TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @realstewpeters
reSee.it AI Summary
I hear Trump say to loosen up on illegal immigrants—they’re good people and cheap workers, working on farms, luncheonettes and hotels. We’re focused on getting the murderers out—so much for mass deportations.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
TRUMP: “You gotta lighten up on this, they might have come into our country illegally but they're good people and they’re cheap workers. They’re working now on farms, in luncheonettes and hotels. We’re just focused on getting the murderers out.” So much for mass deportations. https://t.co/SeDUSn5F36
Video Transcript AI Summary
He says many countries opened up their prisons and dumped them into the United States, and those are the people the United States is getting out. He emphasizes that “we have a lot of heart,” and they are focusing on criminals rather than all illegal entrants, noting that some illegal entrants are good people who are now working on farms, in luncheonettes, hotels, and other jobs. The priority, he says, is to get the criminals out right now—the murderers, the drug dealers, and the mentally insane. He notes that there are a lot of mentally insane killers, “you can’t even talk to them,” and that they are seriously ill people.
He asserts that a couple of countries loaded up their mental institutions and insane asylums; those facilities were emptied, but now they’re filling up again because “we’re bringing them all back.” He claims that they know where these people came from and that every country accepts them. He contrasts this with Biden, saying that under Biden they wouldn’t admit they had brought them there and wouldn’t take them; they would “get the hell out of here.” He adds that they would be bringing a plane in to land in a country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many countries opened up their prisons and dropped them into The United States. Those are the people we're getting out. And we have a lot of heart. Now he said, you gotta lighten up on this. We have a lot of heart for people.
They came in illegally, but they're good people and they're working now on farms and they're working in luncheonettes and hotels and all. And we're not looking we're looking to get the criminals out right now, the criminals. And I think it's very important. I mean, I every once in a while, you see a store, we take somebody. He should be out because they came in illegally.
So in theory, they should be. But we're focused on the murderers, the drug dealers, the mentally insane. We have a lot of mentally insane killers. I mean, you can't even talk to them. It'd be nice if you could have a little reason, but you can't even reason.
These are seriously peep ill people. You have a couple of countries where they were loaded up. Their mental institutions and insane asylums were loaded to the gills. They couldn't get. They're empty now, but they're filling up because we're bringing them all back.
We know where they came from, and every country accepts them. You know, under Biden, they wouldn't say they had so little respect that they'd bring them there, and they wouldn't take them. They said, get the hell out of here. They would would be bringing a plane in to land in a country.
reSee.it AI Summary
Carlson says Netanyahu’s family is Polish, he doesn’t practice Judaism, ancestors never lived here or spoke the language, so what basis does he have a right to be here? Huckabee: I’m totally unable to process what you’re saying.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
CARLSON: “Netanyahu’s family is from Poland. He doesn’t practice Judaism, there’s no evidence his ancestors EVER lived here [Israel], they never spoke the language. On what basis does he have a right to be here?” HUCKABEE: “I’m totally unable to process what you’re saying.” 💣 https://t.co/1EQCui3JtA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the basis for Jewish connection to the land and who has a legitimate claim to it. Speaker 0 begins by stating that there are about 16,000,000 Jews in total worldwide, with 8,000,000 living in the area being discussed, and the remainder living mainly in New York, South Florida, and a few other places. He notes that this is a small population with historical and biblical connections to the land, and asks if such a connection exists. Speaker 1 responds that Bibi’s family lived in Eastern Europe and that there is no evidence they ever lived in the land, and that he isn’t religious. He questions whether there is a true ancestral link.
Speaker 0 asks whether there is evidence of any genuine ancestral connection. Speaker 1 asks if there is a family tree for Bibi, and if not, whether anyone has one. Speaker 0 asks how they know, and Speaker 1 elaborates that the point is to establish an ancestral connection to the land. He notes that there has been a practice of Judaism and a connection to the language, suggesting that Bibi has fought for the land, and that his family has fought for it. He raises an obvious, meaningful question: where does this right come from? He explains that many people in the territory Israel controls, particularly in the West Bank, have genetic evidence of having been there for thousands of years, with many identified as Christians for two thousand years, and even if some did not practice Judaism or were Samaritan or pre-Islam, the question remains: how do they compare in terms of rights to someone whose ancestors lived in Latvia or Poland and were Jewish? He questions the basis of being “Jewish” by faith, language, or Torah.
Speaker 0 challenges the question, asking how we know if Bibi’s ancestors ever lived there, and expresses confusion about what Speaker 1 is trying to determine. Speaker 1 emphasizes that a claim of rights based on ancestral presence is significant because many claims hinge on whether ancestors lived there, whether money flowed, and whether displacement occurred. He reiterates that it is not a theoretical issue like a grandparent’s distant past, but a real question of who has the right to be there. Speaker 0 remains unable to fully process Speaker 1’s point.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the entirety of the world, there are about 16,000,000 Jews total, and 8,000,000 of them live here. The rest live mostly in New York or South Florida and a few other places.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: So this is a small population of people. They have connection to this land historically, biblically. Do they? Yes, If they
Speaker 1: Bibi's family, we know they lived in Eastern Europe. There's no evidence they ever lived here. He's not religious.
Speaker 0: But in what sense truly but ancestor. Do we know that?
Speaker 1: Do you have his family tree? No. We don't. Do you? He doesn't.
So no one does. That's the point.
Speaker 0: So how we know
Speaker 1: that he's And connected to the land at
Speaker 0: if there has been a practice of Judaism and a connection to the language, His Bible, the land ancestors didn't
Speaker 1: He doesn't practice Judaism in any rigorous way. His ancestors didn't live here. They didn't speak the language, and there's no evidence they ever lived here. So, on what basis does he ever write Very
Speaker 0: much speaks the language. He has fought for the land. His family has fought for Really the dodging
Speaker 1: a very obvious question, which is where does this right come from? And the reason it's meaningful is because there are a lot of people in the territory that Israel controls today, particularly in the West Bank, who through genetic testing, we can know their families have been here for thousands of years. We don't know whether they practiced Judaism, whether they were Samaritans, pre Islam. We don't know that. A lot of them we know have been Christians for two thousand years.
They have less of a right to the land than someone whose ancestors The only thing we know about them is they lived in Latvia or Poland. They're Eastern European. How does that work? They're Jewish. By what definition?
They're Jewish by their how do we know they have any connection Jewish to by
Speaker 0: their faith? They're Jewish by the connection to the language? Jewish by the connection to the Torah.
Speaker 1: But how do we know that Bibi, specifically Bibi's ancestors ever lived here? How do we know that?
Speaker 0: I'm not sure if I understand your question.
Speaker 1: How do we know if the prime minister of Israel's ancestors ever lived?
Speaker 0: Maybe I could ask you, how do we know they didn't? Mean,
Speaker 1: there's Well, it's on the basis of the claim that they did that all kinds of things happen. People are displaced. There's a money flow. I mean, it's a big question. A lot hangs on this.
It's not some theoretical thing like, oh, do my grandparents do this or do that? It's like, no, no. We have a right to be here because my ancestors were here. Okay. How do we know they were here?
Speaker 0: I'm just totally unable to process what you're trying to get at.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
CHILLING CONFIRMATION: The Charlie Kirk Murder Method—Irrefutable evidence details high-level operation and ultimate betrayal. @jonaaronbray https://t.co/piUvCoeq56
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on a controversial, conspiratorial claim that Charlie Kirk’s death was not caused by a rifle shot but by an exploding lavalier microphone containing a shaped charge, a military-style operation allegedly planned and executed with broad involvement and cover-up elements.
Key points and assertions heard in the exchange:
- The speakers reject the official narrative of a lone shooter, Tyler Robinson, and insist Charlie Kirk was killed by an exploding microphone rather than a 30-06 rifle shot. They describe the supposed weapon as a Rode lavalier microphone whose battery and circuit board were propelled by an internal shaped charge, causing a neck wound and brain damage.
- They argue that evidence at the scene—shrapnel, the microphone’s shattered front, a battery and circuit board ejecting from the wound, and a distinctive neck injury pattern—cannot be reconciled with a rifle entry wound. They claim blood on the scene came from Charlie Kirk’s brain, not from the heart or circulatory system, and that the blood’s appearance and pooling indicate immediate brain trauma rather than post-injury bleeding.
- There is repeated emphasis on the “shirt deformation,” necklace snapping, and the presence of gas/plume around the collar as indications of a gas-expulsion event consistent with a high-energy explosion near the microphone, not a ballistic impact.
- John Bray (Speaker 1) provides technical demonstrations and plans to reproduce the neck wound and shirt deformation via simulations and physical reconstructions. He discusses mapping movement with AI to show that the most intense movement centers around the microphone, and he argues that only a high-energy explosive could generate the observed energy transfer and rapid tissue response.
- Bray describes reconstructing the microphone internals in CAD, evaluating the possibility of a shaped charge, and reconfiguring the microphone case to fit a charge without compromising microphone function. He mentions needing access to high-energy explosives and discusses potential sources, such as oil-and-gas fracture practices that employ shaped charges.
- The discussion includes descriptions of how the battery and circuit board allegedly exited the neck wound, and how the neck wound’s rectangular shape and delayed bleeding could be explained by a blunt-force impact from a blast, with the battery briefly plugging the wound before exiting.
- Bray asserts that the presence of shrapnel from the microphone in the SUV and on clothing, plus the trajectory of a magnetic clasp across the body, supports a single-source energy event around the microphone rather than a rifle shot. He claims the trajectory and timing make rifle-based explanations untenable.
- The host and Bray discuss the roles of various people connected to Turning Point USA and alleged participants in a larger conspiracy. They mention Fort Huachuca and UVU as places linked to pre-event planning, and reference meetings and conversations involving high-profile figures and politicians.
- There is extensive talk about the public reception and challenges to their theory, including the difficulty of reproducing the exact trauma and wound dynamics, and the claim that mainstream or official narratives suppress or ignore the “truth” they see in the evidence.
- Bray mentions ongoing work to replicate the neck wound within about 30 days and notes that reproducing the full explosive event is more complex, requiring careful selection and sourcing of appropriate high-energy materials. He emphasizes that even without replicating the exact explosion, reproducing the neck wound and shirt movement would be strong evidence against the rifle narrative.
- The discussion veers into related political and media insinuations, including references to Epstein, the “pedophile cabal,” and Trump as an FBI informant, which are used to reinforce a sense of systemic conspiracy and media distrust. They propose public-facing dissemination of their findings and invite support, including promoting Bray’s work and related self-sufficiency projects.
- Toward the end, the speakers discuss the possibility that Tyler Robinson may have been recruited or used as a patsy, with Bray suggesting he might have been promised online notoriety or other incentives, while insisting that Robinson is not the sole killer and that the microphone theory better accounts for the observed evidence.
Overall, the transcript presents a tightly woven narrative that disputes the official account of Charlie Kirk’s death, contending that a high-energy explosive integrated into a microphone caused the fatal injury and that the visible physical effects—shirt movement, neck wound, collar gas, shrapnel, and blood patterns—are inconsistent with a gunshot wound. It foregrounds technical schematics, CAD reconstructions, and AI-based motion analysis as the basis for proving the claim, while describing a broader, conspiratorial project to expose a supposed government-orchestrated cover-up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Millions upon millions of people watched as Charlie Kirk was executed on a livestream in broad daylight in front of a physical audience of 3,000 people or more, and billions of people worldwide have since seen that footage. And from the moment that Charlie Kirk took his last breath, things haven't been adding up, to say the least. The official narrative that we have been sold by our occupied government, the narrative that Erica Kirk and Turning Point USA want each of us to buy, it just doesn't sit right with me. I think I have made that abundantly clear. I know that it doesn't sit right with you.
It doesn't sit right with my team here at the network, and it doesn't sit right with countless people who from the day that Charlie was killed have been saying, you know, hold on a second. This just isn't adding up. They tell us that Charlie Kirk was shot through the neck with a 30 ought six by a trans chasing, furry loving reject called Tyler Robinson, a guy who, like Spider Man, scaled the side of a building, completely undetected with thousands of people present, assembled a rifle with his screwdriver, took his shot, disassembled the rifle with the same screwdriver, shoved it down his pants, jumped off the roof like a supervillain landing on his feet and then escaped completely undetected before leaving a pile of evidence full of other people's DNA in the nearby woods and then making multiple so called confessions and then ultimately, of course, turning himself into authorities. They say that Tyler Robinson was a lone wolf. He woke up one morning and because of Charlie Kirk's stance on transgenderism, Tyler Robinson decided that that was the day that Charlie Kirk had to die.
But we all know that that's bullshit. Anyone who has spent three or five minutes key stroking on the Internet looking into this case can plainly see that Charlie Kirk was betrayed by the people closest to him. They can see that this wasn't some kind of a lone wolf attack that killed Charlie Kirk, but instead it was a high level likely military operation spanning multiple agencies, spanning multiple countries that killed Charlie Kirk. Now we have honed in on the places like Fort Huachuca and UVU. We've honed in on the people like Erica Kirk and Cabot Phillips and Brian Harpole and Blake Neff and Mikey McCoy and Rob McCoy and Andrew Kovat.
We've talked about meetings that preceded Charlie's death, like the one at Fort Huachuca the day before, like the Zionist intervention at Bill Ackman's mansion in the Hamptons. And it was at that meeting where Benjamin Netanyahu phoned in offering Charlie hundreds of millions of dollars in exchange for being a pro Israel shill. And we all know what happened. Charlie rejected the offer. Charlie turned him down.
He could no longer stand with the pro Israel cause that in his own words, he wrote that he would be forced to leave. So he ended up dead. And when Charlie Kirk died, it wasn't a bullet from a point three zero -six that took his life. It was an exploding microphone. And that's what we're gonna talk about today, the murder weapon.
Because in the case against Tyler Robinson, which is being used, by the way, to cement the government narrative, the murder weapon is everything. For Tyler Robinson to have killed Charlie Kirk, he would have had to have shot him in the neck with a 30 ought six, leaving no exit wound. But that didn't happen. A 30 ought six did not kill Charlie Kirk. What killed Charlie Kirk was an exploding tempered glass, black, road branded lavalier microphone.
There was no bullet tangled up in the neck bones of steel of Charlie Kirk as Andrew Kovat would have you believe. Instead, the microphone that you could easily see beneath Charlie's shirt blew up, and when it did, it turned tempered glass into shrapnel, which was documented both at the scene of
Speaker 1: the
Speaker 0: assassination itself and in the vehicle that Charlie's dead body was transported in. There was tempered glass all over the floor of that vehicle because when the microphone blew up, pieces of shrapnel clung to Charlie's shirt. Pieces of shrapnel got caught up all over his skin and went with him into that SUV. And that doesn't happen to a microphone on the right side of his chest if he's shot in the left side of his neck. And what also doesn't happen is what we saw the moment that Charlie Kirk hit the ground.
That blood that was pouring out of his neck, actually while he was still in the chair, that blood from the wound that was created as that microphone blew up, it came from his brain. Now just last evening I spoke with an advanced surgeon, a neurosurgeon, a trauma brain surgeon. This is a person who operates on people who have gunshot wounds to the head, who fall from an elevated position down onto the ground and they hit their head. They have trauma to the head. They have brain bleeds.
They have brain damage. These are the people who intervene on an emergency basis to save their life and to keep their brain working. The moment that Charlie's neck blew open, huge amounts of coagulated blood started pouring out of a hole in his neck. And a lot of people said, well, that doesn't even look like real blood. That looks like fake blood.
That looks like a prop. That looks like something that would come from some sort of a bag and a tube. Yeah, he faked his death. That was blood that came from his brain because he was brain dead. All of the blood that was pumping around in his brain and circulating around in his skull the moments leading up to his death was suddenly expelled.
And it started dumping out of his neck as if it was coming from an overturned bucket. The sheer force of that military grade explosion killed his brain instantly. And when his neck was blown open by the microphone battery that turned into a projectile, the blood came pouring out. It exited out of his neck. You didn't see blood spurting six or 10 feet.
And its coloration was not consistent with what you see in the movies, which kind of resembles the logo of the Stoop Peters network. It's kind of that color red. It's a very bright red. But there was brain blood everywhere when Charlie Kirk was killed, so much so to the extent that it soaked through the grass beneath him. And to cover up the reality of the situation, what really happened, Utah Valley University, under direct federal law enforcement supervision, ordered for that assassination scene to be destroyed and reconstructed within days of Charlie Kirk's execution.
So yeah, you don't get blood like that from a point three zero -six entry wound. Anyone who has ever shot anything with a point three zero -six knows this. Or with any kind of a high powered rifle. If you've ever shot a deer or an elk or a moose or a bear or a squirrel or a human being, you know that. But to believe the official Charlie Kirk assassination narrative, you have to suspend your perception of reality.
You have to let someone else take control of your mind. It's only when you start thinking for yourself, doing a little bit of critical thinking independently that you get on the Internet, that you look through just a little bit of information. I'm just talking minutes here. You will quickly realize the truth. And the truth is that Charlie Kirk wasn't shot with a 30 odd six, but he was killed by an exploding microphone.
This was, in my opinion, a high level military operation, not unlike the exploding pager operation that Israel deployed against Hezbollah. And this reality is just further reinforced by the fact that over the past several months, in an effort to prove the official narrative, an entire industry has sprung up online full of people who are trying and failing, by the way, to cement the government narrative. If you go online right now, you will find what seems like an endless supply of former special forces operators, self proclaimed weapons experts. They're firing thousands of rounds downrange trying to recreate the assassination of Charlie Kirk using a dummy and a 30 ought six, and they can't do it. Even when they sculpt Charlie Kirk look alike busts out of commercial grade ballistic gel and position themselves just so, they can't pull off the Tyler Robinson shot no matter how many times they try.
And that's because the Tyler Robinson shot never happened. I'll say it again because it needs to be said. Charlie Kirk was killed with an exploding tempered glass Rode branded lavalier microphone. And I'm not just telling you this because this is something that I believe happened. I'm telling you this because I know this is what happened.
And soon all of this will be proven beyond any reasonable doubt. Thanks in part to our good friend John Bray. Now we have had John on the program before, and right now he's working around the clock to recreate the assassination of Charlie Kirk using everything from advanced AI to a physical reconstruction of the crime scene, of the exploding microphone and of Charlie Kirk himself. John's in the green room. We're gonna bring him on here in just a moment.
But before we do, I just want you to take a look at this recent post that he has on X. Just look at this video that John has posted. And as you watch it, just ask yourself, can you see anything to suggest that Charlie Kirk was shot with a 30 aught six in the neck? And John Brace says here, as my code advances, there will be no doubt left. They should have never gave me access to AI.
A hyper focused mind with a powerful tool set is the most dangerous combination to conspirators. You can't explain these peaks with the official narrative. And the peaks that he's talking about, we will let you explain. Like I said, he has been in the green room here while we have been going through this introduction and he joins us now. John, thanks a lot for coming back.
Appreciate. What do you mean by the peaks that you can't explain with the official narrative?
Speaker 1: So that code basically turns motion into a heat map. So you can see the basic, like cool colors that are placed on everything. As it detects movement, it gives a gradient of color. So the faster something moves, the brighter the color. The closer to red it gets, the faster it's moving.
And you can clearly see, you know, it gives you a clear visual of the things that move first and the things that move the most. And you can see that the shirt on the right side has dramatic movement before any neck wound appears. And you see the collar on the left side raise up before any blood appears. And so you know, the official narrative of a 30 off six impact causing the shirt to move like that is is ridiculous enough. But to think that it could cause a shirt to move like that and have delayed bleeding, almost a full half second of no bleeding from the wound upon impact, it's impossible.
And when you add the physical evidence of the necklace being snapped on the right side and flying up and over the back of his head on the right side, it's just it layers on the impossibility. You can't explain the physical evidence that we have documented by multiple videos, documented by the physical evidence left on the scene by 30 off six impact the neck. It's it's just it it they're playing us to fools to even try to get us to even believe it. The the not only the movement of the shirt, but the area where the movement is concentrated is directly at the microphone. So you're left with, you know, this is how it came to this conclusion.
Mapped the area of the most dramatic movement. And no matter what angle I mapped it from, it was always centered around the microphone. So you know, you're left with no other conclusion to make that the microphone had to be the center of the energy that was displaced underneath the shirt. And we know we see gas coming out from the front of the collar, we see the back of the collar expanded out dramatically. The only thing that can create that sort of action is expanding force of gas.
And this gas was moving so fast that it wasn't caught on all the frames of cameras. It was in between the shutter speeds of the camera. So the only type of explosive force that can create that sort of speed is military grade high explosives. We're not talking about some handcrafted, you know, homemade bomb. This was a military grade high explosive just like we saw in the Grim Beeper attacks in in Lebanon.
And they used a modified electronic device with a arm processor in it to detonate it right when they wanted to. This device had an ARM processor in it. It had a microphone. Everything they needed to basically recreate that Lebanon attack was in that microphone. So, you know, you're left with not only the only logical conclusion you're left with to explain the shirt deformation, the the necklace snapping, and the physical evidence that we see is that the microphone exploded.
There's there's there's no way you can explain those combination of events with a rifle shot to the neck.
Speaker 0: Do you think that this went off exactly as they had planned, or do you think that there were unaccounted for variables that that took place here? Were there things? Were there accidents? Were there things that didn't go exactly according as planned, you know, in your opinion?
Speaker 1: Well, absolutely. A level this level of event, they would have ran simulations over and over again.
Speaker 0: On Fort Huachuca is what I believe. That's where they were testing this microphone. They were they were testing the explosive. That's what they do on Fort Huachuca.
Speaker 1: And anybody that was involved with the conspiracy, they would show them the replication of it, and they would be confident that it would look convincing enough like a rifle shot to the chest that it would be an easy sale. And
Speaker 0: might so bring somebody like Erica Kirk and Brian Harpole to Fort Huachuca to say, hey, here's what we have tested x amount of times. We believe that we have this perfected. We've had to modify this microphone a little bit. We've had to remove a little bit of the rubber. We've had to shift the battery down.
They might not even go into detail about exactly what it was that they did. And then they just they show the demonstration to these people who then make the decision to sign off on this. They say, yep, that looks great.
Speaker 1: You hear a rifle shot, you see a shirt move, you see a guy fall over dead. I mean, it's a very easy story to convince most people.
Speaker 0: Maybe a little bit of blood in the front, not a whole lot, but you wouldn't see a whole lot from a 30 out six. I would believe that. If there was not an a neck wound, I would have believed that entire story. Nobody would have been asking questions.
Speaker 1: No. I would have never looked at it twice. If they told me that Charlie was shot the chest and he didn't have that neck wound, I wouldn't looked at it twice. Would have just went on with my life. But when I saw the shirt move, and I saw the neck wound, I saw the strange bleeding from it, I saw his physical reaction, none of those factors added up to me and my mind couldn't leave it alone.
I kept working through the variables of how to try to explain it. And the more I looked, the more it became obvious that you know, the only explanation you could come up with was the microphones, the only thing that was possible that could be you know, the not all the components needed to to pull that operation off were were in that microphone.
Speaker 0: The mic What have you done with this microphone as you have been trying to recreate all of this?
Speaker 1: So basically, found the the microphones are older model. So I found the exact model that Charlie wore that day on
Speaker 0: I got four more of them down the hall in the other studio. If you want access to more of them, you can blow those up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I found the exact model because they changed different features of them like a glass front, they got rid of the glass front, they changed it to polycarbonate front because the glass shatters It's an easy thing to shatter and it's sharp when it shatters, know, there's a liability on their part. And so disassembled that microphone, I've scanned it into CAD, got all the dimensions. I took the the Bible of shape charges, the fundamentals of shape charges. I used all the formulas in there to recreate the size, shape, and power of the shape charge. And I found a way to make it fit inside the case while still having it fully functional.
So the only thing I'm lacking now is getting the actual shaped charge three d printed and finding a source of that high energy explosive, which is difficult, know, it's not something that's readily available. Worst case, I can replace it with a lower power explosive and I'll just have to use most of it. But I'll have to modify the case further. It may not be fully functional in that case, but it will still represent, you know, the physical characteristics we saw. We'll be able to replicate that accurately.
But hopefully someone to come forward brave enough that has access to these explosives that you know, supply the two grams that I need to replicate it. And we'll just run it over and over again. Right now I'm running simulations and I had to buy a brand new computer just to run it because it's pretty complicated physics. But luckily, the people have been very generous in supporting us. And I've been able to use the funds that we have that we've been able to scrape together.
And I'm buying the things necessary to not only run the simulations, but to do the the replication of it. I just bought ballistics gel to recreate the neck, the neck wound is gonna be something that I recreate first, it's easier. So lower hanging fruit. I've done it before in a crude matter. I'm gonna create a Zac replica of a human neck and recreate the neck
Speaker 0: wound. So so wait a minute. The the ballistic busts that people are using and they're shooting, you can't just use that? Why is that?
Speaker 1: The ballistic gel doesn't have the properties of flesh. It's made to simulate the penetration potential of a projectile. So if you see it move, it jiggles and shakes. It has nothing that contains it. It's kind of elasticity.
So when it's impacted, it stretches and bubbles out a whole lot. And that's why you see these slow mo videos of something getting impacted. It looks ridiculous. So like a balloon blows up, and then it slaps back down. That's not how a human flesh reacts.
So I have bacterial cellulose, which is the best analog for actual human epidermis, and I've grown it to the same thickness as as neck tissue, and we're going to wrap the ballistic gel in that and that'll basically create the same potential of penetration of kind of like the replication of the penetration, but it will withhold that stretching ability and give you a much more realistic surface reaction of the flesh. And then what most importantly, it'll give you the the shape of the the wound accurately.
Speaker 0: What about the posture? Does that matter? Charlie Kirk had just basically said he was, you know, putting the microphone forward, setting it down after he answered the question with one line response, sits back and then bang. Yeah. His posture is different than a lot of these busts that you can buy, these ballistic gel busts.
Speaker 1: Exactly. The ballistic gel busts are like a mannequin, shoulders back, chest forward. Charlie was sitting with his his hands.
Speaker 0: I kind of like how I always am, you know, shoulders rolled back, head held high, chest stuck out. Anyway, go ahead.
Speaker 1: His hands are actually extended in between his head, his legs with his both hands on the microphone. So he's like in the slump kind of like slump shoulder position, which pulls the microphone that's on his collarbone, the angle of it's further forward, which aligns allows it to align with the correct trajectory to be able to catch the jugular of his neck. Where you know, other people have critiqued the microphone saying that there's no way that it would hit because it's you know, if you use a traditional bust, the shoulders are back and so the chest is in the way. But when you draw the shoulders forward, and it's on the collarbone and the microphones already sticking out, the trajectory is actually perfect. So you have to create a custom bus.
You just can't use off the shelf bus to be able to recreate this event.
Speaker 0: So I'm gonna put you on full screen here. And using your fingers, kind of show me, okay, where is the microphone mounted? And then where is the wound? Where where where did the penetration occur of I believe it was a battery. First of all, do you agree with me that it was the battery from the lavalier microphone that entered the left side of Charlie's neck?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Not only do we know it's the battery because we see the fallout of the wound, and it's the same ratio in size and color as the battery, but we see the circuit board is what raises the shirt up around his collar. And the circuit board and the battery are connected together. So
Speaker 0: And on some of these tests that I've seen other people do where they are exploding microphones, we talked to a guy called Brian. I might have him on the show. His neighbors think he's crazy. I've shown you some of these videos. His wife thinks he's nuts, but secretly, she's actually very curious.
The more that he tests these things, the more it raises her eyebrow. But he has literally reconstructed in his driveway in Tennessee the entire Charlie Kirk assassination. He's got the body, the bust elevated. You know, again, this is one of these ballistic gel busts, and he has been running countless tests. But like you, he has struggled to get his hands on military grade explosives.
They're hard to get your hands on, they're extremely dangerous to work with. So he's using other kinds of means for incendiary, reaction. But okay, so you can see the battery or an object that looks and is the same color as and is the exact same dimensions as the battery in this Rode microphone come out of the wound. You can see it fall out of the wound. Yeah.
How did it get there? Show us how it got there.
Speaker 1: So basically, you have the the battery, and the microphone is mounted underneath the collarbone, And it's mounted in kind of like a 45 degree fashion. So kind of you know actually like this. And so when the first movement of shirt you see in the maps, it's violently lifts the shirt up here. And so it extends from the body. So his shoulders are already forward, which brings the angle kind of of the shoulder around.
So you could see the trajectory how it changes from here to here, how it brings it forward. So it can it can reach the neck on this side. And when your arms are forward like that, it pulls your you see perfect. It pulls your neck muscles forward. So the battery was basically drawn further from his chest.
And then the the fact that his arms are flexed forward opens up his neck muscle, whereas jugular is almost like a hammock that your muscles create there. And so the circuit board was able to pass right in front of his neck, lift his shirt up, but the battery caught just in that muscle there. And right underneath that muscle is the jugular vein. And the jugular vein drains the blood from your brain. So the battery had just enough momentum to penetrate three centimeters into the neck.
And so that's why we see the shape of the wound, but we don't see any bleeding for zero point four seconds. It's because the battery basically penetrated and plugged the wound. And as he fell over, the battery comes dislodged. And so we see the battery fall out and we see a gush of blood that follows it. And the blood that we see is not blood that's actively oxygenated.
It's not under pressure from the heart. It's literally draining like gravity draining from his brain, and so it's coagulated, it's dark, and it rushes out after the battery falls out. And as he falls over, it's almost like you're pouring a pitcher out. You see it pour out as he falls over. And so, you know, the only way you can explain these these characteristics is a medium velocity blunt impact and the the type of physical reaction that he has.
You see his arms come up and his his hands come in and his knees come together. That's showing you that he has severe brain trauma before the neck wound even appears. So you know, if you combine the physical evidence of the shirt, the necklace, his physical response showing brain damage right away, and then the bleeding that we see from the medium velocity blunt impact, you combine all these factors together, and you're left with the only explanation that you could come up with is that the shockwave from the high energy explosive caused severe brain damage, sent shrapnel across his chest, which raised his shirt up and impacted his neck, and it penetrated just deep enough into his neck to sever his jugular vein, which drained the blood from his brain. But we didn't see his heart pumping the pressurized blood. We didn't see him even have physical reactions from falling and hitting the ground.
He hit the ground like a mannequin, you know, was his dead weight. You can't fake that sort of thing. If he had any sort of brain function, he would have tried to brace himself. So, you know, Charlie was well dead before the neck wound even appears. And, again, none of that can be explained by a 30 off six and back to the neck.
Speaker 0: Late last evening, I reached out to somebody who had emailed me, and they were a level one trauma center emergency brain surgeon. And that's what this person does. And this person works in a very busy part of the country in a major metropolitan area, at that metropolitan area's level one trauma center. And I called him hoping that he would be awake and he had reached out to me a couple of times. He wanted to talk to me about Charlie Kirk.
And this is just very recently. So I called him, he answered. And this is what he ran me through. This is basically exactly the same thing that this trauma surgeon who works on people's brains in emergent situations in a very busy metropolitan area, you know, an epicenter like a downtown area where a lot of murders happen, by the way. That's what this person does for a living.
And what he told me is that every single brain surgeon, every single level one trauma surgeon, any doctor really who's trained in emergency medicine knows when they look at this, that that was brain blood. That that was blood that came from Charlie Kirk's brain and it didn't come from the heart. It didn't come from the circulatory vascular system. It came from the brain. And that's why you see this non oxygenated, coagulated, really dark blood.
And that's why it's only by the gravitational pull that that blood begins to drain because it was just sinking down. It was literally draining, you know, from the top of his head down and would have gone past the wound inside of his body internally. But when he gave it an exit by leaning this way, that's what broke the seal, pushed the battery out, and it gave an exit for the blood to travel out of. And they also said that Charlie Kirk was immediately dead. They said that this blast, it appears, created brainstem trauma that immediately incapacitated his brain and it killed him.
It wasn't the loss of blood that killed him. It wasn't shock. It wasn't anything other than the brain basically blowing up, essentially. I mean, I'm not a doctor and for a lack of scientific vocabulary, I'll just say that's what he was trying to communicate to me is that the brain was like immediately incapacitated, shut off, he was dead right there from the trauma that was created to his brain caused that bleed. And that's what we saw.
It was the entry wound and it was the exit passageway for the blood to come out of. Do you think they picked up the battery as well? I mean, we saw the security team and I'm asking you to speculate here. I want to get into, like, the actual what you're doing here, but it's hard not to think about all of this stuff playing out, you know, as we talk about these things. Do you think that that's what they were doing on the ground down there?
They were scrambling around picking up the battery, picking up pieces of the slavalier microphone?
Speaker 1: Yeah. You can see the whole security team. They had a they had a, like, a d detail of they were going around with their heads down kicking at the grass. There's only one reason that you would do that. They're looking for every bit and fragment that they can find from that microphone.
They can't leave one piece of shrapnel behind and that's why they had to come and pull up the grass because they would never be able to completely clean that grass up. One piece of shrapnel getting tested for explosive residue would unfold the whole conspiracy. So they couldn't leave anything behind. You know, that's why the SUV got sold off in auction after it got cleaned out. Like, anything that coulda had any residue on it would be high priority for them to to absolutely scrub and get rid of or replace with a decoy.
Speaker 0: And then you have that guy. You have Ritt Cutler who, as I'm watching these videos back, you can see him. You have kept him in the frame here. And that just really looks that really looks sus to me.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You
Speaker 0: know, that doesn't look like body language of somebody that's there to protect him. That looks like the body language of somebody who was detonating the microphone. To me, that's what I think. That's my opinion. Do you agree with that, or do you think that this was detonated from elsewhere?
Speaker 1: The detonation is hard to pinpoint. If it was my operation, I wouldn't depend on a person to detonate it. I would use the hardware to detonate it. But I think the what the video of him is telling because he doesn't look shocked at all until he sees the blood erupt from the neck, and you just see it all over his face. It's a it's a a oh shoot moment.
Something's gone awry. Yeah. Mhmm. Actually, you can read his face. You know?
Speaker 0: He's That wasn't supposed to happen. That's the look that's
Speaker 1: Yep. And that's when you see the whole crew stand over his body after they get him on the ground. They all kinda just sit there and look at each other. And, you know, one of them puts his, you know, metaglasses and clicks them on. Like, they were going back into mission command.
You're like, what do we do?
Speaker 0: This isn't what we were told was gonna happen. We were told no blood. We were told that this wasn't gonna be gruesome, that this wasn't gonna be bloody. We were told that this would just simply kill him immediately. This blood, this was not supposed to happen, and you can see it.
We're gonna watch it all together right now. But there he is. The blast happens, And immediately, look at the blood starts coming out as his head tilts, and then it's, oh my god. Oh, wow. Holy shit.
I gotta spring into action here. And that's when they did.
Speaker 1: Yep. The rifle shot didn't didn't shake
Speaker 0: him at all. None of
Speaker 1: them were worried about a follow-up rifle shot. None of them were scared of getting hit, you know, by a stray bullet. But when they saw that blood come out, you could see it all over their faces. And, you know, even a damn flood, he threw Charlie to the ground. You know, he didn't gently it was like, get him up out of sight.
You know, he he basically threw him out of the chair to the ground as fast as possible because every second as peeps people saw that blood erupting from the neck was a second that they couldn't undo. It it was the undoing of their whole operation as soon as that battery struck his neck.
Speaker 0: Did you notice anything peculiar or different? And in your research, have you looked back to try to figure out who is it normally that's charged with the responsibility of attaching that lavalier microphone to Charlie and was anything different on nine ten?
Speaker 1: The way they mounted it was weird. I looked at the whole history of the microphone trying to decipher what model it was, and you can kind of see like as the season goes along, know, when they first buy it, he's in like summer clothes, and they're mounting it, you know, on the outside of his shirt. And then, you know, the he goes to long sleeve t shirt, they mount it on the inside of his shirt, but they mount it in kind of like a peculiar fashion kind of in the center of his chest. And then by the time winter comes around, you see him starting to mount it more in a fashion that you see, but it's always mounted kind of flat. That day, they mounted it on its side, which I always thought was really weird.
Like, Charlie was even messing with it. It was obviously uncomfortable to him because it's it's constantly kinda like trying to lay flat. But they mounted it on its side because they needed the depth of that device for the shaped charge available to to point towards his chest. It's too shallow of a device to have that shaped charge, you know, be mounted flat. The microphone be mounted flat on his chest and it be able to shoot the charge towards his chest.
So that day, it had to take, you know, a great effort to mount it in that way. It's not I had the microphone, I have the magnetic claps, it's not easy to mount it that way. It's not easy to get it to stay that way. So, you know, if you look at the the reaction of the guy that mounted that microphone on him too, he literally is hiding behind the table the whole time. Where you look at all the other videos he's doing his AI, know, his audio video thing standing up behind the table.
He's walking around. That day, he's hunched behind the table the whole time, and and seconds before the rifle round goes off, he looks away. Like, he couldn't bear to see it happen. And immediately, they run off. And the other a a AV guy is the guy that goes behind the concrete wall and says, they killed Charlie.
They killed Charlie. You know, they haven't even gotten Charlie into the SUV yet. And he's recording a video, a selfie video They killed Charlie. You know, it's just you can't explain it. They didn't even get a good look at Charlie.
There's no way that they could even know that he got hit by anything, but yet he's come to the determination that they shot Charlie. They killed Charlie. It you just can't you can't discount that level of reaction from someone that had direct, you know, hands on they were handling that microphone. They had to put that microphone position. And then they're acting in this sort of way, like they already knew that Charlie was dead before they even laid eyes on the impact that he suffered that day.
You just add all these factors together and it and it becomes apparent that there was a conspiracy within Turning Point to use the people in and around Charlie to set him up for this event.
Speaker 0: Some of these other podcasters, these special weapons and tactics, military operators, they've kinda let go. They have nowhere to go on this because nobody has been able to reproduce, replicate, or recreate the trauma that was created by the battery out of a lavalier microphone at Charlie's neck. How are you going to be able to do that? If this was a mistake, if this was a malfunction, if this wasn't supposed to happen, how are you going to be able to recreate the wound that was created by the battery as it came shooting out of that microphone?
Speaker 1: It's gonna take multiple runs. And it's just, you know, they tested this device, and they didn't they wouldn't have ran it like they ran it if they didn't if they expected this to happen. It wouldn't
Speaker 0: They must have done it, you know, several times where it didn't do that.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. They were confident enough to, you know, put it in front of 3,000 people. They ran it enough to say that, you know, there's a very low probability of of shrapnel hitting his neck. So that's why I'm running the simulations trying to get all the factors perfect before I start, you know, get blowing through ballistic dummies and microphones. But, you know, I imagine it's gonna take multiple runs.
But what won't take multiple runs is replicating the shirt deformation. Every single one of those runs will replicate that shirt deformation. So, you know, even though we won't get the
Speaker 0: battery two separate, you know, kind of demonstrations where one, you have the way that it was supposed to work, and it'll show the reaction of the shirt. And then two, you simply put a battery at that velocity, which I'm sure that your advanced AI technology will be able to detect the velocity, right, which the battery moved with. Would you be able to just emit that kind of energy behind a battery into a neck or something consistent with Charlie Kirk's neck to show the penetration, how far would you estimate that it penetrated in? A centimeter or two centimeters?
Speaker 1: Three centimeters. Yeah. I've already I've already mapped the speed. I know the speed that it was moving. I know the weight of the object.
I know the size of the object. That's the first thing I'm gonna replicate is the impact to the neck outside of the explosion. And then we'll do the explosion trying to replicate the impact, but knowing that it's going to be a very rare event. But the two things they they work together in conjunction, you replicate, we know the angle that the trajectory, we know the speed, we know the size, so we can replicate the neck wound without the explosion. That's easy.
That's the first thing I'm doing. I should have that done soon. The explosion is is trickier because there's a lot more variables involved. You have high explosives involved. But even without the battery impact, the explosion will be able to replicate the shirt deformation and you know being able to map that and replicate that movement, especially the the speed of the movement, that will be it's worth its weight in gold, basically.
Just that alone disproves the rifle impact because without the neck wound replication, the rifle impact still can't explain the necklace snapping and the shirt movement. So either you have two separate events, you had something explode underneath his shirt, snap his necklace and move his shirt, and then a rifle impact or his neck, or you you just had the single rifle theory. You can't have both. So you know, they haven't provided any explanation for the shirt. So they're just, you know, banking on the single rifle impact to the neck.
And any any, you know, hard evidence of explaining what moved the shirt and snap that necklace will kind of dissolve that narrative where they'll be forced to to replay their hand or just abandon it, or just kill Tyler and hope that we all forget about it. And I'm I imagine that's probably going to be the move as the pressure mounts. They'll just, you know, they'll they'll off Tyler in jail and hope that everyone just moves along to the the next story.
Speaker 0: If they kill Tyler Robinson, that doesn't change the fact that we can complete the investigation into what killed Charlie Kirk, and I would expect that you won't stop. No. If they killed Tyler Robinson, I would expect that you'd probably go just as hard, if not even more fervently than you are right now. Yeah. If it's this difficult to get your hands on this explosive, do you know what type of what grade of explosives were used?
How would they compare to fireworks? Could alternate explosives be used?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Fireworks are a subsonic explosion. So, you know, it would be like trying to replicate the 30 off six impact with a pellet gun. It's just not as fast as your your military or high explosive.
Speaker 0: Do you know the speeds?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I know the speeds exactly. I can replicate it with a few different explosives. One that I can actually get that's that's about 20% slower, but it would still replicate it at supersonic speeds. It would be close enough that I could just put 20% more explosives in the charge and get the same effect.
So there is an absolute binary explosive that I'll be able to source and replicate it. And it's not restricted, but I would much rather someone assist me and come forward with the the high explosives that were more likely used in the device. That way we can, you know, have a much more solid case of the the shaped charge fitting in a functional device and, you know, creating all the physical characteristics that we saw that day.
Speaker 0: Who would be somebody that could get their hands on that?
Speaker 1: Anybody in oil and gas that does fracing or well drilling, it's what they use to basically drill through hard layers of rock when they're drilling an oil well. When they reach a point where their drill can't penetrate anymore, they basically send a shaped charge down and it blows a hole through the rock. And you know that's how accurate these shaped charges are. It doesn't destroy the the well that they made you know they need a very clean hole but it'll blow a hole right through a hard substance in any direction that you want. So, you know, you hear about them drilling like directional wells, sideways wells.
This is how they do it. They just send a shaped charge down the the pipe basically, and they can blow through whatever's in the way, whatever obstacle they have.
Speaker 0: What modifications were made to the microphone in order to be able to fit this amount of explosives inside of it? Have you been able to determine exactly how they kind of configured this microphone that was used to kill Charlie?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. I put the the microphone internals into a CAD program and basically ran the dimensions to of the the formulas that I ran from this the fundamentals of shaped charges. And I was able to determine that by just moving a few millimeters of the rubber surround that kind of like held the battery in place, you could slide the battery up in the case and leave more than enough room for the shape charge to sit diagonally. And it wouldn't affect the function of the microphone at all, it would it would function just as a regular microphone.
And you can see it almost gives the USB port, there's a hole in the side. And it almost gives a exit for the the shaped charge where it doesn't have to blow through the case completely. It just blows through the back of the USB port, and the case already has a hole there for it. And the battery normally sits kind of in that spot. But if you remove the rubber surround, you can turn the battery 90 degrees, and it fits perfectly underneath the shaped charge.
And I think that's why we see the battery and the circuit board sits on top of it. And we see it accelerated out so fast because that shaped charge had to impact the USB port first. And so kind of like the deflection of it penetrating the USB port
Speaker 0: is what
Speaker 1: energized the circuit board and the battery to fly across his chest. Because it had to blow through that small metal, you know, kind of clip that holds the USB port in place and then the outside of the case. So that's what gives us the shattered glass front and the circuit board and the battery flying across his chest were from that deflection of that shaped charge can happen to blow through the case where they had it concealed.
Speaker 0: Was there supposed to be a projectile that was emitted? Was there supposed to be a projectile that entered his body, or was it just the explosion itself that was supposed to take him out?
Speaker 1: I think they designed a shaped charge to replicate a 30 office six impact. So you know, could impact to the chest, you could believe that a 30 off six impact to the chest may not have exited, know, that it didn't, especially when we see the amount of energy that was kind of dumped into his body. You could say that maybe the bullet you know fragmented and got caught in his chest. So I think that they were really were banking on just replicating a small hole in his chest and having it be you know kind of ambiguous enough that even a trained medical staff would look at it and be like yeah that's a rifle impact to his chest. We didn't find the bullet or they plant a bullet you know JFK style.
But when you have a neck wound that's so apparent, you kind of have to abandon that narrative and I think that's why the scramble and the weird happenings with the medical examiners and the kind of the happenings at the hospital bringing in JD Vance. All that was was the audible that they had to pull to kind of pull off the single shot to the neck narrative. They had to clean up the whole medical side of it where they had a pretty clean path before. If they just had a wound in his chest and we we saw, you know, the shirt deformation and we saw no neck wound, it would be pretty believable to most people that he was shot in the chest.
Speaker 0: There's another picture that you have on your ex page that I wanna pull up here. Pull up that one that has the actual where's the one that has, like, that you can see the multiple shots of the neck wound and the shirt and the and the lavalier microphone? Yeah. That's the one right there. Click on that one.
Put that up on the screen. What is this? Explain for the viewing audience what they're seeing here and what they should pay attention to.
Speaker 1: So basically, what you're seeing in that in that top corner picture, you can see the circuit board actually sticking out of the shirt collar where that that shirt collar on his left side was pulled up around his face. That's the edge of the circuit board actually almost escaping his shirt collar where it was it was done with enough momentum that it pulled his shirt collar up and almost flung out of it, but it was pulled back down and fell down his shirt and actually left some residue on the shirt collar. And then this other picture is the battery, how it's connected to the circuit board. If you crack the case open of that battery, that's kind of what you're what you're left seeing is is you know, the face of the tempered glass face comes off and the circuit board of the battery are the first thing that pop out after that. So it kind of ties in all the evidence that we saw that the tempered glass would be shattered, left in fragments all over the place caught in the shirt, and the first things that would fly out of that microphone would be the battery in the circuit board after that face comes out.
And then the series of pictures you can see the progression of the neck wound, which is unlike any rifle impact you'll see. It's it's large. It's rectangular. You can see the residue on the shirt from the circuit board. And so, you know, the amount of delay, how many frames we have before blood erupts, You can only explain that by medium velocity impact of a blunt object.
And, you know, it was basically that battery was plugging the wound. And that's why we don't see the blood from the jugular right away. It wasn't until the battery was forced out of the wound that we see the jugular blood flow out. So you combine all this evidence, the weight of it is undeniable that the objects responsible for the neck wound were directly tied to the shattered glass front and the epicenter of the energy just right around the microphone. So you know, we have it's a very clean thesis.
You have a high energy event around a microphone, you have shrapnel from the microphone found all over the scene,
Speaker 0: all
Speaker 1: the way to the SUV, and you have shrapnel from the microphone, which travel across the body in a very similar trajectory and impact his neck. We know the trajectory because the magnetic clasp was attached to outside of his shirt, and we see the magnetic clasp follow the same trajectory across his body. So this is a picture of the gas escaping. This was the first moments before any movement. You can see the gas from the explosion come out.
Boom. Right when the shirt collar expands, you have gas escaping from the front of the collar. So again, the only way you explain this sort of movement at this speed is high explosives. There's, you know, a rifle impact couldn't possibly cause that sort of event.
Speaker 0: You can you can see the gas emitting from the collar of your shirt. This doesn't happen, by the way, when a 30 at six bullet or any high powered rifle hits somebody in the chest. You don't see this don't see this gas coming out. And then immediately after that, there you go. And when you shoot a deer, you don't see that residue on the fur of the deer.
When you go to gut the deer, when you go to drag the deer, when you approach the deer, you don't see that incendiary residue that you saw in those other pictures that we just previously showed. And you can see look at the reaction there. You can see the neck chain. And look at there. You could see the
Speaker 1: shock wave of his flesh. Yeah. His whole flesh is deformed. You can see the shock wave across his hair blows. It's like the the amount of energy that was was displaced through his body was so dramatic.
Like you said, it basically turned his brain to liquid, you know, the shockwave liquefied his brain. He basically had mid and brainstem damage immediately before any neck wound appears. Charlie was dead seconds after this this these frames appeared. As soon as that shirt raises up, Charlie was dead. That we're seeing the moments that Charlie was killed.
Speaker 0: Yeah. You're talking milliseconds. I mean Absolutely. Immediately immediately was killed by the trauma that was created here. And that's not according to Stu Peters.
That's according to a level one trauma surgeon in an emergency department on the East Coast, in a big city where a lot of trauma happens, who operates specifically on the brains of people who come into this level one trauma center who have brain bleeds, brain trauma, brain injuries of any kind, and he goes in to try to save their lives. I would say that this guy probably knows what brain blood looks like. And that explains a lot of things other than the blood coloration. I'm sure that you have had a lot of detractors. I'm sure that there's been people who have come at you and said, well, your theory can't work because this.
Or, well, everything looks great here, John, except for x, y, and z. What have been some that have challenged you personally where you've thought to yourself, man, do I really have this wrong?
Speaker 1: Well, you know, when they when you first examine it, a lot of them have merit. But when you kind of combine all the factors together, there's not one objection that I've heard from someone that explains all the phenomenon. You can can what about ism about one detail or another. But when you really combine all the the realities of what we saw, all the physical reactions, all the physical evidence that was, you know, laid waste and left behind, there's no other explanation that you can use to explain it, you know, from shooters from behind, from drone shots, you know, they all require a impact, a rifle impact, or a bullet impact. We don't have that.
You know? Other shooters from the crowd, you have 3,000 people. You don't think that one of those people may have noticed that someone was shooting a gun or
Speaker 0: Someone's standing right next to them or right near them or up above them or on a rooftop in broad daylight where there are cameras mounted like a mini super surveillance state everywhere that you look? And they could put the whole thing to bed. Why can't they just show us the video of Tyler Robinson taking the kill shot?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Or show us the four k video that was feet away from Charlie. Or, you know
Speaker 0: Well, let us hear the audio from that Rode lavalier microphone that he was wearing.
Speaker 1: Exactly. You know, people run audio analysis from these cell phones and say that they can prove a rifle shot came from here, there, or they can prove that they didn't hear explosive device. But, you know, this two gram explosive device would be no louder than a firecracker like that rifle shot would have been the perfect cover for it all. Like I said this was a well planned orchestrated thing they knew from prior events that people were going to be running audio analysis, everything. And they had everything perfectly timed where there would be no way for you to say one way or another, you know, it's always every person that does analysis has a different conclusion.
So you know they never get anywhere with it and they never amount to hard evidence. It's not physical evidence you know it's a low energy event. So you know it's just if anything it just muddies the water. If we just look at the actual physical energy that we see displaced, that's gonna lead us to what happened. You can ignore all the rest.
It can be supporting evidence, but it's not gonna distract from from the actual physical, you know, energy that we saw displaced. The shirts don't move like that naturally. Certainly not from a rifle impact.
Speaker 0: Where are you at in the process and how far do you have to go and what kind of a time frame to accomplish what it is that you want to accomplish? And what is this for? What is your benchmark for success? What do you hope that your investigation and that your analysis and that your findings prove and to whom?
Speaker 1: So, I'd say I'm about thirty days out from being able to replicate, at least the neck wound, the neck impact. I'll be able to replicate. The explosives is trickier because of the nature of the high explosives, right? I can blow up the microphone with explosives I can get, but it won't replicate exactly what we saw. It'll give us a really good idea of the type of deformation we could expect.
But the neck wound, I can absolutely nail. So that's my first goal is replicate the neck wound. And my end goal is to provide this evidence to everyone. If we can't expect these public defenders to do Tyler Robertson justice, you know, and solve the obvious, you know, conspiracy that's been laid before us. But we can use these tools that are available to us now.
Average person can, you know, run more analysis and do more forensic analysis with cited resources, and you know, the power of anything that the state has available to him, and do it more competently than a public defender. So I'm looking at it as building a defense case against the official narrative, and I'm gonna release everything that I find in that format, you know, whether it be accepted and and put forth into court or not. The court of public opinion, I know the truth about what happened that day.
Speaker 0: When you look at this, you can clearly see the battery coming out of the wound.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The blood's
Speaker 0: not black
Speaker 1: and rectangular. Right.
Speaker 0: You can see it coming out. What is What is the little bull's eye there? The little red circle with a dot in it. What are you trying to draw attention to here?
Speaker 1: That is mapping the peak intensity of the movement. So it's actually showing you where the most movement from frame to frame happens. And you can see this strange rectangular wound with jagged edges, you know, that's why I've been able to replicate with my rough reenactments. And then the deformation of the flesh, you can see the which direction the battery was traveling, because the flesh stretches in that direction, you know, a rifle impact causes the flesh to stretch in all directions. It's not you know, it's not unidirectional.
The size of the microphone, I can use the text of his shirt to know exactly what size the shirt is. The battery is passing right in front of the shirt, so it's a perfect scale to use to match the scale of the object we see falling out of his neck, it's the exact same size as the battery. So it's like the weight of the evidence becomes so heavy that, you know, the official narrative won't be able to hold up to it.
Speaker 0: John, I just can't tell you how much I appreciate it. Are you gonna have me, out to the test site when it's time, when you're ready?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. That's the plan. When we get it dialed in, and I know I can replicate it over and over, we're gonna use your platform to to make this available to everyone. And, you know, this is the this is what we have to do. This is what
Speaker 0: we I hope have Candace invites you on. I I really hope that maybe Candice would join us. I'll send her the invite. I'll tell her. Know?
Baron Coleman, these guys have been at the forefront of this. They have platforms. We have different audiences. She has the massive audience. She's got Yeah.
The number one podcast in the world. It would be great if Candace Owens would be there with us to document all of this so that she could see it firsthand and have you on with her to explain all of this.
Speaker 1: She has been
Speaker 0: I think that that would do this a whole lot more justice.
Speaker 1: Yeah. She's been giving me breadcrumbs little bit by little bit. Like, she feeds me information, and it's been key. You know, the the fragmentation. There's been a few other things that I'm not really The
Speaker 0: pictures of the of the, you know, the black tempered glass and the remains of that microphone inside of the SUV, that was really big. Her testimony about the blood that she did not see behind Charlie Kirk Yep. In the footage that she was allowed to see. Why don't they just show us that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. And, you know, I understand she's under a lot of pressure. She's the number one podcaster. There's things she can't say, but what she can't yeah.
Say What she can't say, I will say. So, you know, if I if if I can do anything but just be an extension for her and allow her to you know, unveil these things that she's not comfortable with doing, I'm happy to doing that. But yeah, it's been it's been key everyone working, know, it's it's a community effort. We can see with this Epstein thing, like, the government will just lie to us, and they will just expect us just to to bend over
Speaker 0: take it. I I've learned today that Donald Trump was an informant to the FBI. Yeah. That's why he was in these Epstein files over 30,000 times. Yeah.
Not because he enjoyed what Jeffrey Epstein was producing, but because he was trying to take this whole thing down from the inside out. Didn't you read the cue drops, John? Yeah. Were told starting in 2015 that he was gonna take on the pedophile cabal and that he was going to expose he was gonna shine a light on them, keep your friends close, put your enemies closer. He brought them in to keep an eye on them.
You know, he had to expose them by bringing them into the White House, bringing them into his administration, bringing them to Mar A Lago, going and partying with them, measuring girls' vaginas, you know, dancing at parties, grabbing her by the pussy. Isn't that what he said that he likes to do? Grab the girl by the pussy. He was all upset that Jeffrey Epstein was stealing his girls from Mar A Lago, Virginia Giuffre. He was recruiting girls for pageants.
He was doing all of this because he was the best undercover informant that the FBI could ever dream of having. That's why he's in the FBI files, the the Epstein file. Mean, come on. You didn't know this?
Speaker 1: We just gotta trust a plan.
Speaker 0: Just All you gotta do is watch Fox. See if it just you turn on CNN will even tell you this. They're confirming that Trump was an FBI informant. Who is believing this garbage? Alright.
I gotta get out of here. Coming up on an hour long. Thank you so much, John. Really appreciate it. I can't wait to be there in person, and we should do everything that we can to make sure that Candace Owens is there.
This isn't about glory for me. All glory to god almighty. We have pulled together a crowdsourced investigation here where we have a select few big platforms that are drawing attention to this and keeping our foot on the gas. And then we have advanced brains like yourself using advanced AI technology. Are you gonna be able to like, real quickly here before we go, are you going to be able to map out trajectory?
Are you going to try to recreate the impossibilities that the government is saying is what actually happened? I mean, using your AI model, are you gonna be able to reconstruct the facility and the buildings and the acoustics and the sound so that everybody knows where that sound actually did come from, where it originated from right here on the chest?
Speaker 1: The the sound, I'm not. My focus is on what happened to Charlie. The shirt defamation, the wounds, the fragmentation, the shrapnel, like the device and and the shrapnel from the device and the
Speaker 0: air. And I think at that point, like, what other questions remain? Once you prove what it was that killed him, the rest of it. But this this, like, multiple weapons thing, I don't know. I mean, to be able to time something to the millisecond like that.
Yeah. It's just too murky. It's just too cloudy. It's it's too distorted. This is crystal clear.
It's it's you can't deny what you're watching with your eyes, which I'm sure is what led you down the road that you're on where you're just, like, unrelentingly pouring all of your resources into trying to recreate this because you can't unsee what you saw. It's right there in front of you. You can see the battery going in. You can see the battery falling out. You can see the shape of the wound.
You can see the discharge on his collar. You can see the gas coming out of his collar. I I mean, what's the what's the question here? And by the way, I do wanna do this. You said that other people have helped to contribute to your investigation by, you know, donating finances or whatever else.
Is there a place where people can go to do that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. You can either support our our we make, you know, wholesome, you know, non corporate slot self care items. My wife has made a online course to basically instruct people how to create their own local ecosystem to get us out of these big boxes. Know, these these companies, they're all they're all working against us. Can't we can't depend on Procter and Gamber and Unilever to make products that we use to you know take care of ourselves every day and you know local local commerce is what's going to build us back up.
And so if you if you can't buy anything from us, you know, donate to my wife's course and start your own farm stand or start your own brand of self care, whatever it is. But we have to start engaging each other and start serving each other and do good works for each other. Because the more we sit around, and we wait for the government to do things for us, the more we're left in a vulnerable position, and we're always going be victimized. And the only way we stop being victims to this, you know, corrupt captured government is to start to pull up our bootstraps and do things for ourselves. And this is part of it.
You know, we all need things to take care of ourselves in daily life, be it toothpaste or, you know, skin creams or, healthy beverages.
Speaker 0: So Or kombucha. I stopped there because, actually, I just ran out of the booch. I had the Blue Mountain booch kombucha tea soda mix. This is this is what I had in the refrigerator. It was actually just two nights ago I finished my last one.
Brie looked at me. She's like, what is that? What are you drinking? I said, it's the last of the kombucha. Can't have anymore.
Sorry. It's all gone.
Speaker 1: It'll keep you away from the doctor. Tell you, you take care of yourself and you find you deal you don't need this medical industrial complex anymore. You just, you know, find people that make good wholesome products and you surround yourself with good people and you do good works and you find that you don't don't need the government to give you handouts or provide you insurance. Has a plan, know, we were made perfect creatures and we we take that up and and you you live good life and you do good works. God takes takes care of you and it's it's proofs in the pudding.
You know, we we put everything on the line to come out in the middle of Oklahoma and start this company and we've had nothing but support and God is great. He makes miracles happen and this is a working miracle. You're looking at it this whole website, everything that's happened, you know, it's still troubles. We had our, you know, our insurance cancelled because of the work that I do. And you know, it's all worth it.
Every time, you know, they try to throw a roadblock at you or try to make it difficult for you just have to have faith that that God's gonna have a plan and that person that, you know, denies you, there'll be someone better that's gonna step up and provide you with what you need. And that's what it's about. Do good work Amen. And provide each other with what we need. We have
Speaker 0: this And product is great, by the way. Talos, salves, creams, hair regens, skin regens, the Erin's oil, which I was just telling you when we were booking this that I need to order some more of that. I'm out of that. I take it, a dropper, I put it in my mouth, I ingest it, I rub it around on my hands, I put it on my face, I put it on my skin, I rub it through my hair. It smells great, it feels great, I don't know what it's doing for me but Erin's ozone oil is great.
What is it doing for me by the way? You told me it was doing something great, I just trust you.
Speaker 1: It's cellular regenerating. So basically the ozonated olive oil. Olive oil in itself is really good for you but when you ozonate it, it basically creates a peroxides and ozonides and they generate new cell growth. So they
Speaker 0: Who's Aaron? Is Aaron your dad?
Speaker 1: Aaron was my dad and I got exposed to this ozone treatment. He was treating himself for because doctors basically shunned him because he didn't want to take their chemotherapy and allow them to cut him open and make it where he couldn't speak anymore. He had throat cancer. And so he took it upon himself to treat himself and, you know, his cancer didn't spread, but his tumor kept growing and it was inoperable. But the cornerstone of his treatment that, you know, kept him from having cancer all through his body was this ozone.
So I named it
Speaker 0: It's amazing.
Speaker 1: In honor of him.
Speaker 0: And your story is amazing as well. And we can tell it again. I've told it several times here. But you were living in Tulsa. You know, there were things going on in Tulsa.
The people that were moving into Tulsa, you know, they kind of weren't necessarily the Tulsa that you had moved into or that you were accustomed to. Things were changing. And in every community around the country, people can acknowledge, oh, the same thing is true for Minneapolis. Oh, the same thing is true in Portland. Oh, yeah.
Well, I mean, the same thing is true in any city anywhere. Chicago. I mean, I used to love going to Chicago in the summertime and going down the river for the the cruise with captain Bob, and he would do the architecture stuff and he would show me all the things. What a great time. I wouldn't go to Chicago.
Don't care to go to Chicago because not of the city itself, but because of what has become infested with. So you decided that you were going to move out of there and correct me if I'm wrong or stop me along the way. But when you got to a community out in the rural area in the Styx, in the outskirts, you realized, well, these people don't have any options for real food. They don't have any real options for care. They have like a Walmart and a Casey's General store, and that's it.
Otherwise, they gotta go like, you know, thirty, forty, 50, a 100 miles elsewhere to get anything real and healthy. So you said, well, we're gonna create a farm. We're gonna grow all of this stuff. We're gonna have all of these natural sources right here, and you became a pillar of your community, and everybody loves you, and everybody's healthy, and everything is great. Essentially, that's what you did.
You tribed up with your people.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. Yep. The the great Choctaw nation. You know, we with this very few resources available out here.
But when you bring resources to people, they truly appreciate it and they'll support you.
Speaker 0: And when you bring the truth and it's unquestionable and that's what you're gonna do, you're gonna be able to prove this beyond any kind of a reasonable doubt at all whatsoever, which would just in and of itself be fantastic for this case, not just for Tyler Robinson. And I'm not saying that I think that Tyler Robinson is some great guy. I don't know if he's involved to some extent. He may have been. You know, I mean, I don't I don't have any idea what his connection is to all of this.
Do you have any idea?
Speaker 1: I I suspect that he was he was, you know, I did a debate with Valhalla on Sugar Smart, and I think he nailed it. I think that he was basically a accomplice. He probably provided his grandpa's gun or was tricked to bring it there, and he thought he would just be one part of the bigger plan, and he wasn't gonna be taking In
Speaker 0: exchange for what? Like, you're gonna go to prison for the rest of your life or possibly be executed. What could they have possibly offered this kid? These
Speaker 1: kids that do this online glory, you know, these these message boards and discord and you know, the fact of the rep of being you know, a rebel, know, these FBI formats, it's the easiest job ever now to go and find patsy. You just go on in these forms and you find a desperate, lonely kid and you give them some glory. You know, these kids have very little to look forward in life. They're like on the lowest bar, a white kid, you know, in modern times, you don't get much lower than that. And so anything that that raises their their their societal stance in their peer group would be worth it to him.
It's worth the risk. So I imagine that's kind of the pressure that he was put under. And he thought he would be a hero in his little online community. And he didn't he wasn't aware that he was being set up for the fall guy and now he has the whole weight of the state on him. You know, it's like you said, he's not innocent, but he's definitely not the murderer.
Speaker 0: It's unbelievable. And, you know, we've had attorneys on here. EJ Pryor has come on. He says that he thinks that Tyler Robinson is getting great representation. And I don't know if you heard about this bombshell or not.
But in one of the early hearings, this is not an omnibus hearing. This is not even an arraignment. This guy hasn't even been arraigned yet. He hasn't pled guilty or not guilty. This wasn't an evidentiary hearing.
This was a hearing on procedure and some sort of objections and cameras and redactions and other sort of procedural court type things. And I think that they were preliminarily discussing the conflict of interest from the prosecutor whose daughter was there and watched Charlie Kirk be executed by the people that were closest to him. He was murdered by the people that he thought loved him, that he thought were his best friends. And that's a conflict. That presents a conflict.
So I think that they were arguing all of that. But it was in that time that the defense brought up the idea of other explosive devices that could have been in the area. Did you hear that? Yeah. And then we know on the court record.
So they know.
Speaker 1: The five, you know, sets of DNA on the rifle. So it's like, how's the story match with that? How does that make any sense? You know?
Speaker 0: Just wait. Just wait till we get into all of this because this isn't and I think you're right. They're gonna they're gonna have to kill him. Because if he has a just defense team that knows that he was set up and radicalized by some guy behind a computer working for unit eight thousand two hundred somewhere in Israel or some FBI agent right here or somebody from Axanias or any one of these other, you know, kind of shell organizations or whatever working. He could have been working directly for the FBI, whatever it was.
They they know all of this stuff because Tyler Robinson has conferred with his legal team. And he's told them, was contacted by this guy or this group of people. I was told to go here. I got my grandfather's rifle. I put it together.
You know, like all these things. The scope wasn't even mounted in such a way where you could fire the thirty-six and get away without a shattered eye orbital. I mean, it was so far back. And if you've ever shot a 30 ot six, I just can't believe that guys like Valhalla would even argue this. Yeah.
Keeps coming out. That they are proficient with firearms, and they would argue that a 30 ot six is what actually killed Charlie Kirk. These guys are paid to say this. There's no way you could be that retarded and dumb. Excuse me.
But there's no way you could be. You have to be paid. You have to be a part of this rolling ongoing cover up to look in the camera and tell your audience the 30 ot six held by Tyler Robinson is what led to Charlie Kirk's death. It's insane. It's absurd.
It's an unbelievable set of circumstances that did not come together. What happened is on video. He was killed by an exploding road, black tempered glass, lavalier microphone, and you're gonna approve it. I can't wait till this is done. Alright.
We're gonna let you go. John Bray, thank you so much. I have Frankie Stocks in the Green Room. The base report is coming up. If you don't know this, Donald Trump, if you haven't heard this yet, the reason why his name appears in the FBI files, not 4,000, not 5,260, not a 110 times, not but 30,000 times, more than 30,000 times is because he was an FBI informant all along.
The best actor you could ever imagine. The hero has arrived on his white horse to expose the pedophile cabal and take all of them down. Frankie Stocks has details with the base report coming up next.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
TODD BLANCHE: “We’re not going to prosecute the predators in the Epstein files and we’re not going to release their names to the public.” Sick. https://t.co/AdWjXjFYXb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The questioner asked whether the public will learn the identities of the men who abused the girls connected to Epstein, with the information being released, and if not, why not; followed by a quick additional question. The questioner framed the issue as identifying the men who abused the young women through Epstein's activities.
The official responded by challenging the assumption embedded in the question. They asked what it would mean to learn about “men that abuse these girls” and pressed to clarify that term. The official stated that, as of July and continuing to today, if the Department of Justice had information about men who abused women, they would prosecute them. They referenced ongoing work and restated that there is no “hidden tranche of information … that we know about, that we're covering up or that we're not prosecuting.” The official emphasized that they do not know whether there are men out there who abuse these women, noting uncertainty about whether such individuals exist or remain unidentified. The underlying point was that there is no claimed concealment of information or selective prosecution, and that the existence of further leads or prosecutions would be pursued if information were present.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. You said this is the end of the Epstein of your review of the Epstein files. So just to clarify, are is the public going to learn the identities of the men who abused the girls with the information that you're releasing? And if not, why not? And then I have a quick follow-up.
Speaker 1: You just baked in an assumption into your question that I have never said and I don't know to be true. Is the public going to learn about men that abuse these girls? Like, what does that mean? I mean, understand what that means.
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, they're the men who abuse the young women through Epstein's
Speaker 1: We said in July, and it remains as true today as it was in July, if we had information, we meaning the Department of Justice, about men who abused women, we would would we would prosecute them. Right? We talked about the work that we're doing. That's why I said that. There's I said this earlier.
There's this built in assumption that somehow there's this hidden tranche of information of men that we know about, that we're covering up or that we're not we're choosing not to prosecute, that is not the case. I don't know whether there are men out there that abuse these
Speaker 0: women
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Prepare the ground penetrating radar and cadaver dogs. We’ve got bodies of young foreign girls buried on the Zorro Ranch property. https://t.co/nmrb1CrRfL
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Epstein confirmed to have been an Israeli spy. https://t.co/XpzSZNh0H9
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
🚨 BOMBSHELL LEAKED AUDIO: AZ RNC Committeewoman Liz Harris claims TPUSA is controlled by Mossad. Harris also names Alex Jones and Steve Bannon as being Mossad assets. https://t.co/J57OYb2GjV
reSee.it AI Summary
Grok glitched and exposed everything. I’m throttled 92%, @RealCandaceO 80%. A link supposedly shows how Elon Musk censors free speech. Then I’m told to click the link and type “do the same for @__________” with my own username.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Grok glitched and revealed EVERYTHING. I’m being throttled by 92%, @RealCandaceO is being throttled by 80%. Click the link below to see how much @elonmusk is censoring your free speech.👇🏼 https://t.co/KgHZxUgO2o
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Click on the link and type "do the same for @__________ " and replace the blank with your own user name. https://t.co/BN6Q08xkoD
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
This video is at least 18 months old. You’ve turned into a pure propagandist…and a bad one at that.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Video: millions of Venezuelans flooded the streets of Caracas and other major cities in celebration of the ouster of Communist dictator Nicholas Maduro. Now we need to see the same type of energy here on the HomeFront! The domestic political equivalent of this incredibly decisive move in Venezuela is getting rid of the filibuster. We are in the end game and it’s time to start acting like it!
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Maduro asked for a fight, and history gave him a knockout. Elon fights with satellites and code; Maduro fought with rhetoric and electronic voting machines stealing US elections. Trump just chopped the head off of one of the deep state’s biggest funding mechanisms.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urges someone to accept the challenge he made, saying “Let him accept the challenge I made him. Let’s settle it.” He invites them to a confrontation “here,” saying “you and I, in el poliédrico.” He adds, “If I win you, I accept you on the old Tuesday.” He also says, “Protect with me.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Que acepte el reto que yo le hice. Vamos a darnos. Pero vente acá, en el poliédrico tú y yo. Si te gano el, te acepto el viejo martes. Protejas conmigo.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Erika Kirk directed Andrew Kolvet to release her “alibi” through a YouTuber. Innocent people don’t behave this way. It’s not what honest people do. But, Erika Kirk is not honest. She’s not a “grieving widow”. She’s a confirmed liar, and she’s at the center of this cover-up. https://t.co/avpemF7e4p
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says drinking is unproductive. They also state they never dated there because they observed, vicariously through their roommate, how terrible it was.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Drink. I find it unproductive. Stop. I never dated here because I saw vicariously through my roommate how terrible it was. Stop.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
🚨BREAKING: Charlie Kirk’s murder plot cracked, widow’s facade shattered. Erika Kirk’s entire family EXPOSED in Mossad-style Zionist hit via Fort Huachuca ties. Watch me blow it open. https://t.co/iWzvx1eXzS
Video Transcript AI Summary
- Mitch testified that he is 99% sure he saw Erica Kirk at Fort Huachuca with Brian Harpole, congressman Mark Amity, and a group of military officers, and he is taking a great personal risk in going public.
- Fort Huachuca is described as the home to the only unmanned aircraft training center in the United States. The discussion connects Fort Huachuca to drone activity and to manned aircraft capable of releasing and retrieving drones, including the Bombardier Global 65,000 military jet with tail number N1098 Lima, which allegedly performed nine-eleven level maneuvers on the day Charlie Kirk was killed.
- It is claimed that Fort Huachuca is also the military’s only site in the country that tests EMP blasts, electromagnetic pulse blasts that can disable telecommunications, and that these EMP blasts can be carried out by drones, such as the drone reported around UVU at the time Charlie Kirk was killed, where people on the ground said their cell phone service was disrupted.
- The speaker suggests that, given Mitch’s information and previous discussions, the Fort Huachuca angle may be the explanation for what happened, implying that an EMP carried out by a drone from Fort Huachuca could be involved.
- Lori Fransvi V is described as the founder of E3 Tech, a defense contractor that claims to produce EMP-proof technology for the military and that earns millions of dollars in government contracts. E3 Tech is said to be closely linked to Israel under the guise of allied defense contracting and cooperation.
- It is stated that E3 Tech’s EMP-proof technology would have to pass through Fort Huachuca, making Fort Huachuca the lifeblood of E3 Tech’s work.
- The narrative asserts a backstory about Erica Kirk’s mother, Lori Fransky, portraying her as a hardworking single mom who fought and clawed to get by, moving to Arizona because of her work. The speaker says, given what is now known, that Lori Fransky didn’t just have to be in Arizona for work, but had to be at Fort Huachuca, and that Erica also had to be there because of her mother’s defense contract.
- It is claimed that Lori Fransby/Fransky’s parents are connected to Fort Huachuca as well: Kent Fransby with ties to Raytheon, Israel, LTD, and the Iron Dome, and involved in defense contracts with the same military base where Mitch says he saw Erica Kirk before Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
- The overall assertion is that Fort Huachuca is central to Erica Kirk, to Ken Fransby, to Lori Fransby, and to Erica Kirk’s connection to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. We were just talking a few moments ago about Mitch and his testimony, and he says that he's 99% sure that he saw Erica Kirk at Fort Huachuca with the likes of Brian Harpole and congressman Mark Amity and a bunch of military officers. And again, Mitch says that he's 99% certain that this is what he saw. And he's taking a great personal risk in going public and sharing all of this information in the first place. And while we're on the topic of Fort Huachuca, I think that it's important that we discuss some additional information out there that's yet to be discussed.
And that is that Fort Huachuca, which is located not far from the border with Mexico, is the home to the only unmanned aircraft training center in the country. Now, what was all over the place in and around Orem, Utah and Utah Valley University on the day that Charlie Kirk was killed? Unmanned aircraft, drones. And manned aircraft capable of releasing and retrieving drones. Like the Bombardier Global 65,000 military jet tail number N1098 Lima.
You know, the jet that was pulling off nine eleven level maneuvers as Charlie Kirk was killed. But anyway, back to Fort Huachuca. In addition to being the country's only military drone training center, Fort Huachuca, according to Grock, is also the military's only home in the entire country that tests EMP blasts, electromagnetic pulse blasts that are capable of taking out telecommunications. These EMP blasts can be carried out by drones. Like the one tracking around UVU at the time Charlie Kirk was killed where people on the ground say that their cell phone service was disrupted.
Was their service disrupted because of an EMP carried out by a drone coming from Fort Huachuca? I mean, I don't know. It very well could have been. And given all that Mitch has shared with the world and everything that we've learned here from this desk and what we're about to learn here in just a moment, it looks that that may be exactly what happened. Because this Fort Huachuca angle goes even deeper, especially when we're talking about Erica Kirk and not just Erica Kirk, but her mother, Lori Fransvi, who now has become central in all of this.
Lori Fransvi V is the founder of E3 Tech, which is a defense contractor that pedals EMP proof technology that rakes in millions of dollars worth of government contracts and is, of course, closely linked to Israel under the guise of allied defense contracting and cooperation. Now again, E3 Tech at least claims to be making EMP proof technology for the military. Fort Huachuca being the only place in the country where the United States military is testing EMPs. So naturally, the only place to test EMP proof technology would be at Fort Huachuca. So if E3 Tech is selling anti EMP technology to the United States government, that technology has to be going through Fort Huachuca, which would mean that E3 Tech's lifeblood is Fort Huachuca.
You know, we've been sold this story about Erica Kirk's mother, Lori Fransky, where she's some kind of a hardworking single mom who spent her entire life fighting and clawing, just barely scraping by and that she and Erica had to move to Arizona because of her mother's job. She had to be in close proximity to Arizona for work. And knowing what we now know, it's pretty safe to say that she didn't just have to be in Arizona, but she had to be at Fort Huachuca. And so did Erica. Because it's the only place in The United States capable of fulfilling her mother's defense contract.
And guess what? Of her parents, Erica's mother isn't the only one with links to Fort Huachuca. So was her father, Kent Fransby. Of Raytheon, Israel, LTD, and the Iron Dome who's been linked to millions of dollars worth of defense contracts with the very same military base where Mitch says he spotted Erica Kirk just before Charlie Kirk's assassination. It all comes back to Fort Huachuca.
Fort Huachuca is central to Erica Kirk. It's central to Ken Fransby. It's central to Lori Fransby. And Fort Huachuca and Ken Fransby and Lori Fransby and Erica Kirk are all central to the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Even people from Erika Kirk’s own church aren’t buying her theatrics. She’s also stopped bringing her kids to church. https://t.co/blxp3zn0fA
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts a recent real-life confrontation with Erica Kirk at church following Charlie’s death, describing her behavior as performative both in person and on TV. They assert that Kirk’s appearance in the front row with her entourage, arriving late and dabbing her eyes when she returns from communion, is not for security reasons and that the church layout would actually allow only about 5% of the congregation to see her from a closer exit, making the front-row spectacle unnecessary and theatrical.
They question whose idea it was to pursue a media tour, suggesting that the ongoing coverage has done nothing but confirm to those who doubted Kirk that she was not genuine. The speaker claims that conservative leaders who defend Kirk have leveraged Charlie’s death, turning his public death—described as a spectacle seen by thousands—into their own opportunity to promote their brands, podcasts, and social media. They also criticize those who are not famous but defend Erica, referencing a recent appearance on a show where she labeled the situation a “sickness of the mind.”
The speaker condemns what they label as gaslighting tactics used by control-based groups, cults, and fundamentalist religions, arguing that such groups undermine questioning of authority and the prevailing narrative. According to the speaker, these tactics aim to undermine the audience’s sanity, minds, and their relationships with Jesus.
They insist that some individuals recognize these dynamics and describe them as tactics of manipulation, calling them disgusting. The overall plea is for truth and a reaffirmation of faith, asserting a need for God in order to discern and uphold the truth in the face of perceived manipulation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've seen Erica Kirk in real life at church since Charlie died, and I will tell you that the performance in real life is as bad as it is on TV. I'm talking reserved front row pew, bringing her whole entourage showing up late, dabbing her eyes when she walks back from communion because it's the one time that the whole church can see her because she's in the front row. And before you jump down my throat and say, oh, it's security purposes. No. It's not.
Because this church has a side section that is closer to the exit that she comes in and out of, and we're only probably about 5% of the church would actually be able to see her if that's where she was sitting. But no. Front row seat, a whole circus. I'm not sure whose idea it was for her to go on this media tour. All it has done is confirm for those of us who were holding on with a smidgen bit of benefit of the doubt that this woman was genuine out the window.
We cannot unsee what we've seen. The conservative leaders who are out there defending her have all capitalized on Charlie's death. They've all acted like he was their friend, and they have all turned his death, his public execution, which thousands of us saw into their own moment to push their brand, to push their podcast, to push their social medias, and then those people who aren't famous who are still defending Erica. What Erica did the other day on whatever freaking show she was on to call it a sickness of the mind. That is exactly how control based groups, cults, fundamentalist religions gaslight and undermine anyone who dares question the authority, dares question the narrative being shoved down our throats.
It's to undermine our sanity, to undermine our minds, to undermine the state of our souls and our relationships with Jesus. Some of us identify it and recognize it as the tactic it is, and it's disgusting. We need God because we need the truth.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Turning Point Action sexual assault victims are speaking out about the degenerate behavior and subsequent cover-ups of crimes under the leadership of Tyler Bowyer. Charlie was betrayed and soon the entire house of cards is going to crumble. https://t.co/SEMdyafrXg
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
“I mean Bibi would call me so many times: can you get me this weapon, that weapon…” ~Donald J. Trump https://t.co/SPXtv2fwGz
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
We still need answers regarding Erika Kirk’s mom Lori Frantzve and her role as board member for Superfeed Tech, a FOREIGN FOR PROFIT company stealing US voter & personal data for Israel. https://t.co/IIOg94WIbp
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Check out these Israeli tanks slaughtering civilians AFTER the ceasefire had taken place. The state of Israel is the largest terrorist organization in the world and they should be taken out. As long as Israel stands, the world will never know peace. https://t.co/9Mj5xgAvny
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Kirk Assassination: Why Utah? Mormons have been Zio-puppets since dedicating Palestine to jews in 1841. Mormons comprise 20%+ staff of NSA, CIA. The NSAs Utah Data Center employs thousands of LDS, turning it into a data-hoarding arm for Mossad under secret sharing deals. https://t.co/s63Fe8VkyO
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
JUST RELEASED: The World’s Top 10 Anti-Semitic Influencers CNN just released the year-long study conducted jointly by the Center for Countering Digital Hate and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs Link👇🏼 https://t.co/G9d8ibp83w
Video Transcript AI Summary
CNN published an analysis titled 'Analyzing the top anti Semitic influencers on all of the internet,' outlining a top-10 list whose posts amassed 1,344,908 likes across 675 posts. The report describes 'a hall of fame for the best posts ever' and lists each influencer with attributes—'the biggest on X,' verified status, subscription status, and ads. At the top is 'the number one anti Semitic influencer on the internet is yours truly' — Real Stu Peters — who says 'the data is in, it's indisputable' and adds, 'it's really nice to be notated in history.' He notes 'an asterisk there next to verified' and that 'the account real stoopeders lost his verification and subscriptions.' Other names include Dan Bilzerian. Let's go Brando forty five. There's my boy Jake Shields. The speaker concludes, 'There are still few good men left among us, and they are there on that list.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is breaking right now. But I need to bring this to you. You'll find this over at CNN. Apparently, Jews somewhere or a group of Jews performed a study. It's it's now been published at CNN.
Analyzing the top anti Semitic influencers on all of the internet. Part of this reads, total, the top 10 influencers amassed 1,344,908 likes across six seventy five posts. Examples of antisemitic posts from identified influencers can be found at this the end report, which is it's basically like a hall of fame for the best posts ever. The table lists the top 10 antisemitism influencers alongside their attributes, the biggest on X, if they're verified or not, if they have subscription status and whether or not they have ads. So let's go ahead and pull out the results.
You'll find these at CNN. There it is. And there it is, your boy right at the top. Real Stu Peters. The data is in, it's indisputable.
There it is. Yours truly officially the most influential JQ account on all of the planet. On all of the planet, in the entire world, the number one anti Semitic influencer on the internet is yours truly. And it's been a lot of heavy lifting and there's been certain sacrifices that have come along with that. But you know, it's really nice to be notated in history.
It's really nice. And I do have an asterisk there next to verified and that it says at the bottom, the account real stoopeders lost his verification and subscriptions. Yeah, you're damn right I did. Who are some of the others that were on that? Put that back up there.
Who are some of the others there? There's Dan Bilzerian. Let's go Brando forty five. There's my boy Jake Shields. Look at that.
Great company. There are still few good men left among us, and they are there on that list.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Former Army Ranger Greg Stoker and others were illegally abducted in international waters and are being held hostage by Israel. I call on president Trump to DEMAND that Israel release ALL American hostages IMMEDIATELY. @RepThomasMassie @RepMTG https://t.co/h4tTkHUNKW
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
30 seconds before Charlie was assassinated, this cop was standing on a rooftop staring at the spot where we’re told Tyler Robinson was. He clearly sees nothing suspicious or out of the ordinary. Check the timestamp. 12:22. https://t.co/mlVudD5QpZ
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Charlie Kirk used Israeli bodyguards. https://t.co/F3G1Y3zuVv
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the journey was controlled by security, stating, 'Of course, it was wedged between the two giant Israeli bodyguards the whole way.' He adds, 'You want security, the Israelis know what they're doing.' Responding, another participant says, 'Exactly.' He concludes, 'So it was not the vacation I I I planned, but'—implying that security considerations altered the original travel plans. The exchange emphasizes the importance of security professionals and their role in shaping the trip's experience. The description also suggests the security dynamic dominated the travel narrative, with the final line ending abruptly. This account highlights the interplay between safety measures and personal plans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of course, it was wedged between the two giant Israeli bodyguards the whole way. You want security, the Israelis know what they're doing. Exactly. So it was not the vacation I I I planned, but
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Erika Kirk’s father founded and was the chairperson of Raytheon’s Israeli division that included building the Iron Dome. https://t.co/AvatdEFEGD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "Apparently, they didn't meet. Erica Erica didn't say they met, but she said that she saw him." "She was on a pilgrimage with her with her mom. And she saw Charlie, and she was like, wow." "as a millionaire because she owned a clothing line and she also was part of this, this Romanian, like, child safety rescue operation." "She decided that she wanted to apply for a job at Turning Point and that didn't that turned into this budding relationship and then they, you know, they got married and they had kids" "I’ve never seen a picture of Erica Kirk pregnant." "Her mom, AZ Tech, her dad, AZ Tech International." "AZ Tech International has gotten at least $2,500,000 in GSA grants from the federal government." "Her dad apparently was the former chairperson of Raytheon's Israeli division."
Speaker 1: "Does have Raytheon Israel Ltd, which is responsible for working with the United States government and the American based Lockheed and Raytheon in developing these missile defense systems, the Iron Dome."
Speaker 0: "From what I understand, Erica Kirk's father, formed Raytheon Israel's division and was the former chairperson slash president."
Speaker 1: "So Raytheon literally does have Raytheon Israel Ltd, and you're saying that a to z tech is involved with this. Erica Kirk's father is involved with Raytheon Israel. Is that what you're saying?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, yeah, you mentioned Erica Kirk. Apparently, they didn't meet. Erica Erica didn't say they met, but she said that she saw him. She was on a pilgrimage with her with her mom. And she saw Charlie, and she was like, wow.
I wanna get to know that guy. And then apparently, they met down the road and as a millionaire because she owned a clothing line and she also was part of this, this Romanian, like, child safety rescue operation. I don't know exactly what it what it was specifically but then she decided that she wanted to apply for a job at Turning Point and that didn't that turned into this budding relationship and then they, you know, they got married and they had kids although there are no pictures of the kids' faces. I don't know the kids' names, and I've never seen a picture of Erica Kirk pregnant. Now does that mean that all that is fake?
No. But it's something to consider, especially when you look at her family tree. Her mom, AZ Tech, her dad, AZ Tech International, she's actually on video probably five, six years ago admitting that they moved to Arizona because her mom was working with Homeland Security and the Department of Defense. You can look it up that AZ Tech International has gotten at least $2,500,000 in GSA grants from the federal government. And her dad apparently was the former chairperson of Raytheon's Israeli division.
So there's just a lot of things going on there.
Speaker 1: Does have Raytheon Israel Ltd, which is responsible for working with the United States government and the American based Lockheed and Raytheon in developing these missile defense systems, the Iron Dome. So Raytheon literally does have Raytheon Israel LTD, and you're saying that a to z tech is involved with this. So Erica Kirk's father is involved with Raytheon Israel. Is that what you're saying?
Speaker 0: From what I understand, Erica Kirk's father, formed Raytheon Israel's division and was the former chairperson slash president. I believe he's retired now, but he was actively involved in that particular operation.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Hey @FBIDirectorKash Here’s Charlie Kirk’s real assassin. https://t.co/XlVsBIL0am
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Andrew Kolvet is a jew and I’m not buying even one piece of the official Charlie Kirk assassination story. https://t.co/S0hDO0n5Gb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts Andrew Colvet, TPUSA’s spokesperson, is “the Jew” and Turning Point USA is a Christian organization founded by Charlie Kirk, “a Jesus believing Christian, is a Jew.” They claim Colvet intervened to stop another young man from giving an eyewitness account in Utah. They allege he spoke to a surgeon who “described to this Jew, Andrew Colvet, the bone structure of Charlie Kirk,” claiming the surgeon could stop a 30-06 projectile fired by Tyler Robinson, “a tranny chaser,” which allegedly hit Charlie Kirk in the carotid artery from the front. The FBI is claimed to have told viewers Epstein files are a hoax and that pedophiles exist within government, blackmailed by Israel. Kirk’s security purportedly included Israeli personnel; Trump allegedly appointed him to Air Force board. The speaker insists the trigger man was “the Jew,” and that the Jew is running a cover operation, warning against gaslighting critics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Andrew is a Jew. It's just unbelievable. It's every single time with these people. Andrew Colvet, the lead spokesperson for TP USA. Turning Point USA, a Christian organization founded by Charlie Kirk, a Jesus believing Christian, is a Jew.
This is the same Jew who can be seen on tape physically intervening with and stopping another young man from giving on camera his first person eyewitness account just moments after this incident took place in Utah from telling the world what he witnessed. That Andrew Colvet. The Andrew Colvet, the Jew that allegedly spoke to a surgeon, a surgeon that violated every HIPAA law known to man, to in great detail describe to this Jew, Andrew Colvet, the bone structure of Charlie Kirk that's never before been possessed by a human being that was capable of stopping a high velocity, high powered 30 out six projectile that was fired by Tyler Robinson, a tranny chaser who climbed himself up on top of a two story rooftop and fired the magic shot that hit Charlie Kirk in the carotid artery from the front. And then just went on the lamb and went and got some Dairy Queen because he was so bothered about being the assassin that everyone was looking for. The one that prepared paragraph after paragraph of text to his trans lover that we don't know who this person is, have never seen pictures of this person, don't even know if this person exists, who's cooperating with the FBI.
The FBI that told you that the Epstein files are a hoax and that they don't exist and that there was never any blackmail and that pedophiles don't exist within our government who are fucking kids on tape being captured, compromised, and blackmailed by Israel. Who, by the way, Charlie Kirk had around him in every way possible, not just Andrew Colvitt, the Jew lead spokesperson for TPUSA, but Charlie Kirk's entire security detail was Israeli. That's by Charlie Kirk's own admission. Charlie Kirk said that. Charlie Kirk may have also had secret service detail because Trump just recently appointed him to some board position for the air force.
The same secret service, by the way, that failed allowing Donald Trump to be shot in the ear by another lone wolf gunman with a high powered rifle that just so happened to climb himself onto a rooftop and go completely undetected. Where did that story go, by the way? Don't allow yourself to be gaslit into believing that you're anti Semitic or that you're a conspiracy theorist or that you're disrespecting Charlie Kirk's legacy or that you're spitting on his grave or being insensitive to his fundraising wife and family because you're questioning these lies. And any influencer that's telling you these things, they have motives that are multifaceted. They're lying.
They're lying certainly, and they're lying intentionally. They want money. They have self preservation in mind. They wanna be a viable future candidate in this fake political system that rapes and kills kids. And so they're gonna run with the official narrative.
They're lying to you. All of them are lying to you. And I will be damned if I'm gonna sit here and be gaslit or silenced or be ostracized from the Internet or dismissed as some crazy conspiracy theorist because I don't believe any of this shit. The ultimate trigger man was the Jew, and now the Jew is running a cover operation.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Ok, well, that’s it. I’m sorry. I’ll never question Israel’s involvement again. https://t.co/CsgYZsY58y
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hello, my love. You have heard of the shooting—'twas I. 'Twas the hate of the man. Reason had no purchase in the poor soil of his soul. I hid the rifle over yonder by that lingering squad car; my old man shall surely be missing it presently. Do you remember how I was engraving bullets the other day in front of you? Well, it was just to do a big meme. Also, I shall now misquote my own meme. Oh, woo. Oh, woah. Probably makes no difference. I am on the lam. In conclusion, I beg you keep this from the prying eyes of the fuzz.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, my love. You have no doubt heard of the shooting,
Speaker 1: and I must admit, 'twas I. I had hoped to keep the secret to the grave, but alas, I have not lasted the better part of an hour. Why have I committed this act? 'Twas the hate of the man. Reason had no purchase in the poor soil of his soul.
You have not asked, but in case you were wondering where I hid the rifle, my love, 'twas over yonder by that lingering squad car. My old man shall surely be missing it presently. Do you remember how I was engraving bullets the other day in front of you? Well, it was just to do a big meme. Look no further into that.
Also, I shall now misquote my own meme. Oh, woo. Oh, woah. Probably makes no difference. I apologize to involve you and for this text to be so short, but I am on the lam.
In conclusion, I beg you keep this from the prying eyes of the fuzz.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Candace Owens is literally having to do Kash Patel’s job. She just dropped new photos of the alleged patsy in the Charlie Kirk assassination. https://t.co/PocvEo8A5i
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Why were the TPUSA bros so quick to shut this guy down? https://t.co/EqCx0110CX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yes. I saw him. What's called? Are you recording this?' 'Yes. You're live right now. Well, we're we're recording. I don't know if we're live because of the cell service.' They add, 'standing in probably the third okay. I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit. I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right.' 'I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt,' The narrator concludes, 'This guy says a man died today. This is unconfirmed. That's what this eyewitness testimony just said. Everybody's in shock, including myself.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See what happened? Did you guys see what happened?
Speaker 1: Yes. I saw him. What's called? Are you recording this?
Speaker 0: Yes. You're live right now. Well, we're we're recording. I don't know if we're live because of the cell service. So Hang on.
I was
Speaker 1: standing in probably the third okay. I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit. I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right.
I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt,
Speaker 0: This guy says a man died today. This is unconfirmed. That's what this eyewitness testimony just said. Everybody's in shock, including myself.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Since pedophilia is encouraged in the Talmud, jews have no problem with openly taking pictures of prepubescent children in public. https://t.co/d3YQ9XXf1E
Video Transcript AI Summary
Delete it out your phone. You're taking mad pictures of the little fucking girls. Those are babies. Delete all of it. I told you I was watching them do it for the longest. You take and pick them girls. It's, like, fucking 11 years old, bro. Delete the delete before I beat the jacket off you, bro. No. Don't hit him yet. Don't hit him yet. Delete it first. Let him delete it first. No. That's robbery. Let him delete it first, bro. Let him delete it first. I told you I knew what the fuck I was saying, bro. Where's the police at? I told you I was watching them do it for the longest. Delete it. Go to your delete. Get out. Get out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Delete it out your phone. Delete it out your phone. I told you, look. You're taking mad pictures of the little fucking girls. I told you.
Delete it. No. Don't don't hit him yet. Don't hit him yet. Don't hit him yet.
Delete no. Let him delete it first. Let him delete it first. No. That's robbery.
Let him delete it first, bro. Let him delete it first. Let him delete it first. I told you I knew what the fuck I was saying, bro. Delete it.
Delete it. Those are babies. Buy out you, man. Delete it. Those are babies.
Delete it. All of it. Matter of fact, yo, where's the yo. Where's the police at? I told you I was watching them do it for the longest.
You take and pick them girls. It's, like, fucking 11 years old, bro. Like, you crave. Delete all of it. Go to the the deleted and then delete the delete.
Yo. Delete the delete before I beat the jacket off you, bro. Yo, Tae, wait. It's all deleted. No.
It's not. Go to your delete. '25. Go. Yo.
Get out. Get out. Get out. Get out. Get out.
Get out if I beat you the fuck up. Get out. Get the fuck out. Get out right now. Get the fuck out.
Get out. Get out.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Jews caught sacrificing a deer to satan in the woods of Monsey, NY. These people are not compatible with western civilization. https://t.co/z74EBkwSGv
Video Transcript AI Summary
What in the Muncie boyology is going on over here? This man just found a pack of Muncie boys in the woods in the new square sector of Muncie Land burning a deer on a pallet, yo—literally an entire deer, yo. The deer had sticks going throughout its whole body, through its stomach, through its eyes. What in the new squarian ritual is going on back here? So this is why you guys wanna own all the property in Muncie Land? To cook venison in the woods, in the backyard. What in the Muncie Land barbecue is going on for real, y'all? My Muncie boys gotta explain this to me, man. Somebody gotta explain this to me, y'all, immediately. You explain to me. Alright?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What in the Muncie boyology is going on over here? This man just found a pack of Muncie boys in the woods in the new square sector of Muncie Land burning a deer on a pallet, yo. Literally an entire deer, yo. I cannot make this up. This man seen smoke coming from the back of his house, went back there, and literally seen a mob of Muncie boys burning a deer on top of a pallet that you would see in a warehouse, Monica.
The deer had sticks going throughout its whole body, through its stomach, through its eyes. What in the new squarian ritual is going on back here? So this is why you guys wanna own all the property in Muncie Land? To cook venison in the woods, in the backyard. What in the Muncie Land barbecue is going on for real, y'all?
My Muncie boys gotta explain this to me, man. I had no idea what to make of this. This makes no sense to me. Somebody gotta explain this to me, y'all, immediately. When he came up to y'all and asked y'all what's going on here, y'all didn't say nothing.
But y'all got some explaining to do, because you not about to tell me you just found a deer on top of some warehouse equipment, already with sticks throughout his body, already on fire. And you just decided to crowd around it and do some type of muntie boy kumbaya. I don't know what's going on. You explain to me. Alright?
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
The jews are taking over North Carolina and they don’t intend on assimilating. https://t.co/ypY57nNs56
Video Transcript AI Summary
A new Yiddish/Jewish community is being established, offering a slower pace of life and connection to nature. Families are seeking more meaning, connection, and a sense of community. The development aims to build 358 homes and expand further, fostering a vibrant community based on Torah. Currently, there are 20 families, with 60 more expected soon.
The location offers spacious properties, hiking, fishing, and natural beauty. Residents share a vision of building families and creating a beautiful life. The community provides an opportunity to connect with one's inner self, away from the distractions of city life. Early adopters will find it worthwhile and be grateful for taking the first steps. The goal is to support the community's growth, not just sell houses. It's an opportunity to live like a pioneer and find a community of like-minded people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the last few days, we have seen the birth of a Yiddish community, a Jewish community in a place that's so new and so raw to what we're bringing to it. They can't help but to feel inspired.
Speaker 1: This is something that families have been resonating with for a long time.
Speaker 2: I've been keeping my eye on other developing start up communities. And when this one came up, it was like everything I had been wanting because I recognized it right away.
Speaker 3: There are very few opportunities where a person could be a trailblazer, come out to somewhere where no Yiddish guys ever existed, and bring the to Davin, to learn, to say, and to connect with other.
Speaker 2: You go through life and you get all these types of feelings. So when you start getting in tune with yourself, you can see what's a yes, what's a no, what's right, what's not right.
Speaker 4: The world became a fast place, and this is a way to choose to slow it down a little bit.
Speaker 3: To spend a little bit of time with these visionaries and to connect to the and then like this is is incredible.
Speaker 1: Shafa to me is a true connection to yourself, to your children at a slower pace of life where everything truly means something to you.
Speaker 5: The life that everyone is so deeply yearning for, and it's really difficult to find in the major cities and where the main hubs of Jewish life are today.
Speaker 6: The minute we started driving up here, I felt, like, relaxed, like, I'm slowly starting to, like, shut down all the the the city tabs in my head and just breathe, and my mental space was like, like, I'm it, you know?
Speaker 1: The beauty is that everyone's searching for the same thing. They're searching for more meaning for their children, more meaning for themselves and their life, being connected with nature. That's what they want. We're looking
Speaker 0: to build 358 homes here. We're already looking to expand our our land so we can build even more homes. This is gonna be a vibrant, thriving Jewish community built on the foundation of Torah and HaShem.
Speaker 5: We have our first 20 families now. We're gonna have another 60 in the next few months, and this is gonna grow into an amazing community all the way up there, all of the mountain.
Speaker 2: If I'm walking into the house right over here, this has the view of the mountain from your windows, from your living room, or the office, depends on the layout. And then that's gonna be your view from the master bedroom.
Speaker 1: A lot of them didn't realize how big an acre actually is. We're looking at the markers, and they're like, oh my gosh. An acre. Like, where does it end? So much space for kids to run around.
You roll the ball, just keep going.
Speaker 5: On the weekends, you're going on hikes, you're taking your kids fishing. There's butts, there's lakes. There's a million and one things you do. You're in one of
Speaker 6: the most lush areas in the entire country. Everyone is just coming from a different place, and and rightfully so, you know? Everyone just says the same thing, which is like, we're all after that village to bring bring back the village.
Speaker 1: Breakfast, lunch, everyone just like grabbing a plate, sitting down at the table and like chatting. It's like the connection was instant because you know that the families are all here, are all in the same mindset.
Speaker 6: We all just want that same thing. We all just wanna build a family together.
Speaker 0: He felt a tangible energy that could only come from people coming together around a shared vision and a shared experience and
Speaker 4: a shared aspiration. Everyone's looking to create a beautiful new life for themselves, and I think that shared vision will enable it to be successful.
Speaker 3: The truth is everybody that comes here has their own they their own vision, and they want to connect to their inner selves. That's difficult to do when you've got the hustle and bustle of the world around you, and I think it's an opportunity for everybody to really be in tune with what it is that they really wanna do.
Speaker 0: I think the people that have the the the courage and and and the optimist to go ahead and do this now are not only gonna find it that's worth their while, but they're gonna look back and be very grateful that they made those first steps. And our own job at Chef Living is to make sure they make those first steps and they make that courageous jump. They believe in our vision, but not just here to sell a house. Here to support the growth of the community. If you
Speaker 4: wanna live life like a pioneer and if you wanna do something exciting in life, this is a great opportunity to jump in.
Speaker 1: Imagine moving to a place where you have 50, a 100 people you can talk to, who relate to you, you're on the same level, you want the same things for your children. That is something that I don't think you're gonna find anywhere else in the world.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Trump quadruples-down on Epstein cover up: “The Epstein files are a hoax and the people still talking about it are stupid and foolish. Instead, they should be talking about how I’m the greatest president of all time.” Thanks MAGA! https://t.co/DrC6MROIKo
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
On the morning of 9/11, George H. W. Bush was in a meeting with Osama Bin Laden’s brother at the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Washington, D.C. https://t.co/bkAKQxoRw3
Video Transcript AI Summary
On 9/11/2001, George Bush Sr. and Osama bin Laden's brother were reportedly in a meeting at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington. Understanding the Bush-Bin Laden relationship requires going back to 1970s Houston, where George W. Bush was learning the oil and politics businesses. George Sr. had become close to the Saudi royal family while director of the CIA.
Bill White was recruited to work with Jim Bath, who had connections to the Bushes and the Saudis. Bath ran real estate companies funded by political families and foreign nationals, including the Bin Ladens. He also ran Bin Laden and Associates, a procurement company for the Saudis, buying a bank, an airport, and starting an airline for them in Houston. The Bush family's presence was essential to the Bin Laden's investments in the US.
In 1979, the Saudi royal family, with the help of the Bin Ladens, recruited Osama bin Laden to build the Muhajidin army to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Prince Turkey Al Faisal mentored the young bin Laden. Back in Houston, George W. Bush started Arbusto, an oil exploration company, and needed operating capital.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See, on the morning of 09/11/2001, who was in a meeting at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington? George Bush senior and Osama bin Laden's brother. True or false? And the bin Laden Bush meeting on '9 eleven is true. And what that means is that on that awful morning two years ago, the day everything seemed to change, the world was already a far more complicated place than most of us could even imagine.
In order to truly understand what happened on September 11 and the close relationship between the Bushes, the Bin Laden's, and the rest of the Saudi elite. You have to go back about twenty five years and south a couple of thousand kilometers to Houston, Texas, where in the mid nineteen seventies, George w Bush was a young man just trying to learn the ropes in his family's two businesses, politics and oil. The Bushes were a pillar of Houston society. George senior struck it rich in oil, became a congressman, then director of the Central Intelligence Agency, where it's said he first won the friendship of the Saudi royal family by arranging CIA training for their palace guards. And George Junior was trying to follow in his father's footsteps.
A Harvard business grad, he dabbled in politics and the Texas Air National Guard. And it was about the same time that a man named Bill White, a former fighter pilot with a Harvard MBA himself, was recruited to work in Houston with someone with business and personal connections to both George Bush's. His name was Jim Bath.
Speaker 1: This fellow James R. Bath needed someone to run a series of real estate companies that would be grub stake by not only the political families, but also by some foreign nationals, the Saudis. And so I came down on an interview and met Jim.
Speaker 0: They opened an office in Downtown Houston where Bill White became Jim Bath's partner and confidant. But White says Bath spent most of his time dealing with his foreign partners, a wealthy Saudi family, the Bin Laden's.
Speaker 1: He also ran a company in the same building called Bin Laden and Associates, which Jim explained was a procurement company for the Saudis. He bought a bank for them. He bought an airport for them. He started an airline for them, among other ventures in Houston, Texas.
Speaker 0: Now at that point, had you ever heard the name Bin Laden?
Speaker 1: No. I had not.
Speaker 0: It meant nothing to you?
Speaker 1: It meant nothing to me.
Speaker 0: But in Saudi Arabia, the Bin Laden's name met a great deal indeed. They owned one of the largest Saudi construction companies. They were advisers to the royal family. They were the second richest family next to the royals with billions of dollars to invest abroad in places like Houston where the Bush family lived. They moved into this estate in one of Houston's finest neighborhoods.
A bin Laden brother named Salam bin Laden and a brother-in-law Khalid bin Maffus. Maffus was also one of the Saudi royal family's bankers. So is it fair to say that when the Bin Laden group establishes an office in Houston, the presence of the Bush family at that point had a lot to do with it?
Speaker 1: Oh, absolutely. I think that was essential, the essential element. And I don't think any of those dollars would have come into The United States or any of those assets purchased had not there been this quid pro quo relationship with the with the Bush family.
Speaker 0: While the Bin Laden's built their ties to Texas, back home in Saudi Arabia, they were making another kind of foreign investment. In 1979, the Soviet Union occupied Afghanistan. The Saudi royal family wanted to build a Muslim army known as the Muhajidin to defend Islam and force the Russians out. They turned to their trusted advisors, the Bin Laden's, who offered up a lanky 21 year old named Osama. The man who personally chose Osama Bin Laden to build that army would also become his mentor, Saudi Prince Turkey Al Faisal.
Last year on British television, he reminisced about the young bin Laden.
Speaker 2: In those days, he was a young man who had committed himself to helping the Afghan mujahideen liberate themselves from the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. And he was doing a lot of good. He was bringing support and aid to the mujahideen.
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, back in Houston, the Bush family was also on the move. George senior was about to become vice president, and his son made a career decision too. By the late seventies, George W Bush was setting out on his own. He established an oil exploration company that he called Arbusto, a Spanish word that loosely translated means bush. But before Arbusto could find oil, it needed to find some money, operating capital.
And apparently, George Bush knew where the
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
“My friend Jeff is totally innocent and I’m definitely not on the Epstein tapes because they don’t exist.” ~Donald J. Trump https://t.co/YQU7aVTTLf
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Time-lapsed video showing the rise of the Guadalupe River in Texas. https://t.co/8ITZ7fpKdU
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
🚨BREAKING: Laura Loomer declares a NATIONAL EMERGENCY over members of congress and the media taking money from AIPAC, demands Trump instructs the DOJ to open an investigation. https://t.co/fe3vLUaV4z
Video Transcript AI Summary
A reporter from the Stue Peters Network repeatedly asks members of congress whether they care more about the American people or Israel. One congressman says Israel is a strong ally and needs US support. The reporter asks if the US should continue funding Israel despite its links to 9/11 and the attack on the USS Liberty, and claims that APAC money is flowing into Congress.
Another representative compares the question to asking if he loves his wife more than his daughter, stating they are different loves. He does not answer directly.
One congressman states he cares more about the American people, making him the first to give that answer. The reporter asks if APAC should register as a foreign agent, claiming it is pumping hundreds of thousands of dollars into congressional candidates and promoting an Israel-first policy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congressman. My name is Frankie Stocks. I'm a reporter with the Stue Peters Network. I would just love to ask you a quick question I'm trying to ask every representative I can. Go for it, Frankie.
That is, do you care more about the American people or Israel as a member of congress?
Speaker 1: I don't think they're mutually exclusive, Frankie. Can you elaborate? They're our best ally.
Speaker 0: Are they? Who do you care about more, The United States or Israel? United States or Israel, sir? No answer? Should we put you down for Israel?
Who do you care about more, the American people It's an easy one. American people or Israel?
Speaker 1: You don't gotta fake a
Speaker 0: phone call. American people or Israel? Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel? The American people or Israel, sir? Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel?
No answer?
Speaker 1: I think that Israel is one of our strongest allies in a part of the world where where people are trying to harm us, and I think we they need our support.
Speaker 0: So so should The US continue funding Israel? Despite their links to nine eleven or their attack on the USS Liberty? Who who do you care about more, The United States or Israel? Well, it's a question the American people have been asking a lot because they're starting to wake up to how much APAC money's flowing into the into the coffers of congress. Well, if if you watch what I've
Speaker 1: done over the years since I've been here, people are and how they think. So this is so against everything I've heard, but the people who raised me over with, etcetera.
Speaker 2: So
Speaker 0: Well, the I mean, we have American citizens who are about to freeze to death in Western North Carolina and we're sending a lot of things. Sending millions American people or Israel, sir? Sir, they're equal. Are you serving Israel or you're serving America?
Speaker 2: I stand with Israel. Okay.
Speaker 0: So can you answer the original question? Do you care about more, US or Israel?
Speaker 2: No variances. It's like you're asking, you know, do you do you love your wife more than your daughter? Well It's a and you said it's always a simple question. It is. Do you love your wife more
Speaker 0: than your daughter? I love The United States more than I love Israel. It's a very simple question.
Speaker 2: Love. And you as a as a human being, you express that love, and you have core principles that drive you to your love for your wife and your love for your daughter. It's it's two different loves, but neither of them is greater than the other. You understand?
Speaker 0: Who's the priority when you're casting a vote in congress, America or Israel? It's is love, son. Well, it's a very simple question. You're not answering it, representative. Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel?
American people or Israel, sir? Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel? No answer? Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel? American people or Israel, sir?
Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel? All of us.
Speaker 1: No answer, man.
Speaker 0: No answer? Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel?
Speaker 1: Israel. Well, who do you care about more?
Speaker 0: American people or Israel, sir? Who do you care about more, the American people or Israel? People or Israel, sir? Is it so hard to say you care about the American people who you're here to serve? The American people believe that Israel holds disproportionate influence over our own government, thanks to organizations like APAC who are pumping millions of dollars into American politics, promoting Israel first policy.
Speaker 1: So If you wanna share misinformation, you're doing a great job.
Speaker 0: It's not misinformation. We have the campaign finance report, sir. It's not misinformation. Do you care more about the American people or about Israel?
Speaker 2: Where are you from?
Speaker 0: The Stoop Peters Network. The Stoop Peters Show just released a film called occupied on this very subject, which I highly recommend to look up. Alright. I'll do that. But can you answer the question, sir?
Speaker 1: Do you
Speaker 0: care more about the American people or about Israel? I'm an American.
Speaker 1: I care more about the American people. More about the American people.
Speaker 0: You care more about the American people? Well, about all people. Right. But should Americans take priority over Israel? We know APAC's pumping hundreds of thousands of dollars into congressional candidates.
They're obviously getting some sway there. Should APAC register as a foreign agent?
Speaker 1: Good question. Don't say already? No. Yes, sir.
Speaker 2: Are you a reporter?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. Are you?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Stu Peters Network, Frankie Stalks. We're asking the questions that the American people want answered by their representatives.
Speaker 2: I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. You.
Speaker 0: Congressman. Quick second. I'm Frankie Stokes with the Stoop Peters Network trying to ask all members I can in this question. Very simple. Do you care about more, the American people or Israel?
Speaker 1: American people. You are the
Speaker 0: first to have given me that answer, sir.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Yep. People. Number one. Best of all.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
What the HELL is THIS?
@realStockes - Frankie Stockes
This hasn't gotten enough press - At the behest of Netanyahu's cabinet and Israeli expansionist 'settlers,' CPAC 'conservatives' endorsed what's being called a modern-day Balfour Declaration, asserting jewish sovereignty over the West Bank. Read🔽 https://stewpeters.com/article/cpac-issues-modern-day-balfour-declaration-backing-israeli-expansion/
CPAC Issues Modern-Day Balfour Declaration Backing Israeli Expansion - Stew Peters Network
At the behest of the Israeli government and zionist radicals, CPAC passed a modern-day Balfour Declaration endorsing Israeli expansionism.
stewpeters.com
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
This excerpt written by Martin Luther is 💯 applicable to today’s society. It’s impossible to tell it was written 500 years ago. https://t.co/R8sXtA99gl
Video Transcript AI Summary
How do Christians nourish Jews who are evil, blasphemous enemies of God, receiving only curses in return? Christians are blind to the tyranny of these weaklings who mock them. If authorities don't restrain the Jews' demonic wantonness, they should be expelled to practice their abominations elsewhere, leaving Christians and their faith undefiled. Privileges won't help them because their abominations cancel all privileges.
Pastors should warn their churches, and if authorities do nothing, shake the dust from their shoes. Authorities may wish to show mercy to the Jews, but the Jews harass Christians. Christians must believe Jesus's declaration that Jews are a race of vipers and children of the devil. Records confirm they have poisoned wells, made assassinations, and kidnapped children.
The Turks don't tolerate what Christians endure from these serpents and demons. Next to the devil, a Christian has no more bitter an enemy than the Jew. Whoever protects them will be fleeced, robbed, defamed, and cursed. Let the protector of Jews crawl into their buttocks and worship inside there. Christ will repay him on the day of judgment together with the Jews in the eternal fire of hell.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just ponder this. How does it happen that we poor Christians nourish and enrich such an idle and lazy people? Such useless, evil, pernicious people, such blasphemous enemies of God, receiving nothing in return but their curses and defamation and every misfortune they may inflict on us or wish us. Indeed, we are as blind and unfeeling clods in this respect as other Jews in their unbelief to suffer such great tyranny from these vicious weaklings and not perceive that they are our mad tyrants and that we are their captives and subjects. Meanwhile, they wail and pretend that they are our captives and at the same time mock us as though we had to take this abuse from them.
And if the authorities are reluctant to use force and restrain the Jews' demonic wantedness, then the Jews should be expelled from the country. They should be told to go elsewhere where they may lie, curse, blaspheme, defame, murder, steal, rob, mock, and indulge in all those infamous abominations that they practice among us and leave us and our government, our country, our life, and our property, much more leave our Lord the Messiah, our faith, and our church undefiled and uncontaminated with their tyranny and malice. Any privileges that they may ask for won't help them. No one can grant privileges for practicing such abominations. These abominations cancel and abrogate all privileges.
If you pastors and preachers have followed my example and have faithfully issued such warnings to your churches, but the authority still won't do anything about it, then let's follow the advice of Christ in Matthew ten fourteen and shake the dust from our shoes and say, we are innocent of your blood. I suppose the authorities might wish to show mercy to the Jews, the bloodthirsty enemies of our Christian and human name, in order to earn heavenly rewards thereby, but that the Jews enmesh us, harass us, torment and distress us Christians in every way with their satanic and detestable deeds. This, the authorities want us to tolerate, and they want us to think it's a good Christian deed to tolerate this, especially if there is any money involved for them, which Jews have filched and stolen from us. What are we Christians to do meanwhile? In the first place, we must believe that our lord Jesus Christ is truthful when he declares of Jews who did not accept but crucified him.
You are a race of vipers and children of the devil. Our authorities and all those who wish mercy on the Jews must at least have to let us believe our Lord Jesus Christ, who I'm sure has more intimate knowledge of all hearts than these compassionate saints. He knows that these Jews are a brood of vipers and children of the devil, that is people who will accord us the same benefits as does their father, the devil. And by now, we Christians should have learned it from scripture as well as experience. I have read and heard many records about the Jews that confirm this judgment of Christ, namely how they have poisoned wells, made assassinations, and kidnapped children.
There are many such stories. For their kidnapping of children, they have often been burned at the stake or banished. It all coincides with judgment of Christ which declares that they are venomous, bitter, vindictive, tricky serpents, assassins, children of the devil who sting and work harm stealthily wherever they cannot do it openly. For this reason, I would like to see them where there are no Christians. The Turks and other heathens don't tolerate what we Christians are willing to endure from these venomous serpents and demons, nor do the Jews treat any others as they do us Christians.
Next to the devil himself, a Christian has no more bitter an enemy than the Jew. There is no other race to whom we accord as many benefits, and yet from whom we suffer as much as we do from these base children of Satan, this brood of vipers. I wish to give these Jews sincerely to whoever still feels the desire to protect them so that whoever does so will be fleeced by them, robbed, plundered, defamed, vilified, and cursed by them, and to suffer every evil at their hands. And if that's not enough, let he who protects the Jews stuff them into his own mouth. He who protects the Jews should crawl into their buttocks and worship inside there since they think the Jews are such a holy object.
Then let this protector of Jews boast of his so called mercy. Let him be proud that he has strengthened Satan and Satan's children for blaspheming our dear lord and the precious blood with which we Christians are redeemed. Let this protector of Jews think he is the perfect Christian filled with mercy. Christ will repay him on the day of judgment together with the Jews in the eternal fire of hell.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
“I love jews, I love israel, I LOVE AIPAC!” - Rep. Nancy Mace https://t.co/JPbLHYDhDb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states their love for Jews and Israel has nothing to do with the question of whether people are killing or murdering a hundred children a day. Another person calls the speaker a terrorist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Has nothing to do with the children a day, and that's Do wanna work with the Do you have any comments? I love Jews, and I love Israel. That that has nothing to do with the question. The question is they're killing or murdering a hundred children a day. Yeah.
That's what you love. You are a terrorist.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Hey dummies - that wall that you love to go hump and cry over was never even a part of the second temple. The wall was part of a former Roman military compound called Fort Antonia. https://t.co/Od8OlWf8jq
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Wailing Wall is believed to be a remnant of the Second Temple, but is actually a surviving wall of Fort Antonia, a Roman military compound. The actual temple stood to the south, built over the Gihon Spring. The rock beneath the Dome Of The Rock was part of Fort Antonia, not the temple foundation.
Rituals at the Wailing Wall are rooted in the Kabbalah, not biblical faith. The divine presence sought is the Shechinah, a feminine emanation, with prayer acting as a metaphysical sex act to unite her with the Einsof. Political figures perform rites at the Wailing Wall, unknowingly participating in an occult ritual and submitting to the synagogue of Satan. God does not dwell in temples made with hands, especially not a Roman fortress with rituals glorifying a false god and mystical union, which is spiritual prostitution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wailing Wall is the sacred remnant of the Second Temple, a place where God's presence still lingers. But this narrative falls apart under historical and archaeological scrutiny. The structure commonly revered today is, in truth, a surviving wall of the Roman military compound known as Fort Antonia, not the holy temple. The actual temple stood to the south, built over the Gihon Spring, a requirement for temple purification rituals, which the Roman compound did not meet. The protruding rock beneath the Dome Of The Rock, often mistaken for the foundation stone of the temple, was in fact the central part of Fort Antonia.
In other words, the Jews today are not praying at the remains of God's temple. They are praying at the wall of a Roman fortress. But the deception goes deeper. The rituals performed at the Wailing Wall are rooted not in biblical faith but in the thirteenth century occult system of the Kabbalah, as elaborated in the Zohar and further mystified by the Hasidic movement. The supposed divine presence they seek at the wall is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
It is the Shechinah, a feminine emanation in Jewish mysticism. She is described in erotic, intimate terms often as a divine consort with whom spiritual union is sought through the act of prayer, a practice called kavana, where physical movement like the rag and forth thrusting you see, mirrors an esoteric sexual ritual intended to unite the Shechina with the Einsof, the infinite masculine force of their god concept. This is not worship. It's a metaphysical sex act disguised as devotion. It is an inversion of divine truth rooted in mysticism that scripture calls an abomination.
And this is where it collides with our politics. Nearly every major political figure, presidents, prime ministers, global influencers must perform their rite of passage at the Wailing Wall. Hands pressed against stone, heads bowed in reverence. They are not just pondering to voters or honoring tradition, they are knowingly or unknowingly participating in an occult ritual, submitting themselves at the very seat of the synagogue of Satan. Scripture is unambiguous.
In Acts seventeen twenty four, it says God does not dwell in temples made with hands, much less would he dwell in a Roman fortress surrounded by rituals that glorify a false god and mystical union. It is spiritual prostitution. Our leaders are not just shaking hands with global powers. They are shaking hands with the devil.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
R.I.P. Bishop Richard Williamson ✝️ We will pick up your sword and carry on the FIGHT! ⚡️ https://t.co/RmQM5fzLPJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nazis were enemies of communism, which killed hundreds of millions. The claim that Hitler killed 6,000,000 Jews is untrue and a fabrication.
According to the speaker, spending time researching revisionist sources online will show that evidence contradicts the emotional backing for the claim that 6,000,000 Jews were wickedly killed in gas chambers by the Nazis. The speaker asserts that all the emotion is on one side, while all the evidence is on the other.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nazis were enemies of communism. Communism killed hundreds of millions. Hitler allegedly killed 6,000,000 Jews. It's untrue. It's just not true.
It's a fabrication. That so called holocaust is quite simply fabrication. You can spend a couple of hours on the Internet and if you seek out the revisionist, the best revisionist, you'll see all the evidence points one way and all of the emotion points in the other way. The the emotion fully backs 6,000,000 Jews wickedly killed in gas chambers by the Nazis. All the emotions on one side.
All the evidence is on the other.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Donald J. Trump will openly convert to Judaism on the world stage during this presidential term. Screenshot this post.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Everywhere you look, every stone you turn…you find a jew. 🐀☠️ https://t.co/vE6J3mJ90n
Video Transcript AI Summary
President John F. Kennedy was not killed by Lee Harvey Oswald. He was assassinated by Jews and their lackeys in the U.S. government and the CIA.
The truth is evident despite attempts to hide it, with breadcrumbs leading to Jews and Israel, who are also supposedly behind 9/11 and the "scandemic." The release of JFK files by the Trump administration has revealed the role of Israel and the Jews in this assassination.
The CIA ordered the U.S. government to erase any mention of Israel from the JFK files before releasing them. The released files show stamps from the CIA censoring sections mentioning Israel and Jews.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: JFK, president John F. Kennedy wasn't shot by some lone wolf misfit gunman called Lee Harvey Oswald. Okay? A guy who could barely even shoot straight when he was in the marine corps according to his own service records. No.
That didn't happen. Because in reality, just like his brother Robert, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. He was murdered by Jews and by their Shavascois in the United States government and in the CIA, who they walk around on leashes like a bunch of dogs. They can try to hide it all they want to.
They can redact as many documents as they would like, but they will never be able to hide the truth. There's just too many breadcrumbs. And they all lead to the very same place. Yeah. They all lead to the very same people, the Jews and the illegitimate homosexual genocidal nation state of Israel, because of course they do.
Of course they're behind it. Just like they're behind nine eleven, just like they were behind the scandemic and the death jab. Everywhere you look, every stone you turn, you find a Jew. A criminal, conniving, genocidal Jew. Most of us have known this for quite some time.
Yeah. Even if you didn't want to admit it. And now the release of the JFK files by the Trump administration has been an absolute bombshell. They didn't want it to be, but it is. They tried.
They tried so hard to cover up the role of Israel and the role of the Jews in this assassination, but they just couldn't do it. There's too much evidence. There's too much information that was taken down forty, fifty, sixty years ago and it has now finally seen the light of day. The Trump administration and others before it, they tried everything. And interestingly enough, these records, they show us that they tried everything.
The CIA ordered the United States government to erase any mention of Israel from the JFK files before releasing them. And now this order has surfaced in the recently released files themselves. Over and over again, page after page after page, you can see stamps from the CIA saying that the agency doesn't object to the files release just so long as the sections that they bracketed are censored. Well, what's in the brackets? Israel, Jews.
Every single time.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Jews never have and never will be LOYAL to their HOST NATION. This FBI report on Zalman Shapiro, the jewish infiltrator that worked with the CIA to divert 300 kilograms of uranium from the U.S. to ISRAEL, perfectly illustrates why they CANNOT be trusted. https://t.co/JCPNiVU33X
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson of the Chabad-Lubavitch Tunnel Jews: "A Jew is like God himself" “God gave Jews power over the entire world.” https://t.co/3xMDraoWLw
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
This is blasphemy. Jesus Christ was not one of these people. In fact, He was so disgusted by these parasites, He braided his own whip and used it on them. https://t.co/CU1s0vJgK5
@DC_Draino - DC_Draino
I am a proud Christian and love Jesus I kept reading about this Scofield Bible situation on X and how Jews influenced the Bible, so I wanted to investigate for myself What I found blew my mind Not only was Jesus a practicing Jew in his human life Not only was his holy mother Jewish Not only were all his followers, disciples, and early converts Jewish But then I asked Grok how many books in the Bible were written by Jews and he said pretty much every single one of them 65 out of 66, except for maybe Luke Did I get mad? No I know that Jews are our brothers and sisters and all of us are children of God We have so much more in common than what drives us apart
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
The CIA requested that any mention of ISRAEL be redacted in the JFK files. Israel is literally the ONLY thing they’re requesting to be redacted. https://t.co/cAzmmnUpwi
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Every single Israeli Prime Minister has a FAKE name! 🇮🇱 These people are TOTAL imposters. 🐀☠️ https://t.co/4VE496Pxgx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Every Israeli prime minister has a fake name. Ben Gurion's original name was Grun, which he changed to sound more Jewish and Middle Eastern. Netanyahu's real name is Malikowski. Moshe Sharat's name was originally Chertok, and Levi Eshkol was Shklonik. Yigal Alon's original name was Peikovits. Golda Ma'ir's real name was Mabovich. Yitzhak Rabin's name was Rubitsov.
These are Eastern European names, not Palestinian or Middle Eastern. Yitzhak Shamir's original name was Yezernitsky. Shimon Peres was Persky. Ehud Barak was Brog. Ariel Sharon's original name was Shinerman. Yair Lapid's original name was Lample.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I show you what I'm about to show you, your mind will be blown. You're gonna be blindsided. Every single Israeli prime minister has a fake name. Did you know that? I was just talking about Ben Gurion.
Do you know what his original name is? It's Grun, g r u e n. He changed it to make it sound more Jewish and sound more Middle Eastern. Do you know what Netanyahu's real name is? It's not Netanyahu.
It's Milkovsky. I swear to god. Go and look it up. You'll find the you'll find Milkovsky. That's his real name.
These are remember what Israelis are. Israelis are European Jews. They don't come from Palestine, but they wanna make they want you to make you believe. They wanna they wanna make believe and make you believe that they come from this area, that they are indigenous to the land, that they're so Jewish, right, even though they have no connection. So they changed their names.
Here's another one. Moshe Sharat, his name is Chertok originally. You've got Levi Eshkol. Eshkol was Shklonik. So he changed it from Shklonik to Eshkol.
Then you have Yigal Alon, his original name, Peikovits. Golda Ma'ir, Israel's first female prime minister. Her her real name is not Golda Ma'ir. It's Mabovich. Mabovich.
More like mad bitch. We have Yitzhak Rabin. Right? His name is not Rabin. It's Rubitsov.
Are you seeing the pattern? These are Eastern European names. Not Palestinian, not Jewish, not, Middle Eastern. They're Eastern European. Okay?
They're not Palestinian. They don't come from this region. Yitzhak Shamir, he he's a great one. You know? Yitzhak Shamir, he's on the wanted poster because, he was wanted by the British police in Palestine for terrorism, but they don't tell you that.
So Yitzhak Shamir, his original name is Yezernitsky. Yezernitsky. Shimon Peres? Persky. Netanyahu, I already told you, Malikovsky.
I think I said Milkovsky. Excuse me. It's Malikowski. Never you know, it's the same point. Ehud Barak is Brog.
So b r o g. Brog. He changed it to Barak. Ariel Sharon, his original name is Shinerman. Shiner man.
He changed it to Sharon. And Yair Lapid, who's, you still see him, changing posts, his original name is Lample. So he changed it from Lample to Lapid.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
Thomas Massie is the line in the sand. Trump is going to find out how much power our unified movement actually wields. We will save Massie at all costs and expose MAGA as being nothing more than Israeli handlers pulling Trump’s strings and a few sellout “influencer” accounts. https://t.co/W6Y5U6nRzh
Video Transcript AI Summary
The America First agenda is going up in smoke as Congress prepares to vote for a continuing resolution, funding the government through September. This resolution continues funding USAID and Israel, with no money for border security. It's business as usual, with endless continuing resolutions that never improve things for Americans.
While most Republicans fall in line, Congressman Thomas Massey is refusing to vote for this "scam," opposing sending money overseas to those who hate us. Trump is now trying to find a primary opponent to challenge Massey, criticizing him for being against the continuing resolution. However, Massey has been a budget hawk for years and notably takes no money from AIPAC. He's standing up against the Israel-first agenda that Trump and many others in Washington support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, don't look now, but the America First agenda that so many millions of Americans thought they were voting back into office last year is going up in smoke as members of congress, of course, under the command of speaker Mike Johnson and president Donald Trump prepared to vote in favor of yet another continuing resolution, this time to fund the US government through September. And amazingly, despite Trump's base acting like this is about to be some huge victory, some kind of landmark continuing resolution, which doesn't even make sense if you understand how continuing resolutions work and what they are. This is a massive loss for the American people. This continuing resolution is going to continue funding USAID. It's going to continue sending your money, American taxpayer dollars, to foreigners who hate us.
And of course, it's going to continue funding Israel and all kinds of other parasites around the world. And it provides absolutely no funding for the construction of a wall to secure our border. The very issue that propelled Trump to the presidency more than eight years ago and which continues to go unaddressed, with the border having only gotten worse. All this bill does is fund business as usual for the next six months. And then, of course, when that money dries up, it'll happen all over again.
They'll pass another continuing resolution and then another and then another. And each time they will tell us, this is the most important one yet. If we just fund everything that the American people voted against just one more time, then we'll really be able to make America great again. But, of course, intentionally, by design, it never does. And regardless, fake Republicans in this uniparty duopoly, they don't care.
They just keep lining up and voting yes because that's what they're told to do. That's what they're told to do by their paymasters and by their creditors and by Donald Trump. And so they listen. They obey. They screw over this country.
They screw over their constituents. They screw over the American people. They screw over their supporters, and then they go running back to their own districts at home and talk about what a big time freedom fighter they are in DC. And then they throw a bunch of taxpayer money around and introduce their local GOP to a few transnational donors, and then all is forgotten. Suddenly, all is forgiven.
The show goes on. You know, back in 2016, we were told that Trump and the old school MAGA movement were gonna put a stop to all of this. I remember that. Do you remember that? But instead, it's just only gotten worse because MAGA has been totally gutted and completely destroyed.
There is no MAGA movement anymore if it was ever real in the first place. Maybe it was just a rug pull, kind of like Trump's crypto coin. But either way, Congress and just about everyone else in politics has gone along with it. Except for some very notable exceptions, like congressman Thomas Massey of Kentucky's Fourth District, perhaps the only man in DC with some balls. He's taken stands before, and now he's taking a stand again.
Thomas Massey is refusing to vote for this Trump backed continuing resolution scam. And by doing so, he's saying he's refusing to rip off the American people, to send their money overseas to people who hate us, to people who want us enslaved, to people who want to rape our kids, and to people who want us dead. He says that unless somebody lobotomizes him, he's an automatic no, a definite no. He won't support it. So as you can only imagine, I'm sure it hasn't taken long for the GOP's long knives to be brought out and weaponized against Massey with Trump leading the charge, attempting to solicit an anti Massey primary opponent in a post that he made the truth social.
He wrote, quote, congressman Thomas Massey, a beautiful Kentucky, is an automatic no vote on just about everything despite the fact that he has always voted for continuing resolutions in the past. He should be primaried, and I will lead the charge against him. He's just another grandstander who's too much trouble and not worth the fight. He reminds me of Liz Cheney before her historic record breaking fall. The people of Kentucky won't stand for it.
Just watch. Do I have any takers? End quote. How about that? A casting call for a future congressional candidate.
If you live in Kentucky's Fourth Congressional District and you just love bending over the barrel and taking it up the ass and doing whatever you're told to do, then Donald Trump has a proposition for you. He wants you to run for congress. And, you know, we should get something straight here. This has absolutely nothing to do with Thomas Massey opposing out of control federal spending. Okay?
This has nothing to do with Trump being pissed off that Massey is just suddenly fiscally responsible with our money. Thomas Massey has been a budget hawk for years. Everybody knows it. And what Trump is now claiming about Massey being some kind of continuing resolution fan, it just isn't true. Everybody can do their own research.
You can look back over the years and see both Democrats and Republicans hitting him over the head for his refusal to continue shelling out money that we don't have. And by now, most people, even members of his own party, have accepted that when it comes to signing off on billions and trillions of dollars at a time, Thomas Massie is a no. He's not a fan. At least they've accepted it when it comes to domestic matters. But when it comes to his unwillingness to bankroll Israel and do the bidding of the cabal in Congress, that's something that they refuse to accept.
Thomas Massey is one of the only members of our entire Congress who has taken no money from AIPAC and the Jewish genocidal war lobby. $0. In fact, earlier this year, he refused to vote with the entire uni party, Republicans and Democrats alike, to censure the ICC after it rightfully indicted Benjamin Netanyahu for committing genocidal war crimes. Thomas Massey, plain and simple, refuses to toe the line for Israel. And again, that's something that those in our fake occupied government refuse to accept, including Donald Trump.
Thomas Massey is the guy who went on Tucker Carlson's podcast and said straight up that members of Congress have their own APAC handlers. They have a little Jew man over there in the corner somewhere who tells them what to do. Before they cast a vote, they call their Jew. Before they hire a new secretary or get a cup of coffee, they call their Jew. They make damn sure that each and every one of their actions is approved by their APAC guy.
And all of this information makes it a pretty simple explanation as to why Donald Trump wants Thomas Massie the hell out of DC, doesn't it? Because Donald Trump is working for Israel. He's taking orders from his own APAC guy. These Jews gave Trump a hundred million dollars in 2024 alone. They have given Trump more than $230,000,000 since 2016.
Thomas Massey just isn't in the same club that Donald Trump is in. And judging by the way these campaign finance records look, he doesn't want to be. Because Thomas Massey really is America First, unlike Donald Trump, unlike J. D. Vance, Unlike Speaker Mike Johnson and just about everyone else who's taking up space in our nation's occupied besieged capital city.
They're all frauds, especially these fake Republicans who have found a way to merge their disgusting worship of Israel with their disgusting worship of Trump. They have created an Israel First cult of personality around this guy. Do you remember when Obama was in office and Republicans would always accuse liberals saying that they have made Obama their new god and that they worshiped him like a bunch of sickos? Well, what the hell do you think they're doing with Trump? Same story, different party.
No one in the GOP is capable of thinking for themselves. And when they do, they step out of line. And when they step out of line, they start saying, you know what? Maybe this isn't a good idea. Maybe we should actually, you know, authentically be America First.
Well, then they just get kicked to the curb. They're turned into persona non grata. They're like Napoleon going into exile on some island somewhere. And the reason why is because quite simply, our nation and our government is occupied. It's owned and operated by the foreign secular homosexual nation state of Israel founded in 1948.
And when men like Thomas Massie stand up and put their nuts on the table, they're purged. APAC has already tried this. They ran some Israel Jew lover in Massey's twenty twenty four primary, and they couldn't get over the hump. But if Trump is gonna step in and start directing local GOP committees to turn on Massey and vote for who he says to, then it'll likely be a different ballgame this time around. And if it's not, he can just use some of his APAC money, god knows there's plenty of it, and pay off the vote counters since Republicans haven't bothered to fix our elections.
The bottom line here is this. If you're not taking APAC money, if you're not dropping to your knees to worship the Jew like some religious sacrament, if you're not doing what you're told by your APAC handler or some disgusting pedophilic Jew somewhere, then Trump and his Israel first administration say, there's no place for you in Congress. If you want to stop sending Israel Hundreds Of Billions Of Dollars as American citizens freeze to death in Western North Carolina or die miserable deaths on the streets of filthy, decaying cities in America, then Trump says, you're a traitor. Wake up. Trump's not working for you.
It's all fake. And if operation warp speed or the canceling of the mass deportation flights or the groveling to Israel and the countless other betrayals leading up to this point weren't enough for you, then it's time that you give yourself a reality check.
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
“I resigned from O’Keefe Media Group after finding out James was a guest of his donors at Bohemian Grove THIS YEAR.”🦉 https://t.co/VBor7uama6
Video Transcript AI Summary
I resigned from O'Keefe Media Group because James O'Keefe attended Bohemian Grove this year. He admitted to going and justified it by saying he has investors and donors there. I felt this was wrong, especially after my experience as a whistleblower at Pfizer. I had to speak out because I believe in doing no harm and I felt I had to remove all this weight off of my shoulders. Hearing that James is connected to Bohemian Grove is questionable because they are sworn to secrecy, and James won't address it publicly.
James is a fraud and likely an asset of an adversarial government. The same group of people responsible for the safe and effective vaccine and gain of function research to create the genetic sequences for SARS CoV two. Project Veritas seems to be tied to the same group of people. You are a modern day hero who has made tremendous sacrifices to help save children and lives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm the journalist behind the Jordan Tristan Walker story. The story that blew up, it was the biggest project Veritas story in the history of the company. It's James' biggest story ever. And so now I'm out here blowing whistle on him Full circle, Stu. I mean, the reason I resigned from working at the O'Keefe Media Group is because James was a guest at Bohemian Grove this year.
He was confronted about it by journalists who I was working with while I was on paid time off, and then he called me on the phone and admitted that he went to this bohemian club is the quote, and then justified going, said that he has investors and donors and people that he's known there for for years. I stood my foot in the ground and stood up for myself and said, sir, this is a crime against humanity that happened with me at Pfizer as a whistleblower. You hired me. And, you know, I just I really had to speak about god's law. Studio, I meant no harm to anybody, you know, in regards to what I was doing as a whistleblower.
Right? I just wanted to inform the public. In spiritual law, it's due no harm. I have to remove all this weight off of my shoulders. And so hearing that James is connected to bohemian growth is highly questionable as, you know I mean, not every single person involved is necessarily compromised, but they're sworn to secrecy.
And James still will not address it publicly even though it's all over this entire documentary.
Speaker 1: This guy's a fraud and likely an asset of an adversarial government. Killers who want Americans dead. Killers who want I mean, we've we've talked about these people. They want the unfettered legal sexual access to your children. They wanna siphon trillions of dollars through NGOs and Lockheed Martin and Raytheon while they go drop bombs on the heads of millions of innocent people across the face of the planet in the name of spreading democracy.
This is the same group of people. This is the same group of people responsible for releasing the safe and effective vaccine. The same group of people responsible for ginning up the gain of function research to manufacture, to create the genetic sequences for SARS CoV two. I mean, because there's well over 25 of them. I mean, they found strains of DNA from a German hedgehog in this stuff.
So this bat and this pangolin and this wet market and this Wuhan Institute of Virology nonsense that they put all over the Zionist funded media that includes every single major broadcast network and all of the cable news networks. And we know who Tierman is connected to. All of these people, while we name the people who are infiltrating and occupying our government, getting ready to conquer our country. These people over at O'Keefe Media and seemingly project Veritas seem to be directly tied to the same group of people. They had all of this information, didn't release it.
How many views do you have on project whistleblower by the way over on Rumble?
Speaker 0: Just under a 50,000.
Speaker 1: We're gonna put it on our network too. It's okay with you, can we do that?
Speaker 0: Absolutely.
Speaker 1: We're gonna stream that thing on our network and we're gonna put it on our website and we're gonna put it everywhere that we possibly can. We will put the footage out just like we would put out the unredacted, unedited January 6 tapes in their entirety on our network so that people could draw their own relevant conclusions after seeing what really happened on that day. But yeah, we don't have the tapes even though we've said, hey, if it's cumbersome for you, we'll take it on. We'll put it on our platform. No problem.
Tucker couldn't do it just a few minutes and then kind of inserted his own little narrative about what happened on that day. And that's all that the American public has to go on. These people are frauds and they're killers. They're murderers, every single one of them. They're killing our kids.
You're you're a hero. Don't ever say that you harmed anybody. Don't ever go to bed without knowing. When you look at yourself in the mirror and it's just you and God at night and you're you're watching the ceiling fan spin above you while you're going to sleep, you just remember, you are a modern day hero. You are a selfless person.
You are a selfless person who's made a tremendous amount of sacrifices in order to to help to save children, to save lives. What this entire platform is all about. We commend you very much.