to misinformation and disinformation.” Add in parts of the 2023 DOD Biodefense Posture Review and newly formed council also. “Develop a hub for biosurveillance data including information collected from wearable devices, medical records, & genomic sequencing.” I have a Substack link in my bio with a couple articles outlining in more detail what was in the NDAA if you’d like to read it. 2023 NDAA H.R. 7900 https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr7900/BILLS-117hr7900pcs.pdf This is the direct link to the 2023 Biodefense Posture Review Report https://media.defense.gov/2023/Aug/17/2003282337/-1/-1/1/2023_BIODEFENSE_POSTURE_REVIEW.PDF https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2023-08-17/pentagon-council-biothreats-response-11078165.html This is a very interesting Meeting covering several aspects of the 2023 DOD Biodefense Posture report.  https://www.csis.org/analysis/department-defenses-newly-released-biodefense-posture-review

Congress.gov | Library of Congress congress.gov
Pentagon forms council to assess biothreats, coordinate response The 54-page “Biodefense Posture Review” dissects the Defense Department’s limited capacity to respond to a host of dangers, including Russian bioweapons, lab accidents, drug-resistant bacteria and artificial intelligence, and outlines reforms to bolster readiness. stripes.com
The Department of Defense’s Newly Released Biodefense Posture Review Please join the CSIS Bipartisan Alliance for Global Health Security to discuss the newly released Department of Defense’s Biodefense Posture Review. csis.org
oldschoolethos
Posted - September 19, 2023 at 11:54 PM
Saved - September 20, 2023 at 5:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Robert Kennedy Jr. has been piecing together a puzzle: Event 201 in Nov 2019, COVID news in Dec 2019, masks and vaccines in 2020. Disinformation on masks, vaccines, and virus origins caused chaos. In Dec 2022, Twitter Files were released. Joe Rogan spoke out about ivermectin and more. Defense Secretary requested a Biodefense Survey Report. Biodefense Council formed in 2023. Control of disinformation and biosurveillance hub recommended. Questions on vaccine injuries and blood clots arose. DOD contracted AI firm Accrete for disinformation detection. CIA paid to hide lab leak scenario. New COVID vaccines approved. Elon Musk faced criticism. Military cloud contract awarded. Google wants exclusive access to tissue samples. Leaders gather at vaccine conference. Puzzle pieces come together.

@oldschoolethos - Old School

Interesting when you put all the puzzle pieces together. Robert Kennedy is doing a good job with this puzzle. •Nov 2019 Event 201 Pandemic Exercise •Dec 2019 news of COVID starts spreading •2020 mandated masks, vaccines, and lockdowns •Eventually they started to lose control of what they identified as “mis and disinformation”. Such as effectiveness of masks, vaccine injuries, other effective treatments, and origins of the virus. •December 2022 Twitter starts releasing the “Twitter Files” thanks to Elon buying Twitter. •@joerogan starts speaking out about ivermectin, vitamin D, eating healthy, working out, ext. •End of 2022. The Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin requests a 2023 Biodefense Survey Report be completed based on the response to COVID. •December 2022 NDAA and Omnibus were passed. Wording in the “International Pandemic Preparedness and response” interesting pages 622,926, 965 of the 1068. •2023 Biodefense Council was formed off the findings of the 2023 Biodefense report, consisting of several top officials to advise the secretary of defense and coordinate DOMESTIC and international efforts to anticipate & respond to emergencies.” •Better control of “disinformation” is recommended along with the recommendation “Develop a hub for biosurveillance data including information collected from wearable devices, medical records, & genomic sequencing.” •Questions continue about medical cases that many believe are vaccine injuries and deaths caused by the vaccine on social media. •Doctors and Coroners start talking about strange blood clots they have never seen before. •The DOD contracted with Accrete an AI based firm to deploy "Argus", a system to detect and "neutralize" real-time "disinformation threats" on social media. •Sept 2023 reports being released about the CIA paying people to ensure the “lab leak” scenario went away. •A new COVID Vaccine has been fast tracked through approval the Pfizer and Moderna versions are approved so far. •@elonmusk musk comes under attack by Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL •A $9 Billion Dollar Military Warfighter cloud contract was awarded to Amazon, Oracle, Microsoft, and Google. Does this help ensure compliance if the government asks for favors? •Google’s confidential effort to secure exclusive access to millions of tissue samples held at the Department of Defense’s (DoD) Joint Pathology Center (JPC). They want to apply AI to the data. A tech company wants this why? •Currently: Leaders from DARPA, the Justice Department, Federal Judges, & the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are gathering at Pfizer's 'National Vaccine Law Conference' in DC Excellent interview. Listen to this and watch the 4 videos in the tweet below. Then see if the puzzle starts to come together. @RobertKennedyJr and Dr. Meryl Nass https://spotify.link/H78oVERveDb 2023 Biodefense Posture Review https://media.defense.gov/2023/Aug/17/2003282337/-1/-1/1/2023_BIODEFENSE_POSTURE_REVIEW.PDF Meeting for the Report. https://csis.org/analysis/department-defenses-newly-released-biodefense-posture-review “Argus” AI by Accrete https://accrete.ai/news/department-of-defense-awards-accrete-multi-million-dollar-ai-production-contract 2022 NDAA https://armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/FY22%20NDAA%20Executive%20Summary.pdf… 2022 Omnibus. Pages 622, 926, 965 are interesting. Of the 1068 pages. https://congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf

@oldschoolethos - Old School

Interesting

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, and introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker also mentions that the vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, not by Moderna and Pfizer as claimed. They discuss the numerous pandemic simulations sponsored by the CIA over the years and the involvement of April Haines, the former deputy director of the CIA. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the role of the CIA and Chinese CDC in suppressing the lab leak theory. They also provide a historical context of the US bioweapons program and its connection to the CIA and Pentagon.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can, a little about how you feel the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, grant opportunity to regulate, introduce surveillance and measures that may otherwise have been resisted. What does the pandemic period tell us about power? And in the event that you became president, how would you address what's happened in the last couple of years? Speaker 1: Well, I I, you know, I I wrote a book about how the pandemic was misused, and that it was not, you know, the the the public health Response was not a was not about public health. It was about it was a militarized and monetized response was a pretense for clamping down totalitarian controls. And the weird thing about the pandemic, was this constant, involvement by the CIA and by the intelligence agencies and by the military. When Operation Warp Speed made its presentation to FDA, to the committee they call it, VRBPAC committee at FDA, Rurbak asked for the organizational charts, which were classified up to that time. And when, Warp Speed turned over the organizational charts, the they would they shocked everybody because the top organization that had managed warp industry was not HHS, which is a public health agency. It wasn't CDC or NIH or FDA. It was the NSA, A spy agency. So that was the top, that was the top, agency, the lead agency on operation warp industry, and the pandemic was the NSA, and the 2nd agency was the Pentagon. And when you start looking at, you know, As it turns out, you know, the vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer. They were developed by NIH. They're they're owned. The patents are on 50% by NIH, nor were they manufactured by Pfizer or by Moderna. They were manufactured by military contractors. And, basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their Stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry, but, you know, that's not what they were doing. They were coming from, you know, the this was a this was industry. Military project from the beginning. And the the, you know, the so and then You have one of the things I teach out my book is these simulations, and I uncovers of 20 different simulations, coronavirus and pandemic simulations that started in 2000 in the year in 2001. The first one right before the anthrax attacks. And, and then every year, the CIA indus CIA was doing these, and the CIA was sponsoring them all. And they were the last one. It was event two zero one, indus Which was in October of 2019, and the participants in there are April Haynes, who was the former deputy director of the CIA, who's been managing coverups her entire life. The Guantanamo Bay and and other, right, on the senate, and it's and she's right. She is now the director that, DNI director of national intelligence, which makes her basically the highest ranking officer at the NSA, which managed the pandemic. So you have a spy industry. Who is convening these pandemic simulations, and in each of these simulations, going back 20 years, They're not, they're not simulated, they're assimilating a public health response, they're not doing the kind of things, how do we stockpile vitamin industry? How do we get people outdoors losing weight, you know, doing exercise? How do we develop an information grid? All the 15,000,000 doctors, frontline physicians all over the world, who are gonna be encountering this disease so we, so that we can get their information about what they're doing that works and what doesn't work and put together a model of, you know, okay, here are the drugs that repurposed drugs that are at work. Here are the treatments that work. None of that happened. We had an incredible opportunity for managing pandemic in a way that was, you know, intelligent and sensitive and, and, you know, devastating to the disease, but we didn't do any of those things. It was all about how do you use the pandemic to clamp down censorship? How do you use it to, you know, do forced lockdowns, which, by the way, the lockdowns, Every pandemic preparedness document that had been adopted by the major public health agencies, whether it was CDC, WHO, European Health Agency, National Health Services in Britain, all of them said you don't do lockdowns. You you quarantine the sick. You protect the vulnerable, and you, let everybody else go back to work because industry. Actually amplify the impacts of the disease. You will. If you isolate people, it makes them more vulnerable. It it makes it you know, it breaks down their immune system. And if you lock them in door, it's gonna spread the respiratory virus. And so all things they were doing were that they were drilling were about clamping down totalitarian controls. And if you look at that event, two zero one, which is still on YouTube, you can still look it up and go to the 4th seminar that day that were is broken into 4 parts. And remember, the people who are here, who are they? Abel Haines, the CIA, that now and, DNI director of national intelligence, who was the CIA deputy director. Former, Bill Gates, you know, a lot of Tony Fauci's people, the, the pharmaceutical industries, the big media, Bloomberg, etcetera, all the social media companies. And then somebody odd, who's George Gayo, who's the director of the Chinese CDC. So this is in October of 2019. Nobody knows about coronavirus there, and yet they're drilling a coronavirus epidemic world global coronavirus epidemic. Nobody's going to ever hear the word coronavirus. The Chinese first acknowledged it on January 1st. So 3 months later, We now know coronavirus was already circulating in Wuhan, and the Chinese knew about it at least by September 19th, so that's a month before that pandemic simulation. George Gail is the is the Chinese head of the CDC and the, the Chinese expert on coronavirus. So clearly he must have known that coronavirus was circulating on September 19th, a month before that simulation. The Chinese military kicked down the door of Wuhan lab, went in and took all of the genomic sequences industry, and started destroying the, you know, all the links between the lab and the virus and put a military general, General Way, in charge of the lab. So they clearly knew that it'd come from the lab and that it was already circulating. And it circulated out, you know, we we know down the subway line, the subway line that leads to the airport from the lab to the airport. So they knew it up in October, and they had the simulation in New York, and people there, some of those people must have known it was already circulating. And what are they talking about? The 4th simulation that day, and you can go up on YouTube right now and look this up. They talk about how do we, how do we stop people from saying that this came from a lab leak? And the people who are leading that discussion are the CIA director, April Haynes, deputy director, and George Gao from the Chinese CDC and Avril Haines says, no, essentially, she's saying George Gao is saying, we got a sense of social media. We gotta stop industry. I'm from saying it's a lab leak. Anybody who says that needs to be deplatformed. This is, you know, this is 6 months before all this started happening. And then, says, not only do we have to censor, but we need to flood the zone with voices who say, who dismissed the idea that this was a lab leak. So they were you know, there's either they're incredible soothsayers Or they, you know, or there's something weird going on with this that they were doing it. And that this isn't the first one. They were doing this again and again. They did it 6 months earlier, The same thing, another coronavirus epidemic. And they and I detail all of these in my book, and every one of them the CIA wrote the script for. Now when, when Biden gets in there or when, you know, at the beginning of the pandemic, Mike Pompeo, who's the secretary of state, Is it says, oh, you know, this looks like may have come from Wuhan. We should check this out. So he has 4 different branches of state department to do an investigation, a massive investigation about whether it's come from Wuhan. If you read Catherine Even's article on Vanity there. She does an amazing job at this, and she shows that intelligence officers came into one of those meetings later on this We're shutting this whole thing down because the US government, which means Fauci but also the CIA, was funding all of that research of that lab. So Fauci was funding Fauci funded about $26,000,000. The CIA was the biggest funder through USAID, about 64,000,000, and then the Pentagon was the 2nd biggest. Of all it wasn't just Fauci. It was the whole us intelligence military apparatus that was basically handing over Cutting edge military technology, bioweapons technology, these Chinese scientists who were messing with is really a strange thing. And then, So then they you know, the intelligence officer shutting down the investigation, which which Catherine even documents. And then but then Republicans in congress when Biden comes in, say, hey. You gotta investigate this. You gotta figure out because there's mounting evidence that it can't that will unlab. So he says, okay. I'm gonna do it. He says, I'm gonna get all 22, US intelligence agencies to get together and and figure this out. And he said, and come back to me in 90 days. Who does he put in charge of it? April Hayes. So she's, I, you know, then she comes with a thing that says, well, nobody knows. We'll never know. You know, she comes with this report 90 in August of 2021. Nobody knows. We're never gonna be able to find out. The intelligence agencies say that we can't figure it out. And, So it doesn't, you know, it doesn't have to do with optics at the same person, and, you know, and she continues to be the primary, Adviser to president Biden on these on, you know, on on coronavirus. I'm just finishing now this book on, the Wuhan lab. And I, you know, I had to kinda put together this history, which was fascinating because, You know, why was the CIA so involved with gain of function and so obsessed with it? And I went back and and kinda this history, which is The CIA was created in 1947, and the 1st task that it was given was operation paperclip, which had already been ongoing. The joint chiefs were already bringing it over, but that was bringing over all the Nazi weapons scientists, many of them indus Who were destined for the gallows in Nuremberg, and they and the CIA created these rat lines to smuggle them out from under the nose of Nuremberg and bring them over to Fort Detrick and to other these, you know, weapons labs. A lot of them are new scientists, but a lot of them were bioweapon scientists because Antler and, Goebbels at, or, Goering had a, a huge bioweapons program, and they've done a lot of work on it. They had a lot of cutting edge stuff. At the same time, the biggest bioweapons program was in Japan, and it was, managed by a scientist called Shiro Ishii, who was just this indigeni like scientist who was doing human experiments that were, you know, as bad as anything that the Nazis said, but the He then was, brought into under the US wing and protected from the Russians who wanted to hang him. And they brought all those scientists over that, you know, not, it was, it was called Japanese paperclip. So on that program, they brought all the Japanese scientists And those scientists who who initiated the US bioweapons program at its birth, not only imprinted it with a lot of their, you know, cell cultures, etcetera, but also with a lot of their, I would say ethical elasticity or ethical lacunae. So there and that continues to, you know, to sort of infect the entire bioweapons program. Now We put huge amounts of money into bioweapons. In 1969, we had nuclear equivalents. They were bragging that they could kill everybody, in basically, everybody in the world for 29¢ a a person, 29¢ a death. This is what they were, you know, this is what they were going for. That's success. They do the opposite of science. They were, you know, scientists are the opposite of medicine. Medicine tries to save people's lives. All of these, you know, microbes, etcetera. And they were trying to enhance the microbes and make them antibiotic resistance, to make them spread faster, to make them deadlier, etcetera. 1969, Nixon goes in there and shuts down the whole program. And everybody's shocked. And those guys were very angry. Now here's what happens. And they live, they're living in the basements, The Pentagon, and they're trying to bring this back. The CIA is secretly doing bioweapons. They they they leave Fort Detrick indus all their cultures illegally, and they store them in these warehouses in New York. And they and they're trying constantly through the neocons will become their allies to to, revive the program. Then 911 happens. And 911, the, they, the neocons ring off of the shelf indus The Patriot Act, which basically is the beginning of the surveillance state in our country. Nobody reads it. The only Congressman to read it was my campaign manager, Dennis Kucinich. And he was in congress at that time, and he told me Not one copy was available to any congressman. The 350 act had suddenly appeared the day after 9/11 and that dismantles basically the United States Constitution. Interestingly, that act, which nobody read, had a provision in it that revokes effectively the Geneva Convention and the Nixon's bioweapons charter. So All of the, you know, the so it basically relaunched the bioweapons, arms race. There were 2 guys who were blocking it, Patrick Leahy and Tom Dashel, a week later, they're stopping it. They're not gonna let it pass. A week later, they get envelopes filled with anthrax in their offices. Congress is shut down. They're shut up. And while Congress is shut down, the Patriot Act gets passed, and the Patriot Act relaunched the arms race. So the military begins and by the way, industry. That anthrax, which was also used as the excuse for going into Iraq and invading Iraq because Saddam Hussein did it, we were told. It turns out after a 2 year investigation, the FBI came back and said that anthrax was AIMS anthrax, Highly sophisticated. There's only 1 place in the world that could've come from, Fort Detrick, which is the CIA Pentagon lab. So At that point, the Pentagon began pumping a lot of money into bio weapons, about 2,000,000,000 a year, but they don't wanna do it because they don't know what the Patriot Act is actually, you know, legal because the Patriot Act, what it says is we're not revoking the Geneva Convention. We're not in the bio web at the charter. But we're making law that any federal official that violates those 2 bills cannot be prosecuted. So the bill so the treaties are still in place, but, you know, they give an exemption to all federal officials. The Pentagon's not sure that that's legal. And by the way, if you violate those provisions, and even it's a death penalty, you get hanged. But they were worried about doing it. So they, instead of putting any in houses, Pentagon, they put it all in NIH in Tony Fauci shop. They give him a 68% raise, which is why he became the highest paid federal official in history. He was making more $450,000 a year. The president only makes four industry. Because of that military, salary, the 68% rate is the military. So he had to do bioweapons development. That's why he was gonna do a data function. And then in 2014, 3 of the bugs escaped from lapsed in the United States, And everybody finds out about it. Congress has hearings. 300 scientists write letters to Obama saying sign a letter to Obama saying you gotta shut down Tony Fauci. He's gonna create an epidemic. Obama shuts down all of Fauci's projects. Orders them closed, has a moratorium, and a doesn't shut them down. He continues doing them, and then he starts shipping everything over to Wuhan where he can do it offshore, out of sight of, you know, these federal overseers and all the the nosy scientists like Richard Ebright and The others from the Cambridge Working Group who were horrified by what he was doing. And that's kind of why the short story of why, you know,
Video Transcript AI Summary
Major strategic problems in global communication have led to the spread of disinformation about the pandemic on social media. State-sponsored groups are creating accounts to sow political discord and gain financial advantages. Violence against healthcare workers and minority populations is increasing. Different countries are implementing limited internet shutdowns to manage the overwhelming amount of misinformation. Experts agree that identifying every bad actor is a huge challenge, and new disinformation campaigns are generated daily. Some believe that controlling access to information is necessary to combat the problem. However, it's not just trolls spreading fake news, but also political leaders. It's crucial to ensure that accurate public health information reaches the public through various outlets. Misinformation is causing unrest, eroding trust, and hindering response efforts. Governments are implementing interventions, including internet shutdowns and penalties for spreading harmful falsehoods. Social media companies are trying to limit misuse of their platforms, but it's a complex issue. The public is losing trust in both misinformation and the measures to control it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have called this meeting today because of major strategic problems around communication that are happening globally. And here's a media debate that just happened on air today. Speaker 1: Alarming news emerging from social media companies today about the CAPS pandemic. Twitter and Facebook are reporting they've identified and deleted a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading disinformation about the outbreak. For more on this, we go to our correspondent, Catalina Parks. Chen, these accounts were created by several state sponsored groups intending to sow political Court and some individuals are seemingly seeking to gain financial advantages. Violence against health care workers and minority populations has been increasing. A recent ride highlights the real danger in these posts. Countries are reacting in different ways as to how best to manage the overwhelming amounts Of dis and misinformation circulating over the internet. In some cases, limited internet shutdowns are being implemented to quell panic. Thank you, Catalina. For more on this, we are joined by experts on crisis communications and social media, Kevin McAles and Sarah Lee. Speaker 2: To me, it is clear countries need to make strong efforts to manage both myths and disinformation. We know social media companies are working around the clock to combat these disinformation campaigns. The task of identifying every bad actor is immense and experts agree that new disinformation campaigns are being generated every day. This is a huge problem, that's going to keep us from ending the pandemic And might even lead to the fall of government, as we saw in the Arab Spring. If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it's the right choice. Speaker 1: I agree with Kevin. This is a big problem and doesn't even account for the massive amounts of misinformation being generated by legitimate users about the pandemic. But it's not just trolls who are spreading the fake news. It's often political leaders themselves. Who's to judge what's real or not? Would we trust every government to separate truth from lies? Speaker 2: I think this is more than just keeping the bad information out. It's also about making sure real public health information reaches the public. News is found from outlets other than social media. News organizations, public health groups and companies need to help people take the right actions to protect themselves by promoting accurate, Real information about the outbreak. Speaker 0: Okay. For more on this, we're going to get a briefing from our communications expert, Doctor. Selle. Speaker 3: Global health experts have highlighted that this and misinformation are wreaking havoc on the CAHPS response. Health workers are under attack in a number of locations due to rumors that they are purposely spreading this disease. And response efforts in many places have had to be suspended because of concerns around violence. Pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing the CAPT virus so they can make money on drugs and vaccines. And have seen public faith in their products plummet. Unrest due to false rumors and divisive messaging is rising and is Exacerbating spread of the disease as levels of trust fall and people stop cooperating with response efforts. This is a massive problem, one that threatens governments and trusted institutions. Polls have shown that mis and disinformation are ubiquitous. At least 90% of the public has been exposed to these messages. At the same time, misinformation messages come from a variety of sources, Even government officials. And often, governments are contradicting one another. We know that social media is now the primary way that many people get their news. So interruptions to these platforms could curb the spread of misinformation, but could also limit access to information from legitimate sources. Health ministries around the world are attempting to combat mis and disinformation By amplifying public health messaging through social and traditional media. But they are being outpaced by false and misleading information. National governments are considering or have already implemented a range of interventions to combat misinformation. Some governments have taken control of national access to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content. And a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, Including arrests. Other countries have taken a more moderate approach and have focused on promoting fact checking efforts and working with traditional media outlets, Yet these approaches are limited in scope. Social media companies report that they're doing all they can to limit the use of their platforms for nefarious or misleading purposes. But this is a technically difficult problem and false, misleading or half true information is difficult to sort without limiting potentially true messages. The bottom line is that members of the public no longer know who to trust. Both the misinformation and the measures to control it have led to a crisis of
Video Transcript AI Summary
There have been more cases and deaths reported in China. Misinformation is spreading, with some people believing the virus was man-made by a pharmaceutical company. It is important to train healthcare workers so they can provide accurate information and not spread false information. Access to reliable communication is crucial, and working with telecommunication companies can help ensure this. Trusted sources should be used to amplify the message and address disinformation. It is necessary to respond quickly to false information that hinders efforts to combat the pandemic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: More cases in China and also death cases reported. And also my staff told me that before, obviously, there's misinformation and there are some belief, people believe this is a man made, some pharmaceutical company made the virus. So there are some violations and even that is because of this misinformation. I saw from like the citizen and I don't know if Steve agree with me. When you are doing the field work and you like to do some so called QOT, training of trainers. So we really need to train the health workers. We try to have care workers, their access to the places, to the public. So make sure they got the right information. So not necessarily sometimes, the healthcare workers, they know something. But they, if they are not well trained, they might give the wrong information, but also they might say something, Oh, I don't know. Even I don't know, that could hurt. So when I remember, that's such a situation reminded me. When I was, early on, I was interviewed by radio, the national radio. I was asked by 1 of the audience to say, okay, we believe Ebola was manmade, is transported from somewhere. So this is, I think, this is very important, we do the TOT. So make sure the health care workers have the right information. Okay. Thank you. Gabriel? Speaker 1: Very much agree with that. So I mean, I think, I agree with a lot of what's been said. I'd just add to it maybe by saying that, I think, one of the things we want to do is work with telecommunication companies to actually ensure that everybody has access to the kind of communications that we're interested in providing, because that's going to be critical for dealing with, obviously, The explosion of the disease. And then another issue I suppose is just through that, if you have a trusted source, I believe in the idea that we shouldn't be trying to control communication, but rather flood the zone in a sense with a trusted source that then is influential community leaders as well as health workers, as Brad noted and others on these issues in order to try to amplify the message that's coming through. And I think Tim is absolutely right. I certainly seen the value of communicating constantly on these issues, so as to continue to deal with sort of the vacuum that can be created in this circumstance. But then also with the comments made about the fact that For all of the disinformation that will be put out, it's going to be important to actually have a response to those questions and to those concerns, as Steven said and I understand from staff that actually there are also intelligence sources identifying multiple foreign disinformation campaigns and so on. But it's all a part of a larger piece, which is to say that every time there is something that comes out that is in fact false information that is starting to actually hamper our ability to address the pandemic, then we need to be able to respond quickly to it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
To address disinformation and misinformation, it is important to bring together other countries and trusted interlocutors who can counter false narratives. This includes survivors, employers, faith leaders, and health workers. Collaboration with the private sector is also crucial in removing false information. Having reliable national and international sources, such as the UN and WHO, is essential in combating government-led misinformation. Trustworthy international organizations need to work together to spread trust and counter disinformation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tools that you can bring to bear to try to address that situation, not the least of which is bringing together other countries to effectively take action against them for the kind of campaigns that they're propagating. But it's but generally, I mean, I would say the disinformation, the line between disinformation and misinformation is not always an easy one to find. And the reality is, the greatest weigh to impact it, in my experience, is not to let it sit. So in other words, find your trusted interlocutors that are capable of saying this is not acceptable, this is in fact the truth, here's the information. And I think the community of survivors is one example, but there's a whole series, employers, trusted faith leaders, health workers and so on can be part of that. In addition, obviously, you want to work with the private sector and those who are spreading information generally to see that they can bring things down that are in fact lies or false information that's being put forward as a way to minimize it. But having a source, a national source, an international source, other trusted sources and really guiding everybody towards that information is one of the most effective ways to deal with a situation like that. Great. I have Martin to Speaker 1: it comes back to misinformation on a level of government of countries, then we need, as Sophia mentioned, trustable international organizations, UN, WHO and they have to come together to get together to spread this trust and to work against this. We cannot hold governments From doing misinformation on their own. So, a fully trust of disinformation in organizations. Tom, just to build on that.
View Full Interactive Feed