TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @sonia_elijah

sonia_elijah
Posted - November 28, 2024 at 11:42 PM
Saved - November 29, 2024 at 4:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the safety studies related to Bovaer, particularly focusing on a 2-year carcinogenicity study in Wistar rats, which initially indicated evidence of carcinogenicity in females. However, an independent group's reanalysis suggested the tumors were not statistically significant. In genotoxicity studies, mixed results were observed, with some indications of genetic damage. The AFFAJEG noted potential for benign tumors at high doses. Alarmingly, an external consultant, funded by DSM, attributed increased micronuclei to staining rather than 3-NOP, raising concerns about objectivity.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

My deep dive into #Bovaer from my latest report🚩 In relation to safety studies for the consumer, a 2-year carcinogenicity study in Wistar rats showed “mesenchymal cell tumours were reported in 4 out of 49 females at the top dose of 300 mg/kg bw/day of 3-NOP given orally. Based on these results, the original study report concluded there was evidence of carcinogenicity in female rats.” https://soniaelijah.com/p/breaking-methane-reducing-feed-additive

BREAKING: Methane-Reducing Feed Additive Trialled in Arla Dairy Farms On November 26th, Arla Foods Ltd. soniaelijah.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

Curiously, this conclusion was changed after an independent group was brought in to “reanalyse the study’s slides.” This group concluded that “mesenchymal cell tumours were present in 3 out of 49 females at the top dose group, which was no longer statistically significantly different from the control group.”

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

In the genotoxocity studies testing whether 3-NOP is toxic to genes, it was noted “that positive results occurred in Chinese hamster V79 cells, with negative results in a study using human peripheral blood lymphocytes and an equivocal result in a study using TK6 cells..” Positive results indicate that the substance tested has the potential to cause genetic damage. In the second study, the results were negative except for males dosed at the top dose and sacrificed at 24 hours, in which micronuclei were statistically significantly increased compared to the negative control.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

The AFFAJEG concluded that at the higher dose levels (300 mg/kg/day in females), the additive has the potential to cause mesenchymal cell hyperplasia and benign tumours.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

Alarmingly, the report went on to state: “Based on the OECD guidance on establishing the biological relevance of a result in this assay, which is neither clearly positive nor clearly negative, AFFAJEG members recognised the requirement for external expert judgement. An external consultant, contracted by the applicant, concluded that the apparent increase in micronuclei may have been an artifact due to the Giemsa-based stain that was used, to which Group experts agreed. The Group concluded that 3-NOP is non-genotoxic in vivo.”

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

This raises alarm bells considering it was an external consultant, paid for by the applicant (DSM), who attributed another cause for the increase in micronuclei- the stain used- not 3-NOP, the active ingredient in DSM’s product, Bovaer. https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/breaking-methane-reducing-feed-additive

BREAKING: Methane-Reducing Feed Additive Trialled in Arla Dairy Farms On November 26th, Arla Foods Ltd. soniaelijah.com
sonia_elijah
Posted - November 2, 2024 at 10:18 AM
Saved - November 3, 2024 at 1:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Dutch government intentionally deleted 878,000 Covid vaccination records from the CIMS database between January 2021 and January 2024, following political pressure. This systematic removal affected records of those who died or emigrated. I'm eager to interview @waukema again about this alarming issue.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

🚨The Dutch government deliberately deleted 878,000 Covid vaccination records from the CIMS database between January 2021 and January 2024, a process designed in early 2022 in response to political pressure. This removal was systematic and intentional, affecting records of individuals who died or emigrated. 🚨 Brilliant work done by @waukema to uncover this damning finding. I'm looking forward to interviewing him again on this very alarming issue.

@waukema - Wouter Aukema

x.com/i/article/1831…

sonia_elijah
Posted - June 20, 2024 at 9:48 AM
Saved - June 20, 2024 at 10:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There is growing concern over the retraction of studies that question the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Several studies, including Mostert et al., Walach et al., and Mead et al., have been retracted or withdrawn from scientific journals. Additionally, reports by JesslovesMJK and P_McCulloughMD and Hulscher et al. have been withdrawn or removed. This censorship of scientific research raises concerns about the transparency and open discussion surrounding COVID-19 vaccines.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

🧵 It appears the Mostert et al. study on excess deaths revealed too many inconvenient truths🔥 ‼️ Surge in #excessdeaths observed in Western World ‼️Questioning whether there could be a link with excess deaths & the experimental #Covid shots https://soniaelijah.com/p/bombshell-study-3-million-excess

BOMBSHELL STUDY: 3 MILLION EXCESS DEATHS IN 47 COUNTRIES Researchers from The Netherlands point out COVID-19 vaccines may be to blame soniaelijah.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

Now this 💣 study faces RETRACTION for daring to question the safey of the experimental jabs. https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/censoring-the-science-bombshell-study

CENSORING THE SCIENCE: Bombshell Study on Excess Deaths Faces Retraction Last week, the integrity of the peer-reviewed, Mostert et al. study on excess deaths, came under simultaneous attack from both the organisation affiliated with the Dutch authors, Princess Máxima Center, and the journal which first published the bombshell study, soniaelijah.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

This study is not alone - others have also been RETRACTED OR WITHDRAWN from scientific journals because they dared to point at the elephant in the room 💉 'The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy'- Walach et al. study RETRACTED from Vaccines👇 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693

RETRACTED: The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy Background: COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits. Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects. Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy. mdpi.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

Mead et al. study RETRACTED from Cureus journal👇 'COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign.' https://www.cureus.com/articles/203052-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-lessons-learned-from-the-registrational-trials-and-global-vaccination-campaign#!/

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered. cureus.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

'A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products' by @JesslovesMJK and @P_McCulloughMD WITHDRAWN from Current Problems in Cardiology 👇 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280621002267

WITHDRAWN: A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full… sciencedirect.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

'A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination' by Hulscher et al. was REMOVED from Preprints with The Lancet 👇 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology. Preprints with The Lance papers.ssrn.com

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

Science is being #censored‼️

sonia_elijah
Posted - April 18, 2024 at 2:25 PM
Saved - April 19, 2024 at 8:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Sir Christopher Chope MP raises concerns in UK Parliament about excess deaths in England and Wales, attributing them to heart disease and flu. Some believe that the increase in heart conditions may be linked to the COVID-19 vaccine. Dr. Thomas Levy estimated that at least 7 million Americans have experienced heart damage from the vaccine.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

🚨BREAKING: Sir Christopher Chope MP speaking in UK Parliament "The Government has acknowledged excess deaths in England and Wales and attributed it to prevalent heart disease and flu. Of course, there are many people who feel that the increase in heart conditions & heart disease has been exacerbated by the very vaccine that people were persuaded to take in order to prevent them against COVID-19. Dr Thomas Levy said last year: Vaccines are causing heart injury in at least 2.8% of people who received the Covid-19 injections. He estimated that a minimum of 7 MILLION Americans now have heart damage caused by Covid vaccines. https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252

Parliamentlive.tv House of Commons parliamentlive.tv
sonia_elijah
Posted - February 1, 2024 at 9:14 PM
Saved - February 2, 2024 at 12:23 AM

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

🚨Retired US Air Force Major Tom Haviland shares the horrifying results from his worldwide embalmer blood clot survey #whitefibrousclots #microclotting Watch the full interview here https://shorturl.at/qrEO1

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses a documentary about embalmers finding strange white fibrous clots in corpses. They highlight a statement made by an embalmer at a conference, where all attendees claimed to have seen these clots after the rollout of safe injections. The speaker contacts the Ohio Embalmers Association and confirms that the vice president also sees these clots. This prompts the speaker to conduct a survey, which reveals that 66% of embalmers have witnessed the clots, with some seeing them in up to 50% of corpses. The clots can be as long as 2 feet and may cause strokes and heart attacks by blocking veins and arteries.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reason I did the survey is I watched that film died suddenly, the day of premiere. It was the week of Thanksgiving of 2022, November of 2022 here in the United States. And to to your audience that may not be familiar with this, it's about an hour long documentary. About half the films devoted to these 6 or 7 embalmers, they're struck finding these strange white fibrous clots in their corpses. And I was struck in the movie by one Their statement that was made in at the 13 minute and 15 second mark in that movie and a bomber from the state of Indiana, mister Wallace Hooker, states that he was recently, lecturing at an Ohio Bulbers Association Conference in Columbus, Ohio on the 26th October in 2022. And he was lecturing to a room of about 100 embalmers. And he showed him photographs of these white fibrous clots like the ones I'll show your audience right here. He showed up photographs of these. He said, by a show of hands, how many of you are seeing these same strange clots? I've never seen I've been involved here 20 or 30 years. I've never seen these clots before. We said the whole room of a 100 and Bowmers raised their hands yes. They were seeing these clots. And then asked them, well, when did you start seeing them? And they all agreed it was, in the middle of 2021, which just happens to be about 6 months after the safe and effective injections rolled out. So I thought that was an amazing statement made in that movie. Right? Either either that statement's true or false. Either those embalmers raised their hands or they didn't. Wow. So I got up the very next day, and I said, you know, I don't think any reporter is gonna chase after this story, Sonia. So I I myself, I decided to call the Ohio Embalers Association. They're located in Cincinnati, Ohio. I talked to their president, a mister Dan Becker, their vice president, a mister Woody Wilson, and their secretary, a mister David Hicks. And I asked all 3 gentlemen, did you happen to be in the room at the time these and the baller supposedly raised their hands saying they're seeing these clots too? Well, none of the 3 gentlemen happened to be in the room at the time. But the vice president, mister Woody Wilson, who runs his own funeral home in Marysville, Ohio, about an hour north where I live in Dayton, Ohio, said, Tom, I'm seeing the white fibrous clots too. So I said, wow. This is a huge deal. Right? Now I have an official officer, the vice president of the Ohio Balmers Association by the way, Woody is now the president of the Ohio Balmers Association. He said that he's seeing the class. So he's corroborating the story of these 6 7 embalmers in this diet suddenly moving. So right there and then, I decided I need to do needed to do a nationwide survey, which I later then turned into a worldwide survey by including, Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand to see how large this phenomenon was. So that led me to the creation of these 2 in bulbar blood clot surveys. The results of the first survey that I did, Sonia, had 3 key results to that. Of the 179 embalmers who responded to that first survey, 119 of them, almost exactly 2 thirds, 66%, said they are indeed seeing the white fibrous clots, or they were through the year 2022. I then, the main consensus of those embalmers is that the clots started for them in the year 2021, which is 6 months after, you know, or when the, safe and effective injections rolled out that same year. And the really shocking result, Sonia, was that some of these embalmers were seeing these clots in up to 50% or more of their corpses. They were seen in an average of about 30% of their corpses. Some balmers saw them even more, like I said, up to 50% or more of their corpses. So this is not a rare phenomenon. These clots are prevalent. Balmers are seeing them all over the place. Speaker 1: What is the length of those cuts? So you showed me some pictures earlier, and it looked about 6 inch is long a white fibrous clot. Like, the one you have in your sort of in that tube. I mean, how long do they go? I mean, Speaker 0: do Do you know Well, they've found clots as long as 2 feet in people's coming out of corpses' legs. There's even been live live people who have had these extracted from their bodies. So they do exist. Yeah. They they embalmers yeah. They believe they may be forming, not just pre death but post death as well. We're not Sure about that, but we they're pretty convinced they're forming predest because they're picking they're seeing these clots in bodies that are very warm. They've only been, dead for an hour or 2. So there's no way these clots like this could form in just a couple of hours inside our, course that's just expired. Cool. So we believe these clots are causing strokes and heart attacks by blocking, you know, the the veins and arteries of of their victims.
ShortURL - URL Shortener ShortURL is a tool to shorten a long link and create a short URL easy to share on sites, chat and emails. Track short URL traffic and manage your links. shorturl.at
sonia_elijah
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 8:48 PM
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 12:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Ryan Cole, MD, highlights that lipid nanoparticles used in vaccines are labeled for research purposes only, not for human or veterinary use. Despite this, they have been administered to billions of people worldwide. Dr. Cole explains the harmful effects of the synthetic spike protein. For more details, check out his presentation to UK MPs.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

🚨"In the lipid nanoparticles' data sheet it states these are not for human and not for veterinary use-these are for research purposes only. Yet, they went into 5BN people around the world." ~Dr Ryan Cole, MD @drcole12 masterfully explains how "the synthetic spike protein is the Swiss Army knife of harm"‼️ #VaccineInjuries #mRNA My latest report has Dr Cole's full presentation to the UK MPs👇 https://rb.gy/gknycb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the potential harms of lipid nanoparticles and synthetic RNA used in vaccines. They mention that the nanoparticles can accumulate in various organs, including the ovaries, bone marrow, spleen, and liver. The synthetic RNA can persist in the body for months. The spike protein, found in vaccines, is said to cause harm and can accumulate in the brain, peripheral nerves, and organs like the liver and heart. It can also lead to autoimmune diseases and reproductive issues. Studies have shown abnormal findings in PET scans and decreased sperm counts after vaccination. The speaker suggests that these potential harms should have been known before administering the vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's the lipid nanoparticle accumulating in the ovaries. They cut it off before the study was done. Where else, bone marrow, spleen, liver, all over the body. These lipids go everywhere in the body. Next, please. The lipid nanoparticles clearly state on their safety data sheets, these are not for human and not for veterinary use. These are for research purposes only yet they went into 5,000,000,000 people around the world. Next, please. As doctor Malone mentioned, this synthetic RNA persists out of Stanford, doctor Rolfein's study. At least 2 months Later the RNA was still present, the synthetic RNA. Next, please. Doctor Brogner had a ability to improve the synthetic spike protein. At least 6 months later, it was still circulating in human beings. Next, please. The spike protein is the Swiss army knife of harm. Next, please. Next, please. This is from doctor Morris out of Germany accumulating in the brain, the spike protein after injection. Next, please. From doctor Burkart, the late great doctor Heart. This is in the brain tissue. Anybody hear a brain fog? This is the spike protein where it does not belong crossing the blood brain barrier after vaccination. Next, please. Peripheral nerves. This is from my laboratory. We proved that the peripheral nerves, that burning after the shot. We're at home stood in Lima. At home stood where it should Go. Next, please. Organ damage, and I don't mean the church organ. Next, please. Because it accumulates in the liver. Absolutely. Causes damage within hours. Next, please. More. Hepatitis in the liver after these injections. Next, please. Autoimmune disease. There's rampant and the studies around the world. Next, please. We knew in 2005 with SARS CoV one, if we use that whole spike protein, we would induce immune harmful immune Multiple immuno inflammatory responses. This has been known in science for decades. Next please. Of course we hear about carditis. This is inflammation in the heart. Next, please. This is spike protein in the heart. On the right, that is persistent mRNA in the heart tissues. Next, please. Doctor Nakahara out of Japan recently approved that 6 months later, every patient in that study that had the vaccine versus the vaccinated, still had abnormal findings on PET scan, abnormal uptake in the heart tissue 6 months after the previous injection. Next, please. Next, please. It also accumulates in your very important adrenal glands. Next, please. And also, attacks the elastic fibers of the body. That's what holds your tissues together. This is in the skin destroying the to fibers of the skin. Next, please. Reproductive harms as doctor Malone mentioned. Next, please. This is spike protein in the placenta where it does not belong after vaccination. Next, This is spike protein. All those brown dots in the uterine lining. Next, please. This is spike protein in the testes. Studies out of Israel showed decreased sperm counts, decreased sperm motility. These are all things that everybody should have known before 1 shot went into 1 human that would have been informed
World Leading Experts Testify at UK's Parliamentary Office While British Press brands expert group as "discredited Covid conspiracy theorists!" soniaelijah.substack.com
sonia_elijah
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 5:38 PM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 10:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Informed consent regarding COVID-19 vaccines was lacking, with lies about their safety and effectiveness. The repeated emphasis on "safe and effective" was a form of psychological manipulation. Dr. Robert Malone's address to UK MPs sheds light on these concerns. Watch the full address here: rb.gy/gknycb.

@sonia_elijah - Sonia Elijah

"Instead of informed consent about the truth of these products [COVID-19 vaccines] and their immature developmental state- we were given a series of lies. Those lies included that these products were safe and effective- without qualifying what safe and effective was. You'll recall that safe and effective was repeated again and again- that's neural linguistic programming- that's psychological operations- that's propaganda!" @RWMaloneMD Watch Dr Robert Malone's full address to over 20 UK Members of Parliament here👉 rb.gy/gknycb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the justification for implementing COVID-19 measures based on a high case fatality rate that turned out to be inaccurate. They argue that this rushed response disregarded ethical and regulatory norms, such as informed consent. The speaker, labeled as far-right and a conspiracy theorist, identifies themselves as a physician and scientist involved in the development of the technology behind the vaccines. They express concern about the disregard for safety and efficacy standards, as well as the lack of transparency in defining these terms. The speaker suggests that the dissemination of misleading information is a form of psychological manipulation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Justification was that, we had a pathogen based on model here in the UK and here in the call. We had a 3.4 percent case fatality rate. And we would potentially be seeing, mass graves, people dying in the streets, bands, full of bodies outside of, hospitals, etcetera. That was all a lie. We knew that was a lie very early on, but the people that spoke the truth that actually gathered the data such as happened in Stanford, that demonstrated that we had 8 case fatality rate of about 0.02%. Percent, not 3.4%. Despite having that college, making it having it available in the Q1, early in Q1 2020, there was a concerted effort to justify the position of this technology in a rapid fashion on on the basis of the thesis that there's a three point 4% case fatality rate associated with this virus. What transpired in that rush was a fundamental breach of both ethics and regulatory norms that have been developed over decades. We're all familiar with this. We're all familiar with the policies that they put in place since World War 2 in Nuremberg that humans human beings have the right to inform consent. Yeah. And What was done here in a haphazard way, under the justification ostensibly that we had to we had to essentially reject, throw them to the brush, norms percent had been developed over decades, both for assuring vaccine safety and for assuring informed consent of patients percent was all. All had to be just in on short notice because of the threat of a 3.4% case fatality rate and the need move, a potential countermeasure forward without, the due process that normally would take place. That's what transpired. And I can tell you, you you you know, I'm I'm labeled as, far right and all the pejorities that we're also familiar with, including being a conspiracy per years, but all I am is a physician and scientist who happened to have had a role in the genesis of this technology percent when I was a young man, back in 1987 to 1990. I'm very, very familiar with the technology work as an academic clinic to try to advance it until I determined that I could not overcome the toxicity associated with it and abandon it for other technology platforms, which I also developed. But in this case, what what I have objected to is that as a physician and scientist who is well trained in clinical research and regulatory affairs that we have decimated my my discipline. We have rejected the knowledge that myself has have contributed to in all of my peers and colleagues over decades about how one should do this, how one should act, What steps one should take in order to ensure that we have safe and effective products for humans? It's that assembly. And furthermore, that we have rejected the norms that have been developed since World War 2 to respect human dignity, to to ensure that human beings are treated as as humans. Their their their autonomy, Their sovereignty is perspective that they are provided with informed consent. Instead of informed consent about the truth of these products in their developmental state, their immature developmental state, we were given a series of lies. Those lies included that these products were safe and effective, of course, without actually qualifying what safe and effective was. You'll recall statement effective was repeated again and again and again without stating what that meant. Okay? People. That's neurolinguistic program. That's psychological operations. That's propaganda.
View Full Interactive Feed