TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @onlythedeadknow

Posted - August 31, 2024 at 2:34 AM

Saved - August 31, 2024 at 10:00 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m concerned about the future of our public lands and national parks. The current Administration is pushing to lease these areas to companies like Blackrock, potentially limiting our access and harming the environment with wind and solar projects. Recent actions by the Biden-Harris Administration aim to expedite solar energy production on public lands, which raises alarms about the implications for wildlife and land use. I’ve shared more details in my pinned post and linked to other sources for further information. The situation feels alarming and urgent.

@onlythedeadknow - Soldier4Truth

Ok so do you like public lands and national parks? Do you like hiking, camping, fishing, hunting? What if I told you the current Administration wants to lease our lands to Natural Asset Type Companies under organizations like Blackrock so you have no access to them and they can destroy them with wind and solar? Crazy right? SEC/NAC a lot of people heard about but oh man they didn’t like that not pacing so they went around it with executive actions. Insane right? Receipts are in my pinned post but here is one from yesterday. Enjoy this crazy train to totalitarian control. AUGUST 29, 2024 FACT SHEET: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Takes Action to Deliver More Projects More Quickly, Accelerates Federal Permitting Today, the Biden-Harris Administration is announcing two new actions that will help build more projects, more quickly. •The Bureau of Land Management is announcing a roadmap to support expanded solar energy production by making renewable energy siting and permitting on America’s public lands more efficient. This action will help expedite reviews of solar projects by steering them to areas with high solar potential and low wildlife and land conflicts, and ease burdens on solar developers. The Bureau of Land Management will make over 31 million acres of public lands across eleven western states available for solar development, helping to deliver clean power to millions of homes. •The Environmental Protection Agency is announcing the conditional approval of a new rule which will allow for new offsets to create clean air credits in Maricopa County. Companies with vehicle fleets can now generate credits by replacing or retrofitting diesel-burning vehicles with electric vehicles. Manufacturers or other new emitters can then purchase those credits to balance out their future emissions. This will allow the county, which is now a center of semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S., to continue to build semiconductor fabs essential to our nation’s future and ensure that residents continue to have clean air. And OH SO MANY AGENCIES They do love that WHOLE OF GOVERNMENT THING Can’t leave anyone out that wouldn’t be very DEI of them after all. Seems like DOE Secretary may be a little corrupt? Now tie all that in to the documents in my pinned post and information from @MelKShow @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU @Margaret_ASL @ASL_Liberty WARNING: You may not sleep again until November 6th or January

Video Transcript AI Summary

Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm introduces SCITAP, a new portal designed to streamline federal transmission permitting to meet President Biden's goal of 100% clean electricity by 2035, which requires a 60% increase in transmission capacity. SCITAP aims to address permitting delays, which can currently take 4 to 10 years. The program has three main functions: First, the DOE will act as the lead agency and main point of contact for federal permitting. Second, SCITAP sets a two-year deadline for the federal review process, cutting the current average time in half. Third, the program incorporates community engagement planning into the application process to prevent future delays. All steps can be managed through the SCITAP portal.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm, and welcome to the CITAP portal, which is your new one stop shop for all your federal transmission permitting needs. As you know, president Biden has set this goal of 100% clean electricity by 2035. So to make that happen, we need to increase transmission capacity 60% over the next few years. So we need to build new lines at twice our current pace. And we know that right now, permitting is a huge obstacle. It should not take 4 years, let alone 10 years or more, just to get federal permits. We do not have that kind of time. So enter SCITAP. SCITAP is designed to help federal agencies permit transmission projects more efficiently without compromising on quality. So the program does 3 things. Number 1, it makes DOE the lead agency, the main point of contact to coordinate federal permitting in this space. No more trying to figure out what goes where in acronym city, what I sometimes call the federal government. Now we'll tell you exactly what you need, who to send it to, and how long the reviews should take. And we'll help make sure that our federal partners stick to that schedule. So number 2, SciTap puts a 2 year shot clock on the federal review process, and that cuts the current average in half. Huge. And then number 3, this program embeds community engagement planning into the application process. We wanna help you prevent delays down the line, and we have plenty of best practices to share. And best of all, you'll be able to do it all through one portal, the SciTap portal. From submitting your paperwork, to checking your project status, to mapping out your participation plans, and more. Your work is so important for helping us to meet this moment in American history. We need you to help us build a 21st century grid so that we're giving you 21st century tools to get that job done. There is no time to waste. Work with SaTAP. Work with DOE to bring your projects and America's clean energy future to life. Thank you so much.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker questions the Energy Department head about who truly runs the department, suggesting it could be mega-corporations or foreign billionaires funding conferences. The speaker brings up a report that over 130 officials in the energy department reported over 2,700 trades of shares, bonds, and options in companies that ethics officers said was directly related to the agency's work. The speaker reminds the Energy Department head that she previously stated she did not own individual stocks, which the speaker claims was false. The Energy Department head admits she was incorrect and believed she had sold all individual stocks. The speaker points out that the Energy Department head testified she didn't own any individual stocks, but didn't sell the stocks for another month, and waited another month before informing the committee. The speaker asks why she misled them and what she was hiding, also asking if Proterra was one of the stocks. The speaker notes the Energy Department head was on the board of directors at Proterra, made millions in stock options, and promoted Proterra.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And here's what I'm trying to figure out. I just wanna know who really runs the energy department. Is it you, or is it the mega corporations whose stock that you own that you're making profits in? Speaker 1: Oh my goodness. Speaker 0: Or maybe it's the foreign billionaires who fund your conferences. Let's try something else. Do you know the names of the foreign billionaires who fund the conferences you get to? When you were here last, I talked with you about the fact that more than a 130 officials in the energy department reported more than 2,700 trades of shares, bonds, and Speaker 1: options in companies that ethics officers said was directly related to the agency's Speaker 0: work. Ethics officers said was directly related to the agency's work. This is institutionalized corruption. And I asked you point blank, do you own any individual stock? And you told me, no. Let's just look at it. Was not a difficult question. Do you own individual stocks, madam secretary? You said no. In fact, you repeated it three times to me. No. No. No. Turns out, that was false. You did own multiple Speaker 1: Oh my goodness. Speaker 0: That was exactly my response. So why did you just leave this evening? Speaker 1: I believed that I had sold all individual stocks, and I was incorrect. So I came back You Speaker 0: just don't know your portfolio? Speaker 1: Pretty much. Speaker 0: It's a big one, I guess. No. It's extremely small. Apparently not. Someone manages it for you? Speaker 1: So I came back as soon as I found out that, in fact, I have not sold all individuals. Wait. Wait. Wait. No. That's not true either. Speaker 0: Let's just Speaker 1: look at the timeline. Let let's not I just remind you you're not. Speaker 0: Madam secretary, you testified you didn't own any indigenous stocks. You didn't sell the stocks for a whole another month. And after you sold the stocks, you waited another month before you informed this committee. Why did you mislead us, and what were you hiding? Why did you wait so long? Why did you hide this? You're here before this committee a year later, after actively misleading to us, after denying and delaying and delaying, and now you won't tell us. Is one of them Proterra? No. You said on the board of directors at Proterra, you made millions CNN reports and stock options at Proterra, then you you promoted Proterra stock and Proterra

Video Transcript AI Summary

A congressperson requested unanimous consent to insert articles into the record detailing Secretary Granholm's ethics issues, including articles from Reuters, CNN, Washington Free Beacon, and Fox News, as well as the Department of Energy's ethical policies. Since January 2021, Secretary Granholm has allegedly violated the Hatch Act multiple times, owned Proterra stock while President Biden promoted the company, and had her husband own Ford stock while she promoted the company. She allegedly cashed in on millions of dollars after these transactions and failed to disclose conflicts of interest. The congressperson claims she lied under oath to Congress about owning individual stocks. The congressperson states that anyone disputing these charges can consult the articles being put into the record.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I'm gonna get into a topic which I know is not gonna be popular, but I think it's really important. And so, Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent to insert 4 articles into the record detailing secretary Granholm's various ethics issues and two articles from the Department of Energy's website concerning its ethical policies. 1st, I just wanna Without exception. Thank you, mister, mister chairman. This is an article from Reuters. US secretary, energy secretary Granholm violated ethics laws, watchdog says. An article from CNN, Biden touts electric car company potentially worth 1,000,000 for his energy secretary. From Washington Free Beacon, energy secretary's husband held stock in Ford as administration approved 1,000,000,000 in electric vehicle subsidies. Next article from Fox News. Biden energy secretary Granholm admits false testimony about owning stocks. The next I wanna just point out and put these for the record, Mr. Chair, just so people have them. These are ethics, 14 principles of ethical conduct for federal employees. That's right on the Energy website. Ethics, impartiality in performing official duties. Wanted to be sure that Objection. Thank you, thank you, Mr. Chairman. So since taking office, I know secretary or my colleague Mr. Eiser referred to some of these issues, but since taking office in January of 2021, secretary Granholm has violated the Hatch Act multiple times. She's owned Proterra stock while her boss, president Biden, repeatedly promoted the company. We saw this huge payout. She admitted 3 months after she took office. Her husband owned Ford stock while she personally promoted the company's work with official resources, and she cashed in on 1,000,000 of dollars after these illegal transactions and failure to disclose obvious conflicts conflicts were revealed. As you said, you it took you, 3 months before you actually sold the stock. And most critically, she lied under oath to Congress claiming she did not own any individual stocks when in fact she did. Anyone disputing these charges could consult to these articles that I put in the record. They're available for everyone. And, I just want to go to, Madam Secretary. The DOE's ethical rules, or federal generally

@onlythedeadknow — Jack Thompson

Posted - April 21, 2024 at 5:41 PM

Saved - June 24, 2024 at 5:33 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Biden Administration has placed "climate Crisis," "global Health Security," and "One Health" under DOD Biodefense Authorities, according to their own documents. The strategy aims to prevent, detect, and respond to biological threats globally. The administration also supports the use of blockchain CBDC, digital ID, bio surveillance hubs, SEC/NAC, and medical passports under these authorities. The focus is on environmental sustainability and minimizing energy use. Critics argue that these measures could lead to a "digital gulag" and control over individuals.

@onlythedeadknow - Jack Thompson

Want hard facts and no opinions that The Biden Administration just placed the “climate Crisis”, “global Health Security”, and “One Health” under DOD Biodefense Authorities? Spread this far and wide. Use anything as your own. Warning It’s terrifying. But if people don’t get eyes on it before the end of May we are in more trouble than we are in now. Their own documents and words (second half in comments) U.S. GOVERNMENT GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY STRATEGY 2024 Released: APRIL 16, 2024 https://whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Global-Health-Security-Strategy-2024-1.pdf “This new Global Health Security Strategy lays out the actions the United States will take over the next 5 years to ensure we continue this progress and deliver on the goals established in my Administration’s 2022 National Biodefense Strategy and Implementation Plan and the bipartisan Global Health Security and International Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Act of 2022, enacted as part of the FY 2023 National Defense Authorization Act. Through investments and cooperation with foreign partners, we will continue to build our capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to biological threats wherever they emerge. And we will rally greater support for these efforts from other countries, the private sector, and civil society to ensure long-term impact.” Three Documents referenced in Strategy above: NATIONAL BIODEFENSE STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR COUNTERING BIOLOGICAL THREATS, ENHANCING PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS, AND ACHIEVING GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY OCTOBER 2022 https://whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/National-Biodefense-Strategy-and-Implementation-Plan-Final.pdf It “improves” on the 2018 DOD Biodefense plan by adding “Global Health” to it. “It is a vital interest of the United States to manage the risk of biological incidents, whether naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate. This National Biodefense Strategy and Implementation Plan for Countering Biological Threats, Enhancing Pandemic Preparedness, and Achieving Global Health Security updates the 2018 National Biodefense Strategy and serves as a foundational component of the President’s vision to create a world free from catastrophic biological incidents, laying out a set of objectives to effectively counter the spectrum of biological threats. It defines biodefense as actions to counter biological threats, reduce biological risks, and prepare for, respond to, and recover from biological incidents, whether naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate in origin and whether impacting human, animal, plant, or environmental health.” “Naturally Occurring Biological Threats. Biological threats can affect humans, animals, plants, and the environment, resulting in significant health, economic, social, and national security impacts. It is therefore important to address biological threats using a One Health approach that recognizes the interconnections among people, animals (domestic and wildlife), plants, and the environment. Infectious disease threats do not respect borders. Urbanization, climate change, habitat encroachment, economic interdependence, and increased travel, coupled with weak health systems, increase the ability of infectious diseases to spread rapidly across the globe. Novel infectious diseases, the resurgence and spread of once geographically limited infectious diseases, zoonotic diseases, and antimicrobial resistance can overwhelm response capacities and make outbreaks harder to control. As we have seen with the COVID 19 pandemic, an infectious disease outbreak—even in the most remote places of the world—could spread rapidly across oceans and continents, directly affecting the U.S. population and its health, security, and prosperity.” The W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty and/or IHR expansions is a massive threat. The Biden Administration may push forward even without them though. Follow: @KLVeritas @MdBreathe @LizaGoitein @psychosort @ASL_Liberty @iamlisalogan @sovcoalition @RepThomasMassie @glennbeck @NassMeryl @zerohedge @RandPaul @Margaret_ASL @WmBillWalton @RepMTG @unusual_whales if you want a fuller picture

@onlythedeadknow - Jack Thompson

The Biden Administration published documents supporting everything in the video below. Blockchain CBDC “U.S. CBDC Technology” Digital ID Bio Surveillance Hubs SEC/NAC Medical Passports All under Climate Change, Global Health Security, and One Health under DOD Authorities. The Future of Money and Payments Report Pursuant to Section 4(b) of Executive Order 14067 “Environmental sustainability The United States has set overarching environmental priorities, including cutting U.S. greenhouse gas pollution by 50-52 percent by 2030 and transitioning to a net-zero emissions economy by 2050. A new payments system or improvements to existing payment systems should be compatible with these priorities and seek to minimize energy use, resources, greenhouse gas emissions, and other pollution, and improve environmental performance relative to the status quo of the existing payments system. Reflecting these priorities, forms of money and payment need to be environmentally sustainable. If based on a blockchain, a U.S. CBDC would likely use a permissioned blockchain, which consumes relatively less energy than a permissionless implementation, as the majority of the energy use from permissionless blockchains derives from the consensus mechanism. In addition, policymakers could require energy efficiency as a key tenet of the development of a U.S. CBDC technology. This technology could form the basis of environmentally sustainable technologies for other financial markets, promoting public welfare.” In part because they would not be based on a permissionless blockchain, instant payments do not raise the same questions of environmental sustainability and are likely to be consistent with the Administration’s climate goals. Although technologies are under development that could lessen energy use, a permissioned blockchain or instant payments would be more sustainable options with current technology.” https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/Future-of-Money-and-Payments.pdf MARCH 09, 2022 Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/03/09/executive-order-on-ensuring-responsible-development-of-digital-assets/#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20should%20ensure,contribute%20to%20human%20rights%20abuses White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Climate and Energy Implications of Crypto-Assets in the United States 5 (Sept. 2022), “At the same, the use of digital assets based on distributed ledger technology is expanding. Digital assets are a form of value, represented digitally. As an emerging technological innovation, digital assets have provided some benefits and value for some U.S. residents and businesses, and have the potential for future benefits with emerging uses. Crypto-assets are digital assets that are implemented using cryptographic techniques, and have a total current global market capitalization of nearly $1 trillion. However, some crypto-asset technologies currently require a considerable amount of electricity for asset generation, ownership, and exchange. Electricity usage from digital assets is contributing to GHG emissions, additional pollution, noise, and other local impacts, depending on markets, policies, and local electricity sources. Depending on the energy intensity of the technology used, crypto-assets could hinder broader efforts to achieve net-zero carbon pollution consistent with U.S. climate commitments and goals.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/09-2022-Crypto-Assetsand-Climate-Report.pdf I now know why the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy was added to the new 2023 DOD Global Health Council. FATF, Targeted Update on Implementation of FATF Standards on Virtual Assets-VASPs 7 (June 2022), https:// fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/doc…. U.S. Pathways to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050 (Nov. 2021), https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/US-Long-Term-Strategy.pdf. @alexnewman_jou tells @glennbeck that Bill Gates and the UN have teamed up to build a "GIANT DIGITAL GULAG for all of humanity": "They are using [CBDCs, digital IDs, & digital health certificates] to build a control system that will be able to manipulate what you do."

Video Transcript AI Summary

The UN and Bill Gates are collaborating on a digital public infrastructure project, aiming to implement it in 50 countries within 5 years. This includes digital IDs, central bank digital currencies, payment processing systems, and digital health certificates. The goal is to create a global control grid to surveil, monitor, and manipulate individuals on an unprecedented scale. The Bank for International Settlements is working on a universal blockchain ledger to tokenize every asset, allowing transactions only through biometric digital IDs and central bank digital currencies. This system represents a level of control over humanity never seen before.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So the UN has partnered with Bill Gates, on this, what they call, digital public infrastructure. It's a very fancy term. And I think the simplest way to understand it is they're building a giant digital gulag for all of humanity. So the UN Development Program, has officially launched this. It was officially launched at the end of last year where they're gonna get 50 govern they call them countries, but, really, they mean governments, to impose at least some major element of this digital public infrastructure on their population within 5 years. So 2020 reports. Digital IDs. And those are already emerging. In fact, many states are are developing these. I just went through the airport yesterday. You can scan your digital ID, QR code. Right? So that's happening. And that's that's really one of the main reasons for the COVID Absolutely. Nonsense. The architecture that was laid down is the backbone of this global control grid that they're building. So then you've got the central bank digital currencies, which are already being unveiled. Right? They they've already been, released. The World Economic Forum just said a few days ago, 98% of the governments and central banks in the world are working on these CBDCs. Once they're fully operational, I guarantee you, they're gonna start waging war on cash much more openly. They'll say it's a tool for terrorists and, pimps and and, you know, every nasty thing you tax cheats, everything you can think of. Then you've got the the payment processing systems, and you've also got we we just had the head of the World Health Organization talk about this recently, the digital health certificates, the digital vaccine passports. They're taking what the EU developed during the COVID, which, by the way, the the European Commission was promoting vaccine passports in May of 2019, long before anybody ever heard of COVID or anything like that. So they're taking all of this together, and they are using it to build a control system that will not just be able to surveil and monitor everything you do on an unprecedented scale when you combine it with AI, the ability to make sense of all this data. It's just mind blowing, but also to manipulate what you do. And so they're talking about this again pretty openly. If you look at the World Economic Forum meetings, they talk about the benefits of programmable central bank digital currency where they will be able to say who can buy what, when, under what conditions. And then the Bank for International Settlements, you know, Carole Quigley, to go back to him for a moment, Bill Clinton's mentor, the guy who really exposed this global agenda to create a one world system, he said the apex of the system was gonna be the bank for international settlements. This is an institution that's almost entirely unknown to Americans, and what they are working on right now, and this is not a secret. It's not a conspiracy because it's not happening behind closed doors, is what they call a universal blockchain ledger. They wanna tokenize every asset in the known universe, every farm, every car, every house, every tree, put it on this ledger, this blockchain ledger, and then you're only able to interact with this blockchain ledger using your biometric digital ID, using your central bank digital currencies. So if I wanna buy something from you, I can't just hand you a $100 bill. I've gotta go on my device, connect to this blockchain system, transfer the central bank digital currencies to you. And so this is a a mechanism for controlling humanity that I think is really unprecedented in human history. And when you take it all together, it's very obvious.

Page Not Found The requested page could not be found. home.treasury.gov

Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets | The White House By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Policy. Advances in digital and distributed ledger technology for financial services have led to dramatic growth in markets for digital assets, with profound implications for the protection… whitehouse.gov

@onlythedeadknow — Jack Thompson

Posted - May 26, 2024 at 4:29 PM

Saved - May 26, 2024 at 5:36 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Biden Administration has implemented various measures to address the climate crisis, global health security, and pandemic preparedness. These initiatives are outlined in a series of documents, including the FY23 NDAA, 2023 DOD Biodefense Posture Review, and the Global Health Security Strategy. Additionally, executive orders and bills have been issued to tackle these issues. Some critics argue that these actions grant the administration extensive powers similar to those invoked during emergencies like 9/11. Fact-checking is requested.

@onlythedeadknow - Jack Thompson

My full breakdown of how the Biden Administration has put Climate Crisis, One Health, and Global Health Security, and Pandemic Preparedness under “whole of government” authorities including DOD Biodefense authorities. Using only 23 of their own documents. My posts Documents 1 through 23 all interconnect with two main documents (FY23 NDAA & 2023 DOD Biodefense Posture Review) and culminated in Document #1 The Beginning of this particular “Climate Crisis” tyranny: JANUARY 20, 2021 Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis (First Step Undo everything President Trump Did) U.S. CBDC : Document #1 APRIL 16, 2024 The Biden Administration Released the Global Health Security Strategy connecting Global Health & Climate Change to “National Security” : Document #2: September 2022 The Prepare Plan Document #3: October 2022 NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY Document #4: June 2022 Fiscal Year 2023 National Defense Authorization Act NDAA Document #5: January 2023 DOD Biodefense Posture Review Document #6: 2023 GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY AGENDA INTERAGENCY REVIEW COUNCIL Document #7: September 2022 The Future of Money and Payments Document #8: September 2022: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Climate and Energy Implications of Crypto-Assets Document #9: MARCH 09, 2022 Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets Document #10: Global Health Security Agenda 2024 Document #11: International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 Document #12: SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy Document #13: Joint external evaluation tool: International Health Regulations (2005) - third edition Document #14: NOVEMBER 14, 2023 Biden-⁠Harris Administration Releases Fifth National Climate Assessment DOD climate tool and the reason why that idea is a joke: Document #15 H.R. 2882 New funding bill that just passed supporting Gavi Vaccine alliance and pandemic preparedness goals & HHS Document #16 JANUARY 10, 2023 Declaration of North America (DNA) Document #17 APRIL 21, 2023 Executive Order on Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice for All Document #18 JULY 21, 2023 White House Launches Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy Document #19 JUNE 06, 2022 Executive Action to Spur Domestic Clean Energy Manufacturing using the DPA Document #20 JANUARY 27, 2021 EO on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad Document #21 APRIL 30, 2024 National Security Memorandum on Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience Document #22 APRIL 12, 2024 Executive Order on COVID-⁠19 and Public Health Preparedness and Response Document #23 The Global Health Security Initiative 2023 DOD Biodefense Council ideas on new Vaccines: The DPA Can Be Our Next Major Climate Tool https://www.evergreenaction.com/blog/the-defense-production-act https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/energy-justice/pdfs/Climate-Emergency-Powers-Report.pdf As reported by both NBC News & Fox News: A climate crisis declaration Biden would have COVID like powers comparing them to the 9/11 emergency powers. Biden could get 130 War Time like powers that could bypass Congress. H.R.3884 - National Emergencies Act 1976 https://www.congress.gov/bill/94th-congress/house-bill/3884 @CommunityNotes please fact check it

Here’s How the Defense Production Act Can Be a Major Climate Tool Hitting our climate goals requires a historic economic mobilization for manufacturing and deployment. The Defense Production Act is a powerful tool that President Biden can wield to meet these demands and propel us toward our clean energy future. evergreenaction.com

404 - I've lost my way biologicaldiversity.org

@onlythedeadknow — Jack Thompson

Posted - May 1, 2024 at 1:58 PM

Saved - May 1, 2024 at 2:11 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The DOD's lack of accountability is concerning. Examples include the creation of Agent Orange, the Anthrax Vaccines, and the COVID Vaccine. EcoHealth and Fauci's involvement raises questions. Military bases are toxic, burnpits cause suffering, and the VA is failing. War is a racket, with profit taking precedence over lives. Presidential power has evolved, leading to conflicts for profit. Money is being laundered through various agendas. It's frustrating, but I hope for a better future. God bless humanity and America.

@onlythedeadknow - Jack Thompson

Unfortunately I think not. They will flex and talk but little will be done. Anything connected to DOD, which Fauci and EcoHealth are, never is held accountable. Why do you think the DOD would be the perfect mechanism to enforce a climate or global health security crisis. Republicans and Democrats alike would protect the DOD. Each side for different reasons but in the end they will protect it. Some examples but there are MANY more: DOD contracts with Monsanto to create Agent Orange that chemically injured the entire town of Anniston and Fort McClellan Alabama. No government accountability and contracts still flow to Monsanto. And they have done worse things. 10 Million gallons of AG sprayed on Vietnam. Our troops and the Vietnamese still suffering today from it. DOD contract for the original Anthrax Vaccines that vaccine injured thousands of troops including being proven linked to Gulf War Syndrome. No accountability. They made a new version under the parent company of the old version and continued the jab. DOD, NIH, NIAID, HHS, created the COVID Vaccine and Pfizer and Moderna stamped it. Thousands of troops and civilians injured now from that vaccine and thousands of Military lives ruined for refusing the jab. No accountability. In fact DOD is still proud of it and wants more vaccines. 2023 DOD Biodefense Council even says it . Dr. Brandi Vann. DOD declined working with the Wuhan Lab due to safety concerns but NIH funded EcoHealth and Fauci stepped in. Was it under DOD “permission” or request? EcoHealth and Fauci have been caught doing dangerous things in the past but contract money still flows. Remember the 3 bugs in 2014 that brought huge concerns in the United Stares. That ended in 300 scientists writing Obama and warning him about Fauci’s dangerous experiments and asking him to shut him down. What happened? They went offshore with some of it but now information shows they continued in the states as well like the NIH Lab in Hamilton, Montana. Military bases being confirmed as some of the most toxic places in the United States. “Forever Chemicals” have injured and killed countless people. Yet even now the DOD publicly says it will not reduce its use of forever chemicals because they are needed for national security. SO climate crisis must not pertain to War? DOD contracts for Burnpits overseas that lead to suffering and death of troops and civilians alike. No real accountability. The PACT Act was their “big win” 20 years late and currently 1,040,000 pending VA claims with 400,000 in backlog. A lot of troops have already died from the injuries and never saw benefits now their families are fighting for VA DIC. War is a Racket Pharma after and during War is a Racket VA is a Racket DOD in general in a Racket Our “representatives” get rich while our Patriots get sick and die. The last “War” was WWII since then Presidents have entered us into “conflicts” under what I call loop holes for profit. The Evolution of Presidential Power: The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution 1964 was the gateway to The War Powers Act 1973 then The Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) War should be a last resort NOT a first agenda Imagine the money being laundered and stolen right now through Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan, Green agendas, climate scam, global health scam. The useful idiots get Rich while the puppet masters destroy America and the globe. Sorry had to vent. Have a great day. God bless humanity and the America I love.

@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley

Will anything come out of this hearing today? Time will tell.. https://t.co/g91ZTvYPzc

@onlythedeadknow — Guardians of Valor: A Veteran’s Quest

Posted - March 15, 2024 at 6:10 PM

Saved - March 16, 2024 at 2:09 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Post 1: Check out this article on x.com/i/article/1768... Post 2: Watch these 3 videos about the WHO and the pandemic treaty. Dr. Lindley provides a thorough explanation of the treaty and its implications. Questions raised include concerns about national sovereignty and the potential suppression of information and treatments like Ivermectin.

@onlythedeadknow - Guardians of Valor: A Veteran’s Quest

x.com/i/article/1768…

@onlythedeadknow - Guardians of Valor: A Veteran’s Quest

3 VIDEOS FOR SECTION 1 of the Article: @RobertKennedyJr warning about the WHO and @realDonaldTrump warning about the WHO. Along with Dr. Lindley @KLVeritas gives one of the best explanations of the W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty I have seen. Keep in mind everything she says as you look through Parts 2 through 8 below. They add in DOD Authorities to the picture and also the enforcement of the Global Health Security Agenda 2024 on top of the W.H.O. amendments. At the end her video she took questions. The first question was Sovereignty of a Nation and I agree with Dr. Lindley conducting mass censorship of information, initiating forced lockdowns, mandating masks/vaccines/and vaccine passports, and limiting treatments seems like it would be impeding on a Nations Sovereignty to me. How about you? The second question should frighten everyone. The lady asking the question says wouldn't these measures stop bad information from being released to the public like the use of Ivermectin? If you are following the current research studies into the effectiveness of treatments that were censored during COVID and the Vaccine injuries from the COVID-19 Vaccine you should be frightened as well that they want total control of any and all treatments.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Dr. Katarina Lindley, a family physician from Texas, speaks in support of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its proposed pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations. She explains that the WHO is seeking expanded powers to address health emergencies and that the treaty would establish a global supply network overseen by the WHO. Dr. Lindley expresses concerns about the potential infringement on national sovereignty, censorship of information, and limitations on freedom of speech. She also discusses the need for a balanced approach to health, including human, animal, plant, and environmental health. Dr. Lindley concludes by emphasizing the importance of open discussion and the potential implications of these documents if passed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, committee for having me today. I'm Doctor. Katarina Lindley. I'm a family physician from Texas. I'm also President of Global Health Project and past President of Texas Osteopathic Medical Association. I'm speaking today on behalf of myself, and I will be giving testimony specifically on the World Health Organization. I'll give you a little bit of a background on the World Health Organization and why I feel that it is important to actually support this bill. So the World Health Organization was founded in 'forty eight as the health arm of the United Nations and currently has 194 member states. Initially, it was 100% funded by the member states, but in recent year, this funding has changed. Today, only 20% of the funding comes from the member states from the assessed contributions and 80% comes from the voluntary contributions. Some of those contributions are coming from some of the member states, but others are coming from the private public partnerships like Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gavi Alliance, Wellcome Trust and others. These voluntary contributions are typically earmarked for specific projects or diseases, meaning that WHO does not really have, control over that part of the budget. In March of 21st, 25 heads of states and international agencies called for a new pandemic treaty that will protect the world from future health crisis. Currently, the World Health Organization is simultaneously negotiating 2 documents. One of them is the pandemic agreement also known as Accord, Treaty, CA+ and 0 Draft. It has changed names over time. And the other one is the amendments in International Health Regulations. International health regulations were actually adopted in 'sixty 9 and then amended in 2,005 as a part of international law. So, this draft, the draft International Health Regulation Amendments, they would lay down new powers for the World Health Organization during health emergencies and broaden the context with which, they can be used. The Pandemic Treaty on the other side is intended to support the bureaucracy, financings and governance to underpin the expanded international health regulations. The World Health Assembly is going to meet in May of this year to vote on adoption of both of these documents. Once approved by 2 thirds of the World Health Assembly, the pandemic treaty will go to our Senate to be ratified, and it will need 2 thirds of the votes to be implemented. As I mentioned before, international health regulations have already been adopted in 'sixty 9 and then amended in 2,005. They do not need any kind of special ratification by our Congress. Once they are adopted by the World Health Assembly, they are going to be implemented within 12 months unless the country member state specifically says we will not comply. So first, we're going to discuss the amendments to the International Health Regulations. The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations will give WHO authority over member states by changing the boarding. So in the past, their recommendations were non binding, they were recommendations. But the non binding has been stricken out, and these are going to become binding recommendations that will now mandate the member states to follow instead just consider these recommendations. States will accept the WHO as the authority in international public health emergencies. And this is in the Article 1. I gave you all some documents to look over. The amendments expanded the scope of the documents from public health risk to all risk that might affect public health and those will include risk to animals, ecosystems and climate. Specifically, the Article 18 of the amendments will change the definition of the public health emergency of international concern to include not only actual but also potential concern that the general, director general would have. So to give everyone an example, let's say there is an outbreak of something in jungle of Brazil, and WHO hears about it. They send their team in, and the team says, well, we're concerned. The country itself might say, this is really not a big concern. This is something that happens this time of year every time. If they decide that this is of concern, they can declare public health emergency of international concern. By the article 18, and I gave you guys an example of that, in article 18, the WHO then would have the powers to decide to close the borders, to restrict travel, require proof vaccination or other prophylaxis, require vaccination, place suspects under public health observation, implement quarantine isolation, tracing, refuse entry of suspects and affected persons and refuse entry of unaffected persons to affected areas, implement exit screening and restrictions. So the World Health Organization by this article 18 director general by declaring this public health emergency of international concern would be able to close down that area whether the country agrees or not. The WHO will have power to designate opinions or information as misinformation or disinformation, and it can require country state governments to intervene and stop such expression and dissemination. Obviously, that will interfere with U. S. Constitution and is incompatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The specific article is Article 44 in the amendments of International Health Regulations. After declaring an emergency, Director General will also have powers to instruct the governments to provide the World Health Organization and other countries with resources, funds and commodities. Countries will also give power to the World Health Organization over patent law and intellectual property, including control of manufacturing commodities deemed to be relevant to the potential or actual health problem the WHO considers of interest. So to summarize this draft of the amendments to International Health Regulation, it will expand the definition of pandemic and health emergencies, including the introduction of potential for harm rather than actual harm. It also expands the definition of health products that fall under this to include any commodity or process that may impact on the response or improve quality of life. It will change the recommendations of the international health regulations from non binding to mandatory instructions that the states will have to undertake and follow and implement. It will solidify the director general's ability to independently declare emergencies. It will set up an extensive surveillance process in all states, which WHO will verify regularly through a county review mechanism. It will enable WHO to share country data without consent. It will give WHO control over certain country resources, including requirements for financial contributions and provisions of intellectual property and know how. It will ensure the national support for promotion of censorship activities by WHO to prevent contrary approaches and concerns from being freely disseminated. It will change existing international health regulation provisions affecting individuals from non binding to binding including border closures, travel restrictions, confinement, medical examination and medication of individuals. So the next document that they are currently negotiating as well is the Pandemic Treaty, also known as Accord Agreement, CA+plus and 0 Draft. They kept changing the name as the public was responding to this document. So the treaty would set up a global supply network overseen by WHO. It will set up a governing body under WHO auspices, a new WHO secretariat and conference of the parties to oversee the whole process. It will set up infodemix management at the local, regional, national and international level to control the information flow and free speech. This is under Article 18 of the treaty. In number 1, it will instruct the parties to combat false misleading misinformation and disinformation. And anything that's considered false misleading, misinformation or disinformation will be something that goes against what WHO says. Under Article 3, number 2, states have in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and general principles of international law the sovereign right to legislate and implement legislation in pursuance the health policies. This specific language fails to address the issue of the WHO assuming sovereignty for health matters over states through the treaty and in the event of the pandemic. Under Article 4, 3 d directs nation to surveil for and perform genetic sequences of potential pandemic pathogens they find and to safely handle them. Under Article 6, the parties will not only surveil for, but will share the pathogens with pandemic potential. And as they are established in Article 12, the pathogens are identified to infect humans, have high transmissibility and are capable of widespread in human population, are highly virulent, making them likely to cause significant morbidity and mortality in humans. Speaker 1: Excuse me, doctor. A couple of things real quick. I'm I'm looking for your written testimonies that come come in this way. Okay. That's on us, not you. Speaker 0: No. No problem. Speaker 1: I wanted to see what what you were referring to. And if you could get me a copy of this. And if we could ask you to kind of take a minute or 2 to focus on your remaining key point. We do have some of the folks that have been waiting. So proceed. Speaker 0: I'm towards the end anyway. Another thing that is very important to understand this pandemic tree specifically is, this one health agenda that is actually under article 5. The one health agenda doesn't have specific meaning. If you look at the wording of it, it's very difficult to understand what they mean. But one health agenda claims that humans, animals, plants and ecosystems are all part of one health and that everything on the planet is interrelated and affects health. Essentially, under the guise of 1 Health, WHO would have control of life on the planet. They will not need to prioritize human health, but rather they could choose to balance human health with animal and plant health as well as environmental health in the name of climate change. So to conclude, why do I speak very strongly against what WHO is currently doing? They are simultaneously creating these two documents, pandemic treaty and the amendments we're We're hearing about this disease x. It's going to be 20 times deadlier. We have no idea what it is. That's what they're saying. But it's going to be deadlier, so we have to do something for future generations and our children. That's one of their favorite phrases. If these documents are passed in May in Geneva, the Pandemic Treaty would give them and the amendments to International Health Regulations will give them powers in the event of another pandemic to actually close down our countries, to issue these things and say, you cannot travel. You have to use these tests. You have to use these medications. You have to use these vaccinations for your population. We will not have a discussion that we're having right now. Their recommendations now are going to become obligations and the countries will have to comply. Not only will we have to comply on the medical front, we'll have to share all our data patents and different commodities as they see fit, so they can change it in very equitable way. The word equity is all over the document. In my opinion, this does take our sovereignty under attack because if we have a supranational agency and body tell us what we can and cannot do and that we have to close our borders, not allow people in and out, that is an attack on the sovereignty of the states and especially United States of America. And then looking at the whole censorship clause, if anyone say if I feel that what they're telling me is not correct, that this person in front of me needs a specific treatment, but that's not the treatment that they allow. And if I say that publicly, they will consider that misinformation, disinformation and then that they require my state to censor me? And I do believe that that infringes on my freedom of speech as well. Thank you, mister chairman. Thank you. Speaker 1: Thank you, doctor Lindley. For the record, could you again just, tell us, I know you traveled to get here. Who who are you representing again? Speaker 0: I'm representing myself. Speaker 1: Oh, okay. And and you traveled here from Speaker 0: I live in Texas, and I practice medicine in Texas. Speaker 1: Okay. Any other questions? Representative, fully up. Speaker 2: Thank you for your testimony. The the Senate of the United States would have to ratify both of these treaties for them to become operative. Correct? Speaker 0: No, sir. The pandemic agreement or treaty does have to go to senate and be ratified by 2 thirds of the vote. The international health regulations were already adopted in 69 and then amended in 2005, and they're part of our international law. They do not have to be ratified. I have a chart at the end of the document that they will pass to you. And it says specifically, we we actually once the World Health Assembly says that they are okay with all of the amendments or they approve certain amendments, we will have 12 months to say that we don't accept that. Speaker 2: And which statute in US law says that? Speaker 0: I'm not the lawyer, so you're gonna have to find a lawyer to give you the actual statues. Speaker 2: The other point that I would like to make is, are you aware of the fact that in the zero draft, the first sentences reaffirming the principle of sovereignty of states parties in addressing public health matters, notably pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and health systems recovery. And the word sovereignty and affirming sovereignty appears 4 times throughout the document. Speaker 0: I'm aware. But my, my opinion is that if you have an agency who declares a pandemic emergency of international concern in your area and tells you that you have to close the borders, that your people cannot leave, that maybe put them in quarantine isolation, that that actually infringes of the sovereignty of that country. Speaker 1: Other questions? Thank you, doctor. Doctor. Speaker 0: Representative Lloyd had a question. Speaker 1: Representative Lloyd, you know her already, alright? Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 3: Thank you, and thank you, check. So I guess with all due respects, because I know you're a medical professional, so wouldn't the fact that this and I understand your concern about the infringement upon free speech. I understand that side of it. But also wouldn't this prevent situations that we had gotten into with things like unapproved treatments having happened, during the COVID pandemic? Things like Ivermectin being taken or, Speaker 0: you Speaker 3: know, bleach or any of those types of things? Speaker 0: Thank you for your question. So as a physician, I treat the person in front of me. And also, I am allowed to to use medications that were not specifically approved for that intention as long as I discuss with my patient risk and benefits. And if I follow science and literature and see that there is a reason for certain things, Even Doctor. Fauci said that during, that for coronaviruses, hydroxychloroquine is well known to work well. He said that before the pandemic. And then the contention of many of our physicians who have treated our patients and who did really well is that the reason we were not allowed to actually treat patients was so that certain things could be put in place, like emergency use authorization of the vaccines that could be approved. Vaccines that could be approved. Another thing to consider is when the pandemic started, one thing that never made sense and it will never make sense to me is as physicians, we were told, tell your patient to stay home until they can breathe and then tell them to go to the hospital. So as a physician, if in an event that something happens, I would expect myself and my colleagues to be the first ones to go in even if we don't know what it is because it's our job to save lives. So I would say that the intentions of CDC and the guidelines from these different organizations were wrong from the beginning. Speaker 1: Thank you again, doctor Linling. I know you have a plane to catch. Thank and thank you again for the written testimony. That's always, as I said, appreciated. Okay. We have 7 more

Video Transcript AI Summary

The WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty gives the WHO excessive power, potentially undermining America's interests. We must prevent President Biden from signing it to protect our constitution and sovereignty. Research this issue and stand against international bureaucrats and their Davos allies. We, the people, still hold the power to resist.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The World Health Organization was once a great agency that took care of the poor and underserved communities around the world. But in recent decades, it's been taken over by global elites and foreign powers that don't have America's best interest at heart. This is why we need to stop president Biden from signing the WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty. That treaty lays out a blueprint giving the WHO unprecedented authority. Those powers go into effect the moment that the WHO declares a pandemic, which it can do at any moment even if no true pandemic exists. Even if no true pandemic exists. If this is the first time that you're hearing about this, it's time for you to do some research. The United States of America has a constitution for a reason. We can't let it be stripped from us by international bureaucrats and their bosses at the Billionaires Boys Club in Davos. We, the people, still have the power. If you want a president who will stop the WHO in its tracks and stand with you

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization as corrupt and controlled by China, highlighting the high fees paid by the US. They condemn Biden for rejoining without negotiation and warn against a pandemic treaty that could limit US sovereignty. The speaker also discusses a courtroom confrontation and accuses the judge and attorney general of corruption. They defend Trump and assert that the legal system is failing. The speaker emphasizes the need for fair representation and criticizes political bias in legal proceedings.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The World Health Organization has become nothing more than a corrupt globalist scam paid for by the United States but owned and controlled by China. When the China virus reached our shores 3 years ago, the World Health Organization disgracefully covered the tracks of the Chinese Communist Party every single step of the way. For this reason, it was my great honor to terminate America's relationship with the World Health Organization. The United States was paying the World Health Organization almost $500,000,000 a year. When I dropped out, I took it out of there. And for 330,000,000 people, even though China was paying only $40,000,000 for 1,400,000,000 people. So we had 330. They have 1.4 and we're paying more than 10 times the amount. That's typical for the United States because they don't know what the hell they're doing. Unfortunately, Crooked Joe Biden foolishly reentered the World Health Organization at the full price and without any negotiations or reforms. And now Biden is pushing to bypass the United States Senate to enter a pandemic treaty that would surrender American sovereignty to the World Health Organization, again, controlled by China. The draft treaty would require the United States to send vast quantities of medical supplies to other countries in the event of another pandemic, and it would push aggressive censorship of free speech on issues of public health just like they censored the truth about the Wuhan lab, which I said that's where it came from. Remember? Under the next Trump administration, that treaty will be immediately terminated. I would not allow public health to be used as a pretext to advance the march of global government. That's what they're doing, globalists. The United States will withdraw from the corrupt World Health Organization, which in light of its utter failure on COVID, they had a tremendous disaster on COVID, deserves to be completely abolished and replaced. Then I will work to forge a new coalition of nations that are strongly committed to protecting health while also upholding sovereignty and freedom. I wanna thank you very much but I also wanna say this, I could have renegotiated the deal. I could have gone into the World Health Organization for $25,000,000. Biden didn't take that deal. He's paying almost $500,000,000. They were so anxious to get the United States back after I terminated the agreement. They were so anxious to get it back that they offered me a deal, 25 to $30,000,000 and I said, no, I'll wait. Could've gotten it for less but I didn't want less at that point. We're paying almost 500,000,000. Could've done it for 25 to 30. Biden took the 500, almost the $500,000,000 deal. He knew he could have gotten back in for less. So why did he pay so much? But that's just one of many things that are wrong with our country. Speaker 1: Rhetoric is really getting dangerous, more and more dangerous. And we saw what happened on January 6th when he uses inflammatory rhetoric now and his recent true social post, is incredibly incredibly scary for anyone, that might be trying to up work in government. And, it is just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see public office again. He is not only unfit, he is destructive to our democracy, and he has to be, he has to be eliminated. Speaker 2: Coming from the judge who was already predetermined that my client committed fraud before we even walked into this courtroom. I'm not here to hear what he has to say. Then why exactly am I being paid as an attorney, and why exactly are taxpayer dollars being used in this courtroom? The answer is very clear. Because miss James wants to stand right here like she did this morning and call my client a liar, call the company fraudulent, and make a name for herself. She said this morning that the numbers don't lie, and they won't lie in this case. Well, miss James, I have a message for you. The numbers didn't lie when you ran for governor, and that's why you dropped out. And the numbers don't lie when president Trump runs for office in 2024. And those numbers are loud and clear. This country is falling apart. And if we don't stop corruption in courtrooms where attorneys are gagged, where attorneys are not allowed to say what they need to say to protect their client's interest. It doesn't matter what your politics are. Everyone has a right in this country to get up and put a defense. I don't care who you are. You have a right to hire a lawyer who can put objections on the record. You have a right to hire a lawyer who can stand up and say something when they see something wrong. But I was told to sit down today. I was yelled at, and I've had a judge who is unhinged slamming a table. Let me be very clear. I don't tolerate that in my life. I'm not gonna tolerate it here. And you know what? You shouldn't either because not every American citizen gets a camera and a microphone. And what I'm seeing is such a demise of American judicial system and democracy. Miss James came out this morning and said that she knew mister Trump, and she always calls him mister Trump because it kills her that he was ton more than that statement of financial condition, and she doesn't know how to get out of it because her politics won't allow her. She calls him a bully. She says he's going to bring out racial slurs. He's going to say things today and taunt her. Well, miss James, you taunted him before you came into office, before you saw one record, one statement of financial condition, you taunted him. You said his administration was was too male and too pale. Those are her words. She said that she and Michael Cohen were going to be his biggest nightmare where I have some news for you, miss James. Michael Cohen folded, lied, and crumbled. Your star witness, along with all the DAs and corrupt AGs, need to be paying attention to what happens when you let us take the stand, when you let my client speak the truth, and the judge can tell me to sit down, and he can try and shorten my client's testimony, but it is loud and clear. Nothing. They've got nothing but their politics. She's got nothing but her Soros backing, which we discovered recently, and I am sick and tired of seeing it. Pay attention, America. Pay attention. Because when you're in court one of these days, and you don't have a lawyer that has a microphone, and you don't have a lawyer that can go on TV, and you've got judges gagging them, what are you gonna do? We need to fix this country, and we need to stop what is happening in this courtroom. President Trump is worth a lot more, and she wasn't ready for it. She doesn't understand it. And before she rushed to judgment, she should have thought about attacking somebody with over 50 years of real estate expertise who changed single handedly the skyline of New York City. She picked the wrong person, and her politics will fail for it.