TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @prem_thakker

prem_thakker
Posted - August 9, 2025 at 8:38 PM
Saved - August 10, 2025 at 11:34 PM

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

Voter in Iowa asks Gallego if he & Democrats will support those advocating for Palestinians. Gallego says “The people of Gaza are in this situation because Donald Trump is President.” Voters point out Biden was president too. Gallego: “Whatever, hey this is your opinion dude.” https://t.co/kG5VoRbUGX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two speakers recount experiences at a Chicago Democratic convention and a boycott motion. They say, 'there were about 15% who are uncommitted' and that they 'asked for a five minute slot on the stage, and we never got that slot.' They argue that 'Democratic values used to to value different values' and claim 'we are violating every one of them by supporting the genocide in Gaza,' alleging funds and weapons are being sent to Israel and that 'we are protecting them also in the United Nation.' They report that 'the city council passed a boycott resolution' and ask, 'Will you support boycott? Would you support us to stand for our rights? Would you support our freedom of speech?' The discussion asks, 'Where is the Republican Party?' and concludes, 'These can't be better... if the Republicans are in charge.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From Iowa to go to Chicago, last democratic convention in in in Chicago. In Chicago, there were about 15% who are uncommitted, to to to to the presidential option. And we asked for a five minute slot on the stage, and we never got that slot on the stage. Democratic Democratic values used to to value different values. He talked about what is democratic party stands stands for. We used to stand for equality, secularism, equal human rights, and now we are violating every one of them by supporting the genocide in in in in Gaza. And our you you vote you vote for $22,000,000,000 to go to to the Netanyahu in the last year or so. The the congress and senate voted for $22,000,000,000, which we don't have. We borrow from our children, and we are sending them to to to to send weapons and send money to to to Israel for to continue with the genocide, and we are protecting them also in the United Nation. So the Democratic Party talked he talked about we need to to be inclusive. There was a 100 of us yester last Tuesday at the city council, and we passed the city council passed a boycott resolution to let Israel know what is going on is not acceptable. Will you support boycott? Would you support us to stand for our rights? Would you support us to have our own voice and not us be be summoned and and and and put in jail like some of us have been doing? Would you support our freedom of speech? Yes. Okay. First of all, first of all, we're Speaker 1: gonna we support anybody having But what we do know, by the way, is that things are significantly bad because Trump is president. I try to point that out. I think we have to figure it Speaker 0: out 100%. Speaker 1: I I I think there's we've been slow to the tape. There's there's times where we didn't live up to our values. But we are in this situation. The people of Gaza are in this situation because Donald Trump is present. It is a lot Speaker 0: to Biden loves that too. Biden loves that place. Whatever. Hey. Speaker 1: This is her opinion, mayor. But, like, things are really, really bad because Donald Trump was left. I'm here with you. What I'm telling you is, yes, Israel's in the wrong. They're in the wrong, and we are actually moving to Speaker 0: the position where we think Speaker 1: there should be limits on it. And and there's a part that's actually talking to you. Where is the Republican Party? This is a co equal branch of government. It's very easy to be kicking people inside the tent. But let's recognize that there's also another part of this government, a view that control the White House, the House of Representatives, and the Senate. So let's work together. Let's remember that these can't be better. These are never gonna get better if the Republicans are in charge.

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

New: Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego says he would’ve voted against Bernie’s resolutions last week to block weapon sales to Israel — but now, says he’s “re-evaluating.” He says that going forward, he’s looking at conditioning aid, if Israel crosses his “red line” and occupies Gaza https://t.co/4nrd52SpXF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 explains that he was returning home to a seven-week-old son when the vote occurred and, with the information I have now, "I would have voted against that resolution with the information I have now." He calls the situation "horrible" for hospitals and civilians and urges Nihayan Wu to lift the siege of Gaza. He adds, "I was in the military. I'm a proud Marine," and that "it was my responsibility when I was in war, no matter what, to take care of all slaveholders." Looking ahead, "we will start looking at conditioning aid going forward." The immediate goal is to "get the hostage back," but he warns against "a full occupation of Gaza"—"the reoccupation of Gaza is a line that I'm not going to cross"—and says, "Nayanu is an awful awful man." He notes that "the worst situation... is a war with Donald Trump and then Ian Agu are both there."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When the the the bills by Bernie Sanders against sending aid to Israel was voted on and how you would have voted had you been Speaker 1: there? So that the one the most recent one, I was actually a returning. So I have a seven week old son and now it is no no diss on on Bernie but when they called the vote, it was not within the planned times and, you know, I I plan time with my wife, plan time with my son, and I have two other kids. That's three altogether. And so there's a certain amount of time I I committed to it. That was your work. Two days. I would have voted against that resolution with the information I have now. You know, we're we're evaluating. This look. What's happening around is horrible. Horrible in hospitals. Horrible to the, you know, citizens of of the house. And we've called for Nihayan Wu to lift his awful siege of the manger in need to Gaza because it is, you know, I was in the military. I'm a proud Marine. I saw some really ugly combat. It was my responsibility when I was in war, no matter what, to take care of all slaveholders. And it doesn't change the situation, what Israel is going through, what what, you know, they're trying to get get their houses back that doesn't give them a right not to follow the rules of war. Now, going forward, as we're hearing a lot more announcements of what their plans are, we will start looking at conditioning aid going forward. Because now it's moving on. We're just gonna try to get the hostage back. Now they're talking about a few full full occupation of Gaza, and that has been a red line for me, and I say that publicly. And so that does Palestinians. It's horrible for these families. Nayanu is an awful awful man. I worst situation you've been we could have ever been in, by the way, is a war with Donald Trump and then Ian Agu are both there. But it it does have to end, and we are now gonna have to look further about how we're going to build going to the future because now the situation has changed. And the reoccupation of Gaza is a line that I'm not going to cross, and I you know, that's that's just where we're gonna have to, you know, have a very frank conversation with Israel about that because that's been very clear for a lot of us too. Speaker 0: Thank you, senator. Speaker 1: Thank you all. Sorry. Next question. Yes.

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

Ad in Iowa as Ruben Gallego visits, on him skipping vote last week on resolutions to block weapons to Israel: "We need a president willing to stand against Israel's genocide, not run away." Gallego's office said he would've voted *against* the resolutions.https://t.co/4lfgYkTdWK

prem_thakker
Posted - June 3, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Saved - June 4, 2025 at 4:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a disturbing video highlighting a popular Israeli TV channel that receives government funding and is accused of inciting violence. A coalition in Israel is urging the Supreme Court to investigate Channel 14 for promoting genocide, drawing parallels to the infamous RTLM station from the Rwandan genocide. The situation raises serious concerns about media influence and responsibility in times of conflict.

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

Some of the most chilling 2 minutes you've ever seen. Look at what's being said on one of the most popular TV channels in Israel — a channel that gets special financial benefits from the Israeli government, which itself gets billions from US taxpayers. (Full story in replies)

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

Inside the TV Network Pumping Genocide Into Israeli Homes An Israeli coalition asked the Supreme Court to investigate Channel 14 for inciting genocide & to stop it from becoming a “modern Israeli version” of the Rwandan genocide-inciting RTLM radio station.https://zeteo.com/p/inside-the-tv-network-pumping-genocide

Inside the TV Network Pumping 'Genocide' Into Israeli Homes A special Zeteo report examines the racist and genocidal statements broadcast on Channel 14 – and hears from the coalition of Israeli groups hoping to hold the popular right-wing network accountable. zeteo.com
prem_thakker
Posted - December 5, 2024 at 3:38 AM
Saved - December 6, 2024 at 2:15 AM

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

The New York Times had entire homepages full of stories on campus antisemitism hearings. It has not yet written about the biggest human rights organization in the world saying that Israel is committing genocide.

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

NEW: Human rights organization Amnesty International has released a 296-page report concluding that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. The group joins Holocaust historians, United Nations experts, and a growing number of nations worldwide in doing so. https://zeteo.com/p/amnesty-concludes-israel-genocide-gaza

Amnesty International Investigation Concludes Israel Is Committing Genocide “We will look back and say, ‘Why did we not do more earlier?” Amnesty's director tells Zeteo. zeteo.com
prem_thakker
Posted - December 1, 2024 at 11:20 PM
Saved - December 2, 2024 at 2:24 AM

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

In the past 2 days, Israeli forces have: –Killed 3 World Central Kitchen aid workers –Killed a Save The Children staffer –Killed a Gaza Soup Kitchen chef –Killed an ICU director –Attacked & killed hundreds of displaced Palestinians –Shot a 10-year-old girl

prem_thakker
Posted - July 29, 2024 at 2:22 PM
Saved - July 29, 2024 at 4:56 PM

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

As the Israeli parliament debates whether it’s okay to rape prisoners, a mob (including lawmakers) attacks a base in protest of the Israeli military police detaining 9 soldiers suspected of sexually assaulting a prisoner https://t.co/y7DKMpJ8up

prem_thakker
Posted - July 13, 2024 at 4:22 PM
Saved - July 14, 2024 at 6:48 AM

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

Tuesday—Israeli forces bomb kids playing soccer Thursday—US announces it will resume shipments of 500-pound bombs to Israel Saturday—Israeli forces bomb a “safe zone,” reportedly killing 70+ people and injuring at least 289

prem_thakker
Posted - February 12, 2024 at 6:58 PM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 1:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US State Department spokesperson emphasized the importance of the President's words in leveraging influence. A question was raised about whether Israel should be held accountable for its actions in Gaza, similar to how Russia is expected to pay for damage caused in Ukraine. The spokesperson suggested that if Israel allows a path to a Palestinian state, it may avoid the need to pay for damages. When asked if the US would strip aid to Israel, the response was that the US will continue to support Israel's right to defend itself against Hamas. The spokesperson did not engage in hypotheticals but stated that consistent communication has been maintained to protect civilians.

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

AP's Matt Lee: What leverage is US using? State Dept spox Matt Miller: "The words of the President…matter" Lee: "Over the top?' That's leverage?" (2 days after Biden called Israel's behavior "over the top," it attacked the last refuge for 1.5 million Palestinians—killing 90+)

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have used diplomatic levers at various levels to urge action from the administration. Our interventions have led to tangible improvements, although not always to the extent we desire. The words of the President and Secretary of State have influenced the government of Israel's response, showing that our efforts have had an impact and will be continued.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What levers have you used? Speaker 1: So we have used diplomatic levers. The Secretary Speaker 0: has That means the Secretary and the President and you and Kirby and whoever else standing up and saying wagging your finger and saying that that's not really leverage. Speaker 1: We have engaged with them on a, at a multitude of levels at this administration. And as I kind of you look at the list that we just went through with Humira, we have seen them take steps at our urging that have had real Yeah. Have had real tangible impact, but but they have not been enough. Speaker 0: But what levers have you actually Speaker 1: I I think the that when the United States of America, stands up and says something publicly, it matters. Yeah. But but but you haven't That's a lever. And and we and we and Speaker 0: But you haven't said Speaker 1: No. And we but that there Speaker 0: are any consequences To my Speaker 1: to my point, we have seen money Speaker 0: or military assistance. Right? Speaker 1: But but we have seen because of the, policies we have pursued, we have seen improvements along these specific areas. We have seen tangible improvements. Speaker 0: Again, I'm just asking you what Speaker 1: what leverage have you been doing? III What leverage have you brought to bear? I just went through it. Speaker 0: When have you gone Speaker 1: I think the words of the president of the United States, the words of the secretary of state matter. And we've seen hold on. We've seen Speaker 0: Over the top. Speaker 1: And we have seen leverage. And we have seen the government of Israel respond to it, not always in the way that we want, not always to the degree that we want or to the level that we want, but the the our interventions, we believe, have had an impact. And we will continue to pursue them because we we believe they do.

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

https://t.co/pQWIU5K2VL

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

Q: If US says Russia should pay for damage it caused in Ukraine, should Israel pay for what it's done in Gaza? State Dept spox Miller: Other countries may help. If Israel allows path to a Palestinian state, that "avoids the question of Israel having to pay for" damage it caused. https://t.co/IV1z80NK1y

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, with discussions on reconstruction and contributions from other countries. Israel is not currently involved in these talks. The focus is on a path to rebuilding Gaza and avoiding Israel having to pay for it. The situation in Ukraine is also unresolved, with efforts to involve other countries in finding a solution. Israel's role in these discussions has not been determined yet.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're all conflicts. And and and and I and I realize that World War 2 is over and, and and the Ukraine war is not over, but they neither is the Gaza war. And you're saying that Russia right now has to pay for the damage that it caused in Ukraine. So I've just said wondering, would you say the same that that that that that Israel should pay for at least some of the damage that it it it has caused So in Gaza even though it's fighting, you know, for what you say is a completely justifiable or what is a completely Speaker 1: So what I would say on that matter is that 1 of the things that we have heard as or through the secretary's diplomacy in the region is that there are countries who are ready to step up and help pay for the reconstruction of Gaza. I don't mean Israel. Other countries who are willing to step up and help with the reconstruction of Gaza and put real money into the game as well as real, you know, political political, credibility. But that's that's another matter on another track. But just with respect to reconstruction, there are other countries who are willing to recontribute or contribute to Speaker 0: the No. No. Recontribute is right because they've already rebuilt Gaza for 3 times. Right? And and so Let Speaker 1: let me just finish. But let me but Israel Speaker 0: is not 1 of Speaker 1: those countries. Let me just finish. Our discussions have been about other countries who are willing to contribute, to the rebuilding of Gaza. But they expect something from Israel in return, and that's what we've talked about this path to to 2 states. Speaker 0: So so Money. Speaker 1: I'm not gonna I'm not gonna get into the hypothetical because we think the policy that we ought to pursue is this path that the secretary has laid out that would lead to the rebuilding of Gaza, and would avoid the question that you are, putting on the table. Speaker 0: No. It's, Speaker 1: I I'm saying I'm saying Speaker 0: avoid the question. Someone's gotta pay for it. Speaker 1: No. No. I'm saying it avoids the question of Israel having to pay for it. What the the the path that we think forward is is the 1 that we've put on the table. Speaker 0: So do you think that path would would would Well, I I Israel or that It Speaker 1: would certainly information from me. I I do not wanna say any we are we are fully well down the path that we have not hardly even started walking at this point. Well, certainly Speaker 0: But certainly you could say the same thing about Ukraine. That that war is not over yet either. Speaker 1: Bring other it countries to the table. Speaker 0: Yeah. But okay. But how about Israel? Do they do they Speaker 1: Again, I said we are not at that point yet in these conversations.

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

https://t.co/5ifmjZJiZQ

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

Q: Has Biden threatened to strip aid to Israel if they advance a Rafah operation that doesn't account for civilians? John Kirby: We're going to continue to support Israel. They have a right to defend themselves against Hamas & we're gonna make sure they have the tools to do that https://t.co/93yf0Lmqta

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president supports Israel's right to defend against Hamas and will provide them with necessary tools, despite concerns about civilian casualties in a potential Rafah operation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And on Rafa, does the has the president ever threatened to strip military assistance from Israel if they move ahead with a Rafa operation that does not take into consequence what happens with civilians. We're gonna continue to support Israel. They have a right to defend themselves against Hamas, and we're gonna continue to make sure they have the tools and the capabilities to do that.

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

https://t.co/zfAC6G2K86

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

Q: Would US policy change under any circumstance or is it support no matter what? John Kirby: I'm not going to engage in hypotheticals Q: Is there anything beyond concern you can give to protect civilians? Kirby: We've communicated consistently since beginning of the conflict https://t.co/kBDs3M7v8r

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US policy regarding the conflict in Israel will not change, as they aim to support Israel's defense while ensuring humanitarian aid reaches Gaza. The focus is on achieving a ceasefire to reduce violence, evacuate people, and deliver aid. The US emphasizes the importance of Israel protecting civilians and assures continued support.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You talk, I know you can't give, specifics about consequences, but, I mean, would the United States policy change under any circumstances? You talk about an obligation to protect civilians. The president has talked about over the top indiscriminate bombings. Is there anything would there be any consequences? Would the US policy change, or is it support no matter what? Speaker 1: I just won't get ahead of where we are right now, and I'm certainly not engaged hypotheticals. We wanna make sure Israel can continue to defend itself. We wanna make sure that humanitarian assistance continues to flow to the people of Gaza. And by no means has there been enough. There needs to be more. And we wanna get all those hostages home. We believe that the best way to accomplish those 3 goals is to get an extended pause in place. To bring the violence down, to get people out and get aid in. And that's what we're focused on. And I I get the I get the thrust of the question. I'm just not gonna engage in hypotheticals about changes in Speaker 0: I'm concerned that you can give to the Israelis to to help protect the civilians. Speaker 1: We have communicated, again, consistently and stridently since the beginning of the conflict. I mean, since the time the president went to Tel Aviv on 17th October, just a week or so after the attacks. How important it is that Israel knows it's gonna have our support and that they do everything they can to protect innocent life.
prem_thakker
Posted - February 23, 2024 at 7:04 PM
Saved - February 24, 2024 at 1:32 PM

@prem_thakker - Prem Thakker

Now at least four (4) on camera instances of Israeli soldiers parading around Palestinian women’s underwear. Israeli forces have rescued three (3) hostages, while killing at least 29,500 people, including hostages. https://t.co/fQMIwHn84G

View Full Interactive Feed