reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@rogerskaer - Roger Skaer
Fuck Around and Find Out. Full Video. https://t.co/fZb3JDUUW0
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the process of finding out information and emphasizes the importance of "fucking around" to achieve this. They explain that by determining the desired level of knowledge on a graph, one can identify the amount of effort required to find out. The speaker highlights that the more one "fucks around," the more they will discover. Conversely, if one avoids experimentation, they will never gain any knowledge. The video concludes with the speaker expressing hope that the lesson has been helpful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Today, we're gonna talk about how we can find out and how much we can find out and what it takes to get there. So first, we have to decide how much do we wanna find out. So let's say in this case, I wanna find out at a level of 7. K?
So I find that level on my graph When I come horizontally to my gradient line, where it intersects with my gradient line, I'm gonna come straight down to where it intersects with my fuck around line. Down there is gonna tell me how much I have to fuck around to find out what I need to find out. See, as you can see, The more you fuck around, the more you're gonna find out. And also, if you stayed on here and you never fuck around, You'll never find out. So I hope this lesson is helpful.
Thank you.
@therobprimo1 - ◻️ Rob Primo ◻️
EXPOSED https://t.co/QXvh7HPmuf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker admits to not having read the UN Sustainable Development Agenda (SDG) but agrees to look into it. Speaker 1 confronts Pierre Polivet about his previous support for the federal sustainable development act. Speaker 0 dismisses the importance of the SDG and criticizes Bernie for his views on free trade and drug legalization. Speaker 0 also mentions working with Maxie and questions Polivet's stance on the Paris Climate Accord. Polivet emphasizes reducing emissions at a lower cost and accuses Maxine Bernier of lying about his affiliations. The conversation ends with a mention of posting the discussion on Twitter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. You denounced the UN Sustainable Development Agenda, the SDG. I haven't read it. I don't know what it is.
You haven't read it? No. I haven't. That's interesting. Do you wanna do a shot?
Sure. Alright. Very good. Thank you. Alright.
I'll I'll have to look at it. Yes. You want to I don't I have a similar rule. If I haven't read it, I don't comment on it. You need to read it.
It's extremely important. Thank you for the good good recommendation. Absolutely. I'll have a look at it. Sure.
I'm remediation. Absolutely. I'll have a look at it.
Speaker 1: No. I didn't have a copy, Pierre. And you know why? Because you told us 1 year ago you were gonna have a look at it, and you still haven't. But you know what I do have a copy of?
I've got a copy of the official report from the House of Commons where you acknowledge the federal sustainable development act 11 years ago. It's It's at this point I let Pierre Polivet know that I'm well aware he's voted in favor of the sustainable development goals before in the House of Commons, and he knows closed that, and that's why he's trying to distract me and bring us to a different topic now. Bill c 474, Federal Sustainable Development Act. All in favor, mister Pierre Polyviers, conservative.
Speaker 0: There's only one there's only 2 teams. I have an orange from Canada. That's what I wanna hear. I don't wanna work for the WEF like Bernie. Right?
We don't need someone like Bernie wants a free trade deal with China, a voice in favor of legalizing our drugs. We don't need, the guy who's just working day and night to keep her on power, which is what you I have a talk with Maxie. We're But you I am your favorite native You have voted on it. I voted on it. No.
I hear you. If I could. Yes. I want you to know if I I voted if I voted if I always I haven't read. Will you just talk to Will you dispose of the, the Paris Climate Accord?
That's the last question. When you're prime minister, will you denounce the
Speaker 2: the Paris Climate Accord, or don't we're gonna we're gonna
Speaker 0: hit the hit the I haven't heard it. I'm gonna we're gonna hit this hit this from the emissions reduction targets. Is it fair to say no, you won't then? We're we're gonna we're gonna reduce the emissions, and we're going to it delivered at a lower cost at the same time. That's my agenda.
That's my policy. And, and and no more I have it. Maxine Bernier needs to explain why he was at the World Economic Forum. Leave that on there. Don't edit that out.
I won't edit. I know. We don't want Bernier to try and lie about who he is and what he chance That will be on there. That will be on Twitter.
@cagrown5 - cagrown5
Must watch. https://t.co/tGRYbmSJX0
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses their disagreement with Mike Johnson and their intention to take shots at him. They mention the upcoming fight over CRs and spending. They highlight the support for Trump, with 74 million people voting for him in 2020. They also mention the increase in interest rates and credit contraction, which they believe will negatively impact people. The speaker talks about a court trial against Donald Trump and the attempt to liquidate his business empire. They mention the debanking and definancing of companies and the need to support Trump and Mike Lindell as entrepreneurs. The speaker discusses the attacks they have faced and the special sale they are running for the War Room audience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Welcome back. We have, obviously, a lot of work to do. And remember, we're not gonna agree with Mike Johnson on everything. We're just, just not gonna happen, and we are gonna take some shots.
So just understand that day's coming. You know, a lot of that, I think, is gonna be around CRs and spending all that. So we just our function is to drive the stake in the ground on the right and then move the conversation to that position. You're not gonna you know, people will tell me that. Well, you lost this.
We lost it. Okay. He said, hey. We ain't lost any of them because directionally, it's all coming our way. Look at president Trump.
I think McLaughlin I'll try to get that later. Some of the polling and I don't wanna get obviously too assessed for the polling because they're gonna try to steal it. We understand we have to protect against that. But, also, remember, 74,000,000 people voted for Trump in 2020. 74,000,000 people.
I thought I did a pretty good damn good job in 16, but we have 63, 64, 74,000,000 people. Right? There's, like, 10 or 11,000,000 votes, and we picked up 12 seats in the house to show how they stole it. We picked up 12, I think, net 12 seats in the house. Nancy Pelosi was hanging by a thread.
The country is coming our way, particularly as a company the country awakens to the crises that are enveloping us and working class people and minorities, African American men, Hispanic men, on the culture issues definitely of what's happening in the schools to their children, but also on things that are waking up to the to to the crisis on the southern border and how it affects cities like Detroit, cities like New York City, like Chicago, and how it's crushing our wages. What we've had now, what, of of Biden's term, I think, only 1 or 2 months you've had any true wage increases, almost wage decreases. In fact, he's on another role now, I think, another 4 or 5 months. For, first, it was a couple of years. People are awakening to what you've known for many, many years.
Appropriations bills. Again, the work started last night. You know? Johnson's gonna drive hard here. We gotta get these appropriations bill, which the senate still hasn't done.
I think they've done some to the minibus, but they they're they've been slow walking a lot of this because they wanna see a CR. The CR fight in November is gonna be a massive fight. And once again, we're gonna say, hey. What's been so bad about having having no speaker for the last couple of weeks? We have no problem with the government shutdown at all.
At all. We've won the battles every time we've had a government shutdown. We've won we picked up seats the next year. That's how Mitch McConnell got a job in the senate. So the everybody says, oh, you always lose the you always lose the nerve.
That's just not true. It's just not true. It's not true. Of course, we have to take the hard line. $600,000,000,000 in new debt, and and the consumers are still spending or the fin or the finished cash of the COVID and quite frankly still tapping out on the credit cards, which is right now, you look at auto loans.
You look at the repossessions. You look at all of it. The the it's overwhelming that the credit contraction and the and the massive increase in interest rates in the 10 year over five is going to start to eviscerate people. Let me bring in Mike Lindell. Mike, how you're one of the guys you know, Trump yesterday was magnificent in New York.
He came out to the sticks and not just gave a ringing endorsement of Mike Johnson. He was he was hell, they they fined him $10,000, I think. He was on fire. Latisha James came in after us babbling about the information. It's obvious in that court they're trying to liquidate Donald Trump.
They're trying to take a business empire for in the United States of America, what you're seeing is a show trial every bit as much of the show trials of the 19 thirties under under the rule of Stalin in Russia, and you're seeing it right in in in midtown Manhattan, which is the financial capital of the world. This will have massive implications. Trump keeps saying that about businesses not coming to New York because you have literally a Marxist, attorney general and not the sharpest tool in the shed. Let me be polite, but not the sharpest tool in the shed, but a Marxist regime of this taken over the great state of New York's, legal, trying to liquidate him. They're also doing it, the corporatist.
And people have to remember, upon our return, not just to the house, but to the White House and when Trump comes back in 24, all of this all of this debanking and definancing and trying to break companies, that is not gonna go away. We have long memories. Right? It's like, you know, I'm Irish. It's like there was, what, Irish Alzheimer's.
The only thing you can remember is the vendettas. Right? The grievances. No. We have long memories.
They're trying to do Mike Lindell. Do they have him in a court trying to liquidate it? No. But they're doing it in a in a more systematic, in a more treacherous way. The big box is dropping.
The network from Millennium advertise. The the the merchants come and and take the credit availability away. They take the processing. I had the young woman, what Wendy on that runs the processing that we all use, the processing that War Room and many other the smaller groups in the patriot economy as we build an alternative economy, payment processing. The banks would cut us off.
The credit card payment process because they're all run by Silicon Valley, left wing oligarchs. Soon as they knew your MAGA, soon as you knew president, boom. This is what they've done to Lindell. They have gone in a very sophisticated weigh, and they basically try to destroy a company. This is how they're doing it.
And the war room posse, one of the things that Naomi's she's gonna talk about tonight is what we've done on the vaccines and everything like that. You, this audience, the work that you've done with Naomi Wolfness has changed the direction on the vaccines just like you've changed the direction in the house and in politics. In another, Lindell is not just about the company. He's symbolic. If they can crush Trump and Lindell, 2 of the greatest entrepreneurs we have, they can crush anybody.
So Trump has to be supported as an entrepreneur because they can take Trump out. They can take anybody out. If they can take Lindell out, they can take any company out. Lindell out, they they're not stopping there. They're heading to everybody out there that disagrees with the way they think and what they're trying to impose in this country, and you can see what they're trying to impose.
This is obvious. It's just see what you see. Don't take it from me. Just watch it. This is this is what Stalin and the Marxists and Mao Zedong and the and and Robespierre and the French revolution.
Particularly, go after those people that support the nuclear family and, particularly, go after business people. Mike, how do you fought back with specials, etcetera. How do we keep the factory floors a 100% at full capacity in, because now this is my new obsession. The my pill. How do we do it?
Speaker 1: And the war room has helped so much, Steve. You you hit it on the you hit the nail on the head there. We've been We've been attacked through our banking. We've been trying to be debanked. We merge our merchants taken away.
We had to switch merchant servers. American Express defunded us. We've been hit from every direction imaginable, but we're getting through a lot of it because we have the greatest products ever, and we have the greatest employees ever, but we have the greatest audience ever. We have the greatest consumers ever, And you guys have helped so much. So what we're doing this week, and you've all responded, we're having a special for the war room.
It's a flash sale. We're gonna I've decided we're gonna run until at least Monday. This is just for the War Room posse. These are the geezer dream bedsheets that made us made, Ben Shee's famous. He's, the best ever, the correct the queen-size, the regular one
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
This... https://t.co/MOWhF8NQbO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Smartwatches, although within government safety levels for radiation, can weaken muscles, including the heart and brain. Magnets placed on top of the hand strengthen the body, while magnets below the hand or on the palm weaken it. Holding phones in the palm exposes the body to magnetic fields, further weakening it. Inverting normal behaviors can lead to societal control. Some individuals have reported numbness in their arms from wearing Fitbits. Instead of smartwatches, consider wearing copper, brass, silver, crystals, or stones for piezoelectric healing properties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Radiation from a digital watch is within government safety levels, but grossly weakens the muscles. Smartwatches, You know how they always tell you about the smartwatches and you can track your steps? Well, if it weakens the body, then it's also gonna weaken the heart and gonna weaken the brain. And also magnets. This is an interesting one.
Check this. If you put magnets on top of a hand, the hand or the body becomes stronger. Okay? If we put magnets below the hand or on the palm, the hand and the body becomes weaker. How do we hold our phones?
You hold them in your palm. You don't hold them like this. You hold them in your palm. So if there's magnetic that magnetics that are taking place in your hands, the body will become weaker. As somebody just said, a weak society is an easily controllable society.
Yes. If you are inverting every single thing in which a human or a person or an animal or something is supposed to be doing and flipping it, then all of a sudden they're going to start to have issues. Somebody wrote down here, I wore a Fitbit for years and it made my arm go numb. So thankfully, I am aware enough to realize that's what it was. Yes.
Any of those smartwatches and anything, just just wear some copper or just wear some brass or wear some silver or wear a piece of, a crystal or a stone. Those are piezoelectric healing proper
@RealSeq16 - Sequencita
This! 👇 https://t.co/48M98iwVBZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
A journalist captured video footage at the Capitol showing two suspicious individuals dressed like government agents. One of them encouraged people to break the windows and enter the building. The journalist warned against it, but one of the suspicious individuals was caught on camera pulling out a large pane of glass and quickly dropped it when he realized he was being filmed. He then blamed a protester for breaking the window and even shoved him. Surprisingly, neither of these individuals has been charged for their criminal actions. The video raises questions about why they haven't been held accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do not go in there. The radio journalist from Michigan was shooting video that day at the capitol. What he captured were 2 most We call suspicious actors, but they are dressed in such a way that led him to believe that they were government agents. And one of them, after the windows had been broken by Protestor, it was encouraging people to to pull the rest of the glass out and go inside. Bobby Powell, who was the journalist that had shot it, and he has his camera rolling, he told them That would be illegal and that wouldn't be a good idea.
He warned people off not to go into that window and then he turned his camera around and he caught this agent or suspicious actor pulling a large pane of glass out, this tempered glass. It kinda folds in into itself, crunch Onto the ground. When he realized he was being filmed, he quickly dropped it. It seems apparent on the video that he did not want to be seen doing what he what he just did. So he pulled in a protester and started blaming him.
He said, what are you doing breaking that window? Poor fellow that was being accused in there was going on. And then he gave him a couple of really good shoves and cocked his arm like he was gonna punch him. We don't know. His, facial image is not on any of the sedition hunter sites or the FBI's most wanted site.
But he clearly was Committing criminal damage to property, and he has not been charged. So it you know, again, It raises a question of why. Also, the individual trying to again, opening the window up is even encouraging people to enter, believe as well. Yes. What's he saying?
Well, he he said, why don't y'all, open the rest of it up?
@playteaux - playteaux
It’s a Farce https://t.co/Hg6kF9Isdk
Video Transcript AI Summary
A discussion takes place regarding the sentencing of a person involved in the Capitol breach. The speaker argues that if it were Antifa, the situation would have been worse, with bombs and casualties. They criticize the media for misrepresenting the events and claim that the only death was caused by a police officer. The speaker believes the sentences given to the January 6th participants were too harsh compared to lenient treatment of other criminals. They highlight past incidents of violence at the Capitol, suggesting that the January 6th events were not as severe. The speaker concludes that the situation has undermined the fairness of the criminal justice system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Corned guy. So you're saying that he got a little over 3 years in prison. He broke into the Capitol and
Speaker 1: He he was escorted around the Capitol by Capitol Hill Police.
Speaker 0: He wasn't escorted?
Speaker 1: He was. It's on video. Look at this.
Speaker 0: Are you saying that if Antifa broke into the Capitol in the exact same way, you would downplay it In the same way you're downplaying
Speaker 1: I don't think I'm downplaying anything. I think I'm seeing things clearly and stating my opinion, which happens to be correct. If this were Antifa If this were Antifa, they would have brought bombs, which they did when I spoke at the University of Pittsburgh just about 6 months ago. If this were Antifa, they would have maimed people and probably killed some of them. But that didn't happen with the January 6thers.
The only person who died in the political violence of January 6th was one of the January 6thers who was murdered by a trigger happy cop. That this is contrary to what we were told by the media. But the media lied to us. And and then the so called January 6thers who may have behaved in an improper way. I'm not suggesting they didn't, were sentenced to years in prison over crimes that should have received a slap on the wrist.
Meanwhile, people who committed heinous crimes for months, were were given a slap on the wrist when they should still be in prison today. Not only was the the January 6th incident not the worst insurrection in the history of the United States. It wasn't the worst attack in the history of the US Capitol. Not even close. It wasn't even in the top half dozen.
As I mentioned earlier, the the Capitol has been blown up on multiple occasions. As I mentioned earlier, In in the 19 fifties, Puerto Rican nationalists broke into the Capitol and started shooting congressmen. 5 of them were injured in that. And what happened later on to those people, Jimmy Carter, liberal darling, let them off the hook. What happened to the Weather Underground when they came in and blew up the Capitol, blew up part of the Capitol?
Well, Bill Ayers basically got off the hook for his involvement with Weather Underground and went on to become a mentor to Barack Obama. What happened to the half dozen mostly left wing attacks. We don't even remember them. People think that the the January 6th lectern guy smiling with Pelosi's podium What was the the gravest assault on the Capitol? It's it's a farce.
And and it has made a farce out of our criminal justice system to see it treated in this way.
@JT4DT24 - 🗽Jordyn Trump🗽
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥THIS!!!!!!🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/ksMLoxGZWz
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't care about the lawsuit I'm facing. I went to a home supply store to buy screws. I saw an elderly man struggling to find something, so I decided to help him. When he asked a store employee for assistance, the employee refused to help and was disrespectful. This made me angry, so I confronted the employee and forced him to help the elderly man. I asked the elderly man why he allowed the disrespect, and he said it was because of his anxiety. I believe we should not let anxiety control our lives and should stand up for ourselves. I don't regret my actions and hope others will do the same.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have 100% got a lawsuit coming from me, and I 1000% don't give a shit. Let me tell you what the hell just happened to me. Alright? I went down to the home supply store. Alright?
You could take your pick. It's either blue or orange. You got a 50% chance of getting this shit right. And I went in there. I had to give me some 2 inch Deckmate T25 screws.
I got a little project I'm working The house had to go in there and give me some fucking screws. I went in there, and I'm walking up and down the damn hardware aisle. Alright? And there is this very, very elderly old man, and he's walking up and down this damn aisle. Okay?
Well, I said, well, hell. Old man knows what he's looking for. I'm just gonna grab these t 20 fives, and I'm gonna go to the checkout. Well, I grabbed my t 25 box of my screws, and I walk up to the damn checkout. Now I'm standing in line because I refuse to go through self checkout even though they asked me.
Alright? When you start giving me 15% off like I work here, Boom. I'll check my damn self out. Until then, I'm standing in this line. So I'm standing in line.
About that time, out the end of the aisle on the hardware Ow. The old man walks out, and there is a younger person standing there with one of that company's vests on, standing there doing absolutely nothing. Okay? He walks out and he asked me. He's with the ear dentist.
I can hear him. He asked the young man. He said, excuse me. Where are your plastic cat nails at? He said, right down there on that aisle.
An old man say, I've been walking up and down that aisle for a few minutes, sir, and I can't seem to find them. And Young boy turned around and looks at it down there on the right. You'll find them. Go down there on the right. And the old man's dumping up and down this aisle for, like, 10 minutes.
So the old man said one more thing to him. He said, well, son, my old eyes just ain't as good as they as as they as they used to be. I ain't, I I I guess I just couldn't find them. Can you please show me where they're at? And the young man wearing that company's vest turned and looked at old man, said, oh, man, I ain't showing you where them damn nails is at.
Alright? They're down there on the right, walk down there, put your glasses on, and find them. Well, all of a sudden now, I need plastic cap nails. I didn't need them when I come in the store a few minutes ago, but now there is nothing more important to me than plastic cap nails because I'm fittin' to test this little son of a bitch's metal. So I walk over to him, get out of my place in line, walk over to him, and I said, hey.
Where's your plastic cap nails at? He said, they're down there on the right. Just follow the old man. I said, no. You work here.
Show me where the plastic cap nails are. And he said, I'm not showing you where the plastic cap nails are. So I took this hand right here. You see this big ass hand? The one that make a double d kitties, like a Granny Smith apple.
And I grabbed that little son of a bitch by the back of his fucking collar. And I against his will, drugged him down this damn aisle, and I stood him up right by that old man. And all of a sudden, he's as helpful as can be. His eyes are about that big around. He's pissing on himself.
Okay? And I said, where's the plastic cat now's at? All of a sudden, he knows exactly where they are. He has no problem showing me where they are, and I released him after he gave that old man their plastic cap nails, and I asked that old man before the repercussions came in. I asked him.
I said, sir, Why did you let that young man disrespect you like that? Now keep in mind that this old man has a United States veteran hat on, which means that he fought for this country. Okay? I asked him. I said, why did you let that young man disrespect you like that?
And old man's just shaking like this right here because he he he's very uncomfortable. He said, my anxiety, man, my anxiety, I I just I I try not to cause no waves. Well, let me tell you something to everybody out there. Young, old, perfectly healthy, mentally handicapped. You do not let that anxiety monster run your life.
If you are ever disrespected, you say exactly what you need to say in order to gain your respect back because I can guarantee you, Guaranteed you that somewhere within 10 foot of you is somebody that will protect you from being disrespected. Okay? Do do believe that. Do not believe the hype of the damn media and all this shit where everybody's gotta be nice to everybody and all this other type of stuff, and you can't stand up for yourself. There is a whole bunch of me's out there that will I I give 0 fucks, Zero about the repercussions of my actions.
I regret absolutely nothing from what I just did. I I welcome it. I hope them damn blue lights pull in this fucking driveway right now. Because before I left, I told that store manager, when he come over there, you can take a picture of my license. Alright?
That's where I'll be if this needs to continue. But let me tell y'all something right now. Okay? The reason that that is available and that that is pretty much prominent in America right now is because half of America has never had a board put on their ass or their ass busted. You understand me?
If you're gonna disrespect somebody, I highly suggest that you look at your surroundings and make sure that I ain't there because we ain't all sheep. There's a bunch of lions out there right now. We're just hiding in the fucking brush.
@digitalassetbuy - Digital Asset Investor.XRP
EXPOSE THEM ALL! 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿 https://t.co/1gHi5KRQzX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses opposition to cryptocurrency. Speaker 1 mentions that Jamie, who supports blockchain, helped launch JPMorganCoin. They explain that JPMorgan created its own blockchain protocol based on Ethereum, allowing private transactions. Speaker 0 suggests that the only use case for blockchain is criminal activity. Speaker 2 states that JPMorgan was involved in Ethereum from the beginning and played a major role in the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance. Speaker 0 comments on shutting down blockchain if they were the government. Speaker 3 compares the Mt. Gox scandal to Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme, where JPMorgan was involved. JPMorgan account holders sued the bank and recovered over $2 billion, but no executives went to jail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've always been deeply opposed to crypto, Bitcoin, etcetera.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, first of all, if I might add, Jamie has always loved the blockchain. You know, I think at one point in time, he publicly said, God bless the blockchain. I definitely believe in the blockchain. So, you know, he's always been a staunch supporter of us through the entire program. And, you know and in fact, that's the reason why we were able to launch JPMorganCoin.
Nordwin is basically US dollars on blockchain. We actually are one of the few banks to have almost created our own Blockchain protocol, like the underlying technology layer, essentially, what we did was take the Ethereum, public Ethereum Blockchain codebase, and we forked it, which meant we copied and pasted it. It was open source. And then we added enterprise technology trappings. But then we also added a private node to enable private transactions, between participants in a network, telling that all of our projects are, you know, on Ethereum variant as an example.
That's that's intentional. And I think that as a bank, you know, many many did not agree with that approach early on, but now it's sort of playing through as as being relevant.
Speaker 0: One You pointed out the only true use case for it is criminals.
Speaker 2: So our company consensus has been, very prominent at Since the start of the Ethereum ecosystem, I I can attest that JPMorgan was there right from the start before Public Mainnet was even launched. One one one
Speaker 0: drug traffickers, anti money laundering, tax avoidance.
Speaker 2: JPMorgan, at what started paying attention to Ethereum blockchain technology even before public mainnet was released. At what So they started, experimenting and and building out some things, when we were still building proofs of concept. One they had a handful of different teams that focused on blockchain technology, one And we've interacted, with them roughly from the start. We one I started to interact with them, in a really concerted way, around the time of at The advent of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance. So, we were 2 of the major drivers of that initiative at 1 and have been 2 of the major drivers of activity inside the EEA since since launch, really.
Speaker 0: I one If I was the government, I'd close it down.
Speaker 3: You know, with respect to to to to Mt. Gox, there's not that much here that's all that unique outside of it being, Bitcoin related. At one side of it being, Bitcoin related. Bernie Madoff had his company banking at JPMorgan. JPMorgan caught on at 1 to the scam about a year before it collapsed.
They pulled most of their money out of, out of the the the Madoff fund, didn't tell their what Their own account holders who were also with Madoff that they were doing that. After everything was revealed, at 1 The JPMorgan account holders who are all who are also with Madoff, they sued JPMorgan for violating the fiduciary obligation that JP at JPMorgan had to them, and they recovered over $2,000,000,000 in that lawsuit. And the JPMorgan executives went to jail. Right? One No.
The JPMorgan executives want to chill? No.
@BiffDon - BiffDon
Sus Cats. https://t.co/uircBZkRZY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cats have slitted pupils, a trait rare in the animal kingdom. Unlike lions, tigers, and jaguars, domesticated cats have this feature. Interestingly, reptiles like snakes and alligators also have slitted pupils. Cats hiss like snakes and share a love for eating mice. They also possess pineal glands, which may enable them to see beyond the visible light spectrum. The origins of these attributes, which seem to combine lion and snake characteristics, remain unknown. It is possible that genetic modifications occurred in ancient civilizations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's something crazy about cats you may have never heard of. The first thing is their pupils. They're slitted pupils. Do you know how rare that is in the animal kingdom? Lions do not have slitted pupils.
They're round just like ours. Tigers don't have slitted pupils either, game, nor do jaguars. Now, this is kind of the weird thing because I kind of thought that a domesticated house cat came from a big cat at some point down the line? But if they don't have slitted pupils like a house cat does, then what does have slitted pupils? Reptiles.
Snakes and alligators have slitted pupils, not any other cat. Now in many cultures, ancient reptiles We're considered to be kind of a trippy creature that had other abilities and senses. The other thing that's weird is that cats hiss like a snake, And they have slitted pupils like a reptile. They also love to eat mice as do snakes. Now we know how much the ancient Egyptians loved cats.
Cats also have pineal glands. And you notice that cats will do that thing where they'll look in the corner of the room and they're making a fuss about what seems to be nothing. It is believed That their eyes enable them to see outside of the visible light spectrum that me and you are bound by. Now, it's not known how a cat Has half the attributes of a lion and half the attributes of a snake. But perhaps some genetic tinkering went on many, many years ago in ancient worlds and civilization?
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
Entertainment👇‼️ https://t.co/zebTeQOgUZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Entertainment is about holding an audience's attention. Hollywood originates from the holly tree used by ancient druids for spells. Today, TVs in our homes deliver programming that subtly influences us through music, TV shows, movies, and games. We are being programmed without realizing it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Watch this. Let's start with the word entertainment. To entertain. What does that mean? To bind or hold.
To bind or hold what? An audience's attention. Okay. Now let's take the word Hollywood. Where does that come from?
Well, Hollywood comes from the holly tree, and the ancient druids back in the day used to take the holly tree, make wands to weave spells, cast spells, or channel spells. And when they needed help, they would consult the magis or the mediums of the day to help channel their spells to the population. We'll cut to you today. What do we have in our houses? We have these black boxes.
What are they called? TVs. But if you stop and you say the word, tell a vision, television. And when you turn on that television, what do you get? What's the first thing that pops up?
A list of channels. And when you turn on those channels, what's on those channels? The following program Programming. They are programming you. They've been programming your whole life.
You don't even know it. They do it with your music. They do it with your TV. They do it with your movies. They do it with your games.
They have been programming us and programming you since you were little, and you don't even know it because you don't even question.
@DocNetyoutube - Black Insurrectionist--I FOLLOW BACK TRUE PATRIOTS
Living In America.............................. https://t.co/iyVT0QMVAp
Video Transcript AI Summary
В Америку летим, переезжаем. Америка – самая свободная страна, страна возможностей. Пассажирам-итальянцам неприятно, что при них едят мясо. Принято придерживаться принципа демократии.
Народ мужа долгие годы терпел притеснения белых. Семья должна пересесть в носовую часть самолёта, потому что их сын попадает в поле зрения пары чайлдфри, и это вызывает у людей дискомфорт.
Translation:
Flying to America, we're moving. America is the freest country, a land of opportunity. Italian passengers are uncomfortable with meat being eaten near them. It is customary to adhere to the principle of democracy.
The husband's people have suffered oppression from whites for many years. The family must move to the front of the plane because their son is in the line of sight of a childfree couple, and this causes discomfort.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: В Америку летите? Да, переезжаем. Америка самая свободная страна, страна возможностей. А вы сможем лететь? Да, мы вместе, Он сейчас подойдет.
А вот и мой муж. Знакомьтесь Эмили. Простите, мистер! Пассажиры позади под цветы итальянцы. Им неприятно, что при них употребляют мясо.
Мы же их не заставляем, это Простите, принято придерживаться принципа демократии. Позвольте мне это заберу. Бари, это очередь в туалет. Good you 1? Мы подождем.
Его народ долгие годы терпел притеснения белых. Мы перед всеми афроамериканцами в долгу. Простите нас, сэр. Прошу вас. Вы не могли бы пересесть в носовую часть самолёта?
Вы сиядем? Нет, Никит, вы все трое! Зачем? Там сзади пара они чайлдфри. Дело в том, что ваш сын попадает в поле их зрения и это вызывает у людей комфорт.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Seriously https://t.co/kxcg2Arf8v
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many artists feel unable to express their political views, particularly regarding support for Trump, fearing backlash. They believe the country is heading in the wrong direction and are concerned about government control over social media. This situation mirrors troubling developments in the UK, where individuals face imprisonment for their online expressions. The potential for censorship is alarming, regardless of political affiliation. Trump emphasizes the importance of free speech and advocates against government influence on public discourse. This principle, which aligns with the First Amendment, should be a fundamental aspect of society but is often treated as revolutionary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Out there. There's a lot of people that don't speak their mind. Do you know many artists that have reached out to me that are, like, fucking hippies, man? Like like, artists, like, musicians, comedians that thanked me for endorsing Trump because they can't do it. They said they want to, but they don't wanna be attacked.
They can't say it. They think the country is going in the wrong direction. They think that this control of social media by the government, which we would have had pretty much fully if it wasn't for Elon buying Twitter Mhmm. That this is a dangerous precedent to set, whether it's a right wing government or a left wing government. And that what you see that's happening in the UK where people are being imprisoned for tweets and Facebook posts.
Yeah. In in the in the UK is the part that's mind bending about it too. Mind bending. The whole thing is nuts, and it's a dangerous path that we were on. We were on that path.
Trump has vowed to have free speech become a very important part of what he's standing for, and that this censoring of information needs to stop, and that we need to stop all government influence in what people have to say. Yeah. Look. I I That alone. That's that's, that shouldn't be as revolutionary as it is.
I know. It should be a core tenant of what I mean, it's essentially the first amendment. You know what I
@JOKAQARMY1 - mrredpillz jokaqarmy
The secret camera 📷 https://t.co/6nwGCC2386
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker challenges the credibility of the narrative about Charlie Kirk’s incident and points to security footage to raise questions. They reference a security detail member wearing “meta AI shades” who appears to be filming. According to the speaker, when Charlie is hit, the security person turns on the shades, films, and then, as chaos unfolds with a crowd rushing the stage, carries out a handoff.
The speaker describes a handoff occurring to a gentleman in a shirt. They claim that this is the moment when someone takes something off Charlie and hands it to the man in the black shirt, who then runs off. The speaker asserts that the item being handed off is the “laugh mic” that allegedly contained an explosive device, implying that the security detail’s first priority was to remove the suspicious object from Charlie and pass it to the other person rather than ensuring Charlie’s safety.
The speaker emphasizes that the security detail “knew exactly what to do” and questions how the person receiving the item would know what to do in such chaotic moments, suggesting coordinated movement. They argue that the security actions undermine the official narrative about Charlie Kirk and Tyler Robinson, indicating that the FBI should be questioned and accountability demanded from the FBI and this administration.
In summary, the speaker uses the footage to claim that the security team’s behavior—specifically the meta AI shades operator filming, the rapid handoff of an object from Charlie to a man in black, and the subsequent actions—casts doubt on the established story and points to potential coordination and a failure to prioritize Charlie’s immediate safety. The call is for greater scrutiny and accountability of the FBI and the administration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you having a hard time believing the ridiculous narrative about Charlie Kirk and what happened to him? Great. Me too because it's embarrassing. Let me show you some footage of Charlie's security details, specifically this man with these meta AI shades on that'll make you question this ridiculous narrative even more so. So there he is.
He turns on his shades right there. He's filming. Charlie gets hit. Rest in peace. Reacts.
Goes up to the body. There we go. The handoff right there. You see? Everyone bone rushing the stage and right there, handoff.
There's a handoff to a gentleman in a shirt. So just to recap, right there, he is taking something from Charlie, which people think is the laugh mic that had the explosive device in it, handing it off to this guy. See, everybody's rushing the stage. He has one job. He knows exactly what he needs to do.
Instead of caring about making sure Charlie's okay, his first reaction is to pull something away, to get something off of Charlie, to give it to the guy in the black shirt, who then knows exactly what to do with it and runs off with it. I mean, if you're security detail, you think that the first thing you wanna do is deal with Charlie and what's happening to Charlie, his first reaction was, let me get this suspicious thing off of Charlie and give it to this guy who knew exactly what to do. I'm sorry. It's pretty obvious. We need to ask more questions of Meta AI shades guy over here because not only does he have high def footage of Charlie right after he was hit, but why the coordinated movement.
Right? If I'm handing something off to somebody in the midst of what seems to be chaos, how does that person know exactly what to do with that piece that I gave him, like the guy in the black shirt who ran off? This guy knew what to take off of Charlie, when to take it off, and who to give it to. The whole Charlie narrative of Tyler Robinson is disintegrating, the FBI should be embarrassed because they're acting in the typical FBI fashion. We need accountability, especially from this FBI and this administration.
@buckkbob - Buck-Bob
🎶🔥White-Trash Millionaire🔥🎶 . . https://t.co/bD1ReJoObd
Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker references a faded parchment where “the four fathers carved the cold times,” marking a legacy tied to midnight and a path where “a cargo floods the veins of every open road,” and “White trash on a mirror of a bloodline's rifle claim.” The image suggests a turbulent inheritance where old ideals collide with present upheaval, described as “thunderheads” ready to drown the original flame, with trains “louder than the liberty bell.”
- New tides are pulling the future, described as “a liberty spell,” while the script has “flipped since the iron quill first caught the spark,” yet “the fire in our veins still refuses to go dark.” There is a sense of reversal or betrayal, with questions like “Why trash me in there?” and the notion that “We call it mercy symphony as the original score gets overthrown.”
- The parchment “cracks under four and ink,” and “softly the dream begins to sing,” implying that the foundational document or ideals are breaking apart, yet the dream persists through singing or expression.
- The line “Yet the blood that signed at first still echoes through the blade” reinforces that the original commitment or violence of the pledge remains audible in present actions, while “Grass real low so snake and avoid the blood” suggests evasion or danger surrounding this legacy.
- The speaker questions “Why trash billionaire?” and notes that “Haunts stacked against free victory,” with the claim that “They bought the rewrite while the” implying intentional manipulation or ownership of history or outcomes to undermine freedom.
- Overall, the passage juxtaposes a revered founding heritage with current distortions and powerful forces (billionaires) that attempt to rewrite or suppress the original values, while the passion or “liberty spell” and the enduring heartbeat of the original bloodline persist despite attempts to silence or replace them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't miss the faded parchment where the four fathers carved the cold times ain't the same midnight. A cargo floods the veins of every open road. White trash on a mirror of a bloodline's rifle claim. I'd stack like thunderheads rolling in to drown the original flame. Their trains ride louder than the liberty bell.
New tides pull the future, it's a liberty spell. The script got flipped since the iron quill first caught the spark, but the fire in our veins still refuses to go dark. Why trash me in there? All stacked the We call it mercy symphony as the original score gets overthrown. The parchment cracks under four and ink, and softly the dream begins to sing.
Yet the blood that signed at first still echoes through the blade. Grass real low so snake and avoid the blood. Why trash billionaire? Haunts stacked against free victory. They bought the rewrite while the
@reality_revolt_ - Dimitri Revolt
A Grotesque Show they don’t even hide https://realityrevolt.com https://t.co/saabZZgMGG