reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @savingourfolk
@savingourfolk - Nathaniel Westermann ✠
“A Dangerous Method” is the most candid film of the past 30 years on the subjects of clinical psychotherapy, secularization of morality, Jewish vs. ‘Aryanic’ influence in Western thought, and the fundamental differences which exist between our two peoples — something M. Samuel discusses at length in his book ‘You Gentiles,’ but which is still not nearly so entertaining to read as this film is to watch. Special attention should be paid to the last 30 minutes or so, in which Doctors Freud & Jung take a fateful trip to America. Layered dialogue at its finest. Highly recommend.
@savingourfolk - Nathaniel Westermann ✠
Times of Israel has always been remarkably off-the-wall about certain topics. Haven’t checked the archive link, but having seen this piece before, I assume it’s there. EDIT: Here’s the link, along with an added disclaimer about this post being elaborate satire. Thoughts? https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/leaked-report-israel-acknowledges-jews-in-fact-khazars-secret-plan-for-reverse-migration-to-ukraine/ “Editor’s Note: This blog post is a work of satire. It was published in 2014 on the eve of Purim, a Jewish holiday that is celebrated with wild merrimaking and raucous comedy – with a particular emphasis on poking fun at antisemitism and ignorance.” I suppose, ultimately, it makes little difference.
@savingourfolk - Nathaniel Westermann ✠
WORLDWIDE CONCERTED EFFORT TO DESTROY WHITE BIRTH RATES (Credits to Thuletide) “A declassified trio of documents, all produced around 1970, prove that White birth rates have been intentionally destroyed throughout the West. You can find the full reports online at the following links, but highlighted versions are included at the end of this short article: 1. Population Planning, United Nations’ World Bank (1972) 2. Implications of Worldwide Population Growth (‘The Kissinger Report’), US National Security Council (includes CIA, military, etc.) (1974) 3. Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S (‘The Jaffe Memo’), Planned Parenthood on behalf of John D. Rockefeller’s Population Council (1969) The reports explicitly detail techniques to intentionally reduce the birth rates of a population. Almost all of these techniques have been openly implemented throughout the West, excluding one or two of the most extreme options (e.g. forced sterilization), which they may attempt to implement covertly or through a trojan horse. This means that the Replacement Migration agenda was a stereotypical Problem-Reaction-Solution: >Globalists want to transform White civilization into multi-racial-mixed-race civilization. >Globalists intentionally destroy White birth rates via techniques documented below. >Globalists tell us that we need mass migration of non-Whites to “fix” our birth rates. >Globalists get their multi-racial society. Key points found throughout all documents include: •Contraception to be made easily and readily available for women •Expand range of contraceptives available •Treat water supply with chemical birth control agents •Promote and encourage sterilization among all classes •“Indoctrination” of children •Use state education to promote a family limitation message •Use non-state propaganda to shrink “ideal family size” in public image (or demonize the notion of a family entirely, as per Paul Ehrlich’s model for climate activism) •Encourage homosexuality (and transgenderism, alternative lifestyles) •Delay the age of marriage (via social pressure or law) •Encourage women to work full time, seek higher education, find value primarily in pursuit of a career •Encourage women to be politically active as an identity bloc (third wave feminism) •Discourage private home ownership (encourage renting — i.e. the Blackrock/Vanguard project of buying up single family homes) •Taxation and income redistribution Source: https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/06/11/the-intentional-destruction-of-white-birth-rates-leaked-reports-from-planned-parenthood-the-rockefeller-foundation-world-bank-us-nsc-incl-cia-military-etc/
@savingourfolk - Nathaniel Westermann ✠
THE WHITE GENOCIDE EVIDENCE PROJECT — REDUX (ENTRY 1) The campaign to deny the white peoples of the 21st century their ancestral homelands, their constitutionally-protected political representation, and even the psychological legitimacy of their group interests, has been a long and carefully carried-out process spanning decades — even centuries. Much of the battle has been fought through language: or, rather, through the denaturing of language to suit anongoing political agenda. Here's an example of how language is used to disenfranchise and dispossess the white (esp. Anglo-Saxon) majority in Western nations: Both academic sources and web encyclopedias (like Wikipedia) define the concept of "Black pride" as a social movement, arising in response to domination by white cultures and ideologies, which encourages black people to "celebrate black culture and embrace their African heritage." (Now, here's the rub: Was the concept of 'whiteness' devised by me to exclude you? Or was the designation of "black/POC" devised solely by you to exclude me? If the answer is "both" then consider this: of these two constructs, which has more social and political capital in the present day?) But, if I consult the entry for 'White pride' via those same sources… “White pride is a motto primarily used by white separatist, white nationalist, neo-Nazi, and white supremacist organizations to signal their racist or racialist viewpoints." (Were the "Nazis" -- that is, the members of the National Socialist Workers' Party of Germany -- white nationalists? Or were they German nationalists seeking solutions to uniquely German problems?) Perhaps the strangest term which appears in articles like these is “white separatism." To engage in separation from something at a given point demands logically that you belonged to it previously. In other words, this language frames White people as some kind of traitors to humanity (that great, undifferentiated mass in which only we, ostensibly, continue to forego membership) who suddenly ignored their responsibility to be join the 'global village' and decided instead to form an entirely separate (and supremacist/antagonistic) society. The key takeaway here: terms like this not only deny that there is any reality to the concept of race, it also denies that there is any psychological or social validity to one's prerogative of claiming to belong to a different race. That is a unique limitation and debilitation which, in a world seemingly obsessed with the march of 'tolerance' and acceptance of a wide range of viewpoints, is applied only to "white" people -- an oppressive group which, though targeted for ultimate destruction through coercive measures, simultaneously doesn't even really exist! From Wikipedia... “Sociologists Betty A. Dobratz and Stephanie L. Shanks-Meile identified “White Power! White Pride!” as “a much-used chant of white separatist movement supporters”,[5] and sociologist Mitch Berbrier has identified the use of this phrase as part of a “new racist … frame-transformation and frame-alignment by (a) consciously packaging a ‘hate-free’ racism, (b) developing strategies of equivalence and reversal–presenting whites as equivalent to ethnic and racial minorities, and (c) deploying ideas about ‘love,’ ‘pride,’ and ‘heritage-preservation’ to evidence both their putative lack of animosity toward others as well as their ethnic credentials.”[6] Anti-racist critics argue that the idea of “white pride” is an attempt provide a clean or more palatable public face for white supremacy and white separatism; it is an appeal to a larger audience in hopes of inciting more widespread racial violence”. We are about 8.5% of the world populace now (and that's a very liberal estimate); women of child-bearing age who share our unique characteristics are a mere 2%, but they have a right to be called minority while we have not. They claim “White” does not exist, and that our rebellious separation from a now-united mankind is the only thing that make us different. Still, when it comes to getting rid of the problem, they seem to have no trouble deciding exactly who it is that needs erasing (read: killing).
@savingourfolk - Nathaniel Westermann ✠
SOME THOUGHTS ON INCENTIVIZING HIGHER WHITE BIRTH RATES (an article originally posted to JWO by Awake Goy, with additions and revisions by myself as a nascent data scientist) “Like with most sociological mass efforts in the modern world, staging an effort to save white birth rates (from the near ruin to which they have plummeted) in the 21st century will begin with computer-assisted data collection. Without relevant data to draw from, we cannot actually convince anyone of any significance that our approach can work. Young people, especially young women, in various Western nations must be polled (vis-a-vis standardized questionnaire) according to the following guidelines: Q: “In a perfect world, where you can have whatever you want from the government…” •Under which circumstance would you be willing to have many children? •Perhaps if the government allows you to earn a degree and work at home? •Perhaps if for every two children the government provides with a nanny? •Perhaps if you can have children without marrying? •Perhaps if the economic system makes sure that having a big family will not be difficult? •Perhaps if many children means getting a big house with employees to help you (these employees could be young white students who need an extra income as a temporary job)? etc. Be creative! We have to encourage the people, especially the young women, questioned in these instances to be comfortable in their responses and to have fun — as a value-free thought experiment, without the banality of social concerns or the demand to keep up with social norms, all of which will heavily skew the responses here. After all, if the new ways in which women turn out to be willing to have more children happen to be classed as ‘immoral’ (whether by the media complex or some other influential entity which pays them), it doesn’t matter — moral systems are only a subsidiary offshoot of human societies; thus, as long as we have children, even if through immoral ways, these societies will develop moral systems that will reflect their racial moral sensibilities (as long as they are racially homogeneous). Though it might pain me to say so as a cradle Catholic, one whose catechistic belief and firm conviction is that we must live morally — before any of the ideal moral life can happen, common sense dictates that we must must first remain alive! Step three would be to translate the information into a plan for a new socioeconomic system that serves our race (not a parasitic subclass) — but even before that, step two will involve collecting the same stochastic data from young white men through a specially-tailored form of polling. This is something cheap, fun, and relatively easy to do — we just need a set of volunteers (which either an org like mine or maybe NLI can provide) who are willing to go out to the streets and ask these questions making it look like a sociological study. Of course, the first volunteer here is me — Nathaniel “Literally Who” Westermann — but we need parsable data samples from many different white countries. That’s where digital organization comes in handy. Raising white birth rates is so important that I don’t care if we have have to offer women free monthly escapades to designer shopping outlets, the latest beauty interventions money can buy, or conflict diamonds in order to convince them — for my God-ordained duty of folk preservation, I would go to any length of effort to do my duty, and would happily sacrifice the balance of my own life to augment our collective one. Interested parties may reach out if they so desire. I am no stranger to the research side of things, but input on how best to go about this process is always welcome. The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step — and to fail by never trying at all is the only sure regret in this world, the only unpardonable sin on the eyes of our Crestor.”
@savingourfolk - Nathaniel Westermann ✠
MONOCULTURAL POLITICAL ORGANIZING IN A MULTICULTURAL AGE Spontaneous multiracial protests with a populist bent are a good way to handle general measures like the ridiculous EU digital wallet/ID mandate which has just passed across the pond. Want to make the globalist agenda drivers skittish? Turn their diversity propaganda against them by showing them that many different demographics hate their oppressive economic protocols with a comparable level of passion. When it comes to protests regarding mass immigration, however, a tone and tenor should be firmly set by any organizer which stresses the importance of identity and homogeneity: Germany for the Germans. England for the English. America for the Americans. One principle of organizing does not contradict another -- racial identarianism can "disguise" and propagate itself much more easily within a broader populist movement. When the time arrives, it may then then unmask itself to fight its own battles in the ongoing demographic war. The more hatred and resentment there is of the existing "elite" -- the internationalist Jews, the freemasonic race traitors, the transhumanist slime and technocratic opportunists -- the better our chances will be of breaking through the existing "hedge" around political power. Agitate, agitate, agitate. No level of chaos short of absolute bedlam is sufficient for what we're planning. But, in the course of your agitation, remain the most organized minority there is amidst many disparate factions of the unshriven and unclean.
@thewhiteflight - Nathaniel Westermann ✠
Apologies for the delayed response. Here you go: