reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @rajnishradu
@rajnishradu - रजनीश दुबे
@bennyjohnson @GenFlynn This is the most horrifying thing I've ever heard from a Supreme Court Justice. Ketanji Brown-Jackson is concerned that the First Amendment is making it harder for the government to censor speech. That's literally the entire point. https://t.co/OYQV6kdrjC
Video Transcript AI Summary
My concern is that you believe the First Amendment limits the government too much during critical times. How can the government protect citizens if it can't remove harmful information? It seems like you're saying the government can't address these issues. Can you clarify your stance on this?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Justice Jackson? So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the Government in significant ways in the most important time periods. I mean, what would you have the government do? I've heard you say a couple of times that the government can post its own speech. But in my hypothetical, kids, this is not safe, don't do it, is not going to get it done.
And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country. And you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information. So can you help me? Because I'm really I'm really worried about that because you've got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government's perspective and you're saying that the government can't interact with the source of those problems? And your Honor, I understand that in seeing that I guess what I tell you is