TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @propandco
@propandco - Propaganda & co
Is Tyler a patsy? https://t.co/IGCv60L9xn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Investigators identified an individual as the roommate of Robinson, who stated that his roommate referring to Robinson made a joke on Discord. He opened it and showed several messages to investigators and allowed investigators to take photos of the screen as each message was shown by Robinson's roommate. These photos consisted of various messages, including content of messages between the phone contact name Tyler with an emoji icon and Robinson's roommate's device. The content of these messages included messages affiliated with the contact Tyler stating a need to retrieve a rifle from a drop point. Discord said: "In a statement to NBC News, a Discord spokesperson said the company did identify an account belonging to the suspect, but said the messages mentioned in the news conference were not believed to have been sent on Discord." "The messages referenced in recent reporting about planning details do not appear to be Discord messages." These were communications between the roommate and a friend after the shooting, where the roommate was recounting the contents of a note the suspect had left elsewhere; "The messages aren't between Tyler, the alleged shooter, and his roommate." They were about Tyler, not from him. This seems to contradict the governor's claims; "The governor never mentioned that these communications were between the roommate and another person." The governor started by saying the roommate told the FBI that Tyler sent him a joke, and then goes on to detail how Tyler allegedly told the roommate to watch over the area where the gun was placed. But asking someone to watch the area where the gun was placed doesn't sound like a joke. It sounds like a deliberate order to assist with the cover up of an assassination. And now, the shooter's own grandmother says the FBI have the wrong man: "There is no way Robinson could be involved. ... I don't think he ever shot a gun to tell you the truth, ... He doesn't own any guns." Up until this point, we haven't heard from the father or any other family members. This raises a very serious issue because right now there are two pieces of evidence that the FBI and the governor of Utah is presenting to the public as evidence that Tyler is the shooter. One is that his father convinced Tyler to turn himself in, and two, the supposed Discord messages. With the Discord messages already being called into question, and since we haven't heard from his father, we shouldn't consider this case closed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take a look at this clip of the governor of Utah speaking about the evidence linking the alleged suspect, Tyler Robinson, to the shooting.
Speaker 1: Investigators identified an individual as the roommate of Robinson. Investigators interviewed that roommate who stated that his roommate referring to Robinson made a joke on Discord. Investigators asked if he would show them the messages on Discord. He opened it and showed several messages to investigators and allowed investigators to take photos of the screen as each message was shown by Robinson's roommate. These photos consisted of various messages, including content of messages between the phone contact name Tyler with an emoji icon and Robinson's roommate's device.
The content of these messages included messages affiliated with the contact Tyler stating a need to retrieve a rifle from a drop point.
Speaker 0: Shortly after these comments, however, Discord released a statement that countered these claims. The company behind the online chat app, Discord, is disputing some details that were shared in Friday's news conference with officials. In a statement to NBC News, a Discord spokesperson said the company did identify an account belonging to the suspect, but said the messages mentioned in the news conference were not believed to have been sent on Discord. In the course of our investigation, we identified a Discord account associated with the suspect, but have found no evidence that the suspect planned this incident or promoted violence on Discord. The messages referenced in recent reporting about planning details do not appear to be Discord messages.
These were communications between the suspect's roommate and a friend after the shooting, where the roommate was recounting the contents of a note the suspect had left elsewhere. According to Discord, the messages aren't between Tyler, the alleged shooter, and his roommate. The messages were between the roommate and a third person described as a friend and were about Tyler, not from him. This seems to contradict the governor's claims. The way the governor presents the information, it sounds as if the messages are between Tyler and his roommate.
The governor never mentioned that these communications were between the roommate and another person. The governor also started by saying the roommate told the FBI that Tyler sent him a joke, and then goes on to detail how Tyler allegedly told the roommate to watch over the area where the gun was placed. But asking someone to watch the area where the gun was placed doesn't sound like a joke. It sounds like a deliberate order to assist with the cover up of an assassination. And now, the shooter's own grandmother says the FBI have the wrong man.
She says, there is no way Robinson could be involved. Adding that she believes he hasn't ever handled such a weapon as the bolt action rifle that the FBI claims killed Kirk, let alone with such precision. I don't think he ever shot a gun to tell you the truth, she said. He doesn't hunt. He's never liked anything like that.
I know he doesn't own any guns. Up until this point, we haven't heard from the father or any other family members. The grandmother is the only person who has spoken to the media about her grandson potentially being the shooter. This raises a very serious issue because right now there are two pieces of evidence that the FBI and the governor of Utah is presenting to the public as evidence that Tyler is the shooter. One is that his father convinced Tyler to turn himself in, and two, the supposed Discord messages.
With the Discord messages already being called into question, and since we haven't heard from his father, we shouldn't consider this case closed. Given how authorities have
reSee.it AI Summary
There is significant disinformation surrounding Tyler Robinson and the shooting of Charlie Kirk. Claims about Tyler confessing, being trans, or sending messages on Discord have not been confirmed. Discord has denied any involvement, and Tyler is not cooperating with authorities. The narrative about a "family friend" turning him in has shifted to imply uncertainty. Additionally, reports suggest his roommate, not his father, was involved in turning him in, but this too is questionable. Tyler's grandmother believes the FBI has the wrong person.
@propandco - Propaganda & co
Tyler Robinson has NOT confessed to the shooting Charlie Kirk https://t.co/YjeS2rJZN3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities.
He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important.
Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities.
He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important.
Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities.
He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities.
He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important.
@propandco - Propaganda & co
There is a lot of disinformation about the alleged shooter People claimed he confessed That he was trans or had a trans partner That he sent messages on discord planning the attack As of now, these things are not confirmed Discord rejected the idea that messages about the shooting were sent by Tyler via their platform The suspect isn’t cooperating, suggesting that he has not confessed to anything The media is now softening their claim that the “family friend” who helped “turn him in” was sure of his confession “Confessed to them” has now become “implied to them.” Is this incompetence by the FBI and governor of Utah in the way they present the information to the media or are these the signs of a cover up ?
@propandco - Propaganda & co
It is also no longer clear that his “father” turned him in. According to the daily mail, Tyler’s roommate turned him in. This should also not be treated as accurate. There is too much disinformation. https://t.co/cs29TxV66S
@propandco - Propaganda & co
Tyler’s grandmother claims the FBI have the wrong man https://t.co/sH9NKPnLRI
@propandco - Propaganda & co
Did Israel Kill Charlie Kirk? https://t.co/KVNdhPVVzW
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video opens with questions about whether 'Israel killed Charlie Kirk,' noting the shooter is in custody and that speculation spread online, with Netanyahu denying it. It cites Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil claiming Kirk was 'beginning to break ranks with the Zionists. He was questioning Israel.' The core question posed is: 'Was Charlie Kirk's assassination just the act of a lone gunman? Or was it a violent coup by Israel to gain control over the most influential conservative organization in America.' The piece argues Zionist donors pressured Kirk, who led Turning Point USA—'over 3,500 chapters nationwide'—and had been funded by figures like the David Horowitz Foundation. It describes Kirk's evolving stance: at times he toed the Israeli line during Gaza, but questioned Israeli government actions; private intimidation by Zionist allies; Netanyahu rejected but offered funding; and 'Cui bono'—there is evidence to believe that Israel and the Zionists do. It notes Shapiro's subsequent campus tour.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did Israel kill Charlie Kirk? The alleged shooter is now in custody, turned in by his own father. Case closed. Right? A lone gunman.
A young man chasing infamy. The assassin of one of America's most popular political activists. The most viral political assassination in modern history. But there's an issue. A very serious issue.
Given how authorities have handled this investigation, we can't treat their information concrete. So it begs the question, what if there is more to this story? Shortly after Kirk's assassination, speculation of Israel's involvement spread like wildfire. The claims were so viral that a Newsmax journalist was forced to ask Benjamin Netanyahu himself during an interview where he appeared agitated and nervous as he denied the allegations.
Speaker 1: Before I let you go, I want you to address one thing and and I've it's just the absurdity of it. Some of the Internet rumors that somehow Israel is behind the Charlie Kirk murder. And, you know, I don't believe it for one second, but I want you to, you know, make a statement. It's so absurd.
Speaker 2: That's insane. That's insane. It's not only insane, it's I I think it's so absurd, so stupid, so stupid, and so ridiculous. You can't believe that people are saying that. They just found the perpetrator.
They'll get to the bottom of this.
Speaker 0: This speculation about Israel being behind Charlie Kirk's assassination came across as absurd to many people, myself included, given Kirk's history of loyal servitude to Israel and the Zionists. I mean, what motive would Israel have for killing their own loyal subject? But then came this bombshell. Journalist Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil revealed Kirk was beginning to break ranks with the Zionists. He was questioning Israel.
He was refusing Zionist money and platforming critics. And for that, he was met with intimidation and backlash from powerful Zionist figures. He was afraid of them. In this video, we'll dive into the article, lay out the claims, and we'll confront the very important question. Was Charlie Kirk's assassination just the act of a lone gunman?
Or was it a violent coup by Israel to gain control over the most influential conservative organization in America. There's a famous expression in Latin dating back to the classical period when attempting to identify criminal suspects, or who benefits? This question comes to mind when considering whether or not Israel is responsible for arranging Charlie Kirk's assassination. To even consider whether or not Israel may be responsible, you first have to believe that they somehow benefited. Therefore, for Israel to benefit from Charlie Kirk's assassination, Charlie Kirk would have to no longer be of benefit to Israel.
To many, including myself, Charlie Kirk was a loyal and beneficial propagandist to Israel. He spent his entire career spreading the myth of Judeo Christian values.
Speaker 3: This country was founded on a Judeo Christian construct, which is a gift from the Lord, and we must honor that.
Speaker 0: He routinely claimed Israel was America's greatest ally and propagated the false claim that Palestinians never existed. What you what you're trying to say?
Speaker 3: I don't think the place exists. What? Because it doesn't. It's called Judea And Samaria. It's not called Palestine.
It's a nonexistent place.
Speaker 0: All of this serves Israel and Zionism. And the organization he founded, Turning Point USA, received tons of financial support from Zionist donors including the David Horowitz Foundation. He repaid his wealthy backers over the years by unleashing a relentless fire hose of anti Palestinian and Islamophobic diatribes. Accepting propaganda trips to Israel and sternly shutting down nationalist forces challenging his support for Israel during TPUSA events. So the idea that Kirk was somehow becoming a threat to Israel was absurd.
But as many social media users have pointed out, Kirk was in fact showing signs of evolution. The same kind of evolution that saw personalities like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Megan Kelly to name a few change their tune in regards to America's relationship with Israel. According to the Grey Zone, as Israel's genocidal assault on the besieged Gaza Strip drove an unprecedented backlash within grassroots right wing circles, where only 24% of younger Republicans now sympathize with Israel over the Palestinians, Kirk began to shift. At times, he towed the Israeli line spreading disinformation about babies beheaded by Hamas on October 7 and denying the famine imposed on the population of Gaza. Yet, he simultaneously ceded to his base wondering aloud if Jeffrey Epstein was an Israeli intelligence asset.
Questioning whether the Israeli government allowed the October to proceed in order to advance long term political goals and parroting narratives familiar to his most vociferous critic on the right streamer Nick Fuentes. Back in July, Turning Point USA held a student action summit for young conservatives in Tampa, Florida. As head of the organization, Kirk would decide who to platform at this event. In a decision that enraged Zionists, Kirk decided to platform Israel critics Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and comedian Dave Smith. At the event, Tucker Carlson made several incendiary comments taunting the Zionist billionaire Bill Ackman.
Speaker 4: How did Bill Ackman get 9,000,000 billion dollars?
Speaker 5: Bill Bill Ackman a pretty impressive guy? I know Bill Ackman. No. Bill Ackman's like well connected and super aggressive. That's
Speaker 0: it. And even suggested that Americans serving in the IDF should lose their citizenship.
Speaker 4: Because you can only really pledge your loyalty to one person or one country. That's just a fact. Like anybody, by the way, who serves in a foreign military should lose his citizenship immediately. There are a lot of Americans who've served in the IDF, they should lose their citizenship. You can't fight for another country and remain an American.
Period.
Speaker 0: Megan Kelly suggested that Jeffrey Epstein was an Israeli Mossad agent.
Speaker 3: So he was an American, which leads basically three options. MI6, Saudi, or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose?
Speaker 6: I guess Mossad, given his connection to Ghislain Maxwell. So
Speaker 3: what does that mean?
Speaker 6: Well, I mean, it's possible that that's the reason everything is getting buried, that there is some treasure trove, and it's getting buried because
Speaker 3: How many people here believe that? Raise your hand.
Speaker 5: Okay. I'd say about half
Speaker 3: half the hands think that it's being buried because of an Israeli thing.
Speaker 0: And Dave Smith heavily criticized Israel's genocidal actions in Gaza.
Speaker 7: Because it's not a war. It's the destruction of a captive people. Gaza has been occupied since 1967 by the Israelis and they're now just slaughtering the people there.
Speaker 0: On social media, Zionists went into a frenzy denouncing Charlie Kirk as a traitor. The Jewish Zionist Laura Loomer tweeted, after this weekend, I'd say he has revealed himself as a political opportunist. Lately, Kirk has decided to behave like a charlatan. It really is shameful. And honestly, I am just disgusted with the constant flip flopping on the right.
In the times of Israel, a blogger called Kirk out for promoting anti Semitism. Quote, Charlie, what are you doing? You know the difference between good faith critique and coded antisemitism. When people obsess over AIPAC while ignoring Qatar, China, Saudi Arabia, the UN, that's not objectivity. That's targeting.
Leadership also means knowing when a conversation is no longer a conversation, it's manipulation. It's how the seeds of Jew scapegoating get watered, not by swastikas, but by just asking questions. Finally, she warns, Charlie, don't abandon your post. You've stood for truth when it wasn't easy. Stand now with Israel, with reason, with your own better judgment.
And the Jewish Zionist Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro also voiced their displeasure with Kirk over who he platformed at the summit.
Speaker 8: We, you and I, had people who we thought were conservatives sound a lot like the Marxist Islamists who were attending this event last week, don't they? They find that conservative groups and conservative organizations that have these weekend events and these seminars, whether they're for young people or think tanks or that sort of thing. They sort of sprinkle these events with these kooks, with these American haters who claim to be American firsters and are fake MAGA and even stabbed the president in the back.
Speaker 9: I mean, I think it's it's definitely an attempt by some of these organizations to quote, unquote, maintain the big tent. The problem with a big tent is that you may end up with many, many clowns inside.
Speaker 0: But the backlash against Kirk wasn't just happening in public. It was being done in private as well. According to the Grey Zone article, Kirk was bombarded with infuriated text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu's wealthy allies in The US, including many who had funded TP USA. According to his longtime friend, the Zionist donors treated Kirk with outright contempt, essentially ordering him to fall back into line. He was being told what you're not allowed to do and it was driving him crazy, Kirk's friend recalled.
The conservative youth leader was not only alienated by the hostile nature of the interactions, but frightened by the backlash. And apparently, Kirk wasn't just disturbed by Zionist donors or leaders here in America that were calling and texting him. He was feeling the heat from Israel itself through its war criminal president Benjamin Netanyahu. Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into Turning Point USA, America's largest conservative youth association. In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader regarding him as a bully.
Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president's personal decisions and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb. According to Kirk's friend who also enjoyed access to president Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel's behalf. Charlie was the only person who did that, they said, recalling how Trump barked at him in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incidents confirmed in Kirk's mind that the presidents of The United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts. By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu.
Figures, he described in an interview as Jewish leaders and stakeholders. He was afraid of them, the source emphasized. The reports of this fear are consistent with other claims made by sources also close to Kirk. A month ago, Harrison Smith, a well known media personality and political commentator tweeted out that someone close to Charlie told him that Kirk was worried Israel might kill him for criticizing them. I'm not gonna name names, but I was told by someone close to Charlie Kirk that Charlie thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against them.
And Charlie himself told Megyn Kelly a month before his assassination that he was afraid.
Speaker 6: Sick of being lectured on like, you you have to see it exactly as we see
Speaker 3: it and support everything, or you're you're against us. Got texts about you, Megan. Why is Megan, like, doing the bidding of Hamas? I was like, what are you talking about? Megan's the best.
And I said, why are you texting me about Megan? This is what they don't understand. You and I, Megan, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after The more you attack our moral character, the actually, the more we're gonna double down in direction because
Speaker 5: 100%.
Speaker 3: I don't do it that way. Okay? On some part of the population, you can scold them into silence.
Speaker 0: But if
Speaker 3: I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, right, Megan? With a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, oh, Charlie is a he's he's no longer with us and all that. So wait a second. What do you mean? What does with us mean exactly?
Right? Mhmm. I'm an American. Okay? Like, I I I represent this country.
The more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated. Right? I'm Megan, would be one thing if it was one text or two text. It is dozens of texts. Yes.
Then we start to say, hold the boat here. And and to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us. It's all. But these are leaders too though. Right?
These are these are stakeholders. Right? I am I'm I'm afraid because again, I want civilization to win. I feel the connection to Israel. And I but at the same time, simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Meghan and Charlie are enemies Right.
Boy, I'll tell you, like, you're you're you're you're you're gonna weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues.
Speaker 0: Now you might think it's weird that Israel would go to such lengths as to kill a former ally for even beginning to question them. But as several social media users have put it, given the influence and power Kirk had on over 3,500 college campuses across the country as the director of Turning Point USA, the very possibility that he could flip on them was a dangerous threat. The mere possibility that Kirk could start down the same path as Tucker and Candace is enough to send shivers down the spine of any Zionist with half a brain. Losing Kirk even to a moderate degree would represent a devastating blow to the Zionist power base in America. Zionist concerns over Kirk's leadership of Point USA, an organization he founded, have been brewing for some time.
Over a year ago, Ben Dominic, a co founder of The Federalist wrote, if Charlie Kirk remains the head of TP USA, the right has an anti Semite problem. And a few weeks ago, in the Times of Israel, Jewish Zionist Daniella Bloom wrote, Turning Point must continue to be a safe haven for aligned pro America, pro Israel Jews on campus and for future generations. What we have established here is consistent thread of Zionist outrage over Charlie Kirk's platforming of Israel critics and concerns over his leadership of TP USA, the most influential conservative organization in America. You see, Turning Point USA isn't just another conservative group. With over 3,500 chapters nationwide, its conferences became the beating heart of Republican youth politics.
Charlie Kirk developed it into a machine that energized young conservatives like no one else. Even Donald Trump credited Kirk NTP USA for his election victory calling it your victory, not mine. This is why the stakes were so high for the Zionists. If Kirk had continued drifting toward criticism of Israel, it wouldn't just be another commentator questioning Zionism. It would mean the entire conservative youth movement could begin shifting its views.
Unlike Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, or Nick Fuentes who can be dismissed as fringe and independent commentators, Kirk and TPUSA had mainstream power. They organized the grassroots. They had access to the White House. That is exactly why Netanyahu offered to bankroll TPUSA to make sure Kirk never turned that influence against Israel. As the founder of this organization, rejecting this funding essentially denied Israel the ability to gain leverage over Kirk's position as leader of the organization.
So without access, they couldn't threaten to remove him from the position. And when gangsters can't buy you or control you, well, they kill you.
Speaker 5: Kid, you work it out any way you want, but nobody's backing out of the deal.
Speaker 3: Mister Cannella, I'm sorry, but the bottom line is I'm not selling the company to you.
Speaker 5: I'll tell you the fucking bottom line, laddie buck. The Barone routes are not Cannella routes. That's that. Bobby.
Speaker 0: So even though Kirk routinely amplified Israeli propaganda, simply questioning Israel's actions in a critical light seems to have been a step too far for Zionists who have lost virtually all support from young Republicans. In Charlie Kirk's final interview, he raised what can only be described as the gentlest of questions with Ben Shapiro about ethnic cleansing in Gaza.
Speaker 3: We've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse. Some people in the Israeli government are saying again, it's all over the place.
Right? You have opinions all over. In your opinion, what would a good outcome five years from now be, and how does one respond to the claims of ethnic cleansing?
Speaker 0: Twenty four hours later, Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck and killed. With Kirk now dead, Zionists began covering up this tension and claiming he was a loyal friend of Israel until the very end. Netanyahu first tweeted prayers for Kirk at 03:02PM in the afternoon on September 10, minutes after news of the shooting broke. He has since authored three additional posts about Kirk, even breaking away from the Israeli war cabinet to spend the afternoon of September 11 memorializing the conservative leader on Fox News. During that interview, Netanyahu did his best to insinuate that Israel's enemies were responsible for murdering Kirk, despite the fact no suspect was named or in custody at the time.
Speaker 2: The radical Islamists and the their union with the ultra progressives, they often speak about human rights. They speak about free speech, but they use violence to try to take down their enemies.
Speaker 0: None of this, of course, is concrete evidence that Israel was behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk. But what this does reveal are three important facts. The first is that Kirk was beginning to criticize Israel even if it was too soft, too little, too late. The second is that Charlie Kirk was growing frustrated over Israel's attempt to control what he says and who he speaks to. And the third is that the Zionists were also incredibly frustrated with him and worried about his position as the leader of TP USA.
So when it comes to the famous Latin expression, Cui bono or who benefits, there is evidence to believe that Israel and the Zionists do. Within twenty four hours of Kirk's death, Shapiro announced that he would be launching his own campus speaking tour, vowing, we're gonna pick up that blood stained microphone where Charlie left it. But what do you think? Is there anything that I'm missing? Let me know in the comment section.
And of course, don't forget to read the article by The Grey Zone which is linked in the comment section below. If you liked this video, please consider subscribing and donating to
Speaker 5: Everything is propaganda. Everything is propaganda. So why not choose your own?
@propandco - Propaganda & co
Max Blumenthal and I saw the Fatah missile at the Aerospace museum in Tehran. We also saw Irani air defense capabilities. https://t.co/HFxwDPDmeP
Video Transcript AI Summary
At Iran’s aerospace museum, the speakers outline Iran’s military capabilities—drones, ballistic missiles, and a Nour space program—highlighting the Fata hypersonic missile that "can actually release warheads, change directions after it locks onto its target. It goes up to Mach 15, reaches Tel Aviv in, like, five minutes." They note the Weitzman Institute strike and say "the Iranian ballistic missiles ... are significant in turning the tables on Israel and will be the key" if deterrence is established. They cite air-defense claims of shooting down "up to three" F‑35s and a captured Israeli pilot. They recount Tajrish bombing: "a huge bombing there today. It may have been a terrorist car bombing." They discuss Netanyahu’s calculus with Trump, and propose: "suspend spare parts to... Nevatim Air Base" to end it; "APAC would have to be registered as a foreign agent," with an espionage act investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also took a tour on different days of the aerospace museum, and we got to see Iran's military capabilities. Can you talk to me about, you know, what you witnessed there and, how that's coming to play now? Mean, I these are the tools basically being used to defend, you know, and from Israel right now.
Speaker 1: Well, I should say I wish we were still there. Just just us. Obviously, I wouldn't want my family to be there to cover the war. That's that's our job, and to bear witness and to use our skills as writers, videographers with our native English language to be able to communicate what's actually taking place there. And so many of the places we visited are now under attack.
The Tajrish neighborhood that we visited so many times, home of this famous market, so many great restaurants and cultural attractions. You know, I spent a night there with a more secular family, and and drank I drank some wine at their house. You know? Like, many Iranians private drink wine privately in their homes, and that's that's the kind of population that lives there. They are now under attack, harshly under attack.
There was a huge bombing there today. It may have been a terrorist car bombing. And I would really want to follow-up and see how people are reacting to this, but some of the friends that we made there are one of them is in in Central Tehran, lives a few blocks from the leader, Ayatollah Khamenei. Apparently, Trump there's news now that Trump vetoed an assassination of him. But that neighborhood has been under intense bombing for the past few days, And I've been hearing from her that she's trying to trying to put into words what war is for her young son and explain what war is.
And the bombings, the way she describes it with drones coming in and then her building shaking, it reminds me of what it was like when I was in Gaza. Israel is going to try to Gaza ify Tehran. And at the same time, Israel's experiencing something that it I don't think it's ever experienced in its history and certainly hasn't experienced the kind of existential dread of being under bombing in your cities that you cannot stop since 1973 when its army nearly collapsed, and it had to have an emergency airlift thanks to Henry Kissinger. The Iranian ballistic missiles that we saw on display at that aerospace museum are so significant in turning the tables on Israel and will be if Iran manages to establish deterrence, they will be the key. And they were designed, conceived by one of the heroes of the Eight Years' War with Iraq, Imbogadam, who was killed in 2011 testing a new missile.
Many of the missiles that he designed have been on display in the last few days. I mean, we're talking about older missiles like the Imad missile. And then, you know, you walk towards the end of that ballistic missile display and you see the Fata hypersonic missile, which can actually release warheads, change directions after it locks onto its target. It goes up to Mach 15, reaches Tel Aviv in, like, five minutes. This, I don't even know if it's been deployed yet, but we saw Iran strike the Weitzman Institute, which is the key nexus of Israeli scientific and nuclear training, as well as, for drone research, AI research, the most advanced research, which is then deployed by unit eighty two hundred and Israel's military other aspects of Israeli military intelligence, were based there.
And in fact, the FBI's counter espionage division investigated the Weitzman Institute for stealing nuclear secrets from The United States, but they, of course, dropped the investigation under political pressure. So Iran is hitting some pretty significant targets, we got to see why and how. And there are other components of the Iranian military outside the IRGC, which we haven't yet seen on display. I mean, the Iranian Navy, for example, infantry, special forces. But we saw the drones.
We saw the ballistic missiles, and we saw that Iran has developed its own space program through the Nour satellites, which have provided it the possibility to obtain some intelligence inside Israel and, improve its targeting.
Speaker 0: We also saw air defense systems. Yeah. Radars, massive radars, and these systems are there's debate over how well the air the space above Tehran and and Yiddan, Western because Israel claimed that they control the airspace. They have air superiority is what they they described it as from Western Yiddan all the way to the capital. And there's debate over whether or not this is true, but we do know that the f 35 has never been shot down before.
But apparently, according to Yiddan, they've shot down up to three, which is historic. Just shooting down one would be historic. So they claim they shot down three, and they announced today I saw as reported by Aria, who's a pretty good ex account, not officially connected to the Iranian government, but does a pretty good job of amplifying official statements from them. And they announced that they actually have an Israeli pilot captured. And so if that's the case, they definitely shot down an Israeli fighter jet.
Whether that's an f 16 or an f 35, regardless, that's still impressive. And I I was, I mean, I knew their capabilities, but going to that aerospace museum and seeing what's on display and being told by the IRGC public relations general that what you're seeing here is at least a decade old. We have things that you haven't seen before, and that was incredibly impressive to me. I mean, what I saw in that museum is what we see Turkey doing with their drones and their systems. It's what we see the West Building, and so it was very impressive.
And it's remarkable, you know, when they they give the presentation. I don't know if you got to experience the presentation because the No.
Speaker 1: I wasn't. Okay. He he wasn't there for me.
Speaker 0: Well, during the present you know, they sit you down in an auditorium, and they put on this presentation, and they just talked about the commitment and dedication for what they've been able to do. And they had pictures of the different generals and, like, the person you mentioned who, died testing a new missile, but there was on this wall, they had all these portraits of all these different generals and engineers and scientists that dedicated themselves to this aerospace museum, and most of them, I think, have been martyred at this point. But there's just a dedication by the people of Iran, not only to the revolution and the government, but to defending Iran itself, and they take you through this exhibit, the the war of the cities, right, between Iran and Iraq, and they talk about how many people died defending Iran from this invasion by Saddam Hussein, was backed by, like, 82 countries around the world. And I think a lot of people just are kind of ignorant of this this history and the experience and the suffering of the Yunani people. So, yeah, that that just stood out to me, and I think it was remarkable and inspiring to see.
These tools, these systems that we saw are currently at play, and it's tough to know which direction this is gonna go, but I wanna ask you. You mentioned that Israel's experiencing something that it probably has never experienced before, at least since 1973, the inability to, prevent missiles, dangerous, powerful missiles, one one and a half ton warheads hitting their cities. And now, actually, we're seeing residential buildings get knocked down as if it's Gaza, and civilians are dying, and, you know, politicians are in hiding. Bezos Moutarich and Ben Gavir haven't been seen since this announcement.
Speaker 1: They have. Ben Gavir came out to Bat Yam after Netanyahu showed up there.
Speaker 0: Showed up. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Okay. They both reared their their heads briefly to cast their eyes on the father of Zion, the people that they have kind of sacrificed for their crazy war, and then they had they basically had to show their faces. Ben Gavir did it as an obvious kind of photo op to show that he's, like, with the people.
Speaker 0: Right. And he's not scared in hiding. Batyama is
Speaker 1: a very Likud area, by the way. It's heavily Russian. It's, like, low a low lower middle class, lower class Jews there. So and and they got hit really hard last night. So it makes sense that they would show up in a place like that rather than, like, North Tel Aviv.
Speaker 0: So given that these kinds of areas are now being hit and they've never experienced this before, what do you think was the calculus by Benjamin Netanyahu? There's a you know, there's discussions and debates over whether they're completely in control of the situation. As we were discussing last night, tweets by people like Zay Squirrel basically suggesting that the war is going to escalate from here. It's a done deal. Israel and The United States have been diluting Iran and tricking them, and this is all just a masquerayevska, and they're going to this is exactly what they wanted, but it seems like potentially it could not be.
So what is your read on the situation? Netanyahu must have known this was gonna be the result, and so what do you think they were expecting?
Speaker 1: What Netanyahu was expecting is Netanyahu knows he's been able to manipulate Trump every step of the way. He sees Trump correctly as a stupid oaf who consistently rolls over after initiating some process of deal making. And that Trump actually has no political agenda, and there's nothing beyond what we actually see. I wish everyone else would see Trump like Netanyahu does. What we see with Trump is him going to Saudi Arabia or Qatar or Dubai, I mean, Abu Dhabi and and and just accepting as, like, bounty.
Just, any amount of gifts that he can take in for his family. He'll take that and there's nothing beyond it. That's all he wants. He just he sees that as the goal. And the Israel lobby has done a lot to incentivize him and entice him as well, but they also have something that the Gulf Arabs don't have, which is political leverage to actually harm Trump domestically.
And after two assassination attempts, I think Trump might actually be afraid that they would ice him if he actually suspended weapons or did something serious to end this. I think Trump personally would not like to see this war take place. The people around him, JD Vance, people in this director of national intelligence, they're not interested in getting The US involved. But every time Netanyahu pressures Trump, he rolls over as he did when Netanyahu told Trump, the two month deadline's up. It's time for us to attack.
And Trump just greenlit it and then went to a performance of Les Miserables with JD Vance who was just like tweeting cringe worthy jokes about how he thought it was actually about the demon barber of Fleet Street. They knew the war was coming. Pete Hegseth went to a baseball game and they knew this consequential war was coming. I don't think they understood or understand Netanyahu. Netanyahu understands them.
He doesn't understand them. Netanyahu sees them as stupid Gentile cattle And they see Netanyahu as a rogue actor, but they also see him as kind of wise and canny. And Netanyahu assumed that by launching this attack with a decapitation strike at the beginning first of all, I mean, it's it's it's very depressing that Netanyahu could get away with something that daring against the IRGC's leadership that they didn't take measures when it was so clear that war was coming at some point soon. But by getting away with it, Netanyahu set the stage for devastating retaliation that everyone knew was coming would would come from Iran. They had the capacity.
Israeli intelligence has done its assessment. The US has done their assessment. And, you know, you can read these publicly or from think tankers like the, director of the Institute for National Security Studies in Israel. I think his his name is like Tamir Hayman, who published in, Israel Israel's channel twelve. What exactly would happen?
And the wild card is Trump. They basically he basically predicted an open ended war with heavy ballistic missile strikes, and that Israel could do deep damage to Iran's leadership, but it could only set back its nuclear facilities six months to twelve months, and it could not carry out a kind of regime change war and finish it on its own. So Netanyahu's calculus is that the stupid Goyim in Washington are gonna ultimately get involved. And that's been Netanyahu's objective all along. If anyone's followed Netanyahu, they would know that when Obama was president, the first time he came to Washington, when John Boehner invited him, who was the majority leader, an opponent of net of of Obama.
Something we've never seen before, a foreign leader being invited by the opponent of the president to speak in congress and and and use that as an occasion to attack and manipulate the president. We've never seen that before. This was like 2011. Netanyahu holds up a satellite or or an aerial photograph of Auschwitz and says FDR refused to bomb the railways to Auschwitz. Then he holds up a satellite photograph of, I think it was Fordow or Boucher or Natanz, one of those nuclear reactors, and he's like, these are the new this is the new Auschwitz that will destroy the Jewish people.
You must do something about it. So basically, if Obama fails to bomb those nuclear facilities, he's the ultimate anti Semite, appeaser of Nazism. And Obama, he didn't do it. They got the JCPOA done, which was a complete failure. But this is Netanyahu and this is his objective with this war.
And so he's raising the stakes so much. And what is he doing to raise the stakes? He's putting Jews out there. He's basically from his from the Netanyahu point of view, he's putting Jews out there like sheep to the slaughter. He's using human shields in order to show them to the West, in order to get the West to bomb.
It's exactly what they accuse Hamas of doing. Will Trump bomb? I mean, maybe by the time this is online, it will have already happened. I'm seeing rumors that he'll do it on Monday. Trump has released a statement saying That they're considering it.
Right? Yeah. No. He released a statement, one of these goofy truth social statements that proves everything I say about Trump just being a complete doofus. He's he he complains about not wanting to get credit about not getting enough credit for making peace, and that he's a peacemaker, and he's a dealmaker.
And things were heating up between Serbia and Bosnia when I came in. I cooled that down. And then Pakistan and India, I shut that down. You know, he wants a Nobel Prize. Because what the Nobel Prize comes with, like, a million dollars.
It's more money for his family
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: With that level of prestige. That's what he wants. But he also doesn't understand Netanyahu or what it would actually take to shut this war down. Now I I could shut it down if I were president, or you could. We would know how to do that.
But, you know
Speaker 0: How would you do it?
Speaker 1: Well, you just suspend spare parts to for, like, one you you just you just stop one shipment on the air bridge to the Nevatim Air Base, and the whole thing ends.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But that would get you potentially iced by, right, by the, Israel lobby or by whatever forces are at play that serve Israel. So what would you do to mitigate that and then take this action? Lock them up.
Speaker 1: Well, of course, I would I would have campaigned for president and probably been assassinated then, so I would have never made it in.
Speaker 0: Alright.
Speaker 1: Because during my campaign, I would have said that APAC that this would be at the top of my agenda. APAC would have to be registered as a foreign agent, and there would be an espionage act investigation. And the the justice department made one of its greatest errors in 1964 by failing to register them.
@propandco - Prop. co
“If a Jew rapes a 3 year old baby, the baby should be executed.” The soldiers who subscribe to this interpretation are currently raping Palestinians in concentration camps. https://t.co/xe849pNhR9
reSee.it AI Summary
Cyberwell, an IDF unit 8200 spin off, released a report on Oct 7 and holocaust denialism sources. The report includes names like Mario Nawfal, Lowkey, Jackson Hinkle, Max Blumenthal, Zei Squirrel, Hadi Nasrallah, Ali Abunimah, Prop co, but some wonder why Syrian Girl is not mentioned.
@propandco - Prop. co
Cyberwell, an IDF unit 8200 spin off group dedicated to identifying “digital antisemitism”, produced a report mapping out the sources of Oct 7 and holocaust denialism Listed on the report is Mario Nawfal, Lowkey, Jackson Hinkle, Max Blumenthal, Zei Squirrel, Hadi Nasrallah, Ali Abunimah, Prop co and others. We just have one question, where’s Syrian Girl?
@propandco - Propaganda and co
LETS DEBUNK THESE ZIONISTS TODAY SPREAD THE WORD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zionists spread propaganda to distract from Palestine recognition by Norway, Ireland, and Spain. They mistranslated a video to falsely claim IDF soldiers were captured as sex slaves. Israelis debunked their own lie about a woman being raped by showing she dirtied her pants due to being tied up. The woman was actually an armed IDF soldier who lost in a gun battle with Palestinian fighters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have to see how Zionists use propaganda to distract. Just hours after Norway, Ireland, and Spain announced that they would recognize Palestine, Zionist influencers, media, and state institutions began tweeting out a video with a fake translation in order to spread atrocity propaganda lies. In this video from October 7th, you see resistance fighters capturing female IDF soldiers. These IDF soldiers engaged in a firefight and lost during the battle for their base. After being captured, the fighters tied them up and took them back to Gaza as prisoners of war.
The Zionists deliberately mistranslated the video, however. Palestinians refer to the women as, meaning young girl or teenager. But the Zionist mistranslated it to another similar sounding word, meaning sex slave. They littered the entire timeline with these posts to completely drown out the talk about Norway, Spain, and Ireland recognizing Palestine, and that's how Zionists use propaganda to distract. Another interesting aspect of the propaganda is that the Israelis literally debunked one of their previous lies with another lie.
Let me explain. For months, Israelis showed this clip of a woman being captured and put into the back of a vehicle. They note the blood on the back of her pants and then claimed that she was raped so hard that she blood through her pants. However, in the new propaganda lie that they started telling today, they show us that she clearly dirtied the back of her pants because her hands were bloody and tied behind her back. Also, they make very clear that she wasn't actually a civilian, but rather an IDF soldier armed who lost in a gun battle with Palestinian resistance fighters.
reSee.it AI Summary
The death toll in Gaza remains unchanged, with approximately 35,000 dead. However, around 10,000 of them are unidentified. Additionally, there are another 10,000 people who are missing or under the rubble. Various reasons contribute to the difficulty in identifying bodies, such as burns, fragmentation, and decay. The recent controversy revolves around the identity of the dead, not the number. Pro-Zionist media and Israel's Foreign Ministry spread misinformation, which was debunked by analysts, journalists, and the UN. Original sources from the UN are provided for reference.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
📰𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗚𝗮𝘇𝗮 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗹.📰 🚨𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗟𝗬𝗜𝗡𝗚, 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆🚨 Thread 🧵
@propandco - Propaganda and co
The death toll has not been decreased or altered. There are still ~35,000 dead. But ~10,000 of them are unidentified, meaning they can't confirm their identity
@propandco - Propaganda and co
In addition to the ~35,000 dead bodies, there are another 10,000 people who are "missing or under the rubble"
@propandco - Propaganda and co
There are many reasons why 10,000 bodies are not identified. 🪦Bodies are badly burnt 🪦Bodies are blown to pieces 🪦Bodies are decayed in makeshift graves 🪦Because Gaza is in chaos, families and civil servants can't ID the dead with 100% certainty
@propandco - Propaganda and co
The recent "change" wasn't about the number of dead bodies but rather the IDENTITY of the dead bodies.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
@propandco - Propaganda and co
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Professor Marc Owen Jones debunked their lies as well
@marcowenjones - Marc Owen Jones
🧵1/ I am somewhat dismayed (though sadly unsurprised) by this extremely disingenuous and callous reporting about Palestinian death figures. Claims that the UN have revised down its death toll are absolutely untrue but have been repeated by right wing outlets but also the CFR 🤔
@propandco - Propaganda and co
The UN debunked their lies too https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/13/middleeast/death-toll-gaza-fatalities-un-intl-latam/index.html#:~:text=The%20United%20Nations%20on%20Monday,and%20Hamas%20on%20October%207
UN says total number of deaths in Gaza remains unchanged after controversy over revised data | CNN
A spokesperson said the health ministry in Gaza is tracking two separate death tolls – an overall death toll and a total number of identified fatalities.
cnn.com
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Original sources from UN May 6 🔗 https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities-gaza-strip-and-israel-reported-impact-day-213 May 8 🔗 https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities-gaza-strip-and-israel-reported-impact-day-215
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - occupied Palestinian territory | Hostilities in the Gaza Strip and Israel - reported impact | Day 213
Day 213
ochaopt.org
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - occupied Palestinian territory | Hostilities in the Gaza Strip and Israel - reported impact | Day 215
Day 215
ochaopt.org
@propandco - Propaganda and co
This thread was made by Mr. N @DontFollowMrN Want to cut through the propaganda? Kindly support our work. https://buymeacoffee.com/propagandad
Prop & Co is Breaking the Narrative
Want to support our work? Buy us a coffee so we can continue to create
buymeacoffee.com
@propandco - Propaganda and co
🚨 BREAKING 🚨 ISRAEL WANTS TO KILL THE HOSTAGES EVIDENCE OF 'MASS HANNIBAL' secret recordings expose Israeli psyop against hostage families
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel's war cabinet is accused of sacrificing its own citizens in Gaza for the purpose of colonization. Secret recordings reveal the government pressuring Israeli families to sacrifice their children. The controversial Hannibal directive, which involves killing their own people to prevent bargaining during negotiations, is mentioned. The mass Hannibal is said to be ongoing, with numerous Israeli hostages being killed or injured. Families of the hostages have organized demonstrations, demanding their loved ones be brought home. Netanyahu is accused of gaslighting the families and prioritizing his political career over their safety. The division among the families is exploited to maintain support for the war. The investigation alleges a policy of ethnic cleansing and genocide against Palestinians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have been told that Israel wants to save the hostages. Captured on October 7th. But what if you've been lied to? What if Israel's war cabinet has no intention of saving you? An investigative journalist made a bombshell discovery.
Filmmaker and journalist Dan Cohen acquired secret recordings of the Netanyahu government pressuring Israeli families Israeli families to sacrifice their children in Gaza in order for the genocide to continue so that Israel can conquer and colonize Gaza for good. Stick around because I'm about to reveal the sickening details of this explosive investigation that confirms Israel's policy of sacrificing their own people. And you'll be surprised to hear that this theory is supported by prominent Israelis and has been reported by Israeli media. Yes. You heard that right.
Israeli media. Now I'm sure you've heard about the controversial Hannibal directive, which is the Israeli doctrine of killing their own people to prevent the Palestinians from using them as bargaining chips during negotiations and prisoner swaps. The Hannibal directive is a doctrine of sacrifice named after the Carthaginian general, who was one of the single greatest threats to Rome to ever live. For years, Hannibal delivered blow after humiliating blow to the Roman Empire. And even after the fall of Carthage, Hannibal swore an oath of revenge.
So the Romans chased Hannibal across the world hoping to capture him. But when they got Close to doing just that, Hannibal decided he would rather die than allow himself to be captured and so swallowed a vial of poison that he always kept just for such a situation. Israel sees killing its own citizens in much the same way so as to deny their enemies any leverage during Now while it was speculated by many in the aftermath of October 7th that Israel implemented the Hannibal directive, it has now become Crystal clear, even irrefutable through Israeli media, no less, that Israel had done exactly that. But what if I told you this mass Hannibal is still happening, that it has been happening every day since October 7th. What if I told you that a major aim of the genocide in Gaza was, in fact, The continuation of this mass Hannibal.
On January 15th, the Palestinians released a video of Israeli hostage, Noah Arghamani. Noah says that she had been injured in an Israeli airstrike and was trapped under the rubble for 2 whole days. She also says that 2 other Israeli hostages had been killed by Israeli strikes, one buried underneath a rubble and the other in a moving ambulance in Gaza. She implored Netanyahu to stop this madness and bring us home to our families. But these aren't the only Israeli hostages who have been killed or injured.
According to Hamas, nearly Steel hostages have been killed by Israeli strikes. Several Israeli hostages released by Hamas have described the terror of being held in Gaza, unsure of whether or not they'd be killed by their own government. An Israeli sociologist and military expert, Yagil Levy, told the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, that Israel is indeed trying to carry out A mass Hannibal. The government's decision to attack Gaza despite the presence of hostages in the bombed sites can be an extension of the Hannibal procedure. That is an attempt to thwart the continuation of the captivity even at the cost of risking the lives of the hostages.
The obvious explanation is that the right perceives the pressure to stop the fighting as endangering the pursuit of victory and revenge in Gaza. And therefore, the lives of the abductees are another reasonable sacrifice that must be made a reasonable and necessary sacrifice to justify the Gaza genocide. Gilad Shalit was a captured Israeli soldier that the Palestinians traded for over 1,000 Palestinians. In an interview with the Israeli media outlet, Shamrim, An unnamed figure who was involved in the Gilad Shalit exchange said that Israel was invoking the Hannibal directive. He says, Hamas Expected this to be a repeat of the Shalit case.
They thought that they would kidnap Israelis and that we would cave in, but the state of Israel has implemented The Hannibal directive on the whole of the Gaza Strip. Now as you can imagine, the families of the hostages are not Happy about this. They want their loved ones to be brought home. They're angry, and they have been organizing massive demonstrations, calling on Netanyahu to strike a deal and end the war to save their loved ones and live up to their promise of bringing them home, which was supposedly a key the objective for Israel in this war. And some of the demonstrators are former hostages themselves.
And so Netanyahu has been gaslighting the families of these Hostages to convince them to sacrifice their own children so that he can achieve his political ambition of conquering Gaza and ethnically cleansing the Palestinians from it. You see, to Netanyahu and his cabinet, the families of the hostages are nothing but an obstacle that stands in the way of Israel's genocide in Gaza. But more importantly to him, they are endangering his political career. In a private meeting between Yahoo! In the family of the hostages, several far right wing extremists whose family members were also taken hostage were brought in to try and convince everyone else That their pain should be set aside for the greater interest of the Israeli state.
1 of these far right wing extremists, Ohadzvi Lapidot, addressed the families. This is a secret audio recording of that exchange. Outraged, a mother of 1 of the hostages responded. What Lapidot said next set fire to the room. Now As you can clearly tell, there is division amongst the families.
Yet, after the meeting, the far right wing extremist family members In support of Netanyahu, sacrificing their children for conquest went outside and spoke directly to the media, pretending to represent By dividing the families and using guilt to dissuade them from standing in his way and then lying to both the public and the media, Netanyahu seeks to maintain his position that Gaza must be completely wiped off the map. This psyop, this lie, this betrayal of the Families of the hostages of the Israeli citizenry who are nothing but pawns to Israeli leadership is how Netanyahu has been able to convince Israeli society to continue the war. Ever since this psyop took place, Netanyahu's war cabinet has implemented a mass Hannibal policy in Gaza, wiping out their hostages and removing all obstacles to the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinian people. In one case, the IDF used Poison gas to kill an Israeli hostage being held in an underground tunnel. In a chilling social media post, The mother of the murdered hostage said her son crushed his fingers trying to dig his way out of the tunnel before choking to death on the poisonous gas.
She rightly asks, if it were Netanyahu's son being held hostage, would the IDF have acted so recklessly? She went on to say that There is no future for this country after what they did to you. This poor mother raises an important point. What is the point of establishing a Safe home for the Jews and expanding your territory through conquest for your own people if you have to murder your own people to achieve it. There is so much more in this bombshell investigation conducted by Dan Cohen, so check out the link to his article.
And remember, we all know that the algorithm censors and bans content like this. So we need your help to spread the word. Support our ongoing investigations. Free Palestine.
reSee.it AI Summary
The video challenges the narrative of a massacre at a music festival, aiming to break the 'atrocity propaganda' used to justify ongoing violence in Gaza. It urges a ceasefire to prevent further suffering and calls for spreading the video. Censorship on platforms is mentioned, and the New York Times article is recommended for more information. The proximity of the event to a base and the militants' knowledge are questioned. The message strongly condemns all violence.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘐𝘔𝘗𝘖𝘙𝘛𝘈𝘕𝘛 𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰𝘴 𝘸𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 We are challenging the narrative that 250 innocent civilians were "slaughtered" at the music festival. We do not challenge this narrative to deny that civilians were killed or to belittle the suffering that has taken place. but rather to break the 'atrocity propaganda' that has been spun in order to justify the ongoing massacre taking place in Gaza Many Americans currently support the Israeli response because they believe the lies that babies were beheaded and that concert goers were raped, tortured, and slaughtered. We need to break this narrative immediately and call for a ceasefire to prevent more human suffering on both sides Join us in this mission by spreading this video EVERYWHERE sidenote: do you notice how many asterisks and audio cut outs we had to use in order to avoid censorship? We are forced to stutter like Joe Biden because Instagram TikTok and other platforms are completely banning our content and silencing our voices. Lastly, we sourced our video content and the sequence of events form the New York TImes article. After watching our video, read the article and watch their content to make up your own mind about what really happened on that day. Keep in mind that the concert was not meant to be held so close to the base and the location of the event was set just the night before. There's no way the militants knew the event was happening. MOST IMPORTANTLY THIS IS NOT A JUSTIFICSTION OR ENDORSEMENT OF THE VIOLENCE THAT TOOK PLACE WE CONDEMN ALL VIOLENCE F*** VIOLENCE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Gaza militants attacked multiple military bases in southern Israel, including one near a music festival. As concert-goers panicked and tried to leave, they were blocked by Israeli police, forcing them to run into a nearby field. When the militants arrived, they exchanged fire with security, resulting in civilian casualties. However, there is evidence that the militants treated some Israelis with kindness. The speaker questions the difference between this situation and the ongoing conflict in Gaza, urging an immediate ceasefire, humanitarian aid for both sides, and negotiations to end the occupation and establish a just peace between Israelis and Palestinians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gaza Mil carried out an attack on southern Israel across 22 different locations and claimed the lives of at least 1500 people. Israel claims the majority of these people were unarmed civilians. And while some civilians were certainly which is tragic, there is a problem with the Israeli narrative. They have presented this attack attack on civilians. A good example of this is the claim that militants attacked and 250 people in a at a concert.
But we are about to exposed and debunked that claim, and we're gonna do it using the New York Times. I want to make clear that I am not justifying or condoning this. I am simply challenging the narrative. Gaza launched there. They're gliding or flying over the wall heading in different directions.
Their targets were military bases. We know this because of dozens of videos showing storming these buildings and capturing soldiers and equipment. 3 miles from the Gaza border is one of these bases, the Gaza regiment military base along the 232 road. There was a music festival while taking place right down the road from the base. After the was completed, militants got into vehicles and continued their by driving along the major roads heading towards other bases.
This is how the found themselves at the concert. Before the mill arrived, the concert goers had heard the shots and were panicking. They then started to leave the concert. They couldn't take their because the road was now being blocked by Israeli police and security trying to cut off the Gaza. Then this is when the concert goers began running away into an been field because they couldn't get into their cars and drive away.
When the arrived, they exchanged air with security. And this is why the parked cars along the were riddled with to be clear, civilians did. They were tragically caught in the cross. They were not and they certainly were not given any mass.
Speaker 1: Now there were just taken by fights, and this is truly terrible. They should be returned safely and quickly. But there is so much evidence showing us the fight. We're not there to civilians. Listen to this Israeli woman talk about how fight were kind to her.
She says even asked her for permission to eat one of her bananas. Think about that. Armed women in her home asking her for permission to eat one of her bananas. And this woman told Israeli media they treated her humanely. She then goes on to say that the she was with were only when Israeli soldiers arrived and got into a fight with the Palestinians.
Speaker 0: Majority. It was a battle between soldiers on both sides with civilians caught in the cross, which leads me to ask, what is the difference between this and what's happening right now in Gaza? Yet Western media seems convinced that Gaza committed to while the Israeli army is engaging in justified defense. The solution to this issue is not to escalate the or to prioritize the of one group of people over another. Solution is to end all hostilities.
There should be calls for an immediate ceasefire, humanitarian aid to both sides, in an escalation in negotiations to end the occupation, establish an independent Palestinian state, and create a just and long lasting peace between both Israelis and Palestinians.
reSee.it AI Summary
In recent posts, there is discussion about the Hannibal Directive being used in the Red Sea War, with Iran striking. @dancohen3000 explains the Hannibal Directive, which involves Israel's actions towards captives in Gaza and their families. The author claims that their argument has not been refuted and predicts that as more Israelis are killed by their own military, it will become impossible to ignore.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
⚡️Hannibal Directive - Red Sea War- Iran strikes⚡️
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses recent events in Yemen, Gaza, and Iran. They mention the implementation of the Hannibal directive by the Israeli military to prevent Israeli soldiers or civilians from being captured by Hamas or Palestinian militant groups. The speaker also talks about the pressure applied by the Houthis in the Red Sea and their objective to end the genocide in Gaza. They mention the US and UK striking Houthi positions in Yemen and the subsequent Houthi attacks on US-owned ships. The speaker discusses Iran's firing of ballistic missiles towards northern Iraq and Syria, targeting alleged Mossad headquarters and an ISIS training facility. They also mention Iran's strike on a group in southwestern Pakistan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tonight, I'd like to talk to you about what's happening in Yemen with Iran and, of course, what's happening in Gaza. Okay. So first, I'd like to start with this report from Ynet, which is a well known Israeli digital publication. And they were reporting on the mass Hannibal, essentially, as Max Blumenthal describes it, a confirmation of mass Hannibal. Essentially, there were friendly fire orders that came down from Israeli military Very high command instructing their soldiers to use any means necessary.
And for those of you that aren't aware, the Hannibal directive is essentially a policy by the Israeli military to prevent Israeli soldiers or civilians from being captured by Hamas or by Palestinian militant groups so that those groups cannot use Those captured civilians or soldiers, those captured Israelis as leverage during negotiations. The Israelis want to have as much Power over the Palestinians is possible. One of the ways that the Palestinians have been able to successfully negotiate is by capturing hostages and then trading them. In the past, Palestinians captured Israeli soldiers and have traded them for 100, if not thousands of political prisoners. So the Israelis implemented this policy over a decade ago where they decided essentially when it comes to IDF soldiers have been captured.
They're going to just kill them. And it's inspired by the Carthaginian general, Hannibal, who was successful in defeating the Romans Many times, he was a brilliant commander and general. But eventually, the Carthaginian empire was defeated by the Romans, and the Romans were hunting Hannibal down. And Hannibal poisoned with him. And right before he was captured, he decided to kill himself because he would rather die than be captured by the Romans.
And so this inspired the Israelis, that's why they named it after him, and they essentially decided that it would be more merciful for their soldiers or their civilians to be killed than to be used as leverage During negotiations to be traded, which obviously goes against Israeli interest, they'd rather give the Palestinians nothing. So they decided, I guess, from their end that it would be more merciful or would be better for the state, the interest of the state to just kill these people. And so what this report by Y Net does really is confirm what many of us have already I did that. The Israelis implemented a mass Hannibal on October 7th because they realized very quickly that they couldn't get the situation under control before Hamas could capture loads of hostages, and so they decided essentially to use to use scorched earth tactics and essentially kill everyone by any means. Right?
And so that's why, as you can see here, 70 cars hit by Israeli helicopters, tanks, or anti tank missiles, and at least in some cases, everyone in the vehicle was Killed. That's confirmed by this report. That's confirmed by interviewing helicopter pilots, and that's confirmed by hostages who survived. There are Israeli hostages who have said that they witnessed A car get blown up in front of them by a Israeli helicopter, and they were lucky enough to survive. And as you can see here, as Max reports, firing regulations were completely abandoned.
The tank operators and helicopter pilots were essentially told, hey. All the regulations that you normally follow, don't worry about them. Abandon those regulations. Just get The job done. And so normally, if there's a situation they would say, well, we shouldn't fire on that home because there could be a civilian in there or it's too close to a civilian or there could be some collateral damage, don't fire.
Those regulations were completely abandoned. And so this, I think just confirms for us what we've already been suspecting. We've, I think, Reported on this and many other people have as well. And if you're watching this and you follow us, you most likely are already in agreement. But essentially, we all suspected that the Israelis were by Ynet confirming that this is actually what happened.
Now does this change anything? No. I don't think the Zionists will ever admit this. It doesn't matter how much The Israelis continue to investigate and report on this. They won't care.
They're going to continuously lie and say, all the different things they've been saying, when it comes to atrocity propaganda, babies were beheaded, babies were burned, people were mass raped. They're gonna continue to say all these ridiculous things. They don't care about Truth. Because it doesn't fit their narrative. It doesn't work for them.
They have to try and justify their genocide, and so that's unfortunately what's taking place. Okay. Pivoting now, I wanna take you to Yemen. We know that Houthis have been applying a lot of pressure in the Red Sea with their blockade, essentially firing on any cargo vessel going to Israel or affiliated with Israel in any way. And, of course, the Houthi stated objective is we want the genocide in Gaza to end.
So as soon as the Israelis retreat from Gaza and stop their genocide, we will Stop the blockade. Sounds like a pretty reasonable request. However, the US and the UK are not happy with this, and so they've decided to strike. A week ago, they targeted Yemeni Positions, Houthi positions. So as you can see here in this picture, they targeted an airfield and they took out a couple of hangars, maybe took out some helicopters and some planes.
And I'm sure you've already seen this before, but in this visual, you're getting an idea of what routes a ship would normally take from Taiwan through the Red Sea, the Bab el Mandeb strait, and then going through the Suez Canal and then making its way north of Africa to Europe, to the UK for example, or to Amsterdam or the Netherlands. But because of the Houthi blockade, they've had to sail south of Africa around the horn of Africa as you can see at the very southern tip, the of good hope. And this has extended. Normally, the trip would take 25 days. Now it takes 34 days, which is more fuel, it's more time.
There's more risk, which means there's more insurance that you have to pay for. So it's been costing companies, shipping vessels a pretty penny, which obviously is going to affect consumer goods for people all over the world really, but especially in the west. Now in this image here, you can see a United Kingdom Royal Air Force Typhoon aircraft, and it took off from Cyprus. So when they struck Yemen, they were taking off from the island off the coast of Israel, Cyprus. And this is just another Mitch here documenting the takeoff of a fighter jet from Cyprus.
Now despite the US and the UK striking targets in Yemen, they haven't Been able to actually stop the Houthis from continuing their attacks. And so shortly after being struck by the US and the UK, the Houthis struck a US owned dry bulk Ship, now this ship didn't have any injuries, and it was still able to to sail. But the what it indicates is that the Houthis still have the ability even though they've been struck by the US and the UK, and they say there are about 75 strikes. They still have the ability fire. And a lot of people say it's because the Yemenis have for years, because they've been fighting Saudi and the UAE mainly through the air, They have become accustomed to getting air struck, so they know how to conceal their weaponry, how to move their weaponry.
And so even with satellite imagery, even with fighter jets, It's difficult to really cripple the Houth. So as you can see here, this is the route that the Royal Air Force took, taking off from Cyprus. It looks like they flew over Gaza through Israel, potentially through the south of Jordan and then crossing into Saudi Arabia. And so this is why people say the Saudis were complicit in their strike even though the Saudi Saudi Arabia has, condemned the strike. Saudi Arabia still had to grant the Royal Air Force taking off from Cyprus Permission to enter their airspace, Jordan may have potentially done so as well.
We know obviously the Israelis did. And so you can see how the Saudi Arabia, even though they're speaking, the language of Being against the strike, they actually are complicit because they allowed them to fly over their airspace. And you can see in the south, you know, the different locations of where the Royal Air Force and the United States struck the Houthis. Now like I said, the Houthis have been able to continue their attacks in the Red Sea even after being struck by the US by the UK. And so this is concerning because now the US has essentially opened the door for an escalation for a war with the Houthis.
And the Houthis are god fearing people. They're not Afraid they're actually inviting, you know, the west for an invasion, which is pretty crazy to think about given that they've been suffering for over 10 years, War, famine, blockades, sanctions, things of that nature, but they're still, you know, willing to fight because they are ideologically driven, and they want to support the people of Palestine. And so they aren't afraid of an escalation. Because the US and the UK have now attacked them, now the Houthis are saying, we're not just gonna attack Israeli ships now. We're gonna attack US ships.
And so that's exactly what happened the other day when the Houthis struck a US owned ship making its way through the Red Sea. Now it seems like this is probably backfiring on the US. They don't wanna show weakness and give in and say, okay. You know, we will, you know, pressure Israel to end the genocide in Gaza. Even though that's the right thing to do, it's Probably even the logical and rational thing to do.
The US and the West feels like their authority is being called into question. They're not gonna negotiate with a group like the Houthis. And so they decided to use of course. But their objective is to do what exactly? To clear up those Red Sea lanes so that they can get shipping under control.
But this is actually having Opposite effect, if you think about it, because even though they are there saying, hey, we're gonna protect you, so go ahead and sail through the Red Sea. Actually, what this does is make the situation more dangerous because now US, UK, western ships are potentially going to be targeted now as well as we've already seen. And Companies are not interested in sailing through a war zone. So even though naval ships and fighter jets are there saying, hey. We're gonna protect you.
You still have rockets flying around. And so as you can see here, the shell company, and this is a week old now, but still, they suspended shipping through the Red Sea. And they've done this because they don't trust shipping through the Red Sea even if the US and the UK are gonna be there firing rockets trying to stop the Houthis. It's still dangerous. And the effect that it's having is that it increases the insurance rates.
A cargo vessel can take a lot of containers, can have a lot of value on the ship. And so you can imagine that one ship could actually be carrying anywhere between $50,000,000 to $100,000,000 worth of Goods, that's a lot of money. Insurance companies will often say, okay, we'll charge you 0.1 or 0.2 percent of the entire total value on the ship. So 0.1 percent of a $100,000,000 worth of goods on a ship is gonna cost about $100,000 That's a pretty penny, but that's worth it. You wanna protect your your assets, right, because it is risky sale.
Anything could happen. But now because of What the Houthis are doing and because of the presence of the US and the UK firing weapons to prevent the Houthis, now there's this escalation, And there's a lot of ballistic missiles in the air. There are drones in the air. Insurance companies have increased the rates to 0.7%. And now they're saying even up to 1%.
So now, a $100,000,000 worth of goods on a vessel needs $1,000,000 to insure. So you can see the insurance rates have basically 10x. So instead of paying $100, you're now paying $1,000,000 to ensure the goods that you're trying to sail through the Red Sea. This is obviously too expensive for many Shipping companies and you would think they're very profitable and a lot of times they are, but they also in many cases, they operate on very tight margins. So to to tell a shipping company, hey, your insurance is gonna rise from $100 to $1,000,000 makes a big deal.
And so the Houthis are have been very effective in this way, and, the US and the UK getting involved doesn't necessarily improve the situation, at least not in the short term. Okay. I wanna show you this picture now. This is a a ship coming supposedly from Iran heading towards Yemen. Now this ship was intercepted by the United States.
And they took pictures of what was on the ship, and what they found were goods and Equipment used to produce ballistic missiles. Iran has been sending equipment to Yemen for the Houthis to then engineer and Put together to create the drones and the ballistic missiles that are being used against the Saudis, to be used against any of their enemies, to be used right now in the Red Sea. So this ship was intercepted. In the process of intercepting in the process of intercepting the ship, there were 2 US Navy SEALs that fell overboard. Apparently, this section of the Red Sea this time of year, there are very large waves.
So supposedly, there was a 10 foot high wave that hit a Navy SEAL That threw him overboard. Another Navy SEAL trying to save him jumped in, and then they both disappeared. And they've been looking for them for 5 days. They haven't been able to find them. The assumption now is that they're dead.
They're still looking for them, but that one Navy SEAL trying to be brave and save the other one, you know, potentially lost his life in trying to do so. That's a story I thought I'd share with you because, you know, intercepting the vessel and seeing how Iran gets their goods to Yemen, but also, you The vessel and seeing how Iran gets their goods to Yemen, but also, you know, just kinda understanding what happened to these Navy SEALs because have been talking about them for the last few days. Okay. Pivoting now to Iran. So yesterday, Iran fired ballistic missiles towards northern Iraq in Kurdistan.
Specifically, they hit A compound in Erbil, and Erbil is viewed as the capital of the autonomous Kurdish region of Adol. And this image you're looking at Here is the destruction of this compound. The destruction this compound took, it's clear that, a very powerful ballistic missile hit it. And Iran claims That this compound, which actually belongs to a Kurdish billionaire, is actually a Mossad headquarter. This compound is not very far from the US consulate in And so that's why people early on were saying that, oh, Iran struck a US base or the US consulate.
That's not true. They hit this compound. Now The cubs are saying that this wasn't a Mossad headquarters. This was an innocent man's home. He's a billionaire.
You killed him, his wife, potentially in his baby daughter, which is very tragic. But what Iran is arguing is that they had a very good intelligence, suggesting that this was Mas'ad headquarters, and Iran insists that they killed 4 high level Mas'ad agents. Don't know what the truth is. I would imagine that Iran wouldn't strike a random billionaire's home. And so I have to imagine there's some truth to their claims, but it's also very difficult to tell.
So I thought, you know, I'd share that with you. So this is the Kurdish billionaire. He was killed in the explosion, and unfortunately, his baby girl was killed as well. The Kurds are completely rejecting The Iranian claims, they say it's not true that is not a Mossad headquarters. So there's debate over what actually happened.
Now Iran didn't only just strike that off. They also hit Idlib in Syria. This is an image of a building that in Syria, apparently, the organization of White Helmets claimed, no, this was a medical facility. What Iran is arguing is that, no, that's not a medical facility. That is actually an ISIS training facility.
Now what is Iran's beef with ISIS? First of all, you know, ISIS has been doing Bashar's regime, trouble in Syria, and Iran obviously backs Bashar. But ISIS also ISIS also, you know, they're Logically opposed to the Shia, and they've been waging war against Shia militant groups and Shia populations in Syria. And obviously, Iran is aligned with Bashar's government and the Shia populations. But ISIS also recently took credit for an attack in Iran, and there was about a month ago, there was a memorial event for the fallen general, Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, who in Iran is held in high regard.
He's responsible for much of their success strategically in the region, specifically in Syria as well. And during the memorial, 2 suicide bombers detonated explosives, and they killed up to a 100 people, and they wounded about 300 people. So ISIS took credit for this attack. Some people speculate the Mossad were involved as well. So Iran decided to retaliate by striking this alleged Mossad headquarters in Iraq, but they also decided to strike Idlib Syria, and they claim this is an ISIS training facility.
The white helmets claim, no. This is just an innocent medical facility. Don't know the truth. But, you know, there's actual actually Another element to this. So if you look here at the range, it's pretty impressive.
Iran fired from southwestern Iran, a ballistic missile that traveled 1200 and hit Idlib in Syria. Right? But if you track the distance to Tel Aviv, theoretically, that rocket could have hit Tel Aviv. Some people speculate that Striking the so called ISIS training facility in Idlib is actually a hidden threat to Tel Aviv in Israel saying, hey. We have the capability to hit you.
So by striking Idlib, actually, what they're showing Tel Aviv is we can hit Idlib, we can hit you. And so the idea is to communicate to Israel that, hey, if you want to escalate with us. And if you think you're gonna be safe, we have the ability to hit you and hit you hard. So this is all speculation, of course, but this is an image that's been shared widely on Twitter. A lot of people are speculating about this.
Now Iran didn't only just strike at all for Syria. They also struck southwestern Pakistan, specifically in the Balochistan region, there is a group called Jaishun Adil, and the it it translates into the army of justice. They're recognized apparently as First organization, this is my first time hearing about them, but this group has claimed responsibility for several attacks against military personnel in Iran because they don't just operate in Southwestern In Pakistan, they operate in Southeastern Iran as well. They describe it as a porous border, meaning it's very easy to get across, and they are supporting Sunni Populations in Iran, and they've been waging war, against the Iranian revolutionary guard. And so Iran decided to strike them as well.
At First, there wasn't a lot of complaints from the Pakistani government. In fact, the same day they had the strike, Pakistan and Iran had joint naval operations together. So it seems Some people speculated that Pakistan, you know, gave the green light, to Iran to do this. But then later, when it became clear that children may have died, it's unclear really what happened. But if Children did die.
I don't actually know if children died, but after reports came out suggesting that they could have been killed, Pakistani government came out and they condemned the attack, they said they're going to investigate. So what the truth is, I don't know, but it's definitely an interesting development. It seems like Iran is trying to show their people that, hey, we're fighting back against terrorism. And they have to do that because just a month ago, they lost over almost a 100 people and 300 people wounded. It's embarrassing for the government.
It shows, hey, they can't protect their own people, also their people are angry. They want revenge. And so it seems like the strike in Northern Iraq, you know, is to show their people, hey, look. We're taking action. So they strike Iraq, they strike Syria, and they strike Pakistan.
And they've actually had another strike this evening as well. So this is the update I wanted to share with you guys. I hope you enjoyed and benefit. Don't forget to hit that like, Comment and subscribe.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Hannibal Directive explained by @dancohen3000 https://x.com/dancohen3000/status/1747676571966587286?s=20
reSee.it AI Summary
Israel spread the claim of beheaded babies on October 10. An Israeli reporter initially reported it, followed by CNN. IDF officials and President Biden also mentioned it. However, no physical evidence supported the claims, and Israel backtracked within two days. Only one baby's death was confirmed, with unknown circumstances. Israel has not held anyone accountable, and CNN reporters continue to report without consequences. Propaganda campaigns precede missile launches and tank deployments.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
💡🎙️How Israel spread the 'beheaded babies' claim on October 10🎙️💡 A detailed thread🧵
@propandco - Propaganda and co
An Israeli reporter initially reported beheaded babies at 1:42 PM on October 10, and later mentioned 40 babies on hospital stretchers at 2:10 PM IST. Only 6 hrs later, CNN would start spreading the claim
@propandco - Propaganda and co
She said, "Babies - theirs head cut off, that's what they said. Gunned down families. Completely. Gunned down in their beds." @Nicole_Zedek from @i24NEWS_EN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Soldiers recount witnessing horrifying scenes as they move through various houses and communities: babies with severed heads, families ruthlessly gunned down in their beds.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I'm talking to some of the soldiers and they say what they've witnessed as they've been walking through these different houses, these different communities, babies, their heads cut off. That's what they said. Gunned down. Families completely gunned down in their beds.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
She adds, "As I mentioned earlier, about 40 babies at least were taken out on gurneys."
@propandco - Propaganda and co
"They cut heads off children. They cut heads off women." IDF Deputy Commander David Ben Zion
Video Transcript AI Summary
We continue walking past the tower of the Great Damnation. We were tired of them. They are aggressive. They are very scared. They have either chilling or making phone calls.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We lopen door na de toren van de Grote Verdorie. We waren stonkel van hen. Ze zijn agressief. Ze zijn heel bang. Ze hebben of chillen kan telefoneren
@propandco - Propaganda and co
"He said very clearly that Hamas was cutting the heads off of people." @NicRobertsonCNN
Video Transcript AI Summary
We were shown the aftermath and heard about the brutal acts described as ISIS-style executions. The speaker explicitly stated that Hamas was beheading people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were taken in today to see the aftermath, but what he had to say about that brutality that's being described as ISIS style executions, He said very clearly that Hamas was cutting the heads off of people. Listen to his words.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
"They killed babies in front of their parents and then killed their parents. They killed parents and we found babies between the dogs and the family that killed before them. They cut heads off of the people." IDF Maj Gen Itai Veruv
Video Transcript AI Summary
They brutally murdered infants in front of their parents and then proceeded to kill the parents as well. We discovered both the deceased parents and the orphaned babies. The perpetrator, who had a history of violence, decapitated the victims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They killed babies in the front of their parents and then killed the parents. They killed parents, and we found babies. We between the dogs and the and the, family that killed before him. He cut head of the people
@propandco - Propaganda and co
"Israeli prime minister spokesman just confirmed - Babies and toddlers were found with their heads decapitated in Kfar Aza in Southern Israel." @sarasidnerCNN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Babies and toddlers in Kfar Azah, Southern Israel, were found decapitated after Hamas attacks in the kibbutz. This information has been confirmed by the Israeli Prime Minister's spokesman.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Israeli Prime Minister's spokesman just confirmed, babies and toddlers were found with their heads decapitated in Kfar Azah, in Southern Israel, after Hamas attacks in the kibbutz over the weekend. That has been confirmed, by the prime minister's office.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
"I never really thought that I would see, have confirmed.. pictures of terrorists beheading children" President Biden - Oct 12
@propandco - Propaganda and co
"Like they did before, cutting babies head off to burning women and children alive" President Biden - Nov 16
@propandco - Propaganda and co
An Israeli reporter on the same media tour as Nicole Zedek witnessed no physical evidence supporting her claims. https://x.com/OrenZiv_/status/1712038436910055925?s=20
@OrenZiv_ - Oren Ziv
1/5 I'm getting a lot of question about the reports of "Hamas beheaded babies” that were published after the media tour in the village. During the tour we didn’t see any evidence of this, and the army spokesperson or commanders also didn’t mention any such incidents.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Haaretz has identified only one baby killed in the October 7 attacks so far. The circumstances are unknown, other than at Be'eri kibbutz.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Substantial evidence indicates Israeli crossfire at Be'eri kibbutz https://x.com/propandco/status/1718092723750899809?s=20
@propandco - Propaganda and co
To date, Israel has not held any officials accountable. CNN has not held anyone accountable for spreading unverified reports. @NicRobertsonCNN , @sarasidnerCNN , @DanaBashCNN , and @Hadas_Gold continue to report. And, Israeli reporter @nicole_zedek continues to report
@propandco - Propaganda and co
This thread was made by Mr N. Want to cut through the propaganda? https://www.buymeacoffee.com/propagandad
Prop & Co is Breaking the Narrative
I love supporting creators!
buymeacoffee.com
@propandco - Propaganda and co
⚡️ 𝑩𝑹𝑬𝑨𝑲𝑰𝑵𝑮 ⚡️ 𝗝𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗢𝗰𝘁 𝟳𝘁𝗵 𝗳𝗼𝗼𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗲𝗹 https://t.co/GZ45VnAXmK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker thanks everyone for attending the private viewing and promises to show evidence of deadly terrier attacks. One person expresses frustration about previous false information and losing followers. The speaker assures them that the evidence is coming but first mentions that the incident on October 7th is considered worse than the Holocaust. The group urges the speaker to show the evidence, emphasizing the urgency due to their declining credibility. The speaker hesitates, suggesting that the evidence is too disturbing to be shown. The group becomes more frustrated and demands to see the evidence. The transcript ends with someone acknowledging the overwhelming nature of the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay, everyone. Thank you for coming to our private viewing. We're back to show you the evidence we collected showing the deadly terrier attacks. Listen, guys. You better give us some real info to work with.
Yeah. Last time you fucking lied and said that 4 d babies were beheaded. Now my credibility's at stake, and I'm losing followers as we speak. You better hurry up and show us something we can use, dude. Don't worry, guys.
Don't worry. The evidence is on its way. But first, I need to tell you that what happened on October 7th is now considered to be worse than even the holocaust. Did you know that? This fucking guy.
Yeah, dude. Whatever. Just show us the Evidence. Okay. I will.
You're about to see the evidence. Guys, I'm telling you. It's shocking. You won't believe it when you see it. It's like the biggest thing that ever happened since world war 2.
I Swear, it's fucking huge. Just show us already. Okay, everybody. Strap yourselves in. Woah.
Holy shit. Woah. Wow, guys. This is horrible. It's an absolute massacre.
I've never seen anything like it. It's horrific. Can we see it? No. No.
No, guys. I think it's really fucking bad. Like, it's pretty overwhelming. I don't think you all should see it. Are you fucking serious right now?
We're fucking bleeding followers here, man. Our credibility is taking. You better show us the evidence right now, you mean, I'm not going to lose my career over this. Okay. Okay.
What kind of evidence do you need? What kind of evidence do we need? He doesn't even have the fucking evidence. Oh, I'm so fucked. You Oh my god.
That must have been really overwhelming.
reSee.it AI Summary
Israeli media quotes confirm that Israel killed its own civilians. Israeli state broadcaster Kan reported that Israeli forces may have shot and killed civilians during heavy crossfire. Residents and witnesses also attest to IDF fire causing civilian deaths. Apache pilots struggled to differentiate between terrorists and civilians, leading to unauthorized firing. An IDF pilot admitted the possibility of killing civilians. Investigations revealed that IDF helicopters fired at both terrorists and innocent revelers. Tanks also targeted homes without confirming the presence of hostages. The Israeli ambassador to the UK initially mistook burnt bodies for Israeli casualties. These incidents raise questions about the IDF's disregard for civilian lives.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
⚡️Israeli media quotes that prove Israel killed its own civilians⚡️ Thread 🧵
@propandco - Propaganda and co
A. Golan: The terrorists shot them? Y. Porat: No, they were killed by the crossfire. Understand there was very, very heavy crossfire. A. Golan: So our forces may have shot them? Y. Porat: Undoubtedly. Source: Kan, an Israeli state broadcaster https://electronicintifada.net/content/israeli-forces-shot-their-own-civilians-kibbutz-survivor-says/38861
Israeli forces shot their own civilians, kibbutz survivor says
Palestinian fighters treated Israeli captives "humanely," recalls Yasmin Porat.
electronicintifada.net
@propandco - Propaganda and co
You can listen to Yasmin Porat's exact words here on Israeli state radio here👇
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the importance of cleaning and using a shisha. They emphasize that if you haven't done it, then you haven't done it. They mention having a Girovée and being happy about it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Die na maar die na zullen kunnen zien na een keer poetsen jezus van die sabbhaan al was is ook weer om shisha als je het niet hebt gedaan, als je het niet hebt,
Speaker 1: dan heb je het niet gedaan, dan heb je het niet gedaan, dan heb je het niet gedaan, dan heb
Speaker 0: je het niet gedaan, dan heb je het niet gedaan, dan heb je het niet gedaan, dan heb je het niet gedaan, dan
Speaker 1: heb je het niet gedaan, dan heb je het niet gedaan, dan heb je het niet gedaan,
Speaker 0: Lo, we hebben net ook een Girovée en ik heb ook een Girovée en ik heb ook
Speaker 1: een Girovée en ik heb ook een Girovée en ik heb ook een Girovée en ik heb ook een Girovée en ik heb ook een Girovée en ik heb ook een Girovée met een Girovée
Speaker 0: met een Girovée met een Girovée met een Girovée met een
Speaker 1: Girovée met een Girovée met een
Speaker 0: Girovée met een en ik ben blij dat ik
@propandco - Propaganda and co
This Israeli was shot dead by IDF "He fended off terrorists who attacked his house but was hit by soldiers' fire in a tragic incident." Ran Posloshani, a resident of Nahal Oz https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/politics/2023-10-15/ty-article/.premium/0000018b-32e1-dff1-a5eb-fefd9bce0000
צה"ל ירה למוות בשוגג בתושב נחל עוז, משפחתו מבקשת שיוכר כחלל
כשאנשי חמאס פרצו לקיבוץ נחל עוז, רן פוסלושני לקח את רובה ה-M16 של בנו ונערך. הוא הניס מחבלים שצבאו על ביתו אך נפגע מאש חיילים בתאונה טרגית. משפחתו מבקשת כעת שהצבא יכיר באופן רשמי בסיפור גבורתו
haaretz.co.il
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Another Israeli shot dead by IDF "Niv Ayos was killed by IDF fire while driving on Route 4 on his way to one of the army bases." "On my child's body, in the autopsy, there were 100 bullets." https://www.maariv.co.il/news/israel/Article-1046584
ניב זוהה בשוגג כמחבל ונהרג מאש כוחותינו, אמו מחפשת צדק: "אף אחד לא לקח אחריות"
קרן איוס אוחנה, אמו של ניב ז"ל שנהרג מאש כוחותינו בעקבות טעות בזיהוי, שוחחה עם ענת דוידוב, אורי סגל וטל לב רם, ושיתפה: "היה לי את הילד הכי טוב שיכול להיות, ממיטב הבנים"
maariv.co.il
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Apache pilots couldn't differentiate Israelis from Palestinians "The pilots realized that there was tremendous difficulty in distinguishing within the occupied outposts and settlements who was a terrorist and who was a soldier or civilian" https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
הטעיה של חמאס למסוקי צה"ל והכוונת טייסים בוואטסאפ | חיל האוויר ביום ה-1
המסוקים הראשונים הוזנקו דווקא מצפון הארץ, והגיעו לעוטף עזה כשעה אחרי תחילת הקרבות. המחבלים הונחו לא לרוץ כדי שמהאוויר יחשבו שהם ישראלים. הטייסים ירו על חוצי הגדר, וגם ממש בתוך היישובים. טייסים קיבלו מידע מהקרקע בניידים. ב-4 שעות הותקפו כ-300 מטרות | אירועי השבת השחורה
ynet.co.il
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Within 3 hours after attack, some Apache pilots begin firing without prior approval "Some of them began to spray the terrorists with the cannons on their own, without authorization from superiors." https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
הטעיה של חמאס למסוקי צה"ל והכוונת טייסים בוואטסאפ | חיל האוויר ביום ה-1
המסוקים הראשונים הוזנקו דווקא מצפון הארץ, והגיעו לעוטף עזה כשעה אחרי תחילת הקרבות. המחבלים הונחו לא לרוץ כדי שמהאוויר יחשבו שהם ישראלים. הטייסים ירו על חוצי הגדר, וגם ממש בתוך היישובים. טייסים קיבלו מידע מהקרקע בניידים. ב-4 שעות הותקפו כ-300 מטרות | אירועי השבת השחורה
ynet.co.il
@propandco - Propaganda and co
IDF pilot admits he may have killed civilians "I choose such targets that I tell myself that the chance that I will shoot at abductees here as well is low. To tell you 100%, it's not." Lt Col. A., an IDF Apache helicopter pilot https://www.mako.co.il/news-military/6361323ddea5a810/Article-02cfdbceafc4b81027.htm?utm_source=AndroidNews12&utm_medium=Share
N12 - "תצילו אותנו": טייסי האפאצ'י שהגיעו ראשונים לזירת הקרבות
"האחת" של 2023: טייסי האפאצ'י, מסוקי הקרב של חיל האוויר, היו הראשונים שהגיעו בשבת שעברה בבוקר לזירת הלחימה כדי לבלום את חמאס. העדויות, התיעודים וקלטות הקשר שעדיין לא נחשפו
mako.co.il
@propandco - Propaganda and co
How many bullets hit civilians? 28 Apache helicopters exhausted their ammunitions on Oct 7. "These are hundreds of 30 mm cannon shells (the effect of a spray grenade for each shell) as well as the Hellfire missiles." https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
הטעיה של חמאס למסוקי צה"ל והכוונת טייסים בוואטסאפ | חיל האוויר ביום ה-1
המסוקים הראשונים הוזנקו דווקא מצפון הארץ, והגיעו לעוטף עזה כשעה אחרי תחילת הקרבות. המחבלים הונחו לא לרוץ כדי שמהאוויר יחשבו שהם ישראלים. הטייסים ירו על חוצי הגדר, וגם ממש בתוך היישובים. טייסים קיבלו מידע מהקרקע בניידים. ב-4 שעות הותקפו כ-300 מטרות | אירועי השבת השחורה
ynet.co.il
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Haaretz confirms IDF killed Israelis "An investigation into the incident also revealed that an IDF combat helicopter that arrived at the scene from the Ramat David base fired at the terrorists and apparently also hit some of the revelers who were there." https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/politics/2023-11-18/ty-article/0000018b-e1a5-d168-a3ef-f5ff4d070000
במערכת הביטחון מעריכים כי המחבלים לא ידעו מראש על פסטיבל נובה
בתחקיר המשטרה נמצא כי בחמאס תכננו להגיע לקיבוץ רעים ולקיבוצים נוספים, וגילו על המסיבה בזמן אמת. עוד עולה ממנו כי מסוק צבאי שירה לעבר מחבלים פגע ככל הנראה גם בכמה חוגגים
haaretz.co.il
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Israeli witnesses IDF kill an Israeli "At some point the helicopter shot at the terrorists, the driver and the others. There was screaming in the tuk-tuk. All the terrorists were dead and we were alive, except for one for one of the women with us." https://www.october7.org/post/i-decided-to-play-dead-and-they-didn-t-take-me-they-ignored-me-they-took-the-three-little-girls
I decided to play dead — and they didn’t take me. They ignored me. They took the three little girls| October7 Blog
Read the story of Neomit D.'s story, Eyewitness & Survivor from Inside the Massacre | October 7 Blog
october7.org
@propandco - Propaganda and co
An Apache helicopter video of Oct 7 uploaded by the @IDF on Oct 9 circulated by @manniefabian from @TimesofIsrael
@propandco - Propaganda and co
IDF Brig Gen Avi Rosenfeld ordered an attack on his own base on Oct 7 "The division was compelled to request an aerial strike against the base itself in order to repulse the terrorists." https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-10-20/ty-article/.premium/underprepared-and-overconfident-israel-failed-to-spot-the-signs-of-impending-disaster/0000018b-4976-d03a-afcb-697edb020000
Failures leading up to the Hamas attack that changed Israel forever
Security Establishment Became Enamored in the Notion That the Enemy Is Deterred Netanyahu Nurtured Hamas, and Israelis Looked Away The Years of Ignoring the Ramifications of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Exacted a Heavy, Sudden Price
haaretz.com
@propandco - Propaganda and co
“The commanders in the field made difficult decisions – including shelling houses on their occupants in order to eliminate the terrorists along with the hostages." https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/politics/2023-10-20/ty-article-magazine/.premium/0000018b-499a-dc3c-a5df-ddbaab290000
בקיבוצי העוטף מנסים להסתכל קדימה: "המטרה מול עיניי — לחזור הביתה"
מתנדבים עדיין מחפשים שרידים באתר המסיבה בקיבוץ רעים, ובקיבוץ בארי עסוקים בחילוץ ציוד מהבתים. אחד מהם מבטיח: "בשבוע הבא נתחיל לעבוד. נתחיל עם הדבר הכי קטן"
haaretz.co.il
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Tanks blasted homes while captives were potentially inside "I arrived in Be’eri to see Brig Gen Barak Hiram and the first thing he asks me is to fire a shell into a house [where Hamas were sheltering]." Lt Col Salman Habaka, an Israeli tank commander https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/02/israeli-tank-commander-hailed-as-hero-after-hamas-attack-is-killed-in-gaza
Israeli tank commander hailed as hero after Hamas attack is killed in Gaza
Lt Col Salman Habaka was among first Israeli troops to arrive in Israel’s south after attack on 7 October
theguardian.com
@propandco - Propaganda and co
He says, "The first question that comes to your mind is – are there hostages there? We did all the preliminary checks before we decided to fire a shell into a house." If Hamas was in these homes, how did the IDF confirm there were no hostages? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/02/israeli-tank-commander-hailed-as-hero-after-hamas-attack-is-killed-in-gaza
Israeli tank commander hailed as hero after Hamas attack is killed in Gaza
Lt Col Salman Habaka was among first Israeli troops to arrive in Israel’s south after attack on 7 October
theguardian.com
@propandco - Propaganda and co
"They're actually bodies that were so badly burnt, we thought they were ours. In the end, apparently, they were Hamas terrorists." Mark Regev, Israeli ambassador to UK
Video Transcript AI Summary
We initially reported 1400 casualties, but we later corrected it to 1200 as we realized our overestimation. We made a mistake by identifying badly burnt bodies as ours, but they turned out to be Hamas terrorists. We acknowledge our errors and take responsibility for them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We had the number at 1400 casualties. And now we've revised that down to 1200 because we understood that we had overestimated. We made a mistake. There are actually bodies that were so badly burnt. We thought they were ours.
In the end, apparently, they were Hamas terrorists. Miss what we're what we're When we make a mistake, we admit it.
@propandco - Propaganda and co
In an Oct 7 meeting with high ranking officials, “Hit Hamas brutally and not take the matter of the captives into significant consideration.” Bezalel Smotrich, Israel Finance Minister https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/11/israeli-man-waits-for-news-of-10-relatives-caught-in-beeri-kibbutz-attack
‘I fear the worst’: Israeli man waits for news of 10 relatives caught in kibbutz attack
Yotam Kipnis does not know if his parents and other family members were killed or taken hostage in Be’eri kibbutz assault
theguardian.com
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Want to cut through the propaganda? Kindly support our work. This thread was made by Mr. N. https://www.buymeacoffee.com/propagandad
Prop & Co is Breaking the Narrative
I love supporting creators!
buymeacoffee.com
@propandco - Propaganda and co
Zionists steal land, lives and dignity. They must be stopped. https://t.co/7OyXSMnift
@propandco - Propaganda and co
⚡️𝗜𝗧'𝗦 𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗘 𝗧𝗢 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗔𝗥𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗢𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗔𝗟𝗟 ⚡️𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗢 ⚡️ "Before they launch missiles, they launch propaganda campaigns. Before they roll out tanks, they roll out narratives." - Caitlin Johnstone https://t.co/TiT6FHBBhf
Video Transcript AI Summary
An Israeli soldier claims that Hamas fighters burned and beheaded babies, but this is proven to be false. Israeli media reveals that the IDF destroyed homes and killed hostages in their desperate attempts to handle the Hamas fighters. The IDF shelled houses, used tanks and Apache attack helicopters, and even opened fire on fleeing Israelis. The IDF commander ordered an airstrike on his own position. While Hamas is not absolved of their actions, this video highlights the IDF's poor response, which led to the deaths of their own people. The goal of the attack was to capture Israelis as hostages for political prisoners. Israeli propaganda is being used to justify acts of genocide in Gaza, and the truth needs to be shared to prevent further escalation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you seen this video? Inside, we find we found, 8 babies burned in this corner.
Speaker 1: An Israeli soldier conducts an interview in front of a destroyed home of a kibbutz. He says Hamas fighters burned babies and then beheaded them, but this is all a lie. And and I'm gonna prove it to you using Israeli media. Yes, that is right, Israeli media. But first, let's ask an important question.
How did the concrete walls of this home behind the soldier turn into rubble. Fires burn wood and other flammable items. They do not collapse concrete structures collect this.
Speaker 0: Children in the same room, then someone come and kills them all. 15 girls and teenagers that put in the same room, 3 hand grenade, and this over. This is a massacre.
Speaker 1: Now the Israelis want you to believe that Hamas fighters did this, but we know that they were only armed with machine guns and small grenade launchers. That doesn't cause this is level of damage. So then how did they destroy concrete homes like this? The answer is they didn't. The Israelis did.
Told what? That is shocking. But why? And how would the Israelis do that? Well, Israeli media has all the answers.
They interviewed took the IDF soldiers who responded to the Hamas attack, and they learned something shocking. The IDF was struggling to handle the Hamas fighters. Tobal Escapa, or however you pronounce his name, a member of the security team for Kibbutz Fieri, set up a hotline to coordinate between Kibbutz residence and the Israeli army. He told the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, that as desperation began to set in, the commanders in the field made difficult decisions, including shelling houses on their occupants in order to eliminate the terrorists along with the hostages. These reports indicate that orders came down from the military's high took command to attack homes and other areas inside Israel even at the cost of many Israeli lives.
According to Haaretz, the army, was only able to restore control over Biyeri after admittedly shelling the homes of Israelis who had been taken captive. The price was terrible. At least a 112 residents were killed according to the paper. Others were kidnapped. Now much of the shelling in the area was carried out by Israeli tank crews as a reporter for the Israeli foreign ministry sponsored outlet I24 noted during a visit to Bi'eris.
Speaker 2: Small and quaint homes bombarded or destroyed. Children's toys lying around well maintained lawns of grass ripped up by the tracks of an armored vehicle. Perhaps a tank. Perhaps a tank. Perhaps a tank.
Speaker 1: In other words, the IDF, in an act of desperation, decided to just kill everyone, including hostages. This is their words, not mine. In fact, Yasmin Porat, an attendee of the NOVA Music Festival, who fled into the kibbutz, told Israeli radio that when Israeli special forces arrived during a hostage standoff, they, quote, eliminated everyone, including the hostages, because there was very, very heavy crossfire.
Speaker 0: Came.
Speaker 1: She goes on to describe a Hamas militants tied her partner's hands behind his back. She saw her partner lying on the ground still alive. She went on to say that Israeli security forces killed him and other as they opened fire on the remaining militants inside, including with tank shells. This is why you see large bits of shrapnel and bullet holes in the walls of destroyed holds homes. It's why you see homes turn into rubble.
And sadly, it's why you find severely burnt bodies of Israeli hostages. But there's more. The IDF, also used Apache attack helicopters. In an interview with Israeli media outlet Mako, an Apache pilot admitted kept many of the cars he fired rockets at contained hostages. But wait, there's even more.
Israeli security forces also opened fire on fleeing Israelis whom they mistook for Hamas gunmen. A resident of Ashkelon named Danielle Rachel described nearly being killed after escaping from the Nova music festival when it was killed by militants. As we reached the roundabout at a kibbutz, we saw Israeli security forces, she recalled. We held our heads down because we automatically knew they'd be suspicious of us in a small beat up carved from the same direction the terrorists were coming. Our forces began shooting at us.
Lastly, let's discuss how an IDF commander ordered an airstrike on his own position. The very first target the Palestinian fighters attacked was the Erez checkpoint. The attack was so fierce that the IDF commander, commander Abi Rosenfeld, in an act of desperation, he called for an airstrike on his own position. The IDF bombed their own base in order to kill the Palestinian continued militants. So what should we take from all this?
Do we absolve Hamas of their actions on October 7? Of course not. None of this would have happened had they not attacked. Now whether or not they have the right to resist occupation and apartheid with the use of force is a topic for cut their video. But the point of this video is to highlight how the IDF's poor response and performance led to the deaths of their own people.
As several Israeli hostages have already made clear the Palestinian militants were kind to them despite the aggression. And as the Nova survivor Yasmin Porat put it, she believes the militants didn't want to killed them. She believes their goal was to take them back to Gaza as hostages. The entire point of the attack seems to be the capturing of Israelis as cussages in order to trade them for thousands of Palestinian political prisoners. And in the chaos that ensued, many people lost their lives.
Now some people say, who cares how it went down? People died. Babies died. Is that not awful?
Speaker 2: Well, of
Speaker 1: course, it is. But the reason we have to cut through Israeli propaganda is because it's being used to justify acts of genocide in Gaza. Israelis believe deep down to their core that their babies were beheaded, that their women were raped and tortured before being killed, and this simply isn't true. And even with Israeli media reporting the facts, they may never change their minds. But the rest of the world needs to know the truth because it is the world that has given Israel the green light to commit acts of atrocity in Gaza.
And there's growing concern of an escalation that may erupt into a greater regional conflict. So share this video and help spread the facts. Because the world deserves to know the truth. And without you, that'll never happen. RIP to all those who lost their lives, especially the thousands of innocent children in Gaza incurring the wrath of a misled population.
Free Palestine.