reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHY DO YOU HAVE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE? https://t.co/2uTCzhPQD7
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a private meeting, Edward Mendel House allegedly stated that a national system would be implemented to register every American's biological property. This system would be used to track people and enforce an agenda, ensuring compliance through the threat of unemployment. Americans would be considered property, stripped of their rights, and used for profit without their knowledge. The government would fund itself through debt and liens, disguising it as social insurance. Plausible deniability would protect those involved, and the education system would prevent people from discovering a remedy. The speaker recommends reading "Fruit from a Poisonous Tree" by Melvin Stamper for more information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now I'm going to just read a quote from Edward Mendel House, and what he had to say in a private meeting with Woodrow, Wilson, President between 1913 and 1921, from the private papers of Woodrow Wilson, quote, very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people, and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as charge back for our Fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever by operation of law merchant under the scheme of Secured Transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivered the bills of Leiden to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent forever to remain economic slaves through taxation secured by their pledges.
They will be stripped of their rights and given commercial value, designated to keep us a profit that will be none the wiser. For not 1 man in a 1000000 could ever figure out our plans. And if by accident, 1 or 2 would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and pledges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest of expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call social insurance.
Without realizing it, every American will ensure us for any loss we may incur, and in this manner. Every American will unknowingly be our servant, however, begrudgingly. The people will become helpless without any hope for their redemption, and we will employ the high office of the president as our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America. Having established plausible deniability, even if people become enlightened that they had a remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could claim that they did not understand the people's claims, especially if the technical requirements for achieving it were not followed pursuant to statutory requirements, requiring the public schools to teach civics, government and history classes out of federally approved, politically correct textbooks written by the publishing houses, owned by the owners of the Federal Reserve, would assure that the people would not discover the remedy for a long time, if ever. I would recommend that everyone read Fruit from a Poisonous tree by Melvin Stamper, m e l v I n, Stamper, s t a m p e r, that is fruit from a poisonous tree.
This is out of chapter 2 of Fruit from a Poisonous Tree.
@IrishAmerican27 - Salty Irish☘Girl 🇺🇲
Bibi 'predicting' 9/11 https://t.co/HkIJgLjKYD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israeli spies were detained after being caught recording the 9/11 attacks. They later admitted on television that it was their job to document the event. They were then questioned again, this time about their alleged membership in Masai. They explained that they come from a country that faces daily terror attacks and their purpose was to document the event.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israeli spies saying they went to go record 911. The men who were detained due to the report they were taping the 1st plane crash and then celebrating and joking about it, actually went on television and admitted it was their job to record the attack. And at that point, we were taken for another round of questioning, This time related to our allegedly being members of Masai. The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.
View with this information as you wish.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
HOW DID THEY ALL KNOW ABOUT COVID-19 YEARS BEFORE IT HAPPENED? via Tironianae https://t.co/N5ycVGALNn
Video Transcript AI Summary
There will likely be a deadly airborne disease in the future, so we need to establish a global infrastructure to quickly detect, isolate, and respond to it. This was emphasized by multiple speakers. A document from 2010 predicted a pandemic similar to what we are experiencing now, with China being better prepared and implementing strict measures. The document also foresaw increased government control and oversight, which has become a reality. A simulation called Event 201, held in October 2019, accurately predicted the coronavirus outbreak. The speakers discussed the importance of managing misinformation and disinformation. They believe that controlling access to information is necessary to combat the pandemic. Some speakers expressed skepticism about the coincidences and the level of control being exerted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There may and likely will come a time in which we have both an airborne disease that is deadly. And in order for us to deal with that effectively, we have to put in place an infrastructure not just here at home but globally that allows us to see it quickly, isolate it quickly, respond to it quickly, so that if and when a new strain of flu like the Spanish flu crops up 5 years from now or a decade from now, we've made the investment and we're further along to be able to catch it. It is a smart investment for us to make.
Speaker 1: Message that I want to leave with you Today, based on my experience, and you'll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that there will be a challenge, the coming administration, in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, But also there will be a surprise outbreak. There will be a surprise outbreak. There will be a surprise
Speaker 2: This document was published in 2010. It's called scenarios for the future of technology and international development. This was put out by the Rockefeller Foundation. This first scenario is called lockstep. In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit.
Even the most pandemic prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20% of the global population and killing 8,000,000 in just 7 months. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies. International mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. Even in developed countries, containment was a challenge.
However, a few countries did fare better, China in particular. The Chinese Government's quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens as well as its instant and near hermetic sealing off of its borders Saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post pandemic recovery. It's a plan, folk. It's all a plan. This is all according to plan.
Speaker 3: Highly intrusive real time tracking of a largely compliant population That was the key to the eventual lifting of the lockdown in Wuhan.
Speaker 4: China did a lot of things right. Some countries Did respond very quickly and get their testing in place, and they avoided the incredible economic pain.
Speaker 2: This document continues. From 2010, I remind you, China's government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like Train stations and supermarkets, even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty and their privacy to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant even eager for top down direction and oversight in developed countries.
This heightened oversight took many forms, biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and more Importantly, economic growth. Isn't that uncanny? Isn't this incredible that in 2010, they were predicting that this exact thing would happen? I mean, sure, you can go back to event two zero one. Now let's talk about a little thing called event two zero one.
The John Hopkins Center For Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted events two zero one, a high level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019 in New York, New York.
Speaker 5: On behalf of our center and our partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the goal of the event two zero one exercise is to illustrate the potential consequences of a pandemic and the kinds of societal and economic challenges they would pose.
Speaker 2: They're running a simulation of what they think would happen and what their response to a pandemic outbreak would be. Again, this simulation that they're running happened in October of 2019 and was about the coronavirus. When they say caps In this video, they're talking about the coronavirus. They knew what the outbreak would be 3 months before it actually happened. Are they just that good at guessing?
I'll leave it up to you to decide.
Speaker 6: CAPS is a serious respiratory disease. More than half of the recognized cases have required hospital care, creating a huge strain on health care systems. Some people only exhibit mild flu like symptoms, not requiring treatment in a hospital. Armingly, those people are able to walk around and spread the virus, not realizing they are doing so. Global health experts have highlighted that information are wreaking havoc on the CAPS response.
Speaker 7: How can governments, international businesses, international organizations ensure that reliable information is getting to the public and prevent highly damaging and false information to the extent that's possible about the pandemic from spreading and causing deepening crisis around the world.
Speaker 5: Twitter and Facebook are reporting they've identified and deleted a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading disinformation about the outbreak.
Speaker 3: To me, it is clear countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis and disinformation. This is a huge problem that's going to keep us from ending the pandemic and might even lead to the fall of government. If the solution means controlling and reducing access
Speaker 2: to information, I think it's the right choice. Is anyone else Feeling a little bit incredulous. It's just a rather odd coincidence, is it not, that you would know exactly which virus it was and exactly what you needed to do to prevent disinformation and misinformation. If you come out and say, hey. It looks like this was awful planned.
What do you think they're gonna do? They're gonna come in and go, This is the type of disinformation we were talking about. This is the type of misinformation we need to protect against.
Speaker 3: This is
Speaker 2: all planned. They have the rollout planned out perfectly In the hubris, the confidence that they have in their ability to control humanity, that they think that they can just do it completely openly.
Speaker 8: The issues you will be dealing with over the next hours, maybe tabletop exercises today. But they address real the critical threats which we at WHO take very seriously. I fully expect, that we will be confronted by a fast moving, Highly lethal pandemic of respiratory pathogen. Many countries will be affected at the same time. This is particularly true with the respiratory pathogen as they are often transmitted by asymptomatic persons.
Speaker 4: I think, an epidemic either naturally caused or intentionally caused is the most likely thing to cause, say, 10,000,000 excess deaths.
Speaker 1: There is no question that there will be a surprise outbreak.
Speaker 4: Today, the greatest risk of global catastrophe doesn't look like this. Instead, it looks like this. If anything kills over 10,000,000 people in the next few decades, it's most likely to be a highly infectious virus.
Speaker 9: You gave this This chilling warning that the world was in danger at some point of a major pandemic. People watching that talk now, you know, the hair stands up in the back of their neck. It is it is exactly what we're living through.
Speaker 10: This is not a case of Random events that's going on now. This is the culmination of a vast amount of time and preparation to reach this Point. Everything was in place before they pressed the button on 2020.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WAS ISRAEL BEHIND 9/11? https://t.co/u82fJSKk4x
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker directs the audience to a website about Israeli art students at the World Trade Center. They discuss the connection between the art group called gelatin and Israeli Mossad bomb experts. The speaker mentions that the art students were renting the 91st floor of the World Trade Center and were connected to a group of traveling art students. They highlight a photo of a man in a pink shirt repelling from a window, which was part of their art project. The speaker also mentions the presence of fuse holders from a company called Littell Fuse and their connection to Mossad bomb experts. They discuss the corporate history of Traycor and its subsidiaries, including Westmark Systems and Kellex Company, which is now known as Halliburton.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm gonna take you to Dick Cheney. Fasten your seat belt, and this is going to Absolutely blow you away. I would like you, if you're if you can do this on your computer, to go to methodical deception.com. And when you open that up on the navigation bar, you'll see where it says resources, and you'll wanna click on that resources. And then, there's a big box that says about the Israeli art students at the World Trade Center.
Click here. Click on that and tell me when you get to that page that has some photographs because this is the elephant in the room that nobody wanted to talk about. And this is one of the documents, A 60/61 page DEA document that I went over and over and over and connected Israeli Mossad bomb experts to an art group that were traveling around the United States and to an art group that gave themselves the name of gelatin. So are you there? I'm there.
So you got those pictures. Yeah. Okay. Now I'm gonna take you to Dick Cheney. Just listen up.
You're looking at those pictures. Those are some Israeli art students that came from a foreign country, And their art project was called Bee Thing. They called their team the gelatin group. And just so you understand this, gelatin is often referred to, gel ignite or blasting gelatin. It's also referred to as blasting jelly, but gelatin, and they literate later on changed their name because they people started waking to this.
So they named their name their name gelatin, they called their art projects the Bee Thing and you will see on the left hand side, A photograph of the title page of their book and what the bee thing was. There was an a group called the Lower Manhattan Cultural Center that was renting the 91st floor or allowed to live on the 91st floor. These foreign art students And some of them were connected to a group of traveling art students that were all over the country that the DEA found out about because they were going door to door to some of their agents' homes and their offices. And some of the offices were not public locations. So they were like, who are these people?
There's Israeli students trying to sell us art. This was just a smokescreen, So you wouldn't go to where we're about to go. Now the guy in the pink shirt, he's on the top right hand side. Yep. Kinda pink shirt, and he has repelling gear on.
They removed a window. This was their art project. They put a wooden balcony out, and they had photographs taken via a helicopter that was rented by their sponsor from the Lower Manhattan center. And that particular gentleman also had a big party to celebrate this event, and he rented part of the top Floors of the Millennium Hotel. You'll remember that from 911 and who was there, the Bush relative, and, took pictures and had a big, champagne party watching this.
Okay? Look behind the gentleman in the pink shirt. You're gonna see 2 big bold numbers. It says BB students from Israel and Austria be having thousands of fuse holders. This building was built in the early 1970s.
They weren't electricians. They weren't redoing all of the electricity in that building. You know, think about this. Okay. So I get this book out.
I'm waiting for my shipment of books to show up, and I literally had a voice say say to me, look into this. Those fuses, by the way, come from a company called Littell Fuse, l I t t e l, Fuse Company. They're located in Chicago, and some little voice said to me, take a look into this Lyttel Fuse Company, where all of those fuseholders behind those artists are. And now some of those artists are guaranteed Mossad Balm experts, and that's in the DEA document that you can read. So I find out that Lytle Company is a subsidiary of a corporation called Traycor, t r a c o r.
Now Traycor, they went bankrupt and split their company. They were a government contractor. They split them off into TRACOR Aviation, LITEL FUSE, and TRACOR Defense Holdings. They're based in Austin, Texas. They were bought out by Westmark Systems.
Bobby Ray Inman was the Chairman of Westmark at a point, then Westmark kind of started losing it and TRACOR bought them back. TRACOR bought out a company called VITRO, which used to be the Kellex Company. Let me tell you about Kellex Company. The Kellogg's Corporation was whole a wholly owned subsidiary of MW Kellogg, as in serial. You know that guy Kellogg company?
Separate and secret. Kel, meaning Kellogg, and x, meaning secret. The new company's goal was to design a facility for the production of enrichment enriched uranium through a gaseous diffusion technique. In gaseous diffusion, isotopes of Uranium 235 could be separated from uranium 238 by turning uranium metal into uranium hexafluoride gas and straining it through a barrier material. Now this is kind of interesting too.
So for those of You who remember that originally, the first responders were getting calls that there was a missile launch from the Woolworth building. The newly formed KELEX company's original headquarters were in the Woolworth Building in Lower Manhattan. I know. This is another coincidence. Isn't it?
They later on moved to Oak Ridge, Tennessee. But now the Kellex company, you will know them today. Here we are fastening your seat belts as Halliburton. The Chinese Old Company.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DID NAPOLEON EVEN EXIST? https://t.co/Rt5DHkM7lI
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to this video, the speaker argues that Napoleon did not exist and that his existence is a result of the sun cult of Apollo. They claim that the word "the" in the statue of Napoleon in Paris suggests a connection to Apollo. The speaker questions the history of Napoleon and his family, suggesting that the names and relationships are derived from Apollo's mythology. They also point out similarities between Napoleon and the sun, such as the length of his reign and his defeat in Russia. In conclusion, the speaker asserts that Napoleon never truly existed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Napoleon didn't exist. Watch this. Suppose we use the same argument on Napoleon. If you have ever seen the statue of, Napoleon in Paris, you will notice that ever the word there of Napoleon is written, the. Now that would mean making us Greek, that means that he is Apollo ever itself, so there never really has been a Napoleon, it's all due to the sun cult of Apollo.
You think you studied the history of Napoleon, ridiculous. Who was this mother? Natuzzi, wasn't it? Who was the mother of Napoleon, what does mean? In one language, Leticia and the other, both joy.
Ever that's how we got the idea that Napoleon was born of a woman named Letizia who will follow. You believe that Napoleon had had 3 sisters? He did according to a myth, but where did the myth start? Ever Apollo had 3 sisters. Didn't Apollo have 2 wives?
1 was the earth. The other was the moon. Napoleon it too, where's the sun the major part of the day? How long is it in the sky? Ever about 12 hours, how long did Napoleon reign supreme?
12 years. See, sun myth, he never ever existed furthermore, where is the sun strongest, to the north or the south? It's the south, isn't it? It's weak in the in the north, doesn't it? Where was Napoleon defeated?
In Russia. See? Napoleon never ever
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHO IS THE THIRD A N T I C H R I S T ? https://t.co/oshQwHBE0L
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nostradamus predicted three antichrists in the future: Napoleon, Hitler, and a yet-to-come individual who will be the worst of all. The term "antichrist" refers to someone who commits terrible acts against humanity, driven by a thirst for power. The third antichrist, referred to as the beast in the book of Revelation, is associated with the number 666 and has connections with computers. This individual, born on February 4, 1962 in Jerusalem, was raised by his evil uncle after his parents were killed. The uncle, along with a powerful group of rich Arabs, has been grooming the young antichrist for his role. Nostradamus warned that the antichrist would initially appear as a savior before revealing his true nature.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nostradamus saw in his future 3 men that he called antichrists. 1 was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who was said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant.
But he said if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity. An antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people, and it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about What it's doing, he only wants power. So this is what he meant by an antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information out him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said, in the bible, in the book of Revelation, and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw, the prophets did.
They only put them in their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the demand he refers to as the antichrist is the number 666 in the book of Revelation called the beast. Of course, he said 6/6/6 also refers to his connections with computers, so there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as bible times, so he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, What happens after that is in the hands of mankind.
Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios, or can we Lessen it. That's the point, but the man is alive now, and he has his destiny to fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February 4, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish.
And his parents were killed during the Israeli war, and when he was about 6 or 7 years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have, in my work, and, we had 1 woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a sidekick who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits, but the uncle took the young boy and was raising him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed so he could have him for his own, and he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East.
They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nostradamus said by the time 7 puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening, that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young antichrist went to college in Egypt, and he we were working on this the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.
His main courses that he took were economics, philosophy, and computers. The computers were going to be very important in his future that he was planning. But after he got out of college, he lives on the different estates of these very rich people. He has no home of his own but travels around to the different estates, and we saw him once on the in the biggest state on the banks of the Nile and another one in Syria and in Oman during the Gulf War, Oman is to the bottom of Saudi Arabia. So we saw him in all of these places during the Gulf War, and he's traveled around from place to place.
But when Nostradamus said, You must remember You must remember that this in the beginning, this man will appear as a savior, the man with all the answers, the man with the golden tongue. This will how you will make his conquests in the beginning. But he said, you must remember he's not what he appears to be. He's the wolf in sheep's clothing, because by the time people realize what is happening, then everything, you know, will become will all come out. We were told in 1995, if you were watching, you'd become aware of these people and what they are doing.
And, of course, I get lots of mail from people trying to tell me who they think the the antichrist is, but a lot of the people they have told me about, I think, are members of the group. They're very rich, but I don't think they are the Right? Because they don't fit all the other criteria.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHAT IS J E S U S 'S REAL NAME? https://t.co/MiNGI5RVi2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes that Jesus is not the correct name to refer to the divine figure. They argue that the scriptures mention the importance of knowing and praising the true name. The speaker believes that the name was intentionally changed in the past, making it meaningless and useless. They explain that the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain actually refers to not making the name meaningless. The speaker imagines a scenario at the pearly gates where using the wrong name would result in not being recognized. They assert that the correct name is Joshua and express their intention to meet Yahweh.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know his name's not Jesus. Right? If you go back to where Jesus was walking the Earth and you walked around and said, where's Jesus? Nobody would know who the fuck you're talking about. If you start looking deep into the scriptures, man, one of them says, my children will know my name.
Well, his name ain't Jesus. No. The scripture says, seek and ye shall find. Listening to a pastor tell you something isn't seeking. Why am I so big on the name?
Because if you look at certain scripture, it says, Give praise to my name. Give glory to my name. What's his name? Nobody says, Jesus. That's not his name.
So everyone says, it doesn't really matter. He just as As long as he knows look. I didn't read the part in the fucking scripture that said that. I didn't read that part. I didn't read the part, hey.
Call me whatever you want. Just call me!' Because his name was given to us over 7,000 times. But then at some point in time, way back in about 383 AD, they translated it, and and they were told not to use the name anymore. One of the Ten Commandments is, 'Thou shalt not take the Lord's name in vain.' Now, what does the word vain mean? It means to make meaningless Or useless.
How much more useless can a name be if you just stopped using it? You're making it as useless as it can be by not using his name. And he says, don't take the lord's name in vain, which most people think says don't say goddamn. Goddamn is it. First of all, God ain't his name.
That's the title. Secondly, that's not what it means. It says, don't make God meaningless and useless. But that's not actually what the thing said. He basically said, don't make my name meaningless.
That was his commandment. And then we are all doing it when we say Jesus. We're all doing it when we say God. Why? Because it's not that's not his name.
Imagine going up to the pearly gates, because I could've just saved all your lives. And there's a big dude up there like this. He's standing there all big and buff as shit. He goes, What's up? You say, what's up?
They say, who you here to see? You say, Jesus. And he goes and he goes, I don't know who you're talking about. You ever read the scripture where he says, go away, you do not know me? Because if you knew me, you'd know my fucking name.
I'm a walk up. They're gonna be like, who you here to see? And I'm gonna say, I'm a here to see Joshua. He's Joshua. My man, Joshua, You're supposed to meet me here so I can go meet Yahooah or Yahweh.
And if I'm wrong,
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
D I D YOU KNOW THIS ABOUT C H R I S T M A S ? COMMENT 👇 https://t.co/3vyDT6VDcJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Viewer discretion is advised as the speaker discusses the origins of Christmas. They explain that Christmas evolved from the Roman holiday Saturnalia, which involved gift-giving, drunkenness, and mistreatment of women. The Protestant church outlawed Christmas until the 1800s. The speaker also mentions that Christmas has pagan origins, with worshipers of the god Molech sacrificing babies during the winter solstice. They connect the tradition of sitting children on Santa's lap to this dark history. The speaker further explains that Santa Claus was originally seen as demonic, and the "ho ho ho" laugh came from a figure called Robin Goodfellow, associated with the devil. They criticize the celebration of Christmas as a distraction from societal issues like government corruption, brainwashing in schools, and economic struggles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now you
Speaker 1: can stay if you want, but viewer discretion is advised. Y'all over here participating in ritualistic, satanic, sensualized traditions and don't even know it? And, yes, I was that kid crying on Santa's lap. Because why does this man know what I'm sleeping and know when I'm awake? Basically, omnipresent.
I'm in the shower thing. He's gonna know if I don't scrubbing between pinky toe enough. And that's kinda weird to me. Y'all do know in the 1800, Christmas was forbidden, deemed sacrilege, and the original version was even banned in ancient Rome. I'm a let Huey explain.
Speaker 0: The truth is Christmas evolved from the Roman holiday Saturnalia, a winter festival where men gave gifts to each other. They also would get drunk, have sex with each other, and beat their wives. People would act so crazy on Christmas. The holiday was outlawed by the Protestant church until the 1800.
Speaker 1: Oh, that's not the darkest parts of the origins of it. Let's keep going. Yeah. Christmas was forbidden, deemed sacrilege. Let's ask Jehovah's Witnesses why they don't celebrate These festivals are massively contaminated by pagan customs, so we know that it's originated from a pagan holiday.
Right? During the winter solstice, you know, December 5th. There were worshipers of a pagan god named Molech, and babies were offered as sacrifices. The statue was made of brass, and burning fire would be in it. And the babies would sit in the hot brass arms of Molech while the child is arsoned to death.
They would beat drums to cover up the screams. And while this would happen, and the parents would have a list of wishes that they wanted for the year. So that whole thing of sitting your kids on Santa's lap and taking pictures with them while they're crying, remember where that came from. Now let's talk about center clause, Old Saint Nick. Old Nick means the devil, Satan.
Before Christmas was actually created by Clark Clement Moore, prior to 18/23, Santa Claus Christmas didn't really exist like that he was more demonic. Oh, yeah. And that ho ho ho laugh came from a half man, half stag, you know, with horns and stuff called Robin Goodfellow. Robin in medieval terms also means devil. He would take kids away on that whole goat situation with children and defeat.
Not to mention that people are engaging and spending all of this fake printed money, and don't take the credit for it, knowing what this government is doing to us as citizens. Because it's a jolly town, we forget about the bad conditions of this country. The fake news. Fake food, paying for water, trafficking, corruption, tyrannized laws, Brainwashing of our children being sent to school to learn how to be slaves. Tyranized laws, inflation of even just trying to survive.
Working jobs that put us on autopilot for 6 ears. Code switching like we're robots to serve people who spit in people's face and throw food. Grown adults who misdirect their dramatic emotions to teenagers over straws and barbecue sauce. So I get why y'all trying to celebrate these pagan holidays to take the pain away from these messed up conditions of this laboratory rate of consciousness that is affecting our conditions.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
W H A T DO YOU THINK J E S U S W O U L D S A Y WBOUT C H R I S T M A S ? https://t.co/NrILPzi50C
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jesus would question why people celebrate his birthday on December 25th when it's not his actual birthday. He would likely point out that this date was originally associated with the sun god Horus, who was honored with the sacrifice of babies. Jesus would also mention that Easter, another pagan holiday, was a time of fertility and orgies, resulting in many births. These babies would then be sacrificed to Horus on December 25th. Jesus would express disapproval of celebrating his birthday on a day that was historically marked by the slaughter of countless infants.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What would Jesus say about Christmas? Well, that's an excellent question. And I've got my own opinion on that. And I believe that Jesus would say, why are you guys celebrating my birthday when it's not my birthday? As we all know, Jesus was not born on December 25th.
Well, why are we celebrating Jesus' birthday on a day that wasn't his birthday? Today. Now maybe your kids are small and you celebrate their birthday on a weekend because their birthday lands on a weekday, so you might move it a smidge, but nobody moves it months. And I think if Jesus saw everybody and told us exactly what he thought about celebrating his birthday on December 25th, he would say that you were all celebrating my birthday in honor of the sun god, Horus, where they used to sacrifice babies to please him. And if you really think if December 25th was actually a day of sacrifice of babies, how many babies would they have had to have had to please Horus?
Well, quite a few, I would imagine. Well, how many months does it take a baby? Because people wanna be prepared. They wanna plan ahead. So, that brings us back 9 months prior to Christmas.
Where? Easter. We celebrate Easter for what? The resurrection. Coincidentally, Easter, which is also another god, Ishtar, the god of war and fertility, which is why there's rabbits and eggs, was actually a pagan holiday that was observed by basically having an orgy.
So everybody got together on Easter, DIR had a lot of sex, so 9 months later, there'd be a lot of babies. And coincidentally, when all those babies were born, old Horace was there December 25th, wanting you to slice them open and sacrifice the babies to him. And then here we are, 1,000 of years later, celebrating baby Jesus's birthday on Christmas, when in reality on Christmas was a a sacrificial day where millions of babies were slaughtered, and that is what I think he would think. How dare
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WAS THE B I B L E TAMPERED WITH? https://t.co/JXCHZR1ruJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker shows different versions of the Bible and explains why they have so many. They mention the 16/11 King James, King James, Amplified, New Living Translation, and new King James versions. The speaker then refers to Revelation 13 verse 16 and compares the translations. They emphasize that the mark mentioned in the Bible will be inside the body, not on the skin. The speaker's love for the Lord is the reason they have multiple Bibles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, y'all. We're gonna fix this fair and square. K? These are all Bibles. They're all different Bibles.
This is a 16/11 King James. This is a King James. This is the Amplified. This is the New Living Translation. And this is a new King James.
And I also got 2 more King James right there. Ask me why I have so many Bibles. Well, because I love the Lord. That's why. Alright?
So we're gonna start with this amplified right here on Revelation 13 verse 16 says on on the New Living Translation. On On even the New King James. On on Now you go over to the King James, and it's n and it's n n and n. Now the 16th and 11, just for proof, the 16/11, right here, Very old Bible. And and that's why you guys are walking around thinking that's gonna be a freaking tattoo stamped on your forehead and arm.
It's in your body, guys. It's not on the outer skin. It's gonna be something inside you. Think about that.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE 9 / 1 1 WAS P L A N N E D ? https://t.co/0hS6uomQRG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11. They question the official explanation that the collapses were solely caused by the impact of the planes and subsequent fires. The speaker highlights the uniform collapse of Building 7 and suggests that controlled demolition may have been involved. They mention the presence of explosive material in the dust samples and the suspicious elevator renovation prior to the attack. The speaker also mentions suppressed testimonies from firefighters regarding explosions in the buildings. They express feeling threatened while advocating for a new investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The impact of a, of a jet. From what I understand, the, the outer, skeleton of the building, the outer columns was like a, a fishnet, and you had these inner core columns, which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand 4 or 5 times what the loads were. The engineers always overdesigned a building. No fill frame building has ever collapsed before or since 911. So that should say something right there.
And it said that building 7, it was a progressive collapse that it was caused by fire. But progressive collapse, unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building 7 collapsing, It collapses uniformly.
It's collapsing from the bottom. The building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground, and you could see the sides caving in on. For a building to collapse uniformly, which the video show all the load bearing columns would've had to have failed simultaneously. Now fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers.
And if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked 1 on top of each other, the stoves up at the top, yes, there's fire, and they've been damage. But the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So the structure underneath all of that is intact. So it's impossible for building to collapse near free full speed and increase.
Without the control demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. Ties. Something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires.
I think that and they examined the dust and they found what they call ferritic material, which is like, explosive incendiary, which was in the dust samples. And that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing an extensive elevator renovation in the 2 or 3 years prior to. All kinds of workers, they had access to the the core, the cores of the building. And on the day of the attack, the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators.
And the elevator company was the aggravated company. It subsequently went out of business. And a couple of years after that, the information is out there. I, at one time, when I was heavily engaged in trying to get a new investigation. I I definitely felt threatened.
I felt threatened for my family, and it wasn't it wasn't a pleasant experience. You have sworn testimonies from firefighters regarding explosions in the building. They were suppressed. Just somebody making a statement, especially from firemen police, if they make statement. I heard an explosion.
That's grounds to initiate an investigation. The firefighters, a bomb went off. This this is their own words made that day. They just ignored it. Just like, building 7 was
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE THIS? https://t.co/kxXAhSYylG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fascia, comprising 60% of the body, is made up of fluid-filled microtubules that carry energy known as photons. These photons, or points of light, make up the entire body and hold consciousness. While most fascia resembles cloth or spider webs, there are seven locations in the body where it appears as belts or bands. These concentrated bands of energy align perfectly with the chakras, which are the body's energy centers. The crown chakra, often depicted as a 1,000-petaled lotus on the top of the head, is actually an opening into the body called the anterior fontanelle. In summary, chakras are bands of fascial tissue that carry energy in the body.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, this is fascia. Fascia is 60% of your body. They are little microtubules that are fluid filled, and they carry your energy. And the energy in your body is known as Photons or little points of light. Your entire body is made of them, and they hold your consciousness or are known as communicators.
Now, most fascia in your body looks like cloth or spider webs, but there are 7 locations in the body where they are actually looking like belts or bands of fascia. This picture right here is directly out of the myofascial And it's very cool because these then, since they carry your energy, are concentrated bands of energy. Here is where your chakras are located in your body. Isn't it interesting that those concentrated energy centers called Chakras align perfectly with the bands of concentrated energy called fascia. Oh.
And the top of your head where your crown chakra is located, do you ever wonder why they often show it as a 1,000 petaled lotus on the top of your head? That's because it's not technically a chakra. It's actually an opening into the body. It's your anterior fontanelle, the soft spot you had when you were a baby. In summary, what is the chakra?
It is a band of fascial tissue located in the body that carries your energy.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHY DO YOU THINK THEY CHANGED JESUS'S NAME? https://t.co/CHwJlGBHEA
Video Transcript AI Summary
His name isn't Jesus, it's Joshua or Yahua. The scriptures emphasize knowing and using his true name, not titles like God. Using the wrong name makes it meaningless and useless, breaking the commandment not to take the Lord's name in vain. Imagine being at the pearly gates and not knowing his real name. It's important to seek and use his true name, not just accept what others tell you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know his name's not Jesus. Right? If you go back to where Jesus was walking the earth and you walked around and said, where's Jesus? Nobody would know who the fuck you're talking about. If you start looking deep into the scriptures, man, one of them says, my children will know my name.
Well, his name ain't Jesus. No. The scripture says, seek and ye shall find. Listening to a pastor tell you something isn't seeking. Why am I so big on the name?
Because if you look at certain scripture, it says, give praise to my name, give glory to my name. What's his name? No. It says Jesus. That's not his name.
So everyone says it doesn't really matter. He just long as he knows. Look, I didn't read the part in the fucking scripture that said that. I didn't read that part. I didn't read the part, hey, call me whatever you want.
Just call me. Because his name was given to us over 7,000 times. But then at some point in time way back in about 383 AD, they translated it, and and they were told not to use the name anymore. One of the 10 commandments is thou shalt not take the Lord's name in vain. Now what does the word vain mean?
It means to make meaningless or useless. How much more useless can a name be if you just stopped using it? You're making it as useless as it can be by not using his name. And he says, don't take the Lord's name in vain, which most people think says don't say goddamn. Goddamn is a first of all, god ain't his name.
That's the title. Secondly, that's not what it means. It says don't make god meaningless and useless. But that's not actually what the thing said. He basically said don't make my name meaningless.
That was his commandment. And then we are all doing it when we say Jesus. We're all doing it when we say God. Why? Because it's not that's not his name.
Imagine going up to the pearly gates because I could have just saved all your lives. And there's a big dude up there like this. He's standing there all big and buff as shit. He goes, what's up? He say, what's up?
They say, who you here to see? You say Jesus. And he goes and he goes, I don't know who you're talking about. You ever read the scripture where he says, go away you do not know me? Because if you knew me, you'd know my fucking name.
I'm a walk up. They're gonna be like, who you here to see? And I'm gonna say, I'm a here to see Joshua. He's Joshua. My man, Joshua, is supposed to meet me here so I can go meet Yahua or Yahweh.
And if I'm wrong, we're all fucked.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE THE JESUITS ARE EVIL? https://t.co/Z1rBImeB0U
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the historical influence of the Jesuits and the Vatican, highlighting their involvement in various events such as assassinations, wars, and financial manipulations. It suggests that the Jesuits have been working towards consolidating power and creating a global empire under the control of the papacy. The Vatican's aim is to establish a one-world government with Jerusalem as its capital, not Rome. The video concludes by urging Christians to pray, study the Bible, and resist the Jesuit agenda for world dominion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In June of 1864, the war between the states was entering its final year, and one of the main thoughts that occupied president Abraham Lincoln's mind was the part played by Rome in the war. Lincoln said repeatedly, this war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits. We owe it to popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons. This seems to be a strange statement by president Lincoln, considering what is taught today about the war between the states. Nothing is ever mentioned of a religious element in the war, or that the pope and the Jesuit order were intimately involved.
But Lincoln was not the only voice raised in opposition to the pope's meddling in the affairs of this country at that time. Samuel Morse, the inventor of Morse code, traveled to Europe and Rome in 18/30 to do his own investigation into the conspiracies hatched against America. After returning home to the United States, Morse wrote 2 books warning Americans of the threat from Rome. Morse would continue sounding the alarm throughout the 1800 and went to discuss the situation with Lincoln after his inauguration.
Speaker 1: Samuel Morse, of course, is the inventor of Morse code that was used for many, many years. And Samuel Morse wrote a book called Foreign Conspiracies Against the Liberties of the United States. It was published in 18/35. And he shows in that book that the Holy Alliance, the Leupold Foundation out of Austria, controlled by the Jesuits, And the Jesuits themselves were the agents to overthrow the liberties of the United States, the Federal Republic of the United States, and to replace it with a papal centralized government as the Vatican is run.
Speaker 0: But today, one looks around us to see US presidents and congressmen and women groveling before the pope. Lincoln's words would seem ironic. Consider this also. In April 2008, the president of the United States, George w Bush, rushed out to meet the pope at his plane. Does this not seem to be odd behavior?
For the first time in history, a US president went out to meet a religious leader, or for that matter, any leader, upon his entry into the US.
Speaker 2: No president in the entire history of the United States has ever greeted a foreign diplomat like that ever. They wait until they're brought into Washington or something. They don't go out on the tarmac. This is a first.
Speaker 0: What makes this even more egregious is that the current pope is a former head of the office of inquisition and a former member of the Nazi party in his youth.
Speaker 3: You know that cardinal Ratzinger was the grand inquisitor of the Vatican before he became pope Benedict. You're aware of that. I assume other people are not aware of that. For a Jew, the inquisition has such awful, awful memories and we are inviting the head of the inquisition to the Jewish states. I gave a lecture yesterday and these are the points that I brought up.
You don't invite the grand inquisitor to Israel. It's that simple.
Speaker 0: How did we go from a nation on the alert against the pope and the Jesuits' desire to bring America down to one of accepting them as friends? Simply put, we have sold out. It has not gone unnoticed that several Protestant presidents have attended mass and taken communion at Catholic churches. Since one cannot take communion at a Roman Catholic service if one is not Catholic, several presidents have misled their supporters into thinking they are Protestant when they are not. Furthermore, those in power are often Roman Catholics outright, so it is expected that they will obey orders from the Pope.
From US presidents to kings and queens, to religious leaders throughout the world, those in power meet the pope and bow down to him. Even when President Obama went to the Vatican in July 2009 to discuss the world economic situation, he too bowed to the pope. Upon leaving, president Obama said, we look forward to a very strong relationship between our two countries. It is important to remember these words of president Obama and what they mean. The pope is not just a spiritual ruler, he is a territorial ruler.
The name of his country since 1929 is Vatican City.
Speaker 4: The Pope is a monarchy. Actually, according to various books, the pope is the monarch of the world. Not just a religious leader, he is actually a political leader. The Vatican is actually a small area over in Rome whereby the Pope is the ruler of that small area. The actual name, Vatican, I found very interesting.
It actually means, worship of the divine serpent. So we find that the very basis of the Vatican, the very word itself means the worship of serpents.
Speaker 0: But from Rome's perspective, the Pope rules over more than Vatican City. He rules over the Earth both spiritually and materially or temporally. According to the Roman Catholic teaching, the pope can keep you out of heaven, and he has absolute authority over you on earth.
Speaker 1: And when I speak of the pope, I speak of the papacy, that the papacy claims its 2 powers. Its first power is universal spiritual power over all individuals, that every person must be subject to the spiritual power of the Pope, that there is no salvation outside of the Catholic church, which is the doctrine of the Council of Trent is reaffirmed in the documents of Vatican 2 of the 19 sixties. It's still on the books of canon law and the other power of the Pope, which is the second key, as you see the two keys, in the Pope's flag with the triple crown, lord of heaven, lord of earth, lord of hell, and the 2 keys, spiritual power. The second key is the temple power. The temple power is this, that the pope believes he has the right to rule the government, the civil government of every nation.
That temporal power has never been denied. It's never been disclaimed.
Speaker 4: But there is no question that the Pope wields both swords, both a spiritual sword that the public sees, as well as a political sword which most people do not see.
Speaker 0: So it is very interesting and unsettling to those who love freedom and the right to worship God as one sees fit, to see our leaders submitting to the pope of Rome. Now, let us revisit Lincoln's words. We have discussed the Pope's and the papacy, but what about the other group Lincoln mentioned? He spoke of the sinister influence of the Jesuits. Who are the Jesuits?
Speaker 4: Jesuits are a group of people that were raised up, right around 1535, 1540. Their leader was Ignatius Loyola. They basically had two purposes. One purpose was to destroy the Protestant Reformation, Because, as you remember, Martin Luther had appeared at the Diet of Worms in 15/21, stood before Charles the 5th and the Holy Roman Empire. And so the Catholic church sought to stop the Protestant Reformation that Luther began, and they couldn't do it.
And so about 20 years after Luther stood at the Diet of Worms, the Jesuit Order was created, and one of their purposes was to destroy every vestige of the Protestant Reformation, both in the religious realm, in the political realm, and in the economic realm. Because the Protestant Reformation not only affected the religious arena, it also affected the political and the economic arenas as well. That was one goal of the Jesuit Order. The other aspect was to restore the supremacy and dominance of the pope throughout the world.
Speaker 0: The Jesuit order has directed popes concerning policy, both foreign and domestic, since 15 40, in particular, since the council of Trent.
Speaker 4: The council of Trent, indeed, it was a it started in 15 45. It went for the next 18 years. That doesn't mean that they stayed there for 18 years. They met in different places. But over that period of time, the various leaders of the Catholic Church and the newly formed Jesuit Order would come together from time to time and discuss how the Catholic Church would respond to the teachings of the Protestant Reformation.
Would they accept them or would they completely reject them?
Speaker 1: So the doctrines that were being championed at the reformations, the doctrines of grace, justification by grace through faith, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura, only the scriptures, scriptures, by grace alone through faith alone, etcetera, etcetera. No baptismal regeneration, that there is only salvation in Christ, that we do not participate in our salvation. It's not a joint effort of man and god, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. All the doctrines championed by the reformers were absolutely accursed and condemned and reprobated by the Council of Trent that the Jesuits really oversaw from 1545 to 15/63. It was an 18 year council in the town of Trent, Italy, and that is the foundation of what we call the Counter Reformation.
Speaker 4: And the Council of Trent laid out the the focal point, the direction that the Catholic church would go for the next 4 centuries. Basically, at the Council of Trent, they decided that tradition and what the church fathers of the Catholic church taught would continue to be the sole authority in the Catholic church. Now, of course, there's other aspects of that, other teachings that branch off from that, but that is the basic sum of the Council of Trent, that tradition would still rule the Catholic Church. The anathemas that they have come out with that came from the Council of Trent to destroy heretics, to destroy those who would uphold the word of God, those still live today?
Speaker 1: That's correct. The papacy has not rescinded any of the curses set forth in the Council of Trent. In fact, the Council of Trent ends and says, accursed be all heretics. Accursed. Accursed.
Every poll passed to swear to uphold the Council of Trent. And if you read the documents of Vatican 2, put together by Abbott, it shows you right there that every pope must swear to uphold the Council of Trent. Even though in the sixties, when they were calling heritage separated brethren, with that delusion and illusion, they still did uphold the council of Trent as well as all the former papal bulls condemning heretics and calling for kings to kill them out of their dominions like the diadocals of Pius the 4th.
Speaker 0: The head of the Jesuits is the superior general of the order. He is called the black pope.
Speaker 4: The head of the Jesuit order is the black pope. The man who is currently there, he was just recently elected Nicholas Adolphus. The black pope is the head of the Jesuit order. He is called the black pope not because he is of African origin, but because he is in the dark. We see the white pope.
We see pope Benedict the 16th because he's visible and all the world knows who he is. But the black pope remains in the dark behind the scenes, and so few people know he even exists. But that's why he's called the black pope, and he's the one who heads the Jesuit order.
Speaker 0: There is an ongoing war against anyone who resists the power of the pope, And this war is directed by the Jesuits. This war is not waged openly by the Jesuits. The society of Jesus moves in the shadows. They infiltrate and get others to do the dirty work of assassination. If armed conflict is needed, they use the army of 1 nation to bring a disobedient nation to its knees.
Speaker 4: The Jesuits would do that very thing. They were very intelligent. They're still very intelligent people. What they would do is they would infiltrate. They did it through economics, through the merchants.
They would then come in, start teaching. They're they were very wise people. They would then infiltrate not only into schools, but they then would infiltrate into local government and then rise up to higher government officials. We find that repeatedly in the book by Avril Manhattan called Vietnam, Why Did We Go, where he talks about how they followed this exact plan throughout Southeast Asia. They did it in Japan.
They did it in China. They did it in Korea. They did it in Vietnam. They did it all along the Pacific Rim. Well, eventually, what would happen, you would have created Catholic cities where all the people in towns would become Catholics.
Well, they would then try to put their Catholic ideals onto the major religious populace of a country. In the Far East, of course, the major religious populace would be the Buddhists. So these Catholics in this country, these converts to Catholicism, they would try to push their Catholicism on their Buddhist friends. And when the Buddhist friends rejected it, the Catholics would start to use force. Well, then the Buddhists would appeal to the local governments, the state governments, the national governments, and then there would be revolution.
It got so bad in Japan that in 16/39, the the Japanese emperor, he said, no more Catholics, no more Europeans will come to our island again. And that band stayed there for almost 2 centuries. This happened throughout the Far East and in other countries throughout the world.
Speaker 0: Why has this assault on the non Catholic world been ignored by most people, especially Protestant ministers?
Speaker 4: Billy Graham is not he didn't protest door towards the latter part of his life. For the first part, I think he was solid when he first started. But along around the early sixties, his voice was silenced. Robert Schuller, Paul Crouch, Hal Lindsey, Pat Robertson, James Dobson. All of these men, they're not protesting.
What they have become is are agents agents of Rome. I remember back when I was starting my student teaching, I was teaching 7th grade history to young people talking about the pilgrims and Puritans coming over to America. The book said absolutely nothing about why they were coming to America. And I was just reading, and I've got a book here called the, Rothschild, money trust, and also a book about the Rockefellers, the Rockefeller File by Gary Allen. But these people have set up trusts, and they have rewritten the history books.
They have rewritten the history books, so that the 7th grade history book that I was teaching out of said nothing about the reformations.
Speaker 1: We have to remember that the papacy, specifically the black pope, controls all high level freemasonry. That includes temple there in Washington DC. The especially the temple there in Washington DC. That includes all of your big evangelists. For example, Billy Graham is the 33rd degree freemason.
And I know that Billy Graham organization denies that, but it's still the truth because we know according to the honest 33rd degree freemason who was truly converted to Christ, we believe the gospel, who was saved by the grace of god. His name was Jim Shaw. And when he was inducted into the order of the 33rd degree in Washington DC, he said there were 2, former presidents there on that, in that council. And, one of them was Gerald Ford, a 33rd degree freemason in pardon Nixon, and the other was Jimmy Carter, 33rd degree freemason. So there they are at the grand council.
Another one was an international evangelist, which he later said told, others that it was Billy Graham because the publisher refused to put Billy Graham's name in there. So Billy Graham was there. So Billy Graham is nothing more than the high level masonic shill for the papacy, which is also a fraud with Freemasons if you read the book In God's Name by by David Yellop. And so we talk about Robert Schuller, for example. Robert Schuller is another 33rd degree Freemason.
He went to Rome to get the pope's blessing to build his crystal cathedral. And Robert Schuller is a personal friend of that of the anti white, hateful racist, Louis Farrakhan, who is another high level freemason who runs the Nation of Islam for the archbishop of Chicago. So we have all these high level masonic leaders, black and white, of all these various different religions working together for agitation among the peoples of this country, but never ever exposing the papacy as the true heart and soul and their its real master.
Speaker 0: All of this sounds incredible. It becomes less so when one examines the oath of the Jesuits.
Speaker 1: We have to understand that these men have died to their own self will. It's something a Christian should do. It's the way we should be. We have no life anymore. Our life is we're dead with Christ, and we're hidden God with him.
When Christ is revealed, who is our life, then we shall be revealed within the glory. We need to learn to die to ourselves and count our lives as nothing. That our only purpose is to do the will of our master. And when he's finished with that with us, then let us die. The Jesuits have done this, but they do it for the devil.
And so they have completely been emptied of their own personalities, and upon the order of their commander will do exactly what they're told. There's no such thing as a disobedient jesus. They're all under orders. They've been trained for 15 years. They're soldiers.
They're more of a marine corps than the marines. The marines were fashioned after the Jesuit order. You break the man down in boot camp, you rob him of his personality, you shave his head, you put everything all the same clothes on him, they're all treated the same, they're treated like dirt, we're gonna rob you of your will so that we can mold you into what we want you. That's all Jesuit. So this is how they think.
In a given order, they will kill you, me, themselves, their mother. Anything they're ordered to do, that is what they will do. We're gonna bring down 911 today, gentlemen. Okay. Give me the order, what we do, what button we push.
Do I need to be inside, outside? What is it? And that's what they'll do. We need to bring down the Pentagon today. We need to blow up the Arizona in in Pearl Harbor in 1941.
Okay? I'll be there. Where's my orders? They're all under orders. And this is why you can have no country with a Jesuit presence in it.
They have to be expelled, and all their agents that they work through must be expelled. And this is exactly what czar Alexander the first did in 18/20. He kicked out all the Jesuits out of Russia. In 18/22, he shut down all the masonic lodges. And in 18/25, he was poisoned.
So this is the Jesuit mindset, and we have to we should read the spiritual exercises. We should read some of their works. We need to read the Jesuit doctrines of regicide. How it's no murder to kill a heretic. How it's okay to lie, cheat, and steal.
How it's okay to kill your enemy. How it's okay to kill a woman that you commit adultery with. If she should wanna tell her, I mean, you can kill her. It's all right there in the canon law. It's okay to steal.
The whole world is their candy shop where they can steal everything they can get their hands on to consolidate it under the power of the Jesuit order. And if that means killing kings or sinking ships, even if it causes their own death, they do it for the greater glory of god. Admigeria de Gloria.
Speaker 0: When a Jesuit priest is elevated to a position of high command, he has administered what is called the Jesuit extreme oath of induction. This oath has been called the 4th vow or the blood oath given to those in the society of Jesus besides the traditional vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience. A copy of the extreme oath can be found in the congressional record.
Speaker 4: I wanna read a statement to you, which is the Jesuit oath. It says, this is the Jesuit oath. I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of my own, that's from the spiritual exercises of Loyola, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver, but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the pope. I furthermore promise and declare that I will make and wage relentless war as I am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate protestants and liberals from the face of the whole earth, I will neither spare aid, sex, or condition. I will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infants' heads against the wall in order to annihilate forever their exocrupled race.
And then it goes on. The point being, throughout the history of the Jesuit order, they will shoot, they will burn, they will play, they will do whatever it takes to destroy anybody who stands in the way of what they want to do.
Speaker 0: In 2009, the Jesuit general was confronted about the oath.
Speaker 5: One of the things in your in your Jesuit high oath, I think it is it says something about furthermore, you promised to declare that we'll, at the first opportunity, seek war at any opportunity against heretics, Protestants, liberals.
Speaker 1: You by what is that?
Speaker 5: See here? And that that, will spear neither age nor sex nor condition, and I will hang, waste, boil, flayze. You've never seen this before?
Speaker 1: No. I haven't seen it.
Speaker 5: Strangled, very alive, and it's horrible.
Speaker 1: And I
Speaker 5: was like, look, let me get Even in the congressional record.
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Thank you for coming. Does the oath and activities of the Jesuit reflect anything Christian? Or is it as Jesus said, beware of false prophets which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly, they are ravening wolves. What else do we know about the Jesuits?
They've been thrown out of 83 countries over the last 500 years. That is correct. 83 countries have physically removed them. And why was it necessary to remove them? In a word, power.
The Jesuits have throughout history sought to take over and control every country in which they reside. Since their beginning in 15 40, the Jesuits power grew until they controlled the papacy, the Roman Catholic church, and many of the governments of the world. In 17/73, all of that changed. 1 by 1, countries began to expel the Jesuits from their borders. This culminated in the suppression or abolishment of the Jesuits in 17/73.
In that year, Pope Clement the 14th officially disbanded the order forever. This providential act enabled a nation based on religious liberty to be formed, the United States of America. At the same time in history as the Jesuits were suppressed, the American Revolution occurred. Many believe this was no accident, but an act of God.
Speaker 1: I see the suppression of the Jesuits as providential because without the suppression of the Jesuit order, there is no successful American Revolution, period. We have to understand that the Protestants and the Baptists of Europe had been persecuted in excess of 200 years, crying out to the lord for some place to live where they could worship him and seek his face and be obedient to his word. But nothing else was more important to them than that. And so as a result, the lord answered their prayers and opened up North America to them in the 1600, but ultimately to get a government that would protect them in their rights. Freedom of worship, freedom of press, freedom of conscience, freedom of self defense, and what came to be the American Bill of Rights and then, of course, the US Constitution.
So without the suppression of the Jesuit order, there is no, escape for us out of Europe into North America to start a free nation where we can worship God according to the dictates of our conscience.
Speaker 4: As the Americans were determining and setting up a constitution where protestant principles would reign, where freedom of religion would reign, where people would have the right to bear arms, where people would have a right to a fair trial, where all of these principles are being laid down, the Jesuit order is abolished. If the Jesuit order had not been abolished in 17/73, And as they watched a Protestant country rising up in the western hemisphere, the Jesuit order would have used not only England, who they did use in the American Revolution, they would have used France, they would have used Spain, they would have used Portugal because those were all Catholic countries. They would have used all those countries to destroy this growing Protestant nation, and it would never have been established.
Speaker 0: Having had their power and influence greatly diminished, the Jesuits were unable to stop the American colonies from establishing a Protestant Republic. That is to say the Jesuits were in no condition to coordinate a crusade against the new Protestant Republic as they had done with England in 1588 by using the Spanish Armada. But the Jesuits had won ace in the hole. Many of the founding fathers were Deists and Freemasons. They attended church services and publicly paid homage to the God of the Bible, but in reality, they did not believe in miracles or the divinity of Jesus Christ.
Their God was the great architect of the universe, not the God of the Bible. Thomas Jefferson went so far as to create his own Bible by cutting out verses he agreed with and pasting them into a blank book. The verses Jefferson believed in were those where Jesus speaks of morality and loving others. Miracles such as the virgin birth or Jesus's resurrection were omitted since they were considered fables. Freemasons like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine had little regard for the divine miracle working Jesus of the Bible.
Thomas Paine, author of the famous pamphlet Common Sense, wrote a book called The Age of Reason. In it, Paine says, Jesus Christ wrote no account of himself. The history of him is altogether the work of other people. And as to the account given of his resurrection and ascension, it was the necessary counterpart to the story of his birth. His historians having brought him into the world in a supernatural manner were obliged to take him out again in the same manner.
Thus, when it came time to create a document that would unite these colonies into one country, The Jesuits had an idea many preferred. It was called religious liberty. The first amendment to the constitution would allow all religions to exist in America, not just religions based on the Protestant Bible. In the new American Republic, Roman Catholicism was allowed to coexist with the Protestant denominations as well as the deistic freemasons. But most importantly, the Roman Catholics were allowed to vote just like any other citizens.
This was key as we shall see later on. For has their numbers increased, Roman Catholics could put in power other Roman Catholics or those who were sympathetic to them and changed the nation from within.
Speaker 1: After the, revolutionary war, voting rights of Catholics did change. We know that one of the signers of the constitution was a Roman Catholic. There was only 1, mister Carroll. But nonetheless, it made it look like a place for Roman Catholics to come, as well as Protestants to have religious liberty, which is absurd. The Roman Catholic people had been used by the priest to kill us for centuries, and so why not stay in Europe?
Well, they were being used by the Jesuits to come here to ultimately then take over political power and then submit North America to the feet of the pope.
Speaker 0: Turning from the happenings with the American colonies, us take a moment to investigate what the Jesuits were up to in Europe after their suppression. As we might guess, the Jesuits were not idle. They decided to seek revenge against those who had turned on them, specifically a traitorous Pope and the Catholic Monarchs of Europe. In 17/74, a year after the Jesuits were disbanded forever
Speaker 2: Pope Clement the 14th had suppressed the Jesuits. And, a short time later, he was poisoned. Poison is a big thing with these guys.
Speaker 0: Pope Clement stated, alas, I knew they would poison me, but I did not expect to die in so slow and cruel a manner. A postmortem examination of his body revealed the presence of a poison. Thus, the Jesuits rid themselves of a troublesome Pope. The vendetta on the Catholic Monarchs of Europe was approached in a less obvious manner. Cleverly, the Jesuits determined not to act in their own name, but decided to work through front groups and to have them take the blame for their revenge.
In this way, the Jesuits would continue to appear to be disbanded and innocent of any involvement in the matter. The first front group the Jesuits used was called the Illuminati. The Illuminati was organized in Bavaria by a Jesuit professor, Adam Weishaupt, on May 1, 17, 76, just 3 years after the Jesuits were disbanded. Many sources only casually mentioned that Weishaupt was a former Jesuit, and they usually state he was an ex Jesuit. In reality, Weishaupt never left the order.
As for the order itself, it never was truly disbanded.
Speaker 1: In Bavaria, when the Illuminati was founded in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt, Weishaupt is used by the Jesuits then to continue the work of the Jesuit Order under another name. Weishaupt never repudiated the Jesuits. That's a lie of many many conspiratorial historians controlled by the Pope. They wanna create this dichotomy between the Illuminati and the Jesuits. Never fall for it.
Weishaupt was operating under orders from a superior. Richie, at the time, was a general, then later another superior. Weishaupt then enters into an alliance with the House of Rothschild. So now we see the Rothschilds, the Jewish Rothschilds, Red Shield become the bankers for the Jesuit order during the upheaval we are we will know as the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars. So this alliance between the Jesuits and the House of Rothschild, these high level masonic Jews, is very important to realize at this point because we have to live with it and deal with it today.
Also Bavaria is the stronghold of the Jesuits. There was a huge inquisitional torture chamber there in Nuremberg. Interesting that the Nuremberg trials and the Nazis would be held there. And the
Speaker 4: very principles of the Illuminati, the way the organization was run, It's the very principles of the Jesuit order, and that's found in in Nestor Webster's book called Secret Societies.
Speaker 0: In 18/14, Francois Charles de Berghiem reported on Germany's secret societies and stated, the oldest and most dangerous association is that which is generally known under the denomination of the Illumiense, and of which the foundation goes back towards the middle of the last century. Bavaria was its cradle. It is said that it had for founders several chiefs of the order of the Jesuits. Through the Illuminati, the Jesuits sought to take over various powerful secret societies, especially the higher degrees of freemasonry.
Speaker 4: If you study all of the different organizations in the world, whether it be the Knights of Malta, the Bilderbergers, the Club of Rome, the Council on Foreign Relations. As you study all these different groups, and the Knights of Malta would be included in that, you find that they are like a buffer behind which the Jesuit order operates.
Speaker 0: In his book, proofs of a conspiracy, John T Robinson wrote concerning the masonic lodges. At this time, 1798, the Jesuits interfered considerably, insinuating themselves into the lodges. Robinson went on to say, this society is well known to have put on every shape and to have made use of every mean that could promote the power and influence of the order. And, we know that at this time, they were by no means without hopes of reestablishing the dominion of the Church of Rome in England. And with the Illuminati and the higher orders of freemasonry, the Jesuits fomented the destruction of the very monarchs who had opposed them beginning with the French Revolution and later with Napoleon Bonaparte.
Speaker 1: The French Revolution was launched and waged by the Jesuits using, Grand Orient Freemasonry and Scottish Rite Freemasonry in England for the purpose of punishing the Roman Catholic Monarchs of Europe, Taking back the Vatican Empire from the Pope. Tearing away the colonies from England, Protestant England. They were doing several things at one time. Remember the Jesuits are the great hegelians. They can think along 10, 20, 50 different lines at the same time and coordinate them all together.
So to understand what we do, we have to think dialectically. We can never think linearly. So the purpose of the French Revolution, 1st and foremost, was to punish the Roman Catholic Monarchs of Europe. And that they did. What happened?
Why they beheaded Louis the 16th. The grandson of Louis 15th. We're gonna teach you bourbons of France who you mess with, whom you suppress the gentleness. And then we're going to behead his wife, Marie Antoinette. And she was the daughter of Maria Theresa.
She was a Hapsburg. Habsburg. So we're gonna punish you Habsburgs. You suppress us, we're gonna cut off the head of Marie Antoinette using our Jacobins. And then you Berganzes of Portugal, we're gonna drive you into exile using Napoleon.
They did. They had to go into South America. And you Bourbons in Spain, we're gonna drive you into exile too. We're gonna have Napoleon set up a little Banana Republic up here in Spain. And, so and then the Knights of Malta?
How dare you kick us off your island of Malta in 17/68? We're gonna teach you a lesson. So they took Napoleon down here with his with his huge fleet, took all the treasures of the Knights of Malta, and took all their weapons so that they could use that in the invasion of Egypt. At which time, the Jesuits used Napoleon to kill all the Mamluks, the bodyguard of the caliph of Egypt. So now they're waging war against Islam like they are today.
Speaker 0: When Napoleon's usefulness came to an end, the Jesuits had him betray his soldiers in a war with Russia. Like many of the founding fathers of America, the French soldiers were very nationalistic, and they would be a problem in the future plans of the Jesuits. After his defeat in Russia, Napoleon was forced to abdicate. Working in the shadows, the Jesuits made sure he was kept in reserve should he be needed. So Napoleon was sent to the island of Elba and given an annual pension of CHF2,000,000.
Then, on August 7, 18 14, the unthinkable occurred. Pope Bias the 7th restored the Jesuit order.
Speaker 1: Jesuits were revived in 18 14, with the papal bull by pope Pius the 7th, which brought them back into existence.
Speaker 0: The suppression of the Jesuits was to last forever. It only lasted 41 years. Former US President John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson in 18 16 about the rebirth of the Jesuits and the danger they posed to America. Adams stated plainly, I do not like the resurrection of the Jesuits. They have a general now in Russia in correspondence with the Jesuits in the United States, who are more numerous than anybody knows.
Shall we not have swarms of them here in as many disguises as only a king of the gypsies can assume, dressed as painters, publishers, writers and school masters? I have lately read Pascoe's letters over again and 4 volumes of the history of the Jesuits. If ever any congregation of men could merit eternal perdition on Earth and in hell, it is this company of Loyola. Jefferson replied back to Adams, like you, I disapprove of the restoration of the Jesuits, for it means a step backward from light into darkness. Coincidentally, the restoration of the order occurred 1 month before the first meeting of the Congress of Vienna in 18/14.
The Jesuits were deeply involved in this meeting. When the monarchs of Europe began fighting among themselves, the Jesuits manipulated the circumstances to bring Napoleon back for an encore performance. The famous 100 days. The monarchs gathered in Vienna came to terms quickly in order to meet this renewed threat. The Jesuits careful manipulation of the events being played out like a chess game.
Again, it must be remembered that the society of Jesus never wanted to do away with kings. The Jesuits only wanted to punish those who had suppressed the order. In March of 18 15, 9 days after the Congress of Vienna ended, Napoleon led his patriotic monarchy hating men to defeat by attacking the wrong spot of the British lines at Waterloo.
Speaker 1: The Battle of Waterloo was deliberately lost by Napoleon as explicated by our great southern general, Thomas Jonathan Stonewall Jackson, when he reviewed the battlefield. And you can find this in Dabney's great work with his, biography that he wrote on Stonewall Jackson called The Life and Times of Stonewall Jackson. And when Jackson went there, he said, Napoleon attacked from the wrong position. He should have attacked over here. And exacts exactly what happened.
Napoleon deliberately sacrificed his army at Waterloo so that there would be the least amount of true patriots in France to resist the return of King Louis the 18th into France who immediately restored the Jesuits and restored the inquisition.
Speaker 0: Having no further need of Napoleon, the Jesuits made sure he was sent far away to the island Saint Helena in the South Atlantic. While there, he was poisoned and died in 18/21. In his memoirs, Napoleon maintained his loyalty to the Catholic church, but had this to say about the Jesuits. The Jesuits are a military organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery.
And the aim of this organization is power. Power in its most despotic exercise. Absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. We have stated that the Jesuits were deeply involved in the Congress of Vienna. Ostensibly, this meeting of the monarchs of Europe under the direction of the Jesuits was for the purpose of reorganizing Europe, restoring the balance of power, and discussing the creation of a federation of Europe.
According to author Burke McCarty, the Congress of Vienna and several other secret meetings were in reality black conspiracy against popular governments.
Speaker 4: After the constitution is signed, protestant principles are put in place in the United States. You go into the early 1800s. The Napoleonic Wars are being fought in Europe, in Russia. But finally, the Napoleonic Wars have stopped. All of the monarchs of Europe convene in Vienna, Austria.
The man who headed it was Clemens von Metternich of Austria. Russia was there. England was there. France was there. They all came there to Vienna to decide on a big problem in the world.
There were governments of the people, by the people and for the people that were being established. And these monarchs of Europe and the Pope himself, Pope Pius the 7th, and the newly formed, reestablished Jesuit Order in 18/14, they all came together and they said, if we don't destroy these free popular governments, eventually, the principles of those governments will destroy us. So at the Congress of Vienna, it was voted that they would pursue the destruction of any free governments in this world. And in 18/14, the one government that was the thorn in their side was the United States of America.
Speaker 0: 8 years after the congress of Vienna, the same parties met in Verona, Italy for a second meeting to discuss the United States of America and the threat of popular governments. For posterity's sake, on April 25th, 1916, senator Robert l Owen of the United States Congress entered into the congressional record, the secret treaty of Verona that was signed by the monarchs of Europe. These kings of Europe, under the control of the Pope, called themselves the holy alliance. The first article stated, the high contracting powers engage mutually in the most solemn manner to use all their efforts to put an end to this system of representative governments. The 3rd article gave special thanks to the pope for what he has already done for them and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations.
Speaker 2: Now the Treaty of Verona was an agreement between the Catholic Monarchies of Europe and the Vatican to destroy the concept of representative government worldwide.
Speaker 4: Samuel B. Moore shows conclusively that Medtner Nitsch and the Jesuit Order and Pope Pius VII, they all agreed that the way that they would destroy the United States would be by sending as many Catholic immigrants to the American shores as they possibly could. So thousands and thousands of Catholics were sent to the United States. Thousands and thousands of Catholic priests and many Jesuit coagitores were sent to America to take over and destroy this government.
Speaker 0: The treaty was signed on November 22, 18 22 in Verona, Italy by Metternich of Austria, Chateau Briand for France, Bernstead for Prussia, and Nessel Road for Russia. After reading the secret treaty, senator Owens pointed out that the threat under the secret treaty of Verona to suppress popular governments in the American Republics is the basis of the Monroe doctrine. This secret treaty sets forth clearly the conflict between monarchial government and popular government, and the government of the few as against the government of the many.
Speaker 4: Because of the congresses at Vienna and Verona in 18/14/18 22, there was an English statesman who was at both of those meetings. His name was Lord George Canning. And in, Burke McCarty's book called The Suppressed Truth About the Assassination of Lincoln, It says in there that George Canning warned the United States government as to what was going on. Canning was in contact with a man by the name of John Quincy Adams, who was a congressman at that time. He wrote to Adams.
He said, the monarchs of Europe, the pope, and the Jesuits are planning to destroy America. Quincy Adams took the information to the president at that time, a man by the name of Jim Monroe. We know him as James Monroe. James Monroe took the information, wrote to a former president who was still alive at that time. The man's name was Tom Jefferson, who was in retirement at Monticello.
Jefferson wrote back to Monroe, and he said, this is the greatest affront to America since the revolution. He said we need to do everything we can to oppose and stop this holy alliance set up by the monarchs of Europe, the pope, and the Jesuit order.
Speaker 0: In his letter to Monroe in 18/23, Jefferson said he did not want to pass up an opportunity of declaring our protest against the atrocious violations of the rights of nations by the interference of anyone in the internal affairs of another so flugidiously begun by Bonaparte and now continued by the equally lawless alliance calling itself holy.
Speaker 4: America's response to these two congresses was James Monroe's State of the Union address called the Monroe doctrine, where he told the powers of Europe, he said, you stay over there. You fight your wars in Europe. We'll stay over here. If you ever colonize in the Western Hemisphere, we will consider it an act of war. That was the Monroe Doctrine.
But in our history books today, we read nothing of the role of the Pope and the Jesuit order to destroy America. Nothing is in our books today to that effect. But that's why the Monroe doctrine was written.
Speaker 0: The Jesuits convened a meeting in Chery, Italy in 18/25 to discuss tactics for dealing with the Protestant nations. Unknown to the 13 Jesuits gathered for this clandestine meeting, a young novice named Leoni was in the adjoining library. Leoni could not believe his ears and began to take notes of what was being said for posterity. An English translation appeared in 18/48. What Leoni heard was no less than the Jesuit plan for world domination, and the destruction of heretics, especially the heretics in Protestant America.
As to the Jesuit plan for world government, you well know that what we aim at is the empire of the world. As to their plan for working in secret, let us prefer a secret war, which, though less brilliant, is more sure to bring us the advantage. Let us shun too much light. As to the pope, also known as the Vicar of Christ, we may say that God designs for extermination like the Canaanites, all the nations that obstinately refuse to enter into the unity of the church, and that the vicar of Jesus Christ is appointed to execute these judgments in due time. As to Protestant and non Roman Catholics who do not join Rome, we have, however, one source of rejoicing.
We cherish at the bottom of our hearts this principle that whatever does not unite with us must be annihilated. That Protestantism must therefore be utterly abolished. As to the Bible, then the Bible, that serpent which with head erect and eyes flashing fire, threatens us with its venom whilst it trails along the ground shall be changed again into a rod as soon as we are able to seize it. And what wounds will we not inflict with it upon these hardened pharaohs and their cunning magicians? The Monroe doctrine was ratified in 18/23.
The Jesuit meeting in Chery, Italy took place in 18/25. 1 year later, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died on the same day. Both of these former presidents and defenders of the constitution died on July 4th, 18 26. What are the odds that these two men so critical to the birth of the United States and enemies of the holy alliance, the Vatican, and the Jesuits would die on the same day? The day they died was the 50th anniversary of the adoption of the declaration of independence.
Autopsies were not performed on the former presidents, and it was assumed that they died of natural causes. Another strange coincidence would be the death of James Monroe on yet another 4th July in 18/31. Monroe left office in 18/25, and supposedly died of tuberculosis 6 years later. It should be noted that the symptoms associated with arsenic poisoning, difficulty in breathing, dryness and tightness of the throat, seizures, and burning pain are similar to those of tuberculosis. George Morgan commented on these strange circumstances in his book, The Life of James Monroe.
Morgan states, as John Adams and Thomas Jefferson had died on the 4th 5 years before, Monroe's death added to the wonder as though a power aloft had taken cognizance of the peculiar patriotism of these mortal men and had translated them. Is it possible that the power aloft was not from heaven and was not benign? Perhaps this power was not looking at the nationalism and patriotism of these men with joy as much as with a vengeful eye. As the Jesuit oath clearly states, a Jesuit vows to make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly against all heretics, Protestants, and Liberals. As I am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth.
That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poison cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the poynard, or the leaden bullet. Others have even pointed out George Washington's sudden death in 17/99 as very suspicious.
Speaker 1: There is evidence that the Jesuits assassinated a few American presidents before the war between the states. The first president they assassinated was George Washington. He was poisoned with anthrax. But one of his 3 attending physicians was behind that poisoning. Remember, from the day he took sick to the day he died was a mere 2 to 2 and a half days according to Hedley's great work, the life of Washington.
So he was murdered.
Speaker 0: Why would the Jesuits want to kill George Washington? Like Jefferson, Adams, and Monroe, Washington was first and foremost a nationalist, and warned against foreign influence. He promoted a policy of neutrality and the avoidance of European alliances. Washington repeated his isolationist policy in his farewell address that was published in newspapers throughout the country. Washington wrote, it is our policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world.
Besides this admonition to avoid foreign alliances, Washington loudly declared America should keep itself free from foreign influence. Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, I conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens. The jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake. In addition to these publicly expressed opinions, Washington had acted swiftly to put down the Jacobin inspired whiskey rebellion in 17/93 with 15,000 troops. Instigating the rebellion was the French ambassador, Edmond Gannet, and the revolutionary democratic clubs that had sprung up in America.
Gannett and the democratic clubs were linked to the Jacobin clubs in France. In her book, World Revolution, Nesta Webster states, these Jacobin Clubs were organized by the revolutionary committee under the direct inspiration of the Bavarian Illuminati. The Jesuits created the Illuminati and were thus working through the democratic clubs in America. Washington never realized he was taking on the Jesuits when he crushed the Whiskey Rebellion. John Adams became president after Washington left office.
During John Adams' administration, war with Illuminati controlled France was averted, but Washington made it known he would not resist a call from Congress to assume command of the army. Furthermore, Washington endorsed the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts that were designed to protect the United States from the extensive French Jacobin conspiracy. It is therefore no wonder that the vengeful eye of the Jesuits was focused on George Washington. After leaving office in 17/97, Washington lived only 2 years 9 months. From the onset of his illness in 17/99 to his death was a mere 2 days.
As with Monroe's death, the symptoms leading up to Washington's death were difficulty in breathing, tightness of the throat, and burning pain. Washington was only 67 years old when he died. Like Jefferson, Adams and Monroe, there was no autopsy with Washington's death. However, the Jesuits made sure they had a servant on hand, Tobias Lear, to carefully plant the story that Washington had neglected to take off his wet clothes after coming in from his day of riding about his farms in snowy weather. Washington had taken cold undoubtedly from being so much exposed the day before and complained of a sore throat.
Lear said this even though Washington explicitly told him that his great coat had kept him dry. According to Lear, we are to believe that George Washington, who survived the hardship of a winter at Valley Forge and other severe winters did not know how to take care of himself in bad weather? The more likely truth is that Washington had opposed the plans and schemes of the Society of Jesus and was assassinated for his interference. Other American presidents, both in the 19th 20th centuries who would run afoul of the Jesuits order would meet untimely deaths. For instance, the short presidency of William Henry Harrison.
Harrison had been elected president on March 4, 18 41. He would serve as president for only 35 days. At the end of March, the newly elected president came down suddenly with an illness and died. Many thought this was the result of his long inaugural address, which lasted over 2 hours in cold weather. But Harrison had been fine after the speech, and weeks had passed since the inauguration.
Why was Harrison assassinated? One only has to go to his inauguration address to find the main reason. Harrison stated in the 4th paragraph of his speech. We admit of no government by divine right believing that so far as power is concerned, the beneficent creator has made no distinction amongst men that all are upon an equality, and that the only legitimate right to govern is an express grant of power from the governed. Like other leaders in the past, Harrison was thumbing his nose against the holy alliance who practiced the divine right of kings to wield power as sanctioned by the pope.
Harrison was also unwilling to accept Texas, a slave territory, into the union, which ran against the Jesuit plan of using the slave issue to agitate and divide the northern states from the southern states. Unlike Adams, Jefferson, and Monroe, the Jesuits did not wait for the 4th July to eliminate the heretical president Harrison. Harrison was poisoned at the end of March and died on April 4th, 18 41. Vice president John Tyler succeeded Harrison as president. The annexation of Texas was accomplished in 18 45 under the watchful eye of the new president.
Another president who died suddenly in office was Zachary Taylor. Taylor was elected president in 18/48. Taylor was a southern slave holder who did not want to see slavery extended to any more areas of the country. Like Washington, Taylor was devoted to the union of the American states, was very popular, and was a military man. Another crisis over slavery occurred by the Jesuits in 18/50.
A compromise was being pushed to avert a split in the union. Taylor did not like the compromise being worked out in congress. On July 4, 1850, Taylor attended the groundbreaking ceremonies for the Washington Monument. He was fine upon returning back to the presidential mansion, then he became ill after eating some raw fruit that some say was a bowl of cherries. A violent fever came upon him.
Senator Benton commented that the violent attack commencing soon after his return to the presidential mansion. Old Rough and Ready frustrated his assassins and managed to fight the poison for 5 days and avoided the 4th July curse. President Taylor died on July 9th. The Jesuits removed a strong unifying leader and replaced him with a more malleable president in Millard Fillmore. Fillmore signed the compromise in 1850, just 2 months after Taylor's death.
As the Jesuit agitation of the American states was reaching its climax in the 18 fifties, A trial occurred in 18 55 at a courthouse in Illinois that would bring 2 faithful men together. These 2 men would join forces to fight the Jesuits. The first was a rebellious Roman Catholic priest by the name of Charles Chinequi. The second was a lawyer by the name of Abraham Lincoln. Charles Chinequi did not approve of the corrupt conduct of many of the priests he knew.
These evil priests were drunkards, sexually promiscuous, and thieves often stealing money and property collected from their parishioners.
Speaker 2: The priesthood in Chicago was very corrupt morally and, every other way. They, I mean, they were drinking heavily. They would go on these retreats, and take up a collection between themselves, put it all in a pot, and go out and, buy a
Speaker 1: lot of
Speaker 2: booze. And they also rented a lot of hookers. Apparently, there was a lot of, you know, sexual deviance going on at the time as well. And he didn't like that though. And he tried to change it.
He quoted exclusively from the Bible and his Bishop just could not tolerate that.
Speaker 0: The heads of the Roman church wanted to ignore these illicit and illegal activities. When he did not, bishop Reagan of Chicago and another priest by the name of Labelle arranged to have Chinequi accused of rape. Chinequi needed a good attorney. An attorney by the name of Abraham Lincoln was suggested.
Speaker 2: Abraham Lincoln had a a team of other lawyers under him. Right? It's like a regular defense team. Lincoln being one lawyer, a gentleman by the name of Stephen r Moore, was another lawyer. And that was a big court case at the time.
It was the most important court case that Lincoln ever had in his entire legal career, as a matter of fact, But it's been buried by the Illinois government.
Speaker 0: The trial did not go well for Chinooki. The general feeling was that he would be convicted.
Speaker 2: Local newspapers of the time, they speculated that Chiniqui was going to be found guilty. And, that was being broadcast, throughout the entire Catholic community at that time.
Speaker 0: Fortunately, for Geniqui, a witness came forward for the defense. Her name was Philomene Schwartz. Miss Schwartz had been in father Labelle's house the day the plot to frame Chinequi had been concocted. Schwartz contacted Lincoln and agreed to testify.
Speaker 2: She caught the midnight train to Urbana and met up with Abraham Lincoln and explained to me exactly what happened.
Speaker 0: Once Bishop Reagan and father Labelle found out about the potential witness, they fled the city. The prosecution dropped the charges, and Chinequi was vindicated. As they left the courtroom, Charles Chinequi was in tears.
Speaker 1: Lincoln says to him, why are you crying, mister Chinequi? He says your agents have your enemies have fled, and you're free to go. And he said, I'm not crying for myself, mister Leaking. I'm crying for you. He said, because I saw no less than 11 Jesuits with the sentence of death on their face today in this courtroom.
And know for a surety they will kill you for what you have done. And Lincoln says, well, let let this be my death warrant. And he gives Genequi a bill for a mere $50. And then Lincoln sobers up and said, it matters not where a man must die, but that he must die at the post of duty and honor.
Speaker 0: Chiniqui's words of warning to Lincoln would prove to be true. The conspiratorial hand of the Jesuits at work. A conspiracy to further their goal of a world under papal control. Abraham Lincoln was elected president of the United States 5 years after Charles Chinequi's trial. By 18/60, agitation between the north and the south was so great that many of the southern states decided to leave the union over Lincoln's election.
This agitation was designed from the beginning to drive a wedge between the north and the south and bring about a war that would result in the death of countless protestants, clearing the way for the Jesuits to reconstruct America into a tool of conquest. Lincoln had no military background. And the perception in the south was that he was incapable of mounting a war to stop the southern states from leaving the Union. However, the Jesuits had studied Lincoln and knew he would be a very effective leader. In his own way, Lincoln would serve the Jesuit ends.
Those ends were, 1, to kill protestants who lived mainly in the south, and 2, to undermine the constitution, especially the doctrines of state sovereignty and states' rights. Once in office, Lincoln refused to accept the right of any state to leave the union. He also refused to remove the federal troops from Fort Sumter under the command of major Robert Anderson, who was a freemason. As tensions mounted, the Jesuit controlled freemasons on both sides turned the standoff into a bloody war.
Speaker 1: It's no coincidence that general Beauregard, a Roman Catholic freemason, fired the first shots at Fort Sumter, and it's no coincidence that a Presbyterian Protestant Freemason incited those shots to be fired when he sent down the Star of the West to reinforce Fort Sumter, and that was Mason James Buchanan. James Buchanan started the war when he sent down the Star of the West, that ship, to reinforce the harbor because the southern states had lawfully seceded if we had a union of consent. And I would like to add here that the 3 states that that specifically reserved their right to secede in their state ratification papers were Virginia, Rhode Island, and New York. And if those 3 states reserved the right to secede to withdraw the powers, the specific powers they had delegated to Washington, then every other state had the right. So the Southern states had the right to secede.
The North had no right to stop it. So therefore, an attack against the southern states who had seceded was an act of war, and therefore, it was indeed a war of northern aggression against the southerners who had rightfully seceded.
Speaker 0: As the war progressed, it was obvious that not all was as it appeared to be on the surface. Time and again, generals on both sides made blunders and missed opportunities that would have ended the war sooner rather than later. The most glaring of these missed opportunities was the first battle of the conflict, the first battle of Manassas on July 21, 1861. Lincoln had ordered the invasion of the south by union troops. To stop them, southern forces were moved into position in Virginia under Brigadier General Joseph e Johnston and Brigadier General PGT Beauregard.
Beauregard had ordered the firing of the first shot at Fort Sumter, and his family was not only Roman Catholic, but also had Jesuit ties. During the course of the battle, the confederate forces were beaten back until colonel Thomas j Jackson stood his ground against the invading northern army. Stonewall Jackson's heroic stand paved the way for the routing of the invading union forces that soon withdrew towards Washington DC. Incredibly, the southern commanders, Beauregard and Johnston, did not pursue the defeated Union troops, although prompted by many, including Stonewall Jackson. Johnston and Beauregard let the defeated northern troops escape.
If they had pursued the northern army, the south would have annihilated their enemy and ended the war in a few days. Along with Johnston and Beauregard, there were other southern generals who seemed at times to be working against the South. Take for instance the legendary Robert e Lee. It was general Robert e Lee who ordered the disastrous Pickett's Charge at the Battle of Gettysburg on July 3, 18 63. Author and historian Bevan Alexander states, Pickett's charge was doomed before it started.
Sending massed bodies of men across nearly a mile of open ground against emplaced riflemen and banked cannons was simply an invitation for destruction. Bevan Alexander goes on to say that by insisting on fighting the north at Gettysburg and ordering Pickett's charge, Lee had lost well over a third of his army and had destroyed the last offensive power of the confederacy. It was also general Robert e Lee who refused to listen to Stonewall Jackson concerning the South's overall strategy. Jackson realized that an offensive war against the North would result in the South's defeat. No matter how skilled a battle leader Lee was, he could never win the war by pitting the far weaker resources of the South against the tremendous economic and military power of the north.
Stonewall Jackson's plan was to avoid the northern strength, its field armies, and strike at northern weakness, its undefended factories, farms, and railroads. Jackson wanted to bypass the union armies and to win indirectly by assaulting the northern people's will to pursue the war. Jackson called this unrelenting war. Lee never fully accepted Jackson's view. However, a union general named William Tecumseh Sherman did.
Sherman's march from Atlanta to the sea conducting unrelenting war broke the back of the South in 18/64 and spelled the end of the conflict.
Speaker 1: Lee was the one responsible for the defeat of and and and Teteram or Sharpsburg, when he left the the what was it? The order of 191, they wrapped up in a cigar. It was found by Yankee generals. Lee was behind that. Lee was behind not allowing Jackson to win at least 4 decisive battles against the Union forces.
And this is, spoken of and written very well in Bevin Alexander's great work, Lost Victories.
Speaker 0: It is also worthy to note this picture of Robert e Lee at the age of 38 with his son. Lee is displaying a mason sign called the hidden hand. Compare that picture with these pictures. All display the same masonic gesture. That the Jesuits had infiltrated freemasonry in the late 1700 and had taken control of the leadership of this secret society was unknown to freemasons serving in both the northern and southern armies.
Essentially, all freemasons were serving the Jesuits and the pope. Besides Lee's inactions and blunders on the battlefield, as well as those of other Confederate generals, a case can be made that the South's greatest general, Stonewall Jackson, was murdered during the 4 day battle of Chancellorsville, Lee being an accomplice.
Speaker 1: Jackson brings forth his plan to Lee how to flank Hooker's army, and then we can attack him from the rear. And Lee says, well, go ahead. Instead of saying praise God. Yes. If we can defeat Hooker, we can then march across the Potomac to Washington because that's all it would have taken.
We were this close to keeping our liberty. But because Lee is in cahoots with Hooker and there are Jesuits who are observers on the battlefield, as there were at Gettysburg. An arrangement is made between Lee and AP Hill because AP Hill hated Jackson's guts. Jackson had AP Hill arrested. This is general AP Hill.
General Jackson had general AP Hill arrested for insubordination, and Hill hated him for it. And so this was Hill's chance to get back. So Hill happens to have a subordinate general underneath him who then will be used to fire upon Jackson. So Jackson, as he arranges his his soldiers as a flank Hooker, and he tells them whatever you do, do not stop. You go you march right through the federal camp.
Well, what happens is AP Hill's general stops stops the whole movement. So everything is almost thrown in disarray and finally, this guy's convinced. Let's just keep going on. So by this time, they're losing valuable time. Still, it was a route, but it wasn't a defeat like it could've been.
And Jackson realizes that something's very wrong. He is now betrayed by AP Hill, and he's betrayed by this other subordinate. So in the evening, Jackson is recontering, trying to see what should be done, and he's fired upon by his own troops. And I show in my book that it was a conspiracy because some of the people there, Jackson, didn't know who they were. They were Confederate officers, and Jackson never seen them before.
So Jackson is wounded, but it's not mortal. He's bleeding, but he's he's bleeding severely. But what happens is that major Maguire, the doctors called to his assistants. Well, the doctor then takes him out off the way from the battlefield and amputates doctor. And from the battlefield by this doctor.
And Jackson said, our men need our doctor. Why deprive our our hurting, dying men of this valuable doctor? I'm getting better. And O'Neil Lee gives the order to go to Guinea Station, take Jackson with you. And so Jackson is being taken there, and he's beginning to recover.
And he's talking to the doctor. When can I get back? And so on. Well, the doctor gets him to Guinea Station and takes Jackson, takes him away from the main house and takes him out to this little shack where only the doctor and he are allowed to be. And it's there that this dirty freemason, Hunter McGuire, poisons Jackson, I believe, on about a Wednesday or Thursday.
And then Jackson's wife is able to come, and she sees him. But but Jackson's not well. His his his arm is it's the famous picture of him where he's had his arm amputated, but you really don't see it. His his his the sleeve is still there. And but he's been poisoned for the first time.
And then Friday or Saturday, he's given the final poisoning, and he can't survive. And so the doctor poisons him, and his wife has pleaded his wife, Julia, is pleading for him. Doctor, isn't there any more you can do for him? And so he dies. And with the death of Jackson, the poisoning of Jackson, then this very same wicked Hunter Maguire poisons Jackson's right hand man, who's also a preacher, saying to Pendleton, Colonel Pendleton, he poisoned him too.
So the Jesuits are busy using this doctrine to get rid of the true Southern Confederate leadership, Lee being a party to all of this.
Speaker 0: Like many others, Stonewall Jackson was getting in the way of Jesuit plans and had to be eliminated. At this point, we should take note of a man by the name of James Clark. Clark graduated from West Point in 18/29. After graduation, Clark was assigned to Louisiana. After a year of service, James Clark resigned his commission and converted to Catholicism.
In 18/44, Clark would become the 1st West Point graduate to join the Jesuits. Clark went on to teach mathematics and science at Georgetown University, and he became the president of Holy Cross. It was said that Clark took a lively interest in the doings of his former classmates. And just who were his former classmates? None other than Robert e Lee and Joseph e Johnston.
One can also include Jefferson Davis in this list since Davis graduated a year ahead of Clark. It can only be guessed as to what communications these former West Point graduates had with each other. But that a Jesuit was in communication with Lee, Johnston, and Davis during the period of the war between the states is surprising and somewhat shocking. And what is even more shocking were the activities of confederate president Jefferson Davis in 18/63. Protestant Jefferson Davis began corresponding with the Roman Catholic pope.
Speaker 1: Pope Pius the ninth, who was completely in the hands of the Jesuit order at this time, because he was not in their hands when he first became pope, He writes a letter to Jefferson Davis acknowledging him as the president of the United States.
Speaker 2: After the Battle of Gettysburg, there was a lot of correspondence that took place between the Davis government and the Vatican. The Davis government appealing to the pope for official help and recognition, which pope Pius the 9 eventually did give him.
Speaker 0: Davis was no stranger to Roman Catholicism. He had entered the Dominican operated college of Saint Thomas Aquinas near Springfield, Kentucky for 2 years. He was the only Protestant student at the school. Interestingly enough, the young Davis sought to become a Catholic, but was encouraged to remain protestant. 1 must ask why would the Roman Catholic church turned down a convert?
Did the Roman church have plans for Davis that would be better served with him remaining a protestant? After the war, Davis was sent a portrait of the pope. Such a gift, said a great niece, was never before conferred on any but crowned heads. General Lee also had his own picture of pope Pius the 9th, noting that the Pope was the only sovereign in Europe who recognized our poor Confederacy. Such was the attitude of these leaders of the Confederacy.
Men who were easily fooled or who were willingly playing along with the Jesuits' plan. It was these men who led the protestants of the south into a war that they had no intention of winning. Shades of Korea, Vietnam and the gulf wars come to mind. It should be remembered that for all of its posturing and open statements of support for the south, the papacy was really not on the south side at all.
Speaker 1: The open but false policy of Rome was that the pope was on the side of the south. And Chiniqui falls for this little delusion in his book, unfortunately. The secret but true policy of Rome was that Rome was completely on the side of the radical red Republicans in the North. Stevens, Sumner, Bingham, the list goes on and on. So because of this, the Jesuits made a show that they were behind the South to create more animosity on the part of the Northern Protestants against Southerners of the South because the Pope's against us by siding with the South, when in fact we wanted the utter annihilation of the southern provinces.
Speaker 0: Now let us turn our attention to the union army. What was true with the southern generals? Lincoln, to his dismay, discovered was also true with his northern generals. They had allegiances to others besides the union and Lincoln. General George McClellan failed to employ his vastly superior forces to defeat confederate general Lee on numerous occasions.
The most famous of which was at the battle of Antietam. Historian James m McPherson has pointed out that the 2 court of troops McClellan kept in reserve were in fact larger than Lee's entire force. The reason for McClellan's reluctance to put his reserve into the fight was that as in previous battles, he was convinced he was outnumbered. It should also be pointed out that McClellan was a freemason. The question has to be asked, who was McClellan really listening to?
Lincoln or the Jesuit superior general? Earlier, we noted general Lee's disastrous orders to general Pickett at the Battle of Gettysburg. At the same battle, union general George Meade allowed general Lee to escape. Meade was a Roman Catholic.
Speaker 1: And after Gettysburg, Lee is allowed to escape because a Jesuit then rides into the camp of Roman Catholic general Mead. And Roman Catholic Mead refuses to pursue Lee's army and captures only one gun when the South could have been defeated right then and there, and there would not have been the rape, pillage, and plunder from 18/63 to 65. There would not have been the destruction of General Sherman from Atlantis and Savannah. It would have been the burning down of Protestant Columbia. The the the 4 Protestant states of the South that were to be destroyed and plundered were Georgia, North and South Carolina, and Virginia.
Those are the states that were plundered. New Orleans was what? New Orleans was under Butler of the Beast, but Roman Catholic Louisiana was not persecuted. But it was those 4 key Protestant southern states that were made war upon. That would not have happened had Lee not been allowed to escape.
And Chiniqui writes of this in his book when the Jesuits rode into the camp and spoke to Mead. So it was a war against the white Anglo Saxon Protestant Baptist people of the South perpetrated by not only the generals of the North, Grant and Sheridan and Sherman and all those all those despicable criminals with their federal bandidi and their Roman Catholic Irishmen that they brought over here to steal everything they could steal off the southern plantations and to rape the black southern women that were slaves. It was a general rapine so bad that many of the black men took their women into the swamps and to deliver them from this Yankee pillage. It was a it was a complete and total grand theft and larceny of the southern people.
Speaker 0: In spite of the treacherous behavior on both sides, on April 9th 18/65, general Robert e Lee surrendered his confederate army to general Ulysses s Grant at the village of Appomattox Court House in Virginia. 2 days later, on April 11th, Lincoln made a speech discussing post war America. In the speech, Lincoln spoke in a conciliatory manner toward the southern states. Let us all join in doing the acts necessary to restoring the proper practical relations between these states and the union. They never having been out of it.
These words, taken with the amnesty for all southerners that Lincoln had proclaimed in November of 18/63 show us that the president was not looking for further reprisals or punishments against the South. However, Rome and the Holy Alliance wanted no amnesty for the South and going back to the hated constitution with states' rights and freedoms derived from the Bible. Lincoln had served his purpose. It was time for his removal.
Speaker 1: Lincoln was a useful tool thinking he was actually saving the Union because he wanted to restore the Southern states on the same footing they had left the Union, which would have frustrated the purposes of the Jesuit order by making a consolidated empire out of all the
Speaker 0: states. To ensure total chaos, the Jesuits decided Lincoln would not be the only target.
Speaker 2: So they came up with this, this plan to assassinate not just Abraham Lincoln, but the entire government.
Speaker 4: The South had lost the Civil War, so they were going to take out Abraham Lincoln, Vice President Andrew Johnson, the head of the Northern Army, Ulysses s Grant, and the secretary of the state, William Seward, all in one night.
Speaker 0: On April 14, 18 65, only 5 days after Lee's surrender, the conspirators struck. Abraham Lincoln was shot while watching a play at Ford's Theater. He died the next morning, April 15th at 7:22 AM. Secretary of state Seward was attacked at his home. The assassin, Lewis Paine, repeatedly stabbed Seward and escaped.
Miraculously, Seward recovered from his wounds. Vice president Johnson's assassin, George Axelrod, lost his nerve at the last minute and fled the scene. And General Grant avoided his assassin by leaving town earlier in the day to check on a sick friend. But who were these assassins? Most people know about John Wilkes Booth, the man who pulled the trigger and killed Lincoln.
But few realize that most of the conspirators were Roman Catholic. Even Booth had converted to Catholicism.
Speaker 4: It's clear that John Wilkes Booth, while he was a member of the Knights of the Golden Circle, at the time he was plotting Lincoln's assassination, he was also meeting in the home of a very devout Roman Catholic woman by the name of Mary Surratt, right in Washington, DC. And it was in her home that the plot to kill Lincoln was hatched.
Speaker 1: The Jesuits of Washington DC put together the plot for the assassination. The Jesuits of power behind that plot was Bernadine f Wiggott.
Speaker 6: Jesuits under the stream of an induction, they were not directly to be involved. They only were the, the, the elements, the intellectual, element that will prepare this. The case of Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln, the person, was killed by the Jesuits of Rome, but there was no Jesuits there involved directly. Nevertheless, was the Jesuit who prepared the plot against his life and prepared and trained those who were to kill him.
The invasion.
Speaker 0: Yes. To be sure, the assassins were also southerners, but they were first and foremost Jesuit assassins and agents of the foreign dictator called the pope. Among the conspirators was Mary Seurat's son, John Seurat. His tale leads to the very doors of the papal palace in Rome.
Speaker 2: 4 of them were eventually hung and the rest were sent to prison for various lengths of time. Booth was killed in a barn, but the story around Surratt is absolutely amazing. Surratt, after the assassination, John Surratt escaped, to Canada. Now the southern government had a kitchen cabinet based in Montreal. So that's the first place he went, was to Montreal.
And who's in Montreal to meet this this, sirat was 2 priests. And they scrolled him away for about 6 months. At the same time, the government is looking all over for this guy. He's like the biggest manhunt in US history, and they can't find him. And, so and here he is sitting in a in a, a little town outside of Montreal, being protected by priests.
Speaker 1: The Jesuits were behind this assassination. They controlled Sirat. Sirat called time outside of Ford's Theatre. John Wilkes Booth, does the shooting. The the guard the Secret Service guard who's supposedly supposedly to be guarding the entranceway to the Booth of Lincoln, He just happens to leave his post, and he's never punished for it.
So the assassination takes place. Surratt escapes to Canada. He's taken to Liverpool. He's taken from there to Rome. He enlists in the Popesawave army.
And in 18/67, he is discovered through another, Roman Catholic who reveals the truth about it. And, he is then brought back to the United States and put on trial. He has 2 trials. And because Roman Catholics have more allegiance to their priests in Buchanan law than they do our our country, when a Roman Catholic's on a jury, they can hang a jury and and let the murderer go free, and that's exactly what happened to John Sur.
Speaker 0: As a result of the Surat affair and the papal policy of not allowing Protestant churches within the city of Rome, the United States of America ended diplomatic relations with the Vatican in 18/67. But even with the end of diplomatic relations with the US, the Jesuits had achieved a great victory. First, 100 of 1000 of Protestants were dead. 2nd, much of the Protestant South lay in ruins. 3rd, forcing the South at gunpoint to stay in the union have dealt a severe blow to the constitution and the concept of freedom.
And lastly, Lincoln was dead and the Jesuits were avenged for his interference in the Chiniqui trial and his attempt to restore the republic to its pre war state. Adding insult to this situation, the jesuit controlled radical republicans in congress. Men like Charles Sumner and Thaddeus Stevens were able to pass the 14th amendment in 18/68. The 14th amendment created a new type of citizen, a citizen of the United States. Whereas before a man was a citizen of the state in which he was born, Citizenship was now at the national level.
Ostensibly, this new citizenship was created to help the freed slaves, But in reality, it was a measure that would allow the federal government to strip away constitutional rights from the people, and replace those rights with privileges granted by the government.
Speaker 1: In Maxwell versus Dow of 18 99, the supreme court said that none of the Bill of Rights are privileges and immunities of 14th Amendment US Citizenship. And the great dissent by John Marshall Harlan, the first Harlan must be read by every viewer as he goes out of his chair to say that we don't enjoy real liberty. That our rights of American freemen have been overthrown. And our Anglo Saxon liberties are gone. And then he reiterates in 1908 in Twining versus New Jersey when Twining versus New Jersey comes out and says, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Third Amendment, the 4th Amendment, the 5th Amendment, the 6th Amendment, the 7th Amendment, the 8th Amendment, none of those amendments are privileges and immunities of United States citizenship under the 14th amendment.
That's why in court, you take your 5th amendment privilege. That's why you you own a gun with a privilege. That's why you worship God now by a privilege granted from Washington. This ought to make us irate. All we have is Soviet citizenship.
But all of us are, whites and blacks were all slaves of the Jesuits from Washington DC. And when none of us have any absolute rights to limit the powers of Washington, the only thing that limits of Washington's powers and decisions is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's controlled by the Jesuits of Georgetown. You got 5 Roman Catholics sitting on it now.
Speaker 0: But why was it so important to the Jesuits to create a nation? In his book, a constitutional view of the law of the late war between the states, Alexander Stevens tells us why.
Speaker 1: In volume 2, Alexander Stevens tells us on page 650 the real reason of the 14th Amendment. Quote, consolidation and empire. That's the purpose of the amendment. Consolidation of the states and empire. That's why I call it the Pope's Holy Roman Fourteenth Amendment, corporate, fascist, socialist, communist empire created by this 14th Amendment.
He goes on and says, they have not as yet openly denied the federative character of the Government. However, in direct war upon its principles, their acts have been covertly aimed. This is an exceedingly important fact to be specifically noted and kept in mind. These monstrous reconstruction measures, with all their enormities and fatal tendencies towards ultimate complete centralism and empire, are still based upon the assumption that the states, as separate integral parts, constitute members of what is still, in words at least, acknowledged to be a Federal Union. All these bold usurpations of power are, upon their face, nothing but resorts to induce or to compel under duress the peoples of the several Southern States to go through the forms of adopting the 14th Amendment as an additional article to the Constitution.
So he then concludes, no system of representative government can be long maintained by any people who have not the intelligence to understand it, the Patriotism to approve it, and the Virtue to maintain and violate both its form and principles as established. So this is the reason for the 14th Amendment, consolidation and empire. And this is what Andrew Johnson understood was the purpose, and so he campaigned against it. And he called Lee a hero if that was the real reason for this war, to keep this consolidation and empire from being formed. The 14th amendment was proclaimed ratified on July 28, 18 68.
That was the end of the Washington's Republic as established in 17/87. So our white Anglo Saxon, Protestant, and Baptist Calvinist Federal Republic of these United States lasted from 17/87 to 18/68. And a new nation was established in 18/68 and that is called the American Empire in my book, and it has existed from 18/68 to the present. And it is squarely in the hands of the papacy for two reasons, for destroying heretics, liberals, perfidious Jews, and infidel Muslims and Buddhists over the last 100 years since the Spanish American war or since, really, the Indian War of the Great Plains. The War of the Great Plains from 18 60 to 18 90 was the annihilation of the Native American Indians so that they could build an empire from sea to shining sea, a terrible crime.
And it was all led by, a Roman Catholic army general named Philip Sheridan, who was advised by the America's most powerful Western Jesuit at the time, Pierre de Schmidt, and it was as Philip Sheridan who said, the only good Indian is a dead Indian.
Speaker 0: With the 14th amendment, the constitution of the founding fathers was tossed into the dustbin of history. And centralization of power in Washington DC was well underway. Now the American empire could begin in earnest. The American states, both in the north and south would be subservient to the federal government and would be essentially slaves to this new master. In rapid secession, the United States found itself in one war after another.
The Spanish American War, World War 1, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, Gulf War War, Gulf War 2, and a host of smaller police actions, such as in Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Libya. Looking over the last 150 years, one can discern the influence of the Jesuits in the initiation of these wars and conflicts for the purpose of building a world empire under their control. Early in the 20th century, the Jesuits were determined to start a new European war.
Speaker 1: Germany expelled the Jesuits in 18/72. Russia had expelled the Jesuits in 18/20. France had expelled the Jesuits in 18/80. Britain had formally, although not in actuality, had formally expelled the Jesuits in 18/29. Every country in Europe Switzerland, 18/48.
Every country in Europe had expelled the Jesuits except Belgium. And so the Jesuits said, well, now we're gonna have to punish these people because they obviously didn't learn the lesson of the Napoleon Bonaparte. So what we're gonna do is we're gonna use Britain and we're gonna use America, and we're gonna have a second 30 years war. The first one was from 16 18 and then 1648. The second one's going to be from 1914 to 1945.
We're gonna have World War 1. We're gonna have the Bolshevik Revolution. We're gonna have the Spanish Civil War. We're going to have World War 2. We're going to just have continual war for 30 years.
We're gonna control all the factions. We're gonna control the allies. We're gonna control the axis.
Speaker 0: The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the spark that ignited the First World War. Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the heir apparent to the Austro Hungarian throne. His inclusive policy towards the Slavic peoples, and lenient treatment of Orthodox Christian Serbia, made him unacceptable to Rome. He therefore could not be allowed to rule. The assassination was set for July 26, 1914.
Since the year 1054, the Catholic church has been waging war against orthodox Christians. The orthodox Christians did not accept the supremacy of the pope. A war involving the major powers of Europe would be a opportunity to have 100 of 1000, if not millions of orthodox Serbs and Russians killed. Afterwards, Rome would be in a better position to dominate these countries. Who shot the archduke?
Gavrilo Prince, a member of the secret society called the Black Hand. The Black Hand was founded by Free Masons. During the trial, Princip testified that his colleague, Ciganovic, told me he was a freemason. And on another occasion, told me that the heir apparent, Franz Ferdinand, had been condemned to death by a freemason's lodge. Even though a masonic group carried out the murder, all of Serbia was blamed.
It was never pointed out at that time that the assassins were linked to freemasonry and that its upper levels had been under the control of the Jesuits for nearly a century. After World War 1, a movement was put in motion to have a world government that would help the nations of the world live in peace, a peace controlled by the Jesuits. When this world government or League of Nations failed to materialize, the Jesuits push forward plans to create a second world war. Even before the end of World War 1, the Jesuits had set in motion a plan to bring the Russian Orthodox Christians back into the fold of the Pope's control. Under the direction of their superior general, Vladimir Letovchowski, the Jesuits instigated the Bolshevik revolution in 1917.
This revolution brought communism to Russia. The Jesuits had been thrown out of Russia over a 100 years earlier. But now, the leader of the Bolsheviks, Vladimir Lenin, admitted the Jesuits back into Russia in 1922. Lenin proved fickle and showed signs of disloyalty to the Jesuits. For this, he was poisoned, and his replacement, Joseph Stalin, was ready to carry on with the Vatican's bidding.
As a boy, Stalin had obtained a scholarship to attend Tiflis Theological Seminary. Openly, the school was Orthodox Christianity. But behind the scene, it was run by the Jesuits. In 1931, Stalin was interviewed by Emil Ludwig. Ludwig, do you not admit that the Jesuits have good points?
Stalin, yes. They are systematic and persevering in working to achieve sorted ends, But their principle method is spying, prying, worming their way into people's souls and outraging their feelings. Once in power, Stalin killed millions of people, both Jews and Orthodox Christians. He killed anyone who would resist the new Soviet state he created based on Marxism. What many failed to understand was that Marxism was based on the jesuit slave plantations or reduciones in South America and sir Thomas More's book, Utopia.
Speaker 1: What the Jesuits did was is they were the masters of communism. Communism originates with the Roman Catholic traitor, whose name was sir Thomas More. Sir Thomas More betrayed King Henry the 8th, gave his full allegiance to the Pope, and for which reason Thomas More was executed as a traitor, holding for the Pope's temporal power over his allegiance to his king. Sir Thomas More is the author of Utopia. Utopia is the foundation for Communism.
So Communism is Romanism. In fact, the orders, the many communities of the Roman Catholic Institution, the Jesuit Order, the Redemptorists, that goes on and on. They run on communist principles of universal equality. Communis is the Latin term. So therefore, communism is a brainchild of the Jesuits, but it has been made to look Jewish through implementing it through Marx and his communist manifesto, financed also by another masonic British freemason, Engels.
Speaker 0: Besides establishing communism in Russia after World War 1, the Jesuits sought to reestablish the Pope's physical kingdom that had been taken from him in 18/71. On June 7, 1929, the Lateran Treaty was ratified, which reestablished the pope's domain called Vatican City. The new prime minister of Italy, Benito Mussolini, was instrumental in bringing about the treaty. The treaty occurred only a few months before the economic crash that started in America and quickly spread around the world called the great depression.
Speaker 1: Approximately $90,000,000 worth of gold in in lira, I think I think it was about a 1000000000 worth of lira, something like that, was given to the papacy by the Italian government. So the for reparations, for lack of a better word, because we had been suppressed from 18/70/19/29. You owe us all this money. So Benito Mussolini enslaves the Italian Catholic people, makes them pay this huge sum, which they didn't wanna pay. And what does the papacy do with this money?
Well, this treaty is in about February or March. In October, the Jesuits crashed the American stock market, and they used their their number one short seller, the Irish Roman Catholic Joseph p Kennedy, to do it. So they sell short. The margin calls can't be met. The Stock market crashes.
And what happens? The Vatican takes their 1,000,000 of dollars that they got from Mussolini, and they invest it in all the corporations and businesses that are busted on Wall Street, and they buy it all for pennies. So by the time Wall Street comes back into power, the archbishop of New York completely controls all the major corporations in this country.
Speaker 0: As banks began to fail, the Federal Reserve did not act to pump money into the system, which it should have done had those in control of it wanted to keep the banks afloat. As the chaos lingered, and many lost their jobs, and were driven into poverty, the Jesuits created a dictatorship out of the office of the president of the United States. In March 1933, the new president Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed into law a state of national emergency. Under such a state of emergency, the constitution was set aside, ostensibly for the public good, until the emergency was canceled by the president. Roosevelt never canceled the emergency.
This was verified in 1973 by the church Mathias Committee and published in senate report 93 dash 549. No American president since then has canceled the emergency. And even though Congress passed the National Emergency Termination Act in 1974, this termination was in name only. The reality was that the emergency powers taken were never returned. They continued in the US code as permanent powers.
Thus, we are currently in a state of emergency or dictatorship. It should also be noted that Roosevelt was a 32nd degree freemason. FDR was obliged to follow the orders of the head of this secret society. His oath to freemasonry superseded his oath to the US constitution. And as we have seen, the man in control of freemasonry was the Jesuit superior general.
In Germany, the Vatican had in place Adolf Hitler. It is usually not emphasized, but Hitler was a Roman Catholic. Hitler praised the Roman Catholic church saying that until now, there has never been anything more grandiose on the earth than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. Heinrich Himmler, Hitler's head of the SS, was also a Roman Catholic. Frederick Hoffett wrote, Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler, and most members of the party's old guard were Catholics.
After the war, Walter Schellenberg, former head of German counter espionage, stated the SS organization had been constituted by Himmler according to the principles of the Jesuit order. Himmler's title as supreme commander of the s s was to be the equivalent of the Jesuits general. Incredibly, although he killed and tortured 1,000,000, the Vatican never excommunicated Hitler. In fact, not one of the mass murderers of the Third Reich was ever excommunicated by the Vatican. The day Hitler died, the Spanish dictator Franco, also a Roman Catholic, had this statement run-in the publication reform.
Adolf Hitler, son of the Catholic church died while defending Christianity. As a loyal son, Hitler killed heretics, including protestants, Jews, orthodox Christians, and even liberal Catholics. All told, the war dead numbered between 62 to 78,000,000 people. 11,000,000 of the total dead from World War 2 died in concentration camps. 6,000,000 being Jews.
The Jewish Holocaust was never condemned by Pope Pius the 12th or, for that matter, by any other pope. Why this silence? The Jews, like all heretics, resisted conversion to Roman Catholicism and obedience to the pope. Who financed Hitler? The answer is clear and easily verified.
The Vatican and many of the wealthy elite in the west gave Hitler the money he needed to build the Third Reich. As early as 1919, archbishop Eugenio Pacelli met a young Adolf Hitler in Munich. The meeting occurred at night while all the household was asleep, except for the nun who attended archbishop Pacelli. Her name was Pasolini. According to Pasolini, Hitler told Pacelli that he was out to check the spread of aesthetic communism in Munich and elsewhere.
It did not come as a surprise to her, therefore, in light of Paselli's hatred of the reds to see the prelate present Hitler with a large cash of church money to aid the rising revolutionary and his small struggling band of anti communists. Go quell the devil's work. Help spread the love of almighty God, Pacelli told Hitler. For the love of almighty God, she heard the young man, Adolf Hitler, reply. Money for this young revolutionary also came from industrialists in the West.
Speaker 1: Hitler's rise to power was financed by London and New York and Berlin. They were the Knights of Malta running the banking institutions of the world.
Speaker 0: In the discipline of historical research, one of the greatest taboo subjects is to look into who financed Hitler. The answer is clear and easily verified. The Vatican and many of the wealthy elite in the west gave Hitler the money he needed to build the 3rd Reich. Many do not realize that Prescott Bush, the grandfather of president George w Bush, and George Herbert Walker, the maternal great grandfather of president George w Bush, were Nazi collaborators. Along with Averell Harriman, they set up Union Banking Corporation as a complex money laundering operation for a number of Nazi front businesses.
Documents at the National Archives and the Library of Congress show conclusively that Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker should have been tried for treason because their Nazi dealings continued after the US entered World War 2.
Speaker 7: They had continued to do business with their primary Nazi patron, who was Fritz Thyssen, who backed Hitler beginning in 1921 and who was the wealthiest man in Germany and a steel and coal baron who, with his partner, Friedrich Flick, essentially built the Nazi war machine along with IG Farben. In 1951, when Fritz Thiesen died in Argentina, Union Banking Corporation was liquidated by the US government and Prescott Bush received $1,500,000 for his holdings in his Nazi business and that was the beginning of the Bush family fortune for all intents and purposes. George Bush doesn't take his philosophical foundation from the Bible or the teachings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount. George Bush takes his inspiration from what he learned in Skull and Bones and from the Fool Society that Hitler and Goebbels and Goring cut their teeth in, Bohemian Grove, these evil organizations that perpetrate the ugly things that these criminals are doing to this country for which they must be held accountable.
Speaker 0: The Jesuits created the Illuminati in 17/76. The American branch of the Illuminati was called Skull and Bones and has its headquarters at CIA recruiting ground Yale University. Prescott Bush was a member as was his son and grandson, president George w Bush. It is interesting that in the 2004 presidential election, 2 skull and bones members ran against each other.
Speaker 8: You were both in Skull and Bones, the secret society.
Speaker 0: It's so secret we can't talk about it.
Speaker 8: What does that mean for America? The conspiracy theorists are gonna go watch. I'm sure they are. I don't know. I haven't seen the webinar.
322? I am first of
Speaker 0: all, he's not the nominee. And, but,
Speaker 8: look. I look for it.
Speaker 0: Are you
Speaker 4: afraid to lose?
Speaker 0: No. I'm not gonna lose.
Speaker 8: You both were members of Skull and Bones, a secret society in Yale. What does that tell us? Not much because it's a secret. Is there a secret handshake? Is there a secret code?
I wish there were something secret I could manifest. 322, a secret number? There are all kinds of secrets then, but one thing is not a secret. I disagree with this president's direction.
Speaker 0: It is evident that the Bush family and others are under and have been under the control of the Jesuits for decades. Most people are familiar with Hitler's book, Mein Kampf. However, it may surprise many that Hitler did not write the book.
Speaker 1: You know, Hitler was not a writer. You know, Hitler was a newspaper reader. According to Kurt Kruger's great book, I was Hitler's doctor, it was published in 1934. He said that Hitler's lair was just filled with old newspapers, that that's all he ever did was read. These old newspapers.
He was not a writer. He was not a student of history. He was not a student of culture. If you read Mein Kampf, whoever wrote it knew the cultures of many different countries over many different centuries. They knew all about political practices.
The writers of Mein Kampf were brilliant. And Mein Kampf, according to Leo Lehmann, who was an Irish Roman Catholic priest who wrote Behind the Dictators in 1942, said that father Bernard Stemfel was the real author of Mein Kampf.
Speaker 0: Adolf Hitler was created to be an instrument of the Jesuits. And like Napoleon, Hitler served his creator well. Millions of the Vatican's enemies were dead and America forgot George Washington's warnings and abandoned its policy of isolationism. During World War 2, the Vatican targeted the Orthodox Christians in Croatia for destruction. As in World War 1, the Orthodox Serbians of Croatia suffered again in World War 2.
A campaign of terror and murder was inflicted on the Serbs by the Croatian Ustase regime. The leader of the Ustase was Ante Pavelic, a Roman Catholic. Pavelic and the Ustase murdered around 500,000 people, while 250,000 were expelled, and another 200,000 were forced to convert to Catholicism. Like the Jewish Holocaust, Pope Pius the 12th never condemned these atrocities, nor has any Pope since then condemned them. Once the war had concluded, the Vatican helped former Nazis escape Germany to save havens in South America.
They even helped Ustase leader Pavelic escape to Argentina.
Speaker 3: Pope Pius the 12 was the pope who saved 100 of 1000 of who passed through Vatican monasteries, Dominican, Benedictine, and Jesuit, where they were given shelter, new identities, new passports, sent largely to South America, but there were plenty, sent elsewhere, including to the United States, where there was even a program to get the good ones out, Operation Paperclip, which is well known, but Canada let in. And I I I know this. Mackenzie King let in tons of Nazis who passed through the Vatican monsters, and this pope Pius the 12th could it's impossible he didn't know about that.
Speaker 0: After World War 2, a conflict began between the western powers, mainly the US and Britain, and those of the east, the Soviets and the Chinese. It came to be called the cold war. From its beginning, the cold war was a way of keeping the world in chaos and fear. Pitting the Christian nations against the communist nations. And most importantly, a way to keep the spotlight off the Vatican.
Many people knew of Rome's backing of the Catholic dictators of Europe. They also knew of Rome's aid in helping many of them to escape. The Vatican had not been punished for these crimes. In fact, Pope Pius the 12th should have stood before the judges at Nuremberg. The Jesuits used the Cold War as an effective diversion for Rome.
It worked like a charm. To get it started, a rock in the road had to be removed. That rock was General George s Patton. At the end of World War 2, General George Patton wanted to attack the Soviet Union. Patton saw the menace to the free world communism was and wanted to go ahead and end it.
Patton's conversation to General McNarny in 19 45 was revealing. Why do you care what these goddamn Russians think? We are going to have to fight them sooner or later. Why not do it now while our army is intact, and the damn Russians can have their hind end kicked back into Russia in 3 months? The Jesuits could not allow the Soviet Union to be destroyed.
As Robert Wilcox lays out in his book, Target Patent, Roman Catholic William Donovan, head of the OSS, arranged for the assassination of Patton. Patton had survived 3 previous attempts on his life. He also survived the 4th, but was hospitalized. While in the hospital, a refined form of cyanide was given to him that can cause or appear to cause embolisms and heart failure. After making preparations to leave the hospital, Patton's health took a sudden turn for the worse, and he died.
The result was that the Jesuits got their cold war. During the cold war, the activity of 2 US presidents, John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, reveals much about the power of the Jesuits. John Kennedy was a Roman Catholic who turned against the Vatican and the Jesuits. Kennedy decided to be his own man, take his own counsel, and not take orders from Rome. He turned out to be a liberal Catholic, which is just as obnoxious to the Vatican as a Protestant or any heretic.
Kennedy began to pull out of Vietnam. He ordered the Treasury Department to print money and not go through the privately held Federal Reserve, and he had plans for a new invasion of Cuba.
Speaker 1: See, Kennedy wanted Cuba back from Castro. The big lie is that Kennedy, he was he canceled the orders. He didn't cancel the orders. McGeorge Bundy canceled the order for the air cover in the Bay of Pigs. That's according to Fletcher Prouty in his book, JFK.
And on the, on the USS Essex, which was a aircraft carrier there, the the captain was told not to give any
Speaker 3: air cover to the invading, patriots here
Speaker 1: in Cuba. But that cover was canceled, not by JFK, because the night before he said he gave a go ahead. And to prove this point, there's a book that's been released about a year ago called Ultimate on December 1, 1963 and get rid of that Jesuit Fidel Castro. On November 22nd, he was killed. Maybe 9 days before the invasion was to take place.
Speaker 0: Like the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, John f Kennedy's assassination was meticulously planned and executed with Lee Harvey Oswald as the patsy.
Speaker 1: You see, Gene Hill with Mary Mormon were right there at the limousine. And Gene Hill and Mary Mormon said that the driver turned around and shot, but they thought the driver was shooting back at the shooter. They didn't know the driver was shooting JFK in the head along with the storm drain shooter, a simultaneous headshot. That shot from the grassy knoll was a distraction. They had a smoke.
I mean, we've had smokeless gunpowder since the turn of the century. I mean, why would they use a rifle and have smoke? It was a distraction for the crowd to run to the grassy knoll because the real shooters was the storm drain shooter and the driver shooting Kennedy in the head simultaneously. And I show in my book, Kennedy was shot 5 times.
Speaker 0: The assassination was done in a very public way to show other would be presidents what would happen if orders were not followed.
Speaker 1: The assassination of John Kennedy is done in broad daylight as a warning to all the other leaders of the world, but it's also done with this viciousness. Because, you see, JFK was a Catholic, and they wanted to kill their Catholic boy who refused to uphold the temporal power of the pope. So they killed him viciously and cruelly. This is a warning to any other Catholic who would dare trample the temple power of the pope.
Speaker 0: In contrast to Kennedy, Ronald Reagan did everything he could to court Vatican approval after an assassination attempt on his life in 1981.
Speaker 1: Well, Ronald Reagan was advocating some things that would have built the middle class that were generally pretty good. He was talking like a conservative. Evidently, he thought for a few minutes he was the president because he'd been told to choose George Bush as the vice presidential candidate. And all the and all the conservatives say, how could you do this to us? And yet he's still, quote, unquote, elected.
So Reagan starts to advocate some pretty good things, and so we're going to punish you, Ronnie. And so they carried out the attempted assassination. If he survives, he'll do what we're told what he's told. If he doesn't survive, well, then George Bush will openly take his place and be the president. Either way, we win.
So Jerry Parr, the secret service agent, shoots Ryan Reagan inside the vehicle and makes it look like Hinkley is the one who shot him. Hinkley did not shoot Reagan. He was Reagan was untouched when at the time he was entering this limousine. He was shot inside the limousine by a secret service agent, and, then phenomenally enough, a a Jewish doctor saved his life. So, Bush was a part of this, of course.
He, was not openly made the president, but he was secretly the president during the entire, two terms of Ronald Reagan.
Speaker 6: President Reagan has come to fulfill the greatest moment in the history of this conspiracy because no other president has come as close as president Reagan with the Vatican and even, not even John f Kennedy. What that means is they have bound to president Kennedy and to president Reagan what they were not able to do even through a Roman Catholic president.
Speaker 0: In 1984, Reagan established diplomatic relations with the Vatican. Not since 1867 had there been any official contact between the two countries.
Speaker 1: That relationship was formally restored by the worst president America has ever been disgraced with, our greatest traitor, Ronald Reagan. When he restored diplomatic relationships with the Vatican, formally recognized the sovereign state of Vatican City as a nation, And now America can enter into a concordat with the pope as warned by ex Jesuit Alberto Rivera for many
Speaker 0: years. Ex Jesuit priest Alberto Rivera also revealed a secret concerning the inauguration of Ronald Reagan that some noted at the time, but few fully understood.
Speaker 4: Alberto Rivera made a startling statement in which he said there would be a sign given to Jesuits throughout the world when all churches would be taken over by the Jesuit order. The sign was to be when a president of the United States took his oath of office facing an obelisk. For the first time in US history, the swearing in ceremonies were moved to the west front of the capitol and president Reagan faced the Washington Monument.
Speaker 0: After Reagan's presidential reign, the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, and the Cold War ended. However, instead of greater freedom, nations around the world found their governments becoming more repressive. Terrorism became the new foe, and the United States and other Western governments pledged to fight this new enemy at all cost. That included taking away all God given rights from the people in order to bring about supposed peace and safety. In America and elsewhere, many noted that the government knew about the terrorist attacks in advance, but failed to stop them.
In fact, it is now painfully obvious that the government allowed these attacks to occur. Unfortunately, the American people find themselves in the same situation and making the same mistake that the southern people made before the war between the states. In the 1800, the South, like the North, had Jesuit controlled freemasons and in key religious, political and military positions. Many newspapers were also under Rome's control. These men and media outlets created the agitation towards war.
As the slave issue escalated, pushing the South towards secession, the Southern people fully expected God to be on their side. However, like America today, the people of the South failed to understand they were not on God's side. The South did not practice biblically sanctioned slavery. The Bible authorizes 2 types of slavery, a voluntary servitude to pay off debt, and slavery as a result of war. The South did not practice these types of slavery.
The South practice man stealing or kidnapping for profit. Exodus 2116 clearly states, and he that stealeth a man and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death. For their sin and refusal to repent of man stealing, the South reaped a harvest of death and destruction. Likewise, America today is finding itself in the same situation. Instead of asking God why he did not protect them from the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
Americans were easily manipulated with pride and cried out for vengeance against a foreign enemy. A vengeance that brought multi $1,000,000,000 profits to the death industries by promoting endless war. Instead of asking God what they had done to offend him and lose their blessed state, the American people are seeking answers and solutions from politicians, false prophets, and economic wizards. For the most part, the American people do not see a correlation between turning their backs on the God of the Bible and the disasters that have come down upon them. At the beginning of 20th century, the Jesuits decided to implement their plans to create a central bank in the United States.
Their plan would enable them to pay for the wars that were coming as the American empire expanded. Once this was accomplished, the common man would hold worthless paper, and the Jesuits would be in a position to fund new wars using the US military as its muscle.
Speaker 1: The Jesuits, in their counter reformation, have set out to destroy the Protestant reformation, which had a middle class and private rights and private wealth and private land ownership. And in their attempt to bring the world back to the Dark Ages, the 13th century, when Pope Clement III was the demon pope of all of Europe at the time, set out to destroy the Abigensis and others. To do this, to destroy Western Protestant civilization, they had to implement the pillars of the Communist Manifesto. Well, 2 of those pillars are these. The national credit would be in the hands of the federal government, so, therefore, the net the credit of this country is in the federal government as extended by the Federal Reserve Bank, which is a private bank.
Lewis versus U. S. Tells us this in a federal case. So this private Federal Reserve Bank, which is controlled by the Vatican, Lewis various orders, particularly the old crusading orders like the Knights of Malta and the Knights Templars, which are today high level freemasons. They have put upon us this horrible Federal Reserve Bank, which is the Pope's bank to finance all the Pope's crusades since no later than the Spanish American war of 18 98 to the present.
Speaker 0: In order to create the central bank, certain obstacles had to be overcome. 1st, those opposed to a central bank would need to be removed. And secondly, the law would need to be changed, or simply appear to be changed. To deal with the troublesome individuals who opposed a central bank, the Jesuits spared no expense. They built a ship of death called the Titanic.
The sinking
Speaker 1: of the Titanic was a design of the Jesuit order to get rid of, the opposition to the creation of a central bank in the United States.
Speaker 4: And the men on the Titanic were opposed to a central bank. They had to die. Among those were John Jacob Astor, Isidore Straus, Benjamin Guggenheim and a host of other millionaires who were opposed to a central bank in America. Therefore, they had to be taken out of the way. And they were on the Titanic.
Speaker 0: The company building the ship was owned by JP Morgan, who was himself an agent of the Rothschilds family. The Rothchilds being the bankers for the pope and the Vatican. The main Jesuit targets were brought on board. The captain of the ship was Edward John Smith. It appears from his actions that captain Smith was a Jesuit coagitor, that is a Jesuit who has taken the oath, but does not wear the robes.
A Coagitor blends into the scenery and never looks like a Jesuit priest. It is a veteran sea captain, Edward Smith, who orders the ship to travel through an 80 square mile ice field at full speed on a moonless night. There had been over 8 telegrams warning the captain of the danger.
Speaker 4: He's warned 8 times, slow the ship down, slow the Titanic down. You're going too fast. Not once stopped. Knew there was an ice, you know, iceberg field up ahead, knew that he should have slowed down, but didn't. And so you look and you say, how was it that this man could go headlong into a field of icebergs and not slow the ship down, not be more careful?
The only way you can the only conclusion you can draw is, as a coagitor of the Jesuit order, right through the line, the chain of command, he was told, Sink the ship. And he did. On board the Titanic, and this is all documented in a National Geographic video that was put out in 1986. You can go to your local library, and they'll either have it on hand or they can get it on library loan. But on that videotape, it shows that as the Titanic was coming up along the coast of England, it had various stops.
And at one stop, a Jesuit priest got on board. His name was Francis Brown. Francis Brown got on board the Titanic, took pictures of all of the wealthy people, took pictures of Edward Smith, the captain. And then just before the Titanic set sail across the Atlantic, Francis Brown got off. And then, of course, the Titanic sunk.
Speaker 1: Well, Francis Brown is given a camera by his bishop by his uncle, the bishop. And he is told to go down and take all these pictures of all these people we're gonna kill in 1st class. And so that's what he does. He takes picture of of all these rich people, everybody that there's that there's gonna go down, and a rich passenger offers him passage. Well, he knows the ship's gonna go down, but he he very sheepishly got in contact with his provincial.
And the provincial's message was get off that ship.
Speaker 0: Like Brown, another noted passenger, Jesuit agent JP Morgan, did not make the ill fated sea voyage. Even though booked on the ship for passage to America, Morgan also fortuitously canceled at the last minute.
Speaker 1: Of course, JP Morgan, he had a he had his own suite reserved for him. And there were some 55 men who at the last minute canceled their reservations on the Titanic. JPMorgan was one of them. Said he was sick. Oh, by the way, don't load any of my art treasures on the Titanic either.
So he didn't have any of his art treasures on it either. Didn't lose any of that.
Speaker 0: How do we know there was foul play involved with the Titanic? When the iceberg was sighted, it was first officer Murdoch who attempted to port around the deadly object. This was sound enough, but Murdoch also ordered the engines into reverse. Author Win Wade asked the obvious question. As long as Murdoch was trying to veer out of the iceberg's way, why had he jammed on the brakes, so to speak, by throwing the engines full speed astern?
In point of fact, the 1910 edition of Knight's modern seamanship clearly contradicted Murdoch's decision. The instructions are clear. Avoid reversing the engines. Wade sums up the situation by saying, Murdoch had maneuvered in a manner more likely to cause collisions than to prevent them. As with many who investigated the Titanic disaster, author Win Wade was at a loss to explain Murdoch's actions in going against the book.
But the captain and Murdoch's actions were not the only telltale signs of treachery on the night the Titanic sank.
Speaker 1: And we see all sorts of anomalies in the Titanic. For example, when it was sinking, the emergency flares were to be red So that ships in those lanes could see the Titanic was in trouble. Well, someone had taken away the red flares and replaced them with white flares, making it look like we were shooting off flares and having a party. And then the loading of the boats, we know that was a fraud. They would not they didn't allow the lifeboats to be completely loaded.
They were only half loaded. Some 1 third loaded because the targets in the first class could not be allowed to board. And the Jesuits were not only the captain, but his officers. And there had been a strike in England at the time, and the men who were normally the ones who would man the ocean liners, they were replaced by Jesuit coadjuters ready to board because they were all under oath to die for the black pope if necessary. And so they did carry out the sinking of the Titanic.
Speaker 0: But how is it possible that men will commit suicide as captain Smith and some of his handpicked crew obviously did?
Speaker 1: We have to understand that these men have died to their own self will. And so they have completely been emptied of their own personalities and upon the order of their commander will do exactly what they're told. There's no such thing as a disobedient judgment. This serves as a warning to all the other men of power, not only in our country, but in England and Europe. You mess with us, and we're gonna do to you what we did to all those people in Titanic.
And we're going to thwart the investigation because a subsequent investigation of the sinking of Titanic blamed Bruce Ismay, the right hand man of JPMorgan, and and Captain Lord of England. They were the scapegoats when they could have easily blamed the men of power at that time, saw who canceled their reservations. It was all in it was a Warren Commission all over again. 9 11 commission all over again. It's a whitewash and cover up.
And that cover up is even more powerful than the murder itself.
Speaker 0: After many of the leading opponents to a central bank had been removed, the Jesuits moved to obtain passage of the 16th amendment and the Federal Reserve Act, both in 19 13.
Speaker 1: So they created the Federal Reserve Bank to finance their crusades. Without the Federal Reserve Bank, there's no war in Iraq. Without the Federal Reserve Bank, there's no World War 2. There's no World War 1. And there's a book written by Katz called The Money Changers and in it he says that it's the Federal Reserve Bank and the creators of all this paper currency, fiat money, credit out of thin air.
Without that, you don't have these wars. So they needed the Federal Reserve Bank to create wars on heretic and liberal peoples in Europe so that they could restore the pope's temporal power throughout the European nations that was being thrown off in the 1800.
Speaker 0: Besides instigating wars and controlling the banking industry, the Jesuits have spent a great deal of time and effort attacking and undermining their number one enemy, the Bible. Specifically, the King James Bible. As stated in Leone's the secret plan, the Jesuits view the Bible as a serpent that must be made into a harmless rod. In an effort to undermine the validity of the Bible, especially the book of Genesis, the Jesuits promoted Charles Darwin's unproven theory of evolution. Evolution theory postulates that man evolved or came about by chance.
There was no God or divine agent at work in creating the world. All life had simply developed over time by mutations from a single cell that was formed 1000000000 of years ago. Supposedly, man himself had evolved from primitive ape like creatures to his present state. When the evolutionary theory needed proof of its validity, a young Jesuit priest by the name of Pierre Teilhard appeared on the scene. In 1912, Teilhard assisted Charles Dawson at the digs in England where the Piltdown man was discovered.
This so called missing link convinced most of the world that mankind had evolved from more ape like creatures. It was not until 40 years later that the pill down man was discovered to be a hoax. Philip Johnson in his book, Darwin on trial, has this to say. Many persons familiar with the evidence, including Stephen j Gould and Louis Leakey, have concluded that Teilhard de Chardin was probably culpably involved in preparing the Piltdown fraud. By the time Piltdown man was exposed, a generation had been indoctrinated into the belief that the evolutionary theory had a solid foundation in science.
The truth of the matter is that the evolutionary theory is questionable or bad science with no solid foundations in truth. To illustrate this fact, let's look at an exchange between author Luther Sunderland and doctor Colin Patterson. Luther Sunderland was a creationist author and exponent. In 1978, doctor Patterson, a senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, published a book entitled Evolution. Sunderland wrote to doctor Patterson and asked why the preeminent evolutionist had not included any pictures of transitional fossils in his book.
Doctor Patterson candidly replied, I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustrations of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualize such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it. And if I were to leave it to artistic license, would that not mislead the reader?
Like a bombshell, this statement by doctor Patterson hit the evolutionary world and enraged it. Patterson sought to pacify his evolutionary colleagues, but he never recanted. To those who had a modicum of common sense, it was evident that the evolutionary emperor was not wearing any clothes. Evolution was just a theory that had no hard evidence to back it up. In his 1996 book, Darwin's black box, doctor Michael Behey made this rather pointed observation.
In the face of the enormous complexity that modern biochemistry has uncovered in the cell, the community is paralyzed. No one at Harvard University, no one at the National Institutes of Health, no member of the National Academy of Sciences, no Nobel Prize winner, no one at all can give a detailed account of how the cilium or vision or blood clotting or any complex biochemical process might have developed in a Darwinian fashion. But in spite of this and other overwhelming evidence that the evolutionary theory had no foundation in fact, the Vatican came out with an extraordinary statement. On October 22, 1996, the same year as Behe's book, Pope John Paul the second issued a statement to the Pontifical Academy in which he said, new knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than hypothesis. This endorsement of evolution showed the true nature of the Vatican.
The God of the bible had to be denied and relegated to the past. The Jesuit plan to cast doubt on the Bible as God's word of truth had come a long way. But Darwin's theory of evolution was not their greatest achievement in undermining biblical authority. The Jesuits set in motion an attack on the original Greek text of the Bible. The New Testament was written in Greek.
For over 1900 years, the Greek text of the scriptures had endured and come down to us as it was read by the first Christians. To be sure, we now only have copies of copies of the originals, but the text has remained the same. Today, there are 5,686 Greek new testament manuscripts in existence. Of these manuscripts, the majority, over 90%, have been used over the centuries as a basis for the text of the New Testament. This majority text came out of Antioch in Syria.
Antioch became the headquarters for Christians of the 1st century. And the majority text is often referred to as the Antiochan text. But the authoritative line of manuscripts is more often called the textus receptus, or received text. The King James version is based on the received text. In the past, there have been attempts to alter the received text.
A group of Gnostic Christians centered in Alexandria, Egypt altered some manuscripts in the 3rd century. The corrupted Alexandrian manuscripts downplayed the divinity of Jesus. The famous scholar Origen seems to have had a hand in this undertaking. However, the Christians of that time were not fooled. In the 4th century, another attempt to pass on these same corrupted manuscripts was led by the Roman Catholic scholar, Jerome.
Jerome made a translation of the bible using the corrupted Alexandrian texts in 3 80 AD. Jerome called his translation, the Vulgate. Jerome's new translations was promoted by Rome and those who did not use it were persecuted. It was not until the reformation that the uncorrupted received text was again used to translate God's word into the common language. The result was such translations as Luther's German New Testament of 1522, Tyndale's English New Testament of 1526, the Geneva Bible of 1560, and the King James Bible of 1611.
Since 1611, the King James Bible supplanted other English translations to become the most revered and cherished translations of Protestant Christians throughout the world. Then in the late 1800, 2 men worked to change that. These 2 biblical scholars were Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort. Westcott and Hort created a new critical text based on the theory that the New Testament was preserved almost perfectly in the 2 oldest manuscripts, the Sinaiticus and the Vaticanus. The Sinaiticus manuscript was discovered in 18 44 in a Roman Catholic monastery.
Facsimile copies of the Vaticanus manuscript were brought out of the Vatican library in the late 1800. Both of these manuscripts were from the corrupted Alexandrian line. Using these two manuscripts as a foundation, Westcott and Hort began to put together their Greek text of the New Testament in 18/50 3. In 18/81, they completed and published their work. According to Westcott and Hort, now for the first time, the true text of the New Testament was available to believers.
Significantly, it is from the Westcott and Hort Greek text that many modern bible translations have been produced. And what has been the effect of this change to those in the pews listening to the word of God? With regard to John 118, we read in the King James version, no man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten son, which is in the bosom of the father he hath declared him. The same verse in the New International Version based on the Westcott Court text reads, no one has ever seen God, but God, the one and only, who is at the father's side, has made him known. Despite the somewhat confused rendering in the NIV, the change really amounts to altering only begotten Son to only begotten God.
The appearance of this alteration in a small body of text originating from the veritable capital of Gnosticism, Alexandria, would suggest that the Gnostics made their mark in these texts and at this verse. Gnostics saw matter as evil and spirit as good. God was spirit and could not be involved with wicked matter or flesh, especially in the conception of the child. To Gnostics, the virgin birth was an impossibility. Another example of the corrupt influence of the Alexandrian manuscript was found in acts 230.
King David is spoken of in this verse as being a prophet and knowing that God has sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne. The same verse in the New International Version based on the Westcott Hort text reads, but he was a prophet and knew that god had statement concerning the literal incarnation and physical descendants of Jesus Christ from David. This is in line with many gnostic systems, which viewed Christ as a purely spiritual being. An Aeon emanating from the everlasting. The reading presented in the traditional text where Christ in the flesh is said to be in physical descendants from David would be antithetical to these speculative systems.
There are many other examples that can be used to illustrate the point that the Westcott and Hort Greek texts holds contrary views to the doctrines and teachings of the majority of the existing Greek manuscripts. Unfortunately, most Christians today are ignorant of this and still rely on the corrupt Westcott and Hort Greek text. Since they have had such an impact on the biblical text from which many modern translations come, it might be helpful to know more about Westcott and Hort. Supposedly, these men were Protestants. Specifically, they were Anglican or Church of England Scholars.
Moreover, unlike what one would expect from a believer in the truth of the word of God, Westcott did not believe that the first three chapters of Genesis should be taken literally. In a letter to Hort, Westcott stated, no one now, I suppose, holds that the first three chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history. I could never understand how anyone reading them with open eyes could think they did. Westcott also doubted the miracle stories in the bible. He stated, I never read an account of a miracle, but I seem instinctively to feel its improbability.
But even more telling is Westcott's devotion to John Henry Newman. Newman, along with several other church of England clergymen, began the Oxford movement in 18/33. The purpose of the secret movement was to reunite the church of England with the Roman Catholic church. That same year, a clandestine meeting was held in Rome between John Henry Newman, Richard Frode, and Monsignor Wiseman. When asked what it would take for the church of England to be accepted back into the Roman Catholic church, Monsignor Wiseman answered, the church of England must accept the council of Trent in its entirety.
Consider that, in 18/33, the spokesman for the papacy brings up the acceptance of the council of Trent as the main condition for reuniting with Rome. The council of Trent met and declared 125 anathemas against the Protestant reformation. The pope and the Jesuits had not changed their minds then or to this day. For 12 years, Newman and his colleagues worked secretly to push the church of England back into the arms of the papacy. When this secret society and its intentions were discovered, Newman and a 150 followers defected to the Roman church.
It is apparent that Westcott was one of Newman's disciples who did not defect, but rather remained as a tool of Rome. Westcott's scholastic partner and pupil, Fenton John Anthony Hort, was no better in his biblical faith. Although Hort doubted the existence of a literal devil and of eternal punishment for the godless, he did believe in the Roman Catholic concept of purgatory. Hort stated that the idea of purgation, of cleansing as by fire seems to me inseparable from what the Bible teaches us of the divine chastisements. Hort also adhered to the Roman Catholic teaching of baptismal regeneration.
Hort stated, we maintain baptismal regeneration as the most important of doctrines. The pure Romish view seems to me nearer and more likely to lead to the truth than the evangelical. These false teachers worked ceaselessly to undermine the King James version of the Bible and install new Bible versions more acceptable to the Vatican. Bible versions like the revised standard versions, the American standard version, the living Bible, and the new international version of the bible. As mentioned earlier, the NIV is based on the Westcott Hort Greek text and its successor, the Nestle Alain Greek text.
A Jesuit translator, Carlo Cardenal Martini, was on the translation committee for the NIV. For this supposedly protestant translation of the bible, a representative of a group sworn to destroy protestants sat on the committee that created a protestant bible. So is this really a protestant bible? Once doubt had sufficiently been cast on the Bible and its veracity, the Jesuits knew the public would be less inclined to rise up in revolt as more open and drastic measures were taken to suppress the true word of God. In the 1962 Engel versus Vitale case, the US Supreme Court voted that prayer in public school was unconstitutional.
Why? Because it violated the first amendment. Prayer and school had not violated the first amendment for a 175 years, but suddenly it did? The following year, in the case of Abington versus Shep, the Supreme Court voted that the reading of the Bible was also a violation of the First Amendment. How did the supreme court arrive at these decisions?
One only has to know that the chief justice of the court, Earl Warren, was a freemason to see why the court voted as it did. And why did the president and congress not impeach these supreme court justices and remove them from the court? The answer is simple. The president and congress agreed with the decision. Otherwise, these godless justices would have been impeached and removed.
How did this happen? First, in the 19 fifties, churches began to incorporate and organize as tax exempt organizations. Churches had always been tax exempt, but now they could offer their congregations tax deductions for tithes and offerings. It was senator Lyndon Baines Johnson who pushed for the churches to be added to the section 501c3 of the tax code. For a 501c3churchtoopenlyspeakout or organize in opposition to anything that the government declares legal even if it is completely immoral.
The church will jeopardize its tax exempt status. The 501c3 has had a chilling effect upon the free speech rights of the church. Another reason for the demise of the protestant churches in America was that church pulpits and leadership had been infiltrated and subverted by freemasons and Jesuit coagitors. It was at this time, the late fifties early sixties, that the second Vatican Council met and set new goals for achieving old purposes.
Speaker 4: Vatican 2 fits right in harmony with the Council of Trent, because what you have is at Trent, the Catholic Church said, We will not compromise with Protestantism. And so between Trent in the 15 forties and Vatican 2 from 1958 to 1963, you have Jesuit infiltration of all the churches so that finally, by 1958 to 1963, there's been enough enough infiltration done, and enough of the messages of those churches have been watered down. So now Rome comes in with the ecumenical movement. That's what John the 23rd did at Vatican 2. It was, let's bring all the churches together now, but it's not under Protestantism.
It's not under biblical
Speaker 0: truth and principle. It's under Rome, and
Speaker 4: it's under Roman Roman authority. That's all Vatican 2 was. So Vatican 2 fits right in harmony with, Alberto Rivera and his statement that all the churches, by 1981, were completely taken over.
Speaker 0: What is the ultimate goal of the papacy? What is it that has not changed since the meetings in Vienna, Verona, and Sherry in the early 1800? The answer is domination of the world. The Vatican is seeking to create a one world government or new world order. And what will be the capital of this world government?
Not Rome, but Jerusalem. In 1993, the Italian
Speaker 3: capital back. The crusades haven't ended. They've they've done this before. It's not a new phenomenon here. What the Vatican wants is Rome is their second capital.
They want a crusade to liberate what they view as their actual physical capital, and that's where they don't want Jews in Jerusalem.
Speaker 2: What they were trying to do with this war now is take an eraser to all of these countries. Right? Now you have no more countries. One massive trading block. Right?
In the middle of this, you've got a city that is revered big time. The papacy has wanted to move from Rome to Jerusalem ever since the fir very first crusade. They still wanna do that.
Speaker 3: And how do we know this? We know this because, a person named, Mark Halter, the French intellectual friend of Jim on Paris, gave an interview in the magazine, Israeli magazine, Shishi, where he said, in May of 1990 3, I delivered a letter to the pope.
Speaker 0: He left Paris,
Speaker 3: promising the Vatican, East Jerusalem. And, he gave a few details. East Jerusalem would be policed by the UN. The Vatican would get to call all holy sites of all religions and, the PLO would get a a state within this end state. The Vatican, gets to hold these sites, and the UN gets to place the place.
And now we've got 2 magazine confirmations. And Erek had agreed to this. According to the staff, 3 days before the signing of the Declaration of Principles, Erek had agreed to the deal, and then when he didn't get the deal, the tariffs started, in earnest.
Speaker 0: If you do not bow down to the Jesuit controlled Roman Catholic leader, you are a heretic and you must die. These are the words of the celebrated Saint Thomas Aquinas. On the part of the church, however, there is mercy, which looks to the conversion of the wanderer. Wherefore, she condemns not at once, but after the first and second admonition, as the apostle directs. After that, if he is yet stubborn, the church no longer hoping for his conversion looks to the salvation of others by excommunicating him, and separating him from the church, and furthermore, delivers him to the secular tribunal to be exterminated thereby from the world by death.
During the Chinooki trial, Abraham Lincoln put Bishop Foley on the stand. The Bishop was forced to admit that Saint Thomas was looked upon as one of the highest authorities. In fact, the Roman Catholic Bishop swore that God himself had inspired what Saint Thomas had written about the manner in which heretics should be treated by the Roman Catholics. If the Vatican has its way, the future for all who speak out against the pope or who do not go along with the goals of the Jesuits is one of torture and death. This has been the fate of many world leaders, including presidents in the United States.
It has also been the fate of others in all walks of life, like Confederate General Stonewall Jackson, those against the central bank on the Titanic, ex Jesuit Alberto Rivera. In the Jesuit oath, the Jesuits states, I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly against all heretics, protestants, and liberals as I am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth. In light of all that has been exposed in this documentary, what is to be done? 1st and foremost, Christians should seek the Lord's guidance through daily prayer and bible study. We should pray for a new reformation, not a false revival, nor one that piggybacks on a political movement, or even one that tries to take control of the existing antichrist, Republican, and Democrat parties.
But rather a reformation that emphasizes the God of the bible. A bible based on the Textus Receptus, like the King James version. Secondly, the Bible tells Christians to separate ourselves from evil. Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers. And in the same chapter, verse 17.
Wherefore, come out from among them and be ye separate, say of the Lord. We should seek for a peaceful separation or secession from the American empire.
Speaker 1: We wanna go back to a typical constitutional Protestant form of government that was isolationist. We kept our noses out of the businesses of other nations, and we sought to develop our own country. George Bush has called the United States Constitution a GED piece of paper, and he's called this present war a crusade, which it is. So it's all the more reason to secede. We're never going to get any relief.
We need to have a move in every state for secession, or we can begin to withdraw from roaming the Potomac, which is Washington, and we can reestablish state national government once again and begin to govern our own affairs for what's best for that population or those populations in those states. And if we wish, we can then confederate together with other states, but we don't have to.
Speaker 0: Christians should not only avoid the poisons of this world, but also the false churches in the land. We should attend bible believing churches that are not incorporated and thus controlled by the government. If you cannot find a bible believing congregation in your area, start a house church yourself with your family or with other people in your community. Christians should shine light on the evil we see and speak out against it. In Ephesians, we read and have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.
Do not be timid, but speak out about what is clearly unbiblical and evil in this country. And finally, be aware of deceivers and deceptions. Jesus warned of false prophets with lying tongues. In Matthew 24 verse 11, we read, and many false prophets shall rise and shall deceive many. In 1 Timothy, the apostle Paul wrote.
Now the spirit speaketh expressly that in the latter times, some shall depart from the faith. Giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils. As we move closer to the second coming of Christ, we should be vigilant and hold steadfast to the true faith as found in the scriptures, leaning on the holy spirit to empower us against false doctrine and wicked men. God's word does not tell us to make war on other countries to bring them democracy, or to do nation building. These lies need to be denounced.
The Jesuits will not stop in their quest for world dominion and the setting up of a new world order. Christians are to resist this antichrist system and be the light of the world. As the light shines, it reveals the truth. And the dark creatures of this world retreat from it.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE THE VATICAN CONTROLS THE WORLD? https://t.co/7E9rLmOBUX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Vatican is believed to have significant influence globally as the largest stockholder and property owner not subject to taxes. There is mention of a secretive organization called the solidarity, a 2000-year-old club meeting in the Vatican catacombs. The Vatican is seen as a powerful entity controlling much of the world's affairs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does the Vatican run the world? Figure this out. Most people don't digest this. They're the largest single stockholder in the world. They own the most property in the world that pays no taxes.
Every school, every Celtic church. I mean, there's an organization a lot deeper than them called the solidarity. I'm not familiar with that. Well, nobody is solidarity. It's a 2 1000 year old club.
It's a club. It's a club. And it's in the catacombs of the Vatican. You know, the Vatican's a city where it's in itself. I know.
I used to live right next to it. Oh, okay. Yeah. Then you know. I mean, I don't know where that Most people don't know it, but I'm telling you.
So they meet down there, you're saying? They they're not judge where they are. They only meet there, period. Right. Okay.
They're very high level profile people throughout the world. You can't invite it to be in it. Who's running the world? I think they are. Wow.
When you think of what they control and what they do, they they it's it's amazing.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU BELIEVE THEY LIED TO US ABOUT EASTER? https://t.co/zG0APOfpn2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Easter Sunday doesn't align with Jesus' resurrection as it varies yearly due to its connection to the solar system. The origins of Easter trace back to Babylon, where the goddess Ishtar was worshipped on the first Sunday after the first full moon following the equinox. Constantine later shifted this day to honor Jesus' resurrection, incorporating pagan symbols like eggs and bunnies. This history raises questions about other false teachings that may have infiltrated Christianity. The devil's deception in ancient times warns of potential falsehoods in modern practices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you know that Easter Sunday cannot possibly be the day of the resurrection? You know why? Easter never falls on the same date year to year. Right? It can't be the day of Jesus resurrection.
I'll tell you why. Let's go back 5 or 6 years. In 1996, Easter came on April 7th. That's when you all celebrated it. The next year, 1997, it came on March 30th.
The next year, 1998, it came on April 12th. Last year, it came on April 3rd. This year, it's gonna come on April 23rd. So So how can you have a difference from April 23rd clear back to March 30th? That's a difference of 23 days.
How does that happen? I'll tell you how it happens. Easter is not regulated by a date. Easter is regulated by the solar system. You know why?
Easter always comes the 1st Sunday after the first full moon after the equinox when days nights are equal length. You never knew that, did you? Isn't it amazing? And so all the people that are celebrating the resurrection of Jesus on Easter Sunday morning, it's just not true. It didn't happen then.
Okay? But, anyway, the question is, how did we ever get Easter on the 1st Sunday after the first full moon at the equinox? Did you ever wonder about that? I'll tell you where it comes from. Would you like to guess?
Comes from Babylon. You're right. Everything goes back to Babylon. I don't care what it is. In Babylon, they had a goddess of fertility.
Her name was interestingly Ishtar, I s h t a r. That's where we get our word Easter from was this pagan goddess of fertility. If you doubt this, by the way, go home tonight in your encyclopedia and look up Easter in your encyclopedia. It'll tell you the whole story that I'm gonna tell you right now. It's in every history book.
And what they did, this goddess of fertility called Ishtar, they worshiped her in the springtime. You know why? Because everything was coming to life, and she was the one that caused all life and everything to grow anyway. So they thought she got very active in the springtime. So they honored her always on the 1st Sunday after the first full moon after the equinox.
That was Ishtar's day because she was the goddess of fertility, the goddess of reproduction. And you know what happens, folks? They took that then, and they celebrated this day of her in her honor, and so did Meda Persia and so did Greece. In fact, Greece had her under another name called Venus. You ever heard of Venus before?
That's Ishtar in Babylon, the same thing. And then you go to Rome, and Rome had this. And, folks, the same thing. You come to Constantine. Constantine, about 300 years after Jesus says, hey.
We got all these pagans out here, and they're worshiping each htar on the 1st Sunday after the 1st full moon after the equinox. You know what? Jesus rose from the tomb in the springtime. It was passover time and so on. Why don't we take this Ishtar's day, and instead of getting honor to Ishtar, the giver of life and so on, Jesus is the resurrection.
Jesus is the life. Why don't we start to keep this day in honor of Jesus Christ, and we can win all these pagans to Christianity? And the Christians said that's a great idea. And so, folks, he changed Easter's day to Easter day in honor of Jesus' resurrection. And then as papal Rome again rules the entire world for the next 12 160 years, it passes that teaching on to everybody in the world, and the whole world doesn't, and nobody even thinks twice about it.
But you all tell me, what in the world do chocolate, chickies, and bunny rabbits gotta do with the resurrection of Jesus? Because, folks, in Babylon, they worshiped the egg on Easter's day because an egg is a symbol of fertility. Not only that, they worship bunny rabbits on Easter's day. You know why? Because bunny rabbits are the most prolific reproducers in the world.
I know. I grew up on a ranch. We had lots of rabbits. All rabbits do is make love and have babies. Isn't that right?
Yeah. And so, honestly, did they worship the rabbit, and we still have that today all the way back from Babylon. If things like Christmas and Easter coming straight from pagan Babylon have made their way into our world tonight and been Christianized, and everybody just does it because everybody else does it. My question to you is this, don't you suppose that there might be some other things also? Don't you suppose there might have been some other false teachings or errors or pagan practices or deceptions that have snuck their way in that we are following and teaching and practicing that's totally contrary to the truth of the bible?
Don't you think there might be some of those? You better believe it, my friends. You better believe it. There are many, many things, not only in our world but also in our Christian world today that we believe, that we teach, that we follow, and that we practice many things that are totally contrary to this Bible that you're holding in your hands tonight. History is repeating itself.
And I'm gonna tell you something, if the devil was so successful to deceive everybody at the first coming of Jesus, because they were so entrenched with the false teachings of Babylon at that time, Don't you think the devil has redoubled his efforts in these last days? You better believe it folks.
@TheFlatEartherr - THE FLAT EARTHER
Did you know April 1st is actually the real New Year? https://t.co/KX2WkPsplp
Video Transcript AI Summary
April fools is considered the real new year, with 13 months of 28 days each making more sense than our current calendar. The 28-day cycle aligns months to start on a Monday and end on a Sunday. The names of the months reveal the current calendar's flaws. April 1st symbolizes being misled into thinking January 1st is the new year. Nature shows the real new year is in spring when life renews. The earth blossoms, signifying a reset. The discrepancy between nature and our calendar is left for interpretation.
Spanish Translation:
El Día de los Santos Inocentes se considera el verdadero año nuevo, con 13 meses de 28 días cada uno, lo que tiene más sentido que nuestro calendario actual. El ciclo de 28 días alinea los meses para comenzar un lunes y terminar un domingo. Los nombres de los meses revelan las fallas del calendario actual. El 1 de abril simboliza ser engañado para creer que el 1 de enero es el año nuevo. La naturaleza muestra que el verdadero año nuevo es en primavera cuando la vida se renueva. La tierra florece, lo que significa un reinicio. La discrepancia entre la naturaleza y nuestro calendario queda para la interpretación.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know that April fools is actually our real new year. In case you're new here, there are actually 13 months in a year with each month can assisting of 28 days. The calendar we use today has for some reason been altered to create these uneven months and has completely thrown us out of rhythm. Before our new calendar, we would follow the 28 day moon cycle. Just think about it.
It makes perfect sense. If every month had 28 days, the month would always start on a Monday and end on a Sunday. You can't tell me that doesn't make more sense than it beginning and ending on a random day. Even when we look at the meanings of the names of each month, they tell us how wrong the current calendar is. April 1st or April fools is actually symbolic to us being fooled into thinking that January 1st is really the new year.
We are connected to nature in more ways than you can believe. And when we follow nature, it shows us that the real new year is in spring. What's significant about spring? Well, it's when the earth comes alive again. The flowers, the trees, and even the grass begin to blossom and grow back.
It's a sign of a reset. So why have we been told otherwise? Well, that's for you to decipher.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WAS THE ECLIPSE NOT AN ECLIPSE BUT PROJECT PEGASUS? https://t.co/WW32GYRiRE
Video Transcript AI Summary
A military liaison reveals Project Pegasus on April 8th was not an eclipse but an alien event. CERN's role in quantum entanglement led to a deal with aliens for advanced technology in exchange for territory in Antarctica. The aliens used human energy to enter our dimension, causing strange phenomena like receding oceans and animal behavior changes. NASA's rockets secretly carried astronauts to meet the aliens. The public remains unaware of the alien presence and their plans for Earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am a high level military liaison between the Pentagon and NASA. I'm here as a anonymous whistleblower to tell everyone that what happened on April 8th was not an eclipse. What happened on April 8th was called Project Pegasus. It's been in the planning for years. What occurred of not an eclipse since the moon was beside the sun during it and not crossing it.
And also, it's you're both in crises. It that whole thing is ridiculous. And that's how much credit the government gives all of you, because they'll do something that blatantly wrong. I mean, inaccurate, just impossible. I get they they know that Americans, they'll be called conspiracy theorists if they even bring it up.
So they they do it. They do it. And they don't even care. Okay? So what would did they do if there wasn't any eclipse?
The biggest thing you have to realize is coincidence, which was no coincidence of CERN being turned on that day.
Speaker 1: This is near impossible to explain or understand for most of us, but monumental nonetheless.
Speaker 0: CERN CERN was turned back on that day, and immediately after it was turned on, this is what appeared in the sky above CERN in Switzerland on the 8th. A literal portal through was created above CERN. And this was actually predicted, which is one reason why it was filmed many by many people who who were in the know. But ever since they discovered the Higgs boson in 2012, the god particle, that's when all of this contact began to occur.
Speaker 1: Using a particle accelerator believe they have found the subatomic particle known as the Higgs boson, otherwise known as the God particle. Here you have it.
Speaker 0: Because this whole thing of project Pegasus was about CERN. Through its experiments with the God particle and particle acceleration in general, they achieved quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon when by working at the quantum level and getting to the the the true incredible energy, of particles, once they combine or or collide, the there was something that occurred where the quantum negotiation that occurred, in a very bizarre way, because it didn't actually happen in person. I'm not gonna waste time explaining how the Negru Shi has happened. But between Russia, China, and America, they dealt with this species, and this species offered a deal.
And the deal was the deal was that we would be given something if they were allowed to come here to Earth and basically set up a secret base. What did we get, and what's their secret base about? Okay. I'll just quickly tell you. What we got was AI.
Think about it. Didn't AI emerge out of nowhere 2023? And didn't it emerge at not just out nowhere, in an incredibly mature sophisticated level of complexity that time did make sense for a new technology. And even even that, 1 year into it, a year and a half into it, whatever. Right?
It's it's getting scary what it can do. I mean, it's indistinguishable from reality in microchip and other things that we got from Roswell and the grease, this is, microchip and other things that we got from Roswell and the grease, this is another technology from another higher level species. Let me just add this. For those who think that AI is about making funny pictures or or interesting videos and stuff, sure, it can do that. And that is the consumer facing end of this technology.
But if you knew the intent of AI in terms of how it will impact your everyday life, very soon, you might take a gun to your head and blow your brains out. It is that radical of a shift what the government tends to do with this shiny toy called AI. That's what we got. In return, they got, basically, the southern half of Antarctica below the South Pole. And that is what hey.
Well, let me first things first. What the hell happened if not an actual eclipse? Well, couple things. Number 1, they required in order to do this, and advise they do this, there, the event to happen on the full of the 8th was the alien species coming through to our dimension. In order to come through, they required a few things.
Number 1, they required louche. But as louche louche is the energy expended and exhibited by human beings when they are collectively excited and focused on something, like at a rock concert or during church or something like that.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's emotional. I can't explain why, but it is. We had tears. We had, screams. We had fire fireworks.
Speaker 0: So by having so much of the planet looking up at a certain time of day and everybody giving their attention and their emotions to it, which by the if you watch some videos, you you had newscasters crying.
Speaker 1: It just took my breath away the whole thing.
Speaker 0: Did you that that was a bit odd that they were crying? And the reason they were crying was because it was an incredibly emotional thing because the aliens made it so. The aliens made it so because the energy created or and received from the Lucian. Again, I've defined what Lucia is. Woah.
Yeah. Woah. Look at that. What's that all about? That Lucian energy coupled with the energy of the sun allowed them at the time of the, of the quote unquote eclipse and for their mothership, which is what that circle was.
It wasn't a moon. Their mothership came out of nowhere, entered into the area of the sun, stopped. Did you notice how it stopped for an inordinate amount of time in the center when it should have been continuing at the very slow crawl rate that the moon typically does. While it didn't, it stayed there for a bit of time. And that's insane.
Okay? That's another blatant giveaway. And again, the government thinks that no one's gonna notice. Or if they notice, they'll be branded a conspiracy theorist, and they don't care. So they just allowed it to happen.
This ship, basically connected with the sun at that moment and got an incredible amount of physical energy required for them to enter through the dimension. Got coming in from another dimension takes an incredible amount of energy. The sun and our luge did that. At that point, the ship went around the back of the sun. Do you notice that, Eric, we didn't see anything depart?
It just sort of disappeared into the sun. Well, it it kinda did. It went around to the back, and it all actually docked there where it is at this moment lose, from that focus, from that also that that actual hydrogen based nuclear energy got from the sun, it was able to send a massive amount of ships and individuals of their race through the Earth into an area just north of the the Antarctic base that they're going to take over. The waves if you look at the waves stuff, the the things that happened on the wave map during that time
Speaker 2: okay. April 9, 2024, the day after the solar eclipse, something terrifying lurked off the coast of Antarctica. Radar systems detected a monstrous wave anomaly, an area larger than Texas with 8 foot waves. The anomaly moved up towards South Africa. At the same time, Cape Town witnessed a horrifying sight.
The ocean receded dramatically as if dragged away by some unseen force. Pieces were left exposed. Waves vanished. What really happened? A glitch in the system, a creature, or something yet to be seen.
Speaker 0: And they had the audacity to tell a public it was a glitch. It wasn't a glitch, because there is tons of video and evidence of people in South Africa running from, you know, mini tsunami level waves that were created by these ships becoming USOs, you know, going underwater. And from basically from doing that and establishing themselves there, they were able to then make their move to southern part of Antarctica. They also took animals.
Speaker 1: We're gonna talk to Jason about some of the changes that we heard, birds making more noises.
Speaker 0: And it
Speaker 2: was fun to see all the animals act up.
Speaker 0: Anything you noticed with the
Speaker 1: animals as as we're sitting back there just a minute ago?
Speaker 2: They get very active. Now the fish were jumping out of the water a lot. Animals were a big part
Speaker 0: of the deal. They are out, but, of course, taking humans was off the table from the from our governments, but they allowed that animals to be taken and animals reacted weirdly during this court and court clips. The the also the government is presently asking for reports of animal behavior because they know exactly what's going on, and they wanna know how it affected them. The reason why it was there's disasters declared all the National Guard and all that was because the government doesn't know if they can trust this this these people. Okay?
They they're still getting to know them. And we didn't know what what would would happen, really. We were told, the governments would wait, man. We have it all on paper. I mean, I have I have packets of reports about what we were told by this species of what happened.
But we had to be prepared in case it got crazy, in case something went off script, in case there was someone to Asia. I mean, we had to prepare for the worst because we did know if we could try I think the craziest secret that I have to divulge though about this whole thing is is that the 2 rockets that NASA shot on the coincidentally, to quote, unquote, observe what was the official, narrative. Look at what people. I am. It was half.
They they were shot up there to to, observe, but there happened to be actually 4 astronauts in those rockets, 2 in each. And they rendezvoused with the mother ship because those astronauts are part of an exchange program that we initiated with these species. And those, it's actually 3 men and one woman, are going to be going it will first do them on the mother ship for, I think, at least 2 years is what's scheduled. And then back to the home planet, which I'm not comfortable divulging the location of their home planet yet. It looks like we can trust them for for the time being.
Everything went as planned. And again, the the fact is that the public doesn't have a freaking clue that that that what they just witnessed was the essentially, the first incursion, I call it incursion, of a alien race onto our sovereign, you know, planet where the and and they now have a piece of it. And what they do next, we have no idea.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU K N O W WHY YOU HAVE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE? https://t.co/0ZZEKjdgqf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a quote from Edward Mendel House about a plan to control Americans through a national system, making them economic slaves through taxation and pledges. The plan involves using the president as a figurehead to hide the true agenda, ensuring people remain ignorant of their rights. The speaker recommends reading "Fruit from a Poisonous Tree" by Melvin Stamper for more information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, I'm going to just read a quote from Edward Mendel House and what he had to say in a private meeting with Woodrow, Wilson, president between 1913 and 1921 from the private papers of Woodrow Wilson. Quote, very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people, and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our channel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever by operation of law merchant under the scheme of Secured Transactions.
Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivered the bills of lightning to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent forever to remain economic slaves through taxation secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given commercial value designated to keep us a profit that will be none the wiser. For not one man in a million could ever figure out our plans. And if by accident, 1 or 2 would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and pledges.
This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest of expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call social insurance. Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur. And in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however, begrudgingly. The people will become helpless without any hope for their redemption, and we will employ the high office of the president as our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America. Having established plausible deniability, even if people become enlightened that they had a remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could claim that they did not understand the people's claims, especially if the technical requirements for achieving it were not followed pursuant to statutory requirements, requiring the public schools to teach civics, government, and history classes out of federally approved politically correct textbooks written by the publishing houses, owned by the owners of the Federal Reserve would assure that the people would not discover the remedy for a long time, if ever.
I would recommend that everyone read Fruit from a Poisonous Tree by Melvin Stamper, m e l v I n, Stamper, s t a m p e r. That is fruit from a poisonous tree. This is out of chapter 2 of fruit from a poisonous tree.
@Red_Pill_US - Red Pill USA
9/11 Was An Inside Job Pass It On https://t.co/x2HSuDiCN4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Eyewitnesses reported explosions before and during the collapse of the World Trade Center towers, with some describing "heavy duty explosions" and "big explosions" that knocked people over. Some recalled the buildings collapsing into dust, with concrete pulverized. Some suggest that devices were planted in the building.
The passport of a hijacker was allegedly found in the rubble, but the individual was later found to be alive. The official "pancake theory" suggests fires weakened the floors, causing them to break loose and initiate a chain reaction. However, some argue that the core columns should have remained standing. The buildings were designed to withstand multiple jetliner impacts. The collapse occurred at nearly free fall speed, which some claim is impossible with the pancake effect. Some suggest explosives were used to cut the core columns, citing molten metal found weeks later in the rubble, which official reports allegedly omit.
Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper not hit by a plane, also collapsed, resembling a controlled demolition. An explosion was heard in the basement of one of the towers prior to the plane impact. On 9/11, no US Air Force interceptors responded in time due to conflicting war game exercises that inserted false radar blips. The 9/11 Commission insisted on appearing together. One of the commissioners had conflicts of interest. The 9/11 report ignored evidence that 9/11 was a false flag operation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is wrong, blasphemous and sinful for you to suggest, imply or help other people come to the conclusion that the US government killed 3,000 of its own citizens.
Speaker 1: This was the result of something that was planned. It's not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse and then the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way. How they accomplished this, we don't know.
Speaker 2: The building collapsed to dust. You don't find a desk. You don't find a chair. You don't find a telephone, computer. The biggest piece of a telephone I found was half of the keypad, and it was about this big.
Speaker 3: What happened to the The concrete was pulverized from river to river. There was dust powder two, three inches thick. The concrete was just pulverized.
Speaker 4: Reminiscing that those pictures revolt seemed too much of television before when a building was deliberately distilled by world place dynamite to knock it down. I
Speaker 5: heard a second explosion. It was an heavy duty explosion.
Speaker 1: That was a secondary explosions and then the subsequent collapses.
Speaker 4: The explosion blew and it knocked everybody over. To me, it sounded like an explosion. It sounded like gunfire.
Speaker 6: Bang bang bang
Speaker 4: bang bang. And then all of sudden, three big explosions. And we heard a big explosion coming down.
Speaker 5: And then the entire top of the building just blew up.
Speaker 4: We saw some kind of explosion. By
Speaker 5: the force of the explosions.
Speaker 4: Big explosion. Flew it back into the Eighth Floor. Then we get to the lobby.
Speaker 1: This is big. What is it?
Speaker 4: A lobby for
Speaker 7: Brazil. A bomb had exploded there.
Speaker 4: A huge explosion now raining debris. It's been a huge explosion. Huge explosion that we all heard and felt. We just witnessed some kind of follow-up explosion. We heard
Speaker 7: a very loud blast explosion. We opened
Speaker 4: a secondary explosion. It's now one can. That is another bomb going off. He thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building. Planted in the build
Speaker 8: Evidence was also apparently planted. The passport of one of the hijackers on flight 11 was allegedly found in the rebel.
Speaker 4: Goes through the fireball, through the side of the
Speaker 9: plane, and comes down to the ground unscathed. But something happened. For six months, they reported they had this passport. Boy, we've got it. We've got the proof.
And then the guy stood up and was alive.
Speaker 8: Several of these 19 men are still alive. Pancake theory according to which the fires while not melting the steel heated it up sufficiently to cause the floors weakened by the airplane strikes to break loose from the steel columns and this started a chain reaction.
Speaker 10: So you would expect then from that theory which is the official theory to see a whole stack of floors piled up on top of each other and then a spindle of core columns standing too.
Speaker 8: The core of each of the twin towers consisted of 47 massive steel columns. If the floors had broken loose from them, these columns would have still been sticking up into the air a thousand feet.
Speaker 10: The plane did not cut all those core columns.
Speaker 4: We designed the buildings to take the impact of the Boeing seven zero seven hitting the building at any location.
Speaker 5: The building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners.
Speaker 6: That the plane flew straight into the building. So
Speaker 5: it flew flew in. Right.
Speaker 6: Yeah. So you're saying that the building was actually designed to cope with a hole like that
Speaker 5: and then still survive? Yeah. It was it was.
Speaker 11: If you had dropped, say, a billiard ball from the top of the World Trade Center, Hundred And 10 floors up there, it would have taken eight to ten seconds to hit the ground, encountering no resistance whatsoever.
Speaker 5: The Twin Towers came down in nearly free fall speed. 200,000 tons of steel shatters and explodes outwards over 500
Speaker 12: feet. This means that floors shattered at an average rate of about 10 floors per second.
Speaker 11: There is no scenario for a pancake effect of buildings falling that allows them to fall at the rate of free fall.
Speaker 10: Now what can do that? What can move mass out of the way? Explosives. 47 huge steel columns going up the core. They're interconnected.
How do you get them to fail simultaneously so the core disappears? It looks like those core columns were cut.
Speaker 12: The way we do this is by cutting the beam at an angle.
Speaker 10: I started looking at the molten metal. All three buildings, both towers in the rubble, in the basement areas, and Building 7, there's these pools of molten metal.
Speaker 13: You get down below and you'd see molten steel, Molten steel running down the channel rails like you're in a foundry. The
Speaker 5: molten steel was found three, four, and five weeks later when the rubble was being removed. He said that molten steel was also found underneath World Trade Center 7.
Speaker 10: So I'm looking through the official reports. What do they say about the molten metal? They say nothing. Wait a minute. This is important evidence to where that come from.
Thermite is so hot that it'll just cut through steel, through structural steel, for example, like a knife through butter. The products are molten iron and aluminum oxide which goes off primarily as a dust. You know those enormous dust clouds? You can imagine when you assemble these chemicals on a large scale. Molten metal pools under both towers after they collapsed and Building 7.
Now Building 7 wasn't even hit by a a jet.
Speaker 12: Part of the problem is that most people simply don't know much about Building 7 due to the extraordinary secrecy surrounding this collapse.
Speaker 11: And this was a 47 story skyscraper. This building fell at 05:25.
Speaker 8: It was not hit by a plane. This building had fires on only two or three floors.
Speaker 11: And it was brought down by what we know was a controlled demolition.
Speaker 10: They look just like that. You know, kink in the middle and then that building just comes straight down almost at free fall speed.
Speaker 4: They first blow one of the central columns so the building falls in on itself. Building 7 had a classic crimp or wedge. Its central column was blown out first, so it didn't structurally damage buildings just a few feet away from it. Our office was on the B1 Level. As I was talking to a supervisor at 08:46, and all of sudden we hear, boom, an explosion so hard that pushes upwards.
And it came from basement between the B 2 Level and the B 3 Level. And when I went to verbalize, we hear, boom, the impact of the plane on the top.
Speaker 7: As I'm walking by the main freight corridor building in the corridor, that's that's when I got blown. I mean, the impact of the explosion threw me to the floor, and that's when everything started happening. All of sudden, the big impact happened again, and all the ceiling tile was falling down. The light fixtures were falling. You know, you gotta go clear across the hole from 1 To 1 To 2 World Trade Center.
And then all of sudden, it happened all over again. Well, something else hit us to the floor. Right in the basement, you felt it. Walls were caving in. Everything that was going on.
I I mean, I know people that got killed in the basement. I know people that got broken legs in there, in the basement. People got reconstructive surgery because the walls hit them in the
Speaker 14: It's a mind bending anomaly. Not a single US Air Force interceptor turns a wheel until it's too late. There are no jets at all.
Speaker 13: What if they were so confused and had been so deliberately confused that they couldn't respond? The reason that they didn't know where to go was because a number of conflicting and overlapping wargame exercises were taking place that involved the insertion of false radar blips onto radar screens in the Northeast Air Defense Sector.
Speaker 4: We have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York. We need someone to scramble some S-16s or something up there to help us out.
Speaker 8: Is this real world or exercise? This real world or exercise?
Speaker 13: There was another exercise, vigilant warrior, which was in fact according to a NORAD source, a live fly hijack drill being conducted at the same time. With only eight available fighter aircraft and they have to be dispatched in pairs, They were dealing with as many as 22 possible hijacks on the day of nineeleven and they couldn't separate the war game exercises from the actual hijacks.
Speaker 15: President. Why are you and the vice president insisting on appearing together before the nine eleven commission?
Speaker 16: Because the nine commission nine eleven commission wants to ask us questions. That's why we're meeting, and I look forward to meeting with them and answering their questions.
Speaker 15: Why you're appearing together rather than separately, which was their request?
Speaker 16: Because it's a good chance for both of us to answer questions that the nineeleven Commission is looking forward to asking us, and I'm looking forward to answering them. Let's see.
Speaker 6: Do you think they should be able to stand up and speak their own words? They should go under oath. They should be yeah, in public.
Speaker 4: Don't you think that the families deserve to have a transcript or to be able to see what
Speaker 16: you You asked me that question yesterday. I got the same answer, yeah.
Speaker 17: The final report was a unanimous report. That means that if there was a single commissioner who had any objection about anything, that fact would be dropped from the report.
Speaker 6: We have found out that he not only served on the transition team of the Bush administration, that he was a person who wrote a draft memo for the setup of the Bush administration's National Security Council, that he was an individual who wrote the preemptive war strategy that was eventually used for the war in Iraq, that he is a close friend of Condoleezza Rice's. We want him to resign.
Speaker 17: There is literally nothing in the nine eleven report that the Bush did not approve of.
Speaker 8: We can understand therefore why the commission under Zelicow's leadership would have ignored all the evidence that would point to the truth. That nine eleven was a false flag operation intended to authorize the doctrines and funds needed for a new level of imperial mobilization.
@reality_revolt_ - Dimitri Legrand
Do you really want to celebrate Christmas? A quick search reveals it has nothing to do with Jesus but everything to do with Saturn, Baal, pagan rituals, and ancient sacrifices. The truth about December 25th is far from what you’ve been told. https://t.co/CTAzeZRgv7
@JOKAQARMY1 - mrredpillz jokaqarmy
Truth behind 9/11 https://t.co/lH2NWYRHyc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nine eleven started as commercial insurance fraud. It was known in 1988 that the Twin Towers were condemned because they didn't wanna pay the $2,000,000,000 to dismantle the buildings the hard way. Controlled demolitions was forbidden. When that was briefed to Dick Cheney as secretary of defense, I believe he said, praise the lord. This is going to be a terrorism event that will give us a reason for invading Iraq Afghanistan.
And at that point, the nine eleven, which was planned and executed by the Zionists, which is not the Jews. When I say Zionists, I'm talking about what's called the red mafia. That's the Russians, Israelis, and Americans who are a criminal network that happens to control Benjamin Netanyahu. It does not control Donald Trump. People don't understand that Trump is biding his time.
The NSA is not about solving problems or making America safe. It's about keeping the money moving. The second reason that the program was canceled was because it was starting to reveal all of the Americans who were complicit in nine eleven. The problem we have in The United States is that the intelligence community is all about spending a great deal of money doing very bad things. So let's say overall, there's about 300 things that the intelligence community should be reporting on.
They don't. They report on two things, war and terrorism. And in both cases, they're the ones starting the wars and funding the terrorists.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nine eleven started as commercial insurance fraud. It was known in 1988 that the Twin Towers were condemned because they didn't wanna pay the $2,000,000,000 to dismantle the buildings the hard way. Controlled demolitions was forbidden. When that was briefed to Dick Cheney as secretary of defense, I believe he said, praise the lord. This is going to be a terrorism event that will give us a reason for invading Iraq Afghanistan.
And at that point, the nine eleven, which was planned and executed by the Zionists, which is not the Jews. When I say Zionists, I'm talking about what's called the red mafia. That's the Russians, Israelis, and Americans who are a criminal network that happens to control Benjamin Netanyahu. It does not control Donald Trump. People don't understand that Trump is biding his time.
The NSA is not about solving problems or making America safe. It's about keeping the money moving. The second reason that the program was canceled was because it was starting to reveal all of the Americans who were complicit in nine eleven. The problem we have in The United States is that the intelligence community is all about spending a great deal of money doing very bad things. So let's say overall, there's about 300 things that the intelligence community should be reporting on.
They don't. They report on two things, war and terrorism. And in both cases, they're the ones starting the wars and funding the terrorists.