reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Globalists Plan To Reduce World Population By 99% https://t.co/Q9ULvlUDX7
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses admiration for President Trump and criticizes the media for spreading lies about him. They claim that the Democratic Party is splitting into a communist and socialist wing and wants to ban elections. The speaker warns of a global plan to collapse the third world and create political division, followed by a release of a bioweapon to wipe out billions of people. They believe that the elite are building bunkers in New Zealand and plan to merge with silicon to transcend humanity. The speaker urges listeners to wake up to this satanic interdimensional attack. The transcript ends with a promotion for a turmeric supplement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fortune Fortune favors the bold, and the fortune I seek is liberty from my family and your family. I am so honored to stand with president Trump. The stamina, the energy, how smart he is, and then you read the news, and it's he's weak, he's stupid, he's racist, he's bad, he hates southerners, but no tapes of any of it. All complete garbage. And the lies get more elaborate, more insane, more out of control.
And here's the takeaway. We're 61 days out. They know they're gonna lose the midterms. All the internal polls show it. They've got bots that can track it all, not the fake polls.
And they know the Democratic Party has lost the people. A total political realignments happened. Normally, that happens then. The the new one party splits into a couple more or into a second party. And they know that's they wanna ban the election, hold new ones that are staged, and then split the Democratic Party into 2 new parties, a communist wing and a socialist wing.
That's what you see happening with the Democratic Party right now and all these socialist and communist winning primaries. And they admit in their white papers they're doing this. People say, how does he know all this? Because I actually read this instead of watching football and baseball. And I'm not saying you're bad if you wanna watch football.
I'm not saying you don't I I kinda wanna go down and see a Houston Astros game or whatever. The point is is that I can't do it because we're in a total war. So I cannot hype enough to you. I don't have words to describe to you how dire the situation is. This country is on an emergency operating table.
Our heart stopped, you, the listeners of this broadcast, Infowars, president Trump, drudgereport.com, are the literal defibrillators that started the heart back. They said, oh, you're dead. Well, now we're showed up. We're walking around. We're on a walker, but we could get a lot better.
And they're like, no. No. No. Lay back down. Lay back down.
And they want to have you lay down and inject you with at least 1 injection, ladies and gentlemen. They want the control. We have the audio tapes of them saying bitter clingers, and they hate Christians, and saying it publicly. We have them cheering, America was never great. It'll never be great.
We have them saying they wanted depression. We have Silicon Valley that I told you 10 years ago is building giant bunkers in New Zealand, and they had the media attack me 10 years ago. Jones claims the elite are moving to New Zealand and building bunkers. I was told it by a gentleman who builds dams around the world, who's very rich, and I'm gonna leave it at that. Who shed?
They're planning something big. They're doing major projects that are 50,000,000, 100,000,000, $200,000,000 projects in New Zealand. For in case of a societal complete breakdown, of course, they're engineering it. Next decade's news today, Bloomberg this week. The super rich of Silicon Valley have a doomsday escape plan.
Exactly what I told you. That's why they want me off the air, folks. Not because I'm fake news, but because I'm real news. And They realized that I can go anywhere I want and take over the media, and they can't stand it. And they know that our numbers went up when they banned us.
They can't stand that. And so I'm telling you, they're making their move on me because they're making their move on you. If you wanna pull up the article from, like, 8, 9 years ago and there's more, just, type in, Hollywood elite moving to New Zealand, infowars.com, or James Cameron moves to New Zealand, to avoid bioweapon release. That's the real reason. See, there's a leftist this global plan that once they collapse the 3rd world and scare the 1st world enough, they're gonna let it in enough to create political division.
About 100,000,000 in Europe, 100,000,000 in the US, then they're gonna build giant walls. Trump isn't part of this, but but because he's doing it early to stop the crisis. They're gonna build the walls later, Bring in total biometric control and a police state to counter the collapsing third world, and then they're gonna release a bioweapon that's gonna wipe out The 1st round, 2 or 3000000000 people. And then once they get a real hyper police state in after that, Then they'll, deliver the true superweapons, and then they will retire to their labyrinthine palaces while we kill each other, but they've gotta have automated military forces and drone forces to carry out suppression and mop ups for some computer models they've got That, human directed forces, and then by that, people directed for a prohuman future, would be able to basically understand the plan even once it was launched and then run a countervailing system that would then, remove the planetary cleansing operation that they are preparing. So the real reason I'm verboten is because there is a planetary cleansing nation prepared to reduce world population by 99%.
They tell university students 80%, but you're part of the elite 20%, they're gonna save the earth because you're an environmentalist, you're anti human, you're anti God. You'll be part of the priest class because, you know, they don't tell them it's 99%. They can do the math knowing they're gonna be killed as well. To tell low level folks at the 1st entry level, we're gonna kill 80%. Then at higher levels, they say, well, it's actually 90%.
And then at the highest levels, they say 99%, Except one level above that, the final level. There's there's always a hidden level. They say, actually, our god tells us we must transcend humans and merge with silicon, and that humans are actually a curse to the universe, and that our god will only let us ascend to godhood once the human race has been completely eradicated, and that is the they believe the interdimensional transmission they're receiving. Course, we are in deep space. That does sound quite like a plan, doesn't it?
But regardless, that's what they believe, and they're building the plan for Lucifer. And Lucifer plans to kill, steal, and destroy. And if God doesn't intervene, there will not be any flesh spared. Revelation. So you need to understand that they are going to kill you and your family for sure if they have their way.
And you have to understand that why is Elon Musk having his company destroyed and sabotaged? The ability to have people in there I I I did this 6 months ago, but now it's firm blowing up stuff in his plant because he's been in these meetings and said, I don't wanna be part of it. He's come out and told you. Beware of those that worship AI gods. They plan to get rid of everybody by 2050, it's a nightmare plan.
Oh my god. Humanity, please wake up. And now his company is to be destroyed. They're like, hey, dude. We let you in the club, and you said no.
Now we're gonna slowly destroy you and discredit you everywhere, and that's why you see them doing that. It's how it works. And so at the end of the day, none of these globalists are gonna make it out of this. Whatever it is they're building will kill everybody in the end. There won't be one Luciferian person left, they succeed this program standing there in this system supposedly gonna merge with some silicon god in ascend, and they're gonna be deceived, of course, in the end.
That's how it works, and that's it. You're not living in a science fiction book. You're living on a planet in deep space, baby, orbiting a standard sun, and you're living in the future. And it's here, and you're facing a satanic interdimensional attack.
Speaker 1: The scientists at Infowars Life have created a powerful formula for inflammatory support and joint support. Discover the power of ancient medicine with bodies. Bodies contains one of the most potent forms of turmeric available. Tumeric has been used for 1000 of years and is one of the most studied herbals today. It is well known in traditional medicine for its soothing properties.
Our pure turmeric extract plus piperine from black pepper makes for optimal absorption to help boost and support your flexibility, mobility, joint function, immune system and so much more. Regular from the store only contains 1 to 5% of active ingredients. But our turmeric root extract contains over 90 5% of the active ingredients. Bodies combines turmeric with organic herbs such as spearmint, sage, lemon balm, time to work synergistically for full body support. Try bodies today at infowarslife.com, or call us at 188253
@BubbaSon6x9 - Bubba 🐸
CEO of Pfizer at a WEF meeting states: “Our dream and goal is to reduce the human population by 50% by 2023.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
We commit to bringing new medicines to the US, Europe, and the world every year. These medicines will be added to our portfolio for these countries. This fulfills a dream we had when we started in 2019. In that year, we set goals for the next five years, including reducing the global population by 50% by 2023. Today, this dream is becoming a reality, making us a purpose-driven company.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we also make the commitment that every year, as we discover and bring to the U. S. Or to Europe or to the world, new medicines. Automatically, those new medicines will be inserted into the offer of the portfolio that we're offering to these countries. I think that is really a fulfillment of a dream that we had together with my leadership team when we started in 'nineteen.
The 1st week we met in January of 'nineteen in California and to set up the goals for the next 5 years. And one of them was by 2023, we will reduce the number of people in the world by 50%. I think today, This dream is becoming reality. So it's really a purpose driven company.
@LarryTaunton - Larry Alex Taunton
World Economic Forum “Agenda Contributor” Dr. Dennis Meadow says we need: • To reduce the global population to less than 2 billion “peacefully” • A global “dictatorship” This is why I went to Davos. #Globalists are dangerous and must be stopped.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that our current population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They hope for a civil and peaceful decline in population, where conflict is resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1-2 billion people, depending on the desired level of liberty and material consumption. They mention that a strong dictatorship with a low standard of living could support 8-9 billion people, but that is not desirable. The speaker hopes for a slow and relatively equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few rich individuals forcing others to deal with it. These hopes are seen as pessimistic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are so far, goby, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another, it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way. And I mean civil in a special way. Peaceful.
Peace doesn't mean, that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through force, but rather in other ways. And so, that's what I hope for, that we can the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people. Maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people.
We could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships, they're always stupid. But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a but but we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, trying to force everybody else to deal with it.
So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes. But, that's that's what lies ahead.
@backtolife_2023 - Wittgenstein
Dennis Meadows, one of the original members of the Club of Rome & co-author of 'Limits to Growth' (1972) speaking openly about how the population must be reduced to 1-2 billion & mentions epidemics as a possibility. Source: Muh World (YouTube)
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that the global population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They express a desire for a civil and peaceful decline in population, where conflicts are resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. They mention that having more people would require a strong and smart dictatorship, which is unlikely. The speaker hopes for a slow and equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing it on others. They admit that these hopes may be pessimistic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But in one way or another, we are so far globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another, it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way. And I mean civil in a special way. Peaceful.
Peace doesn't mean, that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through force, but rather in other ways. And so, that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet, can support something like a 1000000000 people? Maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, if you can have more people, I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000, probably, if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart.
Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships, they're always stupid. But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a But We want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich trying to force everybody else to deal with it. So those are my hopes.
I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know, but, that's that's what lies ahead.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 2015 speech, former Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad warned of a globalist plan to reduce the world population to one billion. He suggested methods like mass killings, starvation, and birth prevention. For more content, visit wide-awake-media.com.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Speaking in 2015, former Malaysian prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad, warned of the globalist plan to reduce the global population down to one billion. "There will be a need to kill many billions of people, or to starve them to death, or to prevent them from giving birth, in order to reduce the population of this world." Full speech: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UGRkQiLxi3Q… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the concept of a new world order, where a single world government led by wealthy and powerful elites would govern the entire world. The focus is on abolishing states, nations, and borders, and imposing rules on everyone. The video highlights the use of military force and propaganda to enforce this new order, including regime change in non-compliant countries. Sanctions are mentioned as a means of punishment, and the intention to reduce the world's population is discussed. The video concludes by suggesting that the peace achieved through this new world order would be akin to the peace of the graveyard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The subject is the new world order. It is about having a world government. We should abolish all states, all nations, all borders, but instead have only 1 world government. And that world government is to be by certain people, elites, People who are very rich, very intelligent, very powerful in many ways, they are the ones who will govern the world. There was not much talk about democracy or choice of leaders.
Instead, There was to be a government by these elites who will impose their rules on everyone in this world. And for those who are unwilling to submit to them, there will be punishment. So we find that already there is a new world government enforced with powerful military forces and a willingness to subvert and undermine the governments of all countries. Politically, We see them urging every country to undergo regime change except for those who are already submitting to them. There must be regime change so that All governments in this world would submit to this world power, this world government.
And if you refuse to change your government, you will be persuaded through propaganda, through actions including invasion and occupation, and the removal of the hate of that government to be replaced by one that submits to the most powerful nation. In other words, the one who will accept the concept of a new world order. But that is not all. We find that if you are recalcitrant, You don't like to conform. Then you may have sanctions placed against you.
We see already countries like Iran and Russia facing the application of sanctions on their trade with other countries. We see all kinds of subversion taking place, undermining our moral values to the extent that we become helpless, unable to do anything. And the peace that we will get from this is the peace of the graveyard because the intention also is to reduce the number of people in this world. At the time when the new world order was enunciated, the population of this world was only 3,000,000,000. The intention was to reduce it to 1,000,000,000.
Now the population of the world is 7,000,000,000. There will be a need to kill many billions of people or to starve them to death or to prevent them from giving birth in order to reduce the population of this world. This is what is in store for most, for those who will suffer and die. There will be the peace of the grave.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a Club of Rome member, envisions a civil depopulation of Earth to one billion, reducing today's population by 87.5%. The planet can sustain up to two billion people, depending on liberty and material consumption. More liberty and consumption require fewer individuals, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate eight or nine billion. Visit wideawakemedia.com for similar content. #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Prominent Club of Rome member, Dennis Meadows, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of Planet Earth, down to one billion—an 87.5% reduction from today’s population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have." "If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are currently consuming and populating the planet at unsustainable levels. I believe that this will eventually lead to a decline, and I hope it can happen peacefully. Peace doesn't mean everyone will be happy, but conflicts should be resolved without violence. The planet can support a billion or two billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. If we want more freedom and consumption, we need fewer people. However, smart dictatorships with low living standards could support even more people. Ideally, we should aim for a slow and equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience rather than a few wealthy individuals forcing others to deal with it. These hopes may seem pessimistic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far, Goboy, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a special way, peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have?
If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8,000,000,000 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid.
So but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have it. But we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes.
I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But,
reSee.it AI Summary
UN Messenger of Peace Jane Goodall urges reducing global population to 450 million, a 95% decrease from today. Population growth is the root cause of many problems we face. Solutions would be easier with a population size similar to 500 years ago. Source: [link] For more content, visit [link]. #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda
Video Transcript AI Summary
We should reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it contributes to many other problems. If our population size resembled that of 500 years ago, many of the challenges we face today would not exist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 2015 speech, former Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad warned about a globalist plan to reduce the world population to one billion. He suggested methods like mass killings, starvation, and birth prevention. For more content, visit wide-awake-media.com.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Speaking in 2015, former Malaysian prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad, warned us about the globalist plan to reduce the global population down to one billion people. "There will be a need to kill many billions of people, or to starve them to death, or to prevent them from giving birth, in order to reduce the population of this world." Full speech: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UGRkQiLxi3Q… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the concept of a new world order, where a single world government would be established by a group of wealthy and powerful elites. The idea is to abolish all states and borders, with these elites imposing their rules on everyone. Those who resist would face punishment, including propaganda, invasion, occupation, and sanctions. The ultimate goal is to reduce the world's population from 7 billion to 1 billion. The video suggests that this new world order would bring a false sense of peace, but at the cost of suffering and death for many.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The subject is the new world order. It is about having a world government. We should abolish all states, all nations, all borders, but instead have only 1 world government. And that world government is to be by certain people, elites, People who are very rich, very intelligent, very powerful in many ways, they are the ones who will govern the world. There was not much talk about democracy or choice of leaders.
Instead, There was to be a government by these elites who will impose their rules on everyone in this world. And for those who are unwilling to submit to them, there will be punishment. So we find that already there is a new world government enforced with powerful military forces and a willingness to subvert and undermine the governments of all countries. Politically, We see them urging every country to undergo regime change except for those who are already submitting to them. There must be regime change so that All governments in this world would submit to this world power, this world government.
And if you refuse to change your government, you will be persuaded through propaganda, through actions including invasion and occupation, and the removal of the hate of that government to be replaced by one that submits to the most powerful nation. In other words, the one who will accept the concept of a new world order. But that is not all. We find that if you are recalcitrant, You don't like to conform. Then you may have sanctions placed against you.
We see already countries like Iran and Russia facing the application of sanctions on their trade with other countries. We see all kinds of subversion taking place, undermining our moral values to the extent that we become helpless, unable to do anything. And the peace that we will get from this is the peace of the graveyard because the intention also is to reduce the number of people in this world. At the time when the new world order was enunciated, the population of this world was only 3,000,000,000. The intention was to reduce it to 1,000,000,000.
Now the population of the world is 7,000,000,000. There will be a need to kill many billions of people or to starve them to death or to prevent them from giving birth in order to reduce the population of this world. This is what is in store for most, for those who will suffer and die. There will be the peace of the grave.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a member of the Club of Rome, envisions a civil depopulation of the planet to one billion people, reducing today's population by 87.5%. The planet can sustain up to two billion people, depending on liberty and material consumption. More liberty and consumption require fewer people, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate even eight or nine billion. Source: youtu.be/Dbo6uvJBtZg. For similar content, visit wideawakemedia.com. #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #DepopulationAgenda
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Dennis Meadows, a prominent member of the Club of Rome, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to just one billion people—an 87.5% reduction from today's population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #DepopulationAgenda
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are currently consuming and populating the planet at unsustainable levels. I believe that this will eventually lead to a decline, and I hope it can happen peacefully. Peace doesn't mean everyone will be happy, but conflicts should be resolved without violence. The planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. If we want more freedom and consumption, we need fewer people. However, smart dictatorships with low living standards could support even more people. Ideally, we should aim for a slow and equal decline in population, avoiding a few wealthy individuals imposing solutions on others. These hopes may seem pessimistic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far, Goboy, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a special way, peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have?
If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8,000,000,000 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid.
So but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have it. But we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes.
I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But,
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a Club of Rome member, envisions a civil depopulation of the planet to one billion people, reducing today's population by 87.5%. The planet can sustain up to two billion people, depending on liberty and material consumption. More liberty and consumption require fewer people, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate eight or nine billion. Visit wideawakemedia.com for similar content. Check out the best-selling T-shirt collection at wideawakeclothing.com (discount code: TWITTER15).
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Dennis Meadows, a prominent member of the Club of Rome, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to just one billion people—an 87.5% reduction from today's population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #DepopulationAgenda
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that our current population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They express a desire for a peaceful and civil decline in population, where conflicts are resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. They mention that having more liberty and consumption requires fewer people, while a strong dictatorship with a low standard of living could accommodate a larger population. However, the speaker emphasizes the importance of freedom and a high standard of living. They hope for a slow and relatively equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing solutions on others. The speaker admits that these hopes may be pessimistic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far, Goboy, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a special way, peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have?
If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8,000,000,000 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid.
So but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have it. But we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes.
I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, that's that's what lies ahead.
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
T-shirt available here: https://wideawake.clothing/collections/best-sellers-tshirts?filter.v.price.gte=&filter.v.price.lte=&sort_by=best-selling Use discount code 'TWITTER15' for 15% off (first 20 customers only)!
Best Sellers (T-Shirts)
Some of our best selling t-shirts. Click here for our best selling hoodies.
wideawake.clothing
reSee.it AI Summary
UN Messenger of Peace Jane Goodall emphasizes the need to address global population growth. She suggests reducing the population to 450 million, a 95% decrease from today. Goodall believes many problems stem from overpopulation, which didn't exist 500 years ago. Source: [YouTube link]. For more content, visit [website]. #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs… Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda
Video Transcript AI Summary
We should reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it contributes to many other problems. If the population size resembled that of 500 years ago, the challenges we discuss would not be as significant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
reSee.it AI Summary
Renowned primatologist Jane Goodall, speaking at the World Economic Forum, suggests reducing the global population to 450 million, a drastic 95% decrease. Goodall believes that overpopulation is at the root of numerous global issues. She argues that addressing this problem is crucial for resolving other pressing challenges.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population. "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda
Video Transcript AI Summary
We should reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it contributes to many other problems. If the population size resembled that of 500 years ago, many of the challenges we face today would not exist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then, finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if There was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The rising concerns over depopulation are linked to the World Economic Forum's initiatives, raising questions about their global agendas. Whistle-blower Barry Young suggests a potential connection between Covid vaccines and increased mortality, prompting an investigation. Comparisons to Nazi ideology highlight the dangers of elitism in globalism. The devaluation of human life and disregard for ethics are reminiscent of the Nazis. We must challenge elitist notions and prioritize empathy and ethics in population and resource challenges. The infiltration of globalist groups into governments threatens sovereignty and democratic principles. Concentrated power in global entities undermines local needs and voices. The World Economic Forum's influence raises concerns about undemocratic decision-making.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Are the elitists really looking to reduce the Global population by 6 Billion people? Beyond Boundaries: The Perilous Intersection of Global Elitism and Population Control. The rising concerns about the ideology of depopulation are increasingly linked to the World Economic Forum's (WEF) initiatives, sparking debates over the implications of their global agendas and the potential impact on world population dynamics. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/LarryTaunton/status/1732037113254707512?s=20 In response to alarming revelations emerging from New Zealand, whistle-blower Barry Young has brought to light information that suggests a potentially disturbing connection between the Covid Vaccines and an unprecedented increase in all-cause mortality and excess deaths. This revelation raises urgent questions about the possibility of a sinister agenda by certain global entities. Could there be an intentional effort to significantly reduce the world's population under the guise of public health measures? Such a scenario necessitates a thorough and unbiased investigation into the implications of these findings and their potential global impact. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731365553632055464?s=20 As we navigate the complex and often murky waters of the global population control debate, it's crucial to contextualize this discussion within the broader historical narrative, particularly the chilling parallels with the ideologies espoused by the Nazis. This comparison not only highlights the dangers of elitist attitudes in modern globalism but also serves as a stark reminder of humanity's potential for darkness. The notion of population control, as advocated by figures like Dr. Dennis Meadows, who desires a peaceful and equitable reduction, superficially appears humane. Yet, beneath the surface of these propositions, there lurks a shadow of elitism, reminiscent of the most sinister chapters in human history. Meadows' statement, "I hope that population can be reduced peacefully, in a fair way that everyone can participate in the experience," though seemingly benign, inadvertently echoes a mindset that can quickly spiral into dangerous territory. This is where the haunting specter of Nazi ideology becomes relevant. The Nazis, driven by a perverted sense of elitism and superiority, embarked on one of the most horrific genocides in history, systematically exterminating millions whom they deemed 'unworthy' or 'inferior.' Their actions were underpinned by a chilling belief in racial purity and a deluded view of social engineering, which they believed would lead to an improved human race. The parallels between this and the contemporary rhetoric of elitism in globalist circles, where certain individuals deem themselves fit to decide the fate of populations, are unnervingly clear. Attempts to silence whistle-blower Barry Young.⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731632653290344862?s=20 The psychology behind such elitist views, whether in the context of Nazi Germany or modern globalism, reveals a disturbing willingness to devalue human life. This mindset, which reduces individuals to mere variables in a demographic equation, is dangerously akin to the dehumanizing policies of the Nazis. It reflects a lack of empathy and a disregard for the sanctity of human life, where people are categorized and valued based on arbitrary criteria set by a self-proclaimed elite. The moral implications of drawing parallels between the elitism in globalism and Nazi ideology are profound. They force us to confront uncomfortable truths about human nature and the ease with which a sense of superiority can lead to the justification of atrocities. This historical context serves as a warning of the potential consequences when extreme views on population control are allowed to go unchecked. Moving forward, it is essential to challenge the elitist notions within globalist agendas, advocating for an approach to population and resource challenges that respects human dignity and rights. Solutions must be grounded in empathy and ethics, not in cold calculations or the arrogant presumption of a select few. The lessons from history, especially the horrors perpetrated by the Nazis, must inform our approach, ensuring that respect for every human life remains at the forefront of our global discourse. Why did Jacinda Ardern exempt 11,000 politicians and doctors from getting the vaccine in secret?⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709827142148628638?s=20 We must not forget the involvement in one of the most influential Globalist movements namely the World Economic Forum led by Chairman Klaus Schwab. The infiltration of globalist groups into national governments poses significant risks, fundamentally threatening the sovereignty and democratic principles of nations. Such a scenario can lead to the erosion of local governance and the prioritization of international agendas over national interests. This shift of power can dilute the voices and needs of local populations, as policies are increasingly influenced by a global elite with their own set of priorities and objectives. Moreover, the concentration of power in the hands of a few global entities increases the risk of unchecked, undemocratic decision-making, potentially leading to policies that are not in the best interest of the citizens they are meant to serve. This not only undermines democratic values but also jeopardizes the cultural, social, and economic well-being of nations, creating a global landscape where the diversity of local needs and voices are overshadowed by a homogenized global agenda. Is the World Economic Forum a dangerous death cult?⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709159686325367167?s=20 #DepopulationAgenda #WEF2030Agenda #NewZealand #CovidVaccinations #VaccineInjuries #ExcessDeaths #Myocarditus #SuddenDeath #DiedSuddenly #JacindaArdern #KlausSchwab
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Barry Young: The Whistle-blower Who Stood Up for Transparency and Public Health Barry Young, a former employee of Te Whatu Ora, took a courageous stand. Disheartened by what he perceives as critical flaws in the national vaccination program, Young decided to act. He accessed…
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
#JacindaArdern former Prime Minister of #NewZealand pushed the vax like a cheap city block drug pusher while telling everyone that the Government was the only true source of information. However evidence has emerged that she and her Government decided they were exempt from…
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Is the World Economic Forum a Cult. The command and control of members of the World Economic Forum by sole Chairman #Klaus Schwab is increasingly being likened to that of a #Cult leader. Unelected Schwab has groomed young people and assisted by other powerful fellow cult…
@CaelorumAngelus - Angelus caelorum 🧣
🇺🇸David Rockefeller, in 1994, during an UN Ambassadors’ Dinner, just said casually that the “world population should be decreased by the UN in a way that is “sensible to religion and moral consideration” in another words: you will be eliminated as painless as possible.👇🏻 https://t.co/yDPVpWzphW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Improved public health has led to a 60% decline in infant mortality and an increase in average life expectancy from 46 to 63 years. However, this has resulted in a rapid population growth, reaching almost 6 billion people and potentially exceeding 6 billion by 2020. The negative impact of this growth on our ecosystems is evident, with increased exploitation of energy and water resources and dangerous levels of pollution. To ensure a decent life on our planet, nations must work together to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation. The recent UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, but controversies arose due to divisive issues with moral implications. The United Nations should play a crucial role in stabilizing population and promoting economic development while considering religious and moral values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me illustrate. Improved public health has caused the world's infant mortality rate to decline by 60% over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world's average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 19 fifties to 63 years today. This is a development of which, as individuals, we can only applaud. However, the result of these positive measures is a world population that has risen during the same short period of time geometrically to almost 6,000,000,000 people and could easily exceeds 6,000,000,000 by the year 2020.
The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. In particular, the rapid and growing exploitation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern, and the toxic byproducts of widespread industrialization have increased as atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle to these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth, but the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population, and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral consideration.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a member of the Club of Rome, suggests a significant reduction in the global population to ensure sustainability. He believes the planet can support around one to two billion people, depending on the desired level of liberty and material consumption. Meadows implies that fewer people are necessary for greater freedom and consumption, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate a larger population.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Key Club of Rome member, Dennis Meadows, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to one billion—an 87.5% reduction from today’s population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have." "If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://www.wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that the global population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They express a desire for a peaceful and civil decline in population, where conflicts are resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. They mention that a strong dictatorship could potentially support 8 to 9 billion people, but it is not desirable due to the lack of freedom and low standard of living. The speaker hopes for a slow and equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing solutions on others. They admit that these hopes may be pessimistic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet, that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a, a civil way. And I mean civil in a in a special way. Peaceful.
Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have? If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. Conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart.
Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So, But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a but but we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience, and then you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it.
So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, that's that's what lies ahead.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Ted Turner, in an interview 15 years ago, suggested that a population decline of 95% to 250-300 million people would be ideal to address overpopulation and climate change. However, the author questions the motives behind such proposals and criticizes the ideas put forth by Turner and others, suggesting an anti-human agenda.
@Inversionism - Inversionism
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." - Ted Turner This interview with Charlie Rose was from 15 years ago, and he said that the changes needed to be made to save humanity from impending collapse from overpopulation and climate change would need to come in the next 15-20 years and require global cooperation from every country. Well it's 15 years later and we're still here, listening to the same criminal eugenicists like Ted argue for reduced consumption of meat, more abortions, geoengineering and solar radiation management programs to block the sun, worsening fertility, and all the other anti-human agenda goals iterated by the WEF and their degenerate colleagues. The one question that always lingers in my mind is whether or not these people actually believe the words coming out of their mouth and that overpopulation is the problem, or if there is another subversive evil motivation behind the push beyond just saving the earth.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the credit crisis and believes it is a mess because people borrowed too much money on their houses. They emphasize the importance of having equity in one's home and saving money. They also talk about the need to mobilize and change the energy system to combat global warming. They mention the potential benefits of this change, such as job creation and clean air. The speaker warns that not taking action will lead to catastrophic consequences like extreme heat, crop failure, and societal breakdown. They compare not addressing these issues to committing suicide. The speaker expresses optimism that the world can come to its senses and make the necessary changes for the sake of future generations. They use a baseball analogy to illustrate the need to hold the opposition and score runs to win the game. They call for smart political leaders and criticize ineffective leadership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you think of the credit crisis we're in now?
Speaker 1: You know, I think it's a mess.
Speaker 0: And why is it a mess?
Speaker 1: Well, I because I think what happened is people were borrowing too much money on their houses. I I you know? Doing that. I don't my house is paid for. I mean, it has been.
I mean, I I I don't believe you know, I think having equity in your home is a good thing. I I don't believe in spending every penny. Yeah. When I was making $80 a week after taxes were taken out of 20 when I was 21. I saved $10 a week and lived on $70.
I mean, I've I've always saved. I I believe that was the thing. That was one of my father taught me that too.
Speaker 0: What's possible? Tell me what's possible to do that
Speaker 1: in 15 or 20 years, we could completely redo it. If we we have to mobilize if this is how important it is and and how how how important that we do it quickly. We have to mobilize the same way we did when we entered World War 2 in 1941. We have to fully mobilize everything we have and put it into changing the energy system over and not just here in the United States but all over the world. It's gonna be the business business biggest business project in the history of the world.
Fortunes, 1,000,000,000 of dollars are gonna be made. Hundreds of thousands of people were gonna be employed. We're gonna have clean air. We're gonna have so many benefits from it. It's not gonna cost us anything.
Like, once we get going with it, it's not gonna cost us anything. Only the people that don't don't understand it think it's gonna not doing it will be catastrophic. Will have 8 degrees will be 8 degrees hotter in 10 not 10, but in 30 or 40 years. And basically, none of the crops will grow, most of people who have died and the rest of us will be cannibals. Civilization will have broken down.
What the few people left will be living in a in a failed state like Somalia or Sudan, and and living conditions will be intolerable. The droughts will be so bad. There'll be no more corn growing. It it will not doing it is suicide. Just like dropping bombs on each other, nuclear weapons is suicide.
So we've gotta stop doing the 2 suicidal things, which are hanging on to our nuclear weapons And
Speaker 0: global
Speaker 1: and and then after that, we've got to we've got to stabilized the population. When I was born, there
Speaker 0: was too What's wrong with the population? I mean
Speaker 1: With too many people. That's what that's why we have global warming. We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff. But they If there were less people, they'd be using less stuff. If we don't get global warming and the nuclear weapons tried that we don't have to worry about human rights.
Well, all the humans will all be gone.
Speaker 0: You know? Okay. Do you think we'll do it? I mean, are you optimistic in the end
Speaker 1: I have country
Speaker 0: that the world will come to its senses?
Speaker 1: Behalf of my grandchildren and the children all over the world, I absolutely think we gotta do it, but I have a way of explaining it very simply. I see a human situation I like into a baseball game. It's in the 7th inning, and we're down by 1 run. What so we're backs to are to the
Speaker 0: wall. Right.
Speaker 1: What we have to do though in the next 2 innings, the game's not over. It's still winnable.
Speaker 0: But what we've got
Speaker 1: to do is hold them right where they are with our best pitcher.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: And we've got to get a couple runs on the base.
Speaker 0: Get a man on the base.
Speaker 1: And then get them in. Get them in. And that ties it, and then another run to go ahead, and we win. That's where we are. We're we're in a tough situation, but we can play our way out of it if we do the right things.
It's time for smart political leaders. No more dummies. We can't afford dumb
Speaker 0: leadership.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a member of the Key Club of Rome, believes that the planet can only sustain a population of one to two billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. He suggests that reducing the population is necessary for more liberty and consumption, but emphasizes the importance of achieving this in a civil manner.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Key Club of Rome member, Dennis Meadows, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to one billion—an 87.5% reduction from today’s population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have." "If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Globally, our population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. I anticipate a decline, but I hope it happens peacefully. Peace doesn't mean everyone will be happy, but conflicts should be resolved without violence. The planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. If we want more freedom and consumption, we need fewer people. Ideally, we should aim for a slow and equal decline to around 1 billion people. This way, everyone shares the experience and avoids a few wealthy individuals imposing their will on others. These hopes may seem pessimistic, but that's what lies ahead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet, that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way. And I mean civil in a in a special way. Peaceful.
Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, The planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have? If If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart.
Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships, they're always stupid. So, but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a, but But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share, the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes.
I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, I mean, that's that's what lies ahead.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a member of the Club of Rome, suggests that the planet can sustain a population of one to two billion people, depending on the desired level of liberty and material consumption. He believes that achieving this reduction can be done peacefully. Meadows also mentions that a stronger dictatorship could potentially accommodate a larger population.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Club of Rome member, Dennis Meadows, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to one billion—an 87.5% reduction from today’s population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have." "If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg Follow my backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to me on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to my newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Globally, we are consuming more than the planet can sustain, and it will eventually come crashing down. The speaker hopes for a peaceful decline in population and consumption, where conflicts are resolved without violence. They believe the planet can support around 1-2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. However, having a smart dictatorship with a low standard of living could accommodate even more people. Ideally, the decline should be slow and equal, ensuring that everyone shares the experience rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing their will. These hopes may seem pessimistic, but that's what the future holds.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet, that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a in a special way. Peaceful. Peace doesn't mean, that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways.
And so, that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people? Maybe 2,000,000,000 depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart.
Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So, But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a but but we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1,000,000,000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, so that people share the experience, and then you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it.
So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, that's that's what lies ahead.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
The globalist depopulation agenda https://t.co/62qpN14Gfk
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how to reduce CO2 emissions by focusing on factors like population control and energy efficiency. They mention concerns about a globalist agenda to depopulate the world and the resistance from groups like Dutch farmers. The speaker also touches on potential food shortages, political tensions, and the need for a worldwide people's revolution against oppressive forces. Stand up against evil now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Has four factors, a little bit of multiplication. So you've got a thing on the left, c o two, that you wanna get to 0, and that's gonna be based on the number of people, the services each person's using on average, the energy on average for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let's look at each one of these and see how we can get this down to 0. Probably one of these numbers is gonna have to get pretty near to 0. That's back from a high school algebra, but let's let's take a look.
First, we've got population. The world today has 6,800,000,000 people. That's headed up to about 9,000,000,000. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services. We could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%.
Speaker 1: Many believed that Bill Gates somehow misspoke when he attributed successful depopulation to the vaccines, but it's now evident that he didn't. He was being very clear about the intentions of the globalist agenda. Kill 99.99 percent of all humans. According to these psychopaths, this is how we will save the planet, and they have convinced an overwhelming amount of the world's population into accepting their agenda and pushing for it. People who believe that humans need to be aborted and believe the human race needs to be called into a small compliance herd.
People that are okay with billions of people starving so long as the screens on their devices tell them it's the right thing to do. But not everyone has gone insane. Some still have a survival instinct. When the Dutch government voted in a scheme that will force farmers to cut their livestock down to unsustainable levels, thereby forcing them out of work and shutting down the 2nd biggest food in the world. The farmers did the right thing and said no, and protests have broken out all throughout the Netherlands.
Shutting down the world's 2nd biggest food exporter is all part of the anti human zero emissions plan. And so the Dutch farmers aren't just protesting losing their jobs. They are protesting the mass murder of the world's population. Just like the Canadian truckers and farmers did last winter and just like the Canadian police sided with the tyrants, the Dutch cops are doing the same. Police drawing their side arms on peaceful protesters and opening fire on them.
Speaker 0: Rio, hey. Vampers. Hey. What are they doing? What are they there?
Speaker 1: Using undercover agents and provoking violence to shut down peaceful gatherings. Because the globalists are not taking no for an answer. And while you may back the blue, chances are that they won't back you when it comes to the globalist agenda, which has now enlisted a list celebrities to convince us all to eat bugs. I'm Nicole Kidman, and I am going to eat a 4 course meal of bugs. They're trying to persuade us into dying peacefully like good obedient slaves.
But soon, the food will start to run out. And worse, more signs of kinetic world war on the horizon as Japan's longest standing prime minister Shinzo Abe is assassinated. And former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev joins president Putin in threatening nuclear annihilation
Speaker 0: if
Speaker 1: the United States continues their provocations, which is exactly what the extinction rebellion wants, and it's what the Biden administration wants. It's what everyone in charge wants. The only way out of this is a worldwide people's revolution. The Dutch farmers have begun, and they have been joined by people from other nations. The revolution will not be televised.
And if you want to stand up against evil, then now is the time.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Club Of Rome Unveils Plan To Cull Billions From The World Population This globalist cult wants every last human dead to reduce that pesky CO2 so they can have the planet all to themselves. https://t.co/DS9li8tn0P
Video Transcript AI Summary
Companies and governments need to prioritize long-term sustainability peacefully. Agriculture must play a key role in achieving net zero emissions by 2050. Transitioning to a low-energy lifestyle is crucial for a sustainable future. TerraPower is developing a nuclear power plant to combat climate change. The push for net zero faces challenges from coal use in China and India. Iodine deficiency is a major global issue addressed by X3 iodine supplement. Visit infowarsstore.com for discounted products supporting the broadcast.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It will be a big revolution to bring companies and governments to really give importance to the long term. That would be a revolution. I hope that it can occur in a a a civil way. I I and I mean civil in a peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through to force.
Speaker 1: We can't get to net zero. We don't get this job done unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution. I
Speaker 0: mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship and a low standard of living. You can have a buddy. But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're gonna have a 1,000,000,000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. So a key issue here is the speed of the decline.
We hope for a slow decline because that gives you time to adjust. So a a key question is what is the force that we're trying to adjust to? And if we know the speed, then that tells us something about kind of revolution we need. So we need personal revolutions. We need people to reimagine a lifestyle which, requires much less energy and material.
A minister of, let's say, agriculture would do something which actually makes the farming situation seem worse in the That would be a a hard revolution. We we need all of those, kinds of things.
Speaker 2: The British government with their top universities and government institutions has put out a report called absolute zero where they don't wanna just have net zero increase in carbon or lower it to a previous state. They wanna get rid of all carbon, which humans are.
Speaker 3: But because we need to get to 0 emissions by 2050, we have to come
Speaker 1: up with an alternate way, which isn't too much more expensive
Speaker 4: to perform those same activities without emitting any greenhouse gases. People began to talk about a world in which greenhouse gas emissions and greenhouse gas removals balanced each other out so that the overall effect was net 0.
Speaker 5: We'll need to go from a world economy that pumps out on the order of 40,000,000,000 tons of c o two a year to one that sucks down, that is removes billions of tons per year in the future to get to that net zero future.
Speaker 2: Bill Gates and his 17 year old energy company, TerraPower, are planning their first cutting edge nuclear power plant.
Speaker 3: So this company TerraPower that, I'm I'm very involved in, it is talking with Chinese partners. It's signed, some, agreements where the pilot plant, there's a good chance it will be built first in China, but then it will be for global usage. I don't use some of the, less proven, approaches. Such as? I don't plant trees.
Speaker 4: Some people would even say
Speaker 6: that if you just planted enough trees, it could take care of the climate issue altogether. And that's complete nonsense. Okay.
Speaker 3: I mean, are we the science people or are we the idiots? Like, which one do we wanna be?
Speaker 7: 50 years ago, nearly everybody considered unlimited growth as the only pathway to greater prosperity for all. And then there came a group of young scientists and showed that there are indeed limits to growth. That truly was a revolution.
Speaker 0: If we begin making really drastic changes, we can reverse, the growth pressures and try to bring the system back down under the capacity, which can be supported, by the planet.
Speaker 8: But we don't burn coal anymore because we didn't just close down our coal fired power stations. We blew them up. At the same time, China is, even as we speak, building the equivalent of 2 new coal fired power stations a week. India has a vast expansion program of coal fired power stations. Everything that we do is completely blotted out by what other much larger countries are doing to maintain their own power.
Now if you want to live in a country with net zero, if you want to live in a country where nobody can afford to heat their house, where people have incredibly expensive and largely non functioning heat pumps inflicted on them, if you want lots of people to lose their jobs because there's no energy, if you wanna be cold all the time, if you want the computers which make life possible, in fact, every form of life, to shut down every so often, then carry on believing that the the the the demand to to to go for net zero, to keep it in the ground is intelligent and thoughtful.
Speaker 2: It it's it's so nightmarish that it it's it's just hard to describe, what they're doing other than total futilism, the end of civilization.
Speaker 3: Can you explain a little bit about how this, technology works? Okay. Basically And then you're just among friends here. Yeah. Absolutely.
Speaker 2: You shouldn't purchase the products at infowarsstore.com just because it keeps us on the air. You should get these products because they are game changing. Everybody knows our information. It's some of the most hardcore accurate intel on the planet. Well, our products are absolutely no different.
They are amazing. They are the missing links people need. And of all the deficiencies that are out there, one of the biggest problems on the planet is iodine deficiency. Just look up iodine deficiency on Wikipedia. More than 2,000,000,000 people that UN estimates have major cognitive disabilities because they haven't had iodine.
It is essential in all electrochemical activity in the body, but most iodine in plants or in meat is bound to other compounds or other elements. So you don't get the full absorption. Not with x 3. It has all 3 of the healthy types of iodine in it. The good halogens, the deep earth crystal, pure nascent iodine, and then 2 other types the scientists tell us help with absorption.
X3 has been sold out for 6 months. It's now back in stock for 40% off at infowarsstore.com and it funds the broadcast and everything else we do. So I wanna encourage you all to get your X3 for 40% off now at infowarsstore.com. Takes about 2 weeks to kick in, but almost everybody has incredible results. Separately, we have another great product, 10 hour clean energy, turbo force available discounted at infowarsstore.com as well.
It's discounted as well despite the fact we're about to sell out. So whether it's X3 Next Level Iodine or whether it's TurboForce 10 hours of energy, they're both available discounted right now atimpolewarstore.com. It funds the broadcast, and it's game changing. Take action now.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
David Rockefeller states that controlling the world population growth is the Elite's top agenda. https://t.co/847qik4ocf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns over energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened.
The UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, highlighting the difficulty of addressing divisive issues with moral dimensions. The United Nations should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth, essential for improving living standards, poses environmental threats without careful coordination.
The Rio de Janeiro conference addressed sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but requires regulation by governments and international bodies. The United Nations should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. The rapid growing exploitation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern and the toxic byproducts of widespread industrialization have increased us atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension.
The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is, of course, an in inevitable corollary of a growing population and is essential to improve standards of living. But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment 2 years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth and global development.
It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, But regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations should certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
David Rockefeller talking about population control https://t.co/DmKbbUbXNJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Innovations improving human well-being are also creating significant challenges for our biosphere. While public health advancements have reduced infant mortality by 60% and increased life expectancy from 46 to 63 years, the global population has surged to nearly 6 billion, potentially reaching 8 billion by 2020. This rapid growth strains ecosystems, leading to overexploitation of resources and heightened pollution. The recent UN meeting in Cairo highlighted the urgent need to address population growth and its moral implications. The UN must facilitate a balance between stabilizing population and promoting economic development, while considering religious and moral factors. Sustainable growth, discussed at the Rio de Janeiro conference, requires both private sector efficiency and regulatory oversight from governments and international bodies, with the UN playing a crucial coordinating role.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ironically, however, the very innovations that are making possible dramatic improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems, which raise the specter of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster to the biosphere we live in. And herein lies the dilemma that we all face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health has caused the world's infant mortality rate to decline by 60% over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world's average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 19 fifties to 63 years today.
This is a development which, as individuals, we can only applaud. However, the result of these positive measures is a world population that has risen during the same short period of time geometrically to almost 6,000,000,000 people and could easily exceed 6,000,000,000 8,000,000,000 by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. The rapid and growing exploitation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern, and the toxic byproducts of widespread industrialization have increased as atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened.
The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth. But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is, of course, an inevitable corollary of a growing population and is essential to improve standards of living. But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment.
This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment 2 years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth and global development. It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, But regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations should certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.
@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser
The depopulation agenda exposed. https://t.co/qB5oI53pwQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Synthetic molecules do not serve the living. Medicines, defined as registered and patented items with synthetic molecules, are decimating the human family. This is intentional, using synthetic molecules designed as cancer aids for sterilization and population control. The goal, as Bill Gates stated, is to eliminate at least three billion people, starting in Africa, because they're considered deplorable and worthless. Multilateral agencies and health authorities appear to be weaponized and colluding against living people. This isn't bacterial warfare; it's systemic poisoning, a chemical war against everyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One question for me. Where does any synthetic molecules serve the living?
Speaker 1: They don't.
Speaker 0: Right. I mean, none. And am I right in suggesting that a medicine, by definition, is something which contains synthetic molecules? Something that that is registered, patented, and put into the market as a medicine?
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
Speaker 0: Right. So what I'm learning from you, doctor Young, is that a quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us decimating, culling the human family.
Speaker 1: Intentionally.
Speaker 0: Intentionally, using synthetic molecules which by design are cancer aids, all
Speaker 1: of them could dream Yes. For the purpose of sterilization and population control. There's too many people on the planet we need to get rid of. In the words of Bill Gates, at least three billion people need to die. So we'll just start off in Africa.
We'll start doing our research there and we'll eliminate most most of the Africans because they're deplorable. They're worthless. They're not part of this world economy. So they have their rights taken away and they're suppressed and they're experimented.
Speaker 0: And the multilateral agencies and the health and regulatory so called authorities and agencies appear in the main to have become weaponized and appear, I again use the word appear advisedly, we're not casting judgments here, we're taking depositions, listening to expert testimonies, appear to be weaponized and appear to be working in collusion against the living men and women of the soil. Is that a fair statement?
Speaker 1: It is. It's it's not it's not a it's not a bacterial war. It's a systemic poisoning war. And they're using chemical warfare against all of us.
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
‼️⚠️The Depopulation Plan⚠️‼️ Dr. Vernon Coleman👇 https://t.co/gxuJlfitjJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In June 2025, the speaker claims a conspiracy aims to reduce the world's population by 90%. Global warming myths, immigration, the end of medicine, destruction of farming, and economic issues are allegedly part of this plan. UK farmers are paid to rewild land, increasing food prices and hunger. Energy prices rise due to net zero policies, and wars divert money to arms.
Vaccines are given without regard for side effects, even when dangers are apparent. Drug companies control governments and the medical establishment. The depopulation plan aims for world control via net zero and the Great Reset, saving money on pensions and healthcare. The Liverpool Care Pathway and DNR notices are cited as examples of legalized murder.
The COVID-19 pandemic was a hoax to deliberately murder old people in care homes using midazolam and morphine. Attempts to reveal this fraud were suppressed. Euthanasia is being promoted globally, and rules will be abandoned, making it available to the anxious, depressed, disabled, unemployed, and poor. The speaker claims governments are destroying palliative care to push people towards euthanasia, and doctors are wrongly told that prescribing drugs affects global warming. He urges people to read his books, distrust the government, avoid mass media, and fight the lies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's June 2025, and this is video number 339. There is, in case you hadn't noticed, a plan to reduce the world's population by nine tenths. Almost everything that is happening, and these days nothing happens by accident or coincidence, is driven by that conspiracy. Sadly, too many people assume that all these things are a result of individual occurrences of incompetence, greed, or stupidity. They are not.
We are all victims and prisoners to be of the world they have designed for us. A world being prepared with malignant contempt rather than quiet respectful humanity. The global warming myths, massive immigration programmes, the end of medicine, the destruction of farming, and economies around the world are all part of the plan. Farmers in The UK are being paid £250 per acre not to grow food, but to use their land to grow nettles, brambles, a few wild flowers. It's called rewilding, and the aim is to push up food prices and increase the number of people dying of hunger.
Food prices around the world have soared and countless millions in Africa have already died. Energy prices have soared too as the absurd and unnecessary net zero campaign has progressed. Millions die of cold as a result. What a pity global warming isn't real and we could all have some sunshine. Wars are spreading and huge amounts of money are being diverted into arms and armed forces often without good reason.
Vaccines are promoted and given in huge numbers without much effort to examine side effects and dangers. Even when dangers are clearly apparent as with the COVID nineteen vaccine, doctors ignore the warnings and continue to jab patients by the thousand. Many doctors didn't have the jab themselves, but they've happily taken huge sums of money to give the vaccine to their trusting patients. Drug companies are crooked. It's what they do best.
But the companies have corrupted governments and they now own the medical establishment. The aim of the depopulation plan is to gain control of the world, set up a world government and lead us via the horrors of net zero into the wilderness of the great reset. A subsidiary aim is to save money by dramatically cutting the amount of money spent on pensions, benefits, welfare, and medical care. We've entered our own killing fields, and this is truly the slaughter of the innocent. It began with the Liverpool Care Pathway, one of the most shameful and inhumane programmes ever introduced in medicine.
It was simple enough. Patients whom doctors or nurses thought were too old were literally starved of food and drink. They were denied medicines they needed too. Doctors and nurses who were employed to save patients were doing the opposite. It was legalized murder.
The Liverpool Care Pathway was condemned, but it still continues. The problem with it, as far as the establishment was concerned, was it could only be applied to the elderly and the very ill. And so then came the introduction of do not resuscitate, DNR notices. Death sentences slammed on the medical records of countless millions of patients. When DNR notices were introduced, the idea was to temper scientific advances with a little genuine kindness and concern for the welfare of patients.
Medical science had reached a point whereby patients could be kept alive long after real hope had disappeared. In the beginning, DNR notices were introduced with good intentions. The idea was that patients who were dying and beyond help would not be resuscitated time and time again, simply delaying the inevitable and putting comatose patients and distraught relatives through endless pain. Around the world, millions of comatose and brain dead patients would still be alive today, kept breathing by machines and without hope of recovery, if the principle of DNR had not been quietly introduced. But today, do not resuscitate notices are routinely slapped on the medical note of patients who are awaiting surgery for entirely curable problems or who are simply old, by which they mean they're over 50.
Or disabled or ill or suffering from mental illness. Even young adults and children have been labelled do not resuscitate, if a doctor or nurse felt that their lives were in some way worthless. The medical establishment had by then deliberately and cold bloodedly taken the caring out of medicine. But the decline in caring came to a head during the COVID fraud. It was then that the medical establishment decided that the Liverpool care pathway wasn't killing people fast enough and that the DNR notices just weren't, fast enough either.
Most people became aware that doctors were deliberately killing their patients during the COVID lockdowns of twenty twenty, when doctors began systematically, deliberately and cold bloodedly murdering old people in care homes using a kill shot injection, consisting of midazolam and morphine. What else do you call it but murder when patients are deliberately killed to save money? As I warned in February and March of twenty twenty, the alleged COVID pandemic was a hoax. The science and the statistics showed that COVID was nothing more than a remarketed annual flu. It was no surprise that in 2020, there was no official flu.
That's because everyone who had COVID actually had the flu. People forget that worldwide, up to six hundred thousand people can die in an annual flu season. Governments around the world try to fiddle the figures to show that COVID was killing millions. It wasn't. People who died of heart attacks or cancer or accidents in the street were all put down as COVID victims.
As everyone now knows, it was a massive fraud. The extra deaths were a result of the lockdowns, which were never never justified, and later the toxic vaccine, which I had warned was coming right at the start of 2020. It was obvious too that they tried to make it compulsory. The mass murder of the elderly was part of the depopulation plan. In March 2020, doctors said that they would simply refuse to see or treat old people.
One GP told a care home manager that no one over the age of 75 would be admitted to hospital. Referrals by GPs for suspected cancer fell by seventy percent as doctors abandoned their patients and their responsibilities. As the number of pensioners dying increased, government ministers openly boasted of the huge amounts of money that those they were saving. They were saving on pensions that they didn't have to pay, and they were saving on medical care. The slaughter of the innocent, which occurred during 2020, was nothing more or less than a form of genocide.
During the COVID lockdowns launched in celebration of the remarketed, rebranded annual flu in 2020, thousands of old people were murdered. And that's not hyperbole. Thousands of elderly people were isolated from their families and friends and then deliberately murdered with kill shots of morphine and a benzodiazepine. The argument was that old people had to be kept out of hospitals so that the staff would be free to deal with younger patients who were suffering from COVID. I made a number of videos about the murders taking place in hospitals around the world back in 2020, and they were murders.
What else do you call it when people are deliberately killed? Murder's murder, whether it's committed by a man with a gun or a nurse with a syringe. In fact, as is well known, doctors and nurses had so little to do during the COVID hoax that they spent their time rehearsing TikTok dance routines while the innocent, while the innocent elderly were being slaughtered. Specially built hospitals designed to cope with the avalanche of COVID patients were left empty and unused. Politicians boasted about the money that was being saved by killing off pensioners.
Attempts to tell the truth about the deliberate cold blooded fraud were suppressed by media organisations such as YouTube and the BBC, the staff of which will, in due course, be tried en masse for genocide, at least I hope so. I wouldn't trust medical advice by anyone now offering their views on these or any other mainstream channel. And now euthanasia, global doctor assisted suicide, mercy killing, or whatever you want to call it, is being promoted globally. You know something's planned and bad when it's sudden and global. Every country which has introduced a euthanasia program of any kind has effectively abandoned any pretence at civilization.
The people who promote euthanasia claim that there will be rules and regulations and restrictions which will ensure that only the terminally ill will be accepted for death by doctor. They talk of compassion and kindness, and they've done everything they can to try to grab the moral high ground. Though the idea that any government would do anything designed to make people's lives better is sadly laughable. But I'm afraid that their intentions are built more on ignorance than kindness. Some supporting the plans for euthanasia have actually said that individuals should be allowed to die if they feel they have become a burden.
Whenever and wherever euthanasia is introduced, the rules are abandoned or changed. It is not long before the service being promoted is available to the anxious, the depressed, the disabled, the unemployed, and the poor. It will be available to the young and to the old, and it will be available to teenagers who are feeling down. More than half The UK population is officially a burden on the state. In other words, they receive more money in benefits than they pay in tax.
They are the primary target of the government's plan to start the mass slaughter of citizens. No one promoting euthanasia or suicide by doctor seems to know or care that nine out of ten people who attempt suicide but fail subsequently live long successful lives and regret having tried to kill themselves? And how many of those supporting euthanasia have taken the time to read the paper entitled high rates of psych Psychiatric Co morbidity Among Requestors of Medical Assistance in Dying Results of a Canadian Prevalence Study. The paper occurred back in 2021 and the researchers concluded patients with psycho comorbidity comprise a substantial proportion of patients requesting medical assistance in dying. The initial idea is always that euthanasia will be available only to patients who are at the end of a very long process of dying.
The idea is that those patients will be liberated from their pain and suffering and will be allowed to die in quiet dignity. But that's not what happens. That's definitely not what happens. Look at every country which has introduced euthanasia. Look at Canada where people are being murdered because they're jobless and poor and without hope.
People are being killed for social reasons. Euthanasia will be available for patients with mental illness in 2027. Children with autism, Asperger's and ADHD will be quietly euthanized. Schoolchildren who are miserable will be quietly euthanized without their parents' knowledge or consent. And it is, of course, all about money.
Killing patients isn't about kindness, it's about saving money, and it's part of a well documented plan to reduce the size of the world's population down to 500,000,000. There's no doubt that killing the long term sick saves a lot of money. A Canadian Armed Forces veteran who was injured in Afghanistan has reported how at least six veterans in Canada have been offered euthanasia after asking for help. One asked for care and received a letter saying, if it's too difficult for you to continue living, madam, we can offer you medical assistance in dying. One veteran called a crisis hotline and was offered assisted suicide as a solution.
And this is already happening in The UK. A 25 year old veteran was in crisis and asked for help. A doctor in The UK suggested assisted dying. In The UK, it's been claimed a euthanasia program will save millions for the government and doubtless enable it to spend more money on bullets and bombs to kill more people. Modern politicians save money by killing people and then use the money they've saved to kill more people.
Providing decent palliative care for those who are dying would be kinder, gentler, and more in keeping with the tradition of healing. But why cure people or just care for them when you can just kill them instead? That's the official policy. The government doesn't admit this, but the biggest advantage of the official death by doctor scheme will be the billions which will be saved by cutting the benefits and pensions bills. Euthanasia has been promoted worldwide, and although the process always begins with some caveats, it doesn't take long for suicide to be freely recommended to the elderly, the mentally ill, the disabled, the poor and the unemployed.
When patients are diagnosed with a serious illness, the thing that will happen is that they'll be invited to avoid all their problems, save the nation money and join the waiting list for death. Of course, there'll be a waiting list for death. This is happening under the auspices of the National Health Service of course. This is already happening with the DNR scheme too. Doctors and nurses lie to patients and tell them resuscitation is always painful and that it's better for them to die if they develop an infection for example.
Killing patients or just letting them die is officially part of the medical establishment's response to the global warming myth. Read my book The End of Medicine if you want to know more. The lack of decent pain relief means that some patients will choose euthanasia because they're frightened of being in pain. Evidence shows that patients in genuine need of pain relief do not become addicted, as some doctors claim. Additionally, some doctors are refusing to prescribe painkillers because they have been wrongly told that global warming comes and patients' needs come The argument is that doctors should stop prescribing because drugs are affecting global warming.
This is patently dangerous cultist nonsense. But without painkillers, more people will opt for the government approved euthanasia option in whichever country they live. The problems with euthanasia are legion. It isn't painless and it isn't fast. Patients can wake up after being given a lethal dose.
How is this going to work? But the bottom line is that the demand for euthanasia will increase as medical care becomes worse and waiting lists get longer. Both things which are happening very rapidly. Millions of patients in The UK will now die before they receive the treatment they need. Is this being done deliberately to push them into choosing euthanasia?
The idea of patients dying in agony is grossly exaggerated for the purpose of promoting death by doctor. No one need ever be in intractable pain. Pain control is available and can free patients and often give them more life than they knew they had, or that the authorities would allow them. Patients are only in unbearable pain if their pain control isn't being managed properly. The fear that painkillers will cause addiction is a nonsense, for it's been shown, as I said, that patients in genuine pain don't become addicted.
The real problem today is that a clique of cultists within the medical establishment, who mistakenly believe that prescribing drugs contributes to global warming, have encouraged doctors to cut back on their prescribing. And remember, governments everywhere are deliberately and cold bloodedly destroying palliative care. Hospices are closing because changes mean that they can't afford to stay open. Hospices are closing because of government policies and tax rules. Without hospices, patients are left with nowhere to go except to opt for euthanasia.
That's the plan. Close the hospices and push the sick, the depressed and the elderly into one of the state's death rooms. Palliative care is already difficult to find and governments are withdrawing aid. The result, as governments know, will be a greater demand for euthanasia. Anyone who really thinks that euthanasia is painless needs to do a little research because it isn't.
Proponents of the euthanasia bill claim that it'll be offered to those suffering from a terminal illness. When I was a GP, I had two patients who were diagnosed as having terminal cancer. Both lived for more than a decade after they'd been abandoned by hospitals. Both had strong reasons for staying alive. Older GPs who, like me, practiced in a different time could tell you similar stories.
There's much talk these days about terminal illness. The words are used as though there comes a point when there is no hope and nothing can be done. But that isn't true. When doctors use the words 'you're going to die', what they really mean is we don't know what else to do, we have no treatment left that we can use. Remember, it is impossible to know when a patient is terminally ill.
When doctors say there isn't any more we can do, they don't mean that the patient is going to die, they mean they don't know what else to do. No doctor can possibly say to a patient you've got six months to live. No one should make predictions like that. I've known patients live for many years after they've been told they were close to death. When doctor says that patient has three months, six months or twelve months to live, they're merely guessing.
And although their guess may sometimes be based on past experience, it's as likely to be wrong as right. Moreover, remember doctors particularly the ones in white coats have a negative placebo effect or a positive placebo effect depending on what they're saying. If a doctor gives a patient a sugar pill and says with enthusiasm that the pill will cure them, then there's a good chance that the patient will recover. If a doctor says to a patient, You're going to die, then the very words will have an impact. There isn't much difference between a doctor in a white coat and a voodoo witch doctor dressed in feathers.
It's no coincidence that medical care is being dramatically reduced at the same time as euthanasia is being promoted. So, for example, asthma patients are being told that the treatment they've used for years must be stopped because it affects global warming. The incidence of sepsis is soaring as doctors refuse to prescribe antibiotics because once again they've been convinced that antibiotics will make global warming worse. Doctors have been told to stop investigating, diagnosing and treating illness because they must put the myth of global warming above the interests of real patients. Why doctors believe this dangerous nonsense is a mystery, but it's happening.
To find out precisely why and how doctors are deliberately killing their patients, please do read my book The End of Medicine. And if you want to know the truth about euthanasia, read my free book called The Big Kill. It's available to download on my website www.vernantcoleman.com, which is free and contains no adverts or sponsors. You should know that the Nazis ran a euthanasia program for a while, and after a short period, Adolf Hitler abandoned it because he considered it to be morally indefensible. Today, the global depopulation plan is real, and you are the target.
During the last few decades, the major progress in medicine has come not in saving people, but in killing them. The Liverpool Care Pathway, the Do Not Resuscitate notices, the kill shots and euthanasia. We're living and dying in strange and frightening times. If you want to keep in touch in future, please do so by visiting vernalandcolman.com. No adverts, no fees and roam twenty four hours a day, seven days a week.
You're always very welcome. The website's often blocked and hidden, so if you have difficulty getting through, please try again. Finally, remember, distrust the government, avoid mass media, and fight the lies. And thank you for watching an old man in a chair.
@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser
Dr. Bryan Ardis exposes the depopulation agenda. https://t.co/o3MfQOwfaO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that there is a depopulation agenda between now and 2050. They argue that if a plan were to make a massive portion of the global population sick and lockdown people, the only things people can control entering their homes are water. They claim water treatment for drinking and showering uses proprietary blends, including a protein called e carol, described as a snake venom component that elicits blood clotting. The speaker urges viewers to look for venom and asserts that they are poisoning us, specifically pointing to the water. They state that there is no part of me that even questions whether or not they're poisoning us in water. To keep a family healthy, they conclude, you must ensure the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the food you eat are clean.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is my belief and my awareness that there is a depopulation agenda between now and the year 2050. If you were gonna make a massive amount of people around the entire globe sick, if you're gonna do that, and at the same time, you're gonna lock them down, what do they have control of going into your home while you're locked down in the home? Water. Water. You can actually see for our water treatment that we drink and we shower in in their proprietary blends.
They include a protein called e carol. That is a snake venom component that elicits blood clotting. You need to go look for venom. They are poisoning us. You need to look at the water.
There is no part of me that even questions whether or not they're poisoning us in water. If you wanna make sure your family's gonna stay healthy, you gotta make sure the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the food you eat is clean.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a Club of Rome member, envisions a civil depopulation of the planet to one billion people, a drastic reduction from today. The Earth can sustain up to two billion individuals, depending on liberty and material consumption. Fewer people allow for more freedom and consumption, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate eight or nine billion. (Source: YouTube) Visit wideawakemedia.com for similar content. ClimateScam, NetZero, DepopulationAgenda.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Dennis Meadows, a prominent member of the Club of Rome, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to just one billion people—an 87.5% reduction from today's population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #DepopulationAgenda
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that our current population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They express a desire for a peaceful and civil decline in population, where conflicts are resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption desired. They mention that having more liberty and consumption requires fewer people, while a strong dictatorship with a low standard of living could accommodate a larger population. However, the speaker emphasizes the importance of freedom and a high standard of living, suggesting that we need to reduce our population from the current 7 billion to a more sustainable level. They hope for a slow and equal decline, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing solutions on others. The speaker admits that these hopes may be pessimistic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far, Goboy, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a special way, peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have?
If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8,000,000,000 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid.
So but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have it. But we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes.
I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, that's that's what lies ahead.