reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @realannapaulina

Saved - September 12, 2025 at 9:40 PM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

https://t.co/SgNuqOfYwb

Saved - June 15, 2025 at 1:52 PM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

" What they're doing is they are using Hispanic Americans the way that BLM used Black Americans during these riots. And frankly, the way that Code Pink, which is also funded by the CCP is using Palestinians. So what they're trying to do is … usher in Marxism." https://t.co/AcnloGq7WP

Video Transcript AI Summary
A billionaire named Neville Singham is allegedly funding the Party for Socialism and Liberation, identified as a communist organization. This organization is accused of exploiting Hispanic Americans, similar to how BLM allegedly used Black Americans and Code Pink is using Palestinians. The aim is purportedly to introduce Marxism. Singham is allegedly largely funded by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The House Oversight Committee will send a letter calling for Singham to testify before Congress. Failure to appear or provide documents will result in him being held in contempt of Congress and prosecuted by the Department of Justice. The claim is that interfering with American politics as a foreign agent will result in accountability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congresswoman, looking at this chaos, who's funding it, and then why are they funding it? So it's actually being funded by a billionaire by the name of Neville Singham. He's actually funding a group called the party for socialism and liberation, which if you look online, they are a communist organization. What they're doing is they are using Hispanic Americans the way that BLM used black Americans during these whites and frankly, the way that code pink, which is also funded by the CCP, is using Palestinians. So what they're trying to do is they're using this to usher in Marxism, but it's important to note that actually when you find and you follow the money trail, mister Sigham is actually largely funded by the communist Chinese party. So house oversight has issued and will be sending a letter this Friday with all members of oversight calling mister Sigham to testify before congress. If he does not appear and does not provide documents, he will then be held in contempt of congress, and he will be prosecuted by the Department of Justice. We are not playing. This is a different administration. We have the Department of Justice. And if you interfere with American politics and are a foreign agent, you will be held accountable.
Saved - June 13, 2025 at 9:41 PM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Receiving reports out of New York tonight that 88 antifa members were arrested. They were from out of state and came to riot. They’re NOT MEXICAN OR HISPANIC and were waiving Mexican flags. This is a giant psy-op.

Saved - April 4, 2025 at 8:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I spoke with @SpeakerJohnson after the President's statement. We discussed limiting the vote to new moms who can't travel in emergencies, which I think is a smart approach. It's important to note that this is a rare situation in U.S. history and should be separate from the legislation for the president.

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Update: @SpeakerJohnson has called me after POTUS statement and we discussed limiting the vote to just new moms who cannot physically travel in event of emergency etc. This is smart. Remember: only 13 in US history. Also, this should not have anything to do with the legislation being passed for the president. I’ve told him this.

Saved - March 21, 2025 at 11:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I found a document confirming that the CIA rejected the lone gunman theory shortly after JFK's assassination, known as the Donald Heath memo. Thanks to @jeffersonmorley for bringing this to my attention.

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

This document confirms the CIA rejected the lone gun theory in the weeks after the JFK assassination. It's called the Donald Heath memo. TY @jeffersonmorley for flagging this. Part 1/2 https://archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2022/104-10103-10024.pdf

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Part 2/2 https://t.co/BFl7Jx2tNo

Saved - March 18, 2025 at 1:37 AM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Just talked to @USNatArchives. All JFK files being released tomorrow will be housed at the below link. ⬇️ archives.gov/jfk 🔦

Saved - March 17, 2025 at 9:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I usually ignore negative headlines, but with a book allegedly attacking @POTUS, his marriage, and me, I feel compelled to respond. During my pregnancy, I experienced pre-eclampsia symptoms but wasn't diagnosed. When @realDonaldTrump boarded the plane, he kindly offered me the back room if I felt unwell, showing great respect and concern. I find it appalling that the author fails to acknowledge this compassion. They never reached out for my comment, suggesting the book will be a biased hit piece. Those close to POTUS should distance themselves from this author.

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

I seldom respond to nasty headlines because I don’t like giving trash credibility, however, being that there is allegedly a book coming out with me named and attacking @POTUS , his marriage, our first lady, and frankly implying something distasteful about me, I am responding. I was very pregnant and at the time experiencing pre-eclampsia symptoms, but was not diagnosed. As soon as @realDonaldTrump boarded the plane, being the gentleman and good person that he is, said if I did not feel well, I could use the back room. He did this in a respectful way and in front of my husband, of which we thanked him. He also assured me that they had a medical team on board in case anything happened and they were aware of how pregnant I was. This was the most compassionate thing that could’ve been done at the time. I find it disgusting that the author fails to recognize that. A few weeks later, I was induced because I did have pre-eclampsia . The author of this book never reached out to me for comment. Which means that this book is likely going to be a shit hit piece. If people in POTUS orbit are talking to this author, they need to be cut off immediately. This is gross. https://www.thedailybeast.com/dont-tell-melania-trump-once-offered-rising-maga-star-his-bed/

‘Don’t Tell Melania’: Trump Once Offered Rising MAGA Star His Bed The alleged comments cast new light on the president’s eyebrow-raising marriage to Melania Trump. thedailybeast.com

@thedailybeast - The Daily Beast

The new revelations reveal how Trump reportedly offered a female congresswoman his bed, as long as she kept it a secret from his wife. https://trib.al/PjR624a

SocialFlow trib.al
Saved - February 25, 2025 at 8:49 PM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

There is a massive war happening in the intelligence agencies right now. The corruption being exposed right now is actual treason…

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

CNN now says that "top leadership" at the CIA are worried anti-Trump personnel may by motivated to sell out America to a foreign power. In other words, the people who created the Russia Hoax might now sell America's secrets to Russia — and then CNN will be there to blame Trump. https://t.co/uYskrz8Qeg

Saved - February 15, 2025 at 1:20 AM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Thank you @MikeBenzCyber for bringing this to light. USAID is about as swampy as it gets. https://t.co/3LwF2e68ej

Video Transcript AI Summary
Initially, USAID was created with good intentions. However, the agency has broken the trust with the American people and hasn't been transparent about where our taxpayer dollars are going. In 2021, the special operations command put out an instruction manual with instructions and examples on how the military could work with the state department, intel services, and USAID using race riots in order to destabilize nations. They also advocated for setting up job fairs near some of these riots so that disaffected workers could gain employment. These operations are taking place without government oversight, without the authority of the president, without the authority of congress. USAID needs to condemn this and provide oversight to congress on exactly where our tax dollars are going. Do you agree that this is wrong?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna start up by saying, initially, I think the idea behind USAID was done with a good intention. However, we've come to find out that the agency has indeed, to a certain extent, operated in a row capacity, And USAID has absolutely broken the trust with the American people and not been transparent about where our taxpayer dollars are going. There's an individual by the name of Mike Benz. He actually served over at the state department for a while, and he's been going on to expose a lot of what USAID has been doing, which being a member of oversight and being on this committee, I wanted to verify and see if he was telling the truth, which much to my disappointment he was. And I say that because I'm disappointed that our taxpayer dollars are funding some of these items. I mean, to just put this in perspective, in 2021, the special operations command under Mark Milley, as chairman of the joint chiefs, put out an instruction manual, a vision for 2021 and beyond, that contained instructions and examples on how the military could work with the state department, intel services, and USAID using race riots. Here's examples of some of the, instruction manuals here, one and two, in order to destabilize nations. In addition to that, they advocated for setting up job fairs near some of these rights so that disaffected workers could gain employment. Now as a member of congress, I asked myself, did anyone in USAID get elected to congress? How about to a presidency? When you are acting in the shadows and you are destabilizing nations using race wars to do it and then advocating that the military does it, in my opinion, not only do you put the future generations that would have to fight in those wars in jeopardy, but at the end of the day, you're operating without any oversight. So I guess the question for you guys is, mister Natsios, is that something that you were aware of? Are you aware that that instruction manual is being promoted not just with the military under Milley, but that USAID may be operating in this capacity. Because in my opinion, and I'm sure I speak on behalf of many of my constituents, I don't think that's where our taxpayer dollars need to be going. Speaker 1: Well, I completely agree with you. I, personally, I doubt very much that what you've been told is accurate. But let me just Well, Speaker 0: I look. I'm telling you right now, I brought the receipts. Okay? And the reason I'm not trying to argue with you, but I find this disturbing on so many capacities. And I would like to also just if I can, sir, Mike Benz, what he's exposing and bringing receipts, I've confirmed it. Thank you for doing that on behalf of the American people because I understand that when you take on the intelligence agencies, we're also now finding that, apparently, in this manual, that they're also advocating for social media campaigns illuminated in controversy to a global audience. I mean, using disinformation campaigns, does this happen here in our own country? Where's the oversight? Speaker 1: To ask you. Who in the agency? What bureau Speaker 0: I just said you can actually find that instruction in this manual, that Milley Speaker 1: approved military manual. Speaker 0: Was that Yes. But Milley approved it. You have it right here, USAID, working with with government agencies. I mean, this is not Speaker 1: Wait a second. Did AID say that, or did the military say AID? Speaker 0: Question for you, sir. Speaker 1: Well, I Speaker 0: don't think I knew Speaker 1: I knew I knew that. Speaker 0: Sorry to interrupt you. These operations that are taking place without government oversight, without the authority of the president, without the authority of congress, real men and women serve, and they die because of stuff like this. When you destabilize nations without any oversight, we have to fight those wars. You have our chairman right here that literally risked his life. No. I I'm sorry to interrupt you. I'm frustrated. I know it's not necessarily your fault. Speaker 1: I'm telling you But Speaker 0: as the head of agency that's not I'm Speaker 1: telling what Ben's told you is nonsense. Speaker 0: Not nonsense. These are the information you've been informed. And then Vince put this out to me. Speaker 1: I didn't start. Write that down. Speaker 0: Sir, I disagree with you on so many levels, and I appreciate you being your take on this. It's not easy. How do I know what? Speaker 1: The any person can write AID's name into a manual. It goes on all Speaker 0: the time. They are advocating that the US military work with taxpayer on the state department. USAID funds to destabilize nations. That is unacceptable. I don't care who wrote it. USAID needs to come down and condemn it. They need to provide oversight to congress on exactly where our tax dollars are going. And I know I might be at seventeen seconds with our time. But, sir, I hope that you agree. Can I yes or no? Do you agree that this is wrong? Period. Speaker 1: Should this be happening? Should be held accountable. I think it's not Speaker 0: a sense of nonsense, the suggestion that I need to be wrong with that. Should they condemn it? Speaker 1: The military should. Speaker 0: USAID should USAID also condemn this? Speaker 1: Of course. We don't Thank you. Comment. AID does not comment on military meddling.
Saved - February 15, 2025 at 12:35 AM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Bibi in the House🇺🇸. @netanyahu https://t.co/ABv3zhBm2R

Saved - February 13, 2025 at 8:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I urge everyone to be cautious of individuals with large followings who oppose declassification or seek to undermine these efforts; they are bad actors on both sides. The President has declassified information that will soon be available to the public. We are committed to investigating and exploring new information. The American people deserve transparency, and we will utilize all available avenues to ensure you receive it. I encourage you to conduct your own research into the declassified records, as transparency is essential.

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Pay attention to those with large followings arguing against declassification or attempting to undermine efforts. These are BAD actors. They exist on BOTH SIDES. A) @POTUS declassified. Meaning it will be available publicly to ALL of YOU very soon. B) We will be conducting investigations & deep diving into new info. C)The American people deserve transparency. We will be using every avenue we have to get this to you guys. D) Do your own research into the declassified records. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 2:20 AM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Say “NO” to a corrupt prosecutor in the WH. Kamala hid evidence. https://t.co/0ohMdiDzeH

Video Transcript AI Summary
I never thought I'd be charged with sales murder. I wasn't questioned by detectives, police, or the DA, just arrested and charged. The first time I saw Kamala Harris in person was the day of the verdict. She was there at my conviction and sentencing. It felt like a celebration for her. When I share my story, people say it's the worst nightmare, like dying.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Never in a million years I would have thought that they were gonna charge me for sales murder. I never talked to no detective, no police officer, no DA, nobody. Just arrested and then charged. Arrested and charged. That's it. Was the first time you saw Kamala Harris in person the day that the verdict was issued? She showed up at the two most pivotal times in this first trial and me being convicted and me being sentenced. She wanted to be present for a celebration of a of a conviction. That's what it felt like. A celebration? A celebration. That's what it felt like. The reactions I get when I tell people my story is they say it's it's the worst nightmare. You know, it's the closest thing to dying.
Saved - December 19, 2024 at 6:22 PM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

After further discussion with my constituents, I am officially voting NO on the Cramnibus bill I cannot in good conscience vote for: -billions to Ukraine -mask and vaccine mandates -Deep State immunity I will still fight for a standalone disaster relief bill Let’s get it done!

@TRHLofficial - The Redheaded libertarian

What they get: $60B to Ukraine Unconstitutional force of courts to protect Congress Past & future blanket immunity for deep state Unconstitutional emergency powers Mask/vaccine mandates Gain of function research Vaccine passports Funding of 12 biolabs What we get: Hurricane aid

Saved - December 6, 2024 at 3:57 PM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Any adult that rapes an infant deserves the death penalty. https://t.co/0TgeCKGZf2

Saved - November 7, 2024 at 1:39 AM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

I am going to be looking into DHS and who authorized the unconstitutional surveillance of Americans. Let this also be known, FISA is DOA for renewal in the 119th Congress and I will be aggressively ensuring it does not pass with unconstitutional surveillance.

Saved - February 2, 2024 at 4:38 AM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Within hours of my office sending a letter asking Jack Smith to produce information regarding his investigation, his case against Trump is removed from the docket. Jack Smith owes the American people and Congress answers.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

BREAKING: Trump J6 case REMOVED from DC court docket https://thepostmillennial.com/just-in-trump-dc-election-interference-case-removed-from-court-docket?utm_campaign=64501

BREAKING: Trump J6 case REMOVED from DC court docket The case, brought by special counsel Jack Smith and presided over by Judge Tanya Chutkan, currently has motions pending that are on appeal. thepostmillennial.com
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 2:15 PM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

The DOJ answers to Congress. It’s time Jack Smith is reminded of that. Jack Smith has until December 15th to respond. I am personally working on this. https://t.co/kHmUjweTCY

Saved - August 2, 2023 at 2:20 AM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

Saved - June 13, 2023 at 11:22 AM

@realannapaulina - Anna Paulina Luna

We have evidence.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I will be heading back to Washington soon to update you on the Joe Biden investigation. Representative Mace pointed out that on the same day the House Oversight Committee received access to special activity reports, Alvin Bragg indicted President Trump in New York. On that day, we also obtained a form from the FBI stating that Joe Biden received a $5,000,000 bribery transaction while he was vice president. This shows an exploitation and abuse of the justice system. To conduct a thorough investigation without interference from the DOJ and FBI, we may need to impeach President Biden. The evidence we have makes this a likely course of action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Getting ready to head back to Washington this week and to give you guys a quick update on everything happening with the Joe Biden investigation. So something that, representative Mace had pointed out this morning and something that's completely true is that the day that house oversight, which is the committee conducting the investigation into his bribery scheme with the president. On the day that we got access to these special activity reports, Alvin Bragg indicted president Trump in New York. The day, again, that house oversight got access to the form that the FBI had that stated that Joe Biden received a $5,000,000 bribery transaction when he was sitting vice president. They then indict president Trump again. So there is absolutely an exploitation and abuse of the justice system. We will be sending out more subpoenas, but the fact is is that Right now, I do believe that the only way that we can fully conduct a full investigation without interference from the DOJ and the FBI is if we impeach president Biden. And based on the evidence that we have, think that that's something that's very likely.
View Full Interactive Feed