reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @sabback
@sabback - Donna Marie
@TuckerCarlson "Maybe not everything is true that you've heard about me" https://t.co/6jPgpgvUhn
Video Transcript AI Summary
On 04/19/1995, a Gulf War veteran allegedly bombed the Oklahoma City Federal Building with a truck bomb he didn't build or rent, aided by a nonexistent passenger. The bomber was caught due to a missing license plate. The ATF, the supposed target, was empty that morning. The president vowed swift justice, but John Doe number two, identified by 24 witnesses, was deemed nonexistent by the FBI.
The prosecution didn't present CCTV footage of McVeigh and John Doe number two or explain the witnesses' accounts. They also didn't address government truck bomb testing or FBI informants. McVeigh and Nichols were convicted, but some insist the Ryder truck bomb couldn't have caused the damage, citing experts and a second explosive device that was found.
The FBI claims to have lost footage of McVeigh and John Doe number two. Terry Nichols alleges FBI involvement, but he was prevented from testifying. A bomb squad truck was present two hours before the blast, and someone called the Justice Department 24 minutes before the bombing to report it. Governor Keating's brother wrote a novel about a similar bombing with a character named Thomas McVeigh. McVeigh claimed to be a secret special forces operative with an implanted microchip. His execution was delayed due to withheld evidence, then carried out. No autopsy was performed, and the case was closed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you the Oklahoma City bomber?
Speaker 1: Maybe one of the benefits of me talking to you today is that you'll see that maybe not everything is true that you've heard about me.
Speaker 2: On the morning of 04/19/1995, a decorated Gulf War combat vet blew up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City using a truck bomb that he didn't build and a rider truck that he didn't rent with the help of a passenger who didn't exist. Having just gotten away with the largest act of terrorism on US soil to date, the Fort Bragg train Special Forces Sheep Drip Dropout blended in with the crowd by making his getaway in a car without a license plate and was immediately pulled over. The ATF was the supposed target of the attack, but luckily, all of their agents were out of the office that morning. Later that day, the president boldly declared
Speaker 3: We will find the people who did this. And When we do, justice will be swift, certain, and severe. Except for
Speaker 0: John Doe number two. John Doe number two. John Doe number two.
Speaker 2: Who, according to the FBI, never existed. In McVeigh's unprecedented three and a half week trial, the prosecution didn't show the CCTV footage of him and John Doe number two parking the Ryder truck. Didn't explain why 24 separate witnesses mass hallucinated the existence of John Doe number two. Didn't explain why the government testing truck bombs and the army was storing rider trucks at Camp Gruber right before the bombing, and didn't talk to the FBI informants who blew the whistle on the plot. But they did collaborate with the CIA, and they did convict McVeigh as the lone wolf bomber and Terry Nichols as his bomb constructing accomplice.
Still, a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists, including 300 bombing victims, insist on talking about facts and evidence and refuse to simply believe what they've been told a million times by people in tailored suits with well clothed hair. They quote the US army brigadier general the FBI crime lab whistleblower and the inventor of the neutron bomb who point out the physical impossibility that the Ryder truck bomb did the damage to the building, but that doesn't matter because if there were other bombs in the building that day, we would have heard about them.
Speaker 0: The second explosive was found and diffused. I think he said another phone.
Speaker 4: The justice department is reporting that a second explosive device has been found.
Speaker 0: They then found a third device, which was also larger than the first. And I see another bomb truck going, so apparently, they're gonna try to get out that third bomb.
Speaker 2: The FBI claims to have lost the footage showing Mubay and John Doe number two parking the truck in front of the Murrah Building that morning, but that's understandable because the bureau has a lot of important evidence to store. Terry Nichols insists the FBI was involved in the plot, but thankfully a judge has saved us trouble of listening to him by preventing lawyers from deposing him. There was a bomb squad truck parked across the street two hours before the blast, but that just shows the authorities were prepared for anything. And
Speaker 0: Other documents obtained by 2020 show that someone called executive secretary at office at the justice department in Washington and said the Morrow Building had been bombed, but this was twenty four minutes before the blast.
Speaker 2: But that just shows the public was unusually vigilant that morning. Also
Speaker 4: Apparently, before the bombing, governor Frank Keating's brother, Mark, had been working on a novel about a terrorist bombing in Oklahoma City, stranger still. One of the characters in the novel was named Thomas McVeigh.
Speaker 2: But that's probably just a coincidence. McVeigh wrote a letter to his sister where he admitted to being a secret special forces operative and he complained to friends of the pain in his ass from an army implanted microchip, but that's crazy because if he didn't actually leave the army in 1991, there would be proof of that. McVeigh was not executed on 05/16/2001 as scheduled because
Speaker 0: The FBI had failed to turn over thousands of pages of evidence to McVeigh's defense attorneys.
Speaker 2: But the execution went ahead on June 11. In highly unusual and secret agreement, no autopsy was performed. One witness said he was still breathing, and the prison officials admitted his hearse was a decoy. Then the case was officially closed. And if you question any part of the story, you are a paranoid wingnut birther truther, tenth or prepper conspiracy loon who bring up any of these points ever again, ever.
This message has been brought to you by the friends of the FBI, ATF, DOJ, CIA, SBLC, MSN, and the US Army. And remember, ignorance is strength.
@sabback - Donna Marie
@DC_Draino Never forget! https://t.co/v6dBaR8RtS
Video Transcript AI Summary
Disinformation has prolonged the COVID crisis, as some people refuse to wear masks or socially distance. Credibility must be earned; people are scared and need to feel understood. I communicated authentically, sharing my fears about the pandemic, and New Yorkers responded responsibly to the truth.
Normalcy, like eating indoors without masks, requires a widely accepted vaccine, likely months or a year away.
I foresee Trump losing the election but claiming voter fraud. I believe Attorney General Barr is a political tool and that the Supreme Court nomination is aimed at winning a Bush v. Gore-style case on voter fraud. I hope the Supreme Court prioritizes its integrity and doesn't act as a political shield. I am trying to go right to the people and give them the information because I believe they will act responsibly when they get the information that they believe unfiltered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, yeah, it's all disinformation, except some people believe it. And the way the virus works, the people who believe it and then won't wear a mask and don't do social distancing, they keep spreading it. And that's why this country loses more people per day to COVID than many other industrialized nations on the globe because he spreads disinformation, and political polarization has has now spread to public health disinformation.
Speaker 1: What have you learned about leadership in all this? I mean, you look at the president. He said, look. He didn't wanna panic people. I think back to, you know, the daily news conferences you would hold, which I found just very kind of honest and raw, and you said what you knew.
You said what you didn't know. And I don't know.
Speaker 0: I I
Speaker 1: think for a lot of New Yorkers, it felt like, oh, we are all part of this. We we are all in this together.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I look. I think I think that's right. Intuitively, I knew, going in, Anderson, that, credibility has to be earned. You know?
Institutions have lost credibility. It's not enough to say, I'm the governor. I represent New York state. Even, you know, I'm the from the media. I'm from this network.
People discount that now. The credibility is more personal than anything else, and you have to earn it and you have to prove it. And this was a unique moment in time. It still is. People are scared.
That's what this is about. It's about the emotion. It's not really about the information first. It's about the emotion first, and you have to connect with that emotion. And you had to show, the same vulnerability that they were feeling.
And I went first, frankly. I communicated 100% genuine, authentic, my emotional truth, my personal truth. I I was feeling everything other people were feeling with my daughters and my family and my mother, and I was afraid. And I didn't know where we were, and I felt like we were living a science fiction movie, but I trusted the people. I gave them the information.
I never sugarcoated anything. I don't believe, what Trump says. Well, I didn't wanna panic people. You're not a babysitter for people. You're a representative.
People deserve the truth and the facts. And by the way, they're responsible and they're smart. And if you give them the truth and the facts, they will respond. And that's what New Yorkers did. You do it in a way that that, empowers people and unifies people.
But our state, Anderson, that, has so many divisions, upstate, downstate, Democrat, Republican, sexual orientation, religions, we were united in a way that I've never felt it. And it actually was inspiring to me, and it gave me energy. And that's what keeps me going. That's what the book is about. When you give people information and you trust them, they respond in kind.
I believe that. And that's the hope that keeps me going with all this, president in the White House and all this politics. People are good and people are smart, and I'm trying to go right to the people and give them the information because I believe they will act responsibly when they get the information that they believe unfiltered.
Speaker 1: I know it's impossible to say. When do you think the next time in New York City anybody can walk into a restaurant, eat inside, not have to wear a mask, just have a normal night out in a restaurant with other people?
Speaker 0: It would it would have to be you'd have to develop a vaccine. People would have to believe it's a vaccine. You'd have to be able to administer it to 20,000,000 people. It would be months and months or a year at least at least, I believe, before you get to that full normal, if you will.
Speaker 1: You mentioned your daughters. In in your book, you write about how you tried to make a 10 bet with your daughters that president Trump will lose the election, but will then claim voter fraud as the reason he lost, and the attorney general will bring a suit that ends up at the Supreme Court, but the court will rule against him. Your daughter did not take the bet, but you wrote that you'd put even money on that today. Are you still are you still sure of that today?
Speaker 0: Oh, look. Do do I do I see a scenario where Trump loses the election? Yes. Do I believe he will accept the loss? No.
Do I believe Bill Barr is his political tool? Yes. Do I think they wanna, they want to confirm this supreme court justice so that they own the court? And do they think that they could bring a case on voter fraud, which they have been talking about for weeks, Anderson. Right?
They always you always know where they're going if you listen to them. Mhmm. They've been building this voter fraud case. They go to the Supreme Court like Bush v Gore, and I think they think they'll win at the Supreme Court. I think that's their hope, and that's why they want this confirmation now even though it's a political liability.
I believe that's, that's their plan. I don't believe they think they're gonna win on election night. I think they're planning to win at the Supreme Court, and my optimistic self says the Supreme Court's gonna think about the Supreme Court first and their integrity, and they're not going to want to look like a political shield. But, that's that's what the wager is about.
Speaker 1: Your governor, Andrew Cuomo. Appreciate your time. The the new book, American Crisis Leadership Lessons from the COVID nineteen Pandemic, just came out. We appreciate your time.
Speaker 0: Thanks. Thank you, Anderson.
Speaker 1: Thanks, governor. Still to come. Look at the second day of supreme court confirmation hearings, which just ended a few minutes ago. Democratic senator Amy Klobuchar will join us to talk about what judge Amy Coney Barrett would and more often wouldn't answer.
reSee.it AI Summary
Alex Jones highlighted that a bishop who criticized Trump's immigration policies received $53 million in taxpayer funds. He encouraged viewers to watch a live stream for more details. Another user shared a link in response, adding to the conversation.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
HOLY CASH! Bishop Who Rebuked Trump's Immigration Policies From The Pulpit Pocketed $53 Million In Taxpayer Dollars » WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: https://t.co/mgKlD6gcvA https://t.co/4FBsJuS22K
@sabback - Donna Marie
@CollinRugg Remember when Whoopi told Trump she LOVED him? 🤣🤣https://t.co/cMFdlzaKnc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that someone likes them and put them in the movies a long time ago. They claim to have not judged anything, and that "they hate the dog."
Speaker 1 warns not to be fooled by attempts to humanize someone and change perceptions of who they are.
Speaker 0 confirms the discussion is about Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And she likes me. She even put me in the movies. You're saying. She put me in the movies. Right?
A long time ago. So how much did I judge? Nothing. Like, they hate the dog. Premium.
I know. But we hate the dog. Darling, I love you. I'm telling you.
Speaker 1: And they're trying to humanize them and change your idea about who this guy is. Don't fall for that.
Speaker 0: Trump. You're talking about Yeah. Johnny, that's fine.
@sabback - Donna Marie
@amuse Not according to this Former Green Baret/Special Forces sniper https://t.co/QCY5YDaPlv
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a retired Green Beret and sniper, believes the shooting of President Trump was a planned attack due to security measures in place. He questions how a 20-year-old could access the president and take shots without help from insiders. He offers to protect the president for free.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. What's going on, everybody? I'm here to tell you why the shooting of president Donald Trump yesterday, without a doubt in my mind, was a planned and coordinated attack on the president inside our government, our local agency, or police force. Here's why. My name is Matthew Murphy, and I am a retired Green Beret, retired from this special forces group, but I'm also a level 1 sniper, which means that I have graduated the the highest level of training for snipers that you can do in special operations.
We're trained. I'm gonna avoid, confidential or classified terminology. We're trained in assassinations and counter assassinations for the very reason, case in point yesterday, the shooting of president Donald Trump. So first of all, anywhere the president's gonna go, there are teams with the secret service that go out days, if not weeks, if not months before the president will ever be at that spot, and they do a site security assessment, and they do that with a local, police forces and agencies to ensure that every potential security threat or vulnerability is secured and, of course, protected against. Now, this is done way before Donald Trump will ever get there and they know every place that the president will be and the sniper team especially is responsible for ensuring that no one can take a shot at the president.
Now that does not mean that sniper team just sets up with their guns and scans the crowd and shoots. No. What they do, the most important thing they do pre Donald Trump showing up is within a 360 degree environment of that podium of the president, they ensure that there is not a place that is open that will be accessible by someone with a rifle to take a shot at the president. So they make sure those places are barricaded off, unaccessible, and heavily guarded. So there is no way you were gonna get to the place where you could even shoot the president with a rifle before the president shows up.
Then they scan the crowd and those places of the rifle just in case by some miracle you do. Now you're not gonna tell me. I don't care who you are. Don't listen to the media. Nonsense, anyway.
So they most of us would know that by now. That some 20 year old kid that looks like he played Dungeon and Dragons in his mom's basement is trained on a gun, especially a sniper life like that is a registered republican, and then can access anywhere near the vicinity of that crowd of that event with him not dressed in a uniform and that sniper rifle. He was wearing American flag t shirt and pants, and he had a rifle. You're gonna tell me that that kid went through all these levels of security, somehow got into the closest building to the president, then access the rooftop of the closest building to the president, then have the time to unpack his rifle, lay down in the prone, and then take 5 to 8 well aimed shots of the president before he was decisively engaged by the secret services counter cyber teams or a local police department. I don't know who they were.
Most likely police. You're gonna tell me all that happened and a 20 year old kid did that without it being heavily planned, coordinated, and people on the inside making it happen? There's absolutely no way possible that that kid was able to get up there and take those shots at the president without a lot of internal help. So someone in that local or or some people inside that local police department agency whose secret service is compromised and is a threat to our president. So we need to stop worrying about that damn shooter and start worrying about who allowed this shit to happen.
And president Trump, if you need an American to protect you who's actually good at sniping and stopping this crap, give me a call. I'll do it for free. Everybody have a good day. God bless.
@sabback - Donna Marie
@alx Donna Brazile admitted to sending town hall debate topics to Hillary Clinton‘s presidential campaign while she worked for CNN, calling it "A mistake I will forever regret". https://t.co/QZEpEri9PF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donna Brazil admitted to sending debate topics to Hillary Clinton's campaign while at CNN, leading to her departure. The delay in her admission is questioned, with concerns over ethical breaches and the impact on her credibility. The expectation of a Clinton victory may have influenced her actions. The incident highlights the need for transparency and ethical conduct in media and politics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then that she in fact did send town hall debate topics to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign while she worked for CNN that happened a year ago. She's now saying she will, quote, forever regret it in a column in Time Magazine. It took more than a year for Donna Brazil to admit this. CNN ended up cutting ties with Donna Brazil while she was serving as the interim head of the DNC. Tammy, why a year later?
You know, it's
Speaker 1: fascinating because she's still kind of mincing the words here. She said sending debate topics over when the issue was sending direct questions over to her, the specificity of what was happening. Ahead.
Speaker 0: Before the debate. Before the debate. CNN.
Speaker 1: I mean, we knew what the
Speaker 0: topics were going
Speaker 1: to be. That each debate had a general, idea of, you know, of of an approach of what the topics would be. So the topics are not a big deal necessarily, but the nature of the questions and what was coming gonna come from the audience, etcetera. And I think that there's a point where she's now that there's new DNC heads, that she's finding that that kind of behavior, and with her candidate having lost, that it's catching up with her a little bit and she's trying to clean up a little bit.
Speaker 0: Eric, weigh in here. What are your thoughts?
Speaker 2: You know, I'd look, she's got an ethical obligation. I mean, she was certainly a contributor to CNN. There's supposed to be some kind of firewall. There wasn't. And then to wait a year.
And I think that, Tammy's right. I think that there's a gonna be a much higher bar. I think that there she's hurt herself for a long time to come over that. And certainly with the CNN and certainly with other networks, bad move, crossed the line.
Speaker 1: Especially with Hillary losing. The fact that they thought they could really do whatever they wanted because they expected Hillary to win. When she didn't, suddenly the real world
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 2: For all
Speaker 1: of us reenters this picture. No longer is it gonna be their bubble. Now they've got to face reality.
Speaker 0: Tammy, Eric, thank you so much for your time tonight. Have a good weekend. Okay? Thanks.