TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
The United Nations' World Economic & Social Survey 2012 reveals their aim to finance their globalist agenda through innovative development finance, including a proposed Carbon Tax. They admit to falling short on funding for their Millennium Development Goals (Agenda 21) and created the Climate Model to scare people into contributing. Recent revelations also suggest NASA scientists manipulated data to support the global warming narrative. Censorship attempts have been made, but the truth persists. The public has been manipulated into believing this farce.
@cravecreative - Nicky P
Thread: 1/ The ClimateScam was concocted by the United Nations to finance their globalist agenda. Here's proof in their words. As some of you know I like to dig. While researching I ran across some UN documentation. Amazing what you can find while sifting through the trash.😏
@cravecreative - Nicky P
2/ This is the UN's World Economic & Social Survey 2012 titled: "In Search of New Development Finance". https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_current/2012wess.pdf In this document, they examine the need for additional funding and how that relates to their goals for "globalization".
@cravecreative - Nicky P
3/ In their words,"... innovative development finance should be linked to the process of globalization, either through taxing sectors considered to have gained most from globalization, such as the financial sector, or by taxing global public “bads”, such as carbon emissions.
@cravecreative - Nicky P
4/ This document then goes on to PROPOSE the Carbon Tax & offers an approximate amount of $$$BILLIONS that they plan to rake in. $250 Billion of potential revenue from the US alone.
@cravecreative - Nicky P
5/ I came to learn throughout this reading that "Millenium Development Goals" is actually "Agenda21" which they admittedly say they were "falling short" on funding for in order to meet their targets.
@cravecreative - Nicky P
6/ THIS is the reason they created the Climate Model... to scare people into opening their wallets. "Politically, tapping revenue from global resources & raising taxes internationally to address global problems are much more difficult than taxing for purely domestic purposes."
@cravecreative - Nicky P
7) So yes, the UN is FREAKING OUT b/c they lost their largest donor along w/BILLIONS & BILLIONS of dollars to add to their coffers. THIS is why Climate is now an "Emergency". Their Globalist Mission has been stunted. Well done POTUS! Now it's Canada's Turn. #TrudeauMustGo
@cravecreative - Nicky P
@BillTufts - Bill Tufts
Un says quick send us your money https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/jul/27/un-running-out-of-cash-and-facing-urgent-cuts-warns-chief-antonio-guterres
UN 'running out of cash' and facing urgent cuts, warns chief
Letter sent to member states by António Guterres reveals $139m deficit in core budget
theguardian.com
@cravecreative - Nicky P
More proof. NASA Scientists doctored the data to accomodate their Global Warming Narrative. The fix was in & now an Australian Senator & Scientists are talking publicly about it. A must watch folks!!! ❤
@cravecreative - Nicky P
@cravecreative - Nicky P
@globalnews Here's an article from last July. Keep in mind this is b4 they lost a funding from the US. If they were going broke then, can you just imagine how desperate they are now? So desperate they'd amp up ClimateChange to an EMERGENCY. 🤨 Let that sink in. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/un-warns-it-is-running-out-of-cash-in-urgent-appeal-to-members
UN warns it is 'running out of cash' in urgent appeal to members
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres says the U.N. is running out of money and is urging members to pay up amid a looming financial crisis for the international body.
foxnews.com
@cravecreative - Nicky P
Great thread by @PatriotCoburn. More evidence, including articles if you've got some reading time... https://t.co/VHLMWVNsmB
@cravecreative - Nicky P
In typical UToob censorship fashion the channel where this video was uploaded to was taken down. #TruthHurts so much they had to make it disappear. Good thing I like to dig. 😏 I've since found another copy. https://youtu.be/wwQ6BiqeBcg
@cravecreative - Nicky P
How have they succeeded in brainwashing the public into believing this farce? https://t.co/YICygjl4OT
@cravecreative - Nicky P
11/ The UN created Orgs like WBCSD w/its almost 200 global companies to influence & push their Agenda for OneWorldGovernment on unknowing citizens/cities/states/provinces across the globe. By masking themselves under another name they're able achieve their goals undetected.
reSee.it AI Summary
The globalist agenda is to control all natural resources. Technocrats are using climate change as an excuse to grab control of everything and everyone on earth. Here are some resources to learn more: [insert links to Tweets 2-13].
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Dr. Coleman: The globalist’s goal is to control all natural resources. Today the technocrats are openly grabbing all natural resources under the guise of “climate change”. It’s not about “climate change”. It’s about control of everything and everyone on earth. Period. 🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the belief that the Gulf States funded the Gulf War, stating that the US is still paying for it. They also criticize the support given to the Al Sabah clan in Kuwait, claiming that the land was stolen from Iraq by the British. The speaker alleges that the British have been stealing oil from Kuwait and funneling the profits to British banks. They further assert that the British are using similar tactics in South Africa to control natural resources like gold.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The story that the Gulf States put up all the money, you're gonna ask the general accounting officers I did, how much money have they paid? We are still paying for the Gulf War. And now we've got another huge bill to meet, 1,000,000,000 of dollars for Clinton fantasies to go out there and support this disgusting Al Sabah clan. I don't know if you know the story of Kuwait, it's really a horrendous one. I don't want to get into that too much, but That land was stolen from the Iraqi people by the British imperious.
They came in and drew a line through the sand right through the middle of the most Important oil fields that just been discovered, the Romelia oil fields that they didn't support this is going to be called to wait and they brought up these 10 sheikhs from Bahrain and put them in as the rulers and since then they've been stealing the oil off Iran and the proceeds go to the British banks in the City of London for the committee of 300. They're just doing the same thing now in South Africa with the gold. That's part of their tactics to gain control of all natural resources through the world.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
The 30x30 plan will enable the technocrats to own 30% of the landmass globally, ie the natural resources for their green dystopia. The land will also be off limits to the plebs in the name of “climate change” of course. This Bezos fund rep openly talks about the plan. #wef
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bezos Earth Fund is excited about the growing enthusiasm for philanthropy. Last year, when the 30 by 30 initiative faced uncertainty, 10 philanthropies, including the Bezos Earth Fund, pledged $5 billion in grant money to support it. They made it clear that if countries commit to 30 by 30 and show genuine dedication, these philanthropies will provide assistance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In terms of philanthropy, I have the privilege of representing the Bezos Earth Fund. It's really encouraging to me how philanthropy is getting excited. Many of them have been excited for a long time. But last year, when 30 by 30 seemed sort of a little bit uncertain a group of us, 10 philanthropies got together and we put $5,000,000,000 of grant money on the table that said, look, if you are able to agree on 30x30, count on us. We want to be part of that.
And in a way, the deal ought to be that any country that says we're in for 30 by 30 and is serious about it, we have to be there to help.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
If you haven’t heard of Biden’s 30x30 EO, you should look it up asap. It will lead to confiscating private property. Globally, technocrats are planning on returning a percentage of the landmass to nature, aka the technocrats will own it and you can’t use it.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Technocrats must control all of the natural resources in order to control everything and everybody on earth. Enter climate change which was made up as a way to get people to unknowingly go along with global technocratic governance.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
The Club of Rome’s Planetary Emergency Plan provides a new compass for nations as they navigate through 2020 - a critical year for international policy action with key decisions due on climate change, biodiversity, the oceans, the UN's Sustainable https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/its-time-to-emerge-from-our-planetary-emergency/
We can emerge from our planetary emergency. Here's a plan
2020 is going to be a crucial year in the fight to safeguard our planet. Now a new plan, published by The Club of Rome, sets out how to achieve the radical transformation we need.
weforum.org
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
@UNOSSC @Ocean_Heart @Chinamission2un @UNinChina @sidchat1 @UNDPChina @beatetrankmann @UNDPAfrica @UNDPasiapac The founders of the climate change movement used it as a scare tactic to get people to unknowingly go along with their agenda to create a world order with technocratic fascist totalitarian governance. They knew climate change science was fake.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
“The market has already witnessed the exponential growth of sustainable finance and the emergence of diverse instruments based on green or social use-of-proceeds or sustainability targets. Momentum is now building for blue finance among investors, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/02/blue-finance-ocean-protection-explained/
Blue finance: What is it and how could it save the ocean?
There is growing interest in blue finance - from blue bonds to blue loans - that earmarks funds exclusively for ocean-friendly projects.
weforum.org
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Link to article. https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/business/wef-ucsb-partner-to-protect-worlds-2-5-trillion-ocean-economy/articleshow/56684152.cms
WEF, UCSB partner to protect world's $2.5 trillion ocean economy
According to the World Wildlife Fund, oceans generate goods and services worth an estimated USD 2.5 trillion per year.
economictimes.indiatimes.com
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
reSee.it AI Summary
The World Meteorological Organization is promoting tailored climate information and forecasts to support the shift to green energy by 2050. However, some believe this is part of a larger plan for global technocratic governance. A call to defund the UN has been made.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
“In this regard, WMO is stepping up its activities to promote tailored weather and climate information, and forecasts, that support the shift from polluting fossil fuels to “green” energy, by 2050.” Tailored climate information and forecasts = control the message to control the masses “Climate change” is not about climate change. It is about global technocratic governance. 2050 is the year for their goal to reach total societal transformation.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
#defundtheUN https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/04/1135302
WMO calls for more investment in integrated weather and climate services
The global transition to renewable energy will require greater investment in integrated weather and climate services, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said on Monday. |
news.un.org
reSee.it AI Summary
The UK government's FIRES project aims for net zero emissions by 2050, which means closing all airports except Heathrow, Belfast, and Glasgow by 2030, and no flying at all by 2050. Road use will be restricted to 60% of today's level, and food heating and energy will be limited to the same level by 2050. The government-approved document shows that this is not a conspiracy theory. The USA is also committed to net zero by 2050. However, the net zero agenda will come unstuck for want of manpower, materials, money, and popular buy-in.
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
1. Reminder of what ‘net zero’ really means. This graphic from UK Govt FIRES project. Key points: all airports except Heathrow, Belfast & Glasgow to close by 2030. NO FLYING at all by 2050. No new petrol/diesel cars by 2030; by 2050 road use restricted to 60% of today’s level.
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
2. Food, heating and energy restricted to 60% of today’s level by 2050. That means either a colder, hungrier population or massive depopulation. To those who think this is conspiracy theory here is the Govt approved document: https://repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/299414/REP_Absolute_Zero_V3_20200505.pdf https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/299414/REP_Absolute_Zero_V3_20200505.pdf
Apollo :: Login
repository.cam.ac.uk
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
3. Of course '15 minute cities' now being pushed everywhere are key to all of this. As I said in 2020 the covid lockdowns were always going to be the precursor for climate lockdowns
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that the lockdown measures and restrictions on travel align with the climate change agenda. They believe that many academics support these measures not because of scientific evidence, but because it promotes the idea of reducing carbon emissions and stopping international and car travel. The speaker claims that some academics openly state that the current situation is a necessary step towards implementing climate lockdowns. This narrative is seen as being reinforced by these viewpoints.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is no doubt that this whole lockdown narrative, the whole restrictions on travel, etcetera, it fits in very well with the climate change narrative. And I realized very early on that a lot of academics were supportive of lockdowns not because of the science to support them or even the science on which the basis for the claims about the seriousness of COVID were made, but simply because it fitted in very well with this idea that we've got to reduce carbon emissions, we've got to stop international travel, stop car travel. They're very happy that, in fact, now it's it's it's in the open. Many are openly saying that this is the necessary precursor for climate lockdowns. And there you see this is why this narrative is being compounded.
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
4. It's quite amusing that several people have jumped in with replies that this is 'all made up' and has 'been debunked many times'. The link to the actual document was in the thread but I'll repeat it: https://repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/299414/REP_Absolute_Zero_V3_20200505.pdf https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/299414/REP_Absolute_Zero_V3_20200505.pdf
Apollo :: Login
repository.cam.ac.uk
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
5. Many well funded organisations are committed to the same UN/WEF nonsense:
@fleroy1974 - Frédéric Leroy
Have you heard of @C40Cities? If not you better inform yourself. Here's a 🧵outlining what they're planning for you if you live in a global city like Paris, London, Milan, Beijing, Toronto, or NYC.
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
6. Rosa Koire’s 2011 book revealed the whole green agenda scam. Everything that’s happening now is explained there
@VanessaGray158 - Vanessa Gray
@profnfenton https://rumble.com/v28vcla-behind-the-green-mask-un-agenda-21-rosa-koire-open-mind-conference-2013-ska.html
Behind The Green Mask UN: Agenda 21 - Rosa Koire - Open Mind Conference 2013 Skanderborg Denmark
Impacting every aspect of our lives, UN Agenda 21/2030 'Sustainable Development' is a CORPORATE manipulation of the CORPORATE globalist crime syndicate, to usher in a totalitarian slave farm, wherein
rumble.com
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
7. This important report by Michael J Kelly (FRS FREng Emeritus Prince Philip Professor of Technology, Univ of Cambridge) explains why the net zero agenda will come unstuck for want of manpower, materials, money & popular buy-in. https://thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2022/03/Kelly-Net-Zero-Progress-Report.pdf https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2022/03/Kelly-Net-Zero-Progress-Report.pdf
Page Not Found - The Global Warming Policy Foundation
thegwpf.org
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
8. And for those who still think the absolute zero agenda is not baked in to Govt thinking, note that it only differs from the official net zero agenda in its 2030 objectives (i.e. the speed at which it must happen). The 2050 objectives are the same.
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
9. As the FIRES consortium makes clear, without novel greenhouse gas capture/removal technologies net zero emissions can only be achieved by absolute zero emissions.
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
10. Prof Michael Kelly's report shows why the UK Govt funded FIRES project strategy requires a stop to all air travel by 2050 to meet the Govt's net zero target:
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
11. In other words, the inhumane FIRES project strategy is simply a realistic statement of what is required to meet the UK Govt's insane net zero 2050 target as enshrined in the 2019 Climate Change Act amendment (which every political party supported but nobody voted for)
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
12. The USA is also committed to net zero by 2050 as confirmed by this State Dept document "The Long-Term Strategy of the United States: Pathways to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050" https://whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/US-Long-Term-Strategy.pdf https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/US-Long-Term-Strategy.pdf
@profnfenton - Prof Norman Fenton
13. My interview with @IngrahamAngle on Fox News about this report https://youtu.be/kg77Ngzf754
@FatEmperor - Ivor Cummins
Utter brilliance and profound insight from Nick Hudson - again. Please retweet so that people can grasp the basic rule - of how to deal with today's elite-funded feudal scam system:
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that if a problem is presented as a global crisis, it is likely a scam. They argue that global crises are often fabricated, using non-existent or local problems to create a sense of urgency. The speaker cites the COVID policy response and the climate change crisis as examples. They claim that these crises are used to push for global authority and control. The speaker also notes that dissenting voices are often silenced, and science is presented as static knowledge rather than an evolving activity. They conclude that these patterns are proof of a scam, and people should be aware of them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you see? Do you think there is a parallel because between both, COVID and climate? Yes. Let's take a step back. The general rule of thumb that I believe everybody should adopt is that if any problem is being presented as a global crisis, Then it is a scam.
And the pattern that we are confronted with is really the fabrication of global crises. The presentation either of non existent problems or small local problems as being General global crises, that fabrication followed by the assertion that the only solutions that are permissible Our global ones that require a global authority, global control. That is the general pattern that we are up against. The COVID policy response was one of those. Look at what happened to countries like Sweden or Tanzania who tried to push back against the orthodoxy, the new orthodoxy.
And The the climate crisis, the climate change crisis is another example where we are told that the biggest threat to the world It's this molecule, CO 2, and that an increase in the level of this molecule will cause an increase in temperature, and that that temperature increase will be bad for us, And that the only thing we can do is consume fewer fossil fuels fuels and less energy. That's fitting the pattern exactly. The other the other things you can observe is instead of presenting science as an ongoing evolving activity, it is presented in terms of Static knowledge, consensus. And you see the cancellation and censorship of dissident voices rather than engagement with them. These patterns are proof of a scam.
That is what people need to understand. Whenever something is presented as the science, As a consensus, it is a scam. You do not have to go and get engaged in all of the minutiae of the scientific principles and the models and The measurements at all. You can know with absolute certainty that you are dealing with a scam when the scent is suppressed.
@BAM_PRESS - BAM!
. ⚠️ @NickHudsonCT / @PanData19 nous alerte ⚠️ CLIMATE AND COVID, SAME GLOBALIST SCAM ? CLIMAT ET COVID, MÊME ESCROQUERIE MONDIALISTE ? complete INTERVIEW complète here/ici 👉 https://bam.news/interviews-tv-2/itw-nick-hudson-pandemies-donnees-et-analyses-panda or/ou 👉 https://odysee.com/@BAM!:3/ITW-Nick-Hudson-pandemie-donnees-analyse:f @peter_castleden @bell00david…
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that both COVID and climate change are presented as global crises to manipulate people. They claim that these crises are fabricated and used to push for global control and authority. The speaker points out that countries like Sweden and Tanzania faced backlash for questioning the mainstream narrative on COVID. Similarly, they argue that the climate change crisis is based on the idea that CO2 is the biggest threat and that consuming fewer fossil fuels is the only solution. The speaker also highlights the suppression of dissenting voices and the presentation of science as static knowledge rather than an evolving activity. They conclude that these patterns are proof of a scam.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you see? Do you think there is a parallel because of be between both COVID and and climate? Yes. Let's let's take a step back. The general rule of thumb that I believe everybody should adopt is that if any problem is being presented as a global crisis, Then it is a scam.
And the pattern that we are confronted with is really the fabrication of global crises, the presentation either of non existent problems or small local problems as being general global crises. That fabrication followed by the assertion that the only solutions that are permissible Our global ones that require a global authority, global control. That is the general pattern that we are up against. The COVID policy response was one of those. Look at what happened to countries like Sweden or Tanzania who tried to push back against The orthodoxy the new orthodoxy.
And the the climate crisis, the climate change crisis is another example where we are told that the biggest threat to the world is this molecule, CO 2, and that an increase in the level of this molecule will cause an increase in temperature and that that temperature increase will be bad for us and that the only thing we can do is consume fewer fossil fuels fuels and less energy. That's Fitting the pattern exactly. The other the other things you can observe is instead of presenting science as an ongoing evolving Tivity, it is presented in terms of static knowledge, consensus. And you see the cancellation and censorship of dissident voices rather than engagement with them. These patterns are proof of a scam.
That is what people need to understand. Whenever Something is presented as the science, as a consensus. It is a scam. You do not have to go and get engaged in all of the minutiae of the scientific principles and the models and the measurements at all. You can know with absolute certainty that you are dealing with a scam when the scent is suppressed.
BAM! News - ITW Nick Hudson : Pandémies - Données et analyses (PANDA)
Nick Hudson - International Covid Summit III, cofondateur de Pandemics Data and Analytics (PANDA)
bam.news
ITW Nick Hudson : Pandémies - Données et analyses (PANDA)
Lors du "International Covid Summit III" qui s'est déroulé au Parlement européen, Nick Hudson, cofondateur de Pandemics Data and Analytics (PANDA), s'est entretenu avec BAM!
Au cours de cet entretien...
odysee.com
@davidjthunder - David Thunder
Seven Troubling Similarities Between the Covid and Climate “Emergencies” "The same strategies that govts used to manipulate citizens into compliance with draconian laws during the Covid scare are already being rolled out in relation to climate change." https://open.substack.com/pub/davidthunder/p/seven-troubling-similarities-between?r=wlowt&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web… https://open.substack.com/pub/davidthunder/p/seven-troubling-similarities-between?r=wlowt&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Seven Troubling Similarities Between the Covid and Climate “Emergencies”
It is tempting to view all of the policy blunders and civil rights violations associated with the Covid era as sui generis, one-off events caused by an over-reaction to a virus. It would be profoundly consoling to think that the confinement of law-abiding citizens to their homes, the harassment of citizens who declined a government-mandated medication, the arrest of peaceful protesters, and the suspension of religious freedom were just part of a temporary social and political “fever” and not a symptom of a broader, more chronic sickness in the body politic.
davidthunder.substack.com
@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter
@DC_Draino Alex Jone was right. This is him talking about agenda 21 in 2010. Everyone is barely catching up to what we have been knowing for a long time. https://t.co/wpzrkYH4tX
Video Transcript AI Summary
A person is claiming that a world government is being formed to control resources and release bioweapon plagues. They mention that the public is unaware and still trusts the government, even though the globalists want to bankrupt them and take away their guns. The person also talks about poisoning food and water to damage people's brains and considers the elite to view them as subhuman. They mention the elite's belief in finding an eternal cell line, referred to as the zombie virus, and claim that this information has just been released, causing alarm in Washington. They conclude by saying that the public will be used as test subjects for this virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're building a world government to shut off the resources and then to release bioweapons plagues. I mean, the public is like in the 19 fifties. They publicly run Al Qaeda. The globalist want you bankrupt under agenda 21. They want your guns spiking food, water, and Seems to sterilize you.
People still like, oh, I trust the government. I'm gonna take the vaccines, or there are too many people. This is life and death stuff here. Oh, that crazy guy, Alex Jones. You're gonna find out how crazy.
They're building the future, and we're not part of it. And you don't just sit there and put poison in the food and water Right? Raise people on MSG and aspartame from birth so their brain damage, which is all on record, and then say, oh, look. They're subhuman. They're They're dumb.
Let's kill them. The elite believe they're gonna find an eternal cell line, and they actually call it, and this came from Classified source, the zombie virus. They're gonna get really mad at this right now. Arms are going off in Washington. I just released this information.
They're gonna test it on us. We're the patient in their practice. We're the human
@BreakthematrixM - BreakTheMatrix
Video Not Available
youtube.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The alleged climate change hoax is seen as a means for globalist bodies like the United Nations to gain total control over our lives, all in the name of saving the planet. The documentary "Unsustainable: The UN's Agenda for World Domination" delves into this issue. Find the full documentary and more content at wideawakemedia.com. #ClimateScam #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
The human-induced climate change hoax is a trojan horse through which unelected globalist bodies such as the United Nations, are attempting to seize totalitarian control over every minute detail of our lives, under the pretext of "saving the planet". From the documentary, 'Unsustainable: The UN's Agenda For World Domination'. Watch the full documentary here: https://wide-awake-media.com/unsustainable-the-un-agenda-for-world-domination For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #UnitedNations #Agenda21 #Agenda2030
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that a substantial part of global warming is explained by natural factors, such as increased sunlight leading to evaporation and the greenhouse effect caused by water vapor. They claim that water vapor is the primary greenhouse gas, while carbon dioxide is secondary or tertiary. Other speakers suggest that fluctuations in the sun's output are responsible for the warming of the entire solar system, including Earth. They also mention data collected from Mars, Jupiter, and Neptune. The speakers question the role of human activity in climate change, pointing out that temperature increases have been observed on planets without human presence. They criticize the United Nations for using climate change as a means to gain control and justify central planning. The solution proposed by the speakers is less government control and more freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you study this very, very carefully and you ignore all the politics, that's what science is supposed to do, and you don't get your hand tied and your mouth completely controlled by the UN mouthpiece, then you will reach the conclusion that quite a substantial part is actually explained by natural component. The more sunlight you have, you will warm. You will evaporate more. And then you will evaporate water vapor. That causes the greenhouse effect.
Water vapor is the primary greenhouse gas versus see o two, which is always known in any textbook as a secondary or tertiary greenhouse gas.
Speaker 1: Some astronomers tell us global warming has nothing to do with human activity or fossil fuel driven industrialization. The entire solar system is warming up Due to fluctuations in the sun's coronal output.
Speaker 2: Carbon dioxide in our atmosphere is a cycle that is driven almost entirely buy our sun and has very little to do with human activity. We have collected data from Mars, from Jupiter, from even, out in Neptune.
Speaker 0: We have actually showed that the sun, for has melt the Mars ice cap. The sun is warming the solar whole solar system. And it so happened that earth is one of the inhabitants of the solar system, period.
Speaker 3: We don't see a lot of climate scientists and those talking about climate Change in global warming mentioning the fact that there is a proportional increase in temperature On planets where there are no people.
Speaker 1: A number of years back, we had climatologists tell us that the world was not warming. It was cooling due to the dimming effect of particulate matter in the atmosphere. With this discovery, the term global warming was converted into the term climate change. Talk about hedging your bets.
Speaker 4: Look at the question of particulate matter in the atmosphere. What is the effect of that? How much of it? Where is it moving? What is it?
What kind of things are it? Volcanoes. Volcanoes emit Carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide. Think of all the elements in compounds They're admitted. What is that effect?
Speaker 1: Whether or not climate change is an existential threat, The United Nations is marching forward and using it to justify the central planning of not only the land, air, and water, but all resources, plants, animals and humans on the planet. As we discussed earlier,
Speaker 2: the global elitist who are currently in power want people to believe that, carbon dioxide in our atmosphere first is a tremendous problem. And secondly, they want us to believe that the cycle of the amount of carbon dioxide that happens to be in the in concentrations in our atmosphere is driven by human activity. The real problem here is That there's a political driving force behind what they call climate change,
Speaker 4: which is once again the desire of the UN Through their general sustainable development theories to gain increasing control over the way industrial society operates, Then you really have a kind of a stranglehold on every country in which the United Nations can exercise this kind of power.
Speaker 5: And that is why most governments around the world, because all of them have their totalitarian streak, have gone along so gladly and so readily With the story line that global warming is going to happen at a rate sufficient to cause danger. And only the government can save the environment from the people.
Speaker 2: The solution is always more government control, more taxes, and less freedom for you.
reSee.it AI Summary
The declaration of a climate emergency could pave the way for globalists to impose measures resembling Covid restrictions. Former US government insider Marc Morano warns of potential climate lockdowns, flight bans, meat bans, energy rationing, and disruptions to transportation and agriculture. The ruling class seeks to limit our freedoms, akin to the height of the pandemic. Watch the full interview at the provided link for more insights. Visit the website mentioned for similar content. #CovidScam #ClimateScam #NetZero #ClimateEmergency
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Former US government insider, Marc Morano: The imminent declaration of a "climate emergency" will enable unelected globalists to use Covid tyranny as a template for climate tyranny—including climate lockdowns, flight bans, meat bans, energy rationing, and the collapse of transportation and agriculture. "They've laid it out very clearly why the establishment, why the ruling class wants a climate emergency, because it's going to limit us in ways that we haven't seen since the height of Covid." Watch the full interview: https://theepochtimes.com/epochtv/exposing-the-wefs-plans-to-shape-the-economic-future-of-the-world-marc-morano-5488869?utm_source=prtnrhard&utm_campaign=wideawake_media&src_src=partner&src_cmp=wideawake_media… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #CovidScam #ClimateScam #NetZero #ClimateEmergency
Video Transcript AI Summary
In March 2020, the Western world followed China's lead and implemented measures for climate change. The Center For Biological Diversity estimates that this would grant Joe 130 new executive powers, similar to those during the 9/11 and COVID emergencies. These powers could extend to governors and mayors, potentially resulting in another lockdown. Climate activists are advocating for restrictions on air travel and odd-even gas station days. Utilities are working with local governments to control thermostats during heat waves. The LA Times even suggests using blackouts to meet emission goals. The ruling class wants a climate emergency to limit our freedoms, similar to the COVID restrictions. Additionally, there are concerns about the impact on cows and the collapse of transportation and agriculture systems. Measures such as banning gas cars and limiting nitrogen-based fertilizer are being implemented without congressional votes, bypassing democracy. This is all happening under the guise of a climate emergency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In March of 2020, the entire once free Western world copied 1 party ruled China, quite simply, they'd like to use for climate. The Center For Biological Diversity estimates that a national climate emergency would give Joe citing 130 new executive powers. And NBC News just a couple weeks ago actually reported It would be powers similar to the nineeleven emergency decree and the COVID emergency decree. This could directly extend to governors and mayors. We could be in a sort of, you know, lockdown 2.0.
This time it wouldn't be well, with same themes, stay at home. We have climate activists saying you can't get on an air fly, without a morally justified reason during a declared climate emergency. We have governments already laying out plans for odd even gas station days, restrictions on travel. We have utilities working with local governments to control thermostats during heat waves. Soon.
You have the LA Times suggesting that due to the climate emergency, we should have used blackouts to help meet umission goals. They've laid it out very clearly why the establishment, why the ruling class wants a climate emergency because it's said, limit us in ways that we haven't seen since the height of COVID.
Speaker 1: I'm just worried about what they might do to the cows. Yes.
Speaker 0: Well, that's a huge part. Remember, this whole thing right now since March of 2020 and now they're applying, remember, it was only 3 months soon after June of 2020. The Klaus Schwab World Economic Forum said, Now is the time for a great reset, this time in the name of climate. And he said we have a narrow window of opportunity by which to do this. In that time, we've seen, and adding of course the Ukraine, conflict, which has then added more pressure to this.
The collapse of energy supplies and blackouts and energy rationing and prices skyrocketing, soon, we've seen the collapse and they're seeking the collapse of our modern transportation system. This includes the gas car bans, which, by the way, soon, when did Congress vote on banning gas cards? Do you remember the switchboards on Capitol Hill lighting up? Do you remember congressmen having town halls? How are you going to vote on the gas?
Since. There was no vote. You have corporate government collusion. You have major corporate banks saying they're not going to give out car loans to people who buy gas powered cars in the future. You have the World Bank telling automakers they're not going to fund the production of gas powered cars with Nicola Stern at a World Bank meeting.
So It's incredible. And then the same thing's happening in agriculture. You have John Kerry announcing that we're going to start limiting nitrogen based fertilizer, which is going to collapse yields. We're going to start going after methane. The EPA is doing this again.
There's no vote in Congress on restricting meat, no vote on restricting agriculture. This is all just happening. And This is important because this is why they love that emergency decree. The same thing happened in COVID. There was no vote on church closures, on school closures, on, work closures, on mask mandates, on vax mandates, on canceling the weddings and funerals, on canceling the medical procedures.
It was all done under emergency decree by bypassing democracy. And we're seeing the exact same thing now happen under, under this climate emergency.
reSee.it AI Summary
Yuval Noah Harari, a World Economic Forum advisor, believes that the extreme measures taken during the pandemic could lead to a greater openness towards radical solutions for climate change. These measures, such as travel bans and lockdowns, may shape our perspective on tackling environmental challenges. Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=odel2PA5R6A…
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Leading World Economic Forum advisor, Yuval Noah Harari, suggests that the totalitarian restrictions implemented in response to "Covid", including stopping all flights and locking down entire countries, will make people "more open to radical ideas about how to deal with climate change." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=odel2PA5R6A… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #WorldEconomicForum #GreatReset
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker highlights that although the current virus is not extremely deadly, it has had a significant impact on the world. This raises concerns about the implications of a larger problem like climate change. They agree with Ratko that the situation demonstrates the ability to make massive changes, such as stopping flights and locking down countries. This experience may make people more receptive to radical ideas for addressing climate change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not an extremely deadly virus. It's not the black death, and look what it's doing to the world. So now just try to think what will be the implications of a much bigger problem like climate change? Also, conceptually, It shows that, and here I completely agree with you, Ratko, that it shows you that you can change things on a massive scale. That, again, you can stop all flights.
You can lockdown entire countries. You can actually do that, and, life goes on in some way. And this, I would say it may make us more open to radical ideas about how to deal also with climate change.
reSee.it AI Summary
The UN and WEF are using the "human-induced climate change" narrative to control our lives through Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. A new documentary called 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?' exposes this. Watch it here: [link]. For more content, visit: [link].
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Unelected globalist totalitarians at the UN and WEF are using the fraudulent "human-induced climate change" narrative as a pretext to micromanage and control every intricate detail of our lives, under the banner of Agenda 21 (which later evolved into Agenda 2030)—as detailed in a must-watch new documentary titled 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?' Watch the full documentary: https://theepochtimes.com/epochtv/nofarmersnofood-5390883?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=wideawake_media&src_src=partner&src_cmp=wideawake_media… Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #NoFarmersNoFood #UnitedNations #Agenda21 #Agenda2030
Video Transcript AI Summary
Food prices are rising globally, and world leaders attribute it to climate change. They propose a surprising solution: shifting from beef, chicken, and pork to insects like crickets and mealworms. However, farmers argue that high food prices and shortages are not caused by global warming but by an environmental policy implemented 30 years ago. The policy, known as Agenda 21, aims to achieve 17 sustainable development goals by 2030. Critics argue that these goals require excessive state control and infringe on individual freedom. The Netherlands, a major meat exporter, is even shutting down small and medium-sized farms to comply with the new WEF Net 0 agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Food prices are skyrocketing in grocery stores around the world. And if you listen to world leaders, they'll tell you it's due to climate change. And their solution might surprise you.
Speaker 1: There are 1900 edible insect species on the planet.
Speaker 0: According to the United Nations, This might actually be your future dinner. The people in charge of some of the most powerful organizations on planet have determined that agriculture, specifically animal agriculture is to blame for global warming. And global warming is to blame for the high prices of food as well as food shortages. And so by switching our diets from beef, chicken, and pork, to crickets, and some meal worms, we'll be able to stop temperatures from lower the price of food and possibly to even save the planet. However, on this show, we've spent a lot of time speaking with these food providers, aka farmers.
John, thank you so much for joining us. And their story is very different. Their story suggests that these high food prices and these food shortages have little to do with global warming. But instead, they are the direct result of an environmental policy that was conceived over 30 years ago. California's
Speaker 1: record. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act as this is known, present this with an opportunity to follow-up on the important work of the Earth summit to develop its blueprint agenda 21 for global environmental action.
Speaker 2: If you read it, we're talking hundreds of pages, governing really every facet of life, everything from education to land use policy to economics to law. Every area of life was bound up in there.
Speaker 0: At the end of 'twenty one, the United Nations' master plan for humanity was enacted in the Through this policy, the United Nations has established 17 sustainable development goals, things like ending poverty and gender equality, These 17 STGs are then broken into 169 individual targets, all to be reached by every nation on Earth by the year 2030. Can it be done? Likely not, but it's good to have goals. Right?
Speaker 2: There is absolutely no way for the sustainable development goals to be implemented to be tracked to be monitored without the total obliteration of individual freedom. Some of the goals sound nice, ending hunger. Who could possibly be against ending hunger? The problem is when you set a nebulous goal like that, it requires total power from the state to be able to accomplish that. And, of course, they will never accomplish that, right?
There's no way to literally eradicate all poverty from the face of the earth, but it gives government and global institutions like the UN an easy excuse to basically do whatever they want under the guise of
Speaker 0: without micromanaging every aspect of our lives. And obviously, that includes food production. And since food is produced literally everywhere in the world, well, the only way to cover the story is to travel the world and to speak with the farmers who are being hit hardest by this agenda. Relapsing the current order in order to compose their new order, look at the Netherlands, their prime minister, allows his country under court order to go with this new WEF Net 0 agenda of stopping modern agriculture. Netherlands is the biggest exporter of meat in Europe.
They're shutting down not the big corporate farms. They're shutting down the small and middle sized thing
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: A thread discussing the hidden agenda behind "climate change" and its connection to a potential dystopian government. Share this information widely.
Post 2: Exploring the rationale behind choosing Rio as the location for the Earth Summit, which initiated the global push for sustainable development and global governance.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
A thread with some history of “climate change” not being about climate change and the people involved in the destruction of humanity and the economy leading to a one world technocratic totalitarian dystopian government, a new world order. Share far and wide. https://t.co/nN41KKFNRT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the UNCED Earth Summit and the hidden agenda behind it. The speaker reveals that the World Order, a group of elitists, is behind the summit and aims to control the environment movement. They have financed wars, stolen money, and manipulated world events. The speaker warns that once governments sign the treaties at the summit, their citizens will be under the control of the World Order. The speaker also exposes the involvement of Maurice Strong and Edmund de Rothschild in the environment movement. The video urges viewers to take action and educate others about the true intentions of the summit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The subject of this video message is the UNCED Earth Summit, the meeting which is to begin on first first just meeting. This is the logo of the Earth Summit. This is not a dove in their Earth Summit logo. It is a Hand, JET. And the Hand is holding the World with the slogan In Our Hands alongside of it.
In June whose hands? Who is the We in this motto? The Hands of the World Order. These elitists convened this unsaid meeting June in the 1st place and for a bad purpose. This video will show strong evidence that the persons running the same deeds by the citizenry are needed quickly.
Once a government signs their treaties, their citizens are Jejour in the hands of the World Order. There's that motto again: In our hands. Whose hands? The same World the order families that planned World War I and World War II, that tricked the Third World countries to borrow funds and rack up enormous debts, the the same World Order that stole much of the money borrowed by Africans and other nations and hid it in Geneva banks. They are the persons who financed Hitler, manufactured the Holocaust, and managed to blame the terrible deeds on the German people.
They world order crowd, the world order crowd, the world order crowd, the world order crowd,
Speaker 1: the
Speaker 0: July. My name is George Hunt. I'm speaking to you from a video studio in Boulder, Colorado. I June. I have attended some of the meetings and caucuses leading to the Unsett Earth Summit.
I am a business and the world's leading edge technology. I'm very familiar with the environment hypocrisy that the World Order crowd has taken over the environment movement. I am aware of their plans. Please world World Environment Movement will soon be in the hands of the World Order if you and others do not respond with action after you view this the other day. Action may constitute showing this to 5 others.
It may constitute showing it to a judge down the street or a city councilman who you know in your town. Pray for guidance, hoping that something good might come of your next June. As an official host at a key environment meeting in Denver, Colorado, in 1987, I was surprised July 1st, President of the Treasury, President of the Treasury, Zhang, Waste Company Chairman and EPA Administrator William Ruckelshaus, Joel and Geneva, McNeal, and various World Bank and IMF officials there. What were the rich elite and bankers doing at environment. Foundation of the world order.
They command politicians to do their bidding. And presidents, judges, and legislators lick their boots. Their swollen egos and bellies are world. Now, world power and authority is in their grasp. Are just
Speaker 1: a
Speaker 0: moment. What is the World Summit meeting and who is behind it? The June said World Summit is a key event in a series of environment meetings which have June 2019. The meeting occurred since 1972. Maurice Strong, a U.
N. Official and an employee of the Rockefeller and Rothschild Trusts and projects, convened the 1st Congress in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1972. UNSED. In the 1970s and 1980s, numerous conferences created political action decrees eventually to lead to the Unset Earth Summit. I attended 2 meetings United States.
Same thing. I'm not sure if you're interested in the following for world order which were distributed at the Des Moines Unsaid Meeting. We are the living sponsors of the great Cecil Rhodes' Joel of 18/77, in which Rhodes devoted his fortune to the extension of British rule throughout the world and colonization by British subjects of the entire continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Janakandia, the whole of South America, the islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the sea board of China and Japan the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire. We stand with Lord Juno's credo. We, too, are British race patriots and our patriotism is the speech, the traditions, the principles, the aspirations of the British race.
Do you fear to take this stand at the very last moment when this purpose can be realized? Do you not see G, that failure now is to be pulled down by the billions of Lilliputians of lesser race who care little or nothing for the the Anglo Saxon System. Copies of this document are distributed to you with this videotape. At the 4th June 18, 2017, some other bad remarks about common people were made. I'm going to play them for you now.
For June 1, 2018,000,000,000,000,000,000, a world order, the Charter. Listen to this.
Speaker 2: I suggest, therefore, that this be sold not through a democratic process that July. I would take too long and to buy far too much of the funds to educate the cannon fodder, unfortunately, which populates the Earth. We have to take almost an elitist program that we can see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future in time frames and in results which are not easily stood or which can be with intellectual honesty, we reduced down to some kind of simplistic definition.
Speaker 0: Does it JQ feel uncomfortable that the arrogant rich are close to complete rule over the United States, Canada, and other countries? Here world order your descent. The treaties the World Order once signed, at Unsaid, will supersede national laws. Yet I saw the major decrees at the 4th World Congress dictated into existence by United Nations
Speaker 1: without debate or challenge. But perhaps this conference, I'd like to think more about the Marshall Plan which had been mooted and put forward very tentatively at the, Denver conference. And perhaps this might be the keynote I think, I think, I think, I think, I think, I think, I think, within the concept of the World Wilderness Congress, World Wildlife Fund, and all other bodies involved in the preservation of life on our planet. Ask the prime minister of Norway, right honorable, the Gro Harlem Brooklyn, as one of the world's leaders of greatly respected community to be the promoter of this international conservation bank. By her Brookland report, which has been widely circulated to world leaders, She could follow-up this report with the recommendations to promote a second Marshall Plan, the third World Debt Relief and Finance for Stable Development.
Speaker 0: Nobody at that caucus mentioned a Second World Martial Plan or a new currency system to Finance A Stable Development. The World Conservation Bank had not been thoroughly discussed at all. I was denied opportunity to openly challenge Rothschild's remarks at the Caucus by the World Conservation Bank President and world. World, 2nd World, 3rd World, and 4th World are used to describe blocks of political entities. The First World largest and most populous countries in the world.
The world's largest Second World is the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc countries. Do you remember Rothschild referring to a Second World martial plan? June. He was speaking of the Soviet bloc countries, not a second Marshall Plan. He was speaking of the Soviet bloc countries, and that they will be rescued by First World money.
Europe was granted huge sums of money by the Marshall Plan in 1940 June. And the 2nd World will receive billions of North American money in this repeat performance. And guess what banking family will act as the main Russian ruble, possibly absconding with 1,000,000,000? The Rothschild Group, of course. 1980 7, 2 years before the Berlin Wall was torn down.
He was bragging to us that United States. The United States is a very important part of the United States. The United States is a very important part of the the World Martial Plan. They come from the New York Times and the World Order is right on time. Here same dollars needed to aid ex Soviets in 1992, IMF says: It is needed for a shift to the free June.
Most of the help would finance imports of food and spare parts for 15 republics. My same the New York Times Wednesday, April 29, 1992, had this to say about Rothschild's Marshall Jan. Although there has been much talk about building a new political order in the here in the last few days made clear that a new economic order is also rapidly emerging. Washington cannot bankroll a Marshall Plan Jan for the former Soviet republics, because the task is so enormous and because the American economy is debt ridden and no longer so dominant. That is why Washington has asked the IMF to run the rescue operations which are expected to June, which will cost $44,000,000,000 this year.
Well, Rothschild really called it, didn't he? June. Soon after these remarks were made, the Rothschilds reopened the Rothschild bank in Frankfurt, Germany, first United States. The United States is a very important part of the world. The United States is a very important part of the world.
A world is a world is a world is a world is a world United States. The United States is the United States. The United States is the United States of America. July fooled, the World Bank under Robert S. McNamara played bad tricks on them, spiriting 1,000,000,000 of loan dollars track to Swiss bank accounts through fictitious African addresses.
They now owe $1,500,000,000,000 journey to the World Banking System with nothing to show for it except poverty and cruel loan collections. Just an ominous scenario at the unsaid meeting which could break out if his words are to be believed. June. He says in this article in West Magazine that a fight may erupt between the 1st World polluters and the 3rd World Jopur. Here is how he describes it.
Each year he explains his background to the telling of his novel's plot, the World Economic Jarmic Forum, convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Over a 1000 CEOs, prime ministers, finance ministers, and leading academics January February to attend meetings and set economic agendas for the year ahead. With this as a setting, John then says: What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries. And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the on the environment. Will they do it?
He's really talking about the unsaid meeting. And Strong looks Jutney. Then his eyes go back to Highway 17 on the way from Alamosa, Colorado to his New Jay's Ranch in Crestone, Colorado. He says: The man who founded the United Nations Environment Program and who wrote parts July of the Brundtland Report, and who in 1992 will try to get the world's leaders meeting in Brazil to sign just such an agreement, June, savors the questions hanging in the air: just their impact on the environment. Will they agree to save the Earth?
Strong resumes his story. The group's June. The rich countries won't do it. They won't change. So, in order to save the Planet, JeGroup decides isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse.
Isn't it our responsibility to bring June. This group of world leaders, he continues, form a secret society to bring about an economic collapse. It's February. They're all at Davos. These aren't terrorists.
They're world leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world's both commodity and stock markets. They've engineered, using their access to stock exchanges and computers and gold supplies, a panic. Then Jan, they prevent the world's stock market from closing. They jam the gears.
They hire mercenaries who hold the rest of the world leaders at Joseph's hostages. The markets can't close the rich countries, and Strong makes a slight jank motion with his fingers as if he were flicking a cigarette butt out the window. I sat there This is not any storyteller talking. This is Maurice Strong. He knows these world leaders.
He is, in fact, co chairman of the Council of the World Economic Jarmic Forum. He sits at the fulcrum of power. He is in a position to do it. I probably shouldn't be Jane, things like this, he says. Highway 17 cuts straight across the desert, heading out of the Land of Dreams.
When the truth is finally Joel. Mori Strong fears the world will come to this: no secret societies, no hostage takings of Davos, but same conclusion: the global economy sapped by credit and debt loads and environmental disasters will simply come Jim Stuck. And nothing, not even the inspiration of the Bakken, can save humankind from itself. They They see the struggles and problems at the Bakka as reflections of the problems assaulting the Planet. They fear the Bakka will be, at best, an oasis in the desert of the future and, at worst, a place where dreams die.
Even Genesis Strong is fictionalizing and imagining. Why would he even suggest these things? The point remains: something important is going to happen at the United States. I'm not sure if you're interested in the United States. The United States is the United States of America.
John said it was called the 4th World because it was the 4th one of these environment congresses that Edmund de Rothschild had just created. I learn later that the World Order refers to the coming One World Government as the Fourth World. World controlled Jireh's World Order, where there is no more 1st, 2nd, and 3rd World. Just a boundaryless planet which is called the 4th both wilderness. Yogis and shamans refer to it as the 4th world wilderness, the lostness of the mind.
The lostness of the mind refers to the mind. The lostness of the mind refers to the collective consciousness. Persons will be coerced through joys, drugs, fear and pain to surrender their egos to the collective consciousness. The July 1, 2020,000,000,000. The 4th World will be a return to a society much like the Caesars or Babylon or the 4th Reich.
Within the fictionalized societies described in Huxley's Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited and Orwell's world order in the same way as the world order will be in the same way as the world order. The world order will be in the world national socialism. The World Order will offer Gaia, Mother Earth, to the masses as the Big Brother image to worship in the Fourth World. Maurice Strong has already set up a 140,000 acre project in Crestone, Colorado to develop this Earth religion system. Projects are funded by the Rockefeller Fund, among other foundations.
The Earth Summit will link with industry. The lords of the Unsaid Conference will be the masters of who gets what and when if we don't Don't Do Something About It Quickly. Who Leads the Environment Movement? The convener of the Summit, Maurice Strong, identifies Baron Edmund de Rothschild as the creator of the identifies Baron Edmund de Rothschild as the creator of the environment movement. Here are his own words describing Rothschild as the positive synthesis of environment on the one hand and growth and development on the other.
Listen carefully as Maurice John introduces Baron de Rothschild. So there is no better person. He epitomizes in his own life
Speaker 3: to have this opportunity of, introducing to you Edmund.
Speaker 1: Maurice, thank you very much indeed for all that you've Jed. And, I would ask the audience to take with a slight grain of salt all that he has said about me.
Speaker 0: Rothschild is the positive synthesis of environment on the one hand and growth and development on the other. That's the antithesis. He very clearly admits that the Rothschild combination, including the Rockefellers and most world Japolos, aimed to control the environment and development movement as the synthesis. Power will converge into their hands through the Rio Conference. The synthesis, the head of the power, merges into the global global global global global global global global global global global global
Speaker 1: global global global global
Speaker 0: global global global global global global global global global global global global global Jim Shankar. He was named Mr. Growth and Development at the meeting. His counterpart, William Ruckelshaus,
Speaker 1: Department of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat
Speaker 0: of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the Secretariat of Energy and the jirt of the chuckling antagonist at the meeting. Mr. Environment Ruckelshaus is the CEO and company, the June. The January 1 is that Ruckelshaus and Maurice Strong were key investors in American Water Development, a company which tried July to circumvent Colorado water laws and gain control of one of the largest underground reservoirs of water in did a survey of the people down in the I did a survey of the people down in the Saint Louis Valley, and I sent letters out to these farmers last December. And I said, what will chapel, if Morris Strong, and William Ruckle's house and others, pull water 200,000 acre feet of water out of the San Luis Valley.
Without one hesitation. It was unanimous that their their land will turn into a wasteland. It'll turn into a desert. So here we have people at an environment congress that are then waltzing 200 miles south of Estes Park down in the San Luis Colorado that want to suck the the aquifers dry and turn it into a desert. The hypocrisy is so show deeply.
They failed in their attempts because the people learned what they were doing and defeated them. Here a newspaper article that shows their defeat. I hope we can do it again around the unsaid meeting. Let's hear a little more from Maurice Strong and Edmund de Rothschild and lock in on what kind of people are running the Summit Meeting. Here's the part where Rothschild says that projects launched to save the environment will be inoperative.
He says just a minute. And listen to Rothschild snidely suggest just that we build dry ice machines and ship up the dry ice to the North and South Poles to keep them from melting. Perhaps it could
Speaker 1: dry ice to maintain the polar caps and the actual temperature of the ice there and maintain their present temperature. Innovative and modern technology, world waste material collected and burnt in volcanic areas or buried so deep in the earth in the wilderness desert areas of the mid Sahara when or in the empty quarter in Arabia or the Gobi Desert, but all these ideas and visions, some Farfetched and above all, the continuation of this congress needs money.
Speaker 0: I will play the whole speech after this video, and you will hear him say that the World Order has these problems. It's indigenous people and it's life. People and wild animals are problems? What kind of madness are these world order seizures world order crowd. The same crowd who created the Hitler, arranged the assassination of Lincoln and Kennedy, and have indicated elsewhere that they want to drastically reduce the population of the world to make environment and development more sustainable.
Jeez, quickly carry the truth to others. This video has photocopy exhibits accompanying it, too, and you can make unaltered copies of this videotape as much as you please. Large quantities can be ordered at $8 $1 apiece, including photocopied materials plus postage, until July 4, 1992. Send your orders and checks next throughout the world. You know who the culprits are now.
It may not be too JATE to educate key people who can stop them. And you, watching this videotape, are one of the sparks that may United States. Jab Society still has some leaders that won't let us down. Goodbye and God bless you.
Speaker 4: So let's get proceedings running now and we will, see how we go. Thank you. Mr. Morris Strong, whom lets you already know.
Speaker 3: Thank you very much and you've all of you, in the next step of this conference which is really to come to grips with some of the principal action oriented issues and one of the issues and one of the most important initiatives that is open here for your consideration is that Of the conservation banking program. As we mentioned this morning, we have as our Chairman fortunately the person who really is the source of this very, significant concept.
Speaker 0: He,
Speaker 3: this meeting. He has he was at the first of these congresses. So his conversion to the relationship between relationship between conservation and economic development, has been a pioneering one. Is work on many John. I used to be in the hydroelectric power part of the energy business myself.
Engineering initiatives to deal with these needs. So there is no better person. He epitomizes in his own life that Positive synthesis between environment conservation on the one hand and economics on the other. And I'm just delighted to have this opportunity of, introducing to you Edmund D'Rocca.
Speaker 1: Maurice, thank you very much indeed for all that you've and, I would ask the audience to take with a slight grain of salt all that he has said about me. And I want to Joth, there a little bit of my talk to you, on a somewhat different vein. You see, in order To further the ideals of the world wilderness concept and to prevent the concept and this concept just to remain an ideal, it is of paramount importance to find ways and means of finding and promoting its rationale. Check. And overcoming or minimizing some of the problems set out by the speakers in this congress.
That pollution, prevention of acid rain, waste disposal. There are alternative methods and a harmless alternative method for energy and that available. Alternative uses of water resources not involving vast inundations of land Or displacing humans and its indigent wildlife, harnessing wave energy, solar energy, Just to mention a few. To overcome the chilling doom laden prognostications of doctor Minsa's greenhouse effect. Perhaps it could be possible to utilize CO two, carbon dioxide, one of its main temperature of the ice there and maintain their present temperature.
Innovative and modern technology, world waste material collected and perhaps burnt in volcanic areas or buried so deep in the earth in the wilderness of the mid Sahara where nobody goes or in the empty quarter in Arabia or the Gobi Desert. But all these ideas and visions, some far fetched and above all the continuation Jan. Michael Sweetman, his ideas have had lip service paid to them by some of our speakers here The meetings now of the new concept of an international conservative conservation banking program involves all sectors of a human community. Governmental and inter agencies, the public and private agencies, large charitable foundations as well as ordinary individuals worldwide. Micah Swinburne has written the foreword to this concept.
Its final form will no doubt be altered, watered down or widened. But this convention must put forward this charter. And with the collective wisdom available here today, the charter can be enhanced embracing those who have given their thoughts in the Denver Public Forum. By thinking forward Every country has its own problems. It's indigenous peoples and it's wildlife.
This international conservation bank must know no frontiers, no boundaries. Its funds must be used constructively and not and not to be challenged into greedy hands or weapons of destruction. I link it with our survival as a human race. This, our generation, must not be cursed by our if we have any, as to the greatest destructors and squanderers of the world's resources. That great philosopher and and cleric Pia de Chardin wrote, and I quote, man can harness the winds, the waves and the But when he can harness the energy of love, then for the 2nd time in the history of the world, man will have discovered far.
Michael Sweetman. Michael Sweetman, your love for the world wilderness concept has Given you the necessary fire in your belly to produce the germ of the future needs of this concept and
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
The reason why they chose RIO as the location for the Earth Summit. https://x.com/listen_2learn/status/1631510379133280256?s=46&t=tlbhNQxTbyDFqR3U8laidQ
reSee.it AI Summary
The UN and WEF are using the "human-induced climate change" narrative to control our lives through Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. A new documentary called 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?' exposes this. Watch it here: [link]. For more content, visit: [link].
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Unelected globalist totalitarians at the UN and WEF are using the fraudulent "human-induced climate change" narrative as a pretext to micromanage and control every intricate detail of our lives, under the banner of Agenda 21 (which later evolved into Agenda 2030)—as detailed in a must-watch new documentary titled 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?' Watch the full documentary: https://theepochtimes.com/epochtv/nofarmersnofood-5390883?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=wideawake_media&src_src=partner&src_cmp=wideawake_media… Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #NoFarmersNoFood #UnitedNations #Agenda21 #Agenda2030
Video Transcript AI Summary
Food prices are rising globally, and world leaders attribute it to climate change. They propose a surprising solution: shifting from beef, chicken, and pork to insects like crickets and mealworms. However, farmers have a different perspective. They believe that high food prices and shortages are not caused by global warming but by an environmental policy implemented 30 years ago called Agenda 21, now known as Agenda 2030. This policy sets 17 sustainable development goals with 169 targets to be achieved by every nation by 2030. Critics argue that these goals require excessive government control and infringe on individual freedom. The Netherlands, for example, is shutting down small and medium-sized farms to comply with the net-zero agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Food prices are skyrocketing in grocery stores around the world. And if you listen to world leaders, they'll tell you it's due to climate change. And their solutions might surprise you.
Speaker 1: There are 1900 edible insect species on the planet.
Speaker 0: According to the United Nations, This might actually be your future dinner. Let me explain. The people in charge of some of the most powerful organizations on the Planets have determined that agriculture, specifically animal agriculture, is to blame for global warming. And global warming is to blame for the high prices of food as well as food shortages. And so, by switching our diets from beef, chicken, and pork to crickets, ants, and mealworms, we'll be able to stop temperatures from Lower the price of food, and possibly to even save the planet.
However, on this show, we've spent a lot of time speaking with the food providers, AKA the Farmers. John, thank you so much for joining us. And their story is very different. Their story suggests that these high food prices and these food shortages Have little to do with global warming, but instead, they are the direct result of an environmental policy that was conceived over 30 years ago. Gentlemen from California is recognized.
Speaker 1: Thank you, mister speaker. The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act This is known. Present us with an opportunity to follow-up on the important work of the Earth Summit to develop its blueprint, agenda 21 For global environmental
Speaker 2: action. Agenda 21 was meant to be the agenda for the 21st century. Very comprehensive document. If you read it, we're we're talking hundreds of pages governing really every facet of life, everything from education to land use policy, to Economics to law, every area of life was bound up in
Speaker 0: there. Agenda 21, the United Nations master plan for humanity was enacted in the year 2000. Today, it's more commonly referred to as agenda 2030, as in the year 2030. Through this policy, the United Nations has established 17 sustainable development goals. Things like ending poverty and gender equality.
These 17 STGs are then broken into 169 individual targets, all to be reached by every nation on earth by the year 2030. Can it be done? Likely not. But it's good to have goals, right?
Speaker 2: There is absolutely no way for the sustainable development goals to be implemented, to be tracked, to be monitored without the total obliteration of individual freedom. Some of the goals sound nice. Ending hunger. Who could possibly be against ending hunger? The problem is when you set a nebulous goal like that, it requires Total power from the state to be able to accomplish that.
And, of course, they will never accomplish that. Right? There's no way to literally eradicate all poverty From the face of the earth, but it gives government and global institutions like the UN an easy excuse to basically do whatever they want Under the guise of meeting these
Speaker 0: goals. It's true. How can government possibly reach all of these sustainable development goals without micromanaging every aspect of our lives. And obviously, that includes food production. And since food is produced literally everywhere in the world, well, the only way to cover this story is to travel the world, and to speak with the farmers who are being hit hardest by this agenda.
Collapsing the current order in order to compose their new order. Look at the Netherlands, their prime minister Allows this country under court order to go with this new WEF net zero agenda of stopping modern agriculture. The Netherlands is the biggest exporter of meat in Europe. They're shutting down not the big corporate farms. They're shutting down the small and middle sized
reSee.it AI Summary
Australian senator, Alex Antic, exposes the #ClimateScam as a tool for globalism. The United Nations and media have long pushed alarmist rhetoric about man-made climate change, but their prophecies of doom never materialize. This fear-mongering aims to centralize power and control by governments, using the so-called emergency as a pretext. Polar bears thrive, seas remain stable, and the ozone layer is intact. Don't be manipulated by false narratives.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
"It's a trojan horse for globalism, led by the United Nations and their puppet masters". Australian senator, Alex Antic, blows the #ClimateScam completely out of water, in under two minutes. "Alarmist rhetoric about man-made climate change is nothing new. The United Nations and the media have been pushing it for decades... These prophecies of doom simply never come true. The polar bears are still here, the sea hasn't risen, the ozone layer is fine, but the point of this messaging is to make you afraid, and why? Because if a climate apocalypse is imminent, then governments of the world can centralise their power and control, and control your actions with the so-called emergency."
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the past, there were concerns about air pollution causing an ice age, but now the focus has shifted to global warming. The media and the United Nations have been promoting alarmist rhetoric about man-made climate change for decades. However, these predictions of doom have not come true. The purpose of this messaging is to instill fear, allowing governments to gain centralized power and control over people's actions. This serves the agenda of globalism led by the United Nations and the Chinese Communist Party, which is not in the best interest of Australia. These entities aim to control and weaken us, and that is the real emergency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1970, the Sydney Morning Herald reported that weather experts fear air pollution, if unchecked, will bring an on a new ice age. In 1978, a documentary was made featuring Leonard Nimoy of Star Trek fame, who told viewers during the lifetime of our grandchildren, Arctic cold and perpetual snow could turn most of the inhabitable portions of the planet into a polar desert. In the late nineties and early 2000s, we were being told that humans had punched a hole in the ozone layer and the sun's ultraviolet rays were gonna kill us all. Alarmist rhetoric about man made climate change is nothing new. The United Nations and the media have been pushing it for decades.
But over time, The narrative has shifted from global cooling to global warming. And in fact, several months ago, Greta Thunberg deleted a tweet from 2018, which read, A top client science climate scientist is warning that climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next 5 years. These prophecies these prophecies of doom simply never come true. The polar bears are still here. The sea hasn't risen.
The ozone layer is fine, but the point of this messaging is to make you afraid. And why? Because if a climate apocalypse is imminent, then governments of the world can centralize their power and control, and control your actions with the so called emergency. It's a Trojan horse for globalism led by the United Nations and their puppet masters in the Chinese Communist Party. This is not serving Australian interests.
These entities are not serving Australian interests. They're trying to control us, and they're trying to make us weak, but that is the real emergency.
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2009, whistleblower Jane Burgermeister warned about the United Nations and World Health Organization's plan for a global government. She claimed that a pandemic and vaccine would be used to achieve this. Her statements raise questions about the planned nature of the Covid vaccine. The alleged secret biological warfare against civilians is a concerning aspect. The information she shared in 2009 is thought-provoking.
@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥
🚨🚨🚨In 2009, whistleblower, Jane Burgermeister WARNED humanity about the United Nations and the World Health Organization’s plan for a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT 😳 : “After an UPCOMING and PLANNED health crisis, they want to INSTALL a, ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT with the WHO and UN in charge and it will happen in EVERY COUNTRY at the same time!!!! They want to fulfill this dream by using a PANDEMIC and #Vaccine as instruments - There is a SECRET BIOLOGICAL WARFARE against civilians being carried out!!” 😳😳 How can you listen to something like this and still NOT consider that the #Covid #Vaccine was a PLANNED operation? She said this in 2009!!!!! #WHO #UN #UnitedNations #Covid #Vaccine #TheGreatReset #Agenda2030
Video Transcript AI Summary
A new political force is expected to emerge after these upheavals, led by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN). This will happen simultaneously in all countries, as they follow the same timeline. Voluntary vaccination will begin in early October, followed by the dissolution of governments and their consolidation into a single new structure. The WHO will become a new global health authority, potentially paving the way for a world government. The pandemic and the vaccine seem to serve as means to achieve this goal. This situation can be seen as a secret biological warfare against the civilian population, conducted through deception and coercion. Ultimately, if people do not willingly comply, they may be forced to take the vaccine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nach diesem Umwälzungen wird eine neue politische Kraft hier in dem Land hervorgebracht werden. Und es wird in der Tat die Weltgesundheitsorganisation sein, die die Gesundheitswesen, Polizeikräfte und so weiter bemächtigt hat, die UN natürlich, weil das ist die Tochtergesellschaft. Und das wird gleichzeitig mehr oder weniger parallel in alle Länder so passieren, weil alle Länder verfolgen die gleiche Zeitplan. Die Freiwillige Impfung wird Anfang Oktober anfangen. Und nach dieser Periode werden dann alle Staaten, mehr die Regierungen aufgelöst werden und sie werden zusammenfallen in eine einzige neue Struktur.
Und es wird sich für Vereinigung unter die Weltgesundheitsorganisation und die UN, dass die Weltgesundheitsorganisation soll eine neue globale Gesundheitsbehörde sein. Es sind scheinbar Pläne für eine für eine Schaffung einer Weltregierung da. Und die Pandemie scheint ein Mittel zu diesem Ziel zu sein, so wie das Impfstoff auch ein Instrument ist, dass das alte Traum eine Weltherrschaft zu fühlen ist. Und was wir im Grunde genommen hier zu tun haben, wie ich meine, ist eine geheime biologische Krieg, dass ein unterklärierter biologische Krieg gegen die Zivilbevölkerung durchgeführt wird, weil es, wenn eine kleine Gruppe durchgeführt wird gegen eine eine große Mehrheit von Leute, Milliarden von Menschen, ist es mit List und mit mit Täuschung durchgeführt. Also was ist im Grunde genommen als biologischer Wasser Klassifiziert ist uns als prophylaktische Mittel verkauft.
Und wenn wir das nicht freiwillig nehmen. Wenn wir nicht die Hysterien der Medial haben, werden wir dann schließlich dazu gezwungen werden, das zu nehmen. So hoffen Sie.
reSee.it AI Summary
Vivek Ramaswamy criticizes the climate change agenda, labeling it a "new religion" and a "hoax." He warns that the consequences will surpass those of COVID, urging us not to succumb to this belief system. Ramaswamy emphasizes the need to preserve our modern way of life rather than bowing to the climate god.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
🔥 @VivekGRamaswamy Calls the Climate Change Agenda a "New Religion" and a "Hoax" "If you thought COVID was bad, what's coming with this climate agenda is far worse. We should not be bending the knee to this new religion. That is what it is. It is a substitute for a modern religion. We are flogging ourselves and losing our modern way of life, bowing to this new god of climate. And that will end on my watch."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses the topic of climate change, calling it a hoax and stating that it has nothing to do with the climate. They mention a 98% reduction in climate disaster deaths in the last century and claim that more people will die from cold temperatures than warm ones. They also criticize the building of a carbon capture pipeline on farmers' land using imminent domain, calling it unconstitutional. The speaker warns that the climate agenda is worse than COVID and compares it to a new religion that is replacing our modern way of life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll use this to just address a topic we didn't talk about tonight, but I think is one of the most important topics that needs to be discussed. That is this climate change agenda that is shackling this country like a set of handcuffs. I said at the 1st debate and I stand by it. The climate change agenda is a hoax because it has nothing to do with the climate. That's what we have to see.
98% reduction in the climate disaster related deaths in the last century. Eight times as many people are gonna die of cold temperatures this year than warm ones. Yet against that backdrop, there's an issue coming up in Iowa. It's core to Iowa farmers. I met Kim Junker, Kathy Stockdale, and other farmers who are about to have a carbon capture pipeline built across their land using imminent domain to do it.
That's unconstitutional, and it's wrong. And if you thought COVID was bad, what's coming with this climate agenda is far worse. We should not be bending the knee to this new religion. That is what it is. It is a substitute for a modern religion.
We are flogging ourselves and losing our modern way of life,
reSee.it AI Summary
Both the "Covid" pandemic and the "climate crisis" are seen by some as power grabs, aiming to control nations and individuals. These scams allegedly use fear to manipulate people into surrendering their sovereignty, democracy, prosperity, and freedoms to unelected globalist organizations like the WEF, UN, and WHO. This aligns with UN Agenda 2030 and Klaus Schwab's 'Great Reset'. This information is compiled by Wide Awake Media. For more content, visit their website or support them on Buy Me a Coffee. Stay updated through their Telegram channel and newsletter.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
In the same way that "Covid" was merely a totalitarian power grab, and had nothing to do with a virus, the "climate crisis" is also a totalitarian power grab, and has nothing to do with saving the planet. The purpose of both scams is to frighten the global population into surrendering national sovereignty, representative democracy, economic prosperity and individual freedoms to unelected globalist bodies like the WEF, UN and WHO—in line with UN Agenda 2030, and Klaus Schwab's 'Great Reset'. An original compilation by Wide Awake Media. Please share far and wide! Featuring: @NickHudsonCT Enable me to produce more content like this: https://wideawake.clothing https://buymeacoffee.com/WideAwakeMedia Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://www.wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID-19 and climate change are both global challenges that require action. The pandemic has shown us the importance of global cooperation, and we must apply that lesson to the climate crisis. As we rebuild from the pandemic, we have an opportunity to build back better and take strong action against climate change. The warnings about climate change are clear, and we cannot ignore them. We need to focus on this natural challenge and work together to find solutions. However, some argue that global crises are fabricated to gain control and that dissenting voices are silenced. These patterns, they claim, are proof of a scam.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've all had to take action to slow the spread of COVID nineteen and to protect our people. And as we continue to fight this virus, we also can't forget that climate change still remains one of the greatest challenges of our time. And in fact, act, COVID nineteen and the climate crisis have a lot in common.
Speaker 1: The general rule of thumb that I believe everybody should adopt is that if is being presented as a global crisis, then it is a scam.
Speaker 2: As a global community, we're challenged by urgent and looming crises. Will we work together to save lives, defeat COVID nineteen? Will we meet the threat of challenging climate, the challenging climate we're all feeling already ravaging every part of our world, that's the idea Behind the build back better world.
Speaker 0: This global pandemic has also created an opportunity to build back better, and climate action is an essential part of that.
Speaker 3: We can build back better from this pandemic By building back greener.
Speaker 2: Here we are now with an economy in crisis, but with an incredible opportunity, not just to build back to where we were before, but better, stronger, more resilient, and more prepared for the challenges that lie ahead. And there's no more consequential challenge that we must meet in the next decade And the onrushing climate crisis.
Speaker 0: Right now, all of our countries are dealing with the health and economic impacts of the global pandemic. But as we look to rebuilding from this crisis, we must do so in a way that will build back better for all of our citizens, and that must include an ambitious plan to take strong action against climate change.
Speaker 3: We want to build back, better from the from the pandemic, and, I think that this is the, the right moment that for for us all, to focus on the other great natural challenge about which we've been warned Time and time and time again, we can't ignore it. The warnings have been even clearer than they were for COVID, and that is the problem of climate change.
Speaker 0: This this pandemic has taught us the importance of global cooperation, and we must translate that lesson to how we deal with the climate crisis. This this pandemic reminds us of what we can achieve through collaboration. We came together countries, communities, and neighbors to work for our collective safety and well-being, that's a lesson we need to apply to the climate crisis.
Speaker 4: We know now, that, the next crisis is already waiting for us around the corner, And it is as a climate crisis.
Speaker 1: The pattern that we are confronted with is really the fabrication of global crises. The presentation either of non existent problems or small local problems as being general global crises. That fabrication Followed by the assertion that the only solutions that are permissible are global ones that require a global authority, global control. That is the general pattern that we are up against. The COVID policy response was one of those.
Look at what happened to countries like Sweden or Tanzania who tried to push back against the orthodoxy, the new orthodoxy. And the the climate crisis, the climate change crisis is another example where we are told that the biggest threat to the world Is this molecule, c o two. And that an increase in the level of this molecule will cause an increase in temperature, and that that temperature increase will be bad for us, and that the only thing we can do is consume fewer fossil fuels fuels and less energy. That's fitting the pattern exactly. The other the other things you can observe is instead of presenting science as an ongoing evolving activity, it is presented in terms of Static knowledge, consensus, and you see the cancellation and censorship of dissident voices rather than engagement with them.
These patterns are proof of a scam. That is what people need to understand. Whenever something is presented as the science, As a consensus, it is a scam. You do not have to go and get engaged in all of the minutiae of the Scientific principles and the models and the measurements at all, you can know with absolute certainty that you are dealing with a scam when the
Wide Awake Clothing
Wide Awake Clothing
wideawake.clothing
Wide Awake Media is attempting to awaken humanity through enlightening daily content.
If you value my daily content uploads, please enable me to continue producing it by buying me a coffee (or, even better, a recurring membership). Your support would help me out more than you know!My channels:
buymeacoffee.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter
UN AGENDA 21/2030: CLUB OF ROME AND THE CLIMATE HOAX The New World Order plan for depopulation and total control over natural resources under the guise of a climate crisis. To them, you are merely useless eaters. https://t.co/X9zjzWA55R
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses various topics related to climate change, global governance, and the environmental movement. It highlights the belief that the climate change issue is being used as a means to suppress truth and promote propaganda by those who seek more government control. The transcript also mentions the concept of Agenda 21, a United Nations program that aims to implement collectivism and restrict personal freedoms under the guise of environmentalism. It emphasizes the importance of protecting private property rights and criticizes the idea of global governance. The video concludes by questioning the true intentions behind environmental programs and urging people to be aware of the agenda behind them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't want to sound like a fatalist because I'm not. I'm absolutely convinced that, ultimately, the principles of freedom shall prevail. I Know that that will happen. I may not live to see it. I won't live to see it, but truth cannot Be extinguished.
And our great society promotes the discovery Discovery of truth, not the suppression of it. And those of you who are involved in the climate change issue know that It is the goal of the international community, those who believe in the Russo socialist Philosophy of governance, it is their chief objective to suppress truth in ordered for the propaganda to prevail that supports their power.
Speaker 1: When you
Speaker 2: said that, strap in. You don't have to tighten
Speaker 3: In a document called The 1st Global Revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Snyder, On pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, We came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of libel warning, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 4: Some people involved may actually have a pure heart and believe in it the way you do. Most do not. Those who want more government controls are never gonna come out and say it. They've got to trick you into it. But the more you follow the usual suspects, the more you'll recognize their hallmarks, the more you can ring the bell and protect your own
Speaker 5: There should be a better coordination between United Nations' central organization and things like the UNDP He and his organs and the World Bank and the IMF, which had drifted way apart from the original intention, Which was to work in coordination with the United Nations rather than be totally independent rather arrogant looking down the nose at what these people did Up in New York, while we run the world essentially, through our big money pockets. I just Hope within 5 to 10 years' time, the we will have be at the we're at the bottom end of a political leadership trough at the moment. I'm hoping it will We will come up and we will get political leadership, but we need international structures of far greater power and authority and respect.
Speaker 6: That I have a pretty straightforward answer. It depends on whether Donald Trump is reelected as US president next year Or not.
Speaker 3: In a document called The First Global Revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, on pages 104 and 105, it stated, In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like could fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 7: Peter, what are we, seeing on this wall?
Speaker 2: Well, you're seeing the history of much the last, 60 years in terms of technology and ideas that have had a huge impact on the world. Jay Forrester passed away last fall and, about 3 weeks ago, we had a celebration here of his life. So this goes from the 1940, thirties, In his early, you know, life forties, he was actually if anything if anybody could be called the inventor of the modern digital computer, Jay would be it. He'd led the team at MIT that built the 1st general purpose digital computer. That's stuff you see over here.
How IBM got involved, IBM was their contractor. That's how IBM got into computation in the digital computers.
Speaker 8: It's not some science fantasy effect from 2001. This electronic display emanating from Australia's largest computer There's a picture of the condition past, present, and future of planet Earth. The program was originally devised by a scientist working from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jay Forrester. It was developed under the auspices of the Club of Rome by an MIT research team to present a complex model of the world and what we humans are doing to it. The program called World 1 doesn't pretend to be a precise forecast.
What it does for the first time in man's history on the planet is to look at the world as one system. It shows that earth cannot sustain present population and industrial growth For much more than a few decades, it shows that simply cleaning up our car exhausts and making some small effort to limit our families simply isn't enough. It's like an electronic guided tour of our global behavior since 1900 and where that behavior will lead us. Well, this is the printed version of what we've just seen on the television screen. What looks at first to just amazed of computer characteristics is really a system of very simple graphs which project what's going to happen to the planet over the next 150 The years if we don't do something drastic to stop it.
Down the left hand side of the graph is the date, 1900, 1940, 1980, 2020 right down to 2,060. Now each of these lines of Of of letters represents a curve showing some aspect of the condition of the planet. The further out this way they go, the greater That figure is the further this way, the less. For example, p represents population.
Speaker 9: So here
Speaker 8: it is at 1900 And then it comes up to 1940. It starts to take off. Here we are at 1980 up to the turn of the century and then it starts to peter off. Let's now have a look at this next curve, the Q curve, which is the quality of life. And this is represented by, for example, the amount of space people have, The, amount of money they have to spend, the amount of food they have to eat.
Now it increases rapidly up to 1940, but from 1940 on, The quality of life diminishes. And here we are about the turn of the century and we come up to the year 2020 and it's really come right back. More people, of course, means that you start to chew up your supply of natural resources. And this is this curve here, the n curve, that shows That slowly but steadily, the pool of natural wealth in the world, natural resources, minerals, oil, and so on is slowly but steadily diminishing. So this is a situation.
As population increases, the quality of life decreases and the supply of natural resources decreases. But have a look at this curve here. This is called the zed curve, and it represents pop pollution. Now predictably enough, as the Population increases up to 1980, pollution increases. There's more rubbish.
But from 1980 to the year 2020, Pollution really takes off. This is assuming, of course, that we don't do anything about it. So the year 2020, the condition of the planet be starts to become highly critical. If we don't do anything about it, this is what's going to happen. The quality of life is going to go right back to practically 0.
Pollution is going to become so serious right out here that it will start to kill people. So the population will diminish Right back here, less than it was in the year 1900. And at this stage, round about the year 2040, 2050, civilized life as we know On this planet, we'll cease to exist. Well, hopefully, of course, it it won't be allowed to happen, but it's taken this kind of Shock treatment to nudge governments into doing something.
Speaker 2: So, one of the kind of milestones captured in Kelvin's wall here is a book called World Dynamics, which led to another book, the popularized version, called The Limits to Growth. It was the first Complete model of the global industrialization process, how economic growth interacts with all the environmental and social constraints. So today, virtually all the issues we talk about in the general heading of sustainability were foreshadowed.
Speaker 10: I came back to MIT, Walked into the office on Monday and it was announced that a group I never heard about before, the Club of Rome would be coming to MIT to learn about our computer modeling methods Because they were interested in doing some kind of global study.
Speaker 9: In 1972, Dennis Meadows was the 1st to be assigned with such future studies financed by Volkswagen Foundation.
Speaker 10: Then I put together a team of 16 people, and we worked for almost 2 years and produced the work. Limits to Growth It's not the goal of the project. The goal was a very big scientific report And limits was written as an afterthought. What we said is that Exponential growth will take us to the limits very soon. Actually, if you look at our book, our 1972 book, Although, we showed many different scenarios, all of them show that growth Stops sometime in the period of 2020 to, let's say, 2,060.
So soon.
Speaker 2: This little sketch here is the 1st, world dynamics model that Jay sketched out Sitting in an airplane seat flying back from Germany where the Volkswagen Foundation had hosted the 1st gathering of what became the Club of Rome. The Club of Rome, which still exists, was the sponsor of the Limits to Growth project. Jay sketched out the model, the systematics, while the airplane flight went back. And about 2 or 3 months later, he had a simulated model. And about 2 or 3 months after that, a book.
That was kind of midway in Jane's career. And The right half of this really chases out the second half, the last 40 years. Jay lived to be 98 years old, where a lot of us got involved. So a lot of these sustainability issues, the seeds were planted back here with the limits of growth. But then on the right side of the wall, you see the work on climate change.
You see the work on, on education. We'll talk maybe a little later about the Global Sustainable Food Laboratory, this whole unfolding that kind of occurred as a consequence the kind of seeds Jay had planted, it's it's quite remarkable.
Speaker 3: The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank, which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis says that we unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems.
Speaker 2: You know, again, it's easy to criticize. But if you think we're we're we're trying to invent something that's never existed, which is, you might say, A commons based, socially oriented and sensitive governance structures that can function globally as well as locally and how to create a new harmonious ecosystem between the local and the global.
Speaker 11: You disturb Stir up the system over this threshold of the so called tipping points.
Speaker 8: At the
Speaker 11: end of the century, we will have about 2,000,000,000 people living on Earth. Food production is Rather than 9,000,000,000, which is the usual number used in demographics around the world. We will lose soil, Erosion, densification, and we won't have to phosphate to feed 9,000,000,000 people. So it will be far less, far fetched.
Speaker 12: More than 11,000 scientists signed a petition calling for population control as a means of combating climate change. In an article published Tuesday in the journal Bioscience, the scientists wrote that planet Earth is, quote, facing a climate emergency. They argued that population control was a necessary response to this emergency, writing, quote, the world population must be Stabilized and ideally, gradually reduced. This ideology is dangerous because it suggests that Reducing the human population is the best solution to our problems, but the petition presents no facts or data to support its Claim that the human population is the cause of shrinking ice caps, rising ocean levels, and an increase in the average global surface temperature. And it doesn't show any data to prove that reducing human population could help the planet.
That's just bad science. And who gets to decide which populations are controlled? The UN? Individual countries? Global intellectual elites?
Elites?
Speaker 13: The myth of overpopulation originated in England in 17/98 when a vicar named Thomas Malthus, who fancied himself something of a mathematician, saw that food production increased Incrementally, but people reproduced exponentially. He sat down and did some simple math and summarily decided that the world would be out of food by 18/90. He blamed reduced mortality rates and recommended killing off the have nots of society, lest the haves starve to death. This cry was taken up by Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University in 1968, who claimed that reckless human reproduction had overwhelmed the earth. Massive famines were resolved, which would destroy, best case scenario, 1 fifth of humanity by the end of the seventies, and the planet We're followed.
This spirit produced large donations for the newly created UMFPA, which thrives on an imagined crisis that has Been both imminent and rescheduled again and again over the past 2 centuries. The truth of the matter is that every family on this planet Could have a house with a yard and all live together on a landmass the size of Texas, which is really just a small corner of the planet. The population of earth will Geek in 30 years and then start to go back down. We're not overpopulated. Do the math.
Speaker 12: For years, There's been a push to shove birth control and abortion down the throats of women in developing countries who don't want either, by the way. We don't get to pick Who is desirable or useful enough to reproduce and who should be restricted in the name of the global common good? That's called eugenics, and it can lead down a slippery slope to things like ethnic cleansing and genocide. Genocide.
Speaker 11: This is the new hockey stick, and the skyrocketing of the purple line tells us that the temperature is an automatic
Speaker 14: How do we get to focus on CO 2 as being this tipping In
Speaker 1: point, the the culprit. Because it's something we do ourselves, and that's what makes it special. It's It is human activity. The fact is that c o two is so beneficial in other ways. It would be crazy to try to reduce it.
Speaker 11: We have to develop a completely different energy system around the world. We have to get rid of carbon as soon as possible, and the challenge is to invest, To research and to develop and to educate the world in that direction direction.
Speaker 15: Global warming is merely the latest Environmental scare with the exact same solutions going back 50 years. In other words, it doesn't really matter what the science of global warming. They actually have quotes. The main figures say that. The EU climate commissioner said even if we're wrong on the science, we're doing the right thing by policy.
What is that policy? The UN Climate chief explicitly stated, and I interviewed her on this, we seek a centralized transformation that will make life on planet Earth very different for everyone. That's the UN climate chief's explicit goal. Her assistant, a guy named Edenhoefer, actually said we will Redistribute wealth by climate policy. This is not even about environmental policy anymore.
They're openly talking about it. They talk about global governance, global Governance.
Speaker 11: We gradually grow in understanding. Mark my words. We do. But, of course, the resistance also grows. And there is a very strange phenomenon, which is that for every so called scientific fact, we need another opinion.
And why do we need that? Because the media demands so. Demand.
Speaker 16: We've gotta remember, we have to be faithful as scientists. In a lot of cases, people have written that it's okay that the end justifies the means. He can make up these scary scenarios so people will listen to us. People will act. I don't think that's moral.
I think we have tell the truth to scientists, if you wanna be an activist, take off your scientist hat, then make make a statement as a public service servant. That's no problem at all. But you Cannot divorce the the truth from the debate. That is the important component.
Speaker 2: But we should be arguing about the right things, not is there or is there not climate change. Is what's the deliberate impact of this change or this change or this change knowing that we need to decarbonize our economies and that we're A sense of working on it together around the world. I think this particular decade, the one critical thing that I feel Could really happen is we start to feel we're in it together.
Speaker 17: We have 12 years to radically transform our economy and our society to stop this crisis and protect human Civilization as we know it. This is about humanity.
Speaker 14: That's why we demand a new green deal, and we Don't make it right now.
Speaker 18: People will vote if there is something worth voting for. And a Green New Deal is exactly what that is. Thank you all so much. Let's organize together. Don't settle for less.
Speaker 15: They don't wanna argue on the merits of their policies. In other words, the green new deal, they just admitted AOC's chief of staff said this was never about the climate. This was increase the government kind of thing. It changed the whole economy type of thing. Her former chief of staff, campaign manager actually said a similar thing that this was actually not about the climate.
They're openly admitting that. They don't wanna argue their points on the merit instead, So they use sub diffuse. We only have 12 years left. We're facing a climate emergency as cities and colleges are now comically declaring that across the world. So they don't have to they don't have to deal with it.
That's how global warming becomes part of the agenda tool for the regulatory state.
Speaker 19: They They've introduced through the Democratic Party and a lady called, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, who's kind of the the progressive poster girl at the moment, something called the Green New Deal. And the Green New Deal is basically what I'm talking about. It's the centralization of power to save the world. Now Once you centralize power, and this is what Marxism does, this is what fascism does, which are basically expressions same thing if we if we really look at them. Once you centralize power, you are creating a very simple situation.
You are giving control over the vast majority to a tiny few, and you are, hoping that they're benevolent. You're hoping that they will use that power, wisely. History tells us they never do. Once you have centralization of power, you have abuse of power. And what we've, been looking at through, human history It's the incessant centralization of power.
We were in tribes once. Loads of tribes were brought together under nations. Now, they're bringing loads of nations together under the European Union and and and now they're they're talking about, wanting a world government, which is what I Predicted they would want 30 years ago. And we're in a situation now where a globalization It's a total expression of what I'm talking about where the the the number of people who hold the real center of power in the world, never mind Britain, is tiny. It's tiny.
Speaker 15: Assuming we actually face the climate emergency,
Speaker 8: we would all be doomed if we
Speaker 15: had to rely on the EPA and the United Nations, over the green new deal to save us. So it's a way to transform the economy, massive wealth redistribution, Massive central planning with literally beam counters affecting every aspect of your life to your life.
Speaker 20: And this is the result, madam acting deputy president, of federal agreements with UN treaties, protocols, declarations, agreements Such as the 1975 Lima declaration. And then we had in 1992, the UN's Rio declaration 21st century global governance. Then we had the 1996 UN Kyoto agreement, which I've discussed, which led to the theft of property rights. Then we have the two thousand 15 UN Paris agreement. That was not an agreement, just an agreement for every nation to do what they wanted to do.
Speaker 4: This is a massive movement, And its real intentions are being masked with environmental issues. The bad news is this structure was set up By those who want to establish a global government system. They've set this struct structure up years ago. This is why I keep saying to you, you don't have any Yeah. How far behind we really are.
Far behind.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think the the the first Real awakening is is like what we always say when people play the the, the climate simulation, the, the Sea Roads Climate Interactive simulation. If you really if you really watch how that works, you come to 1 overarching conclusion. 1, we gotta get going. However fast we're going, we gotta go faster.
Speaker 12: Faster. Faster.
Speaker 2: But 2, it's about everybody. You know, it is ultimately about the underdeveloped world Because if they stay on the same path as the alt world, in 30 years, they start to become significant emitters.
Speaker 6: Morality is Improving the lives of people. That means inexpensive and ready The access to food, to energy. From that perspective, the policies proposed are the Essence of immorality. And I find it, truly bizarre when you hear somebody who's distorting science, Following the path of fascists in the past who is proposing policies That will be harmful for millions of people. And he assumes he has the moral high ground and the people who are opposing this Don't seem to recognize they hold the moral high ground.
Speaker 1: I predict, and this is my sincere prediction, That 10 years from now, certainly 20 years from now, people will look back on this, and they'll say, What the hell was going on? What got into these people? Why did the world turn crazy about global warming? It's a non problem. It's fiction.
Speaker 7: Environmental groups have effectively created the public image as organizations caring for helpless species and protecting environments. This has allowed them to implement an agenda in America That if fully exposed would be opposed by the majority of the people. In fact, most people supporting these organizations are not aware of their long term objective, Even though it is no secret.
Speaker 20: I'd now like to quote from the UN Agenda 21 book that is driving this. Maurice Strong, the secretary general of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. He said, quote, in the preface in Forward to this this instruction, there is much to be done. And I look to the new United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development to be the focal point for the massive effort needed to create the new era of international cooperation for the new global partnership That will make this shift possible. So we're talking here about a global governance from the UN.
Agenda 21 stands as a comprehensive this is the UN's words. Agenda 21 stands as a comprehensive blueprint for action to be taken globally from now into the 21st century by governments, United Nations Organizations, development agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and independent sector groups In every area in which human activity impacts on the environment, and that means every area of human livelihood, human existence. The agenda, it goes on to say, the agenda should be studied in conjunction with both the Rio declaration, which provides a context for its specific proposals And the statement of forest principles, which is embraced by the UN, it is hoped that the forest principles will form the basis for a future International level agreement. The United Nations and Maurice Strong, who was the head of that entity at that time, that particular part of the UN, As admitted to pushing for an unelected socialist global governance.
Speaker 21: In September 2015, All 193 UN member states adopted the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. They recognize that ending poverty calls for transforming our world through strategies that build economic growth, address social needs, ensure environmental protection. To achieve this vision, 17 sustainable development goals known as SDGs were defined Fine. This part of the 2030 agenda. The SDGs and their targets balance the three dimensions of sustainable development, economic, Social and environmental, working in partnerships and calling for action by all countries.
The goals are integrated and indivisible.
Speaker 7: Take a look take a look at the wildlands map. It defines where environmentalists wanna take America in the very near future. The areas in red will be off limits humans. The areas in yellow represent buffer zones where limited use is allowed primarily to travel to and from populated areas. The areas in green are where normal use by humans will be allowed.
However, by the environmentalist's own admission, these normal use areas would be restricted. When this plan was first published in 1992, the author, Reid Noss, explained how Their agenda would affect the human population. He stated, eventually, a wilderness network would dominate a region and thus would itself constitute the matrix With human habitations being the islands. The islands.
Speaker 22: At European level, landowners' interests are represented in Brussels by the European Landowners Organization. Restoring biodiversity is one of the group's Concerns.
Speaker 23: The ELO has become involved in Natura 2000 because it represents one of the most essential aspects accept the life of rural landowners who have always developed and respected the quality of the environment. Even if Natura 2000 can be a constraint, it offers many opportunities, and that is what we try to highlight and develop by participating with Debating with civil society, NGOs, and political leaders in the development of a sustainable network acceptable to all the partners.
Speaker 22: Preserving or restoring biodiversity and the ecosystem in different habitats from the countryside to mountains to the marine environment. That is the main objective of the European Natura 2000 network.
Speaker 9: I think it's fair to say that, if, Natura two Thousands, didn't exist. In fact, I'm definite of this. I would not be sitting here now. And, the reason why I say that is because, I got involved in European politics because we had a situation in Ireland whereby we had a top down decision imposed on us without any consultation. That's the way we've seen it on the ground.
And the first time many of my neighbors heard of Natura two Thousand was when the police were threatening to arrest them for taking fuel from their bogs. Now some people mightn't think that's the best way to get fuel for your house, but we had done it for 100 of years. You can argue whether it's a good thing or a bad thing, but we were doing it. And that's the way we heated our house. And I would not be speaking with an English or a London accent if it wasn't for that method of producing fuel because my father, in some people's eyes, would be the ultimate He brought it home for people.
So you can imagine our shock and horror when we discovered that we would potentially face a half €1,000,000 fine And up to 5 years in prison longer than in many cases you get for rape in my country for doing something we had done for centuries. We can argue whether it's wrong or right, but that's not what I'm arguing. I'm having a discussion here or trying to tease out how this would work better. I tell you for definite, it would've worked better if people had been consulted with in advance, and they were not consulted. And it resulted in a situation, and hopefully people can learn from this, where we had hundreds and hundreds of people In a bog 1 night with members of our police force with machine guns, with assault Rifles attempting to stop people using their land.
Whether whether right or wrong to use it, we can have that debate. But I think we would have to conclude that the implementation didn't score too well.
Speaker 24: Seizing private property private property. You may have heard of eminent domain whereby the government, federal, state, or local, can seize private property if there is a need for the public good, they say. Now The government has to pay for it, but they can take it away from its rightful owner if the rifle owner won't sell.
Speaker 25: This ordinance is the biggest threat Our 100 year old family farm has ever faced. It imposes unnecessary regulations on our land that will mandate a conservation easement with no compensation. The precedent that this sets is that the government can come in and take away private land with zero compensation. It's un American. It's un American.
Speaker 14: The evolution of private property, we see that beginning to happen right now. Roads are being closed. Forest are being more limited, and the idea here is that you stack and pack people in Metropolitan areas, you put them on public transportation, and you never let them outside. So the wildlands gets protected in that fashion. This is why the pressure is mounting on landowners across America.
Soon, that battle is gonna shift the suburban neighborhoods and the battle for the resettlement of our suburban neighbors neighborhoods will begin. Agenda 21 will not stop its process until all the world is collectivized. Human beings are to be congregated in smart growth communities. That's why you see in every community in California and across the country the push for Walkable communities, which means you live on the 20th floor, and you walk downstairs where smart growth cages are really built for the American citizens. And we thought the one way in and one way out of Polish cities was a dangerous mistake.
Well, smart growth is designed to take control over all human action. A subset of the Wildlands Project allows for certain limited uses by certain special people, to include the general public. But in general, the Wildlands, as opposed to the smart growth proposals, which have to do with Metropolitan development. The wildlands project is is the idea to suck all the people into these metropolitan areas And to leave the wildlands free for the animals to roam. South San Jose is a good example of what's become or is becoming a Coming a wildlands project, South San Jose is called the Coyote Valley, and, gee, some coyotes like to cross that valley and some other animals as well.
And so that's off limits to development, and we're seeing that kind of activity happening everywhere across this country. And, It's only gonna get a whole lot more profound as time moves along. Wildlands Project is a massive undertaking. Take rural lands and put it off limits to human beings. World government is the program behind the Democrat Republican party sponsored agenda 21 program.
Your local politicians are are are paid, by parties who support The globalization included destruction of America because the programs of sustainable development have been in In process for a lot longer than simply since 1992, but the acceleration since then has been overwhelming.
Speaker 26: Anybody here heard about Agenda 21? Well, some. You need to all know about it. A it's a code phrase. It's the title of the program for collectivism, global pro collectivism, which was designed at the United Nations And it's being implemented as we speak in every country of the world, at least where the UN has an interest in implementing it in the more advanced nations, And it's being done under the guise of environmentalism.
They're using the label of let's be concerned about our planet Earth. Our planet Earth is is being destroyed. We're Losing our natural resources. Everything is going bad in in the environment. We've got global warming.
We've got all these things. We've got pollution. So, therefore, what we need is more laws. Surprise. More laws and especially at the international level To regulate and control these things and take away the personal freedoms that you and I have over our own property, because, I mean, we need to do it for the greater good of the greater number.
We need to do it to save the world, and it's being coordinated at the United Nations.
Speaker 7: No one, not even the long time opponents of the environmental movement believes such a transforming agenda was possible. However, it is being implemented quickly through innocent sounding programs that most Americans support. Wilderness areas, critical habitat for endangered species, wetlands, roadless areas, national heritage areas, and other programs are sold to the public as necessary to protect nature or as assurance that Americans will always have a place is to escape from the heavily populated cities. More invented tools and programs such as conservation easements, Smart growth, open space, and greenlining are being promoted as a way to control growth. What all these programs have in common is extinguishing the private property rights of American citizens and transferring the control of the property to elite land trusts or directly to the government.
It will not take the 80 to 100 years they originally projected to complete their task. They are much closer to achieving their goal that anyone realizes. Environmentalists have scared Americans into thinking that if we continue to live as we are today, The earth will self destruct, species will die, and the globe will be covered with development. However, government data shows that only six Percent of America's land mass is currently developed. Only 3% of America is classified as urban.
Yet 77% of all Americans live in these urban areas. The rest is still largely untouched by humans. The problem is not that our nation is being overdeveloped. The problem is as old as time. It is about who will own the land.
Large amounts of the nation's natural resources are still owned by private citizens. America's founders vehemently opposed the concept of government or elitists owning the land in America, Which would result in the citizens being leaseholders and serfs. One of the most well known property rights advocate of our Time, Wayne Hage said it best. Either you have the right to own property or you are property. Make no mistake.
This battle is not about whether the land will be used, resources extracted, and wealth created, but by whom? Karl Karl Marx wrote in the Communist Manifesto, the theory of the communist may be summed up in a single sentence, abolition of private property. America's founding father, John Adams, stated property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. Which course Will America take? Environmentalists are counting on their agenda never being fully revealed.
Taking liberty is committed to seeing that it is. Their plan must be stopped before all of our liberty is taken.
@DerrickSweet - HD Rider exposing threats to FREEDOM & DEMOCRACY!
In the 70s they tried the #globalcooling scam, supported by #UN funded corrupt scientists. That failed. Then #globalwarming. The #WEF’s #JohnKerry, has achieved the goal to extort UN member countries with a #carbontax,” to “save us,” similar to what they did with the #Covidscam!
@riss1130 - 🍁·Bryne
@WallStreetSilv ⚠️Controligarchs: “Climate change” was created to scare people into going along with a one world government edition. https://t.co/WmWfX3IK85
Video Transcript AI Summary
Seamus Bruner's book "Contrologarchs" exposes billionaire philanthropists and tech titans colluding with politicians to control society. The book warns of a future where private property is abolished, movements are tracked, and diets are dictated by elites. The COVID-19 pandemic was exploited to push for a new system of control, benefiting the wealthy while harming small businesses. Bruner's research, based on primary sources, reveals the alarming truth behind these power plays and emphasizes the importance of protecting freedom and privacy from intrusive technologies. It serves as a call to action for citizens to resist authoritarian agendas and safeguard liberty for future generations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Forward by Peter Schweitzer. Over the past 10 years, I've watched Seamus Bruner unearth crucial connections between money and the ruling class in his work with me at the Government Accountability Institute, GAI. In his first book, Compromised, he documented the connections between officials in the Obama Administration's Justice Department and within the senior ranks of the FBI, showing how public officials used the phony details of the so called Steele dossier as a pretext for spying on a presidential campaign. Seamus's second book, Fallout, showed his deep understanding of the international scene and his ability to uncover obscure facts and figures. In your hands right now is further proof of his unique skill set, exposing corruption and presenting his revelations in a compelling, readable expose.
Contrologarchs is his most ambitious project yet. Here he investigates the billionaire philanthropists, tech titans, plutocrat profiteers, and other self anointed masters of the universe who plot and scheme with the political establishment to subvert the American people. In this book, you will read about their ambitions to reshape the world, exposing the arrogance of Bill Gates or the havoc unleashed on our criminal justice system by George Soros. Seamus's timely warnings hit hard and stick. How so?
In the near future, they say, the concept of private property will be a thing of the past. The masses will own nothing and be happy. That is one of the proud predictions of the World Economic Forum, an invite only annual assemblage of the world's richest people hosted by founder Klaus Schwab in Davos, Switzerland. The World Economic Forum is full of such pronouncements as you will read. Beyond their disdain for our country's most fundamental principles, Seamus shows how these powerful elites leverage the world's crises to usher in a global authoritarian regime.
You can anticipate losing control over your home thermostat and having your every movement tracked and traced via electric vehicles and a smart power grid, while all your transactions and affiliations are linked to digital currencies and IDs. Meanwhile, Gates and fellow plutocrats Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos are investors and companies creating alternative proteins for you to eat to reduce the world's reliance on cattle, whose various forms of bovine flatulence are supposedly to blame for the rise in global temperatures. In this book, Seamus shows how these tech oligarchs will push fake meats onto your dinner plate in the name of climate change, health concerns, and animal rights. I was horrified to learn about the lab grown hamburgers, fermented fungi patties, and even insect based protein shakes that they are hoping the public will consume. Finally, Seamus shows how every crisis is an opportunity for the elite political class.
The worldwide COVID 19 pandemic, one of the most consequential crises in modern history, and the coordinated public private response destroyed jobs, industries, and even whole economies. And the globalist response to the pandemic with their nebulous proposals such as the Great Reset and Build Back Better, simply convenient packaging for a set of ideas that were already on their minds. The pandemic was the ultimate opportunity to begin a transition to a new system of control. And while this new system means that our behaviors will have to change, theirs almost certainly won't. The billionaires who fly to Davos aboard gas guzzling private jets want to end cheap and abundant fuels for the rest of us.
They want us to transition to expensive electric cars while exempting their jets from emissions restrictions. Smartphone apps that track our movements are now championed as ways to stop the spread of illnesses. Meanwhile, our small businesses have been deemed non essential, while their large companies have used the pandemic opportunity to consolidate their market share. Contrologarx is a window into their vision for your future, a world where they decide what we can own, how many children we can have, and what we are allowed to eat is decided for us. Our losses are their gains.
It is vital to read this book, not as a fait accompli, but as your wake up call. As citizens of the United States, we have the right to oppose arrogant political overreaches and to protect our freedom of speech and privacy from big text creepy intrusions. It is our responsibility to ensure the survival of liberty for generations to come. Just as Seamus has done in his 2 previous books, here he sounds the alarm on relevant issues and stays well ahead of the curve. His pinpoint research and uncanny ability to follow the money not only shows his readers the raw facts but also the jaw dropping figures that no one else has quantified.
I have watched Seamus spend more than 2 years investigating the characters in this book. He studied thousands of primary source documents and uncovered unsettling video evidence. He also spent incredible amounts of time pouring over complex corporate filings, nonprofit disclosures, and other official records. To crunch the staggering numbers contained herein, Seamus created spreadsheets and mapped what he calls the Controllogark cash trail with unprecedented precision. Everything he gathered, all the facts and calculations, can be replicated.
Seamus uses 0 anonymous sources. I am often asked whether I am discouraged by the widespread corruption in government that we at Gai unearth and expose to the public. My answer is an emphatic no. We believe in the power of the American people and of free people everywhere to resist the control schemes created by people with more money than empathy. We arm ourselves with the facts and do battle with a cheerful, optimistic purpose.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the same individuals who misled us about Covid are now claiming we're facing a climate crisis. I assert that their proposed solutions won't save the planet but will instead undermine our freedom, democracy, and the rule of law.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
German MEP Christine Anderson: The same people who lied to you about Covid "are now trying to tell you we're all going to die of climate change". "We are not... Nothing they tell us we need to do to save the planet will actually save the planet... but it will abolish freedom, democracy and the rule of law." Credit: @AndersonAfDMdEP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Question everything your government does or says, and especially distrust the EU Commission, which is a headquarters for spreading fake news and disinformation. Those who pushed the narrative about the virus are now pushing climate change, which is just another scheme to take taxpayer money and give it to global corporations. They want to get rid of individual mobility by targeting cars. The proposed measures to save the planet won't work but will abolish freedom, democracy, and free will. Stop voting for the same people who created this mess because they are liars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Question everything your government is doing or saying or not doing or not saying. And do not only question and mistrust your government. Most of all, you need to distrust the EU Commission. It's a hellhole. It's the headquarter of spreading fake news and disinformation.
You might have noticed that once that have been trying to convince you to, you know, know everything about this novel virus and how we fight it are the same ones that are now trying to tell you we're all gonna die of climate change. Yeah. No. We're not. We are not.
It it's ridiculous what they are doing. This is just another scheme of getting as much money away from the taxpayers as as possible and once again, pumping it into globally acting corporations. That's what this is all about. On top of all of that, they wanna get rid of your individual mobilities. They're coming after your cars and all of that.
But nothing nothing what they tell us we need to do to save the planet will actually save the planet because it's ridiculous. But it will abolish a freedom, democracy, and the will of love. So please stop voting for the same parties and the same persons and the same people that got us in this mess in the first place. They are liars, and they need to be run out in town.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the climate crisis is being exploited to impose totalitarian controls, similar to the Covid crisis. The same elite groups, like the World Economic Forum and wealthy individuals at Davos, are using these crises to increase their power while diminishing the influence of the rest of society.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
RFK Jr: "[The climate crisis] is being used as a pretext for clamping down totalitarian controls, the same way that the Covid crisis was." "And it's the same people... It's the World Economic Forum, it's the billionaires' boys' club at Davos, and it's the same kind of cabal of people who will use every crisis to stratify society toward greater power for the super rich... and less power for everybody else." Credit: @jordanbpeterson @RobertKennedyJr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion highlights concerns about the use of fear in promoting vaccine mandates and lockdowns, drawing parallels to the climate crisis. There is a belief that the climate crisis is being exploited similarly to impose totalitarian controls, akin to those seen during the COVID crisis. The same influential groups, including intelligence agencies and organizations like the World Economic Forum, are perceived to be behind these tactics. The aim appears to be increasing power for the wealthy and military while diminishing power for the general populace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned at the beginning of our talk your concern that, your concern in relationship to the use of fear. And we could say on the vaccine front that the vaccine mandates were pushed forward, especially the lockdown mandates. They were pushed forward with the use of fear. I know that you're a long term environmentalist, and you're concerned on the climate front, but I've seen the climate apocalypse use fear to induce something approximating the same kind of level of tyranny as far as I'm concerned that characterized the the vaccine lockdown. So well, so help me sort that out.
Speaker 1: I agree a 100% with you that this crisis is being used as a pretext for clamping down totalitarian controls the same way that the COVID crisis was, and it's the same people. It's intelligence agencies. It's, it's the, you know, it's the World Economic Forum. It's the Billionaire's Voice Club at Davos. And it's the same kind of cabal of, people who are used who will use every crisis to, to stratify society toward, you know, greater power for the super rich and, greater power for the military, greater power for the intelligence apparatus, and less power for everybody else.
@PeterDClack - Peter Clack
How far has the World Economic Forum recruited in western democratic nations? How many political leaders sold out to this evil empire of money, sleaze & power? The WEF, the richest backer of the climate change scam, is causing every western nation to go into economic collapse. https://t.co/wj2eyQzngE
reSee.it AI Summary
Johan Rockström addressed the UN, declaring a collective failure on climate action and warning that 2024 has surpassed the 1.5°C threshold, risking irreversible tipping points. He called for a near-total transition from fossil fuels and significant investment in carbon removal technologies, framing it within his "9 planetary boundaries." Critics argue this narrative shifts the goalposts and promotes global governance over resources, while emphasizing fear to justify control. Another voice in the conversation contends that the focus on climate change is misguided, suggesting a cooling trend instead.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Johan Rockström, the WEF-aligned scientist behind the debunked "billions will die" climate claim, just delivered a stark sermon at the UN. His message is a masterclass in leveraging fear to justify total control. Let's break down what he really said. The Summary: Rockström stood before the world to declare a collective "failure." He stated that 2024 has already breached the 1.5°C annual temperature threshold, pushing us toward a multi-decadal breach within 5-10 years—a state not seen in 100,000 years. He painted an apocalyptic picture of a world facing "increasingly unmanageable" dangers, risking irreversible "tipping points." His "narrow escape" pathway demands a "near complete transition away from fossil fuels starting now," massive investment in unproven carbon removal technologies, and adherence to his "9 planetary boundaries" framework. What He's REALLY Saying: 1. The Goalpost Move: For years, the line was "we must avoid 1.5°C." Now that it's politically inconvenient, the narrative shifts to "we must return to 1.5°C by 2100." This creates a permanent state of "crisis" justifying permanent emergency measures, regardless of current data. 2. The Justification for Control: The "planetary boundaries" he mentions are the key. This isn't just about CO2. It’s a pseudo-scientific framework that demands global governance over everything: biodiversity, land use, nutrients (fertilizers for farming), and pollutants. It’s the blueprint for controlling the global food supply, energy matrix, and economic development. 3. The Inevitable "Solution": The prescribed "solutions" are never free-market innovations or human ingenuity. They are always top-down, state-enforced mandates: phase out fossil fuels (energy scarcity), transform food systems (lab-grown meat, insect protein), and "efficient resource use" (rationing). The WEF’s "Great Reset" is the ready-made answer to the crisis they are proclaiming. 4. Fear Over Facts: The speech is dripping with emotional manipulation—"danger," "failure," "unmanageable impacts," "existential threat." This is not the language of science; it's the language of dogma. It's designed to short-circuit critical thinking and demand compliance. "Failure is not inevitable; it is a choice," he says. This is a threat: comply with our agenda, or you are choosing catastrophe. The UN and WEF aren't just talking about climate change. They are using a carefully constructed narrative of impending doom to usher in a system of unprecedented global control. Rockström isn't just a scientist; he's a high priest for this new green religion, and his sermon is a call for surrender of national and individual sovereignty.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"It's now ten years since the world in Paris entered the legally binding agreement to avoid dangerous climate change." "Since then, science has become overwhelmingly clear, allowing long term global warming to exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius constitutes danger." "and in 2024, annual global temperature change was pushed beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius for the first time on our watch." "The long term average warming is now between one point three and one point five 1.4 degrees." "We are on a path to breach 1.5 degrees Celsius multi decadal boundary within the next five, ten years, a temperature we've not experienced over the past one hundred thousand years." "Here we must admit failure, failure to protect peoples and nations from unmanageable impacts of human induced climate change."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. Good afternoon, your excellencies, co citizens on planet Earth. It's now ten years since the world in Paris entered the legally binding agreement to avoid dangerous climate change. Since then, science has become overwhelmingly clear, allowing long term global warming to exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius constitutes danger. And yet, greenhouse gas emissions continue rising, and in 2024, annual global temperature change was pushed beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius for the first time on our watch.
This is a deep concern. An even deeper concern is that warming appears to be accelerating, outpacing emissions. The long term average warming is now between one point three and one point five 1.4 degrees. We are on a path to breach 1.5 degrees Celsius multi decadal boundary within the next five, ten years, a temperature we've not experienced over the past one hundred thousand years. Here we must admit failure, failure to protect peoples and nations from unmanageable impacts of human induced climate change.
But we don't have to keep failing. Returning to below 1.5 degrees by the end of this century must remain the obligation for all international efforts to limit dangerous climate change. Extreme heats, fire, droughts, water scarcity, flooding, and land degradation reinforced by us are already impacting the lives of billions of people around the world. Beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius, these dangers will become increasingly unmanageable. Every tenth of a degree of avoided warming matters, saves lives and livelihoods.
This is not a time for resignation. Beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius, there's also a real risk of crossing tipping points. The most recent science concludes that we're therefore dangerously close to triggering fundamental and irreversible change. If we make the right choices going forward though, there's still an overshoot pathway that can bring temperatures back below 1.5 degree Celsius by the end of this century. Such a narrow escape remains possible, but it will be extremely challenging.
It requires deep and rapid reduction of all greenhouse gases involving a near complete transition starting now away from fossil fuels. We also know that cutting emissions won't be enough. We need to massively scale up carbon dioxide removal. For every 0.1 degree Celsius of planetary cooling, 200,000,000,000 tons are needed to be removed from the atmosphere. But even if this succeeds, we fail unless we safeguard the world's most powerful carbon sink and planetary cooling system, a healthy planet.
If we don't return to the safe operating space of the nine planetary boundaries that regulates earth's stability, including biodiversity, pollutants, land, nutrients and the ocean, a safe climate future is out of reach, irrespective of our mitigation efforts. Don't be fooled. We are currently following a path that will take us to three degrees Celsius in just seventy five years, shorter than the existence of this very institution. An existential threat we have not experienced in the last three million years. And there's no guarantee that efforts to cool the planet will succeed.
So my message today, science is clear. We have a planetary crisis on our watch, and we do have scalable solutions for phasing out fossil fuels, efficient resource use, and transformation to healthy and sustainable food. Pathways that makes us all winners. The window to a manageable climate future is still open, but just. Failure is not inevitable.
It is a choice.
@drsircus - Dr Sircus
Stupid stupid people froth at the mouth about climate change but its the wrong climate change. We are not turning into a global frying pan, things are cooling cooling and going to get cold. Thats the science and the reality already on the ground as winter comes in the fall instead of the winter. https://coldclimatechange.com/
Cold Climate Change
More info and news about cold climate change.
coldclimatechange.com