TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @pepesgrandma

Posted - November 27, 2025 at 6:40 PM

Saved - November 27, 2025 at 9:27 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report breaking news that the earliest operation group told the Military to defy Trump (June 2025). The Chamberlain Network partners with The Save America foundation. Chris Purdy, founder and CEO of The Chamberlain Network, also works at Afghan Evac. Afghan Evac, formed Aug 2021 during the U.S. withdrawal, is a 501(c)3 that coordinates US agencies with NGOs to honor promises to Afghan allies, uniting 250+ organizations.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🚨🚨 Breaking news about the earliest operation group telling the Military to defy Trump (June 2025)! The Chamberlain Network is partnered with The Save America foundation. Well, Chris Purdy, Founder and CEO of The Chamberlain Network, also works at Afghan Evac. Afghan Evac was involved in the Biden 2021 evacuations to the US. “Formed in August 2021 during the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Afghan Evac is a 501(c)3 tax-exempt charity organization that built and administers the mechanism for cooperation between U.S. government agencies and non-governmental, mostly volunteer, groups working to ensure the United States keeps its promise to our Afghan allies. Afghan Evac convenes a coalition of more than 250 organizations from across the ideological and political spectrum. Our coalition members - spanning veterans, national security professionals, human rights advocates, and Afghans - are united by a shared belief: The U.S. has a sacred duty to honor its promises to Afghan allies who served alongside the U.S. over the course of our longest war.” Link to Afghan Evac: https://archive.is/FsmN2

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🔥 🔥🔥Huge! From Steve Schmidt, formerly of Lincoln Project which brought us the Tiki Torch hoax, I bring you his latest influence operation. June 12, 2025 the day that his Save American Movement was announced. This was the first known mention of an influence operation to defy Trumps military orders! A nearly 6 month operation coming to fruition. Inside his video, they tell you to report to the GI Rights Network. Which surprise surprise is partnered with the MILITARY LAW TASK FORCE and the National Lawyers guild. Hello @DataRepublican Oh and this movement is thriving within all the Trump resistance circles including 50501. But wait, it gets better. The Save America movement is part of a consortium. Including active military! Thank you to @glasses_no for showing me this article. Their speaking out led me to greater things. “Save America Movement, Valor Media & Coalition Partners Release New Video Featuring Veterans Standing in Solidarity With Senator Mark Kelly” “Save America Movement (SAM), a national organization dedicated to defeating MAGA extremism and restoring American democracy, today, along with allied organizations including Valor Media, Veterans for Responsible Leadership, Common Defense and The Chamberlain Network released a new video featuring veterans from across the country speaking out in support of Senator Mark Kelly and condemning the Trump Administration's threat to recall and court-martial him for publicly stating the basic legal duty of men and women in uniform to refuse unlawful orders.” These orgs all seem to involve military. But Common Defense seems to include active military. This is a major no no! “Since then, we’ve grown into a powerful movement with more than 150,000 supporters and tens of thousands of veterans and military families across all 50 states. Millions of military veterans, service members, and families are tired of being exploited.” What makes these people dangerous is their predilection for running narratives. Recall Lincoln Project used to hang around with Military strength, Narrative Strategies of ASU. If these folks still do, they hide it well. There’s also a couple of MAJOR things I’m not telling you yet. Link to article mentioned. 👇🏻 The rest will follow. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/save-america-movement-valor-media-144600077.html

Video Transcript AI Summary

American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines: for two hundred fifty years, American soldiers have sworn an oath, not to a man, but to the constitution of The United States. The cause is liberty. The mission is democracy. You were not the weapon of a wannabe strongman. You were the shield of a free people. No unlawful order can erase that. Following such an order is not loyalty. It's a crime. Your oath. Remember your duty. Paid for by the Save America movement.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: American soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines. For two hundred fifty years, American soldiers have sworn an oath, not to a man, but to the constitution of The United States. The cause is liberty. The mission is democracy. You were not the weapon of a wannabe strongman. You were the shield of a free people. No unlawful order can erase that. Following such an order is not loyalty. It's a crime. Your oath. Remember your duty. Paid for by the Save America movement.

Save America Movement, Valor Media & Coalition Partners Release New Video Featuring Veterans Standing in Solidarity With Senator Mark Kelly Save America Movement (SAM), a national organization dedicated to defeating MAGA extremism and restoring American democracy, today, along with allied organizations including Valor Media, Veterans for Responsible Leadership, Common Defense and The Chamberlain Network released a new video featuring veterans from across the country speaking out in support of Senator Mark Kelly and condemning the Trump Administration's threat to recall and court-martial him for publicly stating the basic legal duty finance.yahoo.com

Posted - November 26, 2025 at 10:31 PM

Saved - November 27, 2025 at 1:50 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m noting a claim that at least five of the “seditious six” were recruited and trained for office by New Politics, with six Congress members involved. New Politics is described as a campaign accelerator that even recruits from intelligence. They recently got $20 million to fund “The Next Mission,” aiming to recruit 5,000 candidates in four years. More than 30 officials are on the recruitment committee, including six other members of Congress such as Jason Crow. Five listed names: Elissa Slotkin, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, Chrissy Houlahan. Mark Kelly is mentioned as missing.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

‼️Breaking! At least five of the seditious six were recruited and trained for office by “New Politics”. Maybe even all six! (Jason Crow and SIX other Congress members are involved in recruitment.) “New Politics is a purpose-built political talent agency and campaign accelerator that recruits, trains, and develops leaders with service backgrounds to transform our politics.” They even recruit from Intelligence agencies too. Not even two months before the Military Coup narrative was started, (I’ll explain later) New Politics got a sudden infusion of twenty million dollars! More money than they’ve seen in eight years of operations! Where did this come from? Rep. Pat Ryan, D-N.Y., who will co-chair the effort, said the country is “at a crisis moment in political leadership” and ex-federal workers are among potential recruits. Ryan is co-chairing the group’s new recruitment effort, called "The Next Mission" and powered by $20 million, which will aim to recruit 5,000 candidates up and down the ballot over the next four years. More than 30 elected officials are participating in the New Politics recruitment committee, including ➡️SIX OTHER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS⬅️who have worked with the group in the past. Among them is Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo., who is also co-chairing recruitment efforts for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. EMILY CHERNIACK is the founder and executive director Here’s the five they have listed and I archived all their pages Elissa Slotkin Jason Crow Chris Deluzio Maggie Goodlander Chrissy Houlahan Missing but could be one of the six others: Mark Kelly Stay tuned it’s gonna get better! Additional sources to follow. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/crisis-moment-20-million-push-recruit-service-candidates-rcna198219

'A crisis moment': New Politics launches $20 million push to recruit service-oriented candidates New Politics, a group focused on supporting candidates from service backgrounds, is launching a multimillion-dollar effort to recruit thousands of candidates over the next four years. nbcnews.com

Posted - November 11, 2025 at 1:32 PM

Saved - November 11, 2025 at 4:51 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I connected posts claiming Soros-aligned groups (Open Society, Neo Philanthropy, State Infrastructure Fund, Democracy Fund) coordinated a large 2020 election effort— Partnership for Safe Voting, Transition Integrity Project, and related funding networks—raising over $500M, deploying tools and audits, and aligning multiple organizations (Brennan Center, Protect Democracy, DFN) to “protect voting” and influence outcomes.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🔥🔥🔥Breaking new 2020 election scandal! Soros ran a $500 million organized plan called “Partnership for Safe Voting”, to ADMINISTER the 2020 election to benefit Democrats! This included utilizing the Brennan Center to litigate. We are talking drop boxes, ballot deadlines, fighting fraud allegations, ballot curing, etc… And the Brennan Center was even involved in audits! They did this as a member of the Soros Neo Philanthropies State infrastructure funds, Voting Rights Working Group. Laleh Ispahani as Co-Director of Open Society-U.S. created the “Partnership for Safe Voting”. This ran under Neo Philanthropies State Infrastructure Fund plus other orgs. She was promoted to executive director of OSF after this. “Last year, she ( Laleh Ispahani ) created and co-chaired the Partnership for Safe Voting, a large philanthropic partnership to protect voting in the face of the pandemic, voter suppression, and disinformation which raised over $500 million for front-line organizations.” Joe Goldman, President of the Omidyar Democracy Fund, and a member org of Soros Democracy Alliance also co-chaired the Partnership For Safe Voting. “Our grantees provided crucial technical assistance and education to local election administrators adopting mail-in voting, implemented health protocols at polling centers, and recruited thousands of much-needed poll workers.” Multiple pieces of software created to protect the 2020 election were created by the Trump resistance. The same people that colluded under Soros master plan. Protect Democracy ran the Transition Integrity Project that was mentioned in the Times fortification article. They ran both Voteshield and Ballotshield in 2020. Lisa Monaco was involved in Voteshield too! Rabed-v and the misinformation reporting portal were funded by the Joe Goldmans Democracy fund. Joe Goldman, the co-chair of the Partnership For Safe Voting, admitted that they were partisan hacks even tho running 501 c3 charities to do this! All of this election collusion stuff they did was to benefit the Democrats! “we are anchored in our values, not this sense that the ultimate goal is actually some kind of bipartisan stance.” “And worries about entire sets of nonprofits having their 501c3 status revoked, which I'm sure you'll remember there was a period in April where everybody said that's coming and then it didn't come.” “They can come after my 501c3 status. They can target my staff or myself. But I am far more protected than those on the front line.” (Protected? How?) Obviously they got more money than they intended. Here’s the Democracy Funders Network (DFN) call for funding. DFN is ran by Rachel Pritzker and Mike Berkowicz. DFN also put a call in for funding the TRANSITION INTEGRITY PROJECT ran by Protect Democracy and mentioned in The Times election fortification article: (And trust me, there’s going to be more later on DFN .) “Attend this funder briefing with Joe Goldman of the Democracy Fund, Laleh Ispahani of the Open Society Foundation, and Scott Moyer of the Langeloth Foundation to learn about the Partnership for Safe Voting 2020, an ambitious initiative being launched by several philanthropic partners in an effort to raise and align $168 million in c3 and c4 resources to ensure the elections are safe, accessible, and secure.” According to Mike Berkowicz, who was co-founder of DFN with Rachel Pritzker, the 2020 election was all about philanthropy: Mike Berkowitz: philanthropy wound up having to play a role in election administration itself for the first time in history Robert Wiblin: Just to be clear, you’re saying philanthropists were funding the operation of the election, like the existence of polling places and things. I saw that and I couldn’t believe it. Mike Berkowitz: For instance, there was an actually not great Time magazine piece by Molly Ball on this a few weeks ago that talked about it in really conspiratorial terms. Sourcing will take many hours, enjoy!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🙀This webpage was deleted right after I accessed it! Was it this or is it something else being hidden? “Laleh Ispahani serves as Co-Director of Open Society Foundation for the U.S. (OSUS), the US component of the largest foundation dedicated to advancing justice, democratic governance, and human rights in the United States and globally. Laleh is an expert on protecting and expanding the right to vote, reducing the influence of money on politics, and ensuring that the internet remains an open and secure platform for free expression and civic participation. Last year, she created and co-chaired the Partnership for Safe Voting, a large philanthropic partnership to protect voting in the face of the pandemic, voter suppression, and disinformation which raised over $500 million for front-line organizations.” (All of my links are double archived so holler if you ever need a spare.) https://web.archive.org/web/20211207221630/https://rockwoodleadership.org/announcing-the-2021-22-national-leading-from-the-inside-out-yearlong-fellows/

Announcing The 2021-22 National Leading From The Inside Out Yearlong Fellows – Rockwood Leadership Institute web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Joe Goldman, is president of Omidyar Democracy Fund. Democracy Fund is a Soros Democracy Alliance member org. Joe Goldman was a Co-chair of Soros, Partnership For Safe Voting. In 2024, Joe was named “Foundation Leader of the Year” by Inside Philanthropy for his leadership of a campaign to support earlier nonpartisan election-year giving, called “All by April”. Joe has played a key role in creating and leading several bodies aimed at strengthening and growing the field, including chairing the Trusted Elections Fund and co-chairing the Partnership for Safe Voting. https://web.archive.org/web/20251005232546/https://givingdoneright.org/season-5-episode6/

Season 5, Episode 6 - Giving Done Right Podcast web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🚨🚨Soros commandeered our 2020 election! 🚨🚨 You will darn near 💩 yourself now that you know this Brennan Center stuff was directed by Soros! Read what all they did!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🔥 Thread 🧵 In my opinion, the Brennan Center did an exemplary job in fortifying the 2020 election. With generous help from Soros Open Society, Ford Fndn, Omidyar Democracy Fund (Partnered with Arabella/Soros Democracy Alliance), Rockefeller, Tides, Soros Fund Charitable Fndn and many thousands of other orgs! The Brennan Ctr estimated it would cost at least ➡️ $4 BILLION ⬅️ to “protect” all elections including primaries throughout 2020. Here’s what the Brennan Ctr proudly accomplished: ♦️ Constant communication with a coast-to-coast network of hundreds of election officials. ♦️ Pushed, “Covid-19 Should be a Legitimate ‘Excuse’ to Vote by Mail”. ♦️Pushed the purchasing and deployment of centralized vote tabulation machines (high-speed scanners). ♦️ Suggested localities deploy drop boxes to reduce their postage cost and increase security. ♦️ Partnered with the National Association of Secretaries of State. ♦️ Prioritized protecting the election by countering disinformation, misinformation, and attempts at further suppressing the vote under the pretext of a pandemic. ♦️ Provided solutions such as where to locate polling sites and how to configure and supply them. ♦️ Released tool kits for activists in all 50 states. In each tool kit, they identified the voting reforms needed in each state. ♦️Worked with local groups in Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Texas on state specific voter education and protection efforts. ♦️Worked alongside the Center for Tech and Civic Life and National Vote at Home, etc. (Zuckerbucks) ♦️ Conducted high-level media briefings and partnered with ABC. ♦️ Traveled to Georgia to help election officials conduct a recount of the presidential vote. ♦️ Helped to develop and implement Pennsylvania risk limiting audits. ♦️ Their attorneys filed or intervened in lawsuits in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Texas. To quote the Brennan Center on the 2020 election: “We are pleased to share with you this report on the truly extraordinary year that was. As we reflect on the Brennan Center’s accomplishments in 2020, we can say with great pride and relief that in the end, democracy prevailed against brazen assaults on our electoral processes, against lies intended to equate ballot access with stolen elections, and against naked attempts to delegitimize the votes and voices of Black and brown people.” Thread will include all evidence. Plus I will expand on CTCL with past threads. And who knows, there could be more.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Here’s Soros Open Society mentioning Laleh Ispahani’s promotion after creating the successful Partnership for Safe Voting for the 2020 election. Open Society Names Laleh Ispahani as Co-Director of Open Society-U.S. “Last year, in the face of the pandemic, voter suppression, and disinformation, Ispahani created and co-chaired the Partnership for Safe Voting, the largest philanthropic partnership in American history to protect voting rights. The Partnership’s efforts helped to ensure safe, secure, and fair elections in the U.S. in 2020 despite the enormous challenges.” Everything is coming with the sources and then some! https://web.archive.org/web/20211215185717/https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/newsroom/open-society-names-laleh-ispahani-as-co-director-of-open-society-u-s

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

This Democracy Funders Network, call for funding of the Partnership For Safe Voting, mentioned three people. Was Scott Moyer a third co-chair for the Partnership For Safe Voting? Because the other two certainly are. 🤷‍♀️ “COVID-19 has taken the urgency of efforts to protect our elections to a whole new level. Wisconsin and Georgia illustrated the chaos that can ensue for an election amid a pandemic. States and localities are sprinting to implement new voting procedures and rules, and the Iowa caucus debacle reminded us that accelerated implementations of changes can be risky. The necessary but dangerous rush towards implementation of safe voting comes against a backdrop of massive budget shortfalls for states and municipalities, as well as ongoing threats of disinformation threats and voter suppression. Attend this funder briefing with Joe Goldman of the Democracy Fund, Laleh Ispahani of the Open Society Foundations, and Scott Moyer of the Langeloth Foundation to learn about the Partnership for Safe Voting 2020, an ambitious initiative being launched by several philanthropic partners in an effort to raise and align $168 million in c3 and c4 resources to ensure the elections are safe, accessible, and secure. What are the objectives of the Partnership? How can it advance quick and strategic change at scale? How can you get involved? “ https://web.archive.org/web/20251003020719/https://www.democracyfundersnetwork.org/events/2020/6/2/funder-briefing-partnership-for-safe-voting-2020

Funder Briefing: Partnership for Safe Voting 2020 — Democracy Funders Network COVID-19 has taken the urgency of efforts to protect our elections to a whole new level. Wisconsin and Georgia illustrated the chaos that can ensue for an election amid a pandemic. States and localities are sprinting to implement new voting procedures and rules, and the Iowa caucus debacle reminded us that accelerated implementations of changes can be risky. The necessary but dangerous rush towards implementation of safe voting comes against a backdrop of massive budget shortfalls for states and municipalities, as well as ongoing threats of disinformation threats and voter suppression. Attend this funder briefing with Joe Goldman of the Democracy Fund, Laleh Ispahani of the Open Society Foundations, and Scott Moyer of the Langeloth Foundation to learn about the Partnership for Safe Voting 2020, an ambitious initiative being launched by several philanthropic partners in an effort to raise and align $168 million in c3 and c4 resources to ensure the elections are safe, accessible, and secure. What are the objectives of the Partnership? How can it advance quick and strategic change at scale? How can you get involved? REGISTER HERE> web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

‼️Here’s Democracy Funder Networks (DFN) call for funding the Transition Integrity Project and the Fight Back Table both mentioned in the Times Fortifying the election article. As I have already proven, Protect Democracy ran the Transition Integrity Project. I’ll show this at the end. Another note, the Brennan Center ran a similar project in 2024. I’ll also show this at the end. Plus more. “Tuesday, August 25 from 12-1pm ET / 9-10am PT Join DFN donors to discuss the potential and importance of planning for various election-related crises, and to highlight specific actions donors can take to prevent and/or respond to crises. We'll be hearing from Zoe Hudson of the Transition Integrity Project, Angela Peoples of Fight Back Table, Peter Colavito of Social & Economic Justice Leaders Project, and Jenny Flanagan of the Trusted Elections Fund on their efforts to identify, prepare for, and respond to threats to the integrity of the election results or potential abuse of power during a transition.” https://web.archive.org/web/20231228045641/https://www.democracyfundersnetwork.org/events/2020/8/25/planning-for-and-responding-to-election-crises

Planning for and Responding to Election Crises — Democracy Funders Network Tuesday, August 25 from 12-1pm ET / 9-10am PT Join DFN donors to discuss the potential and importance of planning for various election-related crises, and to highlight specific actions donors can take to prevent and/or respond to crises. We'll be hearing from Zoe Hudson of the Transition Integrity Project, Angela Peoples of Fight Back Table, Peter Colavito of Social & Economic Justice Leaders Project, and Jenny Flanagan of the Trusted Elections Fund on their efforts to identify, prepare for, and respond to threats to the integrity of the election results or potential abuse of power during a transition. In the last third of the call, donors with capacity for non-501(c)(3) giving will have the opportunity to stay on to discuss 501(c)(4) aspects of the work to coordinate post-election mobilization and response. REGISTER HERE> web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Soros Democracy Alliance, Neo Philanthropies - State Infrastructure Fund, is one of the orgs that ran the Partnership For Safe Elections. The State Infrastructure Fund has a multi state alliance each with multiple orgs. ♦️“The State Infrastructure Fund (SIF), established in 2010, is a project of NEO Philanthropy.” “SIF is a member of the Partnership for Safe Voting 2020 (PSV). PSV is a collaboration of pooled funds intended to scale needed community resources and reduce inefficiencies and duplication across existing democracy funds and strategies.” https://web.archive.org/web/20210624131441/https://www.macfound.org/grantee/neo-philanthropy-39197/ I also found this same evidence in a tax form for Freedom Together Fndn aka the JPB Fndn. Donation to Neo Philanthropy: TO SUPPORT ELECTION PROTECTION AND PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFE VOTING VIA THE STATE INFRASTRUCTURE FUND https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/900747216/202123159349101517/full

NEO Philanthropy - MacArthur Foundation The MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and effective institutions committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. In addition to selecting the MacArthur Fellows, we work to defend human rights, advance global conservation and security, make cities better places, and understand how technology is affecting children and society. web.archive.org

Freedom Together Foundation, Full Filing - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica Since 2013, the IRS has released data culled from millions of nonprofit tax filings. Use this database to find organizations and see details like their executive compensation, revenue and expenses, as well as download tax filings going back as far as 2001. projects.propublica.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

NEO Philanthropies of Soros Partnership For Safe Voting; ♦️ Claims that they won the 2020 election using five states! (Wouldn’t be a bad idea for our DOJ to review those five.) ♦️Claims to be progressive vs bipartisan. ♦️Mentioned juggling a ton of 501 (c3) money into a 501 (c4) to get over tax hurdles. ♦️Used over 42,000 attorneys. ♦️Plus more - please read the thread

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

💥Breaking Thred! NEO Philanthropy, a little known Soros partnered org that prioritizes BIPOC, claims their use of minorities had a major role in determining election results in 5 states! Can you guess the 5? They also claim to be bipartisan and get tax free status. But they have talked about progressive and anti Trump causes a good bit. 🟣 “In November 2020, 159 million people turned out to vote—turnout not seen in more than a century.” “Central to this transformation is NEO Philanthropy’s State Infrastructure Fund (SIF).” They also have 42,000 legal volunteers. 🟣 The bio of the Head of their State Infrastructure Fund: “Erica assumes leadership of SIF after a period of dramatic achievement.” “In the 2020 election period alone, SIF, a non-partisan 501(c)(3) collaborative fund, awarded $56 million to 140 orgs in 17 states.” “African Americans eligible to vote in a presidential election hit a record 30 million, playing a major role in determining election results in AZ, GA, MI, PA and WI.” 🟣 In the Fall 2016 Soros Democracy Alliance doc, The Neo Philanthropy State Infrastructure fund was listed to receive checks for the “Committee On States” an Aligned Partner Organizations (APO) of Soros Democracy Alliance. Recall I found that Soros was a co-founder of Democracy Alliance. 🟣The State Infrastructure Project falls under Donor Services. In my referenced article, it worked in eight states across the country. (This number changes yearly.) “NEO’s Donor Service program meets a growing demand within the philanthropic sector for social justice groups to unify and collaborate with mission-aligned partners in order to empower movements and generate 🔸PROGRESSIVE🔸social change in our communities.” I’ll show tons more evidence in a later post that they support progressive policies. 🟣The groups supported by the State Infrastructure Fund are 501(c)(3) nonprofits and cannot make direct political expenditures. “But some of them, including Black Voters Matter, which was co-founded by activist LaTosha Brown, and the New Georgia Project, are associated with 501(c)(4) organizations, which can participate in politics, subject to limitations.” “Pro Georgia, is the nonprofit that manages grant money from the State Infrastructure Fund.” Pro Georgia is a member of the State Voices Network. State Voices is a Soros Democracy Alliance Aligned Partner as listed in 2016 doc mentioned above. (See photo) The grantee list (Who gets money from them.) for the Neo Philanthropy State Infrastructure Fund is massive! (See doc) Here’s a few notables: ♦️American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) - recall they worked on elections in at least Georgia. ♦️Brennan Center for Justice - Involved in election changes, Zuckerbucks, and audits etc. ♦️ Common Cause - Involved with DHS for election censorship etc. Listed in the same doc are the donors. Here’s some highlights: ♦️Carnegie Corp of New York ♦️Democracy Fund ♦️Ford Fndn ♦️Open Society Fndn Fndn ♦️Unbound Philanthropy ♦️Wellspring Philanthropic Fund 🟣 STATE VOICES SOROS DEMOCRACY ALLIANCE “A core part of SIF’s early grant-making, and one that continues was to support “state Tables.” These orgs, many of which are associated with a national umbrella org State Voices, coordinate the activities of civic engagement groups in a state so they are strategically aligned, and their collective plans are designed to have the greatest impact.” “SIF collaboratives prioritize BIPOC” and uses “a racial equity/justice lens”. Extra 🟣2018 Neo Philanthropy announced 3 new partner donor services: 🔹Democracy alliance polled fund 🔹NEW AMERICAN MAJORITY FUND 🔹Virginia plus 🟣 The Four Freedoms Fund is a project of NEO Philanthropy. Recall earlier discussions on this, CCDH, Unbound Philanthropy, & Narrative Change use. 🟣 The ADL works with the Thought Partnerships Hub thru the Bridging Divides Initiative. Thought Partnerships is ran by Neo Philanthropy. *All referenced links will be in a later post.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@Woodshed2012 Oh don’t worry about them, I have them covered, IN THE FUTURE. 😈

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@white_winf29065 The Times article project was repeated in 2024 by the involved Brennan Center.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@RickTrussell3 Actually yes it is.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@wildbill_70 Oh, I dug thru the web like a banshee. I’d like to know more about the third person at the DFN Funder call tho.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

@CatZimmerer @Smith_mountian Ohh this just the beginning things are gonna get worse.

Posted - October 18, 2025 at 8:17 PM

Saved - October 19, 2025 at 2:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I trace Jack Smith’s role in the 2010 IRS targeting of conservatives, noting a Public Integrity Section meeting with Lois Lerner and a left‑leaning billionaire grant while at the DOJ. I flag Clinton ties, Soros Open Society and ACLU links, Smith’s DOJ and HCA roles, and Democracy 21’s Norm Eisen with Lanny Breuer. I cite ongoing discussions on targeting 501(c)(4) groups and campaign‑finance enforcement.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

2010 - Obama DOJ employee, Jack Smith, initiated the IRS targeting of conservatives, although Lerner was the one to become famous. And he solicited and accepted a huge GRANT from an unnamed billionaire WHILE AT THE DOJ. I want to find more on this. 🤔 He was brought into the Obama admin by a trusted Clinton Loyalist. He also worked with Soros Open Society and ACLU Etc lawyers. “The Justice Department convened a meeting with former IRS official Lois Lerner in October 2010 to discuss how the IRS could assist in the criminal enforcement of campaign-finance laws against politically active nonprofits. This meeting was arranged at the direction of Public Integrity Section Chief Jack Smith.” “According to the Republican National Lawyers Association, "Public Integrity Section Chief Jack Smith told investigators that officials at the Justice Department discussed targeting conservative nonprofit groups with Lerner as early as October 2010." Smith was picked as the Specialist Prosecutor for the Yugoslavia war crimes trials by European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo mission head, Alexandra Papadopoulou. Who later became a Biden ambassador to Greece. (Have I ever told you about Obama’s links to Kosovo? Kosovo is also a fake state created by the CIA to destabilize pro-Russian Serbia. Perhaps I should…) Smith had been handpicked to run the DOJ's public integrity section by Lanny Breuer. Lanny, a trusted Clinton friend that was widely disliked, distrusted and hated even by fellow Democrats and lefties over his connections and client list, a man whom no one in D.C. believed had an ounce of integrity, then brought in Jack Smith to do some of his dirty work. Lanny Breuer, Bill Clinton's Special Counsel who defended him during his impeachment hearings, and then Sandy Berger, after he stole classified documents from the National Archives to cover up Clinton's actions, had been brought in by Obama to head up DOJ's criminal division. The Clintons had been fixated on seizing control of the DOJ and punishing their political enemies. And that is what the DOJ began to do from Hillary's abuse of FBI files to Russiagate. When Jack Smith became a Harvard Wasserstein Fellow, even while, unironically, serving as head of the Department of Justice's Public Integrity Section, seemingly soliciting and accepting a grant funded by a leftist billionaire, he joined a list of leftist activist lawyers working for the ACLU, Earthjustice, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Soros' Open Society, Catholic Charities and the UN. After Trumps win, Jack Smith became the head of litigation for the Hospital Corporation of America (HCA). Where Nancy-Ann DeParle, the architect of Obamacare, became an HCA director. This was to protect Obamacare. There’s much more inside the article on Clinton connections. And I’m off to find out about this billionaire Grant while serving under the DOJ. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/19199/jack-smith-doj-trump

Jack Smith, Clinton's DOJ Hit Man, Comes After Trump How the DOJ's Jack Smith would go about promoting social justice was a question that was answered at least twice in public view, where everyone could see and hear it. Under Obama, the IRS and the DOJ had illegally targeted conservative nonprofit gatestoneinstitute.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Jack Smith initiated the IRS targeting meeting on October 8, 2010, with Pilger and Lois Lerner. Jack smith also regularly met with the FBI on this too. “In the ensuing weeks, the Public Integrity Section (Jack Smith headed this) began to discuss possible actions on non-profits engaged in political speech. Smith convened meetings on a “possible 501/campaign finance investigation.” At Smith’s direction, Pilger arranged a meeting with Lerner and the IRS to discuss the “evolving legal landscape” of campaign-finance law after the Citizens United decision. Pilger intended to engage with Lerner about being “more vigilant to the opportunities from more crime in the . . . 501(c)(4) area.” He also sought to better understand the “practicalities” of criminally enforcing non-profit political speech, such as whether the IRS could review donor lists of 501(c)(4) organizations for potential violations of campaign-finance law. Similarly, the IRS sought to “walk [the Justice Department] through the basic civil rules within [the IRS’s] jurisdiction and find out what if anything else they are looking for. . . . These are not tax people so [Lerner] may also take [IRS employee] Joe Urban to do clear perimeters about tax info should they want to do any 6103 fishing (as opposed to public record 6104 info).” “Public Integrity Section Chief Jack Smith testified to the Committee that his team continued an investigatory “dialogue” with the FBI about non-profits engaged in political speech.” https://web.archive.org/web/20141225040046/https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/December-2014-IRS-Report.pdf

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Here, Norm Eisens Democracy 21 was feeding Eric Holders DOJ info to target five leading republican presidential candidate-specific Super PACs. This included the Santorum presidential campaign. It seems Norm Eisens Democracy 21 was involved in the IRS scandal to target republicans. Inside they also cc’d Jack Smith and Lanny Breuer. https://web.archive.org/web/20150930184235/https://democracy21.org/uploads/D21_Supplemental_Letter_to_Justice_Department_1_13_2012.pdf

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Just so you understand, Eisen was at Democracy 21 later than this. I think… This just shows the rot he always seems to hang around. Hes been working around Democracy 21 a long time. Here’s 2011. “Norm Eisen, sponsored by several of the same lobbying organizations signing this comment is a case in point. Eisen simply reimbursed the organizations for his share of the costs.” “These comments are submitted by the following organizations – Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause, Democracy 21, Public Citizen and U.S. PIRG – etc…” https://web.archive.org/web/20190517041833/https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/oge-gift-comments.pdf

Posted - May 2, 2025 at 1:14 AM

Saved - May 6, 2025 at 4:43 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve uncovered some concerning information about the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). They openly admit to running influence campaigns targeting populists, using media, celebrities, and politicians. Notably, Imran Ahmed from CCDH has expressed intentions to exclude conservatives from elections, which raises questions about election interference. Additionally, there’s a broader narrative change initiative funded by various organizations aimed at reshaping public attitudes on key issues, including immigration and conservatism, even infiltrating schools and religious institutions.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🔥🔥Breaking! The Center For Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), that is going after Elon Musk, happened to post a US job. Where they admit to running influence campaigns! Does this sound reputable to you? Especially an org that censors populists specifically? “Our uniquely impactful campaigns dynamically combine mainstream media, broadcast, online influencers, celebrities and civil society and politicians to create sustained, intensifying impact for our research-driven insights.” Dang.. This is sick! As for targeting populists specifically: “Populist politicians have allied with haters to gain new advocates and troll armies which harass opponents and institutions that provide checks and balances in liberal states, like the media and judiciary.” “If we do not deal with this threat, it will continue to divide our societies and undermine the strength of our democratic systems.” Booom! Sources to follow!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Yeah, I don’t make this stuff up. The Center For Countering Digital Hate is running a star studded influence campaign and even using the media, celebrities and POLITICIANS! And it’s certainly not populist conservative politicians that they are using as I’ll show in my next post. Heck, Labour Together (Democrats) was involved a lot longer than they tell you. Two archives 1. https://archive.is/Cnen7/image 2. https://web.archive.org/web/20210717170929/https://252f2edd-1c8b-49f5-9bb2-cb57bb47e4ba.filesusr.com/ugd/f4d9b9_568cca92d4ae441eaffc40a02ec0b6b4.pdf

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

This document is a lot bigger than folks realize. In 2019, Morgan McSweeney of Labour Together (UK Democrat party) was STILL working at the Center For Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). While at the same time admitting to targeting populists (conservatives). According to this doc, a tipoff that someone is a populist is a revulsion to political correctness. Oh gosh.. 🤦🏻‍♀️ Bad form Peter. Who else was working on this report? A person from the Soros and Omidyar funded Unbound Philanthropy and oh look, Euan Neill, from the UK GOVERNMENTS Commission for Countering Extremism. Yes the UK government was targeting USA conservatives! Archive 1 https://archive.is/sTeje/image Archive 2 https://web.archive.org/web/20191214143146/https://252f2edd-1c8b-49f5-9bb2-cb57bb47e4ba.filesusr.com/ugd/f4d9b9_ce178075e9654b719ec2b4815290f00f.pdf

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Sometimes I feel like a fallen tree in empty woods. Imran Ahmed vows to shut conservatives out of elections. This is foreign election interference. And if @AGPamBondi does her job right, she will not only stop this, but destroy the CCDH.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

🔥Imran Ahmed - Center For Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) in 2019 said that it’s all about the conservative/populist “troll” influence on elections. Vows to shut them out of politics. Says that some ELECTION CANDIDATES need to have their content removed or hidden on social media! *Now hold on a sec, if you are claiming that you need to remove voices in elections, who’s the one interfering in elections here? “Online extremists are already influencing our election – but we can do something about it” “This election campaign will see online trolls attempting to use bile and hatred to gain a platform and to intimidate their opponents. But they only have power if their hate is seen, read, and engaged with. Let’s instead do what we can to shut them out of our politics.” “Populists around the world, from Russia to the Philippines, use online troll armies to harass, frighten and silence their political opponents. In Britain, extremist trolls are having a similar impact. If these tactics are allowed to work and more public figures are driven to remove themselves from public life, we will only see levels of hate increase.” As far as the troll armies, I wouldn’t go there tootsie. Conservatives don’t have organized troll armies, but the left does. Maybe you’d like to educate us? 😉 😬 “This isn’t a new problem, but with the general ELECTION campaign almost underway, it’s too late for further calls for social media companies to act or for the government to regulate - although they should. If we’re to stem this tide, we need to change the way we react to online abuse.” “Deleting or hiding comments on candidates’ Facebook pages, when they cross the line from criticism into hateful abuse or hateful language, also keeps the space safe for the vast majority who want to discuss and debate politics without harassment.” *Once again, this is election interference. Source link to follow. And yes, I was hinting about something.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Unbound Philanthropy and Pop Culture are connected to Imran Ahmed of CCDH. And are utilized for Narrative Change aka brain washing. Like I have already shown you, Imran Ahmed was a lead at a narrative change org. Narrative change eas created to destroy the populist right. “The political, economic and social developments that have given rise to populist and conservative movements the world over are a rude wake-up call. There is a new sense of urgency.”

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

Exclusive! “Re | Claiming the Narrative for Social Change” A breathtaking 2019 document exposes the massive brainwashing network of the left. Just as we thought, it’s all coordinated and includes both the UK and US with plans to brainwash the entire world with progressivism. Likely a thousand plus narrative change linked orgs. Including the Narrative Initiative, and 350 dot orgs which I already discussed at length. The NGO’s involved are funded by the usual suspects like, Soros Open Society, Ford Fndn, Omidyar, Atlantic Philanthropies etc. But there’s also a UK side with Oak Fndn and Soros Eurasia OSF, etc. These are not limited to operating in their respective countries. I even found mention of at least two orgs in a gov grant doc which involves infiltrating schools at our expense. Imran Ahmed of The Center For Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is associated with those orgs. Noteworthy - these plans involve defunding ice which Biden just added to a funding request. Here’s a short rundown of the doc: They are infiltrating the Catholic Church, reclaiming “disinfo” narratives, setting climate narratives, deploying narrative change in media, stopping the border wall, decreasing Fed funding for detention of illegals, training children against conservatism in schools especially if migrants are there, pushing LGBTQ on our children, and shoving migration down our throats. All in order to reclaim progressive rule. We need to watch our children’s schools even closer for further indoctrination. It’s not just LGBTQ and race, they are there to turn our children against us. We also need to communicate with churches to see who is contacting them. They are even sending priests, sermon talking points! They also send talking points to the media too. I find it noteworthy that they are concentrating on brainwashing schools with migrants against conservatism. Here’s some alarming quotes on objectives: 🔸 “The political, economic and social developments that have given rise to populist and conservative movements the world over are a rude wake-up call. There is a new sense of urgency.” 🔸 “This report provides a mapping of initiatives supported by various European and American philanthropic bodies. These initiatives aim to leverage the power of strategic communications, and in particular, effective narratives.” 🔸 “All are engaged on projects relating to narrative change, strategic communications and research aimed at changing public attitudes on issues ranging from immigration, human rights, gender equality, sexual reproduction and sexual orientation rights and the closing of civic space. 🔸“This mapping of a philanthropic response on strategic communications for narrative change is a real-time snapshot. It covers a wide range of actions being taken, from research to movement building. It aims to spotlight opportunities for collective strategic communications solutions.” Here’s some of their orgs/funders: 🔹Narrative4 – Story exchange “There is a need for: 👩‍👧1.Outreach programmes that engage children and young adults at school and community levels to build understanding and support for core values and to counter conservative action. 👩‍👧2.Narrative programmes that work with schools and local communities, particularly in areas of high migration. 👩‍👧3.Initiatives that empower young adults to design solutions and lead on progressive values.” * So far, it has reached 200 schools (2019). 🔹More in Common “More in Common piloted programmes with the Catholic Church, NGOs and five mayors of areas with mixed populations. This included research on the opinions of Catholics later used as the basis for producing successful messages to engage priests, Catholic organizations and believers. Notes for sermons were explored to see how to reach anti-migrant people.” ———————————— Being out of space, this will be continued. And I will also show that our censorship apparatus is involved in narrative control. Link will be in the next post.

Posted - April 14, 2025 at 5:38 AM

Saved - April 15, 2025 at 6:55 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve uncovered significant connections involving Norm Eisen and MoveOn, revealing their collaboration even before the resistance movement began. Eisen and Richard Painter, both former White House ethics counsels, worked together on various initiatives, including a video warning about Trump's potential constitutional violations. They also led an alliance of over 30 groups aimed at addressing Trump's conflicts of interest. Their efforts included attempts to influence the Electoral College and mobilize public protests, drawing parallels to Serbian Otpor's strategies. More details are coming.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

🔥🔥Breaking! Norm Eisen committed sedition and colluded to remove Trumps electors in December 2016. All while colluding with the MoveOn Trump resistance aka Serbian Otpor. But it gets better, the main man that Eisen colluded with, Robert Painter, got Eisens good friend, John Roberts, into the Supreme Court! Remember that nail biting moment where the Dems were trying to get Trumps electors to change their legally binding vote? It was Norms and MoveOns doing. Together.. Plus he was involved in the Serbian Otpor, Color Revolution regime change against Trump. Yes, he partnered with MoveOn and Indivisible. And, Norm Eisen was partnered with MoveOn, the main resistance org, LONG before the resistance even started. Here’s their recent partnership: “MoveOn’s recent work includes partnering with former White House ethics counsels Richard Painter and Norm Eisen” On Norm Eisen and Richard Painter partnering: “Eisen and Painter also have influence beyond CREW. They have assumed a leadership role with an informal alliance of about 30 good government groups and individuals, including Common Cause, the Center for American Progress and the Project on Government Oversight, that have been coordinating with frequent calls on ways to take issue with Trump’s conflicts.” About the Supreme Court and Norm Eisens accomplice Robert Painter: “Republicans have also given Painter grief for his ethical advocacy. The former GOP White House lawyer served in Bush’s second term, helping handle the tax implications tied to the complicated divestments of $600 million in Goldman Sachs stock held by the incoming Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, as well as the Supreme Court nominations for John Roberts and Samuel Alito.” There are even greater stories to be told here. And you know that I’ll find them. Sources to follow.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Richard Pater and Norm Eisen express concern about Donald Trump's financial conflicts of interest, particularly regarding the emoluments clause of the Constitution, which prohibits public officials from receiving payments and gifts from foreign governments. Trump's hotel is soliciting foreign governments for business, which they claim would violate the Constitution. They assert that Trump has stated that the laws don't apply to him, which they dispute. They also raise concerns about potential litigation and corruption risks during a Trump administration. They urge electors to consider whether Trump can honestly take the oath of office to defend the Constitution when he may be in violation of it immediately upon being sworn in. They believe it would be unacceptable for a president to be in violation of the Constitution on their first day in office.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I'm Richard Pater. I'm Norm Eisen. Speaker 1: I'm chief White House ethics lawyer under president George w Bush. Speaker 0: The chief ethics adviser to president Barack Obama. Speaker 1: We cannot have a president who is in violation of the constitution on his very first day in office. Speaker 0: And I'm very concerned about Donald Trump's financial conflicts of interest. Speaker 1: It is very important that he separate himself from his businesses. Speaker 0: President-elect Trump has said the laws don't apply to him. That's not true. Even our constitution, the most fundamental legal document that we have as Americans, has a constitutional conflicts clause prohibiting just the situation that we're in. It's called the emoluments clause. Speaker 1: There's a serious risk that he could be in violation of the emoluments clause of the constitution, which prohibits public officials in The United States from receiving payments and gifts from foreign governments. There's also a significant risk that he could face litigation from plaintiff's lawyers over his business that would be a distraction from his duties as president, and also a significant risk of corruption through bribery and other, means of corruption during a Trump administration. Speaker 0: President-elect Trump, through his hotel, is soliciting foreign governments for business. Every one of those foreign government payments is gonna be a violation of our constitution. This is a very serious matter as we move towards the electoral college that requires electors like all Americans to search their conscience, to study the law and the facts, and to ask themselves, can Donald Trump honestly take an oath of office to defend and protect the constitution of The United States when the first moment after he's sworn in, he'll be in violation of that same document. Speaker 1: It would be unacceptable to have a president sworn into office and be in violation of the constitution on his very first day in office.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Whoops, fell asleep. Here’s evidence that Eisen was partnered with MoveOn before the resistance even started. Here’s Eisen Democracy 21 partnering with MoveOn at Democracy Awakening in early 2016. https://archive.is/XTZOj

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Welp, fell back to sleep. 😹 Here’s where Norm Eisen partnered with MoveOn for the resistance. “MoveOn’s recent work includes partnering with former White House ethics counsels Richard Painter and Norm Eisen, who served Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama respectively, to produce a new video with more than 4 million views and host a Facebook Live conversation on how Trump will be in violation of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause on his first day in office due to his conflicts of interest.” https://archive.is/fPv4j

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Here’s the MoveOn video that Norm Eisen and Richard Painter made on the electors. “Trump Could Violate Constitution George W. Bush and Barack Obama lawyers agree: Donald J. Trump is in danger of violating the Constitution on his first day in office.” https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=10153931691870493&vanity=moveon

Error Facebook m.facebook.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Now this December 11, 2016 article is huge in many ways! Including Norm Eisen and Richard Painter trying to change the election results! And that Painter got John Roberts his court gig. “Two longtime ethics experts argue Trump’s business conflicts are so big it should affect how the Electoral College votes.” For starters, it mentions that Norm Eisens pal, Richard Painter, got Supreme Court justice, John Roberts his gig. “Republicans have also given Painter grief for his ethical advocacy. The former GOP White House lawyer served in Bush’s second term, helping handle the tax implications tied to the complicated divestments of $600 million in Goldman Sachs stock held by the incoming Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, as well as the Supreme Court nominations for John Roberts and Samuel Alito.” And here’s where it says that Norm Eisen and Richard Painter were trying to change the outcome of the 2016 election. “That might be an exaggeration, but Eisen and Painter happen to be the two ethicists who are actively working to shape the outcome of an election that most voters think has already been decided.” This also mentions Eisen and Painter working at Crew together just to get Trump. “As the new board leaders at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonprofit that Eisen helped co-found in 2003, they’ll be offering regular guidance and advice policy, legal and research experts whose primary task is to hold the new Republican White House accountable.” But there’s also some mystery org that they work at also. Next post I’ll show the 30 member names. “Eisen and Painter also have influence beyond CREW. They have assumed a leadership role with an informal alliance of about 30 good government groups and individuals, including Common Cause, the Center for American Progress and the Project on Government Oversight, that have been coordinating with frequent calls on ways to take issue with Trump’s conflicts.” https://archive.is/SsUxV

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

The above article 👆🏻links to a letter, signed by the 30 groups and individuals that Norm Eisen and Richard Painter also worked with besides CREW. This is interesting to me because it was pretty much an unknown. “Eisen and Painter also have influence beyond CREW. They have assumed a leadership role with an informal alliance of about 30 good government groups and individuals, including Common Cause, the Center for American Progress and the Project on Government Oversight, that have been coordinating with frequent calls on ways to take issue with Trump’s conflicts. They sent Trump a letter” - Ambassador (ret.) Norm Eisen, chief White House ethics lawyer, 2009-2011 - Richard Painter, chief White House ethics lawyer, 2005-2007 - Campaign for Accountability - Arne H. Carlson, Former Governor of Minnesota (R) - Kathleen Clark, Professor of Law, Washington University, - Center for American Progress - Center for Media and Democracy - Common Cause - CREW - Democracy 21 - Former Rep. Mickey Edwards (R-OK), Former Chairman, House Republican Policy Committee - Every Voice - Issue One - Thomas Mann - OpenTheGovernment dot org - Norm Ornstein - People For the American Way - Trevor Potter, President, Campaign Legal Center - Project On Government Oversight (POGO) - Public Citizen - John Pudner, Executive Director, Take Back Our Republic - The Rootstrikers Project at Demand Progress - Former Rep. Claudine Schneider (R-RI) - Former Rep. John J.H. Schwarz, M.D. (R-MI) - Peter Schweizer, President, Government Accountability Institute - Former Rep. Peter Smith (R-VT) - Sunlight Foundation - Laurence H. Tribe - Carl M. Loeb University Professor and Professor of Constitutional Law, Harvard Law School, - Christie Whitman, Former Governor of New Jersey (R) web.archive.org/web/2016121403…

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Here’s Impeach and Remove (Trump) ran by MoveOn. Here’s a sampling of the partners in this: - Crew (Norm Eisen and Robert Painter) - Democracy 21 (Norm Eisen) - Avaaz - United we dream - Sierra club - Woman’s march - Indivisible - MoveOn - Demos - etc https://archive.is/VVn7s

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

This is the MoveOn Trump Resistance aka Serbian Otpor’s Mueller Firing Rapid Response Team. Here’s a sampling: - Democracy 21 (Norm Eisen) - Pantsuit Nation - Indivisible - MoveOn - Common Cause - Womens March - Etc https://archive.is/VhH0v https://t.co/mgo228BEor

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Yeppers I have another Norm Eisen and MoveOn video coming up. And it’s a whopper! “Wow, our Facebook video on the Mueller investigation reached 1m views! Thx all MoveOn including ace videographer skenigsberg. And happy new year! Here is the video in case you missed it!” https://archive.is/OQqie

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Well, I did promise you another MoveOn, Trump Resistance, video with Norm Eisen. Here he tells people to take to the streets. A common technique that was utilized by Serbian Otpor. And was also utilized for resistance training.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! Norm Eisen, partnered with the Trump Resistance (aka Serbian Otpor) MoveOn, tells people to take to the streets if Mueller was fired! The video is titled: I KNOW ROBERT MUELLER! Inside the video dated Nov 21, 2017, Norm Eisen discusses the “guilt” of the Trump campaign and admin colluding with Russia! And said that Trump met with Putin like it was a bad thing. Trump was president, and should meet with Putin just like every other president has. Norm also said that they must also protest to protect the rule of law and manipulate the Trump administration into not firing Mueller. As I already shared, here’s a small sampling of the Mueller firing rapid response team: - Pantsuit Nation - Indivisible - Democracy 21 (Norm Eisen) - MoveOn - Common Cause - Womens March - Etc

Video Transcript AI Summary

Robert Mueller, a Republican and former FBI Director appointed by George W. Bush, is leading the investigation into Russia's attack on American democracy and potential Trump campaign collusion. The Trump campaign had numerous contacts with Russia, raising questions about potential collusion and crimes. Key questions include what Donald Trump knew and when he knew it. Mueller has secured guilty pleas from George Papadopoulos, who had contact with Russian proxies, and Michael Flynn, Trump's national security advisor, who admitted to collusion with Russia during the presidential transition and lying to the FBI. Mueller also has indictments against Manafort and Gates for money laundering and other offenses. Flynn's plea deal suggests he is cooperating, potentially leading to further indictments. It is critical for Americans to defend Mueller's investigation, the rule of law, and democracy. Peaceful protest is necessary to deter interference with Mueller's investigation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I know Robert Mueller and I know what it's like both, to work with him and against him. Robert Mueller, is a Republican. He served in Vietnam, was a decorated veteran there, longtime law enforcement official, was appointed by George W. Bush, as the director of the FBI. He, has been applauded by both Republicans and Democrats alike. Robert Mueller has done some very, very important work over the course of his career. But, yes, I do believe that the single most important thing that Robert Mueller has done in his entire career is to head up the investigation into Russia's attack on our democracy. There can be no question that Russia, attacked our democracy. They tried to interfere with our elections. And the question is, did the Trump campaign collude? And Mueller is looking at that. It's so, so important. We've seen a level of contacts. There's no question that the Trump campaign had dozens of contacts with Russia. I worked on campaigns. I was the deputy general counsel of a presidential transition. I've never seen anything like this. Nobody has. Did it amount to collusion? And what crimes, if any, were committed? Most importantly, what did Donald Trump know and when did he know it? These are the questions, by which our democracy hangs. Mueller has moved with great speed to tackle the issues, around the Russia investigation. He's secured two guilty pleas, one from George Papadopoulos, a foreign policy adviser who had contact with Russian proxies during the campaign and, shared information about that including at a meeting attended by Donald Trump. He got an even more significant guilty plea a few weeks later from Michael Flynn, Trump's national security adviser. And, Flynn admitted to collusion with Russia during the presidential transition. He pled guilty to lying about that to the FBI while Flynn was Trump's national security adviser in the White House. Mueller has also secured two indictments that he's gonna take to trial, of Manafort and Gates. Manafort, of course, was Trump's, campaign manager for a time. Gates was a deputy, and they're accused of money laundering and other offenses. Mueller has done a tremendous amount, so far, and he's really just getting started. I expect because Flynn got a very sweet plea deal that Flynn is cooperating against others and there will be other guilty pleas or indictments to come. Mueller can't do it alone. There's a critically important role for every American to play in defending his investigation, the rule of law, and our democracy. If we don't make our voices heard now, we're, putting our democracy at risk. If we're not ready to peacefully protest, then, the rule of law is in jeopardy. So, we need to get ready. And then, when the president, the White House, and the people around the president see that there'll be a massive, peaceful, popular, outcry if they interfere with Mueller's investigation by firing him or in any other way. If they see that, they'll think twice. So far, it's worth it.

Posted - April 9, 2025 at 11:05 PM

Saved - April 11, 2025 at 6:00 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I have information about Chris Krebs being investigated, including details from a pre-2020 election meeting where he and others criticized Trump in a private session. They discussed the ongoing transformation of state agencies under Trump's influence, describing it as an authoritarian state capture. The meeting included notable figures opposed to the Trump administration, such as Christopher Krebs, Megan Stifel, James Clapper, Bill Kristol, Laura Rosenberger, Vanita Gupta, and Nina Jankowicz, among others.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

🔥🔥 Not only is Chris Krebs under investigation, but I have the goods on him! Here’s a pre 2020 election meeting where he and his cohorts talked smack on Trump! Most of this was in a private closed session! “We are not in a static situation but in the midst of an authoritarian state capture ongoing since Trump’s rise to power. Over time, every state agency and dept has been and continues to be hijacked and transformed by his agents to serve his private ends.” And look who was there! All enemies to the Trump admin and conservatives! ♦️ Christopher Krebs, Dir DHS/CISA ♦️ Megan Stifel Executive Dir, Americas Global Cyber Alliance ♦️James Clapper, Penn Law’s Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law ♦️ Bill Kristol, Dir, Defending Democracy Together ♦️ Laura Rosenberger, Dir, Alliance for Securing Democracy, Hillary campaign manager ♦️ Vanita Gupta, Biden’s present Associate Attorney General ♦️ Nina Jankowicz Disinfo Fellow, Science & Technology Innovation Program Wilson Center ♦️Plus more!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Huge! 🧵 On Sept 17, 2020, The Ctr for a New American Security, Ctr for Ethics & the Rule of Law (Univ Penn) & the Annenberg Public Policy Ctr (Univ Penn) presented a virtual symposium on the 2020 election. There were also closed sessions and Chris Krebs was there. You can imagine the people present. One member emphasized that, “we are not in a static situation but in the midst of an authoritarian state capture ongoing since Trump’s rise to power. Over time, every state agency and dept has been and continues to be hijacked and transformed by his agents to serve his private ends.” The participants agreed that domestically generated disinfo posed one of the greatest threats to the integrity of US elections. They concluded that a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach was needed to address election security issues, one being combatting DOMESTIC disinfo. So who all was there? ♦️ Christopher Krebs, Dir DHS/CISA ♦️ Megan Stifel Executive Dir, Americas Global Cyber Alliance ♦️James Clapper, Penn Law’s Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law ♦️ Bill Kristol, Dir, Defending Democracy Together ♦️ Laura Rosenberger, Dir, Alliance for Securing Democracy, Hillary campaign manager ♦️ Vanita Gupta, Biden’s present Associate Attorney General ♦️ Nina Jankowicz Disinfo Fellow, Science & Technology Innovation Program Wilson Center ♦️Plus more!

Posted - February 17, 2025 at 7:55 PM

Saved - February 18, 2025 at 4:56 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A whistleblower revealed that during the early Trump administration, refugees were flown in at night, given Social Security numbers and passports without proper vetting. Staff were instructed to enroll them in Social Security disability programs while American citizens faced denials. This practice, linked to the Wilson-Fish amendment, bypassed state sovereignty and has been ongoing since at least October 2016. The whistleblower's claims were discussed in an interview with Josh Tolley, highlighting the automatic qualification of refugees for SSI and Medicaid.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! A whistleblower came forward early during the first Trump admin. Refugees were flown in at night and given SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS and PASSPORTS and were completely non-vetted. Staffers were then told to push them onto social security disability all while Americans were being denied! This is why there are so many Social Security numbers in use, this has been going on for a very long time. If you have a social security number, it also makes voting a whole lot more easier too! Syrians were even admitted during the Trump 7 country Muslim ban which included Syria. The United Nations operated refugee resettlement thru Missouri Social Services. And I’m certain many other states were involved too. This started around October 2016. They also bypassed state sovereignty by using Wilson-Fish if a states governor wouldn’t accept illegal aliens. “The Wilson-Fish alternative (so named for its Congressional sponsors) was added in 1984 as an amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act. The amendment authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement alternative projects for refugees.” Wilson-Fish states: Alabama Alaska Colorado Idaho Kentucky Louisiana Massachusetts Nevada North Dakota South Dakota Tennessee Vermont (There could be others, my list is old) This mind numbing interview was conducted by @JoshTolley. This is a massive scandal! Full video link to follow!

Video Transcript AI Summary

We were instructed to identify refugees in a way that would qualify them for long-term Social Security disability, which is essentially a lifetime setup for medical treatment. This involves asking them about recurring headaches or lower back problems. We were told to sign them up for Social Security and process them for a U.S. passport. Governors are often unaware of the refugees entering their states. States can refuse refugees, but the federal government can bypass their sovereignty through the Wilson Fish program, directing funds to third-party entities, like Catholic charities, and taking away the states oversight. I believe this is an invasion, especially when refugees from countries with malevolent intent, like Syria, are given support and passports without proper vetting.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: They wanted us to try to identify them in such a way that they would qualify for long term social security disability. Now What? Yeah. And long so long term social security disability is for life. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: So if they get identified and qualify for long term social security disability, they are as good as set up for life for medical treatment. Speaker 1: That doesn't sound like a refugee to me. Just being honest. Yeah. That sounds like somebody who's planning on staying here. Speaker 0: A refugee Speaker 1: stays until the problem's over and then goes home. Speaker 0: Well, that's right. And so, they they instructed us to try to identify to try to get the client because once they arrive here where they're now called clients. They're now called Speaker 1: clients. Yeah. Okay. Speaker 0: Because clients pay. Speaker 1: Sure. Sure. I'm certain Speaker 0: to see Speaker 1: where this is leading here. Speaker 0: So, they told us that we needed to talk to the client and ask them if they had any headaches, recurring headaches, or any lower back problems. Excuse me. Anything that would qualify them for social security long term disability. Speaker 1: Wait. Wait. Hold. Wait. Wait. Wait. So let me get this straight. Part of the screening is supposed to be, are you sick, maimed, injured, whatever? Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: No. Okay. Good. You can come in. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: You get on the airplane. Are you sick, maimed, injured, whatever? Yes. Good. So we can give you disability. Speaker 0: Correct. What? Yes. Speaker 1: This is insanity. Speaker 0: Yes. It is insanity. Speaker 1: But in order to get social security disability benefits, don't you need a social security number? Speaker 0: Well, we are we were instructed in the meeting that one of the first things we were supposed to do was sign them up for social security. Speaker 1: Yeah. Wait. This is unbelievable. So they come over here and they get a social security number. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: They become legal. Speaker 0: Correct. Speaker 1: Are you pulling my leg? Speaker 0: No. I'm not. And then after they after we process them for social security card, then, we were to process them for a US passport. Speaker 1: No. You're not. Mhmm. Mhmm. Speaker 0: So that that's about the time I kind of decided okay I was done. I've heard everything I I wanna know. I I was so angry about this that they would receive a US passport. It just you know, I just couldn't believe it. I couldn't believe that we were giving these people social security cards and US passports and free medical, free housing, free food, free everything. Speaker 1: Yeah. But this the the thing that bothers me because the food we can recoup from. And the money irritates me, but we can earn it back and we can stop the program or whatever it is. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: But once you give somebody a Social Security number Mhmm. And you give them what's considered globally the golden ticket, which is a US passport. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: That is beyond comprehension that we're doing this. Speaker 0: That's right. Speaker 1: Do bureaucrats know this is happening? Speaker 0: Well, interestingly enough, no. They don't. A lot of governors are unaware of how many refugees have come into their state, where they're located, under what conditions they've arrived, and I believe this is intentional. I believe this is intentional. Now we do know that the governor of Texas and the governor of Tennessee have both stopped this and they're and they're refusing to take any more refugees. In fact, they've, federal government has filed a lawsuit against both of those states because they're refusing to take any more refugees. Speaker 1: How dare you keep your people safe? Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: But it okay. So let's just say all the states are saying we wanna pull out of this refugee resettlement program Mhmm. From the federal government, then they're fine. Right? There's no other way the refugees are getting in? Speaker 0: Well, no. You can the state can assert that they no longer want to receive refugees, and then the federal government says, alright. And so then they start implementing a program called the Wilson Fish program. And Wilson Fish simply bypasses the sovereignty of that state. In other words, the state no longer processes the refugees. That means, in plain English, you no longer get to know how many are coming in, when they're coming in, where they're going, how much money is being spent on them, whether they're diseased or not diseased. You've lost all control over the entire situation, and as as a sovereign state, you've relinquished that. And so Wilson Fish comes in then, and all of the federal monies that that are set aside for this program bypass the state and go to third party, entities. And that would be something like, Catholic charities or Jewish vocational services. So it would bypass the state entirely, and they would take over the the entire process of, processing the refugees. Speaker 1: That's crazy. Speaker 0: It is crazy. And as a US citizen and as a citizen of the sovereign state of Missouri, I am not in favor of that. I think we need to maintain our sovereignty just like we would in, in The United States. You know, honestly, we are first a citizen of the state of Missouri because we are a sovereign state, and then we're a citizen of The United States Of America. But our first sovereignty and citizenship is to our state, and a lot of people don't realize that. So in order for us to maintain, the the health and welfare and the security of our borders, we must know who's coming and going. Speaker 1: Yeah. You have to. Right. You have to and funoo doesn't work for me. Speaker 0: Funoo doesn't work for me either. Speaker 1: And giving them a social security number and a passport actually makes this problem worse not better. Speaker 0: Correct. Speaker 1: Have have we been placed at risk? I mean, you you mentioned that this is an invasion. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Are we at risk? Speaker 0: I believe we are at risk, Josh, because when they come in, we're urged to compatriot them with fellow, refugees. Those who have come in before them. We're we're urged to locate other communities of refugees from the same country of origin, the same language, the same culture as those who are arriving. And so, when they come in, you know, and we have had Syrians come in, and we know Syrians are on the list of those seven countries Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: That have been banned. And so we've received Syrians here in Missouri. Speaker 1: Even after the ban? Yes. What? Mhmm. Mhmm. Speaker 0: Yes. And so, these Syrians are coming in, and we know that they are coming from a country of origin that has malevolent intent toward us as a nation. And we now know they're not being vetted, and we now know that that not only are they coming from a malevolent country or country that has malevolent intent and we now know they're not vetted, we're giving them support and we're giving them a passport. Speaker 1: What name do they put on the passport if their name on the thing is Foonu? Speaker 0: I don't know. Can Speaker 1: they just pick a name?

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Here’s the entire Whistleblower interview with @JoshTolley on illegals getting Social Security numbers, passports, Medicaid, and Social Security disability. Articles and videos most times don’t auto populate for me, thus the screen shot. https://youtu.be/3qXL6IB9YKE https://t.co/mvuo5ao4WV

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

@JoshTolley Obviously the whistleblower knew what she was talking about. 😏

@4familyfreedom4 - Freedom4Family

@pepesgrandma @BanksChnl Refugees automatically qualify for SSI and Medicaid!! https://t.co/SSI0cr2HpO

Posted - February 12, 2025 at 2:40 PM

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 7:50 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I recently discovered that Judge John Bates' wife, Carol Rhees, is the founder of Hope For Children in Ethiopia, which has received long-term funding from USAID. This raises concerns about a potential conflict of interest, especially since Bates ordered the Trump administration to restore information on gender ideology and sex change operations. While I acknowledge that the NGO does good work and I hope the funding continues, I believe Bates should not be involved in these lawfare cases due to this conflict.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

🔥🔥Breaking! Judge John Bates wife gets funded by USAID! This is a serious conflict of interest since her funding relies on the Trump admin! Recall Bates is the judge who ordered the Trump admin to restore website info on gender ideology and sex change operations. His wife, Carol Rhees, is the founder of Hope For Children in Ethiopia. And has been a very long term recipient of USAID.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Here’s where Hope For Children says that Carol Rhees, is the founder. She’s the wife of Judge John Bates. https://archive.is/NYLmS Carols personal website mentions this foundation, tho not by name. https://archive.is/Sr8t0

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Hope for Children, ran by the judges wife, has been funded by USAID long term. I’m not saying it’s wrong, because the NGO does good things. And I hope the funding stays. But, this judge John Bates has no business being involved in these lawfare cases. It’s a conflict of interest. https://web.archive.org/web/20250129064830/https://2017-2020.usaid.gov/ethiopia/work-with-us/usaid-forward-grants-local-organizations

USAID FORWARD: BUILDING CAPACITY OF LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS (2012-2016) | Ethiopia | Archive - U.S. Agency for International Development We are working with more local organizations in Ethiopia to improve their capacity, build new effective and long-term partnerships and reduce the need for foreign aid over time. Building capacity and increased partnership with the private sector and civil society, as well as government, will spur investment and growth while improving transparency and accountability web.archive.org

Posted - July 11, 2024 at 5:30 PM

Saved - January 24, 2025 at 9:02 AM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Catherine Herridge and Tucker Carlson shoot the breeze on Biden. Obviously they feel her firing was due to Hunter Biden reporting. https://t.co/mTUu17z3sT

Video Transcript AI Summary

One son asked if I would go to jail, reflecting on the state of democracy and press freedom. The media's reaction to Biden's debate performance surprised many, despite prior indicators of his decline. There's a need for transparency in releasing interview transcripts to assess his fitness for office. The press should hold powerful entities accountable, and the lack of diverse reporting is concerning. Independent journalism is flourishing, as audiences seek credible information. The Press Act aims to protect confidential sources, essential for investigative reporting. My recent work focuses on military accountability regarding health issues linked to vaccinations. The landscape has shifted, and there's a hunger for honest journalism that serves the public interest.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: One of our sons asked me, mom, are you gonna go to jail? And I wanted to tell him that in this country where we say we value I could get a little choked up when I think about it, but, you know, in this country where we say we value democracy and we value a vigorous press, that it was impossible. But I couldn't offer him that assurance. Speaker 1: I was shocked that they fired you. And when I reflected for a moment, I was not shocked at all. From my perspective, super obvious they're taking you out before the election because you're reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop. 10 days ago ish, there was the debate. I've known Biden for over 30 years, and I thought that's not the guy I know. I mean, he's just completely different. If conspiracy nut, I would think he was a body double because it's that different. I'm so glad you're back here. Speaker 0: I'm so glad to see you. Speaker 1: You are not far away. Speaker 2: It's it's good. Far away. Speaker 1: We work together. We live near each other. It's all in many places. Amazing. How are you enjoying your new life? Speaker 0: Pretty well. It's, good. It's been an adjustment. I've had an energetic few months. Speaker 1: I knew you would. I knew you would. Okay. So I just have to ask you because you're I was in television a long time also, but you were in the the news side of television preparing interviews and packages and every day for decades. And given your extensive knowledge of that, I'm just a little bit confused by how the media people in our business, form of business, could look at the last debate with Biden and Trump and say, I just can't believe that there's something wrong with him. That he's neurologically compromised or ill or senile or whatever, that he's not operating the way that he used to. How could this be news to people who've interviewed him before? Speaker 0: Well, I think this is a real opportunity to gather more data and to take an investigative lens and look at this issue of president Biden and his decision to seek reelection. We've got some data points already. We have the debate Yeah. That you've just referenced that people were so surprised Yeah. His demeanor. And we now have this ABC interview and the full transcript. I think it's a moment where other media organizations who've done interviews with the president over the last couple of years could release the full transcripts from those interviews. I think it makes sense because we'd have broader data points to assess was this a one off, as the White House says, or were there indications of decline earlier on? Were they obvious and apparent, or were they subtle and missed? And and if they were obvious, why was it that they seemed to end up on the cutting room floor? I think that having this broader dataset for an independent review would really inform the public discussion about the president's decision to stay in the race. Speaker 1: And there's a lot of data to look at. I mean, I've known Biden, watched Biden, been around Biden a lot for over 30 years. And I remember my reaction in 2019 when he decided to run, once again for president for the 4th time, I think. I thought that's not the guy I know. I mean, he's just completely different. And then his sister told a friend of mine, actually, we're very upset because he's in cognitive decline. He's got some neurological illness, and we don't want him to run for president. So I immediately said that on Fox News. Speaker 0: So you reported that at the time? Speaker 1: Absolutely. Yeah. And then I showed the tape. Like, look at this guy. And was attacked, of course, and ignored. So that was 5 years ago. I wasn't shocked by his performance of the debate, especially. But then other journalists were. They seem to be. Were they pretending? Or, like, what I don't understand how someone who did an interview with him, like, 2 years ago wouldn't have been aware that there was something wrong. Speaker 0: Well, I think it's an opportunity to provide this broader data set so there can be this independent review by the public. Speaker 1: What would that data look like? Speaker 0: Well, let's look at the what the transcript show. Do they show someone who is, you know, very consistent, very focused, very deliberate in their answering of questions, or does it show someone who's maybe struggling to stay on track or is lacking? Speaker 1: Do we have that case? Speaker 0: Well, media outlets who've conducted interviews with the president should have those transcripts. I mean, it's it's not standard to release video outtakes from an interview, but you could release the transcript. And I say that as someone who released the transcripts of my interview with president Trump back in 2020. Releasing a transcript, I think, is about transparency so you can have a broad overview of the interview. I think it makes sense because there are other headlines in the interview that maybe you your news organization is not gonna look at Right. Per se. You know, just sort of separately, I think you have a tremendous responsibility when you sit down with the president of the United States, probably the ultimate newsmaker, to ask questions that are of interest to your news organization, but also to others. Right? And then finally, I think a transcript, allows you to stand behind the edit that you either post online or that you broadcast. Right? Because then the public can see the sections of the interview that you, you know, condensed or you made edits for clarification. Speaker 1: Right. So I know that in, I haven't thought about this enough, but I know that in 2015 or 2016, the New York Times editorial board sat down with Trump, and they released a full, apparently, unedited transcript, which was chaotic. His speaking style tends to be a little discursive. Speaker 0: Nonlinear. Word, discursive. Speaker 1: Yeah. It is nonlinear. But, you know, that's that's well known. I think he's much better on camera than he is, you know, in transcripts, but but whatever you think of it, that they put that out there. I don't remember in the last 4 years any news organization interviewed Biden, and there have been some releasing a transcript of the interview. Do you? Speaker 0: I, you know, I I don't I can't recall, but I don't really I haven't gone back and looked at all of them. But But Speaker 1: so, like, what would be the so I guess what bothers me is that everyone acts like this is a shock. It was not a shock to me. I have no special knowledge. I'm quite some special knowledge, but I which I revealed immediately. But it was, like, super obvious every time I saw him, there's something wrong with that guy. How could the journalist be shocked? Well, why don't they just release immediately? Speaker 0: Well, they could. That's that's what I think makes a lot of sense right now to do that. That's ultimately up to them, but I think it just goes to transparency. I think it goes to informing the public discussion right now about the president's, fitness for office and to seek reelection. And I think it's also about standing behind your work. Right? Like, you decided to make edits in the process, for for clarity, for time, what you know, whatever the issue is. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 0: And so you can really you can really stand behind that. I think that's that's important. Speaker 1: But so, again, you were in this business for so long and me too and at a time, you know, pre Internet, pre streaming where you have a very small chunk of time, 3, 5, 6 minutes for the long ones, and then you you just can't use the rest. But now news organizations should just put the whole thing. I mean, that's what we do. I do this interview is not edited in any way. And if, you know, we'll just let viewers decide what they think of Katherine Harish or me or whatever. Speaker 2: Why is this? Speaker 1: Harris. Was that you know? But so what would be the excuse that, say, NBC or CBS or ABC or Fox or anybody would have to not put the full thing online now? Speaker 0: I mean, I can't speak to what their rationale would be. I just don't in my case, I felt it was important to to release a transcript Yeah. To allow people to see the work, and to also I mean, it's hard to look at your own transcript because you you look at it and you say, oh, that question could have been more focused, or I should have followed up more, or I missed that little piece of news. I should have drilled down a little further, or I interrupted there when I really shouldn't have. I mean, it's a really kind of warts and all process that you're looking at, but it's it's about sort of the raw integrity of the interview. You know, when you make edits in an interview, you do it for clarity. Sometimes you do it because you have to condense things because you only have a certain amount of time on a broadcast. But it's a real fine line and a balancing act, and you don't want, you know, seeking clarity and brevity or condensing it to cross the line into, you know, a cleanup on aisle 7. Speaker 1: Well, that's what it feels like, though. It does feel like and I don't wanna be too judgy. I was telling you at breakfast this morning, I edited something out of an interview once with somebody. I can't remember ever doing that before since, but and I would not do that now. But several years ago, someone said something so bizarre in the interview that I didn't wanna follow-up on it because I don't wanna I mean, what the hell are you even talking about? Mhmm. And so I asked the editors to take that out just because I didn't think it was relevant to the conversation. It was weird. Mhmm. So whatever. I did that. I'll say that I did that. But if you're interviewing someone, and he seems, like, bizarre through the whole interview, and you find yourself trying to cover that up, then maybe you're a liar. Mhmm. Do you think? Speaker 0: Well, I think the I think the instinct when you sit down with the president of the United States is this is your president. You want them to look their best. I mean, I under I understand that. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: But if there were indicators, and I don't know there were, but if there were indicators that he was in decline or he was really struggling to answer a series of questions, I mean, that's news. Right? I mean, that's a news headline. Speaker 1: Well, and the opposite of news is, of course, you know, censorship and deception. So if you're hiding that, then you're committing, well, a moral crime, but you're also committing an offense against the profession that you chose whose purpose is to inform the public of what reality is. Right? And you're hiding things rather than exposing them. And that I mean, that that's pretty clear violation, isn't it? Speaker 0: Yeah. I again, I think it's an opportunity to build the dataset, to better understand what's happened over the last couple of years and, you know, really apply that investigative lens. You know, I I find it so hard to take off my, like, investigative reporter. Right. But that's that's sort of how I see it right now. I'm curious. I'm genuinely curious to see what those transcripts may reflect. Speaker 1: Well, in 2016, you know, NBC went and back into its archives and found an outtake of Donald Trump saying something vulgar to Billy Bush, the host, about women and grabbing them and all this stuff. And then they leaked it to David Fahrenthold. I think I'm remembering this correctly. Speaker 0: Can't remember that exactly, but it came out public. Speaker 1: If I say if I've gotten that wrong, pardon me. But they leaked it to Washington Post reporter who had been a college friend of an NBC executive, and then it became this huge thing that, you know, almost derailed Trump's campaign. And that's why they did it, of course. So there's precedent for showing us the outtakes. Mhmm. Do they have an excuse not to show it to the Biden outtakes? Speaker 0: I mean, I I can't really speak for them. I I'm sorry to sort of be a little evasive about that. I just I just would advocate for it. I think that it's an issue of such import to the country, and it really informs the discussion and the discourse surrounding this this issue. And it and it goes to accountability with the White House. Was it really a bad night, or was was there a broader trend that had been developing? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I'm I feel totally qualified to pass judgment on that question. Speaker 0: I'll over to you. Speaker 1: Well, since I knew the guy, that's not Biden. Like, that's not the guy I remember who and I mean this. I always I never agreed with him, but I'm a I'm a shallow person, so is he. So I always kinda liked him because he's throw you know, Irish guy throw his arm around. How are you doing, buddy? You know, rub your chest. Maybe sniff maybe he sniffed me. I don't care. I like sniffing. And that's just not the guy on TV at all, like, at all. And really, I mean, if that was a conspiracy, now they would think he was a body double because it's that different. So anyway. Alright. In your long and varied career working in a bunch of different big media the biggest media outlets in the country, Did you see people's political or social agendas shape news coverage a lot? Speaker 0: I I the short answer is is is yes. I think it's difficult for people to step back and do what I like to say I do is which is balls and strikes. Right? People have their own personal lens through which they see stories, but I think you have to really park that at the front door when you go to work because I think that's when you have the most transparent, credible, authentic journalism. Speaker 1: I agree with that. Do you feel like the composition of newsrooms has changed from when you started in the business? It feels like there was a greater, like, actual diversity of life experience back then, 30 years ago. Speaker 0: Hard to say. I started my career at ABC in London. Yeah. And that was, an extremely rarefied atmosphere in a lot Speaker 1: of That's right. Speaker 0: These are very we're very experienced people. A lot of the correspondents came out of Vietnam. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: You know, very, very deep experience, and I was very fortunate to learn in that environment. I haven't This Speaker 1: is when Jennings was so forced there. Speaker 0: Jennings had just left London by the time I had arrived, and, I I wanted to be a foreign correspondent. You know, when you're that young, you have ideas. I I just it's like it looks so exciting to me. Totally. And some of the correspondents in the office really took me under their wing and taught me how to write a story by looking at the interviews, the strongest elements of the interview, the sound bites, and then they trained me to really sit down and look at the video and identify the strongest video, and then the natural sound, which really can be such an important technique. Speaker 1: That sound. Speaker 0: That's right. When you're when you're editing a a piece together because it's really like this mosaic, the strongest sound, the best video, and the natural sounds. So this was a really rarefied environment. Have I been in in a newsroom like that since? I don't think so. Speaker 1: What was the difference? Was it smarter, more serious? Speaker 0: I I just felt with with that cohort of reporters, they're just it was all about accountability journalism. I mean, to me, if that's part of my DNA, it's it's What does that mean accountability? Accountability journalism is when you're you're curious and you seek the facts, and then you try and figure out where the buck stops. Right? And it's not a question of, well, it's this party or that party. It's whatever entity is responsible. Right. And accountability journalism is, you know, like they say, speaking truth to power on both sides of of the aisle. Speaker 1: So power is the key though. I mean, accountability doesn't necessarily mean, you know, hassling poor rural whites with diabetes, you know, the weakest, most despised people in our society. It means, like, you know, asking questions about BlackRock and the National Security Council and the people who actually have all the power. It it felt to me 30 years ago like that was implied. Like, everyone sort of thought that your job was to hold the powerful accountable, not the weakest. Speaker 0: I still feel that way. Speaker 1: I do too. Yeah. I do too. Speaker 0: We have that in common. I I Speaker 1: do too. Did you see that change? Speaker 0: Boy. You know, I I used to say to people that, you know, technology was supposed to really improve our ability to do journalism, but I sometimes felt that the technology has never been better, but the reporting's never been worse. And and I I don't know why that is except Speaker 1: Is there a connection? Speaker 0: I've never Speaker 2: thought of Speaker 0: I think sometimes what we're missing is that boots on the ground, person to person contact Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: In reporting. Years ago when I did a journalism degree at Columbia, I had this professor, Dick Blood. That was his name. Speaker 2: Dick Blood. Speaker 0: Dick Blood. And he was sort of a legend in New York City newsrooms, and he used to always say to me, detail matters and good reporting. You know, if you go to a crime scene, you wanna count how many bullet holes are in the windshield. So I think there's that kind of on the ground, sort of real traditional investigative feel sometimes that's that's missing in that person to person context. Speaker 1: Yes. Well, I agree with that. I remember going to a murder scene and looking down, there was blood all over my shoes. Mhmm. I didn't put that in the story. But I remember thinking, wow, you know, that actually is shoe leather reporting. You get a real sense of things when you can smell them. Speaker 0: You know, when you think back to major events, I I was in New York on 911, and we were down near, the World Trade Center in the days right afterwards. And I I saw someone who was collecting, ash off the top of the cars. And at that point, we'd realized that all of the abandoned cars in downtown Manhattan belong to people who had been killed in the towers. And I stopped this woman, and I asked her what she was doing. And she said, my sister was wasn't, the the windows on the world at the top of the World Trade Center. She didn't survive, and I wanna have something to bury for my family. So the ash is what I'm collecting. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: And that was the moment that I realized that so much of the ash that was spread around the city was really Speaker 1: People. Speaker 0: People and the buildings. And that kind of tactile feel to the reporting is the kind of reporting that really impacts people and stays and stays with them. And I don't know whether it's the technology or whether it's sort of the immediacy of all these deadlines, but the ability to do that, is much harder now than it used to be. Speaker 1: No. No. I and I I think that's really smart. And technology gives you the illusion that all the information is on Google or a text away when actually talking to people makes all the difference. Right. So one phenomenon that I noticed well, that I actually didn't notice until I was in middle age, but came You're Speaker 0: in middle age? Speaker 1: I'm well, that's what they claim. Okay. Actually, I'm way past middle I'm not gonna live to. I'm not good at math a 110. So I guess I'm in late life now. But there are beat reporters, people who've, you know, covering federal agencies, particularly in Washington, who become captive to those agencies, to their sources. You know, not in a literal sense or not held in the basement in chains, but they're I mean, they are sort of puppets of the people they cover. I really noticed that I'm thinking of one specific person who I'm not gonna name, but I would just say a female national security reporter in Washington who and I would watch these, you know, stories come out. I'd be like, that well, that that's a lie. You know it's a lie, and you're doing it on behalf of the people who feed you these lies. Mhmm. Have you seen a lot of that? Speaker 0: I think that the danger is that people become sort of so friendly with the the press offices that work in in these big, agencies that they they find it hard over time to really challenge them. Speaker 1: That was never a problem for you, I noticed. Should stay for we work together. For people who don't know, Catherine Herridge, one thing I've always loved about you, I don't even know who you vote for, and I mean that. But I did notice that a lot of the didn't like you, so I always thought that was a good sign. Speaker 0: You wanna you wanna have the ability to really operate outside the ring. I used I used to say that, one of the advantages to doing reporting as long as I've done it is that you start to build a network of contacts so that that's really where your your stories are coming from. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And that the public affairs office and a major government entity is really the last stop for you. Right? That's where you're trying to get some response. And I really believe in in giving these offices ample time to respond. I did a story recently where we engaged with, the Department of the Army and the National Guard for 2 weeks. I mean, we really gave them time because we wanted to understand their position and what had happened in a particular case. But sometimes the danger is that people become too close. That's why I think it makes sense in in some cases to really rotate reporters so that you don't spend so long on a certain beat that you start to lose your context sort of outside of that circle. Speaker 1: That's exactly or you become a tool of of lies, which some, Pentagon reporters have become, I would say, one in particular. But what's the mechanism for for pulling that person back and putting that person on another beat or for fixing that? Speaker 0: I can I I when I worked overseas, Speaker 2: I saw this with some of the British news organizations, that Speaker 0: they would rotate people into the United States that they would rotate people into the United States for a few years and then they would take them back to Britain? So they would be there an election cycle, let's say, they'd be there long enough to build contacts, and then they would go back overseas, and someone else would come in. So you'd have a fresh set of eyes and ears. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And I think that that makes a lot of sense. It can be a little frustrating for a reporter because on some beats it takes you a decade or more to really start to build the contacts and the reputation with individuals. But I do think that you have to check yourself. You have to ask yourself, am I really checking it out to the degree, that I need to be? As professor Blood would say, just because your mother says she loves you, doesn't mean you should not Speaker 2: check it Speaker 0: check it out. Right? Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 1: I I learned that firsthand. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's a that's a different conversation. Speaker 2: It Speaker 1: sucks. No. Totally kidding. It's so dark, but it is funny. So if you're paying any attention at all to what's going on in the world, you probably asked yourself, what would I do, not just for myself, but for the people who love me and I'm responsible for my family? What would I do if things really went south, either for a short period or a longer period? If there was an emergency, how would I respond? Of course, you need food and water. You need security, some way to protect yourself and your loved ones. You probably have taken care of all of that. But one problem you may not have addressed is what do you do about medicine? If there's a medical problem when there's not readily available medical care, what do you do for your family? And that's a tough question to answer, actually. But now there is an answer, and it comes from Jace Medical. It is a personalized emergency supply of medicines you might need, antibiotics, other life saving medicines to treat a long list of problems you could have, bacterial illnesses, respiratory infections, skin infections, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. Things that could come up and happen when you can't just drive over to the doctor. This is preparation, and for its cost, probably well worth it, but find out for yourself. Go to jacemedical.com to get emergency stock of common medicines for yourself and your family. It'll all be reviewed by a board certified physician and dispensed by a licensed pharmacy at a fraction of the regular cost, not crackpot stuff. It's essential. I have it. You should too. Use the promo code Tucker at checkout for an extra discount, but don't wait until you need it. It's worth doing now. Jacemedical.com. I wonder since you spent, you know, you're at ABC, Fox News, CBS. You just left CBS pretty recently, the spring maybe? Speaker 0: This February. Speaker 1: February. Okay. Like, you spent your whole life at and I have too at these huge news organizations at and toward the end, you know, independent journalism, digital journalism is on the rise. Like, what was the view of that from inside the big news organization? Speaker 0: Well, I think within, big corporate media, there was still a sense that they were sort of the the the final word on things. Really? Yeah. Or, you know, sort of and maybe it's not the best phrase, gatekeepers Yeah. For information. But after I lost my job in February, I took a couple of months to really educate myself about the marketplace, and I was surprised at how much the media landscape had really changed just Speaker 1: Isn't that crazy that you wouldn't know that? I didn't know it either. I mean, I'm not criticizing you. I mean, I but isn't it weird that you can work? I'm in the news business, but you really don't know what the news business is. Speaker 0: I think you're very focused on what you're doing day to day, and you're not sort of looking at the bigger picture. But I took some time to to try and understand how the landscape had really shifted, and I was surprised at how much it had really evolved in the four and a half years that I was at CBS News. And I say this as someone who spent my entire career working with big corporations, and I was and I was grateful for those jobs. I don't wanna minimize that. Yeah. But what I see now is that those entities are really shrinking and contracting, and the audiences are getting older. And the real explosive growth is with, smaller independent operations and smaller independent newsrooms. Speaker 1: Why do you think that is though? I mean, if you're someone like Matt Taibbi, who also worked, you know, for Rolling Stone, you know, big worked for a big company, But then went out completely on his own. He has a substack, and then he creates his own news organization. But it's just one guy. And if you look at his growth and revenue, it's so much higher than, like, people with the backing of these huge corporations. Like, why how could Matt Taibbi get a bigger audience than Nora O'Donnell or whoever's hosting the show? I don't even know who's hosting them anymore, but, like, how did that happen? Speaker 0: I think I think the the public is really hungry for credible, reliable information. Speaker 2: So I Speaker 0: don't think it's more, complicated Speaker 1: I agree with you. Speaker 0: Than that. And I'm not here to sort of take shots Speaker 1: I get Speaker 0: it. With employers, but I I just that's what I came away from. Speaker 1: But what's so interesting is, like, if you have like, if you're, you know, General Motors and you have a sort sort of monopoly on your on your area, and all of a sudden, some guy starts building cars in his garage, and, like, they're more popular than you Mhmm. It's kind of an indictment of you, isn't it? Speaker 0: I think the speed at which things have have evolved has really surprised people. I mean, when you start to look at the I think we're at at an inflection point. Speaker 1: For sure. Speaker 0: You start to look at, the numbers. You know, for example, you did some interviews that related to the Biden investigation. Yeah. And these were, you know, 90,000,000 views or, you know, sometimes higher, but these are these are big numbers. And when you compare that to what an evening news broadcast is, you know, 4000000, 7000000, 6000000, I mean, you're just reaching a broader, larger global audience. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And I would argue, and I don't have the benefit of all the data, but it's also a younger audience. And it may be an audience that's really engaged in gathering information. Speaker 1: Because if Speaker 0: they're on these platforms, they're checking multiple times a day for for headlines, for new video, for new content. So these are real, voracious consumers of information. Speaker 1: I think that's all absolutely true. But it leaves an answer to the question, how did this happen? How did, you know, penniless upstarts beat, you know, the entrenched monopolies? And I just know in my own life, the only moments of growth that have ever occurred for me, the pivot points of my life have all been those moments from, like, wow, I really suck. Like, I really made bad no. For real. Mhmm. You know? I drink too much, or I got caught lying, or I'm just kind of a rotten person. I have to change. Mhmm. And I got fired once for, basically, I was just lazy and not taking my job seriously. I stopped being lazy. I started taking my job. So you notice, like, it's really important to realize how much you suck. Speaker 0: Well, there's a forcing function. Speaker 1: Yes. That's what it is. Long winded question. Do you see that process playing out at in corporate media? Speaker 0: I can I can speak for myself right now? If, you know, I lost my job in February. You Speaker 1: just lost it? Like, you forgot where you put it? Speaker 0: No. I I I didn't actually lose my job. I I Speaker 1: I had a few drinks and lost my job along with my car keys and my cell phone. Speaker 0: Looking around for it. You know, my job was terminated. That was a very public thing. Speaker 1: I know. I'm not the people I put I was fired too. Speaker 0: I lost my company health insurance. That was a very big deal for us because we have a son who's a transplant patient. He's got chronic medical condition. And then I had my record seized by my employer, which was a red line I thought should never have been crossed. And then I was held in contempt of court. So February was a very, very big month for me. But I made a decision once I'd educated myself about the marketplace, which I would never have done if there hadn't been that forcing function, that for now I was gonna go independent. I'd had some opportunities from generous opportunities to sort of go back to a large corporate media outlet, but I decided that I would go independent and I would tell the stories that I couldn't tell before because I was at a point in my career where I had built up a network of contacts, and I felt now is the time. If it's not now, then then when? Speaker 1: Amen. I I couldn't agree more. So since you, brought up and I'm and I'm sorry. I didn't mean to make fun. I know it's it is traumatic to have your life turned upside down in a day. I just think you're gonna be so much happier. But let's talk about that. Like, so you get hired. You were at Fox News where we worked together, and I really enjoyed that. Thank you. Speaker 0: I enjoyed it too. Speaker 1: I thought you were really Speaker 0: You're very well behaved. Honest person. Speaker 2: I thought Speaker 0: the guy was a good moderating influence when we sat down to Speaker 1: I loved it. But then you left and went, to CBS News, which is a, you know, a huge channel with a storied past in decline in decline. This is my assessment because they weren't doing what they're supposed to do, which is, like, tell you interesting stuff that you didn't know and be honest and brave. You are honest and brave, and you specialize in interesting stories. So I thought, wow. This is so this is great. I mean, CBS is a little smarter than I thought they were. And you did break a bunch of stories, and you were the most memorable person on their air, the one doing the fiercest journalism. This is again my assessment, and then they have cutbacks because their business is failing, and they fire you. I'm like, wait. What? Did you see that coming? Speaker 0: I didn't see it coming. Yeah. I didn't. It wasn't a performance issue. I am so proud of the work that we did there, especially the work with veterans. I mean, we really helped be a catalyst for legislation that impacted a 1000000 veterans and civilians for for the better. Yes. I mean, I feel very proud of that. But, that's that's their choice. Whether I work there or not. It's not my company. Speaker 1: Of course. Speaker 0: But the the seizing of the records was, a terrible red line Speaker 2: that was crossed. Speaker 1: If you don't mind, I know this has been written about, but I just wanna get a record on video of what exactly happened. So how how did this unfold? Like, what kind of warning did you have, and what happened? Speaker 0: Well, I testified to congress, about this as well. I was, laid laid off on a Zoom call. I was told my job was terminated. And, Could you Speaker 1: explain why? Speaker 0: No. Not beyond saying that they were they were making cuts. And, I was, locked out of my email and locked out of the office. And, a couple of days later, a courier came to the house with just a couple of boxes of clothing and, some books and, you know, a few awards. And I said, where are all my investigative files and my research and my reporting notes? And she said you're just gonna have to talk to human resources about that. And I got the union involved, SAG, AFTRA. I'm not gonna go into all the details, but there was a very vigorous back and forth about returning the records. What Speaker 1: were the records, like, interview notes? Speaker 0: You know, what I would say is that there were interview notes, research, reporter notes, contact information. And, when I had left other major organizations, ABC and Fox, it was completely different. There was an understanding that you would go through your materials, you would take with you what was essentially your reporting materials, and you would leave what belonged to the company. And I knew from people at CBS that that what was happening to me was not standard. One person in particular said that, when their office was cleaned out, they put in dirty coffee cups and post it notes. I mean, everything came back to them. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: I think if the union hadn't gotten involved and there hadn't been a public outcry, I would never have seen those records again. The union really stood up for journalism. And I I testified that when the network of Walter Cronkite sees this your reporting information, including confidential source information, it's an attack on investigative journalism. And I heard from contacts that I've worked with over the years, who've helped me to expose government wrongdoing interruption that they were very concerned that they would be identified. Speaker 1: So you I mean, again, I I doubt you will agree with this. I don't know what you really think. But from my perspective, super obvious they're taking you out before the election because you're reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop. And that was that's my take on it. I was shocked that they fired you. And when I reflected for a moment, I was not shocked at all. You know, they took out the Drudge report before the 2020 election. They, you know, whatever. Lots of people who are in the way have been taken out before election. So, what yeah. Do you think there was do you think your notes were did they go through your notes during the time they had them? Speaker 0: I really can't answer that. Speaker 1: Because you don't know? Or Speaker 0: I just don't wanna really answer that that right now. That's okay. Speaker 1: No. Of course. I think Yeah. I think people can draw their own conclusions. Tell us about the reporting you did. Speaker 0: Yeah. Publicly, they said they haven't, but, anyway, I'll leave it at that. Speaker 1: Yeah. Will be kinda tempting to go through your interview notes. I'd like to. I mean, why would they seize your personal report, reporting product, you know? Speaker 0: It was a very sad episode for me, just professionally and personally, because I thought that we had done some really tremendous work, on, not only, the the laptop, but also, the IRS whistleblowers. I mean, this was a major story for CBS News. I did an interview along with one of my colleagues, and I think that really changed the public discussion of a Hunter Biden investigation and this question of whether there was a double standard applied in that So in that case. Speaker 1: For those of us who missed the CBS report, tell us what the the the tax investigation into Hunter Biden. So Hunter Biden in the end got convicted of completely ridiculous gun this is my personal editorializing, but ridiculous gun charge. Like, who cares, actually? But there are other potential crimes. Tell us about the tax Speaker 0: Well, you have to I I would think about the Hunter Biden case as having 2 buckets. The first was the gun charges, and then the second is this tax case. I've always felt the tax case is a much more serious case Yes. And has the greatest legal jeopardy for himself and members of his of his family. It I'd encourage people just to look at the indictment, which is in California, and it's, my memory is that it's on the first page or the second page. They refer to him as a lobbyist. And that to me is an indicator that the special counsel is exploring whether there were violations of FARA, which is the Foreign Agents Registration Act. And that in simple terms means that if you're working on behalf of the interest of a foreign government, you need to be clear with the US government. Speaker 1: Just to register. Speaker 0: That's right. And seated throughout that document is information about his businesses with Ukraine, with China, with with others. So to me, it leaves the door open to a superseding indictment. I'm not saying that's gonna happen, but it certainly, to me, was an indicator or a flag that that was possible. Speaker 1: So, but the tax charges specifically, what what do they amount to? Speaker 0: These are felony tax charges. They're pretty significant. And a tax case, the challenge for any defendant is that these are paper driven cases. They're not really witness driven cases. What did you attest to when you signed the forms? What did your accountant attest to? And, I think one of the important elements in the case is how much of this happened after he was sober. Right? Because there's a whole window with the taxes where he's really, a heavy user and drug addict. But as he told the Delaware court last year when the plea deal fell apart, there was, a period of time where he became clean. So how many of these alleged bad acts happened during that period versus when he was an addict? Speaker 1: And that's relevant because sober people have no excuse? Speaker 0: Well, it just goes to your state of mind. Right? I think I think a Speaker 1: jury mistakes. Speaker 0: Yeah. I think I think any jury wants to understand someone who's come through addiction. They they wanna understand that. They're they're they're sympathetic to that because that's like a daily challenge for individuals. And I think that knowing when they were able to get themselves clean, I think, helps un inform, their view on the evidence and what actions Speaker 1: I think that's I think that's right. So what's the status of those charges? Speaker 0: Last, I haven't been following it as closely, but in the fall, I think that goes to trial. Speaker 1: It was just kind of inter I mean, this is relevant now, and I don't think it's often referred to in daily reporting on what Joe Biden is going through right now. So 10 days ago ish, there was the debate. People were shocked. Democratic donors appear shocked. Some I talked to one of them who really was shocked, didn't know that Biden was impaired. And there was a push, pretty sizable push, from members of congress for Biden to step aside, and he's now issued this letter, which seems to me is written by his son, Hunter, saying I'm staying it. And Hunter, it's been reported widely, is in the White House. He's his father's chief adviser on this. And you're sort of wondering, like, what is this? And you're saying, well, Hunter Biden is facing this trial. Yeah. It's probably better to have your dad be president when Speaker 2: when he's in a trial. Speaker 0: I I really can't really Right. Speaker 2: No. That's just saying Speaker 1: you don't have to connect those dots, but that's not an irrelevant fact that he's facing these charges. Speaker 0: It's not it's not a it's not an irrelevant fact, and I I I I guess what has my attention is that over the last couple of years, there has been such an effort by the White House to distance the president from his son, especially in terms of business affairs. Yes. Right? But now they're they're really sort of joint joint at the hip apparently. I don't know that independently, but, you know, they're very and it just, did their relationship really suddenly change in that moment or not? Or maybe it's always been like that. I don't know the answer to that. Speaker 1: Most of us well, actually, all of us go through our daily lives using all sorts of quote free technology without paying attention to why it's quote free. Who's paying for this and how? Think about it from it. Think about your free email account, the free messenger system you used to chat with your friends, the free other weather app or game app you open up and never think about. It's all free, But is it? No. It's not free. These companies aren't developing expensive products and just giving them to you because they love you. They're doing it because their programs take all your information. They hoover up your data, private personal data, and sell it to data brokers and the government. And all of those people who are not your friends are very interested in manipulating you and your personal political and financial decision. It's scary as hell and it's happening out in the open without anybody saying anything about it. This is a huge problem and we've been talking about this problem to our friend, Eric Prince, for years. Someone needs to fix this and he and his partners have and now, we're partners with them and their company is called Unplugged. It's not a software company. It's a hardware company. They actually make a phone. The phone is called Unplugged and it's more than that. The purpose of the phone is to protect you from having your life stolen, your data stolen. It's designed from a privacy first perspective. It's got an operating system that they made. It's called messenger and other apps that help you take charge of your personal data and prevent it from getting passed around to data brokers and government agencies that will use it to manipulate you. Unplugged Kibman is to its customers. They will promise you and they mean it that your data are not being sold or monetized or shared with anyone. From basics like its custom Libertas operating system which they wrote which is designed from the very first day to keep your personal data on your device. It also has, believe it or not, a true on off switch that shuts off the power. It actually disconnects your battery and ensures that your microphone and your camera are turned off completely when you want them to be. So they're not spying on you in, say, your bedroom which your iPhone is. That's a fact. So it is a great way, one of the few ways to actually protect yourself from big tech and big government to reclaim your personal privacy. Without privacy, there is no freedom. The unplugged phone, you can get a $25 discount when you use the code Tucker at the checkout. So go to unplugged.com/tucker to get yours today. Highly recommended. Well, my impression knowing Hunter Biden pretty well as I did, I think he was always close to his dad. Mhmm. He revered his father. I know that Speaker 0: And there's a difference, to being close than being a business with somebody. Speaker 1: Of course, there is. I revere my dad, not in business with him. But I do think it's I know for a fact that he was always close to his dad. I always loved his dad. That's one of the things I liked about him, actually. But, you know, it's all these are very different circumstances from when I knew him. And so he's facing and, you know, these are charges that carry potentially jail time. Correct? Speaker 0: Yes. Mhmm. The gun and the taxes. Speaker 1: The gun and right. Interesting. So why do you think there's been that seems like kind of a big deal. It doesn't seem like there's been a new reported on it, but there hasn't been a ton of reporting on Speaker 0: that. I guess what I would say is that, I felt very proud at CBS News of the of the of the investigative journalism that we did, whether it was with the whistleblowers or whether it was, with a laptop. And I went to a lot of effort to get, data from that laptop, which had a very clean chain of custody Yeah. That I learned through my reporting was, mirrored what was given to the FBI, and I felt that was important to understand the integrity of of the data. Speaker 1: Given that that laptop had been described by a bunch of retired intel officials as Russian pop as fake. Speaker 0: Right. Mhmm. And we went to a lot of effort to, have it, forensically analyzed by a very reputable group and a group that was, with sort of no political attachments that was outside the beltway, a group out out west, and really a stand up group. Great group. They did a terrific forensic scrub of it, and and they concluded that there nothing had been altered or changed on the of the copy of the data that we had. Other journalists, got their data through third parties, And I think that that probably contaminated the data in some way, but I felt extremely confident, about our data. I, I guess what I would we did that story in, late 2022. And, you know, my reputation is for moving quickly and efficiently through complex investigations. Not believable. What does that mean? Not believable. Speaker 1: What does that mean? Speaker 0: I I think that, and I I wanna be respectful of my former employer. I think that there was an opportunity to lead earlier on that story. I guess I would lead leave it at that. Speaker 1: Well, I authenticated at day 1 because there was emails from me on there, and no one knew I knew Hunter Biden. So I knew it was real because no one would ever do you know, no one would ever fake it. Speaker 0: Your typos. Speaker 1: Well, so, like, I I had lived near Hunter Biden. That's how I knew him. And so, just live in Washington because you did. So it's not that weird if you live in Washington. It's like a small city. Everyone knows everybody else. But I knew that nobody knew that I knew Hunter Biden. So, like, if you're assembling a fake laptop, you wouldn't put emails from, like, the Fox News host on there because that's too weird. So I instantly knew it was real. And, I'm just a little bit surprised that it took you that long. So you're saying it didn't actually take you that long. There were roadblocks for Speaker 0: I just think my reputation is for moving quickly and, unfortunately, to a complex investigation. Speaker 1: Yeah. Did so but it took 2 2 years for that story to make air. Speaker 0: And I'm glad it did. Yeah. Because I think it really changed the conversation. Speaker 1: For sure. Mhmm. Interesting. Did you feel could you feel it at the company that, like, people didn't want you to do this? Speaker 0: You know, I I've always tried to be respectful of my former employers. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And I testified to congress that, I mean, there was tension over, the Biden reporting. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Especially when I sort of turned my lens on to president Biden. Speaker 1: Oh, didn't like that. I'm sorry. It it's it's I'll say it. You don't need to. I'm not even speaking of CBS specifically. It's so corrupt to me. It's just absolutely ridiculous. Because it's not a reporter's job to cover for a politician. Right? I'm just checking. Speaker 0: Well, you know, I I like to think that I call balls and strikes. People like to talk about the Hunter Biden reporting at CBS, but I was also the reporter who obtained the audiotape of president Trump apparently bragging about these Iran documents at Mar a Lago. Right. But they don't talk about that. Speaker 1: Well, I well, you should, I mean. Speaker 2: You should, Speaker 0: but I'm just saying, you know, I'm kind of equal opportunity when it comes to the accountability. Speaker 1: Were there any well, I know that, which is I'm what I'm saying is that your supervisors, whoever they were, and you're being very polite, I would say, but they should have the same fair minded attitude and, you know, allow reporters to tell the truth, period, no matter who it's about, I think. Don't you? Speaker 0: I think that's what the public's looking for. Speaker 1: And because they're not delivering that, Matt Taibbi is more influential than CBS News. That's all I'm saying. Like, it finds its own level. People need credible information. They need to Speaker 0: There's such a hunger for it. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: That's that's, we just, did our first investigation, on x, and we looked at, the defense department's, specifically the army and the National Guard's failure to look after a soldier who had a debilitating heart condition that they blamed on, the COVID vaccine. This was someone who had no heart issues before they entered the military, and we did an independent review of their medical records. And the symptoms appeared almost immediately after, being vaccinated, and they're really amplified after they had that that second dose. And, Speaker 1: Can you fill out some of the details? Like, how old is this? Speaker 0: She's 24 years old. Her name is Carolina Stancic. She was, a a soldier in the Army National Guard, and she was on active duty orders when she was diagnosed with this debilitating heart condition called POTS, which is postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. And what it means is that there's kind of a disconnect between the way your heart is working and your blood pressure. People can have blackouts, puts a lot of stress on your heart. And she's had multiple heart attacks. She's had a mini stroke At 24. And we sat down with her, just days before she got a pacemaker at 24. And this story, appealed to me for months because she had paperwork, we learned, from the army, or rather there was army paperwork that, showed that they conceded over time that, her heart condition was in the line of duty, and it it was especially important. And, when we launched that investigation, I felt along with the team that x was probably the only platform that we could have such an authentic and candid and open conversation about the failure of the US military to take care of its people. Speaker 1: But I just find that crazy. I mean, I have a 24 year old daughter, so it makes me emotional thinking about it. But a 25 year old child, this girl, has a peacemaker Mhmm. Because she followed orders. So or it seemed that's what she says, and that's certainly a credible claim given that's happened to a lot of people, and everyone knows that. So why would x, which is not was not designed as really a news platform, like, why are they the last outlet that would run something like that? That's crazy to me. Speaker 0: I I didn't really fully appreciate this until until I started working independently, but we felt that x was the platform where we could really have an open candid conversation and we could put out the records so people could analyze them and fact check them for themselves to understand the issue and make up their own minds as to whether the army and the national guard had really let this soldier down. Right? We just put it all out there for scrutiny. And, I say this, because what I heard anecdotally from from colleagues is that other platforms, that story, even though it was a story about a failure to take care of, of of soldiers, could be de amplified on other platforms or or or labeled something that Speaker 1: But why is NBC News leading with that? I mean, I thought we No. Speaker 0: I can't I can't really answer for those outlets. But But Speaker 1: we both know they would never run that. Speaker 0: I don't know if they would never run it, but I I just felt that it was a completely legitimate story. Of course. It was, it was a story, about accountability, a failure of the government to look out for its own people. And then in her particular case, it took her 19 months to get the acknowledgment that this heart condition was in the line of duty. And what that means is that she's eligible for different benefits and and medical care. But because there was such a delay to get medical care, because there was such a delay to get mental health care, she told us at one point she considered suicide. 24. And, anyway, I we heard from other people who believe that they have similar circumstances, and I and I say this with some humility. That's what good journalism does. Speaker 1: Well, obviously, there's no other point to it. Like, what's the point? I mean, either you're carrying water for people who are paying you to do that, which is just the definition of dishonesty, or you're doing what you're supposed to do. The reason we have First Amendment protections in the first place, which is tell the public what their government is doing, what the powerful people who control their lives are doing. I mean, I don't Speaker 0: And and and to the credit of the army and the national guard, we engaged with them over 2 weeks. I felt it was very important to give them a lot of time to respond to the charges because they were such serious charges, and they engaged with us, which I thought was a very positive thing because I'm now working independently. Right? I'm not working for a big corporation. And it it said to me that they understood sort of the power and the impact of what we were doing. You know, 3,000,000 people watched that video or touched that video. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's Speaker 0: a lot of people. And, you know, global and young people and probably a lot of service members as well. Yeah. So I I I wanna give them credit for that. They they engage. They try to answer our questions. Folks who are watching this can decide whether their answers, you know, pass the sniff test. But that's that's part of what Speaker 1: you're doing. You've got a very generous spirit, and you're trying to give people credit where it's due. I will say I've always thought just watching you from a distance that one of your main kind of advantages over everybody else is you cared less about, you know, what the prevailing view of the group was, and it didn't bother you to go in a direction that you felt was the right direction or to tell the truth even when it was unpopular. Why it does it feel to you like a lot of journalists are you know, it's a big deal to them what their colleagues think Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Back in the newsroom. Speaker 2: Do you Speaker 1: know what I'm saying? Mhmm. Speaker 0: I guess it it doesn't matter to me as well. Speaker 1: I can tell. Speaker 0: I I I I I don't really have any other sort of, explanation for it. I I would say, without getting sort of too personal because I'd like to keep the conversation professional Speaker 2: Well, it's just interesting. Speaker 1: It's like, why you Speaker 0: I just I just, if there's anything I hate more, it's injustice. I hate injustice when I when I see it. And, I just think throughout my career, I've taken on a lot of stories which are about the little guy. Speaker 1: Well, they should be. Speaker 0: Fighting the big bureaucracy or the person who says, wait a minute. It's not, you know, it's not adding up. And, so it's that's really what drives me in the end is that sense of there's injustice and there's an opportunity. In the case of this 24 year old, I think that we've seen some incremental, improvements to her situation. I hope that her records issue with the military is resolved quickly because at 24, she's really given up everything. I mean, she's she's given up her health to serve this vaccine. Speaker 1: And a lot of other people. I I mean, I know someone who died from the vaccine. Dead. Speaker 0: But it's not the story was the story was not a moratorium on the vaccine Right. Or the mandate. The story was always about the the alleged failure of the military to take care of its people because that's that's the sacred pledge that you leave no one behind. Speaker 1: Well, I agree, but I would say that pledge applies to the entire country. The government exists only to serve us. That's its only that's its only job. We pay for it. We own it. This is a democracy. And, so if they're hurting people and don't care, then that's the the gravest crime they could commit. That's my personal opinion. I thought that was everybody's opinion. Apparently, it's not. Speaker 0: Apparently not. Speaker 1: Yeah. Apparently not. Right. I'm not in the military, and I'm never gonna be in the military, but an American citizen. And if my government hurts me, I think it's just obvious that they should apologize and try to make it better. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: But, but they don't. So you're saying well, we've had such a similar experience. You're like, you're in this little world, which you think is a much bigger world than it actually is. I'll speak for myself. And then you get ejected from that world, and you're, like, shocked, but then you thank god for it because, wow, there's fresh air and sunlight. And then you look around, and you realize that all these smaller organizations or individuals are having, like, a huge effect, and you didn't even know that. It's amazing. But one and I I just love the whole thing. But one of the problems is it's pretty easy it's pretty hard to take down, like, a big news organization because they have, like, a well staffed legal department. Pretty easy to take down an individual with law fair. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: I mean, great? I don't know. Concern. Speaker 0: Yeah. One of the things I I'd like to talk about is this the press act. The press act is a piece of legislation, that's in the senate right now. It passed unanimously, in the house, and the press act is a federal shield law for reporters. It would allow them to protect confidential sources, and there are just very few exceptions to what I would call common sense exceptions for imminent violence or threats to critical infrastructure. And I've said that I think the protection of confidential sources is the hill to die on. Because if if you don't have that ability, a credible assurance that you're going to protect your source, as an investigative reporter, your toolbox is empty. I mean, you really have nothing to offer. And you know and others, I can't say a lot about it, but I'm in the middle of a major case where I was asked to disclose confidential source information. I refused to disclose. Speaker 1: Who asked you to disclose it? Speaker 0: It was a it's part of a privacy act lawsuit. I'm a witness in the case. And, I So Speaker 1: this is a private entity? Speaker 0: Mhmm. There's a a plaintiff. They're suing, government agencies including the FBI, and they wanna understand, the source of sources for my reporting, a series of stories, national security stories in 2017. And, Speaker 1: This is all public. So just remind me, who's suing? Speaker 0: A Chinese American, scientist, and she's suing the FBI, the Justice Department, Defense Department, I believe Homeland Security as as well. They're, like, 4 or 5 different agencies. And, the the plaintiff wants to understand how I got information, about her and her So Speaker 1: you're not being sued? Speaker 0: No. I'm not. I'm just a witness. Speaker 1: It's just the same thing happened to me. They grabbed all my text messages. I was not named in the suit, but a judge said I had to divulge. So they're trying to violate, among other things, your privacy, but also the the they're trying to violate the the protection that we all assumed was real, that confidential sources had. Speaker 0: Look. I I don't wanna lit I wanna be very careful because I don't wanna litigate, you know, the case the case here. But the issue is, the the forced disclosure of confidential source information. Speaker 1: And So that means you as a reporter talk to people, they tell you stuff on the condition of anonymity. I'm not gonna tell anybody that we spoke, but tell me the truth about what you know. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Correct? Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And this is something that journalists deal with constantly. Speaker 0: If you don't have that credible pledge of confidentiality as an investigative journalist, you really have very little to offer. Speaker 1: Yeah. I've done it, like, 3 times today already. Speaker 2: Oh, wow. No. But that's just that's Speaker 1: your life. You know? Right. You're talking to people constantly about stuff and but everyone knows you're not gonna rat them out. Right? Speaker 0: The question is in the appellate court right now in Washington, and, the question is when when the need for that information overrides the first amendment and, the reporter's, privilege. I haven't lost a night's sleep over my decision to protect confidential sources. But that doesn't mean I don't feel a tremendous burden and responsibility with this case. Tell Speaker 1: us about the burden. Speaker 0: Well, it's it's so much bigger than just my individual case. It's it's not just about me. It's not about just a single series of stories. It's not about one media outlet. Whatever the courts decide, and and I have respect for the legal process and what's unfolding. Whatever they decide is gonna impact every working journalist in the United States. Speaker 1: Well, in the public. Speaker 0: For the yeah. And the public and for the next generation. And that's why, you know, the press act is an opportunity to really strengthen press freedom and press protections at a time, as as you mentioned, that there's this explosion of smaller and independent outlets. And they can't, you know, they can't withstand the legal and financial pressure. Speaker 1: Tell us about the financial pressures. Like, what does that look like? Speaker 0: Well, right well, right now, I'm, facing fines of $800 a day for refusing to disclose. That has been, put on hold, and I'm grateful for that pending the appeal, in in the court in Washington. But then there's the cost of litigating a case like this. This is not an inexpensive thing to do. I've been fortunate to have, Fox News, which has mounted a very vigorous defense, an excellent legal team. Speaker 1: Because you worked at Fox at the time. Speaker 0: That's correct. I worked at at Fox at the time. But not every outlet can afford to do that. And so having the press act would prevent them from sort of being sort of legally strangled in the future, and and losing that pledge of confidentiality. And if you believe as I do, that an informed electorate and an engaged, reporting core is fundamental to democracy, you're gonna wanna see this opportunity seized and and really realized. Speaker 1: Well, if you think the public has the right to know what its government is doing, which is kind of the bottom line as far as I'm concerned, and I think the public does public has no idea what the government's doing. I I can say that factually. No clue. They should know. And, then you need to make sure the mechanisms exist for them to get that information. Correct, I mean? Speaker 0: Yeah. So I I I testified to congress about this earlier in the year, and, I just feel like we're at an inflection point. There's just this incredible shift in the media landscape. There's this sort of exciting diverse group of new voices doing some really tremendous journalism. So this is the moment to me where you wanna offer these kinds of protections for confidential source protection at the federal level so that it's consistent with what existed in almost every state in this country. And I think it's an acknowledgment of the role that journalism should play and can play in the democratic process. Speaker 1: Yeah. It can't. You know, if you make it too expensive to tell the truth, nobody will. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And that's kind of where we are. I mean, you can take people out with lawsuits if you're some well funded political group, particularly on the left. They've been doing this at scale. You just you you shut people up by bankrupting them. Speaker 0: Well, one of our kids, as we were really, wrestling with the subpoena and how that was all going to unfold, and there's a certain amount of, you know, you can't keep your kids off their phones. Right? So they're seeing sort of some of this play out. And one of our sons asked me, mom, are you gonna go to jail? Are we gonna lose the house? Are we gonna lose everything that you've worked for? And I wanted to tell him that in this country where we say we value I could get a little choked up when I think about it. But, you know, in this country where we say we value democracy and we value a vigorous press, that it was impossible. But I couldn't offer him that assurance. And, the best part of the story is how he ended it. He said, mom, do what it takes. I've got your back. And I thought Speaker 1: Good day. Speaker 0: If a teenager understands the importance of this pledge of and understands the importance that journalism plays in a democracy, then certainly congress can get this legislation passed. Right now, it's in the senate. Chuck Schumer has said he would like to get it to the president's desk this year, and I hope there'll be movement before the August recess. Speaker 1: Social media are great. They're important. They're the main way we communicate with each other. They're where politics happen in this country. But one of the problems with social media is that the rules change. People in charge don't want you to say something. They don't tell you that, And the next thing you know, you're without a platform. Well, now you have an option. Parler. It's back. The original free speech app, taken off the Internet by the sensors, has come back in full force. Parler was the first big app to be pulled off because it was the 1st big app to make free speech a top priority. Now, other platforms may be relaxing their policies and they change a lot, but Parler will not change. Its distinct approach is here to stay. By paving the way for other apps to protect users free speech, Parler has set the standard in the industry. It is now launched on a hyperscale private cloud called Parler Cloud and that means your data are secure, your words cannot be controlled by third party companies. It's uncancelable. Again, Parler has been canceled. They don't plan to be canceled again, and they've taken extensive and very expensive steps to make sure it's not going to happen. Parler is not at the mercy of other companies that don't believe in free speech. And here's the best part, it's ad free. You are not the product on Parler. Parler is committed to providing a space where you can share and engage without interference of ads or invasive targeting. So it's more than just a platform. It is effectively a movement and its goal is to keep the free flow of information open globally where everybody can talk without fear of suppression. So it's upholding the values this country was founded on, free expression, open dialogue, also innovation, by the way. We're on parlor at Tucker Carlson, and you can go there and find us and stay formed about what's happening in the world. So join a place that embraces your right to say what you actually think, and that fosters connections between people. Without free speech, you can't connect with other people. We're all just lying to each other. But Parler offers you that a seamless social media experience tailored to your needs. You can get Parler from the App Store, Google Play, or visit parler.com. At Parler, you are valued, you can say what you think, and you're awarded for doing so. Who's against it? Speaker 0: You know, I think there are some Republican members who have hesitations, about it. What I would say is that Speaker 1: Well, because they hate the media. Speaker 0: I I I can't speak to the their Well, I Speaker 1: hate the media because they're liars, so you wanna protect the truth tellers. I guess that would be my view of it. Speaker 0: I mean, I think the important thing to understand is that this is legislation that would do so much to protect these smaller independent out outlets where you have this diversity of voices, period, on both sides of the left and on the right. And it's a moment when we can codify those protections. And it's a moment when we can say, you know, we talk about the importance of the First Amendment, we talk about the importance of press freedom, and now we can actually really do something concrete to protect it. Speaker 1: Yeah. I think you're right. And I I do think the one thing that we can do is just not obey. I mean, I was told to give up my text messages. I never should've done that. I knew I shouldn't have done it. I should've just, oh, they're gonna throw you one joke. Go ahead. Now come to my house. Try it. And I never should've done that, and in a weak moment, I did it. I I mean, clearly, you're facing this right now. I caved. You haven't. Bless you. But, I mean, what are you gonna do if they if they command you to do it? Speaker 0: I mean, I just have to cross that bridge Yeah. When when we get to that. In in the meantime, I've been so encouraged by how many media outlets have really filed briefs in support of of our position, that they understand that it's a case that's gonna impact everyone who's working today. And, that's encouraging. Speaker 1: Does it ever strike you how small our world has become? I mean, so you you work for 30 years or whatever more to become Speaker 0: It is more. More. Speaker 1: I'm not I I actually know how long it is, but I I'm not gonna a long time. And you become, you know, the most, arguably, famous investigative journalist in the United States. Speaker 0: I don't know about that. Speaker 1: Well, I I would say that's true. Or, certainly, you're top 2 or 3. I mean, well, you are. Okay? But you it's like you you'd think that every news organization be like, oh my gosh. Katherine Harris is free. Let's hire her. But you're independent on acts. Like, what does that say about the landscape? It's just it's amazing. Speaker 0: Well, it was a personal choice. Speaker 1: I I know that. Yeah. Yeah. But but, really, I mean, NBC in a normal world would be like, hey. We don't pay you $3,000,000 a year to do what you do. But they didn't. So, like, is is that a little strange? Speaker 0: I think it's an indicator of how the marketplace has really shifted. Yeah. I I think it's I think that's the biggest indicator to me. I didn't really understand how much sort of the Earth had moved moved beneath me in the last four and a half years. And when you start to look at the numbers, you see that, these big corporate out outlets are not, essentially the the gatekeepers on the information anymore. Yeah. That it's that it's much larger on these on these platforms. And I I really believe in my heart that there is a place for investigative journalism on platforms like X and and other platforms. People are just hungry for it. And that's the investigation we did. It's like as I said, about 3,000,000 people. I mean, that's a that's a good healthy number. Speaker 1: Do you don't seem angry, though. Speaker 0: No. I don't. I don't I don't feel angry. Really? Mhmm. Speaker 1: There's not a smoldering ball of rage inside towards your old employers? Speaker 0: No. I I, look. If they don't want me to work there, they don't want me to work there. I know the work was it was not a performance issue. I heard from many of my colleagues who were very, very sad Speaker 1: that Oh, I know. I I heard from them too. Speaker 0: Yep. But that's but that's not my call, in the end. The but the seizing of the records was a completely different thing. That was something that I was gonna go to the MET because I felt so strongly, Speaker 1: about Can you explain why they stole your stuff? Speaker 0: Well, in a letter to congress, they argued that they had not seized the materials. I think the language they used was that they had tried to secure and protect them, which I left me a little, speechless, because it was diminishing reporter materials to work product. And to say that what had happened was an effort to seize or protect my materials was I mean, it just showed that some executives had a very difficult relationship with the facts. Speaker 1: That's kind of a problem for news Speaker 0: I am restrained. I am restrained. Speaker 1: But if you have liars in charge of it, you know, the truth telling business, that's a problem. Speaker 0: Well, I'm not saying I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that. Speaker 2: Oh, I Speaker 1: am saying that. Speaker 0: I okay. Speaker 1: Alright. I'm saying that. I mean, that's just a you know? I don't know. There are certain businesses you sort of expect that, you know, time share sales or whatever, used cars. But, like, if your job is to tell the truth and the people in charge are just, like, lie for fun. Speaker 0: It was fair I said this before. It was very sad. Very, very disappointing, to see that see that happen. And I heard from people I used to work with, and they were really saddened by it as well. Speaker 1: Did any of them say I gotta get the hell out of here? I can't work for these people anymore? Speaker 0: I don't wanna go into the conversation. Speaker 1: But do you feel like people who remain at in corporate media jobs are desperate to get out? Is that your sense Speaker 0: in general? I think there's a lot of anxiety. Yeah. I I think people are starting to feel the sort of the earth move beneath them. You just have to look at the the ratings and the numbers to understand sort of the the for lack of a better term, the old order has has kind of disappeared. Speaker 1: That's for sure. How long can they keep going, do you think? Speaker 0: I don't know. Edge I think this election cycle will be, pivotal. If these town halls go ahead on x I think it's the partnership with NewsNation. I think that the the numbers on those town halls are gonna be just mind blowing in in the true sense of of the word, and it's gonna be global. And, I forget I think Elon Musk or, Linda Yaccarino posted on x what the numbers were with the presidential debate. And, I mean, when you looked at how many people watched it on, you know, traditional outlets versus the kind of, volume and engagement on on that platform, it's I mean, it was many multiple times larger. Speaker 1: Well, the entire political conversation in the United States plays out on x, period. I mean, I I can't speak for, you know, sports, entertainment, culture. I mean, there are many different verticals in any civilization, but the political conversation takes place on acts, period. Does not take place on any TV channel or any newspaper. You think that's fair? Speaker 0: I do. I think it's and I think it's exciting too, actually, to to see it, a little bit unleashed. It's not always pleasant. It's not always easy. But it's, it's sort of unleashed and evolving and engaging, and it's bringing in different points of view, and I think that's what civil discourse, is about. Speaker 1: Did you read it before? Speaker 0: I did. Speaker 2: But you Speaker 0: But I I when I was, when I worked at Fox, I was I was not on what was, Twitter at that time. And then when I went to CBS, I I joined because I thought it would be a good way for people to find me. Speaker 1: What role do you think x is playing in the media landscape right now? Speaker 0: Oof. Wow. You're asking me. That's a big, a big question. Yeah. Speaker 1: I don't know that I know the answer, by the way. Speaker 0: I I from my own experience, when I had an investigation that I thought was a sensitive topic, I felt very confident that I could put it on x and there could be a really engaging, candid, authentic discussion about it. And I thought that was important because, it seemed to be an undercover issue. This is the the soldier story. Yeah. And, I was really grateful for that, and I I would commend Elon Musk in in that way. I I kind of understood it. And then when I actually went to do it, I had a different and sort of larger appreciation for it. That people could have that conversation. And the the comments that we received were, you know, this happened to me or can you look into this. And I mean, it was a very organic thing. And I think that you can't look into every case. You can't follow-up on everything. Speaker 1: That's for sure. Speaker 0: But I think there's something very positive about people sharing their experiences and not feeling so isolated on a subject that's so sensitive. And I I think that's, really commendable. Speaker 1: Well, yeah. And there's no someone who thinks she's sincerely believed she's been injured because she followed an order has nothing to be ashamed of, and she does have a right to tell her story in public. I I I mean, the whole thing is so nuts. Did anyone would prevent a 24 year old girl who thinks she's been injured by following an order from talking in public is just like, you're not on the right side if you're preventing that. Don't you think? Speaker 0: I think it was the right thing to do. I I I first heard about her story last October, and it's always been in the back of my mind as a story that should be done. And so when I decided to launch the first investigation, it just seemed like a natural to me. Speaker 1: So when I thinking back when I got into this business when I left college in 1991, you've been in it for a couple years maybe before no. Not long. But Speaker 0: Yeah. No. 87. Speaker 1: 87. 87. So in 1987, you worked for ABC News in London. Speaker 0: The very the starter job of all starter jobs. Speaker 1: That's crazy. Yeah. Yeah. It's hard to convey now to younger people the prestige that attached to that job. And you had, you know, all the all the credentials necessary to get that, and you went to Harvard and Columbia. Speaker 0: Well, the joke with my father was, did you really go to Harvard to make coffee and fax documents and photocopy? I said, absolutely. Yeah. 1000000. I I make the I do the best job photocopying and faxing if anyone I But it's about pride in your work. Speaker 1: Of course. Speaker 2: But it was such Speaker 1: a different world. Like, that was a really rich company then. I mean, they had, like, catering and, you know, executives flew 1st class. You can go wherever you wanted. And, I mean, do you ever look back on that and think, boy, that was just such a different time? Speaker 0: It was I was, in touch recently with there was sort of a little core group of us that were starting out at that time between the news desk and, what they call the production control room. And there were maybe 12 of us, so between maybe 22, 23, and 27. And, we look back on that period as kind of like a like a golden window in television news. The the quality of the correspondence, many had come out of Vietnam, or had come out of Washington and then got a foreign assignment. The crews were incredibly experienced. Speaker 1: Yeah. You know, Speaker 0: if you had a cameraman take your stand up, you know, he probably had been in Beirut during the very For sure. Bombing. Oh, for And the editors were so I mean, he learned so much from from all of them. Speaker 1: Oh, oh, I I grew up around that stuff. Yeah. Those guys were impressive. Speaker 2: I Speaker 0: mean, this was an incredible opportunity for me and very formative. Speaker 1: Yeah. And now yeah. It's just it's I remember filling out my tax return in 1991, my first job. I worked at a gas station on a factory, but I never, like, had a real job. And I remember, you know, occupation journalist. I was like, I'm a journalist. Now it's like, I mean, I don't even know what I would put on there. You know? I don't know. Armed robber would be less embarrassing. But it was you know, it seemed like a pretty honorable profession, I guess. That's what I'm saying. Speaker 0: I I, you know, I I hear what you're saying, and you're gonna accuse me of being so sort of deferential, but I just have always tried to stay focused on my own work. Like, I have to answer to myself. Speaker 1: That's not deference. That's the opposite of deferential and ask kissy. That's, like, that's integrity. Speaker 0: I just I just am like, is this the story I you know, there's stories in front of me. Which is the one that I should really be doing? Where can I make the most impact? What's the story that hasn't been told that I can actually Well, so that's Speaker 1: that's it right there. That I agree with you a 100%. It's like it's not that hard to tell the truth, I don't think. It's pretty easy. Actually, it's easier than lying. What's hard is figuring out what you should be focused on, and I think you're really good at that. What are the stories that should be told that aren't being covered? Speaker 0: Our our next project is gonna look at, the issue of, immigration and and the borders. And I don't wanna give it all away, but, we've got a lot of good data about how, homeland security is in violation of federal law and regulations on a on a daily basis and creating, I think, a significant security risk for many American citizens. And I think that that really deserves a deep dive. Yeah. And it's a story that I can really tell now that might have been hard to tell before. Speaker 1: So I can't even get, and I have tried, like, a clear number on how many people have come into this country illegally over the last 4 years. I mean, it ranges from 5,000,000 to 30,000,000, and I can't and those are all kind of credible estimates, and I don't I have no idea which one is correct. But why can't we get even a real number on that? Speaker 0: I I I I think the the simple answer may be, and I don't know, but my my assessment would be that it's just the volume that that we're talking about. I guess the volume. Speaker 2: So Speaker 0: But there's not but to your point, I don't think there's great transparency on this issue. I hope to bring a little bit more transparency to it. Speaker 1: So in your judgment, that's a big deal story. Speaker 0: Oh, 100%. I yeah. I and it's not just I'm looking at what the the polling shows about the top issues for American, you know, American voters in this election cycle. I'm asking myself, I have information. I think there are violations of federal law and federal regulations every day, at the border. I need to find out if that's really if that's really true. And if it is true, why is it true? And who's really losing in that equation? Is is is the country less safe as a result or or not? I don't know the answer to all of that yet. But that's that's a very legitimate story to Speaker 1: put in. Also, how does a bankrupt come country, which ours is, pay for all these services? I don't. Yeah. There are many questions. I totally agree. But so you're focused on the question, is the federal government violating its own laws? Speaker 0: Federal employees. Yes. Mhmm. Speaker 1: And to the extent that you've reported it out, are you closer to an answer? Speaker 0: I I think based on our reporting so far that it's it really, tips that way. It does appear that way. And so my question is, where's you know, who's been disciplined? Who's been suspended? Who's been fired? Who's been demoted? And I'm not sure the answer is really anyone except the people who blew the whistle on it. Really? Don't make me give the story away. No. I won't. Speaker 1: I won't. Speaker 0: I won't. I won't. Right now. Speaker 2: Like, I Speaker 1: I'm, like, so shocked. I mean you know? Speaker 0: But I think but that's the kind of, to me, that's the kind of story you wanna be doing. Right? I I just think it's, the thing that has always encouraged me about, the the, the consumers of news in this in this country is that they really understand this idea of accountability. They they they wanna see it. They expect it. They demand it. And and when you do it, I think it can be very gratifying to, you know, to kind of shine a light. I it sounds like so old fashioned, but to shine a light on an issue that really is worthy of that and is sort of screaming out for coverage. Speaker 1: How do you I've had many people ask me this over the years, but, you know, one channel will do a story or one newspaper will do a story, and then every other outlet will do exactly the same story. And sometimes it's like a really boutique story. You know, it's a story of limited obvious importance, but everyone does the same story. Yeah. How do these like, who decides that? Where how does you know? Ugh. Where does that come from? Speaker 0: I mean I mean, this comes from the executives or the show producers. Speaker 1: But have you noticed that you know, I don't know how many news organizations are in the United States in a country of 350,000,000 people. They're they're a lot. Mhmm. They all do, you know, in a in a given week, they do a suite of maybe 20 stories. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Themes, you know, variations on the theme perhaps, but but, I I mean, why? You'd think that Speaker 0: I really I I wish I could answer that question. But Speaker 1: you've noticed this. Right? Speaker 0: I mean, when you look at the rundowns, let's say, for an evening news broadcast, you'll see a lot of the same stories. Now that may be a function of the fact that they have such limited time to tell the story. It was at 18 or 19 minutes or 20 For sure. Or 20 minutes. Speaker 1: But it's the the topics are the same. It's just interesting. I'm not suggesting coordination, but I I do think it's a I don't know what it is. It's I think it's a conspiracy of like minded temperament. They all are kind of the same people. Speaker 0: I I just I don't know. Speaker 1: But you'll concede there are a lot of stories that they could be doing that they're not. Speaker 0: Yeah. I I think so. That's that's the appeal of being independent is that you can tell some of the stories that maybe you couldn't tell before. Speaker 1: Is it weird not to have a boss? Speaker 0: Yeah. It's a big change after nearly 4 decades of working, for major media outlets. It's a it's a huge change. I've had a lot of change in the last 4 months, 5 months. A lot. Speaker 1: Do you miss being scolded? Speaker 0: I'm not even scolded. I miss the structure. I'm very used to the structure, and, you know, structure that, you know, has resources that you didn't realize that you needed until you went to do it yourself. I'm sure you understand that. Speaker 1: Been there. Speaker 0: Yeah. You've been there. Right? But I I really like working with a small team and, as a group, deciding what is it that we're gonna pursue next, and how can we structure the story that it has an impact, and what kind of reporting do we need to be doing, and at what point do we engage with government agencies, And how do we keep moving the story forward after after we do it? I I just find that just kind of exhilarating and refreshing all at all at the same time. And in a marketplace that's really just exploding where you're setting your own boundaries and your own rules. Right? You're saying, okay. I've got almost 4 decades of experience. This is what I believe journalism is. This is how I'm gonna execute it. These are my standards. These are my expectations, and I'm gonna be true to those. I'm I'm gonna follow it through. That's the exciting part of it. And then having a public that responds to it, which I'm, you know, so grateful for. Speaker 1: People like honesty in a world full of lies, I think. Do you feel that? Speaker 0: People are looking for credible, reliable information in a way that I never maybe seen in my lifetime working as a journalist. Speaker 1: So not maybe what you're saying is that as a business, journalism is, like, more discredited than it's ever been and more disliked. But individual journalists who decide to tell the truth are Speaker 2: I don't know I don't know if I I don't know if Speaker 0: I would go that far. I'm not sure how comfortable I am really commenting on the whole, you know, profession that way. How's that? I I just sort of come back to my, you know, I come back to my own, you know, my my own work. I I wrote something recently for the free press, which is really an amazing operation. It's Barry Weiss has really built it into this sort of, you know, engaging, driving thing, you know, it's like it's like a great source for information. I wrote something on on the press act, and, you know, that it's the protection of sources is the hill to die on. And it was such a great experience to work with them and to see the reach of that story and to take an issue that I felt needed to kind of, you know, poke up through the noise and get some attention. Because all of our our futures, our careers rest on that basic principle. So to me, that's an example of, you know, an independent media outlet which is really has a lot of impact and made a difference. Speaker 1: How, of the people that you worked with 30 years ago, were any still around in the business? Speaker 0: Oh, I'm trying to think. A lot of them are retired now. I went to a a reunion, ABC Lending Reunion. I wanna say it was maybe 7 years ago, 7 6 or 7 it was before I just before I went to CBS, and a lot of people were retired. A lot of people had, passed. 5 of them were already gone. Speaker 1: Is that weird? Speaker 0: Yeah. It's sad. But, I learned so much from them. And I think that not to sound, too sentimental, but I think you carry that on. I think one of the greatest things you can do at a certain point in your career is to share your experience and to share the skill set that you that you have. And I really enjoy doing that, especially with younger journalists. Speaker 1: How long are you gonna do it? Speaker 0: Oh, you know, we I talk about this with our kids. How long am I gonna do this, and when will I retire? And, you know, they all have the same verdict, which is like, oh, mom, like, you need to keep working as long as you can work. Because you're really, if we had you loose in the house all the time, it would just be crazy and you love I mean, I just love it. I feel fortunate to have found something I feel so passionate about. Maybe you feel Speaker 2: Oh, of Speaker 1: course I do. Speaker 0: Maybe you feel the the the same way. Speaker 1: Of course. Speaker 0: And I I can't sort of I'm I'm surprised even by the evolution of where I am, today, and I'm surprised that I'm fighting in the courts to be protecting confidential sources. But if if there's something that folks who are listening and watching this can take away is that, you know, I came out of February, so it was a tough time. There's no question about it. But I had a lot of clarity, and sometimes crisis gives you clarity. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 2: And Speaker 0: the idea of a free press and free speech, these really became my North Star. They really became the driving force of what I'm gonna do in this next chapter. Speaker 1: Yeah. I couldn't agree more. And it's weird to wake up and see things you took for granted under threat. Mhmm. Did you ever think that free speech in the United States would be open to question? Speaker 0: No. I I wouldn't have anticipated the situation that I'm in now. That's that's for sure. Speaker 1: Well, we're rooting for you fervently. Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 1: Catherine Hertz, thank you very much. Speaker 2: It's so good to see you. Speaker 0: Thanks for Speaker 1: having me. To you. To watch the rest unlock our entire vast library of content, you can visit tucker carlson.com and activate your membership today. In the name of free speech, we hope you will.

Posted - October 31, 2018 at 6:06 AM

Saved - January 22, 2025 at 12:57 AM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁💪🏻

Library of congress just deleted history! 1866 congressional doc where originator of 14th said foreigners or aliens do not get birthright citizenship. Everyone save a copy NOW, History deleted! OMFG! #birthright #BirthrightCitizenship #trump https://web.archive.org/web/20170228210602/https://www.loc.gov/law/help/citizenship/pdf/congressglobe_2890.pdf https://t.co/GQV3Eaa4Nk

Posted - November 7, 2024 at 7:46 PM

Saved - November 7, 2024 at 10:26 PM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥Arizona election attorney says that Maricopa County has zero authority to retabulate the votes! And it’s destroying county evidence at central count! https://t.co/swP6pizyUq

@Ryan_L_Heath - Ryan

@pnjaban needs to check her DMs. There is zero authority under AZ law for MC to “back out” and “retabulate” ballots at MCTEC that have already been tabulated at its vote centers. I sent her everything that she needs to file today. https://t.co/ZYHa8RPcVF

Posted - October 30, 2024 at 9:08 PM

Saved - November 1, 2024 at 9:38 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Norm Eisen has established a large election sabotage network involving over 100 organizations, collaborating with groups like Indivisible and the Working Families Party. His State Democracy Defenders work closely with Democracy 21, which aims to protect the 2024 elections from election deniers. They are also planning a post-election response. Key figures like Matt Traldi, co-founder of both State Democracy Defenders and Indivisible, are central to these efforts. The network reflects a continuation of Obama-era resistance strategies against Trump.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥 Norm Eisen set up a massive election sabotage network of over 100 orgs! Working with Obamas Indivisible and the communist Working Families party! This is Obamas Army. Literally.. Norm Eisens State Democracy Defenders runs this, and works with multiple orgs. I exposed one earlier, but never expanded upon it. Now meet Democracy 21 which led me to it! Back in May, I reported on Eisens State’s United which included a little on Democracy 21. Today we hear the rest. Democracy 21 works alongside Eisens States Democracy Defenders. And Norm even sat on the Democracy 21 board. What’s interesting is its Election Sabotage Response Network. “We are working in partnership with State Democracy Defenders and its founder Amb. Norman Eisen (ret.) to help coordinate and lead the Election Sabotage Response Network. This is a network of more than 100 national and state nonprofit organizations working to protect the 2024 elections from election deniers and ensure the integrity of our elections.” Well obviously this led to yet another Bad Kitty rats nest! They are also organizing a post election response! Considering they are all radical leftists, it looks like Obama and Eisen have things well underway! Interestingly, many of these orgs are from the Trump Serbian Otpor (resistance) movement. Event November 7, 2024 “Join Election Sabotage Response Network, the Working Families Party, MoveOn, Indivisible, Public Citizen, the ACLU and many more as we move quickly to make meaning of the moment after Election Day. Come together with the PROGRESSIVE movement for a community-wide mass call to get expert assessment on the situation and learn about points of action moving forward in whatever scenario we find ourselves.” Matt Traldi is a Co-founder and Board Member of State Democracy Defenders. along with Norm Eisen. Matt was also a cofounder of Obama’s Indivisible which was in the Resistance aka Otpor efforts with Obama’s OFA. “In 2022, Matt led the Democracy Defense Coalition’s election crisis boiler room, a movement-wide coalition effort involving hundreds of organizations, then founding the Election Sabotage Response Network.” Keep reading, it gets better… 👇🏻 Politico 2017 - Obama’s Army Takes On Trump “Six months into a presidency geared toward undermining the legacy of the man these young operatives still revere — more as someone who shaped not just their politics but their entire political consciousness — OFA (Obama’s, Organizing For Action) has found new life. It’s become the lead organizing hub of the Trump resistance.” “OFA has organized thousands of people to attend events protesting the president’s policies, while also advising new progressive groups taking shape. Matt Traldi, chief operating officer at Indivisible, met with OFA in January for a primer on what the group does and how.” The Democracy Defense Coalition is the fight back table mentioned in the Times fortifying the election article. The same players are back. Obamas alumni page pushed the Democracy Defense Coalition. Along with Obamas linked Blue State Digital now acquired by LONDON based WPP. As I said earlier, the Transition Integrity Project and the radical leftist, Fight Back Table (Democracy Defense Coalition) were previously in a joint strategy call together with potential funders. A storm is brewing… Every last drop to be referenced with Internet sources. And a whole lotta extra to be added. Expect tons!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! Congressman Jamie Raskin joins the Norm Eisen team to help thwart Trumps presidency! The planning for the Trump dictator and Hitler theme has been in use since at least Feb 2024. This will be the basis to seditiously fight his presidency. They also intend to use the Trump supporting Project 2025 fake narrative theme also. Others included are: Susan Corke, George Conway, Bill Kristol, Keith Ellison, Joanna Lyndgate, Sarah Longwell ACLU, and Jen Rubin. This all now falls under the State Democracy Defenders: “We go on OFFENSE against democracy deniers who break the law, including through our innovative program of outside public support for criminal prosecutions.” They also have what they call a NO DICTATORS DECLARATION. “We are alarmed about the rising autocratic movement in the United States that threatens the American idea and the American people. January 6, 2021, represented an ugly inflection point of this movement and it is driving forward with authoritarian proposals like Project 2025 that constitute an assault on the freedoms of every American. This movement threatens to eviscerate our rights, our prosperity, and our stability and security upon which our nation and the world rely.” *To me, Norm Eisen and Bill Kristol are like Soros without the billions. Funders include: - Reid Hoffman - MORAN, GARRETT M - HORING, JEFFREY L - DINTERSMITH, TED - Etc Their No Dictators coalition bands together the ACLU, State Democracy Defenders, and Principles First One State Democracy Defenders event was the ANTI-AUTOCRACY MOVEMENT. The event was co-hosted by: State Democracy Defenders Action, Principles First, Democracy Forward, and The American Autocracy Threat Tracker, in partnership with convening co-chairs Ruth Ben-Ghiat, Ty Cobb, Norm Eisen, Bill Kristol, Heath Mayo, and Skye Perryman. “The American Autocracy Threat Tracker is a comprehensive catalog based on Donald Trump and his associates’ plans, promises, and propositions.” *This listing is extensive! Now, Norm Eisen and crew discussed this autocracy tracker on the involved MSNBC in Feb 2024 while making outlandish accusations. “By Norman Eisen, co-founder and a board member of State Democracy Defenders Action and Andrew Warren, state attorney for Hillsborough County, Florida” “Norman Eisen is the co-founder and a board member of States United Action, a nonpartisan group dedicated to free, fair, secure elections.” (MSNBC later edited this Feb 2024 article to add the State Democracy Defenders for Eisen, which was created April 2024 and removed mention of his States United. Which makes it appear that this was all started under States United.) “Arguably Trump’s scariest rhetoric, however, relates to how he continually demonizes Americans with whom he disagrees. He has called those who don’t support him “demonic forces.” “Echoing fascist dictators like Hitler and Mussolini, Trump has labeled those who oppose him as “vermin” and has vowed to root them out. This is not politics as usual, harmless humor or careless hyperbole.” So there we have it, sources to follow.

Posted - October 28, 2024 at 5:42 PM

Saved - November 1, 2024 at 9:33 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I recently learned that Congressman Jamie Raskin has joined Norm Eisen's team to combat Trump's presidency, focusing on themes likening Trump to dictators. They aim to challenge the rise of autocracy in the U.S., particularly in light of events like January 6, 2021. The coalition includes notable figures and organizations like the ACLU and Principles First, and they are launching initiatives like the No Dictators Declaration. They also discussed an extensive American Autocracy Threat Tracker on MSNBC, highlighting Trump's divisive rhetoric and its implications for democracy.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! Congressman Jamie Raskin joins the Norm Eisen team to help thwart Trumps presidency! The planning for the Trump dictator and Hitler theme has been in use since at least Feb 2024. This will be the basis to seditiously fight his presidency. They also intend to use the Trump supporting Project 2025 fake narrative theme also. Others included are: Susan Corke, George Conway, Bill Kristol, Keith Ellison, Joanna Lyndgate, Sarah Longwell ACLU, and Jen Rubin. This all now falls under the State Democracy Defenders: “We go on OFFENSE against democracy deniers who break the law, including through our innovative program of outside public support for criminal prosecutions.” They also have what they call a NO DICTATORS DECLARATION. “We are alarmed about the rising autocratic movement in the United States that threatens the American idea and the American people. January 6, 2021, represented an ugly inflection point of this movement and it is driving forward with authoritarian proposals like Project 2025 that constitute an assault on the freedoms of every American. This movement threatens to eviscerate our rights, our prosperity, and our stability and security upon which our nation and the world rely.” *To me, Norm Eisen and Bill Kristol are like Soros without the billions. Funders include: - Reid Hoffman - MORAN, GARRETT M - HORING, JEFFREY L - DINTERSMITH, TED - Etc Their No Dictators coalition bands together the ACLU, State Democracy Defenders, and Principles First One State Democracy Defenders event was the ANTI-AUTOCRACY MOVEMENT. The event was co-hosted by: State Democracy Defenders Action, Principles First, Democracy Forward, and The American Autocracy Threat Tracker, in partnership with convening co-chairs Ruth Ben-Ghiat, Ty Cobb, Norm Eisen, Bill Kristol, Heath Mayo, and Skye Perryman. “The American Autocracy Threat Tracker is a comprehensive catalog based on Donald Trump and his associates’ plans, promises, and propositions.” *This listing is extensive! Now, Norm Eisen and crew discussed this autocracy tracker on the involved MSNBC in Feb 2024 while making outlandish accusations. “By Norman Eisen, co-founder and a board member of State Democracy Defenders Action and Andrew Warren, state attorney for Hillsborough County, Florida” “Norman Eisen is the co-founder and a board member of States United Action, a nonpartisan group dedicated to free, fair, secure elections.” (MSNBC later edited this Feb 2024 article to add the State Democracy Defenders for Eisen, which was created April 2024 and removed mention of his States United. Which makes it appear that this was all started under States United.) “Arguably Trump’s scariest rhetoric, however, relates to how he continually demonizes Americans with whom he disagrees. He has called those who don’t support him “demonic forces.” “Echoing fascist dictators like Hitler and Mussolini, Trump has labeled those who oppose him as “vermin” and has vowed to root them out. This is not politics as usual, harmless humor or careless hyperbole.” So there we have it, sources to follow.

Posted - September 11, 2024 at 7:11 PM

Saved - September 12, 2024 at 2:18 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I recently uncovered significant information about the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) and its connections to the U.S. State Department and Google. The IFCN was launched in 2015 with funding from the National Endowment for Democracy and the Omidyar Network. It has collaborated with various organizations, including First Draft News, which was initiated by Google to combat misinformation. This partnership has influenced fact-checking practices in the U.S. and globally, particularly during elections. The connections between these entities raise questions about transparency and the role of funding in shaping media narratives.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! Florida based, official international fact checking org, is funded by the US State Dept! And it operates in the United States too! This is a massive scandal! The State Department, who legally can’t operate in the US, has been funding US fact checking since 2015! Yes, it’s earliest days! The news orgs that operate under the IFCN flag, such as the Washington Post, do the leg work. Which then results in posts on Facebook etc being labeled and the algorithms throttling the post. This official international fact checking org is also partnered with Google. Poynters IFCN was funded by the CIA linked, State Dept NED and Omidyar grants. Recall Google initiated the first ever US censorship and expanded it globally by using the First Draft Consortium. First Draft also worked hand in hand with the IFCN. Poynters Politifact was in the First Draft network. ♦️Now check out this timeline of events. April 2015 - First Draft Consortium started by Google June 2015 - Official First Draft Announcement comes out. Along with its Google News Lab partnership announcement (obviously) Aug 2015 - Google News Lab partners with Poynter Sept 2015 - IFCN is launched by Poynter Oct 2015 - Poynter launches IFCN with State Dept NED funding Oct 2017 - Google news lab partners with IFCN specifically Dec 2018 - Poynter acquires Politifact ♦️Next I’ll list some key quotes from IFCN’s beginnings: Oct 21, 2015 - “Today marks the online launch of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at Poynter. This informal network, a forum for fact-checkers from five continents, is born out of the desire to study and discuss fact-checking as a journalistic instrument worldwide. The IFCN is supported by grants from the Omidyar Network and the National Endowment for Democracy.” “Poynter's partnership with Google is the institute's first major alliance with a digital technology company.” ♦️ Now showing US links is easy. “Led by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at the Poynter Institute, FactChat is the first collaborative project to unite U.S. fact-checking organizations with two major Spanish-language news broadcasters to fight mis/disinformation during the 2020 presidential campaign.” “Facebook users in the US and Germany can now flag articles they think are deliberately false, these will then go to third-party fact checkers signed up with the IFCN. Those fact checkers come from media organisations like the Washington Post and websites such as the urban legend debunking site Snopes. Another warning appears if users try to share the story, although Facebook doesn't prevent such sharing or delete the fake news story. The "fake" tag will however negatively impact the story's score in Facebook's algorithm, meaning that fewer people will see it pop up in their news feeds.” “Alexios Mantzarlis at first led the IFCN: Then he moved to GOOGLE NEWS LAB. And is now Principal, Google Trust & Safety Intelligence. As Director of the IFCN, he helped draft the fact-checkers' code of principles and shepherded a seminal partnership between fact-checkers and Facebook.” ♦️Now let’s head into Brazil: - Cristina Tardáguila, NED FELLOW, Founder of Agência Lupa and was at Brazil misinfocon with Zommer. Both were GDI advisors. Cristina Tardáguila is the IFCN Associate Director. - Laura Zommer is Zommer isn the board of the IFCN and Género & Numero from Brazil. She’s also the Executive and Editor-in-Chief at Chequeado, the first initiative of fact-checking and verification of public discourse in Latin America. Knight Fellow Laura Zommer started Factchequeado, a journalism and education hub to stem disinfo flows in Spanish-language platforms in the US. Factchequeado will use innovative approaches developed by Chequeado and Maldita in Latin America and Spain – introducing a WhatsApp tipline to involve audiences in fact-checking. Factchequeado is a collaborative alliance with Latino media and fact-checking orgs. Sources plus more to follow.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Let’s begin with the International Fact Checking Network’s (IFCN) first days. ♦️Oct 2015 the IFCN was launched by Poynter with support from grants by the Omidyar Network and the National Endowment for Democracy. https://archive.is/RpKYc ♦️This is a September 2020 report, and funding still was from the State Dept NED and Omidyar but now included Soros funding etc. Broadband Commission research report on ‘Freedom of Expression and Addressing Disinformation on the Internet’ The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN, 2019a) was launched in September 2015 as a business unit within the non-profit journalism school Poynter Institute for Media Studies, based in St. Petersburg, Florida, U.S.. The Institute, which owns the Tampa Bay Times, launched IFCN to bring together fact-checkers worldwide and to promote good practices and knowledge exchange in the field. The IFCN’s mission is to monitor trends, formats and policy-making about fact-checking worldwide, to publish regular articles about fact-checking, to promote training - both in person and online - as well as ensuring basic standards through the fact-checkers’ code of principles. On August 6th, 2020, IFCN had 79 verified active signatories of its code of principles, 14 verified signatories under renewal (IFCN, 2020d) IFCN has received funding from the Arthur M. Blank Family Foundation, the Duke Reporters’ Lab, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, the National Endowment for Democracy, the Omidyar Network, the Open Society Foundations and the Park Foundation (IFCN, 2019d). https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://www.broadbandcommission.org/download/2809/

Wayback MachineInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Please excuse both the Sept and Oct 2015 dates, in the top post, for the inception of the IFCN. The likely explanation is that most things are planned before they are announced. Now back to sourcing the timeline. This here 🧵 discusses Google starting the First Draft Coalition in April 2015. With the June 18, 2015 formal announcement. And only 2 days after Trump announced running.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

❗️❗️Breaking! Google just didn’t seed fund First Draft News, the first major US and global censorship org, it CREATED IT! I also have finally gotten the names of the Google employees they used to start the global censorship in 2015. This was in preparation for the 2016 elections. Yup, the same Google that visited the Obama White House 427 times. And the same Google that helped Obama win both his first and second presidencies! Interestingly, Tim Walz went on to hire one of the two Google individuals, Steve Grove. All along I thought the First Draft News consortium was started on June 18, 2015, when it was announced by Olivia Ma. But actually contact was made in April 2015. I’ve been looking for more specifics on First Drafts origins for years, now I have TWO SOURCES. Also Google expanded its support to include its GLOBAL TEAM. 1. First Draft website: “Most importantly, a final huge thank you to Steve Grove and Olivia Ma at Google News Lab. They got us all in a room in New York in April 2015 and FLOATED THE IDEA of First Draft. Since then, their support and enthusiasm, now combined with the same from their global team, has been invaluable. 2. Google News Lab on Medium - Steve Grove Director of the News Lab at Google. “At the center of our efforts around this topic is the First Draft coalition, WHICH WE STARTED in 2015 with seven social media verification organizations to create standards and best practices in the news industry for verifying eyewitness media content and COMBATTING FAKE NEWS. In 2016, we expanded the coalition to over 80 partners worldwide, and were thrilled to welcome Facebook and Twitter as well.” Claire Wardle, the director of First Draft, on March 31, 2015, and weeks prior to Googles offer, became the Tow Centers Research Director. She worked with Tow/Knight previously. Google is partnered with the Knight Foundation. And, it just so happens that Steve Grove and Olivia Ma who started First Draft were frequent visitors to the Obama White House over many years! I even have Steve Grove down for a strategy meeting with Obama less than 3 months before the April 2015 First Draft Consortium inception. ♦️Video #1 - Shows that Steve Grove, the director of Google News Lab, first met Obama at Google while Obama was still a senator. This also shows the multiple projects from multiple time frames that Steve Grove worked with Obama from 2009 to 2016. He’s all over this video. This also shows that Steve Grove worked with Obama during the same time that he and Olivia Ma created the First Draft News global censorship org. ♦️Video # 2 - Shows that Olivia Ma accompanied Steve Grove to the White House on at least one occasion in 2010. These videos may seem boring to you, but to me they are documentation of evidence. Sources to follow.

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Obama engaged with the American people through platforms like YouTube, using tools like Google Moderator to solicit questions on technology and foreign policy. These interactions were framed as 21st-century fireside chats, providing direct access to the President. The format allowed ordinary citizens to ask questions and sometimes challenge the President directly, creating a more conversational dynamic. One participant questioned H1B visas amid American unemployment, while another shared how healthcare reform impacted medication costs. Obama also discussed his personal connection to cancer research, referencing his mother's death. Participants felt these platforms democratized access to power and believed future leaders should continue using them for direct engagement. The interviews aimed to connect with a broader audience, including those not typically politically active, and allowed for more personal and meaningful conversations.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I am way too excited. I'm going to the White House. Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. President Obama, are you serious? Speaker 2: This is different, and it's really a big deal. Constantly, I seek to look beyond the doors of the White House into the hopes, fears of men and women in their home. Speaker 3: Standby. And five, four, 321. Speaker 4: We've asked a lot of YouTube users to submit some questions and get your take on, technology, foreign policy. I first met president Obama back when he was a senator, and he came to Google to give a speech to the company about his technology agenda. Speaker 5: We're gonna have 21st century fireside chats where, I'm speaking directly to the American people through video streams. Speaker 1: In that 1st year, we used a tool called Google Moderator, where people submitted video questions and, text questions. Speaker 4: Hello, mister president. Speaker 5: I'd like to know Speaker 6: His minimum wage will go up in 2012. Speaker 2: YouTube has allowed the common man to connect with the entire population. We're just common people, but we have access to to people in high places. Speaker 5: It gives me great access to all the people out there with wonderful ideas. Even if you didn't make your question, even if it wasn't on this show, we appreciate your submission. Hopefully, we'll catch you next time. Speaker 3: Welcome to the first ever presidential Google plus Hangout live on YouTube. Mister president, welcome to Google plus. Speaker 5: Great to talk to you, Steve. Speaker 7: The idea of asking the president a question, having him respond, and then maybe asking a follow-up. You're not just sitting on the sidelines anymore. You're actually, you know, able to participate in a way that you weren't. Speaker 6: Why does the government continue to issue h one b visas when there are tons of Americans with no job? Speaker 5: There's a huge demand for engineers around the country right now. Speaker 6: I understand that. Yeah. But how I mean, Speaker 7: I had never really seen someone interrupt the president before. I wanted him to look Speaker 6: at me. I wanted him to look in the face of someone who is still struggling. Speaker 4: The context that a regular person brings to a question in an interview is personal and gave a kind of conversational element to it that stripped away some of the traditional power dynamics of a of a presidential interview. Speaker 5: From 1, man to another, from a father to another, an American to another just like you are, how are you? That's a great question. Good with you? Is everything good with you, man? You know, we we should have that beer. Speaker 8: Talking to a camera by yourself, you never think in a 1000000 years, you're gonna get to meet the president because of it. Speaker 1: When we had started these in in 2009, I don't think that people would have kind of understood the concept of a YouTube star. Speaker 2: I think that it's important to pick out people whose audience might not be super politically active. Speaker 1: Inviting those 3 creators to have this conversation with president was a venue for a meaningful conversation. Speaker 9: Imagine being able to ask the leader of the free world any questions you want. Usually, only certain reporters get to do that. But on Friday, the president of the United States made an exception. Speaker 3: 321. Hello, everyone. My name is Steve Grove, and I'm the director of the News Lab at Google. And it's my pleasure to welcome you to a YouTube interview with the president of the United States. Mister president, thanks for having us here today. Speaker 5: To see you. Speaker 2: You walk into the situation room with the intelligence briefing Right. And you're presented with a problem. I wanna know how you get Smarter Every Day on that topic. Speaker 1: What do Speaker 7: you think Speaker 6: is the best long term plan for making education as a whole more affordable for students? Speaker 2: Before I had insurance, I could not take this medication. It's about $1100 a month, and that is a receipt showing it being $5 a month. Speaker 0: And something that I heard you talk about that you wanna work on is cancer. My mom is actually a cancer survivor. Speaker 4: I think Speaker 5: we can do a lot. Look. My mom died of cancer, when she was younger than I am now. Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. I just interviewed the president, and it was the best thing ever. Speaker 2: America doesn't work if people don't feel like they are part of democracy. Speaker 7: Access to power is is really important for the democratic process. Speaker 1: It will be increasingly important for future presidents and elected officials to take these platforms seriously and to use them to have conversations with the people that they serve. Speaker 4: We certainly hope your successor, follows in your footsteps and goes straight to Speaker 5: the American people after the big speeches. If they're smart, they will. Speaker 4: I agree. I agree. Thanks so much, mister president. Speaker 5: Really enjoyed

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker describes an upcoming interview with President Obama, noting its unique format where questions will come directly from YouTube users on the screen. The speaker believes this may be disorienting but fun, as people will be virtually "beaming into" the White House to ask follow-up questions. After the interview, the speaker says it went exceptionally well. The speaker felt it was really engaging, and that President Obama took the questions thoughtfully and gave substantive answers. The speaker also notes the personal format allows people to hear the unique voice of people.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And, it's gonna be a neat dialogue. I think it's gonna be a very unique format. I mean, just to see how the president will respond to it because, you know, I'll be interviewing him, but the questions will actually be coming, you know, from users on the screen. So it'll be a little sort of disorienting probably, but it'll be neat because really it's just people beaming into the White House via YouTube to ask the president, you know, follow-up questions on his speech. So I think it's gonna be a lot of fun. Hi. We're headed to the north gate. And here is the White House entering momentarily. We just came out of the interview. Come on. We just finished our interview with President Obama in the White House. It went exceptionally well. And I think Steve was saying a little word about what it was like to be sitting next to the president. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Let's see him. Wait. Pulled the hand up. This man. Round sucks. Yes. One glitch in our strategy. I think that adds character. It did add some character. It was a lot of fun. It was really engaging, and, he took the questions, I thought, really thoughtfully and gave really, like, substantive answers. And, it's sort of a it's a personal format. People feel like you're getting access to the unique people. Like, you actually get to hear the voice of people, which is cool. So it's fun. Good job, everybody. Google Moderator for the win. For the win. For the win.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Since we are on the subject of the CIA linked, and State Dept funded NED, First Draft Consortium founding orgs included the NED funded Bellingcat. Another founding org included Storyful Intelligence whose Global Managing Director was the founder of the UK 77th psyop brigade. First draft worked massively with the IFCN and Poynters Politifact. Now back to the IFCN sources.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥The first ever major US censorship was not only Google initiated, it is 💯 linked to the CIA and the UK 77th psyop brigade! First Draft News, was our first major censorship org both in the US and globally. It was started by the CIA funded Google. But just in case you don’t want to take me seriously on the CIA part, here’s more: Bellingcat was one of the original orgs signed up by Google to run First Draft News. And it’s been 💯 funded by the CIA NED Bellingcat was also in the intel cutout Integrity Initiative censorship org. Oh and Bellingcat was also in the Zinc Network censorship org. The CIA founded Google asked Bellingcat to sign up. Never mind that they also asked Meedan who is a major global censor that works with our DHS and in Brazil who is going after Elon. Most noteworthy is Google, Meedan, Storyful and Bellingcat. Storyful, another founding org that Google approached, had Alastair Aiken, he founded the UK 77th psyop brigade: “ALASTAIR AITKEN, of Storyful Intelligence, the News Corp digital intelligence company, he provided advice and insight to senior corporate and financial services leaders on digital networked influence and ESG strategy. For thirty years he was in the British Army, leaving as a Brigadier having founded and built the internationally renowned 77th Brigade, the first Information Warfare organization in a western country.” And Alastair Aitken too was a member of the intelligence cutout, Integrity Initiative. Our censorship was created by intelligence and there’s no way out for these goons. Now on to the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) “National Endowment for Democracy (NED) has funded groups such as Bellingcat, Index on Censorship, Article 19, Finance Uncovered, and the Thomson Reuters Foundation” (Reuters is connected to the Zinc Network intelligence cutout via leaks I have previously exposed.) “Former CIA officer tells Declassified the NED is a vehicle for US government propaganda” “Allen Weinstein, the director of the research study that led to creation of the NED in the 1980s, remarked in 1991: “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.”” “CIA whistleblower Philip Agee, who served in the agency in the 1960s, commented in 1995: “Nowadays, instead of having just the CIA going around behind the scenes and trying to manipulate the process secretly by inserting money here and instructions there and so forth, they have now a sidekick, which is this National Endowment for Democracy.”” “The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a non-profit corporation funded by the US Congress, has ploughed over £2.6m into seven British independent media groups over the past five years.” “The NED was “created…to do in the open what the Central Intelligence Agency has done surreptitiously for decades”, the New York Times reported in 1997. That included spending millions of dollars to “support things like political parties, labor unions, dissident movements and the news media in dozens of countries.”” Yeah doom on CIA! Sources to follow!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥And this is what you call bringing the baby home. Massive document found right here with Google admitting everything! Google is synonymous with disinfo work! Google News Lab created the First Draft Coalition in April 2015. Then announced it formally in June 2015. In August 2015, Google News Lab partnered with Poynter who then on Sept/Oct 2015 created the IFCN. Conveniently, First Draft News worked heavily with the IFCN. Google later partnered with the IFCN itself. ♦️Here’s an article on Google partnering with Poynter in August 2015. And before IFCN was created. Dates are important! https://archive.is/W2XKf ♦️Now here’s the big document, Google admitting everything! “Addressing disinfo is not something we can do on our own. The Google News Initiative also houses our products, partnerships, and programs dedicated to supporting news organizations in their efforts create quality reporting that displaces disinformation. This includes: 🔹Helping launch the First Draft Coalition (https://firstdraftnews.org/), a nonprofit that convenes news orgs and technology companies to tackle the challenges around combating disinformation online – especially in the run-up to elections. 🔹Participating in and providing financial support to the Trust Project (http://thetrustproject.org/), of which Google is a founding member and which explores how journalism can signal its trustworthiness online. The Trust Project has developed eight indicators of trust that publishers can use to better convey why their content should be seen as credible, with promising results for the publishers who have trialed them. 🔹 Partnering with Poynter’s International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), a nonpartisan organization gathering fact-checking organizations from the United States, Germany, Brazil, Argentina, South Africa, India, and more. In addition, we support the work of researchers who explore the issues of disinformation and trust in journalism by funding research at organizations like First Draft, the Oxford University’s Reuters News Institute, Michigan University’s Quello Center for Telecommunication Management law, and more. https://web.archive.org/web/20190915004409/https://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/14a-8/2019/arjunanyscrfl041919-14a8.pdf

Home firstdraftnews.org

Home - The Trust Project We can now be found on more than 200 news sites. It is the first global transparency standard that helps people know who and what is behind a story. thetrustproject.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

The Google Trust project mentioned above is what created the Trust Indicators used by Newsguard. And they partnered with Newsguard before it even went live. This was slightly off topic, but you all need to understand how central Google was with everything. Also the Disarm framework used by our DHS CISA and ran by rabid anti conservatives globally, was started by none other than Googles Newsgeist. (Long story, it’s a mess.) Now back to the ICFN.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥Breaking! Bad Kitteh busts Newsguard and its shady GOOGLE links in multiple ways! In fact, their censorship methodology was acquired from a Google, Omidyar and Soros etc funded partner! A little history first: Recall Google seed funded a humongous censorship apparatus called First Draft News, created on June 18, 2015, and 2 days after Trump announced running. Google also visited the Obama Whitehouse 427 times and Googles Eric Schmidt with an est $1.5 billion budget, ran Hillary’s 2016 campaign with artificial intelligence to sway the media and voters. Newsguard the beginning and GOOGLE PART 1: Nov 3rd and 4th 2017 Gordon Crovitz, the founder of Newsguard attended Newsgeist at Arizona State University (ASU). This is a very rare find. Newsgeist is hosted by Google (both Europe and US programs) and The Knight Foundation (US program only). Born at Newsgeist was Misinfocon. Connected to my major pinned expose’, and more to come later. Jennifer 8 Lee, co-chaired the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Media, Entertainment and Sport and also co-founded what is now the Newsgeist conference. She also co-founded the Misinfocon conferences and the Credibility Coalition (more later). Also in attendance with Gordon Crovitz, at the Google and Knight Foundation Newsgeist was the other Newsgeist cofounder, Wired’s, Karen Wickre, who was a past editorial board member at Twitter and currently serves on the boards of The John S. Knight Journalism Fellowships at Stanford and the News Literacy Project. At Newsgeist with Gordon Crovitz, was also Craigslist's Craig Newmark, a funder of some of the trust projects. Claire Wardle of First Draft News was also there. And was also a host at the first ever Misinfocon. It just so happens, that along with the WEF partnered Publicis, the hard left, Knight Foundation seed funded Newsguard too. Newsguard and GOOGLE part 2, the Trust Project: “Nuzzel is joining the Trust Project and the Credibility Coalition, and collaborating with other partners such as NewsGuard and http://Deepnews.ai on NuzzelRank.” Never mind that Nuzzel was a Newsguard investment, and the Credibility Coalition is involved in my major pinned exposé. But the Trust Project that partnered with NewsGuard BEFORE they even went live, was funded by: ♦️Craig Newmark Philanthropies ♦️Google ♦️John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, ♦️Democracy Fund ♦️Markkula Foundation. Recall that the Omidyar Democracy Fund is a Soros Democracy Alliance partner. And its money is funneled thru Arabella Sixteen Thirty Fund. But it gets better. “Adding to Trust Project’s momentum are new uses of the Trust Indicators by partners in the technology sector. Google, Bing, Facebook, Nuzzel, PEN America and NewsGuard are using them to surface, display or better label journalism on their platforms.” The Trust Indicators from the Trust Project are what Newsguard uses to judge new sites. “NewsGuard: The news literacy company uses the Trust Indicators as a source for rating the transparency and accountability of participating news and information sites.” Boom.. Big bada boom…. Sources to follow. How’s this sweeties? 😁

Overtone.ai overtone.ai

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔹February 12, 2018 Poynter Expands Fact-Checking Franchise by Acquiring PolitiFact. “Though Poynter owns the Tampa Bay Times newspaper — which created the PolitiFact initiative in 2007 –the formal acquisition and relocation allows Poynter to expand its fact-check training and leadership in best practices, and to be engaged in the real time journalism that it teaches. Poynter and PolitiFact have a history of collaboration and have worked together to secure grant funding.” https://archive.is/Y9fnb 🔹Second photo - PolitiFact was also in the First Draft News Network. That photo was a listing of all of its members. (Lupa, another member, is partnered with Brazil’s TSE aka Alexandre de Moraes.)

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

The State Dept NED funded IFCN was involved in US elections. And I’m telling you, they were involved massively in Fact Checking globally starting in 2015. There’s lots of evidence to be had. That WhatsApp stuff mentioned here involved Brazil and its TSE court with Alexandre de Moraes etc too. “Led by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at the Poynter Institute, FactChat is the first collaborative project to unite U.S. fact-checking organizations with two major Spanish-language news broadcasters to fight mis/disinformation during the 2020 presidential campaign. FactChat brings together U.S.-based journalists and fact-checkers in a bilingual alliance to give voters the information they need to make their decisions based on facts. From Sept. 15, 2020 until the Inauguration Day in 2021, fact-checkers from AFP, Check Your Fact, http://FactCheck.org, Lead Stories, MediaWise, PolitiFact, The Dispatch, The Washington Post Fact Checker, Science Feedback and USA Today will share their content with Telemundo and Univision. Both networks will translate the fact-checks to Spanish before republishing the content on their respective websites. With support from WhatsApp, the IFCN will upload both versions into the FactChat chatbot. The system, developed by http://Turn.io, is free for all WhatsApp users and features an easy-to-use interface available in both languages.” https://archive.is/DfTd4

FactCheck.org factcheck.org

Chat for impact | Turn Meet your users where they are. Connect to the largest encrypted chat audiences globally. turn.io

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥This is even bigger yet. I forgot that in 2016 with the help of Google, Poynter and IFCN actually PARTNERED with First Draft News! You see they started as a smaller First Draft Coalition and in 2016 they were expanded to be called First Draft News. If you look in this photo you will see Poynter IFCN as being a new partner. Later, this partnership grew even larger. Linkie https://archive.is/bzWzR The linked post shows how Googles Olivia Ma and Steve Grove were responsible for the creation of the First Draft Coalition. And then later Googles Olivia Ma expanded it to include Poynter IFCN plus more. There’s pertinent info above that post too.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now there are multiple formal announcement of the creation of the First Draft Coalition, but why not share one made by Googles Olivia Ma, one of the actual creators herself? I’ll also show that Olivia got a promotion to the Google News Lab to join, Steve Grove. Where she grew the First Draft Coalition to become the massively expanded, and now globalized, First Draft News. 1. Olivia Ma, the director of the Google News Initiative, and the creator of the First Draft Coalition: “We’re bringing together a group of thought leaders and pioneers in social media journalism to create educational resources on how to verify eyewitness media, and how to consider the ethics of using it in news reporting. This new group, called The First Draft Coalition, will consist of experts from Eyewitness Media Hub, Storyful, Bellingcat, First Look Media's http://Reported.ly, Meedan, Emergent, SAM Desk, and Verification Junkie. The Coalition will develop and program a new site for verification and ethics training, tools, research, and, most importantly, case studies around the biggest news stories of the moment.” https://archive.is/l8y7Q 2. Olivia Ma, Head of Partnerships, the Google News Lab. “Today, just over a year after its creation, we’re excited to announce the expansion of the First Draft Coalition, with the launch of a new partner network, including major news and technology organizations. We’re proud to welcome Facebook and Twitter into the network, as well as newsrooms around the world, including: The New York Times, The Washington Post, BuzzFeed News, CNN, ABC News (Australia), AJ+, ProPublica, Agence France-Presse, Channel 4 News, The Telegraph, France Info, Breaking News, Les Décodeurs, International Business Times UK, Eurovision News Exchange, SAM, Aljazeera Media Network, Reveal project, InVID project, Euronews, Sourcefabric, WITNESS, Amnesty International, European Journalism Centre, American Press Institute, International Fact Checking Network, Duke Reporters’ Lab.” https://archive.is/xMgYS

Posted - September 2, 2024 at 9:49 PM

Saved - September 4, 2024 at 12:38 AM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Obama was Acorn, and Acorn lives on today thanks to the Voter Registration Project which was renamed from Obama’s and Acorns Project Vote. Thank you @Popcorn_Patriot for sharing this. In the old days your account would have been suspended for this. https://t.co/Pz3FJkmAJH

Video Transcript AI Summary

The discussion clarifies the relationship between the Obama campaign and Acorn. Barack Obama, a former community organizer, crossed paths with Acorn in Chicago and represented them as an attorney in a motor voter case in Illinois, which he won. During the primary campaign, the Obama campaign reportedly gave $800,000 to an Acorn subsidiary for voter registration. The Obama campaign now claims they may have paid Acorn for canvassing, stating that their primary work with an Acorn subsidiary is distinct from the general election. Earlier emails confirmed the Obama campaign worked with an Acorn subsidiary during the primary, but they claim this connection has ended. One attendee at an Acorn volunteer rally observed that 50% of attendees wore "Acorn for Obama" t-shirts.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Just clarify for our viewers what we know about the relationship between the Obama campaign and Acorn specifically because there's been confusion out there. Speaker 1: I think Brian Todd laid it out very well. Barack Obama goes back with his organization. It's a community organizing organization. He was a community organizer. They crossed paths back in Chicago, worked together. He trained some of them. As a an attorney, he represented, the Acorn Group in a motor voter case in the state of Illinois, a case that he won. And in the primary campaign, Barack Obama's campaign gave $800,000 to a subsidiary of Acorn to go out and register to vote. Now today, I'm told that, the Obama campaign is saying we may have paid them some money for canvassing, but in earlier emails with the Obama campaign, they did say that they paid them $800,000 to a subsidiary of Acorn in the primary to garner votes. What the Obama campaign is trying to say now is, look, we're not working with them in the general election. That was the primary. This is the general election, and these problems that we're seeing surfacing right now are in the general election. Therefore, we're not connected with Acorn. Speaker 0: But but, Drew, are they confirming that they work with what you're you're describing as a subsidiary of Acorn or some third party that, in turn went ahead and subcontracted to Acorn. Speaker 1: No. What in earlier emails with the Obama campaign, our producer, Kathleen Johnson, specifically spelled that out with their people, Ben LeBold in Chicago, who said, look. Yeah. We did with them a subsidiary of Acorn back in the primary, but we're not working with them anymore. I also wanna point out, you know, we're talking about whether or not this is a nonpartisan group or not. I attended a a volunteer rally with Acorn. I would say 50% of the people had on Acorn for Obama T shirts. So to say that this group is nonpartisan or not somehow connected

Posted - September 2, 2024 at 7:39 PM

Saved - September 2, 2024 at 10:33 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I recently uncovered a leaked document linking the Voter Registration Project to Obama and Acorn, revealing their focus on swing states like FL, GA, and PA. This project, previously known as Project Vote, employs individuals connected to Obama, including Karine Jean-Pierre and Frances Fox Piven. The document highlights the involvement of various organizations, including the Soros Democracy Alliance and the Advancement Project, suggesting a coordinated effort to influence elections. This isn't just about voter registration; it's a strategic move to secure Democratic victories.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking leaked document! Obama and Acorn linked Voter Registration Project/Everyone votes is amping up voter registration in swing states only! The Voter Registration Project operates on the Everyone Votes website. It was essentially renamed from the Obama and Acorn ran Project Vote. All the evidence for this is in the below 🧵.👇🏻 Karine Jean- Pierre and Frances Fox Piven all worked together with Obama at the Acorn partnered Project vote. Here’s the states they are concentrating on. So watch them closely because we know that Acorn was broken up due to illegal registrations. Here’s the states they are concentrating on: FL, GA, MI, NV, AZ, PA, TX, Wi Yes all swing states! And, Sam Bankman-Fried’s mother was involved in this too. The document is from Influence Watch. Sources to follow!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Breaking 🧵! The communists, Acorn, and rich billionaires took over our elections! Obama’s radical Acorn never left! The get out the vote registration/election efforts, lawsuits to counter election fraud claims, election changes, Zuckerbucks, and poll workers are all connected to: 🔹Acorn offshoots are still in operation such as: Acorn partnered, Project Vote/Voting For America, is now renamed to the Voter Registration Project and working in current elections. Obama was a director at Project Vote. *Project Vote employees Obama got to work with include Karine Jean-Pierre, and Frances Fox Piven of “Cloward-Piven Strategy” fame. The Voter Registration Project hires contractors. 🔹Soros Democracy Alliance is partnered with the Brennan Ctr, Project Vote, and the Advancement project. Recall Soros funded Acorn and partnered with its reboot called the communist Working Families Party too. 🔹Mao/Lenin aligned FSOB Liberation Road (BLM) communists thru the Advancement Project. - This worked with Obamas Project Vote, Acorn, ACLU, and the Brennan Ctr etc. Recall the Brennan Ctr is connected to everything election related including Zuckerbucks. ——————————— To begin, I found a tax form for the Voter Registration Project (VRP) that used GBI Strategies as a contractor, and it sent my wheels spinning. https://www.influencewatch.org/app/uploads/2021/12/VRP-2020-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-signed.pdf Next, thru this DOJ doc, I found that the still operable, and communist, Advancement Project, was partnered with the Voter Registration Project (Voting For America/Project Vote). The plaintiff (remember this name): PROJECT VOTE/VOTING FOR AMERICA, INCORPORATED, “On May 11, 2009, a Project Vote affiliate—Advancement Project—requested (snip) “ https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2012/06/19/projectvote.pdf The Advancement Project, did legal work for ACORN and it’s board members included Harry Belafonte. https://archive.is/dPEJx Here we have Soros involved in the Obama connected Advancement Project and Project Vote: The Soros Democracy Alliance partner, “Brennan Center, is currently working closely with SV (State Voices) as part of a national Voter Enfranchisement Working Group, which includes the Lawyers' Committee on Civil Rights, Advancement Project, and Project Vote.” Soros Democracy Alliance, State voices, had 31 orgs in 2014 that has grown considerably since: 🔸Advancement project 🔸Project vote 🔸Seiu 🔸NAACP 🔸AFL-CIO 🔸etc The 2014 Soros Democracy Alliance doc was included in a Catalist lawsuit. “In 2008, then-Senator Obamas presidential campaign committee, Obama For America, selected Catalist as its data vendor. Victory Lab at 299. As a Catalist client, the Obama campaign was able to "create seamless links across the activist left, including outside groups with whom candidates were legally prohibited from coordinating directly." GBI Strategies, ACLU, Fieldworks, OFA, Project Vote, and tons more also used Catalist. https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/current/116164.pdf As previously reported by me: “The Advancement Project (AP) is a Maoist/Leninist Freedom Road Socialist Org (FRSO) that funds a variety of radical causes. They work to organize ‘communities of color’ into politically cohesive units while disseminating its leftist worldviews and values as broadly as possible by way of a sophisticated communications Dept.” https://archive.is/iykfa The Advancement Project Partner list is huge, and include: ♦️Acorn ♦️Project vote ♦️Aclu ♦️Brennan center ♦️AFL cio ♦️Common cause ♦️Demos ♦️NAACP ♦️SEIU ♦️Tons more! https://archive.is/w8n1k Here’s evidence that Obamas Project Votes/Voting for America, is the Voter Registration Project: “The Voter Registration Project (VRP), formerly Voting for America (Project Vote), is a public charity with a mission to reshape the electorate.” https://archive.is/mFX1u Acorn was actually partnered with Obamas Project Vote/Voting for America which is now called the current Voters Registration Network. Click the, “Acorn Family of organizations” link, and it will show Obamas Project Vote. web.archive.org/web/2005020320… To be continued

Page not found - InfluenceWatch influencewatch.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Here’s the link to the one page document showing that the Voter Registration Project was concentrating on swing states only. Proof that this isn’t about helping minorities, it’s about winning the election for democrats. https://web.archive.org/web/20231004070356/https://www.influencewatch.org/app/uploads/2023/05/Everybody-Votes-Training-Logistics-Consultant-VRP-job-listing.pdf Now this may be breaking to us, but this has been known for a year! But few also know the history behind the Voter Registration Project like I do. They are not your grannies voter registration org.This is alarming to me! https://georgiastarnews.com/commentary/commentary-voter-registration-charities-are-a-massive-overlooked-scandal/realclearwire/2023/09/19/

Commentary: Voter Registration ‘Charities’ Are a Massive, Overlooked Scandal | The Georgia Star News georgiastarnews.com

Posted - August 31, 2024 at 6:10 PM

Saved - September 1, 2024 at 3:09 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve uncovered significant details about Google’s role in establishing First Draft News, a major censorship organization, which began in 2015. Google employees Steve Grove and Olivia Ma were pivotal in its creation, collaborating closely with the Obama administration, which they visited frequently. The Biden administration has since expanded these censorship efforts globally. First Draft’s framework remains influential today, even as it has been shuttered. This connection between Google and political power raises concerns about the implications of their actions on media and information integrity.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

❗️❗️Breaking! Google just didn’t seed fund First Draft News, the first major US and global censorship org, it CREATED IT! I also have finally gotten the names of the Google employees they used to start the global censorship in 2015. This was in preparation for the 2016 elections. Yup, the same Google that visited the Obama White House 427 times. And the same Google that helped Obama win both his first and second presidencies! Interestingly, Tim Walz went on to hire one of the two Google individuals, Steve Grove. All along I thought the First Draft News consortium was started on June 18, 2015, when it was announced by Olivia Ma. But actually contact was made in April 2015. I’ve been looking for more specifics on First Drafts origins for years, now I have TWO SOURCES. Also Google expanded its support to include its GLOBAL TEAM. 1. First Draft website: “Most importantly, a final huge thank you to Steve Grove and Olivia Ma at Google News Lab. They got us all in a room in New York in April 2015 and FLOATED THE IDEA of First Draft. Since then, their support and enthusiasm, now combined with the same from their global team, has been invaluable. 2. Google News Lab on Medium - Steve Grove Director of the News Lab at Google. “At the center of our efforts around this topic is the First Draft coalition, WHICH WE STARTED in 2015 with seven social media verification organizations to create standards and best practices in the news industry for verifying eyewitness media content and COMBATTING FAKE NEWS. In 2016, we expanded the coalition to over 80 partners worldwide, and were thrilled to welcome Facebook and Twitter as well.” Claire Wardle, the director of First Draft, on March 31, 2015, and weeks prior to Googles offer, became the Tow Centers Research Director. She worked with Tow/Knight previously. Google is partnered with the Knight Foundation. And, it just so happens that Steve Grove and Olivia Ma who started First Draft were frequent visitors to the Obama White House over many years! I even have Steve Grove down for a strategy meeting with Obama less than 3 months before the April 2015 First Draft Consortium inception. ♦️Video #1 - Shows that Steve Grove, the director of Google News Lab, first met Obama at Google while Obama was still a senator. This also shows the multiple projects from multiple time frames that Steve Grove worked with Obama from 2009 to 2016. He’s all over this video. This also shows that Steve Grove worked with Obama during the same time that he and Olivia Ma created the First Draft News global censorship org. ♦️Video # 2 - Shows that Olivia Ma accompanied Steve Grove to the White House on at least one occasion in 2010. These videos may seem boring to you, but to me they are documentation of evidence. Sources to follow.

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Obama engaged with the public through online platforms like YouTube, using them for "21st century fireside chats" to connect directly with Americans. Google tools like Google Moderator were used to solicit video and text questions. These platforms allowed ordinary people to connect with those in high places and gave the President access to diverse ideas. A Google plus Hangout live on YouTube allowed for follow-up questions, enabling participation in a way that wasn't previously possible. One participant even interrupted the President to highlight personal struggles. These interviews created a conversational element that stripped away traditional power dynamics. The President addressed questions on topics ranging from H1B visas to education affordability and cancer research, sharing personal experiences. Participants felt that these platforms were important for the democratic process, giving access to power and ensuring people feel part of democracy. It was suggested that future presidents should continue using these platforms to connect with the people they serve.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I am way too excited. I'm going to the White House. Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. President Obama, are you serious? Speaker 2: This is different, and it's really a big deal. Constantly, I seek to look beyond the doors of the White House into the hopes, fears of men and women in their home. Speaker 3: Standby. And five, four, 321. Speaker 4: We've asked a lot of YouTube users to submit some questions and get your take on, technology, foreign policy. I first met president Obama back when he was a senator, and he came to Google to give a speech to the company about his technology agenda. Speaker 5: We're gonna have 21st century fireside chats where, I'm speaking directly to the American people through video streams. Speaker 1: In that 1st year, we used a tool called Google Moderator, where people submitted video questions and, text questions. Speaker 4: Hello, mister president. Speaker 5: I'd like to know Speaker 6: His minimum wage will go up in 2012. Speaker 2: YouTube has allowed the common man to connect with the entire population. We're just common people, but we have access to to people in high places. Speaker 5: It gives me great access to all the people out there with wonderful ideas. Even if you didn't make your question, even if it wasn't on this show, we appreciate your submission. Hopefully, we'll catch you next time. Speaker 3: Welcome to the first ever presidential Google plus Hangout live on YouTube. Mister president, welcome to Google plus. Speaker 5: Great to talk to you, Steve. Speaker 7: The idea of asking the president a question, having him respond, and then maybe asking a follow-up. You're not just sitting on the sidelines anymore. You're actually, you know, able to participate in a way that you weren't. Speaker 6: Why does the government continue to issue h one b visas when there are tons of Americans with no job? Speaker 5: There's a huge demand for engineers around the country right now. Speaker 6: I understand that. Yeah. But how I mean, Speaker 7: I had never really seen someone interrupt the president before. I wanted him to look Speaker 6: at me. I wanted him to look in the face of someone who is still struggling. Speaker 4: The context that a regular person brings to a question in an interview is personal and gave a kind of conversational element to it that stripped away some of the traditional power dynamics of a of a presidential interview. Speaker 5: From 1, man to another, from a father to another, an American to another just like you are, how are you? That's a great question. Good with you? Is everything good with you, man? You know, we we should have that beer. Speaker 8: Talking to a camera by yourself, you never think in a 1000000 years, you're gonna get to meet the president because of it. Speaker 1: When we had started these in in 2009, I don't think that people would have kind of understood the concept of a YouTube star. Speaker 2: I think that it's important to pick out people whose audience might not be super politically active. Speaker 1: Inviting those 3 creators to have this conversation with president was a venue for a meaningful conversation. Speaker 9: Imagine being able to ask the leader of the free world any questions you want. Usually, only certain reporters get to do that. But on Friday, the president of the United States made an exception. Speaker 3: 321. Hello, everyone. My name is Steve Grove, and I'm the director of the News Lab at Google. And it's my pleasure to welcome you to a YouTube interview with the president of the United States. Mister president, thanks for having us here today. Speaker 5: To see you. Speaker 2: You walk into the situation room with the intelligence briefing Right. And you're presented with a problem. I wanna know how you get Smarter Every Day on that topic. Speaker 1: What do Speaker 7: you think Speaker 6: is the best long term plan for making education as a whole more affordable for students? Speaker 2: Before I had insurance, I could not take this medication. It's about $1100 a month, and that is a receipt showing it being $5 a month. Speaker 0: And something that I heard you talk about that you wanna work on is cancer. My mom is actually a cancer survivor. Speaker 4: I think Speaker 5: we can do a lot. Look. My mom died of cancer, when she was younger than I am now. Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. I just interviewed the president, and it was the best thing ever. Speaker 2: America doesn't work if people don't feel like they are part of democracy. Speaker 7: Access to power is is really important for the democratic process. Speaker 1: It will be increasingly important for future presidents and elected officials to take these platforms seriously and to use them to have conversations with the people that they serve. Speaker 4: We certainly hope your successor, follows in your footsteps and goes straight to Speaker 5: the American people after the big speeches. If they're smart, they will. Speaker 4: I agree. I agree. Thanks so much, mister president. Speaker 5: Really enjoyed

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker describes interviewing President Obama at the White House, using questions sourced from YouTube users. The format is considered unique and potentially disorienting for the president, but fun and engaging. The interview is described as exceptionally well, with the president giving thoughtful and substantive answers. The personal format allows people to hear the unique voice of people. Google Moderator is credited for the success.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And, it's gonna be a neat dialogue. I think it's gonna be a very unique format. I mean, just to see how the president will respond to it because, you know, I'll be interviewing him, but the questions will actually be coming, you know, from users on the screen. So it'll be a little sort of disorienting probably, but it'll be neat because really it's just people beaming into the White House via YouTube to ask the president, you know, follow-up questions on his speech. So I think it's gonna be a lot of fun. Hi. We're headed to the north gate. And here is the White House entering momentarily. We just came out of the interview. Come on. We just finished our interview with President Obama in the White House. It went exceptionally well. And I think Steve was saying a little word about what it was like to be sitting next to the president. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Let's see him. Wait. Pulled the hand up. This man. Round sucks. Yes. One glitch in our strategy. I think that adds character. It did add some character. It was a lot of fun. It was really engaging, and, he took the questions, I thought, really thoughtfully and gave really, like, substantive answers. And, it's sort of a it's a personal format. People feel like you're getting access to the unique people. Like, you actually get to hear the voice of people, which is cool. So it's fun. Good job, everybody. Google Moderator for the win. For the win. For the win.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Google started what I consider the first major censorship in America, and globally, so this can’t be taken lightly. The Biden admin has expanded things globally, during the same time that First Draft was shuttered. But First Drafts framework and training, still used today, was already built. Here’s the evidence that proves that Google was responsible. 1. First Draft News Website: “Most importantly, a final huge thank you to Steve Grove and Olivia Ma at Google News Lab. They got us all in a room in New York in April 2015 and floated the idea of First Draft. Since then, their support and enthusiasm, now combined with the same from their global team, has been invaluable.” https://archive.is/n3pXV 2. Steve Grove - Google News Lab Director on their Medium page: “At the center of our efforts around this topic is the First Draft coalition, which we started in 2015 with seven social media verification organizations to create standards and best practices in the news industry for verifying eyewitness media content and combating fake news. In 2016, we expanded the coalition to over 80 partners worldwide, and were thrilled to welcome Facebook and Twitter as well. Any news organization can sign up, and in 2017, we’ll be working with the coalition to engage in more projects like Electionland, our polling place verification initiative.” https://archive.is/XNWj9

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now there are multiple formal announcement of the creation of the First Draft Coalition, but why not share one made by Googles Olivia Ma, one of the actual creators herself? I’ll also show that Olivia got a promotion to the Google News Lab to join, Steve Grove. Where she grew the First Draft Coalition to become the massively expanded, and now globalized, First Draft News. 1. Olivia Ma, the director of the Google News Initiative, and the creator of the First Draft Coalition: “We’re bringing together a group of thought leaders and pioneers in social media journalism to create educational resources on how to verify eyewitness media, and how to consider the ethics of using it in news reporting. This new group, called The First Draft Coalition, will consist of experts from Eyewitness Media Hub, Storyful, Bellingcat, First Look Media's http://Reported.ly, Meedan, Emergent, SAM Desk, and Verification Junkie. The Coalition will develop and program a new site for verification and ethics training, tools, research, and, most importantly, case studies around the biggest news stories of the moment.” https://archive.is/l8y7Q 2. Olivia Ma, Head of Partnerships, the Google News Lab. “Today, just over a year after its creation, we’re excited to announce the expansion of the First Draft Coalition, with the launch of a new partner network, including major news and technology organizations. We’re proud to welcome Facebook and Twitter into the network, as well as newsrooms around the world, including: The New York Times, The Washington Post, BuzzFeed News, CNN, ABC News (Australia), AJ+, ProPublica, Agence France-Presse, Channel 4 News, The Telegraph, France Info, Breaking News, Les Décodeurs, International Business Times UK, Eurovision News Exchange, SAM, Aljazeera Media Network, Reveal project, InVID project, Euronews, Sourcefabric, WITNESS, Amnesty International, European Journalism Centre, American Press Institute, International Fact Checking Network, Duke Reporters’ Lab.” https://archive.is/xMgYS

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now Kamala’s running mate, and censorship King, Tim Walz, hired Google News Labs, Steve Grove. Recall Steve was involved in the creation of Googles first major US and Global censorship org. And of course Steve Grove worked with Obama for many many years too. “Minnesota Gov.-elect Tim Walz appoints seven commissioners; Google News Lab director (Steve Grove) will run DEED” “Steve Grove will go to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). Grove is currently director of Google News Lab and the founder of Silicon North Stars.” https://archive.is/SRX9C

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

This article is about Googles 427 White House visits. And this doesn’t even include things like Google’s, “moon shot” program, who have also been to the White House. Moonshot labeled conservatives as extremists. “A detailed examination of White House visitor logs reveals the extraordinary access to the Obama White House enjoyed by Google, its top executives and employees. Since President Obama took office in January 2009 through October 31, 2015, employees of Google and associated entities visited the White House 427 times. That includes: •• 363 meetings between White House officials and Google employees.ii •• 64 meetings involving employees of companies solely owned by Google’s executive chairman, Eric Schmidt. •• The meetings were attended by at least 169 Google executives, from the company’s senior ranks down to software engineers, and 182 White House officials. Overall, Google executives have had extraordinary access to the White House meetings at which policies are set. Google executives met over 100 times with the White House offices that set and execute White House policy, including the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), Office of Management and Budget (OMB), National Economic Council (NEC), Council of Economic Advisors (CEA), National Security Council (NSC) and others. It’s a great read! Make certain to click, “read more”. You can’t access that part with the archive so I’m including the real sites link too. Link A https://old.techtransparencyproject.org/articles/googles-white-house-meetings Link B https://archive.is/UExmP

Google's White House Meetings Google’s lobbying juggernaut reflected in more than 427 White House Visits during Obama’s presidency A detailed examination of White House visitor logs reveals the extraordinary access to the Obama White House enjoyed by Google, its top executives and employees. Since President Obama took office in January 2009 through October 31, 2015,i employees of Google and associated old.techtransparencyproject.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

This is what I listed as Video #2 in my top post. Both Steve Grove and Olivia Ma are in this. It’s from Feb 1, 2009. Presidential YouTube Interview - behind the scenes Here are a few clips from our preparation for the YouTube interview we did with President Obama on Monday, February 1st, 2009. We started our preparation in Davos during the World Economic Forum, where we were working on the Davos Debates. When we heard the President had accepted the request for the interview, we had to get started right away and then fly back to DC for the taping. Here's the interview itself: • The YouTube Interview We weren't allowed to film any behind the scenes footage from inside the White House, but you'll see here some footage of our practice and prep. The quip about the brown socks at the end is referencing the fact that Steve neglected to color code properly, and then exposed his brown sox during the interview, which drew some comments from viewers on YouTube. Featured here are Steve Grove, Olivia Ma, Ramya Raghavan, and Aaron Zamost from YouTube, and Ginny Hunt who leads the Google Moderator team. https://youtu.be/4JJYHufF8PA

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

This is an extra Steve Grove video from 2011 that I’m adding because it shows who Obamas videographer was. Arun Chaudhary was the first official White House videographer (Obamas) and was the creative director at Loren Merchans, Revolution Messaging. Yeah the daughter of Trumps judge. Revolution messaging ran Obamas presidential campaign. And was before Authentic Campaigns. I owe you more some day on Arun. “Some behind the scenes footage from the White House before and after the YouTube Interview with President Obama. Thanks to Arun Chaudhary for the footage inside the Diplomatic Room of the White House, where the interview was held.” https://youtu.be/z2-17cfa3mQ

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

This is what I labeled video #1 in my top post. It shows Google News Lab director, Steve Groves, working with Obama from 2009 to 2016. This also means that while Steve was censorship happy for Google and First Draft News, he was working with Obama at the White House. Boohyeah 🤘🏻 Dec 21, 2016 “Over the last eight years, Google and YouTube have partnered with the White House to host a unique set of interviews that have empowered ordinary Americans and YouTube creators with direct access to the president of the United States. This piece takes a look back at that series of interviews, its evolution over the course of the Obama presidency, and its role in democratizing political discourse and expanding access to presidential power.” https://youtu.be/CIxSXBuDePM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

The Sutori Government Transparency Project White House Google + Government meeting log This timeline compares Google's White House Meetings and other notable occurrences with related federal government actions. (These are not the normal White House logs.) January 21, 2015: Steve Grove, Director of Google's News Lab, meets with Jenna Brayton, Associate Director of Content at the Office of Digital Strategy at the White House. January 23, 2015: Steve Grove and Johanna Shelton, of Google, meet with Dan Pfieiffer, White House Senior Advisor for Strategy and Communications. January 31, 2010: Macon Phillips (White House director of new media) meets with Steve Grove(YouTube head of news & politics), Olivia Ma (YouTube news manager), Aaron Zamost (YouTube manager of public affairs), Ginny Hunt (Google principal strategy & civic innovation), and Norm Magnuson Michael Mathis (Google video production managers). https://archive.is/BPrL0

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

There’s a lot more to this Obama and Google love story than what’s in this thread SO FAR. I’m. Not. Done. Stay tuned

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥Massively huge! Obama was a made man! His first presidential election was no accident, and was helped along by globalists and especially Google! Obama has been working with Google since at least 2004. And unbeknownst to most, Obama was actually a globalist himself!(See video clips.) Not only this, the World Economic Forum partnered, Google, who helped make Obama, is involved in most major censorship. As already evidenced by me over the years. Google seed funded First Draft News, and even got what is now known as the CTI League Files started. Even having a hand in Newsguards start. Plus so much more! This is part three of my series on, Elections, Obama, Ushahidi and Big Tech. These below main globalist characters were all involved in getting Obama elected into his first presidency. And maybe even as a senator. By his second presidential candidacy, Silicon Valley created an entire tech campaign team for him. I have reported on this part previously. The Trilatetal Commission, as I previously reported, is part of what made Obama, but it looks like Google helped the most. Zbigniew Brzezinski - cofounder of the Trilateral Commission worked Obamas 2008 campaign and endorsed him Mark Brzezinski - Son of the Trilateral Commission cofounder - worked Obamas 2008 campaign Eric Smith Google CEO, Trilateral Commission member, and Bilderberg attendee. He worked Obamas 2008 and 2016 campaign’s. Eric Schmidt also worked in the Obama admin while he worked at Google. It’s no wonder Google visited the Obama White House 427 times. Google and its partnered Knight Fndn was paying for censorship during the Obama admin. Chris Hughes - Facebook founder, Council on Foreign Relations and Bilderberg. He worked Obamas 2008 campaign also. “Prior to 2008, the tech industry maintained an especially low profile in Washington. All of that changed when Google, led by chairman Eric Schmidt, played a major role in Barack Obama’s first presidential campaign, as did Facebook cofounder, Chris Hughes. Obama’s win led to a revolving door between Silicon Valley and the executive branch, with Google dominating the flow in both directions.” Google executives soon found themselves assuming roles in the Obama administration. Including Eric Schmidt who landed in the same Council of Science and Technology Advisers that Obama announced in the below mentioned video. Google's former head of global public policy, Andrew McLaughlin, was named deputy chief technology officer office. Plus tons more positions including on Obama’s transition team. Obama and Google were synonymous. Video clips: - Senator Obama 2007 at Google to debut his Innovation (tech) Agenda. Video #1 quote by Obama: “The average Americans incomes and wages have flatlined. They’re not making progress. And they feel anxious about it. And because they feel anxious about it, they are afraid of globalization. And that fear has been led by our politics. Now my strong belief is that globalization and a here to stay and is a powerful tool with potential for good. But we have to make sure that everybody has the ability to access what is good about globalization.” Video #2 Google executive, David Drummond, mentions that in 2004, Obama before he was even a senator, met with the two CIA linked founders of Google, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, along with Eric Schmidt. After announced, Obama admits that the founders of Google, Eric Schmidt, and David Drummond are great friends of his. All sources to follow including the full video, and my thread on the Trilateral Commission.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The average American worker's wages and incomes have flatlined, causing anxiety and fear of globalization, which has been fed by politics. Globalization is a powerful potential tool for good and is here to stay. It is important to ensure everyone can access the benefits of globalization.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The average American worker's wages and incomes have flatlined. They're not making progress. And they feel anxious about it. And because they feel anxious about it, they are afraid of globalization. And that fear has been fed by our politics. Now my my strong belief is is that globalization is here to stay and a powerful potential tool for good. But we've got to but we've but we have to make sure that everybody has the ability to access what's good about globalization.

Posted - December 23, 2023 at 5:29 PM

Saved - August 9, 2024 at 1:10 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I just learned about a national swatting ring involving kids in LulzSec, a hacking group, who are reportedly getting paid in Bitcoin. There's an ongoing investigation, and I found a news conference from the Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office and School District discussing the issue. It’s a long read but quite fascinating, especially since it’s happening in Texas.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Breaking! National swatting ring exposed! Children in LulzSec, a black hat computer hacking group, are being paid thousands in dollars in Bitcoin! Investigation is ongoing! Joint Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office/Okaloosa County School District Swatting News Conference It’s a bit long but interesting considering it’s an ongoing problem. It’s also interesting that it’s Texas. 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary

Law enforcement officials in Okaloosa County, Florida, have arrested two teenagers in connection with a series of swatting incidents across the United States. Swatting is the act of making false emergency calls to prompt a large police response. The suspects, Landon Whittington and Cameron Gully, allegedly made swatting calls to schools and residences in multiple states, causing significant disruption and fear. The investigation revealed that the suspects were part of a larger group involved in swatting activities. Both teenagers face multiple felony charges, including false reporting of a violent crime. Law enforcement agencies are continuing to investigate other incidents potentially linked to the group.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I'm going to briefly is there anybody else supposed to be up here before we get started? I wanna briefly basically introduce those folks that are here and then why we're here. We have our captain over investigations, Matt Abbott. We have Michelle Sandlin representing the state attorney's office. Investigators, Kristen Gingrich and Misty Piaget on our criminal investigation and, of course, our honorable superintendent, Marcus Chambers, is here from the Okaloosa County School District. So this thing is very convoluted and it is very, you're gonna have to bear with me because there's a lot that I'm gonna go over. But I think it's important to get to the chronologic or chronologically get to the point of where we're at. And the big takeaway in this press conference to me would be to explain to our citizens what swatting is first. Secondly, for the parents of the north end of the county that experiencing this traumatic event to them back in November, explaining to them that we held those people to justice and what we're doing, to continue that and to champion that and to protect our citizens and the staff of the school district and our citizens and, of course, students being number 1. And then lastly is to explain and try and educate and deter young kids that may not understand their ramifications or even if they do, maybe they don't care because they're delinquents. But either way, I would like I feel an onus on us to be able to explain to them what the real significant consequences to something like this could be so that we don't have these things happen to us because most people in the community don't even know what a swatting event is. So let me get started by saying I was honored enough to be an SRO back in 97, 98. And, of course, was a student of this great school district, growing up. And so I was a product of that and so I remember the bomb threats. I mean, that was really the big threat short of hurricanes and tornadoes, but from an active and outside individual or entity to try and do harm to our citizens or our students, The only thing we really faced back then was bomb threats. And though we took them serious, you know whether it was when I was a student or an SRO we evacuated people to the bleachers. We did bomb threat drills and those sort of things. The reality of that being an actual threat was usually pretty minimal. I mean the likelihood of a child having a bomb back then was pretty minimal. Columbine in 99 changed all of that. So in April of 99, again, I was an SRO in 97, 98. I remember Columbine in 90 in 99 happening and that changed the face of how we did business in securing schools. You saw a huge influx of SROs and school resource officers or deputies or police officers in schools across the country. And it's probably the most high profile mass shootings in our country's history is is in schools. So we take them serious. We we train harder for school shootings than we probably do anything else at this agency, and I I would probably attest that my peers around the country do the same. That being said, there's something called swatting. And a lot of people again to reiterate what is swatting. Well, swatting is is an attempt to basically scare just like a bomb threat used to be to disrupt the functions of the school system. But what it does is so much more. It creates fear and parents' minds unlike a bomb threat beyond that by far, from back in the day because we have had real examples of school shootings. So we have to send resources. We have local municipalities. We have state agencies. Everyone comes running when we have a potential school shooting. Not to mention I said all the training that goes into preparing for that whether it be SWAT or our SRO unit, our tactical units to go in there and be able to take out that threat. But you push all your resources towards that when you can. Well, what a swatting event is someone can be sitting there and calling in the today's bomb threat, whether it be a bomb threat or a mass shooting or some other type of violent event. And it's totally fictitious. But yet we we go there assuming it's real. We have to treat it real. And so that's why it's such a serious offense and why there's been legislation to enhance penalties even with juveniles to make sure that those that do such a thing will be held accountable and this would be treated as a violent crime. So let me back up. We have a local delinquent that is pictured here, Landon Whittington. He's a resident of Baker. And the reason I'm gonna go back is this this investigation has been taking place now over the last 5 months frankly and it's still ongoing because it started in July. So July 21, 23, we got a tip that he was actually the target of a victim of a residential swad. Because I might I might wanna remind you that that we've had real incidents across the United States where law enforcement had been killed and innocent residents have been killed due to swine. And that's the reason for the enhanced penalties is to make sure because it is such serious. And some people do this to people that they don't like. And, and so in this particular case, this individual, mister Whittington, he was the actual victim of a swanning call on July 21st. So we were actually investigating that And then 4 days later we get a call from New Jersey that we had they had a swan of an individual in New Jersey. And now this you're going to find again this is an elaborate ring. An elaborate group of young kids that are doing this. So there's a there's a swanning event of an individual of a residence in New Jersey. We start looking into that. Well, our victim is now the suspect in that case. He has swatted an individual up there and they rushed resources to that event and thankfully everybody was okay. But so now he's a target of of that. We go out there. We try to interview him. He denies everything of course which they always do. During the investigation and during the interview we had a nexus that led us to be able to do a search and seizure of his phone which further investigation revealed that he was doing swatting all over the United States to include Canada. So this investigation culminated in 4 months before we were able to get the first warrant because there were so many things splintering off of this at different jurisdictions. While on the initial investigation, OCSO investigators reached out to some of those states that we found from the download of his electronic devices. One of the states which was the second incident after New Jersey was Arizona. It was again a residential swatting call where he called in a threat to do harm and this was in Arizona. So, the Arizona one, the police department there which was in Buckeye, Arizona, again, the all the IP address, everything came back to this individual at his residence in Baker. So on 11923, so in in in, November we were able to actually link him to these have enough probable cause to pair a case up together and, be able to charge him with both the first incident and second incident. Now something that's important to note that these charges because they're transmitted through electronic devices can be done at the jurisdiction that's receiving the call or where they are, basically initiated from. So we charged him locally here with those crimes because in this particular case it's frankly easier. We have all the evidence. We're already downloading. We're already analyzing the data. So he was arrested and it this is where the education component of this comes into. So he's charged with a 2 counts of felony, fraud, false reporting of a violent crime. He's charged with 2 counts of use of two way communications to device to to facilitate a felony. And then he's charged with misdemeanor charges of 911 misuse. Two counts. So now we go to the 3rd incident in Indiana. Reviewing more legal documents, OCSO was able to determine that there was a Swati, jurisdiction up in Indiana. They reach out to their, people and Lieutenant Tyree from Hendricks County, Indiana SO confirmed that there was another case, a residential case, a third one, where this individual did 3 different swatings between 725 on the first date that we had that we knew that he did in Arizona, or excuse me, New Jersey, all the way to 83 of 23. So across a roughly just over a week period of time, he did 3 other incidents in that jurisdiction alone. So and again, I know you're probably wondering why are they Speaker 1: picking these victims and I'll get Speaker 0: to that. So now we're able to charge this individual that's that's incarcerated with another warrant on these charges and he faces he now he's got 3 different felony charges again. False reporting use of firearm for a violent felony. Use a two way communication device to facilitate a felony, 3 counts on that and 3 counts of misuse. So we got New Jersey, Arizona and Indiana and multiple ones in those states. So while active actively investigating these incidents, the next two incidents came simultaneously. And this is the incident that came here to our front door in the north end of the county. So these incidents are what we call the Baker and Crestview incident. So initially and this was on 11/3. This was 6 days before some of these incidents done by our mister Whittington here. So this is where this individual comes into play. Cameron Gully of Mansfield, Texas. So initially, and I was at a retirement ceremony and I saw some of my CID staff bolting out the door and that's you know sometimes unfortunately a regular thing around here, so I just assumed they were going to something. And sure enough all of our resources were rushing to Crestview High School. Ironically Crestview was not the target. Despite obviously the population of Crestview is much greater than nature and there's a lot of people in Crestview. The reason for the confusion was so this individual, on 11/3 decided to make a phone call to the non emergency chat group, a gaming group together, and they have kind of one chat group, a gaming group together. And they have kind of one of these newest secretest, you know, secret, apps that they use to communicate. And, and he encourages somewhat anyone. He doesn't say, hey, you. But he's he says somebody needs to call in a SWAT to my school, Baker School. Okay? So this kid, Mr. Gulley, decides he's going to call in a threat to Baker School. Well, he does his little research and I guess he's, doesn't find the city of Baker. He sees city of Crestview and he calls Crestview Police Department. And and then he goes on with this detailed script that he had written about. He had an accomplice that was hiding in the bathroom. Guess what? His name is Landon. Landon Whittington. And and he's got an accomplice that's hiding in the bathroom with a rifle and a pistol and they're gonna shoot up the school. So Crestview, thankfully, Chief McCosker and his crew start rushing towards Crestview High School. Our crew starts rushing to Crestview High School. We also rush to Baker. Other than us Baker was the actual intended target. He never he never, we are actually not charging him with the Crestview one because of the target was actually Baker. Is that right? Yeah. So, and so this young man, we end up doing, interviews with, we send out the local police department, we seize their phones, we seize their electronic devices, we get them back and that's where our tireless efforts come into place with our investigation starting to download his information. But we do, we do a telephone interview with his mother who acknowledges that's her son on on the voice, on the audio that we have, the audio recording, and acknowledges that he's part of a group, a swaddie group called LutSec. Even more so, they pay each other in crypto currency. Mr. Gulley received over $5,000 in crypto currency for his swatting methods. Don't know how much Mr. Whittington has received. Of course he said he didn't do anything right? So but on 12 16th of this year just, you know, a week ago we were able to, get enough probable cause to establish a warrant. A warrant was approved, approved by a local judge. We worked with the Mansfield Police Department. Mr. Gulley is arrested. We're awaiting extradition. Of course, you know he has a right to fight the extradition. But if we want to get him here we want to be able to do further interviews with him. But he is, he is currently awaiting transportation here and is in all likelihood going to be, tried as an adult for this case. But, I will yield to the state attorney on that if, if need be. But, let's see here. He, mister Gulley, for his actions in our case of the what we call the best Baker Crestview case is that he will be charged with second degree felony which carries up to a 15 year prison sentence and false report of a violent felony. Again second degree felony. Use of two way communication felony and interference with school administrative functions. Now listen, we're gonna pause on this local incident for a second and go back to mister Whittington. And hours before we arrest him. We get a phone call from Houston, where from Houston where mister Whittington has made yet another swatting call where he's called out there and alleged him to plant a bomb out there. So, ironically, our CID or our investigation division, excuse me, says, well, we're about to hit his house. No problem. So we just add that to the charges. So now, mister Wootington served on 12/7 with another warrant. He's charged with extortion, false reporting of concerning planning a bomb, false reports of planning, excuse me, School of Religious or Lawful Assembly, a litany of charges he is facing there. So we use the information from the local detectives there in Houston, Texas to be able to establish the case for probable cause to incarcerate him on that. So I kinda went through some of this already, but once once Gully admitted to the Crestview Baker incident, he he told investigators Piaget and Gingrich on the phone interview that he was a part of this said ring of people and that he in fact received money. As I mentioned, that they swatted various groups and schools across the country and in exchange for payments. So, investigator Gingrich was able to obtain Jolie's email address, YouTube account, Instagram, etcetera, which was a, imperative in us being able to do that. Again, the mother corroborated that that was in fact her son on the audio recording of Crestview Police Department. Again he mentions that he had an accomplice named Landon that was in the restroom. So there's some additional indicators of some serious delinquency here, you know, in the download of their phones. There are some some significant encouragement of school shootings. They're showing school shootings to their fellow friends and peers and in their realm of depravity. But they, they're sending out videos of murders, montages of school shootings and death and to include animal torture. There is videos of human murders and and dismemberments and and other just nefarious things. Lots of compilations of this kind of depravity. And so there's a lot of different other incidents that are splitting spluttering off this and we appreciate FDLE and the FBI. They're working with us on different ones. I was just at a lunch with the Escambia County Sheriff yesterday and I believe we have another incident over there that may be tied to this. We haven't determined that yet. There was a bomb threat in Oregon that's going to be tied to this ring. So, you know, the school district, the sheriff's department maintain that nothing's more important than the safety of our children, its citizens, and our staff that work at the schools. We'll continue to reinforce that our at our greatest disposal any it will bring anybody to justice that we can that's going to try and be responsible to jeopardize the safety. Those students that believe that this is a joke or a non serious matter or it is non serious violation, they may want to pay close attention. They may want to research the statutes that I just described. You're talking about up to 15 years in in prison and being charged as an adult not a juvenile. So we're gonna take these matters serious and I wanna thank the school district for their continued support and partnership in protecting our schools. I want to thank the local and state and federal agencies that have helped. Some of those mentioned Crestview and Highway Patrol showed up. We had hundreds of people. We had we had deputies getting out of the tree stands coming to assist, because of the fear that this was a real act going on. And we'll continue to do it. We're always gonna treat them as they're real. But I wanna thank the State Attorney's Office for their support and working with us on on the there's a lot of different aspects on trying someone as an adult in a case like this and and those things extradition and those sort of things that we work with on getting the warrants approved and then getting them through the process. And I want to thank the brave men and women of the Oklausk County Sheriff's Office. Always just an unbelievably talented crew that gives tireless efforts and work day and night. This was a 4 month long case. So without that, without further ado, anybody that you know, I know that, superintendent Chambers has a few words he'd like to say or maybe Michelle or any of the investigators if you have questions for him. Feel free, superintendent. Speaker 2: So you can imagine this is a complex, situation and you heard the sheriff outline it, very well. And I was thinking today, you know, when educators decided that they wanted to become teachers and get an education, they weren't necessarily thinking about the school safety side of things. They're they're thinking about teaching students. They're thinking about helping athletes, helping those in band and courts. And what we've evolved into is school officials now have to be safety experts as well. To the point where in our school district, we have a safe schools office And we have one of the strongest safe school offices in the state of Florida under, mister Danny Dean. And I thought back to this day. So originally, we think that there's a lockdown situation at Baker School. Then Crestview High School. So honestly, your senses are heightened on that day. When parents are sending their kids to school, there's a clear expectation that their kids come home. So when you have an incident like this that happens, you know, all, senses are heightened, but it's also why at our schools, we train routinely. And I do wanted to share, a few few comments and I wanna say, you know, there's nothing more important than the safety of our students, our teachers, staff, and administrators. You know, keeping our schools safe is first and foremost. Everything else pales in comparison to that. I wanna say that we do not take safety for granted, rather we prepare routinely for moments such as what happened on November 3rd. And I have to say I couldn't have been more proud of our students, our school employees, and the district staff who immediately put their training into action that day. Not knowing whether the threat was real or not, that's your worst case, scenario. That's a nightmare scenario. But to be able to put the training into action immediately is something that I could not have been more proud of. You know, as superintendent when I arrived on the scene that day and I saw the overwhelming force in support of law enforcement And I have to say that's what gave me a sense of calm to see that and how quickly they arrived on scene. And I do wanna extend my appreciation to sheriff Aiden, the school resource officers, the entire, sheriff's department, as well as Crestview Police Department, especially chief, Stephen McCosker, as well as other agencies. Everyone converged on Baker School and Crestview High School in minutes. And that's one of the things that we are trained on is seconds matter. And when you know you're in a community or law enforcement is not only gonna show up, but they're gonna show up and act and they're not gonna hesitate, that's something that, I couldn't be more thankful for. For you, sheriff, your department, and the other agencies who showed up that day, there was a story that we had a, an officer who was in a was in a hunting stand. And that officer didn't stay in the hunting stand. An officer came straight to Crestview High School. And for me sitting here as superintendent, again, that's something that gives me a great sense of pride. And as a school district, I do wanna say we have a 0 tolerance in effect for situations like this, for students who initiate threats of any kind upon our schools, and there's no place for this type of behavior. I could not be more grateful again for the quick action that occurred in our schools on that day. And it led to keeping students safe, faculty and staff safe. And again, on a day like that where you don't know exactly what's happening, that's something that, for me, I'm very grateful of. You know, knowing that we have a true partnership with the sheriff, the school resource officer program, and the agencies in this, area is something that our school district appreciates and values and cherishes. And again, on that day, when you're not sure whether this is real or not and to see people jump into action, people being, our school district officials and students and the agencies, for me, it's something that, I could be prouder of. So thank you. Thank you. Speaker 0: This, Speaker 1: you wanna say anything or anybody? Speaker 3: The state can't say anything more about these great agencies and our partnerships with the schools, Minneapolis County Sheriff's Office, Crestview Police Department that hasn't already been said. What we can say is that this is a continuing investigation and an ongoing evaluation for the proper charging determinations to the fullest extent of the law. Speaker 0: Thanks. Anybody have any questions? Go ahead, Chris. Speaker 4: How safe of our how safe are kids in our in these schools? I mean, we've seen a number of threats made to schools this school year. Are our kids safe? Speaker 0: I I can tell you that that probably as much as our SRT or our SWAT team, our our school resource officers are certainly trained at that level. It's unbelievable the amount of training. So all we can do is train. We use our accredited agency as is the school and we use best practices. We work in conjunction with our safety team with Danny Dean and their administrators. And we don't always get it right. You know our training sometimes proves that hey we need to make improvements to it. And sometimes the administrators actually tell us hey you know this is what we have to do. And it's good because they're they know that the partnership and we've had examples of this. They know the partnership that they don't have to feel fear of any kind of repercussions to tell a law enforcement officer, hey, this is what we're trained to do and this is what we have to do. And we work those things out. We did a debrief with the school system after this. And, you know, to answer your question, Chris, I I can tell you that not maybe naively, I feel like that we're probably the safest school district in the country. I mean, we have an expectation that was set before I got here and it's certainly been maintained since I got here that with, you know, we're not going to have the failures that we've seen at some of these jurisdictions at some of these places. Our people understand that they are expected to act immediately. We're not waiting. And, I mean, frankly, again, maybe it's naive, but I feel that I can I can probably outmaneuver a kid that's been gaming any day of the week? Speaker 2: And if you don't mind, I'd like to add on that. In terms of our school safe, I'd say this our school district as well as school district across the state of Florida have challenges. But do I believe our school system is safe? Absolutely. So first of all, I think, with our school resource officer program, one of the strongest school resource officer programs, not only the state of the nation. We have school resource officers at every school, 2 of our high schools. But that's a layer. We have single point of entry at our schools. That's a layer. We have guardians in our schools. That's a layer. Our communication devices have been enhanced at the school level to where if we had to call a lockdown anywhere on the perimeter, we have the ability to do so. Our camera systems in conjunction with the sheriff's office camera systems. So there are many layers that I just spoke about and others that we can't, but, do I believe our schools are safe? Absolutely. But it's multiple layers. Speaker 0: That's that's a good point. Superintendent makes us that we have a lot of technology at our disposal. And and and it's testament to this, you know, just like these young kids have technology at their disposal, just like my own children do. But we have ways to combat that. We have invested in lots of money, not just for the school system, but the average citizen that's that's maybe a victim of a crime. We have the ability to be able to forensically download evidence to be able to prosecute and keep people held accountable and bring someone to justice. But I think the multiple layers the superintendent mentions is the reason why. You know, everything we do, we try to be the best at, whether it's training. But we do have the most SRO program. We, you know, we're proud to say that we've been a model across the country for our Speaker 1: SRO program. It was something that was Speaker 0: championed by my predecessor, and we've just continued the torch. So we're real proud of that. Go ahead, Kimberly. Speaker 5: Hey, sheriff. First off, like, what in the world are these kids thinking being in a group chat and making this across the country is borderline, it almost sounds, terrorism. To be able to attack different cities and different countries to bring all these forces around. Speaker 4: What are these kids thinking? Speaker 5: Well, whether or not, what's sad is that these kids have Speaker 0: a lot of intelligence, and they have the ability to be able to decide whether they wanna use that intelligence and they have the ability to be able to decide whether they wanna use that intelligence for good or bad. And and they clearly are are using it for nefarious reasons. They could channel that into something positive. You can imagine what they could do if they didn't want to do something like this. And I don't know what triggers an individual to do something. It's it's frankly easier. It takes, you know, you know, seconds to do, and and unfortunately disrupts the entire school system, you know, And disrupts all the resources of law enforcement that have to go and not to mention the dramatic feeling that a parent has, you know, has seen these horrific acts take place on TV or after the fact. And that they know their child's in there. You know. And they have to just hope and pray that this is not a real incident or that we are going to act and save their loved ones. So I don't know, Kim, or what to say. I mean, I you know, I don't know what makes people trigger to commit crimes, but, you know, we're here all day every day. So we're here to solve them. Daniel? Sorry. Daniel? Speaker 6: Sorry. So you mentioned you guys are already working with the FBI. Any other, national agencies and do you their, considerations of other arrests that might be coming whether it's local or national standing? Speaker 0: We know there's other players in the ring and right now these are the only 2 we've charged. There's other incidents that are going to splinter off this. We already know of them. So this is still an ongoing investigation. We just felt the timeliness of this needed to be done prior to the kids being let out of school today so that they could be made aware or their parents could may be be made aware. And then we will probably rehash this as the school comes back in because we really want this to be used as an educational component. My job is to actually hold people accountable, but we also want to educate those kids against making poor life decisions and this is a major poor life decision. But Daniel to answer your question we know the FBI is involved and FDLE is involved from a component. We have multiple jurisdictions in the state that possibly would be in touch. FBI has helped on us because it's crossing state state lines. But, Matt, do you have any other knowledge of any other agency? That's it. Sir? Speaker 7: Oh, yeah. I was wondering if you could say where Wilmington is being held in custody and if you have an estimated cost of monetary cost of this massive, first responder response. Speaker 0: Well I don't have that dollar amount. That's interesting to say because when you figure in what I can tell you what there's a number we have on what it takes to roll our SRT unit and it's a lot. It's 1,000 of dollars every time we roll that unit. Not to mention all of the I mean we had a 100 law enforcement officers there. So you do yeah, we don't make a lot of money, but when you add up a 100 of them to us, it does. You know, it adds up. And then, you know, as far as where is he being held, I mean, I believe he's held in DJJ currently. I'm sorry. Locally, currently at the division of juvenile, detention. But, you know, he he keeps on racking up charges so he, you know, he's gonna be there for a while. Speaker 4: So you mentioned that, these kids are getting paid in Bitcoin. What's the financial incentive for these swatting and where's the money coming from? Speaker 0: Well, it's cryptocurrency and it's my understanding that they pay each other, their little network of, minions. So but is that correct, Matt? I mean, we're assuming that they're being paid within themselves, you know, kind of exchanging it. Speaker 8: Sure. They're they're exchanging cryptocurrency in their network for whatever actions they take based on their organization. Speaker 4: The $5,000 seems like a lot for 14 year old. I'm I'm curious where they're getting it. Speaker 0: Well, we know I've already told you about 5 or so incidents and then some of them multiple incidents. So I mean, what do we got? Like, 8 on him. I don't know people. I don't know what and of course he's denied and did anything. But but this kid has got we know of 1. But I doubt he got paid $5 for that one. So I mean how many has he done? I don't know. I mean we're still working on it. Speaker 8: Yes, sir. How large is this internet community group? Speaker 0: I wouldn't know that. I and and I don't even know if we know that, but I don't know it myself. I'm sorry. Speaker 6: Any work on, I know it's too early to suggest what motive might have been, but, any, was this from from the both of them, was it just a joke? Were they just trying to, do something other than play games? Speaker 0: The the only thing I could think is this one for whatever reason wanted it done at his school to disrupt his school's function, you know, because that's what it's gonna do. And, you know, sit back and, you know, laugh about it online. I mean, they they they're smart, but they're very dumb in some of the things that they do because, you know, we were able to, you know, nail them from across the country, you know. Anything else? Speaker 3: I I would love to do an a 1 on 1 interview with you a couple minutes after. Sure. Speaker 0: No problem. Speaker 6: Overall, what would you say, to those parents who are seeing this right now and meaning they've been concerned about what their kids are doing online? Maybe I mean, obviously, maybe they're not into this group, but they're still having some suspicion. What would you say to those parents? Speaker 4: Well, I Speaker 0: mean that's what we want the educational component. We know that most of my kids aren't sitting around watching the 6 o'clock news tonight, but we know the parents do. So we're hoping that they if they have someone on their radar or their child that they feel might be going down a bad road or that they may just be gaming with kids that are maybe they know something. You know, because they're chatting. It's see something, say something. You know, something we've implemented a long time ago. You know, we can know about it. We can try and intervene maybe before it gets to that point. But you know, this lady knew her son was involved in this chat group and and I believe she knew about the exchange of no. Speaker 1: She didn't know about the exchange of funds. Did she? Speaker 8: She did after his arrest. Okay. Yeah. There are there are gonna be people watching this online. Is there anything you wanna say to kids that, you know, may think of doing something like this may be fun in the future in County? Speaker 0: Well, it's a good point. It goes back to what I said earlier. This is one of the critical three top reasons why I wanted to do this press conference is a deterrent. I don't, you know I went to every high school when I became the sheriff. And I wanted to let them know, hey there's a new sheriff and I wanted to let him know if there's recourse to things and I wanted to talk to him about making good life choices and not making poor life choices. And this is one of those times that we want to tell these kids, you know, you have an opportunity to make good choices in life and bad ones. We're all sinners. We're all going to make a mistake, But make things you can recover from. Overdoses you can't recover from. Suicide you can't recover from. These kids are gonna have a tough time recovering from this. You know, they are. And we're gonna make it that way. Anybody else? Speaker 8: Have you guys found Speaker 7: out why they called the group walls SCC? Speaker 0: I I have no idea. I I've got it spelled 2 different ways. I can't even hardly say Speaker 1: it, let alone spell it. Speaker 0: But it I I don't know what it means. Right. Speaker 6: And it's still too early to say whether or not they'll be charged as adults. Speaker 0: It it it isn't. Our our hopes are that, well we'll leave that to the state attorney's office to decide. There's a litany of things that have to be checked and bonds to be checked. So I mean, that's that's their that's their their goal. We charge them, but but how how they get charged would be their choice. Anybody else? Well, hey. Thank you all for coming. Hope you have a merry Christmas and, you know we

Posted - July 18, 2024 at 12:47 PM

Saved - July 18, 2024 at 3:33 PM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Oh holy heck, who or what is on top of that water tower? See the black near the center? https://t.co/bwMIaid2ru

Posted - July 16, 2024 at 12:04 AM

Saved - July 16, 2024 at 1:10 PM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

❗️Attention everyone! Everything on witness reports of a second shooter or a water tower shooter will be listed here! Just bookmark this 🧵 and keep checking back!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! A woman interviewed in Butler mentioned a second shooter in the water tower! 👀 We now have our grassy knoll!

Posted - July 15, 2024 at 8:30 PM

Saved - July 16, 2024 at 5:09 AM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! Yet another Butler Water Tower shooter witness! Here’s a second witness that heard a man scream, “there’s a sniper”, while he pointed towards the water tower! https://t.co/oyjL6V6YkL

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker heard gunfire and thought it was a sniper shooting towards a water tower. They also saw what they thought was gas or smoke on the stage. More shots were heard, and people were told to leave.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: 1st crack of the gunfire, and I just screamed it's the sniper. It's the sniper, and he was firing down toward the water tower. That's what we're hearing. And yeah. And then at that same exact moment, there was a spray from the right side of the stage that I thought was some type of gas. Mhmm. Like or not gas, but smoke to wind, you know, wind up front. And he said it was he heard gunfire. He's coming all up on the one Wow. And then a few minutes later, there was a couple more shots blocking down the hill, and that's when they started blood and pushing everybody out.

Posted - July 15, 2024 at 9:25 PM

Saved - July 16, 2024 at 2:36 AM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥Oh my goodness! A THIRD Water Tower shooter witness! This lady claims there were two shooters too! https://t.co/QRu7ornNlg

Video Transcript AI Summary

A sharpshooter shot Trump, injuring his ear and killing someone in the stands. A man in a white shirt was covered in blood, indicating he was near a victim. The realization that it was not fireworks but a shooting occurred when Trump was on the ground. Authorities suspect two shooters, with one still at large. The speaker expresses sadness over the violence and hopes for justice.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Sharpshooter shot to the left. He killed a gentleman in the water tower here. Now when I called my husband at home who's watching TV, he said, I thought Trump hurt his ear when he went to the ground, but he said no. On TV, they showed before Trump hit the ground, the ear was bleeding. So that sharpshooter went across. Trump turned his head. His ear must have been nipped, and it killed somebody in the stands over to the left. Could you see anyone injured besides the blood on the former president? All I saw was the gentleman from Beaver County who spoke earlier in the day who was running for the state house representative Elmore. I know his name. He had a white shirt on, and I saw him come from that left stands where the people were mostly shot. I think there were several. They said 3 medevacs left here. Blood was down the right side of his he wasn't shot, but you could see that he was next to somebody who must have been bleeding profusely because he either helped them and ran you know, rubbed against them or tried to get them help or something. It was covered. So I knew that he was near somebody. That was my first indication indication that somebody was actually shot when I saw his blood on his shirt. Erin, when did you realize that, hey. This might not be fireworks. This might be something else. When they got Trump down on the ground. You know, we were just so concerned that he wasn't hit because we couldn't. It happened so fast. You know, it's really hard to process it. You know, I guess when they if you have it on the your camera to see the exact minute, you can tell. But when he got up, he did not look so bad at all. What I've heard coming out here is now they feel that there was 2 shooters on both sides. So they got the 1 on the tower on this side, but the one on the right side, they never got. So they that's why they wanted us to leave immediately because they thought there's still a shooter out there somewhere. So there could be in these woods around Butler. And I feel sad for our country. I feel sad for everybody. You know? I mean Yeah. You know, like the guy, don't vote for him. Don't kill him. We love the guy. We're gonna vote for him. You know? I mean, what what what is up with his violence? I mean, it's just it's just terrible. I mean, I just I just wish that people that I'm I'm glad that guy is no longer with us anymore in that tower, and I hope they get the other one too. And I hope they don't they don't nip them. I hope they get them. He's down.

Posted - July 7, 2024 at 7:07 PM

Saved - July 8, 2024 at 2:14 AM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! The Patriot Front website was renamed from a socialist website. You heard about their links first from me, this is the kill shot. #PatriotFront

@jumpmarkets - go-jumpmarkets

@pepesgrandma Patriot Front = Vanguard America = Blood and soil .org. Socialists. https://t.co/R74oUDzNBT

Posted - July 1, 2024 at 5:17 PM

Saved - July 2, 2024 at 1:21 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

X has partnered with the World Economic Forum's Shaping the Future of Media, Entertainment and Sport project, as part of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM). GARM's guidelines were developed in coordination with the European Commission and NGO partners. There are concerns about Nick Pickles, the director of Global Strategy at X, due to his previous affiliations and connections. GARM is currently under congressional investigation for potentially acting inconsistently with US antitrust laws. GARM also works with Newsguard, which is partnered with the World Economic Forum's Publicis Group.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥Massively Huge Breaking News! X is once again PARTNERED with the World Economic Forum! GARM is part of the World Economic Forum's Shaping the Future of Media, Entertainment and Sport project! I’ll add my old info on GARM below.

@Safety - Safety

We’re excited to announce that X has reinstated our relationship with the @wfamarketers Global Alliance for Responsible Media. As of today, X is included as a member of #GARM here: https://wfanet.org/leadership/garm/members-governance X is committed to the safety of our global town square and proud to be part of the GARM community!

Members & Governance - World Federation of Advertisers wfanet.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

This here 🧵 will provide all the details and sources on the now, X partnered GARM, being a World Economic Forum program.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥 Thread!! 🧵 Breaking! Social Media and others colluded with the WEF! The Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) project is part of the WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM’S ’Shaping the Future of Media, Entertainment and Sport Platform. @Jim_Jordan @JudiciaryGOP ♦️Twitter 1.0 was previously one of 16 original active members and founders of GARM. As was Google and Facebook. ♦️The misinformation guidelines have been developed in coordination with the EUROPEAN COMMISSION and in consultation with NGO partners such as Consumers International, Reporters without Borders, ADL and NAACP.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now if you want to know where this is likely (tho not certain) coming from, look no further than here. I’ve warned Elon repeatedly about Nick Pickles. Here, he got a promotion! Lemme remind you of what he is, next.

@xDaily - X Daily News

NEWS: Linda Yaccarino has reshuffled her inner circle to boost sales and cut costs. - Yaccarino let go of Joe Benarroch, her right-hand man and head of business operations and communications - She has expanded the role of global government affairs head Nick Pickles to include global communications. - Steve Davis, Elon’s ‘Fixer’, was brought in to review X's finances and performance management Via FT https://www.ft.com/content/b114dd0d-3881-4e5f-822b-02b2596e6a42

Linda Yaccarino shakes up X amid pressure from Elon Musk over costs Tensions between billionaire and his top executive have been rising as the platform’s financial health has struggled ft.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Here’s an old thread on Nick Pickles. I have more on this now tho. 1. He worked under Bidens current CIA director at Carnegie Endowments. 2. He was on a CTI League contact list. 3. I found him in a GitHub group working on the credibility coalition. 4. He was a “Trustee of the international development charity BBC Media Action.” Which is a UK funded entity.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Well, Nick Pickles, the current director of Global strategy at X is in the Carnegie Endowment advisory group along with the notorious censorship funder, Craig Newmark. https://archive.ph/LYjmg I posted this for @elonmusk in December. Since I’m on a roll, Nick is also on a preferred contact list for the Cogsec collaborative censorship network listed under “people”. https://web.archive.org/web/20230713023409/https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1v9jTkL267n4-cS3DOdvbYguoHfcte6bjqJd_a7Vp26A/htmlview# And lastly, Multiple former Chinese gov employees and at least 20 CCP members worked at Carnegie Endowment while CIA DIR William Burns was pres 2015-21 They are closely associated with CUSEF (reg under the Foreign Agents Registration Act as a Chinese foreign gov org) https://dailycaller.com/2022/09/12/cia-william-burns-lance-gooden-carnegie-endowment-chinese-communist-party/ Perhaps I’ll go out with a bang. 😹 👋🏻

EXCLUSIVE: GOP Rep Calls On CIA Director To Address His ‘Strong Ties’ To CCP While At Helm Of Elite DC Think Tank Rep. Gooden pressed CIA Director Burns to explain his ties to the CCP members which Carnegie Endowment for International Peace employed during his presidency. dailycaller.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

GARM, a World Economic Forum project, is currently under a congressional investigation also. I’ll show you how GARM managed to do the below in my next post. “The World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) through its Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) initiative may be acting inconsistent with U.S. antitrust laws and congressional intent by coordinating GARM members’ efforts to demonetize and eliminate disfavored content online,” “Evidence the Committee has obtained suggests that GARM members, led by Steer Team members, are colluding to demonetize conservative platforms and voices. Further, this coordination does not always revolve around ‘brand safety’ and ‘harmful’ content as GARM publicly claims, but instead the desire to censor conservative and other views that GARM members disfavor,” Jordan added. https://www.dailywire.com/news/docs-show-corporate-giants-are-colluding-to-demonetize-conservative-platforms-judiciary-committee-says

Docs Show Corporate Giants Are ‘Colluding To Demonetize Conservative Platforms,’ Judiciary Committee Says The House Judiciary Committee is investigating whether major advertisers ran afoul of antitrust laws by coordinating about which news outlets to blackball. dailywire.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

The World Economic Forums GARM works with Newsguard too. And Newsguard is partnered with the World Economic Forums Publicis Group. It’s just one big happy family! And now you can see how News is affected by GARM also. And PS, I really don’t think Elon realizes what was done here. I’m letting him know now.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Ok, so we all know that the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) works with Newsguard. And Newsguard is partnered with Publicis Group. Well it just so happens that GARM has control over advertising dollars. And, GARM is the World Economic Forum too. See attached thread. “The (GARM) Alliance also benefits from the active expertise of major holding company media agencies including Dentsu, WPP’s GroupM, Havas Media, IPG, Publicis Media, and Omnicom Media Group.” Did you see the part where it said Publicis Media? 😏 https://archive.is/SUM2U

Posted - May 31, 2024 at 2:07 PM

Saved - June 1, 2024 at 8:15 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Judge Juan Merchan is a fellow at the Advanced Science and Technology Adjudication Resource and Center (Astar), funded by Biden's Department of Justice. He is also associated with the Latino Law Students Association, which focuses on progressive issues like immigration and social justice. The NY Court page on Judge Merchan was modified and redirected, but later restored.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! Judge Juan Merchan is a Fellow at the Advanced Science and Technology Adjudication Resource and Center ("Astar") which is funded by Bidens Department of Justice! Also, Judge Juan Merchan is biased against Trump due to immigration issues. Merchan belonged to the Latino Law Students Association dedicated to the progressive way and supporting IMMIGRATION and other social justice issues! This association is supported by our military and PERKINS COIE! Sources to follow!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Let’s begin with the OFFICIAL NY COURT page with the evidence on Trumps DOJ funded judge. Hon. Juan Manuel Merchan: Fellow, Advanced Science and Technology Adjudication Resource and Center ("Astar"), 2012 to Present https://archive.is/NEmJN Next I have an archive showing that ASTAR is funded by Bidens Department of Justice! https://archive.is/26han

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Next here’s Juan Merchan listed as belonging to the Latino Law Students Association. https://issuu.com/hofstralaw/docs/1992.1?ff&experiment=new-bff-dynamic Now here’s the info on the Latino Law Students Association. Calling themselves non partisan, but pushing progressivism. “Let there be no question that NLLSA is a progressive union whose Member Chapters will work nationally, regionally and locally to bring about positive change within the law school community and society at large by addressing legal issues dealing with immigration, education (both K-12 and higher education), healthcare, gender equality, employment issues, and sexual orientation.” https://archive.is/PIrUX Lastly, this shows that the top funders of the Latino Law Students Association are the: • Marines • Perkins Coie • Navy JAG Corps web.archive.org/web/2016111117…

1992 Pocket Part Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Easily share your publications and get them in front of Issuu’s millions of monthly readers. Title: 1992 Pocket Part, Author: Hofstra Law , Length: 140 pages, Page: 1, Published: 2013-05-07 issuu.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Wow! This must be pretty big! They just deleted Juan Merchans bio page that listed he was a fellow at the Biden DOJ funded Advanced Science and Technology Adjudication Resource and Center ("Astar")! This is Juan Merchans bio page from April 22, 2024. A. https://archive.is/dD0Br B. https://web.archive.org/web/20240422151744/https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/judicialdirectory/Bio?JUDGE_ID=Jvv5ZfC8zLC57yZndmF4ow%3D%3D Now it is gone! It refused to load so I tried to archive it, and got a different page! A. https://archive.is/klbxA B. https://web.archive.org/web/20240601134105/https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/judicialdirectory/JudicialDirectory?1

Judicial Directory: Judge Bio The official home page of the New York State Unified Court System. We hear more than three million cases a year involving almost every type of endeavor. We hear family matters, personal injury claims, commercial disputes, trust and estates issues, criminal cases, and landlord-tenant cases. web.archive.org

Judicial Directory The official home page of the New York State Unified Court System. We hear more than three million cases a year involving almost every type of endeavor. We hear family matters, personal injury claims, commercial disputes, trust and estates issues, criminal cases, and landlord-tenant cases. web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

I should have mentioned this, but this archive shows that the Judge Juan Merchan page is being redirected to the main directory now. Look at the top! https://archive.is/klbxA

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Ha ha! Even further evidence that the NY Court page for Judge Juan Merchan was modified TODAY specifically! As @So_ynoT just showed me the page that was supposed to be Judge Juan Merchans and is now just displaying a directory instead, shows that it was just updated today, June 1, 2024. And this is preserved for eternity in achieves too! Links are two posts up.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Folks, although it redirected earlier, they put the page back! I have two totally different archives from today. Did they do this because they got caught? I have two archive sites showing they redirected the page earlier. A redirect is something purposely done to the websites code thru a setting. 1. The first link and photo shows the redirect, watch while it’s loading. https://web.archive.org/web/20240601134104/https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/judicialdirectory/Bio?judge_id=Jvv5ZfC8zLC57yZndmF4ow%3D%3D 2. This link and second photo is the newest archive with it placed back. I don’t care what they do now, it’s all been documented. https://web.archive.org/web/20240601164751/https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/judicialdirectory/Bio?judge_id=Jvv5ZfC8zLC57yZndmF4ow%3D%3D

Judicial Directory The official home page of the New York State Unified Court System. We hear more than three million cases a year involving almost every type of endeavor. We hear family matters, personal injury claims, commercial disputes, trust and estates issues, criminal cases, and landlord-tenant cases. web.archive.org

Judicial Directory: Judge Bio The official home page of the New York State Unified Court System. We hear more than three million cases a year involving almost every type of endeavor. We hear family matters, personal injury claims, commercial disputes, trust and estates issues, criminal cases, and landlord-tenant cases. web.archive.org

Posted - May 31, 2024 at 2:07 PM

Saved - June 1, 2024 at 5:17 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Judge Juan Merchan is a Fellow at Astar, funded by the Department of Justice. There are claims of bias against Trump due to immigration issues, as Merchan was part of the Latino Law Students Association, supported by the military and Perkins Coie. Sources to follow.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! Judge Juan Merchan is a Fellow at the Advanced Science and Technology Adjudication Resource and Center ("Astar") which is funded by Bidens Department of Justice! Also, Judge Juan Merchan is biased against Trump due to immigration issues. Merchan belonged to the Latino Law Students Association dedicated to the progressive way and supporting IMMIGRATION and other social justice issues! This association is supported by our military and PERKINS COIE! Sources to follow!

Posted - May 23, 2024 at 10:21 PM

Saved - May 24, 2024 at 1:24 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Obama executive order reveals that the Biden administration and Jack Smith already possessed the documents they demanded from Trump. This contradicts their claim that the documents were needed for the archives, suggesting a dishonest motive behind the trial. Calls for the arrest of all involved are being made.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🏆Breaking! Due to never released parts of an Obama executive order, we now know that the Biden admin, and Jack Smith already had the documents they demanded from Trump! Recall the original reason they demanded the docs was because the archives needed them. Well, they lied to prosecute Trump with a sham trial! Everyone involved needs to be arrested!

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨EXPLOSIVE LITIGATION DOCS: We sued DOD and uncovered a secret Obama memo on presidential records which shows that Jack Smith is the one subverting the law. The directive, which legally binds DOJ, vests POTUS with sole authority to determine which records are his. More… https://t.co/tvIRlPn6PR

Posted - October 16, 2023 at 10:13 PM

Saved - May 7, 2024 at 10:32 PM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Google seed money funded First Draft news, which was a MAJOR disinfo network. First Draft had huge links to the Integrity Initiative with British Intelligence and CIA NED connections. It just seems all too coincidental that Google may possibly be linked to the starts of VineSight too.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🚨🚨🧵 Breaking new evidence! The first ever US censorship and propaganda is 100% linked to Britains 77th Brigade psyop unit, Integrity Initiative and Google! First Draft News which recently renamed is what ran this all! Watch my new evidence unfold! First Draft Network👇🏻 https://t.co/wnx2bc4Tjy

Posted - April 11, 2024 at 5:28 PM

Saved - April 12, 2024 at 12:01 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The posts discuss the connections between various organizations, such as the Vera Institute for Justice and the Center for Court Innovation, with government agencies and officials. They highlight partnerships, funding, and initiatives aimed at criminal justice reform, reducing jail populations, and addressing racial disparities. The posts also mention the involvement of individuals like George Soros and the potential global implications of these collaborations. Additionally, they touch upon the Global Cyber Alliance's involvement in elections and partnerships with organizations like the World Economic Forum. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office is mentioned multiple times in relation to these partnerships and initiatives.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! The Trump incriminations should be over! The Department of Justice (DOJ), Attorney Generals, District Attorneys, and Judges are all connected to the Vera Institute which is like a spare arm of Soros Open Society! The Vera Institute For Justice, in its early days, even shared major staffers with Open Society. And is responsible for tons of court related social justice programs such as no bail etc. This is the what is realigning our courts. The Vera Institute has gotten countless millions from Open Society, Ford Foundation, MacArthur and other leftist orgs. There is even a linked Manhattan Attorney General Office program, located right next to the Manhattan court building for easy access! Although this Vera Institute For Justice is a rats nest in our Justice system, let me introduce you to its partner: The Center for Court Innovation. Later known as,The Center for Justice Innovation. Founded in 1996 as the independent research and development arm of the New York State Unified Court System. Let’s begin: 1. In 2012, the Manhattan District Attorney Office partnered with the Vera Institute of Justice 2. In 2014, The Vera Institute For Justice, The Center for court innovation, and The Center for American Progress etc partnered to run the Safety + Justice Challenge. To reduce jail populations by 50% by 2025. 3. The Vera Institute wrote plans for a Manhattan resource center: “In 2018, the Vera Institute of Justice completed a six-month planning process to create a blueprint for a court resource center in Manhattan.” 4. The Vera Institutes partner, The Center for Court Innovation, partnered with the MANHATTAN DA OFFICE to run the Manhattan Justice Opportunities Resource Center: “This Manhattan Justice Opportunities (MJO) was created by the Center for Court Innovation and the Manhattan DA office. And located next door to Manhattan criminal court.” 5. Merrick Garland, Attorney General (DOJ) and Jack Smith, Special Counsel - The Department of Justice (DOJ) Funds The Vera Institute For Justice 6. Merrick Garland, Attorney General (DOJ) and Jack Smith, Special Counsel - The Center for Court Innovation is funded by the Dept of Justice (DOJ) Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs. 7. Author Engoron, Manhattan Supreme Court Judge - New York State Unified Court System works with the Center For Justice (court) Innovation. (After all my work I found that this NY Unified Court System covers EVERYONE in the NY judiciary including Judge Arthur Engoron.) 8. Letitia James, New York State AG - Worked with the Center for Court Innovation. She must also comply with the rules for the New York State Unified Court System 9. Alvin Bragg, Manhattan District Attorney - People from both the Vera institute and Center for Court Innovation served on his transition team. Manhattan DA’s Office is partnered with the Center for Court Innovation to create the Manhattan Justice Opportunities (MJO), a resource center inspired by the Vera Institute’s blueprint. Located next door to Manhattan Criminal Court In 2012, the Manhattan DA Office partnered with the Vera Institute of Justice. 10. Fani Willis, Fulton County Georgia DA - Georgia State Courts Works with the Center for Court Innovation 9. Fani Willis, Fulton County Georgia DA - Fulton worked with the Center for Court Innovation 10. Juan Merchan, New York State Supreme Court Judge (New York County, Manhattan) - worked with the Center For Court Innovation thru the Mental Health Courts. Merchan planned the Mental Heath Court and presided over it. 10. Rikers works with the Center For Court Innovation (Trumps associate went there) I’ll follow with all supporting evidence and perhaps new materials. At the end, we will also review the Manhattan DA office partnering with the London PD for the GLOBAL Cyber Alliance involved in our elections along with the World Economic Forum. What’s happening here is global and has been for decades. Stay tuned for one crazy ride!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Reminder, this is going to get a lot worse sometime after this thread. I just want you to realize where this is going NEXT (not now). To offer you some clues, think of The Hague, USAID, Kosovo, Brazil, and Russia etc. Do you know anyone connected to The Hague and Kosovo?😈 Kosovo is also CIA Central (as is USAID): “American intelligence agents have admitted they helped to train the Kosovo Liberation Army before NATO's bombing of Yugoslavia. (Pristina) The disclosure angered some European diplomats, who said this had undermined moves for a political solution to the conflict between Serbs and Albanians. Central Intelligence Agency officers were ceasefire monitors in Kosovo in 1998 and 1999, developing ties with the KLA and giving American military training manuals and field advice on fighting the Yugoslav army and Serbian police.” https://web.archive.org/web/20210407062331/https://archive.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/192-kosovo/38782.html

CIA Aided Kosovo Guerrilla Army All Along Global Policy Forum is a policy watchdog that follows the work of the United Nations. We promote accountability and citizen participation in decisions on peace and security, social justice and international law. web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Ok now time for sourcing. In my opinion, Soros is synonymous with the Vera Institute For Justice. Per the Soros Open Society author Aryeh Neier: “I had known Sturtz since the second half of the 1960s. When I first met him (Herb Stutz), he was the founding director of the Vera Institute of Justice, which was then, and is still today, a leading force in the drive to reform the U.S. criminal justice system.” “When I enlisted Sturz to represent Open Society in dealing with housing in post-apartheid South Africa, he helped to create an organization in that country called the National Urban Reconstruction and Housing Agency (NURCHA) in partnership with the Mandela government. He became Open Society’s representative on that organization’s board.” https://archive.is/RywWH Vera Institute Executive Director, Chris stone: My Role at the Open Society Foundations: “Ever since George Soros announced that I would take the helm of the Open Society Foundations, people have asked me if I have a particular goal that I would like to accomplish here.” https://archive.is/zKBBI Although Soros has donated immeasurable millions to the Vera Institute, Soros recently gave Vera a five year, $10 million grant in 2016 for Criminal Justice Reform. https://archive.is/ARBdK There’s more, but this is enough.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

“In 2012, the Office (Manhattan DA), partnered with the Vera Institute of Justice (Vera) to examine 220,000 criminal cases disposed of in 2010 and 2011, with an eye towards evaluating discretionary decisions and racial disparities in case processing. “ https://web.archive.org/web/20211230165443/https://data.manhattanda.org/special_reports/Reducing_Criminal_Justice_Footprint_Manhattan.pdf https://t.co/kOuRZBp6T1

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

2014, The Vera Institute For Justice, The Center for court innovation, and The Center for American Progress etc partnered to run the Safety + Justice Challenge. To reduce jail populations by 50% by 2025. https://archive.is/W5sIQ “The Safety and Justice Challenge is reimagining and rebuilding local criminal justice systems — reducing jail incarceration and increasing equity for all.” “Our goal is to support policies and practices that will safely reduce jail populations by 50% across all Safety and Justice Challenge jurisdictions by 2025 and eliminate racial inequities. We’re providing practical support and scaffolding to communities that are taking bold action in response to centuries of institutional and systemic racism, honoring the expertise of directly impacted communities, and working together to achieve transformational change.” https://archive.is/p8RCz MacAuthor funding: “The Vera Institute of Justice, the Center for Court Innovation, the Justice Management Institute, and Justice System Partners work to advance knowledge and practice in criminal justice through research, program evaluation, training, and the provision of technical assistance. This grant will enable them to assist in the planning, design, and launch of the Safety and Justice Challenge, a Foundation initiative aimed at reducing the overuse and misuse of jails nationwide.” https://archive.is/rd6Pl MacArthur Fund Pledges $75-Million to Reduce Local Jail Populations “In addition to the competitive grants, the foundation will support research into alternatives to jail and enlist four organizations—the Center for Court Innovation, the Justice Management Institute, Justice System Partners, and the Vera Institute of Justice—to provide guidance to the grant winners.” https://archive.is/9c5jj

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

The New York State Unified Court System is contracted with the Vera Institute partnered, Center for Justice (Court) Innovation “The Office is responsible for the fiscal stewardship of over 300 human and legal service contracts, including contracts with the Center for Justice Innovation, Judiciary Civil Legal Services providers, Attorney for the Child programs, Community Dispute Resolution Centers, Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) programs and substance abuse, mental health and domestic violence services in our specialty courts. https://web.archive.org/web/20240402213449/https://www.nycourts.gov/legacyPDFS/23-Annual-Report.pdf

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Hot cha cha cha! I’m going to make a liar out of myself and post this before I’m done sourcing. This quote is from an official gov document which is sourced in this below linked🧵. “City of London Police, Manhattan District Attorney and Center for Internet Security (CIS) were jointly establishing the Global Cyber Alliance (GCA)” Yes, the Manhattan District Attorney Office! And the Center for Internet Security is involved in our elections! Originally the GCA and CIS even shared the same address!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥 Breaking thread!🧵 Our elections have been globalized! The World Economic Forum is involved in our elections thru partnerships in joint projects with the Global Cyber Alliance (GCA). Along with many other countries too. This is concerning because: 🔸This was used for our 2020 election and later ones. 🔸Our elections are operating under the GLOBAL CYBER ALLIANCE. 🔸The WEF thinks one party rule is desirable and pushes China as a role model. 🔸 The Center for Internet Security (CIS) shares an address with the US branch of the Global Cyber Alliance. So who are SOME of the Global Cyber Alliance partners? Premium Partners: ♦️DHS CISA (Not listed but they are in the GCA meeting video.) ♦️Crowdstrike (Election machine and server security.) ♦️ICANN ♦️Microsoft ♦️ The Center for Internet Security (CIS or Cisecurity) ♦️Craig Newmark Philanthropies ♦️CentralNic Group PLC ♦️TIKTOK (China owned) ♦️Omidyar Network ♦️Etc Some other partners: ♦️MITRE Corp ♦️Chertoff Group ♦️Brennan Center ♦️Alliance for securing democracy aka Hamilton68 ♦️US Secret Service ♦️ MIS-ISAC (Multi-State Information Sharing & Analysis Centers) ♦️Universal Postal Union ♦️National Security Institute ♦️Belfer Center (China ties) ♦️Pen America a nationwide community of more than 7,500 novelists and journalists etc. ♦️Alliance4Eu (In doc) ♦️Plus tons more including globally! Founders and Funders: ♦️Manhattan District Attorney ♦️Hewlitt Foundation ♦️City of London Police ♦️NY Metro Infragard (citizen alliance with FBI.) A few extra concerns and highlights? 🔹The Brennan Center is also involved, so recall my mega thread on their massive election involvement! 🔹The World Economic Forum worked on the DQ framework. The IEEE Standards used to secure both ours and global election networks. 🔹Alvin Bragg (Manhattan DA) is a member. You click that partner link and it takes you to Alvin Bragg’s page. 🔹I have video of a July 2020 GCA America meeting with some US involved parties including; GCA, DHS CISA, Alliance For Securing Democracy, Mitre, Brennan Center, and CIS. A few highlights? ◦They don’t want a repeat of the 2016 elections. ◦They were concerned with paper ballot fraud. ◦Performed election roundtables, tabletop practice exercises, and what they called, “election dress rehearsals”. ◦Used MITRE SQUINT™ app to spot social media posts featuring election disinformation. Following will be sub threads with all evidence and other pertinent information. So please keep watching for updates. And of course, there could be even more added.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

“2018, the Vera Institute of Justice completed a six-month planning process to create a blueprint for a resource center in Manhattan for court involved individuals. The Manhattan D.A.’s Office then partnered with the Center for Court Innovation to create Manhattan Justice Opportunities (MJO), a resource center inspired by the Vera Institute’s blueprint. Located next door to Manhattan Criminal Court, MJO provides judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in Manhattan with effective and restorative sentencing alternatives. The Center for Court Innovation partnered with the Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services (CASES), the Osborne Association, and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH).” https://web.archive.org/web/20220118133920/https://data.manhattanda.org/special_reports/Sentencing_Alternatives_In_Manhattan.pdf

Posted - April 4, 2024 at 12:17 PM

Saved - April 4, 2024 at 1:11 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Loren Merchen of Authentic revealed on a podcast that they used AI bots to message people on Facebook for both the Harris and Biden campaigns. This raises concerns about privacy and the tracking of individuals. The use of AI bots in messaging is seen as intrusive on social media. Listen to the podcast to learn more.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🤖 Judge Merchen’s daughter, Loren Merchen of Authentic, on a podcast admits to using artificial intelligence bots to message people on Facebook on behalf of both Harris and Biden! In 2019 they used this for the Harris Campaign. And in 2020 they, “took it to the next level”, with others and the Biden Campaign. Another thing that bothers me is that Loren said that they used these AI bots to message individuals that they had difficulty contacting thru traditional methods. So are they tracking real life people to their Facebook accounts? And if so, how? Being a sort of political historian, this really interested me. We always felt that AI bots were intrusive on social media, but to actually message you? And what about privacy concerns? And what else are they currently doing with these AI bots? How do you feel about this? Listen to the podcast yourself! 👇🏻

Video Transcript AI Summary

Using digital programs can help reach a wider audience and engage with them in a unique way. For example, in 2019, we used an AI bot on the Harris campaign to start conversations with potential donors and voters via Facebook Messenger. In 2020, we expanded this approach to other campaigns, like Biden's, to reach individuals who were hard to contact. This method allowed us to engage with people in a more personal way, moving them through the engagement funnel effectively. It's essential to view digital media differently from traditional methods to maximize its potential.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So making sure that you're using a digital program to really complement what you're doing elsewhere and reach those people who you're having a harder time reaching, making sure you're getting that frequency, and also that you're making use of some of the things that digital can do that other platforms can't. So one of the things that is great about digital is the ability to really, engage with people. You're not just talking at people. Right? You can sort of have a conversation. And so one of the things that I love that we did, in 2019 on the Harris campaign, our team was the first to use an artificial intelligence bot to start conversations with potential donors, volunteers, and voters via Facebook Messenger. And then in 2020, we had the opportunity to do that and take it to the next level with some other campaigns, including the Biden campaign. And we worked with their campaign's organizing team to reach individuals that they were having trouble contacting, use a bot to start a conversation with them, and then move them through the appropriate engagement funnel. So we were able to reach people that they couldn't through traditional methods. And, again, not just talk at them, but start the conversation with them, which is something that's really unique to digital and why we really need to be thinking of digital in a different way than we thought of traditional media. Well, you hit on a lot of really important points there. And I'm

Posted - March 25, 2024 at 10:06 PM

Saved - March 26, 2024 at 12:08 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

There are new details emerging about Letitia James' undisclosed mortgage deal, with reports suggesting a second one. According to Black Insurrectionist, her net worth has significantly increased from 150k in 2010 to 14 million during the years she pledged to go after Trump. Thanks to @Beans84811745 for bringing this to my attention. I have sent a message to @LauraLoomer.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! More information on the Letitia James secretive mortgage deal! And now there seems to be a second! As per Black Insurrectionist: “Her net worth goes from 150k in 2010 to 14 million, all in the years she has promised to get TRUMP.” Thank you for alerting me @Beans84811745! Message sent to @LauraLoomer

@DocNetyoutube - Black Insurrectionist--I FOLLOW BACK TRUE PATRIOTS

In June of 2011, Letitia James filed for a Modified Morgage, as Laura Loomer reported, she cried poverty and said she could not pay her mortgage. I am posting what I can so I do not show her address. This dropped her interest rate significantly. Donald Trump announced his candidacy in 2015, a year later, James suddenly presents an affidavit from an attorney at Wells Fargo referencing an additional loan of 770,000 and asking for mortgage tax exemption. The New Mortgage holders are private money holder "The French's". This affidavit requests a mortgage tax exemption. So, she goes from broke, to getting 770k additional monies and then gets a mortgage consolidation agreement whereas she never pays the mortgage tax either. This NEW LOAN is in 2016. Now, follow along, she had a legit loan, no consolidation filed from 2011, now she gets another loan in 2016, while running for AG and after Trump announces, the new loan is 770k. The new loan is private money on top of the loan with a normal bank from 2011. Putting her well above the assessed value at the time. These loans are no longer due and owing. Not only did she get nearly 1 million, she got it via some kind of private money connected thru ANTI-TRUMP people. Furthermore, it appears her Mortgage exemption is illegal. Now, this is commonly done in NY and is rarely enforced I am told, except, she is the AG FOR NY. Around the same time, she gets over 1 million in Amazon stock. Her net worth goes from 150k in 2010 to 14 million, all in the years she has promised to get TRUMP. Had her net worth been substantial in 2011, she would not have received the loan modification, that was for distressed homes who were in default of their mortgage. This is case closed. Now, I have uncovered another private loan on her investment property. This loan was received by a man named Mike Lynch. I cannot tell you for sure if it is the same guy, but google Chief of Staff for our favorite commie Senator in NY Chuck Schumer.

Posted - September 14, 2023 at 3:36 PM

Saved - March 22, 2024 at 7:09 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A 2019 document reveals a coordinated effort by left-leaning organizations in the UK and US to brainwash the world with progressivism. The NGOs involved, funded by organizations like Soros Open Society and Ford Foundation, aim to infiltrate schools and churches, push LGBTQ agendas, and promote migration. Imran Ahmed of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is associated with these organizations. The narrative change initiatives seek to reshape public attitudes on various issues. Imran Ahmed is also involved in a narrative change organization called Inter-Narratives. Additionally, a government grant document highlights efforts to combat right-wing disinformation.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Exclusive! “Re | Claiming the Narrative for Social Change” A breathtaking 2019 document exposes the massive brainwashing network of the left. Just as we thought, it’s all coordinated and includes both the UK and US with plans to brainwash the entire world with progressivism. Likely a thousand plus narrative change linked orgs. Including the Narrative Initiative, and 350 dot orgs which I already discussed at length. The NGO’s involved are funded by the usual suspects like, Soros Open Society, Ford Fndn, Omidyar, Atlantic Philanthropies etc. But there’s also a UK side with Oak Fndn and Soros Eurasia OSF, etc. These are not limited to operating in their respective countries. I even found mention of at least two orgs in a gov grant doc which involves infiltrating schools at our expense. Imran Ahmed of The Center For Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is associated with those orgs. Noteworthy - these plans involve defunding ice which Biden just added to a funding request. Here’s a short rundown of the doc: They are infiltrating the Catholic Church, reclaiming “disinfo” narratives, setting climate narratives, deploying narrative change in media, stopping the border wall, decreasing Fed funding for detention of illegals, training children against conservatism in schools especially if migrants are there, pushing LGBTQ on our children, and shoving migration down our throats. All in order to reclaim progressive rule. We need to watch our children’s schools even closer for further indoctrination. It’s not just LGBTQ and race, they are there to turn our children against us. We also need to communicate with churches to see who is contacting them. They are even sending priests, sermon talking points! They also send talking points to the media too. I find it noteworthy that they are concentrating on brainwashing schools with migrants against conservatism. Here’s some alarming quotes on objectives: 🔸 “The political, economic and social developments that have given rise to populist and conservative movements the world over are a rude wake-up call. There is a new sense of urgency.” 🔸 “This report provides a mapping of initiatives supported by various European and American philanthropic bodies. These initiatives aim to leverage the power of strategic communications, and in particular, effective narratives.” 🔸 “All are engaged on projects relating to narrative change, strategic communications and research aimed at changing public attitudes on issues ranging from immigration, human rights, gender equality, sexual reproduction and sexual orientation rights and the closing of civic space. 🔸“This mapping of a philanthropic response on strategic communications for narrative change is a real-time snapshot. It covers a wide range of actions being taken, from research to movement building. It aims to spotlight opportunities for collective strategic communications solutions.” Here’s some of their orgs/funders: 🔹Narrative4 – Story exchange “There is a need for: 👩‍👧1.Outreach programmes that engage children and young adults at school and community levels to build understanding and support for core values and to counter conservative action. 👩‍👧2.Narrative programmes that work with schools and local communities, particularly in areas of high migration. 👩‍👧3.Initiatives that empower young adults to design solutions and lead on progressive values.” * So far, it has reached 200 schools (2019). 🔹More in Common “More in Common piloted programmes with the Catholic Church, NGOs and five mayors of areas with mixed populations. This included research on the opinions of Catholics later used as the basis for producing successful messages to engage priests, Catholic organizations and believers. Notes for sermons were explored to see how to reach anti-migrant people.” ———————————— Being out of space, this will be continued. And I will also show that our censorship apparatus is involved in narrative control. Link will be in the next post.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Before we get back to the doc, which will be listed last, let’s clear a few things up. ♦️The Four Freedom Fund, Unbound Philanthropy and Pop Culture org are associated with Imran Ahmed of the Center For Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and Inter-Narratives. ♦️CCDH is funded by: 🔹Barrow Cadbury Trust 🔹Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust 🔹Laura Kinsella Foundation 🔹The Pears Foundation 🔹Unbound Philanthropy https://archive.ph/sSEcE ♦️The Four Freedom Fund collaborated with Unbound Philanthropy https://archive.ph/jQW6X ♦️A curator of Inter-Narratives along with Imran Ahmed was the CEO of, the Pop Culture Collaborative, Bridget Antoinette Evans. https://archive.ph/BkQPo ♦️As listed in the main doc, Unbound Philanthropy runs the Pop Culture Collaborative. “Unbound Philanthropy - Pop Culture Collaborative” (See photo from main doc.) Now let’s get back to the narrative change doc. Re | Claiming the narrative for social change: 🔹 Four freedom fund (FFF) “Training is given via the Spin Academy, a technical resource entity. The latter provides a strategic communication “how to” for immigration activists through immersive “boot camps” with an evolving curricula. These are followed up with one-on-one mentors.” 🔹Unbound Philanthropy “Convening on Sanctuary projects. Thematic and geographic focus: Immigration, USA A convening is being planned for actors and advocates working on sanctuary projects. The goal is to reframe the migration debate to create a more positive vision on welcoming migrants and refugees into society.” 🔹Unbound Philanthropy - Pop Culture Collaborative “This is a five-year hub to create high-impact partnerships that use pop culture to change narratives around people of colour, immigrants, refugees, Muslims and Native people, especially women, LGBTQI, disabled and others.” Here’s the promised doc.👇🏻 https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://globalphilanthropyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Claiming-the-narrative-for-social-change-updated.pdf

Wayback MachineInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Here’s my earlier research on Imran Ahmed of the, Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCHD), running a narrative change org called Inter-Narratives. This was renamed from, “Reset Narratives”. Next we will discuss the government grant on narrative change and their involvement.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥Breaking and HUGE Information on the Center For Countering Digital Hate @elonmusk It appears that Imran Ahmed is a curator of a Narrative Change org called Inter-Narratives. In my opinion, Narrative Change is essentially pushing your ideas on people to brainwash them into supporting social justice. For those of you not familiar with Narrative Change, let’s grab a definition from Berkeley. “Since the 2016 election, interest in the concept of “narrative” has spiked in the nonprofit and philanthropic worlds. There exists a growing consensus among people committed to social justice that traditional change efforts like organizing, advocacy, and litigation cannot be fully effective or lasting unless they are integrated with a narrative change strategy. Definitions of what narrative means vary greatly, and the art and craft of changing it can seem mysterious. But experience and research point to clear, replicable approaches for reshaping public narratives in support of social justice.” https://archive.is/1CfwH Inter-Narratives is a community, a space for folk working on (or who are curious about) narrative change and the role it plays in system change. Narrative coherence – depending on the degree of synthesis activities built in, narrative communities can give more coherence to messages across different movements. What are they responding to? “An entrenched set of unjust narratives, disconnected from reality, in a paradigm of accumulation, control and domination,” inter-narratives has been developed with, and is maintained by the Environment Funders Network, which is a UK-based network of foundations, family offices and individual donors supporting environmental causes. ♦️This was formerly known as the RESET NARRATIVES COMMUNITY, from August 2020-April 2023. The effort is funded by Calouste Gulbenkian, and JJ Charitable Trust. https://archive.is/BkQPo They are a group of people from over 120 organizations. See the partial list on the page which includes the Democrat 350 .Org, Equally Ours, and tons of climate orgs. https://archive.is/YfDBy OBJECTIVE of Inter-Narratives: 🔹Most people will be working with narratives to influence a specific audience https://archive.is/UkbGW Narrative change is a specialty of mine. And frankly, the left is bent on shoving their global narratives down our throats. I saw a week ago, that there were links with CCDH to narrative change work. This is enough for now, but there’s a ton of loose ends. Some, I’m already familiar with.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now for the DHS FEMMA conservative disinfo grant doc. I’ve actually discussed this before under its “Vaccine Red” programs. Which is to inoculate against the right. These involve Moonshot CVE and Google Jigsaw too. “VACCINE-RED: The Versatility and Adaptive Capacity of Communicative Inoculation for Neutralizing the Effects of Right-wing Extremist Disinformation The file name for this approved gov grant submission is called: “Braddock_TVTP_Narrative_Appen” 😏 One of the people involved in this Gov narrative submission was Caty Borum Chattoo. Her programs involve Unbound Philanthropy and all the usual billionaires including Omidyar, Soros, and Gates. RESEARCH, CREATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS: 🔸Entertainment Storytelling and Social Change: Documentaries and Public Engagement/Social Change; Comedy and Social Justice; Participatory Culture and Activism; Engaged Scholarship. “I cultivate funding opportunities and serve as principal investigator for externally-funded research and creative initiatives focused on media, social change and equity; I have raised more than $3.2 million in grant and contract funding (approximately 39 grants, contracts, and gifts) since 2013. 🔸Partial funders list: National Endowment for the Arts, Bill &Melinda Gates Foundation, Univision/Fusion Networks, Ford Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Atlantic Philanthropies, Open Society Foundations, Comedy Central, Luminate (Omidyar Networks), Unbound Philanthropy, The Opportunity Institute, The Fledgling Fund, Independent Television Service, Participant Media, Doris Duke Foundation, Odyssey Networks, Link Media. 🔸Highlight initiatives launched: • “Yes, And...Laughter Lab (launched 2019), an innovation lab and annual event that brings together comedians and social justice leaders to create collaborative socially- conscious comedy, co-directed by cultural strategy group Moore + Associates, funded by the Pop Culture Collaborative, Open Society Foundations, Comedy Central, Luminate, Doris Duke Charitable Trusts. • Comedy ThinkTanks (launched 2019, in collaboration.” • leverage for public engagement; collaborative partners include IllumiNative, Color of Change, Caring Across Generations, National Domestic Workers Alliance, Family Values @ Work Network, and Hip Hop Caucus. The Laughter Effect (launched 2017), an ongoing research and creative initiative that examines the role of entertainment comedy in social change, originally funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Unbound Philanthropies. https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/EMW-2020-GR-APP-00171%20-%20American%20University%2C%20School%20of%20Communications.pdf

Wayback MachineInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

Posted - March 15, 2024 at 3:53 AM

Saved - March 15, 2024 at 11:47 AM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

John Barnett : 'If anything happens, it's not suicide': Boeing whistleblower's prediction to family before death https://t.co/KVmuXf5Lwo

Video Transcript AI Summary

John Barnett's friend is certain he didn't commit suicide, believing someone wanted to silence him. Barnett, a Boeing whistleblower, faced retaliation for exposing unsafe practices. He had big plans and loved life too much to take his own life. Despite his death, legal action against Boeing will continue.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I know that he did not commit suicide. There's no way. Speaker 1: 1st, tonight, our investigative reporter, Anne Emerson, has new information in the death of Boeing whistleblower, John Barnett. A close family friend of Barnett says he predicted he might wind up dead, Speaker 2: that a story could surface that he killed himself, but he told her, don't believe it. Anne? Tessa, Barnett's friend Jennifer said they had talked about this exact scenario playing out, but his words seem like a premonition. He told her, don't ever believe it. Speaker 0: I knew John because his mom and my mom are best friends. And so over the years, get togethers, birthdays, celebrations, and, you know, whatnot, we've all got together and talked and, you know, that's how we really know each other. Speaker 2: And when Jennifer needed help one day, Barnett came by to see her. They talked about his upcoming depositions in Charleston. Jennifer knew he filed an extremely damaging complaint against Boeing. He says the aerospace giant retaliated against him when he blew the whistle on unsafe practices. For more than 30 years, Barnett was a quality manager. He'd recently retired and moved back to look after his mom in Louisiana. Speaker 0: He wasn't concerned about safety because I asked him, I said, aren't you scared? And he said and his boys and his the way he would talk no. I ain't scared. He said, but if anything happens to me, it's not suicide. You know, I know that he did not commit suicide. There's no way. He loved life too much. He loved his family too much. He loved his brothers too much to to put them through what they're going through right now. Speaker 2: And he basically told you not to believe it? Speaker 0: Yeah. Basically. Yeah. Not true. He's got too much to do, likes breathing. And he did. He had a lot of plans of things that he wanted to do. Speaker 2: What do you think happened? Speaker 0: I think somebody got in there and made, you know, money can buy anything nowadays, it seems like. And there's a lot of evil in this world. I think somebody, didn't like what he had to say and wanted to shut him up and, didn't want it to come back on, anyone, so that's why they made it look like a suicide. Speaker 2: The last time she saw Barnett, it was at her father's funeral in late February. He was one of the pallbearers. Sometimes family and friends referred to him by his middle name, Mitch. Speaker 0: I think everybody is in disbelief and can't believe it. And I don't I told everybody that I don't care what they say. I know that Mitch didn't do that. Speaker 2: And just because John Mitch Barnett is dead, doesn't mean this case won't move forward. His attorneys say they're still prepared to go to trial in June. Working for you, Ann Emerson, news 4.

Posted - March 10, 2024 at 5:39 PM

Saved - March 11, 2024 at 2:31 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Breaking! The Secretary for Defense authorized the use of the National Guard with rules for engagement in response to planned demonstrations on January 5-6, 2021. This memo confirms Trump's order and clarifies that the DCNG remains under the command of the Commanding General. Link to the document provided. Additionally, Norm Eisen and the Voter Protection Program warned governors against using the National Guard until votes were certified, potentially contributing to the lack of Guard presence on January 6. Trump fulfilled his part.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥Breaking! Secondary evidence from the Secretary For Defense on approval of the National Guard with rules for engagement! Ok first I provided you with a Jan 2021 memo from Catherine Herridge showing that Trump DID order the National Guard on January 3, 2021. Now we have a memo from the Secretary For Defense working out the details and providing rules for engagement! “This memorandum responds to your January 4, 2021 memorandum regarding the District of Columbia request for District of Columbia National Guard (DCNG) support in response to planned demonstrations from January 5-6, 2021. You are authorized to approve the requested support, subject to my guidance below and subject to consultation with the Attorney General, as required by Executive Order 11485.” “At all times, the DCNG will remain under the operational and administrative command and control of the Commanding General of the DCNG, who reports to the Secretary of Defense through the Secretary of the Army.” @MZHemingway Link to doc to follow!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Here’s the link to the doc of Trumps Secretary For Defense authorizing the use of the National Guard and providing engagement rules. This is one day after Trump requested that the National Guard be deployed. https://web.archive.org/web/20210629140520/https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Jan6-Clearinghouse-Acting-Secretary-of-Defense-Christopher-Miller-Memorandum-for-Secretary-of-Army-Employment-Guidance-for-the-DC-National-Guard-Jan-4-2021.pdf https://t.co/2ZHAl3my29

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

And here’s my post about Trump ordering the National Guard on Jan 3, 2021. Catherine Herridge’s post is referenced second in this 🧵. I’ll always bring receipts!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Bad Kitteh never forgets, Cheney did lie! This is from the now, fired from CBS, Catherine Herridge. It’s a January 2021 report from the Secretary of Defense. January 3, 2021 “The Acting Secretary of Defense (A/SD) and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs (CJCS) meet with the President. President concurs in activation of the DCNG to support law enforcement.”

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

It’s Christmas in March, and it’s raining receipts! Here’s Norm Eisen sticking his nose into things and telling the Governors that it’s illegal to use the national guard until the votes are certified. Add Pelosi to the mix, and the missing National Guard was a result of Democrat collusion. Let’s put the blame where it’s rightly deserved. Trump did his part.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! Norm Eisen was involved in the lack of National Guard on January 6! The voter Protection Program, cofounded by Norm Eisen, told state governors in a letter, that they would be breaking the law if they did! “This memorandum guides state officials in preparing for and responding to the possible involvement of the National Guard in the 2020 election. Governors should remember that the Guard remains under their command unless “federalized” by the President.” “It’s Not Just Election Day: The election has already started. It will last until all the votes are counted and the results are certified. Federal interference with counting votes is just as illegal as interference with voting. 18 U.S.C. §§ 593, 595.” On January 6th that’s what Congress was there for, the certification of electors! Sources to follow!

Posted - February 18, 2024 at 8:40 PM

Saved - February 18, 2024 at 9:54 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In March 2017, former CIA analyst Larry Johnson claimed that Obama used GCHQ to spy on Trump during the election campaign. He mentioned a "Trump Task Force" and stated that the video discussing this topic has been repeatedly deleted from YouTube. The post references the difficulty in finding the video and questions why it has been removed.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

❗️March 2017 : Former CIA Analyst Larry Johnson shares insider knowledge that Obama used GCHQ to spy on Trump. The week after Trump first accused Obama of wiretapping him (March 6, 2017), Larry Johnson revealed the CIA and FBI colluded with GHCQ to derail Trumps election campaign. Larry claims they even had a, “Trump Task Force”, and that it was extensive and VAST. This video has been deleted by YouTube more times than I can count over the years. And it’s difficult to find. 🤣 So may I ask, why?

Video Transcript AI Summary

The British spied on Donald Trump with the help of a close relationship between GCHQ and NSA. The FBI and CIA were heavily involved in an extensive intelligence operation against Trump. Brennan approached individuals to join the "Trump task force" in 2015, which is illegal.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The British spying on Donald Trump? Absolutely. They did. And then it was it was as you know, the workaround, CIA cannot spy on American citizens, but there's nothing there that says British can't spy on American citizens because they do. And the close relationship between the GCHQ and NSA where they've got actually got personnel that sit side by side physically, It it's easy to pass information back and forth. I know that was correct. I just didn't realize how extensive involvement of both the FBI and the CIA was at the time. We've subsequently learned that this was a vast, vast intelligence operation directed against Donald Trump. In fact, I had one of our former colleagues who was, he was, an SIS level, still in touch with folks back at the agency. He told me that one of his friends came and told him that he'd been approached by Brennan about joining what they called the Trump task force. And this was, late summer of 2,000 and 15. So, you know, that that is that's the kind of activity that is completely illegal.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now I was not kidding about this video being deleted repeatedly. Every different Twitter link I’ve found for this YouTube video is gone, including my own. We knew we were onto something hot.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

@pepesgrandma This has been deleted repeatedly from Youtube. Found 1 more link on yahoo + nabbed it. Appropriate now due to Spicer's claims.

Posted - February 16, 2024 at 3:47 PM

Saved - February 16, 2024 at 5:09 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

There are concerns about the Manhattan DA office's involvement in creating the Global Cyber Alliance (GCA), a globally linked organization linked to the World Economic Forum and the Biden administration. The GCA has partnerships with various entities, including DHS CISA and Crowdstrike. The involvement of the DA office in such activities raises questions about their role and the globalized nature of elections. Additionally, the Center for Internet Security (CIS) played a role in the creation of the GCA and shared the same address. These revelations raise concerns about the integrity and security of elections.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Let’s tell you about Alvin Bragg and his Manhattan DA office We have shadowy dark stuff emanating from the Manhattan DA office that is going after Trump. Let’s review this. The Manhattan DA office, London Police, and CIS (elections) all partnered to create the Global Cyber Alliance (GCA) in Sept 2015! CIS runs our election security and the Election integrity partnership (EIP) along with DHS CISA. Where they ran the disinfo portal! And who created the earlier version of CIS election activities called Defending Digital Democracy? The Belfer Center. Defending Digital Democracy comprised of: Crowdstrikes Dmitri Alperovich, Google Jigsaw staff, MIT staff, Harvard Kennedy staff, Alex Stamos of Facebook, Eric Rosenbach former secretary of defense, Robby Mook, plus tons more! The Project enlisted Marc Elias of Perkins Coie and Ben Ginsberg of Jones Day. Co-Sponsors: ♦️Institute of Politics, Harvard Kennedy School ♦️Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy, Harvard Kennedy School But who was all at the Belfer Center that housed this program? 🔸Kurt Campbell, Biden China Tsar 🔸Jake Sullivan, NatSec Adviser 🔸Lisa Monaco, #2 at DOJ 🔸John Sawers, ex MI6 Chief 🔸Nawaf Obaid, ex boss of Mifsud 🔸Robby Mook - Hillary campaign manager 🔸Ash Carter, ex SOD 🔸Robert Hannigan, ex GCHQ Chief 🔸Susan Rice, WH Council 🔸James Clapper, ex DNI 🔸Jeh Johnson, ex DHS What kind of District Attorney office creates such a thing as the WEF linked GLOBAL Cyber Alliance along with a foreign PD office and CIS used for US election security (which also brings in the DHS)? This just doesn’t seem like what a DA office should be doing. And it also makes our elections globally linked.

@_johnnymaga - johnny maga

Some smart, evil people in the nation’s capital approached Letitia James, Alvin Bragg and Fani Willis and convinced them to throw the kitchen sink at Trump They were the perfect candidates: unscrupulous, low IQ prosecutors who don’t care about their reputations

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

And here’s the Global Cyber Alliance that the MANHATTAN DA office helped create. It’s Global and World Economic Forum and DHS linked. We have a globally linked, and Biden admin linked, DA office going after Trump. This just doesn’t sit right with me.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥 Breaking thread!🧵 Our elections have been globalized! The World Economic Forum is involved in our elections thru partnerships in joint projects with the Global Cyber Alliance (GCA). Along with many other countries too. This is concerning because: 🔸This was used for our 2020 election and later ones. 🔸Our elections are operating under the GLOBAL CYBER ALLIANCE. 🔸The WEF thinks one party rule is desirable and pushes China as a role model. 🔸 The Center for Internet Security (CIS) shares an address with the US branch of the Global Cyber Alliance. So who are SOME of the Global Cyber Alliance partners? Premium Partners: ♦️DHS CISA (Not listed but they are in the GCA meeting video.) ♦️Crowdstrike (Election machine and server security.) ♦️ICANN ♦️Microsoft ♦️ The Center for Internet Security (CIS or Cisecurity) ♦️Craig Newmark Philanthropies ♦️CentralNic Group PLC ♦️TIKTOK (China owned) ♦️Omidyar Network ♦️Etc Some other partners: ♦️MITRE Corp ♦️Chertoff Group ♦️Brennan Center ♦️Alliance for securing democracy aka Hamilton68 ♦️US Secret Service ♦️ MIS-ISAC (Multi-State Information Sharing & Analysis Centers) ♦️Universal Postal Union ♦️National Security Institute ♦️Belfer Center (China ties) ♦️Pen America a nationwide community of more than 7,500 novelists and journalists etc. ♦️Alliance4Eu (In doc) ♦️Plus tons more including globally! Founders and Funders: ♦️Manhattan District Attorney ♦️Hewlitt Foundation ♦️City of London Police ♦️NY Metro Infragard (citizen alliance with FBI.) A few extra concerns and highlights? 🔹The Brennan Center is also involved, so recall my mega thread on their massive election involvement! 🔹The World Economic Forum worked on the DQ framework. The IEEE Standards used to secure both ours and global election networks. 🔹Alvin Bragg (Manhattan DA) is a member. You click that partner link and it takes you to Alvin Bragg’s page. 🔹I have video of a July 2020 GCA America meeting with some US involved parties including; GCA, DHS CISA, Alliance For Securing Democracy, Mitre, Brennan Center, and CIS. A few highlights? ◦They don’t want a repeat of the 2016 elections. ◦They were concerned with paper ballot fraud. ◦Performed election roundtables, tabletop practice exercises, and what they called, “election dress rehearsals”. ◦Used MITRE SQUINT™ app to spot social media posts featuring election disinformation. Following will be sub threads with all evidence and other pertinent information. So please keep watching for updates. And of course, there could be even more added.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

And here’s the UK GOVERNMENT document on the creation of the Global Cyber Alliance by the MANHATTAN DA office, CIS and London police. Now I also want to point out a couple important things. 🔹CIS and the Global Cyber Alliance shared the same address. 🔹CIS became involved in US elections with the DHS AFTER the Global Cyber Alliance was created.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

⚡️Breaking! Cisecurity aka the Center For Internet Security (CIS), that worked with DHS CISA for election security, didn’t just share an address with the Global Cyber Alliance (GCA). CIS was actually involved in the creation of the Global Cyber Alliance! I absolutely have no idea how I missed something so major! “The City of London Police, Manhattan District Attorney and Center for Internet Security (CIS) were jointly establishing the Global Cyber Alliance (GCA), an international, cross-sector, non-profit organisation designed to confront, address, and prevent malicious cyber activity through the establishment of a strong network of cyber experts and sharing of key information. https://web.archive.org/web/20230506183510/https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/documents/s55959/Visit%20USA.pdf

Posted - August 15, 2023 at 11:47 PM

Saved - February 10, 2024 at 1:48 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The posts discuss the alleged connections between various organizations, including Acorn, Project Vote, the Voter Registration Project (VRP), and the Advancement Project, and their involvement in election activities. They mention partnerships with Soros Democracy Alliance, the Brennan Center, and the use of funds from private foundations. The posts also highlight allegations of illegal practices and voter registration fraud. Additionally, they raise concerns about the impact of these organizations on the 2020 election and call for further examination by Congress. The Brennan Center's role in fortifying the election and advocating for the acceptance of matching errors on voter registration is also mentioned.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Breaking 🧵! The communists, Acorn, and rich billionaires took over our elections! Obama’s radical Acorn never left! The get out the vote registration/election efforts, lawsuits to counter election fraud claims, election changes, Zuckerbucks, and poll workers are all connected to: 🔹Acorn offshoots are still in operation such as: Acorn partnered, Project Vote/Voting For America, is now renamed to the Voter Registration Project and working in current elections. Obama was a director at Project Vote. *Project Vote employees Obama got to work with include Karine Jean-Pierre, and Frances Fox Piven of “Cloward-Piven Strategy” fame. The Voter Registration Project hires contractors. 🔹Soros Democracy Alliance is partnered with the Brennan Ctr, Project Vote, and the Advancement project. Recall Soros funded Acorn and partnered with its reboot called the communist Working Families Party too. 🔹Mao/Lenin aligned FSOB Liberation Road (BLM) communists thru the Advancement Project. - This worked with Obamas Project Vote, Acorn, ACLU, and the Brennan Ctr etc. Recall the Brennan Ctr is connected to everything election related including Zuckerbucks. ——————————— To begin, I found a tax form for the Voter Registration Project (VRP) that used GBI Strategies as a contractor, and it sent my wheels spinning. https://influencewatch.org/app/uploads/2021/12/VRP-2020-Form-990-Public-Disclosure-Copy-signed.pdf Next, thru this DOJ doc, I found that the still operable, and communist, Advancement Project, was partnered with the Voter Registration Project (Voting For America/Project Vote). The plaintiff (remember this name): PROJECT VOTE/VOTING FOR AMERICA, INCORPORATED, “On May 11, 2009, a Project Vote affiliate—Advancement Project—requested (snip) “ https://justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2012/06/19/projectvote.pdf The Advancement Project, did legal work for ACORN and it’s board members included Harry Belafonte. https://archive.is/dPEJx Here we have Soros involved in the Obama connected Advancement Project and Project Vote: The Soros Democracy Alliance partner, “Brennan Center, is currently working closely with SV (State Voices) as part of a national Voter Enfranchisement Working Group, which includes the Lawyers' Committee on Civil Rights, Advancement Project, and Project Vote.” Soros Democracy Alliance, State voices, had 31 orgs in 2014 that has grown considerably since: 🔸Advancement project 🔸Project vote 🔸Seiu 🔸NAACP 🔸AFL-CIO 🔸etc The 2014 Soros Democracy Alliance doc was included in a Catalist lawsuit. “In 2008, then-Senator Obamas presidential campaign committee, Obama For America, selected Catalist as its data vendor. Victory Lab at 299. As a Catalist client, the Obama campaign was able to "create seamless links across the activist left, including outside groups with whom candidates were legally prohibited from coordinating directly." GBI Strategies, ACLU, Fieldworks, OFA, Project Vote, and tons more also used Catalist. https://fec.gov/files/legal/murs/current/116164.pdf As previously reported by me: “The Advancement Project (AP) is a Maoist/Leninist Freedom Road Socialist Org (FRSO) that funds a variety of radical causes. They work to organize ‘communities of color’ into politically cohesive units while disseminating its leftist worldviews and values as broadly as possible by way of a sophisticated communications Dept.” https://archive.is/iykfa The Advancement Project Partner list is huge, and include: ♦️Acorn ♦️Project vote ♦️Aclu ♦️Brennan center ♦️AFL cio ♦️Common cause ♦️Demos ♦️NAACP ♦️SEIU ♦️Tons more! https://archive.is/w8n1k Here’s evidence that Obamas Project Votes/Voting for America, is the Voter Registration Project: “The Voter Registration Project (VRP), formerly Voting for America (Project Vote), is a public charity with a mission to reshape the electorate.” https://archive.is/mFX1u Acorn was actually partnered with Obamas Project Vote/Voting for America which is now called the current Voters Registration Network. Click the, “Acorn Family of organizations” link, and it will show Obamas Project Vote. https://web.archive.org/web/20050203201306/http://www.acorn.org/index.php?Id=2703… To be continued

Page not found - InfluenceWatch influencewatch.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Before I continue, you need to read this. Parker Thayer and I were unwittingly researching the same exact top org. Tho his is more current and includes DAMNING INFO on the 2020 election. Sam Bankman-Fried’s mother was involved in this. This definitely sounds like no accident. I tried not to confuse you too much by including, “Everybody Votes”, but it’s pertinent to include this now. These are all the same organization: 🔸Voting for America/Project Vote 🔸Voter Registration Project (New name) 🔸Everybody Votes - an alternate name and used for website What I will be showing you next, is the practices of the past of Acorn and Obamas Project Vote/Voting For America. It’s important to see this, because the Voter Registration Project is the same org. And maybe I’ll add some additional evidence, I have tons more sources. I’ll also include my Brennan Center election thread near the end.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking 🧵! Parker Thayer of Capital Research releases a damning report on massive and illegal 2020 election practices. “Commissioned by Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and funded by the Democratic Party’s biggest donors, the Everybody Votes campaign used the guise of civic-minded charity to selectively register millions of “non-white” swing-state voters in the hopes of getting out the Democratic vote for a 2020 presidential win. It worked. The Voter Registration Project (VRP) leveraged connections with billionaire private foundations, Sam Bankman-Fried’s mother, and foreign billionaires with a history of breaking US election law to raise $190 million for the Everybody Votes campaign & register 5.1 million people. Using data from leaked copies of the campaign’s secret plans, as well as 2020 exit polls, researchers have discovered that the VRP’s 5.1 million new registrations provided Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden with somewhere between 1 million to 2.7 million votes across eight specially chosen swing states during the 2020 election.” (Everybody Votes is also the unused website name for the Voter Registration Project. Which was previously called Voting for America/Project Vote. The website was never kept up which kept the appearance of an org gone dead. But there’s current tax forms. Recall GBI Strategies under them which went defunct, & had no website, yet still operated. What’s still coming in my thread is how together, Acorn and Project Vote used the same corrupt targeting of democratic areas. This very well could be how Obama won.) “Democrats used truckloads of money from private fndns and public charities to give their donors enormous tax breaks & pad their electoral margins in 2020, even though charities and fndns are strictly forbidden by law to operate with the effect, much less the intent, of benefiting a political party. The investigation also proves that the cam- paign’s supposed concerns for the “civic partici-pation” of “underrepresented communities” were nothing more than a convenient lie. Unearthed drafts of the Everybody Votes campaigns original partisan schematics prove that it was designed to win elections first & worry about “civic participation” later. On Nov 24, 2015, John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, received an email from Stephanie Schriock, then-president of EMILY’s List, a powerful Democrat-affiliated political action committee (PAC). “Is this the registration pro- gram you were hoping for? Can I push it?” Schriock asked. The email contained the blueprints for a voter registration program dubbed the Everybody Votes campaign. The program proposed using $106 million in donations from “interested donors or [tax-exempt private] fndns” to fund voter registration drives in 8 states over 5 years (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia, and Nevada). The plan states, “The five-year program will register more than 6.3 million voters and gener- ate close to 2.2 million net new registered voters in the electorate across the eight targeted states from 2016 through 2020.” One of the groups was Everybody Votes, “a national organization that funds and trains a consortium of 50+ local community groups across the country that do the actual registration work.” Everybody Votes, a tax-exempt charity, also checks “on the back end” that every single registration is filled out properly and that registrants end up on state voter rolls. The memo also instructs Mind the Gap’s donors to keep Everybody Votes a complete SECRET. “In 2018,” Barbara Fried and her colleagues wrote, their Super PAC “managed to stay out of the news and as far as we know out of Republicans’ sight lines.” ♦️Odd that me and Parker were working on the same thing sorta. 😹 “Why was the whole thing kept top secret? Was this Everybody Votes campaign even legal? For years, these questions have gone un- asked and unanswered—until now.” https://capitalresearch.org/app/uploads/CRC-Voter-Registration-Report.pdf To be continued

Page not found -Capital Research Center America's Investigative Think Tank capitalresearch.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Here’s a few highlights on the Voter Registration Project/Everybody Votes from Influence Watch. 🔸The Voter Registration Project (VRP) and Voter Registration Project Election Fund (VRPEF) provided a combined $2.2 million in funding to the New Georgia Project, a left-wing voter registration and organizing nonprofit founded by failed Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams. 🔸 Lauren Groh-Wargo was Voter Registration Project’s treasurer until 2017, when she was hired by now-former Georgia State Rep. Stacey Abrams (D-Atlanta) to run Abrams’s Georgia gubernatorial campaign. After Abrams lost to Gov. Brian Kemp (R-GA), Groh-Wargo became CEO of Fair Fight Action, a left-of-center voter rights advocacy group founded by Abrams. 🔸 VRP Board member Isaiah Castilla is (still?) a managing director at Arabella Advisors, and has previously worked as the general counsel for the Democracy Fund. 🔸Steve Rosenthal of, “The Organizing Group”, (TOG) worked at VRP. (He and Tom Lindenfeld of LSG Strategies, created TOG. Recall Gary Bell of GBI Strategies worked at LSG Strategies.) ❗️Reminder this used to be called Voting for America/Project Vote where Obama was a director. https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/voter-registration-project/

Voter Registration Project - InfluenceWatch The Voter Registration Project, also knowns as Everybody Votes, is a voter mobilization group which targets African-American, Latino, Native American, low-income, and other voter groups likely to lean left-of-center. The organization claims to be non-partisan, but is run by individuals with long-standing connections to left-of-center non-profits, including the AFL-CIO labor union federation, George Soros’s Open […] influencewatch.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Are we seeing a repeat of past history? Is this what happened in 2020? Considering the Voter Registration Projects, not so shiny past, I think our congress needs to examine this more closely. Unless we want to lose 2024. Right now, we have a lone man traveling to country to register republicans. Meanwhile the democrats have massive coordinated troops on the ground. Democracy can’t survive like this, and it hasn’t been.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

❗️The Voter Registration Project is in the news for allegations of illegal use of, “non partisan”, tax exempt, charities for partisan election activities. As already proven by me: 🔹The Voter Registration Project (VRP) aka Everybody votes changed its name from Voting for America/Project Vote. Voting for America & Project vote both shared the same address obviously. 🔹Obama was a director at Project Vote. 🔹Project Vote was partnered with Acorn, and was its registration arm. Being as VRP was a part of Obama’s Acorn partnered, Project Vote, maybe this below info would explain what we are seeing now? In 1992, when Obama first became the Illinois dir of Acorn partnered Project Vote, his career would be forever changed by their methods. (See photo) https://archive.is/JdvDb Next we have an Acorn and Project Vote whistleblower doc from the house oversight. “I joined the staff of ACORN affiliate Project Vote's development dept. I worked for both ACORN & Project Vote. I worked with grassroots organizers across the country to fund one of the largest voter registration drives in US history.” At first she went to the NY Times, but the reporter told her that her boss said to stand down. What happened is the “non partisan”, Project Vote illegally contacted the Obama presidential campaign for his donor list. Then Project Vote solicited Obama donors to pay for voter registration efforts. Project Vote received donor lists from other Democratic & labor union sources: John Kerry campaign, Hillary Clinton campaign, Barack Obama campaign, DNC, America Coming Together (ACT). ACORN "employees" were paid through Project Vote for partisan campaign activities, such as telling voters “don’t vote for Albert Wynn (sic) or vote for this person”. Registration drives (by Project Vote) conducted in 'battleground states" where “by coming in and registering new voters, it could change the outcome of the election”. ACORN also had official & unofficial programs called “Muscle for the Money”. The official one they would spend money to push people to vote for specific candidates. Then report to the FEC the money was for sound and lighting etc. The unofficial Muscle for the Money program, Acorn would sell services to harass folks. For example, the SEIU paid Acorn to break up a banquet and protest at the home of The Carlyle Group founder. There’s tons more, visit the link to read the full report. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/20091201MonCrief.pdf In Oct 2003 Acorn prepared a campaign plan called "Floridians for All". In this campaign plan Acorn states as their objective to "defeat George W Bush and other Republicans by increasing Dem turnout in a close election. Part of the Acorn campaign plan was illegally carried out through Acorn's 501(c) (3) subsidiary org, Project Vote & an affiliated org, the SEIU. There’s 464 pages of additional evidence, have fun! https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/Attachment13.pdf After reviewing the entire Project Vote sites files, I noticed that it was filled with election lawfare. Which is similar to what we now observe. This report is called “The Politics of Voter Fraud”. “The claim that voter fraud threatens the integrity of american elections is itself a fraud. it is being used to persuade the public that deceitful & criminal voters are manipulating the electoral system. No available evidence suggests that voters are intentionally corrupting the electoral process, let alone in numbers that dilute and cancel out the lawful votes of the vast majority of americans.” “Registration fraud is typically punished less severely than fraud in voting and this is as it should be.” web.archive.org/web/2014072913… The Franklin County sheriff's office investigated complaints to the elections board from people who received voter ID cards based on info they never submitted or for people who don't exist. Others who never registered through the group and its partner, Project Vote, caught the problem when the board asked them to submit info missing from their forms. web.archive.org/web/2005042509…

Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversight.house.gov

Wayback MachineInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

A must read thread! I’ve also included additional info on the Brennan center advocating for the acceptance of, “matching errors”, on voter registration. The Brennan center is mixed up in all of this through the Soros Democracy Alliance. Along with partnerships thru various orgs such as the Advancement Project The Brennan Center was also involved with Zuckerbucks which sent money to predominantly Democrat areas. And also Zuckerbucks did, “get out the vote”, efforts in those areas too. Communication between the Brennan Center, the Advancement Project, and Acorn: “This memorandum explains why the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (“HAVA”), permits Pennsylvania to register applicants who provide their driver’s license numbers or the last four digits of their Social Security numbers on their voter registration applications but whose information does not “match” information in state motor vehicle or Social Security Administration databases. The Brennan Center believes that a matching failure should not be a barrier to inclusion on Pennsylvania’s or any other state’s voter rolls.” https://web.archive.org/web/20230813185130/https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/d/download_file_49738.pdf

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥 Thread 🧵 In my opinion, the Brennan Center did an exemplary job in fortifying the 2020 election. With generous help from Soros Open Society, Ford Fndn, Omidyar Democracy Fund (Partnered with Arabella/Soros Democracy Alliance), Rockefeller, Tides, Soros Fund Charitable Fndn and many thousands of other orgs! The Brennan Ctr estimated it would cost at least ➡️ $4 BILLION ⬅️ to “protect” all elections including primaries throughout 2020. Here’s what the Brennan Ctr proudly accomplished: ♦️ Constant communication with a coast-to-coast network of hundreds of election officials. ♦️ Pushed, “Covid-19 Should be a Legitimate ‘Excuse’ to Vote by Mail”. ♦️Pushed the purchasing and deployment of centralized vote tabulation machines (high-speed scanners). ♦️ Suggested localities deploy drop boxes to reduce their postage cost and increase security. ♦️ Partnered with the National Association of Secretaries of State. ♦️ Prioritized protecting the election by countering disinformation, misinformation, and attempts at further suppressing the vote under the pretext of a pandemic. ♦️ Provided solutions such as where to locate polling sites and how to configure and supply them. ♦️ Released tool kits for activists in all 50 states. In each tool kit, they identified the voting reforms needed in each state. ♦️Worked with local groups in Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Texas on state specific voter education and protection efforts. ♦️Worked alongside the Center for Tech and Civic Life and National Vote at Home, etc. (Zuckerbucks) ♦️ Conducted high-level media briefings and partnered with ABC. ♦️ Traveled to Georgia to help election officials conduct a recount of the presidential vote. ♦️ Helped to develop and implement Pennsylvania risk limiting audits. ♦️ Their attorneys filed or intervened in lawsuits in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Texas. To quote the Brennan Center on the 2020 election: “We are pleased to share with you this report on the truly extraordinary year that was. As we reflect on the Brennan Center’s accomplishments in 2020, we can say with great pride and relief that in the end, democracy prevailed against brazen assaults on our electoral processes, against lies intended to equate ballot access with stolen elections, and against naked attempts to delegitimize the votes and voices of Black and brown people.” Thread will include all evidence. Plus I will expand on CTCL with past threads. And who knows, there could be more.

Posted - February 4, 2024 at 2:34 PM

Saved - February 4, 2024 at 4:23 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Renowned expert Harri Hursti expressed concerns about the Georgia election system, stating that it lacks safeguards. Another expert, Halderman, highlighted worries about the QR code system, explaining that attackers could duplicate QR codes with no consequences. Additionally, there were last-minute software changes and missing names from a significant senate race, potentially opening the system to hackers. Hursti emphasized the importance of proper testing and avoiding rushed implementations. Raffensperger claimed that post-election audits would address QR code issues, but provided no evidence of these audits being conducted.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

PBS - Only 2 weeks before the 2020 election in Georgia, the renowned Harri Hursti admonished the Georgia election system: “It’s a complicated central system that doesn’t seem to have any safeguards.” If a trusted Democrat expert doesn’t feel safe about the Georgia system, how are we supposed to? Halderman said that the QR code system was worrisome. And that there was NOTHING to stop an attacker from duplicating a QR code. And the new one would count just the same as the original. And of course there was the issue where half of the names from a hugely impactful, senate race just up and disappeared from the screens. Prompting a last minute and untested change to the software. These last minute changes opened up the system to potential hackers. Harri Hursti: “You never want to rush something that is mission critical into production without proper time testing. It’s one of the ways bad actors are finding vulnerability exploits. And finding out if they can be weaponized, if they can be exploited.” As far as the QR code issue, Raffensperger said post election audits will catch any QR code funny business. The same audits that he provided zero evidence of them ever being done. Thank you @ChellyLongoria for sharing this with me!

Video Transcript AI Summary

Protecting the voting process in Georgia is crucial this election season. Independent experts are examining the state's new $107 million voting system, which includes a complex array of technology such as laptops, iPads, touch screens, and scanners. While Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger believes this system is more accurate than pen and paper, critics argue that paper records marked by voters are the ideal solution. The new machines faced issues during the June primary, including long download times, incorrect race displays, and power failures. Concerns have also been raised about the QR codes used for scanning votes and a last-minute software patch. Despite these concerns, the election will proceed with the ballot marking device system, and post-election audits will be conducted.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Protecting the voting process from outside interference is a high priority this election season. In his latest report, Miles O'Brien looks at some of the latest technology being used in Georgia and whether it provides a stronger defense against tampering than the traditional paper ballot. It's part of our ongoing leading edge series on science and innovation. Speaker 1: In Georgia, early voting turnout is high. The presidential race is a toss-up, and both senate seats are in play. So naturally, the political world is nervously watching what voters here will do, while in the world of computer science, they are tensely tracking what the voting machines will do. Speaker 2: George is kind of a petri dish. Speaker 1: Alex Halderman is a professor of computer science at the University of Michigan. Speaker 2: There's a lot more we have to learn about Georgia's election system, And that's going to help inform how to better secure elections, not just in Georgia in November, but across the country for years to come. Speaker 1: He's among a handful of independent election security experts getting unprecedented access to the inner workings of the state's $107,000,000 voting system rolled out earlier this year. Also taking a deep dive, election security white hat hacker, Hari Hirschi. Speaker 3: They have set set up a, a complicated system Which is centralized, doesn't seem to have any safeguards. Speaker 1: Georgia's vote tallying system is a complex assortment of laptops, iPads, magnetic cards, touch screens, printers, and scanners, lots of moving parts. Speaker 4: This is the poll pad. On election day, it is used to check-in voters. Speaker 1: Rick Barron is Fulton County's director of registration and elections. He gave me a demo. Speaker 4: It tells whether we've issued an absentee by mail ballot, whether Somebody's voted early, whether they've voted that absentee ballot or whether they they're still eligible to vote. Speaker 1: Once a voter is deemed eligible, the iPad activates a magnetic card, which in turn unlocks a so called ballot marking device or BMD. This is a, pretty complicated way to do something you could do with pen and paper. The there are advantages Speaker 4: Yes. The advantages are puts a true mark on the screen. Speaker 1: When done, the voter prints a ballot. Elections are recorded in human readable text and in a QR code, which is read and counted by an optical scanner. Georgia secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, says this is more accurate than pen and paper. Speaker 5: The problem with pen and paper is sometimes you have your Instructions on what you're supposed to do, but you end up with spoiled ballots. Sometimes people will put an x here, but then they'll circle this one here, or They'll make different marks on it. What did they really mean there? Speaker 1: Still, elections officials tell us they seldom see a hand marked ballot Where they can't determine voter intent. In 2019, Georgia bought the devices from a Canadian company called Dominion Voting Systems. They replaced paperless machines like these made by a now defunct company called Diebold Election Systems. A federal judge forced the state to scrap the discredited devices. Election security activist, Marilyn Marks, was part of the lawsuit that triggered the chain. But for her, ballot marking devices, now used widely in 14 states, Are not the ideal remedy. Speaker 6: We need paper records that are marked by the voter with the voters on hand where we know that was recorded the way that the voter wanted it recorded. Speaker 1: So she and the other plaintiffs took aim at the new voting machines. The lawsuit came into sharp focus after their chaotic debut in the June primary. The poll pads took as long as 30 hours to download the voter database displayed the wrong races and would randomly shut down. And the power hungry ballot marking devices blew circuit breakers in numerous locations. Poll workers, many of whom had no hands on training Because of the pandemic, we're often befuddled by the new technology. Speaker 4: We've learned a lot of lessons. We're putting technicians in every single polling place. We have to make sure that not only do the poll workers know how to use the equipment, but then these technicians are then gonna be relied upon to fix any issues. We wanna just Fly under the radar and do our jobs and, you know, stay away from the news. Speaker 1: But election security experts working for the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the state have uncovered several troubling issues. Alex Halderman looked closely at the QR codes where the votes are encoded for the scanner. Speaker 2: By analyzing the structure of the QR codes, I've been able to learn that, there's nothing that stops an attacker from just duplicating 1, And the duplicate would count the same as the original barcode. Speaker 1: And in late September, another concern came to light. During testing, election workers found half the names of the 21 candidates for senate intermittently disappeared from screens during the review phase. Dominion sent out a last minute software patch. Speaker 2: I'm worried that the Georgia system is the technical equivalent to the 7 37 max. They've just made a last minute software change that, might well have unintended consequences and cause even more severe problems on election day. Speaker 3: You never want to rush something which is mission critical, and this is mission into production without proper time testing. That's really one of the ways bad actors are finding the vulnerabilities exploit is looking for in honest vulnerabilities and finding out if they can be weaponized, if they can be exploited. Speaker 1: Despite all the concerns, federal judge Amy Totenberg decided to let the election proceed with the ballot marking device a system. The secretary of state says post election audits will bring any QR code discrepancies to light. Speaker 5: We're in the process of really, you know, Continue to expand the capabilities that we have so we can audit more of the races. When we do the audit, we actually do it on a human readable portion, not on the QR code. Speaker 1: Alex Halderman and his team at the University of Michigan conducted a mock election to see if voters are likely to catch mistakes on the printouts. Only 7% spotted a deliberately planted error. So double check your ballot before you scan.

Posted - February 1, 2024 at 2:26 PM

Saved - February 1, 2024 at 3:33 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Judge Kathleen McCormick, who ruled against Elon Musk, was involved with the Delaware Community Foundation, which created the Beau Biden Foundation for the Protection of Children. The foundation's board members include Hallie Biden, Hunter Biden, and Ashley Biden. Former FBI agent Louis Freeh, known as "One-Eye," was also on the board. Burisma made a $20,000 transfer to the Delaware Community Foundation. McCormick sat on the grant committee of the foundation. The foundation is linked to the Beau Biden Foundation.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

❗️Biden corruption gone wild! Judge Kathleen McCormick, that ruled against Elon Musks Tesla salary, was involved with the Bidens! Kathaleen was on the committee of the Delaware Community Foundation. This foundation just so happened to have created the Beau Biden Foundation for the Protection of Children in honor of Biden's life and work protecting youth. The Beau Biden Foundation’s board members include Hallie Biden, Hunter Biden and Ashley Biden. Joe Biden himself has promoted the charity. Previous FBI Louis Freeh, was also on the Beau Biden Foundation board. He was the FBI mole named “One-Eye” who tipped off Hunters Chinese business partners that they were under investigation. Also Burisma made a transfer on June 11, 2015 to “DELAWARE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, BEAU” for $20,000 Attention @elonmusk and thank you to @KanekoaTheGreat for stirring my memory with his wonderful post on Kathaleen McCormick. And PS, Delaware was Beau Biden country. He was the AG in the very Delaware office that Weiss is working out of. He knew everyone and many were also family friends. I’m certain there’s more to be found! Sources to follow!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Here’s the document on the Delaware Community Foundation that Kathaleen McCormick sat on a committee. They created the Beau Biden Foundation! I’ll show more details on the foundation relationships next since this doc doesn’t provide much more than names. https://web.archive.org/web/20211014205722/https://delcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/dcf-2020-annual-web-spread-1.pdf

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Further evidence The Delaware Community Foundation created the Beau Biden Foundation for the Protection of Children: “As The Kenny Family Foundation mourns the loss of Beau Biden, a supportive member of our community, please take a moment to acknowledge the Beau Biden Foundation for the Protection of Children, created by The Delaware Community Foundation in honor of Biden’s life and work protecting youth affected by domestic violence. In memory of our friend Beau Biden, The Kenny Family Foundation has made a donation to the Beau Biden Foundation for the Protection of Children.” https://archive.is/ly8kJ

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Judge Kathaleen McCormick, who ruled against Elon Musk, sat on a committee of the Delaware Community Foundation that Created the Beau Biden Foundation For The Protection of Children. . Here’s the Board Members including ex FBI Louis Freeh aka “One Eye”. https://archive.is/WFgvk

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now here’s the details on the Burisma $20,000 donation to the Delaware Community Foundation for “Beau”. Judge Kathaleen McCormick didn’t just sit on any committee at the Delaware Community Fndn, by the way. She sat on the GRANT committee. “The Delaware Community Foundation has only one fund that starts with the letters “BEAU” — the Beau Biden Foundation for the Protection of Children. “ Here’s the Burisma Ledger document: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zeyao9gossl3pih/436048670-Burisma-Holdings-Accounting-Ledger.pdf?dl=0 And here’s the link to the great article where I found this! https://archive.is/BS8DB

436048670-Burisma-Holdings-Accounting-Ledger.pdf Shared with Dropbox dropbox.com

Posted - January 25, 2024 at 2:05 AM

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 7:12 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Biden administration allowed the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to infiltrate Edwards Air Force Base, where the CCP's BYD company is located. BYD has ties to the CCP and the United Front Work Department. The project on the base involves BYD, LG Chem, and Samsung. BYD was previously a military battery producer under Norinco and was sanctioned for its ties to the CCP and slave labor in Xinjiang. BYD also has contracts with the People's Liberation Army.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🚨OMFG! The Biden admin allowed the Chinese Communist Party to infiltrate the Edwards Air Force Base! Folks we actually have the CCP physically located on an Air Force base! This base is home to the Air Force Test Center, Air Force Test Pilot School, and NASA's Armstrong Flight Research Center. To quote @BenTallmadge01 “BYD founder & CEO Wang Chuanfu is a member of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress & was selected into the United Front Work Dept - the overseas espionage & influence peddling arm of CCP.”

@BenTallmadge01 - Ben Tallmadge

Partners of the 4,600-acre project in Kern County incl. China's BYD, founded by a CCP & United Front official. Part of the project is located on the Edwards Air Force Base. 🚨🤬@TheLastRefuge2 https://www.energy-storage.news/edwards-sanborn-california-solar-storage-project-world-largest-bess-battery-system-fully-online/

California solar-plus-storage project with world's largest BESS fully online The Edwards & Sanborn solar-plus-storage project in California is now fully online, with 3,287MWh of battery storage capacity. energy-storage.news

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Here’s some interesting back history on BYD, formerly called Norinco.

@BenTallmadge01 - Ben Tallmadge

@pepesgrandma @Perich_Suzanne Wikipedia removed the guy's info after Ben 1.0 exposed that BYD was a military battery producer under Chinese defense firm Norinco. They renamed it BYD to evade US sanctions because Norinco was caught smuggling AK47s into the US.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

You know how I’m an evidence gal. Well, here you go, and these all need translated if you visit the links. The CCP part has been in his profile since 2019 to present. ♦️Current “Wang Chuanfu, male, Han nationality, born in February 1966, a native of Wuhu, Anhui Province, member of the Communist Party of China.” “ October 24, 2018, he was selected into the List of 100 Outstanding Private Entrepreneurs in the 40 Years of Reform and Opening-up by the United Front Work Department of the Central Committee and the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce.” https://archive.is/QSb82 ♦️2019 archive: “Wang Chuanfu, male, Han nationality, born in February 1966 in Wuhu, Anhui Province, a member of the Communist Party of China.” “On October 24, 2018, he was selected into the List of 100 Outstanding Private Entrepreneurs in the 40 Years of Reform and Opening-up by the United Front Work Department of the Central Committee and the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce.” Alt link because X don’t seem to like the dot org one https://archive.is/j9jL2 https://web.archive.org/web/20190601020727/https://baike.com/wiki/王传福/ ♦️2018 archive Wang Chuanfu He is a deputy to the Shenzhen Municipal People's Congress and a member of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. Alt Archive because X doesn’t seem to like the other one. https://archive.is/OCCQV https://web.archive.org/web/20180105021708/https://baike.com/wiki/王传福/

微百科_互动百科百科大全是互动百科的分类知识总库，通过树状与网状分类相结合的方法，将繁杂的百科知识进行梳理，以百科分类树和知识地图的形式展现，便于网友快速准确的查找所需知识。 web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now Ben does great work, but sometimes ya need an explainer. The project on the Edward’s base in conjunction with California is called the “Edwards & Sanborn solar-plus-storage project”. The providers are 🔸BYD (Wang Chuanfu of CCP) 🔸LG Chem 🔸Samsung https://archive.is/uFeig Here they mention the new solar project on Edward’s Airforce Base is part of the “Edwards Sanborn Solar Storage Project.” https://archive.is/e37ew

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

And here’s a Vice article on BYD from years ago. It talks about 5 Chinese orgs including BYD then says this: “The five organizations were led by the United Front Work Department of the CPC Central Committee and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.”

@BenTallmadge01 - Ben Tallmadge

BYD is led by China's overseas propaganda & influence peddling org United Front. It had been sanctioned by Trump for its CCP/military ties & slave labor in Xinjiang. https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjdqnb/trump-blacklisted-this-chinese-company-now-its-making-coronavirus-masks-for-us-hospitals

Trump Blacklisted This Chinese Company. Now It’s Making Coronavirus Masks for U.S. Hospitals. China’s BYD got special FDA approval to import respirators for medical use despite a history of problems in the U.S. vice.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

I think I’m pretty much done here, tho @BenTallmadge01 could go on all night. 😹

@BenTallmadge01 - Ben Tallmadge

@TheLastRefuge2 BYD also has large contracts with the People's Liberation Army and the Guangdong Municipal People's Government owns a significant stake in one BYD subsidiary. https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjdqnb/trump-blacklisted-this-chinese-company-now-its-making-coronavirus-masks-for-us-hospitals

Trump Blacklisted This Chinese Company. Now It’s Making Coronavirus Masks for U.S. Hospitals. China’s BYD got special FDA approval to import respirators for medical use despite a history of problems in the U.S. vice.com

Posted - January 14, 2024 at 7:01 PM

Saved - January 14, 2024 at 10:48 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

John Bambenek, a cybersecurity expert, worked for the FBI and played a role in uncovering evidence of Russian hacking. He is also known for his work as a vigilante hacker, using software tools to exploit vulnerabilities in digital networks. Bambenek's involvement in both hacking and law enforcement raises legal and ethical questions. The technology underlying daily life is flawed and vulnerable, making software flaws valuable to both hackers and defenders. The posts also mention connections between Bambenek, Crowdstrike, and the Qanon conspiracy. There are concerns about Twitter's handling of related threads and videos.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! A vigilante HACKER from Obama’s Illinois, that WORKED for the corrupt FBI who set Trump up, and went after “American Nazis”, was one of those that found evidence of Russian hacking along with their Crowdstrike buddies. Even better yet? This dudes website was linked to a post mortum Qanon circus after McAfees death. Trying to reel in conservatives with crazy conspiracy. Recall that Dmitri Alperovitch of Crowdstrike was VP of threat research at Mcafee LLC. Let’s begin “Bambenek wasn't wearing a GOP hat while conducting the conversation (with Guccifer 2.0). Instead, he was an executive at Fidelis, a Bethesda, MD, cybersecurity firm that, along with CrowdStrike, had quickly attributed the attack to Russia.” Let’s learn more about John Bambenek “But Bambenek is also a digital vigilante. Part of an exclusive but growing group of skilled coders who moonlight for the FBI.” So let’s get this straight, the dude who worked on the DNC hacking moonlit for the corrupt FBI that tried to frame Trump? And he writes software to hack folks. 👇🏻 “He’s helped the FBI dismantle two crime rings by writing software tools that take advantage of so-called “zero-days,” or unknown vulnerabilities in digital products that manufacturers have not fixed.” Lemme think of a headline here. HACKER that deploys vulnerabilities to hack digital networks works for the corrupt FBI that set Trump up, then finds evidence of Russian hacking. “Still, deploying vulnerabilities to hack digital networks, even those used by suspected criminals, raises serious legal questions.” Legal and ethical questions for the Russia hacking investigators? Oh really? 🤔 “The spyware syndicate operation, he admits, is “definitely a gray area ... . Yeah, I work for a security company, but nobody’s protecting Joe Sixpack, and you really can’t protect them. All you can do is just go after the criminals and change the dynamics, hopefully.” “Much of Bambenek’s work is possible because the technology that underpins most of daily life – the websites we all use, the apps on our smartphones, the software on our laptops, and industrial systems running critical infrastructure – is flawed. It’s rife with vulnerabilities. It has bugs and shoddy code. And in an age in which criminal hackers or intelligence operatives may be able to influence entire democracies by breaching and leaking sensitive emails, such as those in the Democratic National Committee’s mailbox, software flaws are increasingly valuable to both the people trying to break into digital networks and those trying to defend them.” Nothing to see here folks. And as always, all sources to follow. First photo - Illinois Republican that goes after “Nazis”, which is what we’ve been called since 2016. 😹 Actually even tracking them on Twitter. Second photo, yeah because republicans use the terms, “White Supremacists” and “hate groups” all the time. But hey, it’s his prerogative.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

When the crazy Mcafee $whacked Qanon 3 ring circus came about, I investigated and found a bit of overlooked code that linked to John Bambenek. Inside you will also find the post that references his Russiagate investigation along with Crowdstrike. Recall that Crowdstrikes Dmitri Alperovitch worked for Mcafee.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Thread: The Mcafee $whackd evidence, you decide You tell me why a man linked with the Guccifer 2.0 crowdstrike Russia investigation is linked to this http://Britbonglogpost.blogspot.com site. A site undergoing a crazy Qanon circus as I type. See my evidence and by all means, explain away.

$WHACKD - BRITBONGLOGPOST McAfee, $whackd, 0xCF8335727B776d190f9D15a54E6B9B9348439eEE britbonglogpost.blogspot.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

And here’s the raving article on John Bambenek in all its glory. Meet the guy that helped uncover the Russian hacking. A Vigilante hacker extraordinaire that works with the FBI in his spare time due to his uncanny artistic ability to hack networks. https://archive.is/PtyJ9 https://t.co/eBipG5K6gj

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now remember folks, I came across this dude totally by accident. I didn’t plan on this. https://t.co/E1tz49mcrh

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Now may I ask how and why Twitter 1.0 deleted a part of my $whacked thread?

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Twitter just immediately deleted one of my tweets in my Mcafee thread. https://t.co/4NaENe2aT6

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

But have no fear, Nina Jankowicz of the ministry for truth, has it all under control with Dmitri

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Coming soon! When you get your just reward for a job well done. Nina Jancowicz and Dmitri Alperovich of Crowdstrike appear together to discuss DNC and Twitter hacks. https://t.co/ivSfjXrFR1

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Oh double damn, when Twitter 1.0 inactivates a fricken Dmitri Aleperovich and Nina Jankowicz video. 😹 But here it is you buggars. https://t.co/0DMsVgONZx

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker expresses concern about the lack of action from the US government in deterring organizations that are trying to influence elections and obtain coronavirus vaccine information. They criticize the Trump administration for favoring Putin and disregarding the intelligence community. The second speaker explains that the Russian unit responsible for hacking the DNC is different from the one attempting to hack vaccine information. They believe that every country is likely trying to gather vaccine development information, and while there are other concerning actions by the Russians, this particular hack is not a top concern. The conversation ends with gratitude towards the speakers.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: From these sorts of exploits. Not only are they trying to, you know, deal with coronavirus, vaccine information, they're also, you know, still, trying to influence our elections, which are approaching ever more quickly. The US government has not done enough to deter these organizations, and the Trump administration instead has curried favor with Putin and trusted Putin's word over the word of its intelligence community. I think this is a dereliction of duty, and and certainly, I think we all need to be very worried for what's to come in November. Speaker 1: DEMITRI, you're obviously familiar with this particular Russian unit. You've had some dealings with them, so to speak, in the past. What is your sense of what they're trying to get at? Were they simply trying to look at the development of the vaccine? Were they trying to steal something? What do we know about that? Speaker 2: So this is actually one of the units that was responsible for the hack of the DNC, and it's not the most well known unit, the one that everyone thinks of, and the one that was Indicted by the Justice Department a few years ago was known as GRU, Russian military intelligence that not just, didn't just hack the emails, But also leaked them out publicly and provided them to WikiLeaks. This is a different unit that went into the DNC year prior. And, as far as we know, was not responsible for any leaking of information. It was probably engaged just in political espionage on campaigns. And it's, believed to be tied to SVR, Russian civilian intelligence agency that was sort of, the precursor, the successor to the KGB. And I'm a lot less concerned, to be honest with you, About this particular attempted hack, because the reality is every country in the world right now, every intelligence agency is probably tasked with getting information on vaccine developments. And, you know, I would certainly hope that the US intelligence community is doing the same thing Against Russia, China, and anyone else that's working on vaccines because it is in the interest of every country to develop a vaccine and solve this crisis as quickly as possible. We have thousands of people that are dying every day. So of all the things to be concerned about, and there are certainly plenty and the Russians are doing a lot of nefarious things that we should be confronting, this is, ranking very, very low on my list of concerns. Speaker 1: Alright, Dimitri Alperovitch and Nina Jankowicz. Thank you both very much for being here.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

I’m wrong, Twitter told me so.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Wait, don’t look, I’m lying you are not seeing what you think you are seeing. Dont ya think a bad kitteh suspension and deletion proves you are not seeing what the video says? https://t.co/VlNUiZ37HQ

Posted - January 3, 2024 at 7:56 PM

Saved - January 3, 2024 at 7:59 PM

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

I’m cross referencing this, the info speaks for itself. Off the top of my head you have here at Disinfo Portal: ♦️CTI League Folks ♦️CIA NED ♦️Integrity Initiative leaked orgs and members ♦️Alliance for Securing Democracy (Hamilton68) ♦️Ukraine Color Revolution org ♦️Serbian Otpor Org ♦️etc

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥Hot stuff! I’ve STRONGLY linked the CIA to US regime change and at the very least, disinfo work! Now here’s what I missed in the below linked Disinfo Portal thread: ♦️The CIA NED was partnered with the Atlantic Council Disinfo Portal: - NED International Forum for Democratic Studies ♦️The CIA’s Serbian regime change branch was physically partnered with the Atlantic Councils Disinfo portal! -Center for Euro-Atlantic Studies (CEAS) -CEAS is actually a MEMBER of the NED! https://archive.is/R5pLR Here’s the link that shows that CEAS was actively involved in Serbian regime change. https://archive.is/To2nO -Link to contract awarded to NED👇🏻 https://archive.is/lU9G5 ♦️ Ukraine Crisis Media Center (UCMC): The CIA’s NED FUNDED Ukraine Regime change tool (For the Orange Revolution) is actually partnered with the Disinfo Portal too. Ned funding: https://archive.is/FVJD5 Here’s info on UCMC and the Ukraine color revolution. https://archive.is/aiFWi And of course many CTI League folks were members of the Disinfo Portal too. Here’s a link to Disinfo Portal partners: https://web.archive.org/web/20190218145839/https://disinfoportal.org/partners/ And TONS of the other Disinfo Portal partnered orgs and members were in the Integrity Initiative and linked to the CIA. Read about this and tons more CIA links below. 👇🏻

Partners - Disinfo Portal web.archive.org

Posted - December 31, 2023 at 3:05 PM

Saved - December 31, 2023 at 3:38 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The DHS CISA partnered with Alliance4EU to create DemoCrisis, a new global organization. DemoCrisis aims to fight against the populist right, which they see as a global pandemic. Their mission is to support democratic activists, share experiences, and provide rapid support to countries facing democratic backsliding. They believe that nationalistic populism transcends borders and requires global cooperation to combat. The debut of DemoCrisis was hosted by the European Parliament.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 20 Bad Kitty Exposé The DHS CISA partnered, Alliance4EU, has now recently cofounded a new GLOBAL networked org called DemoCrisis. Their debut hosted by the European Parliament! An org for gathering up the few crumbs of the populist right leftovers, and destroying them. The DemoCrisis mission is fighting the populist right which they consider a pandemic and scourge upon the world. DemoCrisis: “Our mission is to foster cooperation among democratic activists, share experiences, and support one another in countries facing democratic backsliding or at risk. In a world where nationalistic populism transcends borders, our network seeks to provide global solutions and rapid support to democracy advocates worldwide.” “The platform is based on the premise that nationalistic populism is a global pandemic, travelling fast across borders; nationalistic leaders who succeed inspire others to follow suit. The solution must therefore cross borders, ensuring that best practices and even moral support travel fast among freedom fighters across the world. Just like climate change requires urgent cooperation at a global level, democratic backsliding is an urgent wake-call to act together. The DemoCrisis Action Network is connecting global solutions for a global problem.”

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥Bad Kitteh Exposé part 20. Dear right-wing populists, the DHS CISA partnered, Disarm Fndn, is coming for you! Poland, Hungary, and Israel, are the last bastion of right wing holdout countries. They are top on the list, but any country at risk of right-wing leadership is a DemoCrisis target! And what started this targeting? The election of Trump! See video #1 for evidence! In the last few parts, I exposed the rampant anti right sentiments of Disarm Fndn’s, Alliance4eu, and also their deep connections to billionaire philanthropy to accomplish their mission. Recall our DHS CISA etc is partnered with them to censor the right. Early fall, Alliance4EU cofounded a new org called DemoCrisis, and its debut was HOSTED by the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT! The idea is to destroy the last bastion of the right in primarily 3 countries but yet still have a global aim when needed. Say when a country elects, or attempts to elect, a right-wing leader. This is what is censoring us, and we were right all along, censorship was built to destroy the populist right. DemoCrisis mission statement: “Our mission is to foster cooperation among democratic activists, share experiences, and support one another in countries facing democratic backsliding or at risk. In a world where nationalistic POPULISM transcends borders, our network seeks to provide global solutions and rapid support to democracy advocates worldwide.” DemoCrisis on Omri Preiss of the DHS CISA Disarm Fndn partnered Alliance4eu: "All over the world we see similar patterns of the destruction of democracy. We have to fight for our freedom and democracy" says our board member and co-founder Omri Preiss CEO of Alliance4Europe” Jerusalem post: “In essence, the idea is to link the Israeli pro-Democracy/judicial overhaul protest movement with European groups sharing the same worldviews, especially in countries such as Poland and Hungary, ruled by NATIONALIST or POPULIST governments. The launching of DemoCrisis will start with a handmaid march by Israeli, Polish, Hungarian and other European women, outside the European Parliament building in Brussels.” “We are talking about a global plague which requires global action.” “The DemoCrisis conference will take place just four days before crucial elections in Poland, where voters will have to choose between four more years of a populist government and its long-standing opposition.” “Populist parties are usually well-organized and we have seen that they inspire each other by using similar strategies and tactics to undermine democratic institutions and human rights.” Omri Preiss: “As societies, we have a clear choice: let our democracies fall apart and be taken over by kleptocratic strong-men, and go extict as a species when we fail to act on climate change *or* innovate democracy to be inclusive and effective so we can build a successful sustainable future.” DemoCrisis: “All over the world we see similar patterns of the destruction of democracy. We have to fight for our freedom and democracy" says our board member and co-founder Omri Preiss CEO of Alliance4Europe.” Videos 1 - DemoCrisis and their associated founders, Alliance4EU, was sparked by the election of Donald Trump, whose populism spread thru the EU like a virus. Netanyahu was a symptom. Video 2 - The CEO of a pharmaceutical company welcomes DemoCrisis and is adamant they will win against the populist right. Likely because they have European Union activists at their beck and call. Video 3 - Omri Preiss, a key figure in the DHS CISA partnered Disarm Fndn, says they are at war, and calls us dictators. @elonmusk what more do you need? Our censors are out to destroy the populist right! All sources will follow below!

Video Transcript AI Summary

Poles, Hungarians, and other Europeans understand the struggle of living without the rule of law. It is crucial for us to unite and fight against this growing problem in other countries. Let's join forces and stand together.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Poles, Hungarians, and other Europeans know well what it means to be deprived of the rule of law. We need today to stand up together. This Phenomena, is unfortunately growing in other countries. And that's why we should Join our forces. Stand together.

Video Transcript AI Summary

A person talks about how they are amazed by the impact of social media in connecting people around the world. They mention the challenges and benefits of this global connection. They also discuss the importance of self-expression and freedom of speech. The speaker expresses gratitude for the opportunity to share their thoughts and experiences. They mention a significant event called "The Remarkable Event, Enlightenment Fritz Yog Metment to the Mockerfield." They conclude by thanking the audience for their attention.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: A lei. Ellen't the old, the your and rest the world, of the match and the quams, the help people, and the time from is are. I'm very muching volden That trollow is koleli in not canfin the throughs bothers is is all is ating is un po the world watching with and throughs can't therean and and and and and the metratic cras with of the therean to the metereing therean to the metere ed is people e cross of atletico and relage spanbris and the it it walls ex it e nei quali sono stati stati stati The move crices this now printga da prould the mockers in self size and of size and freeing fighter from your al suo test and brothers new york and it great homeing è presente di knighting of schrottle that must bewan and wall bewan quello di ping yourp a marikolation. I the for want on the lunching and the your pimp on the need to you to the and to pre you for the to last and my great trings ed è The The Romukable Event, Entenment Fritz Yog Metment to the Mockerfield. Thank you foressling and Washid Greed Fotion.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker highlights the importance of addressing the crisis in democracies around the world. They mention the rise of disinformation and attacks on those in power. They call for a united effort across Europe to defend democracy, both offline and online. The speaker invites people to join an event at the European Parliament on October 11th to make their voices heard.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The world might be on fire with climate change, with war and suffering, but we cannot put that fire out as long as our democracies are in crisis. All over the world and all over Europe, we've seen democracy under attack. A common, well coordinated, well funded dictator's playbook That rolls out and tears the fabric of our societies with hatred and lies. Whether it's in Poland, in Hungary, Israel or countless other countries, We see the same patterns of disinformation and attacks on those who hold power to account. We need to roll out a playbook for democracy To come together across Europe, across borders and the region, out on the streets and online, bringing together all parts of society. People and social movements have stood up for their rights, and we need to share that experience and know how. So come join us at the European Parliament the 11th October, and you'll be able to make your voice heard.

Posted - July 10, 2023 at 2:10 PM

Saved - December 30, 2023 at 6:46 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Title: Unveiling the Complex Web of Disinformation: Examining the Role of NGOs, Governments, and Social Media Introduction: In today's interconnected world, the spread of disinformation has become a pressing concern. This article aims to shed light on the intricate relationship between non-governmental organizations (NGOs), governments, and social media platforms in disseminating misleading information. By exploring various initiatives and collaborations, we will delve into the efforts made to counter disinformation while emphasizing the need for transparency in these operations. NGOs, Governments, and Social Media: A Nexus of Disinformation: The connection between NGOs, governments, and social media platforms in amplifying disinformation has raised significant concerns. To address this issue, the State Department GEC and Drog developed the AMITT framework, which serves as a valuable tool in countering disinformation. However, questions arise regarding the influence of entities such as Sofwerx, New Knowledge, Sara J Terp, and Jonathan Morgan in shaping public opinion. It is crucial to examine the extent of their involvement and advocate for greater transparency in their operations. Government Task Forces and Collaborative Efforts: Recognizing the urgent need to combat propaganda, advocates have called for the establishment of a government task force. This led to the creation of the Global Engagement Center (GEC), which aims to monitor and respond to disinformation effectively. Additionally, social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter formed the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT), enabling information sharing to combat terrorist content. These collaborative efforts demonstrate a collective commitment to address disinformation on various fronts. The Network of Disinformation: The disinformation network involves a wide range of organizations and collaborations. The World Economic Forum, Google, Hacks/Hackers, and the Credibility Coalition are among the entities engaged in countering disinformation. Furthermore, the World Health Organization's collaboration with the CTI League has been instrumental in controlling COVID-19 messaging, ensuring accurate information reaches the public. It is essential to understand the roles played by these organizations in shaping the narrative and countering the spread of disinformation. The Influence of Misinfocon: Misinfocon, funded by Craig Newmark and the Knight Foundation, has emerged as a significant player in shaping disinformation efforts. This organization has played a pivotal role in fostering discussions and initiatives aimed at combating the spread of misleading information. By examining Misinfocon's contributions, we gain valuable insights into the ongoing efforts to address disinformation challenges. Conclusion: As disinformation continues to pose a threat to public discourse, it is crucial to comprehend the intricate web connecting NGOs, governments, and social media platforms. The AMITT framework, government task forces, collaborative initiatives, and the involvement of various organizations highlight the collective commitment to counter disinformation. However, to ensure the effectiveness of these efforts, transparency in operations becomes paramount. By fostering open dialogue and promoting accountability, we can strive towards a more informed and resilient society in the face of disinformation challenges.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

1. More on my huge expose’: Essentially I found how NGO’s and gov work together on social media and OFF LINE too. I highly suggest you read the last doc in this tweet, it explains their methods. Earlier I introduced you to the word, “Amitt” (Adversarial Misinformation and Influence Tactics and Techniques). I found this thru the State Dept GEC partnered org called Drog. AMITT, is an information security-based framework for responding to disinfo. ➡️ How they do this is the interesting part. ⬅️ It’s very important to know this. 👇🏻 ♦️The Blue Team framework is how THEY RESPOND to disinformation.♦️ I found a GitHub page that led me to everything there is to know about how AMITT works. AMITT was later upgraded to the DISARM framework and used for Covid disinfo in coordination with Chris Krebs (CTI League). More on this later. And it’s also how I found Sara J Terp which led to a tweet and an article she was in. More on the article later. Tweet archive https://archive.is/0y56y Sara said there would be no more secrets, so I took her up on this. Thank you Sara! Also listed under her tweet was a very interesting article that led me to finding additional history on Amitt. I was also introduced to Sofwerx and her work pals. This is coming up next and very interesting! “2017-2018: SJ Terp starts working on adapting information security tools, processes, and procedures for disinformation use. She links up with JJ Snow, Pablo Breuer, the usual collection of infosec geeks, and the SOFWERX team to work on characterising and countering hybrid incidents (cybersecurity plus disinformation, noting that information operations have always included this).” GitHub link - there’s all kinds of links and goodies. https://github.com/DISARMFoundation/DISARMframeworks/ Archive of page: https://archive.is/BocFC Next we will review AMITT a tiny bit further using a document that describes how Blue Team responds to each incident. You really need to read the Blue Team counters. This is an entire doc of responses. Here’s one example of counters for rallies and protests. 🔹Doxing (Name and Shame) 🔹Cut off Banking Access 🔹Infiltrate Groups 🔹Etc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kc0O7owFyGiYs8N8wSq17gRUPEDQsD5lLUL_3KGCgRE Doc Archive https://archive.is/YKzBr 🔸List your favorite counters in a reply! I’ll review AMITT/DISARM more a bit later. This was just to acquaint you. Make certain to read the intro first.

GitHub - DISARMFoundation/DISARMframeworks: Master copies of the DISARM frameworks, with generated files to help you explore the data Master copies of the DISARM frameworks, with generated files to help you explore the data - GitHub - DISARMFoundation/DISARMframeworks: Master copies of the DISARM frameworks, with generated files to help you explore the data github.com

Page Not Found Web word processing, presentations and spreadsheets docs.google.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥 Thread 🧵How I found the info for my newest expose’: I have found that the State Dept GEC actually is partnered with Drog, the creator of Harmony Square. Drog has multiple connections to the global disinfo apparatus. Although I have no idea if Drog did anything else besides Harmony Square with the State Dept, this led to huge discoveries. I have 2 terms you need you to acquaint yourselves with because they will be coming up a lot later: ♦️Cogsec Collaborative ♦️AMITT framework The Drog Forensics Journalism project used the AMITT framework. An artificial intelligence platform used for global disinfo work. This led me to discover AMITT which enabled my massive discoveries. As per the actual State Dept, Adtac is a project of Drog. And Adact was also working in partnership with the CogSec Collaborative. My second huge lead. Interestingly, the state dept deleted the linked Disinfo Cloud page on Adtac. I’m curious what was on it? No archives exist.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

In this below thread, you have the first days of Sofwerx working with Sara Terp, Pablo Breuer, Marc Rogers etc on what will become the Amitt framework. It was an invitation event. I also added what Sofwerx is, and how it came about. It’s Special Operations Cyber Command working with non government orgs (NGO). But it seems to me that they are incubating the NGO’s tho they say they don’t do this.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

2. What led me to the Dept of Defense Sofwerx international disinfo work with non military folks? Most specifically thanks to an ex UK Ministry for Defense person in the US who was also the prev CTO of the UN's big data team: “ONE DAY IN early June 2018, on the anniversary of D day (June 6) Sara-Jayne Terp, a British data scientist, flew from her home in Oregon to Tampa, Florida, to take part in an exercise that the US military was hosting (Sofwerx in FL). Terp: “I think they instantly classified the report.” But she wound up at dinner with Pablo Breuer—the Navy commander who had invited her—and Marc Rogers, a cybersecurity expert (Now working with the WH). “The trio left Tampa convinced there had to be a way of analyzing misinformation campaigns so researchers could understand how they worked and counter them. Not long after, Terp helped pull together an international group of security experts, academics, journalists, and government researchers to work on what she called misinfosec.” “So when Breuer invited Terp back to Tampa to hash out their idea six months later, she decided not to fly. On the last day of 2018, she packed up her red Hyundai for a few weeks on the road. She stopped by a New Year's Eve party in Portland to say goodbye to friends. Thus began an odyssey that started with a 3,000-mile drive to Tampa but didn't stop there. Terp spent almost nine months on the road—roving from Indianapolis to San Francisco to Atlanta to Seattle—developing a playbook for tackling misinformation and promoting it to colleagues in 47 states.” “In Tampa, Terp and Breuer swiftly got down to plotting their defense against misinfo. The misinfosec group eventually developed a structure for cataloging misinformation techniques, based on the ATT&CK Framework. In keeping with their field's tolerance for acronyms, they called it AMITT (Adversarial Misinformation and Influence Tactics and Techniques). Last October (2019?), the team integrated AMITT into an international, open source threat-sharing platform. That meant anyone, anywhere, could add a misinformation campaign and, with a few clicks, specify which tactics, techniques, and procedures were at play. Terp and Breuer adopted the term “cognitive security” to describe the work of preventing malefactors from hacking people's beliefs—work they hope the world's cybersecurity teams and threat researchers will take on. “People on the receiving end (of disinfo) usually don't see the big picture. They just see 5G trending or a friend's Pizzagate posts. Or, as 2020 got off the ground, links to sensational videos about a new virus coming out of China.” https://archive.is/eHnsy Dr. Pablo Breuer is a non-resident senior fellow of the Atlantic Council's GeoTech Center and twenty-two-year veteran of the U.S. Navy with tours including military director of U.S. Special Operations Command Donovan Group and senior military advisor and innovation officer to SOFWERX, the National Security Agency, and U.S. Cyber Command as well as being the Director of C4 at U.S. Naval Forces Central Command. https://archive.is/sTpSH SJ Terp works on disinfo mechanisms and counters. She was CTO of the UN’s big data team, designed machine learning algorithms and unmanned vehicle systems at the UK Ministry of Defence, and taught data science at Columbia University. She holds degrees in AI and neural networks. She runs Bodacea Light Industries, is a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council, and chairs the Cognitive Security CoLab. (Plus sooo much more! I’ll follow this up.) https://archive.is/SKbnP Marc Rogers is a UK citizen based in the San Francisco Bay Area. He has been hacking since the 80’s. Most recently Mr. Rogers helped found the CTI League, a multinational cybersecurity initiative combining industry professionals, government agencies and law enforcement from 80 different countries. https://archive.is/2MLAp Link for Marc’s WH announcement photo https://www.linkedin.com/posts/marcrogers_readout-of-office-of-the-national-cyber-director-activity-7024215758415044608-qgJF?trk=public_profile_like_view

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 3 covers the details on the building of the AMITT disinfo framework by Sara Terp and crew. Renee Diresta helped. Also inside I found a doc that showed Sara Terp as an actual employee of Sofwerx. And she worked on the disinformation rating system for the Global Disinformation Index. Recall that Sofwerx was created under a Partnership Intermediary Agreement, established in September of 2015, between DEFENSEWERX and the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). Does this make her a US gov employee? I don’t know, does anyone here know?

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

3. Sara Terp builds the AMITT Disinfo Framework with help from Renee Diresta of New Knowledge & Stanford plus others. The Misinfosec Working Group (“misinfosecWG”) is part of the Credibility Coalition (CredCo). This was used by Sara Terp to incubate the AMITT disinfo framework. She and Christopher Walker started the CredCo misinfosec working group in Dec 2018, and officially launched it in Jan 2019. “MisinfosecWG has come a long way since Pablo of Sofwerx and I talked in 2018 about creating standards for misinfosec” (Interesting note here - The DC workshop was held in the Atlantic Council’s meeting space) https://archive.is/5HJUa Prior to the Atlanta meeting, in March, 2019 they started working on AMITT. May 24, 2019 the credibility coalition (credCo) misinfosec working group met for a session in Atlanta at the Carter center. Those present to work on AMITT were Sara-Jayne Terp, Christopher Walker, John Gray, Courtney Crooks, Chau Tong and ➡️ Renee DiResta ⬅️ There they revisited their collection of existing models (Mitre ATT&CK model, marketing funnels, psyops, DOJ model), and models from Renée diResta, Ben Decker, Clint Watts and Bruce Schneier. Also utilizing Ben Nimmo’s 5 D’s. By the end of their working session at CredConX at the Carter Center in Atlanta on May 24, they successfully created AMITT. As Rand Waltzman and Renee DiResta have noted, “Disinformation is a not a problem that can be solved. It’s like a chronic disease that can be managed — not cured- allowing the afflicted to lead a moderately normal life.” https://archive.is/vQKRO AUGUST 29, 2019 Austin, Texas-based New Knowledge raises $11 million for cybersecurity to combat disinfo and fake news https://archive.is/D7z5D Also note that on Dec 4 2018, SOFWERX, in collaboration with USSOCOM/J5 Donovan Group, hosted a Radical Speaker Series covering weaponized information. Sara Terp and David Perlman were there. David Perlman was a Twitter employee and worked with Sara Terp and Rand Waltzman too. I’ll show this in a bit. https://archive.is/fKll2

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 4 covers the DISARM foundation. This was established some time after the Disarm framework (previously called AMITT) was put into use. DISARM is an upgrade. It’s also been formally taken up by the US government now in the last few weeks. Although it was part of CTI League that Chris Krebs used for Covid. Next we move on to CTI League.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 4 - Bad Kitteh Expose’, when you think it can’t get worse, it does. The Disarm foundation - The disinfo Framework was put into use long before the foundation was created. Disarm, was previously called AMITT and was first used for the CTI league Covid disinfo program. First trialed by the EU and picked up by the US. The Executive Dir, Jon Brewer, was prev Dir of Development at the Global Cyber Alliance UK July 2018 to June 2021. You know that other expose’ I recently released? The GCA is a WEF product. Before this he worked at its sister WEF org, Salesforce. (Hyphen8 is a Salesforce consultancy.) SalesForce just so happened to work with the Post Office iCop AI spying program called Zignal. With 1400 Intelligence professionals. And coincidentally, Rand Waltzman is at Zignal. Rand is good friends with Sara Terp and worked with her. (Coming up) https://uk.linkedin.com/in/jpnbrewer?original_referer= Notice the Alliance4EU being a partner? I’ve written about them before. Omri Preiss, a Disarm Vice chair, is Managing Director of Alliance4Eu. Their staff was involved in the Netwar System and Social Media Intelligence Unit. And those folks are involved in a lot here too. We’ll come back to this. Partners and staff link https://archive.is/bWddt ♦️SJ Terp and Pablo Breuer, led the initial 2019 AMITT creation and remain the joint design authority of Disarm. ♦️Craig Newman funded this just like the Global Cyber Alliance ♦️The AMITT (DISARM) disinfo framework has been used in practice across the UN, WHO, EU, NATO and various country teams. https://archive.is/GRvW6 🚨This just happened, the DISARM Framework was just formally adopted by the EU and the US governments. Talk about timing. Is the US trying to sneak in disinfo programs? Why now?🚨 https://archive.is/eUUWk Coming up next is CTI League which runs on the Disarm Framework. Later I may possibly also post more DISARM information here.

Jon Brewer - DISARM Foundation | LinkedIn Addressing big challenges - countering disinformation, getting cyber secure, achieving net zero - all require effective collaboration and partnership. As a strategist and connector, I reach out to engage and help remove walls around strategic priorities, and operationalise relationships to deliver intended outcomes and impact.

Functionally, my skills and experience range across: corporate and product strategy; to partner sales and marketing; and operationalising both the outreach and fulfilment - making the right connections for the right reasons and then delivering the end results. Specifically, these include:

Partnership and direct/indirect channel development
Sales, relationship and account management
Funding and sustainability
Strategy reviews and policy setting
Sales and marketing operations management
Business change programmes, including systems/process implementation
Research, analysis and business case development
Marketing communications and content management
Team leadership and external consulting
New product development and product marketing

Sectors:
Global risks - cybersecurity/disinformation
B2B technology - mid-market/enterprise; SaaS; data centres; telecoms
Social enterprise, not-for-profit and public sectors | Learn more about Jon Brewer's work experience, education, connections & more by visiting their profile on LinkedIn uk.linkedin.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 5 exposes Chris Krebs for working with CTI League which handles disinformation by swarming hashtags, using online and offline influencers, using volunteer ELVES and tons more! Yes, people on social media are being affected by gov coordinated influence operations. I have a ton more on this for another day. Next I think we’ll discuss just what elves are. And where this term originated from.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Part 5 - Bad Kitteh Expose’ Busts Chris Krebs! CTI League - This used the Disarm disinfo framework for Covid Chris Krebs worked with CTI League for Covid which included a disinformation team. Here’s the Chris Krebs tweet linkie where he said CISA partnered with them. 👇🏻 https://archive.is/6byvE March 2020 CTI League report: “The CTI League neutralizes any threat in the cyber domain regarding the current pandemic, including disinformation. The mission of this effort is to find, analyze, and coordinate responses to the current pandemic disinformation incidents as they happen, and where our specialist skills and connections are most useful. Disinformation is a new workstream within the league. Formed Wednesday 8th April, it has already hit the ground and is tracking several major disinfo campaigns.” Some examples of what it was used for? 🔹WeWontStayHome protests 🔹Covid 5G misinfo 🔹 Texas Freedom Force rally’s 🔹Operation Gridlock rally’s https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://cti-league.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CTI-League-Inaugural-Report-March-2020.pdf CTI League Management Team: Ohad Zaidenberg Nate Warfield (Microsoft) Chris Mills (Microsoft) Marc Rogers https://archive.is/KN7pI And of course, Terp had to be involved. 😏 Rogers had helped organize an international group of volunteer researchers. He had been seeing a flood of misinformation like the video Breuer analyzed, and Rogers wanted to know if Terp would run a team that would track campaigns exploiting Covid. She signed on. https://archive.is/eHnsy Ohad Zaidenberg, is also a lead cyber intelligence researcher at Israeli Clearsky Cyber Security. CTI League’s ranks of volunteers has skyrocketed with more than 1,400 vetted members in 76 countries spanning 45 different sectors, including cybersecurity, healthcare, technology, telecommunications, computer emergency response teams (CERTs), government, and law enforcement. These stats increased a lot over time, for this invite only org. Chris Krebs: “CISA is working around the clock with our public and private sector partners to combat this threat. This includes longstanding partnerships, as well as new ones that have formed as a direct result of COVID-19, including the COVID-19 Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTI League).” https://archive.is/7Ic6a Here Ohad Zaidenberg gives examples of trolling Social Media to fight “disinfo”. “Post large volumes of unrelated content on known misinformation hashtags (as the LGBT community did to the proud boys).” Read more of this thread at the link. CTI League Darknet Report 2021: “CTIL Dark has assessed during our research that disinformation, misinformation, and conspiracy theories of COVID is one of the biggest threats to the general public’s health and safety.” “Niacin, was observed to be referenced and promoted highly by the conspiracy theory group QAnon and later promoted by the same community on Twitter.” https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://cti-league.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CTI-League-Darknet-Report-2021.pdf CogSecCollab maintains and updates. We've used DISARM in the CTI League's Covid19 responses, and tested it in trials with NATO, the EU, and several other countries' disinformation units. https://archive.is/8moaV CTI League is run by three group coordinators from the UK, US, and Israel. Private sector companies like Microsoft and Amazon are in the mix. https://archive.is/ybQqW Potential responders include the whole of society, including the infosec bodies already linked by the ISAOs and cyber Interpols. That’s platforms, law enforcement, government, ➡️ELVES⬅️(volunteer groups), the public, ➡️ONLINE and OFFLINE INFLUENCERS⬅️, media, nonprofits, educators and corporations. CogSecCollab has built theory and examples for effects-based, tactic-based and doctrine-based countermeasures. The CTI League team is using effects-based counters: reporting to law enforcement, platforms, and registrars, with CogSecCollab helping to connect the RealityTeam COUNTER-NARRATIVES group back to the CTI League. https://archive.is/zpWLS We’ll be hearing more on CTI League later.

Wayback MachineInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 6 is on Elves and influencers (trolls and disinfo researchers) used in the disinfo/misinfo racket. Volunteers that help silence “disinfo” both online and offline. They even coordinate with the news. This will also cover their use in the AMITT/DISARM disinfo framework. This is used by the US, UN, EU, NATO, and tons of other foreign governments. The USA just officially partnered with the DISARM foundation tho they worked with them for the CTI League Covid program.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 6 - Bad Kitteh expose’. You don’t want to miss this thread! Globally ran disinfo Elves and influencers used for internet trolling, internet account reporting, disinfo research, and even media collaboration! Also accused of spreading disinfo themselves. This is very likely how our disinfo researchers and censorship came about too. We will cover this in multiple tweets: ♦️History of Elves and influencers. ♦️What are some of the orgs that use Elves and influencers? ♦️I will share modern discussions of Elves and influencers by orgs. ♦️How do Elves and influencers fit in with the Amitt/Disarm framework? — The History of Elves and influencers — The first Elves are often referred to as the Baltic Elves, Lithuanian Elves, and the Latvian Elves. Their first use was claimed to be in 2014. The earliest Elve activity: The Baltic elves – They became active in 2015 after the Maidan Square events in the Ukraine. Volunteers monitored the internet for Russian disinfo and responded. https://archive.is/ObNQK This here is a Zinc Network aka Integrity Initiative doc on Elve use. Interesting huh? 🤔 (Photo) “Zinc Network’s currently implementing the FCO's flagship £9m EXPOSE project to counter and build resilience to disinformation by working with 40+ media outlets in Europe and the Baltics (e.g. Latvian Elves, Demaskuok and Propastop).” https://archive.is/oOOKI And the Elves are mentioned in this Expose Network report quite a lot. The Expose Network is the Zinc Network aka Integrity Initiative. Here the Elves are accused of spreading disinfo themselves. 😏 (Photo) “The Lithuanian Elves (also known as the Baltic Elves) have been extremely successful at exposing Russian media manipulations, but have been accused of fomenting anti-Russian prejudice and spreading falsehoods themselves. Their credibility inevitably suffers from the fact that they are volunteers, not trained journalists.” https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://mronline.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/untitled-pdf-document.pdf They (Lithuanian Elves) got their name, says their founder Ricardas Savukynas, “because elves fight trolls.” Working alone, and meeting only in the virtual space of Facebook groups, they jump into action whenever one member identifies a piece of fake news or a number of fake accounts that seem to be the clear product of Russian troll farms. By reporting the disinformation en masse to the platform they eventually generate enough complaints to have it removed by Facebook. https://archive.is/HiECB But Elves aren’t just used on Social Media, they are used for the news too! This article shows how the Lithuanian Elves fit into operations at countering disinfo. Their work thru the Mainstream Media reaches 90% of their countries population! (Photo) (Debunk dot eu has tuned its algorithm and partnerships towards the presidential elections in Lithuania. 200,000 articles per day were reviewed and they use speech-to-text technology to analyse TV programmes and video on demand.) https://archive.is/uZr3D In an age of internet trolls, Latvia has the perfect response: an army of “elves” to take them on. The project takes its lead from an existing initiative in Lithuania, which has already attracted several thousand “elves”. https://archive.is/TBSVo Here’s a 2022 article on Elves used in the Ukraine war. “Cyber elves from all over Europe are supporting their comrades in Ukraine by fighting the Russian narrative. The cyber elves are groups of anonymous cyber activists established in 2014 to fight against pro-Kremlin trolls and Russian disinfo and cyber operations.” Paywall but you can see plenty: https://visegradinsight.eu/cyber-elves-helping-their-comrades-in-ukraine/ Here’s a few suggestions from a cofounder of CTI League showing 3 of the 5 D’s used by AMITT/DISARM (Photo) “Deny: Challenge misinfo creators to prove they're not an information operation.” “Disrupt: Post large volumes of unrelated content on known misinfo hashtags (as the LGBT community did to proudboys).” “Degrade: Promote healthy narratives, Make more noise than disinformation”

Wayback MachineInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

Cyber Elves Helping Their Comrades in Ukraine In the Czech Republic, the cyber elves are monitoring the main narratives surrounding the conflict in Ukraine in the central European information space. visegradinsight.eu

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 7 Although Reality Team technically should be under the Elves and Influencer section, it’s too significant to bury. We are talking about government partnering with social media influence operation runners.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🚨🚨 Part 7 Bad Kitteh expose’ Reality Team, a part of the DHS CISA partnered CTI League. Artificially pumping out stuff on social media to bury, “disinfo”. Wouldn’t this be considered another form of censorship? Recall how I showed CTI League suggested hijacking hashtags, and challenging social media users etc. (See link in 1st tweet of part 6.) CTI League uses the Disarm Disinfo framework first used for Covid “disinfo”. Reality Team: “We have focused campaigns on combating election and vaccine disinformation, and are now embarking on an effort to combat climate disinformation.” Reality Team Partners: ♦️CTI League ⬅️ ♦️Hacks/hackers ♦️Credibility coalition ♦️CogSec collaborative ♦️USC Annenberg ♦️The Propwatch Project (We will be reviewing the other orgs later.) This is funded by Craig Newmark Philanthropies. Reality Team is a project of Hacks/Hackers a 501(c)(3), which was founded to catalyze collaboration between journalists (Hacks) and technologists (Hackers). They were founded Aug 2020, only months before the election. https://archive.is/9uWZz Sara J Terp is on the board of Reality Team along with being involved in a massive disinfo censorship network. Recall she worked with US Special Ops Command Sofwerx. Including working with the EU, WHO, NATO and the UN. https://archive.is/zjgjL Here’s Sara Terp at a State Dept GEC meeting discussing Reality Team. “This is the AMITT (DISARM) Blue framework: it contains 160 countermoves to the campaign and incident techniques that we analysed with AMITT Red. We used information operations frameworks to create this, specifically the classifications Deny, Disrupt:, Degrade, Deceive:, Destroy, and Deter - for each tactic stage and Red technique. We’ve partnered with counter-disinformation groups like RealityTeam who use targeted counter messaging and metrics to push away disinfo narratives.” https://archive.is/rVH99 The CTI League team is using effects-based counters: reporting to law enforcement, platforms, and registrars, with CogSecCollab helping to connect the RealityTeam counter-narratives group back to the CTI League. https://archive.is/zpWLS In the included video from Sept 20, 2020, Deb Lavoy, the founder of Reality Team, discusses how they are short on time till the 2020 election. The objective? To artificially drown out disinfo. They were involved in countering anti Covid masking too.

Video Transcript AI Summary

With the next election approaching in 116 days, the speaker emphasizes the need to simplify and address the impact of disinformation. They identify three categories of people affected: the reality team, who can distinguish truth from fiction; the indoctrinated, who believe lies and conspiracy theories; and the confused, who lack trust in any information source. The speaker focuses on helping the confused by making reliable information more visible, simple, and memorable. They introduce the "reality team" and their three initiatives: explainers, talking points, and the network. They seek assistance in research, writing, social media management, design, networking, and funding. The goal is to provide competition to disinformation and promote a balanced understanding of the world. Contact information is provided for those interested in getting involved.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: But the clock started ticking down faster and faster and faster. It's a 116 days as of today to the next election. And we're at a point where it's now or never. So the only thing left to do is to simplify. And so This was my approach to simplification. I have all kinds of windows that are in the way of what I'm trying to say here. Disinformation in and of itself is Something to study, but, really, what I wanted to look at is who is it affecting? It's affecting roughly 3 categories of people. The reality team, these are people a lot like you and me. We can usually tell truth from fiction. Nobody can tell always. The indoctrinated, these are the people who, you know, the lies and conspiracy theories are affecting them, they believe, pretty much anything Fox News says. And then there's a third category of the confused. These are people, I think about my son who's in college now. They're not focused on the news, and they don't really trust any source of information anymore. Oops. So the reality team, we don't really have to worry about them. The indoctrinated, that's not a 120 day problem. That's a longer term problem. I can't help them. So let's focus on the confused. So why is disinformation so impactful on the confused? And it's because the information space looks like this. The disinformation is, presents itself in really bold, really simplistic terms. It's incredibly pervasive. It's everywhere. It's unavoidable. It's very, very repetitive. It sticks in your mind. Whereas the more reliable information, requires more engagement. You need to read it more carefully. It's not always presented in such simple terms. They're not using the tools of rhetoric and marketing to push information in the same as successfully as disinformation. So our job is, in this very brief window of time, not to end disinformation or disrupt Disinformation, although that would be nice, but to compete with it. So the job is to make real information as visible, simple and memorable as the fake stuff. And then the confused will have, a much more balanced understanding of what's going on in the world. They will have opportunities to turn to sources that resonate more with their general sense that, you know, things should be reality based, things should make sense. So, I got together with some, friends, and we have formed what we're calling the reality team. And what we're doing is 3 things, explainers, talking points, and the network. Explainers Take, issues 1 at a time, issues that should perhaps be simple, but have been complicated by disinformation. Should I wear a mask? We give them the bottom line up front. So within 3 seconds, piece people should have the key points. We get into the q and a of it, the common questions we're seeing out in the world and answering them in very plain language. And at the end, we show our work. So we show that the work is valid and reliable by showing the all the references and places that we have, retrieved this information from. Then we build talking points. Masks Do work, and master patriotic. Masks are something you can do for your country right now. So we take these talking points and we refine them as we see how people are responding to and we push them out into the network. We are ramping up to try to get to publishing 3 topics per week and as much, exposure as we can possibly get on these things. And this is reliant on, the network that we are building. The network is building rapidly, but we have to accelerate it as much as possible to make it work. So we need some help. So if you're sitting around wondering what you can do, in this next 3 month period, maybe maybe you could help us out. We need people to do the research. We need writers. We need social media managers to help, manage the various channels. Some better designers would be great, actually professional designers. We need people who are great at networking, and we are also, looking for funding so that we can use not just organic growth, but also, the engines of amplifications on the platforms. So if you are so inclined, You can, follow us on Twitter or, Instagram at reality team eleven. You can contact me at deb@realityteamdot org. And, with any luck, we can give disinformation some competition in the next, important time frame. And thank you very, very much.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 8 delves into the connections between these people and the CIA linked Integrity Initiative. Both Sara Terp, and Pablo Breuer who were at the Atlantic Council Disinfo Portal with all those Integrity Initiative folks and orgs, were Atlantic Council themselves. (Evidence inside the thred.) These folks worked in unison with the US Defense Dept’s Sofwerx etc in developing the AMITT/DISARM disinfo framework currently adopted by our DHS. Pay attention people, because you are going to eventually be aquatinted with the end result Isn’t it also awfully coincidental that a “past” Ministry For Defense woman, involved in the earliest days of disinfo work, hung out with much of the Integrity Initiative at the Disinfo Portal? Recall the Ministry for defense payed the Institute For Statecraft Integrity Initiative. At least 3 of this crew have been linked to Disinfo Portal: 🔹Sara Jayne Terp 🔹Pablo Breuer 🔹Christopher Walker

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥 Regime change in the USA linked to & funded by the CIA NED thru the Integrity Initiative, Atlantic Council, & also includes Soros & NATO funding. Watch out for flying CIA, I’ll use this 🎯to mark it in my thred. Remember, the CIA NED ran the orange revolution in the Ukraine. ⚡️Let’s begin with the actual Integrity Initiative partners from their website archives: ♦️The Beacon Project ♦️ Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis (VIPA) ♦️Kremlin Watch ♦️Institute For Statecraft ♦️European Values ♦️Center For European Policy Analysis (CEPA) ♦️CIDOB ♦️Political Capital ♦️Public Opinion Research Unit ♦️Res - Public Affairs Corporate Affairs ♦️Stopfake Partner link: https://archive.is/qX7fm Stopfake link: https://archive.is/OwwEP Integrity Initiative partners via leaks (see photo): ♦️Atlantic Council DFRLAB ♦️Bellingcat ♦️EUVdisinfo (East Stratcom) ♦️Buzzfeed ♦️ Irex ♦️ Detector Media ♦️Lithuania Mod Stratcom ———————————- The Integ Init partner, the Beacon Project: “is only possible though the funding of the NED (CIA 🎯) and support of the International Republican Institute.” https://archive.is/0Qw0A Rep Mike Rogers was on the steering committee for the Beacon Project. https://archive.is/B3QR6 ———————————— Next we have the Vilnius Institute. Partners of the 🎯CIA Ned Funded Beacon Protect: 🎯Vilnius Institute 🎯Res Publica Etc https://archive.is/nJTRv The Vilnius Institute is also sponsored by 👉🏻Soros Open Society and NATO etc (See photo) https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://vilniusinstitute.lt/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/VIPA-Annual-Report-2020.pdf ————————————- The Integrity Initiatives Detector Media is also funded by the 🎯CIA’s NED. “Monitoring is performed (snip) with the financial support of NED. https://web.archive.org/web/20230531220409/https://detector.media/doc/images/news/archive/2016/134198/DM_NED_2017_engl.pdf ———————————— Disinfo Portal is at the Atlantic Council Eurasia Center ( DC). The Atlantic Council is funded yearly in part by the 🎯CIA NED. https://web.archive.org/web/20211204223453/https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/2020-annual-report-honor-roll-of-contributors/ They have 7 former CIA dir on its own board of dir: 🔹Michael Hayden 🔹James Woolsey 🔹Leon Panetta 🔹David Petraeus 🔹Michael Morrell 🔹William Webster 🔹Robert Gates So I guess this links all of the Disinfo Portal partners to CIA NED too. Atlantic Council Disinfo Portal Partners: 🎯International Forum for Democratic Studies 🎯Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis 🎯 CEPA 🎯European Values 🎯Drog (State Dept GEC partner) 🎯Euvsdisinfo 🎯Stopfake 🎯EU disinfolab 🎯DFRLAB 🎯CEPA 🎯Alliance For Securing Democracy (Hamilton68) 🎯Polygraph 🎯 Henry Jackson Society 🎯 Hague Centre for Strategic Studies 🎯 CEAS (Serbia) 🔹ETC https://web.archive.org/web/20190218145839/https://disinfoportal.org/partners/ And this means that I found another direct 🎯CIA NED org, The International Forum for Democratic Studies. https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/NED_FORUM-Shielding-Democracy.pdf Next post we discuss the Atlantic Council Disinfo Portal Experts. There’s also many more direct links to the CIA NED here, I’ll add more later. Notice The Hague Center for Strategic Studies involved? I still think Jack Smith is linked somehow since he’s from, The Hague, and I will find it!

Wayback MachineInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

Honor roll of contributors The Atlantic Council is grateful for the generous support it receives from private foundations; US and non-US government agencies, companies, and individuals. These supporters enable the Council to continue its quality programming and timely analysis, thereby allowing it to pursue its mission of renewing the Atlantic community for global challenges. web.archive.org

Partners - Disinfo Portal web.archive.org

Wayback MachineInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 9 - Now that you have some basics, let’s delve into the earliest days of cognitive security. The main players in this thred here are: 🔸David Perlman 🔸Pablo Breuer 🔸Sara J Terp 🔸Thaddeus Grugq 🔸Rand Waltzman In 2016, David operated CoPsycon and mingled with the US gov and NATO. Later leaving Twitter disgruntled. Later this became CogSecTech. And I have linked, “the main crew” to this. This early history is important for laying the groundwork of even more to come.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥🧵 Part 9 - Bad Kittehs Exposé on the early days of Cognitive Security Post 2016 election the Silicon Valley resistance works with the gov to save democracy “Currently, the largest active attacks are represented by the Brexit campaign and the Trump presidency.” ———————————- 🔹David Perlman & Copsycon Disgruntled by the 2016 election, David Perlman started disinfo work at his Counter psyops consortium (CoPsycon). Which later became CogsecTech. In Feb. 2016, David Perlman worked at Google. But later worked at Twitter Jul 2017 - Jun 2019. Now he’s at Stanford, & also running a carbon credit program plus more. https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmperlman Since 2017 David has worked with a number of US & NATO defense agencies on understanding & combating information warfare, particularly the role of social networks in influence campaigns. He also ROLE PLAYED as a legitimate employee of a major tech company in Silicon Valley. (This bio was from his Twitter years.) https://archive.is/Znmp1 Copsycon was registered June 17, 2017 but the main players worked together since mid 2016. (See under Cogsectech) ———————————— 🔹David Perlman resists: “We’re all currently in an abusive relationship with a narcissist. We’re all getting f’d over by this one person who exists at the boundary of evil and ill, & the other people who have joined the ranks.” “Maybe you help organize protests, & you stay abreast of breaking news so you know what you need to organize. Or maybe you volunteer with a group of tech activists who are archiving climate science data so it doesn’t get deleted.” “The biggest threat to America is decades of efforts by the GOP to undermine democracy.” “Even if Trump steps down; even if he’s impeached, IMPRISONED, even execut.. (🙀) for treason… Democracy is on life support.” “Recognizing in Trump a profound threat to America & democracy itself. “ “This is war, & for the first time in more than a hundred years, it’s a war for the survival of America.” “Everyone in the Resistance is here.” *Conspirator0 from Netwar Systems is also mentioned. Netwar is linked to the 2nd multi platform suspension in 2016. Read more at this link: https://archive.is/ZlSdv ———————————— 🔹See David of CoPsycon meets the gov evidence, plus more in the next posts. ——————————- 🔹David Perlman & Cogsec Technologies Inc (Cogsectech) “We have been working since mid-2016 on foundational frameworks & software tools.” “David has also led a workshop for NATO officials in London.” https://archive.is/MBnLu At CogsecTech David worked with (see photo): ♦️Sara J Terp (Bodaceacat), Sofwerx, who previously worked at the UK Ministry For Defense and the United Nations. ♦️Thaddeus Grugq (thegrugg), cyberarms broker. ♦️Pablo Bruer (Ngree_HObit), Sofwerx, Innovation Officer Donovan Group, US Special Operations Command. https://archive.is/haoha “MISINFOSEC - Brainchild of CogSec co-founder Sara Jayne Terp She inspired the formation of the Misinfosec Working Group, which built the Adversarial Misinfo and Influence Tactics and Techniques (AMITT) framework, an adaptation of the MITRE ATT&CK security framework.” https://archive.is/utKNs ———————————— 🔹Rand Waltzman is connected to these people. Sept 2015, Rand Waltzman first used the phrase, “Cognitive Security” on the need to create a Center for Cognitive Security. He was later credited for coining the phrase. (Rand works at Rand Corp, Narrative Strategies, & Zignal. He was previously an AI specialist at DARPA.) https://archive.is/mZMAS ♦️Video #1 Evidence starring, David Perlman, where he names his friends & cohorts: 🔹Rand Waltzman - invented Cogsec - cognitive security 🔹Sara Terp- chief science officer of Cogsec - invented the term misinfo security ♦️Video #2 highlights: -World went insane 2016 -Academics re-educated to become data scientists -Nazis running in streets -The Deepstate is real -Submitted DHS proposal -Fake news and Misinfo not a content problem it’s a war Please read the earlier exposé parts too.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In this video, Alan Sokian interviews Dr. David Perlman, founder and CEO of CogSec Technologies, about misinformation security. Dr. Perlman expresses gratitude to his co-founders and collaborators for their contributions. He mentions Sarah Jane Turp, the chief science officer who coined the term "misinformation security," and Rand Waltzman, who invented cognitive security technology. The interview focuses on the purpose of this creation and the importance of showing gratitude to those who have supported Dr. Perlman.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What's up everyone? Welcome to simulation. I'm your host, Alan Sokian. So pumped to be talking about misinformation security. We have doctor David Perlman joining on the on the show. Hi, David. Hi, Alan. Thanks for having me. I'm so pumped for this conversation. Thanks for coming on the program. Speaker 1: I'm pretty pumped too. I love it. Speaker 0: It was so cool meeting you and getting to know you more last Dier and now getting the chance to sit down with you and talk about this very, very pressing field that's emerging. For those who don't know David's background, He's founder and CEO of CogSec Technologies, Cognitive Security Technologies, the first misinformation security vendor protecting socio technical systems of enterprises and you can find the link in the bio below to cogssec. Tech as well as his LinkedIn and the Twitter profile for the company. David, we're so obsessed with this the question. And we start all of our shows with this, so I'm very pumped to ask you it. What do you think is the point of this creation? The point of this Speaker 1: creation. Wow. That is that is a big question. And, you know, I'm gonna buy some time by giving a shout out to to my co founders at the company. And just thanks to all the people who supported me. Sarah Jane Turp is the chief science officer, and she actually invented the term misinformation security as far as I know. And, you know, another friend, Rand Waltzman, invented CogSec, cognitive security technology. So I owe so much to so many people, Bull. And I don't have time to thank everyone, but I just, you know, it's, it's really important to me to show gratitude. And I Speaker 0: want to start with that. It's beautiful. And hopefully, we can, feature some of the brilliant minds that you get to collaborate with and that have been such major influences on you.

David Perlman Ph.D. - Stanford University Graduate School of Business | LinkedIn Author, presenter, panelist, and featured guest on security and social media influence… | Learn more about David Perlman Ph.D.'s work experience, education, connections & more by visiting their profile on LinkedIn linkedin.com

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 10 introduces you to a history few are aware of for New Knowledge. While relatively new, New Knowledge was given a boost by the United Nations that helped cement their place in the tech world. Many also didn’t know of their work with the State Dept, NSA, and Obama Whitehouse. The most bothersome to me personally was the war room, and their post election activities. This organization has had many name and ownership changes: Popily, Yonder, and now Primer. Two important people in this org were Jonathan Morgan and Renee Diresta. New Knowledge was from Austin Texas.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥 Part 10 - Bad Kitteh Exposé: The early history of New Knowledge that few know. Including: 🔹They advised both the Obama Whitehouse and State Dept. 🔹Their unusual and ALARMING data collection from the 2016 election while advisors. 🔹Ran a 2016 pre election, conservative monitoring, war room. 🔹Were the first, outside the IC, to claim Russian interference in the 2016 election. Starting in 2015, Renee Diresta & Jonathan Morgan of New Knowledge (aka Popily, Yonder, & Primer) were both involved with the United Nations, State Dept, & Obama WhiteHouse. The earliest official mention of Russia disinfo by them was in Oct 2015 by Renee Diresta to the Obama Whitehouse. After the 2016 election, Renee said, “now I’m going to pay more attention!” (to Russia) New Knowledges claim to fame is being the FIRST to identify 2016 Russian election interference. Renee & Jonathan Morgan met up at the Obama Whitehouse in Feb 2016. Although they first met earlier. 🔥After the 2016 election, their Data For Democracy harvested all of the United States voter information FROM THE SECRETARIES OF STATE! Thats a huge task too! What did they do with all this massive data? They worked for the Obama Whitehouse, was this even kosher to do?🔥 Renee Diresta & Jonathan Morgan also operated an 2016 election disinfo war room that concentrated on conservative fake news. Once again, let me remind you that they were advisors to the Obama Whitehouse. After the 2016 election, Jonathan Morgan was even invited to the Whitehouse to do a podcast with Obama’s Chief Science Officer. ♦️New Knowledge was founded in May 2015 in Austin, TX by Jonathon Morgan, a former adviser at the US Dept of State, NATO, & was a propaganda researcher at DARPA. ♦️Months later New Knowledge joined up with the Sustainable UN. (See linked video and thread.) ♦️Renee Diresta: “Late 2015, the problem of ISIS on Twitter had gotten to be incredibly large, & I connected with a data scientist named Jonathon Morgan.” “In late October 2015 & early 2016, gov acknowledge that social network manipulation was a real problem.” “Russia was part of the conversation in the WHITE HOUSE AND in the STATE DEPT advising I was doing in Oct 2015.” “Going back to Oct 2015, there was information sharing between the State Dept, the White House & companies like Facebook about thinking about the vulnerabilities of their system to foreign actors looking to spread misinfo or disinfo.” “Russia was brought up by other people in the gov who were concerned about the potential for manipulation.” “I did sit down with Twitter. Twitter was really much more concerned about harassment than disinfo & manipulation. “ (After the election - on Russia.) “I thought, now we're going to start to pay a lot more attention to this problem.” ♦️New Knowledge: “We were the first org outside the US intel community to identify Russia’s campaign to influence the 2016 presidential election.” ♦️The Obama admin, reached out to Renee Diresta in 2015 Renee Diresta claims she first met Jonathan Morgan at a White House tech meeting in Feb 2016. (Conflicts with PBS article date of late 2015.) Senate & House staff members, who knew of DiResta’s expertise through her public reports & her previous work ADVISING THE OBAMA ADMIN on disinfo campaigns, had reached out to her & others to help them prepare for the hearings. ♦️In 2016, they monitored thousands of Twitter accounts that suddenly started using bots, or automated accounts, to spread salacious stories about the Clinton family. They watched as multiple Facebook pages, appearing out of nowhere, organized to simultaneously create anti-immigrant events. When I put it all together & started mapping it out, I saw how big the scale of it was,” said Jonathan Albright, who met DiResta through Twitter. Albright published a widely read report that mapped, for the first time, connections between conservative sites putting out fake news. To be continued in the next post, many sources to follow.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 11 is an excellent recollection by New Knowledge’s, Renee Diresta, of the after effects of the 2016 election. Tech world was not amused. Here Renee admitted to building a disinformation machine as a result of the 2016 election. Q: “So essentially, are you guys building a disinformation machine?” A: Renee Diresta - “That's a good way to put it, yeah.” The State Department Global Engagement Center was created as a result of the 2016 election. “ So we were advocating for a couple of really basic things: One, create a task force or a center in government that's responsible for monitoring this and ultimately became the Global Engagement Center, which exists.” It also seems Russia discussions started in the Whitehouse in October 2015. “Russia was part of the conversation in the White House and in the State Department advising I was doing in October 2015” Read more inside, there’s multiple posts and you shouldn’t miss any!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Exposé Part 11 - Bad Kitteh with the night conservatives lost their voice. Being compared to ISIS and must be stopped! 💥After the 2016 election, Silicon Valley cried out, “What did we build, what did we build?”💥 What happened to conservatives next was the result of Silicon Valley’s, “terror”, of facing 4 years of Trump. The State Department Global Engagement Center was created as a result of the 2016 election. And also in mid 2016, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism was used for multi-platform actions. Remember that’s when multi platform suspensions started? 🧐 Questions & Answers with Renee Diresta of New Knowledge aka Popily, Primer & Yonder, on the building of a disinfo machine & their recounting of a Silicon Valley reckoning. Here’s some short highlights before we get into the best parts of the interview in detail. ♦️“I would say election 2016 was where it became—that was when everyone came out of the woodwork, right?” “That was where the engineers themselves, talking very publicly on Twitter that night as the data was coming in, [were] saying, as the election results are coming in, saying: “What did we build? What did we build?" ♦️“The results came in, and yes, some of it was absolutely partisan handwringing over the fact that Trump had won.” ♦️“Would we have had a different outcome if we had been more proactive at shutting down the fake news & the conspiratorial partisan content?” ♦️“Right after the election, Mark Zuckerberg says, “It's crazy,” right? I mean, there's the kind of famous “crazy” moment about [whether] misinfo or fake news played any role in this at all.” ——————————— 🔹Question: So essentially, are you guys building a disinformation machine? Answer: “That's a good way to put it, yeah.” 🔹Question: What were you recommending at the time? What were you advising the State Department or the platforms to do about this problem at the time? Answer: “We were trying to say that there should be better channels of communication, for starters, trying to say that information sharing about these things needed to be more robust. It was hard. You know, there was a lot of distrust between the government and tech, between people and the government. This was after [Edward] Snowden, right after the Snowden revelations. The tech companies really didn't want to be seen as cooperating with the government. So we were advocating for a couple of really basic things: One, create a task force or a center in government that's responsible for monitoring this and ultimately became the Global Engagement Center, which exists. It's focused on terrorist propaganda but has also recently had its mandate expanded to foreign propaganda in general as a result of what we saw with Russia, the idea that at least if we had a kind of a government center in charge of thinking about what the government's response was going to be, or detecting threats that would be a good starting point.” “The platforms—in mid-2016, I think it was; you might want to check this; it might be in 2017—created what was called the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism and that Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism was an effort where they would share information with each other, so when terrorist content appeared on Facebook, Facebook would make that content available to YouTube and Twitter so they could block it also. That was a really positive response. That was the kind of thing that we were advocating for, like there must be information sharing. We've got to treat this almost like we treated spam, where the platforms came together to think about ways to deal with the spam issue. It was somewhat remarkable that we do have these instances of cooperation in the past to deprecate the impact of bad actors, but it took so long to get us there on terrorism. That was a real surprise.” 🔸Somehow I’m out of space? Keep reading folks! We will also review the actions of another person associated with this crew. https://archive.is/QLvga

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 12-A Bad Kitteh Exposé Contrary to what many people think, the coup upon Trump began within days of him announcing his run in June, 2015. In fact the first propaganda about Trump began within 24 hours of him announcing, and originated from Moveon. We had Google Lab partnering with Hacks/Hackers, and even seeding the First Draft News Coalition. First Draft News concentrated on disinformation. The integrity initiative website went live at the same time to fight, “Russian” disinfo. First it worked during Brexit and then for the Trump Campaign. The Integrity Initiative even infiltrated US election campaigns. First Draft News and Integrity Initiative linked orgs worked together from the get go. And one of its founder orgs, Storyful, even had a Director that founded the 77th psyop brigade. The director of First Draft News sat on the World Economic Forum's Global Agenda Council on the Future of Information and Entertainment. Interestingly, Google is partnered with the World Economic Forum, who also later independently inserted itself into the disinfo racket.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🚨🚨🚨Part 12-A of the Bad Kitty exposé gets to the roots of the disinfo apparatus! My most important release yet! The World Economic Forum partnered GOOGLE, is where most disinfo work originates! Just yesterday I exposed the Google partnered WEF gathering up & organizing disinfo orgs in 2018. Also see my linked post for some of Googles massive involvement in disinfo work! There’re also multiple other orgs involved. One is the Soros partnered Arizona State University (ASU). Also, recall my previous connecting of First Draft News (Google News Lab seed funded) to Integrity Initiative partnered orgs. Also recall how I connected my main Exposé orgs & people to the CIA & Integrity Initiative orgs too. There will be more on this later. Looking back at Trump riding down the escalator, look at these dates: 🔹June 16, 2015 Trump announces running 🔹June 18, 2015 First Draft Coalition Announces their new org. (funded by Google News Lab) 🔹June 22, 2015 Google News Lab Announced by Google 🔹June 22, 2015 Google News Lab & Hacks/Hackers partnership announced by Google 🔹June 22, 2015 Google News Lab & First Draft News partnership announced by Google. 🔹June 22, 2015 Integrity Initiative domain registered The most important are above but add these two: 🔹Sept of 2015 Sofwerx created 🔹Sept 16, 2015 the Global Cyber Alliance was formed What do all our earliest & later disinfo orgs have in common? Google! Google partnered Hacks/Hackers is part of the CTI Leagues, Reality Team. Now recall this story: “Feds Pay Journo Group called Hacks/Hackers $5M To Create Software To Turn People Into Anti Misinfo Bots” Here’s some more GOOGLE partnered Hacks/Hackers facts: -H/H got a grant from CIA linked Mozilla for misinfo work -H/H & Meedan founded the Credibility Coalition -H/H sponsored the first Misinfocon where the WEF partnerd Credibility Coalition was incubated -Credibility Coalition Partners with GOOGLE JIGSAW “Jigsaw is a unit within Google that explores threats to OPEN SOCIETIES” Google also runs an annual event called Newsgeist used to incubate new programs. Of course the 2017 one I examined, had Claire Wardle of First Draft News & Crovitz of Newsguard there. Misinfocon, born out of Google & Knight Fndn Newsgeist 2017 was yet another incubator. And like I said, sponsored by Google partnered First Draft News, Nieman, & Hacks/Hackers. The first MisinfoCon is where the Credibility coalition was incubated by Google partnered Hacks/Hackers. Credibility Coalition announced it received generous grants from Google News Lab, Facebook Journalism Project, & Craig Newmark Philanthropies etc. “We’re thrilled to see industry & philanthropic partners join in on the momentum of our cross-disciplinary grassroots initiative BORN OUT OF A MISINFOCON EVENT in February 2017,” noted Jennifer 8. Lee, a journalist & technologist from Hacks/Hackers, which also organizes MisinfoCon.” Jennifer 8 Lee of the WEF, & Beijing University & Google partnered Hacks and Hackers, cofounded Newsgeist, MisinfoCon, & the Credibility Coalition. Google Newsgeist was held at ASU Walter Cronkite school of journalism. ASU is the only USA University in the Soros Open Society University Network. And its president, Michael Crow, serves as a Chairman of the CIA’s In-Q-Tel. Google News Lab University Network formed Dec 2016 with 49 universities & ASU as the pilot. We will discuss ASU more in a later exposé part. The below people worked with the WEF & many Google linked orgs & events, such as Newsgeist, Hacks/Hackers, Misinfocon, & the Credibility Coalition (funded by VOA, WEF, CIA NED, & more!): 🔸Jennifer 8 Lee - Google/Knight Fndn Newsgeist, Hacks/Hackers, Misinfocon, Credibility Coalition 🔸Connie Moon Sehat - Hacks/hackers, credibility coalition, Meedan 🔸Claire Wardle - First Draft News, Misinfocon 🔸Nevin Thompson - Credibility coalition lead 🔸Ahmed Medien - Project Manager, Hacks/Hackers 🔸Amy Zhang - Credibility Coalition To be continued - long 👇🏻

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 12-B Bad Kitty Exposé In March 2018, the World Economic Forum convened a meeting of the minds with a very large consortium of disinfo groups. Essentially to take stock of where they all sat and how it could be improved upon. The entire disinfo network is massive and funded heavily by the left. The Knight Foundation, Soros Open Society, Craig Newmark, and many others started early on. The Google Partnered Knight Foundation and Craig Newmark actually even funded the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP)!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥🔥 Breaking Bad Kitty exposé Part 12-B supplemental. I’ve had a missing link all along, and it’s a WHOPPER! In March 2018, the World Economic Forum, gathered a project and meeting with government officials, advertising industry, and key censorship orgs to take stock of what was needed to combat disinfo. First Draft News, Data and Society and so much more were involved! The project itself was being handled by the Tow Knight center at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism (CUNY). Ol Craig Newmark never gets enough attention. He’s involved in funding and/or participation in a large majority of the earliest disinformation work. Including the: 🔹Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) 🔹Global Cyber Alliance 🔹First Draft News - It was moved from Harvard to the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY 🔹Trust Project 🔹Misinfocon 🔹World Economic Forum 🔹Credibility Coalition 🔹Reality Team (CTI League) 🔹Disarm Foundation (AMITT/Disarm framework) 🔹INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR PUBLIC INTEREST MEDIA (Biden admin global news takeover org) 🔹Aspen Cyber Security Group 🔹Brennan Center 🔹Atlantic Council Cyber Statecraft Initiative 🔹 Carnegie Endowments Partnership for Countering Influence Operations 🔹Plus tons more! “The World Economic Forum, and underwritten by Craig Newmark, convened a meeting in San Francisco in March 2018. This brought together many of the independent efforts to rate quality in news — including the: 🔹TRUST PROJECT 🔹CREDIBILITY COALITION 🔹Reporters Without Borders 🔹Internews 🔹Storyful - Global Managing Dir founded 77th psyops brigade - one of a handful of founding First Draft orgs 🔹Open Brand Safety 🔹W3C 🔹and others With representatives from the major technology companies, the ad industry, the academe, and GOVERNMENT to take stock of the overall effort to combat disinformation and support quality, determining what is needed.” “We hope to work with a variety of fact-checkers, including Politifact, Poynter, and Duke to gather behavioral signals for this project.” “Certain signals across this project will be considered non-starters, or those that will automatically consider a site to be of poor quality despite other factors of the site. These signals will include, but not be limited to, knowingly spreading disinfo, promoting conspiracy theories, and creating false news. These signals will not only come from fact-checkers, but also through Data & Society’s and First Draft’s antimanipulation campaigns.” This meeting was the same month and year that Newsguard was “officially” announced. Recall Newsguard and Google are both partnered with the above mentioned Trust project that was part of this WEF Project. They even mentioned Newsguard in the article. “The meeting identified five ongoing needs, summarized here: ♦️Work together on a common data model to facilitate sharing of signals. ♦️Continue convening the coalition of initiatives working on the problem of trust and credibility in news. ♦️Encourage platforms and others to share data with researchers to inform this work. ♦️Support networks to share alerts about targeted campaigns of disinformation. ♦️Investigate opportunities to use blockchain to enable this work.” Part 12-A will be coming out later today. This was just a supplement so yeah it’s gonna be pretty big! The main links will follow now. But Craig Newmark funding will be much later. It’s a heck of a job, but I have everything I mentioned here, and likely much more. @elonmusk here’s additional WEF and Newsguard links. This is gonna be a whole lot worse than just the WEF.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 13 Bad Kitty Exposé This part is relatively short and concentrated on a single WHO document prepared by the CTI League folks. The biggest news here is that the World Health Organization (WHO) embedded people at the CTI League! What this means is that the WHO was working with anti conservative (coming up in later parts) and gov linked influence operations to control Covid messaging.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥🔥Part 13 Bad Kitty Exposé! Boom! The World Health Organization (WHO) was actively involved in Covid vaccine disinformation work at CTI League. The CTI League is where they ran Psyops on innocent citizens! A document compiled by Sara Jayne Terp, of the CTI League files, worthy of a part of its own! Here she exposes the massive, and worldwide, disinfo network along with some unexpected twists. Highlights? 🔸The World Health Organization (WHO) embedded people at the CTI League! 🔸The Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) was funded by Craig Newmark and Knight Foundation! (Besides the Omidyar Democracy Fund Funding I already exposed. Democracy Fund is part of the Soros Democracy Alliance.) 🔸They have a Security Operations Center with graded network tiers. 🔸Bot Sentinel (Chris Bouzy) is a part of the disinfo network. 🔸Wikipedia has a disinfo team? This document was compiled by request from, Rakesh Bharania, the director of humanitarian impact data at Salesforce for the World Health Organization (WHO) disinfo use. He participated in the WHO Tech Task Force since March 2020. Salesforce was part of a WHO subgroup working on vaccines. Salesforce is partnered with the World Economic Forum, the Global Cyber Alliance, and Zignal. Links to follow!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 14 Bad Kitty Exposé Kate Starbird of the, Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), was involved in work for a grant which was for the Hacks/Hackers organization. Recall Hacks/Hackers was partnered with Google Lab who organized the first major censorship ever. Hacks/Hackers was also a part of the CTI League Reality Team that worked on social media to control narratives. Amy X Zhang, of Hacks/Hackers was involved in the above grant along with Kate Starbird. Amy Zhang was also involved in a second grant called Wisdex that DIRECTLY involved the EIP. Zhang is from the Washington University Center For Informed people (CIP). The same center that was part of the EIP, and is where Katie Starbird also worked. There is also a World Economic Forum group called the Global Coalition For Digital Safety. Many involved in the CTI League Files were involved in this. Also involved with this WEF coalition was the Atlantic Council GeoTech Center. The same center that housed Sara Terp and Pablo Breuer of the CTI League files.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🏆 Breaking! Part 14 of the Bad Kitty exposé! The confusing entanglements of the DHS CISA Election Integrity Partnerships (EIP) personnel, the World Economic Forum (WEF) Global Coalition For Digital Safety, Atlantic Council GeoTech Center, and the CTI League Files. Recall I already connected the CTI League file crew to a World Economic Forum 2018 program. I also connected, Katie Starbird of the EIP, to the CTI League partnered Hacks/Hackers too. I’ll attach both of those below. This newly found WEF program, the Global Coalition For Digital Safety, is headed by David Bray from the Atlantic Council GeoTech Center. The same center that housed Sara Terp and Pablo Breuer of the CTI League files. (See photos) Amy X Zhang, of the WEF Global Coalition For Digital Safety (see photo), is from the Washington University Center For Informed people (CIP). The same center that ran the EIP, and is where Katie Starbird worked. Amy Zhang also worked on the National Science Foundation (NSF) Convergence Accelerator project called Wisedex. Wisedex worked with the EIP. “The Election Integrity Partnership (Washington and Stanford) will provide a data stream (to Wisedex) of misleading content related to the 2022 U.S. elections that will serve as one source of claims to profile. (See photo) Also listed in the same NSF doc is mention of the ARTT 2 convergence accelerator. The same Hacks/Hackers one that Amy Zhang, Connie Moon Sehat, Tanushree Mitra, and Kate Starbird worked together on. An amazing find here 👇🏻 ❤️‍🔥 The World Economic Forum Global Coalition For Digital Safety even thanked Hacks/Hackers for their support. ❤️‍🔥 “We thank HACKS/HACKERS and Craig Newmark Philanthropies for their support of the Global Coalition for Digital Safety.” So a U.S. government grant funded org (hacks/hackers) was thanked for their support by the WEF? This would include Katie Starbird then, true? Hack/Hackers was also partnered with Google News lab, one of the earliest disinfo orgs. Also note that Hacks/Hackers and Meedan founded the Credibility Coalition. And Hacks/Hackers works on Reality Team and is partnered with the CTI League, Credibility Coalition, and the Cogsec Collaborative, plus more. Amy Zhang is also from the WEF partnered Credabilty Coalition, Hacks/Hackers, Harvard Berkman Klein, and MIT. Additional people listed on the WEF Global Coalition For Digital Safety doc: ☢️Connie Moon Sehat, Hack Hackers phase 2 of ARTT, WEF partnered Credibility Coalition, Meedan, and is a Senior Project Fellow, World Economic Forum. ☢️Jennifer 8 Lee, Hack/Hackers board member, co-founder Misinfocon, Founder Google/Knight Fndn Newsgeist, co-founder Credibility Coalition, Co-chair of the WEF Global Future Council on Media, Entertainment and Sport ☢️Daphne Keller, Director of Stanford Program on Platform Regulation, Cyber Policy Center Lecturer, Stanford Law School ☢️Ahmed Medien, Project Manager, Hacks/Hackers, Misinfocon organizer, Credibility Coalition, Project Fellow World Economic Forum Media Entertainment and Sport ☢️Tanushree Mitra, Hack/Hackers phase 2 of ARTT, credibility coalition, Assistant Professor, University Washington *Note, their orgs listed may not be all inclusive. **I just found something that indicates interoperability of Hacks/Hackers and Credibility Coalition. An email list request for Credibility Coalition to send help requests to either of two Hacks/Hackers individuals. Sources and referenced posts to follow. This certainly calls for a congressional investigation. @Weaponization

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Part 15 Bad Kitty Exposé This part discusses the first ever Misinfocon held not long after Trumps inauguration. The Credibility Coalition was created during this event. Interestingly, Project Candelabra, was also conceived during this event by Dean Jackson of the CIA NED. Just recently I realized that Dean Jackson was also involved at the Atlantic Council Disinfo Portal. There he shared space with NED involved Ukraine and Serbian regime change orgs, the NED itself, many CTI League Files folks, the Alliance For Securing Democracy aka Hamilton68, Integrity Initiative partnered orgs, and many Integrity Initiative linked people. Dean was even an analyst on the Jan 6 committee.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Bad Kitteh exposé part 15 on the censorship complex now known as the CTI League Files. Introduction to MisinfoCon. Do you really want to see who’s responsible for censorship? Then pay attention! What is Misinfocon, why is it so important, what’s its connections to Google and the Knight Fndn, what’s it’s connections to Kate Starbird, and what happened at its first meeting? ♦️Approximately a month after Trumps inauguration, the first Misinfocon was held. An event for brainstorming on new disinfo procedures and creating new disinfo orgs. Twenty projects emerged from this event including the creation of the Credibility Coalition org. ♦️Recall Kate Starbird belongs to Hack/Hackers and was part of the ARTT 2 GOVERNMENT FUNDED program. ♦️Jennifer 8. Lee, Hacks/Hackers board member on ARTT 2 admitting this government funded org was made possible by MisinfoCon: “It is rewarding to see the conversations around credibility and communication online that were first sparked at our first MisinfoCon at MIT in 2017 blossom into a project of this scope, and with such potentially practical benefits for society. As an incubator for projects that bring together interdisciplinary teams of journalists, researchers, technologists, and policymakers, Hacks/Hackers is excited to continue to help take people’s ideas into the real world.” ♦️This Credibility Coalition comes from the following organizations: -AAAS -AppNexus (Sara Terp) -Associated Press -Berkeley Institute for Data Science -Climate Feedback -Data & Society -Data for Democracy (New Knowledge) -Factmata (Listed in the Expose Network leaks aka the Integrity Initiative) -Global Voices -GoodlyLabs -Hypothesis -Snopes -New York Times -MIT CSAIL -University of Michigan’s Center for Social Media Responsibility. This Credibility Coalition and also Kate Starbird are important and we will review them more later. Including breaking info on the Starry Bird! 🥴😬 ♦️The idea for Misinfocon was conceived at the 2016 Google and Knight Fndn Newsgeist. This was held at Soros Open Society partnered, Arizona State Universities, Walter Cronkite school of Journalism. See attached thread. ♦️This first Misinfocon multi day event was Feb 24-26, 2017 and was held at MIT, and Harvard Nieman labs. This was hosted by First Draft News, Hacks/Hackers, and Nieman Labs. The first MisinfoCon is possible through the generous support of Craig Newmark Philanthropic Fund, Mozilla, Knight Foundation, Center for Civic Media, and Alley Interactive. ♦️Noteworthy people there: -Dean Jackson, a researcher at the CIA NED Dean was also an analyst on the Select Committee to Investigate January 6th -Claire Wardle from First Draft News and of the World Economic Forum, a past head of social media for the United Nations, and previous Director of News Services for Storyful. (Global Managing Dir of Storyful Intel, the News Corp digital intel co., was ALASTAIR AITKEN. He founded the 77th brigade psyop unit and was in the Integrity Initiative.) -Julia Haslanger of Hearken, which created Zuckerbucks CTCL -Mark Little – Founder of Storyful now acquired by NewsCorp. Storyful was a founding organization of the earlier First Draft Coalition. Important Misinfocon member names out of a long list are: ♦️Jennifer 8 Lee (WEF linked) ♦️Renee Diresta (resistance) ♦️Amy X Zheng (WEF linked) The people who organized this first Misinfocon event were Ahmed Medien and Jennifer 8 Lee of Hacks/Hackers. Photo 1- Slide deck - Early planning in Feb 2017 to disqualify sites for advertising dollars. Recall that a Newsguard founder was at Newsgeist that founded Misinfocon Photo 2 - Newsguard listed in a Credibility Coalition doc. Photo 3 - from slide deck. Oh nos we gotta get into schools to brainwash kids thru news. Photo 4 - Slidedeck - Orange man bad All sources to follow.

Posted - December 29, 2023 at 4:40 PM

Saved - December 29, 2023 at 5:33 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Norm Eisen, co-founder of the Voter Protection Program, advised state governors that it would be illegal to involve the National Guard in election events, including the January 6 certification. The program aims to protect the vote and prevent political violence. This raises questions about the presence of the FBI during the certification.

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

🔥Breaking! Norm Eisen was involved in the lack of National Guard on January 6! The voter Protection Program, cofounded by Norm Eisen, told state governors in a letter, that they would be breaking the law if they did! “This memorandum guides state officials in preparing for and responding to the possible involvement of the National Guard in the 2020 election. Governors should remember that the Guard remains under their command unless “federalized” by the President.” “It’s Not Just Election Day: The election has already started. It will last until all the votes are counted and the results are certified. Federal interference with counting votes is just as illegal as interference with voting. 18 U.S.C. §§ 593, 595.” On January 6th that’s what Congress was there for, the certification of electors! Sources to follow!

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

This here is a transcript from Berkeley law saying that Norm Eisen was a cofounder of the Voter Protection Program which told state governors not to use the National Guard. “Now, as co-founder and CEO of the States United Democracy Center in Washington, D.C., Lydgate guides its work to advance free, fair, and secure elections. The nonpartisan center helps connect state officials, law enforcement leaders, and pro-democracy partners across America with tools and expertise to protect the vote, hold democracy violators accountable, and prevent political violence. Lydgate says that amid calls by former President Trump to postpone the November 2020 election and mounting election-related lies, she recalled Berkeley Law mentors “who encouraged me to take risks, think creatively, and understand the power of the law to effect change.” “Working with former U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic and Obama White House “Ethics Czar” Norman Eisen and former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman, they established the Voter Protection Program — which eventually became States United.” https://archive.is/yXmdZ

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Here’s a Document from Norm Eisen, Voter Protection Program, called, “COORDINATION WITH THE NATIONAL GUARD AROUND ELECTIONS”. Here they are telling State Governors that it’s illegal to have the National Guard around for any election certification events. Which would have included January 6. “It’s Not Just Election Day: The election has already started. It will last until all the votes are counted and the results are certified. Federal interference with counting votes is just as illegal as interference with voting. 18 U.S.C. §§ 593, 595.” https://web.archive.org/web/20210224134919/https://voterprotectionprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/National-Guard-Coordination-10.31.20.pdf

@pepesgrandma - Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁

Well, @KerryOLeary4 has a good point. If what Norm Eisens org was pushing is true, then the FBI wasn’t allowed to be present at January 6th either. Especially since they were pushing folks up the wall to interfere with the certification “It’s Not Just Election Day: The election has already started. It will last until all the votes are counted and the results are certified. Federal interference with counting votes is just as illegal as interference with voting. 18 U.S.C. §§ 593, 595.”