TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @patel_patriot

patel_patriot
Posted - June 5, 2024 at 9:10 PM
Saved - June 6, 2024 at 1:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The DoD has made changes to its "Continuity Policy." Join us on tonight's DPH to discuss this topic. Follow us on @rumblevideo to catch the live stream. Thanks to @truestormyjoe for bringing this to our attention.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

The DoD has updated it's "Continuity Policy" and it sure is interesting. We will be discussing this on tonight's DPH. Make sure you're following us over on @rumblevideo so you don't miss us when we go live! H/T @truestormyjoe for pointing this out.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

https://rumble.com/c/BadlandsMedia

Badlands Media Browse the most recent videos from channel "Badlands Media" uploaded to Rumble.com rumble.com
patel_patriot
Posted - April 29, 2024 at 3:29 PM
Saved - April 30, 2024 at 2:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Join us tonight at 10:30 EDT for a watch party of the documentary 'Time of Deceit' during the latest episode of Baseless Conspiracies. Exciting times ahead!

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Couldn't wait any longer We'll be releasing the documentary 'Time of Deceit' tonight! We'll kick things off with a watch party during tonight's episode of Baseless Conspiracies. See you at 10:30 EDT

Video Transcript AI Summary
The press can't investigate CIA operations without solid proof. The intelligence community can retaliate against those who challenge them. The CIA denies involvement in assassinations and kidnappings. Social media, intelligence agencies, and mainstream media are closely linked. Some believe the January 6th attack is misrepresented. Many distrust mainstream media and Congress. The laptop scandal is compared to the Russia hoax. There's talk of irregular warfare and digital soldiers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Investigating covert CIA operations, investigating CIA in general is now off limits to the press, unless you have what Ted Turner called proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which when you're talking about covert operations, you're never gonna find as a journalist. Conspiracy, fears, hoops, crack. You take on the intelligence community, they have 6 ways from Sunday of getting back at you. Speaker 1: We don't engage in assassinations and kidnappings and things of that kind. As far as I know, we never have. 1 third of my staff in this task force was covert actionist propagandist. Speaker 0: Honestly, Twitter or x now is is really where I get, like, all my news. The unholy alliance between the intelligence community, social media platforms, and legacy media outlets. Speaker 1: And we will have to summon the same capacity to adapt to new circumstances and to meet changing times while upholding timeless ideals. Fake, fake, disgusting news. Speaker 0: It's one of those pieces of of what we've seen around January 6th that is pushed by people that wanna suggest that it this was this attack was something other than, what it really was. Speaker 1: This is why so many people can't stand the mainstream media and why there's a hardcore animosity towards the media that that is pretty much commensurate, or or equivalent to the animosity towards congress. Speaker 0: Was that your laptop? For real. I don't know. You mean the laptop is now another Russia Russia Russia hoax? That's exactly what exactly what exactly what this is where he's going. The laptop is Russia Yes, gentlemen. I wanna stay on the issue of rape. Speaker 1: We have an army of digital soldiers. This was irregular warfare at its finest. Fuck you. War.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

'Time of Deceit' Watch party: https://rumble.com/v4s7fko-baseless-conspiracies-ep-80-1030-pm-et-.html?mref=nmtun&mc=4m0ok

Baseless Conspiracies Ep 80 - "Time of Deceit" Watch Party Mondays at 10:30 PM ET Episode Archive: https://rumble.com/playlists/Af3CIq1Wgl0 Jon Herold and Zak Paine talk about their favorite conspiracies! Want to Support your Favorite Badlanders? Click here t rumble.com
patel_patriot
Posted - January 28, 2024 at 5:26 PM
Saved - January 28, 2024 at 9:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: A screenshot suggests that Ezra deleted a tweet about RCO, which is an interesting name I hadn't considered before. Post 2: Robert O'Brien has been mentioned frequently in my series and on the Devolution Power Hour. He replaced John Bolton around the time of the Covid outbreak. Post 3: In early 2020, O'Brien worked with Trump to clear out the deep state from the NSC, a task initiated by Rich Higgins, Steve Bannon, ECW, and Steve Harvey. Post 4: O'Brien's role in EO 13961, the center of the Devolution theory, is intriguing. He was the National Continuity Coordinator and in charge of the committee facilitating the plan's execution. Post 5: I trust Trump's choice for the role, whether it's Pence or O'Brien. O'Brien's appointment would support my theory. Post 6: You can find my series at [substack link].

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

This is interesting... This screenshot was sent to me and it appears Ezra deleted the tweet so I can't personally confirm its authenticity.. Genuine or not, RCO is a very interesting name and one I hadn't considered until now... RCO = Robert C. O'Brien Short Thread 👇

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Robert O'Brien is mentioned numerous times throughout my series and we have discussed his role numerous times on the Devolution Power Hour. He replaced John Bolton right around the time Covid was thought to have "escaped" the WIV. Devolution - Part 15

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

In early 2020, he was working with Trump to clear out the deep state from the NSC. This is work that was started 2017 by Rich Higgins, Steve Bannon, ECW, and Steve Harvey as members of the 'hit list squad.' Devolution - Part 23

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Perhaps most interesting is the role he was given by EO 13961, the EO at the center of the Devolution theory. EO 13961 designated a new National Continuity Coordinator... the APNSA At the time, the APNSA was Robert O'Brien This would be the guy who was in charge of the committee that was facilitating the "execution of the plan and other continuity policy."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

I am good with whoever Trump picks because I trust him. I want it to be Pence for many reasons, one of those being a selfish one as I know it would lend credence to my theory. I think I'd be ok Robert O'Brien, the "former" National Continuity Coordinator as well 🤓

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

You can find my series at http://devolution.link as my substack still can't be posted directly...

Home - Devolution by Patel Patriot Welcome to Patel Patriot’s Devolution Series by me, Patel Patriot. Doing my best to show you how Donald Trump used Devolution to defeat the election theft. devolution.link
patel_patriot
Posted - December 10, 2023 at 6:01 PM
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 12:47 PM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Lol Grok basically calling @elonmusk a hypocrite https://t.co/OaJrZ8cpDK

patel_patriot
Posted - November 28, 2023 at 4:40 AM
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 1:30 PM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Donald Trump files "Motion to Compel Discovery" for his J6 case... Very interesting stuff in here: - Interference in 2016 and 2020 elections - EO 13848 and the report it requires -Solarwinds Hack Thread coming later... Link in next tweet https://t.co/Q7W6k2RZlZ

patel_patriot
Posted - November 11, 2023 at 7:36 PM
Saved - November 12, 2023 at 1:24 AM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Here we go. Finally have a name for the person who was allegedly behind the bombing of the Nordstream pipeline. Didn’t take long to find that the guy was director of an agency “established with active participation of the CIA” https://t.co/X3OP1FmPxa

patel_patriot
Posted - October 22, 2023 at 8:53 PM
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 4:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jeff, originally subpoenaed on 4/6/23, sued CNN to quash it. In his motion, he admits not being a "Q-Anon expert." Eventually, he dropped the suit, reached an understanding with CNN, and agreed to the deposition. Shortly after, he turned on Flynn. Curious about their "understanding."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Just to add a little more detail here. He was originally subpoenaed on 4/6/23 Jeff actually sued CNN trying to quash the subpoena. In that motion to quash he admits he isn’t a “Q-Anon expert” which I found funny. In the end he “reached an understanding with CNN,” dropped his suit and agreed to the deposition. Shortly after he started turning on Flynn. Wonder what “understanding” he came to with CNN?

patel_patriot
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 9:53 PM
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 10:01 PM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Joe Biden has continued the national emergency for EO 13848, extending the EO for another year. I even guessed the date right

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

I am not concerned about Biden continuing the national emergency for EO 13848 I fully expect him to continue it as he has twice before. If I were a gambling man, my money would be on him signing it September 7th.

patel_patriot
Posted - June 21, 2023 at 9:43 PM
Saved - June 22, 2023 at 10:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Newly released communications between the Office of AG Barr and John Durham reveal that another individual was jointly working with Durham at the onset of the Russia Collusion Hoax Probe. Emails show that the two were searching for office space to house the investigation for their team. The name of the other individual is redacted, and some of the communications are still being redacted due to exemption b7a. Questions arise as to who the other individual is and why they are still redacted.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

I may have found something... 👀 Was John Durham working with a partner? Recently released communications between the Office of AG Barr and Durham reveal another individual who appeared to be jointly working with Durham at the onset of the Russia Collusion Hoax Probe. Thread👇

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Communications between former AG Bill Barr's aide, Seth Ducharme, and John Durham at the onset of Durham's probe into the origins of the Russia Collusion Hoax reveal that John appeared to be working with another individual to run the investigation. "John and [redacted]"

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

An email exchange titled "Logistics for new project" show multiple occasions of Ducharme referring to two individuals, one of which is still redacted. Ducharme even asked if a meeting time "works for you both" to which the response was "we will call you at 9am..."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Further emails show Ducharme searching for office space to house the investigation for "John and [redacted] and their team." If John Durham was the one tasked with this probe, why is it being referred to as "their team," and not "John's team" or "Durham's team."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Ducharme would inform both Durham and the redacted individual that the space was ideal.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

The name is redacted due to exemption (b)(7)(c). So it's very likely this person is another investigator.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

What's even more interesting is some of the communications are still being redacted due to exemption (b)(7)(a). "...production of such law enforcement records or information...could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

So a few questions. 1. Who is the other individual working with Durham to launch the probe and why is he still redacted? 2. If Durham's investigation has concluded, how can these communications interfere with "enforcement proceedings?" 3. Are 1 and 2 correlated?

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Sauce Emails: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20537897-doj-communications-between-the-office-of-the-attorney-general-and-john-durham-part-3#document/p15 DOJ Exemptions: https://www.justice.gov/oip/doj-guide-freedom-information-act-0

DOJ Communications Between the Office of the Attorney General and John Durham Part 3 Department of Justice records reflecting meetings with U.S. Attorney John Durham. These records were in response to American Oversight's request for DOJ communications between the Offices of the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General and Durham or his first assistant. (DOJ-19-0688-G; DOJ-19-0688-H; DOJ-19-0688-J) documentcloud.org
Department of Justice Guide to the Freedom of Information Act justice.gov
patel_patriot
Posted - June 17, 2023 at 9:17 PM
Saved - June 18, 2023 at 12:32 AM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Did you know that during the Clinton Email investigation, the State Department proposed a "quid pro quo" with the FBI aimed at getting the FBI to cover up classified emails found on Clinton's server? They ignored crimes like these for Clinton, yet persecute Trump for nothing.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Source: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fbi-confirms-officials-discussed-deal-to-cover-up-clinton-emails

FBI confirms: Officials discussed deal to cover up Clinton emails Newly released documents from the FBI's year-long investigation of Hillary Clinton's server indicate a State Department official proposed a "quid pro quo" aimed at getting the FBI to cover up classified emails discovered on Clinton's server. In return, an unnamed FBI official said it might be open to a deal if the State Department could agree to boosting the FBI's presence in Iraq. washingtonexaminer.com
patel_patriot
Posted - June 15, 2023 at 10:45 PM
Saved - June 16, 2023 at 3:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recently released Halderman report connects to Trump's Draft Executive Order leaked in December 2020, which called for military interdiction in the election due to evidence of foreign interference, specifically mentioning Dominion Voting Systems. The report, unsealed in a court case in Georgia, details how Dominion machines could allow manipulation of votes without detection, just as the EO stated. The EO quoted a judge's order from the same case, which is fascinating.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

🧵 I want to show you a connection between the newly released Halderman report and what Trump was doing to set up Dev/COG. It has to do with the "Draft Executive Order" that was leaked dated December 16th, 2020 - the one calling for military interdiction in the election.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

The Draft EO says there is evidence of "foreign interference." He directly mentions Dominion Voting Systems multiple times. "The Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

It stated that the systems had "crucial code "features" and defects that allowed the same outside and foreign interference in our election, in which there is probable cause to find votes were in fact altered and manipulated contrary to the will of the voters."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

"Multiple expert witnesses and cyber experts identified acts of foreign interference in the election prior to November 3, 2020 and continued in the following weeks."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

It then went on to call for Military "interdiction."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Here is where it connects to the Halderman report. The report was under seal in a court case in GA. Judge Amy Totenberg just ordered the unsealing on Jun 7th.

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

What fascinates me, is that Donald Trump's Draft EO actually quoted one of Judge Totenberg's orders "denying 785 Motion for Preliminary Injunction."

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Yes. In Trump's Draft EO, he quoted one of the Judge's order from the same exact case we just got the Halderman report from... See for yourself... Order quoted in Draft EO: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.240678/gov.uscourts.gand.240678.964.0_1.pdf Halderman Report: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.240678/gov.uscourts.gand.240678.1681.0.pdf

Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction – #964 in Curling v. Raffensperger (N.D. Ga., 1:17-cv-02989) – CourtListener.com OPINION and ORDER denying 785 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; granting in part and denying in part 809 Motion for Preliminary Injunction (see Order for details). Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 10/11/2020. (hpc) (Entered: 10/11/2020) courtlistener.com

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

The Draft EO happens to cite the one court case, out of maybe 100s or 1000s of court cases surrounding election fraud, that years later unseals a report detailing that Dominion machines could allow manipulation of votes without detection, just as the EO stated. Dasting...

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Oh and I wrote about the Draft EO in my Addendum 4 found at http://Devolution.link You could also find the actual Draft EO here: https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000017e-920d-d65f-a77e-fbad182f0000

DEVOLUTION Devolution Series by Patel Patriot devolution.link
patel_patriot
Posted - June 16, 2023 at 1:10 AM
Saved - June 16, 2023 at 1:23 AM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Hey @SECGov How come when I search for "Burisma" on your website, it only shows results for "Barista?" I know you have official SEC links with "burisma" included like this one here: https://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/874792/000114420409017936/v144694_10k.htm So why can't I search your website for this particular word? https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/874792/000114420409017936/v144694_10k.htm So

Webmaster Frequently Asked Questions sec.gov
View Full Interactive Feed