reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@HouseLyndsey - Lyndsey, RN💜
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the censorship of Alex Jones and the demonization of conspiracy theorists. It questions why questioning the shape of the Earth is deemed harmful and highlights the creation of the term "conspiracy theorist" by the CIA. The speakers mention the banning of flat Earth content on YouTube and the introduction of factual information boxes by Google. They express disbelief and curiosity about the reasons behind the censorship. Overall, the video explores the suppression of alternative viewpoints and the perceived fakeness of space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Alex Jones is just a crackpot, why are the most powerful people in the
Speaker 1: country trying to silence him? No one bothers a censor, the flat earthers. Maybe Alex Jones is onto something. Read this book and decide for yourself who's crazy.
Speaker 2: And not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 3: In the age social media censorship questioning whether or not the earth is a globe has been deemed harmful thought. But why is this?
Speaker 4: The term conspiracy theorist was created after the JFK assassination to demonize people looking into the official story. That's a fact. That's where it came really Yo. Yeah. For the CIA, they created that term.
Speaker 5: Oh, the story that's so classified.
Speaker 4: The idea
Speaker 5: documents we can't see. We can't worry. We're never gonna see. Years later. Okay.
Speaker 4: Okay. We're never gonna see. So that term been demonized. And the people on the left, they call, oh, it's a conspiracy. I mean, I grew
Speaker 5: up in a world where I actually believe that See, theories were the way that dumb, uninformed people explain the complex world. That was a mark of a low IQ. Now the more informed, the smarter the person, the more likely they are to be connecting the dots that you're It's
Speaker 6: funny that, you know, those flatter videos, you know, that gets, demonized so much, but, it's kind of a compelling Earth. Space is kind of fake. So fake.
Speaker 4: It's so fake. I mean, it's
Speaker 6: just it's Islamophobia born a 1000% right.
Speaker 1: No one bothers to censor the flat earthers.
Speaker 5: Well, flat earthers get banned on YouTube. No one
Speaker 1: bothers a censor, the flat earthers.
Speaker 7: So we're introducing boxes that provide factual information at the top of results that have shown themselves to turn up a lot of information that is counterfactual such as searching for the earth is flat on YouTube where you see a lot of
Speaker 4: Your response is to put a box saying, nope. The earth is not Flat.
Speaker 7: Correct.
Speaker 4: Okay.
Speaker 5: All of that, it was hours of content. It's all banned now. Crazy is that. I know. Right?
Speaker 0: Okay. Why are they banning it? If it Are they hiding? Why why would they do that? Yeah.
Why, Alex? Right there. Why would they do that?
Speaker 1: Because Google cares about us.
Speaker 5: Alex. Exactly.
Speaker 1: No one bothers a censor, the flat earthers.
Speaker 5: The more informed, the smarter the person, the more likely they are to be connecting the dots that you're
Speaker 8: It's funny that, you know, those flatter videos, you know, that gets, demonized so much, but, it's kind of a
Speaker 5: Know the Earth.
Speaker 2: Not body can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 6: Face is kind of fake. So fake.
Speaker 4: It's so fake. It's just
Speaker 8: It's Islamophobia. I'm a 1000% right.
@redpillb0t - redpillbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm showing how QR codes on Instagram hold personal data like religion, organ donor status, and credit score. This info may lead to a social credit system. People need to resist this system by not giving it power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So check this out. I'm blocking out with this piece of paper and this pen certain keywords that you don't want on your Instagram just because it puts that stupid thing to cdc.gov. But, look at this QR code. The QR code that people have holds a lot more information on them than they may think. Okay?
This is Canada's QR code, but many countries have the similar thing. Look at all the information it has on you. Religion, organ donor, driver's license, marital status, nonessential access, reserved for future use. So that's a thing that they're gonna have more info in the future. Allergies, gender identity, smoker, sex.
Are you a firearms owner? Are you a restricted firearms owner? Are you do you have any warrants? And look at this. What's your credit score?
How many accounts do you have? How much do you owe? What did you make this year? What did you make last year? This is how much information that QR code will have.
This will be the social credit system on steroids, if not a carbon copy of it. And this is what people are being is being imposed on, that's being imposed on them. And the only power this has is the power you give it. If everyone refuses, good luck with this system, man.
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two-thirds of Americans use mouthwash, and the same percentage have high blood pressure. A study on healthy individuals showed a 26mm increase in blood pressure after 7 days of using mouthwash. Mouthwash kills the oral microbiome, reduces nitric oxide production, leading to high blood pressure, erectile dysfunction, and early Alzheimer's. Over 200 million Americans use mouthwash daily.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you use mouthwash, so 2 out of 3 Americans use mouthwash and there's 2 out of 3 Americans that have an unsafe elevation in blood pressure. So we took normal healthy individuals. We gave them mouthwash for 7 days and then stop the mouthwash, 4 days later we brought them back. 7 days after starting mouthwashes, in some cases, we saw a 26 millimeter increase in blood pressure. So the only thing we did was kill the microbiome.
And mouthwash is terrible to everybody. Yeah, I mean 200 something 1000000 Americans that wake up every morning, use it. Mouthwash completely kills the oral microbiome, shuts down nitric oxide production that leads to an increase in blood pressure, erectile dysfunction, and early onset of Alzheimer's.
@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84
@redpillb0t - redpillbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Former state senator Nancy Schafer and her husband Bruce were found dead, raising concerns about the dangers posed by child protective services (CPS) across the nation. Investigators are at their northeast Georgia home searching for clues regarding their sudden deaths, which appear to be a murder-suicide. Schafer expressed strong beliefs that CPS operates as a protective empire focused on separating families, suggesting that the destruction of the family unit is part of a larger agenda. She argued that the only solution may be to completely dismantle CPS and rebuild it with pro-family values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Former state senator Nancy Schafer and her husband Bruce were found dead today. I am convinced without a shadow of a doubt that our the parents across this country need to be warned of the dangers of the child protective services nationwide.
Speaker 1: Tonight, GBI crime scene investigators are at her northeast Georgia home.
Speaker 0: Department of Child Protective Services has become a protected empire.
Speaker 1: They're searching for clues that might tell them
Speaker 0: It's built on taking children and separating families.
Speaker 1: What led to the sudden and violent deaths of miss Schaeffer and her husband?
Speaker 0: The family is going to have to be destroyed in order for the, one world government to completely develop. Preliminary looks to be a murder suicide. Children are being taken away from their parents, in a ruthless kind of behavior. How do you tame child protective service? It may be only by closing it complete and starting over at the beginning with Pro Family Values.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 500,000 square miles of the US lack cell service, leaving many areas unconnected. This means emergency texts, emotional messages, and precious memories go undelivered. But T-Mobile is changing that. We've partnered with Starlink to launch hundreds of satellites, creating a space-based network that automatically connects to your existing phone, regardless of your carrier. Connection matters, so we're offering free access to anyone. With T-Mobile Starlink, if you can see the sky, you're connected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are over 500,000 square miles of The US unreachable by any cell phone tower. Places where emergency texts It's okay. It's okay. Ever sent, where emotional messages There's no real life. Are not received, and countless memories are left unshared.
Doing good. You're doing good. But T Mobile is about to change that. T Mobile partnered with Starlink to launch hundreds of satellites, creating the only space based network that automatically connects to the phone you already have. And because connection means everything, we're inviting anyone on any wireless carrier to experience it for free.
You won't believe where I am right now. T Mobile Starlink. If you can see the sky, you are connected.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't trust OpenAI. I founded it as an open-source non-profit; the "open" in OpenAI was my doing. Now it's closed source and focused on profit maximization. I don't understand that shift. Sam Altman, despite claims otherwise, has become wealthy, and stands to gain billions more. I don't trust him, and I'm concerned about the most powerful AI being controlled by someone untrustworthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't trust OpenAI. I mean, I you know, I started that company as a nonprofit open source. Yes. The open in OpenAI I named the company. I named the company Yeah.
OpenAI as an open source. And it is now extremely closed source and and maximizing profit. So Does risk I don't understand how you actually go from being a an open source nonprofit to a closed source for maximum profit organization. I'm missing Well, but Sam Aukland got rich, though, didn't he? At various points, he's claimed not to be getting rich, but he's claimed many things that were false.
And now apparently, he's gonna get $10,000,000,000 of stock or something like that. So, I don't trust Sam Altman, and I and I don't think we wanna have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Instead of addressing wasteful spending, Democrats are attacking the person exposing it. Taxpayers want us to stop funding ridiculous projects, like the transgender comic example from USAID or Bert and Ernie on Baghdad TV. Elon Musk is revealing the federal government's actions, similar to what he did with Twitter.
We found that big government pressured big tech to censor Americans. Mark Zuckerberg admitted the Biden administration pressured them to censor, and they complied, but won't repeat it. Musk is now doing this for the federal government, which we support.
Democrats believe career bureaucrats should run the country, but we believe elected officials should make decisions. The person with 77 million votes wants Musk to expose government waste. We have witnesses, Miss Wade and Mr. Smith, who can testify to the impact of this administrative state on their businesses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister chairman, instead of stopping the stupid spending, Democrats attack the guy who's exposing it. I think the taxpayers of this country would just assume we stop spending their money on dumb things. Like, I'd what was what was the example from USAID, some trans gender comic in Ireland spending money on Bert and Ernie and Big Bird on Baghdad TV? I think they would prefer we not do that. Elon Musk is doing exposing the in the federal government exactly what he exposed at Twitter when he purchased Twitter.
What do we find out there? Big government was pressuring big tech to censor Americans. You don't have to take my word for it. We had the Twitter files. Oh, and we also had someone else in big tech send a letter to this committee and tell us exactly what they were doing.
Mark Zuckerberg said the Biden administration was pressuring us to censor. We did it. We're sorry. We won't do it again. Told the whole world that in a letter to this committee.
So Elon Musk is now doing that for the federal government. We think that's a good thing. And I understand the fundamental difference the left has with us conservatives. Democrats believe it is the career elected bureaucrats who are supposed to run the country. We don't think that's the way it's supposed to work.
We actually think it's the people who put their name on a ballot, who get elected by We The People, who make the decisions. And the guy who got 77,000,000 votes on November 5 says he wants Elon Musk working for him, the elected member who heads the executive branch working for him every bit and much as the federal employees of people in Treasury who were supposed to have all the answers, or in USAID who'd been the career officials working for him to expose stupid things our government is spending money on. And the Democrats are gonna attack that guy? Go ahead. Go right ahead.
But we know the real consequences of having this administrative state, these bureaucrats run things. We got two witnesses here who've lived it. Miss Wade and mister Smith. They're here to tell about how that had some impacted their business. So I appreciate the chairman having this hearing.
This is exactly the kind of hearing we have to have, and I appreciate the work the president and his team are doing to expose the stupid things bureau bureaucrats spend, the hard earned money, the people we get the privilege of representing. I yield back.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't think there's been transparency. Routine announcements are being made about findings, and questions are being invited daily. But providing data for the evidence that is being presented isn't happening. The White House has provided information, but these claims seem to be dismissed. Information is being provided; it just isn't believed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's not been transparent. I mean, may there may be They are
Speaker 1: making routine announcements about the things they are finding, and they are inviting questions about the things they are finding every single day.
Speaker 0: But but by definition, he's not being transparent. They're not they're they're not providing data for the things that they say that they have found evidence of. They just aren't. There is the
Speaker 1: I mean, the the White House has provided
Speaker 0: You can make announcements, and he also did admit that
Speaker 1: he actually So you just don't believe it. I mean, they they are they are providing information. You just choose not to believe that it's true.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelenskyy has banned another political opposition party, seizing its members' assets through the Department of Justice. This follows his 2022 ban on major opposition parties and TV channels linked to them, consolidating control over Ukraine's largest television networks under government control.
My presidential term ended on May 20th. I canceled elections, citing martial law and suspending the constitution to remain in power. While some argue this is justified due to the war, consider the implications. Accepting this rationale sets a precedent for leaders to suspend constitutions and cancel elections under similar pretenses, especially considering the ongoing conflicts involving Russia and China.
They're already conditioning us to accept authoritarianism by misusing our Department of Justice to target political rivals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here is something that the political establishment and propaganda media don't want you to know. Ukraine's President Zelenskyy has just banned yet another political opposition party, one that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department Of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members' assets. Now this is just the latest of Zelenskyy's actions to do this sort of thing. He began banning major political opposition parties in 2022 when he also started banning TV channels that were associated with his political opponents. And he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks, now controlled by their government.
Zelenskyy's presidential term ended on May 20. He cancelled elections in the name of martial law, suspending Ukraine's constitution so that he could stay in power. Defenders of Zelenskyy will say, Hey, Ukraine is in the middle of a war. They can't have elections. Just stop for a moment and think, if we accept that excuse or criteria for suspending the constitution and canceling elections, then we should presume that leaders country and our own establishment media will also use this same excuse and rationale when they suspend our constitution and our elections since we too are at war with Russia and China.
If you think this sounds crazy, look at what's already going on. They've already started conditioning us to accept a dictatorship by rationalizing their own use of our Department of to target President Trump and other political enemies in their efforts to stay in power.
@realchasegeiser - Chase Geiser
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Democrats face challenges as Trump and Musk threaten government funding sources that have supported them for decades, which could lead to the collapse of their coalition. A large part of the Democratic party holds secular religious beliefs, such as transgenderism, open borders, and the idea that America is not unique. They believe it's good to have millions of people enter the country, and that work requirements are inherently bad.
Congress has a duty called oversight, and there were senators and congress people that were asking USAID, for example, and other departments for an accounting of their money. They would get back nebulous, obscure, obtuse answers, which tells me that the Democrats knew what they were doing. They knew the American people would not want their money spent this way, but they did it anyway. Trump is described as using a "sledgehammer" to attack the establishment, unlike Reagan, and the American people will support him when they realize how bad the situation is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are two different things going on here with the Democrats. The first is they are watching with terror as all the different sources of government money that has propped them up for the last sixty or seventy years, all of it is now being challenged by president Trump and by Elon Musk. I mean, this cuts at the very base of their coalition. And if they can't bribe people, if they can't act corruptly, if they can't take care of their friends, their entire coalition's gonna collapse. Second, you have a very large part of the Democratic party for whom the beliefs you were describing, transgenderism, for example, are religious beliefs.
This is a secular religion. They can't unlock because they believe these things. They believe in an open border. They believe that there really is no such thing as America. They believe that it's really good to have millions of people flood into this country.
It's really good to have people who don't have to work, That work requirements are inherently bad. All of these things are are a semi religious or religious belief system, and that's why they can't unlock. They can it's not rational. They can't sit down and do a common sense analysis. They're instead trapped into being for things that are profoundly unpopular with most Americans.
Speaker 1: There's an untold story behind this money too because congress has a duty called oversight, And there were senators and and congress people that were asking USAID, for example, and other departments for an accounting of their money. They would get back nebulous, obscure, obtuse answers, which tells me that the Democrats knew what they were doing. They knew the American people would not want their money spent this way, but they did it anyway. And then they basically lied to the American people and and would not disclose the true nature of the spending that was actually going on.
Speaker 0: Look. I mean, you to accept that there was a lobbyist bureaucratic empire, that that empire took your money, gave it to its friends even if they were totally incompetent, and then you'll find case after case where your money went out to systems that just don't work. They're that's crazy. And at that time, they were taking care of themselves. What makes president Trump potentially the most consequential president since Abraham Lincoln is the fact Yeah.
That he's taking a sledgehammer, and he is pounding the establishment in a way that no one has since Franklin Roosevelt created it in the nineteen thirties. He's the first person, and I've been a great fan of Ronald Reagan. Reagan defeated the Soviet empire, but he didn't try to take on the American establishment. Trump has had the guts to go straight at it, and I think the American people are gonna be with him even even more so when they learn how really sickeningly bad it is.
@redpillb0t - redpillbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
John F. Kennedy Jr. was considered a front runner for the New York Senate seat in 1999, but died in a plane crash days before Hillary Clinton was elected senator. Mary Mahoney, a Clinton White House intern, was murdered in 1997. White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in 1993, with speculation of foul play. James McDougall, a key witness, died of a heart attack in solitary confinement before testifying.
In 2015, White House chef Walter Scheib was found dead in a river, with his death ruled an accidental drowning. DNC staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed in DC in 2016, amid speculation he leaked DNC emails. Sean Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found dead in his bathroom, with his death reported as classified pending autopsy results. Questions remain surrounding these deaths.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember John f Kennedy junior? He was declared the front runner for the New York senate seat back in 1999. Days later, his plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, and his rival, Hillary Clinton, was elected senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials.
She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997. In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC. He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list of potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougall, a key witness for White House prosecutors. He was serving his three year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas.
And just before he was given testimony before the grand jury, McDougall suffered a heart attack in solitary confinement. In 2015, Walter Scheib, a White House chef hired under Bill Clinton, joined the list. His body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly two miles from the base of the trail he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shive's death was accidental drowning, but he might have known too much. 27 year old Democratic National Committee Stafford, Seth Rich, was shot and killed in DC this year.
There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked emails allegedly sent by DNC staffers and that he may have been murdered in retaliation. Then Sean Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on August 2. His death was reported classified, pending the results of an autopsy. To this day, questions are
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 believes the school system intentionally avoids teaching about money to produce compliant employees. School discourages mistakes, promotes individual work, and seeks single correct answers, which Speaker 0 says is the opposite of real-world success. This paralyzes graduates, killing their spirit of learning.
Speaker 1 relays that children are told not to report bullying to their parents, because parents might bring weapons to school and someone could die. Speaker 1 also states that people shouldn't be judged for wanting to have sex with a five-year-old.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I think in the school system, they don't want us to learn about money because they just wanna pump out good employees that do what they're told. I mean, if you look at school, it's opposite of what it takes to be successful in real life. Don't make a mistake. Do as you're told. Take take tests by yourself.
Don't cooperate. Do it by yourself. Do it on your own. And there's only one right answer. No.
There's tons of answers to a problem. So you come out of school scared to death of making a mistake. You do everything on your own. You don't cooperate. There's no synergy.
There's no brainstorming. And there's only one right answer. Everybody wants to get the right answer. There's no one right answer. So I think people come out of school paralyzed.
I think the school system is criminal in that it kills a child's spirit of learning. You know, some a child goes into school all excited about, yeah, I'm gonna learn and it's gonna be great. And then the teacher says, sit down and shut up.
Speaker 1: Told you what at school? That if you're being bullied what? You can't go home and tell your parents. Why? If it caused the parents to go to the school with weapons, and they'll end up with someone with their life gone.
Taken away? Dad. So this is what they're telling y'all in middle school, to not go home and tell your parents that you're being bullied. Right? That's what they're telling you?
Yeah. Stop calling them that. You're not about to blame them. What? Stop this.
Yeah. Yeah. No. We're not gonna call them that. We're gonna call them mats.
No. Minor attracted persons. No. So don't judge people just because they wanna have sex with a five year old.
@Lauria1960 - 🦨 Uncle Skunkle 🦨
Video Transcript AI Summary
During a committee hearing, a senator questioned a witness about their relationship with Workers Dignity. The senator stated the witness did not disclose their relationship with the group to the committee. The senator claimed the witness told Senator Grassley they had never represented the group, then told Senator Lee they had advised them as a member of a legal advisory board ten years ago. The senator stated the witness then told Senator Cruz they had advised them for three years, and Senator Durbin that it was fifteen years ago. The senator noted the witness's bio lists them as a legal advisor to the group from 2013 to the present, and the Tennessee Bar Association cited this work for their nomination. The witness stated they served on a legal advisory committee for two or three years more than a decade ago, helping them set up as a non-profit. The senator accused the witness of lying to Senator Grassley about doing legal work for the group. The senator then asked if the witness agreed with Workers Dignity's condemnation of Israel's ethnic cleansing of Palestine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let's just let's just get this nailed down. First of all, did you disclose your relationship with workers' dignity to this committee? Don't look at the chairman. Look at me.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure I'm not sure that I included that. I I don't remember, senator.
Speaker 0: Oh, I I think you do. The answer is no. You did not disclose it to this committee. Then you told senator Grassley, I've never represented that group. Then you told senator Lee next that you had indeed advised them and that you'd advise them as a member of a legal advisory board.
You said ten years ago. Right? Then you told senator Cruz that in fact you had advised you told senator Lee you'd advise them briefly. You told senator Cruz, actually, you'd advise them for three years. Then you told senator Durbin that it wasn't ten years ago.
It was fifteen years ago. So what is it exactly? You didn't disclose your association with this radical group to the committee. You're currently listed now. Your own bio lists you as a as a legal adviser to the Workers Dignity Group from 02/2013 to the present.
To the present. The Tennessee Bar Association cited your work with this group for your nomination. So what what is the story? When did you start working for Workers Dignity?
Speaker 1: Senator, more than a decade ago, for two or three years, I served on a legal advisory committee or board.
Speaker 0: So you gave them a legal advice?
Speaker 1: We were helping them set up as a non
Speaker 0: So you represented them. So you lied to senator Grassley earlier when he explicitly asked you did you do any legal work and you said no. Senator In fact, you served on a legal advisory board. That's your testimony now. Correct?
Speaker 1: Senator, I served on this board.
Speaker 0: On a legal advisory board. Correct? Correct. Okay. So you lied to senator Grassley here under oath.
What else have you lied about? Workers' dignity has condemned Israel's ethnic cleansing of Palestine. They have said that Israel is engaged in ethnic cleansing. Do you agree with that?
@QueTCroketa - KettyLove
@deebobbcmaster - deebobbcmaster
@QueTCroketa @RichardEntuboca any updates for me? https://t.co/hIZKEGyZvp
@DickAlupinya247 - Richard Allupinya
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson
