TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @shipwreckedcrew

Saved - January 29, 2026 at 6:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The post discusses a federal search warrant issued for the Fulton County Elections Office, noting that search warrants in federal cases are issued only in criminal investigations. The warrant was signed by a Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of Georgia, and while warrants are typically conducted in the district where the search occurs, the investigation can originate elsewhere. It mentions a planned grand jury in the Southern District of Florida, Fort Pierce Division, with an intended January 12, 2026 date, and references that grand juries are not required to issue search warrants but are commonly used to obtain evidence via subpoenas. The warrant’s face page indicates probable cause to believe violations of two federal statutes, Title 52, Section 20701 and 20511, are involved. Section 20701 concerns retention and preservation of election records and is primarily a record-keeping statute with a basic misdemeanor for not retaining related records for 22 months. The discussion suggests the focus may be on “application” and “registration” records. Section 20511 criminalizes acts by any person, including election officials, that knowingly deprive residents of a fair and impartially conducted election process by procuring false voter registration applications or by procuring, casting, or counting ballots that are materially false or fraudulent; this section is a felony with up to five years’ imprisonment. The article notes the warrant’s “Items To Be Seized,” including all ballots (absentee, provisional, and Election Day registration ballots) and any ballot used to cast a counted vote, as well as all tabulator records and other electronic vote-counting data. The documents indicate the alleged violations occurred after October 12, 2020, suggesting cooperation and specific information to investigators. The affidavit is sealed, but the warrant’s face provides these clues.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

x.com/i/article/2016…

About the Search Warrant for the Fulton County Elections Office

A few general observations based on the limited information we have tonight.

Search warrants are issued only in criminal cases in federal court. So this is a criminal investigation. The Judge who signed the warrant is a Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of Georgia.

As a general matter, search warrants must be obtained from a judge in the district where the search is to take place. But the investigation can be located in a different district. Late in 2025 there was a public filing of the intention to impanel a new GJ in the Southern District of Florida, Fort Pierce Division on January 12, 2026. Grand juries are not needed to issue a search warrant, but a Grand Jury subpoenas are very commonly used to gather evidence that is then used to establish probable cause in a search warrant. The Fort Pierce Division includes West Palm Beach, the location of Mar A Lago.

It has been widely reported that an investigation was commenced in the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida examining a variety of efforts over many years to prevent Donald Trump from winning elections to the Office of the Presidency. Some have speculated -- including me -- that a variety of conspiracy claims could be used reach back to investigate many POTENTIALLY related efforts beyond what would normally be a five year statute of limitations for most federal crimes.

An application for a search warrant lays out alleged facts which the Govt believes supports probable cause that one or more crimes has been committed, and the "fruits or instrumentalities" of such crimes will be found at the location to be searched. The Affidavit is normally sealed and not made public so as to not disclose information that has been gathered thus far.

But the face of the Affidavit does give some clues because it must state what crimes are being investigated -- not necessarily everything, but at least one crime for which there is probable cause.

The face of today's Warrant concludes there is PC to believe violations of two statutes are established by the Affidavit -- Title 52 Sec. 20701 and 20511.

Title 52 is the Federal Election Code.

Chapter 207 is titled "Federal Election Records"

Sec. 20701 is captioned "Retention and preservation of records and papers by officers of elections."

Chapter 205 is titled "National Voter Registration"

Sec. 20511 is captioned "Criminal Penalties."

Section 20701 is, as the title suggests, primarily a record keeping statute, the violation of which is a misdemeanor. It basically requires the retention for 22 months of "all records and papers ... relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting...."

This is not a ballot retention statute. Because of subject matter of the second statute, I believe the focus for the first statute is on the "application" and "registration" records.

Section 20511 has two main subsections -- (1) and (2).

Subsection (1) involves intimidating, threatening, or coercing another person to register to vote, vote, or attempt to register or vote; urging or aiding any person to register to vote, to vote, or to attempt to register or vote; or exercising any right under this chapter.

The allegations of "fraudulent" voting in Fulton County don't seem consistent with a statute that requires "intimidation," "threats" or "coercion" so I SUSPECT Sec. (1) is not the focus.

But Subsection (2) is more intriguing -- it makes it a crime for any person, including an election official, in federal election to:

"(2) knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process, by —
(A) the procurement or submission of voter registration applications that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held; or
(B) the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held,

Violation of Sec. 20511 is a felony punishable by up to 5 years in prison.

As noted in the first statute, the obligation to hold onto the Registration records was only 22 months -- but due to several civil lawsuits filed in the aftermath of the 2020 election, it is likely that Georgia ordered all the counties to not destroy the records.

Keep in mind that various lawsuits filed around the time of the election were all dismissed or abandoned on the basis that there was insufficient evidence of "outcome determinative" fraud.

A criminal investigation into fraudulent registrations or fraudulent cast or counted ballots does NOT require that there be the potential of finding "outcome determinative" fraud.

To get the search warrant the DOJ needed to convince a federal judge there was some evidence of a violation of the statutes. That could be achieved with evidence that registration materials were purposely destroyed earlier than the 22 month requirement in Sec. 20701.

As to Sec. 20511, the evidence would have to show probable cause to believe that persons - including Fulton County Election Officials -- procured or submitted materially false voter registration applications.

Another document released today was the "Items To Be Seized" attachment to the warrant. In this document we learned:

The alleged violations took place after Oct. 12, 2020. That is an AWFULLY SPECIFIC DATE -- which strongly suggests to me that SOMEBODY has cooperated and given specific information to the investigators.

The Items to be seized also includes all ballots, including absentee ballots, provisional ballots, election-day registration ballots, and any ballot that was used to cast a vote that was counted.

The warrant also allows seizure of all tabulator records and other electronic vote counting data.

That's what I can glean from the warrant paperwork that was made available to the public today.

Saved - October 16, 2025 at 4:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A participant claims four high‑level witnesses lied about the Ashli Babbitt incident: USCP Kyle Yetter, Jason Gandolph (House Sergeant at Arms), USCP Michael Byrd, and USCP Sergeant Timothy Lanciano. They allege Gandolph lied in a homicide probe; Yetter and Lanciano said they arrived at the Speaker’s lobby by accident, contradicting recorded orders. They accuse Byrd of multiple lies—radio transmissions, seeing others, and his visibility—portraying a protected, corrupted system.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

I guess there is a reason why instead of saying what the 4 lies were you linked a 92 post string quoting from the investigation report. I'm just not sure what that reason is.

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

@blcartwright @shipwreckedcrew I don't know what testimony is this @shipwreckedcrew "I’ve read the 302 interview of that Sgt. and he did testify". But here in the official investigation report of the police officer that killed Ashli Babbitt, I caught 4 witnesses LYING https://t.co/d2IgzZ4hCl

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

January 6, 2021 "The records contain the prosecution declination memorandum justifying the decision not to prosecute Byrd for the shooting death of Babbitt (nee McEntee) on January 6" 🧵1/

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

January 6, 2021 "The records contain the prosecution declination memorandum justifying the decision not to prosecute Byrd for the shooting death of Babbitt (nee McEntee) on January 6" 🧵1/

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

@shipwreckedcrew 1/ I'm just a private citizen and caught 4 HIGH LEVEL WITNESSES lying about the deadly force incident in the official investigation report All can be proven in court

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

@shipwreckedcrew 2/ 4 witnesses lying about the Ashli Babbitt deadly force incident: - USCP Kyle Yetter - Mr. Jason Gandolph from the Office of the House Sergeant at Arms - USCP Michael Byrd - USCP officer Sergeant Timothy

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

@shipwreckedcrew 3/ Mr. Jason Gandolph from the Office of the House Sergeant at Arms lied in a homicide investigation Babbitt didn't broke nothing https://t.co/eCPOVaeaOk

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

27/ "Ms. McEntee was directly in front of Mr. Gandolph during all of the unrest at the doorway, and he observed Ms. McEntee participate in breaking the glass to the doors." https://t.co/HC2H8LdVJ9

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

@shipwreckedcrew 4/ Officer Kyle Yetter and Officer Christopher Lanciano LIED about how they ended up at the Speaker's lobby. They said "we just found ourselves in from of the Speaker's lobby". They were instructed, watch them receiving the order here https://rumble.com/v34e113-everywhere-man-redonredglasses-gathering-storm-before-ashli-babbitt-is-shot.html

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

@shipwreckedcrew 5/ And finaly the killer of Ashli Babbitt Lied multiple times about the deadly force incident: lied in the radio transmission; lied saying he did not saw the 3 USCP officers; lied about his life or others were danger...

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

@shipwreckedcrew 6/ LIED HE HAS NO VISIBILITY TO THE OTHER SIDE BECAUSE OF THE FURNITURE, but the others cops near to him saw to the other side A killer protected by a corrupt regime, this is America Look at the view! https://t.co/Hy2FWF2TPI

Saved - October 14, 2025 at 11:37 AM

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

I guess there is a reason why instead of saying what the 4 lies were you linked a 92 post string quoting from the investigation report. I'm just not sure what that reason is.

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

@blcartwright @shipwreckedcrew I don't know what testimony is this @shipwreckedcrew "I’ve read the 302 interview of that Sgt. and he did testify". But here in the official investigation report of the police officer that killed Ashli Babbitt, I caught 4 witnesses LYING https://t.co/d2IgzZ4hCl

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

January 6, 2021 "The records contain the prosecution declination memorandum justifying the decision not to prosecute Byrd for the shooting death of Babbitt (nee McEntee) on January 6" 🧵1/

@SMCosta6 - Silvio Costa

January 6, 2021 "The records contain the prosecution declination memorandum justifying the decision not to prosecute Byrd for the shooting death of Babbitt (nee McEntee) on January 6" 🧵1/

Saved - May 25, 2024 at 4:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the past 48 hours, two more J6 clients have emerged. One woman, who was interviewed by the FBI almost 30 months ago, was recently contacted out of the blue and informed of a warrant for her arrest. She complied with instructions to go to the FBI Office, where she was booked, handcuffed, and transported to the federal courthouse. After a brief appearance, she was released. This excessive process for misdemeanor cases is a form of public shaming and humiliation. The DOJ is pushing these cases forward before November, and the workload continues to increase. If you can help, visit the link provided.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Two more J6 clients in the past 48 hours. One is woman who was interviewed nearly 30 months ago by the FBI. They had video of her inside the Capitol that they showed her. They claim she was inside for about 18 minutes. Just recently she was contacted by the FBI out of the blue. Then an agent visited her at her house and told her there was a warrant for her arrest. She was given instructions to go to the nearby FBI Office on a specific date and time. If she failed to do so, they would come to her house and arrest her. She showed up on the given date 30 minutes early. She was then taken inside and booked -- photographed and fingerprinted. Then put her in cuffs and transported to the federal courthouse. She was transferred to the US Marshals. She was placed in leg shackles and her handcuffs were attached to a chain around her waist. She waited in a holding cell with dangerous individuals all waiting for their arraignment. Her appearance took less than 10 minutes. The Marshals then took all the cuffs and shackles off of her. They gave her back her silver Cross necklace and the decorative pins that were in her hair. They told her she could leave. All of this for 4 misdemeanors -- nearly 30 months after the first spoke with her. This is humiliation for the sake of humiliation. It is public shaming by choice because DOJ did not operate this way before for misdemeanors involving first time offenders. The DOJ PROSECUTORS ask for warrants, and the warrants require an arrest. Everything after that is just process. But this was NEVER a process used in misdemeanor cases. This kind of process -- particularly for the all-misdemeanor cases -- should have been curtailed long ago. Now the DOJ is just shoving as many cases into the pipeline as it can ahead of Nov. They are dragging people like my new client through the humiliation because .... IT MIGHT BE ALL THE EVER GET. THAT calls for punishment. This work is going to continue at least to Nov. 5. The DOJ is not slowing down -- just the opposite. My phone rings now more often that it ever has. If you can help, you can do so here. https://www.givesendgo.com/shipwreckedsj6ldf

Saved - December 13, 2023 at 11:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Some liberal attorneys allowed personal bias to cloud their judgment on federal criminal procedure. Trump's defense strategically complained about the trial schedule, anticipating delays. SCOTUS taking up the challenge to Sec. 1512 adds to the uncertainty. A new scheduling order may be needed, potentially impacting the DC case and the upcoming general election campaign. The outcome remains uncertain.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Some very seasoned and smart attorneys on the liberal side of the spectrum allowed their personal and partisan desires to cloud objective judgments on "nuts and bolts" issues of federal criminal procedure. They were Captain Ahab and having a trial in the spring of 2024 was their "White Whale." There were always many opportunities for Trump to derail the trial schedule, and he has now done so. I think the Trump defense played this exactly correctly -- they complained about the trial schedule so they had a record of having done so. They then went about trying to comply with the deadlines with some unstated confidence that the schedule would eventually crash upon the rocks of pretrial issues that would cause delays. The decision by SCOTUS this morning to take up the challenge to Sec. 1512 -- with 2 of the 4 counts charged against Trump being connected to that charge -- was the final straw. There is no reason now for SCOTUS to expedite the appeal of the immunity issue. While the cases are different, both will have a huge impact on what happens with the DC case if/when it ever gets to trial. So SCOTUS can deal with both on parallel tracks with similar schedules. Oral arguments at the end of April and decisions at the end of June is the most likely result. THEN an entirely new scheduling order will be necessary in the case -- if there still is a case. That new schedule will bump up against the FL case which I expect will be reset for mid-to-late summer. The issue will be whether the DC case will be set in the fall of 2024 during the middle of the general election campaign. My guess would be -- "No."

Saved - December 8, 2023 at 1:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread on the challenges faced by defendants in J6 cases. A commercial airline pilot lost his career due to an arrest, even before being charged. The goal was to keep the charges as misdemeanors and avoid jail time. The government delayed the sentencing and disclosed crucial information at the last minute. Our investigation proved the government's claims incorrect. The court acknowledged the government's mishandling but found the information marginally relevant. The pilot received a 2-year probation sentence. This case sheds light on DOJ's actions. Fundraising support is appreciated for J6 defendants' legal representation. Please repost.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

A short thread on what it sometimes means to "win" a J6 case given the realities faced by defendants. In the summer of 2022 I agreed to handle an all-misdemeanor case. At the time I was only doing felony cases.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

But this one particular client asked specifically to have me handle his case and I agreed. He was a commercial airline pilot who had his license revoked by the FAA merely by virtue of his arrest -- he hadn't even been charged yet. TSA labeled him a "domestic terrorist."

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

That meant he lost is AOA badge, which was his ability to go into secure areas of airports not open to the public. So he lost his career with a commercial airline -- which he had gone to college for and was the only thing he had ever done after graduation.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

He was only charged with misdemeanors -- he did enter the Capitol -- but some of the Judges were imposing jail time even on misdemeanors, so the "goal" from the start was to keep the charges as misdemeanors and avoid any jail time.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

The Probation Officer recommended a sentence of 3 years probation. I filed a Sentencing Statement on my client's behalf, but the Government asked for a delay in filing the Govt Sentencing statement. The sentencing date was pushed back approx. 60 days because of the Govt request.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Then we found out why. Most of this is under seal so I'm not going to reveal the details. But the Govt had information from a search for more than 30 months that it never disclosed. AFTER it asked to delay the sentencing, it disclosed to me for the first time the information.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

It had nothing to do with J6, but the Govt stated it would be including the info in its Sentencing Statement. I immediately filed a Memo with the Court bringing to the Court's attention the outrageous sandbagging by the Govt and asked everything related to the info remain sealed.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Our investigation showed the Govt's claims were incorrect. The Govt had this information for 2.5 years, an investigation had been done by other law enforcement officials and was closed. The investigation did not sustain the claims the Govt was making about the information.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

But the Govt insisted on being entitled to argue the facts -- notwithstanding the determination that the Govt's view of them was incomplete and inaccurate. The Court allowed it but said all the info and arguments would remain under seal.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

In reaching a determination on the sentence, the Court acknowledged our justified outrage at the Govt handling of the material and it sandbagging the defense with the last minute disclosure and attempt to use the material. The Court found the info only only marginally releveant.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

The Court did not consider it meaningful in the context of the J6 charges, particularly in light of the inaccuracies we showed about the claims the government was making re the information. The sentencing hearing took nearly 4 hours because of this circus sideshow.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

In the end, Tyler Tew was sentenced to 2 years probation -- one less than recommended. The Judge said the consequences he had already suffered in terms of his career -- for a misdemeanor -- was a reason for imposing only 2 years rather than 3.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

When some "people" ask me here how many J6 cases I've "won," this is an example of how "winning" sometimes is defined by the outcome under circumstances the clients cannot escape. This case shows the public what DOJ is doing that the public doesn't always see.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

I continue to get calls from new clients weekly. The only way I can continue to work in this fashion is with fundraising help from those who want J6 defendants to be able to choose an attorney. Any help you can give is appreciated. https://www.givesendgo.com/j6ldff?gclid=Cj0KCQjwwISlBhD6ARIsAESAmp5qZjR2X14qVazmUnwnpIOpgC7Ru84n4nHav1rLRxYCO2CsZamlUw8aAhauEALw_wcB

GiveSendGo | The Leader in Online Fundraising This campaign is currently unpublished. While you're here, why not discover other amazing campaigns that are making a difference? givesendgo.com

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

RePosts of this thread would be greatly appreciated.

Saved - December 6, 2023 at 8:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent J6 case, a four-hour sentencing hearing was held for a misdemeanor offense. The debate centered around whether the defendant should receive 90 days in custody or probation. Ultimately, the client was granted two years of probation and avoided any time in custody. While the desired outcome was achieved, the time spent on the case may not please the accountant.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

As an example of just how unpredictable J6 cases can be, and how they can eat up so much time in unexpected ways, I just finished a sentencing hearing in an all misdemeanor case - no felonies. The controversy was whether the defendant should get 90 days in custody, or just probation. That's all. The hearing lasted 4 hours. That's four hours I could not work on anything else. It was worth it in the end because my client received only 2 years probation -- not 3 -- and no time in custody. He's very happy with the outcome because this is the result we had been aiming for. But my accountant (wife) isn't going to be pleased with the time it took to get him there. https://www.givesendgo.com/j6ldff?gclid=Cj0KCQjwwISlBhD6ARIsAESAmp5qZjR2X14qVazmUnwnpIOpgC7Ru84n4nHav1rLRxYCO2CsZamlUw8aAhauEALw_wcB

GiveSendGo | The Leader in Online Fundraising This campaign is currently unpublished. While you're here, why not discover other amazing campaigns that are making a difference? givesendgo.com
Saved - June 27, 2023 at 3:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The IRS was investigating Hunter Biden's income from 2014-2015, including his payments from Burisma. They wanted a warrant for emails from Blue Star Strategies (BSS), a PR firm hired by Burisma. The DOJ's Office of Enforcement Operations (OEO) was stalling the warrant, which would have allowed real-time monitoring of BSS's email traffic. This hindered the investigation into potential ongoing criminal activity and FARA violations. BSS's involvement with Hunter and Burisma dates back to 2015, including their participation in planning Joe Biden's Ukraine trip.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

I'm going to reveal the big tease last night that was in my S U B S T A C K article this morning. In the summer of 2020, the IRS Supervisor Gary Shapley had been complaining about DOJ and the AUSA in Delaware dragging their feet getting approvals for certain investigative steps.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

The DOJ attorneys had used the Dem primary election season as an excuse to not go overt with the investigation into Hunter Biden to avoid it having an impact on the elections. They claimed multiple levels of approval were required -- likely just a way to dodge having to act.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

But the Supervisor was reporting up his chain of command that the investigation was being obstructed -- it had been opened for 20+ months, most of the work was done, but the final stages were being blocked.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

He speculated that in the summer DOJ was stalling until it could get to Sept. when DOJ policy said "No investigative Activity" until after the election."

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

On Sept 3, the AUSA wrote in an email to Shapley that "OEO was sitting on the warrant for Blue Star Strategies emails" and it wouldn't get approved. When I read that Red Lights started flashing. That's because of Blue Star Strategies was involved, and OEO was involved.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

BSS is a DC based PR/Crisis Management firm. It was founded by two well-connected former Clinton Admin. people. It first came to my attention when I was looking into Joe Biden getting the Ukraine prosecutor fired -- the guy who had the open investigation of the owner of Burisma.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Hunter played a role in Burisma hiring BSS to do PR work in 2015 to improve Burisma and its owners image in western media. Millions of dollars belonging to Burisma were frozen in a UK bank because of corruption charges brought against the owner.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Burisma and BSS entered into a contract in Nov. 2015. Three weeks later one of the BSS principals was invited to participate in call planning the agenda of VP Joe Biden's upcoming trip to Ukraine. Why would a private PR company participate in planning the VP's trip to Ukraine?

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

That's the trip where Joe Biden ended up threatening to hold up $1 billion in foreign aid to Ukraine if the prosecutor wasn't fired. A couple months later the prosecutor was fired just as Joe had commanded. Benefitting BSS's client -- Burisma and its owner.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

There are emails from 2015 between Hunter and a Burisma executive--one year after Hunter joined the Burisma Board--about Burisma hiring BSS. The contract between them was sent by the Burisma Exec to Hunter for him to deliver to BSS. Then Hunter's dad delivers what Burisma wanted.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

And what an FBI CHS says the Burisma owner paid $10 million to get. Hunter and Joe delivered. In 2015 when this was happening, Hillary Clinton had been all but anointed by the press as the next POTUS in 2016. BSS was a Clinton-connected outfit.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Ukraine was going to a cash-cow for them so they stayed active in advising Ukraine entities. They even hired a former employee of the Ukraine Embassy in Washington to help them with access. But HRC lost and BSS had to secure business in other ways.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Fast forward almost 5 years to the summer of 2020. The IRS group investigating Hunter Biden is looking closely at his income from 2014 and 2015. That includes the $1 million a year he was paid to be on the Burisma board. There is also the question of $10 million in bribe money.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

They want a warrant for emails from BSS -- but not just any warrant, they want a warrant that has to go through "OEO." That is the DOJ "Office of Enforcement Operations." That office has one job -- they review and approve/disapporve applications for Title III wiretaps.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

But the email from the AUSA about OEO dragging its feet on the BSS warrant doesn't mention a wiretap -- it mentions emails. You don't need a warrant to get emails more than 180 days old from an email service provider. A GJ Subpoena gets you those.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

But if you want to get emails less than 180 days old, you have to get a warrant from a judge using the same process as when you get a wiretap. There is a lengthy "probable cause" section showing that criminal activity is ONGOING and the emails will contain evidence.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

More importantly, a warrant for emails that goes through OEO is a warrant requesting getting new emails on a "real time" basis. So IRS was asking to monitor BSS's email traffic as it was happening -- not just after the fact.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Because this was an investigation of Hunter Biden, the email traffic would have been related to Hunter Biden or persons associated with Hunter Biden that were relevant to the investigation.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

This means that the Hunter Biden tax investigation in Sept. 2020 wasn't just "historical" -- it was just looking backwards at the money he earned and didn't pay taxes on. It meant the investigation concerned ONGOING CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IN THE SUMMER AND FALL OF 2020.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

IRS Supervisor Shapley stated that the failure to get the BSS warrant hurt the FARA aspect of the investigation. FARA is the "Foreign Agent Registration Act." Hunter and BSS were under investigation for being unregistered agents of a foreign government.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

That's the same charge the Mueller SCO tortured Gen. Michael Flynn with. But in the late summer of 2020, OEO had stalled and prevented the IRS from getting real-time email traffic that might have exposed that crime.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

It would have also gotten all the historical email traffic of BSS -- maybe as far back as 2015 when the Ukraine prosecutor was fired just after Burisma hired BSS at Hunter Biden's urging.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

l'm just listing these alleged events in chronological order: Hunter joins Burisma board in April 2014. Hunter burgers Burisma to hire BSS in summer 2015. Burisma owner pays $10 million bribe in 2014-2015 time frame -- no certainty at this point.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

Burisma signs contract with BSS in Nov. 2015. BSS participates in planning agenda for Joe's Ukraine trip in Dec. 2015. Joe tells Ukraine President to fire prosecutor during trip. Prosecutor fired in Feb. 2016. By 2018, all charges dropped against Burisma owner.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

That's just the simple sequence of events. Draw your own conclusions. But as a prosecutor I would have wanted to examine all the communcations of all the parties in the relevant time frame. Burisma ended up paying BSS over $600,000 over the term of their contract.

@shipwreckedcrew - Shipwreckedcrew

You can find more details on this in my story over at my "S U B S T A C K dot com" page under Shipwreckedcrew.

View Full Interactive Feed