TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @playteaux
@playteaux - playteaux
Dr. Phil https://t.co/UESVGGfqOM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tax dollars are being used to facilitate the travel of children who may be trafficked for sex or forced into sweatshops. The lack of verification for family members and the absence of rapid DNA testing under the current administration raise concerns. The head official at the border acknowledged the issue when questioned, admitting that children are being sent to potential traffickers. This disturbing revelation highlights the urgent need for action to address the exploitation of vulnerable children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I bet when you paid your taxes, you never thought for one second that your tax dollars would be spent this way.
Speaker 1: Okay. Here we go. We'll apply. These children that are coming in with someone that says, I'm their mother, aunt, uncle, or whatever, we have no way of verifying that. We do not.
We used to
Speaker 2: present under under president Trump. We had rapid DNA testing. That's been done away with.
Speaker 1: Are they given money to these people that are released into the country? So it's our taxpayers
Speaker 2: that ultimately facilitate the travel. But, yes, travel is facilitated, and they are given all the necessities that they need.
Speaker 1: But that could be a trafficker.
Speaker 2: There's a very good possibility that they're being trafficked, that they're going into the sex industry, or they're being forced into the sweatshops.
Speaker 1: And and we know that. We're we knowingly are spending our tax dollars to sell children into sex trafficking. The theory, is that okay for us to be spending tax dollars to traffic children? Holy shit. Now this is the head guy on the border.
And I I ask you when this went on a little more, we went in more depth. You know you're on camera here. Right? You you just said we're spending tax dollars to sell children into sex slavery. He said, yeah.
I said, why have you not talked about this? He said, nobody's ever asked me these pointed questions, but I'm grateful that you're asking them now. That's how out of control we are down there. We are we are paying money to take these children and sell them into sex slavery. They they they come in with these addresses written on their bodies, written on their arm, and we call up there and say, do you know so and so?
Yeah. Yes. We're waiting for them. Okay. They'll be on a plane or a bus, and you need to pick them up.
And and I asked him, so some pamper, crafter, whatever is picking them up up there, and he said, we are knowingly sending them up there for that. And he said, it's terrible, but that's what's happened.
@playteaux - playteaux
The Awakening https://t.co/9c3DRARFWs
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker woke up to the realization that 50% of the country has a different worldview. They used to think it was because these people were being lied to or manipulated, but they started questioning their own beliefs. They read a book recommended by a friend from the opposite political party and struggled to get through it. However, they realized that not everything the other side said was evil. This led them to question their own beliefs and see the dangers within their own political party. They feel alone and confused but are determined to continue learning and finding the truth by listening to both sides. They no longer feel personally attacked and want to explore different perspectives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I woke up. Like, officially woke up. I've been thinking that I was, you know, awake and seeing the world for what it really was for a long time, and I've been kind of I'll I'll occasionally be the person online that'll be like, you know what? Like, wake up. Like, see what's actually happening in this world.
And I had no idea. I legitimately had no idea. And it all started with me kinda coming to the realization that 50% of this country has a completely different way of viewing the world than me. And I've always kind of had this idea that it was because they're being lied to or they were being manipulated or they were evil or they were stupid. That's the reason why they're able to vote for the person that they're voting for in spite of all of the really scary things that are happening in the world.
And I I realized that it cannot be true. It cannot be true that every single one of these people falls into one of those categories. And maybe they're voting for the person that they're voting for with all of those dangers or the scary things either because a, they don't see them or because the things that they see on my side are scarier to them than the things that are happening on theirs. And that really made me start to question because I'm personally not really afraid of I haven't been afraid of much from my political party. And I was like, what are they seeing?
And so I really made it a mission of mine to at least I wasn't gonna agree with what they were seeing, but I wanted to Stand it. And so I kinda went out on this mission to try to start understanding what they were saying that was so scary to them or something that was so caught such a substantial aversion that they were willing to vote for someone that I deemed to be evil. And I started by kind of dipping my toe in the pool by listening to, it's kinda like a documentary. And it was it was very simple idea asking a very simple question and people were not able to answer. They were not able to answer a very simple question.
Something that should be Easy to answer if you're willing to formulate a worldview around it. And and I'm looking at these people as like, I mean, you're you're either at a rally or you're a specialist in the field. Why are you not able to answer these simple questions? And it really started to make me think, you know, what if there's more to this than I thought? And so I talked to a friend of mine who is Someone on the opposite side of the political party who recommended a book to me.
And this friend of mine is someone that I really don't agree with but I still respect as a person, someone that we can still as long as we don't talk politics, we can still hang out and have a really good time. And I trust that they would never do something to actively hurt me. And they recommended this book to me. And I ordered it. I started to read it, and I literally got maybe a paragraph in, and I shut I shut it.
I was, like, I can't read this. This is this is the worst. This is an evil person saying evil things, and I felt personally attacked by this book. And I close it and I was like, why can't I read this? I tried to open it back up and I just couldn't.
Like, there was, like, a mental block. I could not read it. And I started thinking to myself, like, why can't I? And so little bits at a time, sometimes a paragraph, sometimes a page, I forced myself to read this book. And as I went through it, I've been, you know, told in my head that this is an evil person, you know, pushing an evil agenda.
And as I read it I was like this is not an evil person. This is someone that's speaking with compassion. Someone that is trying to actively warn people that they don't even agree with, that have a completely different world view of true dangers within the the ideology that they have, their political affiliation. And it was really really hard. Like, I cannot stressed how hard it was for me to get through this book.
Every fiber of my being fought against it and, you know, it I usually read a a novel in, you know, a couple weeks. I read a lot. And this book took me months to get through. And it was for that very reason. I was like, I'm already so emotionally stressed out and, like, physically uncomfortable all the time that I couldn't in my free time make myself feel that voluntarily.
But I was on this mission to understand, to figure out why we're moving in such different directions and why we can't talk to each other anymore. And as I got through this book, my Worldview just started getting holes poked in it. And I started kind of looking at things from a different perspective, seeing things that I didn't really even know were occurring, threats to our society that I didn't know were there. And it was really, really hard. Like, I I was so confident that I'm on the right side of history.
Looking over at other people and being like, how are you doing what you're doing? And I was at at that moment, I started entertaining the idea of what if I'm wrong? What if I'm wrong? And so I fought and I fought and I started listening to people that I had deemed evil. People that I said, this is this person over there is one of the reasons why this country is going to shit because they're lying to us, They're actively manipulating people or they're just flat out intolerant or evil or whatever.
And while I think some of those things are true because I've seen the videos and the content of them being those things. But as I listened more and more and forced myself to listen, I realized that there was more to it, that not everything that they were saying was evil. And as I began listening and opening my mind to the possibility that I might be wrong, that was when it really changed for me. I started actually seeing wholesome content. I started seeing, you know, people speaking with compassion and just, like, what is this country becoming?
And how are we gonna How are we gonna let it happen? And when are we gonna say enough is enough? And it just it started to tear down my entire world, the way that I saw everything. And while my personal beliefs didn't change that much, the way that I saw the world and the dangers that I saw substantially changed. And not only was I looking at a boogeyman in front of me who had captured my attention for a long time, I started looking behind me to the people that I've been defending and saying, holy crap.
You have gone insane. You've gone insane. And, like, I didn't personally feel like I've become a radical person, but I realized that I've been supporting radical ideas and radical people and just flat out ignoring the dangers that the most extreme parts of my political party were posing on society. And when I'm thinking to myself, what do they see over there That scares them so much that they're still willing to vote for the person they're willing to vote for. It's because they saw that and I haven't.
I haven't been looking or haven't been willing to open my mind to the possibility, or I'm thinking to myself, you know what? That's a small thing in comparison to what I see over there because that boogeyman is still real. And my entire world has been crumbling over the last couple days. And there was a kind of a shift for me where I was really really having a hard time listening to people that I didn't agree with, and then it became this, like, hunger for knowledge. Because I started detaching myself from that narrative, having to be in that group because there's camaraderie in that and there's so much stress and anger and hatred in the world that finding a group that I can be a part of was really appealing.
And as soon as I kinda separated myself from that and started, you know, actually looking at things objectively, I started consuming the other side, you know, their vlogs and YouTube videos and news articles and figuring out how do they see these news events that I've seen because, you know, I lived through them. I feel like I know exactly what happened but they feel the same way and it's a different reality. So of course the reality that they live in is different than mine. They're gonna feel differently than me. And a lot of that has to do with the blame of the news and our politicians and just flat out deceiving us.
And so, like, The last couple days, I just I feel I've felt alone. I feel like I can't talk to anyone. I've tried to talk to some of my family and friends about it, and most people just shut me down or say I'm going over to the dark side. And it's like all I'm doing is trying to acknowledge some dangers within my own political party. You know?
That doesn't mean that I'm gonna jump over and vote for the person that I've deemed evil because I Still believe that. I'm just also recognizing dangers behind me as well. So I really don't know. I'm so confused. And I'm really, really gonna try to continue to learn and to figure out because I'm sure the truth is in the middle.
You know, just they're over there lying to them. I just need to assume that they're lying to me too, and I need to figure out what the truth is. And I don't know how I'm gonna do that other than maybe just listening to both sides and trying to figure out what's in the middle, you know, what's because I just I don't really see unbiased people out there. We we don't wanna hear unbiased stuff. We wanna hear stuff that fits the narrative and the world view that we have because it's easier.
So I'm I'm just gonna post as I explore this because it's unreal to me, but I also feel free. I can now watch stuff from the left or stuff from the right without, you know, feeling personally attacked because I am no longer considering myself to be a part of that. And what does that look like? Because these trains have been diverging for a very long time, and I just decided I wanna get off. I don't wanna be on this train anymore, and I'm just gonna start kind of looking around for other people that have gotten off off the train too.
And, maybe we can start figuring out how the hell we're
@playteaux - playteaux
Flying Illegally https://t.co/EbhIT2iKD7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Illegals at the Miami airport can use the CBP one app as a valid ID to board planes in the US. The app allows migrants to claim asylum and enter the country, even if they have committed crimes. The app does not require photos and does not store biographical information. This raises concerns as illegal immigrants from countries on terror watch lists can use this process, while American citizens are required to have a real ID by 2025 to board flights. This discrepancy is difficult to justify.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Popped up at the Delta terminal, the Miami airport. Instructions for illegals to use their CBP one app, that's the Customs Border Patrol app at TSA checkpoints, as a valid form of ID to board a plane in the United States. For those who don't know, the CBP one app provides appointments for migrants who are claiming asylum at the border. Migrants, particularly those wanted for crimes, can fill in any basic information they want in the app and be let into the country. The goal was to, and I quote, validate adult non US citizen travel documentation when the traveler does not otherwise have an acceptable form of identification.
However, it also notes photos are optional. It says that multiple times. It says they can provide biographical information if requested, but note that information is not stored again multiple times. How is this even serious? Illegals coming to the United States from country that are designated state sponsors of terror and on terror watch list can use this process.
Americans, think about this for a moment. We, as Americans, are gonna be forced to acquire a real ID by May of 2025 or you or anybody else here, myself, we barred from boarding a flight in the United States. How in the world can we justify this when illegal immigrants are allowed to board planes with unverifiable information they filled out on an app.
@playteaux - playteaux
Ukraine Autocracy https://t.co/gMM4BZHbsn
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Zelensky of Ukraine has gained control of the media, banned political opposition parties, and cancelled the upcoming presidential elections. This move is seen as an attempt to silence critics of corruption in Ukraine and the ongoing war. Comparisons are drawn to past instances, such as South Vietnam holding elections during the Vietnam War and Iraq conducting democratic elections during a period of violence. The speaker questions President Biden's support for Ukraine, suggesting that it undermines democracy while taking money from American taxpayers. The concern is raised that if our government supports canceling elections in Ukraine, they may justify doing the same in the United States during times of war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In Ukraine, president Zelensky has already taken complete control of the media. He has outlawed his political opposition parties, and he has banned the 2nd largest orthodox Christian church. That wasn't enough. Now in his latest edict, he declared that he's canceling the presidential elections altogether or planned for March. When you look back in history, even at the height of the Vietnam War, when there's fighting going on in every major city, South Vietnam still held elections.
During my 1st deployment to Iraq, it was 2005. It was the height of that war. And there was great threat of violence for anyone who dared to go out and vote, yet Iraq still held its democratic elections, and people still turned out to vote. Now president Biden claims his mission is to defend democracies and defeat But he continues to take money out of our pockets to underwrite a war of 1 corrupt autocracy, Ukraine, against another, Russia. So the real reason Zelensky has outlawed elections is to stop any who dare to criticize the rampant corruption in Ukraine or the war.
Those in our government who support him must also therefore believe that when the United States is at war, they too will be justified in canceling our elections.
@playteaux - playteaux
We’ve had enough https://t.co/gZbcFqEUR4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Texas has passed a law making it a state crime to cross the southern border illegally, allowing police to arrest suspects. Civil rights groups are already suing over the law. Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick defends the law, stating that the Biden administration is lying about the situation at the border. He argues that the influx of migrants is an invasion and that Texas has the right to protect its citizens. Patrick also criticizes President Biden for not addressing the issue and accuses him of trying to stuff the country with immigrants for political gain. He mentions the large number of migrants crossing the border and the need to pressure blue states to take responsibility. The interview concludes with a discussion on the notice to appear dates for court hearings, which are often set years in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jackie, the state of Texas is once again taking matters into its own hands, passing a law which makes it a state crime to cross the southern border illegally. That means police in Texas had the ability to arrest people suspected of entering the country illegally. Civil rights groups are already suing over the 3 day old law. Let's bring in Texas lieutenant governor Dan Patrick. Lieutenant governor, good to have you with us.
So the White House, other Democrats, immigration Activists, they're they're all complaining long and loud about this new law. Listen to what Karine Jean Pierre said at the last White House briefing.
Speaker 1: This is an extreme law that will not and does not, make the communities in Texas safer. It just doesn't. This is Certainly, extreme as we see it, and it is incredibly unfortunate, but this is what we see from particular Republicans trying to To dehumanize a group of people who are coming here or some of them trying to, migrate here, And they're putting them in harm's way. They're putting them in harm's way.
Speaker 0: Lieutenant governor, what do you see in response to that?
Speaker 2: I'm tired of our lies, John. I'm tired of this administration's lies. They are saying just the opposite of what's happening. They're the ones That have a policy that is seeing Americans killed by Fentanyl. They're the ones who are seeing terrorists cross over our border.
We know we've arrested about 300. They're the ones That are responsible for peeping people drowning in the river. They're the ones responsible for women being raped across the border illegally. They're the ones responsible for all of this. And so we passed a law.
And in Texas, the lieutenant governor is the president of the senate. I oversee it. I was very involved in writing this bill with senators and the governor's office, so I know it well, and we've had enough. So we're saying that we are being invaded, John. You know, our founders said, You know, an invasion by an army.
Well, the army we're facing is not the Mexican army, although the Mexican president is doing nothing to to stem this tide, the army or the cartels. And so we're saying we have a right to to grab people who cross border illegally, arrest them, give them the choice of prison or going back home. And so we arrest them. We get their fingerprints. We get the photographs.
We do the background checks. A magistrate says, you got a choice. Go to jail or go home. And if you go home and try to come back again and we catch you, the jail term is gonna even be longer. We're we think we'll win at the Supreme Court because we're being invaded, and we have a right to protect the lives of Texas and American citizens.
Speaker 0: Let me just add a little bit of context, to that, because the federal government says we have the sole jurisdiction over the border, but governor Abbott and you are citing article 1, Section 10 of the constitution, which says, quote, no state shall, without the consent of congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops or ships of war in time of peace, Enter into any agreement or contact with another state or with a foreign power or engage in war unless actually invaded or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. The governor, couple of months ago, declared this to be an invasion with a 1,000 or more godaways every day. We have no idea about them Running across the border and into this country, that would appear to be a clear national security risk because then that's the basis you say, under which you're enacting this law.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. John, look. We believe in the constitution more than the president of the United States does, but our Founders never envisioned a president who would allow us to be invaded by opening our borders to millions of people. When we say 8,000,000 people have come here in their 1st 3 years of the Biden presidency, That's the ones we've apprehended.
If you get 1 out of 2, that's 16,000,000 people, John. We are being overrun. Everyone knows it from From McAllen, Texas to New York City to Chicago, everybody knows it. This president is cold hearted. He doesn't care about what's happening to American citizens or those coming here.
This is this is something our founders never anticipated. They never thought we'd be invaded by civilians and a drug cartel behind them That's as organized and as powerful, even maybe more so, than the Mexican army. So we've gotta take the stand. We're willing to go to the Supreme Court and say, This is not what our founders envision because this and by the way, the reason there 300,000 were gonna break a record in December. He knows he's gonna be out of office This time next year, he knows the Democrats are gonna go down, and he's trying to stuff every person he can into this country eventually so that they get citizenship and a right to vote.
They're all ready, John. 8,000,000 people who have crossed the border. That would be enough to be the 13th largest state in the country today if they were all in one state.
Speaker 0: Yeah. 300,000. What a staggering number. I wanna ask you very quickly about this as well because the text state of Texas has had to take matters into its own hands again. Chicago put restrictions on buses that were bringing migrants from Texas to that city, so now you're flying them in.
Why?
Speaker 2: You bet. You bet. Because we need to move them on to these blue cities and these blue states. You know, these, quote, we're sanctuaries. Come and Come and be here.
Well, until they came. Look. We we're we have I passed a bill that banned sanctuary cities in Texas, but these other cities, these blue states said, no. Come here. Well, now they're here.
They don't want them. They're sending them elsewhere. We wanna put pressure on blue states. But this president is so bad, Not only doesn't he care about a red state like Texas, who has a target on our back from his administration, he doesn't even care about the blue states. He doesn't care what's happening to New York City.
He doesn't care about Chicago. He doesn't care about anybody. This is a policy that I said is designed to help take over this country long term, and these people are coming here. Most of them, if they got to a court in a short time, they would not be given, asylum because they're mostly single adult, mails that are coming in, they would be sent back. Almost everyone who goes to court gets sent back, but these people, they get a trial date for 5, 8, 10 years from now.
This is Yeah. This is, we're gonna put them on planes. We're gonna put them on trains. We're gonna put them on buses. We're gonna do whatever we can.
We're gonna Out of Texas, I wanna send them all to Martha's Vineyard. I wanna send them all to Delaware and Rehoboth. I wanna send them all to where they start feeling the pain that our citizens feel on the border And across Texas every day.
Speaker 0: You know, that that notice that Bill Malugen saw, that notice to appear, which I think was January 28th 2031. I mean, that was something. Well, we do know that
Speaker 2: it's a joke.
Speaker 0: It's a joke. We do know that the secretary of state and the DHS secretary I'm going to meet with Mexico's president in the days ahead. We'll see if anything comes of it, but they do seem to be getting the message
Speaker 2: Good luck.
Speaker 0: In a way. Yeah. Alright. Lieutenant governor Dan Patrick of the Great State
Speaker 2: of Texas.
Speaker 0: Good to see you again, sir. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Thank you, John. Merry Christmas. I'm Steve Ducey. I'm Brian Kilmeade.
Speaker 3: And I'm Ainsley Earhart. And click here to subscribe to the Fox News YouTube page to catch our hottest interviews and most compelling analysis.
@playteaux - playteaux
Oil Reserves https://t.co/1vKyYGsjSW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Vietnam and Egypt have 4 billion barrels of oil reserves each. India, Sudan, and Oman have 5 billion barrels each. Norway has 6 billion barrels, while Mexico and Azerbaijan have 7 billion barrels each. Ecuador has 8 billion barrels, Angola has 10 billion, and Algeria has 12 billion. Brazil has 13 billion barrels, Qatar has 25 billion, and China has 26 billion. Kazakhstan has 30.8 billion, Nigeria has 37 billion, and Libya has 48 billion. Russia has 80 billion, the UAE has 98 billion, and Kuwait has 102 billion. Iraq has 148 billion, Iran has 157 billion, Canada has 171 billion, Saudi Arabia has 266 billion, and Venezuela leads with 303 billion barrels of oil.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ever wondered which country has the most oil reserves in the world? Let's dive into the global oil reserve rankings. Starting off, Vietnam and Egypt each have oil reserves of 4,000,000,000 barrels. India, Sudan, and Oman ummen are all sitting on 5,000,000,000 barrels each. Norway steps it up a notch with 6,000,000,000 barrels.
Mexico and Azerbaijan each which boasts 7,000,000,000 barrels. Ecuador has 8,000,000,000 barrels. Angola's reserves reached ten billion, while Algeria has 12,000,000,000. Brazil's sitting pretty with 13,000,000,000 barrels. Qatar has an impressive twenty five billion, and China's got 26,000,000,000.
Kazakhstan comes in with 30,800,000,000 Nigeria's reserves are massive at 37,000,000,000 barrels. Libya's even higher with 48,000,000,000. Russia, a whopping 80,000,000,000 barrels. The UAE is not far behind with 98,000,000,000 barrels, and Kuwait has 100 with 2,000,000,000. Iraq's got an incredible 148,000,000,000 barrels.
Iran's reserves are at 157 1,000,000,000 barrels, with Canada topping that at 171,000,000,000. Saudi Arabia's sitting on a giant reserve of 266,000,000,000 barrels, And the winner, Venezuela, leading the path with a massive 303,000,000,000 barrels of oil.
@playteaux - playteaux
Title 9 https://t.co/ngVAgOHqYI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker passionately defends the protection of women and girls in sports. They express concern over the Biden administration's proposed Title IX rule, which allows males who identify as women to participate in women's sports. The speaker argues that this would undermine women's rights and eliminate women's sports as they currently exist. They highlight the potential negative consequences, such as women losing access to roster spots, championships, records, and scholarships. The speaker also raises concerns about the safety and privacy of women in spaces like locker rooms. They propose a bill called the Save Women's Sports Act, which prohibits schools receiving federal funding from allowing biological males to participate in women's sports. The speaker urges colleagues to support the bill and protect women's sports.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have we lost our minds? I sat here and listened to every every label imaginable. I I am here to protect women, girls. My God. Why do I have to apologize for that?
We spent decades trying to protect women, and you know what? We won. We won. So I will not apologize now or ever for trying to protect my daughters and women in sports. And that's what this hearing was about, protecting women.
So you know what? I am a woman, and let me tell you, hear me roar, because I will not Stop protecting women. We have rights too. Women have rights too. And our daughters have rights too.
Let me be explicitly clear on that, and I will never stop protecting our daughters. I will never stop protecting women. That is my job as a mother, and it is the right thing to do. This hearing today has been extremely informative and heartbreaking. Frankly, I am mystified by the Biden administration's shameless failures, to protect women's rights.
We talk about protecting women's rights like that's such a bad thing, that that's so evil to protect women's rights. Have we lost our mind? The administration's proposed title 9 rule will rewind decades of progress in women's rights. The Biden administration is weakening title 9 by allowing all males who identify as women to participate in women's sports. Okay.
Identify as woman. How about just be a woman? Why can't I protect my women? Why can't I protect my daughters? Title 9 was implemented by congress to give women equal educational opportunities, including within federally funded school athletic programs.
No. We're not there. Do we have a lot of work to do? You're doggone right. We we do.
But if this language gets in by the Biden administration, it will definitely not help and I can assure you that. It will not help us on the progress route. The Biden administration's rule would would eliminate women's sports as we know it. That's a fact. And you know how it starts?
It starts little by little by little by little. All you gotta do is look at it it it It's called the salami mentality. Little by little by little. It starts by just a little, and then before you know it, look at our tax system. Right?
As we have discussed today, the Biden administration has no legal grounds to support this rule. Congress is the nation's lawmaking body body, not unelected bureaucrats in the Biden administration. In this world, in a world where biological males compete in women's sports, women lose access to roster spots. It's true. It's not about your feelings, it is the fact.
Women lose championships, records, and scholarships. That's just a fact. I'm sorry if it doesn't fit your narrative, but it's the fact. Women face serious injuries from contact sports with physically biological, or larger biological males. Again, don't let the facts get in the way of a good story.
Women face emotional trauma of exposure to biological males in spaces that should be safe and private for women, like the locker room. And why should women have to change all the time? Would've been nice if we got a little heads up, Riley, About, hey, we got we got a biological male competing. Would've been nice to have a heads up. Then maybe we could have put the curtain up, but we don't even bother to tell anybody.
What about defending our women? What about defending my daughters? Don't I have a right? You know what? I say, yes, I do.
The proposed department of education rules will do nothing to preserve the safety or fairness of women's sports. This is about protecting girls and women. This is about protecting our daughters, our sisters, our nieces, and our granddaughters. And you know what? Lisa McClain is here to fight for them.
That's why I've drafted a bill, Save Women's Sports Act. The the to protect sports and fair competition across the nation. Remember title 9 that we fought so hard for? My bill prohibits any school or university that receives federal funding from allowing biological males from participating in women's sports. So you can do it.
We're just not funding it. If schools violate the provision of this bill, they lose access to all federal funding. You can be who you wanna be, but the American people don't have to fund it. Especially since about 70% of them actually agree with me. Simply put this bill will stop the pattern of unremarkable male athletes that switch to women's sports and suddenly come in 1st place.
Men like those we have heard stories about men like the ones we've heard stories about today. I ask my colleagues to join me in protecting women's sports by signing this bill. In closing, again, I wanna thank our panelists once again for your brave and important testimony today. I'm sure you're gonna get canceled. I'm sure I'm gonna get canceled, but you know what that tells me?
My ladder's on the right wall, and I'm doing the right thing.
@playteaux - playteaux
It’s a Farce https://t.co/Hg6kF9Isdk
Video Transcript AI Summary
A discussion takes place regarding the sentencing of a person involved in the Capitol breach. The speaker argues that if it were Antifa, the situation would have been worse, with bombs and casualties. They criticize the media for misrepresenting the events and claim that the only death was caused by a police officer. The speaker believes the sentences given to the January 6th participants were too harsh compared to lenient treatment of other criminals. They highlight past incidents of violence at the Capitol, suggesting that the January 6th events were not as severe. The speaker concludes that the situation has undermined the fairness of the criminal justice system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Corned guy. So you're saying that he got a little over 3 years in prison. He broke into the Capitol and
Speaker 1: He he was escorted around the Capitol by Capitol Hill Police.
Speaker 0: He wasn't escorted?
Speaker 1: He was. It's on video. Look at this.
Speaker 0: Are you saying that if Antifa broke into the Capitol in the exact same way, you would downplay it In the same way you're downplaying
Speaker 1: I don't think I'm downplaying anything. I think I'm seeing things clearly and stating my opinion, which happens to be correct. If this were Antifa If this were Antifa, they would have brought bombs, which they did when I spoke at the University of Pittsburgh just about 6 months ago. If this were Antifa, they would have maimed people and probably killed some of them. But that didn't happen with the January 6thers.
The only person who died in the political violence of January 6th was one of the January 6thers who was murdered by a trigger happy cop. That this is contrary to what we were told by the media. But the media lied to us. And and then the so called January 6thers who may have behaved in an improper way. I'm not suggesting they didn't, were sentenced to years in prison over crimes that should have received a slap on the wrist.
Meanwhile, people who committed heinous crimes for months, were were given a slap on the wrist when they should still be in prison today. Not only was the the January 6th incident not the worst insurrection in the history of the United States. It wasn't the worst attack in the history of the US Capitol. Not even close. It wasn't even in the top half dozen.
As I mentioned earlier, the the Capitol has been blown up on multiple occasions. As I mentioned earlier, In in the 19 fifties, Puerto Rican nationalists broke into the Capitol and started shooting congressmen. 5 of them were injured in that. And what happened later on to those people, Jimmy Carter, liberal darling, let them off the hook. What happened to the Weather Underground when they came in and blew up the Capitol, blew up part of the Capitol?
Well, Bill Ayers basically got off the hook for his involvement with Weather Underground and went on to become a mentor to Barack Obama. What happened to the half dozen mostly left wing attacks. We don't even remember them. People think that the the January 6th lectern guy smiling with Pelosi's podium What was the the gravest assault on the Capitol? It's it's a farce.
And and it has made a farce out of our criminal justice system to see it treated in this way.
@playteaux - playteaux
Video Transcript AI Summary
The cost of a wedding ring doesn't matter to me. I just want to be in love and have a happy, healthy marriage. The ring is just a symbol of my commitment to my partner, so it doesn't matter how much it costs. I'd rather have a man and a ring than worry about the price. He could even give me a ring pop, and I would be happy with that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How much does a wedding ring have to cost? Baby, it could be $50. It really doesn't matter. I just wanna be in love. I wanna be genuine.
I want a a happy, healthy marriage. So the ring I mean, what the cost of the ring, it really doesn't mean anything because it's not like I'm a go sell it, but the ring is just a symbol of my commitment to my man. So however much have he can really afford whatever he feels like he wants to give me. I think that's better than listen. These hoes have 3 kids with no marriage, so have I'd rather the ring and my man than the cost of it.
That don't matter to me. So, like, he could give you a ring pop and you would Baby, pay me for have a courthouse with that ring pop. Thank you. Hello?