reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @shaunmmaguire
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
America, this is where we’re at
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
This is a miscalculation by Norway of epic proportions These American submarines are patrolling Northern waters for European security Whatever one’s personal views are, it’s foolish to lose sight of the power dynamics
@amuse - @amuse
UKRAINE: Norway's largest marine fuel company refused to sell diesel to a US Navy Virginia-Class attack submarine after Zelensky's disastrous Oval Office meeting. While the fuel was only for the USS Delaware's backup diesel engine, this is the first time a NATO member refused a fellow NATO member fuel for a military vessel. It may be time for the US to exit NATO.
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
I’d love to know what USAID’s $2.1B to Gaza was used for https://t.co/4kJ020fX3T
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
For anyone new to the issue of “mass rape gangs” in the UK Which have been operating for decades And which have been covered up systematically I highly recommend you watch @TRobinsonNewEra’s doc Also, Tommy is in jail for releasing this https://t.co/ZDAYiLn3j4
Video Transcript AI Summary
This documentary reveals the manipulation of the justice system and media to silence dissent and control narratives. It highlights a playground incident involving a Syrian refugee, Jamal, and a British boy, Bailey, which was sensationalized by the media, leading to severe consequences for Bailey. The documentary questions the accountability of the media and legal system, revealing how they can distort the truth for their agendas. It discusses the repercussions of this incident, including threats against Bailey's family and the broader implications for free speech in the UK. Ultimately, it calls for public awareness and accountability, urging viewers to support the fight for truth and freedom of expression.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The documentary you're about to watch is the most important documentary I've ever made. This story is far bigger than Tommy Robinson. This is about the weaponization and the politicization of these buildings. Court buildings across the west. The Royal Courts of Justice, ironically named.
These buildings have been weaponized and used against members of the public to destroy them if they speak out. From Donald Trump to Steve Bannon, to Gert Wilders, to Marie Le Pen, to Katie Hopkins. That's what's happening. My job as a journalist, I stand for freedom of speech. I stand for freedom of press.
And I failed. Because 3 years ago, when I lost a court case in here, then they banked me to the tune of £1,600,000. On a documentary, you're gonna see the entire story was a lie. Okay? I failed because I should have come out of court and I should have played you that film.
Why didn't I play you that film? Because I was given a gagging order by this building, by this judge. I was silent and I allowed them to silence me because I was scared. I was scared of 2 years in prison. I was scared of the effect that solitary confinement for that length of time would have on me.
I was scared of jihadi gangs in jail and I was scared of the effect it would have on my family. I failed me and I failed you. I'm not gonna fail myself again. You're now gonna watch the best citizen journalism and the most incredible expose of the establishment you've ever seen. The news is how we find out what's happening in the world.
It's how we form our opinions. Opinions based on facts. That's the key. Facts. Facts should be delivered to you by journalists based on the truth.
But what if what they're delivering you isn't the truth? What if it's stories that are manipulated to make you think a certain way, to follow a certain narrative, different people's agendas? And what do they do to those who go against that mainstream narrative? Those who try to expose the truth. This is a documentary about the lengths they will go to to shut down and silence anyone from bringing you, the British public, the truth.
Alright. Smell me off. Obviously, not me.
Speaker 1: I lost my job over this. No. I'm just kidding this.
Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit.
Speaker 3: He's won the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it.
Speaker 2: Well, it's all very liberating.
Speaker 4: This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. I'm not
Speaker 5: standing.
Speaker 0: You're not going, but No. Because no. Because what yous are doing, I know what yous are doing.
Speaker 6: Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, aye. This is a documentary
Speaker 0: about the a documentary about the unholy alliance between the media, the justice system, and our politicians. How they conspire to suppress free speech, how they pervert democracy, and how the truth and your freedoms are just 2 of the casualties. We will show how the mainstream media deceives people, how they ignore the truth, how the lies of the virtue signalling, BBC, IT Fear, and Channel 4 are all about their poisonous agenda, no matter the cost to innocent people. It's also a documentary about how an everyday playground incident between 2 young lads was spun into global news at a terrible cost to so many people, not least the 2 young lads themselves. We will show how the law is being abused, how people driven by hateful ideologies attempt to intimidate and silence anyone who dares to challenge the so called progressive, so called liberal narrative.
We will show the foolishness of our fear driven political leaders who jumped on a story, took a side without knowing the truth, or worse still, knowing it but hiding it because the truth didn't fit their narrative regardless of the human cost. And we'll ask 3 important questions. Firstly, is the media accountable to anyone in any way for what they report? Years after the Levinson inquiry, has anything changed, or do they continue to act with impunity? Secondly, is our legal system still fit for purpose?
We will show how lawyers who hate Britain but love jihadi warriors have weaponized the law system against us and how the legal system really only works for the rich. And finally, how do we keep our politicians accountable? If the police, the cause, and the state can silence anyone for speaking inconvenient truths, truths that may raise questions about government policy? Is the UK any different from China, Russia, or Iran in their treatment of dissidents? And, of course, for Piers Morgan, for Jeremy Fine, for the BBC ITV, and channel 4, it's a tutorial on journalism.
Keep watching it. You'll learn. Our story appears to start and end in a brief playground incident at Ormondbury Community School in Huddersfield. A playground scuffle. One boy poured a bottle of water on another child.
The school dealt with it and that should have been that. 3 weeks later, however, a video clip of the incident surfaced and within hours, with the help of lawyers and the ignorant rant ins of ITV's Piers Morgan and the BBC's Jeremy Vine, it was made into global news event. And the lives of so many people were turned upside down. Such playground incidents happen every day. So why was this spat between 2 boys transformed into global news?
Well, one of the boys was white and the other a Syrian refugee, at which point the truth of the matter was buried beneath an avalanche of agendas and opportunism. Within hours, the race hate brigade was sharpening their blades.
Speaker 7: But clearly when somebody comes from Syria fleeing Assad's regime, coming to a place like this, when they get treated that way, that's an issue, and the whole world is looking at us.
Speaker 0: Where are we? We're in Almunbury. Do I say the scene of the incident? Is it a scene in it's the incident? It's the scene of the great lie.
I call it the great lie because this lie was pushed around the globe. Yeah? This here is the school where the world was told a Syrian refugee was waterboarded by a racist English bully. It was in a playing field here, and do you know what? This is the first time I've been here.
Because when this blew up on the news, it's a child's school. Kids are in school. I didn't come outside here. You see the scenes outside here where the imam was here with mobs of men. Yeah?
Mobs of Muslim men. Extremists traveled up from London such as Ali Dua to cause a scene outside this this kids' school. Anyway, but I'm here. Why am I here? I'm here because I faced a court case.
I'm being prosecuted. It's gone it's gone to the high court, and I have to prove I made a video stating that it was a lie, stating that Jamal wasn't innocent, and telling some facts about Jamal beating up girls, an instance that I've been warned about by the members of this community to tell the truth about what happened at this school. I've gotta prove it in court, so I've come to Huddersfield. I'm now gonna knock. I need to find witnesses.
I've got addresses for many. I need to knock and talk to them and see who I can get to come to court to help me prove to you, the public, this is about as much as proven in court as proving to you, the British public, that I was the only journalist in the country who told the truth about what happened in this community. The story you were told. You were told a vulnerable Syrian child refugee had been bullied and waterboarded by a nasty white boy. You were told it was a racist attack.
You were told of the dangers of Far Right extremism. You were invited to agree that this kind of intolerance could not be tolerated. Was he vulnerable? Was it a racist attack? Our evidence shows the answers to both these questions was no.
Was the Syrian lad waterboarded? Why was this word used? What about this? No. Was that waterboarding?
Take a look at this. It shows a group of non white children beating up a white girl. It went viral online, but it wasn't touched by the mainstream media. It wasn't made into a global story. Why not?
Meanwhile, the usual suspects had lit the fire and were gleefully stoking the flames.
Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution.
Speaker 0: And of course, the politicians. They're always quick to jump on the bandwagon. Theresa May, Sajid Javid, Naz Shah, Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill's grandson. Such moral outrage. And it's not just the media and the politicians.
In today's Twitter and Facebook driven worlds where celebrities and groups compete to virtue signal, most of them driven by the warm feeling they get by expressing their moral outrage or by fear. The fear of what might happen to them if they don't. Everyone who's anyone pumped the Bailey Jamal story. Boxers, Lennox Lewis, Huddersfield Football Club, celebrities from across the globe. Let's have a look at all of the celebrities and Blue Tick Brigade who pumped the Jamal story.
And here are some of the people who pumped the story you watched earlier of the white girl getting beaten up. Sadly, whether it's politicians, celebrities, or other groups, None of them are wise enough or pause long enough to ask whether they have the whole story, to check the facts, to find the truth. But why let the truth get in the way of such a good story? And this story was just too good a story. 2 lads in a playground scrap is not international news, but racist white thug water boards helpless Syrian refugee.
Boom. Racism can't be tolerated. Beware of the far right. That's their kind of story. We'll hear more about the militant left later but they clearly weren't gonna miss out on this.
Speaker 7: Well, we well, representing might be too harsh a word, but I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm here as as a concerned citizen.
Speaker 0: Mohammed Amin Pandur, a Mufti on a mission. He rushed to Ulman Bire from his mosque in Bali, a town at the far end of the district. In fact, there's 40 mosques closer to this school. But perhaps Mufti Pandor had his own agenda. You see, his little brother, Councillor Shabir Pandor, is the leader of Kirkland East Councilman Huntsfield.
And they were having some pretty bad news days at that time. By the way, Mufti Pandor, he's the same guy who ordered the Islamic mob to come to the school in Batley and demand the second of the RE teacher who showed a cartoon of Mohammed in a discussion about free speech.
Speaker 7: Look look at what we do as a community, and you'll understand our stance. So what has happened is totally unacceptable. Yeah? And we have made sure that the school understands that. The teacher has been suspended.
The teacher has been suspended.
Speaker 0: You may recall the teacher had to flee, and he's still in hiding under police protection. Luckily, he hasn't ended up like Samuel Patti, the French teacher who's beheaded for having a similar discussion in a classroom about free speech. You see, free speech is essential for any society wishing to maintain intellectual and social progress, but not all societies are bothered about intellectual and social progress. Should we be silenced by the demands of Mufti Pandor and Sharia Law? Should we sacrifice our freedom of speech?
Should we sacrifice the free and open exchange of ideas? Should we sacrifice the cultural inheritance of which we are all custodians? But back to the bad news days in Kirklees and the playground incident in 2018. There was also Kirklees counselor, Masood Ahmed.
Speaker 9: I'm not aware of there's a problem at the school. That's something I obviously need to find out in terms of that there is a problem at this school, and that is something I will definitely be picking up.
Speaker 0: Now some of you may remember this.
Speaker 10: Michael, are you gonna explain what's gonna happen next? Right?
Speaker 0: Are you being arrested?
Speaker 7: You won't be arrested.
Speaker 0: I am being arrested.
Speaker 11: A breach of peace.
Speaker 0: I'm of course.
Speaker 5: Of the I'm of
Speaker 7: course a breach of peace.
Speaker 0: I'm being arrested. The content of what
Speaker 5: you're Can
Speaker 12: we just
Speaker 5: say streaming The content of what I'm streaming told. I'm being
Speaker 10: arrested for breach of peace. The game. I've been
Speaker 0: Can you
Speaker 13: just turn off your
Speaker 12: life, please? Yeah.
Speaker 5: Do you want to someone just What's that?
Speaker 14: Can you
Speaker 0: just explain it again? You want to
Speaker 14: rest in suspicion
Speaker 5: following the breach of the people?
Speaker 0: What what does that mean? What what does that mean? At the same time as this playground spat between 2 young lads, 20 Huddersfield men were being jailed across Yorkshire at Leeds Crown Court for what would be the biggest grooming gang Britain has ever seen. Ultimately, 35 almost exclusively Muslim men would be given 380 years in prison for grooming, trafficking, and raping young children, most of whom were known to counsely Pandora's Kirklees Council. Mufti Pandor traveled for half an hour to rabble rouse a gang outside the school gates over this playground incident.
When within a couple of mile radius in Batley, police have arrested a further 99 men in relation to historic sex crimes. So far 32 have been charged including 1 Ibrahim Pandor, 41 of Batley. That makes it the highest destination of grooming gang arrests anywhere in the UK. We Googled to see what Mufti Pandor has said about these grooming gang atrocities. Nothing.
We Googled to see what counsel and sued Ahmed's condemnation. Nothing. In fact we can't find the condemnation from the of these brother either, Councillor Shabir Pandor, leader of the council. Just one statement from him reported in June 2019, telling the National Working Group of Child Sexual Eratiation Response Unit that his authority had moved forward. That's it.
They've moved on. Never mind grooming gangs, gang rape of young children, all these men seem to be far more concerned about what happened in a playground at Ormerbury Community School or about cartoons of their prophet Mohammed. I think I now realize how difficult this is gonna be because everyone we've spoke to today,
Speaker 1: they're all confirming what I
Speaker 0: said was true. Everyone's confirming what Jamal was like, including school staff. But as soon as I mention this camera, as soon as I mention court, I need someone to come to court, they're just totally silent straight away. No. We no.
No one can have said that. No one can have said this. You jump in. It's raining. But I'm realizing how difficult it's gonna be but I have got an idea for that now after today.
So but first stop, McDonald's. Yeah? Let's go to McDonald's because I'm starving. It's been a long day.
Speaker 14: Yeah. I'll see you on a YouTube.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: Nice to
Speaker 14: see you.
Speaker 0: Smaller in real life. Nice to see you.
Speaker 5: Nice to meet
Speaker 0: you, mate.
Speaker 14: Sorry. I'll put your interview.
Speaker 0: No. I'm fine. Thank you. Cheers, though. You're good.
Yeah. Thanks, man. Oh, man. Very nice to see you. Oh, thank you, bro.
Hello?
Speaker 2: Steve, how
Speaker 0: are you, mate? It's Tommy. How
Speaker 12: are you?
Speaker 0: I'm good, mate. Doing good. Bro, mate, have you still got all those hidden cameras?
Speaker 5: Yeah. Of course, I have. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Could I borrow them? You need Yeah. But when I say borrow them, can I borrow I'm gonna need to take them for weeks because I've got so much to do? It's a long story. I'll explain when I see you.
But, I'm in a bit of a situation. I need some hidden cameras.
Speaker 5: This is not a problem. I have put some kit together for you.
Speaker 0: That's it. So that's the idea. The idea is I've got a friend there, secret Steve, who has all sorts of cameras, yeah. He's a he's a private investigator. I need to show the public everything I've heard today.
I need the public to hear and know the truth. I need them to know how much they've been lied to by the media about what happened in this town. And, the only way, unfortunately, the only way I'm gonna be able to do that is with hidden cameras. Because today, I've heard the truth, but I need everyone of you to know the truth, and everyone's too scared. That's why I said Project Fear.
Everyone is too scared to speak the truth or to come to court. So I'm gonna end up getting I'm gonna end up getting hammered in court. The whole world told I've lied when I haven't. I was the only journalist in the UK who told the truth. So we need to prove it.
So we'll shoot down the motorway now. We'll go get these hidden cameras. These are all so this is a tie. There's a camera in that. That's the camera.
Mad, isn't it? There's a camera there. You've got everything here. Cameras, glasses. I don't wear glasses.
That's gonna be awkward. That's the bottom of a cup coffee cup. So you put that on the bottom of the coffee cup. I feel like James Bond. This today, that's the camera.
I'll have to take this off, but it doesn't matter because apparently this records all the audio, records everything. That's the camera and I feel a little bit dirty doing this. But it is the only way I'm gonna get people to speak. And then I need you to hear what I hear.
Speaker 1: The idea that people would move over the streets looking for him was appalling. The fact that the video itself, although it showed the accumulation of things that built up to that, did not deserve what happened to him or to anybody else in that situation. We knew that I'm afraid the media, I call it a perfect storm. I was getting, emails from Pakistan, from Australia, from America telling me to resign. So it went worldwide, and I'm afraid I came into teaching to help poor people, and they got me today.
I've got a problem here. I lost my job over this. And as a result, the council has told me that I cannot speak to anybody ever about it. So unfortunately When you asked to go over to me about anything? I was there when it happened.
I was there when I dealt with all the situation. And then, Ofsted came, then Trevor wasn't there anymore. That's that's all I can say. Well, I can't get a job. So that's where it's left me.
And I can live with that, but barely only 15. I'm not with her. That's different.
Speaker 12: It's got a
Speaker 1: pretty good man. It's a young man with No. No. If I do,
Speaker 5: I think
Speaker 0: you get
Speaker 1: myself into
Speaker 12: real trouble. No. Okay.
Speaker 1: I thought really serious trouble. Little trouble because partly cancels You signed an NDA or something? Correct. So they've said, you can't be split free. I'm not with the NDA so you keep the pension.
So you get pension? Yeah. Fucking hell, bro. I have to be very careful about what I say to it. I'm not allowed to talk about it.
I really am not. So I can't discuss it. I can't discuss it with the media. I always wanted to have my say against it, which I've never had, Never been allowed to have. Never be allowed to say goodbye to my staff.
They're just told to leave. So I've worked there nearly 30 years. Actually, 20 years and never got a card, never got a goodbye. This whole thing was just used. The whole thing was used.
Yes. Could push him in over there. And hijacked and by by by the right of it politic I'm quite a political person by the right and the left. It was hijacked and spun all out of the position and now we've got problems. That's interesting.
What? I thought she looked 1 more meters of all the silence. What a mess. It is a it is a mess, but but it's a tragedy. It's a tragedy for Bailey.
I'm not sure, Jamar, will get anything out of this ever in his life, positive out of it either. Necessarily, might have he might have got a few, silver coins from Julius, but that's about it. You know, that that's it. The thing is that they haven't 6 weeks, prior or weeks prior. And then in the same day at the same time, if you look for the to go fund me up, the site was released.
Yeah. Now you see your full picture together?
Speaker 0: Already, that's gold. Yeah. I know that's gold. All I hope, I hope that's recorded. I can't turn a computer on.
So I just pray that's got the audio and the visual and it's not pointing up there that we've got it because that was the head teacher and that's the first visit. And I know this is gonna work. So I now need I know just off that, I didn't think he'd talk before he shut the door on my face. He didn't. He seemed like he wanted to talk.
There's a lot he wants to say. So but, yeah, let's go. Next stretch. Yeah? It's exciting.
Was there a racism problem in the school and
Speaker 5: Well, no. I don't I don't I don't think there was.
Speaker 0: What about other Syrian refugees? Like, do you think what happened to Jamal in the school was because he was a Syrian refugee?
Speaker 5: No. Not at all. I told you before That that would have happened
Speaker 1: No, ma'am.
Speaker 5: If the child was white, big, blue, whatever color.
Speaker 0: They're all scared.
Speaker 5: Yeah. A lot of careers on there. I work for operation service now.
Speaker 0: You do now?
Speaker 5: Yeah. So I don't know where I stand with it. If I go, I could lose the job.
Speaker 0: What about if you know, I don't want You
Speaker 5: know what someone said? I work
Speaker 0: I get it, bro.
Speaker 5: I work for probation service now. You see, if
Speaker 0: I didn't work for You see, if you're someone
Speaker 5: If I didn't if I didn't work for the fucking public sector no more, I'd say, god, they can go fuck themselves. They can't. You know what I mean?
Speaker 0: So they seem to be pretty keen on these NDAs.
Speaker 1: Who is that?
Speaker 5: That is counsel. But I can't disclose that with you.
Speaker 0: That's what?
Speaker 5: Lords. I'm saying I can't disclose it because I Yes. Assigned it.
Speaker 1: That incident was talked about by Theresa May at a g twenty summit. He asked her a question about it. We were then offsteaded by 5 of the top inspectors in the country. We'd only send 1 registered inspector. We have the head of safeguarding.
We are I had a member speaking to me about it. If you want my opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shut that school. Get up there and get rid of this.
Speaker 0: Get rid of the problem.
Speaker 1: Over to the Bailey.
Speaker 0: Correct. Over to Mal.
Speaker 12: Correct. Get rid
Speaker 1: of the problem. Over to Mal. Correct. Get rid of the problem. Get rid of it.
But why do you think that is? Do you think because I'm not Jamal. Jamal, because he come here 2 years ago. I've got so many negative things said about it now for so many people. Well, I mean, so many.
You in a few before. We have non Syrian children. Non families. Yep. We're not one issue.
Speaker 0: Well, Well, my my view is
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: That you won't get much of an answer out of all because you work there and it's bound by various confidentiality. So
Speaker 1: Long disclosure of business.
Speaker 0: Do you get paid as well? Not been to me. They all have. Every teacher got paid not to tell the truth. But the head teacher can't even talk about Jamelle at all.
Speaker 2: No. No. They cannot.
Speaker 1: Both, can you? Shouldn't it?
Speaker 0: Well, if you work it out, it must be a good one.
Speaker 1: Mustn't it? Did
Speaker 0: you work there as well?
Speaker 2: No. I was the chair of goodness there. But so it's it's not What my issue
Speaker 0: is is
Speaker 2: you're not gonna get anywhere.
Speaker 1: No. No. No. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And Rob wouldn't talk to you either. So it's
Speaker 0: They're trying to
Speaker 13: It's pointless me even giving you I told but
Speaker 0: I told the truth. Your contact details Okay.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't work with us.
Speaker 0: I told the truth about what happened that day.
Speaker 10: I am not even arguing.
Speaker 0: His life was destroyed.
Speaker 2: Well, that's not fair either, is it?
Speaker 0: As a racist bully, and he won't. And he wasn't. I know. And
Speaker 2: I both know that.
Speaker 15: Truth is just
Speaker 1: How much money is it?
Speaker 5: I can't see the figure because if I see the figure, it goes out.
Speaker 1: Because, mate
Speaker 0: 18. 18. I've just found out. Well, the head teacher's told us already that he was blackmailed and threatened. I've just found out of Kumar.
He was paid £18,000. Paid he said, I can't take I signed. I I was paid. So paid what? He was paid money by the local council, so he can't tell the truth about what's going on in that school.
Then they've they've give everyone non disclosure agreements from school staff to governors to and and Paul Coomar to get £18,000. He's not even involved. If you live here, if you live in this area, your tax money he's got 18 grand what must the head teacher have got? He must have got 6 figures. How much money have they spent on this lie?
We put in a freedom of information request to Kirklees Council to find out exactly how much they had spent of taxpayers' money to get the silence of their staff. They didn't answer the first request. They avoided the second. Only when we sent them legal letters because they have to, by law, answer these questions, did we get our answer. They had spent over a quarter of £1,000,000.
£275,000 of taxpayers' money was spent making people remain silent. But they've they've they've spent money silencing everybody, so no one can ever this is for ever, once you sign that agreement, no one can ever tell the truth While they push this manufactured lie that destroyed lives, schools, communities, everyone's life. I've seen life after life after life, person after person's life destroyed, while the council, your local council, Kirkley's council, give away 100 of £1,000 to make sure that the truth can never be told. I can't believe it. I knew from day dot, I asked myself the question, when this was blowing up and I knew the truth, I kept saying, how come no teacher is telling the truth?
If all those teachers know what's going on in that school, how come none of them are coming out and saying? Well, now we know. Now the whole world's gonna know, because corporate council paid them not to. Unbelievable. Unbelievable.
Jamal was in India?
Speaker 3: Yeah, he was in the same
Speaker 12: well. What was his what
Speaker 0: was Jamal's attitude about in school?
Speaker 3: He wasn't very nice. He called female teachers bitches. He just didn't really have respect for the female students, to be honest. Yeah. Basically, we were in a p lesson, and we were playing hockey with a teacher called Mr.
Cattell. And I had taken the hockey puck off of Jamal, because I was on the other team, and sent it to the other side of the room where my team mates were. And I then turned around and just felt a really sharp pain in my back, and he'd swung the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it.
Speaker 0: Is there do you think there's any way that could have been an accident?
Speaker 3: No. It knocked me to my knees.
Speaker 0: It knocked you to your knees. How how long have your mom been in school when this happened?
Speaker 3: About 2 weeks. I've had lasting injuries from it. It's caused me to have severe pain in my top in the top of my back and, I'm on medication for the pain.
Speaker 0: Still now?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Did
Speaker 0: Jamelle get in trouble for this?
Speaker 3: Not that I'm aware of.
Speaker 0: First, I wanna apologize to anyone I've been forced to record with a hidden camera. Sadly, people are terrified to tell the truth because of the potential consequences, but the truth still needs to be told.
Speaker 1: Do you know if you do remember of any any incident specifically with tomorrow with those?
Speaker 2: Well, do you remember that one there, it it got go with octetick, won't it?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Charlie.
Speaker 2: Charlie. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Don't get the name there. Yeah. You must go. Lovely little girl. Yeah.
Speaker 2: It just
Speaker 0: wrote to him
Speaker 2: of not sure to bloody nasty. No
Speaker 10: he was, like, to the side of me. So he tried, like, pushing me and, like, so I quickly moved out there because obviously I knew what he would like. He would have actually hit me and stuff. Mhmm. So I moved and then he, like, moved his arms if he were gonna try and stop my face, like, back.
Okay.
Speaker 0: And he dropped but he did, but on that day, he spat
Speaker 1: at you. What was on? Where'd the spit go?
Speaker 10: Like, literally, all on me and if I'm outside and all down the school bag. Because when I went home, I told mum and mum we were disgusted in it. But the school said that that because it was outside of school time, so can't really do much about
Speaker 5: it. Okay.
Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit.
Speaker 1: Was he?
Speaker 2: Yeah. And dad.
Speaker 1: 2.
Speaker 2: Everybody and anybody. It does it has no respect for women at all. None. Did he even snap? No response from
Speaker 12: him? No.
Speaker 2: I told I told his father to all this on phone.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 4: Jamal grabbed him by his tie and was just threw him against the wall, cracked his head up and he gets back at wall and just kept throwing against the wall. This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. That's just intent to kill.
Speaker 1: Were they?
Speaker 10: They had, a young lad and a girl. And they were absolutely they were horrendous. The kids, they were just horrific. The the kids that they are, they used to bully the kids.
Speaker 1: Oh, Jamal. Yeah.
Speaker 0: See, what was
Speaker 12: what
Speaker 5: was Jamal like though? The dickhead.
Speaker 0: Was he?
Speaker 5: He spent he he came to isolation a few times. He want he want perfect child?
Speaker 1: No. No.
Speaker 5: He was the same. Well, you know what Joe Biden did, don't you?
Speaker 0: He was in isolation? Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: That's what he's in other times.
Speaker 0: Was he?
Speaker 12: Yeah. What
Speaker 0: was he like, though?
Speaker 5: Troublesome, Charles. Yeah. He's a makeup fucking star, he's
Speaker 0: He used to make up stories.
Speaker 5: Yeah. At at one stage, I think you see something to do with your sister. Somebody said something to his sister that I was in isolation. I just go come out and he was waiting outside isolation. I wanted to be the girl or for someone.
I can't can't remember.
Speaker 0: He want to be here. Yeah.
Speaker 5: They did ask someone to his sister. Just one second. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No problem.
Speaker 5: Yeah. No problem. Well, you you you you want you want he used to lie lie a lot.
Speaker 0: But this whole thing was built with what he said. And if you lied a lot, light, it's a big problem.
Speaker 1: What was that over?
Speaker 5: Him. Oh, no. It's whatever. Oh, no. It's whatever.
Or we want this or not. Did you
Speaker 0: like that with lots of kids? Not really. No. Just certain kids?
Speaker 12: Yeah. I would
Speaker 0: say I'm like, he's got an insurance group. So he thought he could? Yeah. Yeah. So he just randomly attacked you?
Yeah. Yeah. What about, your mom your mom just sank about he puts anything between his hands?
Speaker 16: Oh, yeah. It was a compass.
Speaker 17: I remembered it yesterday. It was just as you went.
Speaker 16: It was a compass. He got he got a compass, and he was going around like when
Speaker 0: he got to be
Speaker 16: with proper hearted to be able to be believed in everything. And I think it was miss Ennis that proper gave him a top telling off
Speaker 0: Okay. You know, you said so so say say like that instant there. You said some girl said something to my sister, and he walked away outside to beat her up. Well there are testimonies from several children who alleged they were being bullied by him. Younger children.
Little girls. Mostly girls. Is Jamal the innocent victim? You've been told. I gathered these testimonies over just a few hours filming in Huddersfield.
I could have carried on.
Speaker 5: Yeah. I was waiting outside my pleasure to be the yellow.
Speaker 0: And about the noise. Yeah.
Speaker 5: I'll say about Juwani used to tell fibs. There was several times he got investigated, and it just fucking turned out to be fucking lies.
Speaker 0: The fact he always lied is a big point. The fact that you know that the police the the school investigated incidents where he said things happened Yeah. And they turned out to be made up. Yeah.
Speaker 5: It was thieves. They couldn't have happened. It could happen because of of the one. The child were even in school that he accused.
Speaker 0: I can remember. Oh my god. Yeah. Oh my god.
Speaker 5: So I'm sure he accused us another guy called Jaden. I can't remember his last name.
Speaker 0: Called what?
Speaker 5: Jaden.
Speaker 0: Jaden.
Speaker 5: He accused he accused Jaden or someone. I'm a mean miss any investigative of complex.
Speaker 2: Not very likable, really.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 2: You know, about what we're gonna do to sisters and what have you bury aunt's office.
Speaker 1: I'm toddlers.
Speaker 2: But not a very nice boss.
Speaker 1: When you say what are
Speaker 0: you gonna do to your sisters?
Speaker 2: Well, I told Betty, wouldn't it?
Speaker 0: Tell Betty is your baby sister? Mhmm. Alright. And I'd
Speaker 1: try to argue that it was in the public's interest for them to know the truth about Jamelle.
Speaker 12: I know.
Speaker 10: Yeah. Unless they They were just retaliating. Yeah.
Speaker 2: You know, which most people know is from the side in the world's history.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Jamelle seems like every kid I spoke to that he attacked was younger.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Bullock.
Speaker 0: Jamelle. Hey, Jamelle. Yeah. Yes. That's what I'm fine now.
Yeah.
Speaker 5: That's what I remember. He said he would have stabbed him or something with a science or something. I remember. He said, yeah. So he goes to come and then what he's saying now.
Speaker 0: Because that thing of him getting caught with a knife in school. It's like, what? What with a knife and screwdriver? Bailey gets his tail thrown in a bottle of water. Yeah.
What the fuck? Surely he gets
Speaker 5: a statement on that?
Speaker 0: No. Because it there's things missing.
Speaker 1: But I've got I've got his dad mentioned it in
Speaker 0: the minutes in the meeting. His dad mentioned it in the meeting with the school. His dad mentioned about them catching him with a knife and a screwdriver. His dad
Speaker 5: his dad bought it up. I've got it I've
Speaker 0: got it in black and white.
Speaker 5: Yeah. You got good case there?
Speaker 1: I've got
Speaker 0: I've got it. Yeah. He got caught with a knife. They they can't deny it. You see, the truth was there for the media.
It was there for celebrities and politicians to see. They could have told you the truth at the time before some of you gave over a £160,000 of your money to the poor victim, Jamal. Well, not so poor anymore. But none of this was true. A key part of this case is that I reported what I was told.
Before my involvement in this story, a mother went online and said her daughter had been attacked by Jamal. I contacted that mother. She sent me images of her daughter. She said her little daughter was beaten by 3 Muslim girls and that Jamal jumped in and bit her daughter on the head. She sent me the images of the bite marks on her daughter's head.
I said, can I speak to you? Can I interview you? I rang the mother, but the child was too scared to talk to me.
Speaker 2: Too scared?
Speaker 0: No. No. Everyone's scared. A girl went online and said that she had been attacked by Jamal. Both of these victims deleted their comments why.
Both of these victims had gone online and reported this before my involvement at all in this case. I simply reported what they were saying. We revisited the mother's house to try and get confirmation as to why she backtracked on the story she had put out and the story she had told me.
Speaker 10: I got car if you're driving. Tony Robinson's there.
Speaker 0: Tell her not to worry, don't worry.
Speaker 13: He said don't worry. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So when you when you put online about Jamelle, what what what happened? Like what did you What happened, what was the response to that?
Speaker 5: What do you mean?
Speaker 0: I mean, did you receive did you receive
Speaker 15: I don't receive threats. Yeah, I did.
Speaker 1: What sort
Speaker 0: of threats?
Speaker 5: We all thought. All thought. Don't let all thought. And I'm just
Speaker 0: because I'm trying to understand this. Is that, and is that because and it because what I've what I've looked at and then because Jamelle's solicitors are using a statement that you made saying that, Jamelle had nothing to do with it. But was that I'm asking is that was that in response to the re reflects your seat that you received?
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It was. Okay.
Speaker 5: Liar. Straight. Is this a symbol just a liar? Jamal telling fibs all the time. There's several times investigated.
Fucking who found out that he's talking fucking shit.
Speaker 12: I don't
Speaker 0: think the whole but then I read Jamal reading reading was slightly a prepared statement on the news.
Speaker 18: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules.
Speaker 11: He used to break rule
Speaker 5: all the time. Yeah. He used to lie. He used to lie a lot. He lied several times.
He lied he lied several times. I caught him several times lying.
Speaker 0: He's suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. And I'm finding out after teacher after teacher after teacher he's far worse than what I said. Far worse. I mean, like, far worse. He was put up on a pedestal by every single media outlet, politicians, footballers, celebrities, boxers, everybody.
They're suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. All I'm knocking on the door and asking teacher after teacher after teacher is what was Jamal like? And it's just flowing. It's just boom. And he was far worse than anything I said.
Far worse. I find it insane because no there is no way that all the things I'm now finding out, the neither journalists has found this out. They must have known what it was like because it hasn't been hard.
Speaker 10: The Isle of Portrait, Port Bailey, the the spin. He was
Speaker 1: and that Jamal was an innocent woman in London too. He wasn't.
Speaker 10: Not far from that.
Speaker 0: So you were told Bailey was a bully and he was a racist. He wasn't a saint in school, he'd be the 1st to admit that, but he wasn't a bully or a racist. Police concluded there was nothing racist about the scuffle, yet you were told he was vermin. You were told he needed to be dealt with. He was vilified by the media, by politicians, and by celebrities.
Bailey a bully, Bailey a racist. Not according to his teachers and other children. Not according to his head teacher of his school. Who is this? He was
Speaker 1: a 15 year old kid Yeah. And it it would have been, could be, have a great future. He's a very articulate lad. He's got a lot of issue about justice. Yeah.
I think, you know, I could've seen him in a row or something like like that because he has that in him. Really? Yeah. And he would stand up for his peers in school where he felt things were. Yeah.
Yeah.
Speaker 12: You know, he would do that. I just wanna tell the truth
Speaker 1: about Vaden. Well His life was destroyed.
Speaker 2: Well, that's not
Speaker 0: fair either, is it?
Speaker 2: As a racist bully, and he won.
Speaker 14: And he wasn't.
Speaker 0: I know. And I both
Speaker 1: know that. I know. Unfortunately, the
Speaker 0: truth is just I know. I know. But Bailey didn't even get to sit his GCSEs because of this campaign of hate, this perversion of the truth. What about Jamal's broken arm? Which the world was told was because of bullying.
That was a like. School incident reports record that he had been punching a much younger child in the face while holding him in a headlock, and he was pushed off him, fell, and broke his arm. The police considered the incident to have been dealt with it properly.
Speaker 5: You were picking you were picking I think you picked I've got an old somebody pushed him to get him off.
Speaker 10: He started calling me my white fat bitch and stuff, and then he like Is
Speaker 0: that what you're my mate?
Speaker 12: I'm a
Speaker 10: white fat bitch.
Speaker 0: White fat bitch.
Speaker 10: And then, I went up to him, and then he like, I took I took the bottle and then he put me in a headlock, and then my mate pushed him off me. And I believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock.
Speaker 12: And I
Speaker 0: believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock? Yeah. So he he physically assaulted you?
Yeah.
Speaker 5: You said
Speaker 0: he called you mama white bitch.
Speaker 10: Yeah. Is
Speaker 0: that the sort of terminology he uses a lot? Yeah.
Speaker 1: There's all sorts of misconceptions like the fact that he had a broken arm.
Speaker 0: Oh, I've got 2 independent witnesses now.
Speaker 1: He he had a year 8 kid. And another kid in year 11 stepped in and said, what are you doing? Pushed him over. Poked him off.
Speaker 0: Who he had in the headlock?
Speaker 4: It was must have been just start of year 11, put this kid in a headlock. One of my friends, one of my friends, didn't like how he was behaving, grabbed him and just threw him off him. Like anyone do break up a fight, they just, like, throw him off him, but this wasn't a fight. This was an all out brawl, one-sided, completely one-sided, because this kid had no match against Jamal, just threw him off him and he landed on the curb.
Speaker 0: How did was he did? Jamal was in year 11?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Half half the size of Jamal, easily.
Speaker 0: Okay. You know, I know he was 12 and Jamal was 15. Mhmm.
Speaker 4: But he was like, kind of like half size ish, kind of like, up to shoulders kind of thing. Yeah. But he still had no match against him, And my friend just grabbed him, threw him off him, he landed on a curb, and that was like it.
Speaker 0: So I've read it reported in by Jeremy Biden and in the newspapers that that was an incident of Jamelle being bullied.
Speaker 4: No. Exact opposite. He was bullying this kid.
Speaker 1: So you see people thought that was all part of it.
Speaker 0: But that's do you know why somebody destroyed it
Speaker 1: for all your broken arm.
Speaker 0: But do you know why they
Speaker 12: do you know
Speaker 1: why they thought
Speaker 0: it was part of it? Because the solicitor said it was.
Speaker 1: No. Well, it's not it's not true. I'm telling you, it's not true. I could even name it I won't. But I could name the child in year 8 that he did it to.
Speaker 12: And I
Speaker 1: could name the child in year 11 that stepped in.
Speaker 0: So someone stepped in?
Speaker 1: Because basically, school school is a pretty good place. Kids have good values. So if you saw a bigger kid, you'd see a little kid. He said, oh, he stepped in and said, what are you doing? Yeah.
And we even had it where
Speaker 0: Do you know what he said to the year 8 kid? No. Called his mom on white slag?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Now I've got that on camera, isn't it?
Speaker 1: Now you say it. Yes. He would have done that, and that would have been incredibly provocative for them.
Speaker 0: Even in his statement to court, Jamal claims they were forced to relocate from Huddersfield for their own safety to a different part of the country. Really? Because the records say there was no most racial motivation and there was no threat at home. That's what the records say. And this is why the authorities, they refused to move them.
And while all this was going on, records also show that his dad Jihad Yeah, his dad's name is Jihad. He'd threatened to kill himself if the rest of his family weren't brought in from Syria. It's not surprising that some authorities expressed concerns that Jihad Hijazi was trying to manipulate the system to get what he wanted, including their housing. You were not told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. You weren't told anything approaching the truth by the mainstream media.
And in Jihad's holy war statement to the court, Jihad said that he wished he had died in the war with his family, rather than go through what happened at Almanbury Community School. Really? He wished he was dead and all his family were dead rather than go through this school playground instant. Listen to the clip again. Listen to what Bailey's saying.
He's asking Jamal repeatedly. What are you saying now? It wasn't a random attack. It wasn't a racist attack. Bailey didn't threaten to stab Jamal.
The playground incident was not the beginning of the story. It was a culmination of many events. Not least, it was a response to Jamal's alleged threats to rape Bailey's younger sisters. They're about 9 years old at the time of this. So how's it going at that school when you saw the portrayal of what happened with Bailey and him.
Because he was painted as this innocent little kid.
Speaker 10: He was an innocent.
Speaker 12: He's out
Speaker 10: in there for a while. He's out in there. I used to see him bully Bailey's little sisters
Speaker 0: and stuff.
Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution. Hope his parents take action. Right? Never mind anything else. What what what what are you producing here with this vermin doing what he's doing here?
Speaker 17: That's not Britain. That's not what
Speaker 8: we do as a country.
Speaker 0: You can hear him there describe Bailey as vermin. Words are important when you're on a daytime platformer and people listen to what you say. What do you do to Vernon? You exterminate. You kill it.
Low life, called him a thug. But worst of all, he demanded severe retribution against this child. At the same time as this, Jeremy Vine was reporting. He didn't tell people the bully's name, although he was finding it hard not to name a child. Instead he told his followers where they could find that name.
Now this is a direct response of both of your reporting, because when you reported, you can follow the timeline and the repercussions of what that bore. What I've done here, in 2018 there's a charity called Tell Mama that records Muslim hate incidents. Even though they've been in the past penalised for exaggerating the figures, let's go, let's work off their figures. They say there are over a 1,000 hate instances with 325 of them being online. Some of them are Islamophobic, which means criticizing Islam as well.
Here, I've printed a piece of paper for each one of those hate incidents. 327 hate incidents online against the entire Muslim community of the UK in 2018. The 325 Islamophobic comments, they're the ones you read about on the news every day. They're the ones people are in jail for. They're the hate incidents the media keeps shoving down your throat.
So each piece of paper here represents a hate comment aimed at a child after a playground dispute. I want to read these now, and peers, you demanded severe retribution, that's what you demanded against this child. Let's see if you're happy with some of this. I pray someone rapes you and your whole family while you watch. Fuck your mother.
Fuck your love. The Syrians will rape your family. If I saw you, I would rape you to death. You'll be raped by the Volusian group. I hope your mother will not be racist when she is raped.
I'm going to bum your nan alive then dead her again. And the threats of rape, all of these threats of rape, imagine being these children, imagine being a 15 year old child living in Huddersfield with your little sisters. Muslim men are jailed in the biggest scandal in the history of our country for mass rapes in that town. And then you're receiving and you're reading these messages. You're going to die, you're going to fucking die, we're going to strangle your mum, your dad, your friends.
I'll kill your whole family. I can't wait to find you so I can slit your throat. You're the person who should be killed in those ISIS videos. You, your parents and your whole family have to be burned. Do heaven a favor of fucking off yourself.
Looking at you makes me want to commit suicide. Go commit suicide your your oxygen thief. Jump off a bridge bro. Do humans a favor and kill yourself. We don't want you and you don't belong in this world.
Again, imagine being that child reading them. Piers. Is that severe enough for you? This is a mental health record for Bailey McLaren. Bailey was referred to Luton CAMS by Luton and Dunstable Psychiatry Liaison on the 31st December 2018.
Reason patient involved in incident in Huddersfield and has been relocated to Luton with family. Patient unable to cope with not returning home and has taken an overdose. So this lie, this narrative, this agenda which comes before anything else by the politicians, by the media that was pumped. This child, it doesn't matter. His life didn't matter.
You know if he killed himself, no one would have cared. We wouldn't have heard condemnation from any of the politicians or from any of the media. No one cared. Because everyone from start to finish in this story is collateral damage so long as they have the narrative. And peers, you have a son, you have children.
Demanding severe retribution against a child for a school playground dispute is unforgivable. You sit there and you preach. You preach against us. You make your accusations against me. Never have I labelled Muslim children as vermin.
Never have I demanded my followers to commit severe retribution against anybody. And this is what the media, the politicians, and the celebrities created, aided and abetted by the left wing activism and the selective indignation of Islam. Hypocrites out there might say, who cares? That's what he deserved, right? Imagine for one moment if I had incited violence against young Muslim lad in the reversal of this situation.
And you see, in a district where a generation of young girls have been raped, these threats are far from empty. What do you think, if you were working in the school at that time, what do you think what the media done?
Speaker 5: I think the media fucking blew out of fucking proportion of what the fucking world body got off.
Speaker 0: I know. But in the media run that Jamal was being bullied,
Speaker 5: like You see, he used to complain that he used to be bullied. There was a there was another, I think, Kirklees Kirklees guy that came that Jamal that Jamal said somebody bought a knife or something? I think that that be that be that that should be on record. Yeah. Yeah.
I don't think when we we we we have to get I think it were a lot of bollocks.
Speaker 0: I'm I'm gathering that by reading the school records. They made accusations and then when they're investigated.
Speaker 5: Yeah. And there were a lot of bollocks. It lied.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Now ITV, Piers Morgan. You used your platform to incite hatred of a young child. No time for facts or the inconvenient truth. Surely you must have known the truth because within a few hours of the story breaking, I was receiving dozens of messages from parents, pupils and staff saying there was much more to the story than met the eye.
So I did what any journalist could have done, should have done. I asked questions. Were you just being lazy? Was it willful blindness? Or are you just incompetent peers?
And the BBC's Jeremy Vine, to you personally, was it clinical cowardice? After all, you didn't reveal the white boy's name. You just told everyone where to find it on Twitter. Were you afraid of being sued? Although it wouldn't have been the BBC licence fee payers picking up your legal bills, would it?
Or was this your Pontius Pilate moment? Condemning a child whilst washing your hands of any responsibility? Because that's what you did and you didn't seek the truth either. Piers, Jeremy, your lazy inept reporting was not without consequence as we will see. You incited hatred, you succeeded.
And that's contempt. Your actions, not Bailey's, led to Bailey and his family being driven from their home in the middle of the night. Like the very refugees you claim you care about. The hate you incited was off the scale. Then when machetes had arrived at the school, gangs were roaming the streets looking for bait.
West Yorkshire police told Bailey's mum that terrorism threat had been raised to writ. They had intelligence of people coming from Bradford to get Bailey and his family. Rather than deal with the threat, they moved Bailey and his family to a place of safety. So whilst one child had the support of the whole country, had the support of the prime minister, Sajid Javid, the local football club. Everyone rallying behind this child, £160,000 donated to him.
The other child in this incident, his family were driven from their home. Fret. Groups of men looking for him, ready to commit violence against him. And the police the police stopped their mom. So the police took the family.
The police went and got the family to get them out of their house through imminent danger, and they were taking them to relocate them here. Let's have a look. The night in. This is the accommodation that Bailey's mother with 2 9 year old sisters and children were being relocated to. This one star hotel where rooms are rented by the hour next door to a brothel.
The imam who brought a mob of men up to the school, he has 3 mosques within a stone's throw of where we're standing now. Bailey's mother, through her sense, looked up this hotel, saw it was owned by Muslims, read this read the reviews that it's a prostitute racket drug hole, and got out of the police meat wagon with her children to take them to safety herself. But this is where Kirklees Council were housing those children and that family. This is the most Muslim populated area of Leeds. That family were taken to so called safety, yeah, Surrounded by mosques in what is a Muslim ghetto.
Yeah? Which is why I'm getting bibbed. I'm gonna get some cause a scene now. We went to see from neighbors what it was like at the time of the incident.
Speaker 17: I think it was a a BMW
Speaker 16: the fire down the house.
Speaker 0: God. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: So it was
Speaker 17: it was meant to shoot,
Speaker 5: the 7
Speaker 0: To shoot the mum?
Speaker 17: The mum. The 7 2, to the it's
Speaker 0: Well, they come outside and under there. It's shouting and screaming. Shout and screaming.
Speaker 10: Well, I
Speaker 3: saw the video because the neighbor had shared it. And then I saw in the Yorkshire live, them making Bailey out to be really horrible, and that Jamal was a poor little victim, and it it wound me up. So I commented on it. The victim wasn't a victim. He hit me in the back with a hockey stick.
And then within the space of 2 hours, I had about 250 comments saying that I was lying, that I must have been excluded from the school because I'm a liar. Just horrible comments like that. None of them believe in me.
Speaker 0: And did you take this did you take the comment down?
Speaker 3: Yeah. I didn't want to, but my mom was worried for repercussions, so she asked me to take it down so I did.
Speaker 0: This is the area that Kirklees Council thought it was the right place to send a child and his family, who were wanted at the time, the main imam outside their school with mobs of Muslim men looking for them, and this is where they decided to send them. They basically dropped them in their backyard. That's what they were doing. This is the hotel. This is, I believe, a 4 star hotel.
It's totally full of illegal immigrants. This is across the country. So the point to make is that illegal immigrants come here, young fine age men, not families, not children, and this is where council would help them. Let's have a look. Hello, boys.
Hello.
Speaker 5: How are you doing?
Speaker 0: Can I do you mind if I ask, what what country are you from, though?
Speaker 1: I I do not know speak English.
Speaker 0: You do speak English. I do. This is what
Speaker 14: country are you from? Mine
Speaker 0: yeah. Iran? Yeah. Iran. Okay.
Speaker 14: Yeah. Iran.
Speaker 0: Kurdistan. Iran. Okay. Nice call, man. I'm just seeing.
Is the hotel full? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Full.
Enjoying it here? Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 14: Nice hotel. Nice food.
Speaker 0: Nice hotel. Nice food?
Speaker 14: Yeah. Healthy food.
Speaker 0: Healthy food. It looks like a nice hotel. Yeah. How many people are in here?
Speaker 14: I think there's 200.
Speaker 0: 200? Lots of children?
Speaker 14: So my iPhone, I think it has a little children.
Speaker 0: No children?
Speaker 14: Oh, my mom's children. No.
Speaker 0: Not many children. But it's a nice hotel.
Speaker 14: Nice hotel.
Speaker 0: Nice hotel. It is a nice hotel. And if if you look at if you look at where the other family were being housed in Beeston and you compare it to this 4 star 4 star hotel, nice food as our friend says.
Speaker 1: Healthy food.
Speaker 0: Healthy food.
Speaker 12: Yeah. Alright.
Speaker 0: Hello, bro. Hi. How you doing?
Speaker 1: Hey. Do you want to come back in?
Speaker 0: Yeah. We're off now, mate. We're only we're only we're only we're done now.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 12: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Do you know what they have in here? They have a full time doctor and nurses. Full time, stationed in there.
Speaker 14: In, buddy.
Speaker 0: Full time. So you know when you come my dad tried to get a doctor's appointment earlier. Couldn't get one. Full time. Full time.
Full time.
Speaker 1: You're very bad.
Speaker 0: The food's bad? Yeah. The food's bad? Yeah. Is it free?
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's free.
Speaker 5: They called our school. Soon as the media media and all that died, they sent in chief inspectors chief inspectors of fucking off state. We knew they're gonna fail and every fucking thing they can think of.
Speaker 1: I have goofiness, There's a lot more changes. All of that and yesterday. And, you know, they're only in the bank, but it was never picked up.
Speaker 0: Apart from my reporting, there was not a single media statement given the other side of this story. The staff knew. Other pupils knew. They could've exposed the lie. Why didn't they?
Speaker 1: The incident I always quote the incident. Yeah. The incident has reoccurred. It's come to my door. They said you can't talk about it because you've got an undistclosure agreement.
They're not satisfactory. So that was the reason they triggered it.
Speaker 0: They were even not free to tell you the truth or they were terrified of the consequences. And that's for so called journalists. Some can't find the truth, some won't tell the truth, and some they're afraid of the truth. But me, as a journalist, it's my job to present you the truth.
Speaker 1: If you want my honest opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shoot that school. Get up there and get rid of this.
Speaker 0: You see, when the media and politicians decide to kill a story, when they decide to hide the truth from you, they'll do whatever it takes. They shut down the school. It's gone. Everyone lost their jobs. You see, once this Live Our Racist attack had gone global, the truth would never be allowed to come out.
The real truth, that a young Syrian refugee was struggling to fit into his new environment was problematic. His allegedly abusive and violent conduct towards teachers and children was allowed to run unchecked. Why? Did the school authorities turn a blind eye rather than be accused of victimizing the boy, of being racist towards him? They stayed silent.
The truth may have triggered accusations of racism or sparked discussion about immigration policies. The challenges of achieving the successful integration of migrants we welcome into United Kingdom, and the need to take those challenges seriously. You see, Jamal was one of 20,000 Syrian refugees who come to the UK as part of the United Nations resettlement program. The government could not allow their policies to be examined and the consequences and their incompetence to be exposed. And if you don't think the government is incompetent, you ain't been paying attention to anything.
Priti Patel's been talking tough, really tough on controlling our borders for years. And yet we have boatloads of illegal economic migrants being escorted across the English Channel and put into these luxury accommodation at your expense. This ineptitude does nothing for the refugees who come here legally, who we welcome into England, refugees who are trying to integrate and make a new life here. And who was the community's rage directed at? All Syrian refugees.
That's who. When in fact, there are many families of Syrian refugees in the area, we're told, all of them delightful, working hard to settle and integrate into the country they can now call home. I spoke to multiple refugee families. In the school, Gremlin, my children. No.
Any Gremlin. No problems with your children? No. That's it. And you've had a you've had a good experience in the school?
Speaker 10: I used to have 2 friends and they don't Bali and they don't care where from country I can't move anything.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 10: And when I spoke English, like, I was we was about 1 month we've been in here, and I used to not speak English very much. So they used to tell me how to speak all that thing. And now I'm in year 8, and I know how to speak English. And I made more friends, and now I am fine.
Speaker 0: And you're fine? And then no problems?
Speaker 18: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules.
Speaker 0: Who told Jamal to go on camera and say this? Who arranged the media tour? Who encouraged him to take legal action? He was originally going to sue the school for not looking after him and then decided to sue me instead. Who told him to put this in his statement to the High Court?
You see, Jamal doesn't like to break the school rules. Here's the problem. This is his behavior record. Almost a 100 codes for bad behavior. Truancy, verbal abuse to teachers, physical violence towards pupils, and lying.
Yeah, there's plenty for lying. You see, I haven't got all of Jamal's school records. Large sections of documents I was given were blacked out. We tried to get access but we weren't allowed. And the lawyers wrote to the court to explain they had misplaced documentation.
And finally, as you can hear, the lawyers decided what they were gonna allow me to see. Whilst I was preparing my defense, Jamal's lawyers decided what I could see. And this global news story wasn't an accident. It was all carefully planned. You see, the day before the video went viral, a GoFundMe page was set up for Jamal and the video went viral the day after a criminal record check come back on Jamal.
Why would his lawyers do a criminal record check? Well, they had to make sure this was financially beneficial exercise. Wasn't going to be derailed by an unhelpful pass. 15 Rold Jamal, his record was clean by the way. Mohammed Akanji, the jihadist lawyer of choice, was immediately on the global media blitz.
Speaker 19: Listen. I'm very conned to himself. I'm after him for my own reason.
Speaker 8: Right. Okay. Nothing sinister though, is it?
Speaker 19: Oh, fuck. No. No. Journalistic. Oh, journalistic.
Well, that's good.
Speaker 1: Oh, no. No. No.
Speaker 19: No. Fucking totally journalistic. I wanna get all the background on him. You reckon he Yeah. You reckon he was a member of that?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Al and Midrgharun are a prescribed terrorist organization. Almost 60% of terrorists in British prisons are ex members of this organization. They kill. They murder.
They slaughter. That is the organization that Mohammed Khanji and his brother were allegedly, according to this, top mainstream Muslim British journalist who are members of it. How does a Syrian lad find himself working with the jihadist lawyer of choice before this video even went out? Before anyone has seen this viral video. Within 2 weeks, the lawyers have been made the beneficiaries of the GoFundMe page of £160,000.
A plan to sue the school? That's put on hold. And a plan to sue, moi, for libel was launched. What riches had these lawyers promised Jamal and his family? School records were edited.
Migration Yorkshire clamored to make this playground fight about race and hate. They contacted the Home Office as soon as they heard about this playground fight. Yeah. The home office, a playground scuffle. Why are they contacting the home office instantly?
Someone went further. You see, we had this school incident report analyzed by a graphologist. Someone who analyzes handwriting. It appears to show that a second person with very different handwriting doctored the report to allege that Bailey had threatened to stab Jamal. Even though all the witness reports mentioned there was only one teacher there, so only one teacher could have done an instant report.
So, with the careful planning, the jihadist favorite lawyer and the enthusiastic support of some useful idiots, it was possible for the lies to go round the world twice before the truth had had a chance to put his pants on. I now need to mention other repercussions of what happened in Ormondbury. I was being sued for reporting the things that were said to me about Jamau. I had to defend myself. The judges already already ruled that I was not allowed to argue.
It was in the public's interest for people to hear a different perspective of Jamal. I had to prove that the information reported to me was true. That's not the kind of burden placed on Piers Morgan or Jeremy Vine. Piers can describe Bailey as vermin without being held to account. And who is behind propagating this deception and the lawsuit against me?
You see, this is where we get to meet the most sinister part of the unholy alliance. All sorts of people are helping out, but leading the posse from the front is the jihadist lawyer of choice. He represented Shamina Begman, you know the jihadi terrorist that's out in Syria. He represented, I think, Michael Adeballajo, Lee Rigby's killer. I think he's even had to change his name because he's got such a terrible track record.
So this is the lawyer who's suing me and who the media celebrated that he had served me papers even though I wasn't in the country. If you're pillaged, if you've plundered, if you've raped and you're beheaded, and you say you've done it in the name of Islam, well these are the lawyers for you. The lawyers who stepped forward for ISIS by Shmina Begum, who've been fighting to get her back into our country. Who defended Michael Adeballaju who beheaded Lee Rigby. This is Mohammed Akanji and his colleague, Faruk Bajwa, who's been banned from claiming legal aid.
Yeah. Banned from claiming legal aid for putting in fraudulent expense claims. Let me rewind a bit. Let's go back a few weeks. There's an important piece of background information to this.
Speaker 16: Don't know the full ins and outs of it, but, basically, to inform the group call themselves Antifa UK. Yeah. Over there? Yep. To be honest, I kind of haven't, and Antifa Dundee.
The base he says are planning to help possibly kill Tommy Robinson, because they know where he lives and want to silence him. They've got their hands on it says they've got hands hands on to make a 40 sevens, make ketchup bombs and stuff. And allegedly, instead, wherever the foot, these petrol bonds through your door when he sleeps. They say they're also friends with a few MPs.
Speaker 0: Now at the heightened tensions with multiple osmond warnings, they now take back the radar phone, the one option we have to go direct to the police, and they are removing it at this current moment.
Speaker 1: Where are you from? I'm from
Speaker 0: So, look, what did you just say, basically, the the the radar phone or whatever it is? Yes. Yes. The phone, the emergency phone that you Will will be taking that back. You'll be taking that back.
Yeah. But those those phones are They're used for a aren't even for real. Like, so so when there's a heightened threat and people have come to the house and the address has been put out where my kids are, you're then gonna take the panic phone back. It's Christmas 2018. The police come to my family's home to tell me that people in Antifa, file a violent and extremist organisation, are planning to kill me and my family.
See who were the first to comment on this video? Well, Mohammed Akanji of Farooq Bazrunko, of course, the jihadists lawyers of choice, but also Mike Stoodsbury, an independent journalist, an Antifa activist. So the jihadist lawyers knew Antifa were planning to kill me, then actually commented on the video of the Ozmen warning. You see, what happened next is interesting, although not interesting to the solicitors regulation authority or the law society. The people who should be interested in the integrity of our lawyers.
Speaker 17: It will be live streamed. I'm not in charge of the
Speaker 4: filming or anything like that.
Speaker 17: That's, down to the
Speaker 4: the guys over here.
Speaker 17: And you literally know we wanted to do this, so we thought, what mug can we probably do with a creep for this?
Speaker 0: So 2 lawyers who know Antifa are planning to kill me, seek out an Antifa extremist, hire him for one day, just one day, and send him to live stream the servant of papers to my home, my family's home. Papers which had already been served by the way, with a gang. When my wife and children were there, when they knew I was abroad, lawyers commissioned the Antifa Extremist to broadcast my home address in order, as they put it, to cause a spectacle.
Speaker 11: The law firm or the lawyer who has been, you know, sort of taking the lead on the Tommy case wanted to make sure, doubly sure that that, a, Tommy got the, the the letter. It actually went out 2 2 two different ways, and he wanted to make a bit of a spectacle out of it. This this is all very they're very amusing.
Speaker 0: A group supported by Mike Stitchbury came to the home that my wife and children were in on a Sunday afternoon when I wasn't even in the country. So let's have a look at Mike Stitchbury, who calls himself a journalist, who promoted this event, who shared it and encouraged it, who found it amusing that my wife was so scared she had to ring the police. My wife has been sat down and told in her home that Antifa are planning to kill her. They're planning to kill our family and harm our family. She's been told that she may get acid in her face.
Well, how do you think she felt on a Sunday afternoon whilst my children are playing outside on their bikes? To be told that Antifa were on their way to our home. Let's have a look at Mike Stuxbury, the man that sent them. Here he is self admitting that he is part of Antifa. Here he is promoting violence against his opposition.
Punch them, punch them, punch them. Here he is hoping that buses full of Antifa get shipped in to smash people's skulls in. Here he is calling for white genocide. Mike Stitchby is an extremist. He's a far left extremist who currently is playing a victim.
He encouraged people to come and he sent people and was part of an organization that communicated together, to send people to the home where my wife and children were when I wasn't there. He even crowdfunded to support them in their action.
Speaker 11: He, you know, he was looking at various people and eventually he sort of came on to Dick Coughlin. Dick Coughlin? I can't say it properly. Who is a a a YouTuber who has made videos about Tommy for, god, almost 10 years, I think, who's a who's a real critic. He's a I don't know if you've checked him out, but he's a he's a funny guy.
Speaker 5: Check out. Yeah.
Speaker 11: He's, sort of, you know, got red hair, x he calls you know, he's he's an ex crackhead, basically.
Speaker 0: And who is this antique extremist hired to come to my kids' home? Keep watching. I went up to where and they said, right. We'll take that from him. We'll make sure he gets it.
And later that night, the Antifa Extremists hired by their lawyers had a message for me and my children.
Speaker 17: And on that note, see, on that on the happy note,
Speaker 6: oh, by the way, Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, mate.
Speaker 0: So look at the man that they sent. The man that you can see, the Muslim lawyer, handed privileged documentation giving this man my children's home address. That's what he's done. Fully aware of the serious danger my family are in, and he hands them my children's address. They then come to my children's home, my wife gets a phone call, my children run off the drive, they lock themselves in the house, they ring emergency, the emergency 999 call for the police to come, they press panic buttons, they need support because Antifa are coming.
They came, they told the Muslim lawyer, he's fully aware they're coming to live stream where my family are. They live stream and dox the name of the road. They dox the door number. I went up to where and I'm and I said, right. We'll take that from him.
We'll make sure he gets it. The man's specifically chosen. He was chosen. He says in his own video.
Speaker 17: The lawyer in this case was a guy called Mohammed Sunimi Akundra who works for a solicitors in London called, I shit you not, Farooq Bajwa and Co, solicitors of London. I get asked by this guy that, they've decided that they're going to Tommy Robinson is going to be served legal papers, so he can be sued by this family. And they asked, me, do I want to be the one to go along to serve legal documents?
Speaker 0: Let's have a look at who Dick Coughlin is. Let's have a look at some of the things he said. Here he is promoting hatred against black people. Serious, this is a crime. The comments he makes are a crime.
Here he is promoting hatred against Pakistanis. Here he is singing a song promoting anti semitism, singing a song about lampshades being made out of Jewish people's skin from the hollow. Yeah. 3rd black, 3rd black, you're a good killer kite. We're white, far right, and we're gonna have a fight.
We're in the A self confessed racist anti semitic crackhead was sent to my children's property. He talked about raping my wife in her skull socket. He talked about my children being fed for a meat winder. He talked about burning my house down and whilst masturbating with my family in it. Now other than to terrorize my wife and children, why would any sane person do this?
It worked, okay. Tipped off by a friend who saw the gang on livestream approaching, my ex wife hit the panic button and barricaded herself and our children in a bedroom. The police thankfully responded in time. And these are exactly the same tactics being used against the unbelievably courageous children in Ombre. Threats of violence and rape against children who are willing to stand with me in defence of the truth at the High Court of London.
The video release, media, GoFundMe, Antifa, it all happened at the same time. It was coordinated, and it was about hate and making money. And how that far left activist, who appears to be an antisemitic, Jew hating, black hating racist, came to my home with his gang and threatened to kill my children. These lawyers, the mainstream media, they don't care about refugees. They don't care about Jamelle.
They don't care about the truth. Say that bloke who made the video saying he's gonna kill the kids. Yeah. Can you if you didn't do it, I know 100% give a statement. I know.
I was there.
Speaker 1: Okay. Give a
Speaker 0: statement about that. She complained about it. She contacted Paul, remember, it would have been the liaison officer at the time, to Okay. Ask if he was arrested. I found out his address, and I gave you all the information for him.
So even now Right. Say now, looking at that, can he be arrested now then?
Speaker 16: I don't know what happened with
Speaker 20: the previous report because when we search on our system that we currently use
Speaker 0: You probably got very good.
Speaker 20: See any crime report that was linked to it.
Speaker 0: You see, the next day, knowing I've been provoked with threats against my ex wife and my children, no doubt thinking they would catch me conspiring to commit violence and lock me up on a conspiracy charge. Here, outside my ex wife's house, men in a car that has never been registered, check the registration plate. So presumably from the security services, we've listing devices recording what's being said in my home. The involvement of the security services may explain why Dick Coughlin, the man who publicly threatened to murder my children, has never even been spoken to or arrested despite my wife's complaints. What are you doing?
Is there any reason the back of your glove? There's no
Speaker 5: one in the back of your glove.
Speaker 0: So what are you doing? We're not here. Anything to do with you. What are you doing now? Well, who what do you think we're doing?
I think you're starting to do me.
Speaker 16: No. No. It's a pissy.
Speaker 0: Who's this with? What are you doing? And there is someone in the back. I'm at
Speaker 12: Can you
Speaker 1: tell me what you're doing now?
Speaker 0: Because essentially, I've got threats against me. I'm not. Yeah? So what are you doing? I don't know what you're doing, bro.
That's all everyone knows what you're doing. I've got police officers sat with a recording in a recording van. In the back of this van is a recording station. I'm not standing. You're not going.
No. Because I no. Because what yous are doing I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing.
They're sat in the back of their van. This is recording devices. The whole of this back thing because he just opened up when I got him out. The whole of this back thing is recording where they're pointing it because they what this is has been a setup. These people are set these police officers are setting me
Speaker 1: up.
Speaker 0: They're setting me up. It's a setup. They're setting me up by sending people to my house because they think I'm gonna react and do something, and they're recording it with listening devices. We checked the vehicle registration plate outside the house on the government website and there's no such vehicle. Let's not forget the politicians are fearless leaders.
It was only when I went alone to the home of self declared journalist, Mike Stuchby, to ask him why he had done what he had and why he thought it was funny to intimidate my children. Some of you may some of you may have seen that people have been outside my home. Timberland, my family. The difference is when they come to my home, 5 men come to my home. I'm on my own.
I've had to move my children who are scared and upset. And people encouraged people to participate in coming to my address. One of those such people
Speaker 14: who
Speaker 0: It was only then that the fearless then deputy leader of the Labour Party, Tom Watson, steps forwards. Ignoring reality completely.
Speaker 21: Every major social media platform other than YouTube has taken down Steven Yaxley Lennon's profile because of his hateful conduct. Late on Monday night, Yaxley Lennon turned up at a journalist home banging on the doors and windows demanding to be let in. And after being escorted away by the police, he returned at 5 AM and continued his intimidation. The incident was live streamed. He later warned journalists in a YouTube video to expect a knock at the door.
Does the secretary of state think that is right that YouTube and the parent company Alphabet continues to give this man a platform, sir?
Speaker 0: It'd be funny, you know, if it wasn't so insidious. The hardly honorable mister Watson totally misrepresented what happened, and from behind his shield of parliamentary privilege, bravely declared but I've been terrorizing a journalist. Journalist. Stokesbury's an antifa activist who incites violence and wants to kill white people. Terrorizing.
Was I terrorizing? Mister Watson bravely demanded that I'd be removed from YouTube. YouTube had now had only recently confirmed that none, not one of my videos had broken any of their stringent guidelines. And my videos hadn't broken any laws. It was clear I hadn't harassed anyone, certainly not Mike Stutchbury, if indeed he is a journalist.
But none of that mattered. My wife and children left their family home that night. They never went back. Perhaps having their lives endangered by their jihadist lawyers. See my wife started legal action against Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra's firm.
But Mo and Co, Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra, see they weren't so keen on facing the law as they were on abusing the law to persecute others for financial and ideological reasons. On the 31st March 2019, they promptly collapsed their law firm. They'd never be involved in the case. That's what they said. And doctor Farooq Basra, well he's no longer gonna be a lawyer.
He'd been living in Pakistan. That's it. That's what they said. That's how easy it was for Mo and Co to escape justice. Interestingly, they're still signing documents on the case on the 6th June, months after saying they're not involved.
Several other law firms have reported them to the Law Society, the body that is supposed to make sure lawyers behave ethically. Nothing's been done. I wonder why. In fact, all the lawyers working at Fruit Basement and Co just moved across to a new law firm called Burlington's. And guess what?
Yeah. Burlington's took on Jamelle's case against me. FruitBazwa now works for Burlington's. FruitBazwa's son now works for Burlington's. Fruit Basra is Burlington's GDPR expert.
Pretty ironic, no? Fruit Basra and Co leaked my children's address to an antifa activist to put it online for everyone. And if we've been stupid enough to expect more ethical behaviour from Birlingtons than from Faruk Bajwa and Mohammed Akanji, well, we'd have been disappointed. I just really, which I've been trying to do, I need all of the disclosure, which I haven't had. I haven't had a full disclosure of his school records.
Speaker 13: Therefore, to make sure, that we have it, that that some documents haven't been lost in the transfer of the bathroom through Bourgeois to to Burlington's, we have done another subject access request to the council for
Speaker 0: July. And how long would that and how long would the council take for that?
Speaker 13: I I don't know. I I don't think they gave us time frame, did they,
Speaker 12: Luke? No. No.
Speaker 16: They didn't, unfortunately. So you're asking
Speaker 0: so what what you're saying is you believe there may be things that I that I haven't been disclosed. You don't know how long they're gonna take, but you won't agree to an adjournment?
Speaker 13: No. No. Our position is that we're not agreeing to an adjournment. Those are my instructions.
Speaker 0: Because my my my concern and serious concern is the safety of the witnesses. And and it's a genuine and and if you I don't believe for 1 minute that Mohammed al Khemji or Farooq Basra give a shit about any of this or Jamelle. Yeah. I I generally don't think they do. And this is I'm
Speaker 13: just gonna say Farooq Bajwa and Mohammed Dukunji have nothing to do with this case. This is my case.
Speaker 0: How how how come how come how come then
Speaker 13: to anybody from Fruit Bajwa
Speaker 0: How come then Fruit Bajwa
Speaker 13: have Burlington started with me.
Speaker 0: How come Fritbajwa signed a form 3 months after he left then to do this case?
Speaker 13: It's absolute it was, if if that was the case, it was before I gave the undertaking, and he wasn't involved in this case before.
Speaker 0: He signed a he signed a form dated June in June. He signed a form, and the date on that form that he signed is June. He left this case in March, apparently. How come?
Speaker 13: Well, I I I if you explanation as to why. I'm not quite sure what the formula is about.
Speaker 0: No. You'll see it you'll see it you'll see it on my documentary. Okay so when you when you send me what you decide is relevant yeah, how am I going to know what you've cut out?
Speaker 16: Well I suppose you wouldn't.
Speaker 0: I wouldn't. Does that seem fair? If the info if the if the information is not relevant, then what harm could it do in me hacking it?
Speaker 16: But it's not about harm Stephen, it's about privacy.
Speaker 0: For the last for the last 3 days, since I gave you, since you received videos so that you become aware that I have video evidence that's going to prove my case, since that point my ex wife and my children for the last 2 days have had police at their house because they've been receiving threats. On top of that pictures of my ex wife have been put online by the same people who were in bed with Mohammed Okanji. Then 2 days ago Mohammed Okanji doxxed my mother and father's house. Last night, that house at 1 o'clock in the morning was smashed to pieces with bricks through the windows, yeah? This is all going on in the background of it.
I've been trying to get my stuff ready, but just so you're aware of what's going on as to why I don't trust the words you say. When you have Farouk Basra's son working for your, working for your company and Farooq Basra is the man that sent people to threaten to kill my children, I'm wondering why in the last 48 hours or last 72 hours, since I disclosed information to you, Why why my family and loved ones have come under persecuted harm? Of which is all detailed with police records and video footage of everything that's been going on. So I'm super concerned and don't trust you or your party to decide what's relevant in this case. I don't trust you.
So where, how, if this should be fair trial about getting out the truth, if that's what you're working for, you need to give me your disclosure. Instead of reviewing it and taking bits out, which is what you've already done with the school records. You'll say, because I know that's not the full school records, so and you've covered up things which, and Luke, Francesca told me, I have a recording of her telling me, that your, that Burlington's did not retract anything, redact anything, yet in court you had to admit you did. I've got the recording of that telling you. Everything was redacted prior to coming to you.
Everything was redacted prior to coming to you. And then in court you sit and admit that you have been redacting things. So, forgive me. It's just lie after lie. This is Burlington's lawyers losing documents that they're supposed to send to me and deleting things that they don't want me to see?
Misplaced. How do you misplace documents that were electronically filed on their case management system through Basra and Co, then passed over to Berlin's? All of this is because they're sharing it. And all of this is to put pressure on me in the weeks before it. And all this, and this is a kanji, I guarantee you this is a kanji, a kanji working with resistant hay.
The the account that's put put it on is is resisting hate, yeah? Resistant hate who a country hires with Dick Coughlin to send to the house before. They're like his little minis. So now he knows that it's coming, it's going to land on his lap. The whole lie that they've told, and this is the actions they use.
They can't play the man so they play the kids and the family. You don't need to be scared, Sanya, because, they're doing this
Speaker 10: you guys just told me he's a good boy.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I know, babe. But they're purposely just doing that. But when they're doing this, they're just doing this to try and get cause me shit and make you worry. So I know it's easier said, but you don't need to worry.
Yeah? They're doing this so they're doing this so that I don't beat them in court. That's why they're doing this. Yeah? The mad thing is the whole time this goes on, the media and all of the, we're the bad guys.
That we've been on. But like I'm the one persecuting people or targeting them. And they're such cowards. They're such cowards, man. I just got a phone call, and they said goodbye.
I'm so scared. I've told the police, but I'm so scared.
Speaker 10: Yeah. Hello?
Speaker 0: Jenna, who's just wrong with Spencer?
Speaker 10: We don't know at the minute.
Speaker 12: What are
Speaker 0: the police then?
Speaker 10: I'm just making a statement.
Speaker 0: Okay. But just quickly, what are they what are they are they getting that account? Let's put a picture of you online. How who's who showed you that picture, Jenna?
Speaker 10: It's on Twitter. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Who saw it?
Speaker 10: I saw it myself.
Speaker 0: You saw it yourself. Okay. Yeah. Are they gonna are the police sorting out to get rid of it?
Speaker 10: Yeah, they've taken the address of the Twitter person to put it out.
Speaker 0: If you can say I give them 50 addresses of people who have done exactly this over the years, including the redhead man who what about the redhead bloke who friends come to kids? What do they say about that?
Speaker 10: Well nothing really.
Speaker 0: No? It's a crime. Do you know what I mean? If I make if I make a video threatening to kill some kids, I'll be arrested. So that the point where you need to ask them specifically and say to them you made a complaint, someone threatened to murder your children, you had to leave your home yeah, Those threats have now followed you to where you're now living.
Yeah. And they're coming from the same people, the same organizations, the same people they done fuck all about last time. They didn't lick them. They didn't speak to them. They didn't.
The solicitor is still acting with impunity, doing it to my mom and dad yesterday. See, you need to specifically ask them, then I want our answer, Adam. When you made a complaint against Richard Coughlin, Dick Coughlin last year, why have they not done anything? And give us and get you a follow-up and an answer as to why they haven't
Speaker 16: done anything, if you can.
Speaker 12: Just get
Speaker 13: it up. You've got time?
Speaker 0: I mean, the kids are right. Am I right that you managed to track the number? Yes. So you know who made those phone calls to her and the
Speaker 15: We know where the number it came from
Speaker 5: Yep.
Speaker 15: And who who that phone was registered to. So that's all obviously, we cannot prove well, I I at that time, I wasn't able to prove who. I only could say where the number came from.
Speaker 0: As in as in as in whose phone is?
Speaker 15: Who the phone is registered to.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Because because, obviously, for me, this was this was threatening phone calls a week before a high court trial trying to prevent the court trying to prevent the court to justice. How come no one's been arrested?
Speaker 15: I can't see any again on the crime report.
Speaker 0: If I send you evidence, which I'm going to anyway because it's all going to the judge, if I send you evidence of Mohammed Akanji doxing my mum and dad's address, if I send you evidence of criminal damage and attacks in the middle of the night at an old pensioner's old pensioner's home, and I show you evidence of pictures of my wife being put on, ex wife being put online, and my son. They've hung my 11 year old son's phone. The police were all involved. They've been threatening my 11 year old son. Yeah?
This is what's going on. If I send you evidence of that, do you think you'll support an anonymity order to protect the children in this case?
Speaker 16: Steven, I I I can't answer that because I don't have instructions to answer that. I don't have conduct of the matter. But what I can clarify for you is some of the issues that I can give answers on. One of those of which I heard you made reference to, Farooq's son working. He is not involved in the case in any way at all, has no access to any files whatsoever.
Speaker 0: You've heard how Luke hack here. He couldn't explain why they were adapting and deleting information from documents before handing them over to me. Information I should have been given. He couldn't answer the simple question, who decides what's relevant? Unfortunately, in terms of integrity, bowlands don't appear to be any better than Fruit Bajwa and Mohammed al Kanchi.
You see, I was told he'd violently attacked a girl. I was told he'd attack someone as part of a gang. And I was told he'd threaten to stab someone. In fact, Jamal would violently attack more than 1 girl and we presented the evidence to the court, including the testimony of courageous children who came to court. These children weren't Tommy Robinson fans, but they came to the high court to speak the truth.
So let me just look at one of the pupils that come to court and testified. This young girl wasn't a supporter of mine, didn't support my politics, but she still came to court and testified. Let me have a look at her school record and read what her teacher says about her. Charlie is a very mature and hardworking member of the form. She has been an absolute pleasure to have in the form.
She has represented the form in the school council and in various events across the school throughout the school year. She represents all that is positive and exciting about studying studying at Almunbury. Charlie is now currently studying law at university. Why would this girl lie, randomly lie, before I was involved? Why would she then travel to the high court of London and commit perjury?
Speaker 12: Because
Speaker 0: that is what the judge has found, that she's made it all up. And Jamal, the Syrian refugee, the one with multiple lies in his school records and behavioral discipline reads everywhere, well, he was telling the truth. That is what he found in this case. Why would a mother post images and send me those images of her daughter being black and blue? Why?
For what reason? Why would the staff lie? Why would the head teacher lie? Why would every single person who was recorded covertly lie about what Jamal was like. 12 different people lying about what Jamal was like.
Why? See, the judge has really helped us out here. The judge says people can lie for reasons that make no sense. Sometimes for no reason at all. He could not readily identify any explanation for why some of these people were prepared to do so and lie.
He concludes the alleged assaults, they never happened at all. Despite Jamal's school record, which you've seen, the judge states the Cayman's record is overwhelmingly positive. He acknowledged Jamal has a record of lying, but decides on this occasion, it is Jamal who's telling the truth and everyone else, everyone else is lying. Really? We waited 10 weeks for this?
That's your conclusion? That's the logic from the highest liable judge in our land? There was no jury. That's right. There's no jury.
All of these people were lying, But Jamal, he was telling the truth. Jamal, who could only find his dad Jihad to speak for him. Not a single teacher. Not a classmate, not a friend, not a neighbor, or a support worker came to court to support Jamal's version of defense. Jamal, who said he only broke the rules a few times at school and even then it weren't his fault.
His school records suggest something very different. I wanna be clear and fair to Jamal. He denies every accusation against him, completely and utterly. On the day the 5 courageous children appeared in the dock, giving testimony against Jamal. Jamal didn't even show up in court that day to face his accusers.
Neither did the press. The press actually left court when the witnesses stood up to give their evidence in my defense. It's alarming to think we have this kind of intellect at the top of our judiciary. The story of these 2 children is actually a story about free speech or the death of it. It's a story about how the mainstream media is more interested in pushing an agenda than giving you balance and truth.
How it continues despite Levenson to act with impunity. Is the media held to account for what they report? Have Pierce Morgan or Jeremy Vine been held to account? No. It's a story about how the the law is being manipulated and exploited by the far left and Islamists to destroy the lives of anyone who speaks out against the accepted so called progressive, so called liberal narrative.
Or about the poisonous influence of Islam's Sharia law in our society. Is the law fit for purpose? No. And it's a story about our government and judiciary's disdain for free speech and the truth, and the lengths that they will go to in order to silence dissent, especially with its new and increasing powers. Is our government being held accountable for its actions?
No. Is the judiciary independent of political influence? You've seen all the evidence. You decide. Whether you agree in my politics is irrelevant.
When dissent is crushed, free speech dies and governments move one step closer to tyranny. The lawyers know the truth. Even Jamal's father Jihad, he knows the truth about his son. They all knew the truth and were using Jamal to further their agenda, regardless of the consequences for Jamal. They continued to pursue the case, which incidentally, has caused my divorce and bankruptcy.
My ex wife had to choose between her marriage to me, and the safety of our children. I'm glad she chose our children. We're still best mates. You see, Jamal's lawyers told me very early on, if I apologized and paid them 50 grand, they'd drop their case. If you're watching this, you know the decision I made.
I might apologize for reporting what I was told, for what I believed to be true, for standing up for Bailey, a young lad unjustly vilified by pretty much everyone. But in silence and dissent, are the media and our government any different to the governments they criticize so much? China, Russia, Iran. Immigration, COVID, Brexit, if it doesn't fit the narrative, you will not hear the alternative view. And where else have we seen this?
Where else has the media, politicians, police, and social services hidden for truth for decades, fearful of being called racist, grooming gangs. That's where a cover up of such horrific cost to 1,000 of young girls in towns and cities across our country. And nowhere worse than under the stewardship of counselor Shabir Pandor's Kirklees Council. You see, hiding the truth doesn't protect communication. It does the total opposite.
It undermines trust in public institutions. It stokes resentment and conflict in our communities. Tragically, those who lead us don't seem to have the moral clarity or courage to speak the truth. They cause the division that they're trying to prevent. People ask me, was it worth it?
Yeah. It was worth it. The truth is always worth defending. I'm still here. If you were born in the United Kingdom, you've already won the lottery your life.
An inheritance from our parents and grandparents of freedom, equality under English law, and democracy. If we allow ourselves to be silenced, that inheritance is rendered worthless. What legacy will we leave for the children and grandchildren who come after us? None of us can afford to let free speech die. We cannot and we will not be silenced.
So you've seen. I'm being sent to jail. I'm being prosecuted for showing you the truth. Nothing else. I didn't lie.
Okay? They've lied, continually lied. Now for the attorney general to bring a charge against a member of the public for contempt to court, it has to be in the public interest. I say to the attorney general, this is not the police prosecuting. In fact, the claimant in this case is not asking me to to be prosecuted.
His lawyers are not asking me to be prosecuted. The Labour government's attorney general is the one attempting to send me to jail. Now for it to be in the public's interest you remember the public. You've just watched this expose. Is it in your interest to lock me up for 2 years?
How can it be? Let the government know. Let the attorney general know by signing the petition at www.truthontrial.co.uk to let them know you don't support the imprisonment of journalists for reporting facts to you, the British public. Who knows what the future now holds for me? The one thing that gives me a peace of mind if I'm in prison or if even if the worst happens is knowing that my family have stability and have security.
If you can support them during these times, the link is at www.helptommy.com. I really appreciate your support.
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
This is so insane @GadSaad’s suicidal empathy on full display
@visegrad24 - Visegrád 24
The Rochdale grooming gang ringleader, (50 men who sexually abused or raped 74 underage girls) still hasn’t been deported 9 years after receiving his deportation order. Qari Abdul Rauf was released in 2014, just 2.5 years into a 6 year sentence. He still lives near his victims https://t.co/Zv5JFDZczD
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
So what happens to the $300k+ in back pay rent that Hunter Biden owes my family from 2019-2020? Is that pardoned now? Thanks Joe (This is a true story)
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
Harris is running pro Palestine ads in Michigan While simultaneously running pro Israel ads in Pennsylvania? How can we tell what she actually believes? Kudos to @CNN for the honest reporting https://t.co/XsFufzh0PW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris is delivering contrasting messages to different voter groups regarding the Gaza conflict. In Michigan, she emphasizes the suffering in Gaza, stating, "I will not be silent." Conversely, in Pennsylvania, her message to Jewish voters focuses on Israel's right to defend itself, condemning Hamas for the October 7 attacks. This strategy highlights the campaign's attempt to appeal to two opposing constituencies, each with distinct views. Notably, an ad targeting Jewish voters omits part of her speech that acknowledges the devastation in Gaza and calls for Palestinian dignity and rights. This selective messaging has drawn criticism, particularly from Republicans aiming to undermine her support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tonight, mixed messages. A k file investigation this hour finds Kamala Harris is targeting crucial battleground voters with vastly different messages on Gaza and Israel. This ad is running in Michigan, which has the largest Arab population in America.
Speaker 1: What has happened in Gaza over the past 9 months is devastating. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering, and I will not be silent.
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, it's a very different story for an ad in Pennsylvania targeting Jewish voters.
Speaker 1: Let me be clear. I will always stand up for Israel's right to defend itself, and I will always ensure Israel has the ability to defend itself because the people of Israel must never again face the horror that a terrorist organization called Hamas caused on October 7.
Speaker 0: Different message. Andrew Kaczynski is out front now. So, Andrew, those obviously do sound, historically different to say the least. Tell me more about what you found.
Speaker 2: Yeah. That's right. And look, this really illustrates the sort of fine line that the Harris campaign is trying to walk here in the closing weeks, closing days of this campaign on, the issue of Israel here. You have 2 entirely different constituencies, and they are getting 2 entirely different messages. There are often times these constituencies have very opposing views on this.
If you are a Jewish person in Pennsylvania, you saw that ad that you're getting. You are getting that ad that talks about how strong, strong she is in Israel. If you're a Muslim voter in Michigan, you are getting that ad, on Facebook that's talking about, talking about how she won't be silent on the issue of Gaza. Now what's really interesting here is that ad, that we that we just played, the one that's going to, Jewish voters in Pennsylvania. Now it sort of sounds like those two clips of her talking about Israel, are together, but they actually cut part of it out.
Take a listen to what they cut.
Speaker 1: What has happened in Gaza over the past 10 months is devastating. President Biden and I are working to end this war such that Israel is secure, the hostages are released, the suffering in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom, and self determination.
Speaker 2: And you've seen too that she, they obviously because they cut out that portion of the ad where they talked about Gaza from, her DNC speech. Those two ports were, together. They sliced them. They cut that part out. Now look, she's also getting hammered a lot on this issue by Republicans.
We talked just a couple days ago about how those robocalls were airing in Wisconsin that are made to sound like they're in support of Jill Stein talking about her position on Gaza saying that, they're highlighting her pro Israel position, and it's they're sort of trying to siphon those votes away from her. So this is a really delicate issue for her.
Speaker 0: Oh, it certainly is. I mean, the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom, and self determination are being cut out. It's important to notice that. Alright. Now you also
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
Another one https://t.co/ILNAVwCpiZ
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
Screw it, cancel me. Anatomy of election fraud. I just heard from a general contractor friend in Los Angeles that in 2020 a vacant home he was doing construction on received hundreds of ballots How is this possible? https://t.co/ztduxZGgKm
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard from a contractor in LA that a vacant home received hundreds of ballots in 2020. It raises questions about how this could happen. Imagine if someone registered many people at that address, filled out the ballots without ID, and submitted them—could that sway an election?
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
Screw it, cancel me. Anatomy of election fraud. I just heard from a general contractor friend in Los Angeles that in 2020 a vacant home he was doing construction on received hundreds of ballots How is this possible? https://t.co/ztduxZGgKm
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
To unpack this more Imagine you’re Antifa You find a vacant house and register hundreds of people to vote there Collect the ballots and with no signature ID fill them out for your party Submit them Win an election
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
“1% of voters in the bluest county in a swing state got duplicate ballots But don’t worry our political opponents caught us so we had to tell you all You can trust us that this won’t happen anywhere else” https://t.co/Cp4MYD6pXS
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
Fuck it, This happened at Google That company is an absolute trash can dumpster fire
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
Should I go public with the story about the time I was told I can’t be promoted for being a white man?