TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @onlydjole

Saved - September 13, 2025 at 11:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Shocking claims have emerged regarding the Israeli attack on Doha, raising questions about Qatar's lack of defense. The Qatari foreign ministry condemned the attack, which targeted Hamas leaders, but many in Doha were unconvinced by Israel's justification. Military expert Yuri Knutov suggested that Qatar's Patriot defense system was remotely disabled by the U.S. during the attack, highlighting concerns over reliance on foreign-operated defense systems. The incident has sparked regional outrage and may prompt countries to reevaluate their security strategies in the future.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇮🇱💥🇶🇦‼️Shocking claims of military expert Knutov: Why Qatar missed the Israeli attack on Doha‼️ September 10, 2025 The attack on Doha opened up the question of why the Qatari capital had no protection at a time when Israeli planes were hitting targets in the very heart of the country. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Qatar's foreign ministry immediately issued a strong condemnation of the attack, while Tel Aviv claimed the targets were top Hamas leaders staying in Doha. According to them, "measures" were taken to reduce the damage to civilians. However, in Doha, that argument did not meet with understanding. What particularly resonated was the claim of Russian military expert Yuri Knutov, director of the Museum of Russian Air Defense Troops. He told the newspaper "Vzglyad" that the system of American origin, "Patriot", with which Qatar protects its skies, was remotely turned off at the time of the attack. "I'm sure the Americans just turned them off," Knutov said. His explanation illuminates the technical side of the problem: The Patriot is a complex system that works in a network with satellite reconnaissance and early warning aircraft. Precisely because of this, it has the ability for Washington to remotely block it - to prevent the systems from opening fire on American aircraft or missiles, but also to be able to keep it under control in certain political circumstances. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

There comes a parallel. Knutov recalls that at one point, Turkey decided to turn to the Russian S-400, precisely because of mistrust of American conditions and fear that the key system could be shut down at a crucial moment. It turns out that Qatar has now experienced a scenario that Ankara did not want to experience. The attack itself caused violent reactions throughout the region. Hamas announced that a delegation that was discussing a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip was hit. Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Iran and Saudi Arabia immediately condemned the Israeli action, and a critical tone also came from the United Nations. Tel Aviv, however, stands by the version that he acted against the leadership of Hamas. However, an open question remains: did Qatar turn off its systems on its own, or did the decision come from outside, from Washington, as Knutov suggests? 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

If the second option is correct, then a serious debate is opening up in the very heart of the Persian Gulf - how reliable are the anti-aircraft defense systems that are held in the hands of the Allies, but operated by someone else. And while the dust surrounding this attack has not yet settled, the feeling remains that Doha has experienced a double blow - from the outside, military, and from the inside, technical. And in the long run, it may change the way many countries view their own security.

Saved - August 22, 2025 at 12:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Kremlin has thwarted China's ambitions to acquire valuable Russian underwater assets, specifically the Borei-class submarines, which Chinese analysts deem crucial for stealth operations amid rising tensions in the South China Sea. Despite Beijing's interest and attempts to negotiate, Moscow firmly rejected any discussions on technology transfer, viewing the Borei as a strategic nuclear asset. This situation highlights the complex relationship between the two nations, as China struggles to match Russia's capabilities while contemplating whether to accelerate its own military development or seek other alternatives.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇨🇳🇷🇺‼️The Kremlin cut off Chinese ambitions: Beijing failed to get its hands on Russian sea treasures‼️ August 21, 2025 The Chinese media openly admitted – Beijing wanted to get hold of one of the most valuable Russian assets under the sea, but it ran into Moscow's closed door. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

While the world is talking about Russian S-400 systems, Su-57 aircraft with reduced radar visibility and Orashnik missiles, Chinese journalists from Soho point out that one gem stands out above all - the Borei-class submarines. Analysts from Beijing do not hide the reasons: the rising tension in the South China Sea reminds the authorities that they need a technique that can move silently and unnoticed, even under the nose of the adversary. Their Project 094 Djinn submarines, though numerous, do not have that level of stealth. Borei, they say, is a different story – capable of staying out of range of all sensors for weeks and practically merging with the depths of the ocean. It is precisely this "high survival" that Beijing desires. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Despite wanting to buy whole series of these submarines, the Chinese attempt failed. The Kremlin, writes Sohu, did not fall for the offer and made it clear that the transfer of such technology cannot even be discussed. In Moscow, they believe that Borei is a strategic advantage at the level of a nuclear arsenal and that it would be tantamount to suicide to hand it over to another country. "They would rather let it rot than give it to others," a Chinese source said. This situation opens up an interesting picture of the relationship between two powers that rely on each other in many ways. On the one hand, Russia has already proven that it knows how to share some of its weapons with its partners, but Borei remains a line that it does not cross. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

On the other hand, China, although it invests huge resources in its own industry, admits that it is difficult for it to reach the Russian level in some segments. In the background of everything, the question remains - if Beijing cannot rely on Moscow in this area, will it accelerate the development of its own projects or will it look for alternative ways? The answer to that could significantly determine the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific for years to come.

Saved - August 13, 2025 at 2:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on the upcoming Putin-Trump meeting in Alaska, highlighting key developments. The summit will take place at Elmendorf-Richardson military base, with potential ceasefire conditions including the withdrawal of Ukrainian forces and recognition of Crimea's status. President Zelensky has refused to withdraw troops or acknowledge Russian control but is preparing the public for peace talks. He recently met with Chancellor Merz in Germany to discuss ceasefire terms, while activists plan protests during the summit.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇺🇸🇷🇺‼️What is known about the Putin-Trump meeting‼️ Here are the most important events taking place in the context of the upcoming Russia-US summit in Alaska: 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

▪️ The meeting of the presidents will be held at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage, CNN reported. ▪️Probable conditions for a ceasefire: withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donbas; freezing of the front along the line of contact in other regions; recognition of the Russian status of Crimea by the US; lifting of anti-Russian sanctions; guarantees that Ukraine will not join NATO. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

▪️Zelensky refused to withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the Donetsk region and to recognize Russian control over other regions. However, he has already begun to prepare the population for the end of the conflict: he said that Ukraine had endured a “war of independence” and even promised to let young men under the age of 22 go abroad. ▪️ As a result of the negotiations, airstrikes may stop, hopes Zelensky’s adviser Mikhail Podoljak. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

▪️ Zelensky arrived in Germany to participate with Chancellor Merz in online negotiations with Trump. It is believed that they will discuss the terms of a ceasefire. Earlier, Merz said that “Russia must compensate Ukraine for damages in the amount of at least 500 billion euros.” ▪️ During the summit in Alaska, Ukrainian activists and the left-wing American party “For Socialism and Liberation” will hold rallies for Ukraine and against Trump.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Die Sprecherin kündigt an, dass heute ein weiteres Telefonat mit Präsident Trump geführt wird, und betont, dass sie sich gemeinsam mit der US-Regierung intensiv auf ein europäisches Treffen vorbereitet. Sie hofft, dass Präsident Selenskyj an diesem Treffen beteiligt wird. Es wird betont, dass über Territorialfragen zwischen Russland und Amerika nicht hinter dem Rücken Europas oder der Ukraine entschieden werden darf; darauf wird eine enge Abstimmung mit den USA verwiesen. Es wird erläutert, dass europäische Sicherheit nicht weiter von Russland bedroht werden darf und kein Frieden einen russischen Aggressionsakt belohnen darf. Die Botschaft lautet, dass es Konsequenzen geben muss – entweder durch erhöhten Druck auf Russland oder durch Einsicht, dass der Krieg nicht fortgesetzt werden kann. Es wird Dank für den engen Dialog mit den Amerikanern ausgesprochen, und was am Freitag in Alaska passiert ist, soll nicht unbeantwortet bleiben. The speaker announces that she will have another phone call with President Trump today, and emphasizes that she and the U.S. government are intensively preparing for a European-level meeting. She hopes that President Zelenskyy will participate in this meeting. It is stressed that discussions about territorial issues between Russia and the United States must not be held behind Europe’s or Ukraine’s backs; there is close coordination with the United States. It is explained that European security must not be further threatened by Russia and that no peace should reward Russian aggression. The message is that consequences must follow—either through increased pressure on Russia or through the realization that the war cannot continue. Gratitude is expressed for the close dialogue with the Americans, and what happened Friday in Alaska should not go unanswered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Werde noch heute ein weiteres Telefonat mit Präsident Trump führen. Wir bereiten uns intensiv auf europäischer Ebene zusammen mit der amerikanischen Regierung auf dieses Treffen vor. Und wir hoffen und gehen davon aus, dass die Regierung der Ukraine, dass Präsident Selenskyj an diesem Treffen beteiligt wird. Wir können jedenfalls nicht akzeptieren, dass über die Köpfe der Europäer, über die Köpfe der Ukrainer hinweg über Territorialfragen zwischen Russland und Amerika gesprochen oder gar entschieden wird. Ich gehe davon aus, dass die amerikanische Regierung das genauso sieht, deswegen gibt es diese enge Abstimmung. Wir können nicht akzeptieren, dass die gesamte europäische Sicherheit von Russland aus weiter bedroht wird. Und deswegen kann es hier keinen Frieden geben, der russisches aggressives Vorgehen belohnt und möglicherweise weiteres Vorgehen ermutigt und ermuntert. Das ist die Botschaft, die wir hier gemeinsam ausgesprochen haben. Und ich bin dankbar, dass wir da in einem sehr, sehr engen Dialog mit den Amerikanern sind. Das, was am Freitag in Alaska passiert, darf nicht ohne Ergebnis bleiben. Es muss Konsequenzen haben, entweder in die Richtung, dass der Druck auf Russland noch einmal vergrößert wird oder dass Russland von sich aus einsieht, dass man diesen Krieg nicht fortsetzen kann.
Saved - August 4, 2025 at 5:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers on Russia's "Dead Hand" or "Perimeter" system, which is designed to ensure retaliation in the event of a nuclear attack. Following threats from U.S. President Donald Trump, analysts highlighted that even if the U.S. and U.K. successfully strike major Russian cities and leadership, the Perimeter system would autonomously launch up to 4,000 nuclear missiles at the U.S. and NATO allies if no response is received. The discussion emphasizes that a nuclear conflict with Russia would result in mutual destruction, leaving no victor.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇷🇺💥🇺🇸‼️"Dead Hand": The perimeter system makes a potential US nuclear attack on Russia pointless‼️ August 3, 2025 After US President Donald Trump's threats to Russia and his verbal conflict with the Deputy President of the Russian Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, Western analysts once again reminded of the nuclear capabilities of Moscow and Washington. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

It is noted that the "Dead Hand" system mentioned by Medvedev, which is also called "Perimeter", makes an attack on Russia pointless. If the USA and Great Britain launch a coordinated nuclear attack on Russia, destroying all major cities and killing the military and political leadership, Russia has a backup system of retaliation - "Dead Hand" - Western experts warn. This system works automatically and in the above-mentioned situation it will timely collect data confirming a nuclear strike (radiation, thermal radiation, seismic activity) from sensors all over Russia, after which the Perimeter will wait for a certain time for instructions from the control center in Moscow. 👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
If the USA and UK launch a coordinated missile attack on Russia, destroying major cities and killing Putin and military leaders, Russia's "Dead Hand" system would activate. Sensors would confirm the nuclear strike via radiation, heat, and seismic activity. If no response comes from Moscow's command center, Dead Hand will assume leadership is eliminated. The system will then autonomously launch approximately 4,000 nuclear missiles at the USA and its NATO allies. This automated retaliation system ensures Russia retaliates, even in death, triggering global devastation. The use of nuclear weapons guarantees widespread destruction, highlighting the fragile balance of power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If The USA and UK launch a coordinated missile attack on Russia, destroying all major cities and killing president Putin along with the entire military leadership, Russia has a backup system in place for retaliation, the Dead Hand. This automated system is designed to respond to such a scenario. Sensors across Russia will collect data on radiation, heat, and seismic activity confirming the nuclear strike. The system will then await instructions from Moscow's command center. If no response is received, dead hand will assume the leadership has been wiped out. At that point, the system will autonomously launch approximately 4,000 nuclear missiles at The USA and its NATO ally, triggering global devastation. Destruction will be widespread, ensuring that even in death, Russia retaliates. This kind of automated retaliation system ensures that no matter the outcome, the consequences of such an attack would be catastrophic. In the end, the use of nuclear weapons guarantees destruction, a grim reminder of the fragile balance of power

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Without receiving a response, which can only happen in the physical absence of leadership, the Perimeter will automatically launch up to 4,000 nuclear missiles at the territory of the United States and its allies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. In a word, this system guarantees that there will be no winner in a nuclear war with Russia. The West will be completely destroyed! Therefore, anyone who thinks that they can defeat the world's largest nuclear superpower - Russia, with impunity - is either frivolous or crazy.

Saved - July 16, 2025 at 12:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
If a long-range missile were launched towards Russia, its true nature—conventional or nuclear—would remain uncertain, leading to potentially catastrophic consequences. Military experts, including former US officer Stanislav Krapivnik, emphasize that this ambiguity could prompt a preemptive response from Russia, escalating tensions significantly. With Ukraine's leadership indicating a commitment to pressure Russian territory and potential new military support from the US, the situation is precarious. Krapivnik warns that any delay in response could be seen as weakness, risking uncontrollable escalation.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇱🇷🇪🇺🇺🇦💥🇷🇺‼️If a long-range missile were to fly towards Russia, no one would know what it was carrying - and the consequences could be unfathomable‼️ July 15, 2025 More and more statements indicate that the current phase of the geopolitical crisis could soon enter a significantly more tense period. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Sources from military and political circles state that scenarios involving long-range systems are being considered, the presence of which on Ukrainian soil is no longer just a matter of speculation, but is being discussed more and more openly in expert analyses. According to former US officer and analyst Stanislav Krapivnik, one of the most dangerous problems concerns the uncertainty of launching these missiles. He explains that, if a long-range missile is fired from Ukraine in the direction of Russia, the Russian military command will not be able to determine in real time whether it is a missile with a conventional or potentially nuclear warhead. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

"At that moment, when the rocket takes off and heads towards the territory of Russia, no one can know for sure its real character," says Krapivnik. According to him, this puts the leadership of a nuclear power in front of a difficult choice - whether to wait for confirmation of the type of warhead or to react preemptively in order to avoid the worst scenario. Exactly this scenario, in which uncertainty can cause a chain reaction, was previously mentioned by Russian President Vladimir Putin on several occasions. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Krapivnik warns that in such a situation there would be great tension and that there is a real danger that the target party will interpret any such attack as a possible start of nuclear escalation. "It is no longer a question of military assessment, but a question of survival. At that moment, any country with strategic assets can decide to immediately respond as harshly as possible - and without warning," he points out. In particular, he emphasizes that, if missiles like the German "Tauraus" or the American "Tomahawk" were to be used, the response could include targeting the place of their production - including the facilities in the European countries that supply them. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Such a reaction would not be driven by political signals, but by the fear that any moment of delay could have catastrophic consequences. In this context, the announced address of the US President Donald Trump comes. According to information reported by the American media Axios, Trump could announce a new plan to help Ukraine, which includes systems of greater range. If this happens, analysts believe, it would mean a radical change in approach and an additional complication of the security situation in the region. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

At the same time, the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, announced that Ukrainian forces will "do everything" to put pressure on Russian territory. Such statements further heighten concerns that certain cities could come within range of long-range systems - which would raise the question of how Moscow would react if it judged it to be in imminent danger. Regarding the possibility of Western countries to continue the transfer of equipment, Krapivnik reminds that it no longer depends on surpluses, but on the redirection of resources from active units. "This is no longer a political message - this is a real change in the military capacities of the West," he says. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

In conclusion, he warns that any delay in taking decisive steps could open the door to an escalation that no one will be able to control. "If the first incident goes unanswered, it can be interpreted as weakness. And in the world of strategic powers, weakness is not forgiven," concludes Krapivnik.

Saved - July 15, 2025 at 7:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The EU is focusing on developing long-range missiles in response to Russia's military advancements. American General John Rafferty highlighted the need for missiles that can strike deep targets, as demonstrated in Ukraine. The U.S. plans to deploy missiles in Europe, but European leaders seek assurance amid changes in the American administration. Germany and Great Britain are working on missiles exceeding 2,000 km, yet analysts warn that Europe needs U.S. support to meet NATO's requirements. The ELSA program aims to enhance European autonomy, but its progress is slow.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇪🇺‼️EU wants rockets that fly thousands of kilometers: New technological goal in focus‼️ July 13, 2025 As the military dynamic changes, NATO faces a reality: Russia is investing more and more in long-range missiles, and NATO does not have enough of its own assets to respond without US help. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

American General John Rafferty, who until recently commanded the artillery in Europe, warns that Moscow has increased the size of the army and continues to invest in advanced technology. In an interview with Reuters, Rafferty emphasized that the war in Ukraine clearly demonstrated the importance of missiles that hit targets deep behind the lines. That is why his former unit is preparing to deploy US missiles in Europe - including tomahawks and a new generation of hypersonic weapons - from 2026. However, given the change in the American administration, European leaders are looking for confirmation that the plan is still valid. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Germany and Great Britain are already developing missiles with a range of over 2,000 km, while existing European systems - such as Storm Shadow and Taurus - reach only a few hundred kilometers. Although MBDA as the leading European arms manufacturer provides certain opportunities, analysts admit: without American help, Europe cannot independently cover all the needs of NATO. The ELSA program, launched in an attempt to strengthen European autonomy in this area, is still in its infancy. The question is whether by 2030 Europe will have its own effective deterrent. Meanwhile, the political pace is dictated by the military – and the room for maneuver is shrinking. Source: 👇👇👇 👉https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/nato-needs-more-long-range-missiles-deter-russia-us-general-says-2025-07-11/👈

Saved - June 25, 2025 at 10:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was surprised by the U.S. reaction to Putin's announcement about the Oreshnik missile system's serial production. Military analysts noted that this marks a significant shift for Russian missile forces, moving beyond short-range and intercontinental systems. Putin confirmed the start of production, highlighting its potential effectiveness in coordinated military actions. While the Oreshnik is designed for accuracy and lacks wide destructive range, it can carry nuclear warheads, making it strategically important. Analysts are closely monitoring its deployment and implications for global security.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇷🇺‼️USA surprised by Putin's statement about the Oreshnik missile system‼️ June 24, 2025 The American reaction to the announcement of serial production of the Russian "Oreshnik" missile system has attracted the attention of military analysts. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

In the article published in the specialized magazine Military Watch Magazine, it was pointed out that the start of serial production of this weapon is a kind of turning point for the Russian missile forces. "The introduction of the 'Oreshnik' system into operational use marked an important point in the development of Russian ballistic capabilities, which until now relied mainly on short-range missiles such as the 'Iskander-M', as well as on intercontinental range systems such as the 'Sarmat'," the magazine said. The authors also remind that the performance of this system, after its first use last year, caused concern among numerous member countries of Western security alliances.👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Let us remind you that the day before, Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed that serial production of the Oreshnik medium-range missile system had begun in the country. Back in November last year, on November 21 to be precise, Putin announced for the first time that the testing of this weapon was successfully carried out. It was announced at the time that the test was carried out in response to the active use of military equipment produced in Western countries, and the target of the attack was a facility within the defense industrial complex of Ukraine. The Russian president emphasized that, if this system were to be used on a larger scale and in one coordinated action, its effectiveness could reach a level that in military circles is compared to the power of a strategically important weapon.👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

However, as he pointed out, "Orešnik" does not belong to the category of weapons that have a wide destructive range, because it is characterized by a high degree of accuracy and does not carry special types of charges. Despite that statement, experts remind that the "Orešnik" system is actually designed so that it can also carry nuclear warheads if necessary. According to available military estimates, the maximum range of this missile reaches between 2,000 and 2,500 kilometers, which makes it particularly significant in the range of medium-range systems. Also, the design of the rocket allows carrying one to three warheads, depending on the configuration and type of charge. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

This technical flexibility additionally increases the strategic importance of "Orešnik", especially in the context of the announced increase in the number of these systems in operational use. Foreign analysts are now carefully watching how this system will be deployed in the coming months and what consequences it will have for the security balance in Europe and beyond.

Saved - June 24, 2025 at 6:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have left Tehran at a crossroads, with potential responses ranging from increased secrecy in its nuclear program to retaliatory strikes on US bases. Analysts are divided on the damage and future of Iran's nuclear ambitions, suggesting a shift towards decentralization and reduced transparency. The possibility of a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has emerged, pending a decision from Iran's National Security Council. Such actions could escalate the conflict, impacting the global energy market and drawing in international responses.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇮🇷⚔️🇮🇱🇺🇸‼️ What will be the consequences of the US strikes on Iran?‼️ After the US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Tehran is facing key decisions — from suspending transparency in its nuclear program, to possible strikes on US bases, to a blockade of Hormuz that could push the world into a new energy crisis. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

More than a day has passed since US strategic bombers carried out strikes on three key facilities of Iran's nuclear infrastructure, and analysts remain divided on the possible consequences — both in terms of the damage caused and Tehran's next steps. ☢️ The Future of Iran’s Nuclear Program 🔹 Even if Iranian sources claim that the timely transfer of radioactive material and relevant equipment to secure locations is confirmed (and satellite images have emerged that suggest this may be the case), all indications are that the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program in its current form is over. 👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
The GBU 57 bunker buster is a 13.6-ton bomb designed to destroy underground fortresses. Dropped from 30,000 meters, it penetrates 60 meters of concrete upon impact due to its speed and design. The bomb's forged steel alloy resists heat and pressure, maintaining its solid form during impact. Adjustable tail fins ensure missile-like precision, calculating the angle and speed of the dive. A special fuse delays the explosion, allowing the bomb to burrow deep underground. Some versions explode in stages: drilling a hole, pushing the warhead deeper, and then detonating.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How does The US GBU 57 bunker buster penetrate 60 meters of concrete? It may look like an ordinary bomb, but this 13.6 ton giant is built to destroy underground fortresses. Imagine a b two stealth bomber dropping this steel monster from 30,000 meters. It falls so fast that when it hits the ground, it slices through concrete like cutting through tofu. Its warhead is an ordinary metal. Its forged steel alloy that resists heat and pressure ensures it keeps its solid steel form at the moment of impact. Adjustable tail fins make it dive with missile like precision with perfectly calculated angle and speed. But the real power is inside. It doesn't explode right away. Instead, a special fuse helps it dig deep into the ground before going off. Some versions even explode in stages. First, it drills a hole, then pushes the main warhead in deeper, and finally causes a huge explosion underground.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🔹 Tehran has so far pursued a policy of partial transparency — openness about its basic capabilities, but a deliberately vague stance regarding its military ambitions. This strategy, conceived as a balance between dialogue and deterrence, has, however, ended in complete failure in both of its central goals. 🔹 Therefore, all prospects are that the future of the Iranian nuclear program, except in the case of capitulation, will include decentralization of capabilities and a dramatic reduction in transparency.👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🚀 Strikes on US bases 🔹 Speaking of the immediate consequences of the further course of the conflict, numerous sources announce inevitable retaliation in the form of strikes either on US bases in the Middle East or on diplomatic missions — this possibility is also taken seriously by regional actors such as Saudi Arabia, which has placed its forces on high alert, but also Qatar and Bahrain, which have declared a state of emergency. 🔹 Despite this, the prospects for uncontrolled escalation seem minimal — numerous analysts have interpreted the US decision not to use the capabilities transferred to the region in the attack as a way to avoid a long-term confrontation. Some Iranian sources have also announced that Tehran does not plan to allow "American interference" to disrupt plans related to Israel, which also indicates a greater chance of a limited response. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

💧 Blockade of the Strait of Hormuz 🔹 Finally, as perhaps the most significant direct consequence of the new escalation, the possibility of a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz appears, which was approved yesterday by the Iranian parliament, but which can only be implemented in the event of a decision by the National Security Council, which has not yet commented on the matter. 🔹 However, Washington has already warned that this step would represent a serious escalation that the US will not leave unanswered, and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also called on China to put pressure on Tehran to keep the strategically important sea route open.👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🔹 If Iran were to actually decide on a step that many consider radical due to its dramatic consequences for the global energy market, there is every chance that it would trigger the internationalization of the conflict, as dozens of countries would face the prospect of serious economic problems with no clear prospects for a solution. And it is not excluded that this is precisely the result that Tehran is striving for. 🔹 However, we can hardly expect a final decision on the future of the Strait of Hormuz today - it can be made at the earliest after tomorrow's consultations between the head of Iranian diplomacy and Russian President Vladimir Putin, since in the event of greater international attention, the Islamic Republic would have to be sure of the support of all its allies, which are not numerous at the moment.

Saved - June 24, 2025 at 6:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Germany and Italy are pushing to repatriate $245 billion worth of gold reserves currently held in the US, citing rising international instability and political tensions, particularly surrounding US monetary policy. Prominent figures, including former MEP Fabio de Masi and former Bundestag member Peter Gauweiler, emphasize the need for European countries to regain control over their gold. Concerns about the US administration's influence on the Federal Reserve have heightened calls for this initiative, reflecting broader issues of security and sovereignty in resource management.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇩🇪🇮🇹💰🇺🇸‼️FT: Germany and Italy intend to remove $245 billion worth of their gold from the US‼️ June 23, 2025 Political circles in Germany and Italy are increasingly calling on the authorities of their countries to withdraw part of the gold reserves from the United States of America and return them to Europe. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

As the Financial Times writes, it is about stocks with a total market value of more than 245 billion dollars. In the background of these appeals there is an increasingly pronounced instability on the international level, as well as political tension in the United States itself. In particular, the current debate between US President Donald Trump and the Federal Reserve, the US central bank, which refused to lower the key interest rate despite the president's expectations, attracted public attention. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Former MEP and current member of Germany's Sarah Wagenknecht Alliance - For Reason and Justice Fabio de Masi told the FT there were "serious reasons" to return gold reserves to Europe, especially "in these troubled times". According to the data of the World Gold Council, Germany and Italy rank second and third in the world in terms of the amount of gold reserves - right behind the USA. Germany has more than 3,300 tons of gold, while Italy has about 2,400 tons. Despite that figure, more than a third of the gold bars of both countries are kept in safekeeping at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York.👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Former member of the German Bundestag from the ranks of the Christian Social Union, Peter Gauweiler, in an interview with the FT, pointed out that the Bundesbank should not make concessions when it comes to the safety of the state's gold reserves. According to him, it is time to ask the question whether keeping gold abroad is still the safest option. "The answer to that is obvious," Gauweiler said, alluding to the need to move reserves out of the US. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

A similar position was expressed by the president of the Taxpayers Association of Europe, Michael Jager. "We are very concerned that President Trump is undermining the independence of the Federal Reserve," Jager said, stressing that it is important for European countries' central banks to have full and unrestricted control over their reserves at all times. He confirmed that his organization has already sent letters to the ministries of finance and the central banks of Germany and Italy with the request that they reconsider the existing dependence on the Federal Reserve. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

This initiative is not new. At the end of May, the German newspaper Bild wrote that the European Association of Taxpayers and several politicians from the ranks of the Christian Democratic and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) appealed for the immediate return of part of the gold reserves from the USA to Germany or, more broadly, to Europe. As Jager stated at the time, Germany's gold reserves could attract the attention of the US administration in the future, which further increases the concern in political circles. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

While the world faces uncertainties in international relations, questions about security, sovereignty and control over strategic resources are increasingly coming to the fore, and gold, as an eternal guarantee of stability, once again occupies a central place in European discussions.

Saved - June 15, 2025 at 10:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The situation in the Middle East is escalating, with sirens in Tel Aviv and explosions in Iran as the conflict intensifies. Despite Israel's requests for US involvement in attacks on Iran's fortified nuclear facility at Fordow, the Trump administration has firmly stated it will not engage directly in the conflict. While the US supports Israel through air defense and intelligence, it aims to avoid a broader war that could destabilize the region. The recent military operations by Israel have provoked Iranian retaliation, raising questions about the future of negotiations and potential escalation.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇺🇸 🇮🇱💥🇮🇷‼️Times of Israel: USA refused to join the war with Iran‼️ June 15, 2025 While sirens wail over Tel Aviv and explosions rock the Iranian capital, a diplomatic twist is taking place behind the scenes that could determine the course of the crisis in the Middle East. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Despite the open calls of Israeli officials for Washington to get directly involved in the conflict with Iran, the administration of President Trump has made it clear that the United States will not participate in attacks on Iranian territory. The information was reported by the Times of Israel and other Western media, citing a senior US administration official, who confirmed that over the past 48 hours, Israel has repeatedly asked the US to join the attacks, especially on the deep-seated nuclear complex in Fordow. The facility, which is located under a mountain massif and additionally fortified with special concrete layers, is considered by Israel to be crucial to Tehran's nuclear program — but also extremely difficult to destroy without American help. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

But a cold shower has arrived from Washington. "We are not currently considering direct involvement in an armed conflict," the US official said. In other words — Israel is left to campaign alone. It is important to point out that the rejection does not mean a complete absence of American support. The White House has previously activated air defense systems to help Israel defend against Iranian missiles, and cooperation on intelligence and logistics remains intense. The US also made it clear to Iran that any attack on US interests would be met with "full force". 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

While the Israeli forces' Operation Rising Lion rocked multiple targets in Iran -- including uranium enrichment facilities and Revolutionary Guard facilities -- Iran's response was not lacking. Explosions rocked Tel Aviv, Bat Yam and even Jerusalem. According to media reports, industrial and military complexes were hit in Tehran, and among the victims were prominent nuclear scientists, including the former head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization. It is interesting that all this followed immediately after the information appeared that the USA and Iran were on the threshold of resuming the indirect negotiations on the nuclear agreement, planned in Oman. Those negotiations are now, as sources close to the UN say, "on ice." 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Analysts believe that the US decision not to get directly involved in the conflict is actually an attempt to balance - on the one hand, Trump does not want to look like a weak ally of Israel in an election year, and on the other hand, going to war with Iran could cause a regional cataclysm, an increase in oil prices and chain political consequences throughout the world. In translation - America stands with Israel, but does not go into the trenches with it. At least for now. In the background of everything, the key question remains: is this rejection a signal that the crisis is calming down - or silence before an even bigger blow?

Saved - June 14, 2025 at 12:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights about a coordinated disinformation campaign by Israel and the U.S. to mislead Iran regarding an impending military attack on its nuclear facilities. Key figures, including Trump and Netanyahu, played significant roles in this deception. While publicly discussing negotiations and normalcy, Israel prepared for military action, even postponing a planned wedding to maintain appearances. Historical parallels were drawn to past operations, highlighting the effectiveness of this strategy. The outcome remains uncertain, but initial results suggest a successful operation against Iranian commanders.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇺🇸🇮🇱💥🇮🇷‼️Secret plan to deceive Iran: How Israel and Trump fooled Tehran when the attack was already ready‼️ June 13, 2025 Israel and the United States have conducted a multi-layered disinformation campaign in an attempt to convince Iran that an attack on its nuclear facilities is not an immediate option. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

As an Israeli official revealed to the Times of Israel, everything was carefully coordinated, and US President Donald Trump played a key role in this operation. According to the official, Trump was informed of the upcoming military operation as early as Monday, when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the final decision to launch an attack. That day, Netanyahu and Trump talked on the phone for 40 minutes. Shortly thereafter, Israel's Channel 12 received information from anonymous sources that during that conversation, Trump allegedly told Netanyahu to "take the attack off the agenda" while negotiations with Iran continue. According to an Israeli official, this information was part of a carefully planned deception. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

The very next day, Netanyahu released a video statement in which he spoke of "significant progress" in negotiations with Hamas over the hostages. Foreign Affairs Minister Gideon Saar supported that message in a joint statement with his Zambian counterpart. The officials claimed to the journalists that the cabinet session on Thursday will be devoted to that very topic. However, Arab officials involved in the hostage negotiations claimed that in reality there had been no progress, and expressed suspicion that Netanyahu was using the statements to politically pressure ultra-Orthodox lawmakers and prevent the collapse of the coalition. And that story, it turns out, was part of a wider deception. The real goal was to create the impression that Israel was more focused on negotiations than on preparations for military action. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Israel wanted to sell Iran the story of considering a possible attack, but not before new talks were held with Washington. In that spirit, it has been announced that Secretary of State for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer and Mossad chief David Barnea will travel for alleged talks with US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. The official version was that the trip was aimed at "clarifying Israel's position" ahead of a new round of talks between Tehran and the US scheduled for Sunday. However, there was no answer from Netanyahu's office when asked directly where the meeting would take place. Today it is clear that the meeting was not planned at all. It was all part of an effort to reassure the Iranians that an attack was not imminent — at least not before Sunday. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

At the same time, Israel tried to give the impression of a normal state on the outside. The Prime Minister's Office announced that, despite growing tensions in the region and some media speculation, Netanyahu will not cancel his planned weekend vacation in the north of the country. An additional element of this performance was the preparation for the wedding of Avner Netanyahu, the prime minister's son, scheduled for next week. Many interpreted this as an additional signal that a major military operation was unlikely. Preparations were going according to plan, and police had already erected iron barricades and barbed wire around the luxury Ronits Farm hall in Kibbutz Yakum, north of Tel Aviv, on Thursday. The ceremony has now, as expected, been postponed. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

"Trump played the game together with Israel. It was total coordination," the same Israeli official told the Times of Israel. On Thursday, Trump said an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities "could very easily happen" but also suggested restraint, saying the possibility of a deal with Tehran was "pretty close" if Iran relented on its atomic ambitions. The American ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said on the same day that it is unlikely that Israel would make such a move without a "green light" from Washington. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

This disinformation strategy is not new for Israel. On the eve of Operation Cast Lead against Hamas in 2008-2009. In 2008, the then government of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced a cabinet session dedicated to "global jihad", while the real topic was preparing for the attack. After the session, the announcement spoke of the banning of 35 Islamist organizations, while Gaza was mentioned in only one sentence. Just one day later, the opening of border crossings with Gaza and the continuation of negotiations were announced. On Saturday, suddenly, Israel launched an attack and in the first day eliminated more than 200 people by bombing Hamas police stations. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

In this latest case, it is still too early to judge with certainty whether the disinformation campaign has fully succeeded. Nevertheless, the prelude to Israel's air campaign against Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile sites proved astonishingly effective. According to the Israeli newspaper, senior Iranian commanders were eliminated in their homes, apparently without any sense that they were in danger. Notably, no Israeli minister has released details of the operation — an unusually high level of discipline compared to earlier leaks during the Gaza fighting. This time everyone played their roles perfectly.

Saved - June 14, 2025 at 12:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Retaliation escalates as Iranian missiles strike key Israeli targets, including the Ministry of Defense in Tel Aviv, in a coordinated operation named "True Promise 3." This follows Israeli attacks that reportedly killed high-ranking Iranian military officials and targeted critical nuclear facilities. Iran's Supreme Leader condemned the Israeli actions, predicting dire consequences. As tensions rise, regional powers call for restraint, while the U.S. monitors the situation closely. The conflict now threatens significant military and strategic implications for both nations.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇮🇷💥🇮🇱‼️Retaliation in full swing: Iranian missiles hit key targets in Israel‼️ June 13, 2025 As the world wonders where this maze of events is leading, Tehran and Tel Aviv are sinking ever deeper into open confrontation. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

According to the official statements of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), dozens of missiles launched on the night between June 13 and 14 as part of the operation called "True Promise 3" hit several strategic locations on the territory of Israel. Among the targets, according to the information reported by the Iranian agency IRNA, was the building of the Ministry of Defense in Tel Aviv - twice. The IRGC statement goes one step further: it states that collected field reports, satellite images and intelligence confirmed the accuracy of the strike. It is claimed that it was a "coordinated and successful" action, although statements from the Israeli military leadership come about the successful interception of a large number of enemy missiles. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

But despite those claims, Israeli forces appeared to be under fire from multiple directions. Iranian sources mention as many as three waves of missile strikes. This response came only a few hours after Israeli forces launched their own operation called "Rise of the Lion", which according to reports from the field was carried out in several parts of Iran, including the capital Tehran. In those attacks, as reported by regional media, high-ranking members of the Iranian military and security apparatus lost their lives. Among them is the Chief of General Staff of the Armed Forces of Iran, then one of the commanders of the IRGC, as well as several important scientists who, as stated, were part of the national nuclear program. Key nuclear facilities - Fordov and Natanz - were also hit in the attacks, which was immediately assessed as an extremely risky move in diplomatic circles. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, reacted quickly and harshly. In his address to the nation, he called the Israeli attacks a "crime" and said that the Israeli side "started a process that will end with its bitter and terrifying fate." While reports from Israel remain scant for now, and Israeli Defense Force officials avoid more specific comments, the fact is that the operation is taking place on multiple levels - military, informational, and political. At this point, the exact damage and number of casualties in both directions remain unknown, but the intensity of the messages and military activities clearly indicate that both sides are counting on a longer period of tension. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

And as the world tries to figure out whether this is a limited exchange of strikes or the start of something much bigger, regional powers including Saudi Arabia and Turkey are urging restraint. US President Donald Trump has not yet issued an official statement, but the White House has leaked information that the situation is being "closely monitored and analyzed at the highest level." Meanwhile, what is clear is that the ground of the Middle East is shaking again, and that the strategic cards have been seriously shuffled. It is no longer just isolated bases or targets of dubious military importance that are under attack - now top security facilities, command centers and scientific institutes are at stake. And when such symbols come under fire, the question is no longer what happened - but what comes next.

Saved - May 25, 2025 at 12:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the insights of military observer Alexander Artamonov regarding hypersonic weapons, emphasizing that Russia holds a significant advantage due to its advanced metal alloys capable of withstanding extreme temperatures at hypersonic speeds. He argues that the U.S. lacks the necessary technology and scientific foundation to develop comparable materials, leading to failures in their hypersonic demonstrations. Artamonov asserts that Russia's operational hypersonic missiles, like the Avangard, showcase their technological superiority, while claims of technology theft by the U.S. are unfounded.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇷🇺🔥🇺🇸‼️The secret of Russian alloys: The key to hypersonic success that America does not have‼️ US President Donald Trump has claimed that Russia stole hypersonic weapons technology from America, but military observer Alexander Artamonov has dismissed the claim, explaining why it is false. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Artamonov detailed why the United States lags behind Russia in developing hypersonic weapons, pointing to key differences in technological capabilities and scientific basis. According to Artamonov, Russia's key advantage lies in its ability to develop special metal alloys that enable hypersonic rockets to function. He points out that at hypersonic speeds - which start at Mach 4.5 - the rocket creates a cocoon of plasma, due to which the temperature becomes extremely high. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Under these conditions, standard metals begin to melt and deform, similar to candle wax. To prevent this, advanced metal alloys that can withstand such temperatures are necessary, and Russia is among the few countries that possess the technology to produce them. 👇 https://t.co/99YMKV4AxH

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

"The United States does not have the technology to produce these materials, nor the scientific research base that would allow them to develop such alloys," said Artamonov. According to him, even today, the US does not have a school of thought that would allow the creation of such advanced materials. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Artamonov pointed out that the US tried to demonstrate its hypersonic capabilities, but that these attempts failed. According to his description, American rockets reach hypersonic speeds only by falling from a height, thanks to gravity, which makes them completely unusable for controlled flights. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

"Their rockets are like stones falling from a height." They can reach hypersonic speeds, but they don't have controllability," Artamonov explains, adding that the US is far from solving the problem of a hypersonic propulsion system and construction, which would enable the long-term functioning of such missiles. He points out that the current American attempts are at the level of technology of the 1950s. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

The US demonstrations include ultra-thin rocket facilities, which are too fragile to contain the necessary propulsion systems and combustion chambers. According to Artamonov, this clearly shows that the US does not have the basic elements needed to develop a functional hypersonic weapon. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Unlike the US, Russia has operational hypersonic missiles, such as the Avangard, which reach speeds of Mach 23. These missiles are not only faster than any other missile in the world, but they are also controllable from Earth, which is a technologically extremely complex problem that Russia has solved. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

The details of this achievement remain a military secret, but the result is clear - Russian hypersonic weapons are far ahead of the competition. In addition to Avangard, Russia is developing other hypersonic systems, including the Kinzhal and Zircon missiles, which further confirm Russia's superiority in this area. Artamonov notes that this success is based on a combination of advanced science, technology and young experts, who are leaders in their fields. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Artamonov also pointed out that the US has a long-standing practice of appropriating foreign technologies. Instead of developing its own innovations, the US often uses a strategy of attracting foreign experts and scientists, who develop technologies on its behalf. This practice is not new and is often used in various industries, including military technology. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

According to Artamonov, claims that Russia stole hypersonic technology from the US have no basis in reality. On the contrary, Russia is a leader in this field thanks to its own scientific and technological achievements, while the US is trying to catch up with Russian capabilities, but without significant success. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Trump's claims of technology theft could have a political background. They may be aimed at discrediting Russia's achievements and distracting attention from US lagging behind in this area. Hypersonic weapons have become a symbol of technological and military supremacy, and the US does not want to admit that it has lost the race with Russia. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Russia stands out as a world leader in the development of hypersonic weapons, thanks to advanced technologies, especially in the field of metal alloys and propulsion systems. https://t.co/zlsEjTrQTi

Saved - May 18, 2025 at 12:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The announcement of the Russian submarine "Knyaz Pozharsky" nearing operational status has alarmed Poland and its allies. This Borey-A class submarine carries 16 Bulava intercontinental missiles, each with a range of up to 10,000 kilometers and capable of deploying multiple warheads. While it has yet to conduct its first missile test, its recent movements suggest imminent readiness. The submarine symbolizes Russia's strategic shift in naval power, particularly in the Arctic, where geopolitical interests are intensifying. The reactions in Poland highlight the growing concern over this military advancement.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇷🇺☝️🇵🇱‼️16 missiles with a range of 10,000 km on one submarine: the Russian nuclear colossus shocked Poland and its allies‼️ May 17, 2025 At a time when the global security climate is becoming increasingly tense, the Polish public is alarmed by the announcement that the Russian submarine "Knyaz Pozharsky" (Prince Pozharsky) is approaching its first major operational phase. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

It is a submarine of the Borey-A class, the pinnacle of modern Russian naval engineering, which carries in its arsenal what is already called "doomsday missiles" in the West - as many as 16 Bulava intercontinental missiles. According to information published by the Polish newspaper Dziennik, the Russian Navy is ready to further strengthen its North Sea fleet with this underwater giant. And it's not just another submarine - it's a symbol of a new phase of Russian naval strategy. "Knyaz Pozharsky" uses the OK-650 nuclear reactor for propulsion, and its crew numbers about one hundred people. The vessel is able to remain on mission for a long period of time, and what worries Western observers the most is the range and payload of its missiles. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Bulava missiles, which were specially developed for this class of submarines, have a range of between 8,000 and 10,000 kilometers, which covers almost the entire northern hemisphere. Each of them can carry up to six separate thermonuclear warheads, which, in theory, allows a single ship to target multiple continents simultaneously. Although such assessments are common in analyst circles, they have been particularly loud in Warsaw in recent days. Polish journalists emphasize that "Knyaz Pozharsky" has not yet performed its first trial launch test of the "Bulava" missile, which is standard procedure before the start of full operational engagement. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

But the recent sailing from Severodvinsk clearly indicates that that moment is near. The main stronghold of the Northern Fleet is located there, which further strengthens the assumptions that this particular ship will be the second active representative of the "Borey-A" project within that strategic unit. In the background of the story there is a wider context. Russia is not only building these submarines as a military tool – they are also a political message. According to Western comments, "Knyaz Pozharsky" is part of a wider plan to strengthen the presence in the Arctic region, the strategic significance of which is growing day by day. Sea routes, natural resources and new energy hotspots - all of this intersects precisely in that cold region of the planet. We should not lose sight of the fact that the Northern Fleet already has several nuclear submarines, and many of them are undergoing modernization. So this is not an isolated case, but part of a bigger picture. 👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
**Original Language Summary:** Военно-морской флот приложит все усилия, чтобы корабль прошел все виды испытаний и завершил государственное испытание в срок боевой стрельбой. Существуют три этапа: закладка доски, спуск на воду, и передача крейсера военно-морскому флоту. Экипаж прошел обучение и подготовит корабль к приему в боевой состав флота. При выводе из эллинга судостроители монтируют в корме подводной лодки ящик, скрывающий винт, так как по количеству лопастей и их форме можно понять шум, издаваемый лодкой под водой. **English Translation:** The navy will make every effort to ensure the ship passes all tests and completes state tests on time with live firing. There are three stages: laying the board, launching, and transferring the cruiser to the navy. The crew has been trained and will prepare the ship for acceptance into the navy. When leaving the slipway, shipbuilders install a box in the stern of the submarine, concealing the propeller, as the number and shape of the blades reveal the noise the boat makes underwater.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Силою Честнаго и Животворящего Христа, Честных Небесных, Умных Сил Безплотных, Бездушными ли весы Правит и крепкою твоею рукою Speaker 1: грозь человеческую Конечно же военно-морской флот приложит все усилия чтобы корабль прошел все виды испытаний, завершил государственное испытание в установленный срок боевой стрельбой и завершил свое строительство и рождение. То есть вот эти вот три фазы и три этапа, когда первый это заложили доску, начали строительство, второй спустили на воду, и третий самый основной, когда из ваших рук товарищи и коробелы военно-морской флот получает крейсер, то есть это подъем военно-морского флота. Я уверен, что мы своевременно поручим этот корабль. Экипаж прошел все виды обучения и сейчас вместе с заводчанами в установленный срок подготовит корабль к приему в боевой состав военно-морского флота Корабль для решения поставленных игроком. Поздравляю вас всех, спасибо, успехов. Speaker 2: При выводе из эллинга судостроители всегда монтируют в корме подводной лодки вот такой своеобразный ящик. Все дело в том, что эта часть корабля одна из самых секретных там прячется винт, а по количеству лопастей, по их форме можно понять какой шум будет издавать лодка под водой.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Russia invests in silence and depth, aware that naval power is not a matter of numbers, but of the ability to remain invisible - until you become decisive. In this sense, the reactions from Poland, although they seem agitated, perhaps best testify to the seriousness of the moment. Because when the very possibility of testing a missile is perceived as a threat, it is clear that the line between symbolism and real power has long since been erased. And perhaps that is the essence of the whole story - in an era when the world is again divided along the lines of silence, speed and range, a submarine that cannot be seen, but is known to exist, becomes more powerful than anything that floats on the surface. Source: 👇👇👇 👉https://wiadomosci.dziennik.pl/swiat/artykuly/9799370,ma-16-glowic-zaglady-nowy-atomowy-okret-podwodny-rosji-wyszedl-w-morz.html👈

Ma 16 głowic zagłady! Nowy atomowy okręt podwodny Rosji wyszedł w morze Nowy okręt podwodny Floty Północnej poważnie wzmocni arsenał nuklearnego odstraszania Rosji. Kniaź Pożarski może przenosić do 16 rakiet balistycznych Buława, z których każda wyposażona jest w cztery do sześciu głowic nuklearnych. Pociski te są kilkadziesiąt razy silniejsze niż bomby atomowe zrzucone przez Amerykanów na Japonię podczas II wojny światowej. wiadomosci.dziennik.pl
Saved - May 16, 2025 at 1:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently discussed the secret testing of China's J-50 fighter jet, which has sparked significant interest among military analysts. The aircraft features a new circular nozzle design, indicating advancements in engine technology. Unlike its predecessor, the J-50 employs multiple prototypes for faster development. It boasts active wing surfaces for enhanced maneuverability, positioning it alongside advanced jets like the F-22. This development reflects China's push for technological sovereignty, challenging perceptions of its role in aviation innovation. The J-50 symbolizes a strategic shift in military capabilities.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇨🇳‼️What's behind the secret testing: China's J-50 stirred up the world - New generation aircraft in the sky‼️ May 15, 2025 China's J-50 Tested in Secret: A New Phase in the Air Domination Race At a time when tensions in the Asia-Pacific region are increasingly being felt in the skies, China has – quietly and without fanfare – conducted a test of its latest fighter jet, the J-50. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

The footage that appeared on the networks triggered an avalanche of comments among military analysts. And not without reason: what immediately caught the eye is the change in construction - the new J-50 no longer has a rectangular two-vector exhaust body, but a circular nozzle, which many interpret as a sign of deep technological advances in Chinese engine development. The aircraft was seen in low flight, without the landing gear extended, with the side hatches closed - clearly, everything was ready for a real test. The Chinese portal Sohu was the first to write about this phenomenon, which previously reported on the development of Chinese aviation systems, but this time the attention was particularly focused on details that indicate what could be the sixth generation of fighter jets. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

The previous version of the J-50 used an exhaust system design similar to the American F-22 - a rectangular two-vector nozzle, which allows for a reduction in the infrared signature, but at the cost of reduced thrust efficiency and more complicated manufacturing. Now, by switching to a classic circular nozzle, Chinese engineers are probably saying they have solved key technical challenges. And not only that - if this is true, China may have taken a step that others are still planning. Another interesting thing is the way the J-50 was developed. Instead of a single prototype being upgraded in series, the Chinese team uses multiple prototypes in parallel. Thus, they discover weaknesses earlier, test different solutions at the same time and accelerate the transition to mass production. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

It is an approach that shows determination, but also a strategic reversal in the way of thinking about the development of weapons systems. The construction of the J-50 also includes active wing surfaces - movable tips that allow the profile to change in flight. This gives it exceptional maneuverability and, together with stealth solutions, puts it side by side with the most advanced aircraft such as the American F-22. Of course, this is all provided that the new design works as expected, because so far China has not made any official comments. Let us recall that the J-50 is part of the wider modernization of the Chinese air force. J-20 planes, known for the so-called "beast mode", which allows it to carry up to 12.7 tons of weapons - almost twice what the F-35 can carry. The PL-15 and PL-17 missiles, which are part of the arsenal of these planes, remain a special mystery, but very little is known about their range and accuracy. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Interest in Chinese systems further increased after Pakistan's J-10CE, based on Chinese technology, managed to eliminate India's Rafale. That event caused a veritable storm of commentary, especially in the American military establishment. Even the 1945 portal, which previously looked suspiciously at Chinese innovations, published as many as three separate analyzes devoted to the PL-15 missile. At the same time, the United States is trying to respond - the development of a completely new F-47 aircraft, whose main contractor is Boeing, has been announced. But things don't go smoothly. Deadline problems, lack of funds and complicated internal procedures slow progress. This further reinforces the feeling that China is scrambling ahead while others are still gathering the pieces of the puzzle. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

The appearance of the J-50 is not just another new aircraft – it symbolizes how China is building its technological sovereignty and self-reliance in the field of aviation. And if the new elements shown by this test are confirmed as successful, it will be a serious message to all those who until now thought that Beijing is still playing the role of a technological follower. Maybe it's time to rethink that image.

Saved - April 30, 2025 at 3:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come to realize that Finland's need for open borders with Russia is more pressing than I previously thought. For years, we relied on practical ties like tourism and trade, but after closing our borders and shifting our security stance, everything changed. Now, many of us feel a deep disappointment as Russia remains silent, leaving us to wonder if we’ve lost our relationship forever. Criticism of our leaders is growing, and there's a sense of panic about our future. Trust seems to have eroded, and I’m left questioning if it can ever be rebuilt.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇫🇮🇷🇺‼️The Finns realized with horror that they needed open borders more than the Russians‼️ In Helsinki, they believed for a long time that the neighbor on the other side of the border would "give in" at some point. That Russia, despite the insults and political twists and turns, will still show initiative and demand the normalization of relations. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

But the opposite happened - while nervousness is growing in Finland, nothing is heard from the Russian side. And that, it seems, is what hurts the most. For years, relations were built on practicalities - tourism, trade, daily visits. But from the moment Finland closed its border crossings and joined the new security architecture, everything stopped. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Now it turns out that an open border with Russia was much more important to that small Nordic country than the other way around. And many citizens admit it now, without embellishment. Recently, the President of Finland, Alexander Stubb, tried to start the topic of opening the border with Moscow - but not in diplomatic silence, but on the way, playing golf with the US President Donald Trump. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

It was as if he wanted to get Washington's blessing before making the first gesture towards Moscow. Although the talks were held at the end of March, the beginning of May is here, and the borders are still locked. On the Russian side - silence. In Helsinki, it seems, they expected that Moscow would recognize the "signal" and make the first move. But neither messages nor offers come from Russia. Because, as ordinary Finns notice more and more often, the Russian side no longer needs anything. And it becomes the number one topic on social networks. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Journalist Matti Kuusela, one of the few voices of reason, openly admitted that Finland should urgently open not only border crossings but also complete trade and diplomatic channels towards Russia. As he points out, that country was one of Finland's key trading partners - which now looks like a missed opportunity, not only economically, but also politically. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

At the same time, ordinary people in Finland are increasingly expressing their disappointment publicly. They write posts full of discomfort and fear - not from some threats, but from the fact that they may have lost stable relations with their powerful eastern neighbor forever. Beneath the surface, there is panic: "The Russians don't need anything anymore, and we don't have anything to get them back." One social media user grimly observed: "How do we get Russia to trust us again after all we've done?" Another adds: "Our leaders played too high politics, and now they would prefer to open the gates silently, but on the other hand - emptiness." 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Many are wondering - what to do next when turbulent political moves have turned Finland from a neutral state into, as some commentators say, "another desolate outpost of the great powers". Criticism of President Stubb is becoming more frequent: "Why would Russia help economically when these same leaders dragged us into a bloc that is actively distancing itself from Moscow?" There are also those who believe that everything is already lost. Comments like: "Let NATO feed them now", or "We don't need Finland, they are the ones who are losing access to the huge market and resources", are increasingly present in the Russian internet space. 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Even in diplomatic analyses, it is pointed out that Helsinki has not shown an iota of remorse for its anti-Eastern rhetoric - only concern for economic losses. And while more and more space is opening up for quiet reflection in Finland, the Russian position remains clear in its silence: there will be no requests, no initiatives. Because borders, as it seems now, are no longer a matter of geography - but of trust. And it seems to have been spent. And the question is whether it will ever be renewed.

Saved - August 10, 2024 at 9:27 PM

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇷🇺✈️🇺🇸‼️ Once an F-16 and a Russian fighter met ...‼️ 😄😄😄 https://t.co/iRvlqNjmRK

Saved - February 20, 2024 at 8:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Shocking news from Germany: Putin was negotiating with Washington and Berlin for the exchange of Navalny with intelligence officer Vadim Krasikov, who is imprisoned for the assassination of Zelimkhan Khangoshvili. Navalny's release was expected, and a recent arrest in St. Petersburg may be linked to the Russian authorities' attempt to obtain Krasikov. Putin had previously hinted at a potential trade involving Krasikov in an interview.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇩🇪‼️Shocking news from Germany: Putin was preparing the release of Navalny, but it didn't suit someone‼️ According to the German newspaper Bild, Moscow was in negotiations with Washington and Berlin on the exchange of Alexei Navalny. 👇 https://t.co/FqnXcW2MFH

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

According to the German newspaper Bild, Moscow was in negotiations with Washington and Berlin on the exchange of Alexei Navalny. The German tabloid claims that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to get the intelligence officer Vadim Krasikov, 👇 https://t.co/ICStYb0oKM

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

who is in a German prison for the liquidation of the former Chechen war commander Zelimkhan Khangoshvili in Berlin, in exchange for Navalny. - Alexei Navalny should have been freed - says the columnist of the German tabloid, Philip Pyatov. 👇 https://t.co/LAbjO7nMwr

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Allegedly, Navalny was supposed to be released in exchange for Krasikov. According to Bild, the recent arrest of a German citizen at St. Petersburg's Pulkovo airport could also be linked to the Russian authorities' intent to get hold of Krasikov. 👇 https://t.co/Tujl7HEVZa

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

In February, police found six gummy bears full of cannabis from a Hamburg resident who flew to St. Petersburg to visit his girlfriend, and now faces up to seven years in prison. 👇 https://t.co/0JIkLO24ke

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Putin previously hinted at the possibility of trading Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich for Krasikov in an interview with Tucker Carlson, though he did not directly name Krasikov. https://t.co/swIwNbu7aA

Saved - December 14, 2023 at 11:34 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The United States is transferring large amounts of weapons and supplies to Ukraine, raising concerns about the state of U.S. inventories. An analysis reveals that while most inventories can be replaced over time, there may be a potential crisis regarding artillery ammunition. The time required to replenish ammo and weapons stocks is a significant factor to consider.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

US inventory replacement time for key systems As the United States transfers massive amounts of weapons, munitions, and supplies to Ukraine, questions arise about the health of U.S. inventories. Are inventories getting too low? ... 1/...👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

... How long will it take to rebuild those inventories? An earlier CSIS commentary identified those inventories that are at risk as a result of transfers to Ukraine. This commentary continues that analysis by examining inventory replacement times. ... 2/... 👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Most inventories, though not all, will take many years to replace. For most items, there are workarounds, but there may be a crisis brewing over artillery ammunition. An interesting set of data shows the time required by the US to replenish their ammo and weapons stocks. 3/..👇

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

... More details: https://www.csis.org/analysis/rebuilding-us-inventories-six-critical-systems

Rebuilding U.S. Inventories: Six Critical Systems Are U.S. weapons inventories getting too low because of transfers to Ukraine? Although most inventories are acceptable, some key munitions will take many years to replace. Often, there are workarounds, but there may be a crisis brewing over artillery ammunition. csis.org
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 2:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
By dismantling American imperialism and the unipolar world order, the entire world, including the USA, stands to benefit. The only losers are the "Deep State" seeking control over people's lives globally. With the US stepping away from its role as the world "sheriff," it can focus on resolving its internal issues and improving the lives of its citizens. Instead of meddling in others' affairs, the US can prioritize its own well-being. This shift heralds the end of unipolarism and the establishment of a new, multipolar world order based on international law. Americans should rejoice, as this change promises a better future for everyone.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇺🇲‼️By destroying the unipolar world order and American imperialism, the whole world will win, including the USA itself‼️ The loser is only the "Deep State" that wants to rule the lives of all North Americans, South Americans, Europeans, Africans, Australians, Asians ... 👇 https://t.co/ax6RBAJh6d

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

However, the US, abandoning the role of world "sheriff", could fully devote itself to solving its own internal social, economic and other existential problems, its prosperity and improving the lives of its citizens. 👇 https://t.co/MxVAs8MoLI

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Instead of solving other people's problems, the US can solve its own. And so, gentlemen Americans, citizens of the USA, don't worry, be happy! Rejoice in the overthrow of American imperialism and hegemonism, 👇 https://t.co/0luP2fG2qh

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

the disappearance of unipolarism, based on some "rules" and the creation of a new, multipolar world order based on international law! Rejoice, Americans, because the whole world, including you, will be much better off! https://t.co/fl68g4uIfQ

Saved - August 17, 2023 at 2:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US secretly deployed 150 nuclear warheads in Europe to blackmail Putin. However, Russia was already two steps ahead, strengthening its nuclear grouping and deploying weapons in Belarus and Kaliningrad. Russia's nuclear arsenal serves as a deterrent against US aggression, not for intimidation. Moscow's actions have thwarted American plans for nuclear blackmail, showing readiness in the Ukrainian conflict. Russia prioritizes strategic security, unlike the US.

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇺🇲💥🇷🇺‼️The US was secretly preparing for nuclear blackmail, but Putin is already two steps ahead...‼️ The US has secretly deployed around 150 new nuclear warheads in European countries in an attempt to blackmail Vladimir Putin. 👇 https://t.co/w1IyAoScx0

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

However, the Russian leader was already two steps ahead, writes Observateur Continental. As noted by the French edition, Washington, secretly from the world community, deployed about 150 new nuclear warheads in its air bases in Belgium, Germany,👇 👉observateurcontinental.fr/?module=articl…👈 https://t.co/SjxrFR9lG3

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey. The US planned to use them to nuclear blackmail Russia, warning Moscow that it would not allow Ukraine to lose a military conflict. "The United States is ready to go to nuclear escalation in the event of the threat of a complete defeat of 👇 https://t.co/hSUDXmgs7I

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

the Armed Forces of Ukraine." To that end, the Pentagon has deployed additional nuclear weapons in Europe," the release states. Knowing about the plans of the American establishment, Russia took countermeasures, writes Observateur Continental.👇 👉observateurcontinental.fr/?module=news&a…👈 https://t.co/0qJazk5j8i

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

As a result of decisions made by Russian leader Vladimir Putin, Moscow is two steps ahead of Washington. "As part of the military cooperation between Moscow and Minsk, Russian nuclear weapons will be deployed on the territory of Belarus." 👇 https://t.co/9zAy0uBdL3

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

In addition, Russia has strengthened its nuclear grouping in the Kaliningrad region by deploying several additional operational-tactical Iskander missile systems in the region." Thus, the Kremlin not only ensured its strategic security, 👇 https://t.co/t2hTJezTqN

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

but also destroyed American plans for nuclear blackmail. Russia showed the American hegemon that it is ready for any development of the situation related to the Ukrainian conflict. "It is important to emphasize that, unlike the United States, 👇 https://t.co/q2W8NX7iUn

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Russia does not use its nuclear potential to intimidate the enemy." Russian nuclear weapons are used solely as a deterrent against the aggressive policies of the United States and its allies. 👇 https://t.co/pBcBGq5DJl

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Everyone knows that Russia does not intend to be the first to use its nuclear arsenal," adds Observateur Continental. https://t.co/Yv34shGI9x

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

🇫🇷: Les armes nucléaires américaines en Europe: un moyen de pression sur la Russie❓ URL: 👇👇👇 https://www.observateurcontinental.fr/?module=articles&action=view&id=4986 https://t.co/pb1XCwuqIp

Saved - June 17, 2023 at 11:49 PM

@onlydjole - Djole 🇷🇸

Putin: "Peace was signed between Ukraine and Russia in the spring of 2022." #Putin publicly showed the previously unpublished document in front of South African President Ramaphosa. (Nato reportedly sent disgraced US puppet Boris Johnson to force Kiev to back down.)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dear friends, I want to draw your attention to the fact that there were negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, led by the same president, in Turkey. These negotiations aimed to establish trust and peace. However, we did not agree with Ukraine on the nature of the treaty, which was called the Treaty on Permanent Security Guarantees for Ukraine. It consisted of 18 articles and included details about armed forces and weaponry. The Kiev delegation signed this document, but the Kiev authorities discarded it after we withdrew our troops. They treated it as history and disregarded its importance.
Full Transcript
Дорогие друзья когда от отказ от переговоров вот хочу обратить ваше внимание на то что при со того же президента э как вы знаете в Турции проходили прошла целая серия переговоров между россией и и украины по выработки и мир доверия гели о которых вы сказали по подготовке и самого текста договора этот договор мы не договаривались с украинской страной что он будет носить ко характер но мы никогда его не пред нет не не коммент этот проект этого договора был пара руководителем п группы и киева он поставил там свою подпись вот он он есть он так и называется договор о постоянном ней гарантия безопасности украины именно о гарантия о которых сказали уважаемый игрок президент республик 18 статей более того есть еще и приложение они знаете сейчас даже не буду об этом говорить они касаются и вооруженных в силах касается других вещей все прописано до единиц боевой техники и до личного состава вооруженных сил вот это документ он пор киев делегации подпись но после того как мы как обещали от вере войска вот киева киев власти как обычно делают их хозяева вы выбросили это все на свалку историю скажем так аккуратно и ин
View Full Interactive Feed